6/22/2021 Kwik Kian Gie School of Business Mail - [GamaIJB ...

6/22/2021 "Kwik Kian Gie School of Business" Mail - [GamaIJB] Submission Acknowledgement

https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=5c92a2b39c&view=pt&search=all&permmsgid=msg-f%3A1626701387721339804&simpl=msg-f%3A1626701… 1/1

Bilson Simamora <[email protected]>

[GamaIJB] Submission Acknowledgement

T. Hani Handoko <[email protected]> Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 3:42 PMTo: Mr Bilson Simamora <[email protected]>

Mr Bilson Simamora:

Thank you for submitting the manuscript, "How Proponents and Opponents Influence Self-Efficacy and Achievement Goals: The Role of Anticipated emotions of Others" to Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business. Withthe online journal management system that we are using, you will be able to track its progress through the editorial process by logging in to the journal web site:

Manuscript URL: https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/gamaijb/author/submission/43873 Username: bilsonsimamora

If you have any questions, please contact me. Thank you for considering this journal as a venue for your work.

T. Hani Handoko Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business ________________________________________________________________________ Editorial Office Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business http://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/gamaijb

https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/gamaijb/author/submission/43873

http://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/gamaijb

6/22/2021 "Kwik Kian Gie School of Business" Mail - [GamaIJB] Unsuitable Submission



[GamaIJB] Unsuitable Submission

T. Hani Handoko <[email protected]> Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 9:15 AMTo: Mr Bilson Simamora <[email protected]>

Mr Bilson Simamora:

An initial review of "How Proponents and Opponents Influence Self-Efficacy and Achievement Goals: The Role of Anticipated emotions of Others" has made it clear that this submission does not fit within the authoring guideline of Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business. The manuscript should have approx 4000-7000 words in the main body and the abstract should no more than 160 words. But, your manuscript main body is 7926 words, and the abstract is 175 words. Complete your manuscript with the limitation and put all table and figures in the appendix. Please kindly check this link for the authoring guideline of GamaIJB https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/gamaijb/pages/view/Author%20Guideline You may resubmit the manuscript and we would be glad to review it.

Thank You, T. Hani Handoko Scopus ID: 56296792800, Faculty Economics and Business, Universitas Gadjah Mada [email protected] ________________________________________________________________________ Editorial Office Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business http://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/gamaijb

https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/gamaijb/pages/view/Author%20Guideline

mailto:[email protected]


6/22/2021 "Kwik Kian Gie School of Business" Mail - [GamaIJB] Submission Acknowledgement



[GamaIJB] Submission Acknowledgement

T. Hani Handoko <[email protected]> Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 9:31 PMTo: Mr Bilson Simamora <[email protected]>

Mr Bilson Simamora:

Thank you for submitting the manuscript, "How Proponents and Opponents Influence Self-Efficacy and Achievement Goals: The Role of Anticipated emotions of Others" to Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business. Withthe online journal management system that we are using, you will be able to track its progress through the editorial process by logging in to the journal web site:

Manuscript URL: https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/gamaijb/author/submission/44042 Username: bilsonsimamora

If you have any questions, please contact me. Thank you for considering this journal as a venue for your work.

T. Hani Handoko Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business ________________________________________________________________________ Editorial Office Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business http://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/gamaijb

https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/gamaijb/author/submission/44042


6/22/2021 "Kwik Kian Gie School of Business" Mail - [GamaIJB] Editor Decision

https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=5c92a2b39c&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%3A1672425663936098229&simpl=msg-f%3A1672425… 1/1


[GamaIJB] Editor Decision 2 messages

Hani Handoko <[email protected]> Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 8:29 AMTo: "Dr. Bilson Simamora" <[email protected]>

Dr. Bilson Simamora:

We have reached a decision regarding your submission to Gadjah MadaInternational Journal of Business, "How Proponents and Opponents Influence Self-Efficacy and Achievement Goals: The Role of Anticipated emotions of Others".

Our decision is: Revisions Required

With this email, we attached the reviewer's comment(s). Hopefully, the reviewer's comment(s) can help to make your manuscript better. We are looking forward to your response and expect to receive the result no later than (July 24, 2020).

Should you have any inquiries, please contact our administrative staff at [email protected].

Your kind attention and cooperation is highly appreciated.

Thank you Sincerely yours GamaIJB ________________________________________________________________________ Editorial Office Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business http://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/gamaijb

2 attachments

A list of Amandement Form.docx 1111K

44042-147738-1-RV.pdf 1115K

Bilson Simamora <[email protected]> Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 8:49 AMTo: Hani Handoko <[email protected]>

Thank you Prof. Handoko for reviewing my manuscript and this decision. I accept that my manuscript should beimproved substantially. Its my pleasure to do that sir. Thank you.

Best regards

Bilson SimamoraThe author[Quoted text hidden]



https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ui=2&ik=5c92a2b39c&view=att&th=1735a647cc286fb5&attid=0.1&disp=attd&safe=1&zw

https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ui=2&ik=5c92a2b39c&view=att&th=1735a647cc286fb5&attid=0.2&disp=attd&safe=1&zw

A Table of Amendment (1st Manuscript Revision)

Manuscript’s Code: 2019.03.185

Title: “How Proponents and Opponents Influence Self-Efficacy and Achievement Goals: The Role of

Anticipated emotions of Others”

Comments of reviewer Author Amendment

Reviewer 1 1. Please rewrite the important

point from the articles that

could easily found by the

reader

Thank you for your opinion. I have changed the

manuscript totally and hopefully made the

important points of the article, as exhibited in

the Abstract, more salient.

2. Abstract and introduction

still not mention why

important and what is the

aim of the research. The

details are on the

manuscript.

I appreciate and accept your inputs. I have

accommodated your inputs as described in the

Abstract and Introduction.

3. The result and the method is

good.

Thank you very much.

4. Difficult to understand, lack

of reading attractiveness.

I strongly agree with you that my manuscript

was written in poor English, organized less-

systematically, overused of abbreviations, less-

attractive, and finally hard to understand. I

have made substantial improvements to

accommodate your inputs. To mention, here,

the list of my corrective actions:

1. Improve writing quality.

2. Re-write the Abstract and Introduction to

make the critical points more salient.

3. Re-write several hard-to-read tables (Table

6, Table 7, and Table 8) to make them more

informative and reader-friendly.

4. Avoid the over-used of abbreviations. For

simplification reason, positive AEPros is

represented by proponents’ joyfulness,

negative AEPros substituted by proponents’

distress, opponents’ joyfulness represents

positive AEOps, and opponents’ distress is

used as a proxy for negative AEOps.

5. Re-writing the literature review and add

some supporting references to make

hypothesis formulation more soundly.

6. Rearrange the structure of the manuscript.

5. Should rewrite with some

important points that should

be clear. A lot of sentences is

difficult to read and

understand.

A Table of Amendment (1st Manuscript Revision) Reviewer 2 1. The study proposes about

How Proponents and

Opponents Influence Self-

Efficacy and Achievement

Goals. In the study, the

theory of anticipated

emotions and achievement

goals was used as the basis

for self-efficacy. This model

proposed interesting.

Thank you very much.

2. In Abstract:

The author explained about

“Other researchers are

encouraged to use

anticipated emotions of

proponents and opponents as

proxy for subjective norm

the Theory of Planned

Behavior or as antecedents

of desire in the Model of

Goal-Directed Behavior to

predict behavioral

intention.” It is not a major

part of his research. It would

be better if the author also

researched gender based.

Thank you for your input. I strongly agree with

you. I have replaced “the suggestion” with the

new one:

“Further research is encouraged to

investigate the efficacy of the concept in

explaining the motivation to perform other

types of social behaviors.”

Gender-based study could not be included in the

suggestion because the body of the text has

stated:

“However, the different proportion of

males and females is expected not to affect

self-efficacy and achievement goals since

both segments are the same in terms of the

mean of the two variables.“ (Page 11,

paragraph 1).

3. For Title: It appears that the word

emotions may be a proper noun

in this context. Consider

capitalizing the word

Sorry for the typo. I have fixed the mistake and

please allow me to use the new title:

In the Name of Love and Hatred: How

Anticipated Emotions of Others Influence

Achievement Motivation.

I think this new title is more attractive.

Thank you.

4. Page 7 reveals that that males

and females have the same

mastery approach (F=0.14,

sig.=0.71), it appears "that"

author typed that twice in a row.

Consider deleting one of them.

The mistake has been fixed.

“ …. reveals that males and females have the

same mastery approach (F=0.14, sig.=0.71)

…. “

(Page 11, paragraph 1)

Thank you.

A Table of Amendment (1st Manuscript Revision) 5. Page 8

Group 1 is framed with

statement: “I you are successful

in your study, people that love. It

appears that the pronouns "I you"

are used incorrectly.

Sorry for this disturbance mistake. “I” should be

written as “If”. The mistakes have been fixed.

Group 1 is framed with the statement:

“If you are successful in your study, people

who love and care for you will feel like,

happy, satisfied, pleased, inspired, proud,

surprise, thankful, joyfulness, pleased, win

and released and confidence.” (Page 11,

paragraph 2).

Thank you.

6. Consider rewriting the phrase. Strongly agree and already done. Thank you.

7. Page 13

with achievement goals the

author ……

Consider adding a comma.

with achievement goals, the

author ……

I have accommodated you suggestion:

To test the mediating effect of self-efficacy

on the relationship between proponents’ and

opponents’ anticipated emotions with

achievement goals, the author utilizes the

method suggested by Kenny (2018)….

(page 17 paragraph 2) ….

Thank you

8. Please use the template already

given for writing References

Strongly agree. I have also found many mistakes

in the References and have made substantial

improvement subsequently using Harvard-

Anglia format.





Hani Handoko <[email protected]> Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 3:48 PMTo: "Dr. Bilson Simamora" <[email protected]>




Please kindly see the attached file to see the comments from the reviewers. We hope the reviewer comment can help to make your manuscript better. We are looking forward to your response and expect to receive the result no later than (August 20, 2020).




2 attachments


44042-178939-1-RV (1).pdf 1331K

Bilson Simamora <[email protected]> Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 4:15 AMTo: Hani Handoko <[email protected]>

Dear Prof. Handoko

Thank you very much for the opportunity to revise my manuscript and the suggestions given by thereviewers. I have just finished the revision and send the results in two files. The first file consists of thedocument with tables and figure in the text for easier reading, and the second consists of separated tablesand figure from the text. I also enclose the list of amendments.

I beg you sorry that I cannot send you a traceable change Word file due to the manuscript's substantialchange to accommodate the reviewers' suggestions.

I have tried hard to revise my manuscript for an expectation that it can fulfill your requirements.However, if further corrections are needed, I will gladly make it.

Thank you very much for your attention. I am looking to hearing from you about the acceptance of mymanuscript.



https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ui=2&ik=5c92a2b39c&view=att&th=173e701d54da37fc&attid=0.1&disp=attd&safe=1&zw

https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ui=2&ik=5c92a2b39c&view=att&th=173e701d54da37fc&attid=0.2&disp=attd&safe=1&zw



Best Regards

The Author

Bilson Simamora[Quoted text hidden]

4 attachments

A List of Amendment - Round 2 (Reviewer 2).docx 17K

How Proponents and Opponents Influence - Separated Table and Picture.docx 808K

A list of Amandement Form - Round 2 (Reviewer 1 and 3).docx1117K

How Proponents and Opponents Influence - Non separated Table and Picture.docx 810K

https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ui=2&ik=5c92a2b39c&view=att&th=1740dba0954176d6&attid=0.1&disp=attd&realattid=f_ke3b020b1&safe=1&zw

https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ui=2&ik=5c92a2b39c&view=att&th=1740dba0954176d6&attid=0.2&disp=attd&realattid=f_ke3b020d3&safe=1&zw

https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ui=2&ik=5c92a2b39c&view=att&th=1740dba0954176d6&attid=0.3&disp=attd&realattid=f_ke3b01zt0&safe=1&zw

https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ui=2&ik=5c92a2b39c&view=att&th=1740dba0954176d6&attid=0.4&disp=attd&realattid=f_ke3b020c2&safe=1&zw

A Table of Amendment (2nd Manuscript

Revision)

Manuscript’s Code: 2019.03.185

Title: How Proponents and Opponents Influence Self-Efficacy and Achievement Goals: The Role of

Anticipated emotions of Others


Reviewer 1 1. Introduction would need to be

rewritten. It should start with

an approach to give

overview about study

background, study

limitation, and direction of

the study.

The suggestion has been accommodated

2. Problem Statement section is

not provided. In one

statement, what is the real

problem? This section

should be presented in a way

that readers after convinced

with evidence and

justification understood the

research element of the

study. It would be good to

start with the storyboard and

the end with the issue that

needs attention.

In the Introduction, the author has made clear

statement to follow the suggestion: … the

research problem is, how others’ anticipated

emotions influence individuals’ current

achievement motivation?

The author has tried to make smooth flow of

storyboard to get to the research problem.

3. No argument or justification

created to explain the

importance of study initial

trust. Please include the

problem statement and it

need to be expanded.

Problem statement has been stated clearly and

the reason why the study has been underlined in

the Introduction

4. What is the research inquiry

that leads to specific

research questions and

research objectives?

Three research question has been stated followed

research objectives. Thank you

5. Research questions and

research objectives must be

able to answer the research

problem.


Revision)

6. The flow of the Abstract need

to be revised. To begin with

a bit on research problem

and followed by the aims of

the study.

This suggestion has been accomdate:

… However, the influence of proponents' and

opponents' future emotions on achievement

motivation remains unclear. …

7. Please include the theory used

in the study.

I have accommodated the suggestion by stating

clearly that the main theory of this study is

Mayer and Salovey’s (1997) emotional

intelligent theory in the Abstract and

Introduction. Thank you.

8. Please include the method was

applied to examine the

research model. For

example, Partial Least

Squares (PLS).

The correction has been made. In the Abstract it

is clearly stated that the Mann Whitney test with

normal approximation supported by Monte

Carlo estimation to test the main effect of the

experimentation.

To test the mediation effect, the author stated

directly the use of Bayesian estimation technic

with 5000 times bootstrapping as suggested by

Reviewer 2

9. To include the description of

the research method and

design. Please state the

selection and numbers of

participant.

In the Abstract I have accommodated this

suggestion by stating clearly that the study

utilizes static group design that involve 203

participants chosen judgmentally. Thank you.

10. To include the implication

from the findings and

suggestion avenues for

future research. Significance

- who would benefit from

this and what is new about

it?

The people who may concern with the finding

of the study have been cited in theoretical and

managerial contributions. They are any parties

that involve theoretically and managerially in

achievement-related tasks, such educational

practitioners, trainer, training centre

management, and families in general

11. The discussion on

Methodology need further

explanation / elaborations.

The suggestion has been made additional

explanations about research site, research

design, and analysis technic as also suggested

by Reviewer 2.

12. Need to include Population,

Sampling and Data

Collection Procedure.

In research method has been stated that the

population are the body of students of the

university chosen as the site of the study.

13. Measures - How would the

researcher validate the

reliability and validity of the

constructs? Details require.

The validation of the construct uses the

Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) with

structural equation modelling (SEM) and the

reability analysis uses Cronbach Alpha. The

author have tried to describe them in details.

Thank you.


Revision)

14. Recommend that the

definition be provided for all

the variables under the

measurement section before

explaining the measure.

The definition about dependent variables has

been added.

15. The content and flow of

writing the introduction

chapter need to be improved.

This chapter is not well

structured.

Thank you for this suggestion. I have improved

the Introduction.

16. The write up need to be

improved. Not focus. Many

points been mixed up in a

The single sentence paragraphs has been

rewritten. The author has also utilized grammar

checking application. Thank you.

single paragraph and

section. The candidate is

strongly recommended to

use topic sentence and

conclusion sentence.

17. The justification of the study

could be better organized

through the use of

subheadings that separate

that theoretical and

managerial contribution.

Theoritical and managerial contributions have

occupied a separate section in the final part of

the manuscript.

Reviewer 2 1. See the comments

Reviewer 3 1. The authors have shown

theoretical gaps in their study.

However, there is no data to

support the actual situation

occurring in the institution unless

it is merely an assumption that

future emotions may affect

individuals’ current achievement

motivation.

Thank you

2. Abstract - it is necessary for the

author to include the

background, objectives,

methodology, significant

findings, and significance of the

study in this section. Also,

consider explaining the

implications and the conclusion

of the research briefly.

The suggestion has been accommodated. Thank

you.

3. What type of sampling design

being used?

The author has stated directly that the study uses

judgmental design. Thank you.


Revision)

4. The statistics are appropriate and

handled with competence. The

author shows a critically

intelligent application of

appropriate principles and

practices relevant to the problem

under the study.

Thank you. The statistical method has been

improved following the Reviewer 2 suggestion

to improve the robustness of the method

5. This manuscript is very well

written. The data are

appropriately attached and can

be clearly legible. The writing

style is easily understood by

readers from various fields.

Thank you

6. There is some authors’ name that

not cited in the text but listed in

the references such as Landry

(2003), Ames & Archer. (1988),

Hsieh, Sullivan & Guerra,

(2007), Israelashvili, Sauter, &

Fischer, (2019), Malhotra

(2020), Mellers & McGraw

(2001), Nicholls (1984), and

Schunk & Pajares (2009).

Thank you for the the detail correction. It helps

me to avoid the disturbance mistake. The

corrections has been made. Ames & Archer.

(1988) and Hsieh, Sullivan & Guerra, (2007)

are skipped out. The rest have cited in text.

7. Citations in the text and

references list do not follow the

format.

The correction has been made. Thank you.

8. Cite the names of all authors in the

first citation - Hair, J.F., W.C.

Black, B.J. Babin, and R.E.

Anderson, (2014)

The suggestion has been accommated. Thank

you.

9. There are some citations in the

text but missing under the list of

references such as Bagozzi et al.

(2016), Davis and Rusbult

(2001), Darnon et al. (2007)

The mistake has been corrected. Thank you.

The List of Amendment – Round 2 (Reviewer 2)

Comment Revision


Revision)

1 This regards the manuscript "How

Proponents and

Opponents Influence Self-Efficacy

and Achievement

Goals: The Role of Anticipated

emotions of Others,"

which is under consideration by

Gadjah Mada

International Journal of Business.

Title of paper is similar to:

“Achievement as Gift and Prestige:

Formulating Anticipated Emotion of

Others as New Determinant of

Consumer Motivation

Author: Bilson Simamora, ASEAN

MARKETING JOURNAL June

2016 - Vol.VIII - No. 1 - 29-53

Title must be changed.

The author has used the initial title.

2 Commented [A3]: Misleading need

to be aligned to content. Mediation

effect is mentioned but baseline and

conceptual model to show

mediation effects are not shown.

Only tabulation of results are

available.

The mediation effect has been stressed in the

abstract:

Using Bayesian estimation technic with 1000

times bootstrapping, this study reveals that

selfefficacy mediates the influence of

anticipated proponents’ joyfulness on

performance-

approach goals partially. Partial mediation of

self-efficacy is also apparent in the impact of

proponents’ distress on mastery-approach and

mastery-avoidance goals.

3 Commented [A4]: Literature need

to be current to

warrant strong underpinning theory

and problem formulation.

The literature has been up-dated

4 Commented [A5]: This paper

should discuss how

personality traits and self-esteem

predispose individuals to

develop and strengthen

perceived academic self-efficacy

beliefs, and how these personal

characteristics interact with

learning conditions in improving

academic performance.

The author has stressed the argument of

selfdetermination theory (Ryan and Deci 2000)

and self-esteem embedded in social envy and

schadenfreude theory (Brambilla and Riva

2017; van Dijk, van Koingsbruggen,

Ouwerkerk, and Wesseling 2011) the

Introduction


Revision)

5 Commented [A6]: Problem

formulation is vague and

ambiguous. Should be leaning

towards Indonesian academia

context to support a cogent

foundation. Thus, this paper should

examine specific domain of

selfesteem (e.g., in the academic

context), rather than global

selfesteem, in addition to basic traits

and self-efficacy beliefs to better

understand the personality

underpinnings linked with a

successful academic performance.

The problem formulation has been improved as

also suggested by Reviewer 1

6 Commented [A7]: Outdated

literature

The author has added more up-dated literatures



9 Commented [A10]: Outdated,

provides weak support for

hypotheses

10 Commented [A11]: Justification for

employing 4 hypotheses has not

been addressed providing strong

structural weakness for this study.

Why has 4 hypotheses employed in

this study? This has not been

clarified and also the issue of how

formal hypotheses for mediation

effects are developed and

articulated. There are two major

approaches: segmentation and

The suggestions have been accommodated.

Thank you


Revision)

transmittal approaches. When

adopting the segmentation

approach, three hypotheses should

be developed: H1) independent

variable (X) effects mediator (M),

H2) mediator (M) effects outcome

variable (Y) and H3) mediation

effect (e.g. M mediates the

relationship between X and Y).

Papers using the segmentation

approach include Zhou, Benton,

Schilling, and Milligan (2011),

Paulraj (2011) and Wu, Choi, and

Rungtusanatham (2010). Next, the

transmittal approach, in turn,

requires a single hypothesis stating

that mediator (M) mediates the

relationship between X and Y

without delving into hypotheses

relating X to M and M to Y are

some of the examples for theorising

mediation models using the

transmittal approach.

11 Commented [A12]: Justification on

selection of unit of

analysis is not specified.

The suggestion has been accommodated. Thank

you.

12 Commented [A13]: Population and

sample size are not

justified.

Has been justified. Thank you.

13 Commented [A14]: Participants are

not randomly

assigned to conditions or orders of

conditions because the

independent variable is

manipulated before the dependent

variable is measured.

Static group design in this study allowed

nonrandomized participants selection as long as

the population are mostly homogenous and the

researcher uses proper technic analysis

(Malhotra 2020). This statement has been

stressed in the manuscript to accommodate this

suggestion. Thank you


Revision)

14 Commented [A16R15]: Were steps

taken to ensure that the groups are

as similar as possible? Researcher

made an assumption and not on a

standardized h test. Are the same

sex, are close in age, and have

similar learning styles? Taking such

steps would increase the internal

validity of the study because it

would eliminate some of the most

important confounding variables.

But without true random

assignment of the students to

conditions, there remains the

possibility of other important

Thank you for this suggestion. Post-analysis

revealed that there are no differences of the

responses under investigation among males and

females segment. The mediation effect using

Hayes (2020) model 7 also showed that the

coefficient h is not significant. Therefore there

is no differences in self-efficacy and

achievement goals between the two segments,

including the difference of mediation effect in

the two segments.

confounding variables that the

researcher was not able to control.

This shows a design error

15 Commented [A17]: Because

participants are not randomly

assigned—making it likely that

there are other differences between

conditions, therefore this

quasiexperiments are generally

somewhere between correlational

studies and true experiments, this

shows directionality problem

Static group experiment viewed as pre

experimental design is possible (Malhotra

2020), especially if the use of the true

experiment has its own challenge. To avoid the

violation of randomization and the normality

distribution of data, the researcher utilized

nonparametric technic, namely Mann Whitney

Test, to test the main effect of the

experimentation on the dependent variables.

To test the mediation effect, following your

suggestion, I use Bayesian estimation method

with 5000 times bootstrapping that is useful for

small sample with unknown data distribution

pattern (MacKinnon, Lockwood, and Williams

2004; Preacher and Hayes 2004; Zhao, Lynch

and Chen 2010).

Following your suggestion, I used the

procedure specified by Zhao, Lynch and Chen

16 Commented [A18]: Was a pilot test,

face validity done? This shows

reliability and validity problems.

17 Commented [A19]: Estimate

specific indirect effects, instead

of total indirect effects.

18 Commented [A20]: Explore other

methods of mediation

analysis, for example Monte Carlo

simulation and Bayesian estimation.


Revision)

19 Commented [A21]: Researchers

should follow Preacher and Hayes’s

approach and bootstrap the

sampling distribution of the indirect

effect. The bias-corrected

bootstrapping is considered a

powerful method to detect

mediation. A statistically significant

indirect effect (t-value > 1.96, two

tailed, p < 0.05) should be taken as

an evidence for mediation (Preacher

& Hayes, 2004; Zhao et al., 2010).

Additionally, evaluating confidence

intervals is another important

condition to confirm a mediation

effect.

(2010) to start the interpretation of the

mediation from the indirect effect generated by

pre-determined 5000 times bootstrapping, then

make a check on c’ (direct effect) and the

direction of axbxc to find the kind of the

mediation.

Fortunately, Hayes’(2020) macro regression

application named Process 3.5 plugged in SPSS

22 facilitates this analysis.

20 Commented [A22]: The posited

model accounted for ? % of the

variance in grades in males and for

of the variance in females? What is

the variance accounted for academic

self efficacy in males and in

females?

21 Commented [A23]: Multiple

mediation should be employed to

reduce effect of insignificance.

Mediation is necessary to test

theories in order to understand the

causal relationship

22 Commented [A24]: This shows the

model is underpowered and needs

to be rebuilt. This because models

in the multi-group structure

equation modeling framework

(with gender) as the group variable

should employ the Akaike

Information Criterion (AIC)which

is particularly well suited for

comparing the adequacy of

nonnested models (Tabachnick &

Fidell, 2001; the lower the AIC

index, the better the goodness-offit).


Revision)

23 Commented [A25]: The main

contribution of this present study

should have been to show clearly

how both personality traits and

selfesteem influenced students'

perceived academic self-efficacy

beliefs, which in turn influenced

grades. Students' personality

antecedents in order to better attune

their efforts to improve their beliefs

about how much they are capable to

successfully pursue challenging

academic and personal goals should

have been a good contributor to

educators.

The suggestion has been accommodated in the

Introduction and General Discussion.

As a theory of personality, Ryan and Deci’s

theory states that when introjected into

selfregulation, people will internalize significant

others’ expectations and build self-esteem and

express their image as socially responsible

persons by accepting and working for it.

Therefore, as Chen et al. (2009), the

demarcation line between personal and

collective goals becomes blurred, commonly

found in an Asian family.





Hani Handoko <[email protected]> Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 1:04 PMTo: "Dr. Bilson Simamora" <[email protected]>




Hopefully, the reviewer's comment(s) can help to make your manuscript better. We are looking forward to your response and expect to receive the result no later than (December 04, 2020).





Bilson Simamora <[email protected]> Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 11:35 AMTo: Hani Handoko <[email protected]>

Dear Prof. HandokoThank you very much for the opportunity to revise my paper. I have my paper as suggested, as can be seen in theTable of the amendment. The files have been submitted through the journal's system. However, I send them againthrough email just to make sure that the files can reach your desk well.In addition to the suggested revision, I have also:

1. Updated the references, and more than 50% of them are from 2015 or newer.2. Fixed typos and ineffective sentences.3. Checked plagiarism with Turnitin (Similarity index=9%, the result is enclosed)

I hope with this revision; my paper can fulfill your requirements. However, if there is still something missing, I willgladly fulfill it. Thank you.

Best RegardsThe author


3 attachments

44042-177884-6-ED - Round 3.docx 818K

A list of Amandement Form-Round 3.docx1115K



https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ui=2&ik=5c92a2b39c&view=att&th=176084e0d585d6d9&attid=0.1&disp=attd&safe=1&zw

https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ui=2&ik=5c92a2b39c&view=att&th=1762c08dded03431&attid=0.1&disp=attd&realattid=f_ki9ryby30&safe=1&zw

https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ui=2&ik=5c92a2b39c&view=att&th=1762c08dded03431&attid=0.2&disp=attd&realattid=f_ki9rybyj1&safe=1&zw



How Proponents and Opponents Influence Achievement Motivation_ TURNITIN.pdf 7941K

https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ui=2&ik=5c92a2b39c&view=att&th=1762c08dded03431&attid=0.3&disp=attd&realattid=f_ki9rybyk2&safe=1&zw

A Table of Amendment (3rd Manuscript Revision)

Manuscript's Code: 2019.03.185

Title: "How Proponents and Opponents Influence Self-Efficacy and Achievement Goals: The Role of

Anticipated Emotions of Others"


Reviewer 1 1. What will a new contribution to this

present study? The significance of the

research needs to be expanded.

Thank you for the suggestions. The author

has re-write and prescribed firmly present

study’s contributions and its significance for

further research in expanding the concept

and related research domains (page 34-35).

1. Abstract entirely appropriate and

comprehensive.

Thank you.

2. The methods appear to be

satisfactory

Thank you.

3. As to improve the writing style

candidate should start each

paragraph with topic sentences, and

at the end of the paragraphs or sub-

section, the candidate must draw

conclusions from the discussed

issues/points and provide his views

and stand on specific issues/points

discussed.

The author agrees that some paragraphs are

poorly written. The author has revised them

to follow the direction tightly. Substantial

changes are evident in the discussion,

limitations, and direction for further

research.

Reviewer 2 1. Since your participants came from

Business college/Accounting

courses, please state the implication

for this study's generalization.

Agree, generalization is an important issue

regarding this research. The author has made

a consideration about this issue under the

direction for further research (page 35,

paragraph 3). Thank you.

2. Gino's (2014) studies -

https://www.scientificamerican.com/

article/banking-culture-encourages-

dishonesty/ - and Abraham et al.

(2020) -

https://www.sciencedirect.com/scien

ce/article/pii/S2405844020311191#b

ib33, for examples, found that

Financial sectors have unique

characteristics in terms of the peoples'

behavioral ethics and moral emotions.

Gino’s (2014) and Abraham et al.’s (2020)

works substantially help the author find

three interesting research issues for further

research. The details are given under

the Limitation and Direction for

Further research issue (page 34-35). Thank

you.

3. Could non-business/accounting

cultures reproduce similar results of

the author's present study? Please

express some statements regarding

this concern in the author's

LIMITATION, DIRECTION FOR

Agree that, as reported by recent studies

(Lipson et al. 2016; Posselt and Lipson

2016), students in different disciplines have

different mental health and sensitivity to

mental disruption. Therefore, they are very

likely different highly in responding to

stimulation as in the present study. This

A Table of Amendment (3rd Manuscript Revision) FURTHER RESEARCH AND

CONTRIBUTIONS section.

issue has been cited in the direction for

further research (page 35, paragraph 3).

Thank you.

4. Please consider the study of Arief

Darmanegara Liem dan Youyan Nie

(2008)

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/a

bs/10.1080/00207590701838097

which found that "the Indonesian

students endorsed more strongly than

their Chinese counterparts on

security, conformity, tradition,

universalism and achievement values,

social-oriented achievement

motivation, and performance-

approach and mastery-avoidance

goals."

Lim and Nie’s (2008) study strengthens, not

change, theoretical perspective for the

study’s results, in which, especially, their

findings help the author to explain why

participants are more sensitive to

proponents’ anticipated distress. I see that,

among others, based on their findings, this

sensitivity is caused by the substantial

endorsement of family-oriented goals and

values to Indonesian students (Page 33,

paragraph 2). Thank you for the suggestion.

5. Saw that the author's study did not

seem aware of that psychological

facts. Could the authors integrate

Liem and Nie's (2008)'s study results

in your Discussions? How might the

facts add or change perspectives in

interpreting the author's current

results?

6. Did the authors apply the Debriefing

procedure to the author's study

participants? Please elaborate on it.

Research procedure has been elaborated

beneath “Procedure” new sub-section.

Thank you (page 14).

7. Does an Ethical Committee review

the author's experimental protocol?

Did the author's have Ethical

Approval from the Committee?

Please state them in the author's

Methods section.

Before being executed, the research

proposal was reviewed by the technical and

ethical committee. The suggestion has been

accommodated by creating the new

subsection Review and Legitimation (page

14). Thank you.

6/22/2021 "Kwik Kian Gie School of Business" Mail - [GamaIJB]Preprint file



[GamaIJB]Preprint file 11 messages

GAMA IJB <[email protected]> Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 1:58 PMTo: Mr Bilson Simamora <[email protected]>

Dear Mr Bilson Simamora

We hope this email finds you well.With this email, we attached the preprint file. Please kindly check it.

Sincerely yours,Gadjah Mada International Journal of BusinessMaster of ManagementFaculty of Economics and Business | Universitas Gadjah Mada | Jalan Teknika Utara No. 1 Yogyakarta, Indonesia 55281 Telp.: +62 (274) 562222, 515536 Ext 113 Fax.: +62 (274) 564388Web: http://journal.ugm.ac.id/gamaijb e-Mail: [email protected]

1-simamora-preprint.pdf 756K

Bilson Simamora <[email protected]> Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 11:55 AMTo: GAMA IJB <[email protected]>

Dear Editors

Thank you for the opportunity to check the article preprint version. I have checked the article as suggested and madesome corrections as can be seen in the enclosed table of corrections. See also the highlighted spaces in the author-checked preprint version.

Since Figure 1 is included in the correction, together with this letter I have sent the high-resolution corrected model toreplace the old one.

Thank you for handling my article well. If there is something missing I will gladly fulfill it.

Best Regards


3 attachments

Simple Mediation Model.png 78K

https://www.google.com/maps/search/Jalan+Teknika+Utara+No.+1+Yogyakarta,%C2%A0Indonesia+55281?entry=gmail&source=g

http://journal.ugm.ac.id/gamaijb


https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ui=2&ik=5c92a2b39c&view=att&th=17742a2dad4af75c&attid=0.1&disp=attd&realattid=f_kkf2u4ak0&safe=1&zw

https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ui=2&ik=5c92a2b39c&view=att&th=1774758c16f61c51&attid=0.1&disp=inline&realattid=f_kkgdubnq1&safe=1&zw



1-simamora-preprint-author correction.pdf 683K

Table of Corrections List.docx 730K

GAMA IJB <[email protected]> Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 10:25 AMTo: Bilson Simamora <[email protected]>

Hello Bilson,

We hope this email finds you well.Here is the revised version of the preprint file (1-simamora-preprint-v2.pdf).Please help us to check it carefully before it is published. Just drop us a note when there is something else to correct.

Sincerely yours,Gadjah Mada International Journal of BusinessMaster of ManagementFaculty of Economics and Business | Universitas Gadjah Mada | Jalan Teknika Utara No. 1 Yogyakarta, Indonesia 55281 Telp.: +62 (274) 562222, 515536 Ext 113 Fax.: +62 (274) 564388Web: http://journal.ugm.ac.id/gamaijb e-Mail: [email protected]

[Quoted text hidden]

1-simamora-preprint-v2.pdf 727K

Bilson Simamora <[email protected]> Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 5:51 PMTo: GAMA IJB <[email protected]>

Dear Editors

Thank you for the opportunity to re-check the article. I have made some corrections, displayed as comments on the highlighted words or phrases. Thank you for handling my article so well.

Best RegardsBilson Simamora[Quoted text hidden]


GAMA IJB <[email protected]> Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 10:46 AMTo: Bilson Simamora <[email protected]>

Hello Bilson,

We hope this email finds you well.Here is the revised version of the preprint file (1-simamora-preprint-v3.pdf).Please help us to check it carefully before it is published. Just drop us a note when there is something else to correct.We thank you for your cooperation.

Sincerely yours

https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ui=2&ik=5c92a2b39c&view=att&th=1774758c16f61c51&attid=0.2&disp=attd&realattid=f_kkgdubn80&safe=1&zw

https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ui=2&ik=5c92a2b39c&view=att&th=1774758c16f61c51&attid=0.3&disp=attd&realattid=f_kkgdubns2&safe=1&zw




https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ui=2&ik=5c92a2b39c&view=att&th=1774c2ca6fc2329c&attid=0.1&disp=attd&realattid=f_kkhq41q30&safe=1&zw

https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ui=2&ik=5c92a2b39c&view=att&th=1774dc55dd0992d2&attid=0.1&disp=attd&realattid=f_kki61gy50&safe=1&zw



Gadjah Mada International Journal of BusinessMaster of ManagementFaculty of Economics and Business | Universitas Gadjah Mada | Jalan Teknika Utara No. 1 Yogyakarta, Indonesia 55281 Telp.: +62 (274) 562222, 515536 Ext 113 Fax.: +62 (274) 564388Web: http://journal.ugm.ac.id/gamaijb e-Mail: [email protected]



Bilson Simamora <[email protected]> Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 11:54 AMTo: GAMA IJB <[email protected]>

Dear Editors

Thank you for the opportunity to check my article before publishing. I have re-read the article and found that so far it has almost been camera-ready. There are only two remaining minor corrections on page 3 (column 2) and page 29 (column 2). Thank you.

Best RegardsBilson Simamora[Quoted text hidden]


GAMA IJB <[email protected]> Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 8:29 AMTo: Bilson Simamora <[email protected]>

Hello Bilson,

We hope this email finds you well.Here is the revised version of the preprint file (1-simamora-preprint-v4.pdf).Again..... Please help us to check it carefully

Sincerely yours,Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business Master of ManagementFaculty of Economics and Business | Universitas Gadjah Mada | Jalan Teknika Utara No. 1 Yogyakarta, Indonesia 55281 Telp.: +62 (274) 562222, 515536 Ext 113 Fax.: +62 (274) 564388Web: http://journal.ugm.ac.id/gamaijb e-Mail: [email protected]






https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ui=2&ik=5c92a2b39c&view=att&th=1775bb31c875053d&attid=0.1&disp=attd&realattid=f_kkm16c000&safe=1&zw

https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ui=2&ik=5c92a2b39c&view=att&th=1775bf16992499a0&attid=0.1&disp=attd&realattid=f_kkm3lmg10&safe=1&zw




https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ui=2&ik=5c92a2b39c&view=att&th=177605c0d1097d4e&attid=0.1&disp=attd&realattid=f_kknbqgp00&safe=1&zw



Bilson Simamora <[email protected]> Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 3:45 PMTo: GAMA IJB <[email protected]>

Dear Editors

Thank you for the opportunity to re-check the preprint version of my article. I am terribly sorry for leaving some mistakes in the reference list. The details can be found in the highlighted comments. In short, here are some actions needed:

1. The name of the journals and books should be typed in italic as specified in the template.2. In Putarek et al. (2020) it is written “Euopean” and should be written “European”.3. Maddux and Rogers (1983) positioned in the old version after Reb and Connoly (2007) should be placed after

Lipson et al. (2016), and Zeelenberg (2018) should be positioned before Zhao et al. (2010).4. Following the template, the year of the reference should be written without brackets.5. Some journal names used different character

I have edited the reference in my metadata and it is now the same as the clean version reference, enclosed with this letter that hopefully can be used if it is necessary. Thank you.

Best Regards


2 attachments

Reference - Clean Version.docx 24K

1-simamora-preprint-v4-Checked.pdf 721K


This is the most current corrected pre-print file[Quoted text hidden]

1-simamora-preprint-v4-Checked.pdf 692K

GAMA IJB <[email protected]> Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 4:07 PMTo: Bilson Simamora <[email protected]>

Hello Bilson,

We hope this email finds you well.Here is the revised version of the preprint file (1-simamora-preprint-v5.pdf).Once again thank you for this cooperation.

Sincerely yours,Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business Master of ManagementFaculty of Economics and Business | Universitas Gadjah Mada | Jalan Teknika Utara No. 1 Yogyakarta, Indonesia 55281 Telp.: +62 (274) 562222, 515536 Ext 113 Fax.: +62 (274) 564388Web: http://journal.ugm.ac.id/gamaijb e-Mail: [email protected]

https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ui=2&ik=5c92a2b39c&view=att&th=17761eb7702644aa&attid=0.1&disp=attd&realattid=f_kknrbpdm1&safe=1&zw

https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ui=2&ik=5c92a2b39c&view=att&th=17761eb7702644aa&attid=0.2&disp=attd&realattid=f_kknrbpd40&safe=1&zw

https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ui=2&ik=5c92a2b39c&view=att&th=17761f00b2f38115&attid=0.1&disp=attd&realattid=f_kknrho3o0&safe=1&zw









Dear Editors

I think this version has been clean, no more mistakes or typos found. Thank you for involving me in the correcting process.

Best Regards


https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ui=2&ik=5c92a2b39c&view=att&th=17761ff5f8949b2e&attid=0.1&disp=attd&realattid=f_kkns3g5y0&safe=1&zw

6/22/2021 Kwik Kian Gie School of Business Mail - [GamaIJB ...

Documents