Experiences from Assessing Daily Activities to Increase Safety and Comfort of Older Persons Living Alone Paul Panek, Peter Mayer, Özge Subasi and Wolfgang L. Zagler Institute for Design and Assessment of Technology Vienna University of Technology IFA 11 th Global Conference on Ageing 28 May – 1 June 2012, Prague, Czech Republic
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Experiences from Assessing Daily
Activities to Increase Safety and
Comfort of Older Persons Living Alone
Paul Panek, Peter Mayer, Özge Subasi
and Wolfgang L. Zagler
Institute for Design and Assessment of Technology
Vienna University of Technology
IFA 11th Global Conference on Ageing
28 May – 1 June 2012, Prague, Czech Republic
Content
Introduction and Aim
Approach
Results from Fieldtrials
Conclusion
Introduction & Aim
Many research papers available about AAL systems and activity monitoring
– But unclear, to what extent such systems can be applied in real life
Therefore - Aim of eHome project:
– Demonstration of practical usefulness
– In daily use
– Basic system with ZigBee based sensors was developed
Approach
Daily life follows certain schedules
– Given by routine
– Following social and biological rhythms
eHome monitors continuously
– Assessing activities in fixed time slices (e.g. 1 hour)
– Triggering supportive or emergency actions if significant deviations
– Keeps private data protected inside the user’s home
Objective of eHome: Improving safety and comfort of older persons living alone at home
Approach
eHome system uses
– Sensors connected via ZigBee
– Storing data in a database
– Data being processed in a small central
unit
– Situated at user’s home ( privacy of
data)
– Connected to the Internet.
Approach
Event triggered expert system can raise
alerts based on:
– Time of activities
(e.g. rising from bed compared to daily history)
– Duration of selected activities
(e.g. nightly leaving of bed)
– Frequency of activities
(e.g. reduction in cooking, hygiene)
Approach
Assumption of eHome is:
– Even by applying a rather coarse monitoring by
a small set of sensors a sufficient insight into the
user’s activity can be reached
– Even if “better” and “more” sensors would be
possible this was avoided in order to
Increase perspective for economic exploitation
Improve the to-be-expected user acceptance
Field Trials
Extensive evaluation with
– 5 research prototype systems
– installed in 11 homes of older persons
– over a total time of 18 months
Field Trials
ZigBee Sensors for
– Door / window
– Acceleration & floor
vibration
(e.g. for fall detection)
– Temperature
– Cooking plate temp.
(infrared)
– Movement (passive
infrared)
– Light
Impressions from Field Trials
Local User Interface
– Touch-Screen Terminal
without typical PC look
– Fits to furniture
– Easy to use
– Video telephone
– Smart-Home Controls
– Emergency Call
– Internet Browser
e-HOME – reminders & call for help
e-HOME – easy to use (video) phone
Field Trials
Results
System was able to classify “usual
behaviour” over time. This can be used in
different ways:
– Unusual sudden changes (e.g. not leaving bed in
the morning) triggering alarm
– mid-term and long-term trends present
changes to care persons to let them judge about
the meaning and severity of recognised
changes.
Presence in living room 9 July
Results
The system is able to learn / adapt over time its
threshold parameters
Remark: Even right from the beginning the system
is able to work with initial values important for
practical use!
By adapting over time it will improve performance
Conclusion
Despite needs for improvement there is evidence
that the system actually is considered by users and
experts to have the potential to bring significant