5-1 Copyright 2009 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Deegan, Financial Accounting Theory 3e Financial Accounting Theory Craig Deegan Chapter 5 Normative.

5-1Copyright 2009 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Deegan, Financial Accounting Theory 3e

Financial Accounting TheoryCraig Deegan

Chapter 5

Normative theories of accounting—the case of accounting for changing prices

Slides written by Craig Deegan


Learning objectives

• In this chapter you will be introduced to:– some particular limitations of historical cost accounting in

terms of its ability to cope with various issues associated with changing prices

– a number of alternative accounting methods developed to address problems associated with changing prices

– some of the strengths and weaknesses of the various alternative accounting methods

– evidence that the calculation of income pursuant to a particular method of accounting will depend on the perspective of capital maintenance that has been adopted


Limitations of historical cost in times of rising prices

• Historical cost assumes money holds a constant purchasing power

• Three aspects of the economy which make the assumption less valid than when historical cost was developed– specific price level changes (shifts in consumer

preference; technological advances)– general price level changes (inflation)– fluctuation in exchange rates


Limitations of historical cost in times of rising prices (cont.)

• Problem of relevance in times of rising prices– asset’s current value may be different from historical cost

• Problem of additivity (adding together assets bought at different times)

• Can overstate profits in times of rising prices, with distribution of profits leading to an erosion of operating capacity

• Including holding gains which accrued in previous periods in current year’s income distorts the current year’s operating results


Support for historical cost accounting

• Predominant method used for many years so tended to maintain support of profession

• If not found useful business entities would have abandoned it

• Nevertheless, recent accounting standards being released have embraced ‘fair values’ as the basis of measurement. However, various assets are still measured on an historical cost basis– e.g. inventory, which is measured at the lower of cost and

net realisable value; property, plant and equipment where the ‘cost model’ and not the ‘fair-value model’ has been adopted; many intangible assets


Definition of Income

• The maximum amount that can be consumed during the period, while still expecting to be as well off at the end of the period as at the beginning of the period (Hicks 1946)

• Consideration of ‘well-offness’ relies on a notion of capital maintenance

• Different notions of capital maintenance will provide different perspectives of income


Capital maintenance perspectives

• Financial capital maintenance– perspective taken in historical cost accounting

• Purchasing power maintenance– historical cost accounts adjusted for changes in the

purchasing power of the dollar

• Physical operating capital maintenance


Development of accounting for changing prices

• Research initially related to using price indices to restate historical costs to account for changing prices

• Literature then moved towards current cost accounting– the basis of measurement changed to current values not

historical values


Current purchasing power accounting

(CPPA)

• Also called general purchasing power accounting; general price level accounting; constant dollar accounting

• Based on the view that in times of rising prices, if an entity were to distribute unadjusted profits based on historical costs, in real terms the entity could be distributing part of its capital


Calculating indices

• A price index is used when applying general price level accounting

• A price index is a weighted average of the current prices of goods and services related to a weighted average of prices in a prior period (base period)– e.g. Australian Consumer Price Index (CPI)

• Can use a general or specific price index


Performing current purchase power adjustments

• All adjustments are performed at the end of the period

• Adjustments are applied to historical cost accounts• Monetary and non-monetary assets considered

separately– values of monetary assets do not change as a result of

inflation– liabilities generally considered monetary items


Performing current purchase power adjustments (cont.)

• In times of inflation, holders of monetary assets will lose in real terms– the assets have less purchasing power at the end of the

period relative to the beginning of the period

• Holders of monetary liabilities gain, given the amount they have to repay at the end of the period is worth less than at the beginning


Performing current purchase power adjustments (cont.)

• No change in purchasing power arises from holding non-monetary assets– non-monetary assets are restated to current purchasing

power so no gain or loss is recognised

• Purchasing power gains or losses are included in income for the period


Movements in net monetary assets

• Must identify changes in net monetary assets as a result of revenues or expenses

• In times of rising prices there will be a loss in purchasing power of cash received during the year

• More expenses are able to be paid earlier in the year as more cash required for expenses incurred later in the year


Advantages of current purchasing power adjustments

• Relies on data already available under historical cost accounting

• No need to incur cost or effort to collect data about current asset values

• CPI data also readily available


Disadvantages of current purchasing power adjustments

• Movements in the prices of goods and services included in a general price index (CPI) may not reflect specific price movements in different industries

• Information generated under CPPA may be confusing to users

• Studies of share price reactions failed to find much support for decision usefulness of CPPA data


Current cost accounting (CCA)

• Based on actual valuations not adjusted historical cost

• Differentiates between profits from trading and holding gains

• Holding gains can be realised or unrealised• Income perspective adopted will determine

whether holding gains or losses treated as income


Treatment of holding gains or losses

• Financial capital maintenance perspective– holding gains or losses can be treated as income

• Physical capital maintenance perspective– holding gains or losses can be treated as capital

adjustments


CCA under physical capital maintenance approach

• Advocated by Edwards and Bell• Valuations based on replacement costs• Operating income represents realised revenues

less the replacement cost of assets in question• Generates a measure of income that represents

the maximum amount that can be distributed, while maintaining operating capacity intact


Adjustments using Edwards and Bell approach

• Adjustments usually made at year end• Historical cost accounts used as basis of

adjustments• Operating profit calculated by using replacement

costs• Holding gains excluded in calculating current cost

operating profit– not available for dividends


Adjustments using Edwards and Bell approach (cont.)

• BUT holding gains are included in calculating business profit

• Business profit shows how the entity has gained in financial terms from the increase in cost of its resources

• Depreciation of non-current assets based on the replacement cost

• As with CPPA no restatement of monetary assets required


Advantages of current cost accounting

• Differentiating operating profit from holding gains and losses can enhance the usefulness of information provided– holding gains different to trading income as due to

market-wide movements that are often beyond management’s control

• Better comparability of various entities’ performance


Criticisms of current cost accounting

• Replacement cost of assets may not be the same for all firms– some firms may not choose to replace the asset

• If the entity requires replacement assets it may be more efficient and less costly to acquire different assets

• Replacement cost does not reflect what the asset would be worth if sold


Criticisms of current cost accounting (cont.)

• Often difficult to determine replacement costs

• Allocating replacement cost via depreciation is still arbitrary as with historical cost accounting

• Chambers (1995) claimed products of CCA were irrelevant and misleading


Continuously Contemporary Accounting (CoCoA)

• Proposed by Chambers as well as others

• Based on valuing assets at net selling prices (exit prices) at reporting dates on the basis or orderly sales– referred to as current cash equivalent

• Chambers argued that key information for decision making relates to capacity to adapt


Continuously Contemporary Accounting (CoCoA) (cont.)

• The balance sheet (statement of financial position) considered to be the prime financial statement– shows the net selling prices of the entity’s assets

• Profit directly relates to changes in adaptive capital

• Adaptive capital reflected by the total exit values of assets


Capacity to adapt

• Chambers approach focuses on new opportunities– the ability of the entity to adapt to changing

circumstances

• The ability of the firm to ‘go into the market with cash for the purposes of adapting oneself to contemporary conditions’ (Chambers 1966, p.91)

• Assumes the objective of accounting is to guide future actions


Definition of wealth under CoCoA

• Present (selling) price is seen as the correct valuation of wealth at a point in time– past prices are a matter of history so not relevant to

current actions

• Profit is tied to the increase (or decrease) in the current net selling prices of the entity’s assets

• No distinction between realised and unrealised gains—all gains are treated as part of profit


Definition of wealth under CoCoA (cont.)

• Profit is the amount that can be distributed, while maintaining the entity’s adaptive ability (adaptive capital)

• Abandons notion of realisation in terms of recognising revenue– revenues are recognised at point of purchase or

production rather than sales


Capital maintenance adjustment

• Unlike CCA there is an adjustment to take account of changes in general purchasing power (inflation adjustment)

• Capital maintenance adjustments form part of the period’s income with a corresponding credit to a capital maintenance reserve (part of owners’ equity)

• Calculated by multiplying net assets by the proportional change in a general price index over the period


Advantages of CoCoA

• By using one method of valuation for all assets (exit values) the resulting numbers can be logically added together (additivity)

• No need for arbitrary cost allocation for depreciation as gains or losses on assets are based on movements in exit price


Criticisms of CoCoA

• If implemented CoCoA would involve a fundamental shift in financial accounting– revenue recognition points and asset valuations– could lead to unacceptable social and environmental

consequences

• Relevance of exit prices questioned if we do not expect to sell the assets


Criticisms of CoCoA (cont.)

• Assets of a specific nature considered to have no value under CoCoA because cannot be separately disposed of– CoCoA ignores the ‘value in use’ of an asset

• Questioned whether appropriate to value all assets at exit prices if the entity is a going concern

• Determining exit prices for unique assets introduces subjectivity into accounts


Criticisms of CoCoA (cont.)

• CoCoA requires assets to be valued separately rather than as a bundle– therefore would not recognise goodwill as an asset– value of assets sold together can be very different from

separate sale


Demand for price adjusted accounting information

• Limited evidence that stock markets react to current cost and CPPA information– little or no share price reaction to price adjusted

accounting information found– results may have been due to limitations with research

methods used reaction to other information released at the same time

could not be distinguished users may have obtained information from other sources

prior to release of annual reports


Demand for price adjusted accounting information (cont.)

• Surveys of managers find limited corporate support for current cost accounting– cost, limited benefits from disclosure and lack of

agreement as to approach are all considerations

• Surveys of users indicate information not helpful, not used and information does not tell users anything new

• Findings interesting given the extent of voluntary disclosure by corporations


Reasons for lobbying

• Watts and Zimmerman examined lobbying reaction to release of FASB Discussion Memorandum on general price level accounting

• Found that political visibility a major factor in explaining lobbying positions– large firms favour general price level accounting as leads

to lower reported profits


Reasons for lobbying (cont.)

• Supported in New Zealand by Wong (1988)– corporations adopting CCA during period of rising prices

had higher effective tax rates and larger market concentrations than those that did not

• In UK Sutton (1988) found politically sensitive firms more likely to lobby in support of exposure draft recommending disclosure of CCA


Professional support for various approaches

• Current purchasing power accounting generally supported by standard-setters from 1960s to mid-1970s

• From about 1975 preference shifted to current cost accounting

• Late 1970s and early 1980s standard-setters issued recommendations which favoured a mixture of CPPA and CCA

• From mid-1980s support waned (time of falling inflation)


Potential reasons for lack of continued support

• May question the relevance of current cost information in times of falling inflation

• Drastic change to accounting conventions could cause disruption and confusion in capital markets

• New method of accounting could have taxation consequences


Potential reasons for lack of continued support (cont.)

• Self-interest motives of corporations

• Limited relevance to decision makers

• Nevertheless, in recent years there have been movements towards the use of ‘fair values’ as new accounting standards are being released

5-1 Copyright 2009 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Deegan, Financial Accounting Theory 3e Financial Accounting Theory Craig Deegan Chapter 5 Normative.

Documents

e development of accounting

power accounting cppa

current cost

mcgrawhill australia

historical cost basis

recent accounting standards

e current

historical values