6.2.2007 Beijing ILC Workshop Global Design Effort 1 High-Gradient Module Test Lutz Lilje.

6.2.2007 Beijing ILC Workshop Global Design Effort 1

High-Gradient Module Test

Lutz Lilje

6.2.2007 Beijing ILC Workshop Global Design Effort 2

Thanks!

• To D. Kostin, Rolf Lange, R. Paparella, K. Przygoda for the viewgraphs

• Many other people involved e.g. DESY technical groups etc.

• Dislaimer:– Some testing still on-going– Final evaluation after 10th cryo-cycle

6.2.2007 Beijing ILC Workshop Global Design Effort 3

Module Test at DESY

• A high gradient module has been assembled

• Test in dedicated test stand underway e.g.– Thermal cycles– Heat loads– Cavity

performance– Coupler

conditioning– Fast tuner

performance

6.2.2007 Beijing ILC Workshop Global Design Effort 4

Overall Module Performance

• Thermal cycling– 10 cycles total planned

• 7 done so far

– No leaks– Wire position o.k.

• Heat loads– Statical heat loads as other modules tested in

TTF/FLASH

6.2.2007 Beijing ILC Workshop Global Design Effort 5

Wire Positions

• Preliminary• Plot illustrates that

positions are repeatably achieved

• Final evaluation to follow

• Also on-going vibration measurements

6.2.2007 Beijing ILC Workshop Global Design Effort 6

Cavity Performance (courtesy D. Kostin – DESY)

1 - AC70 2 - AC76 3 - AC81 4 - Z87 5 - Z85 6 - Z92 7 - Z83 8 - Z900

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

Module 6

18.01.2007

EA

CC [M

V/m

]

Cavity

Cavity tests: Vertical (CW) Horizontal (10Hz) CMTB (2Hz) FLASH

Average gradient: 28 MV/m

planned

6.2.2007 Beijing ILC Workshop Global Design Effort 7

Q(Eacc)

6.2.2007 Beijing ILC Workshop Global Design Effort 8

HPP on Cavity 5 +6

• For short pulses up to 300 us gradient is high >30 MV/m

• Radiation levels are relatively low• This hints to a thermal quench

6.2.2007 Beijing ILC Workshop Global Design Effort 9

Cavity results• 6 cavities perform very similar to previous tests

– Even up to 35 MV/m pulsed operation• 2 don‘t…

– Even after HPP, limitation likely thermal quench– The reason is NOT understood (yet)!– Suspicious:

• Cavities behave like twins in all tests– Speculations (!!!!!!!):

• Assembly procedures– After the cavity on position 4 an intermediate leak check is

made, and the necessary additional flange assembly and disassembly could lead to contamination

• Coupler 5 had leak in the warm part (see below), exchange needed

– Should not have impact on cavity vacuum.• Both cavities have not seen 120°C bakeout for schedule

reasons– But CHECHIA test was o.k.

6.2.2007 Beijing ILC Workshop Global Design Effort 10

Coupler Processing(courtesy D. Kostin – DESY)

• Done in to steps– 1st set of 4 couplers

• Very tight vacuum interlock thresholts

– 2nd set of 4 couplers• Used ‘relaxed’ vacuum

interlock thresholts

• Very fast processing– Due to improved handling

after pre-processing at LAL Orsay

– Comparable to individual cavity high power test results

6.2.2007 Beijing ILC Workshop Global Design Effort 11

6.2.2007 Beijing ILC Workshop Global Design Effort 12

6.2.2007 Beijing ILC Workshop Global Design Effort 13

Coupler 5: Leak in Warm Part

6.2.2007 Beijing ILC Workshop Global Design Effort 14

6.2.2007 Beijing ILC Workshop Global Design Effort 15

Reconditioning after Repair

6.2.2007 Beijing ILC Workshop Global Design Effort 16

Second Set of Coupler

6.2.2007 Beijing ILC Workshop Global Design Effort 17

6.2.2007 Beijing ILC Workshop Global Design Effort 18

6.2.2007 Beijing ILC Workshop Global Design Effort 19

Fast Tuner Tests(R.Paparella –INFN, K. Przygoda – Uni. Lodz, L. Lilje DESY)

• Cavities have two piezos installed – sensor-actuator, redundancy

• Technical remark– All measurements with RF feedforward (no feedback)– All detunings refer to the ‘Flat-Top’-region (beam acceleration) of the RF pulse

• Detuning rather similar for all cavities• All cavities (but one) compensated at maximum gradient with simple pulse

– E.g. Cavity 3 at 35 MV/m– Cavity 5 Piezo no mechanical contact at 1,3 GHz

• Known problem: Piezo fixture stiffness for large pre-detuning of cavity– Currently cavities are compressed, thus exerting an extension of the piezo brackets– This will be changed for future cavities, cavities will pull on fixture

» N.B.: All ILC tuner designs use cavity that pull.• ‘Natural’ frequency of Cavity 5 after cooldown is 317 kHz above 1.3 GHz, larger

compression of cavity needed• At 10 kHz above, operational• Further investigation ongoing e.g. effects due to thermal cycling

– Piezo Voltages within margin• Could also use bipolar operation, but not needed

– Delay of piezo can be used to set cavity pre-detuning

6.2.2007 Beijing ILC Workshop Global Design Effort 20

Lorentz Force Detunings in Module 6 cavities

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

Eacc[MV/m]

Det

un

ing

ove

r F

lat-

To

p [

Hz]

C1C2C3C4C5C6C7C8

6.2.2007 Beijing ILC Workshop Global Design Effort 21

Example: Cavity 3Lorentz Force Detuning

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

Cavity Gradient [MV/m]

Lore

ntz

Forc

e de

tuni

ng [H

z]

6.2.2007 Beijing ILC Workshop Global Design Effort 22

Cavity 3: Gradient

35 MV/m

6.2.2007 Beijing ILC Workshop Global Design Effort 23

Cavity 3: Phase

6.2.2007 Beijing ILC Workshop Global Design Effort 24

Cavity 3: Detuning

6.2.2007 Beijing ILC Workshop Global Design Effort 25

Maximum Compensation per Cavity

Maximum Lorentz Force detuning compensation results

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

cav 1 - 35 MV/m cav 2 - 31 MV/m cav 3 - 35 MV/m cav 4 - 33 MV/m cav 6 - 20 MV/m cav 7 - 30 MV/m cav 8 - 23 MV/m

Det

unin

g ov

er th

e fla

t-top

[Hz]

Piezo OFF

Piezo ON

6.2.2007 Beijing ILC Workshop Global Design Effort 26

Voltage Needed for Compensation

Compensated Detuning vs. Applied Piezo Voltagehalf-sine pulse, 2.5 ms width and 0.6 to 0.64 ms advance from RF pulse

y = 7,594x

R2 = 0,98

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Piezo Voltage [V]

Com

pens

ated

det

unin

g [H

z]

CAV 3

Linear (CAV 3)

6.2.2007 Beijing ILC Workshop Global Design Effort 27

Compensated Detuning vs. Delay to RF@25 MV/m

Normalized detuning over the flat-top for vs. piezo pulse delay

0,0

0,2

0,4

0,6

0,8

1,0

1,2

1,4

1,6

1,8

2,0

-7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2Piezo pulse start time [ms]

No

rma

lize

d a

mp

litu

de

Delay analysison cavity 1

Delay analysison cavity 2

Delay analysison cavity 6

Delay analysison cavity 7

2nd osc.compensationresults1st osc.compensationresults

RF pulse

6.2.2007 Beijing ILC Workshop Global Design Effort 28

Pre-Detuning Change Due to Piezo Pulse Delay

• Can change the cavity pre-detuning of the cavity by changing the delay of the ‘second‘ pulse in the order of 200Hz

• Changes in pre-detuning could be compensated by changing piezo delay instead of using stepper motor– Less motor usage,

increase lifetime

– Correponds to He drifts of a few mbar

6.2.2007 Beijing ILC Workshop Global Design Effort 29

6.2.2007 Beijing ILC Workshop Global Design Effort 30

Summary– No leaks, Static heat loads are o.k.– Cavities

• Six cavities show expected performance• Two cavites perform significantly below their individual high power

test results– Not understood (yet)

– Other components work well• Coupler processed quickly

– Improved handling paid off• Fast tuners perform up to 35 MV/m

– One exception: Problem of the fixture understood

– Module test stand is a big asset• Independent tests of FLASH• E.g. Rapid thermal Cycles

6.2.2007 Beijing ILC Workshop Global Design Effort 31

6.2.2007 Beijing ILC Workshop Global Design Effort 32