Top Banner
1 Dr. Peter Avitabile Modal Analysis & Controls Laboratory 22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4 Mechanical Systems Peter Avitabile Mechanical Engineering Department University of Massachusetts Lowell j ω σ UNSTABLE STABLE TIME FRF FRF TIME FRF TIME FRF TIME TIME TIME > 1.0 ζ = 1.0 ζ = 0.7 ζ = 0.3 ζ = 0.1 ζ = 0 ζ
64

4 - Mechanical Systems - University of Massachusetts Lowell

Feb 09, 2022

Download

Documents

dariahiddleston
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: 4 - Mechanical Systems - University of Massachusetts Lowell

1 Dr. Peter AvitabileModal Analysis & Controls Laboratory22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4

Mechanical Systems

Peter AvitabileMechanical Engineering DepartmentUniversity of Massachusetts Lowell

σ

UNSTABLESTABLE

TIME

FRF

FRF

TIME

FRF

TIME

FRF

TIME

TIME

TIME

> 1.0ζ

= 1.0ζ

= 0.7ζ

= 0.3ζ

= 0.1ζ = 0ζ

Page 2: 4 - Mechanical Systems - University of Massachusetts Lowell

2 Dr. Peter AvitabileModal Analysis & Controls Laboratory22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4

Mechanical Systems-Translational Mass Element

Translation of a particle moving in space due to an applied force is given by:

dtdpf =

Where:mvmomentump

forcef==

=

Considering the mass to be constant:

madtdvmfmdvfdt

dt)mv(df ==⇒=⇒=

Page 3: 4 - Mechanical Systems - University of Massachusetts Lowell

3 Dr. Peter AvitabileModal Analysis & Controls Laboratory22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4

Mechanical Systems – Translational Mass Element

Displacement, velocity, and acceleration are all related by time derivatives as:

2

2

dtxd

dtda =ν

=

xva &&& ==

Page 4: 4 - Mechanical Systems - University of Massachusetts Lowell

4 Dr. Peter AvitabileModal Analysis & Controls Laboratory22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4

Mechanical Systems – Rotational Mass Element

ω=ω

=α &dtd

dtd

dtd 2θ

Centroidal mass moment of inertia – Ic (not to be confused with I – area moment of inertia used in strength of materials)

Angular acceleration

where: ω = angular velocityθ = angular displacement

Then:

Page 5: 4 - Mechanical Systems - University of Massachusetts Lowell

5 Dr. Peter AvitabileModal Analysis & Controls Laboratory22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4

Mechanical Systems - Translational Spring Element

( )21relk xxkkxf −==

A linear spring is considered to have no mass described by:

(Torsional spring follows the same relationship)

fk fk

x1 x2

k

Page 6: 4 - Mechanical Systems - University of Massachusetts Lowell

6 Dr. Peter AvitabileModal Analysis & Controls Laboratory22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4

Translational Spring Element

Hardening Spring

Bi-Linear

Linear

Softening Spring

Gap Cubicf f f

x x x

k

k = lb/in= N/m

Page 7: 4 - Mechanical Systems - University of Massachusetts Lowell

7 Dr. Peter AvitabileModal Analysis & Controls Laboratory22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4

Damper Element

relc cf ν=

Viscous (fluid), Coulomb (dry friction), and structural damping (hysteretic)

Viscous Dashpot

fcfa

vrel

m

Coulomb DamperIn order to have motion, the applied force must overcome the static friction. As soon as sliding occurs, the dynamic friction becomes appropriate.

fc

c

x&

Linear ( )21c cf ν−ν=

fc fcv1 v2

c

Page 8: 4 - Mechanical Systems - University of Massachusetts Lowell

8 Dr. Peter AvitabileModal Analysis & Controls Laboratory22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4

Equivalence - Springs in Parallel

Both springs see the same displacement

k2

x

f

k1

fx

keq

f2=k2x

f

f2

f1=k1x

f1

f=f1 + f2

keqx=k1x + k2x=(k1 + k2)x

21eq kkk +=∴

Page 9: 4 - Mechanical Systems - University of Massachusetts Lowell

9 Dr. Peter AvitabileModal Analysis & Controls Laboratory22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4

Equivalence - Springs in Series

Both springs see the same force but different displacements

But

k2

x1

f

k1

x2

f=keq

x

keq

δ f=k1(x1-x2)=k1

k1

k2

f2=k2x2=k2

2δf

21 δ+δ=δ

2

2

1

1

eq kf

kf

kf

+= 21eq k1

k1

k1

+=

21

21eq kk

kkk+

=21 fff ==

Page 10: 4 - Mechanical Systems - University of Massachusetts Lowell

10 Dr. Peter AvitabileModal Analysis & Controls Laboratory22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4

Translational SystemsNewton’s Second Law- THE RIGHT WAY

∑ = maF OR∑ = xx maF +

∑ = yy maF +

Note that this applies to the center of mass which is not necessarily the center of gravity.

Free-Body Diagram & Sign Convention

kxxc&

m )t(f

xxx &&& →→+

Page 11: 4 - Mechanical Systems - University of Massachusetts Lowell

11 Dr. Peter AvitabileModal Analysis & Controls Laboratory22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4

Translational Systems – Newton’s 2nd LawAssume spring and dashpot are stretched

∑ = xx maF

or in standard input-output differential form

xmFF)t(f kc &&=−−

xmkxxc)t(f &&& =−−OR

)t(fkxxcxm =++ &&&m)t(fx

mkx

mcx =++ &&&

)t(fxx2x 2nn =ω+ζω+ &&&

mkm2ccc

2n

nc

c

ω=

=ζ - damping ratio

– critical damping

ωn– natural frequency

Page 12: 4 - Mechanical Systems - University of Massachusetts Lowell

12 Dr. Peter AvitabileModal Analysis & Controls Laboratory22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4

D’Alembert’s Principle – The Fictitious ForceThe mass times acceleration is sometimes describedas a ‘fictitious force’, ‘reverse effective force’ or ‘‘apparent force’

( )∑ =−+ 0maF

Initially developed since it looks like a classical force balance – but often confuses many students.

DO NOT USE D’ALEMBERT!!!!!USE NEWTON’S SECOND LAW

Page 13: 4 - Mechanical Systems - University of Massachusetts Lowell

13 Dr. Peter AvitabileModal Analysis & Controls Laboratory22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4

Example – Pendulum Problem

Mass at end of massless string

l

mg

θ

2mJ l=

+x

θcosmgmg

θsinmg

T

FBD

sinθmgθJ l−=&& 0sinθmgθm 2 =+ ll &&OR

Then

0sinθgθ =+l

&&0θgθθ =+→

l&&for small .

Nat’l freq. lg

nω =

Page 14: 4 - Mechanical Systems - University of Massachusetts Lowell

14 Dr. Peter AvitabileModal Analysis & Controls Laboratory22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4

Example – Differential Equation about Equilibrium

y

x

+ ∑ = yy maFymmgky &&=+−

( ) xmmgxxk st &&=++−but stkxmg =

0kxxm =+∴ &&

Therefore, the equations can be written about the equilibrium point and the effect of gravity makes no difference.

Source: Dynamic Systems – Vu & Esfandiari

Page 15: 4 - Mechanical Systems - University of Massachusetts Lowell

15 Dr. Peter AvitabileModal Analysis & Controls Laboratory22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4

Systems with Displacement Input

In terms of natural frequency and damping ratio

∑ = xx maF+

m

ck

x

y

m x

)xy(c && −)xy(k −

mck

x

y

FBD

( ) ( ) xmxycxyk &&&& =−+− kyyckxxcxm +=++ &&&&OR

The force exerted can be found to be

yy2xx2x 2nn

2nn ω+ζω=ω+ζω+ &&&&

( ) ( )xycxyk)t(f && −+−=

Page 16: 4 - Mechanical Systems - University of Massachusetts Lowell

16 Dr. Peter AvitabileModal Analysis & Controls Laboratory22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4

Transfer Function and State Space

m

c

k

x

f(t) )t(fkxxcxm =++ &&&

002 XmmsXmX(s)s)x(m &&& −−=L

0)()( cXsscXxc −=&L)()( skXkx =L)())(( sftf =L

)s(f)s(kXcX)s(scXXmmsX)s(mXs 0002 =+−+−− &

Page 17: 4 - Mechanical Systems - University of Massachusetts Lowell

17 Dr. Peter AvitabileModal Analysis & Controls Laboratory22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4

Transfer Function and State Space

( ) ( ) 002 XmXcms)s(f)s(Xkcsms &+++=++

Grouping and rearranging:

Assume initial conditions are zero and rearranging terms to obtain OUT/IN formThen:

kcsms1

)s(F)s(X)s(H 2 ++==

Sometimes written with

kcsms)s(b 2 ++=

Page 18: 4 - Mechanical Systems - University of Massachusetts Lowell

18 Dr. Peter AvitabileModal Analysis & Controls Laboratory22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4

The frequency response function is the system transfer function evaluated along

Frequency Response Function - SDOF

ω= js

kcsms1)s(h 2 ++

=

Source: Vibrant Technology

Recall:

The complex valued function defines the surface shown

Page 19: 4 - Mechanical Systems - University of Massachusetts Lowell

19 Dr. Peter AvitabileModal Analysis & Controls Laboratory22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4

Polynomial Form

Pole-Zero Form

Partial Fraction Form

Exponential Form

kcsms1)s(h 2 ++

=

)ps)(ps(m/1)s(h *

11 −−=

)ps(a

)ps(a)s(h *

1

*1

1

1

−+

−=

tsinem1)t(h d

t

d

ωω

= ζω−

SDOF – Transfer Function

Page 20: 4 - Mechanical Systems - University of Massachusetts Lowell

20 Dr. Peter AvitabileModal Analysis & Controls Laboratory22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4

Polynomial Form

Pole-Zero Form

Partial Fraction Form

kcjωmω1)h(jω 2 ++−

=

)pj)(pj(m/1)j(h *

11 −ω−ω=ω

)pj(a

)pj(a)j(h *

1

*1

1

1

−ω+

−ω=ω

SDOF – Frequency Response Function

Page 21: 4 - Mechanical Systems - University of Massachusetts Lowell

21 Dr. Peter AvitabileModal Analysis & Controls Laboratory22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4

Transfer Function approach is used extensively in design but is limited to linear, time-invariant systems.

SDOF – Transfer Function

1. T.F. – method to express output relative to input2. T.F. – system property – independent of the nature

of excitation3. T.F. contains necessary units but does not provide

physical structure of system4. If T.F. is known, then response can be evaluated

due to various inputs5. If T.F. is unknown, it can be established

experimentally by measuring output response due to known measured inputs

Page 22: 4 - Mechanical Systems - University of Massachusetts Lowell

22 Dr. Peter AvitabileModal Analysis & Controls Laboratory22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4

S-plane Plots

σ

UNSTABLESTABLE

TIME

FRF

FRF

TIME

FRF

TIME

FRF

TIME

TIME

TIME

> 1.0ζ

= 1.0ζ

= 0.7ζ

= 0.3ζ

= 0.1ζ = 0ζ

Page 23: 4 - Mechanical Systems - University of Massachusetts Lowell

23 Dr. Peter AvitabileModal Analysis & Controls Laboratory22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4

Experimental Determination of Damping Ratio

Determine decay of amplitudex1 at t1 and again at n cycleslater xn at t1 + (n-1)T

Then

x1 x2 xn

t1 t2 tn

T - period

( )T

TTt

t

2

1 n

nn

n

ee1

ee

xx ζω

ζω−+ζω−

ζω−===

OR

( )( ) T1n

T1nn

1 n

ne

e1

xx ζω−

−ζω− ==

Page 24: 4 - Mechanical Systems - University of Massachusetts Lowell

24 Dr. Peter AvitabileModal Analysis & Controls Laboratory22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4

Log Decrement

Txxln

1n1

xxln n

n

1

2

1 ζω=

=

For damping < 10%

2dn

1

22

ζ−

πζ=

ωπ

ζω=

2n

1

1

2xxln

1n1

ζ−

πζ=

πζ≅ 2xxln2

1

Note: This damping ratio formulation is applicable to any 2nd

order system of this form

Page 25: 4 - Mechanical Systems - University of Massachusetts Lowell

25 Dr. Peter AvitabileModal Analysis & Controls Laboratory22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4

Estimate of Response Time

whose time constant T of the exponential is

( )φ−ωζ−

= ζω− tcose1

X)t(x dt

20 n

The response of a mechanical system due to an initial displacement is given as:

The exponential response envelope ist

20 ne

1

X ζω−

ζ−

σ=

ζω11

n

Page 26: 4 - Mechanical Systems - University of Massachusetts Lowell

26 Dr. Peter AvitabileModal Analysis & Controls Laboratory22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4

Estimate of Response TimeThe response of the second-order system in terms of the settling time is

σ=

ζω==

44T4tn

s

which will cause 2% of the initial value

Source: Dynamic Systems – Vu & Esfandiari

Page 27: 4 - Mechanical Systems - University of Massachusetts Lowell

27 Dr. Peter AvitabileModal Analysis & Controls Laboratory22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4

State Space RepresentationThe ‘state’ of the system can be described in terms of the displacement and velocity as

=

xx

xx

2

1&

=

=)velocity(x)displ(x

xxX2

1&

u = f (force) and y = x (measured by sensor)

Then )t(fm1x

mcx

mkx +−−= &&&

OR

um1x

mcx

mkx 212 +−−=&

Page 28: 4 - Mechanical Systems - University of Massachusetts Lowell

28 Dr. Peter AvitabileModal Analysis & Controls Laboratory22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4

State Space RepresentationSo that the state space representation is

u0xx10

xx

m1

2

1

mc

mk

2

1

+

−−

=

&

&State Equation

Output Equation [ ] u0

xx01y2

1 ⋅+

=

Page 29: 4 - Mechanical Systems - University of Massachusetts Lowell

29 Dr. Peter AvitabileModal Analysis & Controls Laboratory22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4

Lagrange’s Equations

nciiiiQ

qV

qT

qT

dtd

=∂∂

+∂∂

∂∂

T – Kinetic energyV – Potential energyQnci – non-conservative generalized forcesqi – independent generalized coordinatesn – total # independent generalized coordinates

Kinetic Energy is a function of Potential energy is the sum of elastic potential Veand gravitational potential VgPotential Energy is a function of

),( tqT i

),( tqV i

dtdq /

Page 30: 4 - Mechanical Systems - University of Massachusetts Lowell

30 Dr. Peter AvitabileModal Analysis & Controls Laboratory22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4

Lagrange’s Equations

nciii

QqL

qL

dtd

=∂∂

∂∂&

iq&

One standard form of Lagrange’s Equation

where L = T-V

We can then write

( ) ( )nci

ii

QqVT

qVT

dtd

=∂−∂

∂−∂&

(Note V is not a function of )

Page 31: 4 - Mechanical Systems - University of Massachusetts Lowell

31 Dr. Peter AvitabileModal Analysis & Controls Laboratory22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4

Lagrange’s Equations

2c

2

2

I21mv

21TD2

mv21TD1

ω+=⇒

=⇒

Kinetic energy for a particle

If the mass is not located at a point (such as a particle), then a more complicated form of these equations is necessary

Potential Energy of an elastic element is

Potential Energy of a mass is

2e k21V δ=

mghVg =

Page 32: 4 - Mechanical Systems - University of Massachusetts Lowell

32 Dr. Peter AvitabileModal Analysis & Controls Laboratory22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4

Lagrange’s EquationsNon-conservative Forces are those that cannot be derived from a potential function (i.e., external forces, frictional forces) Generalized Forces are given by Virtual Work.

To determine Qj, obtain , then let all except

L+δ+δ=δ=δ ∑ 2211ii qQqQqQW

Wδ 0qi =δ jqδThus

jj q

WQδδ

=0q j =δij ≠

Page 33: 4 - Mechanical Systems - University of Massachusetts Lowell

33 Dr. Peter AvitabileModal Analysis & Controls Laboratory22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4

Lagrange’s EquationsNon-conservative Forces are then:

L+δ+δ=δ=δ ∑ 22nc11ncincinc qQqQqQW

Then

i

ncnci q

WQδδ

=0qi =δij ≠

Page 34: 4 - Mechanical Systems - University of Massachusetts Lowell

34 Dr. Peter AvitabileModal Analysis & Controls Laboratory22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4

Example using Lagrange EquationUse Lagrange EQ to obtain differential equation for SDOF system

Only one independent generalized coordinate exists: q=x

22c xm

21mv

21T &==

m

c

k

x

f(t)

Kinetic Energy

Potential Energy

Non-conservative Forces

( )0Vkx21VV g

2e ===

applied)t(f −

edissipativxc −&

Page 35: 4 - Mechanical Systems - University of Massachusetts Lowell

35 Dr. Peter AvitabileModal Analysis & Controls Laboratory22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4

Example using Lagrange EquationNon-Conservative Forces

[ ] xxc)t(fWnc δ−=δ &

xQW ncnc δ=δ

xc)t(fxWQ nc

nc &−=δ

δ=

Lagrange Equation

ncQxV

xT

xT

dtd

=∂∂

+∂∂

∂∂&

Page 36: 4 - Mechanical Systems - University of Massachusetts Lowell

36 Dr. Peter AvitabileModal Analysis & Controls Laboratory22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4

Example using Lagrange Equation

Lagrange Equation ncQxV

xT

xT

dtd

=∂∂

+∂∂

∂∂&

WhereThen substituting

xmx

xm

xT

&&

&

&=

∂=

∂∂ )

21( 2

xmdt

)xT(d

&&& =∂∂

0x

)xm21(

xT

2

=∂

∂=

∂∂ &

kxx

)kx21(

xV

2

=∂

∂=

∂∂

OR

xc)t(fkxxm &&& −=+

)t(fkxxcxm =++ &&&

Page 37: 4 - Mechanical Systems - University of Massachusetts Lowell

37 Dr. Peter AvitabileModal Analysis & Controls Laboratory22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4

Example using Lagrange EquationNow let’s repeat this with the Lagrange function

22 kx21xm

21VTL −=−= &

xmt

)xL(

&&& =∂∂∂

xmx

)kxxm21(

xL

22

&&

&

&=

−∂=

∂∂

)t(fkxxcxm =++∴ &&&

ncQxL

t

)xL(

=∂∂

−∂∂∂

∂&

xm)xL( &&

=∂∂

Page 38: 4 - Mechanical Systems - University of Massachusetts Lowell

38 Dr. Peter AvitabileModal Analysis & Controls Laboratory22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4

Example – Translational Mechanical System

m

k

xst

xy

g

Undeformed position

Dynamic positionStatic equilibrium

Solution

Source: Dynamic Systems – Vu & Esfandiari

Page 39: 4 - Mechanical Systems - University of Massachusetts Lowell

39 Dr. Peter AvitabileModal Analysis & Controls Laboratory22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4

Example – Translational Mechanical System

Source: Dynamic Systems – Vu & Esfandiari

Page 40: 4 - Mechanical Systems - University of Massachusetts Lowell

40 Dr. Peter AvitabileModal Analysis & Controls Laboratory22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4

Example – Translational Mechanical System

Source: Dynamic Systems – Vu & Esfandiari

Page 41: 4 - Mechanical Systems - University of Massachusetts Lowell

41 Dr. Peter AvitabileModal Analysis & Controls Laboratory22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4

Example – Translational Mechanical System

Source: Dynamic Systems – Vu & Esfandiari

Page 42: 4 - Mechanical Systems - University of Massachusetts Lowell

42 Dr. Peter AvitabileModal Analysis & Controls Laboratory22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4

Example - Two DOF Systems

Consider

m1

f1(t)

x2x1

f2(t)

m2c

k

FBD (assume x1 > x2)

1121211 xm)xx(k)xx(c)t(f)1(maF &&&& =−−−−=∑

2221212 xm)xx(k)xx(c)t(f)2(maF &&&& =−+−+=∑

221

211 f

)xx(c)xx(k

f →→−←→−←

→ &&m2m1

STATE ASSUMPTIONS!!!

Page 43: 4 - Mechanical Systems - University of Massachusetts Lowell

43 Dr. Peter AvitabileModal Analysis & Controls Laboratory22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4

Example - Two DOF Systems

Rearranging Terms)t(fkxkxxcxcxm 1212111 =−+−+ &&&&

=

−+

−+

2

1

2

1

2

1

2

1

2

1

ff

xx

kkkk

xx

cccc

xx

m00m

&

&

&&

&&

)t(fkxkxxcxcxm 2212122 =+−+− &&&&

Page 44: 4 - Mechanical Systems - University of Massachusetts Lowell

44 Dr. Peter AvitabileModal Analysis & Controls Laboratory22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4

Example - Two DOF Systems

Consider

FBD (assume x2 > x1)

1112212111 xm)xx(k)xx(cxk)t(f)1(maF &&&& =−+−+−=∑

m1

f1(t)

x2x1

f2(t)

m2c

k2

k1

22122122 xm)xx(k)xx(c)t(f)2(maF &&&& =−−−−=∑

)t(f)xx(k)xx(c

xk)t(f

2122

12

11

1 →←−→←−→

←→ &&

m2m1

Page 45: 4 - Mechanical Systems - University of Massachusetts Lowell

45 Dr. Peter AvitabileModal Analysis & Controls Laboratory22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4

Example - Two DOF Systems

Rearranging terms

)t(fxkx)kk(xcxcxm 1221212111 =−++−+ &&&&

=

−++

−+

2

1

2

1

22

221

2

1

2

1

2

1

ff

xx

kkk)kk(

xx

cccc

xx

m00m

&

&

&&

&&

)t(fxkxkxcxcxm 222122122 =+−+− &&&&

Page 46: 4 - Mechanical Systems - University of Massachusetts Lowell

46 Dr. Peter AvitabileModal Analysis & Controls Laboratory22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4

Rotational Systems

A rotational system follows the same equations developed for translation

α=∑ 00 IM

dmrIorJ 20 ∫=

Newton’s Second Law

.accelangularwintofmomentmassI

appliedmomentsM

0

0

&−α−−

Mass moment of inertia of rigid body about axis

Page 47: 4 - Mechanical Systems - University of Massachusetts Lowell

47 Dr. Peter AvitabileModal Analysis & Controls Laboratory22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4

Rotational Systems

Torsion spring stiffness similar to translation

)(KT 12Tk θ−θ=

Dashpot similar to translation

Right hand rule convention determines +/-

)(KT RELTk θ=

)(CT 12DD θ−θ= &&

)(CT RELDD θ=

usedoftenBorCD

RADLBFT /−

Page 48: 4 - Mechanical Systems - University of Massachusetts Lowell

48 Dr. Peter AvitabileModal Analysis & Controls Laboratory22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4

Rotational Systems

FBD

OUTθJ

INθ

J DTST

Page 49: 4 - Mechanical Systems - University of Massachusetts Lowell

49 Dr. Peter AvitabileModal Analysis & Controls Laboratory22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4

Rotational Systems - Equations

Most systems we will treat will be 2D or planar systems. Modeling of general 3D bodies is more complex and beyond the scope of this course.

α=θ

=+⇒α=∑ IdtdJTTJM 2

02

DS

)(KT OUTINTS θ−θ=

OUTD BT θ−= &

OUTOUTOUTINT JB)(K θ=θ−θ−θ &&&

INTOUTTOUTOUT KKBJ θ=θ+θ+θ &&&

Page 50: 4 - Mechanical Systems - University of Massachusetts Lowell

50 Dr. Peter AvitabileModal Analysis & Controls Laboratory22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4

Example - SDOF Torsional System

A torsional system: (a) physical system, (b) FBD

θ&BθK

θ

)t(TJ

K

B

θ

)t(T J

)a( )b(

Page 51: 4 - Mechanical Systems - University of Massachusetts Lowell

51 Dr. Peter AvitabileModal Analysis & Controls Laboratory22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4

Example - SDOF Torsional System

This sign convention is simpler and useful for the given angle θ. Thus,

Consider a single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) torsional system. The system consists of a shaft of torsional stiffness K, a disk of mass-moment of inertia J, and a torsional damper B. Derive the differential equation.

Solution. Applying the moment equation about the mass center along the longitudinal axis.

+→α=∑→+ cc IM

θ=θ−θ− &&& JBK)t(T

)t(TKBJ =θ+θ+θ &&&

The differential equation in the input-output form is

Page 52: 4 - Mechanical Systems - University of Massachusetts Lowell

52 Dr. Peter AvitabileModal Analysis & Controls Laboratory22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4

Example - Two DOF Torsional System

Source: Dynamic Systems – Vu & Esfandiari

Page 53: 4 - Mechanical Systems - University of Massachusetts Lowell

53 Dr. Peter AvitabileModal Analysis & Controls Laboratory22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4

Example - Two DOF Torsional System

Source: Dynamic Systems – Vu & Esfandiari

Page 54: 4 - Mechanical Systems - University of Massachusetts Lowell

54 Dr. Peter AvitabileModal Analysis & Controls Laboratory22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4

Example - Rigid Body in Planar Motion

As before

α=∑ 00 IM

θ+=θ− &&)ml0(mgsinL 2

Point mass on string – Moment method

0sin2 =+ θθ mgLmL &&

0sin =+ θθLg&&

L

mg

θ

0

θsinL

Page 55: 4 - Mechanical Systems - University of Massachusetts Lowell

55 Dr. Peter AvitabileModal Analysis & Controls Laboratory22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4

Example – Pendulum Problem

Thin uniform rod of mass m and length l is a pendulum

Then

α=∑ 00 IM

θθ &&0sin

2ImgL

=−

FBD

0sin2lmgI0 =θ+θ&&

0

mg

θLg

θ

Page 56: 4 - Mechanical Systems - University of Massachusetts Lowell

56 Dr. Peter AvitabileModal Analysis & Controls Laboratory22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4

Linearization: For small

where 2c0 mdII +=

or

θ⇒θ→θ sin

020 =+ θθ mgLI &&

02 0

=+ θθImgL&&

2

2)Lm(Ic +=

20 31mLI =

2

121 mLIc =

Example – Pendulum Problem

Page 57: 4 - Mechanical Systems - University of Massachusetts Lowell

57 Dr. Peter AvitabileModal Analysis & Controls Laboratory22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4

Mixed Translation and Rotation

Pulley system

Rotation of pulley

Newton’s second law for mass m

and

Txm −=&&

Ic of pulley, mass m of radius r, Tension in string

m x

r θ

kcI

(everything measured from equilibrium so no mg term)

For small angle

or

The natural frequency is

kxrTrJ −=θ&&

θ= rx kxrrxmJ −−=θ &&&&then

0kr)mrJ( 22 =θ+θ+ &&

0mrJkr

2

2=θ

++θ&&

2

2

n mrJkr+

Page 58: 4 - Mechanical Systems - University of Massachusetts Lowell

58 Dr. Peter AvitabileModal Analysis & Controls Laboratory22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4

Example – Cart-Pendulum Problem

Consider the pendulum system shown attached to a horizontal cart

This is a mixed problem. First solve the pendulum and then the cart translation.

Cart moves horizontally on frictionless surface. Mass on inextensible string

The general moment about point P (where the string is attached to the cart mass) is needed to sum the forces for Newton’s Second Law.

M

c L

θ

k

m

Page 59: 4 - Mechanical Systems - University of Massachusetts Lowell

59 Dr. Peter AvitabileModal Analysis & Controls Laboratory22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4

pp/cp axmrIMp +α=∑

yP

xPP

L

θ

mgθsinL

xap &&=

Lr p/c1 =

1C

θφ

Example – Cart-Pendulum Problem

Page 60: 4 - Mechanical Systems - University of Massachusetts Lowell

60 Dr. Peter AvitabileModal Analysis & Controls Laboratory22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4

The cross product term is

Using the parallel axis theorem, the mass of the pendulum at a distance L gives

The moment about P due to the mass on the pendulum isθ=α⇒= &&2

p2

p mLImLI

θ−= sinLmgM

φsinarar pc/ppc/p =×θ=θ−= cosxL)90sin(xL &&&&

The general moment equation becomes

θ+θ=θ− cosxLmLmsinLmg 2 &&&&

Example – Cart-Pendulum Problem

Page 61: 4 - Mechanical Systems - University of Massachusetts Lowell

61 Dr. Peter AvitabileModal Analysis & Controls Laboratory22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4

Now the translational equation is evaluated. Only horizontal is considered.

M )t(fkx

mθsinL

xc& xapx &&=

2θL& θ&&L

θθ sinL 2& θθcosL&&

centripetaltangential

Example – Cart-Pendulum Problem

Page 62: 4 - Mechanical Systems - University of Massachusetts Lowell

62 Dr. Peter AvitabileModal Analysis & Controls Laboratory22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4

For the cart, Newton’s Second Law

xckx)t(fmaF &−−⇒=∑

The acceleration of the pendulum masssinθθLcosθθLx 2&&&&& −+

(cart) (tangential) (centripetal)

xM)sinLcosLx(m 2 &&&&&&& +θθ−θθ+=

0sinmgLcosxmLmL2 =θ+θ+θ→θ &&&&

( ) ( ) )t(fkxxcsinLcosLmxmMx 2 =++θθ−θθ++→ &&&&&&

Example – Cart-Pendulum Problem

Page 63: 4 - Mechanical Systems - University of Massachusetts Lowell

63 Dr. Peter AvitabileModal Analysis & Controls Laboratory22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4

For small motion, the equations can be linearized

0mgLxmLmL2 =θ++θ &&&&

or in matrix forms as

( )0;sin;1cos 2 ≈θθ≈θ≈θ &

( ) )t(fkxxcmLxmM =++θ++ &&&&&

=

θ

+

θ

+

θ

+ )t(f0

xk00mgL

xc000

x)mM(mLmLmL2

&

&

&&

&&

Example – Cart-Pendulum Problem

Page 64: 4 - Mechanical Systems - University of Massachusetts Lowell

64 Dr. Peter AvitabileModal Analysis & Controls Laboratory22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4

Chapter 4 - Review Slide

k2

x

f

k1

21eq kkk +=

k2

x1

f

k1

x2

21

21eq kk

kkk+

=

πζ≅ 2xxln2

1x1 x2 xn

t1 t2 tn

T