3>e! I - semspub.epa.gov · Attached is the inorganic data review for the Dupont Newport Site (Case 14552) completed by the Region III Environmental Services Assistance Team (ESAT)

3>e! I

j UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY*> REGION II!

It0 CENTRAL REGIONAL LABORATORY' 839 BESTGATE ROAD

r ANNAPOLIS, MARYLAND 21401(301) 266-9180

DATE : October 9, 1990

SUBJECT: Inorganic Data Validation for the Dupont Newport SiteCase 14552 -

FROM : Dan v- Slizys °J"Region III Acting ESAT DPO (3ES23) <

<TO : Randy Sturgeon ^ îRegional Project Manager (3HW25)

THRU : Patricia J.~ Krantz, Chief ,D-*Quality Assurance Branch (3ES23)

Attached is the inorganic data review for the Dupont NewportSite (Case 14552) completed by the Region III EnvironmentalServices Assistance Team (ESAT) contractor under the directionof Region III ESD.

If you have any questions regarding this review, please callme.

Attachment

cc: Tony Vellios, Dynamac

TID File: 03900818 Task 2090

AR309671*

2563A RP/A ROADSUITE 300ANNAPCL.S. MO 21401

,.j PHONE 3C1-266-9887

DATE: 2 OCTOBER 1990

SUBJECT: INORGANIC DATA VALIDATION, Case 14552SITE: DUPONT NEWPORT

PROM: MARSHA BURRELL f\f$T} MAHBOOBEH MECANICSENIOR DATA REVl£ÊR INORGANIC DATA REVIEWER

TO: DAN SLIZYS ^ÂCTING ESAT DEPUTY PROJECT OFFICER .W jN

c§v O.THRU: RICHARD D. DRESSER

ESAT TEAM MANAGER

OVERVIEW

The set of samples for Case 14552 contained seven (7)low level soil samples. The samples were analyzedthrough the Contrac- Laboratory Program (CLP) RoutineAnalytical Services (RAS).

The EPA Health Advisory Level of 500 mg/Kg for Pb insoil samples was exceeded for several samples asoutlined in the following table:

Sanole Concentration

MCDW58 9920MCDW59 1520MCDW62 7060

SUMMARY

All analytes were successfully analyzed in all sampleswith the exception of Sb. Areas of concern withrespect to data usability are listed according to thes4iri'ousness of the problem. These include:

MAJOR PROBLEMS

The matrix spike recovery for the Sb analyte wasextremely low (<30%) in the samples. The reportedresults and the quantitation limits for these samplesmay be biased extremely low and, therefore, have beenqualified "L" and "R", respectively.

AR309675

MINOR ISSUES

The preparation blank had reported results for the Beanalyte that were >IDL. The reported results for theBe analyte in the affected samples which are <5X theblank concentration may be biased high and, therefore,have been qualified "B".

The laboratory duplicate results were outside of thecontrol limits for the Al, As, Ba, Be, Cu, Me, Mn andHg analytes. Therefore, the reported results andquantitation limits for these analytes in the sampleshave been qualified estimated, "J" and "UJ".

The correlation coefficient for the standard curveprepared and usad during the Pb analyses was O.995.The reported results for the Pb analyte may be biasedand, therefore, have been qualified estimated. "J".

The matrix spike recovery was high (>125%) fcr the Asanalyte. The reported results may be biased/ however,they were qualified estimated, "J", due to duplicateproblems as discussed above.

The matrix spike recoveries were low (30-74%) for theSe and Tl analytes. The reported results andquantitation limits may be biased low and, therefore,have been qualified "L" and "UL", respectively.

The analytical spike recoveries were low for zlie Se andTl analytes. The reported results and quantisationlimits may be biased low and, therefore, have beenqualified "L" and "UL", respectively.

The analytical spike recovery for the Pb analyte in.sample MCDW63 was high. The report results may be

high, however, it has been qualified es-imated,due to a problem with the correlation coefficient.

NOTES:

The data was reviewed in accordance with the National F mctionalGuidelines for Evaluating Inorganic Analyses.

INFORMATION REGARDING REPORT CONTENT

Table 1A is a summary of qualifiers added to thelaboratory's results during evaluation.

48309676

ATTACHMENTS

MB010B01.DUP

\s

TABLE 1A SUMMARY OF QUALIFIERS ON DATA SUMMARY AFTERDATA VALIDATION

TABLE IB CODES USED IN COMMENTS COLUMN

TABLE 2 GLOSSARY OF DATA QUALIFIER CODES

TABLE 3 DATA SUMMARY FORM

APPENDIX A RESULTS REPORTED BY LABORATORYFORM I's

APPENDIX B TPO REPORT

48309677

I TABLE 1A

1 SUMMARY OF QUALIFIERS ON DATA SUMMARY! AFTER DATA VALIDATION

v NON-POSITIVE DETECTED

ANALYTE SAMPLES AFFECTED VALUES VALUES BIAS COMMENTS*

Al All samples J A (43.2%)

Sb All samples L R Extremely B (18.7%)Low

As All samples J A (60.9%)C (133%)

Ba All samples J A (51.1%)

Be MCDW58, MCDW61, B High D (0.60 ppb)MCDW64 A (144%)

MCDW59, MCDW60 J UJ A (144%)MCDW62, MCDW63

Cu All samples J A (77.9%)

Mg All samples J A (69.9%)

Pb All samples except J E (0.991)MCDW63

MCDW63 J ' E (0.991)F (145%)

Mn All sjiSlles J A (105%)

Hg All samples J UJ A (114%)

Se All samples L UL G (62.7%)H (59.0-78.0%)

Tl All samples except UL Low G (37.5%)MCDW62, MCDW64

MCDW62, MCDW64 L Low G (37.5%)H (55.2-54.5%)

ftR3Q9678

: TABLE IB tS' <^

CODES USED IN COMMENTS COLUMN

A = The soil laboratory duplicate result was outside of thecontrol limit RPD >35% (relative percent difference is inparentheses)> Therefore, the quantitation limits and/orreported results are essimated.

3 = Due to an extremely low matrix spike recovery (% recovery isin parentheses), the quantisation limits and reportedresults may be biased eicsrenely low.

C = Due to a high matrix spike recovery (% recovery is inparentheses), the reporsed results may be biased high.

D = The preparation blank hai a result >IDL (the result is inparentheses) and the reported results were <5x the blank.The reported results may be biased high.

Z = The correlation coefficient of the standard curve was <0.995(actual result is in parentheses). Therefore, the reportedresults are estimated.

F = Due to a high analytical spike recovery (% recovery is inparentheses), the reporsad result may be biased high.

G - Due to a low matrix spike recovery (% recovery is inparentheses), the quantisation limits and/or reportedresults may be biased lev.

H =* Due to a low analytical spike recovery (% recovery is inparentheses), the quantisation limits and/or reportedresults may be biased lev.

7 TABLE 2 <V<£»' *--

GLOSSARY OF DATA QUALIFIER CODES (INORGANIC)

CODES RELATED TO IDENTIFICATION(confidence concerning presence or absence of analytes):

U = Not detected. The associated number indicates approximatesample concentration necessary to be detected.

(NO CODE) = Confirmed ider.sification.

B = Not detected substantially above the level reported inlaboratory or field blanks.

R = Unreliable result. Analyte may or nay not be present in thesample. Supporting data necessary to confirm result.

CODES RELATED TO QUANTITATI:^(can be used for both posisive results and sample quantitation limits):

J = Analyte Preser.s. Reported value nay not be accurate orprecise.

K = Analyte present. Reported value may be biased high. Actualvalue is expected so be lower.

L = Analyte present. Reported value may be biased low. Actualvalue is expected so be higher.

[] = Analyte present. As values approach the IDL thequantitaticn nay not be accurate.

UJ = Not detected, quansitation limit may be inaccurate orimprecise.

UL = Not detected, quantitation limit is probably higher.

OTHER CODES "^*m - " - -

Q = Nos'analytical result.

AR3Q9680

i 5

0 ' • ~ - 2 c« 0.

-1 Llom 7i

SiO

< «. I - W •>.

^ S j S1cQ o » C.

s:a

w

2UJ

Cc-\

o4J

Qtna

Iw

aVI

s -• «z ^«

mO

dO*»-•*>ac* eco u

-- - • • a

I • siJ3

r

-g<

,GO2.nlQ

CCS

•>0«b^<CCJ

^

S,/-*«*~>

aft/-*Z

S

i<Q\*

1•0X«IM

C

/-\

C

C

o

q

o

!•0-**Omt*.

Rjj»

cC

s

v "n*I~

,

5

>*O7CC

CMoc

OL<<cc

•r-£J

2"5utM

?tyv~~z.p\

Sfc\iiU"I/"11I"-2/

l£v •i

/••>I— '

IC.•<.'•\."S

So-

£/

4

QVImi

iOiV*«oi/

location

3

_

s

s

0

[A*NJ

nro

0-

UJ

V_Jz

ôacu

h

1 10 300

^Co•r

\hr~*Qo

bCiiyicCG

bQc*C«F™O

4OXcrv_

hoaocr

1

a4-

ec

ClT

_j|r~"UM0>-.V

«

jÎTac^

i

10(T

>.

e

•M

r.•Ml

-

r)r

-

—r>i~

•^__

b\nJT

. <

r*^

h<crf7

CI

V

l_•1

rv

h

1rSh9?s

h^

h•>>.2j

b

ihc-boc-TCf

§i"o<r

acn^

C

br-in"Ocs -*~

3

brl

3

h-r-

cCi

r*Oi_i

5H«

>-

I*

-

C|

cr

vu^

cc

3

ns

CT;

?TSOS

CTcras

§1«

-

r-t

5u

c»ccvv.

«C=IT

oCTS

Oc

~

OtT

CcrCSc«

iu•

i

3^

Q

'A

S.

^£

CTSs

§croc

§§^•

nj

PiCTtoi-j

C«i

• s

as— -^

<-ii2Ui

f-\<r5.

UJ

CCai

t iVr-M

.*"?1

0

HI-—'C^1VorT.

hrjC

huS

hcOwl -~\t*

ho1ho•r

S-3-

m

Cc(O,(N

gjV-1

û~>rr

3krT>

OCsovnre

8<o

Ooa

S>_

5

-*

c:

-_• -i

—z••5.

-^l_r""

-

'-c

"y-

3_

•

••oe

•— >i'

N

ji

•

?S

•-,

* -£3-i»

-

o_"i

••"V

— i

,?

'-/-0ci

bQS•r<

e

•S!a•

§

b

ibqSfT-

bss:h• ^j

bcco;

r:qa

hsc-

e••S

1

K1

Hi«<;

^

r-1-rf-

H

^

hoPM<-».

h

•r

>.3u•

fW.o

or2

crrC

VoW5

*o

Cu

cC«J

CTt£

bias

*>-K•

a

O<Z~]SU,

r-icTt__

^r-r

C.CvI~

Or~

3c«ct — 11

f»c-s

1•i

o

I

J\—^

-J_J

Jo"5

_Jd

Jvnr«6i_t

J

o"1,!>i

__l

<r10

|V•I

-

<T<\5

l_u>—4rt

rj

Si-~

orJ_guC

^C

n!-0aSS

r-,5'-ruj

n

Ci

r~ia;c-VJ

s•g4O

V•—

^

>Ji—»rr6Ua

~J7J

J

t>•Q>M-J15

_jZ5

_J

_Jrr

§

JC

-C

s.

F.•0

«i£lo•«v

d^

<>U-)ns

•3-£

<p•xTO

|

i)

•»i

«5T)

J2~

5a

ioc-2

o5

0.3rocr:

^

»

?*

••

•81>.•

P

-

3]

,

11

'j

j

ij

™

jaJ

i!

y

-*

1"-] APPENDIX A

RESULTS REPORTED BY LABORATORY

FORM I'S

A8309682

U.S. EPA - CLP

1 EPA SAMPLE NO.INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET ________ - '

Lab Name: CEIMIC ~' Contract: 63-D9-0070

Lab Code: CEIMIC Case No.: 14552 SAS No.: SDG No.: MCDW3S

Matrix (soil/water): SOIL Lab Sample ID: OO561-01S

j Level (low/med): LOW Date Received: 07/20/90

:: Solids: 37.1

Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/!<g dry weight): MGx'X3

1r

! CAS No »

7429-90-574 0-36-07440-38-274'-'0— 39— 374,:;o-4i-77/4/4C-43-97440-70-2744O-47-374ao— 4S— 47/V-iO-5O-37439-39-67439-92-17439-95-47439-96-57439-97-67440-02-07440-09-77732-49-27440-22-47440-23-57440-23-O7440-62-2744Qj--.<fc£-6__ .JsaH. _"" — •/ '""!"?" """""

Analyte

-1 urn in urn-rt timony-.'sen i c3c-.riu.rnr=ry IliumTad mi urnI a lei urnChromiumCobaltCopperIron'_=ad''agnesiurnManganeseMercuryNickelPotassiumSeleniumSilverSodiumThalliumVanadiumZincCyanide

iCon can traticn I C

rt

9090 . 00 !13.30!31.80!

2«2?0. CO!0 - 22 ! B

OO "7.", '^_ ,' u / -J i

2290.00!26 . 90 !7 . SO ! B

1440.00!16 100 ,.00!9920.00!2320 . 00 !176.00!

1 . 40 !25.10!

971 .00 IB5.90!3 . 90 !

719.00IB1 . 10 ! U34 . SO !

336O.OO!0 . 59 ! U

1

I it

Q ! n1

-._ - * -.. —* IPN ! PN*S ! F* ! P# ! P

IPIPIPIP

'•if ' C"•t- i rIPIF

* IP* IP* |CV

IPIP

NS IFIP;p

NW I FIPIP1C1t I

-SColor Before: BROWN Clarity Before: Textures MEDIUM

Color After: YELLOW Clarity After: Artifacts:

Comments 5

FORM I - IN 7/88

02 AR309683

U.S. EPA - CLP

1 EPA SAMPLE NO.INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET ______________

MCDW59Name: CEIMIC Contract: 68-D9-OO70 _____________

Lab Code: CEIMIC Case No.: 14552 SAS No.: SDG No.: MCDW58

Matrix (soil/water): SOIL Lab Sample IDs 00561-02S

Level <low/med): LOW Date Receiveds 07/20/9O

"'. Solids: ' S2.3

Concentration Units Cug/L or mg/Kg dry weight): PIG/KG , ,j

1 tt 1

ICAS No. ! Analytet

7429-90-5 - ! Aluminum744O-36-0 ! Antimony7440-33-2 ; Arsen i cT-'i.-.o— 39— 3 ! Barium"•" ••- '••• 0 - 4 1 - 7 : 3 e r y 1 1 i u rn7 .-.1 .vi 0—43—9 1C a d rn i u rn7 440—70-2 ! Ca 1 ci urn7440-47-3 I Chromium74 0-43-4 ! Co ba 1 t7 40-50-3 ! Copper7439-39-6 I Iron7439-92-1 !Lead7439-95-4 | Magnesium7439-96-5 ! Manganese7439—97—6 ! Mercury744O-02-0 ! Ni ckel7440-09-7 ! Potassium7732-49-2 [Selenium7440-22-4 ! Silver7440-23-5 ! Sodium7440-23-0 ! Thallium7440-62-2 I Vanadium7440-66-6 ,'Zinc___ - . _ ! Cyan i d e

-i . !

Concen tration 1Ct

16300.00!3 . 5O ! 3

*s 1 5 „ 70 Itfr. - " T j; ,. OO !fa'f* '*sf,4o;

12 . 3O i47000,00!

17.30!3 . 30 !

64-0. OO!13100,00!1520.00!12100. OO!12=O.OO;

o . 20 ;1 5 . 3O I

326.OOIB2.30!1.0OIU

74/.OO IB0 . 22 1 U19.40!

1590.00!0.65IU

11

tI

Q ;Mi

* IPN ! PN*3 1 F*n t r* ,' P

IPIPIPIP

"•fc ' P''r* i t

IPIF

•^V ' C<& i r* IP* icy

IPIP

NS ;F;pIP

NW IFIP;p!Ci

Color Before: BROWN Clarity Before: Texture: MEDIUM


Comments:

FORM I - IN 03 7/88

U.S. EPA - CLP

1 EPA SAMPLE NO.INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET ______ ___.

MCDW60Lab Name: CEIMIC .'-•. Contract: 63-D9-OO70 _____________,

Lab Code: CEIMIC Cass No.: 14552 SA5 No.: SDG No.: MCDW58

Matrix (soil/water): SOIL Lab Sample IDs OO561-O3S

Level (low/rned): LOW Date Received s 07/20/90

': Solids: 32.1

Con centra tier '.-its Cua/L or ma/Kc dry weiaht): MG/KG

CAS No, ! Analyte

7429-90-5 : -1 urn in urn7'4' 0— 36-O ! --! timany7'--1O— 33— 2 --senic7440-39-3 ~-~r± urn7 440-4 i-7 c 9 r y 1 1 i urn7440-43-9 ! 3 ad mi urn7440—70-2 3alciurn7440-47-3 , 3 nromiurn744O— 43--7440—50-37439— S9-67439-92-17439-95-47439-96-57439—97-6744O-02-0744O-09-777S2-49-2744O-22-47440-23-5744O-2S-07440-62-2744Or ?£-6___j S=' _

~-~-2

CcbaltTcp per3 -on_=ad"aqnesium"anganese~=rcuryr-ickelPotassiumSeleniumSilverEsdiumThalliumVanadiumZincCyanide

Con can tra tion ! Ci

9360,00!c •: 0 I U3 . 50 !

1=9 , 7-0 !0.17IU24.90!

4 L50 ,00 !22 . 20 !6, 90 IB5? , 30 !

12500 .00 !213.00!3470 . 00 !

-. 90 m ii T >_• , '-J t

0.12IU14.30!

1170,00!0.25IB1 . 00 ! U

513. 00 IB0.21IU25.90!

1290.00!0.61 !LI

1

Q_

NN;K:K;K

'X

;:<:{<?K

NW

NW

M

PpC"

C'

pp

ppt"'ppCT

p

C'

CVPPFPPFPPC

Color Before: TAN Clarity Before: Texture: FINE


Comments:

FORM I - Ihl 04 7/S8

U.S. EPA - CLP

1 EPA SAMPLE NO.INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET ________._____

MCDW61b Name: CEIMIC -r Contract: 63-D9-0070 _______________


Matrix (soil/water): -SOIL Lab Sample ID: 00561-O4S

Level (low/med): LOW Date Received: 07/2O/9O

*: Solids: 33.4

Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/!<g dry weight): MG/KG

Q,iS S..- .

7^29-= :--57'--C— 3z-0"7* .-. _ i "* _ — ^ _'O

~ - . '' /"' — "~ * — ~'

'•7 _ i •• _ _; • _ •?

7--..; --C-97 4.: o--- -27'-— C— -~-37440-c.= -4

7439— =r— 67439-F2-17.339— r-f-47'-37-r=-57439-97-6744O-02-07440-C9-77732-49-27440-22-47440-23-57440-2S-07440-62-2744p-ic-6__^^-^____

, --, -~j*$

Analyte

AluminumAn tirnonyArsenicBariumBeryl liumCadmiumCal ciurnChromiumCobaltCopperI ronLeadMagnesiumManganeseMe r cu ryNickelPotassiumSeleniumSilverSod i urnThalliumVanadiumZincCyanide

Con cen t ra t ion ! Cll

875O.OO!3.90IU1 . 20 ! "B

137,00!0 .. 23 ! B4 . 30 !

2 470, ,OO!25.60!7 . 50 ! B31.50!

16?00»00!53 ., 20 !

3250 ,.00!124 ,.00!0 . 1 1 ! U12.80!

1720.00!O . 24 ! U1 . 40 ! U

535. 00 IB0.24IU32 . 00 !110.00!0 . 60 ! U

11

Q

*NN#;!<:K

*

:!<*!*

NW

NW

M

P

d*^

F'"-

i

~-

~i

pP

FPF'CVpp.FPPFPPC

I Color Before: BROWN Clarity Befores Texture: FINE

I Color After: YELLOW Clarity After: Artifacts:•e.>.

; Commentss

FORM I - iVf 05 7/88. AR309686

U.S. EPA - CLP


MCDW62Lab Names CEIMIC , Contract: 63-D9-0070


Matrix (soil/water): SOIL Lab Sample IDs OO561-O5S

Level (low/med): LOW Date Received: 07/2O/90

:•: Sol id ss 31.6

Concentration"Units (ug/L or mg/Xq dry weight): MG/KG

CAS No.

7427-90-57'~~0-36-074-0—33-27'.-~0-39-37<::<.:0-4.i-774-- ;— 43— 974 0-70-274 0—47-37440-43-47440-50-37439-S9-6743?-92-l7439-95-47439-96-57439-97-67440-02-074 0-09-777S2-49-27440-22-474 0-23-57440-23-07440-62-27440-66-6___ i^__

~.---r.bS-

Analyte

AluminumAn tirnonyArsen i cBariumBeryl liurnCadmiumCal ciurnChromiumCobaltCopperIronLeadMagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickelPotassiumSeleniumSilverSodiumThalliumVanadiumZincCyanide

1I

Con can ".ration ! C

i:;=oo.oo:10. 50 IB13.10!

-69 -CO!0 , 24 ! U1 1 „ 70 !

= -o ,. oo ;3.2.10!- '? •* /\ IJ_ i. >• J. V t

172.00!13- 500 .00!"060.0O!•=20 . 00 !192.0O!O.lOiU25.50!

1770.00!3.00!1 . 40 ! U

437 . 00 ! B0.24IB34 . 50 !^08 . 00 !0.65IU

11

Q

*Ni. j «,

*«/

*

#

:lf*|V

:{<*

NS

NW

_,.

M

F'C1

cr~.

!-•r-.rc>C"

ppPtriPPcvppFPPc*

ppc

j Color Before: GREY Clarity Before: Texture: FINE

\ Color After: YELLOW Clarity After: Artifacts:iComments:

- IN • 0 OFORM I - IN • O 7/88

U.S. EPA - CLP

1 EPA SAMPLE NO.INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET _______________

MCDW63Name: CEIMIC r Contract: 68-D9-OO7O ______________


Matrix (soil/water): SOIL Lab Sample ID: 00561-06S

Level (low/rned): LOW * Date Received: 07/20/90

~i Solids: 73.9

] Concentration Units (ug/L or mq/!<q dry weight): MG/KG

tt

CAS No. ! Analyte

7429-90-5 ! Aluminum7440— 36— C" ! An tirnony74^0—38—2 I A r ssn i c7440-39-3 1 Barium7440—4 1 -7 ; Be ry .1 1 ium7 4 4 O - 4 3 - r ! C a d mi u m7440—70—2 I Ca lei urn7440-47-3 ,' Chromium744O-4S-4 ! Co ba 1 t744O- 50-3 ! Co p pe r7439-89-6 | Iron7439-92-1 ILead7439-95-4 ! Magnesium7439-96- .=. ; Man q an ese7439-97—6 ! Mercury7440-02-0 [Nickel744O-09-7 ! Potassium7732 -49-2 ! Selen ium744O-22-4 [Silver744O-23-5 ! Sodium744O-2S-0 ! Thai 1 ium7440-62-2 ! Van ad ium7440-66-6 [Zinc___ •[~j_ _ [Cyanide

- ~= "?" ,

tl

Ccn cent rat ion I Ci

13700.00!S.10IU4 ,. 40 !

29 700 ..0010»S3!B1 . 90 !

9330 „ 00 !25.60!76.0O!63 . SO !

35300.00!46 . 20 !

2430 .,OO[3300.00!

0 . 1 1 ! U23 . 90 !341. 00 IB0 . 26 ! U1 . 20 I U

862.0OIB0.26IU39.30!706 . 00 !0 . 60 ! U

1

Q

"•V'&

NN'.K*''V

#s#J .'n

*

NW

NW

M

C*

.-''tr

.-'C'

.-'

p.

p'p

FPPCVPPFP•e1

FPF'C

Color Before: BLACK Clarity Before: Texture: FINE


Common ts:

FORM I - iM • ' 07 7/88

U.S. EPA - CLP


MCDW64Lab Name: CEIMIC . Contract: 63-D9-OO70 ______________


Matrix (soil/water): SOIL Lab Sample ID: 00561-O7S

Level (low/med): LOW Date Received: 07/2O/90

.': Solids: 80.3

•Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/Kg dry weight): MG/X3

CAS No.

7429-90-5744O-36-074 0-33-27440-39-37440-41-77440-43-974. 0-70-27440-47-37440—43— 4744O-50-37439-39-67439-92-17439-95-47439-96-57439-97-6744O-02-0744O-09-77732-49-27440-22-47440-23-5744O-2S-07440-62-2744O— 66— 6___ _5 . __

. _iT.Sj?

Analyte

AluminumAn timonyAr sen icBarium3ery 11 iumCadmiumCalciumChromiumCobaltCopperIronLeadMagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickelPotassiumSeleniumSilverSodiumThalliumVanadiumZincCyanide

11

Con cent nation ! Ci.__ . . - *

10300 .CO!9 . 60 ! U4, .40! .

2070,00!0 ,. 49 ! B1 . 20 !

6 19. 00 IB26 . 60 !5 . 90 ! B3 . 70 ! B

23400 . OO !7 . 9O !

1 540 , 00 !50.10!0 . 1 1 I U12.30!809. 00 IB0 . 22 ! U1 . 50 I U

703. 00 [B0 . 37 [ B37.50!33 . 1 O [0 . 57 [ U

1

Q— .

*NN::<;K:K

*

***

NW

NW

M

P

O

*

r 1

.=•™io

f"C1

c«

Pcrc*r;i

CVPPFC*

PcraPpc

Color Before: GREY Clarity Before: Texture: FINE


Comments:

"'•" 'OSFORM I - IN 7/88

AR309689

APPENDIX B

TPO REPORT

Page 1 of

TPO: [ ] ACTION : [X] FYI Region III

INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT SUMMARY

CASE NO: 1455275 LABORATORY: CEIMICSDG NO: MCDW58 DATA USER: Deborah SzaroSOW: 7/88 REVIEW COMPLETION DATE: 9/25/90NO. OF SAMPLES: seven (7) MATRIX: Soil

REVIEWER: ESATICP AA Eg CYANIDE

1. HOLDING TIMES _O_ _O_ _0_ _O_

2. INITIAL CALIBRATIONS _O_ _O_ _0_ _O_

3. CONTINUING CALIBRATIONS _0_ _O_ _0_ _0_

4. FIELD BLANKS (F=NOT APPLICABLE) _F_ _F_ _?_ _F_

5. LABORATORY BLANKS _X_ _O_ _0_ _0_

6. ICS _0_

7. LCS _O_ _O_

3. DUPLICATE ANALYSIS _M_ _M_ _0_ _O_

9. MATRIX SPIKE _M_ _0_ _0_ _0_

10. MSA _0_

11. SERIAL DILUTION _O_

12. SAMPLE VERIFICATION _0_ _O_ _0_ _O_

13. REGIONAL QC(F-NOT APPLICABLE) _F_ _F_ _F_ _F_

14. OVERALL AS SEGMENT _M_ _M*_ _0_ _0_O « No problftmtf, or minor problems that do not affect data usabilityX * No more than about 5% of the data points are qualified as either estimated or

unusable.M = More than about 5% of the data points are qualified as estimated.Z = More than about 5% of the data points are qualified as unusable.A = TPO action requested; use in conjunction with one of the above codes.

TPO ACTION ITEMS: ______________________:_____________________________________

AREAS OF CONCERN: (1) Standard curve used to generate Pb data had acorrelation coefficient of 0.99360.______________________________

flfi30969i

3>e! I - semspub.epa.gov · Attached is the inorganic data review for the Dupont Newport Site (Case 14552) completed by the Region III Environmental Services Assistance Team (ESAT)

Documents