Page 1
Environmental and Social Monitoring Report (Part 3)
Project Number: 50156-001
January 2020
INO: Muara Laboh Geothermal Power Project (Republic of Indonesia) Semi-Annual Report (July to December 2017)
Prepared by PT Supreme Energy Muara Laboh for the Asian Development Bank
The Environment and Social Monitoring Report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “Terms of Use” section of this website.
In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.
Page 2
ATTACHMENT 9
ATTENDANCE LIST OF MEETING
WITH NGO‐ICS
Page 4
ATTACHMENT 10
INCIDENT REGISTER JULY UP TO DECEMBER 2017
Page 5
ATTACHMENT 10 2H 2017
ACTIVITY Jul-
Dec DESCRIPTION
CORRECTIVE
ACTION PIC
DATE OF
TARGET STATUS
Number of
Occupational
Fatality Incident
(Company and
Contractor)
0 ___ ___ ___ ___ ___
Number of
Occupational
Lost Time
Incident
(Company and
Contractor)
0 ___ ___ ___ ___ ___
Number of
Medically
Treated
Incident
(Company and
Contractor)
1 ML-IR0178-0001 : 11 Nov 2017
During installing Quick Lock
Well Head and wing valve, four
people were standing on metal
plank scaffolding. 2 persons
were working on installing
Quick Lock Well Head nuts /
bolts and the other 2 persons
installing wing valve. When the
wing valve is lowered onto the
metal plank scaffolding, the
metal plank scaffolding
suddenly curved and
eventually broken. Four
personnel fell into the
wellhead cellar. Three persons
fell in a standing position, and
the other 1 roustabout fell in a
sitting position. When the
roustabout stood up, he
complained that his upper
right-hand felt sore. He then
was brought to the site medic
facility for observation and to
RSUD Muara Laboh hospital for
X-Ray. Results showed no new
fracture / dislocation was
observed.
a) Need certified
scafolder as
inspector / planne
Rig Mgr Done
b) Need to develop
scafolding tag to
identify that
scafolding’s construction is
inspected already or
not
HSE Done
c) Need general
design for
scafolding
construction for
cellar job
Rig Mgr Done
d) Provide cellar
cover
SEML Done
Number of First
Aid Treatment
(Company and
Contractor)
4 1) ML-IR0160-0001 : 31 Jul
2018 : DKB driver fell from
his motorcycle after office
hours near the Kampung
Baru Junction (offsite)
2) ML-IR0170-0001 : 31 Aug
2017 : A drilling crew stung
by bee on the rig floor
3) ML-IR0181-0001 : 21 Nov
2017 Incident flying
object (First Aid) at ML-F
(EPC-C)
4) ML-IR0189-0001: 29 Dec
2017 A Well Test crew
Page 6
ACTIVITY Jul-
Dec DESCRIPTION
CORRECTIVE
ACTION PIC
DATE OF
TARGET STATUS
fell to cellar due to broken
wooden plank when tried to
close master valve of ML-A2.
IP has scratch at cheek.
Brought to nearest clinic,
received 1st Aid Treatment,
confirmed no serious injury,
and able to back to work.
Number of High
Potential
Serious
Incidents or
High Potential
Near
Misses/Near
Hits (Company
and Contractor)
1 1) ML-IR0177-0001: 03 Nov
2017 During POOH,
travelling block hit safety
timber bumper of crown
blocks causing the timber to
disintegrate and fell to rig
floor. Tool pusher instructed
all floor man to take cover
under doghouse. Failure of
crown-o-matic lever due to
improper connection (loose
bolting).
a) Develop Standard
Operation
Procedure to setting
Crown-O-Matic as
value and target to
achieved
Rig Mgr
15 Nov 17 Done
b) Develop Daily
Checklist for Crown-
O-Matic as enforce
Driller / Toolpusher
to do regularly
Crown-O-Matic
checking
Rig Mgr
15 Nov 17 Done
c) Make sure Driller /
Toolpusher fully
understand to
Crown-O-Matic
Setting & Checking
Procedure
Rig
Supt.
15 Nov 17 Done
Number of Near
Misses / Near
Hits (Company
and Contractor)
7 1) Near Miss : 19 Aug 2017: ML-
IR0161-0001
Schlumberger Cementing
Truck and EPC Dump Truck
were almost be in contact
2) Near Miss : 21 Aug 2017
Dump Truck Supplier is stuck
& mired
3) Near Miss: ML-IR0174 : 15
Oct 2017 A stone (size
approx’ 300mmx400mm)
slipped from a slope and
rolled down to the
excavation area, 1m away
from Rekin Engineers who
wanted to see the sub grade
test (Vane Shear Test). Slope
was 4m high and stone was
rolled from a position under
tarpauline / unseen.
4) ML-IR0173-0001 : 16 Oct
2017 During excavation
and installation of HDPE
liner, a worker used a stone
(approx 10kg weight) to hold
the HDPE liner from
windblow. Strong wind blew
the HDPE, caused the stone
to roll into the trench and
almost hit a worker's feet.
Page 7
ACTIVITY Jul-
Dec DESCRIPTION
CORRECTIVE
ACTION PIC
DATE OF
TARGET STATUS
Will use sand bag to hold
the liner from windblow.
5) Near Miss : ML-IR0183-0001
: 26 Nov 2017 EPC-C
Dump truck was slip at the
road shoulder near with
EPC-C Site Office
6) ML-IR0184-0001 : 04 Dec
2017 EPC-C Dump truck
(supplier crash rock) was slip
at drainage STA 6000
7) ML-IR0186-0001 : 6 Dec
2017 EPC-C Dump Truck
(supplier crash rock) was
slipped at drainage channel
on front of SEML nursery
area
Number of
Incident /
Accident
(Company and
Contractor)
20 1) Minor Environmental Spill
:12 Jul 2017 : ML-IR0156-
0001 Vibro compactor
SAKAI hydraulic hose was
failure
2) Minor Property Damage :
21 Jul 2017 : ML-IR0157-
0001 PLTMH cable get
caugh cut off while rig
mobilization
3) Theft & Crime : ML-
IR0158-0001 : 21 Jul 2017
Camera trap lost
4) Minor Property Damage :
23 Aug 2017 ML-
IR0163-0001 Property
damage due to fallen tree
5) Theft&Crime : 27 Aug 2017
: ML-IR0164-
0001Indicator Lamp of
Water Pump was missing.
6) Minor Environmenttal Spill
: ML-IR0159-0001 : 30 Jul
2017 Grey water
discharged directly to
open ditch at Yard#3
7) Minor Vehicular Crash :
ML-IR0165-0001 : 1 Sept
2017 Light Vehicle PRA
plugged into roadside ditch
due to avoid collision with
the villager motorcycle
8) Minor Vehicle Crash : ML-
IR0166-0001 : 4 Sep 2017
Cement Truck vendor
of BAUER for hauling
cement bags to Muara
Laboh, suddenly truck
moved forward and hit the
front vehicle
9) Natural Phenomena : ML-
Page 8
ACTIVITY Jul-
Dec DESCRIPTION
CORRECTIVE
ACTION PIC
DATE OF
TARGET STATUS
IR0167-0001 : 8 Sep 2017
Bangko Putih river flood
due to extreme heavy rain
and the bridge was
blocked
10) Minor Vehicle Crash: ML-
IR0168-0001 : 14 Sep 2017
EPC dump truck (base
course supplier) BM 9036
TN had single vehicle
accident, no one get
injured
11) Minor Property Damage :
ML-IR0169-0001 : 15 Sept
2017 3” HDPE pipe for utility water supply was
leak due to dig by loader
bucket teeth
12) Minor Property Damage :
ML-IR0171-0001 : 24 Sep
2018 4” HDPE pipe for fire hydrant HYD01 was
leak due to dig by bucket
teeth of backhoe loader
owned by WKS
13) Minor Vehicle Crash : ML-
IR0172-0001 : 26 Sep 2018
EPC Dump truck was
hauling material from ML-
B to Disposal area,
suddenly driver loss
control and caused single
vehicle incident (almost
flip over)
14) Minor Vehicle Crash: ML-
IR0175-0001: 24 Oct 2017
Side sweep between
crane mounted trailer
(WKS) and Innova (Rekind)
at access road near Yard 2.
R/H rear vender and lamp
were brushed. Narrow
road.
15) Minor Vehicle Crash: ML-
IR0176-0001: 25 Oct 2017
LV (BH-9808-GK)
suffered cracked at front
windshield due to stone
thrown by unknown when
crossing in front of EPC-C
labor camp.
16) Minor Property Damage :
ML-IR0179-0001 : 19 Nov
2017 Windshield glass
of SDI Slick line Logging
Unit in Wellpad ML-E was
broken due to throwing by
unidentified person
Page 9
ACTIVITY Jul-
Dec DESCRIPTION
CORRECTIVE
ACTION PIC
DATE OF
TARGET STATUS
17) Minor Property Damage :
ML-IR0180-0001 : 19 Nov
2017 Convex mirror was
damaged at access road
ML-B
18) Minor Property Damage :
ML-IR0182-0001 : 21 Nov
2017 : Demolition of
traffic sign at access road
bangko putih
19) Minor vehicle Crash : ML-
IR0185-0001 : 6 Dec 2017
Rear collision between
security patrol car
SECURINDO and light
vehicle DKB on SEML site
office-parking area.
20) Minor Vehicle Crash : ML-
IR0187-0001 : 9 Dec 2017
Supplier Dump Truck
BM-9463 TS with driver
Adek, on the way he look
another Dump Truck (BA-
9952 S) have failure
engine/stoppage then he
took initiative to overtake
that stop car. His right tire
slipped into the drainage
channel.
Page 10
ATTACHMENT 11
CAMERA TRAP LOCATIONS
Page 11
No Camera Trap Code No Series Closed Location Coordinate Documentation Installed
1 SEML CT-005 B141005548 Access to Intake#1
47 m
UTM 0737719,
9819346
1403 mdpl
5-Sep-17 10-Oct-17 20-Nov-17 11-Jan-18
2 SEML CT-004 B141005566 Access to Intake#1
47 m
UTM 0737730,
9819335
1408 mdpl
5-Sep-17 10-Oct-17 20-Nov-17 11-Jan-18
3 SEML CT-002 B141005573 Access to Intake#1
47 m
UTM 0737679,
9819311
1387 mdpl
5-Sep-17 10-Oct-17 24-Nov-17 11-Jan-18
4 SEML CT-001 B141005553 Adjacent to ML-F
47 m
UTM 0736513,
9819645
1459 mdpl
15-Sep-17 15-Oct-17 5-Dec-17 23-Jan-18
5 SEML CT-007 B141005546 Adjacent to ML-H
47 m
UTM 736727,
9819098
1586 mdpl
22-Sep-17 1-Nov-17 5-Dec-17 23-Jan-18
6 SEML CT-006 B141005541 Adjacent to ML-H
47 m
UTM 736665,
9819045
1549 mdpl
22-Sep-17 1-Nov-17 5-Dec-17 23-Jan-18
7 SEML CT-008 B141005531 Adjacent to ML-H
47 m
UTM 736719,
9819066
1599 mdpl
22-Sep-17 1-Nov-17 5-Dec-17 23-Jan-18
8 SEML CT-009 B141005337 Adjacent to ML-H
47 m
UTM 736853,
9819134
1542 mdpl
22-Sep-17 1-Nov-17 5-Dec-17 23-Jan-18
9 SEML CT-010 B141005537 Adjacent to ML-H
47 m
UTM 736686,
9819083
1573 mdpl
22-Sep-17 1-Nov-17 5-Dec-17 23-Jan-18
SEML CAMERA TRAP INSTALLATION
Download
Page 12
ATTACHMENT 12
STAKEHOLDER MEETING CSR 2018
ATTENDANCE LIST
Page 16
ATTACHMENT 13
SEML SOCIO‐ECONOMIC PROFILE
AND VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT
OF COMMUNITIES AFFECTED
Page 17
29112017
SOCIO-ECONOMICPROFILEAND
VULNERABILITYASSESSMENT
OFCOMMUNITIESAFFECTEDBY
PROJECTLANDACQUISITION
REVISEDFINALREPORT
PTSupremeEnergyMuaraLaboh
Geothermalpowerplantdevelopment
project1stphase90MW
(250MWinstalledcapacity)
Page 18
SESVAFinalReportOktober2017SenttoClient i
EXECUTIVESUMMARY
Supreme EnergyMuara Laboh is developing a Geothermal Power Plant Project in Muara Laboh,
locatedinSouthSolokRegencyinWestSumatra.Currentlytheprojectisintheexploitationphase.
FinancialClosehasbeen reachedearly2017after financingagreementwassignedwith JBIC,ADB
andaseriesofcommercialbanks.CconstructionhasnowcommencedwithCommercialOperation
plannedtostartin2019.
Likeothergeothermaldevelopments,theprojectrequiresacomparativelysmallfootprint,forStage
1developmentonly71hectares.Thecompanyhassofaracquired141hectaresofland,grantedto
PTSEMLbyvirtueoflocationpermitissuedbytheSolokSelatanRegent(DecreeNo540-94-2013).
The land, designated by the government as other use area (APL=area penggunaan lain) was
formerlydevelopedasteaplantationbytheDutchEasternIndiesCompanyaround100yearsago.
AfterIndependence,aroundthe1970s,PTPekoninarestartedoperationoftheteaplantationunder
therighttocultivate(HGU)schemewhilethenationalgovernmenthadownershipoftheland.After
thecompanyceaseditsoperationaround30yearsago,thelandwasreturnedtothegovernment,
andhassincebeenusedbythelocalcommunitiesforirrigatedriceanddrylandfarming.
PTSEMLidentified202householdsandafewfarminggroupswhomtheycompensatedona‘willing
buyer-willingseller’basis.Therewasnoinvoluntaryrelocationasallaffectedhouseholdshavebeen
compensatedabovethemarketpriceandapproximately10timesthetaxablevalue(NJOP).Atthe
time of compensation, no detailed socio-economic study was undertaken by SEML, however the
landacquisitionprocess isdocumentedandwasbasedon fairandopennegotiationsbetweenPT
SEMLandaffectedpeople,includingoversightbythegovernmentandlocalelders.
PTSEML instructed IntiHexaSemesta todevelopaCommunityDevelopmentProgramwith those
communities affected by the land acquisition. In 2015, IHS undertook a study with the 75
householdswhoresideinthenearbyvillages inring1.AnIntegratedSocialDevelopmentProgram
(ISDP)was developed based on the findings of that study. TheADB social audit corrective action
planrecommendedtheneedofacomprehensivesocioeconomicbaselineandsurveyprofilingand
vulnerabilityassessmentofalloftheaffected202householdsthathavebeencompensatedaspart
ofthelandacquisitionprocessfortheproject.
ThepresentstudycarriedoutbyPTGreencap/ESC,namelySocio-EconomicSurveyandVulnerability
Assessment (SESVA), covers the remaining households in the other villages in the vicinity of the
project. In addition to the socioeconomic profile and vulnerability assessment, the present study
alsoincludesidentificationoflivelihoodandskillsdevelopmentopportunitiestounderstandcurrent
needs for and community perception on livelihood and skills training and consultation with
governmentandeducational institutionstounderstandcurrentavailablefaciltiesthatareonoffer
to support livelihood and skills development training. The results will be used to refine the
Company’sownIntegratedSocialDevelopmentProgram(ISDP).
TheSESVAstudyhasbeencarriedout fromDecember2016toApril2017,coveringa totalof133
households affected by SEML land acquisition, 4 (four) targeted focus group discussions with
potentially vulnerable segments of the community and traditionalMinang women leaders and 6
(six)keyinformantinterviewswithrelevantgovernmentandothereducationalinstitutions.Thefield
activitieswerecarriedoutasperfollowing:
Page 19
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx ii
1. ScopingVisit(26-30December2016)
2. Socio-EconomicProfileandVulnerabilitySurvey(1-7February2017),and
3. FocusedGroupDiscussion(FGD)andKeyInformantInterview(KII)(12-17March2017).
Thefindingsofthestudyareasfollows:
SocioEconomicProfile
• ThepovertylineforSolokSelatanRegencyfor2015isRp292,292permonthwhichisalmost
Rp100,000lowerthanthatoftheProvincewhilearoundRp40,000lowerthantherural
averageacrossIndonesia.
• ThemajorityoftherespondentsidentifiedasethnicMinang(93%).TherestareMelayu
(3%),Javanese(1%)andotherethnicgroups(1%).InactualfacttheMelayuthemselvesare
asubgroupofMinang.PeoplefromJavaandotherpartsofIndonesiamigratedtothearea
becauseofseveralreasonsincludingworkinginDutchplantationinPekoninaandeconomic
reason.TheTownofMuaraLabohisinfactanoldDutchTown.
• SESVAsurveyrespondentsaremostlymenandwomenof40to60yearsold.Mostofthem
felthealthyduringthesurveyandveryfewindicatedfeelingunwell.Membersoffamilies
rangefrom4to5members,whichisslightlybiggerthanthenationalaverageof3.9.The
dependencyratioofSESVArespondentsis43%,whichislowerthanthenational
dependencyrateof51%.
• Intermsofliteracyandeducationalattainment,mostofallmenandwomensurvey
respondentsindicatedthattheycanread,onlyoldergroupofpeople,mainlywomen,who
areperceivedhavingliteracydifficulties(illiterate).Householdmembersaged20andolder
(uptotheageof49)morethanhalfbothmaleandfemalehavefinishedseniorhighschool
orhaveattainedtertiaryeducation.Womenseemtobeingeneralbettereducatedthan
menandhigherintertiaryratio.Theolderorseniorpeoplehaveonlycompletedprimary
schoolornotfinishedschool.
• Majorityofthosewholookforworksaremenbetween20and30yearsold,whiletotal
laborparticipationoftherespondentsis60%.
• 93householdsstillhavelandwithinPTSEMLarea(indicatedtobeabout245haaccording
tothesurvey),mainlyintheformofdryland(84%)andwetland(13%).9outof133
householdsusedthecompensationmoneytobuynewland(intotal5haor0.04haon
averageperhousehold),intheformofdryland(69%)andwetland(39%).17outof133
householdsindicatedthattheyownorsharecropotherlandof8ha.
• Inregardstolandownershipandstatus,majorityoftheremaininglandarewithoutpapers
(50%),withvillageheadnotice(30%),andonlyafewsaidtheyhadalandtitle/certificates
(12%).34%ofhouseholdsindicatedtheyinheritedtheland,while18%boughttheland.
Page 20
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx iii
PerceptiontowardtheProject
• TheProjectAffectedHouseholds(PAHH)withintheSESVAscopehavenotallbeenawareof
theCompany’sGrievanceMechanism.Someofthemareawarethattherearegrievances
raisedbycommunitiestowardSEML.Majorityoftherespondentsalsoimpliedthatlodging
grievancenotdifficult.TheresponsetimefromSEMLanditsmaincontractortowardthe
grievancesareconsideredquitefastaswellastheresponsesandresolutionstothe
grievances.SEMLemployeesassignedforgrievancehandlingmechanismaremorewell-
knownthanthirdpartypeopleappointedbySEMLforGMcontact.
• IntermsoftheProject’slandacquisition,majorityofthelandacquisitionaffected
householdsarehappywithprocessandfoundittobefairandthattheywoulddoitagainif
theyweretoreturntothattime.SmallpercentageofPAHHsaidthepricewaslowandthat
theyhadnochoicebuttoletgo.
• ThenumberofPAHHwhoworkforSEMLoritssuppliers/contractorsisverylow,
nonethelessthepercentageoflocalworkerscomparedtomigrantworkersishigher(SEML
monthlyreport).AlmosthalfoftherespondentswereawareofSEMLCSRprogramsdespite
thenumberorlevelofparticipationandbeneficiariesofthePAHHintheprogramislowas
wellastheirsatisfaction.
• IntermsofSEMLCommunityCommittee,almosthalfoftherespondentswereawareofthe
Committee.(NotethatSEML’scommunityengagementuntilrecentlyfocusedmainlyonring
1villages,whicharethe5villagesthatsurroundtheproject).
Vulnerabilities
• Vulnerabilityisassessedbasedonanumberofsecurityaspects,i.e.food,social,economic,
environment,healthandotheraspects,gender,educationalattainment,andsatisfaction
withSEMLlandacquisition.Householdsassessmenttowardthevariousvulnerability
indicatorsisasfollows
o Noneofthesurveyedhouseholdsreportedtohaveexperiencedstarving.
o Intermsofsocialsecurity,themajoritydonotactivelyparticipateinvillage
organizations.Ineventsoffamilyorneighborhoodmattersandconflictsthe
communityappearstostillhavestrongsupportfromfamilyandvillageapparatus.
o Intermsofeconomicsecurity,onlyafewreportedtobeunemployed.5households
wereidentifiedaspotentiallyvulnerableintermsofdebtpressure(thatismonthly
installmentsversushouseholdincome).
o Morethanathirdofhouseholdscollectwoodforfiringtheircookingstoves.
o Onlyafewhouseshadeitherroofsmadefromthatchedstrawandorwooden
planksorearthernfloors.
o Inregardstoenvironmentalsecurity,only1householdreportedthathis/herfamily
wasaffectedbynaturaldisaster.
o Intheaspectofhealthsecurity,15householdsindicatedthatoneoftheirfamily
membershadamajorhealthproblemandintermsofsanitationandaccessto
water,17%useriverwaterfordefecationand5%usecommunaltoilet.
Page 21
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx iv
o Genderwise,24womenbetween27to58yearsoldindicatedcompletedifeveronly
primaryschoolandnotworking.
o Intermsofeducationalattainment,12youngsters(betweentheage20and30)
identifiedonlyfinishedprimaryschoolandnotmarried.Twooutofthe12were
reportedtohavingdifficultiesinreading.
o IntermsofsatisfactionofthepriceofSEMLlandacquisition,5householdsindicated
thattheywerenotsatisfied.
• Based on the above vulnerability indicators, 18 households have been identified as
vulnerableorpotentiallyvulnerable,theyeitherapplytomorethanoneofthevulnerability
indicators (6 households) or have a low per capita income (11 households) or high debt
pressureversusincome(1household).Atotalnumberof19householdswerealsoidentified
as vulnerable because they tick two vulnerability indicators. These households could be
potentiallyvulnerableorbecomevulnerablewhenasuddenchangeoflifehappens,suchas
forexampleanillnessthatpreventsthemainbreadwinnertocontinuetoworkorbecoming
unemployedforavarietyofreasons.
SkillandLivelihoodDevelopment(CapacityBuilding)
• Like other newly split and established regency, Solok Selatan try to improve economy,
revenue and welfare of the people. Government institutions such as social, labor and
transmigrationagencyprovidescapacitybuildingprogramtoworkersalthoughitislimited.
AnumberofeducationalinstitutionssuchasVocationalHighSchoolorSMKareavailablein
theRegencyespeciallyaroundtheMuaraLabohvicinity.CommunityAcademy,aDiploma3
certificate,isestablishedbytheRegencygovernmentincollaborationwithPoliteknikNegeri
Padang. SEML may cooperate or partner with relevant government agencies and local
vocational educational institutions to implement its skill or capacity and livelihood
developmentprogram.
• Themain pressing security issue thatmight thwart capacity building program is livestock
theft. Livestock theft is alarming that even though the Project affected people suggested
support to livestockprogram, theyare stillworriedwith theft especially if livestock farms
arefarfromwheretheylive.
• The project affected people have lack of trust toward the village elites and they are
pessimistic to work in a group based on previous capacity building implemented by the
Governmentintheregion.
• Thefutureskillandlivelihooddevelopmentprogramshouldconsiderthefollowingaspects:
Individual or bundled base program rather than group base; Needs base; Sustainability;
Communal Base, Gender equality; Flexible mode of debt/loan payment; Assisting the
families/householdswhosupportvulnerablepeople;andPartnershipandengagementwith
localstakeholders.
In general, the Project affected people have eagerness to improve their livelihood and economic
condition.DuringFGD, they suggestedcapacitybuilding through trainingandskilldevelopment in
agriculture, livestock, furniture/carpentry, business development, cooking, food industry, and
embroidery;provisionofcapital;andprovisionofcapitalgoods.
Page 22
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx v
In summary, of the 133 households, around 13.5% have been identified as most likely to be
vulnerable while another 14.3% are potentially vulnerable. Whether this vulnerability has been
causeddue to land acquisition by SEML is not confirmed at this stage. The results of the various
parts of the study fit well together and confirm individual findings. The major issues can be
summarisedareevolvingaroundeducation,financeandbusinessdevelopment.
CurrentCSRandStakeholderengagementactivitiesofSEMLuntilnowhavefocusedmainlyonring1
PAHH.With the construction stagenow started, SEML is expanding this to theother rings and in
particular to all of thePAHH thatwereaffectedby landacquisition, inparticular those thatwere
identifiedasbeingvulnerable.TostrengthenSEML’sapproachaspecificlivelihoodrestorationplan
forthoseidentifiedasmostvulnerableshouldbedevelopedthatlinksinwithexistinggovernment
programsinadditiontoCSRactivitiesthatfocusoncapacitybuilding.
Page 23
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx vi
TABLEOFCONTENTS
EXECUTIVESUMMARY........................................................................................................................i
TABLEOFCONTENTS........................................................................................................................vi
LISTOFFIGURE...............................................................................................................................viii
LISTOFTABLE...................................................................................................................................ix
LISTOFAPPENDICES.........................................................................................................................xi
ABBREVIATIONS..............................................................................................................................xii
1 INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................................1
1.1 PTSupremeEnergyMuaraLabohProject.......................................................................1
1.2 Landacquisition.............................................................................................................1
1.3 Presentstudyaim,targetandlocationsbrief.................................................................2
2 SEMLCSRANDOTHERENGAGEMENTACTIVITIESTODATE......................................................3
2.1 CorporateSocialResponsibilityProgram........................................................................3
2.2 Grievancemechanism....................................................................................................3
3 OBJECTIVEOFSTUDY...............................................................................................................5
4 METHODOLOGY&APPROACH.................................................................................................6
4.1 Literaturereview...........................................................................................................6
4.1.1 DefinitionofVulnerability..........................................................................................6
4.1.2 IndonesianGovernmentPovertyindicators...............................................................7
4.2 Scoping..........................................................................................................................8
4.3 Socio-EconomicSurveyandVulnerabilityAssessment(Questionnaire)........................11
4.4 FocusGroupDiscussion(FGD)......................................................................................12
4.4.1 SelectionProcessofVulnerableGrouptobeincludedinFGDs...............................13
4.4.2 ClassificationofgroupsforFGD...............................................................................13
4.4.3 TheimplementationofFGD.....................................................................................14
4.5 KeyInformantInterview(KII).......................................................................................17
4.6 ChallengesandLimitations...........................................................................................18
4.6.1 Scopingstudy............................................................................................................18
4.6.2 Householdsurveyforsocio-economicandvulnerabilityassessment......................18
4.6.3 FGDandKII...............................................................................................................18
4.6.4 Questionnaireandanalysis.......................................................................................19
5 SOCIO-ECONOMICPROFILE....................................................................................................20
5.1 Demographics..............................................................................................................20
5.2 Families,familycomposition,agestructureandgender...............................................22
5.3 SkillsandLivelihood.....................................................................................................25
5.3.1 OccupationsofHouseholdMembers.......................................................................25
5.3.2 PerceivedAdultLiteracy...........................................................................................26
5.3.3 EducationalAttainment............................................................................................27
Page 24
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx vii
5.4 LandOwnershipandAssets..........................................................................................28
5.5 IncomeandExpenditures.............................................................................................30
6 COMMUNITYPERCEPTIONOFTHEPROJECT..........................................................................31
6.1 Community’sunderstandingofGrievanceMechanism.................................................33
6.2 Community’ssatisfactionwiththelandacquisitionprocess.........................................35
6.3 Community’sunderstandingofCurrentSEMLCSRProgram.........................................36
6.4 Community’sunderstandingofCommunityCommittee...............................................37
7 VULNERABILITYASSESSMENT................................................................................................40
7.1 Screeningofresults......................................................................................................40
7.1.1 Foodsecurity............................................................................................................40
7.1.2 SocialSecurity...........................................................................................................40
7.1.3 Economicsecurity.....................................................................................................43
7.1.4 Environmentalsecurity.............................................................................................47
7.1.5 Healthsecurity..........................................................................................................47
7.1.6 OtherVulnerabilityIndicators..................................................................................49
7.1.7 SummaryofVulnerabilityAssessment.....................................................................50
7.2 ResultsfromFGDs........................................................................................................55
8 SKILLSANDLIVELIHOODDEVELOPMENT................................................................................56
8.1 ReviewofskillandcapacitybuildingprogramcurrentlyonofferbySEML....................56
8.2 ResultsfromFGDsandKIIs...........................................................................................57
8.2.1 Existingcapacitybuildingprogram...........................................................................57
8.2.2 Challengeandlimitationofcurrentcapacitybuilding..............................................58
8.2.3 Solutionforeconomicandwelfareimprovement....................................................59
8.2.4 NeedsandExpectation.............................................................................................60
9 DISCUSSIONANDRECOMMENDATIONS................................................................................60
9.1 IdentifiedneedsfromVulnerabilityAssessmentandSocioEconomicProfile.................60
9.2 IdentifiedneedsfromCommunityandprioritization....................................................61
9.2.1 PresentdayCSRprogramsufficienttocoverorwhatitalreadycover....................63
9.2.2 Availability of local government/public and private educational/vocational
trainingsforskillsdevelopment/improvement..................................................................64
9.3 RecommendationofthefutureCommunityCapacityBuilding.....................................65
10 CONCLUSION.........................................................................................................................68
11 BIBLIOGRAPHY......................................................................................................................70
Page 25
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx viii
LISTOFFIGURE
Figure2-1 GrievanceMechanism....................................................................................................4
Figure4-1 Human Development Index compared (BPS Sumatra Barat and Indonesia),
2017...............................................................................................................................7
Figure4-2 MapofproposedsurveyedprojectaffectedlandownersforSESVAstudy.................10
Figure5-1 Domicileofthe133surveyedhouseholds...................................................................20
Figure5-2 Ethnicbackgroundofsurveyedhouseholds.................................................................20
Figure5-3 JorongswithethnicgroupsotherthanMinaninsurveyedhouseholds......................21
Figure5-4 Ageandgenderofrespondents1and2......................................................................21
Figure5-5 Self-assessedHealthstatus..........................................................................................22
Figure5-7 Householdstructure–householdmembers................................................................23
Figure5-8 HouseholdMembers....................................................................................................24
Figure5-9 Theagerangeofthedifferentfamilymembers..........................................................24
Figure5-10 Main(a)andSecondary(b)OccupationofHouseholdHead.......................................25
Figure5-11 Main(a)andSecondary(b)OccupationsofWife........................................................26
Figure5-12 Otherhouseholdmembersmaineconomicactivity,N=16..........................................26
Figure5-15 EducationalAttainmentofAdults,aged20andolder.................................................27
Figure5-16 EconomicActivityofsurveyedHouseholds..................................................................28
Figure9-1 VulnerableGroups,needsandexpectations...............................................................61
Figure9-2 Percentageandtypeofrequestedcapacitybuilding...................................................62
Figure9-3 Typeofrequestedtrainings/skilldevelopment...........................................................63
Figure11-1 IdentificationofSESVArespondentinPakanSalasa..................................................105
Figure11-2 IdentificationofSESVArespondentnearMuaraLabohMarket................................105
Figure11-3 SESVArespondentinfrontofhishouseandshop.....................................................105
Figure11-4 IdentificationofSESVARespondent...........................................................................105
Figure11-5 IdentificationofSESVArespondent...........................................................................105
Figure11-6 IdentificationofSESVArespondentinLolo................................................................105
Figure11-7 SESVAhouseholdsurveybeingcarriedoutbyenumerators fromUniversitas
Andalas.......................................................................................................................106
Figure11-8 SESVArespondentinfrontofherhouse....................................................................106
Figure11-9 SESVArespondentinherhouse.................................................................................106
Figure11-10 HouseconditionofoneofSESVArespondents..........................................................106
Figure11-11 TheconditionofkictheninoneofSESVArespondents'house..................................106
Figure11-12 Smallchickenandducklivestockwhichiscommonamongcommunities.................106
Figure11-13 SEML representatives duringWomen Group FGD,Mr. Asyarry Sofyan (Site
SupportManager)andMr.MuhammadRoza(FieldRelationsOfficer).....................107
Figure11-14 Mr. Bujang Joang (SEML Field RelationsOfficer ) socialized contact number
forSEMLGrievanceMechanism................................................................................107
Figure11-15 MenGroupDiscussion...............................................................................................107
Figure11-16 OneofMenFGDparticipantsintroducedhimself.....................................................107
Figure11-17 YouthFGD..................................................................................................................107
Figure11-18 BundoKanduang/WomenLeaderFGD......................................................................107
Page 26
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx ix
Figure11-19 OneofwomenleaderspresentedtheiropinionduringFGD.....................................108
Figure11-20 DR.Indraddin,FGDfacilitatorfromUniversitasAndalas...........................................108
Figure11-21 Key Informant InterviewwithDR.Syamsurizaldi,S.IP,SE,MM,HeadofSolok
Regency's Regional office of Planning, Development, and Ivestment
(BPPMD/BAPPEDA)....................................................................................................108
Figure11-22 CookingTrainingintheCenterofWorkTraining(BLK)..............................................108
LISTOFTABLE
Table1-1 Fieldtrips/studies...........................................................................................................2
Table4-1 DefinitionofVulnerabilitybyInternationalBanks.........................................................6
Table4-2 PovertyLine....................................................................................................................8
Table4-3 Landownerswhonolongeravailableforsurvey.........................................................11
Table4-4 ResourcePersonsforSESVASurvey.............................................................................11
Table4-5 ListofMenFGDParticipants........................................................................................14
Table4-6 ListofWomenFGDParticipants...................................................................................14
Table4-7 ListofYouthFGDParticipants......................................................................................15
Table4-8 ListofBundoKanduang/WomenLeaderFGDParticipants..........................................16
Table4-9 Attendance,participationandinsightofFGDparticipants..........................................17
Table5-1 DependencyandGenderRatio....................................................................................23
Table5-2 Laborparticipationrate...............................................................................................28
Table5-3 LandAssetsofthe133households,SESVASurvey2017.............................................29
Table5-4 IncomeRangeofSurveyedHouseholds,N=133(inRupiah)........................................30
Table5-5 MonthlyExpenditureRangeofSureveyedHouseholds,N=133(inRupiah)................30
Table6-1 Respondentsawareness(heard)ofSEMLGrievanceMechanism...............................33
Table6-2 ThesourceofinformationaboutGrievanceMechanism.............................................33
Table6-3 DifficultiesinlodgingGrievances.................................................................................34
Table6-4 AwarenessofgrievancestowardSEMLinthecommmunity.......................................34
Table6-5 TypesofgrievancesaddressedtoSEML.......................................................................34
Table6-6 PerceivedSEMLresponsestowardgrievances............................................................35
Table6-7 PerceivedresponsivenessofSEMLtowardgrievances(quickness).............................35
Table6-8 Dotheyknowwhotocontactforgrievances?.............................................................35
Table6-9 Whotoreportto?........................................................................................................35
Table6-10 HaveyoueverworkedorareworkingforSEMLorcontractors/suppliers?................36
Table6-11 Awareness(Heard)ofSEMLCSR/ISDP.........................................................................36
Table6-12 ParticipatedorbeneficiariesofSEMLCSR/ISDP...........................................................37
Table6-13 PerceptionaboutSEMLCSR/ISDP................................................................................37
Table6-14 AwarenessofComunityCommittee............................................................................38
Table6-15 SourceofinformationaboutCommunityCommittee.................................................38
Table6-16 ParticipationinCommunityCommitteeevents/activities...........................................38
Table6-17 PerceptiontowardtheperformanceandbenefitsofCommunityCommittee............39
Table7-1 Activeinvillageorganizations......................................................................................40
Page 27
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx x
Table7-2 Typeofvillageorganizations/activities........................................................................41
Table7-3 Whoisconsultedforfamilymatters?..........................................................................42
Table7-4 Whoisconsultedforneighborhoodmatters?.............................................................42
Table7-5 Typesocialconflict.......................................................................................................43
Table7-6 Reasonsfortakingoutaloan.......................................................................................45
Table7-7 Debtpressureof12households..................................................................................45
Table7-8 HouseholdswithMonthlyPerCapitaIncomenearorbelowPovertyLine..................46
Table7-9 Householdsimpactedbynaturaldisasters..................................................................47
Table7-10 ReportedHealthIssues................................................................................................47
Table7-11 AccesstoWater,Numberofhouseholds.....................................................................48
Table7-12 IdentifiedVulnerableandPotentiallyVulnerableSurveyedPAHH..............................52
Table8-1 ExistingSEMLCapacityDevelopmentProgram............................................................56
Table8-2 ListofNeedsandExpectationsforSkillandLivelihoodDevelopment.........................60
Table9-1 Proposed future capacity building for project affected people/vulnerable
people..........................................................................................................................67
Page 28
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx xi
LISTOFAPPENDICES
AppendixI a ListofProjectAffectedHouseholds
b ListofVulnerableHouseholds
AppendixII Questionnaire
AppendixIII KIIAndFGDGuideline
AppendixIV ActivitiesPhotographs
Page 29
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx xii
ABBREVIATIONS
ADB AsianDevelopmentBank
CSR CorporateSocialResponsibility
EPC Engineering,ProcurementandConstruction
FGD FocusedGroupDiscussion
GM GrievanceMechanism
HDI HumanDevelopmentIndex
IFC InternationalFinanceCorporation
ISDP IntegratedSocialDevelopmentProgram
KII KeyInformantInterview
PAHH ProjectAffectedHouseholds
PAP ProjectAffectedPeople
SEML PTSupremeEnergyMuaraLaboh
SEP StakeholderEngagementPlan
SESVA Socio-EconomiSurveyandVulnerabilityAssessment
Page 30
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx 1
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 PTSupremeEnergyMuaraLabohProject
Supreme Energy Muara Laboh is developing a Geothermal Power Plant Project in Muara
Laboh, located in South Solok Regency in West Sumatra. Currently the project is in the
exploitationphase.FinancialClosehasbeenreachedendofJanuary2017(afterthefinancing
agreement was signed with JBIC, ADB and a series of commercial banks). Engineering
procurementandconstructionhasnowbegunwhilecommercialoperationisplannedtostart
by2019.
The ADB social audit corrective action recommended the need of a comprehensive
socioeconomic baseline and survey profiling and vulnerability assessment of the 202
households that have been compensated as part of the land acquisition process for the
project.Theresultsof this studywillbeusedto refine theCompany’sown IntegratedSocial
DevelopmentProgram(ISDP).
The revised ISDP will be developed in line with the company’s commitment to the
communities surrounding the project, in particular those affected by the previous, ongoing
andfutureprojectoperations(exploration,construction,operation,andpost-operation).The
ISDPaddressesadverse impactsand implementsvariousactivities thatarebeneficial for the
communities based on community needs and expectations. The company’s community
relationsteamhasalreadybeguntoimplementtheCSR.
1.2 Landacquisition
Likeothergeothermaldevelopments,theprojectrequiresacomparativelysmallfootprint.The
total area required for Stage 1 development is only 71 hectares. The company has already
acquiredmorethan141hectareswhichismorethansufficientforthetotalprojectfootprint.
The site is locatedonAPL (ex-HGU) land (PTPekonina'splantation’s teapermitarea),which
has been utilized by the community for wet rice fields, coffee and quinine planting, and
generalcommunityland(settlementsandcultivation).
TheCompanyhasaletterfromtheSolokSelatanRegencyRegionalDevelopmentPlanningand
CapitalInvestmentBoardconfirmingthattheProject’slanduse(i.e.forelectricitygeneration)
is in accordance with the Regency Detailed Spatial Plan (Location permit Letter No.
540.542.257.2010,19-8-2010andLetterNo050/43/BPPPMD-2013,4March2013).
Although the project area has been granted by the government to PT SEML by virtue of
location permit issued by the Solok Selatan Regent (Decree No 540-94-2013), the company
nevertheless pursued land acquisition and compensation involving 202 households on a
‘willing buyer-willing seller’ basis. There was no involuntary relocation as all affected
householdshavebeencompensatedabovethemarketpriceandapproximately10timesthe
taxablevalue(NJOP).The landacquisitionprocess isdocumentedandwasbasedonfairand
open negotiations between PT SEML and affected people, including oversight by the
governmentandlocalelders.Detailsonthecompensationprocess,theaffectedpeople, land
area and crops compensated and actual compensation amounts can be found in the ESIA
documentandpertaininedAppendices.
Page 31
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx 2
1.3 Presentstudyaim,targetandlocationsbrief
Thescopeofthisstudywasthreefold,
• Activity 1: Socio-Economic Profile of affected households and vulnerability/needs
assessment- to gather an understanding of the current socioeconomic livelihood
situationofaffectedhouseholdsandtoassessthevulnerabilityoftheseinlightofthe
landthathasbeenacquiredaspartfotheproject.
• Activity 2: Identification of livelihood and skill development opportunities - to
understand current needs for and community perception on livelihood and skills
trainingthattheaffectedhouseholdsrequiretoreducetheirvulnerability
• Activity3:Consultationwithgovernmentandeducationalinstitutions-tounderstand
currentfacilitiesandtrainingthatisonofferbythegovernmentandothereducational
instituitions.
The Socio Economic andVulnerabilityAssessment (SESVA) employs a rangeofmethods, i.e.
HouseholdSocio-EconomicandVulnerabilitySurvey,Key Informant Interview(KII)andFocus
GroupDiscussion(FGD)toexplorefurtherneedsandaspirationfromaffectedcommunitiesfor
skill and livelihood development as well as company document and activities review and
interviewswithgovernmentinstitutionstoexaminehowbesttheseneedsandaspirationscan
beaddressed.
Followingisasummaryofthefieldvisitactivitiesthatwerepartofthisstudy.
Table1-1 Fieldtrips/studies
ScopingStudy 26-30December2016
Socio-EconomicandVulnerabilitySurvey 1-7February2017
FocusGroupDiscussion(FGD)andKey
InformantInterview(KII)
12-17March2017
Page 32
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx 3
2 SEMLCSRANDOTHERENGAGEMENTACTIVITIESTODATE
2.1 CorporateSocialResponsibilityProgram
SEMLhas started its Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)programasearly as 2011.All CSR
programs developed up to date were derived from stakeholder meetings. The 2016 CSR
programwasdesignedbasedon the StakeholderMeeting inOctober 2015. Thebudget and
activitiesaredistributedacross4pillars: Infrastructure,Health,EconomicEmpowermentand
CommunityRelations.In2016moreisinvestedintotheinfrastructurepillar.Around31%was
planned to be used for building classrooms for schools with the aim to improve local
communityaccesstoeducation.Another8%areallocatedtothehealthpillar.Moneywillbe
spent on mass circumcision for around 60 children in the four villages near the project
location.FortheEconomicEmpowermentactivitiesaround10%ofthetotalbudgetisspentto
support potential livelihood opportunities such as fresh water fish breeding. For the
community relations pillar the remainder of the budget is spent which helps to maintain
community support and relationship and to support existing government programs. A total
budgetofUSD99,300wasspentduring2016.
2.2 Grievancemechanism
Thegrievancemechanismhasrecentlybeenupdatedandseveralmeetingshavetakenplace
with the community to disclose the new mechanism (see flowchart in below figure). The
grievancemechanismhas been integrated into the Stakeholder Engagement Plan (SEP) that
was also recently updated and completed. Contact details of relevant staff at site and in
JakartaarealsolistedintheSEP.
The company keeps records of all grievances received and response appropriately to these
according to the mechanism set out. Public consultation and disclosure of information
activitiesarealsorecorded.
Page 33
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx 4
Figure2-1 GrievanceMechanism
Page 34
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx 5
3 OBJECTIVEOFSTUDY
Thedetailedscopeincludesthefollowing:
(1) Socio-EconomicProfileofaffectedhouseholdsandvulnerability/needsassessmentof202
households to assess current livelihood status of economically displaced households
whoselandsorratherpartsthereofhavebeenacquiredbythecompanyforprojectuse.
Theaimofthesurveyandassessmentisto
a. Coverarepresentativesamplebymeansofasoundmethodologicalapproach
b. Understand household income and generation of income from productive land
(retrospectively)toshowextentofeconomicdisplacement
c. Identifymostvulnerablehouseholds
d. Verifycompensationversusreplacementcosts
e. Showhowcompensationwasinvestedandwherehouseholdsareatnow
f. Identify any change in quality of life based on economic indicators and people’s
perceptions
(2) Identification of livelihood and skill development opportunities through community
consultationwithaffectedhouseholdsthatareincludedintheISDP
a. ExaminethevariousactivitiesidentifiedintheISDPandusefulnesstocommunityas
wellasidentifyotheractivities
b. Developbudgetforproposedactivitiesimplementationandtimeboundactionplan
(3) Conduct consultation with relevant government agencies and academic/educational
institutionsto
a. Understandexistingavailabilityofregionaltrainingfacilitiesforskillsdevelopment
b. Understandneedsandprioritiesofcommunitiesonskillsdevelopmentandtraining
initiatives
Page 35
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx 6
4 METHODOLOGY&APPROACH
4.1 Literaturereview
A short literature review was carried out to update ESC’s current socio-economic census
surveywithcurrentpracticesinthefieldandguidelinesbyInternationallenders.Otheronline
resources were also accessed, such as Badan Pusat Statistik for the latest statistics and
definitionofpovertyandthepovertylineinPadang.
4.1.1 DefinitionofVulnerability
Different disciplines weigh different aspects of vulnerability greater than others, some
disciplines specify vulnerability as social or economic, while others focus more on natural
disastersandpronenessofthecommunitytothese.Inthisstudyvulnerabilityisdefinedasa
generalconditionofbeingexposedtopotentiallyharmfuleventsandorexposuretorisksthat
canhaveanimpactonfuturewelfare,suchasforexampletheriskofremainingorbecoming
poor.Poor isgenerallyreferredtoawell-defined lowlevelofconsumptionof foodandnon-
food goods aswell as limited access to services. Various external aswell as internal factors
influencethevulnerabilityofahousehold.External factorsaretheavailabilityofeducational
andhealthfacilitiesforexample,whileinternalfactorsarereferredtoafamilyorhousehold’s
capacityofcopingwithexposurestorisksandharmfuleventsanditscapacitytogeneratean
incomethatissufficienttosustainallofitsdependentmembers.
Those particularly vulnerable are generally those who are in some way or another
disadvantagedinaccessingresourcesandbenefits.
The International banks guidelines define vulnerable groups as is outlined in the following
table.
Table4-1 DefinitionofVulnerabilitybyInternationalBanks
IFCPS1.12 Thisdisadvantagedorvulnerablestatusmaystemfromanindividual’sor
group’srace,color,sex,language,religion,politicalorotheropinion,
nationalorsocialorigin,property,birth,orotherstatus.Theclient
shouldalsoconsiderfactorssuchasgender,age,ethnicity,culture,
literacy,sickness,physicalormentaldisability,povertyoreconomic
disadvantage,anddependenceonuniquenaturalresources.
IFCHandbookfor
Resettlement
Peoplewhobyvirtueofgender,ethnicity,age,physicalormental
disability,economicdisadvantage,orsocialstatusmaybemore
adverselyaffectedbyresettlementthanothersandwhomaybelimited
intheirabilitytoclaimortakeadvantageofresettlementassistanceand
relateddevelopmentbenefits.
ADBInvoluntary
Resettlement
Sourcebook
Especiallythosebelowthepovertyline,thelandless,theelderly,women
andchildren,andIndigenousPeoples,andthosewithoutlegaltitleto
land
ADB
Environmental
VulnerableGroups,includingthepoor,women,children,indigenousand
tribalpeople,ethnicminorities,illegalsettlersandsquatters,disabled
Page 36
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx 7
assessment
guidelines2003
people,newandoldimmigrants,whoseconditionmaybemadeworse
byapolicyreform,anewprogram,orsomeformofprojectintervention,
andforwhomsocialsafetynetsandcompensationmechanismshaveto
beprovidedsothattheyarenotadverselyaffectedbysuchchanges
4.1.2 IndonesianGovernmentPovertyindicators
Badan Pusat Statistik, The Indonesian Statistics Department (BPS) uses in general two
indicators to determine the poverty or welfare status of the various regions in Indonesia,
whicharetheHumanDevelopmentIndexandthepovertyline(gariskemiskinan).
4.1.2.1 HumanDevelopmentIndex
TheHumanDevelopmentIndex(HDI)isacompositestatisticoflifeexpectancy,education,and
per capita income indicators,whichmeasures the achievement of human development and
thequalityoflife.TheHDIiscomposedofthreedimensions,health,knowledgeandwelfare.It
isusedtorankcountriesintofourtiersofhumandevelopment.Indonesiahasrecentlybegan
calculating and recording the HDI on the regional level. Level of achievement is shown in
percentagewhere100%isequivalenttothehighestachievement.
CurrentdataavailableonBPSshowsthattheHDIforSolokSelatancomparedtothatofWest
Sumatra and Indonesia overall is considerably lower. Most likely limited access to public
infrastructuresuchasenergysupply,roads,healthandeducationalfacilitiesandpoorhuman
resourcescapacitycontributetoalowerlevelHDIindexinSolokSelatanregency.
Figure4-1 HumanDevelopmentIndexcompared(BPSSumatraBarat
andIndonesia),2017
4.1.2.2 Povertyline
ThePovertyLine(GK)isthesumoftheFoodPovertyLineandtheNon-FoodPovertyLine.The
population with average per capita expenditure per month under the Poverty Line is
categorizedaspoor.TheFoodPovertyLinerepresentstheminimumfoodexpenditureneeds
equivalentto2100kilocaloriesperday.Thebasicfoodcommoditypackageisrepresentedby
Page 37
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx 8
52 typesof commodities (grains, tubers, fish,meat,eggsandmilk, vegetables,beans, fruits,
oils and fats, etc.). The Non-Food Poverty Line is the minimum requirement for housing,
clothing,educationandhealth.Thebasicfoodnon-foodcommoditypackageisrepresentedby
51 urban commodities and 47 rural commodities. Themain data sources used areNational
Socio-EconomicSurvey(Susenas)PanelofConsumptionandCorrectionModules.
ThepovertylineforSolokSelatanRegencyfor2015isRp.292,292permonthwhichisalmost
Rp. 100,000 lower than that of the Province while around Rp. 40,000 lower than the rural
averageacrossIndonesia(Table4-2).
Table4-2 PovertyLine
RegionPovertyLine2015
(IDR/month)
PovertyLine2016
(IDR/month)
SolokSelatanRegency 292,292 n.a.
SumateraBaratProvince 384,277 425,520(Rural)
IndonesiaAverage 333,034 350,420(Rural)
Source:BPSIndonesiaandSumateraBarat,2017
TheISDPstudyreportfrom2015definedthepovertylineatRp.291,000permonth.
4.2 Scoping
Scopingstudywasconductedon26-30December2016toidentifyrespondentsofSESVAstudy
andtheiraddresses.Therespondentswereselectedfromthelistoflandownerswhoselands
have been compensated by SEML excluding those that previously have been surveyed by
SEML.
Ofthe202householdsitwasdeterminedthatonly127householdswouldbeincludedinthe
survey,since75hadbeenstudiedaspartoftheISDPstudyin2015.Thestudyatthetimeonly
focused on the affected households in Ring 1. The present study therefore covered the
remainder.
Before the scoping trip, the lists thatwereavailablehad tobeconsolidated,as someof the
households were listed twice or more because they have more than one parcel of land
acquiredbySEML.
Outof127respondentsinitiallytargetedforSESVAstudy,approximately70participantswere
identifiedduringthescopingvisitincludingcoordinatorswhowillhelpcontactingrespondents
duringsurvey.Thecoordinatesofthe70respondents’addresswererecordedbyGPSforeasy
access by enumerators during survey. Other details such as villages, sub-villages or jorong,
contact numbers, time of availability, were also recorded. The respondents live mainly in
several Nagari in Pauh Duo Sub-District, i.e. Nagari Alam Pauh Duo, Nagari Pauh Duo Nan
Batigo,NagariKapauAlamPauhDuo,andNagariLuakKapauAlamPauhDuo.
Page 38
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx 9
Page 39
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx 10
Figure4-2 MapofproposedsurveyedprojectaffectedlandownersforSESVAstudy
Page 40
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx 11
Some landowners or cultivatorswere no longer available for the survey due to either pass
awayorhe/shehasmovedtootherplacesfarfromMuaraLabohortheProjectarea.
Table4-3 Landownerswhonolongeravailableforsurvey
No Name Remark
1 Yuhardiman Deceased
2 Basraini Deceased
3 FemiRianto Moved
4 GuHendri Moved
5 Anasril Deceased
6 Arpendi Moved
ThescopingactivitywascloselyassistedbySEMLfieldrelationsofficer,MuhammadRoza,who
hastheinformationoftheaddressandlocationoflandowners.
Afterreturningfromthesite,scopingcontinued.Eventually,thenumberofhouseholdstobe
surveyedwasincreasedto133inordertoincludemembersofthefarmergroupsorKelompok
TaniwhoselandwasacquiredbySEMLnotonanindividualbasisbutasagroup.
4.3 Socio-EconomicSurveyandVulnerabilityAssessment(Questionnaire)
Thesocio-economicsurveyandvulnerabilityassessment(SESVA)wascarriedoutbycollecting
datafrom133householdswithoneortworespondentsperhouseholdtoanswerquestions.
The respondents of the SESVA survey is based on the result of Scoping activity and other
additional names of land owners identified and examined by SEML andGreencap. Any land
owners that have been interviewed in the previous study were not included in the list.
DetailedofSESVA listof respondents ispresented intheAppendix I.Thesurveywascarried
outbyGreencapandlocalUniversity,UniversitasAndalas.
The survey team consisted of enumerators and supervisors. The analysis of the data was
backed up by an SPSS analyist/statistician. The enumerators were briefed about the
questionnaires by Supervisor from Universitas Andalas, DR. Alfan Miko, and by Greencap,
MuhammadZaki.
Everymorninganevaluationmeetingwasconductedwithenumeratorsandfieldsupervisorto
spotanychallengesanddifficultiesfacedbyenumeratorsinthefieldaswellasdifficultieswith
feedbacksinthequestionnaire.Thedatainputofthefilledupquestionnaireswascarriedout
bySPSSspecialistfromUniversitasAndalas.
Table4-4 ResourcePersonsforSESVASurvey
Resource Pax
Supervisor 2
Enumerators 5
SPSSanalyst 1
Page 41
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx 12
Questionnaires developed for household survey consisted of open and closed questions
(SESVAQuestionnairesisattachedinAppendixII).Ingeneral,thequestionsaredividedinto5
topicsasfollows.
1. Demography: to identify family structureandother familymemberswho live inother
places.
2. Household Economy: to find out occupation of family members; assets; income and
expenditure;vulnerability.
3. LandAcquisitionbySEML;toevaluaterespondents’perceptiononlandacquisitionand
price.
4. The existence of SEML: job opportunity with SEML; CSR; Community Committee and
GrievanceMechanism.
5. Closing:respondents’feedback/expectationtoSEML.
Ineachhouseholdtworespondentswereapproachedtoanswerthequestionnaire.Thiswas
done to increase accuracy of data received as knowledge about income, income generation
activities and expenses is often partial, for instance women tend to knowmore about the
expenseswhilemenmayknowmoreaboutthelandtheycultivateandrelatedexpensesand
income.
Dependingonthetimeoftheday,andavailabilityofhouseholdmembers,notallofthetwo
respondentswereheadofhouseholdandwife.
4.4 FocusGroupDiscussion(FGD)
Focus Group Discussion (FGD) were used to explore the understanding of current capacity
building programs, issues with current program implementation and to identify needs and
expectationofprojectaffected landowners.Greencapalsocooperatedwith localuniversity,
Universitas Andalas, to facilitate the FGDs. The FGD was undertaken through the following
processes.
FGD is aimed to identify livelihood and skill development opportunities with the affected
persons,whichincludes,butnotlimitedto:
1. Labor skills: automotive training, computer operator/administration/accounting,
construction,driverandheavyequipmentoperator,wielder,chef,tailor,security;
2. Local business skills: laundry and cleaning services, catering, canteen, car rental,
equipmentrentalsandtailorservices;
3. Fruitplantationmanagement; access to financial support forprocurementof tractors,
and agricultural implements, training on processing and marketing of agricultural
products,financialliteracytraining.
Page 42
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx 13
4.4.1 SelectionProcessofVulnerableGrouptobeincludedinFGDs
Theresultofthesurveywasanalysedintermsofsocio-economicconditionsandanumberof
respondents were selected to be participants for FGDs. The selection is based on the
considerationforvulnerability,whichisbasedonthefollowingcriteria:
1. Womanheadedfamily:womansingleparentwhoiseconomicallyweaktosupporther
family.
2. Lowincome:thatistherespondentswhohavelowhouseholdincomebylookingattheir
monthlygrossincomedividedbynumberoffamilymembers.
3. Debt pressure versus income: In addition, debts versus income also become the
considerationforvulnerabilitywheresomerespondentsshowtheamountofdebtthey
havetopayisalmostequaltoincomeandthosepeoplewhoareindebttocoverfamily
dailyneeds.
4. Lowlevelofeducation:manyoftherespondentseitherdidnotcompleteorcompleted
onlyprimaryschoolandtheydidnotcontinuetheirstudiestoahighereducation.
5. Unemployed: the productive age people especially the youth who have completed
primary, junior and high school, as well as higher education, but they do not work
and/orarenotemployed.
6. Noskill:Onlysmallnumbersofrespondentswhohaveskilllikesewingandembroidery
and furniture expertise. The rest have either none or limited skills that made them
vulnerableandunabletoimprovetheireconomiccondition.
Otherfactorusedtoscreenvulnerablegroup is throughhouseconditionsuchaswhetheror
nottherespondenthavepoorconditionofhouses;foodsecuritysuchaswhetherornotthey
haveeversufferedfromfamineorfoodshortage;healthconditionsuchasdiseasesthatmake
respondent unable to work and earn income; and natural disaster that affect economic
activitiesoftherespondents.
4.4.2 ClassificationofgroupsforFGD
Basedontheabovecriteria,approximately50peoplewereselectedtorepresentthefollowing
vulnerablegroupsforFGDexercises:
1. Womenvulnerablegroup
2. MenVulnerableGroup
3. YouthVulnerableGroup
Besidesvulnerablegroupofpeople,FGDswerealsoorganizedwithanothergroupofpeople
which are used as comparison to the groups of vulnerable people as well as to explore
informationandperceptiontowardtheProject.OneoftheadditionalFGDswasorganizedby
GreencapandtheothertwowereorganizeddirectlybySEMLasseenbelow:
1. WomenleaderandBundoKanduanginthelandacquisitionaffectedarea.
2. YouthLeader(organizedbySEML)
Page 43
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx 14
3. CustomaryLeader(organizedbySEML)
PleasenotethatonlytheresultsoftheadditionalwomenleaderandBundoKanduangFGDis
includedinthediscussionandresultsinthisreport.
4.4.3 TheimplementationofFGD
TheFGDwasorganizedinWismaGemini,about5kmfromMuaraLabohmarketand12kmto
SEMLproject site. The location is relatively central toall FGDparticipantswhomostly come
from3Nagariandthetimeforinterviewwassetintheafternoonfortwosessionstomakeit
easy for participants to attend the FGDs. The first session is from 13.00 to 15.00 and the
secondsessionisfrom16.00to18.00.
ThenumberofparticipantswhoattendedtheFGDsis43participants(outofapproximately50
participantsinvited)consistsofmengroup8people,womengroup11people,youthgroup13
people,andBundoKanduang/womenleadergroup11peopleasshowninthetablebelow.
Table4-5 ListofMenFGDParticipants
No Name
NoofProject
AffectedHousehold
(SESVA)*
Relationtohousehold
(familyhead)Remark
1 CandraDarma 39 HeadofHousehold -
2 Yusra 43 HeadofHousehold -
3 Hendra 138 HeadofHousehold -
4 ZainalDtTalanan 114 HeadofHousehold -
5 SyamSyahril 137 HeadofHousehold -
6 Nasrul 86 HeadofHousehold Thereare2people
namedNasrul(S),theone
invitedandjoiningthe
FGDisNasrulfromPinang
Sinawa
7 MuhammadYulis 89 HeadofHousehold -
8 Dasril 141 HeadofHousehold -
*NumberofParticipantsasinAttachmentIa.ListofProjectAffectedHouseholds
Table4-6 ListofWomenFGDParticipants
No WomenGroupNoofProjectAffected
Household(SESVA)*
Relationto
household(family
head)
Remark
1 DaniRumantika 83 Wife -
2 NetriYenti 3 Wife -
3 Nurleli 118 Wife -
4 Isas 85 Wife -
5 Nurimis 114 Wife -
6 Yuli 50 Wife -
Page 44
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx 15
No WomenGroupNoofProjectAffected
Household(SESVA)*
Relationto
household(family
head)
Remark
7 Rosnawati 103 Wife -
8 SusYunita 89 Daughter Sherepresentedher
mother,Nurjuliswho
couldnotattendthe
FGD
9 SusiSusanti 103 Daughter Accompanyingher
motherandparticipated
intheFGD
10 Ernita 134 Wife ErnitaisLandOwner,
WifeToArdi
11 Pasriati 118 Daughter Sherepresentedher
mother,Nurleli(Nurlaili)
*NumberofParticipantsasinAttachmentIa.ListofProjectAffectedHouseholds
Table4-7 ListofYouthFGDParticipants
No YouthGroupNoofProjectAffected
Household(SESVA)*
Relationto
household(family
head)
Remark
1 YoseSaputra 134 Son -
2 HendraEkaPutra 63 Son -
3 EdoJatiJaya 100 Son HisLandwasAcquiredBy
Seml
4 ErsisWirmansyah 96 Son HisLandwasAcquiredBy
Seml
5 ZulfahRoni^ - Son Memberof landcultivators
inMudiakLolo
6 Ijan 114 Son His father is Zainal (Dt
Talanan)
7 RigaSaputra 13 Son -
8 DindaRatulasmi 3 Daughter DaughterofAldiZamri
9 Mulhandri 72 InLaw Mulhandri isbrotherin law
ofAfdal,sonofNurjani/Aris
Afrianto
10 Ardison 40 Headof
household
-
11 IndraPutra 40 Nephew NephewtoArdison
12 RandaUsmanto^ - Son MemberofLandCultivator,
unemployed
13 Hasnatullah
Khairiah
3 Niece NiecetoAldiZamri
Page 45
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx 16
*NumberofParticipantsasinAttachmentIa.ListofProjectAffectedHouseholds
^ZulfahRoniandRandaUsmantoweremembersofFarmersGroup/landcultivators
Table4-8 ListofBundoKanduang/WomenLeaderFGDParticipants
No
Bundo
Kanduang/Women
LeaderGroup
Position
1 WiraYulita RepresentativefromJorongBlokNol,Pekonina
2 ErmaNeti RepresentativefromJorongKampungBaru,
Pekonina
3 YusneliM BundoKanduang
4 SalmawatiSalta HeadofBundoKanduang
5 Rusdanelly HeadofPKKTeam,NagariPauhDuoNanBatigo
6 Hj.Agustina BundoKanduang,HeadofMajlisTa’lim,PauhDuo
Sub-District
7 YosiAfrianita HeadofPKKTeam,NagariLuakKapau
8 Yurmailis HeadofPKKTeam,NagariKapauAlamPauhDuo
9 WilnaGuspawati HeadofPKKTeam,AlamPauhDuo
10 WiraSantika RepresentativefromJorongTaratakTinggi,Pekonina
11 GusmaYeti RepresentativefromJorongTaratakTinggi,Pekonina
The FGDwas carried out by 1 facilitator, 1 co-facilitator, and 1 note taker and attended by
representatives from SEML to inform SEML Project update as well as to disseminate the
Project’sGrievanceMechanismcontactnumber.
To explore information from the participants, the facilitator usedmetaplan papers and the
participantsweregivenopportunitiestodiscussandexpresstheiropinion.Facilitatorassisted
theprocessofbrainstorminganddiscussionwhiletheco-facilitatortookimportantpointsona
flipchartpaperinfrontoftheparticipants.FortheBundoKanduang/Womenleadergroup,the
FGDsettingwaschangedslightlybyaddingasessionwheretheparticipantsweregroupedinto
three and then they were asked to discuss about women role in economy in the nagari,
load/burdenandresponsibilityofwomen,andwomenroleinthepublicsector.Theresultsof
thediscussionwerepresentedtoallparticipantsintheFGDofwomenleaders.
ThediscussionwascarriedoutinIndonesianlanguageaswellasMinanglanguage.Theuseof
localorethnic language isnotan issuebecause theFGD facilitator isoriginallyMinangwho
speaks the language fluently and understand the context and meanings of the statements
expressedbyFGDparticipants.
Itisobservedthatthelevelsofattendance,participationandinsight,variedfromonegroupto
another.MenGroup has sufficient number of attendance for FGDs of 8 peoplewhile other
groupshavemorethan10people.TheparticipationofYouthGroup intheFGDdiscussion is
lowercompared toothergroups,whichmightbebecauseof low levelof confidenceamong
Page 46
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx 17
theyouthtoexpresstheiropinionandnotusedtohavingdiscussionsuchasFGD.Thelevelof
insight also shows that the youth group demonstrates low level of insight while men and
womengrouphaveamediumlevelofinsightsandtheBundoKanduang/womenleadergroup
hashighlevelofinsight.ThiscanbeseenduringthediscussionintheYouthGroupwherethe
opinion,information,andideasexpressedweremainlyaroundtheactivitiesthattheyaredaily
involved in. It is commonthatyouthwhodonot further their studiesafterprimaryschools
will stay in the village and work as farmers. The highest level of insight is in the Bundo
Kanduang/women leader Group where all participants actively express their opinion about
families, women roles, the system in the society, and the information about development
programsintheirareas.
Table4-9 Attendance,participationandinsightofFGDparticipants
Groups Attendance Participation Insight
MenGroup Sufficient VeryActive Medium
WomenGroup High Veryactive Medium
YouthGroup High Medium Low
Bundo
Kanduang/Women
LeaderGroup
High VeryActive High
4.5 KeyInformantInterview(KII)
In addition to the FGD, a semi structured interviews were carried out with several key
stakeholders in the local government and educational institution. The points of discussion
were about community development programs implemented by government to improve
communityskillandlivelihood,challengesandlimitation,aswellasfutureplanofcommunity
development program in the regency and especially in the area adjacent to the Project site
andlandacquisitionaffectedcommunities.
Thelistofinterviewedkeystakeholderisasinthetablebelow:
No Name Office PositionDay/Dateof
Interview
1 DR. Syamsulrizaldi,
S.IP,SE,MM
RegionalPlanningandDevelopment
AgencyorBadanPerencanaan
PembangunanDaerah(BAPPEDA)of
SolokSelatanRegency
Head Wednesday,15
March2017
2 Hafison Social,Workforce,andTransmigration
AgencyorDinasSosial,TenagaKerja
danTransmigrasi(Dinsosnakertrans)
andVocationalTrainingCenteror
BalaiLatihanKerja(BLK)
Head Wednesday,15
March2017
3 WindraNardi Social,Workforce,andTransmigration
AgencyorDinasSosial,TenagaKerja
danTransmigrasi(Dinsosnakertrans)
SectionHeadof
WorkforceTraining
Wednesday,15
March2017
4 Zulkarnain EducationAgencyorDinasPendidikan Head Friday,17March
Page 47
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx 18
No Name Office PositionDay/Dateof
Interview
2017
5 Novrizon EducationAgencyorDinasPendidikan
FormerHeadofVocationalHigh
SchoolorSekolahMenengah
Kejuruan(SMK)I
SectionHead Friday,17March
2017
6 Efrizal VocationalHighSchoolorSekolah
MenengahKejuruan(SMK)ISolok
Selatan
ActingHead Friday,17March
2017
4.6 ChallengesandLimitations
The study encountered a number of challenges, difficulties and limitation during the
implementationasfollows.
4.6.1 Scopingstudy
1. DifficultyindeterminingnamesoflandownerstobeincludedintheSESVAstudy.Some
landownershavenotonlyoneparceloflandbutanumberofparcelsoflandacquired
bySEML.
2. Thelocationofparticipantsisscatteredinanumberofjorongsinawiderangearea.
3. Not all of the households could be identified during the scoping study due to time
constraint,butcontactpersonswere identifiedwhoknewtheaddressesofother land
acquisitionimpactedhouseholds.
4.6.2 Householdsurveyforsocio-economicandvulnerabilityassessment
1. To find the location of new identified respondents who were not identified during
scopingactivitywasdifficultbecauseofthedistanceandlocation.
2. Negative/unwelcome response from respondents who were not happy or who felt
disadvantagedwiththeProjectandlandacquisitionprocess.
3. Nicknameversusofficialname; respondentsareknown to the communitieswith their
nicknamesratherthatofficialnamesaswritteninthelist.
4.6.3 FGDandKII
1. The location of FGD participants spreads in several sub-villages aroundMuara Laboh,
Projectsiteareaandinthecapitalcityoftheregency,PadangAro.
2. Change of status of survey respondents; dynamic progress and changes of status of
respondentsduringandafterthesurveyforinstanceunemployment.Somerespondents
wereunemployedduring thesurvey,but inapproximatelyone-month time theygeta
job.
Page 48
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx 19
4.6.4 Questionnaireandanalysis
Notalloftheenumeratorsfilledintheanswersastheywererequested. Inparticular,where
we asked for more details this was not filled in. Enumerators had been trained at the
beginningandweresupervised.
Enumerators faced difficulties and spent a lot of time in getting the answer on assets,
especially on land ownership. Some of the respondents knew only howmuch money they
werecompensatedwith,butnotthewidthofcultivatedlandacquiredbySEML.
Duringdataentrythereweresomemistakesoccurringduetotheamountofdatatobeadded.
Someof these errors havebeen identified and addressedduring the analysis.However, the
cleaningupofthedatahasledtodelaysintheanalysis.
Page 49
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx 20
5 SOCIO-ECONOMICPROFILE
5.1 Demographics
Therewere133householdssurveyedinatotalof26differentjorongin3differentnagarinear
SEML’sprojectlocation.Thebulkofthehouseholds(ornearlyhalf)liveinthefourJorongsof
TaratakBukareh,PinangSinawa,TaratakTinggi,andKampungBaru.
Figure5-1 Domicileofthe133surveyedhouseholds
Themajorityof the respondents identifiedasethnicMinang,3%asMelayu,3%as Javanese
and1%asothers.Inactualfact,theMelayuthemselvesareasubgroupofMinang(Figure5-2).
Figure5-2 Ethnicbackgroundofsurveyedhouseholds
Those other ethnic groups are only represented in 8 of the 26 jorongs.Most Javanese are
found to be living in Pekonina (100%) and in Pasar Muara Laboh around 50% of the total
households surveyed. The Javanese who settled in Pekonina have come here around one
Page 50
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx 21
hundredyearsagowhentheywerehiredtoworkintheteaplantationestate,whilethearrival
oftheJavaneseinPasarMuaraLabohisnotclear,butassumedtobeduringtheDutchcolonial
time.PasarMuaraLabohisanoldDutchtown.
In8ofthevillagestherewereotherethnicgroupspartofthehouseholdssurveyed,whilein
theremaining19villagesallwereMinang.
Figure5-3 JorongswithethnicgroupsotherthanMinaninsurveyedhouseholds
The figures on the ethnic distribution show that themajority of the surveyedhouseholds is
Minang. Other ethnic groups who were affected by land acquisition make up a larger
percentage of all affected households are present in all villages. In Pekonina 100% of the
affectedhouseholdsare Javanese,while inPasarMuaraLaboh, theymakeup50%. InPakan
SelasaandothervillagesalsosomeaffectedhouseholdsidentifiedasMelayuandotherethnic
groups.
Figure5-4 Ageandgenderofrespondents1and2.
Most people interviewedwere in the age brackets of 40 to 60 years old, women andmen
acrossthevillages.
Page 51
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx 22
Figure5-5 Self-assessedHealthstatus
Almostallof the interviewed respondents feelhealthyandonlyvery few indicated they felt
unwell.
5.2 Families,familycomposition,agestructureandgender
Figure5-6 Agestructureofsurveyedhouseholds
Thepopulationpyramidshowsarelativelyagedpopulationoftheaffectedhouseholdsandnot
manyveryyoung(0-4)atthispointintimecomparedtotheotheragebrackets.
Page 52
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx 23
Table5-1 DependencyandGenderRatio
AgeGroup Male Female Total Indonesia
Young(0-14) 83 86 169
Senior(65+) 13 4 17
Totaldependent 96 90 186
WorkingAge(15-64) 205 225 430
Total 301 315 616
DependencyRatio 47% 40% 43% 51%
GenderRatio 105 100
The dependency ratio which is the ratio of the young and senior over the working age
population,ortheaffectedhouseholdmembersisbelow50%whichislowcomparedtoother
regionsinIndonesiaandtheIndonesianaverageofaround49%.DependencyRatiomeasures
the pressure on productive population (15-65 of age) by economically inactive population
sections(childrenandoldage).
Figure5-7 Householdstructure–householdmembers
Mostfamilieshave4or5membersoreven6or7members.Themaximumrecordedwas8.A
family usually consists of husband and wife head of household, children and other family
members.
Page 53
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx 24
Figure5-8 HouseholdMembers
HouseholdMembers Number Indonesia
Mean 4.6 3.9
Median 5
Min 1
Max 8
Figure5-9 Theagerangeofthedifferentfamilymembers
Page 54
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx 25
Theage rangeof thedifferent familymembers shown in the figuresaboveshows thatmost
parentsrangebetween25to55whilechildren’sagebetween0and30to35.
Italso shows that in some families thechildren livewith theparentsandalreadyhave their
ownchildren.
5.3 SkillsandLivelihood
5.3.1 OccupationsofHouseholdMembers
Householdswereaskedabout the typeof themain, secondary andotheroccupationsof its
members and the frequency of these economic activities pursued. In Indonesia, most
householdspursueavarietyofeconomicactivities,forinstancewhileafarmermaybemainly
occupiedwithmanagingthecrops,hemayatthesameworkonanoccasionalbasisasaday
labourer,andhiswifemaybetendingtothecattleandhaveashop,andayoungermemberof
thefamilymayhavealreadystartedemploymentatalocalmotorbikeworkshopandsoon.
In this study,most household heads indicated their primary occupation to be irrigated rice
farmer, or 56%. The remaining 44% of the household heads pursued a variety of different
occupations.Forthewives,themainoccupationswereother(36%),followedbygovernment
employee(26%)andricefarmer(25%)whileothermembers’mainoccupationindicatedwere
rice farmer or other (Figure 5-10, Figure 5-11, Figure 5-12). It turns out that multiple
occupationsoreconomicactivitiesarenot thatmuchofanorm in thesehouseholds.Of the
126householdheadsonlyaroundaquarteror32havea secondoccupation,with themain
secondaryoccupations in farmingmainly.For thewives, itwas fourwho indicated that they
wereworkinganotherjobbesidestheirmainoccupation,whichwaseitherfarming,tradingor
other.
(a)N=126
(b)N=32
Figure5-10 Main(a)andSecondary(b)OccupationofHouseholdHead
Page 55
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx 26
(a)N=73
(b)N=4
Figure5-11Main(a)andSecondary(b)OccupationsofWife
Figure5-12 Otherhouseholdmembersmaineconomicactivity,N=16
5.3.2 PerceivedAdultLiteracy
Respondentswereaskedabouttheliteracyabilityoftheirhouseholdmembers, iftheycould
read,haddifficulties, couldn’tatallor if theywouldnotknow.The resultsaccording toage
groupsoftheworkingagepopulationshowsthatinmostagebracketsbothmaleandfemale
can read and only in the older age brackets there are some, in particularwomen,who are
perceivedashavingliteracydifficultiesorareilliterate.
Page 56
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx 27
Figure5-13 Levelofliteracy
5.3.3 EducationalAttainment
Theeducationalattainmentthehouseholdmembersaged20andoldershowsthatuptothe
ageof 49 inbothmale and femalemore thanhalf have finished seniorhigh school orhave
attained tertiary education. Also across the ages, women seem to be in general better
educated thanmen.On average tertiary ratio is higher forwomen thanmen across all age
groups. In theolder agebracketsmanyhaveonly completedprimary school or not finished
school.
LiteracyrateinIndonesia95.8%,femaleliteracy90.1%andmaleliteracy95.6%
SolokSelatan97.72%,SUMBAR97.38(2013,BPSSUMBAR)
Figure5-14 EducationalAttainmentofAdults,aged20andolder
In termsofeconomicactivities, themajorityof those looking forworkaremenbetween20
and30.Althoughmanywomenarehousekeeperstheyarealsoactiveworking.
Page 57
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx 28
Figure5-15 EconomicActivityofsurveyedHouseholds
Table5-2 Laborparticipationrate
LaborParticipationRate Male Female All
Totalworkingagepop 203 220 423
Working 151 89 240
Lookingforwork 9 5 14
Totalactive 160 94 254
Housekeeper 4 67 71
Atschool 33 55 88
Othernoteconomicallyactive 6 4 10
Totalnon-active 43 126 169
LabourParticipationRate(LPR) 79% 43% 60%
TheLPRamountsto79%inmalesand43%infemalesandoverallin60%.
5.4 LandOwnershipandAssets
Land owned by the affected households thatwas leftoverwithin PT SEML contract ofwork
area, landthatwasboughtaftercompensationswerereceivedfromPTSEMLandother land
thatwasownedorsharecroppedhasbeenlistedinbelowtable.
Accordingtothesurvey,therearestill93householdsthathavelandwithinthePTSEMLarea.
Mostofthatlandisidentifiedasladang(84%)andassawah(13%)withatotalsizeofaround
245ha(oranaverage1.84haperhousehold).Thosewhoboughtlandaftertheyhadreceived
compensationare9outof133households.Theyinvestedthatintodryland(ladang)(69%)or
Page 58
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx 29
wetland(sawah) (39%)withatotalareaofaround5ha.17of the133households indicated
that theywerealsoowningor sharecroppingother landwitha total areaof8haandagain
aroundtwothirdsareladangandonethirdissawah.
Intermsofownershipstatusandorigin,thelandleftoverwithinPTSEMLwasmostlywithout
papers(50%)orwithanoticeofthevillagehead(30%)and12%hadtheirlandregistered.34%
indicatedtheyhadinheritedthatland,while18%boughtit.Therewere9householdswhosaid
tohavebought landafter compensation,with7of thesehouseholdsdetailing that the land
boughtwasmostlyeitherwithoutpaperorwithadeedofsales/purchaseandonlyone land
parcel bought had a land title. Of the 16 households with other land, 19% had an oral
sharecrop agreement, 6 % had leased that land, and 13% had land with a title, while the
majorityofthehouseholdsindicatedthattheotherlandwaseitherwithavillageheadnotice
or without papers (31% each). In terms of origin of the other land, 38% indicated they
inheritedtheland,while25%boughtit,19%leaseditand19%wasunspecified.
Table5-3 LandAssetsofthe133households,SESVASurvey2017
ItemLandleftover
withinPTSEML
Landboughtafter
PTSEML
Compensation
Otherlandowned
/sharecropped
N= 133 133 133
1land 76 9 15
2lands 16 0 2
3lands 1 0 0
Noland 40 124 116
Totalsize(ha) 244.72 5.25 8.01
Averagesize(ha) 1.84 0.04 0.06
%ladang(dryland) 84% 61% 62%
%sawah(wetrice) 13% 39% 34%
%tambak(aquaculture) 0% 0% 3.1%
%hutan(forest) 0.4% 0.0% 0%
%tanahrumah(residential) 2.7% 0% 0%
OwnershipStatus N=92 N=7 N=16
landtitle 12% 14% 13%
sale/purchasedeed/grant 2% 43% 0%
villageheadnotice 30% 0% 31%
Borrow/Leaseright 2% 0% 6%
withoutpapers 50% 43% 31%
tenantwithwritten
contract 1%
0%
0%
tenantwithoralagreement 2% 0% 19%
Origin N=88 N=7 N=16
inherited 34% 0% 38%
bought 18% 100% 25%
leased 2% 0% 19%
other 45% 0% 19%
Page 59
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx 30
Source:SESVASurvey
5.5 IncomeandExpenditure
Household income was calculated based on the information received in the questionnaires
from the different household members from their main and other occupations. Note that
however informationon income isusuallynot thataccurateas it isdifficult tomeasure. For
instance,thosewhofarmdonothaveregularpaidmonthlyincome.Thesamegoesforcasual
daylaborersandshopkeepers.Therangethatwasindicatedbythehouseholdswasbetween
Rp.300,000touptoRp.175millionorifcalculatedpercapitaorperhouseholdmemberfrom
lessthanRp.200,000touptoRp.35million.GiventhattheStandarddeviationisalmostashigh
as the average, the income figure here first of all show there is great variation in what
households earn or perceive to earn but theremay also be not very exact. For this reason,
expenditureisagoodmeasuretobetterunderstandthestatusofhouseholds.
Table5-4 IncomeRangeofSurveyedHouseholds,N=133(inRupiah)
HouseholdIncome PerCapitaIncome
Average 33,903,180 7,412,983
Min 300,000 85,000
Max 175,000,000 35,000,000
StandardDeviation 27,166,316 6,053,362
Householdswereaskedabouttheirdaily,monthlyandregularexpendituresforfood,non-food
and specific occasion expenses. These were then calculated and approximated to monthly
expenditurestobeinlineandcomparablewiththeIndonesianpovertylineclassification.
Unfortunately, the numbers gathered in the field were not checked and calculated to a
monthlybasis.For instance, somehouseholds indicated that theydidnotbuyriceeveryday,
buttheenumeratorsdidnotrecordhowmanytimesricewasboughtwithinonemonth.Thus
someapproximationhadtobeused.Someofthenumbersindicatedlookexorbitantandsome
too small. In any case, this record is momentary. For a more exact representation of
expenditure patterns of PAHH, one would have to do recording of expenditures of a few
householdsovera coupleofweeksorevenmonths.Therefore thenumberspresentedhere
havetobetreatedcarefully.
Comparing thesenumbers to thepoverty line,allof thesurveyedhouseholdsareabove the
povertyline.
Table5-5MonthlyExpenditureRangeofSureveyedHouseholds,N=133(inRupiah)
Monthly FoodExpenditures Non-FoodExpenditures TotalExpenditures
Average 1,709,695 844,734 2,554,429
Min 309,000 115,500 424,500
Max 6,650,000 18,235,000 24,885,000
StandardDeviation 1,436,876 222,182 1,659,058
Page 60
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx 31
5.6 LandSoldto/AcquiredbySEML
Households were asksed about the land that was acquired by SEML at the time, what
compensation thathad receivedandwhat theydidwith thecompensationmoney received.
Following tables show the results.1 Accordingly, most land was dry land and only a small
percentage irrigatedricefields,grass landorwoodlots.Noneofthe landsoldtoSEMLwere
houselots.Morethanhalfofthelandwasprivatelyowned,whileaboutathirdwasownedin
partnershipwithothers.Inbothquestions,20%didnotreturnananswer.
Table5-6TypeofLandSoldto/Acquired
bySEML
N=133
DryLand/Garden 96(72%)
IrrigatedRicefield 10(8%)
Meadow/Grassland 2(2%)
WoodLot/Forest 1(1%)
HouseLot 0
Noanswer 24(18%)
Table 5-7 Ownership Status of Land Sold to /
AcquiredbySEML
N=133
OwnLand 67(51%)
OwnedinPartnership 38(29%)
Other 1(1%)
NoAnswer 26(20%)
Table 5-8 Total Area of Land Sold to/
AcquiredbySEML
N=101
Total 146,69ha
Average 1.11ha
Smallest 0.01ha
Largest 8ha
StandardDeviation 1.53ha
Noanswer 31
Table 5-9 Previous Yearly Earnings from Land
Soldto/AcquiredbySEML
N=9
Total IDR52,215,000
Average IDR395,568
Smallest IDR15,000
Largest IDR15,000,000
StandardDeviation IDR1,953,342
Noanswer 123
1 Note that the survey returned a significant number without any answers which indicates the
uptightness of the local community. Another reasons for no answer is also the time that has lapsed
between the time when land was acquired and this survey. And finally, in some cases, those who
participated in the survey were not the same household members who were involved in the land
acquisitionprocess.Therefore,theresultsherehavetobetreatedwithsomecaution.
Page 61
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx 32
Total land thatwassaid tohavebeensold toSEMLwas146,69hectareswithanaverageof
1.11hectares,rangingbetween0.01to8hectares.2Only9households indicatedtheiryearly
earningsofthelandsold,withyieldsrangingfromIDR15,000to15millionandanaverageof
nearlyIDR400,000peryear.
Table 5-10 Compensation Received
fromSEML
N=108
Total IDR6,353,564,000
Average IDR47,771,158
Smallest IDR20,000
Largest IDR551,000,000
StandardDeviation IDR90,761,223
Noanswer 25
Table 5-11 Total Area of Land Left After Land
Acquisition and Percentage of Total Sold to /
AcquiredbySEML
N=62
Total 154.61 -
Average 1.16 48.6%
Smallest 0.16 2.0%
Largest 11.00 100.0%
StandardDeviation 2.11 40.2%
Noanswer 71 32
Compensationpayments received fromSEMLranged from IDR20,000tomore than IDR550
million,whilelandremainingafterthelandacquisitionprocessrangedinsizebetween0.16to
11hectares.Percentageofsoldlandwithintheprojectarearangedfrombetween2to100%
withanaverageofnearly49%.
2 Note, total land sold to Supreme was 140 hectares. The total found in the survey is higher, this
inaccuracymaybeduetothedifficultiesmentionedearlierduringthesurvey.
Page 62
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx 33
6 COMMUNITYPERCEPTIONOFTHEPROJECT
6.1 Community’sunderstandingofGrievanceMechanism
The project affected people were also surveyed in terms of their understanding of SEML
Grievenacemechanism(GM).Only57(43%)outof133respondentsindicatedthattheyhave
heardoftheCompanyGrievanceMechanism.Majorityoftherespondentsorabout55%are
eithernotheardof,don’tknow,orjustknewaboutGrievanceMechanism.Tworespondents
gavenoanswer.Table6-2 indicates that the informationaboutGM is received fromfriends
(18%),SEML(14%),andvillageapparatus(10%).ThedatasuggeststhatdisseminationofSEML
GMhasnot thoroughly reachedPAPsuchas landacquisitionaffectedpeople.Thismightbe
thecasebecauserespondentsofthisstudyliveconsiderablyfarfromtheProjectsiteorthat
mediumofGMdisseminationdidnotreachtheareaoftherespondents.
Table6-1 Respondentsawareness(heard)ofSEMLGrievanceMechanism
N=133
Heardof 57(43%)
Notheardof 26(20%)
Don’tknow 44(33%)
Justknownow 4(3%)
Noanswer 2(1%)
Table6-2 ThesourceofinformationaboutGrievanceMechanism
N=133
Familymembers 5(4%)
Friends 24(18%)
VillageApparatus 13(10%)
SEML 18(14%)
Media 2(2%)
Other 1(1%)
Noanswer 70(53%)
In termsof lodginggrievances,majorityof respondents (56%)outof133 indicatedthatthey
facenodifficultiesinlodginggrievances.Meanwhile,29respondents(22%)implieddifficultyin
lodginggrievancesand35respondents(26)didnotgiveanswertothequestion.
Page 63
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx 34
Table6-3 DifficultiesinlodgingGrievances
N=133
Yes 29(22%)
No 69(52%)
Noanswer 35(26%)
Inregardstorespondents’awarenessofgrievancesaddressedtoSEML,50respondents(37%)
answeredthattheyareawareofgrivances,21(16%)respondentanswerednotawareofthe
grievances,and62respondents (47%)gavenoanswerontheawarenessofgrievance (Table
6-4). Out of 44 respondents who responded on issues or types of grivances lodged by
communities,25respondents (57%) indicatedthe issueof irrigationwaterproblem(clogging
ofcanals,dryingupricefields),followedbylandacquisitionandcompensationindicatedby13
respondents (30%), employment opportunities (7%), and lastly both land compensation and
irrigationwaterproblems(4%)andprojectnegativeimpacts(2%)(Table6-5).Theresponses
fromrespondentarerelevantwiththestagesofSEMLprojectwhichhavepassedthroughpre-
constructionphasewhereissuesofprojectnegativeimpactsareverylowandotherissueslike
landacquisitioncompensationandemploymentopportunitieshigh.
Table6-4 AwarenessofgrievancestowardSEMLinthecommmunity
N=133
Yes 50(37%)
No 21(16%)
Noanswer 62(47%)
Table6-5 TypesofgrievancesaddressedtoSEML
N=44
Irrigationwaterproblems(cloggingofcanals,dryingupricefields) 25(57%)
Landacquisitionandcompensation 13(30%)
Employmentopportunities 3(7%)
Bothlandacquisitionandcompensationaswellasirrigationwaterproblems 2(4%)
Projectnegativeimpacts 1(2%)
Out of 131 respondents who provided answers to SEML responses toward grievances, 34
respondents (26%) indicated that SEML straight away responded to the grievances and 25
respondents(19%)impliedthegrievancedirectlyresolved.15%ofrespondentsperceivedthat
SEMLneededlongtimetorespondtogrievancesand7%ofrespondentsperceivedthatissues
orgrievanceshavenotbeenresolvedbySEML(Table6-6).Intermsoftheperceivedquickness
in responding grievances, 56 respondents out of 132 or 42% indicated that SEML response
quitefast,2%suggestedveryfast.25respondentsor19%perceivedtheresponsequiteslow
Page 64
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx 35
and 5% very slow. Both questions were not answered by 34 % and 33 % respondents
respectively.
Table 6-6 Perceived SEML responses toward
grievances
N=131
Straightawayresponded 34(26%)
Straightawayresolved 25(19%)
Neededalongtime 19(15%)
Hasnotbeenresolved 9(7%)
Noanswer 44(34%)
Table6-7Perceived responsivenessof SEML
towardgrievances(quickness)
N=132
Veryfast 2(2%)
Quitefast 56(42%)
Quiteslow 25(19%)
Veryslow 6(5%)
Noanswer 43(33%)
48respondentsoutof133indicatedthattheyknowwhotocontacttoconveytheirgrievances
orabout36%oftotalrespondentsand33%impliedtheydidnotknowwhotocontact.41%or
41respondentsdidnotanswertothequestion(Table6-8).Intermofwhotoreportto,outof
20 respondents, 12 (60%) people reported to Mr. Muhammad Roza, SEML Assistant Field
Relations Officer, 6 respondents (30%) reported to Mr. Datuk or Bujang Joan, SEML Field
Relations Officer, and finally, 2 persons (10%) answered reporting toWali Nagari (Head of
Village).
Table 6-8 Do they knowwho to contact
forgrievances?
N=133
Yes 48(36%)
No 44(33%)
Noanswer 41(31%)
Table6-9Whotoreportto?
N=20
MuhammadRoza,
SEMLAssistantField
RelationsOfficer
12(60%)
BujangJoanDt.
Panyalai,SEMLField
RelationsOfficer
6(30%)
Wali(villagehead) 2(10%)
TheresponsesfromPAPrespondentshowedthatSEMLrepresentativesaremorewell-known
tothepeoplethanthirdpartyappointedbySEMLforGMcontact.
6.2 Community’ssatisfactionwiththelandacquisitionprocess
Of 132 households, 5 (4%) abstained, 12 (9%) thought the compensation was above
expectations,82(62%)foundthecompensationtobeatthemarketprice,11(8%)foundittoo
lowbutstillaccepteditwhile22(17%)feltitwastoolowbuttheydidnothaveanotherchoice
Page 65
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx 36
(“terpaksaditerima”)3.Overall77%werehappywiththelandacquisitionprocessandfoundit
tobefair,while18%werenotsatisfied.Aroundthesamesharesfoundthe informationthat
wasgivenatthetimesufficient.Around69%woulddoitagainiftheyweretoreturntothat
time, while 18%would not. 58% felt that compensation had a positive effect on their life,
while8%thoughtitdidnotand8%thoughtitdidnotchangeathing.Aquarteror26%didnot
answerthisquestion.Ofthe72householdswholeftareason,saidthecompensationwasused
to build or renovate a house, help with school fees, or for daily needs or the household
economy.
6.3 Community’sunderstandingofCurrentSEMLCSRProgram
In terms of PAP participation and occupation with SEML, out of 131, only 7 persons (5%)
answeredtheyhaveworkedforSEMLorSEML’scontractors/suppliers,45respondents(34%)
indicated that they have not worked for SEML or its contractors/suppliers, the rest of the
respondentseitherdidnotknoworgavenoanswer.
Table6-10 Have you everworked or areworking for SEML or
contractors/suppliers?
N=131
WorkingforSEML 0
HaveworkedforSEML 7(5%)
NeverworkedforSEML 45(34%)
Don’tknow 6(5%)
Noanswer 73(56%)
63 respondents or 47% out of 133 respondents indicated that they are aware of SEML
CSR/ISDPProgram.MostoftheCSR/ISDPactivitiesbySEMLtheyknowofhavebeendelivered
in2013or2014eithertotheirneighbours,thejorong,orthemosque,informofascholarship,
seedlingsassistance,andfundingforthemosque.35respondentsor26%answeredhavenot
heardoftheCompany’sCSR/ISDPprogram.Therestofrespondentsansweredeither,donot
know23%,justknownow2%,andgavenoanswer2%(Table6-11).
Table6-11 Awareness(Heard)ofSEMLCSR/ISDP
N=133
Heard 63(47%)
Havenotheardyet 35(26%)
Don’tknow 31(23%)
Justknownow 2(2%)
Noanswer 2(2%)
3SEMLhasstatedinalllandacquisitionprocessthatitisbasedon‘willingbuyerwillingseller’.
Page 66
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx 37
When asked about their participation and whether or not they have been beneficiaries to
SEMLCSR/ISDP,29(22%)respondentsoutof131respondedthattheyhaveparticipatedinthe
Company’s CSR/ISDP. Those who have not yet received SEML CSR/ISDP is as many as 60
respondents(45%)andtherestrespondedwithdonotknowabouttheprogram(32%),orjust
knownow(1%).
Table6-12 ParticipatedorbeneficiariesofSEMLCSR/ISDP
N=131
Yes,have 29(22%)
Notyet 60(45%)
Don’tknow 42(32%)
Justknownow 2(1%)
Noanswer 0
The perception of the PAP toward SEML CSR/ISDP implementation varied, 29 respondents
(22%)outof133, indicatedthattheyweresatisfiedwiththeCSR/ISDPprogram.Noneofthe
respondentsansweredthattheywerenotsatisfiedwiththeprogram.Therestofrespondents
eitherindicateddonotknow(41%)orgavenoanswer(37%).
Table6-13 PerceptionaboutSEMLCSR/ISDP
N=133
Satisfied 29(22%)
Notsatisfied 0
Don’tknow 55(41%)
Noanswer 49(37%)
The involvementofPAPscoped in this study is considered lowasper theTable6-13 above,
thisprobablybecauseof the focusofpreviousSEMLCSR/ISDPhavenot reachedtheareaor
thesegroupsofpeople.
6.4 Community’sunderstandingofCommunityCommittee
Community Committee was formed by SEML to bridge between Company’s and the
community’sneedsaround theproject area. Theexpectedoutput is a favourable conducive
relationshipbetweentheCompanyandsurroundingcommunities.
Out of 133 respondents surveyed, 60 persons (45%) indicated that theywere aware of the
existenceofCommunityCommittee.12(9%)respondentsdidnotgiveanswerwhiletherest
respondedunawareoftheCommittee21(16%),donotknowaboutthecommittee33(25%),
and those who just knew during the survey 7 (5%) (Table 6-14). In terms of the source of
Page 67
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx 38
informationabouttheCommittee,mostoftheinformationisreceivedfromSEML(23%),from
friendsandvillageapparatus(11%each),family(3%)andheadofRW/RT(1%),andfromother
sources(2%).NoneoftherespondentsobtainedtheCommitteeinformationfrommedia.The
numberofrespondentswhodidnotanswertothequestionis67persons(50%)(Table6-15).
Thedata suggests thatabouthalfof the surveyedPAPawareof the community committee.
Moredisseminationactivitiesof theCommitteeneed tobecarriedout toPAP througheasy
andaccessiblecommunicationtoolsandevents.
Table6-14 AwarenessofComunityCommittee
N=133
Yes,have 60(45%)
Notyet 21(16%)
Don’tknow 33(25%)
Justknownow 7(5%)
Noanswer 12(9%)
Table6-15 SourceofinformationaboutCommunityCommittee
N=133
Family 4(3%)
Friends 14(11%)
VillageApparatus 14(11%)
Rukun Warga (RW)/Rukun
Tetangga (RT) or cluster of
populationinavillage
1(1%)
SEML 30(23%)
Media 0(0%)
Other 3(2%)
Noanswer 67(50%)
TheparticipationofthePAPintheCommunityCommitteeisalsolow(Table6-16).50%or67
outof133 respondents indicated that thehavenotparticipated in thecommitteeeventsor
activities,14%or18persons impliedthatthehaveparticipatedoror joinedtheactivitiesof
theCommitteeand36%or48personsdidnotanswer.
Table6-16 ParticipationinCommunityCommitteeevents/activities.
N=133
Notyet 67(50%)
Yes,have 18(14%)
Page 68
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx 39
Noanswer 48(36%)
InregardtounderstandingoftherolesoftheCommittee,7outof126respondnetsknewwhat
therolewas,whiletheremainderdidnotrespond(whethertheyknewornot,isnotknown).
Answersofthe7respondentsvariedandwereasfollows:
§ Forjobrecruitment(2)
§ BridgingthepublicandgovernmentofficialswithPTSupreme(1)
§ Communitycomplaintscentre(1)
§ Fordiscussinglandmeasurementissues(1)
§ Collectinglocalworkforcedataandaccommodatingpeople'saspirations(1)
Formulatingactivities(1)
Table6-17 PerceptiontowardtheperformanceandbenefitsofCommunityCommittee
N=131
Good 3(2%)
Notgoodenough 7(5%)
Noanswer 121(93%)
Although45%haveheardofthiscommunitycommittee,theyseemtonotbeveryimpressed
aboutit.Thatshouldbefurtherinvestigated.Thosewhothoughtittobegoodreasonedthat
it was the link between SEML and the community (1) or that it was easy to deal with the
committee(1).Thosewhodidnotfinditusefulorgoodenoughsaidthatthey
§ Donotknow/haveseenitsperformance(2)
§ havenotseenitsactivities/itsrealization(2)
§ donotknowthepurpose(1)
§ thoughtifwasnotperformingwell(1)
§ thoughtitdoesnotconveytheaspirationsofthepeople(1)
§ founditalittleforced(1)
Page 69
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx 40
7 VULNERABILITYASSESSMENT
Vulnerability can be defined as a general condition of being exposed to potentially harmful
eventsortorisksthatcanhavean impactonfuturewelfare,suchasforexampletheriskof
remaining or becoming poor. Poor is generally referred to a well-defined low level of
consumptionoffoodandnon-foodgoodsaswellaslimitedaccesstoservices.Variousexternal
aswellas internal factors influencethevulnerabilityofahousehold.External factorsarethe
availabilityofeducationalandhealthfacilitiesforexample,whileinternalfactorsarereferred
toafamilyorhousehold’scapacityofcopingwithexposurestorisksandharmfulevents.This
assessment has focused on food, health, environment, and social and economic security as
wellasatgenderandeducationalattainment.
Theindicatorsbelowwereusedtoidentifyvulnerableindividualsandhouseholdsaspotential
participantsinthefocusgroupdiscussionsinordertofurtherstudytheirparticularneedsfor
skillsdevelopmentandchallengesforlivelihoodimprovement.
7.1 Screeningofresults
7.1.1 Foodsecurity
Householdswereaskediftheyhadeverexperiencedanytimeofhungerorstarvinginthelast
3years,forhowlongandforwhatreasonsandhowtheywerecopingwiththat.Noneofthe
households surveyed indicated that they had ever experiencedperiods of starving (113 had
not,and19didnotwishtoanswer).
7.1.2 SocialSecurity
Thesurveyquestionslookedatifhouseholdswereinvolvedinanysocialactivities,suchasany
villageinstitutions,andwhotheyapproachedtosolveconflictswithintheirfamilyorwiththeir
neighbours.Typeofconflictsandhowoftenthesewereexperiencedwasalsoasked.
Most of the households are not active in any of the village organizations, of thosewho are
active (18%) they either work for the local government or are involved in traditional
organizations related toMinangkabautraditions (adat leader,clan leader ,etc)or Indonesian
villageorganizations(scouts,women’sgroup)(Table7-1).
Table7-1 Activeinvillageorganizations
Activeinvillageorganization
Active 24 18% 21%
NotActive 93 70% 79%
Noanswer 15 11%
Total 132 100% 100%
Theformalandinformalinstitutionsincarryingoutitsrolesandfunctionshavenotyetbeen
supported by adequatemeans, especially from the village administration (Nagari) and sub-
village (Jorong). Institutions existing in the study area in general is the KAN, Nagari
Page 70
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx 41
ConsultativeBody(Bamus), InstituteforCommunityEmpowerment inNagari(LPMN),farmer
groups, theVillageUnitCooperatives (KoperasiUnitDesa/KUD), YouthOrganization (Karang
Taruna), Religious Study Club (Majelis Ta'lim), groups on Islamic studies, funeral organizing
groups (kelompok kematian), Quranic recital group (kelompok yasinan), Family Welfare
Improvement Society (PKK) and youth groups.Details of the functionof theseorganizations
andwhetherthesearepaidorhonorarypositionsarelistedinTable7-2.
Table7-2 Typeofvillageorganizations/activities
Organization Acronym Explanation Paid/Honorary
BadanMusyawarah
DesaorVillage
Forum
Bamusor
BPD
BPDisthevillagelevellegislativethatconsists
ofcommunityfiguressuchascustomary
leaders,headsofcommunityclusterorRukun
Warga,professionals,andreligiousleaders.
MembersofBPDareselectedevery6years
throughBPDSpecialmeeting.
Honorary
Gabungan
PerkumpulanPetani
PemakaiAiror
AssociationofWater
UsingFarmers
GP3A Theassociationoffarmerswhousewateris
formedbythegovernmentwiththebasic
functionto,a).distributeirrigationwaterjustly
andefficiently,b)tomanageconflictjustly
amongwaterusers,and3)tomaintaintertier
irrigationnetwork.P3Aiscloselysupported
andfacilitatedbytheGovernment.
Honorary
KerapatanAdat
Nagari
KAN KANisacustomaryinstitutionattheNagarior
villageleveltopreservetheMinangkabau
customs,whichconsistsofdatukfromevery
clan,intellectual,religiousleader,anddubalang
whoisinchargeforcommunitysafetyand
security.KANisunderabiggerinstitutionatthe
provinciallevelnamelyLembagaKerapatan
AdatAlamMinangkabau(LKAAM).
Honorary
Lembaga
Pemberdayaan
MasyarakatNagari
orInstitutionfor
NagariCommunity
Development
LPMN LPMNisformedtosupportNagarigovernment
toaccommodateandrealizetheneedsand
aspirationofcommunities.ThetasksofLPMN
aretodevelopaprticipativedevelopmentplan,
tomobilizecommunitymutualassistance,and
toimplementandcontroldevelopment.
Honorary
MajilisTa’lim MT MajlisTa’limisreligiouseducationalactivities
organizedorganizedbycommunitiesattended
byparticipantsofallages,usuallyexcept
childrenbecausechildrenwillattendPengajian.
Gathering
Mamak,Ninik
Mamak
- NinikMamakisheadoftheclan(suku)whilea
Mamakisthemother’sbrother,theyhavethe
authoritytodecideinaccordancewithadatlaw
Honorary
Pengajian - PengajianisaregularAlQuraneducation
activitiesorganizedbycommunitiesforlearning
purposessuchaslearninghowtorecite
Alqur’andalsotounderstandthemeaningand
contentofAlQur’anfromchildren,adult,and
adult.
Gathering
PegawaiKantor
PemerintahDaerah
Pemda Localgovernmentofficer Paid
Page 71
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx 42
Organization Acronym Explanation Paid/Honorary
Pertolongan
PertamaPada
Kecelakaan
P3K FirstAid Honorary
Pembinaan
Kesejahteraan
KeluargaorFamily
WelfareCouching
PKK PKKiswomenonlycommunitybased
organizationestablishedandsupportedby
Governmenttoempowerwomenin
development.
Honorary
GerakanPramuka
(PrajaMudaKarana)
Pramuka Scouts Honorary
RukunTetangga RT NeighbourhoodGroup Honorary
KelompokTani Famersgroup Honorary
WaliJorong - HeadofJorong,governmentposition,dicided
byWaliNagariDecreebasedonelectionof
decisionbycommunityevery3years
Paid
WaliNagari - HeadofNagari,governmentposition,elected
every6years.
Paid
Problemswithinthefamilyaresolvedeitherwithinthefamily,theparents,siblings,thelarger
family or the Mamak. For matters relating to neighbours the majority of the households
consulttheheadofthejorong.
Table7-3 Whoisconsultedforfamilymatters?
Helpwithfamilyinternal
conflicts
Percentagedistribution
Family 50%
LargerFamily 7%
Mamak 6%
Parents 14%
Siblings 2%
Alone 8%
Noanswer/Abstained 14%
Total 100%
Table7-4 Whoisconsultedforneighborhoodmatters?
Helpwithneighborhood
conflicts
Percentagedistribution
Family 8%
LargerFamily 2%
Mamak 5%
HeadofJorong 60%
HeadofScouts/Youthgroup 8%
Alone 1%
Nagariinstitution 1%
Closestfriend 1%
Page 72
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx 43
Helpwithneighborhood
conflicts
Percentagedistribution
Traditionalvillageleaders 1%
Noanswer/Abstained 14%
Total 100%
Onlytwooutof133householdsrespondedthattheyoftenexperiencedconflictinthefamily
orwithneighbours,15indicatedrarelyand90saidnever,while26didnotrespond.Typesof
conflictsthatwerementionedare listed inTable7-5.Accordinglydisputesoveremployment
opportunities, land and thefts were mentioned most often whereas young community
members and environmental concerns seem to be less of an issue that can potentially turn
intoaconflict.
Table7-5 Typesocialconflict
Typesofconflicts Frequency
EmploymentOpportunity 10
Land 8
Theft 6
Children&youngsterssocializing 2
Noise 2
Waterpollution 2
Airpollution 1
Source:Greencap,SESVASurvey,2017
7.1.3 Economicsecurity
Economicsecurity lookedatemploymentstatus, family incomeanddebtpressureaswellas
electricityandhousingcondition.
Ofa totalof124headofhouseholds6 indicated theywereunemployed.Halfof themwere
seekingajobforlessthan2yearswhiletheotherswerelookingforajobsincemorethanfour
years.Mostly itwasduetonoopportunitiesarisingaccordingtothesurveyed.Whileforthe
women,therewasonlyonewifewhoreportedthatshewasunemployednotmorethanone
year.
41outof 124households indicated theyhad topaydebt instalments regularly. Reasons for
takingoutaloanwerevaried(
Page 73
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx 44
Table7-6). Itwasassumedthathavingtotakeouta loanforpayingforchildren’seducation
andordailyexpensesaswellas forhaving tobuymedicinewasdeemedasan indicator for
potentiallybeingvulnerable.Forthese12householdsthedebtswereexaminedinmoredetail
Table 7-7. Debts ranged between IDR 1million to IDR 140million andmonthly instalments
betweenIDR200,000andIDR2.4million.
Page 74
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx 45
Table7-6 Reasonsfortakingoutaloan
Type Frequency Vulnerable?
Buildhouse 3
Buycar 1
Buyland 3
Buylivestock 1
Buymedicine 1 couldbevulnerable
Buymotorbike 1
Childreneducation 7 couldbevulnerable
Dailyexpenses 4 couldbevulnerable
Invest 18
Work 1
Total 40
Debt pressure of the 12 households that took out a loan for children’s education, buying
medicinganddailyexpenseswasasfollows:
Table7-7 Debtpressureof12households
Measure TotalDebt(IDR)MonthlyInstalments
(IDR)
Average 27,250,000 796,333
Min 1,000,000 200,000
Max 140,000,000 2,400,000
StandardDeviation 43,703,807 759,531
For5ofthetotal12households identifiedaspotentiallyvulnerabletherewasdataavailable
on income. Monthly debt pressure varied between IDR 200,000 to IDR 2,4 million. Debt
pressureversusmonthlyincomewasanalysedaspertablebelow.
7.1.3.1 Housingcondition
Intermsofhousing,mosthousesofthesurveyedhouseholdsweremadeofstone(78%)and
cementwhilearound20%weremadeofhardwood.Mostroofsweremadeofcorrugatediron
(85%),whilearound7%were tiled,and7%were straw thatched.Most flooringwascement
(67%), some 23% had tiles, 8% had wooden planks and 3% of the houses had an
earthen/adobefloor.
Page 75
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx 46
Table7-8 AccesstoElectricity
Measure Percentageof
Households
InstalledCapacity
• 90W 0.8%
• 450W 31.8%
• 900W 62.8%
• 1300W 4.7%
PaymentSchedule
Prepaid 12%
Postpaid 88%
Blackouts
• Often 47%
• Notreally 53%
7.1.3.2 Cookingfuel
AlmosttwothirdsofthesurveyedhouseholdsboughttheircookingfuelinformofLNG,while
38%collectedwoodforfiringtheircookingstoves.
7.1.3.3 Householdincomeandexpenditure
Households whose monthly per capita income was below Rp.1,000,000 were considered
vulnerablewithreferencetotheSouthSolokpovertylineofRp.292,292.Twohouseholdswere
classifiedasbelowthepovertyline(Table7-9).
Table7-9 HouseholdswithMonthlyPerCapitaIncomenearorbelowPovertyLine
HHSurvey
NoHhmembers peryearincome
percapitaper
yearincome
percapitaper
monthincome
1 5 36,000,000 7,200,000 600,000
3 4 4,080,000 1,020,000 85,000
18 6 14,436,000 2,406,000 200,500
19 2 18,000,000 9,000,000 750,000
21 1 3,600,000 3,600,000 300,000
54 5 57,600,000 11,520,000 960,000
68 3 24,000,000 8,000,000 666,667
97 5 57,600,000 11,520,000 960,000
112 3 28,800,000 9,600,000 800,000
115 5 55,200,000 11,040,000 920,000
Debt pressure versus monthly income from paid work was also looked at. One of the
householdshadahighdebtpressurewithlittlemonthlyincometocover.
Page 76
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx 47
Table7-10 Debtpressureversusmonthlyincome
NKMonthly
InstallmentsTotalDebt
Total
Monthly
IncomeofHH
Incomeminus
monthlyInstallment
7 1,500,000 60,000,000 n.a. -1,500,000
18 1,000,000 25,000,000 1,203,000 203,000
97 300,000 10,000,000 4,800,000 4,500,000
115 2,000,000 150,000,000 4,600,000 2,600,000
7.1.4 Environmentalsecurity
Environmental security lookedat if therewereanynaturaldisasters that thehouseholdwas
affectedby.Accordingly,107outof131hadexperiencedanaturaldisasterinthepast,while
only10outof93indicatedthattheirfamilywasimpactedinsomeway.Andonly4households
statedwhat kindof impact itwaswhich ranged from theirhousebeingdamagedor slightly
damagedandtwomentionedthericefieldbeingdamagedwithresultingharvestfailure.
Table7-11Householdsimpactedbynaturaldisasters
Detail Frequency N
Experienceddisaster 107 outof131
Familyimpactedbydisaster 10 outof93
Houseslightlydamaged 1
Housedamaged 1
Ricefielddamaged 1
Ricefieldanddryland(ladang)harvestfailure 2
7.1.5 Healthsecurity
Thehealth securityquestionsexaminedanymajorhealth issuesoccurring in thehousehold,
theconditionofthehouse,accesstowaterandsanitation.Only15householdsindicatedthat
oneoftheirfamilymembershadamajorhealthproblem.Formosttheseproblemsoccurredin
the last10yearsandwererelatedtostomach, lungsand lightstroke.Mosthouseholds that
wereaffectedusedthegovernmenthealthinsuranceschemetopayforthebills.
Table7-12 ReportedHealthIssues
Item No N Typeofhealthissue
Healthproblem 15 outof121
Howlong
• <5yrs 7 Lungs,pinchednerve,kidney,gastricacid,cyst
removed,breathingdifficulties
• 5-10yrs 5 Neckpain,lightstroke,stomachulcer,prostate,
typhoid
Page 77
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx 48
Item No N Typeofhealthissue
• >10yrs 2 Lightstroke,stomachulcer
Seenadoctor
• notyet 1 outof14
• already 12 outof14
• everynowand
then
1 outof14
Doctorbillspaidfor
Jaminankesehatan
(Jamkes)*help
1 outof9
OwnpocketandBPJS* 2
BPJS 4
BPJSandFamily 1
Ownpocket 1
*JaminanKesehatan=BadanPenyelenggara JaminanSosial (BPJS)KesehatanorSocial SecurityAdministrator for
HealthisanappointedagencybyGovernmenttoimplementnationalsocialsecuritysystemforworkforceaswellas
forhealthinIndonesia.
7.1.5.1 AccesstoWater
Water is a natural resource essential to sustain humanhealth andwell-being;Many factors
affectwaterqualityandavailabilityandseveralinfectiousdiseasesarewaterbornediseasesor
water becomes the habitat of disease vectors for diseases, such as for examplemalaria or
dengue. Sanitation is definedas “provisionof facilities and services for the safedisposal of
humanurineandfeces”and“themaintenanceofhygienicconditions,throughservicessuchas
garbage collection and wastewater disposal.” Many diseases are caused by improper
sanitationandimprovingfacilitieshasamajorbeneficialimpactonhealth,suchasforexample
diarrhoeaandtyphoid.
Overall,inIndonesia,threeinfourhouseholdshaveaccesstoanimprovedsourceofdrinking
waterand70%ofhouseholdsuseanappropriatewatertreatmentmethodpriortodrinking.
With respect to sanitation, 68% of households have improved toilet facilities that are not
shared with other households and about 12% use the natural water environment, such as
rivers,streamsorcreeksastoilets.
In thesurveyedhouseholds,mostusetownwater forall theirwaterneeds,whilesomealso
havetheirownwellorspringneartheirhouse.Mostusethesamesourceforalltheirwater
needs.75%havetheirowntoilet,whilestillalargenumber(17%)usetheriverfordefecation
and5%useacommunaltoilet(Table7-13andTable7-14).
Table7-13 NumberofHouseholdsandAccesstoWater
Source Drinking Cooking Washing/Toilet
PDAM/TownWater 73of127 72of128 67of128
Page 78
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx 49
Source Drinking Cooking Washing/Toilet
Ownwell 27of129 24of129 20of129
Communalwell 3of128 2of128 1of128
Springaroundthehouse 9of128 10of128 10of128
Pond 0of128 0of128 0of128
River 2of128 2of128 2of128
Other 16of128 17of128 18of128
Table7-14 NumberofHouseholdsandAccesstoSanitation
Defecationlocation Numberof
Households
Share
OwnToilet 99 75%
PublicToilet 7 5.3%
River 23 17.3%
Other 3 2.3%
Total 132 100%
7.1.6 OtherVulnerabilityIndicators
7.1.6.1 UseofCompensation
Householdswereaskedforwhattheyusedthecompensationreceivedandiftheyhadputany
of the compensation aside as savings.Most of the households needed themoney for daily
expenses(62%)andschoolfees(35%),andonlyafewinvestedintoland(8%)orsavedupthe
compensationreceived(5%).
Table7-15NumberofHouseholdsandUseofCompensationMoney
N=133 Yes No Noanswer
DailyNeeds 82 31 20
SchoolFees 47 48 38
Bike/Car 28 69 36
Other 28 84 21
Land 11 86 36
House 6 91 36
Saved 7 105 21
Themoneythatthe9%paidintothebanktosaverangedbetweenIDR5millionto70million,
withanaverageofIDR1.6milion.
Page 79
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx 50
Landsoldto/acquiredbySEMLasapercentageofthetotalland(includinglandboughtafter)
rangedfromlessthan10%to100%,thatisallthelandthatpeopleownedorfarmedwassold
toSEML.Detailsareaspertablebelow.
Table7-16 NumberofHouseholdsandPercentageof Landsold to/acquiredbySEML
fromTotalLand(includinglandboughtafter)
N=93
Morethan75% 21
Between25%and75% 50
Lessthan25% 22
Lessthan10%(partof
theabove)
7
Mosthouseholds,forwhichnumbersforareaoflandwasavailable,havesoldbetween25%to
75%oftheirtotallandownedandorfarmedtoSEML.4
7.1.6.2 Gender
Therewere24womenidentifiedbetweentheageof27and58whohadonlyprimaryschool
attained ifeverandwhowerenotworking.19of the24werehousewifesand5wereother
membersofthefamily.
7.1.6.3 Educationalattainment
Thesurveyidentifiedintotal12youngstersbetweentheageof20and30,whohadeitheronly
finished primary school if ever and who were not married yet. Two out of the 12 were
reportedtohavingdifficultiesinreading.Oneofthe12wasunemployed,whileallothershad
work.
7.1.6.4 SatisfactionwithSEMLLandacquisition
There were 5 households (or 4% of the total surveyed) that felt the compensation they
received for the land acquired by SEML was below standard price.While three of the five
householdwerestillsatisfiedwiththatprice,twoofthemfelttheywereforcedtoreceiveit.
Allofthe5householdshoweverindicatedthattheywerenotsatisfied,thatwouldnotwantto
sellagainiftheycouldgobackagainandthattheyfelttheimpactwasnotpositive.
7.1.7 SummaryofVulnerabilityAssessment
Tobeclassifiedasa(potentially)vulnerablehousehold,morethanoneoftheabovediscussed
indicatorhastoapply.Theoneexceptionwasmadetotheaveragepercaptiaincomeanddebt
44Note, the veracityof this statementmayneed tobe further investigated, as thenumbers for total
landmaynotallbeaccurate.40ofthe133householdsdidnotdetailtheirlandowningsorinformation
didnotmatch.
Page 80
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx 51
pressure versus income as these are the most significant indicators that can impact on a
household’s ability to survive in today’s society and economic system. A household with
insufficient financial means will struggle regardless of other indiciators of security being
sufficiently covered. The following table lists all the households that were applicable with
regardstothisclassification.
Whilemanyof thesehouseholdshavebeen invited in the focusgroupdiscussions,notallof
themhaveparticipated. It is thereforeparamount forSEML toeventually follow-upon their
status,asthissocio-economicprofileisonlythebeginning.
Also,otherhouseholdsthathavenotbeenidentifiedhere,maybecomevulnerableforsome
reasonoranotherorarevulnerablebutdatacollectedonthesewasincompleteorincorrect.
TheCSRprogramthatSEMLisimplementingintheregion,willhoweverhelptoaddresssuch
insufficiencies or new emerging (if ever) cases. It assumed, once the project runs and CSR
activities run at full speed, continuedmonitoring and evalution of the programswill ensure
thatvulnerablehouseholdswillbesupported.
Atotalnumberof18householdshavebeenidentifiedasvulnerableorpotentiallyvulnerable
(colour highlighted), they either apply to more than one of the vulnerability indicators (6
households, light yellow highlight) or have a low per capita income (11 households, orange
higlight)orhighdebtpressureversus income(1household,yellowhighlight)(SeeTable7-17
below).
Itisrecommendedthatthesearebeingcloselymonitoredandactivelyincludedinanumberof
CSRactivites.
Another19households(notcolourhighlighted)havebeenincludedinthetablebelowasthey
tick two vulnerability indicator boxes. These households could be potentially vulnerable or
becomevulnerablewhenasuddenchangeoflifehappens,suchasforexampleanillnessthat
preventsthemainbreadwinnertocontinuetoworkorbecomingunemployedforavarietyof
reasons.
It is suggested that these households are included in the monitoring activities and where
deemednecessaryalsoparticipatedintheCSRprograms.
Notethatforallidentifiedhouseholdsitwillbeimportanttoconfirmidentifiedindicatorsof
vulnerabilitytofindspecificmeanstosupporttheseinbecomingmoreresilient.
Page 81
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx 52
Table7-17 IdentifiedVulnerableandPotentiallyVulnerableSurveyedPAHH
PAHHSurveyNo
Periodsofstarving
Conflictwith
neighbours/family
Familyor
neighborhoodconflict
UnemployedHeadof
HH
UnemployedW
ife
Loan-m
edicine
Loan-schoolfees
Loan-dailyneeds
Loan-2forbuying
land
Incomevsdebt
pressure
Percapitaincome
Houseing-Strawroof
Houseing–Earthern
/Woodenfloor
Health-Chronicissue
Sanitation-River
wateruseforMCK
SEMLLA
process-Not
happy
Male<30,lowEA
Male<30,lowEA&
unemployed
Male-notactive,low
EAilliterate
W’n-W
ives,15-64,
notwork’g,lowEA
W’n-Other,15-64,
notwork’g,lowEA
Count
Sum
PercentageLandSold
34
3 1
2 3 6 0%
54
1
1 1
1 1
5 5 na
75
1
2
2 3 2%
83
1
1
1
3 3 67%
97
1 1 1
3 3 100%
107
1
1
1 3 3 73%
7
1
1
2 2 14%
18
1 1
2 2 11%
19
1
1
2 2 na
68
1
1
2 2 na
115
1 1
2 2 na
1
1
1 1 25%
3
1
1 1 na
10
1
1 1 100%
21
1
1 1 0%
44
1
1 1 36%
78
1
1 1 50%
112
1
1 1 100%
Page 82
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx 53
PAHHSurveyNo
Periodsofstarving
Conflictwith
neighbours/family
Familyor
neighborhoodconflict
UnemployedHeadof
HH
UnemployedW
ife
Loan-m
edicine
Loan-schoolfees
Loan-dailyneeds
Loan-2forbuying
land
Incomevsdebt
pressure
Percapitaincome
Houseing-Strawroof
Houseing–Earthern
/Woodenfloor
Health-Chronicissue
Sanitation-River
wateruseforMCK
SEMLLA
process-Not
happy
Male<30,lowEA
Male<30,lowEA&
unemployed
Male-notactive,low
EAilliterate
W’n-W
ives,15-64,
notwork’g,lowEA
W’n-Other,15-64,
notwork’g,lowEA
Count
Sum
PercentageLandSold
24
1
1
2 2 50%
30
1
1
2 2 40%
35
1
1
2 2 50%
62
1 1
2 2 na
69
1
1
2 2 na
70
1
1
2 2 na
71
1
1
2 2 na
72
1
1
2 2 na
77
1 1
2 2 50%
82
1
1 2 2 50%
89
1
1
2 2 44%
98
1
1
2 2 29%
102
1
1
2 2 14%
103
1
1
2 2 50%
105
1
1
2 2 94%
106
1
1
2 2 33%
113
1
1
2 2 100%
127
1 1 2 2 na
129
1
1
2 2* 14%
Page 83
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx 54
*Thosehouseholdsidentifiedwithonlyonecriterionforvulnerability,arenotincludedinthistable.
householdswithmorethan2areasofvulnerability
householdsotherwiseidentifiednearpovertyline(accordingtopercapitaincome)
householdsotherwiseidentifiedwithhighdebtpressure
Page 84
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx 55
7.2 VulnerabiltyandLandAcquisition
Whilewecannotknowtheexactimpactlandacquisitionhadontheaffectedhouseholdssince
baselinedataisnotavailable,thevulnerabilityassessmentcomparedwiththepercentageland
soldcanshedsomelightontheissue.5
Consideringthoseonlywhoindicatedtohavesoldmorethan0%land,thevastmajorityhave
soldmorethan10%,andmorethanhalfhavesoldmorethan50%oftheirtotalland.Allbut
oneofthehouseholdshave lowpercapita incomeandtwoofthesehouseholdsalsohavea
highdebtpressure.
Thus, clearly, having sold land did not benefit all of the households, in fact, having sold so
muchlandonlyacoupleofyearsago,onewouldthinktheywouldn’tbeappearingatthetop
ofthelistofthemostvulnerable.
Table7-18PercentageLandSoldandVulnerabilityofHouseholds
7.3 ResultsfromFGDs
In terms of vulnerability, men participants identified several factors that make people and
householdbecomevulnerableasfollows:
5Notehowever,thattheresultshavetobetreatedcarefullyandneedtobere-examined,householdby
household.Forexampleforthe18householdsidentifiedasvulnerable,5didnotrevealthepercentage
oflandsoldtoSEML,whiletwoofthehouseholdsdeclaredtheyhadsoldnone.Oneofthereasonsfor
theseincrongruenciesmaybethatthosewhowereinvolvedinthelandacquisitionatthetimemaynot
havenecessarilybeenpresentwhilethissurveywascarriedout.
PAHHSurveyNo
Incomevsdebt
pressure
Percapitaincome
Count
Sum
PercentageLandSold
97 1 1 3 3 100%
10 1 1 1 100%
112 1 1 1 100%
107 3 3 73%
83 1 3 3 67%
78 1 1 1 50%
44 1 1 1 36%
1 1 1 1 25%
7 1 2 2 14%
18 1 1 2 2 11%
75 1 2 3 2%
Page 85
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx 56
1. Ageingpopulationandvulnerablepeople:ingeneralproductiveageofmenaccordingto
participants is 65 years old,who can still work as farmers or livestock farmers.More
than65yearsoldisconsideredageingwhocannolongerbeproductive;
2. Young people with low level of educational attainment and who cannot work
productivelycomparedtoiftheyhavehighereducationalattainment;
3. Household who have no land and depend on other people’s request to work during
cultivationseason;thesepeoplebecomevulnerableduringnon-cultivationseasonwhen
theydonothavesourceofincome;
4. Household with many family members or dependents: head of family has limited
incomebutmanydependentsthathehastosupport.
Thewomen group identified vulnerability as those peoplewho have limited ability towork
suchaspeoplewithdisabilities,e.g.blindnessandsenilepeoplewhodonothavesupporting
familyofeitherkinorchildren.
8 SKILLSANDLIVELIHOODDEVELOPMENT
8.1 ReviewofskillandcapacitybuildingprogramcurrentlyonofferbySEML
Despite SEML project is not yet operating and productive, the Company has already
commencedcapacitybuildingthroughCSRprogramstoenhancecommunitycapacity/income
and self-sustaining capabilities. The Company’s Community Empowerment Policy is ‘helping
people to help them selves’, which mean building the capacity and capabilities of the
communitiestosustainablydevelopthemselves.
Until 2016, there are about 8 CSR program activities aimed to improve and develop the
capacity the theProjectaffectedcommunities,3activitiesunderEducationandHealthPillar
and 5 activities under Economic Empowerment Pillar. These activities are carriedout at the
regency,sub-districtandJoronglevelneartheProjectarea.
Table8-1belowshowsexistingcapacitybuildingactivitiesofSEMLinthepillarsofeducation
andhealthandeconomicempowerment.
Table8-1 ExistingSEMLCapacityDevelopmentProgram
Pillar Activities Location
EducationandHealth Provisionof10unitsofcomputersto
6schoolsinSolokSelatan
SolokSelatan
Developmentofnewclassroomof
JuniorHighSchoolandKindergarten
inAlamPauhDuovillages
SolokSelatan
EconomicEmpowerment Developmentofproductionsystem
andinternship/coachingof
embroideryartisans
Jorongnearprojectsite,
Pekonina,KampungBarum
PinangAwan,andTaratakTinggi
Continueprovisionofcapitalsupport
forLembagaKeuanganMikro-
Agribisnis,LKMAoragribusiness
microfinanceinstitutionandprovide
PauhDuoSub-District
Page 86
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx 57
Pillar Activities Location
trainingtonewenterpreneurs
Supportthedevelopmentof
traditionalmarketinKampungBaru
sub-village/hamlet.
PauhDuoSub-District
DonationforbuyingfishseedsofIkan
Larangan(literallymeansprohibited
fish)
SolokSelatan
Provisionof2000Macadamia
seedlingsforselectedhouseholds
PauhDuoSub-District
8.2 ResultsfromFGDsandKIIs
This sub-section highlights the results of four FGDs (Men, Women, Youth and Bundo
Kanduang/Woman Leaders Groups) based on four themes of discussions, that is the
knowledge of local communities of existing capacity building programs, challenges and
limitation, solutions for economic andwelfare improvement, andneeds andexpectation for
livelihoodandskilldevelopment.
8.2.1 Existingcapacitybuildingprogram
Therehavebeenanumberofcapacitybuildingprogramscarriedoutbygovernment for the
communitiesaroundMuaraLabohandProjectarea.Theprogramrangesfromdirectallocation
of cash, rice (food), and health card for the poor, financing, and community empowerment
programssuchastrainingandcapacitybuilding.
The list of community development programs identified during FGD that have been
implementedorreceivedbysomeoftheparticipantsareasfollows:
1. FishbreedingfromFishBreedingCenterorBBI(BalaiBenihIkan).
2. Cattleandlivestockallocatione.g.cows,ducks.
3. Houserenovationprogramforthepoor
4. Plantortreesseedlinge.g.mangosandmahogany.
5. Gasstoveallocation.
6. Riceforthepoor.
7. CommunitySocialDirectAssistance(inCash)orBantuanLangsungSosialMasyarakator
BLSM.
8. Skilltraining,e.g.wielding,electricity,motorbikeworkshop,andcooking,.
9. Revolvingfundandmicrofinance.
10. ProvisionofsewingMachine.
11. Provisionofricefieldplowingmachine.
12. National Program for Community Empowerment, Program Nasional Pemberdayaan
Masyarakat (PNPM), such as building bridge through community based public
infrastructuredevelopment.
Page 87
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx 58
13. FamilyWelfare andEmpowerment,PemberdayaandanKesejahteraanKeluarga (PKK),
e.g.counselingonabalancednutrition,measurestoimprovefamilyempowerment.
14. DasaWismaGroupof20people toanticipateanycommunitiesvulnerable topoverty,
illness,anddeceases.
15. Integratedhealthservicesfortheelderlyandbabiesunderfive.
16. Irrigation.
17. Scholarship.
8.2.2 Challengeandlimitationofcurrentcapacitybuilding
CurrentcapacitybuildingprogramaccordingtotheFGDparticipantsencountersmany issues
thatmaketheprogramsnotsustainable.Thesechallengesandlimitationsareasfollows:
Securityissue
Mostpressingsecurityissueislivestocktheftsuchascows,chicken,andfish.Theftbecomesa
big issue and concern among communities that any community development needs to
considerthisaspect.
Lackofsupportingassistance
Mostoftheassistanceprovidedtothepeopleisnotsupportedwithsufficientknowledgeand
proper training which becomes not sustainable. In other cases, communities do not have
resourcetocontinuetheactivityforinstancetheydonothaveenoughmoneytobuyfishfeed
forfishbreedingprogram.
NaturalDisaster
Naturaldisasterlikefloodcausesfailureinagriculturalactivities.Forsmallfarmers,thecapital
they invest in agriculturemay easily disappear as the result of disaster and it is difficult for
themtogetnewcapitalandtostartthelivelihoodagain.
Difficultyinpayingdebtinstallment
This is attitude issues where to some people it is very difficult to pay debt installment.
“Meminjamrasadiberi, kalaumembayar rasakehilangan”,or“loaned is likegranted,paying
debtislikeloss”,thatistheexpressionsharedbyFGDsparticipantsthataccordingtothemone
ofthefactorscontributetothefailureofrevolvingloanprogram.Topayafixedmonthlydebt
payment is also difficult for the people because their ability to pay debt depends on their
revenueor income.Thewomengroupshowsmoresuccessl inmanagingrevolving loanthan
menaccordingtoFGDparticipants,whichiswhyoneofrevolvingfundwhichwasallocatedfor
meneventuallyshiftedtowomen.
NoCapitaltostartabusiness
Someparticipants said that theyalreadygot trainedonparticularexpertisesuchaswielding
andfurniturebuttheydonothavecapitaltostartupabusinessrelatedtotheirexpertise.
NoSkilltostartabusiness
Someparticipantssaidthattheydonothaveskillorexpertisetostartabusinesssuchashome
industry.
Page 88
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx 59
Weakmarketingoffarmers’produce
The marketing of farmers produce are very weak that results in low income of farmers
especiallyduringharvestseason.
Lackoftrustongroupcooperation
Currentcommunitycapacitybuildingsfailedbecauseofthegroupscreatedfortheprogramis
notsolidandnotrustamonggroupmembers.Thegroupswereformedbasedonlocationand
notbasedonemotionalbonding,whichiswhymanygroupbasedcooperationfailed.
Lackoftrustonvillageleaders/elites.
The communities have trust crisis toward local or village leaders to manage any capacity
buildingprogram.Theysuggestedthatfuturecapacitybuildingshouldbedirectlymanagedby
SEMLorotherthirdparty.
Landavailabilityissues
Land becomes an issue for some community members especially in the areas near Muara
Laboh.Anylandbasedcapacitybuildingsuchasagricultureorfishfarmingwillnotbepossible
ifbeneficiarydonothaveland.
8.2.3 Solutionforeconomicandwelfareimprovement
The FGD participants realized that the capacity building assistance provided by the
governmentdonot last longor sustainable.Mostof theassistance lasted shortand left ‘no
evidence’forthecommunitiesandeventothebeneficiariesthemselves.Thatiswhy,looking
backtopastexperience,FGDparticipantssuggestedthefollowingsolutionsforfutureplanof
communitycapacitybuildingandcommunitydevelopmentprogram,i.e.:
1. Anycommunityassistanceordevelopmentprogramshouldbedesigned for long term
development.
2. Assistance in the formof infrastructure,suchasbridges topaddy fieldswillbehelpful
andsustainable.
3. Assistanceshouldbedistributedthroughaneutralinstitutionsuchasdirectdistribution
bySEML.
4. Groupshouldbebasedonemotionalbonding,notbasedonlocation.
5. Marketingoffarmers’produceshouldbeimproved
6. Needtonurturesolidarityandcooperationamongcommunitymembers
7. Tosupportcontinuededucationthroughgovernment’seducationalPaketA,B,Cprogram
forthosewhocouldnotcontinuetheireducationduetoeconomicorotherreasons.
8. To raise the habit of giving donation (Santunan) to the elderly who is no longer
economicallyproductivesuchastoraisedonationfortheelderlyintheMosque.
9. Fortheelderly,assistanceshouldbegiventochildrenwhotakecareoftheelderlysuch
astoprovidetrainingtoimprovethefamilyeconomyso,
10. Promotethehabitofhelpingthepoor,generallythevulnerablepoorwomen.
Page 89
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx 60
8.2.4 NeedsandExpectation
FGD participants expressed their 25 needs and expectations to improve their skills and
livelihood which can be categorized into three main requests that are training and skill
development,capital,andprovisionofgoodsascapitalsuchasqualitybreedsandseeds.Table
8-2belowshowslistofneedsandexpectationsofeachgroupduringtheFGD.
Table8-2 ListofNeedsandExpectationsforSkillandLivelihoodDevelopment
MenGroup WomenGroup YouthGroup
Bundo
Kanduang/Women
LeaderGroup
1. Trainingonfish
farming.
2. Trainingon
qualitycow
livestock.
3. Trainingon
agriculture.
4. Trainingon
Furniture/carp
entry
1. Sewingand
embroideryskill.
2. Homebasefood
industrysuchas
dendengbaluik,
dendengpucuak
paranci.
3. Trainingon
Agriculture.
4. Trainingonduck
livestock.
1. Farmingskill
2. Qualitycommodity
seeds.
3. Hatcheryskill,how
toincubateeggs
usingmachine.
4. Furnitureexpertise.
5. Foodindustryskill.
6. Business
Managementskill.
7. Techniquesofhow
tomarket
products.
8. Trainingon
Kampongchicken
farming.
9. Trainingonfish
farmingandhowto
makefishponds
correctly.
1. Capitaltostart
businesswithout
interest.
2. Sewingmachine
toimprove
familyeconomy.
3. Quality
seeds/breeds
suchas
vegetableand
fish.
4. Trainingon
sewing.
5. Trainingon
cooking(tata
boga).
6. Trainingon
chicken
7. Trainingonfish
farming.
8. Trainingoncow
livestock.
9 DISCUSSIONANDRECOMMENDATIONS
9.1 IdentifiedneedsfromVulnerabilityAssessmentandSocioEconomicProfile
Vulnerability of the surveyed households is mainly centered around ecomic security and
educationalattainmentoftheyoungeragedmalepopulation.
Themainoccupationsofhouseholdmembersinthesurveyedareaarestillfocusedonfarming
activities.Thosewhoarelookingforjobsarethoseagedbetween20and30yearsold.Theyall
have in general a good educational attainement with most having completed secondary
highschoolandeventertiaryeducation.
However,inthissegment,therewerealsothosemostvulnerabletohavingdifficultiesfinding
a job, themale population surveyed with low educational attainment. Targeting the young
male to support them with targeted livelihood and skills development programs will be a
usefulapproach.Jobsthatevolvearoundtheprocessingoffarmingproduceorthemarketing
Page 90
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx 61
offarmingexperience(agroecotourism),astepfurtherinthesupplychainwouldhelptokeep
economicvalueintheregion.
Another area of vulnerability was the type of loans that are being taken out by the local
communityandthedebtpressurethatsomehouseholdsexperiencewhenlookingatmonthly
instalmentsversushouseholdincomefrompaidwork.
9.2 IdentifiedneedsfromCommunityandprioritization
As it is stated in the section 7.2.4, there are 25 needs and expectation raised by FGD
participants, 20 of which or about 80% requesting the provision of training and skill
development. Trainings and skill development are requested by all groups. The provision of
goods as capital such as quality breeds and seeds requested by the youth and Bundo
Kanduang/women leader groups, 12% or 3 requests. Finally, the request for capital to start
businessor livelihood,2outof25needsandexpectationorabout8percent.Figure9-1and
Figure9-2shownumberofneedsandexpectationsbygroupsanditspercentage
Figure9-1 VulnerableGroups,needsandexpectations
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Training/skill Capital Provisionof
goodsas
capital
MenGroup
WomenGroup
YouthGroup
BundoKanduang/Women
Leader
Page 91
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx 62
Figure9-2 Percentageandtypeofrequestedcapacitybuilding
Out of 20 trainings/skill development requested, the most frequently asked is training on
agricultureandfishfarming,whichare3requestsor15%respectively, followedbybusiness
management/marketing,Kampongchickenlivestock,sewing/embroidery,furniture/carpentry,
andcowlivestockwith2requestsor10%respectively.Othertrainingandskilldevelopments
are on duck livestock, food industry, hatchery, and cooking. Figure 9-3 shows types of
trainingsandskillsrequestedanditsfrequencyamongFGDgroups.
80%
8% 12%
Typeofcapacitybuildingrequested
Training/skill
Capital
Provisionofgoodsas
capital
Page 92
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx 63
Figure9-3 Typeofrequestedtrainings/skilldevelopment
Therequestforprovisionofcapitalwasraisedtostartuphomebasefoodindustryandcapital
tostartbusinesswithoutinterest.Thepaymentofdebtshouldbemanagedinsuchawaythat
iseasyforthepeopletopay.
Intermsoftheneedsfortheprovisionofgoodsfor livelihoodcapital, therearethreeneeds
raisedbyparticipants,theyare2requestsforqualitycommodityseedsandbreedssuchasfish
breeds,andsewingmachine.
9.2.1 PresentdayCSRprogramsufficienttocoverorwhatitalreadycovers
SEMLhasstartedcapacitybuildingprogramsasabovementioned insection7.1whichcovers
not only economic empowerment, but also education and health such as to provide sport
coachestoimproveathleteperformance.
SomeoftheneedsandexpectationsraisedbyFGDparticipantsinthisSESVAinfacthavebeen
implementedbySEMLintheselectedJorongnearandaroundProjectsiteandPauhDuoSub-
districtsuchasprovisionofinternshipforcattlefarmers,provisionofcapitalforfishfarmers,
internship of embroidery artisans, and distribution ofMacadamia seedlings. Some of these
activitiescanbereplicatedandadjustedwiththeconditionofprojectaffectedpeoplecovered
bythisSESVA.
FishFarming/FishPonds
CowLivestock
Agriculture
Furniture/carpentry
Sewing/embroidery
Cooking
KampongChickenLivestock
Hatchery
Foodindustry
BusinessManagement/marketing
Ducklivestock
TotalRequests
05
1015
20
3
2
3
2
2
1
2
1
1
2
1
20
TypeofTrainings/skillsRequested
Page 93
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx 64
9.2.2 Availabilityoflocalgovernment/publicandprivateeducational/vocationaltrainingsforskills
development/improvement
Solok Selatan Regency is newly established regency that splitfrom Solok Regency. As a new
regency, local governmentof Solok Selatanpromotes thedevelopment in the regency in all
aspectsincludingsocio-economicaspect.TheareaaroundMuaraLabohandSEMLProjectsite
haslimitedlandspacebecauseabout60%iswithinTamanNasionalKerinciSeblat(TNKS)or
Kerinci-SeblatNationalPark.
Considering this challenge, the local government promotes ecotourism, agro tourism, and
culturalsiteofSaribuRumahGadangnearMuaraLabuhandSEMLprojectareas.Toanticipate
thedevelopmentofindustriesandgreenandrenewableenergyinthearea,localgovernment
hasestablishedAkademiKomunitas(AK)orcommunityacademywithappliedvocationswhose
graduatesexpectedlycanbeeasilyemployedbyindustries.
The following list of local government offices and educational institutions provide capacity
buildingandvocationaltrainingtothelocalcommunities.
1. Dinas Tenaga Kerja dan Transmigrasi (Disnakertrans) provinsi Sumatra Barat, Jalan.
UjungGurunNo.7Padang,KodePos25114,Telp.(0751)27417.
Provincial office for transmigration and workforce or of West Sumatra provides
workforceempowermentprogramstoanyareaswherethere isnoBalaiLatihanKerja
(BLK)orWorkTrainingCentre.Theofficealsocooperateswithregencyworkforceoffice
to provide services such as internship for Indonesian workforce before being sent
overseas.
2. Dinas Sosial Tenaga Kerja dan Transmigrasi Kab. Solok Selatan, Jalak Raya Lubuk
Gadang,KodePos27378,Telp.(0755)583438
Office for transmigration and workforce of Solok Selatan Regency provides capacity
buildingprogramforpeoplewhocannot furtherstudyanddisadvantagedpeoplesuch
asTenagaKerjaMandiri(TKM)orindependentworkforceprogramandMobilTraining
Unit (MTU) or Mobile Training Unit. The office implements central and provincial
governmentprogramsonworkforcetrainingandempowerment.
BalaiLatihanKerja(BLK)orWorkTrainingCentreisjustnewlyestablishedintheoffice
oftransmigrationandworkforce.Thereareseveralvocationaltrainingsareorganizedin
theCentre, that iswielding,cooking,garmentandfurniture(mobiletrainingunit).The
officeisnowintheprocessoffindingnewlocationtoaccommodatebetterfacilitiesfor
BLK. Vocational training can be requested by communities through Nagari to
DisnakertransandBLK.
3. DinasPendidikanKab.SolokSelatan,LubukGadang,Sangir,SolokSelatan,27778
DinasPendidikan (Disdik)orOfficeof Educationof Solok SelatanRegencyorganized a
number of educational programs to assist the poor and those who cannot continue
studydue toeconomicandother reasons.TheseprogramsareeducationalpackageA
(equal to primary school), B (junior high school), and C (high school plus life skill) to
Page 94
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx 65
improve one’s capacity. Besides educational package, the office established Sanggar
KegiatanBelajar(SKB)orStudioforLearningActivity.
4. AkademiKomunitasSolokSelatan,alamatsepertidiSMK1danSMK5dibawah.
AkademiKomunitasorCommunityAcademyiscollaborationDiploma1and2between
SolokSelatanRegencywithStatePolytechnicofPadang.TheAcademytemporarilyuses
thebuildingsofSMK1andSMK5(theaddressasbelow).SimilartoSMK,theAcademy
provides vocational classes for accounting, computer network engineering, and
electricity engineering. The Academy provides 70 percent practices and 30 percent
theories.
5. SekolahMenengahKejuruan(SMK)1,SolokSelatanJl.RayaKotoBaru–MuaraLabuh
Km.3,PulakekKotoBaru,Kec.SungaiPagu,Kab.SolokSelatan.
The vocational school offers three main expertises that is business management,
technology,andhotelandtourism.TheschoolorganizesPraktekKerjaIndustri(PKI)or
industrialwork internship. The school also initiated to invite industries as partners to
employstudentsfromthevocationalschool.
6. SekolahMenengahKejuruan(SMK)4,SolokSelatanJl.RayaMuaraLabuh-PadangAro
Km.6,2Kec.PauhDuo,Kab.SolokSelatan.
SimilartoSMK1,SMK4alsoprovidesvocationalstudybutindifferentfieldofexpertise
whichisonbuildingconstructionandmachine.
7. SekolahMenengahKejuruan(SMK)5,SolokSelatanJl.AnakLoloBancahPakanRabaa
TengahKec.KotoParikGadangDiateh,PakanRabaa,Kab.SolokSelatan.
Thevocationalschoolprovidestheexpertiseonelectricityandcomputernetworking.
9.3 RecommendationofthefutureCommunityCapacityBuilding
SEMLcapacitybuildingforthevulnerablepeopleshouldconsiderthefeedbacksreceivedfrom
theaffectedpeopleduringtheSESVAstudy.Thefollowingprinciplesshouldbeconsideredin
thedevelopmentandimplementationofskillandlivelihooddevelopmentprogram.
Individualbase(bondedbase)programratherthangroupbase
Thefeedbackobtainedfromthestudyshowsthatthepeopledonothavestrongspirittowork
andimplementaprograminagroup.Lackofgroupcooperationandbondingmayleadtothe
failureofcapacityprogramimplementationasithappenedinothercommunitydevelopment
programs and capacity building activities previously. While implementing individual base
program,SEMLmaydevelopthespiritofcooperationinateamorgroupamongcommunities
throughpilotprogramwith theexpectation that in the futuregroupbasedprogrammaybe
abletobeimplementedmoresuccessfully.
Needbase
Skills and livelihood development should be based on real needs and expectations of the
people identified such as through needs assessment study. Different project affected
Page 95
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx 66
individual hasdifferent needs that canbe included in theCompany’s developmentprogram
basedontheirpriorities.
Sustainability
Any capacity building and community development program should be designed
comprehensivelyincludingtoprovideanysupportingfundingormaterials/goodstomakesure
thattheintendedobjectiveandtargetofimprovingone’seconomicconditionisachieved.
Communalbase
Besidecertaincapacitybuildingprogramsthatshouldbeimplementedonindividualbase,the
feedbackfromcommunityshowthatcorporatesocialresponsibilityprogramandcommunity
development in the form of infrastructure development is more beneficial and useful for
communityatlarge.It isimportancetokeepthedevelopmentand/orrehabilitationofpublic
infrastructureandfacilities,whichcanbecarriedthroughcommunitycollaboration.
Genderequality
Any capacity developmentprogram shouldbe inclusiveof all genders andnodiscrimination
towardanyparticulargender.
Flexiblemodeofdebt/loanpayment
Capacitybuildingprograminmicro-financingsuchasthroughrevolvingfundshouldconsidera
flexiblewayofparticipants topay their loanordebt.The failureofpreviousmicro financing
scheme, among others, was because the participants (debtors) depend on their revenue of
sellingtheirproductstopaytheirdebtinstallment.
Assistingthefamilies/householdwhosupportvulnerablepeople
The communities around theProject areaespecially theMinang communityhas very strong
religiousandtraditionalpracticesthattheystillexerciseuntilnow.Vulnerablepeoplesuchas
the elderlywill be taken care by their children or by their closest families. That iswhy any
capacity building for vulnerable people in some cases can be directed toward improving
economicincomeofthefamilieswhosupportthevulnerablepeople.
Partnershipandengagementwithlocalstakeholders
Capacitydevelopmentprogramcanbe implementedand in some instanceseven stronger if
local stakeholderare involvedsuchas localgovernmentsuchas theDinasofTransmigration
andWorkforce that provides services for improving the skill of local workers and Dinas of
Educationthatprovideseducationalpackages(A,B,C)forthepeoplewhocannotcontinueand
completebasiceducationalrequirement.
SinceSEMLhasstartedCSRprogramthatcoverssomesuggestedcapacitybuildingactivities,it
canreplicatetheexistingactivitiestotheprojectaffectedcommunitieswithinthescopeofthis
study.ThesuggestedcapacityprogramsthathavenotbeenimplementedintheexistingCSR
canbeimplementedbyengagingorpartneringwithrelevantinstitutionwhohastheexpertise
suchasVocationalHighSchoolandCenterforWorkTraining.
Base on the needs identification and prioritization in the section 8.1.1 above, table below
show suggested method/approach and potential partner in implementing future capacity
buildingprogram.
Page 96
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx 67
Table9-1 Proposedfuturecapacitybuildingforprojectaffectedpeople/vulnerablepeople
No Proposedactivities Method/Approach Implementer PotentialPartner
I Training/Skilldevelopment
1 FishFarming/Fish
Ponds
Replicationofcurrent
CSRprogramandwhere
possibleimproveto
adjustwiththelocation
anddemand
SEML DinasPertanian,Peternakan,
danPerikanan,KabSolokor
Agriculture,AnimalHusbandry,
andFisheryDinasofSolok
Selatang
2 Agriculture Developandprovide
trainingsongood
agriculturepractices
SEML DinasPertanian,Peternakan,
danPerikanan,KabSolokor
Agriculture,AnimalHusbandry,
andFisheryDinasofSolok
Selatang
3 Business
Management/Mark
eting
Developandprovide
trainingsonBusiness
Managementand
Marketing
SEML VocationalHighSchool(SMK)1,
CommunityAcademy(AK)
4 KampongChicken
Livestock
Replicationofcurrent
CSRprogramandwhere
possibleimproveto
adjustwiththelocation
anddemand
SEML DinasPertanian,Peternakan,
danPerikanan,KabSolokor
Agriculture,AnimalHusbandry,
andFisheryDinasofSolok
Selatan
5 CowLivestock Replicationofcurrent
CSRprogramandwhere
possibleimproveto
adjustwiththelocation
anddemand
SEML DinasPertanian,Peternakan,
danPerikanan,KabSolokor
Agriculture,AnimalHusbandry,
andFisheryDinasofSolok
Selatang
6 Furniture/carpentry Developandprovide
trainingsonfurniture
andcarpentry
SEML DinasofSocial,Transmigration
andWorkforce
(Dinsosnakertrans),Centrefor
WorkTraining(BLK)
7 Sewing/embroidery Replicationofcurrent
CSRprogramandwhere
possibleimproveto
adjustwiththelocation
anddemand
SEML DinasofSocial,Transmigration
andWorkforce
(Dinsosnakertrans),Centrefor
WorkTraining(BLK)
8 Cooking(Tataboga) Developandprovide
trainingsonCooking
(tataboga)
SEML DinasofSocial,Transmigration
andWorkforce
(Dinsosnakertrans),Centrefor
WorkTraining(BLK),SMK1
9 Hatchery Developandprovide
trainingsonhatchery
SEML DinasPertanian,Peternakan,
danPerikanan,KabSolokor
Agriculture,AnimalHusbandry,
andFisheryDinasofSolok
Selatang
10 Foodindustry Developandprovide
trainingsonfood
industry
SEML DinasofSocial,Transmigration
andWorkforce
(Dinsosnakertrans),Centrefor
WorkTraining(BLK),SMK1
Page 97
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx 68
No Proposedactivities Method/Approach Implementer PotentialPartner
11 Ducklivestock Replicationofcurrent
CSRprogramandwhere
possibleimproveto
adjustwiththelocation
anddemand
SEML DinasPertanian,Peternakan,
danPerikanan,KabSolokor
Agriculture,AnimalHusbandry,
andFisheryDinasofSolok
Selatang
II Capital
1 ProvisionofCapital
forfoodhome
industry
Replicationofcurrent
CSRprogramandwhere
possibleimproveto
adjustwiththelocation
anddemand
SEML DinasofSocial,Transmigration
andWorkforce
(Dinsosnakertrans),Centrefor
WorkTraining(BLK),SMK1
2 Loan/capitalfor
businesswithout
interest
Developmechanismfor
loan/capitaldistribution,
controlandmonitoring
SEML Localornationalexperienced
NGOsonmicrofinance
III Provisionofgoodsaslivelihoodcapital
1 Provisionofquality
commoditybreeds
andseeds
Replicationofcurrent
CSRprogramandwhere
possibleimproveto
adjustwiththelocation
anddemand
SEML DinasPertanian,Peternakan,
danPerikanan,KabSolokor
Agriculture,AnimalHusbandry,
andFisheryDinasofSolok
Selatang
2 Provisionofsewing
machine
Replicationofcurrent
CSRprogramandwhere
possibleimproveto
adjustwiththelocation
anddemand
SEML -
10 CONCLUSION
Theaimofthisstudywastogatherdataonthesocio-economicprofileofPAHHandtoassess
theirvulnerability.ThePAHHhaveallbeenaffectedbylandacquisitioncarriedoutaspartof
SEML’s project development. Although the landwas designated as area for other use (APL)
ownedby thegovernment, the communityhadbeenusing the landapproximatelyover the
last two decades. SEML recognised the community’use of the land and thus carried out a
properlandacquisitionprocessandfaircompensationbasedonthewillingbuyerwillingseller
principle.
At the time, no detailed socio-economic census survey was carried out. This study now
attemptstofillthisgap,alsocomplementingthestudythathasbeencarriedoutin2015with
75ofthePAHHwhostillresidewithinthering1areaofSEMLprojectareaof influence.It is
noteworthytohighlightthatasinitialbaselinedataisnotavailable,thisstudycannotcoverall
aspects thatareusuallyexamined. Inparticular changeof livelihoodsand incomes following
compensationpaymentsaredifficulttoshow.Thatiswhyavulnerabilityassessmenthasbeen
conducted to identify those households that are at risk and those that are vulnerable,
regardlessofpreviousachievementsandimpacts.
The present survey has covered 133 households who were all affected by SEML land
acquisition.Apart froma socioeconomicprofile and vulnerability assessment, livelihood and
Page 98
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx 69
skillsdevelopmentneedsandexpectationsofPAHHandcommunityleadersandlivelihoodand
skills development existing facilities and programs offered by local government and other
educationalfacilitiesandSEMLitselfthroughitsCSRprogramwerealsoexamined.
Anumberof challengeswere facedwhile carryingout the survey, suchas the identification
andlocatingofaffectedhouseholds,thedissatisfactionofhouseholdswiththelandacquisition
process and a corresponding dislike in responding to surveyors’ questions as well as
inadqueacy of enumerators in filling in the requested information, errors in data entry and
subsequentdelaysindataanalysisaswellasdistanceintermsofresidenceofhouseholdsand
arrangeingoffocusgroupdiscussions.
In summary,of the133households,around13.5%havebeen identifiedasmost likely tobe
vulnerablewhile another 14.3% are potentially vulnerable. These households could become
vulnerablewhenasuddenchangeoflifehappens,suchasforexampleanillnessthatprevents
themainbreadwinnertocontinuetoworkorbecomingunemployedforavarietyofreasons.
Whetherthevulnerabilitiesidentifiedaredirectlylinkedtotheamountoflandsold,hasyetto
be confirmed. As indicated earlier, the accuracy of some of the data may be skewed and
baseline data is not available.Nonetheless, it is clear, thatmany households are vulnerable
anddorequirespecialattention.Andsomeofthemostvulnerablehouseholdsalsoappearto
havesoldalargepercentageoftheirland.Thisindicatesthatthecompensationsreceiveddid
notcontributetoabetterandwealthierlive.
The fact that the majority of households has sold between 25 to 75% of their total lands
farmedorownedrevals thatpeoplemayhavehopedfora lifeoutsideof farming.However,
compensation payments were only marginally invested for longterm projects such as
children’seducationandsavingsinthebank,whilethemajoritywasusedforeverydayneeds.
It showsthat there isclearlyaneed for investingmore intopeople’s skillsdevelopmentand
openingupnewemploymentopportunities.
Theresultsofthevariouspartsofthestudyfitwelltogetherandconfirmindividualfindings.
The major issues can be summarised are evolving around education, finance and business
development.Amajor impediment to improvements in farmingskillsare the riskof theftof
livestock thoughwhichmayneed tobe looked into inmoredetailwould suchprogramsbe
considered.ESC/Greencap’srecommendationforfutureimprovementfocusonallofthethree
areasmentionedabove.
A furtherpart lookedat SEML’sexisting stakeholderengagement, currentandpast, and the
satisfaction with the land acquisition process, in particular the working of the grievance
mechanism.Responsetimeisconsideredfastandmostgrievancesarebeingdealtwithtothe
satisfactionof thecommunity, thoughnotallof thecommunity isawareof themechanism.
MostPAHHwerealsosatisfiedwiththelandacquistionprocessandonlyafewfeltnegatively
impacted.
Local employement within SEML is very low. Considering that construction phase has not
started yet, that can become another area of main focus for SEML in looking at ways to
Page 99
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx 70
increaselocalparticipation.Theyoungmalepopulationwithloweducationalattainmentmay
be a good target as potential future workforce during construction to build their work
experienceandcapacity.
ItisalsoclearfromthissurveythatSEMLCSRactivitieshavemainlyfocusedonring1villages,
assuchparticipationofPAHHsurveyedinthepresentstudyisratherlow.
AlthoughSouthSolokisanewregencywithlimitedfunds,thereisgreatopportunitytolinkin
with the existing educational programs and collaborate on a number of livelihood and skills
improvementdevelopmentprograms.
11 BIBLIOGRAPHY
ADB, 2012. Involuntary Resettlement Safeguards – A Planning and Implementation Good
PracticeSourcebook–DraftWorkingDocument,
ADB1998.HandbookonResettlement–AGuidetoGoodPractice,
IFC2002.HandbookforPreparingaResettlementActionPlan,
IHS (Inti Hexa Semesta), 2015. Provision of Integrated Social Development Program Study
Services–FinalReport–SkillDevelopmentPlanandLivelihoodOpportunitiesDevelopment
Moret,W.,2014.VulnerabilityAssessmentMethodologies:Areviewoftheliterature
Accessedwebsites:
BadanPusatStatistics(BPS),IndonesiaandSouthSolokRegency
Page 100
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx 71
LISTOFAPPENDICES
AppendixI a ListofProjectAffectedHouseholds
b List of Potentially Vulnerable Households invited
toattendFGDs
AppendixII HouseholdSurveyQuestionnaire
AppendixIII KIIAndFGDGuideline
AppendixIV PhotographicEvidenceofFIeldActivities
Page 101
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx 72
Appendix I a List of Project Affected Households And Survey Status
b List of Potentially Vulnerable Households to be Invited to FGDs
c List of Identified Vulnerable Households (by survey)
Page 102
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx 73
APPENDIXIA-LISTOFPROJECTAFFECTEDHOUSEHOLDSANDSURVEYSTATUS
NoNo
GPSNama Jorong(Kampung) Alamat Pekerjaan
Jenis
Kelamin
Jumlah
Anggota
keluarga
NoTelp Status
1 119 BAIDARWAR KepalaBukit Bertani M 20823-8728-6146
(no.istri)DONE
2 134 ERNITA KepalaBukit 0852-7451-3986
(erna)DONE
3 135 ALDIZAMRI KepalaBukit DONE
4 136 DASMARIJAL/Elfariza KepalaBukit DONE
5 137 MASRIZAL KepalaBukit DONE
6 109 SUKARNI Kotobaru DONE
7 122 EDIWISRAF Kotobaru kepalajorong M 4 0813-7450-6935 DONE
8 130 YURNALIS Kotobaru petani M 6 0853-7489-9312 DONE
9 150 DONISAPUTRA Kotobaru wiraswasta M 0821-7050-7623
(doni)DONE
10 156 AFRIZALDT.ITAM Kotobaru petani M 0821-6986-6421 DONE
11 79 Nofriadi Lolo
Meninggal,Istri
sudahpindahdan
tidakdiketahui
lokasinya
12 80 DodiPutra(42thn) Lolo wiraswasta M 0813-6375-9500
(dodi)DONE
13 82 Syafrizal Lolo 0852-6600-8610
(syafrizal)DONE
14 102 SopianSoriPinang
Sinawa/Lolo petani M
0812-6618-4466
(sofian)DONE
15 115 EDISUWARNO Lolo DONE
16 154 ZULKARNAINI LubukPeraku Sarapansari wiraswasta M 3 0813-7463-1572 DONE
Page 103
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx 74
NoNo
GPSNama Jorong(Kampung) Alamat Pekerjaan
Jenis
Kelamin
Jumlah
Anggota
keluarga
NoTelp Status
17 120 M.SALIMIN PadangAro DONE
18 95Hengki (42 thn)/Sri
NofriantiPakanRabaa wiraswasta M 4 0853-6463-6501
Tidakada
dirumah,sedang
disolok
19 101 Edward(56thn) PasarMuaraLabuh Pensiunan M 3 0812-6626-569 DONE
20 103 ROSNELI(72thn) PasarMuaraLabuh Iburumah
tanggaF 4
0821-7025-6216
(ibuumi)DONE
21 111 ZAINI(60thn) PasarMuaraLabuh
Batang
Labuh,Nagari
asabarat
wiraswasta M 6 0813-7493-5012 DONE
22 151KOSNEDI YUSDI
(43thn)PasarMuaraLabuh
PasarMuara
LabuhBaratPNSRSUD M 3 0853-7461-2611 DONE
23 104 NOFRIZON PekanSelasaTubo,
TaratakTinggiPetani M 2 0853-7473-9671 DONE
24 112 MASFURIZAL PekanSelasa Jualan M 3 0812-6710-8775 DONE
25 116DARWIS (60 thn) (DT
Panggao)PekanSelasa
DurianTigo
CapangPetani M 5 NA DONE
26 117 HASNULFIKRI(42thn) PekanSelasa petani M 3 0852-7215-3842 DONE
27 118 EDIMIAN/RahmaDeni PekanSelasa dagang M 3 0812-6847-6972 DONE
28 123 DONIP.N PekanSelasa DONE
29 125 ROSNANI(51thn) PekanSelasa wiraswasta F 3 0823-8340-0708 DONE
30 143KHAIRUL AMRI (48
thn)PekanSelasa Petani M 3 0812-7599-9947 DONE
31 148 IRWANTOSAHPUTRA PekanSelasa DONE
32 149 YERISANDRIO(36thn) PekanSelasa wiraswasta M 2 0812-6737-0979 DONE
33 153 ELIMURNI(55thn) PekanSelasa GuruSMP F 4 0813-7416-0395 DONE
Page 104
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx 75
NoNo
GPSNama Jorong(Kampung) Alamat Pekerjaan
Jenis
Kelamin
Jumlah
Anggota
keluarga
NoTelp Status
(suami)
34 90 ZahariWahyudi(45thn) Pekonina Dagangdan
taniM 3 0852-7243-7322
Tidak bisa
dihubungi
35 94 Osriado/Sulastri PinangAwan M 3 0823-8966-4337 DONE
36 144 SUARDI PinangAwan 0812-6636-2472 DONE
37 93 Orfitwandri/Efrida PinangSinawa petani M 2 0852-7231-6559 DONE
38 97 Ediarianto/samsiDewi PinangSinawa M 0852-7118-4146 DONE
39 126 CANDRAD PinangSinawa Petani M 3 0823-9032-8155 DONE
40 128 ARDISON PinangSinawa DONE
41 133SYAIFUL ARFAN (54
thn)PinangSinawa
pegawaikantor
camatM 6 0852-7823-3691 DONE
42 91Burahman (53
thn)/MulhandriPulakek PNS M 2 0813-7463-1171 DONE
43 76Yusra (40thn)
/YulmetraSako kontraktor M 3 0812-6608-7581 DONE
44 139 ANASRIL Sei.Durian SudahMeninggal
45 141 M.ZEN/Istri Sijunjung/Pekonina DONE
46 138 ARMENSIS Sipotu DONE
47 142 SYAHRIAL Sipotu DONE
48 147 JALALUDIN(65thn) Sipotu Petani M 0823-8469-7003 DONE
49 78 Hasran/DeriHasnan Sipotu DONE
50 84 NofriEfendi TaratakBukareh honorersatpol
PPM 2 0853-3541-5370 DONE
51 85 Herdi/EmraYelfi TaratakBukareh petani M 3 0812-6686-0268 DONE
52 89 AhmadTarmizi(43thn) TaratakBukareh pedagang M 5 0823-8209-1566 DONE
Page 105
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx 76
NoNo
GPSNama Jorong(Kampung) Alamat Pekerjaan
Jenis
Kelamin
Jumlah
Anggota
keluarga
NoTelp Status
53 89Giri Indah Purta
(26thn)TaratakBukareh kontraktor M 0813-7489-3701 DONE
54 131 ZULNASRI(60thn) TaratakBukareh pedagang M 0852-7414-1150 DONE
55 155 HERMANANDIKA TaratakTinggi DONE
56 99 RomiYantito/Nefrida UjungJalan petani M 40852-6335-5931
(zia,adik)DONE
57 108 HIDAYATI UjungJalan petani F 2 DONE
58 129 AFRIWANDI UjungJalan supirtruk M DONE
59 132 DIANAYURSYAH UjungJalan petani F 4 0821-7035-1093 DONE
60 152 AFRINALDI UjungJalan perawat DONE
61 Syafrial PinangSinawa Petani M 0852-6364-5535 DONE
62 90a Erwin(44thn) Pekonina M 2 0821-7466-9626 DONE
63 Anizar KampungBaru DONE
64 Yulison
tidak
diketemukan
lokasinya
65 Baharrudin KampungBaru DONE
66 SyamsulAnwar/Yeni TaratakTinggi DONE
67 Syafrudin, Meitina,
LidiaPutri, DONE
68 Darlis/Misnawati TaratakTinggi DONE
69 Wilyedi TaratakTinggi DONE
70 Sahabir KampungBaru DONE
71 dediindra KampungBaru DONE
72 nurjani/Arisafrianto KampungBaru DONE
Page 106
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx 77
NoNo
GPSNama Jorong(Kampung) Alamat Pekerjaan
Jenis
Kelamin
Jumlah
Anggota
keluarga
NoTelp Status
73 Ngatijok
anak di padang,
tidakdiketahuino
kontaknya
74 Ngatiman DONE
75 Tukiran Pekonina DONE
76 Maruli TaratakTinggi DONE
77 Agusman TaratakTinggi DONE
78 Embriadi Mandaro
(Embri)KampungBaru
Tidakada
dirumah
79 Tasril KampungBaru DONE
80 MilPatra/AdeBeno DONE
81 Halnedi KampungBaru DONE
82 Kudun (Syafrizal
Makudun)KampungBaru DONE
83 MasrialMalano TaratakTinggi DONE
84 Kasmir TaratakTinggi DONE
85 Muliadi KampungBaru DONE
86 Nasrul PinangSinawa DONE
87 Armas PasarPakanSalasa 0812-6636-2472 DONE
88 JendriNedi Lolo 82390163025 DONE
89 Muhamadyulis TaratakBukareh Petani DONE
90 JoniHartono GOR/Pekonina DONE
91 Irsyad TaratakBukareh Petani Herdi0812-6686-
0268DONE
92 RomiSyahputra TaratakBukareh Wiraswasta Herdi0812-6686- DONE
Page 107
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx 78
NoNo
GPSNama Jorong(Kampung) Alamat Pekerjaan
Jenis
Kelamin
Jumlah
Anggota
keluarga
NoTelp Status
0268
93 Syaifullah TaratakBukareh Petani Herdi0812-6686-
0268DONE
94 NewinKoprin TaratakBukareh Petani Herdi0812-6686-
0268DONE
95 Yasri TaratakBukareh Petani Herdi0812-6686-
0268DONE
96 ErsisWirmansyah TaratakBukareh Wiraswasta Herdi0812-6686-
0268DONE
97 Firdaus TaratakBukareh Petani Herdi0812-6686-
0268DONE
98 Nelson TaratakBukareh Petani Herdi0812-6686-
0268DONE
99 ZefriMaindra TaratakBukareh Petani Herdi0812-6686-
0268DONE
100 EdoJatiJaya TaratakBukareh Pegawai
Swasta
Herdi0812-6686-
0268DONE
101 MediGandra TaratakBukareh Petani Herdi0812-6686-
0268DONE
102 Anwar TaratakBukareh Petani Herdi0812-6686-
0268DONE
103 Muhamad Zaini
ZakariaTaratakBukareh Wiraswasta
Herdi0812-6686-
0268DONE
104 RamadhanTanjungTaratak
Bukareh Petani
Herdi0812-6686-
0268DONE
105 Usman TaratakBukareh Petani Herdi0812-6686-
0268DONE
Page 108
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx 79
NoNo
GPSNama Jorong(Kampung) Alamat Pekerjaan
Jenis
Kelamin
Jumlah
Anggota
keluarga
NoTelp Status
106 Roni Lolo Dody0813-6375-
9500DONE
107 Dedi Lolo Dody0813-6375-
9500DONE
108 DodiSalfari Lolo Dody0813-6375-
9500
SudahPindahdan
tidakdiketahui
lokasinya
109 Doni(Safrijoni) Lolo Dody0813-6375-
9500DONE
110 EpiLasrianto Lolo Dody0813-6375-
9500DONE
111 Gupran Lolo Dody0813-6375-
9500DONE
112 Ijan Lolo Dody0813-6375-
9500DONE
113 MulyadiS Lolo Dody0813-6375-
9500DONE
114 Zainal(Dt.Talanan) Lolo Dody0813-6375-
9500DONE
115 Suwarmen Lolo Dody0813-6375-
9500DONE
116 Darul Lolo Dody0813-6375-
9500DONE
117 Syahril/Jangbogor Lolo Dody0813-6375-
9500DONE
118 JangPilin SawahSiluwak Dody0813-6375-
9500DONE
Page 109
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx 80
NoNo
GPSNama Jorong(Kampung) Alamat Pekerjaan
Jenis
Kelamin
Jumlah
Anggota
keluarga
NoTelp Status
119 AyahnyaHAM SawahSiluwak Dody0813-6375-
9500DONE
120 Muid SawahSiluwak Dody0813-6375-
9500DONE
121 EdiMando SawahSiluwak Dody0813-6375-
9500DONE
122 SimanT/Sasmiwarti PinangSinawa EdiArianto:0852-
7118-4146DONE
123 Syahri(Amris) PinangSinawa EdiArianto:0852-
7118-4146DONE
124 Arizal PinangSinawa EdiArianto:0852-
7118-4146DONE
125 CondriDarson PinangSinawa EdiArianto:0852-
7118-4146DONE
126 Asdin PinangSinawa EdiArianto:0852-
7118-4146DONE
127 Febrinaldi PinangSinawa EdiArianto:0852-
7118-4146DONE
128 MetraOktavia/Yurnalis PinangSinawa EdiArianto:0852-
7118-4146DONE
129 Dian PinangSinawa EdiArianto:0852-
7118-4146DONE
130 Desmawati/Riki PinangSinawa EdiArianto:0852-
7118-4146DONE
131 Jalinus Tarataktinggi BukiiBulek Farmaidi DONE
132 ALHadi TaratakTinggi BukiiBulek Farmaidi DONE
133 Asril TaratakTinggi BukiiBulek Farmaidi DONE
Page 110
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx 81
NoNo
GPSNama Jorong(Kampung) Alamat Pekerjaan
Jenis
Kelamin
Jumlah
Anggota
keluarga
NoTelp Status
134 Suklirman TaratakTinggi BukiiBulek Farmaidi DONE
135 Yunadi TaratakTinggi BukiiBulek Farmaidi DONE
136 Hermanto/daraman
bengkePasiaTalang
Sec
Waterboom DONE
137 Syam Syahril (syam
milis)PinangSinawa DONE
138 Hendra Alai Yusra DONE
139 Nasrul LoloKaciak Yusra DONE
140 Yulmetra SungaiTalu Yusra DONE
141 Dasril LoloKaciak Yusra DONE
142 TafifRedi AlaiSako Yusra DONE
143 DediSuhendra AlaiSako Yusra DONE
Page 111
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx 82
APPENDIXIB-LISTOFPOTENTIALLYVULNERABLEHOUSEHOLDSTOBEINVITEDTOFGDS
No NamaRespondenSurvey Jorong(Kampung) Alamat NoTelp PesertaFGDStatusdi
Keluarga
Jenis
Kelamin
Peserta
Umur
PesertaAlasan/CriteriaPesertaFGD NamaKelompok
1ALDIZAMRI KepalaBukit Netriyenti Istri P 44
Perempuan 15-64 th/SD/tidak tamat SD/ Tidak
Kerja;TamatSD/IbuRumahTanggaKelompokPerempuan
2M.SALIMIN PadangAro Yuliarti Anak P 31
Perempuan 15-64 th/SD/tidak tamat SD/ Tidak
Kerja;SD/IbuRumahTanggaKelompokPerempuan
3nurjani/Arisafrianto KampungBaru Desmayeni Anak P 27 TidaktamatSD/IbuRumahTangga KelompokPerempuan
4MasrialMalano TaratakTinggi DaniRumantik Istri P 30 TamatSD/IbuRumahTangga KelompokPerempuan
5Muliadi KampungBaru Isas Istri P 43
Perempuan 15-64 th/SD/tidak tamat SD/ Tidak
Kerja:TamatSD/ObuRumahTanggaKelompokPerempuan
6Zainal(Dt.Talanan) Lolo Dody0813-6375-9501 Nurmis(Nurimis), Istri P 55
Perempuan 15-64 th/SD/tidak tamat SD/ Tidak
Kerja;SD/IbuRumahTangga;KelompokPerempuan
7JangPilin(Sapril) SawahSiluwak Dody0813-6375-9501 nurlaili Istri P 58
Perempuan 15-64 th/SD/tidak tamat SD/ Tidak
Kerja;TamatSD/IbuRumahTanggaKelompokPerempuan
8EdiMando SawahSiluwak Dody0813-6375-9501 EliMurni Istri P 40 TamatSD/IbuRumahTangga; KelompokPerempuan
9MetraOktavia/Yurnalis PinangSinawa
EdiArianto:0852-7118-
4148Helmaini Anak P 36
Perempuan 15-64 th/SD/tidak tamat SD/ Tidak
Kerja;TamatSD/IbuRumahTanggaKelompokPerempuan
10Asril TaratakTinggi BukiiBulek Farmaidi Elfiza Istri P 37
Perempuan 15-64 th/SD/tidak tamat SD/ Tidak
Kerja;TamatSD/IbuRumahTanggaKelompokPerempuan
11
ARMENSIS sipotu yurmaningsih Istri P 44
Perempuan 15-64 th/SD/tidak tamat SD/ Tidak
Kerja; Tamat SLTP/Keahlian Menjahit/Ibu Rumah
Tangga
KelompokPerempuan
12
Muhamadyulis taratakbukareh nurjulis Istri P 56
Perempuan15-64th/SD/tidaktamatSD/IbuRumah
Tangga/ Tidak Kerja; Tamat SD/Keahlian buat
makanankueh2goranganpecal,dll;
KelompokPerempuan
13nurjani/Arisafrianto KampungBaru Nurjani Istri P 50 PerempuanKK KelompokPerempuan
14Erwin(44thn) Pekonina KampungBaru 0821-7466-9627 partiyum Istri P 36 Perempuan15-64th/SD/tidaktamatSD/TidakKerja KelompokPerempuan
15Baharrudin(ALM) KampungBaru Nurhidayati Anak P 45 Perempuan15-64th/SD/tidaktamatSD/TidakKerja KelompokPerempuan
16Ngatiman Pekonina Surmi Istri P 64
Usia LanjutAnak ada yang Gangguan Jiwadr kecil,
lantaipapankayuKelompokPerempuan
17ARDISON pinangsinawa Ardison L 45 Pendapatanrendah KelompokLelaki
18ERNITA KepalaBukit 0852-7451-3986(erna) Ardi KK L 44
Pendapatan rendah Rp. 85,000/dibawah garis
kemiskinanKelompokLelaki
19 Nasrul PinangSinawa Nasrul L 65 SulitBaca/TamatSD/KerjaKelompokLelaki
20JendriNedi lolo 82390163025 Jendri L 34
Untang untuk modal usaha 1 juta dari 25jt,
pendapatan1,2jt;KelompokLelaki
21Zainal(Dt.Talanan) lolo Dody0813-6375-9500 Zainal L 58 KelompokLelaki
22SyamSyahril(syammilis) pinangsinawa Syam L 68 TertulisdiSPSSRp.666,667/bulan KelompokLelaki
23Suklirman TaratakTinggi BukiiBulek Farmaidi Sukirman L 60 PendapatanRendah KelompokLelaki
24DediSuhendra AlaiSako Yusra DediSuhendra L 47 PendapatanrendahRp600rb/bulan KelompokLelaki
Page 112
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx 83
No NamaRespondenSurvey Jorong(Kampung) Alamat NoTelp PesertaFGDStatusdi
Keluarga
Jenis
Kelamin
Peserta
Umur
PesertaAlasan/CriteriaPesertaFGD NamaKelompok
25Yusra(40thn)/Yulmetra
JorongAlaiNagarisako
Selatan 0812-6608-7581 Yusra L 40 utanguntukkebutuhanharian KelompokLelaki
26
KOSNEDIYUSDI(43thn) pasarmuaralabuhpasarmuara
labuhbarat0853-7461-2611 KosnediYusdi L 44
Utanguntuk rumahdanmobildari koperasi cicil 2jt
dari 150jt (income 4,6jt); yang tertulis di SPSS
Rp.920,000
KelompokLelaki
27
CANDRADarson pinangsinawa
JoSungai
Durian,Nagari
Bomas
0823-9032-8155 Candra L 32Utanguntukusahaitik300rbperbulandari10jtdari
PNPM(income4,8jt);TertulisdiSPSSRp.960,000KelompokLelaki
28ROSNANI(51thn) pekanselasa 0823-8340-0709 Auzan Anak L 20
Tidak sekolah/SD tidak tamat/bukan KK/dibawah
30th/bekerjaataudirumah;KelompokPemuda
29M.SALIMIN PadangAro Musfir Anak L 25
Tidak sekolah/SD tidak tamat/bukan KK/dibawah
30th/bekerjaataudirumah;KelompokPemuda
30ELIMURNI(55thn) pekanselasa
0813-7416-0395
(suami)Aris Anak L 22
Tidak sekolah/SD tidak tamat/bukan KK/dibawah
30th/bekerjaataudirumah;KelompokPemuda
31Anizar KampungBaru Hendaka Anak L 20
Tidak sekolah/SD tidak tamat/bukan KK/dibawah
30th/bekerjaataudirumah;WorkingKelompokPemuda
32Baharrudin(ALM) KampungBaru Busra Anak L 30
Tidak sekolah/SD tidak tamat/bukan KK/dibawah
30th/bekerjaataudirumah;KelompokPemuda
33Suklirman TaratakTinggi BukiiBulek Yose Anak L 26
Tidak sekolah/SD tidak tamat/bukan KK/dibawah
30th/bekerjaataudirumah;WorkingKelompokPemuda
34nurjani/Arisafrianto KampungBaru Afdar Anak L 25
Tidak sekolah/SD tidak tamat/bukan KK/dibawah
30th/bekerjaataudirumah;WorkingKelompokPemuda
35Kasmir(ALM)
Taratak Tinggi
(KampupngBaru) RahmatFauzi Anak L 24 Pengangguran,mencarikerja KelompokPemuda
36EdoJatiJaya taratakbukareh Herdi0812-6686-0268 EdoJatiJaya Anak L 21
pengangguran, terbatas karena ijazah, syalfitri
(KK)sakitleherKelompokPemuda
37Agusman TaratakTinggi RioNofianto Anak L 17 Kurangdanauntukmelanjutkansekolah KelompokPemuda
38ErsisWirmansyah taratakbukareh Herdi0812-6686-0268
Ersis W (Anak
Syafrial)Anak L 28
Tidak sekolah/SD tidak tamat/bukan KK/dibawah
30th/bekerjaataudirumah;KeahlianMainGitarKelompokPemuda
39M.SALIMIN PadangAro Yusmarni Anak P 28
Tidak sekolah/SD tidak tamat/bukan KK/dibawah
30th/bekerjaataudirumah;KelompokPemuda
40Jalinus Tarataktinggi BukiiBulek Farmaidi Afridayanti Anak P 25 Pengangguran KelompokPemuda
41Jalinus Tarataktinggi BukiiBulek Farmaidi
MitriWulandari, 21
yr.Anak P 21 Pengangguran KelompokPemuda
42SyamSyahril(syammilis) pinangsinawa YuldaAfni, Anak P 20 Pengangguran,belumdapatkerja KelompokPemuda
43DediIndra KampungBaru
Unknown Istri P
PendapatanrendahKelompokPerempuan
44Dasril
Alai,NagariSako
Selatan(LoloKaciak) Dasril
L
utanguntukkebutuhanharian KelompokLelaki
45Febrinaldi PinangSinawa
EdiArianto:0852-7118-
4146Febrinaldi
L
UtanguntukbeliObat KelompokLelaki
46Orfitwandri/Efrida pinangsinawa
0852-7231-6559 Orfitwandri/Efrida
L AtapJerami KelompokLelaki
47SopianSori PinangSinawa/lolo
0812-6618-4466
(sofian)SopianSori
L
Utanguntukpendidikan KelompokLelaki
48Tukiran Pekonina
Hesi Istri P 50
Perempuan 15-64 th/SD/tidak tamat SD/ Tidak
Kerja;TamatSD/IbuRumahTanggaKelompokPerempuan
49JoniHartono GOR/Pekonina
ernawati Istri P 30 TamatSD/IbuRumahTangga; KelompokPerempuan
Page 113
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx 84
No NamaRespondenSurvey Jorong(Kampung) Alamat NoTelp PesertaFGDStatusdi
Keluarga
Jenis
Kelamin
Peserta
Umur
PesertaAlasan/CriteriaPesertaFGD NamaKelompok
50Syafrial PinangSinawa
0852-6364-5536 YurliS, Istri P 51
Perempuan 15-64 th/SD/tidak tamat SD/ Tidak
Kerja:TamatSD/IbuRumahTanggaKelompokPerempuan
51
Ayah nya HAM (Katiak
Samu)SawahSiluwak
Dody0813-6375-9501 Nurhayati Istri P 58
Perempuan 15-64 th/SD/tidak tamat SD/ Tidak
Kerja;SD/IbuRumahTangga;KelompokPerempuan
52Suklirman TaratakTinggi BukiiBulek Farmaidi M.Nakli Anak L 28
Tidak sekolah/SD tidak tamat/bukan KK/dibawah
30th/bekerjaataudirumah;WorkingKelompokPemuda
53Tasril KampungBaru
Warnatis Istri P 52
Perempuan 15-64 th/SD/tidak tamat SD/ Tidak
Kerja:SD/IbuRumahTanggaKelompokPerempuan
54MuhamadZainiZakaria taratakbukareh
Herdi0812-6686-0269 Rosmawati Istri P 55
Perempuan 15-64 th/SD/tidak tamat SD/ Tidak
Kerja;SD/Lainlainkeahliahmenjahit; KelompokPerempuan
Page 114
SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx 85
Table11-1 ProjectAffectedHouseholdsandvillagesthatwereidentifiedasvulnerable.
PAHH
No Livein Respondent1 StatusR1 AgeR1 SexR1 Respondent2 StatusR2 AgeR2 SexR2 NameHeadofHH
34 padangaro salmin 1 66 1 dermala 2 65 2 salmin
54 pinangsinawa sahrul 1 65 1 nursam 2 60 2 sahrul
75 tarataktinggi sukirman 1 60 1 sariana 2 54 2 sukirman
83 tarataktinggi agusman 1 42 1 desniyenti 2 30 2 agusman
97 sungaidurianchandra
darson1 32 1 evi 2 30 2 chandradarson
107 kampungbaru nurjani 2 50 2 desmayeni 3 27 2 nurjani
7 pinangsinawa syaifularfan 1 54 1 almawati 2 52 2 syaifularfan
18 mudiaklolo jendri 1 34 1 santimulya 34 2 jendri
19 lolo zainal 1 58 1 nurmis 2 55 2 zainal
68 pinangsinawa syamsyahril 1 68 1 ramilis 2 68 2 syamsyahril
115 pasarmuaralabuh koesnedy 1 44 1 nuriah 2 39 2 koesnedy
1 alai suhendradedi 1 47 1 nabila 2 40 2 dedisuhendra
3 kepalabukit ardi 1 44 1 ernita 2 43 2 ardi
10 kampungbaru indradedi 1 38 1 hasnawati 2 33 2 indradedi
21 lolo doni 1 30 1 rina 2 28 2 doni
44 pinangsinawa sahrul 1 75 1 nursam 2 60 2 sahrul
78 tarataktinggi zainal 1 60 1 dahlina 2 55 2 zainal
112 lolo ijan 3 24 1 zainak 1 58 2 zainal
24 taratakbukareh syafril 1 55 1 Syamsiar 2 49 2 Syafril
30 taratakbukareh irsyad 1 60 1 elimurni 2 50 2 irsyad
35 taratakbukareh dasrial 1 57 1 muhitah 2 56 2 dasrial
62 matoaia muid 1 50 1 fasniati 2 45 2 muid
69 taratakbukareh yasri 1 43 1 weri 2 40 2 yasri
70 pekonina tukiran 1 63 1 hesi 2 50 2 tukiran
71 taratakbukareh elimurni 2 56 2 masni 1 60 1 masni
72 kampungbaru erwin 1 44 1 partiyum 2 36 2 erwin
77 tarataktinggi nuar 1 50 1 jalinus 2 40 2 nuar
82 kampungbaru almbaharudin 1 75 1 syaribanun 3 39 2 almbaharudin
89 taratakbukareh edo 3 21 1syahyuni
yendni2 42 2 syalfitri
98 ujungjalanromi
syahputra1 31 1 maisatulfitria 2 29 2 romisyahputra
102 tarataktinggimasrial
malano1 35 1 deniromantik 2 30 2 masrialmalano
103 pinangawan satiudin 1 59 1 meltina 2 56 2 satiudin
105 pekonina surmi 1 64 2 adihermawan 3 27 1 surmi
106 kampungbaru jonihartono 1 32 1 ernawati 2 30 2 jonihartono
113 mudiaklolobarat mulyadis 1 45 1 titisumarni 2 36 2 mulyadis
127Bariangrawo-
rowoyurnalis 1 55 1 yulharnet 2 50 2 yurnalis
129 taratakbukareh nelson 1 55 1 navalma 2 50 2 nelson