6. 7. 8. 9.hppwd.gov.in/Links/inspection reports.compressed.pdf · 2017-10-18 · The whole range of concrete grades have been used. M25 in foundation of piers, M30 in foundation

I

INSPECTION REPORT

l. Information provided by Executive Engineer.

1. Name of work:- 252.00 mtr.double lane pSC bridge (7 spans of 36m each) over Batariver on Kishanpura Santokhgarh road at km 1/180. (under RIDF_XV||l).

2. Name of Circle| 12rh Circle H.p.p.w.D. Nahan

3. Name of Divisionr B&R Division, H.p.p.W.D. paonta Sahib

4. Date of lnspectiont- 06-70-2077

5. Name of Inspecting officer:- Er. B.S Chauhan.

6. Designation of inspecting Officer:- E-in-C(eC&D).

7. a) Awarded Amount:- 1591.80lacs.b) Date of Award: - 16-08-2014c)Agreementnumber:- Notintimated

8. Name of Contractor: National Indra Construction Company (pathankot)

9. Date of starta) Stipulated Date ofstarti 3I-Og-2Oj,4b) Actual date of startr- 31-08-2014

10. Date of completion :- )i

a) Stipulated as per agreement:- 30,08-2017bi Extension granted:- provisional given upto 30-10_2017

1.1. Accompanying Field Officer/Officialsr1. Er. Ajay Sharma, Executive Engineer, B&R Division H.p.p.W.D. paonta Sahib2. Er. Manoj Kuthial, Assistant Engineer.

3. Er. Rajesh 5aini, Junior Engineer.

4. 5h. Saiyam Mahendru, Director of Firm.5.5h. D.N. soni, project Manager.

-

Page 1/3

12. Scope and progress of Work I

It.

i) 7 spans of 36 mtr. each .

5 diaphram in each span(2 end +3 inner).ii) Wellfoundation for both abutment & pieriii) Founding level for A1 & ,A2 is at 474.00 mtr.

& fot P1,, P2,P3,P4,P5,P6 is at 480.50 mtr.against deck level of 503.90 mtr.

v) Approaches.

Physical Progressi-5ub structure : completed.Super structure: completeexcept crash railing, expansionjoints, wearing coat andapproaches.Financial Progress:- 58%

(bv Water Cement ratio

2,

OBSERVATIONSi

1. The bridge is a pre-stressed concrete bridge having 7 spans of 36.0 mtr. eacnwith 4 girders & 5 diaphram in each span. The bridge is completed except forcomponents of crash railing, expansion joint, wearing coat and approaches,work of which are going on. The provisional extension for 2 months havebeen given by the Executive Engineer and work is slated for completion by30.10.2017.

2. The whole range of concrete grades have been used. M25 in foundation ofpiers, M30 in foundation of abutment, M4O in sub structure upto bearing cap,M45 in superstructore girders & diaphragm and M35 in deck slab.

3. The mix design has been got done from private laboratory house which is

required to be approved by Employer/Engineer. The following ratios ofingredients of concrete are requjred to be used as per design which is

mentioned below. High quality of e,nforcement of quality control is requiredas rich mix has been used.

DesiSn Ratio as perwergnl

Cementweight)

0.3750.3750.3400.3 25

0.31

4. The laboratory is established at site and tests are also being performed anddocumented in quality control register.

5. The strands used for pre-stressing should conform to lS:1426g as per thedesign requirement. The copy of test certificate of strand, however, is nor

-

Page 2/3

M30M35M40M45M45

1r1.69:3.281.1.6312.97

I'.1.5412.821:1.47.2.80111.46'.2 .8L

390 kg

415 kg

440 kg

447 ke

450 kg

attached in the quality control register which may be done now so thatcomplete report of !ests is availabl<

6. Fe500 grade of steel conforming to lS:1786 is being used, test certificate ofwhich was also not available at site which is also required to be recorded in

quality control register.

7. Since the cement is being arranged by the contractor, it is necessary thatindependent testing of cement for every consignment should be ensured.

8. POT and PTFE bearings are being used, test certificate of which is required tobe obtained and recorded in quality control register.

9. Honeycombing has been noticed in diaph.agm and railings which is required

to be rectified.

10. lt is found that the approach is being constructed in long length by providrng

gabion structure and doing the earth filling. lt is advised to ensure thatgabion structures are properly designed and filling and compaction is done as

per the specification mentioned in the agreement. The gabion provided in

the approaches needs improvement from workmanship point of view as theyare not found in line and plumb.

11. lt was found that two electric poles of H.T. line have been raised on gabion

wall at two locations and there is every chance of its damage due tosettlement as they have not been raised from the firm strata. lt is advised toraise these poles from the firm strata outside the gabion wall to avoid thepossible damage.

The field officers are advised to ensure the compliance on abovepoints and follow the quality assurance mechanism properly so that desiredquality is obtained.

EnAiheer-in Chief (QC&D),

HPPWD, U.S.Club,Shimla-1.

No.PW-E-in-C(QC&D)/PA-lnspection NoteIzot't - If Qp -46 oatea:-1)f/oft yCopy forwarded to the following for information & further necessary action I

I2.

3.

4,

5.

The Additional Chief Secretary (PW) to the 6overnment of H.P. Shimla

The Engineer-in-Chief H.P.P.W.D. Nirman Bhawan, Shimla-2.

The Chief Engineer (52), Nirman Bhawan, H.P.P.W.D. Shimla,2.

The Superintending Engineer l.2h Circle H.P.P.W.D. Nahan.

The Executive Engineer, B&R Division H.P.P.W.D. Poanta Sahib.

ineerin- Chief(qC&D),PWD, U.S.Club,Shimla-1.

Page 3/3

@Il-

INSPECTION REPORT


1. Name of work:- 396.00 mtr. span high Level PSC Bridge(11 spans of 36 m each)

over river Giri on Rampur Ghat Manpur Deora Road at RD 3/290.(under RIDF-XVlll)

2. Name of circlei-

3. Name of Divisioni-

4. Date of Inspection:-

12th circle H.P.P.w.D. Nahan.

B&R Division, H.P.P.w.D. Paonta Sahib.

06-L0-2011

5. Name of lnspecting officer:- Er. B.S Chauhan.

6. Designation of inspecting Officeri E-in-C{QC&D).

7. a)Awarded Amount:- 1663.61 lacs.

b) Date of Award: - 16-08-2014c)Agreementnumber:- Notintimated

8. Name of Contractor: National Indra Construction Company (Pathankot)

9. Date of starta) Stipulated Date of starti 31-08-2014b) Actual date of start:- Not intimated

10. Date of completion :- i

a) Stipulat,d as per agreement: 30-08-2017b) Extension granted:- provisional given upto 31-12-2017

11. Accompanying Field Officer/Officialsr-

1. Er. Ajay Sharma, Executive Engineer, 8&R Division, H.P.P.W.D. Paonta Sahib.2. Er. Rakesh Kanduja, Assistant Engineer.

3. Er. Ajay Chauhan,.lunior Engineer.

Page 1/4

12. Scope and progress of work I

. OBSERVATIONS:-

r.

2.

The bridge is a pre-stressed concrete bridge having 11 spans of 36.0 mtr.

each with 4 girders & 5 diaphram. The work was required to be completed

by 30.08.2017, however, the progress of the work is not satisfactory. The

provisional time extension has been given by the Executive Engineer upto

31.12.2017 but it seems that with the present pace of work it is unlikely to be

compleled by 37.72.2077. The main reason for delay as explained by the

Executive Engineer and the contractor are late handing over of land and

problem in well sinking encountered due to hard strata.

It was noticed at site that there is some problem as sinking in cutting edge

being used does not seem to be designed for the strata encountered at site.

There seems to be some problem with the soil investigation done eadier

which is not showing the actual strata as encountered at site. The piers

already sunk have also tilted and they are required to be set right. The

problem need to be settled by the employer as the cutting edge being used

does not seem to be suitable and is difficult to replace at this stage when part

sinking has already been done. ln case, the issue is not settled the project

may witness long delay with added lmplications.

3. The whole range of concrete grades have been used. M25 in foundation ofpiers, M30 jn foundatlon of abutment, M40 in sub structure upto bearing cap,

M45 in superstructure girders & diaphragm and M35 in deck slab.

Scope Progress11 <^:n< ^f ?6 mtr a:.h5 diaphram in each span(2 end +3 inner).wellfoundation for both abutment & pier

Founding level for A1 & 42 is at 370.500 mtr.& lot P7, P2,P3,P4,P5,P6,P7,P8,P9 &P10 is at

371.300 mtr. against pier cap level of

i)

ii)iii)

393.733 Mtr.iv) Appropaches:-

a) Rampur ghat side :' 580.00 mtr.b) Manpur Deora side:- 50.00 mtr.

1. Physical Progressi-L 41 and 42 arg in

progress

ll. Pl to P5 sinking donelll. P6 to P11 sinking in

proSress.

2, Financial Progressi 37.62%,

4. The mix design has been got done from privaterequired to be approved by Employer/Engineer

ingredients of concrete are required to be usedmentioned below. High quality of enforcementas rich mix has been used.

laboratory house which is

. The following ratios ofas per design which isof quality contlol is required

Water Cement ratio

M30M35M40M45M45

390 kg

415 kg

440 kE

447 kA

450 kg

0.3750.3750.3400.3250.31

1:1.69:3.2811L63t2.97717.5012.82

111.47:2.801'.L4612.87

6.

5. The laboratory is estabiished at site and tests are also being performed anddocumented in quality control register.

The strands used for pre-stressing should conform to tst14268 as per thedesign requirement. The copy of test certificate of strand, however, is notattached in the quality control register which may be done now so thatcomplete report oftests is available.

7. Fe500 grade of steel conforming to lS:1796 is being used, test certificatewhich was also not available at site which is also required to be recordedquality control register.

8. S;rce the cement r5 bejng arrangedjby the contraclor. it rs necessary lhatindependent testing of cement for every consignment should be ensured.

9. POT and PTFE bearings are required to be used for which it is advised to getthe proper testing done before their use.

10. Since rich concrete mix is used, the Executive Engineer should ensure to getthe sample of ingredients and concrete mix checked in departmentallaboratory as per the design mix. The quality assurance mechanism shall beeffectively used and supervising officers should also exercise check on thequality tests being done at site.

11. Since lot of the work project remains to be done, it is advised that for timelycompletion of the project, a resource based working programme is obtainedfrom the contractor and target fixed should be closely rnonitored.

ofin

Design Mix Ratio as per Cement (by

r!The field officers are advised to ensure the compliance on above

points and follow the quality assurance mechanism properly se that desiredqualitv is obtained.

No.PW-E-in-c(QC&D)/pA-tnspection Note / 2o1j _ | 1 3 2-_ 3./ Datedr l))J.) 2. t2Copy forwarded to the following for information & further necessary action:

1. The Additional Chief Secretary (pW) to the Govern ment of H. p. Sh im la2. The Engineer-in-Chief H.p.p.W.D. Nirman Bhawan, Shimla_2.3. The Chief Engineer (SZ), Nirman Bhawan, H.p.p.W.D. Shimla,2.4. The Superintending Engineer 12th Circle H.p.p.W.D. Nahan.5. The Executive Engineer, B&R Division H.p.p.W.D. paonta Sahib.

-

Page 4/4

Eineer-in- Chief (QC&D),PWD, U.S.Club,Shimla-1.

ineer'in- Chief(QC&D),

@l-INSPECTION REPORT


1. Nameofwork:- lT4mtr.singlelanepSCbridge{3spansof58mtr.each)overGiri riveron Nahan Dadahu Haripurdhar road at Km 35/695.

2. Name of Circler

3. Name of Divisioni.


12th circle H.P.P,W.D. Nahan.

B&R Division, H.P.P.W,D. Sangrah.

05-10-2017

5. Name of Inspecting officer:- Er. 8.5 Chauhan.

6. Designation of inspecting Officeri E-in-C(QC&D).

7. Month and Year of Completion:- September 1974

Accompanying Field Officer/Offi cials!1. Er. K.L. Chaudhary, Executive Engineer, B&R Divisjon, H.p.p.W.D. Sangrah.2. Er. Hari Chand, Asistant Engineer.

3. Er. Rajesh Dhiman, Junior Engineer.

ll. OBSERVATIONST

A) Generalr

This is a pre-stressed concrete bridge constructed and completed about 43years back. The bridge has 3 spans of 58.0 mtr. each with 2 girders and diaphragmsacross the girders. lt has 2 abutments on Renuka side and Dadahu side respectivelyand 2 piers in between the abutments. The overall condition of the bridge is good.However, the following pojnts noticed at site need consideration.

B) Sub Structure :-

{i) Both abutments are resting on hard strata and there is no sign of djstress onboth the abutments.

-

The bed block on Dadahu side needs protection as water is flowing from thesides which may endanger the abutment.Retaining wall/Return wall of Dadahu side needs to be repaired as plasterhas peeled off and if timely repair is not done it may further deteriorate andoamage the structure.

The neoprene bearings (8 layers) have been provided which have not beenrepaired/ replaced since completion of the brjde. The bearing life generajlyis not more than 25 years and needs to be thoroughly examined by theexpert as some deflection is also noticed in the super structure when theheavy vehicles passes over it.

C) Super Structure & Approachesr

(i) The bridge is a single lane with 3.278 mtr. Carriageway and additional 1mfoot path on both sides.

(ii) The appfoaches on both sides are in ascending grade and surface waterfrom approaches is flowing into the bridge. The same is required to bechannelized safety towards the river. Cross drain is requjred to beconstructed on both sides just before the approach slab which should becovered with grating and will help the surface water to drain offthe roadinto the bridge by channelizing the same.

(iii) On Dadahu side, the water from nallah js flowing towards the bridge deckand sides of abutment. This water is hitting the abutment sides ano neeosproper channelization as it may erode the hill and cause damage to theabutment,

(iv) The expans;on joints at all the four locations are damaged and needsreplacement.

(v) R.C.C. railing of the bridge is damaged at few locations and they are alsorequired to be repaired urgently.

(vi) lt was found that water supply pipeline is passing through the bridge betowthe footpath which is leaking and water coming down to the abutment sidesand eroding the hill. The same is required to be rectified immediately.

(vii) The drainage spouts are existing but gratings are missing which are alsorequired to be provided.

(viii) Lot of weeds and grass have grown along the railing and sides of deck slabwhich should be routinely cleared.

(ix) Telephone cable has been laid over the footpath and is covered with C.C. insome portion which is damaged. The same should be repaired.

(x) llectric poles provided on the bridge are requjred to be repaired and parnteo.

-

Paee 2/3

(ii)

(iii)

(ivl

-^\ltu)

(xi) The routine white washing and painting ofthe bridge should be done atleastonce in a Vear.

As such it is recommended to ensure that above points areattended to immediately and it should be ensured that inspection of bridge is

routinely done by the Executive Engineer twice in a year and by Senior Officers(Atleast Superintending Engineerl and mechanical wing once in a year.

No.PW-E'in-c(QC&D)/PA-lnspection Note / 20rj - I 1 3 7- q )

Copy forwarded to the following for information & further necessary

L. TheAdditional Chief Secretary (PW)tothe Government of H.p. Shimta

2. The Engineer-in-Chief H.P.P.W.D. Nirman thawan, Shimla-2.

3. The Chief Engineer (SZ), Nirman Bhawan H.P.P.W.D. Shimla-2.4. The Superintending Engineer 12th Circle H.P.P.W.D. Nahan.

5. The Executive Engineer B&R Division H.P.p.W.D. Sangrah.

-

Page 3 /3

oatea,-'f ) / to)2"12

action:-

eer'in- Chief (QC&D),

D, U.S.Club,Shimla-1.

neer-in- Chief(QC&D),D, U.S.Club,Shimla-1.

INSPECTION REPORT

lnformation provided by Executive Engineer.

1. Nameofwork:- ConstructionoflndoorAuditoriumforCultural Programme at Kullu

(5H: C/O BuildinB portion, RWHS and WS & Sl).

2. Name of circle:. 6th circle H.P,P.W. D.Kullu.

3. Name of Divisionr Kullu Division No.ll, H.P.P.W,D.Kullu,

4. Date of Inspection:- 30-09-2017

5. Name of Inspecting officer:- Er. 8.5 Chauhan.

6. Designation of inspecting Officer- E-in-C{QC&D).

I.

7. a) Awarded Amount:-b) likely work costr-c) Date of Award: -d)Agreement numbefl-

8. Date of starta) Stipulated Date of starti-ul 6rrud, ud(E u, r(d, L.-

9. Stipulated Date of completiona) As per agreementib) Extension granted:-

Rs.7,Oa3O,928/-Rs. 9,00,00,000/'17 -02-2076

Not intimated.

02-03-2016Not intimated.

or-og-2011Up to 31-10-2017 unilaterally by

Executive Engineer Kullu Division No.ll.

10. Accompanying Field Officer/Officials:-

1. Er. Lalit Bhushan, Superentending Engineer,6th Circle, H.P.P.W.D.Kullu.

2. Er. litender Gupta, Executive Engineer, Divlsion No.ll, H.P.P.W.D.Kullu.

3. Er. K.K. Sharma, Assistant Engineer.

4. Er. Kirtiman,lunior Engineer.

PaCe 7/4

11. Scope & Progress of work:- Accommodation details are as under I

Level Covered area in(sqm.)

Detail of Accommodation Progress

99.30 1165.00 Parking for 32 vehicles, green

rooms & space for services andbackup system.

1. Physical progress.(i) RCC frame completed.(ii) Roof in Progress.(iii) Brick Work is 95%

completed.(iv) Plaster is 90% completed.(u) Wood Work frame of door

and window completed.(vi) Shutters are in Progress.(vii) Flooring has not started.

{viii) Plumbing is in Progress.2, Financial Progress.

74% as per awardedamount and 58% as per

likely work cost.

102.50 1815.00 Reception, Lounge, Kitchen,Dining Hall, Pantry, Store,Terrace, Auditorium with 680seats (556 in hall and 124 in

Balcony).

105.70 1375.00 Suites 9 Nos., Sitting Store,Dormitory (9 beds) and Toilets.

108.90 1375.00 Suites 9 Nos., Sitting Store,Dormitory (9 beds) and Toilets.

ll. OBSERVATIONS:-

This is a prestigious building work which is not likely to be completed by the stipirlated

date as lot of work of finishing is left. In fact, Aiditorium roof work is yet to be

completed and then after other finishing work like ceiling which is a typical one

involving construction of catwalks will start. As per the discussion held at site unilateral

extension of time of contract for one month upto 31.10.2017 has been granted which

in my view is not sufficient to complete the work. The Chief Engineer / Superintending

Engineer concerned need to closely monitor the project.

For completing such prestigious work in time a strict contact management system in

conformjty wjth the agreement provision are required to be followed. There seems to

be no working programme which cou d be monitored vis-a- vis the targets fixed. As

such it is advised that a realistic working programme is given by the contractor in

consultation with Employer/Engineer whlch should be resource based so that proper

contract management and target fixed are monitored and achieved. This is allthe more

1

2.

Paee 2/4

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

important as all the drawings of finishing are said to be available and there can be no

reason for anY delaY.

The Superintending Engineer concerned and Executive Engineer intimated that work rs

likely to be deviated. Necessary approval of item and deviation are also requlred to be

expedited.

As per the structural design M-20 grade of concrete mix is being used which in my

opinion should have been of richer grade to economise the structure The design mix

has been got done through Private Agency but has not approved by Employer/Fngineer'

As per design mix the ratio of cement, fine aggregate & coarse aS8regate ls 1:1 98:3 56

by weight with water cement ratio of 0.56

It has been found that field lab. ls not established at site which in my opinion should

have been kept at site to ensure the testing of material at site itself The tests

conducted are at Circle laboratory by sending the samples to the laboratory lt is

advised to establish proper laboratory at site and ensure that tests like workability,

cube strength and physical properties of aggregate are got done at site itself The tests

like workability of concrete cannot be done at a place away from the site as it is going

to give misleading results. The tests conducted at site should be properly documented

and inspecting officers should also exercise a check while on visit to the site

Rain water harvesting is required to be designed properly keeping in view its

requirement as the same is proposed to be used for flushing of toilets.

Sanitary P.V.C. pipes are being used in the toilets instead to C l. pipes, however,

com plete specifications of the same were not available at the site which is required to

be obtained from the office of Architect in Chief and ensure the use of the same as per

speclfication.

8. lt was found that P.V.C. pipes are laid below the soffit without depressing the slab

which will have to be covered with ceiling However, it was noticed that door bends

were not being provided which may cause problern in case of blockage of pipes lt is

recommended to examine this aspect in consultation with Archltect-in Chief

9. The concrete balcony laid in Auditorium is not in proper curvature ltisadvisedto

improve it to conform to the curvature shown in the Architectural Drawing

10. Concrete work at few places is showing honeycombing thereby reflecting on the bad

quaJity of work. lt is recommended to correct such deficiency immediately

I

I

The field officers are advised to ensure the compliance on above points

and follow the quality assurance mechanism properly so that desired quality is obtained.

FPPWD, U.S.Club, Shimla'1.

No.PW-E-in-c(Qc&D)/PA-lnspection Note/2077 - l 1 99 - 21

Copy forwarded to the following for information & further necessary action:

1. The Additional Chief Secretary (PW) tothe Governmentof H,P. Shimla-2.

2. The Engineer-in-Chief H.P.P.W.D. Nirman Bhawan, Shimla-2.

3. The Chief Engineer (MZ), H.P.P.W.D. Mandi.

4. The Superintending Engineer H.P.P.W.D.6'h Circle Kullu.

5. The Executive Engineer, Kullu Division No.ll H.P.P.W.D. Kullu.

Dated.- /y'k/zo2

llPWD, u.s.club, shimla-1.

ineer-in- Chief(QC&D),

Page 4/4

tINSPECTION REPORT


1. Name of work:- 110.00 mtrs. Span Stiffened Suspension Bridge over Chenab river on

link road to village Salpat | & ll at RD 0/345.

2. Date of Inspection: 29-09 2011


4. Designation of inspecting Officen E in C(QC&D).

5. Month and Year ol Completion:. June 2006

Accompanying Field Officer/Officials:- 1. Er. Anup Sharma, Assistant Engineer, Udaipur.

2. Er.Chet Ram, Junior Engineer

tt. OBSERVATIONS:-

A) General:-

(i) This is a single lane carriageway stiffened suspension bridge over river

Chenab {Chandra Bhaga) on link road to village Salpat | & ll.(ii) The bridge is having two abutnlents and four towers on which eight ropes

of 58 mm diameter each have been provided.

(iii) The bridge is designed for IRC class- B loading and accordingly

information board is required to be fixed on both sides specifying the

load limit of plying vehicle.

B) 5ub Structure and Foundationr

(i) The abutments on both sides have been founded on non.scour

consideration having safe bearing capacity of 40.00 Tonne/m'z. No sign ofcracking has been noticed. However, spalling has occurred on Udaipur

side abutment where skin reinforcement is exposed and needsjmmediate repair.

{ii) On Salpat side protection provided to the abutment in the shape of

Babion is damaged which is required to be re done.

Page 7/3

- C) Super Structure:-

{i) The truss of the bridge is riveted whereas suspenders are bolted but it

has been found that painting has not been done since the completion of

the bridge. As a result, rusting has been noticed at a few places The

greasing of rollers and ropes are also required'

(ii) The bridge is required to be inspected by Mechanical wing atleast once In

a year and submit their inspection report with regard to bridge member

connection, anchorage systems and any other aspect requiring attention

of field functionarie ,

(iii) lt has been noticed that there is no proper drainage spout which could

facilitate the easy drain out of water from the deck This needs to be

Provided(iv) Water from approaches is draining into the bridge deck frorn both sides

On Udiapur side approach level can be lowered thereby preventing the

water drainage into the deck However, on Salpat side approach cannot

be lowered as road is in upgrade As such best way is to drain oLlt the

approach water through drain pipe of proper size so that water gushrng

into the deck is diverted.

(v) The expansion ioints between approach and deck are totally dama8ed

and need to be fixed.

(vi) Decking of M S. trough plate has been provided over which bituminous

premix has been provided which is damaged at few places and needs

immediate attention.

(vii) The spalling of concrete is taking place in towers at few locations which

need immediate attentlon

(viii) Greasing and painting of rollerl, anchoring system and ropes are required

' as same has not been done since the completion ofthe bridge

D) Anchorage Galleryi

(i) Anchorage gallery needs extra attention as it has been found that

openings in the gallery have been left open without providing grills and

thereby enhancing the chances of likely damage/sabotage of the

anchoring system of roPes.

Even opening provided for gate in inspection gallery on Udaipur side has

been left open which need to be closed immediately by providing suitable

gate.

Open holes has been left in the masonry of gallery on Udaipur side

probably for raising scaffolding during construction which has been left

PaCe 2 /3

(ii)

(iii)

------------7

@

lluncovered. They need to be plugged as they may further endanger thega ery structure.

(ivl The openjngs in the gallery are required to be protected by providing irongrills so that safety ofanchorage system is ensured.(vl There js lot of weeds and grass in and outside the gallery which arerequired to be cleared and gallery to be kept neat and clean.(vi) Ropes, roller and anchorage system needs to be painted and greased assame has not been done since the completion ofthe bridge.(vii) Mechanjcal wing of H.p.p.W.D. to check the whole anchor-age systematleast once in a year and submit report accordingly.

E) Approach:-

(i) R.C.C. parapets in the approaches are damaged badly whjch also need tobe repaired.

No.pW,E-in-C(eC&D)/pA_tnspection Note/ 2OLt-l &- f< ^66 Daledrd64/D,

As such it is recommended to ensure that above points are attendedto immediately and it should be ensured that inspection of bridge is routinely aone ly tt eExecutive Engineer twice in a year and by Senior Officers (Atleast SuperintendingEntineef) and mechanical wing once in a vear.

Endineer-in- Chief (eC&D),HPPWD, U.S.Ctu b,Sh im ta_1.

Copy forwarded to the following for jnformal|on & fu rther necessary action:1.

2.

3.

4.

5. The €xecutive Engineer Division pn+E+ H.p.p.W.D. CaE€t U_;h)4 .

The Additional Chief Secretary (pW) to the covernment of H.p. ShjmlaThe tngineer-in-Chief H.p.p.W.D. Nirman Bhawan, Shimla 2.The chief Engineer fgH.p.p.W.D. kr€€r+arffi. XaJi -The Superinrending Engjneer H.p.p.W. D. f Circte *a+EE+e. kt^0{r^

Z-EnXineer-in- Ch ief (eC& D),

KPWD, U.s.Club,shimla 1.

@I

INSPECTION REPORT


1. Name of work:- 87.00 mtrs. Span stiffened suspension Bridge over river Chenab(chandra Bhaga)on Alwas Killer road km 65/550 (shukrali Bridge)

2a'09-2017


4. Designation of inspecting Officer:- E-in-C(QC&D).

5. Month and Year of Completion:- October 2008

Accompanying Field Officer/officials:-1. Er. DeviSingh Chauhan, Executive Engineet Pangi Division, Distt., Chamba

2. Er. Mohinder, Asistant Engineer, Pangi Divlsion, Distt., Chamba

ll. OBSERVATIONS:-

2. Date of lnspection:-

A) Generalr

(i) This is a stiffened suspension bridge on river Chenab (Chandra Bhaga) and is

the only connection between Killar and chamba from Chamba side

(iii The bridge is designed for IRC class B loading and accordingly information

board is required to be fixed on both sides specifying the load limjt of plying

vehicles over the bridge.

B) sub structure and Foundationi.

(i) Abutments of the bridge are intact and there is no sign of spalling or cracks

in the concreie. However, general maintenance like cutting of bushes and

clearing of weeds etc. is required to be done atleast twice ln a year before

the monsoon and after the monsoon which at present is not being done.

There is a pit in front of Killar side abutment where rain water accumulates.

Page 1/3

This pit needs to be filled so that water is drained into the river and no

erosion/percolation of water takes place in front of the abutment.

{ii) The Abutments are founded on non-scour consideration with Safe Bearinp

Capacity at founding level of40 tonne/m'?.

C) Super Structure:

(il

(ii)

(iiil

(iv)

(v)

(vi)

(vii)

Both towers are also intact and no sign of cracks on spalling noticed in theconcrete.

The truss ofthe brldge is riveted whereas suspenders are bolted. Steeltruss

and ropes has not been painted since the completion ofthe bridge and as

such the same is required to be painted with two coats of paint to prevent

rusting of steel and ensure the durability of the bridge.

Suspenders, ropes, wheel gaurd also needs to be painted to prevent thecorrosion of these members.

The soffit of the bridge also needs to be painted as erosion of memberhave started.

Some suspenders have started loosening and are not in vertical position.

This needs to be attended to immediately as it may endanger the safety ofthe bridge. Mechanical team need to visit site and carrv out necessary

repair immediately. Nuts, bolts and clamps also need to be checked

periodically by the mechanical wing. lt is recommended that Mechanical

wing should inspect such bridges atleast once in a year and issue thenecessary report accordingly.

Greasing of rollers and ropes, it seems have not been done since thecompletion of the bridge. As such it should be done immediately and should

form part ofthe routine inspectidn done dufingthe year.

The bridge decking is of M.S. trough plates over which wearing coat ofbituminous premix has been provided which is totally damaged. At some

places the trough plates also seem to have loosened their grip from thestiuctura members below the decking. The kerb is also damaged and need

to be repaired and re-fixed. One of the reasons for damaged wearing seems

to be the absence of proper drainage spout which is not allowing the freedrainage of water. These deficiencies need to be attended to immediatelv.

D)Anchorage Gallery:-

(i) The anchorage galleries are not at all maintained properlV as bushes andgrass have grown inside it and it seems that painting and greasing of ropes

and clamps have not been done. The galleries needs to be cleared of these

Page 2 /3

grass and bushes and the anchorage system rechecked and properlyr.a:<a.l rn.l n r i^ra.l

Anchorage gallery masonry work is damaged at few places which require

repair.

As such it is recommended to ensure that above points are

attended to immediately and it should be ensured that inspection of bridge is routinely

done by the Executive Engineer twice in a year and by Senior Officers (Atleast

Superintending Engineer) and mechanical wing once in a year.

chief (Qc&D),

U.S.Club,Shimla-1.

tii)

er-ln-a/IC qMe

HP PWD,

No.PW-E-in-c(QC&DJlPA-lnspection Note/2017 | SYV{{ o^r"a, a'{,)Sf l7

Copy forwarded to the following for information & further necessary action I

1. The Additional Chief Secretary (PW)tothe Government of H.P. Shimla

2. The tngineer-in.Chiqf,!.P.P.W.D. Nirman Bhawan. Shimla-2.

3. Ihe Chref Lngineer 14fi, H.n.c.w.o. uaodr. Ka'grr,a4. the Superintending Engineer H.P.P.W.D.f'h CirctJ t#.ffia.*r5. The Fxecutive tngineer H.P.P.W.D. €A€si5 +r.#€y Divi(ion, VbiW. Va'vylr

HPPWD, U.S.Club,Shimla-1.t*

Page 3/3

lINSPECTION REPORT

l, Information provided by Executive Engineer.

1. Nameofwork:- Construction of 108.00 mtrs. Span Bridge PSC (75 mtr clear span) atBalvo over river Ravi (Single span) connecting NH with 5H No.33 (MDR)(Under C.R.F.)

2. Name of Circlei-

3. Name of Divisionr


7rh Circle H.P.P.W.D. Dalhousie(Chamba).

Dalhousie Division H,P.P.W.D. Dalhousie(Chamba).

27 -09-2077

5. Name of Inspecting officer:. Er. B.S Chauhan.


7. a)Awarded Amount:- Rs. L:.,46,75,OOO1,

blDate ofAward: - 06-12-201,6c)Agreementnumber:- Notintimated.

8. Date of starta) Stipulated Date of start:- 27-72-2076b) Actual date of start:- Not intimated.

9. Stipulated Date of completion :-

a) As per agreementr 20-1,2-2019

10. Scope & Prodress of work:-

S. No. Scope of Work Up to date progress

1. Single Span PSC cantilever double lane Bridge. 1, Physical Progress

{i) Al abutment (NH side) is

completed.

(ii) 42 (Sarol side) is raised

upto 915.00m (required

to be raised upto

917.20m).

2, Financial Progress = 48%

11. Accompanying Field officer/Officials:- -';

1. Er. B.S.Baswal, Superintending Engineer, Trh circle Dalhousie, Chamba

2. Er. leet Thakur, Executive Engineer, HP PWD Dalhousie, Chamba

3. Er.Meet Kumar, Assistant Engineer.

4. Er. Chander Mohan,.Junior Engineer.

5. 5h. Ravinder Thakur, Project Manager.

6. Sh. Amit 5ingh, Site Engineer'

ll. OBSERVATIONST

1. lt is a single span cantilever bridge with a central hinge and concrete grade of

M35 for sub structure and M4O for super structure is being used For approach

slab M 30 grade of concrete is being used

2. Both side abutments have been founded on scour consideration with safe

bearing capacity at founding level for Parel side (NH side) abutment i e Al

abutment as 44 Tonnes/m'?. The founding level for this abutment as per

information made available is 900 mtrs TheA2abutmentie Sarol sideissaidto

be founded at R.L. 898 and safe bearing capacity has been adopted as

42 tOnnes/m_,

3. 12 T 13 cables are being used at site. lt is advised that test report of cable as per

lS:14268 mav be obtalned before using the same.

4. Fe 5OO grade of steel conforming to 1511786 has been approved for use as per

structural drawinSs. lt is also recommended to obtain the test report of steel as

oer reouirement of 1St1786.

5. The concrete rnix design has been got done through private agency which is

required to be approved by Employer/Engineer' lt is recommended that design is

revised in case source of material is changed or there is appreciable change in

the properties of aSSregate being used.

6. The field laboratory has been established at site where tests like workability of

concrete and cube strength test are being performed lt is recommended to

document these tests properly and ensure that regular tests are performed as

Per requirement of agreement-

7. There is a tendency of flow of river diverting towards Sarol side and as such may

damage the abutment and approach on this side. lt is recommended that proper

guide bunds are constructed to prevent the possible damage to the abutment.

8. The approach on both side needs to be designed properly to the desired

curvature as roads on both sides are at right anSle to the bridge alignment

9. Proper contract management is required and resource based work schedule

should be obtained from contractor and monitored accordingly so that work is

accomplished within the stipulated date

@

The field officers are advised

follow the quality assurance

obtained.

to ensure the compliance on above points and

mechanism properly so that desired quality is

No.pw-E-in-c(QC&D)/PA-lnspection Nore/2017 -l I I7-A I Dated _lo) t6)A")7

copv forwarded to the following for information & further necessary action:-

1. The Additional Chief Secreta.y (PW) to the Government of H P. shimla

2. The Engineer-in-Chief H.P.P.W.D. Nirman Bhawan, Shimla-2

3. The Chief Engineer (KZ), H.P.P.W.D. Dharamshala

4. The superintending Engineer H.P.P.W.D 7tF circle Dalhousie, chamba

5, The Executive Engineer HP.PWD Dalhousie, Chamba.

neer-in- Chief {QC&D),

eer-in- Chief(QC&D),D, U.s.Club,Shimla-1.

PaEe 3/3

? INSPECTION REPORT


1. Name of work:- Construction of 120.00 mtrs. Span Pre-stressed Cantilever (Both

sides) Double lane Bridge across Neugal Khad on D/shala Dadh

Palampur Holta Chadhiar Sandhol road at km 271030 on s H -17

Palampur (Under C.R.F.)

2. Name of Circle:-

3. Name of Divisionr


5th Circle H.P.P.w.D. Palampur.

B&R Division, H,P.P.W.D. Palampur.

26-09-20!7

5. Name of Inspecting officer:- Er. LS Chauhan.

6. Designation of inspecting Officen- E-in-C(QC&D).

7. a)Awarded Amountr- Rs. 8,25,00,000/-blDate ofAward: - 2a-O3-20L6

c)Agreement number:- 239 for 2015-16

8. Name of Contractor: Sh. Vijay Kumar Sharma

9. Date of starta) Stipulated Date of start:- 17-04-2oIFb) Actual date of starti 71-04-2016

10. Stipulated Date of completion :-

a) As per agreement:- 11-10-2016

b) Extension granted:- upto 31-03-2018

11. AccompanyingFieldOfficer/Officials:-

1. Er. D.R. sashani, Superintending Engineer,5th Circle, H P.P.W D Palampur.

2. Er. Vikas Sood, Executive Engineer, B&R Division, H P.P W.D Palampur.

3. Er.Manoj Sood, Junior Engineer.

4. Er. Rajesh, Representative of Contractor.

5. Er. Sashi Thakur, Representative of Contractor'

Page 1/3

scope of Work

Span arrantement:3 span (40.00 mtrs.)

C/C=120.00 mtrs.

No. of Abutmentsr 2 Nos.

No. of Piers:2 Nos.

Detail of Box girderi P.S.C. Box girder

(Double Lane) with 18 main pre-stressing

cables 10 in web + 4 in soffit + 4 in bluster

block and 2 dummy cable.

5. Specification of main cable: 12 T 13

6. Dummycable:7T13

i]. Scope & Progress of work:-

1.

2.

4.

Up to date progress

Physical Progress

1. Abutment 42 towards Dharamshara

(Dadh)side completed up to level

1018.05 (up to bearing level).

2. Piet P2 Dadh side completed up to

1018.05 level (up to bearing levelJ

3. First span between 42 & P2 comoleted

with 1'I stage stressing.

4. Pier P1 Palampur side is completed up to

1016.85 (bottom of pier cap).

5. Abutment 41 Palampur side - excavation

of pit in progress.

Financial Progress = 51.53%

. oBSERVATIONS:-

The piers & abutment are founded on scour consideration with safe bearing

capacity at founding level for A1 as 47.5 Tonnesfm2,lot A2 as 62 Tonnes/m'?,

for P1 as 52 Tonnes/m':and for P2 as 70 Tonnes/m'?. lt is advisable to ensure

the attaining of safe bearing capacity before laying of concrete for abutment

and pier which are yet to be started..

Cables used should conform to lS: i4268 and it is necessary to obtain a test

ceitificate to ensure that cables comply with the specification requirements.

The mix design being used as per structural design is M30 grade for sub

structure and M40 grade for super structure. The mix desiSn has been got

done from private agency which is required to be approved by

Em p loyer/ E ngineer.

As per the mix design shown at site the ratio for M30 grade is 1:1.81:3.28 by

weight for cement, fine aggregate & coarse aggregate with water cement

ratio of 0.41. The quantity of cement per m3 as per design is 376k8. Similarly,

for M40 grade the ratio of cement, fine aggregate and coarse aggregate is

1:!.4412.72 wlth waler cement ratio of 0.35 and cement to be used @

477.2kg/mr. The mixes of these proportion are required to be checked

independently in Circle Laboratory to ensure its authenticity.

5. Though the laboratory has been established at site the required tests need toh6.l^."manra.l ^r^narh/

Page 2/3

@)

9.

1.

6. It should also be ensured that mix design is revised in case there is change inthe source and quality of aggregates. Being rich mix special care is required tobe taken to ensure that proper water cement ratio which is a major factor forcontributing to durability of concrete is maintained and regular cube testingis done to ensure the quality. The quality assurance mechanism should bemade effective and for this the senior officers of the department should alsooversee that regular tests are being conducted and workmanship is ensured.The work has been delayed and only 51.53% of financial progress has beenachieved even after 1 year of stipulated date of completion. The reasonputforth by the field officers for delay is involvement of excessive dewaterinsin the foundation.

With the present place of work it seems that work can be completed in theextended tlme only if proper monitoring is done bV senior officers.It is suggested that a resource based working programme is obtained fromthe contractor and same is monitored effectivelV to ensuae the timelvcompletion of the work.

The field officers are advised to ensure the compliance on above pointsand follow the quality assurance mechanism properly so that desired quality is obtained.

8.

No. pw- E-in-c(ec&D)/pA- Inspection Note/2or7 - 1119 - J/ t"l)")2"17

ineer-in- Chief (QC&D),

HPPWD, U.S.Club, Shimla-1,

Dated:

Copy forwarded to the following for information & further necessary action I

1. TheAdditional Chief Secretary {pW) tothe Government of H.p. Shimla-2.2. The Engineer-in-Chief H.P.P.W.D. Nirman Bhawan, Shimla-2.3. The Chief Engineer (kZ), H.p.p.W.D. Dharamshala.4. The Superintending Engineer H.p.p.W.D.5th Circle palampur.

5. The Executive Engineer, B&R Division H.p.p.W.D. palampur.

neerin- Chief(QC&D),WD, U.S.Club, Shimla-1.

@

INSPECTION REPORT

l. Information provided by Executive Engineer

1. Name of work:- Construction of Balance work of link road to village liskoon km 0/0 to

8/O under PMGSY, Tehsil Dodra Kawar, District Shimla (H P )Package

No. HP-09-116

2. Date of lnspection:-

3. Name of Inspecting officerr-

4. Designation of inspecting Officer:-

5. a)Awarded Amount:-b) Date of Awardl -

c)Agreement number:-

6. Name of Contractor:

7. Date of starta) Stipulated Date of start:-b) Actual date of start:-

8. Stipulated Date of comPletion:-a) As per agreement:-b) Extension grantedl

c) Likely date ofcomPletionr-

Scope of work:-

5r. No. Items

27-O9-2071

Er. B.5 chauhan

E in'C(Qc&D)

273.84lacs30-10-2014Not intimated

Sh. Vijay Singh Thakur

L4-17-201476-r1-2014

09-11-2015upto 09 11-2016

Not intimated

Formation cutting in km 4/300 to 7/015 is an

progress. D'etail mentioned below:-

Targeted

Quantity

Achieved

1.

2.

3.

Formation Cutting

CD Hume Pipe CLllverts

Soling

In progress in 2.7 km3.7 km

35 No.

2.7 km

I L___Accompanying Field Officer/Officials:- 1. Er. M L.Sharma, Executive Engineer

2. Er. Dashminder Pal, Assistant Engineer

3. Er. Dixit Kumar, Junior Engineer

4. Sh. Pankai Thakur, Representative of Contractor

Page 1/3

1km

35 No.

2.7 km

. OBSERVATIONS:-

This is very old PMGSY sanctioned road. The work was sanctioned in 2006-07 under

package number HP-09 116. The work was awarded to the Contractor but the

agreement was closed as forest clearance under FCA 1980 & gift deeds from private

land owners for transfer of land to HP.PWD was not obtained.

In the earlier tender, formation cutting was completed in first 4.3 km.

The tender for the balance work was awarded to the Contractor on 3O-10,2014 &

some work of formation cutting in portion 4/300 to 7/015 km has been done.

However, as per the present position the work is completely held up at site.

During the interaction with the representative of Contractor & Assistant Engineer

Kawar, it revealed that there is a dispute between the Contractor and the Department.

As per the version ofthe Contractor following are the reasons for his inability to

continue with the work:-

a) Non release of the payment by the Department for the work done.

b) Non availability of blasting material.

cJ Non availability of private land beyond 7/105 km.

As per the version of the Department the payment could not be released to the

Contractor as he has not followed the alignment given by the Department as a result

of which excessive steep gradient has resulted immediately beyond 4/300 km.

Regarding non availability of blasting material the version of the Department was that

the same is being provided to the Contractor at the store as per agreement.

r.

4

2.

3.

5. As such there is a dispute which needs to be settled immediately as such old

sanctioned project cannot be continued to be halted for such a lonS time. Not only

this, the extension of this road beyond 8/00 km has been sanctioned in Package No.

HP 09 117 under the name, 'Jiskoon to lakha road' which also is awarded to the same

Contractor on 22-08-2017. This is also a tender awarded for balance work as earlier

agreement was closed due to non-availability of land. This Package No. HP-09 117

cannot be started till the Package No. HP-09-116 is completed atleast for formation

cutting. As such, resolving the dispute of Package No. HP-09-116 becomes all the more

important. As per site condition, the grade is required to be improved beyond 4/300

P aee 2/3

-

,-i)U,

km which can easily be done. The cutting work done beyond 4/3OO km is badly

damaged which is also required to be restored. There is a village above this proposed

road, below which sliding is taking place where Breast Walls along the road of proper

design need to be constructed to prevent further sliding and damage to the road.

As such Chief Engineer (Shimla Zone) may start immediate effort in resolving the

issues so that work can be carried out at site and finished in some fixed time frame.

No.PW-E-in-c(ec&D)/pA-tnspection Note/2orj -l 7 ga-gll DatedJ7'laT/&t7 ,

Copy forwarded to the following for lnformation & further

L. The Chief Engineer (SZ) Nirman Bhawan Shimla.

2. The Superintending Engineer 14th Circle Rohru H.p.

3. The Executive Engineer (B&R) Division Dodra Kawar

necessary action:

P.W.D. Rohru.

H.P.P.W.D. Rohru.

Z#;-*.6;Iq.&,r,IPfWD,

U.S.Cl u b,shimta-1.

-

Page 3/3

,c\gineerin- Chief (eC&D),

WPWD, U.S.club,Sh jmla-1.

t. lnformation provided

1. Name of work:-

2. Date of Inspedion:-

3. Name of InsPecting officer:-

4. Designation of inspecting Officeri

5. a)Awarded Amount:-b) Date of Award: -

c)Agreement number:-

6. Date of starta) Stipulated Date of start:-

b) Actual date of start:-

7. Stipulated Date of completion l-

a) As Per agreement:-

Scope & Progress of work:-

INSPECTION REPORT

by Executive Engineer.

Constructign of 55 00 metre span Box girder

Double lane bridge over Rai Khad including both

side approaches on Rampur Gaura lvlashnoo

Sarahan leori road at RD 52/095 in Tehsil

Rampur Distt Shimla Himachal Pradesh under

CRF (Job NO CRF-HP-201s-1684)

76-09-2071

Er, B.s Chauhan.

E-in-C(QC&D).

750.001acs

04-11-2015Not intimated

19-11-2016

06-02-20I'7

18-11-2018

Sr. No.

l-

scope of Work i Up to date Progress

Two span Bridge:-

i) 55.00 mtrs SPan PSC Box

girder.

ii) 28.50 mtrs. RCC Box

Sirder'

i) Sarahan side abudment

and pier comPleted,

ii) Jeori side abutment is an

progress

iii) Protection wallin front

of leori side abutment is

in progress.

Page 7 /3

5

Accompanyrng frelo Officer/Officials;- 1.Er. K.K. Kaushal, Executive Engineer

2.Er. K,L.5uman, Assistant Engineer

3.Er. Rakesh Kumar, Junior Engineeer

oBSERVATIONS:-

1.) lt was intirnated by Executive Engineer that Sarahan side abutment has been

founded on non-scour consideration with safe bearing capacity of 45 tonnes/nn'z

The leori side abutment ls also being founded on non-scour consideration with

safe bearing capacity of 20 tonnes/m'z. Since, the leori sid e abutment had just

started it is necessary that bearing capacity is ensured at founding level. The pier

which ls complete has been founded on scour consideration.

2.) The pier is prone to damage due to failing/flowing boulders of nalla whlch has

steep slope. As such, it is advised to get the pier protected by getting it jacketed.

3.) On Jeori side there is likelihood of hill slide just adjoining to the abutment and as

such protection of hill as advised at site is required to safeguard the protection

wall being provided ln front ofthe abutment.

4.) The desi8n for sub structure was available which provide concrete mix of M30

grade. The mix design has been got done fron'r private laboratory which ls

required to be approved by the Employer/Engineer.

5.) The structLrre design of super structure is required to be finalised in time.

6.) No Quality Control laboratory was available at site and as such no test could be

conducted at site. The tests of material are being done from Circle laboratory. Lt

is advised that proper Quality Assurance mechanism is pul in place which wlll

include setting up of field laboratory and carrying out regular tests at site. The

tests like workability of concrete, Cement Concrete cube, etc., should be

conducted at site and properly entered in a Quality Control register. The

frequency ofthe tests is also required to be ensured. Only those tests whlch

require high quality equipnrents whlch are difficult to setup at site should be got

done from NABL accredited laboratory or Government laboratories. lt should

also be ensured that rnix design is revised in case there is change in source and

quality of material based on which mix desiSn was evolved. As such, it ls

Page 2 /3

t:imperative that proper Quality management system for such

put in place.

important project is

-neer-in- Chief (QC&D),

HPPWD, U.S.Club,Shimla-1.A*

No.PW-E-in-c(Qc&D)/PA-lnspection N ote/ 2017 - l7// - l5l

Copy forwarded to the following for information & further necessary

1. The Chief Engineer (52) Nirman Bhawan Shimla.

oatea- 2"1"f lt"l 2acI|0n:-

2. The Superintending Engineer 11th Circle Rampur H.P.P.W.D. Rampur.

3. The Executive Engineer(B&R) Division Rampur H.P.P.W.D. Rampur.

"/ (JHgineer-in- Chief (QC&DJ,

HPPWD, U.S.Club,Shimla-1.

Page 3 /3

1

); INSPECTION REPORT

l. Information provided by Executive Engineer H.P.P.W.D. Shillai throughAssistant Engineer Kamrau.

1. Nameofworkr- lmprovementand M/Tof linkroad from Mashuto Kando Km 0/0 to 3/600 under NABARD.

2. Date of Inspectionr- 70-09-2077



5. a) Awarded Amountr- Rs.I,56,38,722b) Date ofAward: - 31-05-2017c) Agreement numberi- Not intimated

6. Date of starta) Stipulated Date of start:- 15-06-207-7b) Actual date of start:- Not intimated.

7. Stipulated Date ofcompletion :-

a) As per agreement:-

Scope & Progress of work

14-06-2019

ess ot wo5r.No. Content Scope as per DPR Physical Progress as on

70.7 .2017 .

1 Removalofformationdeficiencies

al lmprovement of curves 1090 mtrs various RDs 900 mtrs

c/o R/Wall 180 Mtrs various RDs

c) C/o Breast walls 135 Mtrs various RDs

d) C/o edge works 1080 Mtrs various RDs

2 C/o left out CD works 5 Nos 2 Nos

3 P/L G-rl 3.50Km

4 P/L G Il 3.50 Km

5 C/O C.C Pavement 100Mtrs

6 P/L Premix carpet 3.50 Km

7 (/u v-5nape orarn 3.60 Km

I C/O essential parapets 4A% of 3.6 Km

@

'Accompanying Field offi c e r/ Officia ls:

.

1. Er. K.K.Khosla, Assistant Engineer

2. Er. Ram BhajTomar, Junior Engineer

3. Er. Gulab Singh Tomar, Junior Engineer

4.5h. Dayal chauhan, contractor

OBSERVATIONS:-

1) The work has been started by the contractor and two excavators/loaders are worklng

at site.

2) Some work of improvement offormation deficiencies has been cornpleted cD work

is also in Progress.

3) lt was found that road needs grade improvement from RD 1/150 to 1/400 which can

easily be done as road is in downgrade on one side and upgrade on the other side'

4) The turning point at RD O/0 where it meets the main road is requlred to be improved

5) The portion where cutting is being done require provision of protection walls at some

locations which is requlred to De provided to protect the road from damage

6) A layer of sub-base laid many years back is almost damaged in most of the portions

which requires relaYlng

7) lt was informed by the Assistant Engineer that there is enough saving in the

sanctionedcostWhichcanbeusedforcarryingoutadditionaIwork,ifrequiredats|te'8) lt is advised that proper Quality Assurance mechanjsm is put in place which at

present i5 not there

9) Supervising staff needs to ensure the timely and regular inspection and monitoring of

work so that work is completed in time bound manner'

10) There is a sliding portion in a long reach beyond RD 1/600 which needs proper

protection by planting shrubs above the proposed breast wall for which services of

Horticulture wing of Public Work Department be utilized'

ol/ PWD, U.S.Club, Shimla 1

i;eer in-chief(QC&D),

No.pw-E-in-c(Qc&D)/pA Inspection Note/2017- lg gf- s 1 o""o' i fl aJ J

t ;Copy forwarded to the following for information & further necessary action I

1. The chief Engineer (sZ) Nirman Bhawan Shimla

2. The Superintending Engineer 12th Circle Nahan H P P W D Nahan

3. The Executive Engineer(B&R) Division Shillai H P'P W D Shillai

a/' gineer-in-chief (QC&D),

ffWD, U 5.club, Shimta-r'

Page 212

0eII INSPECTION REPORTlf


1. Name of Project: Re- Construction of Bata Bridge at Km 96/600 onNH-72 in the State of Himachal Pradesh.

2. Date of inspectionr- L0-09-20I7



5. a)Awarded Amount:- 74.42 ctorcb) Date of Award: - E. E Solan letter No. 12832,43 dated 19.1.2015c)Agreement numberi Not intimated

6. Name of Agency: 5h. V.P. Sharma

7. Date of starta) Stipulated Date of start:- Not intimated.b) Actual date of start:- Not intimated.

8. Stipulated Date ofcompletion :-

a) As per agreementi 02-02-2017b) Extension granted:- upto 31-01-2018c) Likely date of completion:- 37-12-20Ia

9. Scope of Work:- The physjcal progress of 35% as on 31.08.2017Detail mentioned below :,

Description Totel depth/ Height meters Casting inmeters

sinkingin

meters

Remarks

22.00(20.25+1.7s wel cap) 14.8d 13.50

22.OA\20.25 +1.7 5 w e I capl 22.0O 22.O4 Abutmeft completed

17.50(15.75+1.7s well cap) 14.50

Ni Ntl Ni Work not siarted due todiverslon of flow of water

Pler P-3 17.s0(15.75+1.75 wel cap) 15.75 15.00

17.50(15.75+1.75 well cap) 17.50 17.50 Plef shaft and p er cap

Pier P.5 17 50(15.75+1.75 weil cap) Ll.50 17 50 Piershaft and pier cap

Shutlering for slab between abutment A2 and Pler P-5 has been comp eted.

Page 1/2

-------------7

Accompanying Field Officer/Officials:- 1. Er. V.K, Aggarwal, Executive Engineer

W 2. Er. NirmalSingh, Assistant Engineer

3. Er. Dalip 5ingh, Junior Engineer

4. Sh. Deepak Garg, Representative of Contractor

ll. OBSERVATIONS:-

1) lt is a six span PsC girder bridge having total span of 174.30 meters.

2) The work has been delayed as the stipulated date ofcompletion of work was 02-02-

2017. There has been some delay due to some land dispute at site which is said tobe resolved now.

3) Extension is said to be granted up to 31-01-2018, but with the present pace ofwork,it seems unlikely that work will be completed by this date.

4) The work on Pier P-2 has not at all been started so far.

5) The shuttering work for super structure between Abutment A-2 and Pier P-5 has

been started.

6) As per the version of Executive Engineer complete structure design is available.

7) The material testing lab is available at site and tests are being performed at site.

8) The mix design has been got done from StrLrcture Engineering Group Department ofCivil Engineering ltT Roorkee on 29-07-2015 for M30, M35, M40 grade of concrete.

9) lt is suggested that project be monitored closely both with respect to program and

quality as per provision of the coniractor so that it is completed at the earliestpossible.

10)Contractor is supposed to submit the realistic working programme mentioning the

gineer-in- Chief (QC&D),

H.PPWD, U.S.Club,Shimla-1.

No.PW-E-in-C{QC&D)/PA-rnspection Note/2017,- )saz - e4 o"t"a'- 1g.foJ1r{ ^

Copy forwardad to the following for information & further necessary action:-

1. The Chief Engineer (NH) H.P.P.W.D Shimla'1.

2. The Superintending Engineer (NH)H,P.P.W.D, Shimla-4.

3. The Executive Engineer(NH) Division Nahan H.P.P.W.D. Nahan.

el1''

lneer-in- Chief (QC& D),

PWD, U.S.Club,Shimla-1.

PaEe 2/2

IIINSPECTION REPORT

Information provided by Executive Engineer.1. Name of work:- Construction of N ew OpD b lock at IGMC, Shimla.

05-09-2017

Er.8.5 Chauhan.

t.

2. Date of Inspectjon:-

3. Name of Inspecting officer:-

4. Designationof jnspectingOfficer:_ E_in-C(eC&Di.

5. a)Awarded Amount:-b) Date ofAward: -c)Agreement number:-

6. Date of starta) Stipulated Date of start:-b) Actual date of start:_

7. Stipulated Date ofcompletion ia) As per agreement:-b) Extension granted:-c) Likely date of completjon:-


Accompanying Field Officer/Officials:

Rs. 2s,57,85,804/-18-03,2015879 fot 2074-75

Not intimated.Not intimated.

09-04-207737-12-207730-06,2018

1.Er. Sanjay Gupta, Executive Engineer.2.Fr. Paresh Chauhan, Assistant Engineer.3.Fr. Chavinder Shandil, Junior Engineer.

Scope of Work

13 story building + lift block, havingtotalfloor area 17107.60 sqm.

Up to date progress

1. RCC Frame work of lift block

,compteted.2. RCC Frame work of main block85% completed.

3. Masonry and plastering work inprogress.

7)

2)

3)

s)

1)

4)

OBSERVATIONS:-

It has been found that the Quality control test of material are being done through

private empanelled labs but adequate Quality management system is not in place at

site.

For such project, material testing lab js required to be established at site so that

routine tests like gradation of aggregate, physical properties of material, workability

of concrete and compressive strength of concrete and other material are conducted

regularly at site. Only those tests which require high qualjty of equipments can be

outsourced to the NABL accredited empanelled lab houses.

Not only the routine tests, as mentioned above, are required to be conducted but a

record of such tests in Quality control register has to be maintained and duly

authenticated routinely by the supervising staff during their inspection.

Though the concrete mix design for M25 mix have been got done through private

agency but the mix design is not approved by the employer/engineer as per the

codal provision.

For achieving the above objective, it is essential that suitable Quality assurance

mechanism is put in place which can be done by establishing a material testing lab

at site, performing requisite number of tests, having record of such tests in Quality

control register and making the supervisioh effective.

Since the building is coming up on steep site slope, proper arrangement for drainage

of surface runoff and rainwater from the roof is required to be put in place.

It is advisable to provide properly designed rain water harvesting system which can

caterto some ofthe needs ofthe hospital.

The concrete finishing particularly in ramp area is required to be improved.

Executive Engineer was asked to send the sample of material to the Central Material

Testlng Laboratory for testing which has been received vide letter No.PW-MCSD-I-

New OPD/2017-891 Dated 06.09.2017. fhe test results are attached annexed-'A'

except for compressive strength of concrete which will be sent after 28 days.

8)

e)

Paee 2 /3

@

10) The materialtested in lab as mentioned above is within acceptable limit,

the suggestion given above are required to be put in place and followed

not only Quality control but also proper Quality assurance mechanism in

projects.

to ensure

SUCn

'ltt-

No.PW-E-in-C(Qc&D)/PAlnspection Note/ zott-l I {3 -t{

Copy forwarded to the following for information & further necessary action:

1. The Chief Engineer (SZ) Nirman Bhawan Shimla.

2. The Superintending Engineer 4th Circle H.P.P.W.D. Shimla-3.

3. The Executive Engineer(B&R) Division No. lll H.P.P.W.D. Shimla

Datedr I t Iog12417/

nglneer-in- Chief {QC&D),HPPWD, U.S.Club,Shimla-1.

Ertgineerin- Chief(Qc&D),

Pa9e 3 /3

:<="6=; -E F'=i I 'clEEE?:8!3

T-

Ir;JP.9

:c.Fr:

s

c

:.=gF

J.= E

19 .::

El ,iE>

21<E

tr

a.

c.

Ec

.:EE

.G>?iljj+

i;z -- .= ";iF; f A

44= Q -:<^-> = 1..2 l-. - i, =C_;.L c_d-

; &. < -6-o+.'\ I -., Y

r'<l- -2 >J)';r < trv:'r- Jar ,!au

J' 7a 3,= 2

.,, : -:

.1 ;' Z

=

t!

z

.d .o .c!9E;6e

J

l;-

Z

ia ,.) t4V :!n t

E3

atr6Z

2.=(r-

J

:?' ,

t. Hformation provided by Executive Engineer.

].

2.

3.

4.

5.

7. Stipulated Date of completion: - 18 months (date not intimated)

scope & Progress of work:-

Up to date progress

state library building at race view near vidhan sabha Shimla-4(C/a

development, Ws & Sl and rain harvesting tank)

05-09-2077

Er. B.S Chauhan.

E-in-C(Qc&D).

Rs.6,51,51,910

06-07-2077477of 2015-76

Not intimated.06-or-20L7

INSPECTION REPORT

6.

Name ofwork:- c/obuilding portion , site

Date of Inspection:-

Name of lnspecting officeri

Designation of inspecting Officer:-

a) Awarded Amount:-b) Date of Award: -

c)Agreement numberl-

Date of starta) Stipulated Date of start: -

b) Actual date of start:-

Accompanying Field officer/officials! I Er. Sanjay Gupta,

LEr.Ravi kaundal,

Physical progress 26.09 %

(Block wise area and progress nol

intimated)

Executive Engineer.

Assistant Engineer.

Scope of Work

Total Plot Area. = 518.77sqm

Ground/Entry floor - 340,00 sqm

a) First floor - 340.00 sqm

b) Attic floor - 180.00 sqm

c) Basement 1- 340.00 sqm

d) Basement 2- 340 00 sqm

e) Basement 3- 340.00 sqm

f) Basement 4- 175,00 sqm

Total floor area = 2055.00 sqm

Sr. No.

Page 1/z

::

-r)

2)

4)

sl

3)

OBSERVATIONS:-

The concrete mix design has been got done through private agencies which is not

approved by employer/engineer.

Though the testing of material is being done through private labs, no proper material

testing labs has been established at site due to which the routine tests are nol beEll}

performed at site. lt is advisable to establish a field lab and perform the requisite

testrat site which should be properly documented in Quality control register. The

authentication of test should also be done by supervising staff from time to t!me. lt is

essential that suitable Quality assurance mechanism is put in place which will include

establishinB material testing lab at site as mentioned above. Only the test requiring

high sophisticated equipment should be outsourced.

For management of rainwater from root properly designed rain water harvesting

arrangerrent be made at site.

Proper arrangement for drainage of surface water should be made so that it does

not pose any threat to the safety of buildinS.

As materialtesting lab is not available at site, Executive Engineer was asked to send

the material to Central Material Testing Laboratory for test but same has not been

received so far. lt is advised to send the material for testlng to Central Material

Testing Laboratory so that same can be tested and results conveyed to the fielo

office.

Edtiineer in Chief(QC&D),tlPPWD, U.5.Club,5himla-1.

No. PW-E in-c(Qc&D)/PA-inspection Notelzott - l6p - t)- Datedr | 5/6112'r2

Copy forwarded to the following for information & further necessary action:-


2. The Superintending Engineer 4th Circle H.P.P.W.D. Shimla 3.

3. The Executive Engineer(B&R) Division No. lll H.P.P.W.D. Shimla

Eigineer-in- Chief(QC&D),

Page 2/2

i

INSPECTION REPORT

l. Information provided by Executive Engineer

1. Name o'i work:- construction of circuit House at willv's oarl Sh;mlalSH:- civil workincluding site development W.5 & 5.1 and rain harvesting iank).

2. Date of Inspection:- 05-09-2017

3. Name of Inspecting officer|- Er. B.S Chauhan.


5. a)Awarded Amount:- Rs.19,94,18,091

b) Date ofAward:- 05-04-2016c) Agreement number 0I of 2OL6-17.

6. Date of sta rta) Stipulated Date of start:- Not intimated.b) Actual date of start:- 19-04-2016.

7. Stipulated Date of completion:- 2years.(date not intimated)


Accompanying Field Officer/Officials:- 1.Er. Sanjay Gupta, Executive Engineer

2.Er.Ravi kaundal, Assistant Engineer.

3.Er. Shivam kumar, Junior Engineer.

Sr. No. Scope of Work Up to date progress

t. Total area:- 6713.00 sqm

a) Floor at level 88.85- 465.00sqm

b) Floor at level 92.35- 465.00 sqm

c) Floor at level 95.85- 1707.00 sqm

d) Floor at level 99.80- 1355.00 sqm

e) Floor at level 103.30- 1331.00 sqm

f) Floor at level 106.80- 697.00 sqm

g) Floor at level 110.30- 693.00 sqm

Physical progress is 52.65%.

(Block wise area and progress

not intimated)

PageT/3

----7

/"

.

1.

2.

3.

5.

7.

8.

5.

OBSERVATIONS:-

It is found that the drainage system around the complex needs to be properly put in

place so that sLrrface water is properly channelized and does not pose any danger to

the complex.

The protection wall between cart road and the proposed building is required to be

raised as there seefBto be tendency to sliding of hill above cart road

The level of approach road need to be examined so that the surfaces run off does

not flow into the complex.

Properly designed rain water harvesting system is required to be put in place as the

water stored is proposed to be used for flushing oftoilets.

It has been found that sanitary pipes are being laid in the soffit of the slab which are

further proposed to be covered with suitable ceiling. lt has to be ensured that door

bends are provided for facilitating the clearing of these pipes in case of blockage.

The drainage pipes for draining of water for balcony has been taken out into the roof

around the balcony which need to be properly fixed to avoid any leakage which may

endanger ceiling below.

The finishing quality of concrete is required id to be improved particularly in the stair

portion.

It was found that only nominal concrete mix is being used for such important proiect

whereas design mix should have been used. Proportioning of concrete as per design

mix is important to ensure the workability of fresh concrete, strength of concrete

and durability of hardened concrete. water cement ratio is one ofthe important

factors contributing to the durability of concrete. Though certain test like gradation

of aggregate, physical property of aggregate have been got conducted from the

private lab which are conforming to the requirement as stated by the Executive

Engineer, however in the absence of material testing lab at site test are not

performed at site. lt is advisable to put in place a proper quality assurance

mechanism which will include establishing a site lab and performing, tesa like

gradation of aggregate, physical property of aggregate, workability, compressive

strength of concrete cube and brick etc. Only the tests which require sophisticated

Pa1e 2 /3

e)

equipment should be outsourced to NABL accredited empanelled labs. The records

of tests conducted at site are also required to be maintained in Quality Control

register which should be duly authenticated by the supervising staff.

9. For achieving above requirement, it is essential that concrete mix is designed and

only designed mix concrete is used for such projects.

10.The Executive Engineer was asked to send the sample of the material to Central

Materjal Testing Laboratory Shimla-1 but same has not been senfio far. tt is advised

to send the sample of material so that same could be tested in Central Material

Testing Laboratory and results conveyed accordingly.

The field officers are advised to ensure the above provisions regarding

Quality Assurance in the project.

No. PW-E-in,c(Qc&D)/pA-inspection Note /2ori-/l57- 57 Dated: )S:/q)2 ! 7Copy forwarded to the following for information & further necessary action:-


2. The Superintending Engineer 4th Circle H.P.P.W.D, Shimla-3.

3. The Executjve Engineer(B&R) Division No. lll H.P.P.W.D. Shjmla

tEScineer-in- Chief (Qc&D),-1lPPWD, U.S.Club,Shimla-1..

gineer-in- Chief (QC&D),

l-llPwD, U.s.club,shimla-1.

Page 3 /3

6. 7. 8. 9.hppwd.gov.in/Links/inspection reports.compressed.pdf · 2017-10-18 · The whole range of concrete grades have been used. M25 in foundation of piers, M30 in foundation

Documents