48 10/12/19 18:34

48 10/12/19 18:34 Nancy Peter This plan is terrible for Glenview! I will be at the meeting to voice my opposition!

49 10/12/19 18:39 Mary Beth Kiefer

This project does not conform to the downtown revitalization plan, it eliminates badly needed parking for commuters and downtown visitors, and I question whether they will be able to fill 72 units in that location. I can't imagine wanting to live almost literally *on* the tracks, with train noise, crossing bells, and station announcements going 24/7. Additionally, traffic is already heavy on Glenview Road, and adding both

residential and retail traffic there would make it worse. This project *might* work somewhere else, but not at this location.

50 10/12/19 19:25 Rob Orr Plan does not comply with town development strategy. Leave no room for parking, which is already a mess; planned road will only add to congestion and danger. This plan needs to be re- conceived

51 10/12/19 19:36 Mary Beth Ayres52 10/12/19 19:42 B Lynk53 10/12/19 19:46 Dominique Reed54 10/12/19 19:48 Mary Jane Lynk55 10/12/19 20:07 MALIN BOWERS This is an ill-conceived plan that will negatively affect the residents of Glenview. I totally oppose this planned development.56 10/12/19 20:08 Mary Anne Nash Sebby57 10/12/19 20:16 Bridget Baker No more condos!58 10/12/19 20:17 Cathy Wilson We need to stop this massive development that will completely overwhelm downtown and impact traffic and pedestrian safety. 59 10/12/19 20:32 Mari Orr60 10/12/19 20:58 Sarah Muskivitch61 10/12/19 21:11 Kate Fleming

62 10/12/19 21:22 Melissa Tarpey

The building is very nice looking, but not for such a small area in Glenview. My biggest concern is for the businesses that exist already and those that will come to the downtown area. Parking really needs to be considered. Living within walking distance of the downtown area, I don't

always want to walk. If I go to Forza's, I want to be able to park with in a block. If I go to a restaurant in the area, I may walk during the warmer months, but if the weather is cool or raining, I would like to park near by. Not the same distance as if I walked from my home. This

already occurs when I make choices for dinner in the Glen. Please help us bring and KEEP businesses in our downtown area by giving our residents and non-residents ample and close parking to those businesses. I was also surprised by the parking study. There are a fair number of

accidents at Glenview Road and Harlem that seem to be not even considered as important to this development. Why is Harlem considered a main road and not Glenview Road? I hope that there will be more consideration to this development and what is allowed to be built in this

space. It will be a precedent for others to come. I enjoy the cozy hometown feel of Glenview.

63 10/12/19 21:29 John Dillon

This would be a travesty to build this building. We have enough unoccupied apartment/condo buildings in Glenview. The traffic congestion on top of an already heavily congested area would be a nightmare, not to mention the public safety concerns with children coming and going from

school. If this passes, I'll will do my best to see that everyone who favors and votes for this gets voted out of office. The Village has made enough bad decisions regarding this property and allowing this to happen would be the biggest travesty of all.

64 10/12/19 21:37 Richard Berkowitz65 10/12/19 21:46 Zaneta Ahuja I fully support the objection. 66 10/12/19 21:47 Sachin Ahuja I fully support the objection. 67 10/12/19 22:07 mary BENNETT Traffic concerns Parking concerns

68 10/12/19 22:07 Heather CooperI feel this project like so many of recent Glenview projects does NOT take the citizens‚Äô‚Äô concerns about overcrowding and poor traffic

control into consideration. I‚Äôve lived in Glenview for over 45 years. It‚Äôs so sad to see the village no longer listen to the people who made Glenview what it is. Please consider voting against this project.

69 10/12/19 22:08 Bruce BENNETT Traffic concerns Parking concerns

70 10/12/19 22:12 Susan A GregoryI believe that alternative developers and plans should be seriously considered. This site is ideal for inclusion of workforce housing units, and

developers with a vested interest in developing this type of multifamily residential or mixed use property should be contacted for design proposals.

71 10/12/19 22:14 Christina Coleman Too dense, too busy, plus I can‚Äôt pull out on Glenview Road now. Yes, I‚Äôm in the neighborhood. Five buildings down. Also, my house is in the picture.

72 10/12/19 22:32 Dakota rivero resident for 17 years, this is exactly what Glenview DOES. NOT. NEED. terminate! 73 10/12/19 22:47 Barb Cordell74 10/12/19 22:52 Carol Sinople75 10/12/19 22:54 Scott Harp76 10/12/19 23:36 Andrew Pawlusiewicz Stop the development of 1850 Glenview Road77 10/12/19 23:57 Robert B Katz78 10/12/19 23:59 Margie Rumpsa79 10/13/19 0:17 Catherine Keelan I'm for sensible development in downtown Glenview. I moved to Glenview, not Evanston.80 10/13/19 1:17 Aimee Medina Opposed 81 10/13/19 1:28 Martha Fergus I agree that the traffic congestion and possibility of more accidents will be a nightmare waiting to happen.

82 10/13/19 1:42 Marina ChudnovskyMy questions need answers, otherwise I will stop paying taxes---1. why developers get our money for this development. 2. Will they accept section 8 vouchers? If "Yes", I am against this development. 3. We pay huge property taxes to support school ranking, though our kids don't

attend the school anymore. With rental property, the school will lose ranking and I oppose the idea of this development.83 10/13/19 1:47 Mavis J84 10/13/19 1:48 Jingwei85 10/13/19 1:48 peter choe The proposal is big for the lot size and would alter the downtown as we know it. 86 10/13/19 1:49 Clarice87 10/13/19 1:50 Catherine Smith 88 10/13/19 1:51 Boyan Dai89 10/13/19 1:52 Elizabeth Hibner I believe this plan will cause congestion and parking problems downtown. 90 10/13/19 1:54 Amy D Traffic would be a big issue, so does parking! Oppose! 91 10/13/19 2:23 tom james seems there should be more transparency and conversation with residents..92 10/13/19 2:37 Georgia kalkanis I say no to all aspects of this project!!!93 10/13/19 2:49 Jim Limperis 94 10/13/19 3:02 Jennifer Firer Please respect the process.95 10/13/19 3:19 Lucinda J Fuller96 10/13/19 3:38 Eleni97 10/13/19 3:43 Cathy Scott Against this development 98 10/13/19 3:48 Catherine L99 10/13/19 3:53 Ann Jankey

100 10/13/19 4:16 Rochane Youna No more condos!!!! . Glenview Rd should be considered a main road. There‚Äôs going to be traffic and our number one priority should be the safety if pedestrians It‚Äôs sad to see that the village no longer listens to its people the people who made Glenview what it is.

101 10/13/19 4:18 Maria Lorenzo102 10/13/19 4:45 Elaine Okamoto We are already overcrowded!103 10/13/19 5:04 Mariah Decwikiel104 10/13/19 5:11 Letty Lebamoff 105 10/13/19 5:28 Trevor Mathias 106 10/13/19 5:30 Brian Pugal107 10/13/19 11:35 Liana Torskiy108 10/13/19 11:38 Demetra Pugal109 10/13/19 11:43 Karen Wirtschoreck I oppose the Drake plan at 1850 Glenview Road. 110 10/13/19 12:13 Laura Kordish

111 10/13/19 12:42 Sharon Mann I do not support this development as it will negatively impact current Glenview residents-- too large, terrible location (on busy thru road) and not pedestrian friendly. I DO support REASONABLE downtown development. Thank you

112 10/13/19 13:01 Mari Campbell I‚Äôm against anymore of these large developments. Especially in that already congested area. 113 10/13/19 13:19 Sari Pina 114 10/13/19 13:30 Vincent Chen115 10/13/19 13:36 Liz Flores116 10/13/19 13:47 Camille Mongiardini117 10/13/19 13:47 Kaitlin Fiore

118 10/13/19 13:54 T

Glenview road and Lehigh /Harlem are already slow moving - we need a rejuvenation of downtown since the owners of the Glen are mismanaging it so badly they can‚Äôt fill or keep their retail space - Glenview road needs proper parking and more businesses like Glenview grind, Forza, Gusto, the new arcade, etc. - not more greedy condo/ townhouse developments. I want a downtown that‚Äôs walkable and a

place to go for adults,teens, and families. 119 10/13/19 13:55 Laura Abrahams I don't support this development. 120 10/13/19 13:57 Katherine Bouchard

121 10/13/19 13:58 Kathy Sansone We have enough new apartment and buildings in our community. It is bringing in the riff raff not to mention over crowding our already crowded schools. How about putting more retailers on Glenview Road like Highland Park??

122 10/13/19 14:10 Jenna barrett123 10/13/19 14:12 Georgia Pappas124 10/13/19 14:25 Robert Grammer 125 10/13/19 14:38 Sharon Hayhurst This needs to be opposed...come to the board meeting on the 22nd and make our voices heard!126 10/13/19 14:42 Peter Pocrnich Over built. 127 10/13/19 14:50 Kristin baker128 10/13/19 15:00 Megan Biasco129 10/13/19 15:15 JOYCE HENEGHAN Too dense! Powers that be: please drive to surrounding communities who have gotten it right -- Highland Park, Wilmette, etc.130 10/13/19 15:26 Summer Kays131 10/13/19 15:51 Jose Bascaran132 10/13/19 16:21 Kim Isham

133 10/13/19 16:30 Diana Horvat What a traffic nightmare around an already congested area not to mention the safety factor of kids going to school, library, Dairy Bar, etc. We already had a fatal incident at those tracks, do you really want another?

134 10/13/19 16:57 Robyn Murov Downtown Glenview is crowded enough, this building is too tall and that intersection is busy enough. No thank you135 10/13/19 17:09 Dia Morgan136 10/13/19 17:17 Barbara Seeberg137 10/13/19 17:26 Margaret Vergamini 138 10/13/19 17:46 Madelyn Tirpak 139 10/13/19 17:47 Therese Tirpak140 10/13/19 17:59 David Murphy I live 2 blocks north of here and completely oppose this development. 141 10/13/19 18:01 Patricia Hauser142 10/13/19 18:19 Heather Plunkett143 10/13/19 18:22 Jessica This apartment complex is a really bad idea144 10/13/19 18:29 Bhairvi Shah Schools are already over populated and deteriorating, this will just add to that.145 10/13/19 18:40 Nora McAllister146 10/13/19 18:45 Maheen Ayub147 10/13/19 18:57 Marv and Susan Klebba148 10/13/19 18:59 Dana Ward No no no!!!! 149 10/13/19 19:05 jessica mercado150 10/13/19 19:57 Adam McGovern

151 10/13/19 19:58 Lisa McGovern I oppose this new development as it will detract from the character downtown and make traffic/train congestion a lot worse!!152 10/13/19 20:05 Susan Dunning

153 10/13/19 20:22 MIKE PURPURA

This project does not appear to conform with the downtown development plan. It is extremely dense. The Village has made concessions to the developer which include extending the development onto vacated public property, use of public property for developer's water detention, sale

of the property to developer at a loss, inadequate parking for 72 unit development. 80 spaces permitted and should be closer to 116. Elimination of approximately 20 METRA parking spaces by narrowing Depot Street. Constriction of westbound traffic on Glenview Road due to extension of Depot street to Glenview Road. Constriction of pedestrian movement across RR tracks and crossing Genview Road by the same

extension of Depot Street. Everyone should be very concerned about the favorable treatment being shown by the village to this developer. This building will be with us for a century. Is this the best work our planning commission and trustees can produce?

154 10/13/19 20:53 Cheryl Jaffe

155 10/13/19 20:59 Elaine SullivanI am very opposed to the development project in the former Bess Hardware property. Parking and traffic will be stressed beyond control. This

development will drive business away from the former downtown area. Gridlock at the train tracks will force people away from existing businesses and parking will become even more of an issue in this neighborhood.

156 10/13/19 21:15 andersen maren I‚Äôm concerned about the size and wonder why it seems as if the guidelines / restrictions for building structures downtown are not being followed?

157 10/13/19 23:33 Darcy Ibach158 10/13/19 23:34 William Suhadolnik

159 10/13/19 23:38 William Sullivan It is a serious breach of fiduciary duty for any elected public official to support this project, which will have an adverse impact on the neighborhood. I will raise money in the next election to oust any elected official who supports it.

160 10/13/19 23:53 Marikay D Boraca161 10/14/19 1:40 Carrie Marquardt162 10/14/19 1:46 Lindsay nealt 163 10/14/19 4:17 Meredith

164 10/14/19 12:10 jim mooney

It seems like we already have too many vacant storefronts around town. Glenview DT has what seems to have a perfect situation to really make the downtown nice I understand its hard to have 2 DT (the glen and the old DT) It IS HARD TO CHASE 2 RABBITS AT SAME TIME. It would

be great if we could somehow make it so residents of Glenview could open shops up in Downtown and get some help from the village. It seems most families that live in Glenview are extremely proud of the community and would like to help keep some hometown vibe, not try to be OAK Park or Chicago. I think the more Glenview resident shops the better, as a Glenview resident I would rather support a small business of

a neighbor we need to cut the red tape make it easy to keep the community 165 10/14/19 13:06 Paula Stoddard166 10/14/19 13:12 James Murphy167 10/14/19 13:33 Harry Wells168 10/14/19 14:03 Rick Medina Opposed

169 10/14/19 14:11 Anne O'Loughlin The last thing downtown Glenview needs is more living quarters. Why not add retail and restaurants? The Glen could probably use the competition. It's amazing how dead downtown Glenview is on the weekend evenings.

170 10/14/19 14:28 Louise Fischer Please listen to your constituents. Glenview does not need to be like every other city raped by ‚Äúprogress!!‚Äù171 10/14/19 14:47 Mark O'Loughlin We need more restaurants and shops...not more condos and apartments.

172 10/14/19 16:08 Virginia PupilloI object to this building! The building is entirely too big for that location. Glenview Road is very busy, especially at rush hour with Metra trains

tying up traffic. To open up Depot Street at Glenview Road is a tragedy waiting to happen. It‚Äôs very dangerous to pedestrian traffic, especially to OLPH school children walking there.

173 10/14/19 16:27 Sarah Song174 10/14/19 17:15 Andrew Lapp175 10/14/19 18:20 Chris McKenna

176 10/14/19 18:35 Vlad Krenzel 177 10/14/19 18:59 Malek el Khazen178 10/14/19 19:07 Paul Berman My family is opposed to this project.179 10/14/19 20:17 Joanna Berman180 10/14/19 20:22 Deborah Ascaridis181 10/14/19 20:27 Tony Martin182 10/14/19 21:24 David Schwartz

183 10/14/19 21:53 Janet It‚Äôs time for the Village Of Glenview to work for the people of Glen View. While the Drake corp. may be from Glenview, their interests are

not for Glenview. It is clear our village board is for sale. And until the residents step up, the village will continue to model the corruption of Chicago.

184 10/14/19 22:06 Colleen Hogg I am concerned about the traffic this is a high children area and seems so close to road. 185 10/14/19 23:56 Todd Hackl

186 10/15/19 0:03 Ann Johnson On behalf of all Glenview residents, I wish to voice my concern about this large building. It will disrupt the residential areas, and there‚Äôs already plenty of inventory on the market in Glenview.

187 10/15/19 0:37 Jieying Zheng

188 10/15/19 0:47 Kim mahandru We need to retain the hometown charm of Glenview by balancing restaurants, shops, residencies and purposeful green undeveloped space. I firmly believe we have overdeveloped on the residency side. I oppose this project due to its size and purpose.

189 10/15/19 2:20 Melody Dewar

190 10/15/19 2:21 Nicole I'm concerned with the shortage of parking that we are going to experience. The proposed access point from Glenview Road is a hazard for both pedestrians and motorist.

191 10/15/19 3:06 David Andrew192 10/15/19 4:43 Heidi Ortiz193 10/15/19 4:47 Katherine Sawicz 194 10/15/19 5:56 Tiffany Cordell 195 10/15/19 11:50 Charlotte Sparrow 196 10/15/19 12:11 Jennifer197 10/15/19 13:13 Kirsten Branstrom198 10/15/19 13:16 William Holmstrom199 10/15/19 14:55 Matthew Skweres200 10/15/19 15:33 allie201 10/15/19 15:44 Mary Vogel The planned density is just way too high as is a 5 story building. I thought 3 stories was the max for downtown. This should be challenged. 202 10/15/19 16:12 Georgieanne Alef I have observed the automobile traffic in this area. It is already crazy. This building is too dense for the area.203 10/15/19 16:57 Claudia Wojslaw204 10/15/19 17:19 Conor Holihan205 10/15/19 17:33 maggie we want restaurants !! 206 10/15/19 17:36 Suzy Greenberg207 10/15/19 17:37 Grant Reese

208 10/15/19 18:21 Janet Jacobs Why can't we have little shops like Northbrook has east of the train station - this is a monstrosity - look at Northbrook's monstrosity on the west side of its train tracks - it blocks everything that is beautiful - the library, the small town feel of the village

209 10/15/19 19:04 Howard Willard210 10/15/19 19:18 Maria211 10/15/19 19:18 Mitzi Labant212 10/15/19 19:35 Daniel Toy

213 10/15/19 19:46 Anonymous

Do we really need another apartment building or condos on Glenview Road? Look at the monstrosity adjacent to the Glenview House. The lower level to have stores, how many are there? Not many. When I moved here some 30 years ago Glenview had a lovely downtown. Now it looks like a dump to me. Recently drove through Franklin Park and Elmhurst which are not on the North Shore and their downtown is so lovely. Perhaps someone on the Board should take a look. In addition there is the huge apartment building on Waukegan Road and Townhomes next to the Fire House. Why anyone would want to be living in any of these places is beyond my realm of comprehension. Does one really want to

be next to railroad tracks? Glenview Road already is too congested. People dislike smokers, but they like the scent of diesel fuel? I recently read a report about restaurants and housing close to vehicle traffic & trains and yes, we are breathing in the emission of these vehicles.

214 10/15/19 19:54 Chris Andrew215 10/15/19 19:57 Themis Paspalas Ludicrous. I thought Glenview didn't do "greed", at the expense of its citizens.

216 10/15/19 20:28 Julie orr Glenview has far too much high density housing already! And the added access to Glenview Rd from Depot St sounds like a disaster in the making.

217 10/15/19 20:49 Rowena Parma This project is not in the best interest of downtown Glenview. It will cause substantial traffic and congestion problems, danger to pedestrians and especially school children and loss of much needed parking at the train station.

218 10/15/19 21:00 JANE Marie MARMET219 10/15/19 21:01 Christian Funduianu 220 10/15/19 21:12 Lisa Adler221 10/15/19 21:13 Chelsea Paspalas THIS IS JUST TOO GREEDY FOR OUR VILLAGE. 222 10/15/19 21:44 Marigo Afendras223 10/15/19 21:54 Karen Lesak Too dense. Shame on Glenview for trying to railroad this through.224 10/15/19 22:11 Robert Wise225 10/15/19 23:44 Coko226 10/15/19 23:45 Jacqueline Thompson-Fernandez227 10/15/19 23:46 Periklis Moutzouros

228 10/16/19 0:23 Jason erickson Not only does this present a congestion hazard it also represents poor handling of village (tax payer) funds. The inflated purchase price followed with a fire sale is not acceptable business.

229 10/16/19 2:04 Catherine Tristano 230 10/16/19 2:38 Amanda Smeegs231 10/16/19 2:45 Cheryl Briceno232 10/16/19 3:04 Kendra Dillon233 10/16/19 4:45 Lori Diversey Rethink the height and size of this structure. It looks like a prison which will loom over the small town.234 10/16/19 11:35 Ireta Enright235 10/16/19 11:44 Lindsey meyer236 10/16/19 13:22 David Yurik why so secret? We all pay so we should all know what is going on here.237 10/16/19 13:23 Kristin milito238 10/16/19 13:44 Elizabeth Bolger Respect the opinions of the Glenview residents! There must be a good reason the tax-paying residents are not on board! 239 10/16/19 14:36 Suzanne McAulay240 10/16/19 14:53 maria kolesnikov241 10/16/19 17:28 Jill Pilarski242 10/16/19 18:23 Dick Moser243 10/16/19 18:40 jessica Pilarski DO NOT BUILD THIS IT WILL RUIN OUR HOME244 10/16/19 19:09 Vernon O Sebby245 10/16/19 19:13 Nancy Brennan246 10/16/19 19:47 Drew Pilarski This is an absolutely terrible idea. No!

247 10/16/19 20:28 Mais Albazi248 10/16/19 20:29 Neel 249 10/16/19 20:38 Jonathan Pilarski250 10/16/19 20:46 Jack Hagerty251 10/16/19 20:56 Kevin Pilarski The building will be an eyesore for our community.252 10/16/19 21:35 Edith Nordby The traffic in downtown Glenview at this location is already problematic. This new project will make getting around virtually a nightmare.

253 10/16/19 21:48 Mark Santacrose This project is really intolerable - and that is if it is successful. Multi family housing is over saturated nationally and I am even more concerned about the prospect of a failed project of this size.

254 10/16/19 21:53 Eileen Savino255 10/16/19 21:59 Hannah Waldfogel

256 10/16/19 22:13 MARK J VOGEL We already have more than enough traffic and developmental density in Glenview. Particularly near the railroad station and crossing! We should not cave into another developer who has no real concern about this.

257 10/16/19 22:31 Debbie Hepburn258 10/16/19 22:49 Sweta Harrison259 10/16/19 23:22 Pat Marziani260 10/16/19 23:25 Brigette Sargent261 10/17/19 0:03 Todd Frank This project is ridiculously dense for the size of the parcel.262 10/17/19 0:07 John thissen Feels too big, bad traffic implications. Looks nice but scaled down version seems like it would work better263 10/17/19 1:29 Tom Condon I hope Glenview comes to realize what a mistake this project is. 264 10/17/19 1:31 Carol Schippman Far too much congestion in this area already.

265 10/17/19 1:52 Tracey CascaranoThe size of the development overwhelms the site. I don‚Äôt think Glenview should approve a development of 5 stories tall when the downtown

development plan recommended 4. It will dwarf neighboring building and cut much sunlight from them as well when nothing else is as tall. Please have them reconsider and adjust plans to fit the space and align with the original development plan.

266 10/17/19 2:00 Ann Hagerty267 10/17/19 2:01 DeAnne Frank268 10/17/19 2:11 Laura Selby269 10/17/19 2:28 Ken McAvoy Please convert our opposition to the development of the Bess property into apartments.

270 10/17/19 3:21 Kathleen Barnard As a Glenview resident, I am opposed to the increased density and congestion in an area that already has traffic and trains, as well as the loss of parking for the trains.

271 10/17/19 4:27 Margaret Fiorenza272 10/17/19 11:23 Kathryn Hall273 10/17/19 14:10 Ben Edward274 10/17/19 14:15 Tom Miller No green space to even plant a tree. Reduce the height and number of units. Surface parking unfriendly to folks walking on Pine Street 275 10/17/19 15:38 Julie Karr

276 10/17/19 16:32 Richard C Erickson

I think this is going to be a problem with the concentration of people through the 72 apartments and the shop on the ground floor, plus I do not like the using of public money to benefit a private company that is going to show a profit to the owners of the company. There is also the

issue of pedestrian safety crossing the corner of Glenview Road and Pine Street. There is a traffic jam there now. OLPH kids walk to and from school at that crossing. I am opposed to this project.

277 10/17/19 19:43 Don Andrew278 10/17/19 19:54 Sarah Lane-Hill

279 10/17/19 21:28 Nancy Halliday It is shocking that a development this large at such a sensitive area even be proposed. Please, less height and more consideration for affordable units and green space.

280 10/17/19 23:01 Romana Karlove I oppose due to the size and location of this project.281 10/17/19 23:33 Nancy Flitcraft

282 10/17/19 23:38 Gregg Flitcraft This will add significantly to an already significant traffic problem at Pine/Glenview/Harlem as well as parking problems in that area .

283 10/18/19 0:20 Sven R Dahlquist Too dense and massive for the site. Half the at-grade building is a brick wall with parking behind it, not very inviting to the community at all. A shame for such an important civic site (no green space?).

284 10/18/19 0:42 John Holecek Too big, too congested, too many problems. Trying to turn on Glenview road is already difficult with the trains stopping traffic. It will be unbearable and dangerous many times during the day.

285 10/18/19 1:18 Sharon Anderson286 10/18/19 1:19 Patty Holecek287 10/18/19 1:42 JOAN JOHNS It's offensively large and uncomfortably placed in a high-traffic auto/pedestrian/train intersection.

288 10/18/19 1:48 Stephanie HurleyThis building is too massive for this space and it will cause more car congestion around an already busy area. The traffic will definitely make it

more dangerous for pedestrians on Pine. Until I saw this rendering, I didn‚Äôt realize there was no green space in the whole complex. This plan should not go forward.

289 10/18/19 2:10 Peggie Garrigus290 10/18/19 2:43 Colleen whelan

291 10/18/19 3:48 Cindy DrostThis proposal is not in the best interest of GV down town - It is architecturally not appealing., and the influx of traffic will only add to more

confusion to the spine Street & GV Road, Metra & Amtrak traffic. Has anyone in the planning committee ever walked, biked or driven their car around at rush hour around the adjacent streets? This will not be an enhancement for DT GV & property values are already declining!

292 10/18/19 3:56 Angie McMahonThis corner is already so congested. With children trying to get to school by bike or walking; I worry about the commuter rush. The commuters

are so agressive, looking out only to catch the light or train. Pedestrians walking across traffic, to get to the train has been something I‚Äôve observed over the years. This will only get worse.

293 10/18/19 12:15 Joan Dobson294 10/18/19 12:20 Kathleen McCarthy295 10/18/19 12:33 Michael Regan Traffic around this area is a disaster. This will only make the problem worse.296 10/18/19 12:46 Jill Regan297 10/18/19 14:17 Dennis and NaN Glynn298 10/18/19 14:53 Christabel Rocap299 10/18/19 15:50 Shelly Helton300 10/18/19 18:19 Margo Webb

301 10/18/19 18:34 John Muir

In one fell swoop you will destroy downtown Glenview. Trying to get through the light at Glenview and Harlem is already a nightmare. Adding this many rental units, on top of the massive rental development that occurred several years ago, will further destroy the enjoyment of owning a home west of downtown Glenview. This development is not at all what the downtown needs. Further, the congestion this development will bring to an already congested cross street that incorporates a train crossing will likely result in future fatalities. The fact that this development is even contemplated, begs the question as to who is really benefiting because it doesn't seem that it is the residents of Glenview. Safety for the children and other residents of Glenview should be the paramount concern and this development does not reflect that concern. Moreover,

this number of rental units does not even seem to be warranted. Do the right thing Glenview, protect the residents from this unreasonable danger.

302 10/18/19 18:43 Thomas taylor This development is way to dense for this area.303 10/18/19 18:48 Carole Taylor This development is way too dense for this area. Glenview Road and Lehigh is too busy now with car and train traffic.304 10/18/19 18:58 Rosemary Kropp

305 10/18/19 19:12 Justin Gruby If we do not have parking replaced it will negatively affect our business. e have been in Glenview for 12 years and have 8 full time staff members currently.

306 10/18/19 19:20 NELS R NELSON307 10/18/19 19:20 Harry Sullivan308 10/18/19 19:38 Gordon Hill Petition signed.

309 10/18/19 19:48 Mike Rivero It‚Äôs too large for the area. There will be so much traffic coming from there. Scale it down310 10/18/19 19:48 Lara Andersen311 10/18/19 20:06 Peter Maroutsos There‚Äôs enough traffic and congestion in Glenview already . It‚Äôs becoming unbearable 312 10/18/19 20:08 Becky Kadel313 10/18/19 20:35 Anne Vavloukis314 10/18/19 20:38 Kaylee Durow315 10/18/19 20:41 Steve Lazzara It‚Äôs already chaotic in that area every weekday . Imagine if you add a couple hundred more cars. 316 10/18/19 20:45 Linda M Hopkins317 10/18/19 21:00 Hilary Dexter 318 10/18/19 21:27 Charlotte Walker319 10/18/19 21:29 Joe Walker320 10/18/19 21:47 Suzanne Janak321 10/18/19 22:10 James P Hopkins322 10/18/19 22:35 Elle Stewart323 10/18/19 22:48 Krista Frick324 10/19/19 0:40 Kim Rivero NO! NO! NO! NO! NO! I live on Glenview Road, east of Waukegan. It's so backed up now, I can't get out of my driveway half the time. 325 10/19/19 1:28 Maureen Zeivel326 10/19/19 2:20 Amy bond327 10/19/19 3:49 Martin Fogarty Looks like a good deal for developers but not for the community 328 10/19/19 14:26 Julia Sonneborn

329 10/19/19 15:03 Pamela Perl Too much mass. It needs to be set back and scaled down. I am also concerned that these units will sit empty. Would like to know what the asking price for these units will be.

330 10/19/19 17:14 Dave Tosh331 10/19/19 17:15 christine cooper Takes forever to get around town now. Please, no more multi-home developments.332 10/19/19 17:25 Stacy Dolan333 10/19/19 17:57 Jeanne Scoby334 10/19/19 18:02 Heather Scoby335 10/19/19 18:03 Mike Andrikanich336 10/19/19 18:59 Pete Janus337 10/19/19 19:15 Tim Feldheim With train traffic and OLPH traffic this area has poor traffic flow already. This is far too dense for the property.338 10/19/19 22:49 John Nimesheim 339 10/19/19 23:03 April Perry340 10/20/19 0:36 Eileen hoekstra341 10/20/19 1:34 Jennifer Gentry STOP DESTROYING this beautiful town w/ your concrete monstrosities!!! All because of GREED!! Money isn't EVERYTHING! 342 10/20/19 15:49 Emily Andrew

343 10/20/19 18:50 Craig Harrison

Once again the Village trustees are quietly taking it upon themselves to waste millions of dollars of our hard earned money. This behavior should have been nipped in the bud at its origin, specifically by blowing millions of dollars on the library/post office land swap, later by loosing millions of dollars over time in tax revenue regarding the Willow Creek deal. These folks are not transparent, not trustworthy and lack business

acumen. This behavior needs to stop.344 10/20/19 18:51 Danish haque Greed for tax revenue should not supersede intelligent city planning. 345 10/20/19 19:02 Jean Losquadro This is a big mistake waiting to happen!

346 10/20/19 19:38 Robert Schumacher I oppose the proposed development at the former Bess Hardware. It is not within the best interest for the residents of the Village of Glenview or the downtown area, will lead to more traffic gridlock, and is a safety hazard for pedestrians.

347 10/20/19 21:09 Mary schaeffer

348 10/20/19 23:39 George Garcia

349 10/21/19 1:17 Rita MasiniThis is not a wise use of space. The tax revenue from this project will be substantially less than potential tax revenue from condominiums. Yet,

the potential impact on schools and other village services can easily overburdened by the dense nature of this development. In addition, the resident safety surrounding this busy area of downtown Glenview will be very negatively impacted.

350 10/21/19 1:59 Jenny Gitelson351 10/21/19 2:10 Barney Rupp352 10/21/19 2:45 Nick Vassilos353 10/21/19 3:10 Maureen Hugo I am against the current 1850 Glenview development plan.

354 10/21/19 4:17 Charles Loebbaka

This development will forever change the downtown area and future projects like this one into Chicago Right Here in Glenview. A slate of trustee candidates must run in the next election to pledge to never approve projects like this that do not belong in our village. I would but I was

a trustee for 10 years and at my age don't have the stamina to serve. But I will help and support a slate, including public relations, to replace short-sighted trustees and commissioners to save our village from the next imperious assault on our community. Save Glenview!

355 10/21/19 5:47 Phil roseman Too big!, Too close to Glenview rd! Too tall! No parking! Unsafe for pedestrians and vehicular traffic! Out of character for Glenview at this location. It‚Äôs forced and ugly like that building on Waukegan Rd across from Harrison‚Äôs Poultry, that thing is hideous!

356 10/21/19 6:18 Heddie Romanoff 357 10/21/19 10:42 Julie Evans358 10/21/19 15:37 Dan Lomer359 10/21/19 15:53 Elaine Michelini Opposed 360 10/21/19 15:53 Paul Michelini Opposed

361 10/21/19 16:15 Nancy Garcia Would be able to get across the train tracks impossible Long lines now from both directions Way too large Parking will be impossible in front of any homes School to close

362 10/21/19 17:26 Burns Ross363 10/21/19 18:01 Jordan Bond

364 10/21/19 18:22 Jeanne Minorini This project is way too dense for the site. Trains tie up that intersection for 15 minutes at the worst times. Adding more traffic to the site will exacerbate this problem.

365 10/21/19 19:53 Scott Pierce Not for this. Find tax dollars elsewhere.p366 10/21/19 21:11 Susanne Kubik367 10/21/19 22:28 Mary Anne Wengel368 10/21/19 22:47 robert hicks

369 10/21/19 22:49 Kathleen Knorr I dont think there is enough green space, in addition to space for pedestrians for the train. I also dont see appropriate garage space for parking

370 10/21/19 23:25 LaVerne Dellinger371 10/22/19 0:57 Mary Thomas Oppose372 10/22/19 1:26 Carol Sullivan373 10/22/19 1:38 Erin Murnighan 374 10/22/19 1:51 Terry Harris375 10/22/19 2:12 Christina Sugrue376 10/22/19 2:13 Corinne Heggie377 10/22/19 2:34 Jan Odeshoo378 10/22/19 2:43 Dianne Larsen379 10/22/19 2:43 Patrick Sugrue380 10/22/19 2:54 Rita Goodman Schneider The area is already very congested and we don‚Äôt need any more building there 381 10/22/19 2:57 kevin kuncheria382 10/22/19 3:00 Dana Millman

383 10/22/19 3:23 Daniel Liner384 10/22/19 3:36 Karen snow385 10/22/19 3:44 Martha Haritos386 10/22/19 3:56 Jody Mason387 10/22/19 4:42 Laura needs more restaurants!388 10/22/19 7:36 Richard P Mann389 10/22/19 13:22 Deb Anderson Opposed - too dense! This is a bad place to increase traffic. 390 10/22/19 16:18 Donald Doan Traffic and safety are major concerns. The train already causes major delays.

391 10/22/19 16:26 Carol A Christensen Please don't destroy the Glenview downtown with this massive development! Consider the people who live here as more important than a developer!

392 10/22/19 17:34 Tracey Moore393 10/22/19 17:34 Amy McClory

394 10/22/19 17:50 Elle Cunningham The traffic in downtown Glenview at this location is already problematic. Adding this new project will make getting around virtually would make it worse. Accidents are bound to happen with all this congestion.

395 10/22/19 17:57 Jennifer Richards396 10/22/19 18:25 Gail Thomas397 10/22/19 18:28 Brittany Sidoti

398 10/22/19 18:44 Andrea Doan It would be nice to see more restaurants or gathering places in our community that offer ample parking and don‚Äôt congest an already congested intersection.

399 10/22/19 18:45 Dru Van Harten400 10/22/19 18:53 Marilyn Tazalla Reject reject reject

401 10/22/19 19:44 Vladislav Torskiy

The Drake Development Group project that does not comply with building codes: construction density, parking requirements, etc. Based on the above, it is an illegal development. This project is not supposed to be reviewed by Village of Glenview's Plan Commission department unless

the design flaws are fixed. Prior to Plan Commission hearings proper public meetings have to be conducted seeking public approval for the project, which also did not take place. The question is - does Village of Glenview tacitly supports the project and tries to implement it despite

public disagreement?402 10/22/19 20:08 Mike Murphy Too Dense for the proposed location403 10/22/19 20:13 Elizabeth Murphy Too tall for the area, and too close to Glenview Road causing too much congestion and unsafe for the community.404 10/22/19 20:37 Ann Swenson 405 10/22/19 20:55 Kathleen Buckland This building is an outrage!406 10/22/19 20:58 Kiley white

407 10/22/19 22:12 Nicole Torskiy

The building is too dense with absolutely not enough parking to accomodate its residents and their guests. It is being built at already a problematic intersection for pedestrians and traffic and in an area that struggles with parking availability. The Village of Glenview needs to

reexamine their approval of a building that doesn't comply with building codes and require the developer to adhere to Village codes instead of creating exceptions that only hurt the current residents of this area.

408 10/22/19 22:21 Raven Rand409 10/22/19 22:30 Maureen Zajac410 10/22/19 22:30 Michelle Gutowski Glenview residents do not want or need this!411 10/22/19 22:37 Rhonda Miller

412 10/22/19 22:44 Jill Wachter As a Glenview resident, I have viewed the drawings of this potential development. It is too tall and too big for our community and will change the feel and dynamic of downtown Glenview in a way that I do not believe is positive. Please consider alternatives.

413 10/22/19 22:52 Debra Madden414 10/22/19 23:04 Ellen figarty415 10/22/19 23:23 Adam Sidoti

416 10/22/19 23:46 Brian Harrigan 417 10/22/19 23:54 J Huston418 10/23/19 0:01 Tom Monticello Density419 10/23/19 0:14 Patricia Koclanis This building is too large and has too many apartments in it for the area.

420 10/23/19 0:36 Barbara Bell I'm opposed to this because of the increased car traffic being so close to OLPH, the church traffic as well as the train station traffic which is already heavy!

421 10/23/19 0:38 Michele Brennan422 10/23/19 1:55 Christopher Richards This will not improve Glenview!423 10/23/19 2:21 Erin Corrado424 10/23/19 2:41 Cindy Beck Stop!!!425 10/23/19 3:15 Brent Goff426 10/23/19 4:17 Albert Pawlusiewicz I am against the development proposed by the Drake Group427 10/23/19 7:54 Kirby Weiland 428 10/23/19 10:46 Sarah Barney 429 10/23/19 11:31 Janelle Wood430 10/23/19 12:21 Leah Campbell431 10/23/19 13:09 Sarah Nitschke432 10/23/19 13:29 Michael Keating433 10/23/19 13:30 Michael J Radel434 10/23/19 13:38 Matt Chango435 10/23/19 13:44 John Ramsey436 10/23/19 13:46 Kristin Lafferty437 10/23/19 14:12 Beth Redding438 10/23/19 14:20 Ryan Sheedy No!439 10/23/19 14:21 Kris Battista440 10/23/19 14:24 Murphy Weiland441 10/23/19 14:25 Nic Pape442 10/23/19 14:27 Adam Mitchell

443 10/23/19 15:39 Brad Langenbach The building is way to big and will cause a significant amount of traffic congestion in a high traffic area already. I also have kids at OLPH and do not want a building this big next to a school.

444 10/23/19 15:53 Kirsten Kenny 445 10/23/19 15:58 Kelly Kasher446 10/23/19 16:01 STEPHEN GALO447 10/23/19 16:02 Maureen Galo448 10/23/19 16:13 Becky Dempsey449 10/23/19 17:05 Mary Ward450 10/23/19 18:46 Krista Gruszeczki451 10/23/19 19:22 Katie Strzalka452 10/23/19 20:18 Jeff Duncan Pine St resident. 453 10/23/19 20:44 Deirdre Schwallie 454 10/23/19 21:15 Aimee Blakeslee This building is a terrible idea.455 10/23/19 21:19 Amy schneider456 10/23/19 22:52 Carrie Nicholson457 10/24/19 1:04 Andrew Luett Why?

458 10/24/19 2:57 Kristen McGargill 459 10/24/19 3:13 Maria Memmos460 10/24/19 4:24 Daniel jurczak461 10/24/19 11:17 Doug bonvechio462 10/24/19 11:17 Lance Robinson 463 10/24/19 18:08 Heidi Duncan Overdevelopment for the site is my concern 464 10/24/19 18:15 Jennifer unis465 10/24/19 18:16 Katy Becker466 10/25/19 1:37 John O'Connell467 10/25/19 1:47 Andrew Richter It's just too big.468 10/25/19 4:09 Julia Paspalas This is just not on. It‚Äôs just another ugly building. 469 10/25/19 5:00 Lindsey Kilsdonk470 10/25/19 11:09 Megan Lehn

471 10/26/19 18:49 Beth A AbbottI live at Pine and Grove. This area is already too congested. With the limited number of access roads to either get to Waukegan or Glenview

Roads I‚Äôm concerned about the added traffic, especially since this location is so close to the train tracks. Please keep me updated as things progress. I wasn‚Äôt able to attend the meeting on the 22nd.

472 10/26/19 21:50 Debbie Plager All for sustainable development and transparent communications with the citizens of Glenview. 473 10/27/19 14:44 Anonymous I oppose the building of this structure for all of the reason that have already been listed.

474 10/28/19 0:49 Chris JohnsonMore traffic and the street will look like a dark canyon most of the day. All for an extra $50k or so in annual property tax revenue, which you could also get by building another 7 or 8 townhouses... no thanks. Not to mention the town should have gotten a lot more money for the land

anyway.475 10/28/19 12:15 christy vavloukis Too BIG!476 10/28/19 14:24 Jennifer Mitchell 477 10/28/19 14:50 Dave Zimmer478 10/28/19 15:25 Janet Marks Vavloukis479 10/28/19 18:22 Alex Stukalov480 10/29/19 1:15 Mary Jo Novak

481 10/29/19 14:28 kathleen pickardway too big and dense development. so out of place. The appearance committee needs to seethis again in3d in relation to the rest of

downtown. we want shops and restaurants . not a monster building with a cupcake shop. You should have made this a park because you won't see much in tax revenue from empty apartments

482 10/29/19 21:11 Bethany Woods483 10/29/19 21:22 Christopher Gariepy484 10/30/19 0:02 Lynn Sanders That area is already congested and it's really not appropriate for such a large development.485 10/30/19 0:51 David waldherr486 10/30/19 4:17 Nicole Slade487 10/31/19 0:58 Kerstin An488 10/31/19 16:24 Margaret Sents Parking is an issue too.489 11/1/19 18:20 Leslie Wojick490 11/1/19 19:01 Dale Sands491 11/2/19 1:18 Robert Cronin Vote no492 11/2/19 3:24 Sarah wojick493 11/2/19 14:55 Jean Thompson Too big494 11/4/19 14:46 Jessie Wu495 11/4/19 15:05 Tom Nelson

496 11/4/19 16:12 Rula Marziani497 11/4/19 16:21 Maurita Freas This is just too big for the area. The traffic and parking will be a problem.

498 11/4/19 16:38 Robert Martier

We have to see how any of the high rise developments have served the people of Glenview. The increased density, congestion and traffic have not made Glenview a safer, more attractive or pleasant place to live. Nor has there been any financial benefit. If all these developments were

such economic engines, we should be awash in cash. Instead, we have seen an increase in empty store fronts and, especially, a dramatic increase in taxes. Glenview should not be in the real estate business. It has usually not turned out well. Who can ever forget that the Glen

Towne Center developer, Oliver-McMillan, was allowed to walk away owing us $17 million.499 11/4/19 17:09 Yao li I am a resident in glenview, I object to the development of the new building.500 11/4/19 17:10 Xuesong Li501 11/4/19 17:24 Waigen Zhang502 11/4/19 17:34 sandy mcbreen enormous rental bldg for our town way to big

503 11/4/19 20:05 Janet Rogers

As a lifelong resident, I don't want to see Glenview change from a Tree City into a brick city. The zoning changes that allow buildings in the downtown corridor to go right up to the property line have already significantly altered the landscape. The proposed building is enormous and

even taller than Midtown Square. It will overwhelm the Bess site, as well as create increased traffic congestion, safety concerns (proposed entrance off Glenview Rd.), decreased parking, and stormwater issues, among others. It was reported that the village turned down a proposal

for 27 townhomes when Bess owned the site because of density. Now they're considering a far denser 72 unit apartment building that requires a number of zoning exceptions and adds virtually nothing to the community. Stop the insanity.

504 11/5/19 1:58 Elizabeth Murphy505 11/5/19 5:38 Michele Bass506 11/5/19 20:22 Sandra Walker

507 11/5/19 22:31 Bill Traynor

The Plan Commission must do its duty to the Village Board, and to the residents, and reject the Drake ‚ÄúMixed-Use‚Äù Apartments Project. It admits to creating much more parking demand than it provides to tenants. This will hurt the business district, and overflow onto residential streets. The towering building is very unattractive. No lawns, trees or plantings are included to enhance pedestrian traffic. The project was

poorly chosen. It is a disaster while only on paper. Reject it. 508 11/6/19 0:10 Julie I do not approve 509 11/6/19 7:02 Gail Goldberg Please do not ruin our Village and our downtown with this building. 510 11/6/19 11:09 Mary Garvey511 11/6/19 11:48 Elizabeth Bauer512 11/6/19 12:54 Laura Hancko

513 11/6/19 13:00 Barbara J RasmussenThis is NOT in keeping with our village atmosphere. Glenview is already burdened by horrendous congestion. (Try driving south from Willow to

Glenview Rd down Waukegan any weekday between 5 - 6 pm. ) What is the benefit to current residents? This project will only bring more cars and clog the already jammed area. When will enough be enough? Please STOP!

514 11/6/19 13:09 Erin McGavicThis project is far too large for the proposed location. If the Village of Glenview were not directly involved as a party to the transaction, there is

no way this would be approved. Hard to imagine that the village could approve this and simultaneously require other landlords to request parking variances or weigh in at all on proposed uses of space going forward.

515 11/6/19 13:17 Julie Barker516 11/6/19 13:55 Lisa Doerr517 11/6/19 13:56 Ace B Hassen Ace Stop this project518 11/6/19 14:51 Douglas Baddeloo

519 11/6/19 14:56 Monica SantosThis development will bring TOO MUCH traffic and congestion to an already congested area. Visit that area any weekday between 3-5PM, and watch the Kids from OLPH riding their bikes, walking across the tracks, and cars backing up when there are numerous rush hour trains. No and

No. Please stop this development.520 11/6/19 15:28 Jane Payne 521 11/6/19 16:04 Peter Brown Glenview is too crowded and the infrastructure has not kept pace with the increase in people.

522 11/6/19 16:09 Joe Robinson

523 11/6/19 16:18 Gerri WicklanderI live on Glenview Road. The traffic if backed up for blocks sometimes all the way from town to Wagner at busy times what will happen if we add more apartments?????after they built Glenview and Church apartments traffic has increased. I am against anymore apartments in town

524 11/6/19 16:25 Jennifer Davis525 11/6/19 16:45 Janice Byron As a close to 30 Glenview Road resident just west of the library I am opposed to the size and density of this project.526 11/6/19 17:03 Stacey Wood527 11/6/19 18:47 Graham Welch

528 11/6/19 18:57 Kristi Carroll I live in the neighborhood, and hope you will please consider scaling this project down to a more reasonable and aesthetically pleasing size for this particular site.

529 11/6/19 19:00 Raymond Kracik530 11/6/19 20:05 Andrew neukirch

531 11/6/19 20:31 Scott M Batt There is enough traffic congestion on Glenview Road and neighboring streets. Put some decent retail in downtown and then watch the people come!

532 11/6/19 22:47 Julie Dillon ohlsen533 11/7/19 0:33 Steve Chaiken534 11/7/19 2:17 Carolyn Lezon I don‚Äôt support this project. We need more options from the developer. 535 11/7/19 2:26 Linda Friedlieb536 11/7/19 2:27 Linda Polak537 11/7/19 2:28 Dolly kuruvilla538 11/7/19 2:44 Micheke Too big and will cause too much more traffic at an intersection that‚Äôs already too busy.539 11/7/19 2:49 Sparvim nazarof540 11/7/19 3:49 Xiangheng Yang Too big, increase more traffic

541 11/7/19 4:10 Connie SchapiroI oppose the design of this proposed development due to both its proximity to the railroad tracks (safety issue) and to the eyesore it creates. It changes the flavor of the Village of Glenview away from a quaint village to a dense suburb. I also question the objectives of this development.

Is it really meeting the needs and wants of the current tax paying residents?542 11/7/19 4:14 Alain Stephan543 11/7/19 4:30 Lisa Brooks544 11/7/19 5:26 Eve Paschen545 11/7/19 6:22 Corey Green546 11/7/19 8:55 Hannah Schiller547 11/7/19 10:42 Nellie Wilkinson 548 11/7/19 10:43 Eric Wilkinson549 11/7/19 11:00 Jeanne Grant550 11/7/19 11:57 Peter Loughran I would support a far less dense project551 11/7/19 13:25 Laya

552 11/7/19 13:36 Heather Kimura As a taxpayer and voter, I do not want the Village to proceed with this development as planned. Look at the Glen Development, the traffic plan was not adequate and we live with the outcome.

553 11/7/19 13:45 Jackie Scoby

554 11/7/19 14:34 John Newman The size and scope of this development in its current firm is overbuilt for this location, presents disruption to the safety and current commerce in the area and not acceptable.

555 11/7/19 15:19 Bonnie Garcia I do not approve of this building. Too large for this location. Will cause too much traffic congestion. Not keeping with the small town feel of Glenview.

556 11/7/19 15:25 Meredith Hodson There is no need for that large of a construction in downtown Glenview.

557 11/7/19 16:17 Ron Reif Project was flawed starting with the purchase of the property by our village.558 11/7/19 18:01 Dick Moser559 11/7/19 18:13 Sally Claffey560 11/7/19 18:20 Maria Sobczak

561 11/7/19 18:31 Patrick Andrus

The north shore offers a number of wonderful communities, including Glenview. Having spent the latter part of my childhood in Glenview, it was an easy decision to move back in 2018 with our infant daughter (and soon to be two daughters). While we are hopeful to raise our family in Glenview, the lack of focus on supporting small businesses and building lively downtown area - in addition to the large focus on developing

large apartment complexes - is alarming. Other suburbs such as Wilmette, Winnetka, and Lake Forest have invested more in their local business, festivals. and downtowns rather than overpopulating their communities. This decision will have a long term impact on how residents

and nonresidents view Glenview and the value (or devalue) it brings to our community.

562 11/7/19 18:33 Kevin Stanton This condensed housing development is not appropriate for this Glenview location. Common sense was obviously not used by our village but the dollar signs and possible kickbacks.

563 11/7/19 19:02 Tom schwallie 564 11/7/19 19:18 Olga La Luz The congestion this will create is terrible. Please reconsider. 565 11/7/19 19:50 Marcia Masloski566 11/7/19 19:50 Ruth Koziol567 11/7/19 20:00 Benjamin Lewis How is this improving Glenview?! I have no desire to see this monstrosity built. It's certainly not what the residents want.

568 11/7/19 20:03 Georgette Phillos Too many units, and the traffic which is already horrendous and backed up by trains will be unbearable. And no way should there be a curb cut at depot!

569 11/7/19 20:20 jan zanoni570 11/7/19 20:31 Stephanie Arkus Glenview Road is too congested now especially from 3:00-6:30pm.571 11/7/19 20:50 Diane Bobis572 11/7/19 20:53 Marcie Kolton573 11/7/19 21:07 m mooney574 11/7/19 21:09 Sue Skovranko575 11/7/19 21:14 Natalya Northrip576 11/7/19 21:44 Ren√©e Thaler Too dense. Totally too many apartment buildings already in Glenview. This lack of creativity for Glenview needs to end.577 11/7/19 22:45 Rita Farrington578 11/7/19 22:49 Bert Johnson579 11/7/19 22:53 Erda Beslow580 11/7/19 23:01 Susan Thorne581 11/7/19 23:06 Sarah Schneider I'm glad you added a picture of what is being proposed. It is massive

582 11/7/19 23:33 Kathleen Harris It is already a nightmare to get through this area. Plus, it would add additional dangers to the children that travel back and forth to school and the library. Please reconsider your decision.

583 11/8/19 1:21 Elizabeth Tulach584 11/8/19 1:23 Margaret Pawlusiewicz Stop the development Bess Hardwareat 1850 Glenview Rd.585 11/8/19 2:26 Nancy Krueger586 11/8/19 2:40 Judith Traynor587 11/8/19 6:08 Tj biebel588 11/8/19 6:11 Meagan Biebel589 11/8/19 12:27 Kelly OGrady Agree this is the wrong project for the site. Should not b a commercial site not apartments590 11/8/19 12:58 Lynn Mohr

591 11/8/19 14:00 BARBARA HALL This project will create issues with the train tracks. It is also too dense a use for the site. I would propose that if they turned the building around so that the courtyard faces Glenview road, people could see the trains better.

592 11/8/19 14:35 Jaime Crosby593 11/8/19 14:49 Kelly Cole594 11/8/19 15:09 Gretchen Conlon Would rather see restaurants and stores to entice people to get off the train and visit Glenview.595 11/8/19 15:12 Annie McCauley

596 11/8/19 15:29 Raymond Mitchell Glenview is already over crowded. If this project goes through, I would move out of Glenview after being a resident and paying taxes to Glenview for over 50 years.

597 11/8/19 15:53 stephanie phillips598 11/8/19 16:12 Edwin Layman599 11/8/19 16:22 Todd Phillips600 11/8/19 18:38 Christine Ploetz601 11/8/19 18:39 Jeffrey Ploetz602 11/8/19 19:26 Aaron Hoffman

603 11/8/19 19:34 Diane Tkach As a frequent pedestrian I am concerned about increased traffic at an already congested intersection. Also proposed building looks overbearing and heavy on the size of the property.

604 11/8/19 20:32 Eric Christophersen605 11/8/19 21:16 Julie Maurice 606 11/8/19 21:19 Aidan minihane607 11/8/19 21:20 Michael 608 11/8/19 21:21 Sean minihane609 11/8/19 22:49 Jill Partner610 11/9/19 2:26 Stuart Schapiro Absolutely hideous! A nice restaurant and a few shops would do the trick in that spot.611 11/9/19 2:56 Linda Eick612 11/9/19 3:43 Clare Martin613 11/9/19 13:41 Brian Martin614 11/9/19 13:44 Violette This project is not a good idea for glenview and it‚Äôs residents 615 11/9/19 15:52 Jeanine Kane616 11/9/19 17:13 Angella Inman

617 11/10/19 0:07 Fran DaughertyTraffic is a horrible and unsafe mess at that intersection, not to mention the fact that we don‚Äôt need more retail space in that area - another grocery store - ridiculous! I give the most blame to our representatives, not the developer. In my opinion, they are enablers, who can stop this if

they forego their own personal interests. BTW I don‚Äôt live near that intersection, but pass it once or twice almost daily.

618 11/10/19 1:36 Susan Harkna I feel this project would be detrimental to our surrounding neighborhood and to downtown Glenview in general. We don‚Äôt need more housing in Glenview‚Äôs downtown area. We need restaurants or even a youth center!

619 11/10/19 2:31 Rebecca Gerber620 11/10/19 18:11 Martin Golden621 11/10/19 20:38 Michelle Geraty622 11/10/19 20:59 Mary Ann Roche623 11/10/19 21:00 Paul Roche624 11/10/19 21:08 Laura Nelson625 11/11/19 1:00 Christopher Just The proposed development will create a dangerous intersection and negatively impact the downtown area. 626 11/11/19 2:34 Sarah Hogue627 11/11/19 16:51 charles e lord Too huge for area628 11/11/19 18:11 Rita Bolano

629 11/11/19 18:18 Ed Beucher

I've been a resident of Glenview for 61 years I was raised here Glenview is gone nothing but downhill I had to fight the village for the fence along Lake Street you guys are so stupid you put the fence on top of the electric now you're talkin a 5-story building we're Best hardware is you

guys are destroying this place me personally I'm moving out of here you've destroyed the village so bad you don't know how to run a vehicle think about those kids think of what might happen The trains zipping by a little kid guess her little foot caught in between the track which how

many times have you read down the crosswalks to begin with cuz you didn't know how to do it the first time correct take it from the people the people understand what you guys have been doing I'm sorry to say you put up five stories apartments you don't need it you won't find parking the traffic will be crazy this is why I cannot live in Glenview anymore everybody knows my name here they knew my parents I can't wait see

what happens cuz if this happens everybody's going to end up moving out and it won't be anybody's fault except the village of Glenview village trustees all they're looking for is more money the hell with the money keep it small just do a couple stores no more big deal leave some

parking so some people can park cars there's nowhere to park downtown I'm scared even go to gusteau's restaurant because the parking you can't even park in that parking lot then in the nighttime just go to the next store and sit down and enjoy a meal it's crazy you don't need that

building especially five stories tall just going to be so many accidents I'm done

630 11/11/19 18:27 Maria Ephrem631 11/11/19 19:26 Dan Bouska632 11/11/19 19:51 Karen Graves633 11/11/19 20:04 Jenny Scahill634 11/11/19 20:07 Sonia Grandfield635 11/11/19 20:08 Jessica Reimer636 11/11/19 20:10 Todd Novak637 11/11/19 21:20 Douglas Stuart Way too big & ambitious - would negatively change the character of the town638 11/11/19 21:33 Patty Yang639 11/11/19 22:35 Christine Rusin640 11/11/19 23:24 Daniel Danko641 11/12/19 0:52 MICHAEL W JOYCE642 11/12/19 1:15 Lori Alexander We have to many rental units not being rented and other developments with high vacancies. This will be a disaster.

643 11/12/19 3:17 Jeff Reis

We live right by the library. This building is too large for the area, the height should be at least one floor less. I am concerned with parking issues and further congested traffic on Glenview Rd. I shave noticed throughout Glenview our roads are much more congested than even five or

ten years ago. That is due to all the apartment complexes that have been built. Would prefer a building like this closer to Glenview and Waukegan. This plan is definitely more esthetic than the ugly one built at Church and Glenview Rd.

644 11/12/19 3:25 Mike Sweeney645 11/12/19 3:32 Andrew Ianiro646 11/12/19 3:58 John Rischke647 11/12/19 4:58 Amy Rizman648 11/12/19 12:24 Izabela Wozniak649 11/12/19 16:14 Lina650 11/12/19 16:47 Cara Dolick We need to revitalize the downtown area but this is too large of a housing complex- parking and traffic will be a nightmare!!651 11/12/19 16:52 William Seitz652 11/12/19 17:05 Christopher Carleton653 11/12/19 23:44 Michelle ely 654 11/13/19 1:22 Renee Etienne655 11/13/19 2:42 Rene Redfern656 11/13/19 2:42 Brett Redfern657 11/13/19 3:05 Jonathan Roberts658 11/13/19 3:29 Laurie Klapacz

659 11/13/19 13:21 Ruth Mendel660 11/13/19 13:27 Anne Vavloukis661 11/13/19 14:26 Carla Holmes662 11/13/19 15:08 Bruce C Smaha663 11/13/19 16:48 Mary J Stump664 11/13/19 17:59 Lisa Cahill665 11/13/19 18:23 Paul Mitchell Where will people park when going to the local restaurants?????

666 11/13/19 18:23 Natalie Donin Agree, as a new resident on Glenview I agree that this building would add a lot more traffic from the tenants to an already busy street. Need to add infrastructure to digest current stream of people let alone adding more to it. Do not like idea at all.

667 11/13/19 18:43 Julie delisi 668 11/13/19 18:55 Alison Kramme

669 11/13/19 19:23 Colleen WadeI want the site developed to help revitalize downtown which is still recovering from loss of foot-traffic from prior GV decisions like Post-office

move and Glen development but believe the plan needs to be scaled down(not so tall/so many units) and better address traffic and parking issues.

670 11/13/19 19:27 Amy Luckey671 11/13/19 20:09 Charles Roberts

672 11/13/19 22:08 Leonid ChernyavskyI agree the building needs to be scaled down so it fits well with surrounding buildings and downtown overall while including in the plan space for multiple businesses (retail shops, cafes, etc.), does not increase traffic, allows for wider pedestrian sidewalks and keeping original trees

already in place - all to help revitalize Glenview downtown area.673 11/13/19 22:17 Ana Cassorla674 11/13/19 22:20 Jeffrey Ludwig 675 11/14/19 1:44 andrew jaley

676 11/14/19 2:56 Ed Brown This proposal has the "cart in front of the horse". Downtown isn't in need of more residents, it needs more interesting retail/dining destinations that draw existing residents to it. This proposal is all problem and limited benefit to existing residents.

677 11/14/19 4:10 Laura WiseThis development seriously affects traffic congestion to an already congested area. It does not bring any value to a Downtown Glenview which in reality does not really exist. We have had empty storefronts and empty rentals in the area and cannot see how this development will further

this goal. Seriously look at the intersection of Pine and Glenview Rd adjacent to the train and tell us how traffic will be managed?

678 11/14/19 6:30 Mary pat faoro679 11/14/19 11:06 Maria kost680 11/14/19 12:52 Kyle MacDonald681 11/14/19 17:42 Rick Watson682 11/14/19 17:43 Janis Watson683 11/14/19 18:59 norman pearson i would rather see a smaller condo development684 11/14/19 19:01 Allen Schaefer This planned development is hideous.685 11/14/19 19:11 Norine Meister686 11/14/19 19:27 Henry Russell

687 11/14/19 19:37 Mary Ann Hannain 15 years ..sidewalks not fixed, trees not trimmed..streets not repaired..u focus on building and ruining this neighborhood..too many

apartments..home value will be down..shame on glenview..drugs sold on routine at sleepy hollow park..stop building apts..as waukegan and glenview road apts...this land was worth more than u sold it for too..shame on glenview

688 11/14/19 19:38 Joe689 11/14/19 20:20 Laura Olson690 11/14/19 21:01 Dan Cloud Impact to traffic will be intolerable. 691 11/14/19 22:28 Mike Hogan

692 11/14/19 22:44 Anonymous

693 11/14/19 22:48 Sam Lukasiewicz

I've lived in glenview since 2001 and have seen it go from this vibrant community to one that sucks to live in. Thank the corrupt village officials for all of this. They have taken a nice thing and destroyed it bit by bit. No business in it's right mind should set up shop at any of the retail locations. Theres a reason glenview is failing and it's because of terrible decisions made by town leaders. Developing that land into that

abomination is another one of them694 11/14/19 23:06 Mikayla Steinhable695 11/14/19 23:23 Chris Harmon696 11/14/19 23:27 Michael Kurtzner697 11/14/19 23:27 Christina698 11/15/19 0:25 Gregory Carlson Too residentially dense. Not enough street level activation/retail/common space699 11/15/19 0:35 Dora Moats This development will not benefit our community. It only adds more traffic and overcrowds our town.700 11/15/19 0:44 Danielle Greenwood701 11/15/19 0:44 Jim Daltorio I want this eyesore to be developed but not this way.

702 11/15/19 1:17 Susan FinleyI live on the West side of Glenview. Trying to go East when an Amtrak/Metra train is stopped is a nightmare. I can only see a major problem. It needs to be developed- but not a large structure. I am still upset that the village purchased the property for 2.25 and sold it for 1.8. Somebody

had a connection? This was my tax dollars padding the pockets of someone in the Drake Group!703 11/15/19 1:47 Stacy Sanford 704 11/15/19 1:51 Darren Phillips

705 11/15/19 1:57 Richard Feit This proposed development clearly OVERWHELMS a downtown area already OVERWHELMED by the newest development on the south side of Glenview Road.

706 11/15/19 2:24 Kristin Buikema

707 11/15/19 2:56 Constance Kalas

Why are the commissioners and trustees trying to destroy our community. Listen to your constituents. WE DON‚ÄôT WANT THIS! The Willows is fighting the dense commercial development at Willow-Pfingsten. GWProperties will be creating dangerous traffic patterns and cutting down

a hundred trees to build tenant stores we don‚Äôt need. These two developers have monstrosities in Chicago at the protests of those neighborhoods. The greed has got to stop. Our representatives are ignoring us and I want to know why.

708 11/15/19 3:12 John Beadle This development is way too dense, right on top of a busy intersection, will take away convenient parking from Metra commuters, will add lots more congestion where there is a bottleneck already. Scale it back, please

709 11/15/19 3:17 Jim Hoshaw

710 11/15/19 3:54 Bertrand Guerin I strongly opposed the project. Traffic is very bad already in this area. This is not what downtown Glenview needs. Let's bring a smaller condo building and more retail space

711 11/15/19 12:43 Alison Beitzel712 11/15/19 13:09 Barbara Anderson Curious where moving vans, bakery delivery trucks, and various UPS/Fed Ex/ Amazon etc delivery trucks will be parking.713 11/15/19 13:10 Mary Beth Darr714 11/15/19 13:32 Michael J Burke715 11/15/19 13:34 Julie Burke716 11/15/19 13:38 Sarah Tekippe717 11/15/19 13:47 Leslie Kullman718 11/15/19 14:22 John Jaksch this land could be better utilized as a small business or a public parking lot719 11/15/19 14:32 Lindsley Godbout720 11/15/19 16:09 karen gebert721 11/15/19 17:00 Karen Stack722 11/15/19 17:54 ali graeme i like the idea but the location and parking is a problem for me.723 11/15/19 18:24 Martin McLaughlin724 11/15/19 19:24 thomas Cohen We do not need another apartment building which only lower my property value. Build restatrants

725 11/15/19 20:47 Vi Halloran Our representatives need to stop ignoring tax payers of Glenview.

726 11/15/19 21:30 Michael Vergamini There is no need for a building this tall with that many units with so little retail space. It will increase congestion and not increase the revitalization to downtown. This is a negative.

727 11/15/19 21:57 Michael Gallegly It would be disappointing to see our town proceed with something that residents obviously don't want, that is guaranteed to increase traffic congestion in an already congested area. The impact on parking sounds awful, especially when it comes to parking for the Metra.

728 11/16/19 0:00 Drew Weller729 11/16/19 0:17 Jee Ku

730 11/16/19 2:50 Charles Maslic We don't need any more traffic congestion in the downtown area. I've lived in Glenview over 40 years and since the village has approved these new residental developments over the past years in this area, the traffic is unbearable.

731 11/16/19 2:51 George ouellette732 11/16/19 4:08 Maureen Kay Way too dense for that location and creates another hazardous traffic situation!733 11/16/19 9:10 Jay Dawes Traffic is already bad enough here. No more traffic!

734 11/16/19 13:32 Joan Beadle This is project brings too much congestion and adds very little to the downtown area other than traffic. Gives me more reason to stay away from downtown than to go to any business in the vincinity.

735 11/16/19 13:45 Brad Dempsey

736 11/16/19 14:15 Della Deme We already have so many, many apartment buildings in Glenview. I found this out when canvassing and I was shocked at how many of them are very run down.

737 11/16/19 14:45 Tom Barosso738 11/16/19 15:12 Julie Doherty

739 11/16/19 15:14 Robert DiMarcantonio This means at least another 100 car's. More congestion. Safety factor. Roads will be more torn up. What next. They even reduced the price by a million plus. Tax payer money. I vote no. 1015 Huber Lane Glenview il 60025

740 11/16/19 15:32 Jim Gernady741 11/16/19 15:56 John G McAuley If this goes through, can we change the Village name to Schaumview?

742 11/16/19 16:10 Richard KilbyAdding 68 to 100 cars to a limited access residential street with the railroad tracks, two lanes on Glenview Rd, and the traffic at at Harlem/

Glenview will post a lot more hardship on an already difficult corner downtown. With the current Illinois and Cook county taxes and governance, this adds another reason for residents to leave Glenview.

743 11/16/19 19:51 John Hoffmann #NAME?744 11/16/19 20:21 Susan Hoffmann745 11/16/19 21:09 Christine Ryan746 11/17/19 1:11 Marlene Lacy747 11/17/19 1:54 Barry Brownstone Traffic is already horrible in this area. This will cause longer wait times and make conditions unsafe especially when trains are going by.748 11/17/19 1:55 Joan Dermer

749 11/17/19 3:47 JoAnn Eriksson

I feel the Village Board will be betraying the the community if they allow the proposed apartment complex to be developed. All the finances benefit the Drake group and not the residents. The complex is too massive for this site. Density will be excessive and traffic will become a

huge issue. The village will likely have to spend more money to make traffic accommodations as density will be too much in that area to be safe for drivers and pedestrians. Change the development. The Drake Group has already gained way too much to the detriment of the people of

Glenview.

750 11/17/19 4:22 Lorraine Bayne Why would you turn our beautiful village into such a dense area. We don't need high rises and more traffic in the downtown area. Structures like this have no place in our village. Do we really need an influx of so may people or are we just looking for more tax revenue?

751 11/17/19 13:36 Timothy Kane

752 11/17/19 15:56 Jane Rapoport We don't need this monstrosity development in middle of Glenview, we need more shops cafes and small businesses on Glenview rd. to revitalize our downtown. Sucj huge residential development will make road congested and all existing public venues overcrowded.

753 11/17/19 16:02 eugene RAPOPORT Our village is already very densely populated and this monstrous building will completely alter the character of the village bringing it to close to the city image.

754 11/17/19 17:16 eric skoglund755 11/17/19 17:20 robert - Lori Lucchetti Totally oppose the Village plan. Size and scope of project is detrimental to the GV development strategy.756 11/17/19 17:43 Elizabeth Sedin

757 11/17/19 18:13 David RaithThis is a One Hundred Year Mistake, this development is too dense and too large and will forever change the character of the downtown area. This project does not meet ANY of the stated goals of the Downtown Revitalization plan, which was developed with community input. Clearly

this proposed development ignores that. Traffic safety, parking, congestion ... this is not good for our community.758 11/17/19 18:45 SUSAN SCHY759 11/17/19 20:03 Alan Lofgren 760 11/17/19 21:44 Kisa sthankiya761 11/17/19 22:52 Joseph Kubiak Ugly development. Do something else!762 11/18/19 0:33 Jeremy Boehm absolutely horrible!763 11/18/19 2:27 Cynthia Pinkowski WAY TOO MUCH! Enough building already!

764 11/18/19 2:37 Mark Maloney

I actually am a FORMER Glenview resident, but want to add my support to this petition. I still have family members in Glenview, so I have a good feel for the impact that this proposed project will have on the community. City planning should not be all about ‚Äúgrowth‚Äù and

perceived added tax dollars. First, it should be about quality of life and what is in the best interests of the residents already living in Glenview. This project would cause irreparable harm to the quality of life in Glenview. Please do the right thing!

765 11/18/19 3:05 Linda Smith

766 11/18/19 16:11 William J Frey The whole project is an insult to the citizens of Glenview. The density and height, lack of public parking and the height of the building is just a money grab by the developer

767 11/18/19 16:15 Patricia Frey This is a travesty. Why would the zoning board ever allow such density and encroachment 768 11/18/19 17:11 Linda Nelson Too many floors and too big for Glenview ... traffic will be terrible!769 11/18/19 19:24 Gail Weiss

770 11/18/19 19:34 Marilyn Davis As a Glenview resident, I support development of the downtown, but this proposed building is unsightly and far too large for the site. Its immediate proximity to train tracks and the nearby school will compromise pedestrian and motorist safety.

771 11/18/19 19:42 Tom Skahen The size of the proposed project will negatively impact every entity and individual in the area.

772 11/18/19 21:19 Sandy Sheagren Please stop developing every open space to over-sized commercial property which increases traffic congestion and hazards to school children and other pedestrians.

773 11/18/19 22:28 Delayne Rittmueller774 11/18/19 23:39 Jim Cantwell775 11/19/19 1:12 Leandra Juarez776 11/19/19 5:07 Lindsey Gallegly777 11/19/19 5:34 Margarite Loew778 11/19/19 15:15 mary lou skoglund779 11/19/19 16:21 Wendy Winzeler Ditto780 11/19/19 18:42 Janese Bechtoldt Too large of a building for a small downtown. Not enough green space. Not enough parking. Why do we need this?

781 11/19/19 19:45 Gus Serna We oppose the building of the structure that's planned in Glenview, Illinois on 1850 Glenview Road . This project will have a negative impact on pedestrian crossing and traffic.

782 11/19/19 21:03 Lisa M This is a horribly planned project. I know some people feel this is good for revitalizing the downtown area but I believe this build will sit empty. Plus they are overbuilding a small plot of land. If this project passes I will work aggressively to vote out our village leadership.

783 11/20/19 17:01 Nina SwansonI strongly oppose this development. The proposed is far too dense for this site and will significantly impact traffic in a negative way. DON'T DO

IT. No one will be able to safely navigate Harlem/GV road with all the trains and traffic making quality of life in GV diminished. Then the avoidance of Harlem/GV Rd will spill over to our other already clogged traffic.

784 11/21/19 18:26 Anne Dolan Thank you for bringing this decision making process to the public. If Glenview is to retain some of its Village feel I would prefer our tax dollars be directed to attracting viable businesses to our downtown area, as the Board has talked about for the past 30 years.

785 11/24/19 23:51 Cristina Burke

I strongly oppose another apartment complex in Glenview. Recently the village has added a multi unit complex just east of the proposed development, two developments on Waukegan Road between Glenview Rd. and Lake Street and a mega apartment complex next to

McDonald's (168 units). The amount of traffic that will be brought into the area will make travel through town very difficult. Why is the village so supportive of ruining the quality of life in such a beautiful suburb?

786 11/25/19 23:57 willam r Halloran787 11/26/19 15:42 Priscilla Merrick We don‚Äôt need another (ugly)apartment building, especially one that so dense and tall. 788 11/27/19 3:55 Donna Kellogg Downtown is a traffic nightmare. Glenview does not need another rental development, let alone this monster. 789 11/27/19 14:06 Anonymous790 11/27/19 14:43 karen clatch791 11/27/19 14:47 Mike Haley792 11/27/19 14:52 Olga kudryavsev793 11/27/19 15:31 Wally Pfenning794 11/27/19 16:03 Anton T Schirmang This is ridiculous. Live in Glenview for 60 years and do NOT want this nightmare 795 11/27/19 17:05 Danielle Scharf

796 11/27/19 17:57 John Thompson I live in Glenview and love this community. I agree we need to do more to revitalize our downtown as well as the town center but this is not the way to do it. It is too large, will bring in too much traffic and will overburden our already stretched infrastructure.

797 11/27/19 18:18 Nicholas Ryan Insane! More housing to be left vacant by baby boomers ... How many schools were left empty in the 1980's?? Revitalize with vitalizing vendors.

798 11/27/19 19:33 Elfriede Glatz Would like to keep Glenview as is - a village with these Hugh buildings it will start looking like a city .....799 11/27/19 20:22 John Habes800 11/28/19 0:33 Randee Simon801 11/28/19 0:33 Allen Simon802 11/28/19 18:04 Brina McConnell803 11/29/19 15:27 Megan tomczyk

804 11/29/19 19:52 karen rosenbluh I‚Äôve lived in Glenview 40 years. This project would be detrimental to our community as it‚Äôs too dense and doesn‚Äôt improve parking for everyone nor benefit the residents in our town as a whole. It‚Äôs dangerous as walkers will be at risk. I oppose it vehemently.

805 11/30/19 0:26 Ellen Duffy806 11/30/19 0:35 Kevin Duffy807 11/30/19 4:11 Sean Minihane 808 11/30/19 4:33 Thomas Sheagren Not a benefit to the community...809 11/30/19 18:55 Patricia Bidwill 810 11/30/19 20:18 Jamie witte811 12/1/19 2:30 Filippo Aliperta812 12/1/19 22:04 Mitchell Glenview is busy enough and we have plenty of vacant buildings retrofit those pigs l. - animal farm813 12/1/19 22:06 Jacob Juhasz I‚Äôm not in favor of the placement of this building.814 12/2/19 5:26 Kimberly Petersen815 12/2/19 17:04 Jennifer Burrowes I do not favor this development, which is too large/dense and will contribute more traffic to a highly congested area. 816 12/4/19 22:45 Eva Jarosik

817 12/5/19 6:57 Charles Boedeker This project is completely out of line with existing structures and, if built as planned, would have a clearly negative impact on the entire neighborhood.

(I) GleiiV:iew Community Development Department

SUBJECT: Consideration of a Resolution authorizing the Agenda: 11.b. execution of a Purchase and Sale Agreement regarding the former Village Hall site at 1225 Waukegan Road DATE: September 6, 2016

TO: Village President and Board of Trustees

FROM: Jeff Brady, Director of Planning, {847) 904-4306

THROUGH: Todd Hileman, Village Manager

PURPOSE AND ACTION REQUESTED: Staff Is requesting Village Board consideration of a Resolution authorizing the execution of a Purchase and Sale Agreement regarding the sale of 1225 Waukegan Road (the "Property" ), the 2.31 acre former Village Hall site.

BACKGROUND: The Village of Glenview relocated the Village Hall to the consolidated Municipal Center at 2500 East Lake Avenue in December 2015. Prior to the move, direction was provided by the Village Board to begin the marketing process associated with the sale of the Property. The Village coordinated with its Development Advisor Michael Tobin and Marty Stern from CBRE, who began marketing (see attached brochure) the former Village Hall site to numerous developers in the first quarter of 2016 to ascertain potential redevelopment options. The opportunities for the site could include up to a four-story building height with retail, office, service, or residential uses, or a mix of those uses, as they are all currently permitted under the existing D-D Downtown District zoning.

A review of the submitted offers for the redevelopment of the site was conducted by staff and CBRE from April to July 2016. All short-listed proposals met the minimum thresholds that would be used to evaluate the offers and included such criteria as:

• minimum price range • a compliant 0-D use(s) • the developer's capacity to construct the

proposed project

• ability to address engineering requirements • medium residential densities

• previous high quality development experience

Staff met on numerous occasions with each of the three short-listed development teams to review multiple configurations of various residential product types and site layouts given the constraints of the infill site. Through the review an emphasis was placed on residential building types that could add to the vibrancy of downtown, be compatible to the existing uses along Waukegan Road, and be of a similar scale to the existing residential neighborhood to the east. Additionally, the prospective purchasers needed to conduct preliminary engineering due diligence to ensure any site engineering requirements could be addressed in the proposed development plans. Following the evaluation of all the submitted proposals against the aforementioned minimum thresholds and after several rounds of interviews with

the prospective developers, staff is recommending the Property be developed by The Drake Group ("Drake").

PROPOSAL: Development Description Drake's vision for the Property is a creative mix of twenty-six (26) for-sale, attached and detached singlefamily dwelling units, which includes two different rowhome product types (13 units), duplex units (4 units), and small-lot single-family residences (9 units). The attached executive summary and preliminary development plan includes additional project details. The proposed development is consistent with other recent downtown detached single-family in-fill developments in Libertyville (School Street) and Skokie (Floral Avenue), and is representative of the mix of unit types seen in the Cambridge at The Glen development, north of Gallery Park in Glenview and adjacent to the North Glen Metra station.

The proposed units would be two-stories (single-family homes) and three-stories (two-story townhome with a first floor garage) in height and are oriented in a north-south configuration around private streets and alleys. The larger rowhomes along Waukegan Road address that street, while the smaller rowhome units are tucked in behind the fire station. The front facades of the single-family and duplex units are oriented towards an internal private street, with a!I the units having access to their garages via a private alley. The variety of unit types means the development will appeal to a broader range of potential buyers at differing price points, which should result in a quicker absorption of the units into the market.

Site Considerations Several site considerations were evaluated during the review of the proposed development. The site plan includes a landscaped buffer along the east lot line adjacent to the existing single-family neighborhood to the east, which will include a sidewalk connecting the neighborhood to Lyons School, similar to the existing conditions. Where possible, the height adjacent to the existing residences to the east has been minimized and will be below the permitted 53 foot height requirement for the zoning district. The access point into the development aligns with MacClean Court according to best traffic management practices and the limited amount of traffic generated by the site will not adversely impact the adjacent Fire Station 6 operations. The driveway connection from the commercial property to the north to the subject property will be eliminated to keep the traffic from the different uses separated. Staff has already begun coordinating with representatives of the property owner to the north on a pavement marking plan to re-establish two-way traffic into their site using their existing curb cut.

Potential utility conflicts were evaluated, as well as how stormwater would be detained in the proposed development. An existing storm sewer, along with some utilities associated with the monopole and on the Fire Station 6 site will be relocated by the proposed developer. Drake has preliminarily designed a stormwater detention system for the property that will store water within the development site in accordance with Glenview's and other outside agency requirements. Any run-off from neighboring properties would be accounted for in the development's engineering plan and the overflow route of stormwater occurring during a 100-year storm event will continue to exit the Bonnie Glen neighborhood as it does today and run towards Waukegan Road.

Lastly, staff will continue to coordinate with School District 34 on the potential location of a large stormwater detention vault to be installed by the Village below an open playground field at Lyons School. This new detention system, which is a separate project from the Drake proposal, would further mitigate the existing storm water capacity issues that impact the Bonnie Glen neighborhood.

2

PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT ("PSA"} TERMS: A summary of the terms included in t he attached PSA are listed below:

Contract Provisions The Drake Group Purchase Price $2,620,000.00 Escrow $130,000.00 Due Diligence Period Earnest money deposited within five (5) days of signed

agreement. Purchaser has 60 days to perform due diligence with respect to the Property.

Regulatory Approvals Period - completion of development approvals (rezoning, site Within 180 days after the due diligence period had concluded and plan, preliminary subdivision, appearance, consistent with the preliminary Development Plan (Exhibit B) ordinance adoption) Closing No later than May 31, 2017 Village's Right to Repurchase • If the following occurs prior to the end of the Development

Period schedule:

I 0 Purchaser does not develop the Property in accordance with

schedule 0 Purchaser contracts to sell or lease the property

I 0 Purchaser abandons the Development Plan I

• Repurchase price - lower of the Purchase price, the fair market value at time of repurchase, or the purchase price in the contract for sale/lease

Construction Commencement • Infrastructure -within 12 months of final subdivision approval • Building construction - within 18 months of final subdivision

approval Other • Property will pay property taxes

• Property subject to School and Park Donation requirements • Village approval of HOA documents to include notice of

proximity to Fire Station 6, location of overflow route easements, and public sidewalk along east lot line

REGULATORY REVIEW: Following the execution of the PSA, Drake will have 60 days to conduct due diligence on the site, which is proceeded by 180 days to go through the Village's regulatory review process. It is anticipated preliminary site plan, architectural, and engineering drawings would be submitted for staff review towards the end of October 2016. A formal application is likely to be submitted before the end of the year, with the typical regulatory reviews being conducted by the Plan Commission (site plan and Planned Development approvals) and Appearance Commission (architecture, landscaping, lighting and signage approvals) over the winter. Public input on the project would occur during a neighborhood meeting hosted by Drake early in the process and during the public hearing process before the Plan Commission. Mailings will be used to inform the adjacent neighbors of the meeting date, time, and place of those meetings. Following the Plan Commission's review, a recommendation is forwarded onto the Village Board for final development approval consideration. The Plan Commission, Appearance Commission, and Village Board meetings are open to the public and attendance is encouraged. In accordance with the PSA, the regulatory review would be completed by the beginning of May 2017.

RECOMMENDATION: Staff is recommending Village Board consideration of a Resolution authorizing the execution of the Purchase and Sale Agreement regarding the sale of the former Village Hall site to The Drake Group.

ATTACHMENTS: 1. Site Marketing Materials 2. Executive Summary of Proposed Development 3. Resolution 4. Purchase and Sale Agreement with Attachments

4

11~~ The Drake Group :... IUILD E RS • D E V f: LOP ERS

P A R K PL A C E

Park Place Glenview (Former Glenview Village Hall Site)

Introduction

The former Glenview Village Hall Site located at 1225 Waukegan Road, Glenview is approximately 2.25 acres. The Drake Group's proposal to purchase and develop this property is based on a plan to create a hallmark community of 26 total homes. This community, named Park Place Glenview will include a highly designed diverse mix of narrow lot single family and row homes with an emphasis on quality and an attractive streetscape. The entrance to the community will align with Maclean Court to the west of Waukegan road. The community design maintains the existing sidewalk on the eastern edge of the property. This is an important pedestrian connection to Lyon School for the adjacent neighborhoods. The neighbors will benefit from the new sidewalk in the community which will connect Waukegan road to the existing sidewalk. Neighbors and Park Place Glenview residents alike will enjoy convenient proximity to the surrounding retail establishments and the Glenview train station. Early in the design and approval process, The Drake Group will conduct a neighborhood meeting to obtain feedback. It is expected that the construction will begin in the spring/summer of 2017. The first homes could be ready for occupancy by spring 2018.

Company Overview and Experience

The Drake Group is a Glenview based regional and national award winning Builder/ Developer that has completed land development projects ranging in size from single lot infill sites to 240 acre communities. Since 1999, the company has completed a wide array of semi-custom and custom homes, multifamily projects and land development. In total, this experience represents approximately 200 homes worth more than s100,ooo,ooo.

The Drake Group has received the Chicago Association of Realtors Good Neighbor Award seven times. This award is given to projects which have made a positive contribution to the surrounding neighborhood. The company has also received the Gold Key Award from the Greater Chicago Association of Homebuilders multiple times, including consecutive years in

L3

2012, 2013, 2014 and 2015. In 2015, The Drake Group received the Crystal Key Award, the Greater Chicago Association of Homebuilders highest accolade. The company has been nominated for additional Gold Key and Crystal Key awards in 2016. Builder Magazine selected Lakeshore Cottages, The Drake Group's second home community in Union Pier as one of the Country's best new developments under 150 units.

Additional team members for the project include Roth Architects, a firm specializing in suburban and urban infill projects. Their local and national expertise with this type of design brings a fresh and viable perspective. The team also includes Manhard Consulting, a full service engineering, land planning and landscape design firm with significant project experience in Glenview.

Development Summary and Community Vision

Our preliminary design efforts have centered on creating an attractive, highly desirable community with an impressive streetscape. As shown on the attached site plan, the entrance to the community is on the southern portion of the site; aligning with the Mclean Court intersection on the west side of Waukegan Road. The entrance design combined with the thoughtful site plan layout creates a great view corridor for the community. The community will consist of 9 detached single family homes, 4 attached single family homes (duplexes) and 13 row homes. This plan presents a diversified selection of new homes while delivering a community with a sense of space.

The exterior home designs will follow neo-traditional style components with traditional front elevations with front covered entries and private rear yards. Exterior materials for the homes will include a combination of masonry, fiber cement siding and architectural shingles. The approach to architectural design will be one of quality and traditional character while including modern amenities and design desired by today's homeowners.

The professionally designed landscaping plan will create attractive common area spaces and buffers along the edges of the community. The single family homes and row homes on the eastern portion of the site have garages facing east. These garages will be accessible from an alley. The space to the east of the alley will maintain the existing pedestrian connectivity and landscaping. This creates distance and multiple layers of buffer from the homes to the east of the site.

The vision is one of neighborhood unity with uniqueness in plan, massing and density. The community will highlight the pedestrian experience at the sidewalk level. Jts low density use will not negatively impact the flow of traffic on Waukegan Road. The walkability index to the school, nearby retail and the train station will be high. Residents will find it convenient to walk to the many nearby amenities; including the park, Metra Station, schools and shops. The neighbors will benefit from the new sidewalk in the community which will connect the existing sidewalk on the eastern edge of the property to Waukegan. This walkable path to th is section

Iii

of the Waukegan corridor will energize this section of downtown Glenview and benefit the local retail establishments due to the increased flow of pedestrian foot traffic.

Description of the Different Home Types

The homes at Park Place Glenview will consist of single family homes and row homes. The design of both home types will follow the nee traditional style combined with traditional elevations. This will create a sense of unity throughout the neighborhood.

Single Family Homes As shown on the attached site plan, the detached narrow lot single family homes will be located in the center and the eastern portion of the community The homes will have approximately 2,900 sf of finished space including the finished basement. These three to four bedroom homes will have two car garages which are accessed through a rear loaded alley and attached to the home through an enclosed mudroom corridor. This connection will open up to a unique, charming, private outdoor space for each home. The attached single family homes (duplexes) will be the same size as the detached single family homes and will share one common wall.

Row Homes The row homes will be placed on the western and southeastern edge of the community. These two to three bedroom attached homes will have rear loaded, attached two car garages. The rowhomes will range in size from approximately i,800 square feet to approximately 2,600 square feet. There will be a slight variation in width and depth of the homes.

Demographics of the Likely Homebuyers

This community is expected to appeal to a number of different buyer groups. The walking distance to the Lyon Elementary School will attract families with young children. The convenience of walking to the Metra train station and to nearby retail establishments a long with the low maintenance lifestyle will be desirable for empty nesters and single parent households. Based on the Illinois School Consulting Service/Associated Municipal Consultants, i996 Table included in the Glenview Municipal Code, the projection for the number of children which will live in this community is as follows:

Children ages 0-4 7 Children ages 5-13 11

Children ages 14- 3

lS

Storm Water Detention

Storm Water detention will be provided on site and designed per the Village of Glenview requirements . Volume control will also be designed and provided per the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District {MWRD) requirements. The design is projected to include the use of permeable pavers with stone detention and an underground detention vault. The detention vault will control the release of storm water through an existing 2711 storm sewer (which will likely be rerouted through the property).

Offsite storm water runoff from larger storm events flows overland onto the site from the northeast corner of the property in the existing condition. This drainage will be conveyed overland via the new street network. The street design will channel water to the middle and direct it from the northeast corner to the Waukegan Road right-of way.

Marketing Efforts

A website has been created forthe community- www.parkplaceglen.com . This site provides an opportunity for those interested in the community to register and receive updates on the community. @ Properties will lead the marketing and sales efforts for the project. Prior to the delivery of the model on site, @ Properties will coordinate pre sales from their office a few blocks south of the community.

Summary

The former Glenview Village Hall is an extremely visible site in the downtown area of Glenview. As a local, Glenview based builder, The Drake Group appreciates the significance of this infill community and will commit the necessary resources and dedication to design, develop and build an attractive, highly desirable community that will be tremendous source of pride for both the future residents and the greater Glenview community.

16

48 10/12/19 18:34

Documents