Tables 235 19. Mergers, Consolidations, and Acquisitions of Assets or Assumptions of Liabilities Approved by the Board of Governors, 1985 Bank of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, to merge with Citizens Trust Bank, Portsmouth, Virginia SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL (11/30/84) The proposed transaction would not be signifi- cantly adverse to competition. BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE BANK (1/22/85) Bank of Virginia (Applicant), with assets of $2.8 billion, proposes to merge with Citizens Trust Bank (Bank), with assets of $124 million. Applicant is a subsidiary of the Bank of Vir- ginia Company (BVA), which controls 7.5 per- cent of deposits in the Norfolk-Portsmouth banking market. If the proposed merger were consummated, BVA would control 11.7 percent of commercial bank deposits in that market. The proposal would have no significantly ad- verse effect on competition. The proposed merger would not alter the sat- isfactory financial condition of Applicant and BVA. Considerations relating to the conve- nience and needs of the community are consist- ent with approval. Bank of New York, New York, New York, to acquire the assets and assume the deposit lia- bilities of the Great Neck Branch of Hamburg Savings Bank, Brooklyn, New York SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL (12/21/84) The proposed transaction would not be signifi- cantly adverse to competition. BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE BANK (2/1/85) Bank of New York (Applicant), with assets of $13.2 billion, proposes to acquire the Great Neck Branch of Hamburg Savings Bank (Branch), with deposits of $29 million. Applicant is a subsidiary of the Bank of New York Company (BONY), which currently con- trols 2.2 percent of commercial bank deposits in the New York banking market. If the pro- posed merger were consummated, BONY would continue to control 2.2 percent of the market deposits. The proposal would have no significantly adverse effect on competition. The proposed merger would not alter the sat- isfactory financial condition of Applicant and BONY. The considerations relating to the con- venience and needs of the community are con- sistent with approval. Chemical Bank, Cass City, Michigan, to ac- quire the assets and assume the deposit liabili- ties of the Marlette Branch of Peoples State Bank of Caro, Marlette, Michigan SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL (2/8/85) The proposed transaction would not be signifi- cantly adverse to competition. BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE BANK (2/26/85) Chemical Bank (Applicant), with assets of $25 million, proposes to acquire the Marlette Branch (Branch) of Peoples State Bank of Caro. Deposits at Branch amount to $2 million. The relevant market in the proposal is the Sanilac market, in which Branch is located. Applicant is not presently represented there. The acquisition would have no significant effect on competition because Applicant would have a small share of area deposits. The banking factors and considerations relat- ing to the convenience and needs of the commu- nity are consistent with approval. Merchants & Farmers Bank, Columbus, Mississippi, to merge with Tombigbee Bank & Trust Company, Fulton, Mississippi SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL (2/15/85) The proposed transaction would not be signifi- cantly adverse to competition. BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE BANK (3/3/85) Merchants & Farmers Bank (Applicant), with assets of $68 million, proposes to merge with Tombigbee Bank & Trust Company (Bank), with assets of $24 million. Applicant does not currently operate offices in the Itawamba County and Tbpelo markets, where Bank's offices are situated, and there would be no significant effect on competition. Applicant plans to offer a higher lending limit at the offices now operated by Bank. The con- siderations relating to the convenience and needs of the community therefore lend weight to approval. Financial factors are consistent with approval. Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 1985
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Tables 235
19. Mergers, Consolidations, and Acquisitions of Assets or Assumptions of LiabilitiesApproved by the Board of Governors, 1985
Bank of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, tomerge with Citizens Trust Bank, Portsmouth,Virginia
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL(11/30/84)The proposed transaction would not be signifi-cantly adverse to competition.
BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVEBANK (1/22/85)Bank of Virginia (Applicant), with assets of$2.8 billion, proposes to merge with CitizensTrust Bank (Bank), with assets of $124 million.
Applicant is a subsidiary of the Bank of Vir-ginia Company (BVA), which controls 7.5 per-cent of deposits in the Norfolk-Portsmouthbanking market. If the proposed merger wereconsummated, BVA would control 11.7 percentof commercial bank deposits in that market.The proposal would have no significantly ad-verse effect on competition.
The proposed merger would not alter the sat-isfactory financial condition of Applicant andBVA. Considerations relating to the conve-nience and needs of the community are consist-ent with approval.
Bank of New York, New York, New York, toacquire the assets and assume the deposit lia-bilities of the Great Neck Branch of HamburgSavings Bank, Brooklyn, New York
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL(12/21/84)The proposed transaction would not be signifi-cantly adverse to competition.
BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVEBANK (2/1/85)Bank of New York (Applicant), with assets of$13.2 billion, proposes to acquire the GreatNeck Branch of Hamburg Savings Bank(Branch), with deposits of $29 million.
Applicant is a subsidiary of the Bank of NewYork Company (BONY), which currently con-trols 2.2 percent of commercial bank depositsin the New York banking market. If the pro-posed merger were consummated, BONYwould continue to control 2.2 percent of themarket deposits. The proposal would have nosignificantly adverse effect on competition.
The proposed merger would not alter the sat-isfactory financial condition of Applicant andBONY. The considerations relating to the con-
venience and needs of the community are con-sistent with approval.
Chemical Bank, Cass City, Michigan, to ac-quire the assets and assume the deposit liabili-ties of the Marlette Branch of Peoples StateBank of Caro, Marlette, Michigan
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL(2/8/85)The proposed transaction would not be signifi-cantly adverse to competition.
BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVEBANK (2/26/85)Chemical Bank (Applicant), with assets of $25million, proposes to acquire the MarletteBranch (Branch) of Peoples State Bank of Caro.Deposits at Branch amount to $2 million.
The relevant market in the proposal is theSanilac market, in which Branch is located.Applicant is not presently represented there.The acquisition would have no significant effecton competition because Applicant would have asmall share of area deposits.
The banking factors and considerations relat-ing to the convenience and needs of the commu-nity are consistent with approval.
Merchants & Farmers Bank, Columbus,Mississippi, to merge with Tombigbee Bank &Trust Company, Fulton, Mississippi
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL(2/15/85)The proposed transaction would not be signifi-cantly adverse to competition.
BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVEBANK (3/3/85)Merchants & Farmers Bank (Applicant), withassets of $68 million, proposes to merge withTombigbee Bank & Trust Company (Bank),with assets of $24 million.
Applicant does not currently operate officesin the Itawamba County and Tbpelo markets,where Bank's offices are situated, and therewould be no significant effect on competition.
Applicant plans to offer a higher lending limitat the offices now operated by Bank. The con-siderations relating to the convenience andneeds of the community therefore lend weightto approval. Financial factors are consistentwith approval.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
1985
236 Tables
19. Mergers, Consolidations, and Acquisitions of Assets or Assumptions of LiabilitiesApproved by the Board of Governors, 1985—Continued
Central Bank of the South, Birmingham,Alabama, to acquire certain assets and assumecertain deposits and other liabilities ofbranches of First National Bank of Mobile,and AmSouth Bank, Mobile, AlabamaSUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL(3/8/85)The proposed transaction would not be signifi-cantly adverse to competition.BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVEBANK (3/22/85)Central Bank of the South (Applicant), with as-sets of $3 billion, proposes to acquire certainassets and assume certain deposits and otherliabilities of certain branches (Branches) ofFirst National Bank of Mobile and AmSouthBank, N.A. total deposits of branches to be ac-quired are $113 million. Branches are situatedin the Mobile banking market, and Applicant,which now ranks fifth of nine organizations inthat market, with 7.4 percent of market de-posits, would rank fourth, with 13.7 percent ofmarket deposits. The proposal would have nosignificantly adverse effect on competition.
The banking factors and considerations relat-ing to the convenience and needs of the commu-nity are consistent with approval.
Farmers & Merchants Bank of Central Cali-fornia, Ledi, California, to acquire certainassets and assume substantially all of the lia-bilities of Golden Valley Bank, Turlock,CaliforniaSUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERALNo report received. Requests for reports on thecompetitive factors were dispensed with, as au-thorized by the Bank Merger Act, to permit theReserve Bank to act immediately to safeguarddepositors of Golden Valley Bank.BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVEBANK (3/22/85)Farmers & Merchants Bank of Central Califor-nia (Applicant), with assets of $301 million,proposes to acquire Golden Valley Bank(Bank), with assets of $73 million.
In view of the financial condition of Bank, theCalifornia superintendent of banks has recom-mended immediate action by the Federal Re-serve System to prevent the probable failure ofBank.
Farmers & Merchants Bank of Long Beach,Long Beach, California, to acquire certain as-sets and assume substantially all of the liabili-ties of Capistrano National Bank, San JuanCapistrano, CaliforniaSUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERALNo report received. Requests for reports on thecompetitive factors were dispensed with, as au-thorized by the Bank Merger Act, to permit theReserve Bank to act immediately to safeguarddepositors of Capistrano National Bank.BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVEBANK (4/8/85)Farmers and Merchants Bank of Long Beach(Applicant), with assets of $691 million, pro-poses to acquire Capistrano National Bank(Bank), with assets of $49 million.
In view of the financial condition of Bank, theComptroller of the Currency has recommendedimmediate action by the Federal Reserve Sys-tem to prevent the probable failure of Bank.
Central Fidelity Bank, Richmond, Virginia,to merge with First National Bank of Poquo-son, Poquoson, VirginiaSUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL(3/29/85)The proposed transaction would not be signifi-cantly adverse to competition.BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVEBANK (4/10/85)Central Fidelity Bank (Applicant), with assetsof $2.9 billion, proposes to merge with FirstNational Bank of Poquoson (Bank), with assetsof $30 million. Applicant is the sole bankingsubsidiary of Central Fidelity Banks, Inc. (Cor-poration).
The relevant market in this proposal is theNewport News-Hampton market, in whichCorporation controls 8.1 percent of deposits. Ifthe proposed merger took place, Corporationwould control 10.3 percent of market deposits.Ten thrift institutions operate offices in thismarket. Overall, the proposal would have nosignificant competitive effects.
The banking factors and considerations relat-ing to the convenience and needs of the commu-nity are consistent with approval.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
1985
Tables 237
19.—Continued
Blue Ridge Bank, Floyd, Virginia, to acquirecertain assets and assume certain deposit liabil-ities of the Christiansburg Branch of Jeffer-son National Bank, Winchester, Virginia
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL(4/26/85)The proposed transaction would not be signifi-cantly adverse to competition.
BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVEBANK (4/16/85)Blue Ridge Bank (Applicant), with assets of$12 million, proposes to acquire a branch(Branch) of Jefferson National,Bank. Depositsat Branch amount to $3 million.
The relevant market in the proposal is ap-proximated by the counties of Montgomery andPulaski plus the independent city of Radford,where Branch holds the smallest share of de-posits held by 11 commercial banking organiza-tions. Because Applicant is not now representedin this market, the proposal would have no sig-nificant effect on competition.
The considerations relating to the conven-ience and needs of the community furnish somesupport for approval because after the acquisi-tion Applicant will provide new or enhancedbanking services at Branch. Financial factorsare consistent with approval.
Johnstown Bank and Trust Company, John-stown, Pennsylvania, to acquire the assets andassume the deposit liabilities of two branchesof Equibank, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL(5/24/85)The proposed transaction would not be signifi-cantly adverse to competition.
BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVEBANK (6/10/85)Johnstown Bank and Trust Company (Appli-cant), with assets of $370 million, proposes toacquire two branches (Branches) of Equibank.Branches have deposits of $24 million.
Branches are in the Greensburg/Latrobebanking market, where they hold 2.2 percent ofmarket deposits. Applicant controls 0.5 percentof market deposits held by 14 banking organiza-tions in this market. Because Applicant wouldcontrol less than 3 percent of market depositsfollowing the acquisition, the proposal wouldhave no significant effect on competition.
The banking factors and considerations relat-ing to the convenience and needs of the commu-nity are consistent with approval.
Peoples Bank and Trust Company, CedarRapids, Iowa, to acquire certain assets andassume substantially all the liabilities of Ur-banna Savings Bank, Urbanna, Iowa
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
No report received. Requests for reports on thecompetitive factors were dispensed with, as au-thorized by the Bank Merger Act, to permit theReserve Bank to act immediately to safeguarddepositors of Urbanna Savings Bank.
BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVEBANK (6/21/85)Peoples Bank and Trust Company (Applicant),with assets of $211 million, proposes to acquireUrbanna Savings Bank (Bank), with assets of$7 million.
In view of the financial condition of Bank, theIowa Department of Banking recommended im-mediate action by the Federal Reserve Systemto prevent the probable failure of Bank.
Pacific Inland Bank, Anaheim, California, toacquire the assets and assume the liabilities ofTown and Country Bank, Seal Beach, Cali-fornia
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL(3/29/85)The proposed transaction would not be signifi-cantly adverse to competition.
BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVEBANK (6/28/85)Pacific Inland Bank (Applicant), with assets of$29 million, proposes to acquire Town andCountry Bank (Bank), with assets of $35 mil-lion.
The relevant market in the proposal is theMetropolitan Los Angeles area, in which Appli-cant and Bank are located. Because Applicantwould hold less than 1 percent of deposits in themarket following the acquisition, the proposalwould have no significant effect on competi-tion.
The banking factors and considerations relat-ing to the convenience and needs of the commu-nity are consistent with approval.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
1985
238 Tables
19. Mergers, Consolidations, and Acquisitions of Assets or Assumptions of LiabilitiesApproved by the Board of Governors, 1985—Continued
Glenwood State Bank, Glenwood, Iowa, toacquire certain assets and assume certain lia-bilities 0/Mineola State Bank, Mineola, IowaSUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERALNo report received. Requests for reports on thecompetitive factors were dispensed with, as au-thorized by the Bank Merger Act, to permit theReserve Bank to act immediately to safeguarddepositors of Mineola State Bank.BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVEBANK (8/6/85)Glenwood State Bank (Applicant), with assetsof $48 million, proposes to acquire certain as-sets and assume certain liabilities of MineolaState Bank (Bank), which has assets of $5.1million. In view of the financial condition ofBank, the Iowa superintendent of banks recom-mended immediate action by the Federal Re-serve System to prevent probable failure ofBank.
The banking factors and considerations relat-ing to the convenience and needs of the commu-nity are consistent with approval.
Buffalo Bank, Eleanor, West Virginia, tomerge with First Community Bank-Winfield,Winfield, West VirginiaSUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL(8/2/85)The proposed transaction would not be signifi-cantly adverse to competition.BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVEBANK (8/12/85)The Buffalo Bank (Applicant), with assets of$28 million, proposes to merge with First Com-munity Bank-Winfield (Bank), with assets of$6 million.
The relevant market in this proposal is ap-proximated by Kanawha and Putnam counties,in which the bank resulting from the mergerwould rank 11th among 19 banking organiza-tions. The proposal would have no significanteffect on competition.
The banking factors and considerations relat-ing to the convenience and needs of the commu-nity are consistent with approval.
United Counties Trust Company, Elizabeth,New Jersey, to acquire certain assets and as-sume certain liabilities of the Keensburgbranch of United Jersey Bank/Mid State,Hazlet, New Jersey
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL(8/22/85)The proposed transaction would not be signifi-cantly adverse to competition.BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE SECRETARY OF THEBOARD (9/23/85)United Counties Trust Company (Applicant),with assets of $910 million, proposes to acquirecertain assets and assume certain liabilities ofthe Keensburg Branch (Branch) of United Jer-sey Bank/Mid State. Branch has deposits of $6million.
The relevant market in the proposal is theAsbury Park market, where Applicant ranksfourth among 14 banking organizations, with8.9 percent of market deposits. Because Branchholds less than 1 percent of market deposits, theacquisition would have no significant effect oncompetition.
The banking factors and the considerationsrelating to the convenience and needs of thecommunity are consistent with approval.
Bayshore Bank of Florida, Miami, Florida,to acquire certain assets and assume substan-tially all of the liabilities ofTower Bank, N.A.,Hialeah Gardens, FloridaSUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERALNo report received. Requests for reports on thecompetitive factors were dispensed with, as au-thorized by the Bank Merger Act, to permit theReserve Bank to act immediately to safeguarddepositors of Tower Bank, N.A.BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVEBANK (10/3/85)Bayshore Bank of Florida (Applicant), with as-sets of $35 million, proposes to acquire TowerBank, N.A. (Bank), with assets of $16 million.
In view of the financial condition of Bank, theComptroller of the Currency has recommendedimmediate action by the Federal Reserve Sys-tem to prevent the probable failure of Bank.
Farmers and Merchants Bank of LongBeach, Long Beach, California, to merge withTown and Country Bank, Seal Beach, Cali-forniaSUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL(10/18/85)The proposed transaction would not be signifi-cantly adverse to competition.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
1985
Tables 239
19.—Continued
BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE
BANK (10/25/85)Farmers and Merchants Bank of Long Beach(Applicant), with assets of $764 million, pro-poses to merge with Town and Country Bank(Bank), with assets of $33 million.
In view of the financial condition of Bank, theCalifornia superintendent of banks has recom-mended immediate action by the Federal Re-serve System to prevent the probable failure ofBank.
Banco de Ponce, Hato Rey, Puerto Rico, toacquire certain assets and assume certain lia-bilities of the Pitkin Avenue Branch of EastNew York Savings Bank, New York, NewYork
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL(9/20/85)The proposed transaction would not be signifi-cantly adverse to competition.
BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE
BANK (11/1/85)Banco de Ponce (Applicant), with assets of $2billion, proposes to acquire a branch (Branch)of East New York Savings Bank. Deposits atBranch amount to $26 million. The relevantmarket in the proposal is the Metropolitan NewYork area, in which Branch is located and inwhich Applicant is represented. The acquisitionwould not have a significant effect on competi-tion because Applicant would have a smallshare of area deposits.
The banking factors and considerations relat-ing to the convenience and needs of the commu-nity are consistent with approval.
First Georgia Bank, Atlanta, Georgia, tomerge with Gwinnett Bank & Trust Com-pany, Norcross, Georgia
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
(11/1/85)The proposed transaction would not be signifi-cantly adverse to competition.
BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE
BANK (11/27/85)First Georgia Bank (Applicant), with assets of$649 million, proposes to merge with GwinnettBank & Trust Company (Bank), which has as-sets of $123 million.
Applicant is a subsidiary of First Railroad &Banking Company of Georgia, Augusta, Geor-
gia (Company). Company is the 6th largest of26 banking organizations in the Atlanta bankingmarket, and controls 3.5 percent of market de-posits. Bank ranks 10th, with 0.7 percent ofmarket deposits. In view of the relatively smallsize of Bank in the market, there would be nosignificant competitive effects.
The banking factors and considerations relat-ing to the convenience and needs of the commu-nity are consistent with approval.
Central Trust Company, Rochester, New\brk, to acquire the assets and assume the lia-bilities of the Hilton, New York, Branch ofChemical Bank, New York, New York
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
(11/8/85)The proposed transaction would not be signifi-cantly adverse to competition.
BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVEBANK (12/31/85)Central Trust Company (Applicant), with assetsof $658 million, proposes to acquire the assetsand assume the deposit liabilities of the Hilton,New York branch (Branch) of Chemical Bank,with deposits of $17 million.
Applicant is a subsidiary of Irving Bank Cor-poration, New York, New York (Company).Company is the fifth largest of 13 banking or-ganizations in the Rochester banking marketand as a result of the acquisition would increaseits market share from 6.0 percent to 6.4 per-cent. The proposal would have no significantcompetitive effects.
The banking factors and considerations relat-ing to the convenience and needs of the commu-nity are consistent with approval.
Bank of New York, New York, New York toacquire the assets and assume the liabilities ofFidata Trust Company, New York, New York
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL(12/13/85)The proposed transaction would not be signifi-cantly adverse to competition.
BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVEBANK (12/31/85)Bank of New York (Applicant), with assets of$15 billion, proposes to acquire the assets andliabilities of Fidata Trust Company (Bank),with assets of $592 million. Applicant is a sub-sidiary of the Bank of New York Company, and
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
1985
240 Tables
19. Mergers, Consolidations, and Acquisitions of Assets or Assumptions of LiabilitiesApproved by the Board of Governors, 1985—Continued
in view of the size and number of banking alter-natives in the Metropolitan New York market,competitive considerations with respect to thisapplication are consistent with approval.
The banking factors and considerations relat-ing to the convenience and needs of the commu-nity are consistent with approval.
Mergers Approved Involving Wholly OwnedSubsidiaries of the Same Bank HoldingCompanyThe following transactions involve banks that
are subsidiaries of the same bank holding com-pany. In each case the summary report by theattorney general indicates that the transactionwould not have a significantly adverse effect oncompetition because the proposed merger is es-sentially a corporate reorganization. The Boardof Governors, the Federal Reserve Bank, or theSecretary of the Board of Governors, whicheverapproved the application, determined that thecompetitive effects of the proposed transaction,the financial and managerial resources and theprospects of the banks concerned, and the con-venience and needs of the community to beserved were consistent with approval.
Name of bank, type of transaction,and other banks involved '
Norstar Bank of Upstate N e w York, Albany, New YorkMergerOneida National Bank, Utica, New York
Ohio Citizens Bank, Toledo, OhioMergerTwo branches of BancOhio National Bank, Columbus, Ohio.. .
Gravois Bank, St. Louis County, MissouriMergerGravois Bank at Mehlville, St. Louis County, Missouri
Valley Bank and Trust Company, Salt Lake City, UtahMergerBountiful Valley Bank, Bountiful, UtahWeber Valley Bank, Ogden, Utah
Colonial Bank, Montgomery, AlabamaMergerColonial Bank of Opp, N.A., Opp, Alabama
First Virginia Bank of Tidewater, Norfolk, VirginiaMergerFirst Virginia Bank-Eastern Shore, Onancock, Virginia
First Georgia Bank, Atlanta, GeorgiaMergerFirst Georgia Bank, Cobb County, Marietta, GeorgiaCommercial & Exchange Bank, Bremen, Georgia
Peoples Bank of Leslie, Leslie, MichiganMergerIndependent Bank-South Michigan, Olivet, Michigan
Assets(millions of
dollars)
Date ofapproval
1,488
939
744
43
245
14
636
16
24
75
18
249
60
448
125
25
34
10
2/25/85
2/28/85
3/21/85
3/25/85
4/19/85
6/4/85
6/11/85
6/20/85
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
1985
Tables 241
19.—Continued
Name of bank, type of transaction,and other banks involved '
Wheeling Dollar Savings and Trust Company, Wheeling,West VirginiaMergerWheeling Dollar Bank, Wheeling,West Virginia
M&I Marshall & Ilsley Bank, Milwaukee, WisconsinMergerH e r i t a g e B a n k , W a u w a t o s a , W i s c o n s i n
F i r s t Inters ta te B a n k o f C a l i f o r n i a , L o s A n g e l e s , C a l i f o r n i a . . . .MergerWarner Center Branch of First Interstate Bank, Ltd., Los AngelesCalifornia
Fifth Third Bank, Cincinnati, OhioMergerFifth Bank of Miami Valley, Kettering, Ohio
Toledo Trust Company, Toledo, OhioMergerSociety National Bank of Northwest Ohio, Fostoria, Ohio
Trustcorp Company, Columbus, OhioMergerSociety National Bank of Mid-Ohio, Bucyrus, Ohio
1st Source Bank, South Bend, IndianaMerger1st Source Bank of Marshall County, Plymouth, Indiana
Fifth Third Bank of Columbus, Columbus, OhioMergerFayette County Bank, Jeffersonville, Ohio
Princeton Bank, Princeton, New JerseyMergerBank of New Jersey, N.A., Moorestown, New Jersey
Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company, New York, New York..MergerManufacturers Hanover, N.A., Rochester, New York
Citizens State Bank, Silverton, OhioMergerC.S. Bank, Silverton, Silverton, Ohio
Georgia Railroad Bank & Trust Company, Augusta, Georgia . . .MergerGeorgia State Bank, Martinez, Georgia
Assets(millions of
dollars)Date ofapproval
209
21
1,896
464
17,481
3
1,875
49
1,863
277
48
69
809
153
20
34
421
615
61,000
595
39
( 2
607
57
6/21/85
8/7/85
8/28/85
9/18/85
9/26/85
9/26/85
10/4/85
10/22/85
10/22/85
10/30/85
11/22/85
11/27/85
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
1985
242 Tables
19. Mergers, Consolidations, and Acquisitions of Assets or Assumptions of LiabilitiesApproved by the Board of Governors, 1985—Continued
Name of bank, type of transaction,and other banks involved1
Comerica Bank, Detroit, MichiganMergerComerica Bank, N.A., Grosse Pointe, Michigan
Continental Bank and Trust Company, Salt Lake City, UtahMergerMoore Financial of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
Assets(millions of
dollars)
Date ofapproval
607 11/27/85
48
7,115 11/27/85
46
281 11/27/85
( 2 )
1. Each proposed transaction was to be effectedunder the charter of the first-named bank. The entriesare in chronological order of approval.
2. A newly organized bank, not in operation.
Mergers Approved Involving a NonoperatingInstitution with an Existing BankThe following transactions have no significanteffect on competition: they merely facilitate theacquisition of the voting shares of a bank orbanks by a holding company. In such cases thesummary report by the attorney general indi-cates that the transaction will merely combinean existing bank with a nonoperating institu-tion; in consequence, and without regard to theacquisition of the surviving bank by the holding
company, the merger would have no effect oncompetition. The Board of Governors, the Fed-eral Reserve Bank, or the Secretary of theBoard of Governors, whichever approved theapplication, determined that the proposalwould, in itself, have no adverse competitiveeffects and that the financial factors and consid-erations relating to the convenience and needsof the community were consistent with ap-proval.
Name of bank, type of transaction,and other banks involved1
Wheeling Interim BankMergerHalf Dollar Trust and Savings Bank, Wheeling, West Virginia . .
New Bank of Hartsville, Hartsville, South CarolinaMergerBank of Hartsville, Hartsville, South Carolina
Metamora Interim Bank, Metamora, OhioMergerMetamora State Bank, Metamora, Ohio
Assets(millions of
dollars)Date of
approval
( 2 ) 2/28/85
162
( 2 ) 4/1/85
67
( 2 ) 4/12/85
56
( 2 ) 4/16/85
13
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
1985
Tables 243
19.—Continued
Name of bank, type of transaction,and other banks involved1
New Belknap Bank, Belmont, New HampshireMergerBelknap Bank & Trust Company, Belmont, New Hampshire
Ponce Interim Bank, Ponce, Puerto RicoMergerBanco de Ponce, Ponce, Puerto Rico
Farmers Interim Bank, Pomeroy, OhioMergerFarmers Bank and Savings, Pomeroy, Ohio
First Virginia Bank-South Hill, South Hill, VirginiaMergerCitizens Bank, Inc., South Hill, Virginia
First Interim Bank, Arlington, VirginiaMergerFirst Commercial Bank, Arlington, Virginia
First Virginia Bank-Hanover, Ashland, VirginiaMergerFirst Virginia Bank-Colonial, Richmond, Virginia
George Mason Interim Bank, Fairfax, VirginiaMergerGeorge Mason Bank, Fairfax, Virginia
Mobile County Bank, Grand Bay, AlabamaMergerFirst National Bank of Mobile, Grand Bay, Alabama
ATS State Bank, Dubuque, IowaMergerAmerican Trust and Savings Bank, Dubuque, Iowa
Shawsville Interim Bank, Inc., Shawsville, VirginiaMergerBank of Shawsville, Shawsville, Virginia
LSB Bank, Linden, IndianaMergerLinden State Bank, Linden, Indiana
Fidelity Bank Northeast, Minneapolis, MinnesotaMergerFidelity Bank and Trust Company, Minneapolis, Minnesota
Assets(millions of
dollars)
Date ofapproval
42
1,952
44
146
46
148
86
168
203
28
20
159
4/26/85
5/6/85
5/14/85
5/15/85
5/28/853
6/4/85
6/17/85
7/25/85
8/9/85
8/12/85
8/20/85
8/29/85
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
1985
244 Tables
19. Mergers, Consolidations, and Acquisitions of Assets or Assumptions of LiabilitiesApproved by the Board of Governors, 1985—Continued
Name of bank, type of transaction,and other banks involved !
Assets(millions of
dollars)
Date ofapproval
Society Bank of Northwest Ohio, Port Clinton, OhioMergerThree branches of Society National Bank of Northwest Ohio,Fosteria, Ohio
CBT Interim Bank, Fruit Heights, OhioMergerContinental Bank and Trust Company, Salt Lake City, Utah . . .
Apple Country Bank, Charlottesville, VirginiaMergerAlbemarle Bank and Trust Company, Charlottesville, Virginia .
Bibb Interim Bank, West Blocton, AlabamaMergerFirst State Bank of Bibb County, West Blocton, Alabama
New Independence Bank, Piano, TexasMergerIndependence Bank, Piano, Texas
Green Valley Bank, Inc., Bluefield, West VirginiaMergerValley Bank and Trust Company, Bluefield, West Virginia.
M.B. Bank, Minerva, OhioMergerMinerva Banking Company, Minerva, Ohio.
First Virginia Bank-Southside, Farmville, Virginia . . .MergerFirst National Bank of Farmville, Farmville, Virginia ,
First Virginia Bank-Middle Peninsula, Urbanna,VirginiaMergerBank of Middlesex, Urbanna, Virginia
Citizens Interim Bank, Ocala, FloridaMergerCitizens First Bank of Ocala, Ocala, Florida.
ONB Merger Bank, Greencastle, IndianaMergerFirst Citizens Bank and Trust Company, Greencastle, Indiana
Peoples Interim Bank, Van Wert, OhioMergerPeoples Bank and Trust Company, Van Wert, Ohio
55
2,722
17
11
42
13
35
96
68
51
78
56
9/26/85
9/27/85
10/2/85
10/4/85
10/21/85
10/25/85
10/25/85
10/30/85
10/30/85
11/13/85
11/29/85
12/10/85
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
1985
Tables 245
19.—Continued
Name of bank, type of transaction,and other banks involved l
Monroe County Bank, Monroeville, AlabamaMergerFirst Nat iona l B a n k o f M o n r o e v i l l e , M o n r o e v i l l e , A l a b a m a . . . .
Gassaway Inter im B a n k , I n c . , Gassaway, West V irg in iaMergerBank of Gassaway, Gassaway, West Virginia
Boca Interim Bank, Boca Raton, FloridaMergerB o c a B a n k , B o c a Raton , F lor ida
Beaver Trust C o m p a n y Inter im B a n k , Beaver , Pennsy lvan ia . . . .MergerBeaver Trust Company, Beaver, Pennsylvania
Sun Bank/Suncoast, N.A., St. Petersburg, FloridaMergerSun Bank of Tampa Bay, Florida
Assets(millions of
dollars)
Date ofapproval
43 12/12/85
19
( 2 ) 12/12/85
47
( 2 ) 12/16/85
38
( 2 ) 12/18/85
152
541 12/19/85
506
1. Each proposed transaction was to be effected underthe charter of the first-named bank. The entries are inchronological order of approval.
2. A newly organized bank, not in operation.3. Application denied by the Board.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
1985
Tables 253
19. Mergers, Consolidations, and Acquisitions of Assets or Assumptions ofLiabilities Approved by the Board of Governors, 1986
Colonial Bank, Montgomery, Alabama, to mergewith Luverne Bank and Trust Company, Lu-verne, Alabama
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL(12/6/85)The proposed transaction would not be signif-icantly adverse to competition.BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVEBANK (1/8/86)Colonial Bank (Applicant) has assets of $102million, and Luverne Bank and Trust Com-pany (Bank) has assets of $31 million. Ap-plicant and Bank are not located in the samemarket, and the proposal would have no sig-nificant effect on competition.
The banking factors and considerations re-lating to the convenience and needs of the com-munity are consistent with approval.
The Suburban Bank, Richmond, Virginia, tomerge with Virginia Capital Bank, Richmond,Virginia
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL(2/6/86)The proposed transaction would not have asignificantly adverse effect on competition.BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVEBANK (2/5/86)The Suburban Bank (Applicant) has assets of$13.2 million, and Virginia Capital Bank hasassets of $23.4 million. Although Applicant andBank compete in the Richmond banking mar-ket, the proposal would have no significant ef-fect on competition. The resulting bank's proforma market share would be only 0.5 percent.
The banking factors and considerations re-lating to the convenience and needs of the com-munity are consistent with approval.
Shelby County State Bank, Shelbyville, Illinois,to merge with Windsor State Bank, Windsor,Illinois
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL(10/10/86)The proposed transaction would not have asignificantly adverse effect on competition.BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVEBANK (3/4/86)Shelby County State Bank (Applicant) has as-sets of $52.6 million, and Windsor State Bank(Bank) has assets of $11.5 million. Applicantand Bank are not in the same banking market.Thus, no adverse competitive factors exist.
The banking factors and considerations re-lating to the convenience and needs of the com-munity are consistent with approval.
Norstar Bank of Upstate New York, Albany,New York, to acquire six branches of The Bankof New York, New York, New York
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL(1/24/86)The proposed transaction would not be signif-icantly adverse to competition.BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVEBANK (3/18/86)Norstar Bank of Upstate New York (Appli-cant) has assets of $2.7 billion, and six branchesof The Bank of New York (Branches) haveassets of $220 million. Applicant and Branchesare both located in the Syracuse market; how-ever, the Herfindahl-Hirschman index willincrease only 18 points to 1850, and thus noadverse competitive factors exist.
The banking factors and considerations re-lating to the convenience and needs of the com-munity are consistent with approval.
City Bank and Trust Company, Moberly, Mis-souri, to acquire certain assets and insured de-posits of Farmers and Merchants Bank ofHuntsville, Huntsville, Missouri
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERALNo report received. Request for report on thecompetitive factors was dispensed with, as au-thorized by the Bank Merger Act, to permitthe Federal Reserve System to act immediatelyto safeguard depositors of Farmers and Mer-chants Bank.BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVEBANK (3/31/86)City Bank and Trust Company (Applicant) hasassets of $108.2 million, and Farmers and Mer-chants Bank of Huntsville (Bank) has assets of$18.8 million.
The FDIC has recommended immediate ac-tion by the Federal Reserve System to preventthe probable failure of Bank.
American Trust and Savings Bank, Dubuque,Iowa, to acquire certain assets and liabilities ofThe National Bank, Dyers ville, Iowa
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERALNo report received. Request for report onthe competitive factors was dispensed with,as authorized by the Bank Merger Act, to per-
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
1986
254 Tables
19. Mergers, Consolidations, and Acquisitions of Assets or Assumptions ofLiabilities Approved by the Board of Governors, 1986—Continued
mit the Federal Reserve System to act imme-diately to safeguard depositors of The NationalBank.BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVEBANK (4/10/86)American Trust and Savings Bank (Applicant)has assets of $246 million, and The NationalBank (Bank) has assets of $41.6 million.
The Comptroller of the Currency has rec-ommended immediate action by the FederalReserve System to ensure continuation of Bank'sservices.
Georgia Railroad Bank & Trust Company, Au-gusta, Georgia, to merge with Bank of Waynes-boro, Waynesboro, Georgia
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL(4/16/86)The proposed transaction would not be signif-icantly adverse to competition.BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVEBANK (4/22/86)Georgia Railroad Bank & Trust Company(Applicant) has assets of $753.6 million, andBank of Waynesboro (Bank) has assets of $43.4million. Applicant and Bank operate in sepa-rate banking markets.
The banking factors and considerations re-lating to the convenience and needs of the com-munity are consistent with approval.
Norstar Bank of Upstate New York, Albany,New York, to assume the assets and liabilitiesof the Greenwich branch of Chemical Bank,New York, New York
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL(4/25/86)The proposed transaction would not be signif-icantly adverse to competition.BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVEBANK (4/25/86)Norstar Bank of Upstate New York (Appli-cant), with assets of $2.7 billion, proposes toassume $11.7 million in assets and $11.6 millionin liabilities of the Greenwich branch of Chem-ical Bank (Bank). Applicant and Bank operatein the Glen Falls banking market. On a proforma basis, Applicant will control 12.3 per-cent of the commercial banking deposits in themarket. The Herfindahl-Hirschman index willincrease only 47 points. Consummation of the
proposal would have no significant effect oncompetition.
The banking factors and considerations re-lating to the convenience and needs of the com-munity are consistent with approval.
Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company, NewYork, New York to acquire certain assets andassume certain liabilities of six branches of Dol-lar Dry Dock Savings Bank, White Plains, NewYork
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL(3/28/86)The proposed transaction would not be signif-icantly adverse to competition.BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVEBANK (5/8/86)Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company (Ap-plicant), with assets of $62.3 billion, proposesto acquire $333 million in assets and assume$354 million in liabilities of six branches of Dol-lar Dry Dock Savings Bank (Branches). BothApplicant and Branches are located in the met-ropolitan New York banking market. Appli-cant is ranked third in the market, with 8.1percent of market deposits. On a pro formabasis, Applicant's market share will increase to8.3 percent, and Applicant will remain the thirdlargest banking organization in the market.
The banking factors and considerations re-lating to the convenience and needs of the com-munity are consistent with approval.
First Community Bank, Inc., Princeton, WestVirginia, to merge with First Community Bank-Castle Rock, Pineville, West Virginia
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL(5/2/86)The proposed transaction would not be signif-icantly adverse to competition.BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVEBANK (5/23/86)First Community Bank, Inc. (Applicant) hasassets of $136 million, and First CommunityBank-Castle Rock (Bank) has assets of $56million. Applicant and Bank are not located inthe same market, and the proposal would haveno significant effect on competition.
The banking factors and considerations re-lating to the convenience and needs of the com-munity are consistent with approval.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
1986
Tables 255
Indiana Southern Bank, Sellersburg, Indiana,to acquire United Bank of Indiana, N.A.,Clarksville, Indiana
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL(5/2/86)The proposed transaction would not be signif-icantly adverse to competition.BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVEBANK (6/26/86)Indiana Southern Bank (Applicant) has assetsof $82.4 million, and United Bank of Indiana,N.A. (Bank), has assets of $38 million. Ap-plicant and Bank operate in the Louisvillebanking market, and each controls less than 2percent of the commercial banking deposits inthe market. Although Applicant, combined withother commercial banking deposits controlledby its parent holding company, would controlslightly more than 30 percent of the marketdeposits, thrift institutions offer substantialcompetition to commercial banks. No signifi-cant adverse competitive effects arise from thetransaction.
The banking factors and considerations re-lating to the convenience and needs of the com-munity are consistent with approval.
The Bank of New York, New York, New York,to acquire certain assets and assume certain li-abilities of three branches of The Home SavingsBank, Brooklyn, New York
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL(5/2/86)The proposed transaction will not have a sig-nificantly adverse effect on competition.BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVEBANK (7/2/86)The Bank of New York (Applicant), with as-sets of $17.2 billion, proposes to acquire assetsof $1.4 million and liabilities of $79 million ofthree branches of The Home Savings Bank(Branches). Applicant and Branches operatein the metropolitan New York-New Jerseybanking market. The pro forma market shareis 2.4 percent. The proposal would have nosignificant effect on competition.
The banking factors and considerations re-lating to the convenience and needs of the com-munity are consistent with approval.
Ireland Bank, Malad City, Idaho, to acquire allthe assets and liabilities of Downey State Bank,Downey, Idaho
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL(7/7/86)No existing competition of significance will beeliminated by the proposed transaction.BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVEBANK (8/15/86)Ireland Bank (Applicant) has assets of $25.2million, and Downey State Bank (Bank) hasassets of $18.1 million. The Director of theIdaho Department of Finance has recom-mended immediate action by the Federal Re-serve System to prevent the probable failureof Bank.
The banking factors and considerations re-lating to the convenience and needs of the com-munity are consistent with approval.
Norstar Bank of Upstate New York, Albany,New York, to purchase assets and assume lia-bilities of three branches of Citibank (New YorkState), N.A., Buffalo, New York
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL(9/12/86)The proposed transaction would not have asignificantly adverse effect on competition.BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVEBANK (10/1/86)Norstar Bank of Upstate New York (Appli-cant), with assets of $2.7 billion, proposes topurchase assets of $1 million and assume lia-bilities of $42 million of three branches ofCitibank (New York State), N.A., in the Al-bany banking market. Applicant's resulting in-crease in market share in the Albany area iswell within Justice Department and Boardguidelines.
The banking factors and considerations re-lating to the convenience and needs of the com-munity are consistent with approval.
Security Savings Bank, Mars hall town, Iowa, toacquire certain assets and liabilities of The FirstNational Bank of Prairie City, Prairie City, Iowa
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERALNo report received. Request for report on thecompetitive factors was dispensed with, as au-thorized by the Bank Merger Act, to permit
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
1986
256 Tables
19. Mergers, Consolidations, and Acquisitions of Assets or Assumptions ofLiabilities Approved by the Board of Governors, 1986—Continued
the Federal Reserve System to act immediatelyto safeguard depositors of The First NationalBank of Prairie City.BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVEBANK (7/24/86)Security Savings Bank (Applicant) has assetsof $163.3 million, and The First National Bankof Prairie City (Bank) has assets of $8.7 mil-lion.
The Comptroller of the Currency has re-quested immediate action by the Federal Re-serve System to ensure continuation of Bank'sservices.
Banco de Ponce, Ponce, Puerto Rico, to acquirecertain assets and assume certain liabilities oftwo branches of The East New York SavingsBank, New York, New York
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL(9/26/86)The proposed transaction would not have asignificantly adverse effect on competition.BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVEBANK (10/10/86)Banco de Ponce (Applicant), with assets of $2.3billion, proposes to acquire certain assets andassume certain liabilities of two branches ofThe East New York Savings Bank (Bank), withassets of $1.4 billion. Both Applicant and Bankare in the metropolitan New York-New Jerseybanking market. As a result of this acquisition,Applicant's market share of 0.1 percent willremain unchanged. Consummation would re-sult in no significant adverse competitive ef-fects.
The banking factors and considerations re-lating to the convenience and needs of the com-munity are consistent with approval.
Imperial Bank of Florida, Coral Gables, Flor-ida, to acquire certain assets and assume certainliabilities of the Hialeah branch of Popular Bankof Florida, Miami, Florida
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL(7/25/86)The proposed transaction would not have asignificantly adverse effect on competition.BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVEBANK (10/14/86)Imperial Bank of Florida (Applicant), with as-sets of $18.0 million, proposes to acquire $12.5
million in assets from the Hialeah branch ofPopular Bank of Florida (Bank), with totalbanking assets of $71.2 million. Both Applicantand Bank are in the Miami-Fort Lauderdalebanking market. As a result of this acquisition,the Herfindahl-Hirschman index will remainunchanged at 909. Thus, no significant adversecompetitive effects exist.
The banking factors and considerations re-lating to the convenience and needs of the com-munity are consistent with approval.
Norstar Bank of Upstate New York, Albany,New York, to merge with Seaway National Bank,Watertown, New York
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL(9/12/86)The proposed transaction would not have asignificantly adverse effect on competition.BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVEBANK (11/14/86)Norstar Bank of Upstate New York (Appli-cant) has assets of $3.2 billion, and SeawayNational Bank (Bank) has assets of $25.8 mil-lion. Applicant does not currently operate inBank's market, and no issues are raised withrespect to competition. Thus, the proposedtransaction would have no adverse competitiveeffects.
The banking factors and considerations re-lating to the convenience and needs of the com-munity are consistent with approval.
United Virginia Bank, Richmond, Virginia, tomerge with People's Bank of Chesapeake, Ches-apeake, Virginia
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL(10/17/86)The proposed transaction would not have asignificantly adverse effect on competition.BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVEBANK (11/3/86)United Virginia Bank (Applicant) has assets of$6.9 billion, and People's Bank of Chesapeake(Bank) has assets of $80 million. Applicant andBank compete in the areas of Norfolk-Ports-mouth, Virginia, and Currituck County, NorthCarolina, with Applicant ranked second andBank ranked eighth among 16 banks in themarket. Applicant would remain the secondlargest bank in the market with 16.7 percentof commercial banking deposits.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
1986
Tables 257
The banking factors and considerations re-lating to the convenience and needs of the com-munity are consistent with approval.
First Interstate Bank of California, Los Ange-les, California, to acquire the assets and assumethe liabilities of First National Bank, Willows,CaliforniaSUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERALNo report received. Request for report on thecompetitive factors was dispensed with, as au-thorized by the Bank Merger Act, to permitthe Federal Reserve System to act immediatelyto safeguard depositors of First National Bank.BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE BOARD (11/21/86)First Interstate Bank of California (Applicant)has assets of $20.6 billion, and First NationalBank (Bank) has assets of $65 million.
The Comptroller of the Currency has rec-ommended immediate action by the FederalReserve System to ensure continuation of Bank's
First Virginia Bank-Citizens, Clintwood, Vir-ginia, to merge with Peoples Bank of Pound,Pound, VirginiaSUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL(11/21/86)The proposed transaction would not be signif-icantly adverse to competition.BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVEBANK (11/28/86)First Virginia Bank-Citizens (Applicant) hasassets of $28.7 million, and Peoples Bank ofPound (Bank) has assets of $45.9 million. Ap-plicant and Bank are not located in the samemarket, and the proposal would have no sig-nificant effect on competition.
The banking factors and considerations re-lating to the convenience and needs of the com-munity are consistent with approval.
Security Bank, Marshalltown, Iowa, to pur-chase the assets and liabilities o/Hawkeye Bank& Trust, Eldora, IowaSUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL(11/21/86)The proposed transaction would not be signif-icantly adverse to competition.BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVEBANK (12/30/86)Security Bank (Applicant) has assets of $188million, and Hawkeye Bank & Trust (Bank)has assets of $16.5 million. Applicant and Bankare not located in the same market, and theproposal would have no significant effect oncompetition.
The banking factors and considerations re-lating to the convenience and needs of the com-munity are consistent with approval.
Mergers Approved Involving Wholly OwnedSubsidiaries of the Same Bank Holding Com-panyIn each of the following cases, the summaryreport by the attorney general indicates thatthe transaction would not have a significantlyadverse effect on competition because the pro-posed merger is essentially a corporate reor-ganization. The Board of Governors, the Fed-eral Reserve Bank, or the Secretary of the Boardof Governors, whichever approved the appli-cation, determined that the competitive effectsof the proposed transaction, the financial andmanagerial resources and the prospects of thebanks concerned, and the convenience andneeds of the community to be served were con-sistent with approval.
Institution1Assets
(millions ofdollars)
Date ofapproval
Commerce Union Bank, Nashville, TennesseeMergerCommerce Union Bank of Humphreys County, Waverly,
TennesseeCommerce Union Bank of Rutherford County, Murfreesboro
TennesseeCommerce Union Bank of Sumner County, Gallatin,
Tennessee
1,956
48
118
79
3/7/86
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
1986
258 Tables
19. Mergers, Consolidations, and Acquisitions of Ass;Liabilities Approved by the Board of Governors.
t̂s or Assumptions of1986—Continued
Institution1Assets
(millions ofdollars)
Date ofapproval
The Toledo Trust Company Three Sea Gate, Toledo, Ohio...MergerFirst Buckeye Bank, N.A., Mansfield, Ohio
The Merrill Trust Company, Bangor, Maine.MergerMerrill Bank, N.A., Farmington, Maine
The Central Trust Company, Newark, OhioMergerThe Clear Creek Valley Banking Company, Amanda, Ohio ..
Security Bank & Trust Company, Southgate, MichiganMergerSecurity Bank & Trust Company of Oakland County, Novi,
Michigan
State Bank of Carthage, Carthage, IndianaMergerThe First National Bank of Mays, Mays, Indiana
Ohio Citizens Bank, Toledo, OhioMergerThe Citizens National Bank, Bryan, Ohio.
First Source Bank, South Bend, IndianaMergerCommunity State Bank, North Liberty, Indiana.
Rocky Mountain State Bank, Salt Lake City, UtahMergerRocky Mountain State Bank of Bountiful, Bountiful, Utah ..
Mercantile Bank & Trust Company, Kansas City, Missouri..MergerNoland Road Mercantile Bank, Independence, MissouriMercantile Regional Bank, Kansas City, MissouriMercantile National Bank of Clay County, Kansas City,
Missouri
Old Kent Bank of Kalamazoo, Kalamazoo, MichiganMergerThe American National Bank in Portage, Portage, MichiganThe American National Bank & Trust Company
of Michigan, Kalamazoo, Michigan
Old Kent Bank-Southwest, Niles, MichiganMergerThe American Bank of Niles, N.A., Niles, Michigan.
2,184
833
665
108
367
15
1,100
50
11
9
773
134
827
19.7
15
13
237
138164
31
28
33
420
258
25
3/25/86
3/31/86
5/27/86
6/19/86
6/23/86
7/8/86
8/15/86
8/29/86
9/25/86
10/1/86
10/2/86
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
1986
Tables 259
Institution1Assets
(millions ofdollars)
Date ofapproval
Norstar Bank, Rochester, New YorkMergerNorstar Bank of Upstate New York, Albany, New York .
Hawkeye-Capital Bank & Trust Company, Des Moines, Iowa.MergerHawkeye Bank and Trust of Des Moines, Des Moines, Iowa...
Silicon Valley Bank, San Jose, CaliforniaMergerNational Intercity Bank, Santa Clara, California .
Commerce Union Bank, Nashville, TennesseeMergerCommerce Union Bank of Lawrence County, Lawrenceburg,
Tennessee
Security Bank of Richmond, Richmond, Michigan.MergerSecurity Bank Imlay City, Imlay City, Michigan ...
First Virginia-Commonwealth, Grafton, Virginia.MergerFirst Virginia Bank-Surry, Surry, Virginia
The Merchants Bank, Kansas City, Missouri.MergerThe Bank of Kansas City, Kansas CityWestport Bank, Kansas City, Missouri
1,682
1,043
107
61
101
54
1,956
64
83
40
37
17
963
11484
10/10/86
10/16/86
10/31/86
11/18/86
11/25/86
12/1/86
12/15/86
1. Each proposed transaction was to be effected are in chronological order of approval,under the charter of the first-named bank. The entries
Mergers Approved Involving a NonoperatingInstitution with an Existing Bank
The following transactions have no significanteffect on competition; they merely facilitatethe acquisition of the voting shares of a bankor banks by a holding company. In such casesthe summary report by the attorney generalindicates that the transaction will merely com-bine an existing bank with a nonoperating in-stitution; in consequence, and without regard
to the acquisition of the surviving bank by theholding company, the merger would have noeffect on competition. The Board of Gover-nors, the Federal Reserve Bank, or the Sec-retary of the Board of Governors, whicheverapproved the application, determined that theproposal would, in itself, have no adverse com-petitive effects, and that the financial factorsand considerations relating to the convenienceand needs of the community were consistentwith approval.
Institution1Assets
(millions ofdollars)2
Date ofapproval
Shelbyville Interim BankMergerShelby County State Bank, Shelbyville, Illinois. 50
3/4/86
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
1986
260 Tables
19. Mergers, Consolidations, and Acquisitions of Assets or Assumptions ofLiabilities Approved by the Board of Governors, 1986—Continued
Institution1Assets
(millions ofdollars)2
Date ofapproval
B.N.S. Bank, Northbrook, IllinoisMergerBank of the North Shore, Northbrook, Illinois .
The New Waterford Interim Bank, New Waterford, OhioMergerThe New Waterford Bank, New Waterford, Ohio
The Bel Air Bank, Bel Air, Maryland .MergerCommercial Bank, Bel Air, Maryland .
PCB Company, Hurricane, West VirginiaMergerPutnam County Bank, Hurricane, West Virginia.
New First Union Bank and Trust Company, Medaryville,Indiana
MergerFirst Union Bank and Trust Company, Winamac, Indiana
FIBC Service Bank III, Howe, Indiana.MergerState Bank of Lima, Howe, Indiana
Central Virginia Bank, Powhatan, VirginiaMergerCommunity Bank of Powhatan, Powhatan, Virginia.
Barbour Interim Bank, Philippi, West Virginia.MergerBarbour County Bank, Philippi, West Virginia.
Beach Bank, Seabrook, New HampshireMergerSeabrook Bank & Trust Company, Seabrook,
New Hampshire
Lake view Interim Bank, Lake view, Michigan.MergerBank of Lake view, Lake view, Michigan
New Lowell State Bank, Lowell, Michigan.MergerState Savings Bank, Lowell, Michigan
Traders Interim Bank, Spencer, West Virginia .MergerTrader Bank, Spencer, West Virginia
32
46
122
128
476
31
31
36
44
50
67
63
3/11/86
3/27/86
4/21/86
6/5/86
6/19/86
8/5/86
8/28/86
9/15/86
9/26/86
10/29/86
11/25/86
11/26/86
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
1986
Tables 261
19. — Continued
Institution
The Lunenburg County Bank, Kenbridge, VirginiaMergerCommunity Bank of Lunenburg, Kenbridge, Virginia
Assets(millions of
dollars)2Date ofapproval
12/1/86
24
1. Each proposed transaction was to be effectedunder the charter of the first-named bank. The entriesare in chronological order of approval.
2. In each case, the first-named bank is newly or-ganized and not in operation.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
1986
Tables 247
16. Mergers, Consolidations, and Acquisitions of Assets or Assumptions of LiabilitiesApproved by the Board of Governors, 1987
Security Bank, Marshalltown, Iowa, to acquirecertain assets and liabilities o/Hawkeye Bank &Trust, Eldora, Iowa
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
(11/25/86)The proposed transaction would not be signifi-cantly adverse to competition.
BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE
(1/9/87)Security Bank (Applicant) has assets of $163.3million and Hawkeye Bank & Trust (Bank) hasdeposits of $16.0 million. Applicant and Bank arenot located in the same market, and the proposalwould have no significant effect on competition.
The banking factors and considerations relatingto the convenience and needs of the community areconsistent with approval.
Intrawest Bank of Grand Junction, GrandJunction, Colorado, to acquire certain depositsof American National Bank of Grand Junction,Grand Junction, Colorado
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
No report received. Request for report on the com-petitive factors was dispensed with, as authorizedby the Bank Merger Act, to permit the FederalReserve System to act immediately to safeguarddepositors of American National Bank of GrandJunction.
BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE
(1/8/87)Intrawest Bank of Grand Junction (Applicant) hasassets of $116.0 million and American NationalBank of Grand Junction (Bank) has deposits of$7.6 million.
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency(OCC) has recommended immediate action by theFederal Reserve System to prevent the probablefailure of Bank.
Bank of New York Company, New York, NewYork, to merge with Long Island Trust Com-pany, N.A., Garden City, New York
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
(12/17/86)The proposed transaction would not be signifi-cantly adverse to competition.
BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE
(1/16/87)Bank of New York Company (Applicant) hasassets of $21 billion and Long Island Trust Com-pany, N.A. (Bank), has assets of $2 billion. Ap-plicant and Bank are not located in the same mar-
ket, and the proposal would have no significanteflFect on competition.
The banking factors and considerations relatingto the convenience and needs of the community areconsistent with approval.
Farmers State Bank of West Concord, WestConcord, Minnesota, to acquire the deposits ofFarmers National Bank in West Concord, WestConcord, Minnesota
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
No report received. Request for report on the com-petitive factors was dispensed with, as authorizedby the Bank Merger Act, to permit the FederalReserve System to act immediately to safeguarddepositors of Farmers National Bank in WestConcord.
BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE
(3/5/87)Farmers State Bank of West Concord (Applicant)has assets of $12.9 million, and Farmers NationalBank in West Concord (Bank) has deposits of $9.1million.
The OCC has recommended immediate actionby the Federal Reserve System to prevent the prob-able failure of Bank.
Demotte State Bank, Demotte, Indiana, to ac-quire certain assets and liabilities of MoroccoState Bank, Morocco, Indiana
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERALNo report received. Request for report on the com-petitive factors was dispensed with, as authorizedby the Bank Merger Act, to permit the FederalReserve System to act immediately to safeguarddepositors of Morocco State Bank.
BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE(3/20/87)Demotte State Bank (Applicant) has assets of$59.8 million, and Morocco State Bank has de-posits of $16.2 million.
The State Banking Commissioner has recom-mended immediate action by the Federal ReserveSystem to prevent the probable failure of Bank.
Commerce Union Bank, Nashville, Tennessee,to merge with United Citizens Bank of ChathamCounty, Ashland City, Tennessee
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
(2/13/87)The proposed transaction would not be signifi-cantly adverse to competition.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
1987
248 Tables
16. Mergers, Consolidations, and Acquisitions of Assets or Assumptions of LiabilitiesApproved by the Board of Governors, 1987—Continued
BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE
(3/25/87)Commerce Union Bank (Applicant) has assets of$2.3 million, and United Citizens Bank ofChatham County (Bank) has assets of $17.4 mil-lion. Applicant and Bank operate in the samebanking market. On a pro forma basis, Applicant'smarket share is within Department of Justice andBoard guidelines.
The banking factors and considerations relatingto the convenience and needs of the community areconsistent with approval.
Farmers Bank and Savings Company, Pom-eroy, Ohio, to acquire the assets and liabilities ofthe Tuppers Plains Branch of Bank One,Athens, N. A., Athens, Ohio
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
(2/13/87)The proposed transaction would not be signifi-cantly adverse to competition.
BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE
(3/26/87)Farmers Bank and Savings Company (Applicant)has assets of $48.2 million, and the Tuppers PlainsBranch (Branch) has assets of $4.2 million. Appli-cant and Branch are both located in the MeigsCounty banking market. On a pro forma basis,Applicant's market share is within Justice Depart-ment and Board guidelines.
The banking factors and considerations relatingto the convenience and needs of the community areconsistent with approval.
Bank of Lenawee, Adrian, Michigan, to acquireHudson State Savings Bank, Hudson, Michigan
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
(2/12/87)The proposed transaction would not have a signifi-cantly adverse effect on competition.
BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE
(3/31/87)Bank of Lenawee (Applicant) has assets of $96.2million, and Hudson State Savings Bank (Bank)has assets of $38.9 million. Applicant and Bankcompete in the Lenawee County, Michigan, bank-ing market. On a pro forma basis, Applicant'smarket share is within Department of Justice andBoard guidelines.
The banking factors and considerations relatingto the convenience and needs of the community areconsistent with approval.
Prudential Bank, Denver, Colorado, to mergewith Commonwealth State Bank, Glendale,Colorado
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
No report received. Request for report on the com-petitive factors was dispensed with, as authorizedby the Bank Merger Act, to permit the FederalReserve System to act immediately to safeguarddepositors of Commonwealth State Bank.
BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE(4/9/87)Prudential Bank (Applicant) has assets of $15.1million, and Commonwealth State Bank (Bank)has assets of $7.8 million.
The State Banking Commissioner has recom-mended immediate action by the Federal ReserveSystem to ensure continuation of Bank's services.
First American Bank, Rosemead, California, tomerge with First Arroyo Bank, South Pasadena,California
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
(1/14/87)The proposed transaction would not be signifi-cantly adverse to competition.
BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE
(4/16/87)First American Bank (Applicant) has assets of $74million, and First Arroyo Bank (Bank) has assetsof $45 million. Applicant and Bank operate in theLos Angeles metropolitan banking market. On apro forma basis, Applicant's market share iswithin Department of Justice and Board guide-lines.
The banking factors and considerations relatingto the convenience and needs of the community areconsistent with approval.
Chemical Bank Clare, Clare, Iowa, to acquirecertain assets and liabilities o/The Mount Pleas-ant branch of Michigan National Bank-Valley,Midland, Michigan
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
(3/11/87)The proposed transaction would not have a signifi-cantly adverse effect on competition.
BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE
(4/17/87)Chemical Bank (Applicant) has assets of $122million, and The Mount Pleasant branch of Michi-gan National Bank (Branch) has deposits of $4million. Applicant and Bank operate in the samebanking market. On a pro forma basis, Applicant's
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
1987
Tables 249
16.—Continued
market share is within Department of Justice andBoard guidelines.
The banking factors and considerations relatingto the convenience and needs of the community areconsistent with approval.
Pacific Western Bank, San Jose, California, tomerge with County Bank & Trust, Santa Cruz,California
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
(4/2/87)The proposed transaction would not be signifi-cantly adverse to competition.
BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE
(4/17/87)Pacific Western Bank (Applicant) has assets of$470.6 million, and County Bank & Trust (Bank)has assets of $476.6 million. Applicant and Bankoperate in the same banking market. On a proforma basis, Applicant's market share is withinDepartment of Justice and Board guidelines.
The banking factors and considerations relatingto the convenience and needs of the community areconsistent with approval.
Professional Bank, Englewood, Colorado, tomerge with American Bank of Commerce,Denver, Colorado
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERALNo report received. Request for report on the com-petitive factors was dispensed with, as authorizedby the Bank Merger Act, to permit the FederalReserve System to act immediately to safeguarddepositors of American Bank of Commerce.
BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE
(5/6/87)Professional Bank (Applicant) has assets of $5.0million, and American Bank of Commerce (Bank)has assets of $22.5 million. The State BankingCommissioner has recommended immediate ac-tion by the Federal Reserve System to ensure con-tinuation of Bank's services.
The banking factors and considerations relatingto the convenience and needs of the community areconsistent with approval.
Farmers & Merchants B&TC, Aberdeen,South Dakota, to acquire deposits of First StateBank, Sisseton, South Dakota
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
No report received. Request for report on the com-petitive factors was dispensed with, as authorizedby the Bank Merger Act, to permit the Federal
Reserve System to act immediately to safeguarddepositors of First State Bank.
BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE
(5/15/87)Farmers & Merchants B&TC (Applicant) hasassets of $68.2 million and will acquire deposits of$19.5 million from First State Bank (Bank). TheState Banking Commissioner has recommendedimmediate action by the Federal Reserve System toensure continuation of Bank's services.
The banking factors and considerations relatingto the convenience and needs of the community areconsistent with approval.
Forest Hill State Bank, Forest Hill, Maryland,to acquire certain assets and liabilities of theDarlington branch of Equitable Bank, N.A.,Baltimore, Maryland
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
(5/13/87)The proposed transaction would not be signifi-cantly adverse to competition.
BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE
(5/26/87)Forest Hill State Bank (Applicant) has assets of$125 million and will acquire $7 million in assetsof the Darlington branch of Equitable Bank, N. A.(Branch). Applicant and Branch operate in theBaltimore market. On a pro forma basis, Appli-cant's market share is within Department of Justiceand Board guidelines.
The banking factors and considerations relatingto the convenience and needs of the community areconsistent with approval.
Provident Bank, Cincinnati, Ohio, to mergewith Hamilton County State Bank, Lockland,Ohio
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
No report received. Request for report on the com-petitive factors was dispensed with, as authorizedby the Bank Merger Act, to permit the FederalReserve System to act immediately to safeguarddepositors of Hamilton County State Bank.
BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE
(6/12/87)Provident Bank (Applicant) has assets of $1.4million, and Hamilton State Bank (Bank) hasassets of $8.7 million.
The State Banking Commissioner has recom-mended immediate action by the Federal ReserveSystem to ensure continuation of Bank's services.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
1987
250 Tables
16. Mergers, Consolidations, and Acquisitions of Assets or Assumptions of LiabilitiesApproved by the Board of Governors, 1987—Continued
Chase Bank of Ohio, Mentor, Ohio, to acquirecertain assets and liabilities of the Atrium IBranch of Bank One, Milford, N.A., Milford,Ohio
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL(5/14/87)The proposed transaction would not be signifi-cantly adverse to competition.
BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE(6/18/87)Chase Bank of Ohio (Applicant) has assets of$456.4 million, and the Atrium Branch of BankOne (Branch) has assets of $247,000 and depositsof $8.4 million. Applicant and Bank operate in theCincinnati banking market. On a pro forma basis,Applicant's market share is within Department ofJustice and Board guidelines.
The banking factors and considerations relatingto the convenience and needs of the community areconsistent with approval.
Prudential Bank, Denver, Colorado, to acquirethe assets and liabilities of Citizens Bank ofGlendale, Denver, Colorado
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERALNo report received. Request for report on the com-petitive factors was dispensed with, as authorizedby the Bank Merger Act, to permit the FederalReserve System to act immediately to safeguarddepositors of Citizens Bank of Glendale.
BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE(8/27/87)Prudential Bank (Applicant) has assets of $20.3million, and Citizens Bank of Glendale (Bank) hasassets of $3.6 million. The State Banking Com-missioner has recommended immediate action bythe Federal Reserve System to ensure continuationof Bank's services.
The banking factors and considerations relatingto the convenience and needs of the community areconsistent with approval.
Norstar Bank of Upstate New York, Albany,New York, to acquire certain assets and liabilitiesof six branches of United National Bank, Calli-coon, New York
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL(8/14/87)The proposed transaction would not have a signifi-cantly adverse effect on competition.
BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE(9/22/87)Norstar Bank of Upstate New York (Applicant)
has assets of $3.1 billion, and the six branches ofUnited National Bank (Branches) have assets of$95.3 million.
The banking factors and considerations relatingto the convenience and needs of the community areconsistent with approval.
Farmers and Merchants Bank, Huron, SouthDakota, to acquire Security State Bank,Doland, South Dakota
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERALNo report received. Request for report on the com-petitive factors was dispensed with, as authorizedby the Bank Merger Act, to permit the FederalReserve System to act immediately to safeguarddepositors of Security State Bank.
BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE(9/23/87)Farmers and Merchants Bank (Applicant) hasassets of $104.5 million, and Security State Bank(Bank) has deposits of $19.5 million. The StateBanking Commissioner has recommended imme-diate action by the Federal Reserve System toensure continuation of Bank's services.
The banking factors and considerations relatingto the convenience and needs of the community areconsistent with approval.
Century Bank Orchard Road, ArapahoeCounty, Colorado, to merge with Century BankSoutheast, N.A., Greenwood Village, Colorado
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERALNo report received. Request for report on the com-petitive factors was dispensed with, as authorizedby the Bank Merger Act, to permit the FederalReserve System to act immediately to safeguarddepositors of Century Bank Southeast, N.A.
BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE(9/24/87)Century Bank Orchard Road (Applicant) has assetsof $11.3 million, and Century Bank Southeast,N.A. (Bank), has assets of $19.7 million. TheState Banking Commissioner has recommendedimmediate action by the Federal Reserve System toensure continuation of Bank's services.
The banking factors and considerations relatingto the convenience and needs of the community areconsistent with approval.
Independent Bank-South Michigan, Leslie,Michigan, to acquire four branches of MichiganNational Bank, Lansing, Michigan
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL(8/12/87)
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
1987
Tables 251
16.—Continued
The proposed transaction would not be signifi-cantly adverse to competition.
BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE
(10/1/87)Independent Bank-South Michigan (Applicant)has assets of $49.4 million, and the four branchesof Michigan National Bank (Branches) have de-posits of $28 million. Applicant and Branchesoperate in the same banking market. On a proforma basis, Applicant's market share is withinDepartment of Justice and Board guidelines.
The banking factors and considerations relatingto the convenience and needs of the community areconsistent with approval.
Star Valley State Bank, Afton, Wyoming, toacquire the deposits of American National Bankof Afton, Afton, Wyoming
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
No report received. Request for report on the com-petitive factors was dispensed with, as authorizedby the Bank Merger Act, to permit the FederalReserve System to act immediately to safeguarddepositors of American National Bank of Afton.
BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE(10/15/87)Star Valley State Bank (Applicant) has assets of$54.6 million and American National Bank ofAfton (Bank) has deposits of $10.6 million. TheOCC has recommended immediate action by theFederal Reserve System to ensure continuation ofBank's services.
The banking factors and considerations relatingto the convenience and needs of the community areconsistent with approval.
First Bank of Mules hoe, Muleshoe, Texas, tomerge with First State Bank of Bovina, Bovina,Texas
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
No report received. Request for report on the com-petitive factors was dispensed with, as authorizedby the Bank Merger Act, to permit the FederalReserve System to act immediately to safeguarddepositors of First State Bank of Bovina.
BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE
(10/22/87)First Bank of Muleshoe (Applicant) has assets of$33.2 million, and First State Bank of Bovina(Bank) has assets of $16.3 million. The StateBanking Commissioner has recommended imme-diate action by the Federal Reserve System toensure continuation of Bank's services.
The banking factors and considerations relating
to the convenience and needs of the community areconsistent with approval.
The Commercial Bank, Bel Air, Maryland, toacquire three branches of Maryland NationalBank, Baltimore, MarylandSUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
(9/25/87)The proposed transaction would not have a signifi-cantly adverse effect on competition.
BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE
(10/23/87)The Commercial Bank (Applicant) has assets of$150 million, and the three branches of MarylandNational Bank (Branches) have deposits of $16million. Applicant and Branches operate in sepa-rate banking markets.
The banking factors and considerations relatingto the convenience and needs of the community areconsistent with approval.
Bank One Mansfield, Mansfield, Ohio, to ac-quire the Gallion branch of Chase Bank ofOhio, Mentor, Ohio
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
(10/16/87)The proposed transaction would not have a signifi-cantly adverse effect on competition.
BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE(11/4/87)Bank One Mansfield (Applicant) has assets of$318.5 million, and the Gallion branch of ChaseBank of Ohio (Branch) has assets of $17.5 million.Applicant and Branch do not operate in the samebanking market.
The banking factors and considerations relatingto the convenience and needs of the community areconsistent with approval.
Johnstown Bank & Trust Co., Johnstown,Pennsylvania, to merge with The First NationalBank of Avonmore, Avonmore, Pennsylvania
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
(10/16/87)The proposed transaction would not have a signifi-cantly adverse effect on competition.
BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE
(11/6/87)Johnstown Bank & Trust Co. (Applicant) hasassets of $417 million, and The First NationalBank of Avonmore (Bank) has assets of $12.1million. Applicant does not currently operate inBank's market.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
1987
252 Tables
16. Mergers, Consolidations, and Acquisitions of Assets or Assumptions of LiabilitiesApproved by the Board of Governors, 1987—Continued
The banking factors and considerations relatingto the convenience and needs of the community areconsistent with approval.
The Merrill Trust Company, Bangor, Maine, tomerge with Norstar Bank of Maine, Portland,Maine
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
(10/23/87)The proposed transaction would not have a signifi-cantly adverse effect on competition.
BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE
(11/9/87)The Merrill Trust Company (Applicant) has assetsof $853 million and Norstar Bank of Maine (Bank)has assets of $800 million. Applicant and Bankcompete in the Bangor banking market. On a proforma basis, Applicant's market share is within theDepartment of Justice and Board guidelines.
The banking factors and considerations relatingto the convenience and needs of the community areconsistent with approval.
Valley Bank of Nevada, Las Vegas, Nevada, tomerge with Security Bank of Nevada, Reno,Nevada
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL(10/14/87)The proposed transaction would not be signifi-cantly adverse to competition.
BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE
(11/30/87)Valley Bank of Nevada (Applicant) has assets of$1.5 billion and Security Bank of Nevada (Bank)has assets of $483 million. Applicant and Bankcompete in four common banking markets. On apro forma basis, Applicant's market share iswithin Department of Justice and Board guide-lines.
The banking factors and considerations relatingto the convenience and needs of the community areconsistent with approval.
Texas Capital Bank-Ft. Bend, Richmond,Texas, to merge with Bancfirst-Austin, N.A.,Austin, Texas
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
No report received. Request for report on the com-petitive factors was dispensed with, as authorizedby the Bank Merger Act, to permit the FederalReserve System to act immediately to safeguarddepositors of Bancfirst-Austin, N. A.
BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE(12/10/87)Texas Capital Bank-Ft. Bend (Applicant) hasassets of $36.2 million, and Bancfirst-Austin,N.A. (Bank), has assets of $24.6 million. Appli-cant and Bank do not operate in the same bankingmarket. The State Banking Commissioner has rec-ommended immediate action by the Federal Re-serve System to ensure continuation of Bank'sservices.
The banking factors and considerations relatingto the convenience and needs of the community areconsistent with approval.
Mergers Approved Involving Wholly OwnedSubsidiaries of the Same Bank HoldingCompany
In each of the following cases, the summary reportby the attorney general indicates that the transac-tion would not have a significantly adverse effecton competition because the proposed merger isessentially a corporate reorganization. The Boardof Governors, the Federal Reserve Bank, or theSecretary of the Board of Governors, whicheverapproved the application, determined that the com-petitive effects of the proposed transaction, thefinancial and managerial resources and prospectsof the banks concerned, as well as the convenienceand needs of the community to be served, wereconsistent with approval.
Institution1
M&I Marshall & Ilsley Bank, Milwaukee, WisconsinMergerM&I Bay View State Bank, Milwaukee, WisconsinM&I Silver Spring Bank, Milwaukee, WisconsinCommerce Union Bank of Rutherford County, WisconsinM&I of Greenfield, Greenfield, Wisconsin
Assets(millions of
dollars)
Date ofapproval
2,226 1/30/87
66675648
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
1987
Tables 253
16.—Continued
Institution1
Texas Capital Bank-Richmond, Richmond, TexasMergerTexas Capital Bank-Katy, N.A., Katy, Texas
Community Bank-Northwest, Houston, TexasMergerCommunity Bank 1-10 West, N.A., Katy, Texas
Security Bank Northeast, Richmond, MichiganMergerSecurity Bank of Almont, Almont, Michigan
Carney Bank, Boynton Beach, FloridaMergerCarney Bank of Broward County, Sunrise, Florida
First of America Bank-Central, Lansing, MichiganMergerFirst of America Bank-Charlotte, Charlotte, MichiganFirst of America Bank, Grand Ledge, Michigan
Norstar Bank of Long Island, Hempstead, New YorkMergerNorstar Bank of Commerce, New York, New York
Norstar Bank of Upstate New York, Albany, New York . . . .MergerNorstar Bank of Hudson Valley, N.A., Newburgh, New YorkCentral Bank, Monroe, Louisiana .MergerLincoln Bank and Trust Company, Ruston, Louisiana
Provident Bank, Cincinnati, OhioMergerMidwest Bank and Trust Company, Cleveland, Ohio
State Bank of Freeport, Freeport, IllinoisMergerRock City Bank, Rock City, Illinois
Old Kent Bank & Trust Co., Grand Rapids, MichiganMergerOld Kent Bank of Kentwood, Kent wood, Michigan
Central Bank of the South, Birmingham, AlabamaMergerCentral Bank, Cahaba Heights, Alabama
Peoples Bank of Bloomington, Bloomington, IllinoisMergerThe First National Bank of Normal, Normal, Illinois
Assets(millions of
dollars)
Date ofapproval
39
24
7
15
128
30
15
10
444
2317
1,176
449
2,724
632439
90
1,084
176
152
15
3,000
23
3,479
2
205
99
3/11/87
4/15/87
4/30/87
5/7/87
7/15/87
8/4/87
8/5/87
9/29/87
9/23/87
9/30/87
10/9/87
10/23/87
10/27/87
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
1987
254 Tables
16. Mergers, Consolidations, and Acquisitions of Assets or Assumptions of LiabilitiesApproved by the Board of Governors, 1987—Continued
Institution1Assets
(millions ofdollars)
Date ofapproval
Old Kent Bank & Trust Company, Grand Rapids, MichiganMergerOld Kent Bank of Greenville, Greenville, MichiganOld Kent Bank of Fremont, Fremont, Michigan
Old Kent Bank and Trust Co., Grand Rapids, Michigan . . .MergerOld Kent Bank of Fremont, Fremont, Michigan
First Community Bank-Adrian, Buckhannon, West VirginiaMergerFirst Community Bank-Princeton, Princeton, West VirginiaGlendale Bank of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PennsylvaniaMergerWilliam Penn Bank, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Comerica Bank, Detroit, MichiganMergerComerica Bank, Novi, MichiganComerica Bank, Sterling Heights, MichiganComerica Bank, Livonia, MichiganComerica Bank, Southfield, MichiganComerica Bank, Troy, MichiganComerica Bank, Warren, Michigan
Chemical Bank Bay Area, Bay City, MichiganMergerChemical Bank Cass City, Cass City, Michigan
First Trust & Savings Bank of Kankakee, Kankakee, IllinoisMergerFirst Trust & Savings Bank of Bradley, Bradley, Illinois . . .
Valley Bank & Trust Company, Salt Lake City, UtahMergerS i l v e r K i n g S t a t e B a n k , Park C i t y , U t a h
First V i r g i n i a B a n k - C o m m o n w e a l t h , G r a f t o n , V i r g i n i a . . . .MergerFirst Virginia Bank-Surry, Surry, Virginia
First Nebraska Bank-Valley, Valley, NebraskaMergerFirst Nebraska Bank, Brainard, NebraskaFirst Nebraska Bank, Decatur, NebraskaFirst Nebrasks Bank, N.A. , Emerson, NebraskaFirst Nebraska Bank, N.A. , Stanton, NebraskaFirst Nebraska Bank, N.A. , Columbus, Nebraska
1. Each proposed transaction was to be effected underthe charter of the first-named bank. The entries are inchronological order of approval.
2,900
62
54
2,900
62
49
133
27
27
7,32462137153198192330
122
27
166
19
787
29
40
17
12166
161510
10/30/87
10/30/87
11/13/87
11/16/87
11/25/87
11/17/87
11/27/87
12/1/87
12/1/87
12/29/87
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
1987
Tables 255
16.—Continued
Mergers Approved Involving a NonoperatingInstitution with an Existing Bank
The following transactions have no significant ef-fect on competition; they merely facilitate the ac-quisition of the voting shares of a bank or banks bya holding company. In such cases the summaryreport by the attorney general indicates that thetransaction will merely combine an existing bankwith a nonoperating institution; in consequence,
and without regard to the acquisition of the surviv-ing bank by the holding company, the mergerwould have no effect on competition. The Board ofGovernors, the Federal Reserve Bank, or the Sec-retary of the Board of Governors, whichever ap-proved the application, determined that the pro-posal would, in itself, have no adverse competitiveeffects, and that the financial factors and consider-ations relating to the convenience and needs of thecommunity were consistent with approval.
Institution1Assets
(millions ofdollars)2
Date ofapproval
Orrville Interim Bank, Orrville, OhioMergerOrrville Savings Bank, Orrville, Ohio
Hardy County Bank, Inc., Wardensville, West VirginiaMergerCapon Valley Bank, Wardensville, West Virginia
Morgan County Bank, Falkville, AlabamaMergerMadison County Bank, New Hope, AlabamaCentral Bank of the South, Falkville branch, Birmingham, Alabama
First Virginia Bank-Clinch Valley, Richlands, VirginiaMergerClinch Valley Bank & Trust Company, Richlands, Virginia
The New Colonia Bank, Opelika, AlabamaMergerColonial Bank, Montgomery, Alabama
Alpine Bank & Trust Co., Glenwood Springs, ColoradoMergerAlpine Bank, Glenwood Springs, Colorado
Newport News Interim Bank, Newport News, VirginiaMergerAmerican Bank, Newport News, Virginia
Sandusky Interim Bank, Sandusky, OhioMergerCitizens Banking Company, Sandusky, Ohio
Iron and Glass Interim Bank, Pittsburgh, PennsylvaniaMergerIron and Glass Bank, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Liberty State Interim BankMergerLiberty State Bank, Mount Carmel, Pennsylvania
59
36
71
150
13
22
168
78
47
1/5/87
1/9/87
1/28/87
4/3/87
4/9/87
4/22/87
5/8/87
5/28/87
6/8/87
8/14/87
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
1987
256 Tables
16. Mergers, Consolidations, and Acquisitions of Assets or Assumptions of LiabilitiesApproved by the Board of Governors, 1987—Continued
Institution1Assets
(millions ofdollars)
Date ofapproval
Second BHN Acquisition Bank, Manchester, New Hampshire.MergerSuncook Bank, Suncook, New Hampshire
L.T. Interim Bank, East St. Louis, Missouri.MergerLindell Trust Company, St. Louis, Missouri.
Wiles Interim Bank, Niles, OhioMergerThe Security Dollar Bank Company, Niles, Ohio
First of America Bank-Manistee, Manistee, Michigan. . .MergerManistee Bank and Trust Company, Manistee, Michigan
Princeton Bank of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PennsylvaniaMergerPrinceton Bank of Pennsylvania, N.A., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania . .
CB Bank, South Haven, MichiganMergerCitizens Trust & Savings Bank, South Haven, Michigan .
Newco Bank, Ypsilanti, MichiganMergerYpsilanti Savings Bank, Ypsilanti, Michigan
New Bank of Mora, Mora, Minnesota .MergerKanabee State Bank, Mora, Minnesota
Traders Interim Bank, Spencer, West VirginiaMergerTraders Bank, Spencer, West Virginia
New Valley Bank, Grand Forks, North DakotaMergerValley Bank & Trust Company, Grand Forks, North Dakota
The Lunenburg County Bank, Kenbridge, VirginiaMergerCommunity Bank of Lunenburg, Kenbridge, Virginia . . .
Lapeer Interim Bank, Lapeer, MichiganMergerLapeer County Bank & Trust Company, Lapeer, Michigan
102
107
64
112
137
138
39
63
84
24
125
9/15/87
9/17/87
9/18/87
10/13/87
10/17/87
11/9/87
11/16/87
11/24/87
11/26/86
11/27/87
12/1/86
12/14/87
1. Each proposed transaction was to be effected under 2. Where no assets are listed, the bank is newly organ-the charter of the first-named bank. The entries are in ized and not in operation,chronological order of approval.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
1987
Tables 233
16. Mergers, Consolidations, and Acquisitions of Assets or Assumptions of LiabilitiesApproved by the Board of Governors, 1988
Columbia Bank, Avondale, Arizona, to acquireassets and liabilities of The North AmericanBank, Phoenix, Arizona
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
No report received. Request for report on thecompetitive factors was dispensed with, as autho-rized by the Bank Merger Act, to permit the FederalReserve System to act immediately to safeguard thedepositors of The North American Bank.
BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE
(1/8/88)Columbia Bank (Applicant) has assets of $9.4million and The North American Bank (Bank) hasassets of $30.5 million.
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation(FDIC) has recommended immediate action by theFederal Reserve System to prevent the probablefailure of Bank.
Farmers & Merchants Bank and Trust Com-pany, Aberdeen, South Dakota, to merge withBank of Cresbard, Cresbard, South Dakota
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
No report received. Request for report on thecompetitive factors was dispensed with, as autho-rized by the Bank Merger Act, to permit the FederalReserve System to act immediately to safeguarddepositors of Bank of Cresbard.
BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE(2/3/88)Farmers & Merchants Bank and Trust Company(Applicant) has assets of $94.2 million and Bank ofCresbard (Bank) has assets of $8.9 million.
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency(OCC) has recommended immediate action by theFederal Reserve System to prevent the probablefailure of Bank.
Farmers State Bank of Western Illinois, NewWindsor, Illinois, to merge the assets and liabilities0/Bank of Viola, Viola, Illinois
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
(12/18/87)The proposed transaction would not be significantlyadverse to competition.
BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE
(2/18/88)Farmers State Bank of Western Illinois (Applicant)has assets of $28.4 million and Bank of Viola(Bank) has assets of $10.9 million. Applicant andBank are located in the same banking market. On a
pro forma basis, Applicant's market share will bewithin Department of Justice and Board guidelines.
The banking factors and considerations relatingto the convenience and needs of the community areconsistent with approval.
Citizens Bank and Trust Company, Baytown,Texas, to merge the assets and liabilities of FirstAmerican Bank & Trust of Baytown, Baytown,Texas
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
No report received. Request for report on thecompetitive factors was dispensed with, as autho-rized by the Bank Merger Act, to permit the FederalReserve System to act immediately to safeguard thedepositors of First American Bank & Trust ofBaytown.
BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE
(3/11/88)Citizens Bank and Trust Company (Applicant) hasassets of $ 149.2 million and First American Bank &Trust of Baytown (Bank) has assets of $35.7million.
The FDIC has recommended immediate actionby the Federal Reserve System to prevent theprobable failure of Bank.
Central Bank, Hollidaysburg, Pennsylvania, tomerge the assets and liabilities of the Broad TopCity office of Mellon Bank (Central), N. A., StateCollege, Pennsylvania
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
(3/4/88)The proposed transaction would not be significantlyadverse to competition.
BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE
(3/28/88)Central Bank (Applicant) has assets of $159.8million and the branch of Mellon Bank (Branch) hasassets of $4.1 million. Applicant and Branchoperate in the same banking market. On a pro formabasis, Applicant's market share is within Depart-ment of Justice and Board guidelines.
The banking factors and considerations relatingto the convenience and needs of the community areconsistent with approval.
State Bank and Trust of Colorado Springs,Colorado Springs, Colorado, to merge the assetsand liabilities of Citizens National Bank, Colo-rado Springs, Colorado
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
1988
234 Tables
16. Mergers, Consolidations, and Acquisitions of Assets or Assumptions of LiabilitiesApproved by the Board of Governors, 1988 — Continued
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
No report received. Request for report on thecompetitive factors was dispensed with, as autho-rized by the Bank Merger Act, to permit the FederalReserve System to act immediately to safeguard thedepositors.
BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE
(4/21/88)State Bank and Trust (Applicant) has assets of$12.7 million and Citizens National Bank (Bank)has assets of $17.6 million.
The FDIC has recommended immediate actionby the Federal Reserve System to prevent theprobable failure of Bank.
Interstate Bank North, Houston, Texas, toacquire the assets and liabilities o/First NationalBank of Kingwood, Kingwood, Texas
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
No report received. Request for report on thecompetitive factors was dispensed with, as autho-rized by the Bank Merger Act, to permit the FederalReserve System to act immediately to safeguard thedepositors.
BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE
(5/26/88)Interstate Bank North (Applicant) has assets of$37.7 million and First National Bank of Kingwood(Bank) has assets of $16.1 million. The OCC hasrecommended immediate action by the FederalReserve System to prevent the probable failure ofBank.
Citizens Bank and Trust Company, Baytown,Texas, to merge certain assets and liabilities ofLone Star Bank, Baytown, Texas
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
No report received. Request for report on thecompetitive factors was dispensed with, as autho-rized by the Bank Merger Act, to permit the FederalReserve System to act immediately to safeguard thedepositors.
BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE
(5/26/88)Citizens Bank and Trust Company (Applicant) hasassets of $19.0 million and Lone Star Bank (Bank)has assets of $12.1 million.
The FDIC has recommended immediate actionby the Federal Reserve System to prevent theprobable failure of Bank.
Citizens Bank, Smithville, Tennessee, to mergewith Bank of Ardmore, Ardmore, Tennessee
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
(2/26/88)The proposed transaction would not be significantlyadverse to competition.
BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE
(6/6/88)Citizens Bank (Applicant) has assets of $204 millionand Bank of Ardmore (Bank) has assets of $54million. Applicant and Bank operate in the samebanking market. On a pro forma basis, Applicant'smarket share will be within the Department ofJustice and Board guidelines.
The banking factors and considerations relatingto the convenience and needs of the community areconsistent with approval.
First Interstate Bank of California, Los Angeles,California, to merge with Bank of Contra Costa,Walnut Creek, California
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
(4/29/88)The proposed transaction would not be significantlyadverse to competition.
BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE
(6/16/88)First Interstate Bank of California (Applicant) hasassets of $19.6 billion and Bank of Contra Costa(Bank) has assets of $175.9 million. Applicant andBank are not located in the same banking market.
The banking factors and considerations relatingto the convenience and needs of the community areconsistent with approval.
Irving Trust Company, New York, New York, toacquire certain assets and liabilities of the Seoul,South Korea, branch of Continental IllinoisNational Bank and Trust Company of Chicago,Chicago, Illinois
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
(5/6/88)The proposed transaction would not be significantlyadverse to competition.
BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE
(6/27/88)Irving Trust Company (Applicant) has assets of$20.5 billion and the Seoul, South Korea, branch(Branch) has assets of $129 million. Applicant andBank are not located in the same banking market.
The banking factors and considerations relating
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
1988
Tables 235
16.-Continued
to the convenience and needs of the community areconsistent with approval.
Beaver Trust Company, Beaver, Pennsylvania,to acquire the assets and liabilities of branchoffices of First Seneca Bank, Butler, Pennsyl-vania and of Union National Bank, Pittsburgh,Pennsylvania
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
(8/5/88)The proposed transaction would not be significantlyadverse to competition.
BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE
(8/11/88)Beaver Trust Company (Applicant) has assets of$ 187 million and the branches of First Seneca Bankand of Union National Bank (Branches) haveacquired assets of $46.8 million. Applicant andBranches do not operate in the same bankingmarket.
The banking factors and considerations relatingto the convenience and needs of the community areconsistent with approval.
Norstar Bank, Hempstead, New York, to acquirecertain assets and liabilities of three branches ofChemical Bank, New York, New York
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL(7/22/88)The proposed transaction would not be significantlyadverse to competition.
BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE
(8/30/88)Norstar Bank (Applicant) has assets of $2.3 billionand the branches of Chemical Bank (Branches)have assets of $108 million. Applicant and Bankoperate in the same banking market. On a pro formabasis, Applicant's market share is within Depart-ment of Justice and Board guidelines.
The banking factors and considerations relatingto the convenience and needs of the community areconsistent with approval.
First Community Bank, Inc., Princeton, WestVirginia, to merge with First National Bank ofGrafton, Grafton, West Virginia
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
(8/12/88)The proposed transaction would not be significantlyadverse to competition.
BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE
(9/7/88)First Community Bank, Inc. (Applicant), has assetsof $250.6 millionand First National Bank of Grafton(Bank) has assets of $34.0 million. Applicant andBank do not operate in the same banking market.
The banking factors and considerations relatingto the convenience and needs of the community areconsistent with approval.
Merchants State Bank, Freeman, South Dakota,to acquire certain assets and liabilities of HurleyState Bank, Hurley, South Dakota
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
(7/15/88)The proposed transaction would not be significantlyadverse to competition.
BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE
(9/9/88)Merchants State Bank (Applicant) has assets of $22million and Hurley State Bank (Branch) has assetsof $ 10 million. Applicant and Branch do not operatein the same banking market.
The banking factors and considerations relatingto the convenience and needs of the community areconsistent with approval.
First Virginia Bank-South Central, Amherst,Virginia, to merge certain assets and liabilities oftwo branches of Colonial American NationalBank, Roanoke, Virginia
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
(9/9/88)The proposed transaction would not be significantlyadverse to competition.
BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE
(10/4/88)First Virginia Bank-South Central (Applicant) hasassets of $43.6 million and the branches of ColonialAmerican National Bank (Branches) have assets of$2.5 million. Applicant and Branches operate in thesame banking market. On a pro forma basis,Applicant's market share is within Department ofJustice and Board guidelines.
The banking factors and considerations relatingto the convenience and needs of the community areconsistent with approval.
Isabella Bank and Trust, Mount Pleasant,Michigan, to merge the assets and liabilities of theShepherd branch of Commercial National Bankof Alma, Alma, Michigan
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
1988
236 Tables
16. Mergers, Consolidations, and Acquisitions of Assets or Assumptions of LiabilitiesApproved by the Board of Governors, 1988-Continued
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
(10/21/88)The proposed transaction would not be significantlyadverse to competition.
BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE
(10/24/88)Isabella Bank and Trust (Applicant) has assets of$154.3 million and Commercial National Bank(Branch) has assets of $4.2 million. Applicant andBranch do not operate in the same banking market.
The banking factors and considerations relatingto the convenience and needs of the community areconsistent with approval.
Bank of Woodward, Woodward, Oklahoma, toassume the assets and liabilities of Bank of theNorthwest, Woodward, Oklahoma
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
No report received. Request for report on thecompetitive factors was dispensed with, as autho-rized by the Bank Merger Act, to permit the FederalReserve System to act immediately to safeguarddepositors of Bank of the Northwest.
BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE
(11/15/88)Bank of Woodward (Applicant) has assets of $103million and Bank of the Northwest (Bank) hasassets of $22 million.
The FDIC has recommended immediate actionby the Federal Reserve System to prevent theprobable failure of Bank.
First Interstate Bank of California, Los Angeles,California, to merge with Point West Bancorpand its banking subsidiary, Point West Bank,both of Sacramento, California
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
(10/12/88)The proposed transaction would not be significantlyadverse to competition.
BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE
(11/23/88)First Interstate Bank of California (Applicant) hasassets of $19.7 billion and Point West Bancorp(Bank) has banking assets of $168.3 million.Applicant and Bank are not in the same bankingmarket.
The banking factors and considerations relatingto the convenience and needs of the community areconsistent with approval.
First Community Bank, Inc., Princeton, WestVirginia, to merge with Valley Bank & TrustCompany, Bluefield, West Virginia
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
(11/4/88)The proposed transaction would not be significantlyadverse to competition.
BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE
(11/29/88)First Community Bank, Inc. (Applicant), has assetsof $283.4 million and Valley Bank & Trust Com-pany (Bank) has assets of $15.4 million. Applicantand Bank operate in the same banking market. On apro forma basis, Applicant's market share is withinDepartment of Justice and Board guidelines.
The banking factors and considerations relatingto the convenience and needs of the community areconsistent with approval.
State Bank of Caledonia, Caledonia, Michigan,to acquire certain assets and deposit liabilities ofthe Middleville Branch of PrimeBank, Middle-ville, Michigan
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
(11/4/88)The proposed transaction would not be significantlyadverse to competition.
BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE
(11/30/88)State Bank of Caledonia (Applicant) has assets of$56.9 million and the Middleville Branch (Branch)has deposit liabilities of $8.9 million. Applicant andBank do not operate in the same banking market.
The banking factors and considerations relatingto the convenience and needs of the community areconsistent with approval.
First Community Bank, Forest, Virginia, toassume deposit liabilities from three branches ofSignet Bank/Virginia, Richmond, VirginiaSUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
(10/28/88)The proposed transaction would not be significantlyadverse to competition.
BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE
(12/9/88)First Community Bank (Applicant) has assets of$27 million and the branches of Signet Bank/Vir-ginia (Branches) have assumed deposits of $48million. Applicant and Branches do not operate inthe same banking market.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
1988
16.-Continued
237
The banking factors and considerations relatingto the convenience and needs of the community areconsistent with approval.
The FDIC has recommended immediate actionby the Federal Reserve System to prevent theprobable failure of Bank.
Continental Bank and Trust Company, SaltLake City, Utah, to merge with Tracy-CollinsBank and Trust Company, Salt Lake City, Utah
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
No report received. Request for report on thecompetitive factors was dispensed with, as autho-rized by the Bank Merger Act, to permit the FederalReserve System to act immediately to safeguarddepositors of Tracy-Collins Bank and TrustCompany.
BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE
(12/23/88)Continental Bank and Trust Company (Applicant)has assets of $410.9 million and Tracy-CollinsBank and Trust Company (Bank) has assets of$213.3 million.
Mergers Approved Involving Wholly OwnedSubsidiaries of the Same Bank HoldingCompany
In each of the following cases, the Summary Reportby the Attorney General indicates that the transac-tion would not have a significantly adverse effect oncompetition because the proposed merger is essen-tially a corporate reorganization. The Board ofGovernors, the Federal Reserve Bank, or theSecretary of the Board of Governors, whicheverapproved the application, determined that thecompetitive effects of the proposed transaction, thefinancial and managerial resources and prospects ofthe banks concerned, as well as the convenienceand needs of the community to be served wereconsistent with approval.
InstitutionlAssets
(millionsof dollars)
Date ofapproval
First of America-Straits Area, Cheboygan, MichiganMergerFirst of American Bank, N. A., Sault Ste. Marie, Michigan
Trustcorp Bank, Toledo, OhioMergerTrustcorp Co. Dayton, Dayton, OhioTrustcorp Company, N. A., Columbus, Ohio
Marine Bank of Champaign, Champaign, IllinoisMergerMarine American National Bank of Champaign, Champaign, Illinois
Chemical Bank and Trust Company, Midland, MichiganMergerChemical Bank Bay Area, Bay City, Michigan
Trustcorp Bank, Lenawee, Adrian MichiganMergerJipson-Carter State Bank, Blissfield, Michigan
Old Kent Bank of Kalamazoo, Kalamazoo, MichiganMergerOld Kent Bank of Allegan, Allegan, MichiganOld Kent Bank of Battle Creek, Battle Creek, MichiganOld Kent Bank of South Haven, South Haven, MichiganOld Kent Bank of Three Rivers, Three Rivers, Michigan
85
52
2,898
40
100
89
452
9
147
31
521
42414132
1/20/88
1/26/88
3/18/88
3/18/88
4/15/88
4/22/88
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
1988
238 Tables
16. Mergers, Consolidations, and Acquisitions of Assets or Assumptions of LiabilitiesApproved by the Board of Governors, 1988 —Continued
Institutionl (millionsof dollars)
Date ofapproval
Sovran Bank/Central South, Nashville, TennesseeMergerSovran Bank/Williamson County, Franklin, Tennessee
Bank One, Mansfield, Mansfield, Ohio.MergerBank One, Ashland, Ashland, Ohio
United Jersey Bank, Hackensack, New JerseyMergerUnited Jersey Bank Edgewater N. A., Englewood, New Jersey.
United Jersey Bank, Hackensack, New JerseyMergerUnited Jersey Bank/Wood Ridge, N. A., Wood Ridge, New Jersey.
Landmark Bank, Fairview Heights, IllinoisMergerLandmark Bank Edgemont, East St. Louis, Illinois .Landmark Bank St. Clair County, OTallon, Illinois.Landmark Bank, Mascoutah, Illinois
First City Bank of Dallas, Dallas, TexasMergerFirst City Bank-East Dallas, Dallas, TexasFirst City Bank-Market Center, N. A., Dallas, TexasFirst City Bank Valley View, Dallas, TexasFirst City Bank-Farmers Branch, Farmers Branch, Texas.First City Bank of Garland, N. A., Garland, TexasFirst City National in Grand Prairie, Grand Prairie, Texas.First City Bank of Lancaster, Lancaster, TexasFirst City Bank of Richardson, Richardson, Texas
State Savings Bank of South Lyon, South Lyon, Michigan.MergerFirst of America Bank-Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, Michigan .
Scottsdom Bank, Scottsdom, Arizona.MergerThunderbird Bank, Phoenix, Arizona.
First City Bank of Dallas, Dallas, TexasMergerFirst City Bank of Lewisville, Lewisville, TexasFirst City Bank of Piano, N. A., Piano, Texas
First Interstate Bank of California, Los Angeles, California .MergerPoint West Bank, Sacramento, California
2,700
349
349
70
4,025
155
4,183
102
62
932925
1,600
10570
1351551348083
240
46
495
52
315
1,500
13162
19,700
168
7/1/88
7/13/88
8/1/88
9/7/88
9/29/88
9/29/88
10/20/88
11/16/88
11/22/88
11/23/88
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
1988
Tables 239
16.-Continued
Institutionl
Cole Taylor Bank/Drovers, Chicago, IllinoisMergerCole Taylor Bank/Main, Chicago, IllinoisCole Taylor Bank/Skokie, Skokie, IllinoisCole Taylor Bank/Ford City, Chicago, Illinois
First City Bank of Dallas, Dallas, TexasMergerFirst City Bank-Central Arlington, Arlington, TexasFirst City National Bank of Arlington, Arlington, TexasFirst City National Bank of Colley, Colleyville, TexasFirst City Bank-Forest Hill, Forest Hill, TexasFirst City National Bank of Fort Worth, Fort Worth, Texas
First Bank of Johnson City, Johnson City, IllinoisMergerFirst Bank of Carbondale, Carbondale, Illinois
Assets(millions
of dollars)
Date ofapproval
340 11/29/88
287182291
1,500 11/29/88
87245
554675
3,000 12/13/88
135
29 12/22/88
26
1. Each proposed transaction was to be effected underthe charter of the first-named bank. The entries are in
chronological order of approval.
Mergers Approved Involving a NonoperatingInstitution with an Existing Bank
The following transactions have no significant effecton competition; they merely facilitate the acquisi-tion of the voting shares of a bank or banks by aholding company. In such cases the summary reportby the attorney general indicates that the transactionwill merely combine an existing bank with anonoperating institution; in consequence, andwithout regard to the acquisition of the surviving
bank by the holding company, the merger wouldhave no effect on competition. The Board ofGovernors, the Federal Reserve Bank, or theSecretary of the Board of Governors, whicheverapproved the application, determined that theproposal would, in itself, have no adversecompetitive effects, and that the financial factorsand considerations relating to the convenience andneeds of the community were consistent withapproval.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
1988
240 Tables
16. Mergers, Consolidations, and Acquisitions of Assets or Assumptions of LiabilitiesApproved by the Board of Governors, 1988—Continued
InstitutionlAssets
(millionsof dollars)2
Date ofapproval
The ACB Bank, Apple Creek, OhioMergerApple Creek Banking Company, Apple Creek, Ohio.
Orrstown Interim Bank, Orrstown, Pennsylvania .MergerOrrstown Bank, Orrstown, Pennsylvania
Commonwealth Bank, Arlington, TexasMergerCommonwealth Bank-Lamar, N.A. , Arlington, Texas .
Norstar Bank of Callicoon, Callicoon, New York .MergerNorstar Bank of Upstate NY, Albany, New York..
F&M Bank-Martinsburg, Martinsburg, West VirginiaMergerMerchants and Farmers Bank
*St. Elmo Bank, St. Elmo, IllinoisMergerFayette County Bank, St. Elmo, Illinois .
New Bank, Madisonville, TennesseeMergerBank of Madisonville, Madisonville, Tennessee
Richwood Interim Bank, Richwood, OhioMergerRichwood Banking Company, Richwood, Ohio .
Ripley Bank Merger Subsidiary, Inc., Ripley, West Virginia .MergerBank of Ripley, Ripley, West Virginia ,
Ranson Interim Bank, Ranson, West VirginiaMergerBlakeley Bank and Trust Company, Ranson, West Virginia.
Central Florida Bancshares, Inc., Maitland, FloridaMergerFirst American Bank of Orange County, Maitland, Florida .
21
74
113
94
53
16
86
46
38
64
41
1/27/88
2/5/88
4/1/88
4/26/88
5/23/88
6/20/88
7/29/88
8/18/88
8/29/88
9/26/88
11/4/88
1. Each proposed transaction was to be effected under 2. Where no assets are listed, the bank is newlythe charter of the first-named bank. The entries are in organized and not in operation,chronological order of approval.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
1988
Tables 235
16. Mergers, Consolidations, and Acquisitions of Assets or Assumptions of LiabilitiesApproved by the Board of Governors, 1989
First Western Bank Custer, Custer, SouthDakota, to acquire the Hill City South Dakotabranch of Rushmore State Bank, Rapid City,South Dakota
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
(12/16/88)The proposed transaction would not be significantlyadverse to competition.
BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE
(1/20/89)First Western Bank Custer (Applicant) has assets of$32 million and the Hill City Branch (Branch) hasassets of $5.6 million. Applicant and Branchoperate in the same banking market.
The banking factors and considerations relatingto the convenience and needs of the community areconsistent with approval.
Central Bank, Hollidaysburg, Pennsylvania, toacquire the Pleasant Valley and Logan Valleybranches of United States National Bank, Johns-town, Pennsylvania
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
(1/13/89)The proposed transaction would not be significantlyadverse to competition.
BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE
(2/17/89)Central Bank (Applicant) has assets of $167 millionand the two branches (Branches) have assets of$15.7 million. Applicant and Bank operate in thesame banking market.
The banking factors and considerations relatingto the convenience and needs of the community areconsistent with approval.
Crestar Bank, Richmond, Virginia, to mergewith Colonial American National Bank, RoanokeCounty, VirginiaSUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
(1/13/89)The proposed transaction would not be significantlyadverse to competition.
BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE
(3/14/89)Crestar Bank (Applicant) has assets of $9.4 billionand Colonial American National Bank (Bank) hasassets of $367 million. Applicant and Bank operatein the same banking market.
The banking factors and considerations relating
to the convenience and needs of the community areconsistent with approval.
The Bank of Mid Jersey, Bordentown, NewJersey, to acquire the University Plaza branchoffice of Howard Savings Bank, Livingston, NewJersey
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
(3/17/89)The proposed transaction would not be significantlyadverse to competition.
BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE
(3/17/89)The Bank of Mid Jersey (Applicant) has assets of$527.8 million and the University Plaza Branch(Branch) has assets of $5.7 million. Applicant andBranch operate in the same banking market.
The banking factors and considerations relatingto the convenience and needs of the community areconsistent with approval.
Kent City State Bank, Kent City, Michigan, toacquire the Sparta, Michigan branch office ofPrimeBank Federal Savings Bank, Grand Rap-ids, Michigan
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
(3/3/89)The proposed transaction would not be significantlyadverse to competition.
BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE
(3/31/89)Kent City State Bank (Applicant) has assets of$53.6 million and the Sparta Branch (Branch) hasassets of $7.5 million. Applicant and Bank operatein the same banking market.
The banking factors and considerations relatingto the convenience and needs of the community areconsistent with approval.
Central Bank of Oklahoma City, OklahomaCity, Oklahoma, to acquire certain assets andassume liabilities o/Allied Oklahoma Bank, N. A.,Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
No report received. Request for report on thecompetitive factors was dispensed with, as autho-rized by the Bank Merger Act, to permit the FederalReserve System to act immediately to safeguard thedepositors of Allied Oklahoma Bank.
BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE
(4/13/89)
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
1989
236 76th Annual Report, 1989
16. Mergers, Consolidations, and Acquisitions of Assets or Assumptions of LiabilitiesApproved by the Board of Governors, 1989-Continued
Central Bank of Oklahoma City (Applicant) hasassets of $229.3 million and Allied Oklahoma Bank(Bank) has assets of $ 59.1 million. The OCC hasrecommended immediate action by the FederalReserve System to prevent the probable failure ofBank.
Family Bank of Hallandale, Hallandale, Florida,to merge with Seminole National Bank, Holly-wood, Florida
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
No report received. Request for report on thecompetitive factors was dispensed with, as autho-rized by the Bank Merger Act, to permit the FederalReserve System to act immediately to safeguard thedepositors of the Bank.
BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE
(4/26/89)Family Bank (Applicant) has assets of $93.3 millionand Seminole National Bank (Bank) has assets of$7.3 million. The OCC has recommended immedi-ate action by the Federal Reserve System to preventthe probable failure of Bank.
Bank of Fountain Hills, Fountain Hills, Arizona,to assume deposit liabilities of Grand CanyonState Bank, Scottsdale, Arizona
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
No report received. Request for report on thecompetitive factors was dispensed with, as autho-rized by the Bank Merger Act, to permit the FederalReserve System to act immediately to safeguard thedepositors of the Bank.
BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE
(5/22/89)Bank of Fountain Hills (Applicant) has assets of$6.9 million and Grand Canyon State Bank (Bank)has deposits of $12.3 million. The State hasrecommended immediate action to prevent theprobable failure of the Bank.
Banco De Ponce, Ponce, Puerto Rico, to acquirethe Prospect Avenue Branch of Banco CentralS.A., New York, New York
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
(4/14/89)The proposed transaction would not be significantlyadverse to competition.
BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE
(6/1/89)Banco De Ponce (Applicant) has assets of $2.9
billion and the Prospect Avenue Branch (Branch)has assets of $3.4 million. Applicant and Bankoperate in the same banking market.
The banking factors and considerations relatingto the convenience and needs of the community areconsistent with approval.
Union Colony Bank, Greeley, Colorado, to mergewith Northern Bank and Trust, Ft. Collins,Colorado
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
No report received. Request for report on thecompetitive factors was dispensed with, as autho-rized by the Bank Merger Act, to permit the FederalReserve System to act immediately to safeguard thedepositors of Northern Bank and Trust.
BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE
(6/15/89)Union Colony Bank (Applicant) has assets of$ 115.6 million and Northern Bank and Trust (Bank)has assets of $6.2 million. The FDIC has recom-mended immediate action by the Federal ReserveSystem to prevent the probable failure of Bank.
Liberty Bank South, San Francisco, California,to acquire certain assets and liabilities of theBoulder Creek Branch of Pacific Western Bank,San Jose, California
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
(3/3/89)The proposed transaction would not be significantlyadverse to competition.
BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE
(6/16/89)Liberty Bank (Applicant) has assets of $47 millionand the Boulder Creek Branch (Branch) has assetsof $14 million. Applicant and Bank do not operatein the same banking market.
The banking factors and considerations relatingto the convenience and needs of the community areconsistent with approval.
Texas Commerce Bank Rio Grande Valley,Brownsville, Texas, to merge with National Bankof Brownsville, Brownsville, Texas
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
No report received. Request for report on thecompetitive factors was dispensed with, as autho-rized by the Bank Merger Act, to permit the FederalReserve System to act immediately to safeguard thedepositors of the National Bank of Brownsville.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
1989
Tables 237
16. -Continued
BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE
(7/13/89)Texas Commerce Bank (Applicant) has assets of$442.2 million and National Bank of Brownsville(Bank) has assets of $32.7 million. The FederalReserve System has acted immediately to preventthe probable failure of Bank.
Bank of Fountain Hills, Fountain Hills, Arizona,to merge with Fidelity Bank, Scottsdale, Arizona
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
No report received. Request for report on thecompetitive factors was dispensed with, as autho-rized by the Bank Merger Act, to permit the FederalReserve System to act immediately to safeguard thedepositors of the Fidelity Bank.
BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE
(7/21/89)Bank of Fountain Hills (Applicant) has assets of$11.8 million and Fidelity Bank (Bank) has assetsof $11.5 million. The Federal Reserve System hasacted immediately to prevent the probable failure ofBank.
BancFirst, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, to assumethe liabilities o/The Liberty State Bank, Tahle-quah, Oklahoma
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
(7/14/89)The proposed transaction would not be significantlyadverse to competition.
BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE
(7/27/89)BancFirst (Applicant) has assets of $657 millionand The Liberty State Bank (Bank) has assets of $41million. Applicant and Bank do not operate in thesame banking market.
The banking factors and considerations relatingto the convenience and needs of the community areconsistent with approval.
First Community Bank, Princeton, West Vir-ginia, to merge with Cherry River National Bank,Richwood, West Virginia
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
(7/5/89)The proposed transaction would not be significantlyadverse to competition.
BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE
(7/28/89)First Community Bank (Applicant) has assets of
$360.2 million and Cherry River National Bank(Bank) has assets of $36.8 million. Applicant andBank operate in the same banking market.
The banking factors and considerations relatingto the convenience and needs of the community areconsistent with approval.
First Interstate Bank of California, Los Angeles,California, to merge with Bank of Alex Brown,Sacramento, California
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
(5/10/89)The proposed transaction would not be significantlyadverse to competition.
BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE
(8/1/89)First Interstate Bank of California (Applicant) hasassets of $19.6 billion and Bank of Alex Brown(Bank) has assets of $324 million. Applicant andBank operate in the same banking market.
The banking factors and considerations relatingto the convenience and needs of the community areconsistent with approval.
Comerica Bank-Detroit, Detroit, Michigan, tomerge with Dearborn Bank and Trust Company,Dearborn, MichiganSUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
(8/11/89)The proposed transaction would not be significantlyadverse to competition.
BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE
(9/21/89)Comerica Bank Detroit (Applicant) has assets of$9.1 billion and Dearborn Bank and Trust Com-pany (Bank) has assets of $287.2 million. Applicantand Bank do not operate in the same bankingmarket.
The banking factors and considerations relatingto the convenience and needs of the community areconsistent with approval. Manufacturers HanoverTrust Company, New York, New York, to purchasecertain branches of Goldome, Buffalo, New York
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
(4/14/89)The proposed transaction would not be significantlyadverse to competition.
BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE
(9/26/89)Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company (Appli-cant) has assets of $57 billion and the 12 branches
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
1989
238 76th Annual Report, 1989
16. Mergers, Consolidations, and Acquisitions of Assets or Assumptions of LiabilitiesApproved by the Board of Governors, 1989 —Continued
(Branches) has assets of $1.2 billion. Applicant andBank operate in the same banking market.
The banking factors and considerations relatingto the convenience and needs of the community areconsistent with approval.
Central Savings Bank, Sault Ste. Marie, Michi-gan, to acquire certain assets and liabilities of theMain Street Branch of First of America Bank,Northern Michigan, Cheboygan, Michigan
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
(9/1/89)The proposed transaction would not be significantlyadverse to competition.
BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE
(10/3/89)Central Savings Bank (Applicant) has assets of $68million and The Main Street Branch (Branch) hasassets of $2.2 million. Applicant and Bank do notoperate in the same banking market.
The banking factors and considerations relatingto the convenience and needs of the community areconsistent with approval.
Meridian Bank, Reading, Pennsylvania, tomerge with Hill Financial Savings Association,Red Hill, PennsylvaniaSUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
(9/12/89)The proposed transaction would not be significantlyadverse to competition.
BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE
(10/13/89)Meridian Bank (Applicant) has assets of $8.5 billionand Hill Financial Savings Association (Bank) hasassets of $2.0 billion. Applicant and Bank operatein the same banking market.
The banking factors and considerations relatingto the convenience and needs of the community areconsistent with approval.
Heartland Bank, Croton, Ohio, to merge withLyndon Guaranty Bank of Ohio, Columbus,Ohio
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
(10/4/89)The proposed transaction would not be significantlyadverse to competition.
BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE
(10/23/89)Heartland Bank (Applicant) has assets of $36
million and Lyndon Guaranty Bank of Ohio (Bank)has assets of $16 million. Applicant and Bank donot operate in the same banking market.
The banking factors and considerations relatingto the convenience and needs of the community areconsistent with approval.
CivicBank of Commerce, Oakland, California,to merge with Meridian National Bank, Concord,California
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
(10/18/89)The proposed transaction would not be significantlyadverse to competition.
BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE
(11/9/89)CivicBank of Commerce (Applicant) has assets of$232 million and Meridian National Bank (Bank)has assets of $87 million. Applicant and Bankoperate in the same banking market.
The banking factors and considerations relatingto the convenience and needs of the community areconsistent with approval.
Central Bank, Hollidaysburg, Pennsylvania, tomerge with two branches of Landmark SavingsAssociationSUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
(10/12/89)The proposed transaction would not be significantlyadverse to competition.
BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE
(12/6/89)Central Bank (Applicant) has assets of $203.8million and the two branches (Branches) haveassets of $ 17.0 million. Applicant and Bank operatein the same banking market.
The banking factors and considerations relatingto the convenience and needs of the community areconsistent with approval.
Rapides Bank and Trust Company in Alexan-dria, Alexandria, Louisiana, to merge with FirstBank, Pineville, Pineville, Louisiana
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
No report received. Request for report on thecompetitive factors was dispensed with, as autho-rized by the Bank Merger Act, to permit the FederalReserve System to act immediately to safeguard thedepositors of First Bank.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
1989
Tables 239
16. —Continued
BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE
(12/8/89)Rapides Bank and Trust Company (Applicant) hasassets of $415.9 million and First Bank (Bank) hasassets of $84.6 million. The State has recommendedimmediate action by the Federal Reserve System toprevent the probable failure of Bank.
Central State Bank, Elkader, Iowa, to merge withFirst State Savings Bank, McGregor, Iowa
SUMMARY REPORT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
No report received. Request for report on thecompetitive factors was dispensed with, as autho-rized by the Bank Merger Act, to permit the FederalReserve System to act immediately to safeguard thedepositors of First State Savings Bank.
BASIS FOR APPROVAL BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE
(12/12/89)Central State Bank (Applicant) has assets of $44.7million and First State Savings Bank (Bank) hasassets of $7.8 million. The FDIC has recommended
immediate action by the Federal Reserve System toprevent the probable failure of Bank.
Mergers Approved Involving Wholly OwnedSubsidiaries of the Same Bank HoldingCompany
The following transactions involve banks that aresubsidiaries of the same bank holding company. Ineach case, the summary report by the AttorneyGeneral indicates that the transaction would nothave a significantly adverse effect on competitionbecause the proposed merger is essentially acorporate reorganization. The Board of Governors,the Federal Reserve Bank, or the Secretary of theBoard of Governors, whichever approved theapplication, determined that the competitive effectsof the proposed transaction, the financial andmanagerial resources and prospects of the banksconcerned, as well as the convenience and needsof the community to be served were consistentwith approval.
Institutionl
Texas Bank of Denton, Denton, TexasMergerTexas Bank of Weatherford, Weatherford, Texas
BancFirst and Trust Company, Oklahoma City, OklahomaMergerAmerican Bank of Commerce, McAlester, OklahomaCitizens State Bank, Hugo OklahomaCity Bank, Muskogee, OklahomaFederal Bank and Trust Company, Shawnee, OklahomaFirst Bank & Trust Company, Sand Springs, OklahomaFirst National Bank of Guthrie, Guthrie, OklahomaFirst National Bank in Madill, Madill, OklahomaFirst National Bank of Prague, Prague, OklahomaFirst National Bank of Seminole, Seminole, OklahomaFirst National Bank, Stillwater, OklahomaFirst Oklahoma Bank and Trust Company, Sulphur, OklahomaOklahoma State Bank, Konawa, Oklahoma
Sovran Bank, Memphis TennesseeMergerFirst National Bank, Collierville, Tennessee
Sovran Bank, Chattanooga, TennesseeMergerFirst Bank of Marion County, South Pittsburg, Tennessee
Assets(millions
of dollars)
Date ofapproval
16 1/9/89
153
657 2/10/89
412634
2395045354040933022
303 2/16/89
54
213 3/1/89
96
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
1989
240 76th Annual Report, 1989
16. Mergers, Consolidations, and Acquisitions of Assets or Assumptions of LiabilitiesApproved by the Board of Governors, 1989 - Continued
Institution *Assets
(millionsof dollars)
Date ofapproval
Macomb County Bank, Richmond, MichiganMergerFirst State Bank of East Detroit, (Clinton Branch),
East Detroit, Michigan
Chemical Bank Bay Area, Bay City, MichiganMergerCass City State Bank, Cass City, MichiganHuron City Bank, Harbor Beach, Michigan ,The Peoples State Bank of Caro, Caro, Michigan ,
Sovran Bank Central South, Nashville, TexasMergerSovran Bank Marshall City, N.A., Lewisburg, Tennessee
First of America Bank-Northern Michigan, Cheboygan, Michigan ,MergerFirst of America-Petoskey, N. A., Petoskey, Michigan ,
First Bank of Stockton/Warren, Stockton, IllinoisMergerFirst National Bank of Freeport, Freeport, IllinoisMount Carroll National Bank, Mount Carroll, Illinois .
First Bank/Dixon, Dixon, IllinoisMergerPolo National Bank, Polo, IllinoisLincolnway State Bank, Sterling, Illinois
First Nebraska Bank-Valley, Valley, Nebraska . . . .MergerFirst Nebraska Bank-Arcadia, Arcadia, Nebraska .
Lake Buchanan State Bank, Buchanan Dam, TexasMergerLake Country National Bank, Burnet, Texas
Pioneer Bank and Trust Company, Belle Fourche, South Dakota ..MergerFirst State Bank, Buffalo, South Dakota
Bank of New York, New York, New YorkMergerIrving Trust Company, New York, New YorkBank of Long Island, Babylon, New YorkDutchess Bank & Trust Company, Poughkeepsie, New YorkNanuet National Bank, Nanuet, New YorkScarsdale National Bank & Trust Company, Scarsdale, New York .
54
6
28
183237
3,200
76
131
165
40
15229
56
3422
78
10
12
6
96
19
23
21294299385498
3/23/89
4/17/89
4/26/89
5/25/89
5/31/89
5/31/89
6/8/89
6/8/89
6/16/89
6/29/89
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
1989
Tables 241
16.-Continued
InstitutionlAssets
(millionsof dollars)
Date ofapproval
First of America Bank-Northern Michigan, Cheboygan, Michigan ..MergerFirst of America Bank-Grand Travers, N. A.,
Traverse City, Michigan
Norstar Bank, Hepstead, New YorkMergerFirst National Bank of Downsville, Downsville, New York
Crestar Bank, Richmond, VirginiaMergerMountain National Bank of Clifton Forge, Clifton Forge, Virginia ..
Sovran Bank/Central South, Nashville, TennesseeMergerSovran Bank/Eastern, Oak Ridge, TennesseeSovran Bank/Hickman County, Centerville, Tennessee
Security Bank and Trust Company, Southgate, MichiganMergerTrenton Bank and Trust Company, Trenton, Michigan
Indian Head Bank and Trust Company, Portsmouth, New Hampshire.MergerIndian Head National Bank, Nashua, New HampshireIndian Head Bank North, Littleton, New HampshireDartmouth National Bank, Hanover, New HampshireIndian Head National Bank of Keene, Keene, New HampshireFleet Bank of New Hampshire, Nashua, New Hampshire
Victoria Bank & Trust Company, Victor, TexasMergerBank of Commerce Calhoun City, Point Comfort, TexasJackson County State Bank, Edna County, Texas
Chemical Bank and Trust Company, Midland, MichiganMergerChemical Bank Bay Area (Saginaw Township Branch),
Bay City, Michigan
American Bank of St. Louis, St. Louis, MissouriMergerAmerican Bank of St. Louis County, Chesterfield, Missouri
Liberty Bank-Oakland, Troy, MichiganMergerLiberty State Bank and Trust, Hamtramck, Michigan
Villa Grove State Bank, Villa Grove, IllinoisMergerFirst National Bank of Villa Grove, Villa Grove, Illinois
131
165
2520
72
10,038
58
3,221
19939
1,403
135
377
976208175166
3
613
952
447
4
117
11
354
99
24
11
6/30/89
7/5/89
7/10/89
8/23/89
8/30/89
8/31/89
9/25/89
10/17/89
10/31/89
11/8/89
11/10/89
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
1989
242 76th Annual Report, 1989
16. Mergers, Consolidations, and Acquisitions of Assets or Assumptions of LiabilitiesApproved by the Board of Governors, 1989 - Continued
Institution1
First of America Bank-Northern Michigan, Cheboygan, Michigan ...MergerAntrim County State Bank, Maoncelona, Michigan
Landmark Bank of Highland, Highland, IllinoisMergerLandmark Bank of Alton, Alton, IllinoisLandmark Bank of Madison County, Glen Carbon, Illinois
Union Bank/Streator, Streator, IllinoisMergerUnion Bank/Triumph, Triumph, Illinois
Sovran Bank/Central South, Nashville, TennesseeMergerSovran Bank/Chattanooga, Chattanooga, TennesseeSovran Bank/Greenville, Greenville, TennesseeSovran Bank/Memphis, Memphis, TennesseeSovran Bank/Tri Cities, Johnson City, TennesseeSovran Bank/Union City, Union City, Tennessee
Assets(millions
of dollars)
Date ofapproval
168 11/14/89
32
96 12/1/89
3526
127 12/15/89
18
3,621 12/28/89
21813138895
105
1. Each proposed transaction was to be effected underthe charter of the first-named bank. The entries are in
chronological order of approval.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
1989
Tables 243
16, —Continued
Mergers Approved Involving a NonoperatingInstitution with an Existing Bank
The following transactions have no significant effecton competition; they merely facilitate the acquisi-tion of the voting shares of a bank (or banks) by aholding company. In such cases, the summaryreport by the Attorney General indicates that thetransaction will merely combine an existing bankwith a nonoperating institution; in consequence,and without regard to the acquisition of the
surviving bank by the holding company, the mergerwould have no effect on competition. The Board ofGovernors, the Federal Reserve Bank, or theSecretary of the Board of Governors, whicheverapproved the application, determined that theproposal would, in itself, have no adverse compet-itive effects and that the financial factors andconsiderations relating to the convenience and needsof the community were consistent with approval.
Institutionl
New Byron Bank, Byron Center, MichiganMergerByron Center State Bank, Byron Center, Michigan
1st United Interim Bank, Boca Raton, FloridaMergerFirst United Bank, Boca Raton, Florida
Citizens Bank of Virginia, Arlington, VirginiaMergerArlington Bank, Arlington, Virginia
Romney Interim Bank Corporation,MergerBank of Romney, Romney West Virginia
First Interim Bank of Crestview, Crestview, CaliforniaMergerFirst Bank of Crestview, Crestview, California
CB Interim State Bank, Philadelphia, PennsylvaniaMergerConstitution Bank, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Effingham Interim Bank, Inc., Effingham, IllinoisMergerEffingham State Bank, Effingham, Illinois
Assets(millions
of dollars)2
Date ofapproval
1/19/89
118
3/7/89
30
3/21/89
64
5/23/89
66
8/4/89
42
11/3/89
117
12/8/89
132
1. Each proposed transaction was to be effected under 2. Where no assets are listed, the bank is newlythe charter of the first-named bank. The entries are in organized and not in operation,chronological order of approval.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis