396141 1 En BookBackmatter 115..115978-1-137-58802-9/1.pdf · Bivand, M. (2012). A place to stay in Pakistan: Why migrants build houses in their countries of origin. Population, Space

REFERENCES

Abdelhady, D. (2008). Representing the homeland: Lebanese diasporic notions ofhome and return in a global context. Cultural Dynamics, 20(1), 53–72.

Abramsson, M. (2012). Housing careers. In S. Smith (Ed.), International ency-clopedia of housing and home. London: Elsevier.

Aguilar, F. (2009). Labour migration and ties of relatedness: Diasporic houses andinvestments in memory in a rural Philippine village. Thesis Eleven, 98(1), 88–114.

Ahmed, S. (1999). Home and away: Narratives of migration and estrangement.International Journal of Cultural Studies, 2(3), 329–347.

Ahmed, S., Castañeda, C., Fortier, A., & Sheller, M. (Eds.) (2003a). Uprootings/regroundings: Questions of home and migration. London: Berg.

Ahmed, S., Castañeda, C., Fortier, A., & Sheller M. (Eds.) (2003b). Introduction.In S. Ahmed et al. (Eds.), Uprootings/regroundings. London: Berg.

Al-Alì, N., & Koser, K. (Eds.) (2002a). New approaches to migration?Transnational communities and the transformation of home. London:Routledge.

Al-Alì, N., & Koser, K. (2002b). Transnationalism, international migration andhome. In N. Al-Alì, & K. Koser (Eds.), New approaches to migration? London:Routledge.

Alba, R., & Nee, V. (2005). Remaking the American mainstream. Cambridge:Harvard University Press.

Allen, S. (2008). Finding home: Challenges faced by geographically mobilefamilies. Family Relations, 57, 84–99.

Alsop, C. (2002). Home and away: Self-reflexive auto-ethnography. ForumQualitative Research, 3(3), 10.

Altman, I., & Werner, C. (Eds.) (1985). Home environments. New York: PlenumPress.

© The Author(s) 2017P. Boccagni, Migration and the Search for Home, Mobility & Politics,DOI 10.1057/978-1-137-58802-9

115

Ambrosini, M. (2013). Irregular migration and invisible welfare. Basingstoke:Palgrave.

Appadurai, A. (2004). The capacity to aspire: Culture and the terms of recogni-tion. In R. Vijaendra, &M. Walton (Eds.), Culture and public action. Stanford:Stanford University Press.

Arbaci, S. (2007). Ethnic segregation, housing systems and welfare regimes inEurope. International Journal of Housing Policy, 7(4), 401–433.

Arbaci, S. (2008). (Re)Viewing ethnic residential segregation in southernEuropean cities. Housing Studies, 23(4), 589–613.

Arnold, J., Graesch, A., Ragazzini, E., & Ochs, E. (2012). Life at home in thetwenty-first century. Los Angeles: University of New Mexico Press.

Atkinson, P. (2015). For ethnography. London: Sage.Back, L. (2007). The art of listening. London: Berg.Baldassar, L. (2001). Visits home. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.Baldassar, L. et al. (2016). ICT-based co-presence in transnational families and

communities. Global Networks, 16(2), 133–144.Basu, P. (2001). Hunting down home: Reflections on homeland and the search

for identity in the Scottish diaspora. In B. Bender & M. Winer (Eds.),Contested Landscapes: Movements, Exile and Place. Berg: Oxford.

Baxter, R., & Brickell, K. (2014). For home unmaking. Home Cultures, 11(2),133–144.

Belloni, M. (2015). Cosmologies of destinations. Roots and routes of Eritrean forcedmigration towards Europe. Trento: University of Trento, PhD thesis.

Benjamin, D.N. (1995a). Introduction. In D. Benjamin et al. (Eds.), The home:Words, interpretations, meanings, and environments. London: Avebury.

Benjamin, D.N. (1995b). Afterword, or further research issues in confronting thehome concept. In D. Benjamin et al. (Eds.), The home. London: Avebury.

Benjamin, D.N., & Stea, D. (Eds.) (1995). The home: Words, interpretations,meanings and environments. Aldershot: Ashgate.

Berg, M., & Sigona, N. (2013). Ethnography, diversity and urban space.Identities, 20(4), 347–360.

Berger, J. (1984). And our faces, my heart, brief as photos. London: Vintage.Berry, J. (1997). Immigration, acculturation and adaptation. Applied Psychology,

46(1), 5–34.Bertossi, C., & Duyvendak, J.W. (2012). National models of immigrant integra-

tion. Comparative European Politics, 10, 237–247.Birdwell-Pheasant, D., & Lawrence-Zúñiga, D. (Eds.) (1999a). House life: Space,

place and family in Europe. Oxford: Berg.Birdwell-Pheasant, D., & Lawrence-Zúñiga, D. (1999b). Introduction: Houses

and families in Europe. In D. Birdwell-Pheasant, & D. Lawrence-Zúñiga(Eds.), House life. Oxford: Berg.

116 REFERENCES

Bivand, M. (2012). A place to stay in Pakistan: Why migrants build houses in theircountries of origin. Population, Space and Place, 18(5), 629–641.

Bivand, M. (2014). “This is my home”. Return considerations as articulationsabout “home”. Comparative Migration Studies, 2(3), 361–383.

Black, R. (2002). Conceptions of ‘home’ and the political geography of refugeerepatriation. Applied Geography, 22, 123–138.

Bloemraad, I., Kortenweg, A., & Yurdakul, G. (2008). Citizenship and immigra-tion: Multiculturalism, assimilation and challenges to the nation-state. AnnualReview of Sociology, 34, 153–179.

Blunt, A. (2003). Home and identity. In M. Ogborn et al. (Eds.), Culturalgeography in practice. London: Routledge.

Blunt, A., & Bonnerjee, J. (2013). Home, city and diaspora: Anglo-Indian andChinese attachments to Calcutta. Global Networks, 13(2), 220–240.

Blunt, A., & Dowling, R. (2006). Home. London: Routledge.Blunt, C. (2008). Arriving home: A multi-sited ethnography of the making of

“home”. London: Goldsmiths College, PhD thesis.Boccagni, P. (2012). Rethinking transnational studies: Transnational ties and the

transnationalism of everyday life. European Journal of Social Theory, 15(1),117–132.

Boccagni, P. (2014a). What’s in a (migrant) house? Changing domestic spaces, thenegotiation of belonging and home-making in Ecuadorian migration.Housing,Theory and Society, 31(3), 277–293.

Boccagni, P. (2014b). Making the “Fifth Region” a real place? Emigrantpolicies and the emigration-nation nexus in Ecuador. National Identities,16(2), 117–137.

Boccagni, P. (2015). Burden, blessing or both? On the mixed role of transnationalties in migrant informal social support. International Sociology, 30(3), 250–268.

Boccagni, P. (2016). Searching for wellbeing in care work migration:Constructions, practices and displacements among immigrant women in Italy.Social Politics, 23(2), 284–306.

Boccagni, P., & Baldassar, L. (2015). Emotions on the move: Mapping the emer-gent field of emotion and migration. Emotion, Space and Society, 16, 73–80.

Boccagni, P., & Brighenti, A. (2015). Immigrants and home in the making:Thresholds of domesticity, commonality and publicness. Journal of Housingand the Built Environment, forthcoming, available as online first.

Boccagni, P., & Decimo, F. (2013). Mapping social remittances. MigrationLetters, 10(1), 1–10.

Bolognani, M. (2016). From myth of return to return phantasy. Identities, 23(2),193–209.

Bolt, G., Phillips, D., & Van Kempen, R. (2010). Housing policy, (de)segregationand social mixing: An international perspective.Housing Studies, 25(2), 129–135.

REFERENCES 117

Bolt, G. (2012). Ethnic minorities and housing. In S. Smith (Ed.), Internationalencyclopedia of housing and home. London: Elsevier.

Bourdieu, P. (1977 [1970]). The Kabyle house or the world reversed. InP. Bourdieu (Ed.), Algeria 1960. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Brah, A. (2005). Cartographies of diaspora. London: Routledge.Brettell, C. (2006). Introduction – Global spaces/local places: Transnationalism,

diaspora, and the meaning of home. Identities, 13, 327–334.Brickell, K. (2012). Geopolitics of home. Geography Compass, 6(10), 575–588.Briganti, C., & Mezei, K. (Eds.) (2012). The domestic space reader. Toronto:

University of Toronto Press.Brun, C. (2012). Home in temporary dwellings. In S. Smith (Ed.), International

encyclopedia of housing and home. London: Elsevier.Buchli, V., Clarke, A., & Upton, D. (2004). Editorial. Home Cultures, 1(1), 1–4.Buffel, T. (2015). Ageing migrants and the creation of home: Mobility and the

maintenance of transnational ties. Population, Space and Place. Online first.Buitelaar, M., & Stock, F. (2010). Making homes in turbulent times. In H.

Moghissi, & H. Ghorashi (Eds.), Muslim diaspora in the West: Negotiatinggender, home and belonging. Aldershot: Ashgate.

Butcher, M. (2010). From ‘fish out of water’ to ‘fitting in’: The challenge ofreplacing home in a mobile world. Population, Space and Place, 16, 23–36.

Butcher, M., & Dickens, L. (2015). Creating Hackney as home. Project reportavailable on www.hackneyashome.co.uk [last consulted: 19 February 2016].

Cancellieri, A. (2015). Towards a progressive home-making. Journal of Housingand the Built Enviroment, available as online first.

Carling (2014). Scripting remittances. International Migration Review, 48(s1),S218–s262.

Carsten, J. (2004). After kinship. Cambridge: CUP.Carsten, J., & Hugh-Jones, S. (1995). Introduction: About the house – Levi-

Strauss and beyond. In J. Carsten, & S. Hugh-Jones (Eds.), About the house.Cambridge: CUP.

CECODHAS (2007). Social housing and integration of immigrants in theEuropean Union. Exchange, Special Edition, Brussels: European SocialHousing Observatory.

Chapman, T. (2001). There’s no place like home. Theory Culture and Society,18(6), 135–146.

Chapman, T., & Hockey, J. (Eds.) (1999). Ideal homes? Social change and domesticlife. London: Routledge.

Chevalier, S. (2012). Material cultures of home. In S. Smith (Ed.), Internationalencyclopedia of housing and home. London: Elsevier.

Cieraad, I. (2010). Homes from home: Memories and projections. HomeCultures, 7(1), 85–102.

118 REFERENCES

Clarke, A. (2001). The aesthetics of social aspiration. In D. Miller (Ed.), Homepossessions. Oxford: Berg.

Cohen, R. (2007). Solid, ductile and liquid: Changing notions of homeland andhome in diaspora studies. QEH working papers series no. 156.

Constant, A., Roberts, R., & Zimmerman, K. (2009). Ethnic identity and immi-grant home ownership. Urban Studies, 46(9), 1879–1898.

Coolen, H., & Meesters, J. (2012). Editorial special issue: House, home anddwelling. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 27, 1–10.

Cuba, L., & Hummon, D. (1993). Constructing a sense of home: Place affiliationand migration across the life cycle. Sociological Forum, 8(4), 547–572.

Cwerner, S. (2001). The times of migration. Journal of Ethnic and MigrationStudies, 27(1), 7–36.

Dalakoglou, D. 2010. Migrating-remitting-‘building’-dwelling: House-making as‘Proxy’ Presence in Postsocialist Albania. Journal of the Royal AnthropologicalInstitute, 16, 761–777.

Davies, M. (2014). Home and state: Reflections on metaphor and practice.Griffith Law Review, 21(2), 153–175.

De Souza, M. (2005). No place like home: Returnee R&R (retention and rejec-tion) in the Caribbean homeland. In R. Potter et al. (Eds.), The experience ofreturn migration. Aldershot: Ashgate.

Dedieu, J., & Mbodj-Pouye, A. (2016). The first collective protest of BlackAfrican migrants in postcolonial France (1960–1975): A struggle for housingand rights. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 39(6), 958–975.

Després, C. (1991). The meaning of home. The Journal of Architectural andPlanning Research, 8(2), 96–115.

Donà, G. (2015). Making homes in limbo: Embodied virtual “homes” in prolon-gued conditions of displacement. Refuge, 31(1), 67–73.

Douglas, M. (1991). The idea of a home: A kind of space. Social Research, 58(1),287–307.

Dovey, K. (1985). Home and homelessness. In I. Altman, & C. Werner (Eds.),Home environments (pp. 113–132). New York: Plenum Press.

Dowling, R., & Fitzpatrick, S. (2012). Home and homelessness. In S. Smith(Ed.), International encyclopedia of housing and home. London: Elsevier.

Duyvendak, J.W. (2011). The politics of home. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Easthope, H. (2004). A place called home. Housing, Theory and Society, 21(3),

128–138.Edgar, B., Doherty, J., & Meert, H. (2004). Immigration and homelessness in

Europe. Bristol: Policy.Eggert, N., & Pilati, K. (2014). Networks and political engagement of migrant

organisations in five European cities. European Journal of Political Research,53(4), 858–875.

REFERENCES 119

Ehrkamp, P., & Leitner, H. (2003). Beyond national citizenship: Turkish immi-grants and the (re)construction of citizenship in Germany. Urban Geography,24(2), 127–146.

England, K. (2010). Home, work and the shifting geographies of care. Ethics,Place and Environment, 13(2), 131–150.

Espiritu, Y.L. (2003). Home bound: Filipino American lives across cultures, com-munities and countries. Los Angeles: University of California Press.

Fitzgerald, D. (2006). Towards a theoretical ethnography of migration.Qualitative Sociology, 29(1), 1–24.

Fitzgerald, D. (2014). The sociology of international migration. In C. Brettell, &J. Hollifield (Eds.), Migration theory: Talking across disciplines. New York:Routledge.

Fletcher, P. (1999). La casa de mis sueños: Dreams of home in a transnationalMexican community. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

Fortier, A.M. (2001). ‘Coming home’: Queer migrations and multiple evocationsof home. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 4(4), 405–424.

Fox, L. (2002). The meaning of home: A chimerical concept or a legal challenge?.Journal of Law and Society, 29(4), 580–610.

Fox, L. (2007). Conceptualising home: Theories, laws and policies. London:Bloomsbury.

Franklin, A. (2008). Ethnography and housing studies revisited. Studies inQualitative Methodology, 10, 271–289.

Freeman, L. (2013). Separation, connection and the ambiguous nature of émigréhouses in rural highland Madagascar. Home Cultures, 10(2), 93–110.

Gallo, E. (2013). Migration, circulation and shifting conceptions of the house:Perspectives from Kerala. Desi, 2, 103–121.

Gardner, K. (2002). Age, narrative and migration. New York: Berg.Gauvain, M., & Altman, I. (1982). A cross-cultural analysis of homes. Architecture

and Behavior, 2, 27–46.Ghorashi, H. (2002). Ways to survive, battles to win. New York: Nova Science.Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity.Gielis, R. (2011). The value of single-site ethnography in the global era: Studying

transnational experiences in the migrant house. Area, 43(3), 25–63.Gieryn, T. (2000). A space for place in sociology. Annual Review of Sociology,

26, 463–496.Ginsberg, R. (1999). Meditations on homelessness and being at home. In

G. Abbarno (Ed.), The ethics of homelessness. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Giorgi, S., & Fasulo, A. (2013). Transformative homes: Squatting and furnishing

as sociocultural projects. Home Cultures, 10(2), 111–134.Glick-Schiller, N. et al. (1994). Nations unbound: Transnational projects, postcolo-

nial predicaments and deterritorialized nation-states. New York: Routledge.

120 REFERENCES

Glick-Schiller, N., & Fouron, G. (2001). Georges woke up laughing: Long-distancenationalism and the search for home. Durham: Duke University Press.

Glynn, S. (2005). East end immigrants and the battle for housing: A comparativestudy of political mobilisation in the Jewish and Bengali communities. Journalof Historical Geography, 31(3), 528–545.

Goodman, S. (2010). Integration requirement for integration’s sake? Identifying,categorising and comparing civic integration policies across Europe. Journal ofEthnic and Migration Studies, 36(5), 753–772.

Graham, L. et al. (2015). The psychology of home environments: A call forresearch on residential spaces. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(3),346–356.

Graham, M., & Khosravi, S. (1997). Home is where you make it: Repatriation anddiaspora culture among Iranians in Sweden. Journal of Refugee Studies, 10(2),115–133.

Gram-Hanssen, K., & Bech-Danielsen, C. (2012). Creating a new home: Somali,Iraqi and Kurdish immigrants and their homes in Danish social housing.Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 27, 89–103.

Gurney, C.M. (1997). “ . . .Half ofme was satisfied”: Making sense of home throughepisodic ethnographies. Women’s International Forum, 20(3), 373–386.

Habal, E. (2007). San Francisco’s international hotel: Mobilizing the FilipinoAmerican community in the anti-eviction movement. Philadelphia: TempleUniversity Press.

Hage, G. (1997). At home in the entrails of the west: Multiculturalism, ethnicfood and migrant home-building. In H. Grace et al. (Eds), Home/World.Sydney: Pluto Press.

Hayward, D.G. (1977). Housing research and the concept of home. HousingEducators Journal, 4(3), 7–12.

Heller, A. (1995). Where are we at home? Thesis Eleven, 41, 11–18.Ho, E., & Kissoon, P. (2012). Migration: Ethnicity, race and mobility. In S. Smith

(Ed.), International Encyclopedia of Housing and Home. London: Elsevier.Holland, C., & Peace, S. (2012). Life course. In S. Smith (Ed.), International

encyclopedia of housing and home (pp. 405–414). London: Elsevier.Hollows, J. (2012). Domesticity. In S. Smith (Ed.), International encyclopedia of

housing and home (pp. 405–414). London: Elsevier.Hondagneu-Sotelo, P. (2015). At home in inner city: Immigrant community

gardens. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, forthcoming, availableas online first.

Jacobs, J., & Smith, S. (2008). Living room: Rematerialising home. Environmentand Planning A, 40, 515–519.

Jacobson, K. (2009). A developed nature: A phenomenological account of theexperience of home. Contemporary Philosophical Review, 42, 355–373.

REFERENCES 121

Jacobson, K. (2012). Philosophical perspectives on home. In S. Smith (Ed.),International Encyclopedia of Housing and Home. London: Elsevier.

Jansen, S., & Lofvig, S. (Eds.) (2009). Struggles for home: Violence, hope and themovement of people. Oxford: Berghahn.

Joppke C. (2010). Citizenship and immigration. Cambridge: Polity.Kabachnik, P., Regulska, J., & Mitchneck, B. (2010). When and where is home?

The double displacement of Georgian IDPs from Abkhazia. Journal of RefugeeStudies, 23(3), 316–336.

Kasinitz, P. (2013). Toward a sociology of home. Sociological Forum, 28(4), 881–884.King, R., Christou, A., & Levitt, P. (Eds.) (2014). Links to the diasporic homeland.

London: Routledge.Kissoon, P. (2015). Intersections of displacement: Refugees’ experiences of home and

homelessness. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars.Kivisto, P. (2001). Theorizing transnational immigration. Ethnic and Racial

Studies, 24(4), 549–577.Klaufus, C. (2006). Globalization in residential architecture in Cuenca, Ecuador:

Social and cultural diversification of architects and their clients. Environmentand Planning D, 24(1): 69–89.

Klodawsky, F. (2012). Home and homelessness. In S. Smith (Ed.), Internationalencyclopedia of housing and home. London: Elsevier.

Koopmans, R. (2013). Multiculturalism and immigration. Annual Review ofSociology, 39, 147–169.

Koopmans, R., Statham, P., Giugni, M., & Passy, F. (Eds.) (2005). Contestedcitizenship: Immigration and cultural diversity in Europe. Minneapolis:University of Minnesota Press.

Korac, M. (2009). Remaking home. Reconstructing life, place and identity in Romeand Amsterdam. Oxford: Berg.

Kumar, K., & Makarova, E. (2008). The portable home: The domestication ofpublic space. Sociological Theory, 26(4), 324–343.

Kusenbach, M. (2003). Street phenomenology. Ethnography, 4(3), 455–485.Kusenbach, M., & Paulsen, K. (2013). Home: An introduction. In M. Kusenbach,

& K. Paulsen (Eds.), Home: International perspectives on culture, identity andbelonging. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.

Lam, T., & Yeoh, B. (2004). Negotiating ‘home’ and ‘national identity’:Chinese–Malaysian transmigrants in Singapore. Asia Pacific Viewpoint,42(2), 141–164.

Law, L., (2001). Home cooking: Filipino women and geographies of the senses inHong Kong. Ecumene, 8(3), 264–283.

Lawrence, R.J. (1985). A more humane history of homes: Research methods andapplications. In I. Altman, & C. Werner (Eds.), Home environments (pp. 113–132). New York: Plenum Press.

122 REFERENCES

Lawrence, R.J. (1987). What makes a house a home? Environment and Behavior.19(2), 154–168.

Leitner, H., & Strunk, C. (2014). Spaces of immigrant advocacy and liberaldemocratic citizenship. Annals of the Association of American Geographers,104(2), 348–356.

Levin I. (2016), Migration, settlement, and the concepts of house andhome. London: Routledge.

Levin, I., & Fincher, R. (2010). Tangible transnational links in the houses ofItalian immigrants in Melbourne. Global Networks, 10(3), 401–423.

Levitt, P., Jaworsky, B. (2007). Transnational migration studies. Annual Reviewof Sociology, 33, 129–156.

Levitt, P., & Lamba-Nieves, D. (2011). Social remittances revisited. Journal ofEthnic and Migration Studies, 37(1), 1–22.

Levitt, P., & Lamba-Nieves, D. (2013). Rethinking social remittances and themigration-development nexus from the perspective of time. Migration Letters,10(1), 11–22.

Levitt, P., & Waters, M. (Eds.) (2002). The changing face of home: The transna-tional lives of the second generation. New York: Russel Sage Foundation.

Ley-Cervantes, M., & Duyvendak, J.W. (2015). At home in generic places:Personalizing strategies of the mobile rich. Journal of Housing and the BuiltEnvironment. doi:10.1007/s10901-015-9492-z.

Lithman, Y. (2010). The holistic ambition: Social cohesion and the culturalizationof citizenship. Ethnicities, 10(4), 488–502.

Liu, L. (2014). A search for a place to call home. Emotion, Space and Society, 10,18–26.

López, S. (2010). The remittance house: Architecture of migration in ruralMexico. Buildings & Landscapes, 17(2), 33–52.

López, S. (2015). The remittance landscape. Chicago: CUP.Lozanovska, M., Levin, I., & Gantala, M.V. (2013). Is the migrant house in

Australia an Australian vernacular architecture? TDSR, 24(2), 65–78.Lu, D. (2012). Cultural analysis of housing and space. In S. Smith (Ed.),

International encyclopedia of housing and home. London: Elsevier.Lucas, S. & Purkayastha, B., (2007). “Where is home?” Here and there: transna-

tional experiences of home among Canadian migrants in the UnitedStates. GeoJournal, 78(2): 243–251.

Luken, P. (2012). Ethnography. In S. Smith (Ed.), International encyclopedia ofhousing and home. London: Elsevier.

Luna, G., & Ausley, F. (2009). Global migrants and access to local housing:Anti-immigrant backlash hits home. In F. Ansley, & J. Shefner (Eds.),Global connections and local receptions. Knoxville: The University ofTennessee Press.

REFERENCES 123

Mack, J. (2004). Inhabiting the imaginary: Factory women at home on BatamIsland, Indonesia. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 25, 156–179.

Madianou, M. (2016). Ambient co-presence: Transnational family practices inpolymedia environments. Global Networks, 16(2), 183–201.

Madianou, M., & Miller, M. (2012). Migration and new media. London:Routledge.

Malkki, L. (1992). National Geographic: The rooting of peoples and the territor-ialization of national identity among scholars and refugees. CulturalAnthropology, 7(1), 24–44.

Malkki, L. (1995). Refugees and exiles: From “refugee studies” to the nationalorder of things. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 495–523.

Mallett, S. (2004). Understanding home. The Sociological Review, 52(1), 62–89.Markowitz, F. (2004). The home(s) of homecomings. In F. Markowitz, &

A. Stefansson (Eds.), Homecomings: Unsettling paths of return. Lanham:Lexington.

Markowitz, F., & Stefansson, A., (Eds.) (2004). Homecomings: Unsettling paths ofreturn. Lanham: Lexington.

Marte, L. (2007). Foodmaps: Tracing boundaries of “home” through food rela-tions. Food & Foodways, 15, 261–289.

Massey, D. (1992). A place called home? New Formations, 17, 3–15.Mata-Codesal, D. (2014). From ‘mud houses’ to ‘wasted houses’: Remittances

and housing in rural highland Ecuador. REMHU, 22(42), 263–280.Mee, K.J., & Vaughan, N. (2012). Experiencing home. In S. Smith (Ed.),

International encyclopedia of housing and home. London: Elsevier.Meijering, L., & Lager, D. (2014). Home-making of older Antillean migrants in

the Netherlands. Ageing & Society, 34, 859–875.Miller, D. (Ed.) (2001a). Home possessions: Material culture behind closed doors.

Oxford: Berg.Miller, D. (2001b). Behind closed doors. In D. Miller (Ed.), Home possessions.

Oxford: Berg.Moore, J. (2000). Placing home in context. Journal of Environmental Psychology,

20, 207–217.Morley, D. (2000). Home territories: Media, mobility and identity. London:

Routledge.Murdie, R. (2002). The housing careers of Polish and Somali newcomers in

Toronto’s rental market. Housing Studies, 17, 423–443.Murray, A., & Dowling, R. (2007). Home.M/C –A Journal of Media and Culture,

10(4). website: http://journal.media-culture.org.au/0708/01-editorial.php.Nieswand, B. (2013). The burger’s paradox. Ethnography, 15(4), 403–425.Noble, G. (2012). Home objects. In S. Smith (Ed.), International encyclopedia of

housing and home. London: Elsevier.

124 REFERENCES

Nowicka, M. (2007). Mobile locations: Construction of home in a group ofmobile transnational professionals. Global Networks, 7(1), 69–86.

O’Neill, M. et al. (Eds.) (2015). Advances in biographical methods. London:Routledge.

Obeng-Odoom, F. (2010). Urban real estate in Ghana: A study of housing-relatedremittances from Australia. Housing Studies, 25(3), 357–373.

Ochs, E., & Kremer-Sadlik, T. (Eds.) (2013). Fast-forward family: Home, workand relationships in middle-class America. Los Angeles: UCP.

Olwig, K.F. (1999). Travelling makes a home: Mobility and identity amongWest Indians. In T. Chapman, & J. Hockey (Eds.), Ideal homes? London:Routledge.

Ortega-Alcazár, I. (2012). Visual research methods. In S. Smith (Ed.),International encyclopedia of housing and home. London: Elsevier.

Ozuekren, A., & van Kempen, R. (2002). Housing careers and minority ethnicgroups. Housing Studies, 17(3), 365–379.

Pattillo, M. (2013). Housing: Commodity versus right. Annual Review ofSociology, 39, 509–531.

Pechurina, A. (2014). Positionality and ethics in qualitative research of migrants’homes. Sociological Research online, 19(1), 4.

Pink, S. (2004). In and out of the academy: Video ethnography of the home.Visual Anthropology Review, 20(1), 82–88.

Portes, A., Guarnizo, L., & Landolt, P. (1999). The study of transnationalism:Pitfalls and promises of an emergent research field. Ethnic and Racial Studies,22(2), 217–237.

Portes, A., & Rumbaut, R. (2001). Legacies. Los Angeles: University of CaliforniaPress.

Probyn, E. (1996). Outside belongings. London: Routledge.Ralph, D. (2009). ‘Home is where the heart is’? Understandings of ‘home’ among

Irish-born return migrants from the United States. Irish Studies Review, 17(2),183–200.

Ralph, D., & Staeheli, L.A. (2011). Home and migration: Mobilities, belongingsand identities. Geography Compass, 5(7), 517–530.

Rapoport, A. (1995). A critical look at the concept “home”. In D. Benjamin et al.(Eds.), The home: Words, interpretations, meanings, and environments. London:Avebury.

Rapport, N., & Dawson, A. (Eds.) (1998a). Migrants of identity: Perceptions ofhome in a world of movement. Oxford: Berg.

Rapport, N., & Dawson, A. (1998b). Opening a debate. In N. Rapport, &A. Dawson (Eds.), Migrants of identity. Oxford: Berg.

Reinders, L., & Van der Land, M. (2008). Mental geographies of home and place.Housing, Theory and Society, 25(1), 1–13.

REFERENCES 125

Riccio, B. (2002). Senegal is our home: The anchored nature of Senegalesetransnational networks. In N. Al-Ali, & K. Khoser (Eds.), New approaches tomigration? London: Routledge.

Ronald, R. (2011). Ethnography and comparative housing research. InternationalJournal of Housing Policy, 11(4), 415–437.

Ronald, R., & Elsinga, M. (Eds.) (2012). Beyond home ownership. London:Routledge.

Rybczynski, W. (1986). Home: A short history of an idea. London: Penguin.Rykwert, J. (1991). House and home. Social Research, 58(1), 51–62.Said, E. (2000[1984]). Reflections on exile. Cambridge: Harvard University

Press.Saile, D. (1985). The ritual establishment of home. Home Environments: Human

Behaviour and Environment, 8, 87–111.Salih, R. (2002). Shifting meanings of ‘home’: Consumption and identity in

Moroccan women’s transnational practices between Italy and Morocco. In N.Al-Alì, & K. Koser (Eds.), New approaches to migration? London, Routledge.

Sandu, A. (2013). Transnational homemaking practices: Identity, belonging andinformal learning. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 21(4), 496–512.

Saunders, P., & Williams, P. (1988). The constitution of home: Towards aresearch agenda. Housing Studies, 3(2), 81–93.

Saxbe, D.E., & Repetti, R. (2010). No place like home: Home tours correlate withdaily patterns of mood and cortisol. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,36(1), 71–81.

Schutz, A. (1945). The homecomer. American Journal of Sociology, 50(5),369–376.

Silva, K. (2009). “Oh, give me a home”: Diasporic longings of home and belong-ing. Social Identities, 15(5), 693–706.

Sinatti, G. (2009). Home is where the heart abides: Migration, return and housingin Dakar, Senegal. Open House International, 34(3), 49–56.

Sinfield, A. (2000). Diaspora and hybridity. In N. Mirzoeff (Ed.), Diaspora andvisual culture. London: Routledge.

Sirriyeh, A. (2010). Home journeys: Im/mobilities in young refugee and asylum-seeking women’s negotiations of home. Childhood, 17(2), 213–227.

Skrbis, Z. (2008). Transnational families: Theorising migration, emotions andbelonging. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 29(3), 231–246.

Smets, P., & de Uyl, M. (2008). The complex role of ethnicity in urban mixing.Urban Studies, 45(7), 1439–1460.

Smets, P., & Watt, P. (2013). Editorial: Exclusion and belonging in urban publicand quasi-public space. The Open Studies Journal, 6, 27–29.

Smith, A. (2014). Interpreting home in the transnational discourse: The case ofpost-EU enlargement Poles in Dublin. Home Cultures, 11(1), 103–122.

126 REFERENCES

Smith, L., & Mazzucato, V. (2009). Constructing homes, building relationships.Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 100(5), 662–673.

Smith, S. (Ed.) (2012). International encyclopedia of housing and home. London:Elsevier.

Somerville, P. (1997). The social construction of home. Journal of Architecturaland Planning Research, 14(3), 226–245.

Somerville, P., & Steele, A. (Eds.) (2002). “Race”, housing and social exclusion.London: JKP.

Staeheli, L., & Nagel, C.R. (2006). Topographies of Home and Citizenship:Arab-American Activists in the United States. Environment and PlanningA, 38(9), 1599–1614.

Staeheli, L., Ehrkamp, P., Leitner, P., & Nagel, C. (2012). Dreaming the ordin-ary: Daily life and the complex geographies of citizenship. Progress in HumanGeography, 36(5), 628–644.

Stea, D. (1995). House and home: Identity, dichotomy, or dialectic? InD. Benjamin et al. (Eds.), The home: Words, interpretations, meanings, andenvironments. London: Avebury.

Stefansson, A.H. (2004). Homecomings to the future: From diasporic mythogra-phies to social projects of return. In F. Markowitz, & A. Stefansson (Eds.),Homecomings: Unsettling paths of return. Lanham: Lexington.

Taylor, H. (2015). Refugees and the meaning of home. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Taylor, S. (2015). “Home is never fully achieved . . . even when we are in it”:

Migration, belonging and social exclusion within Punjabi transnational mobi-lity. Mobilities, 10(2), 193–210.

Tolia-Kelly, D. (2004). Materializing postcolonial geographies: Examining the tex-tual landscapes of migration in the South Asian home. Geoforum, 35(6), 675–88.

Van der Horst, H. (2004). Living in a reception centre: The search for home in aninstitutional setting. Housing, Theory and Society, 21, 36–46.

Van der Horst, H. (2010). Dwellings in transnational lives: A biographicalperspective on ‘Turkish–Dutch’ Houses in Turkey. Journal of Ethnic andMigration Studies, 36(7), 1175–1192.

Van der Horst, H. (2012). Material cultures of domestic interior. In S. Smith(Ed.), International Encyclopedia of Housing and Home. London: Elsevier.

Vertovec, S. (2009). Transnationalism. London: Routledge.Wagner, L. (2014). Trouble at home: Diasporic second homes as leisure space

across generations. Annals of Leisure Research, 17(1), 71–85.Waldinger, R. (2015). The cross-border connection. Cambridge: HUP.Walsh, K. (2006). British expatriate belongings: Mobile homes and transnational

homing. Home Cultures, 3(2), 119–140.Walsh, K., & Nare, L. (Eds.) (2016). Transnational migration and home in older

age. London: Routledge.

REFERENCES 127

Walters, W. (2004). Secure borders, safe haven, domopolitics. Citizenship Studies,8(3), 237–260.

Wardhaugh, J. (1999). The unaccomodated woman: Home, homelessness andidentity. The Sociological Review, 47(1), 91–109.

Werbner, P. (2013). Migration and transnational studies. In A. Quayson,G. Daswani (Eds.), A companion to diaspora and transnationalism.London: Blackwell.

Werner, C.M., Altman, I., & Oxley, D. (1985). Temporal aspects of homes:A transactional perspective. In Altman I., & Werner C. (Eds.), Home environ-ments (pp. 113–132). New York: Plenum Press.

Wiles, J. (2008). Sense of home in a transnational social space: New Zealanders inLondon. Global Networks, 8(1), 116–137.

Windsong, E.A. (2010). There is no place like home: Complexities in exploringhome and place attachment. The Social Science Journal, 47, 205–214.

Young, I.M. (1997). House and home: Feminist variations on a theme. InI. M. Young, Intersecting voices: Dilemmas of gender, political philosophy, andpolicy. Princeton: PUP.

128 REFERENCES

INDEX

AAcculturation, 53, 57, 66, 73, 75Adaptation, 20, 75, 76, 109Age, 7, 34, 38, 57, 66, 68, 75Anthropology, 6Appropriation

emotionally-driven, 108grassroots ways, 42home, 4of home metaphors, 91of place, 84relationally-based, 108of space, 49, 99, 106

Architecture, 4, 6, 60Aspiration, 8, 13, 15, 25, 37, 40, 43, 50,

52, 57, 58, 65, 67, 70, 80, 82, 87future-related, 58home improvement, 57prevalence of, 113socially legitimized, 58

Assimilation, 21, 56, 66, 75–76, 81immigrant, 75long-term, 75old-fashioned, 56

Asylum seekers, 2, 17, 54, 79, 80, 96Attachment, 4, 8, 11, 20, 30, 37, 41,

50, 54, 63, 82, 93, 100

emotional, 20to remittance house, 72romanticized, 82scales of, 50spatial, 8transnational, 93

Autochthony, 16, 99

BBeing at home, 18, 26, 74Belonging, 6, 11, 20, 21, 30, 43, 47,

59, 60, 88, 91, 93, 99–101, 107attendant boundaries, 100homing-as, 107materialization of, 43

Biographical interviews, 41Biography, 109Boundaries, 3, 5, 10, 12, 14, 20–22,

53, 60, 62–64, 83, 84of belonging, 100gendered, 60historical, 83institutional marker, 88material, 3, 22social, 62state, 53

© The Author(s) 2017P. Boccagni, Migration and the Search for Home, Mobility & Politics,DOI 10.1057/978-1-137-58802-9

129

Built environment, 4–6, 30–32,41–42, 57, 60, 77

CCamps, 72, 80, 96Case study, 20, 30, 32, 39, 46, 53, 54,

56, 58, 80, 81, 100, 102Centredness, 10Citizenship, 93, 95–97, 101

culturalization of, 97relation with state, 97territorialization of, 93topography of, 101

City, 16Claim, 20, 23, 59, 82, 88, 90, 91, 95,

97, 101, 102Claims-making, 23, 44, 57

organized forms of, 100Class, 7, 78, 87, 92

middle-, 69social, 34, 38, 110

Cognition, 17, 31, 57, 62, 70Comparative research, 37, 46, 60Concentration, 37, 46, 60Conservative, 13, 91, 101Construction, 7, 14, 26, 30, 38, 45, 50,

63, 66, 69, 71, 77, 78, 81, 96, 106Continuity, 7, 26, 70, 72, 74, 76, 77

biographical, 65, 70, 74residential, 72temporal, 59

Control, 21, 23, 32, 42, 57, 62–63, 71,72, 74, 79, 82, 89–91, 93, 99, 102

DDecent home, 109Decorations, 61, 71De-fetishizing home, 106De-materialized, 44

De-territorialized, 10, 19, 50Diaspora, 25, 27, 50, 67, 83, 88, 89,

94, 103Displacement, 17, 18, 50–55

conditions, 3double, 74migration driven, 111temporal, 78war-driven, 40

Dissimilation, 77, 81Distance, 23–25, 112Diversity, 31, 36, 96, 111

multi-cultural, 101societal, 111urban, 63

Domestication, 34, 63, 90Domestic culture, 41, 75, 76, 112Domestic ethnography, 43, 45Domesticity, 2, 14, 23, 29, 30, 32–35,

50, 66, 76, 94, 97, 101home and, 14, 23renewed, 76sources of, 50, 77, 101subjective bases, 30variable configurations, 34

Domestic objects, 11, 43, 54, 107emotional value of, 11functions of, 54use of, 43

Domestic space, 8, 14, 22, 30, 32, 41,43, 54, 62, 69–71, 75, 80, 83, 88,102, 107, 113

Domopolitics, 88, 95–98Domus, 96, 97Drawings, 36, 41, 45Dwelling place, 2–3, 11, 14–16, 21,

23, 37, 39, 42, 50, 52, 55, 57, 59,61, 67–68, 70–75, 78, 87, 90,109

home as, 2, 87scale of, 16

130 INDEX

EEducation, 38, 75, 110Embodiment, 54, 55, 59, 61, 70–74Emotion, 1–12, 17, 20–21, 29–31,

39, 40, 42, 50, 52, 57, 62, 63, 66,67, 71–80, 87–89, 91–95,97–100, 106, 108, 109–111, 113

elicitors of, 39home-related, 97intangible, 82memories and, 43personal, 98

Emplacement, 12, 57, 70, 78, 82, 109Ethnicity, 34, 38, 63, 87Ethnic relations, 88, 89Ethnography, 30, 32, 41–46, 55Experience

day-to-day, 17domestic, 12, 24emotional, 11, 66, 88everyday, 3, 11, 15, 24exploitative, 14hard-to-access, 33homeland, 94international migration, 9multi-sensorial, 42, 45open-ended, 3personal, 67residential, 20, 73social, 2, 5, 13, 30, 33, 36, 51, 52, 110subjective, 10, 42, 91

FFamiliarity, 1, 2, 7, 23, 32, 36, 42, 57,

63, 71, 72, 74, 79, 82, 89, 90,93, 102

Family life, 9, 44, 55, 56, 61, 69,82, 113

Feeling at home, 11, 30, 37, 38, 79,80, 82, 88, 91, 98, 101

Filming, 45Forced migration, 14, 40, 80

GGender, 7, 34, 38, 43, 57, 66, 78,

89–90Geography, 6Go-alongs, 30, 41

HHistory, 6, 37, 40, 41, 66, 71, 72,

75–76, 111Homecoming, 81Home cultures, 52–54, 75, 77,

111, 112Home experience, 2, 7, 10–14, 18–23,

26, 31, 32, 34, 36–38, 40, 43, 46,49–55, 62–64, 66–70, 74–78, 81,89, 101, 105–111

Home interiors, 42, 43Homeland, 25, 36, 52, 57, 62, 75,

76–77, 82–83, 88–95ancestral, 25–26, 83as-home, 88, 94, 103co-ethnic gatherings, 76feature of, 83languages and traditions, 76protection of, 97

Home lens, 16, 21, 57, 62, 97, 113Homeless, 18, 43, 109Home-making, 7–9, 12, 19, 21, 23,

32, 39, 42–45, 54, 58, 66, 74, 75,79, 81, 82, 108, 111, 112

dimensions of, 42forms of, 7, 43, 74local, 82potential, 44, 54progressive sense, 108transnational, 81

INDEX 131

Home ownership, 56–58, 80Home studies, 6, 21–22Home tours, 30, 46Home unmaking, 17Home views, 26, 34, 38, 111, 112Home visits, 58, 83, 107Homing, 3, 8, 16, 18, 22–26, 30–32,

34, 37, 42, 44, 50, 51, 54, 66–70,74, 77–84, 91, 101, 106–110

Household, 5, 7, 11, 14, 34, 39, 42,45, 50, 53, 57, 62, 84, 94, 96,101, 103

Housing career, 38, 50, 56, 57, 76, 80Housing pathway, 37, 39, 111Housing studies, 32, 41, 55Hybrid-domestic, 63

IICT, 44Ideal home, 24, 43, 82, 88, 109,

112–113Identification, 2, 11, 17, 20, 21, 37,

53, 54, 60, 62, 76, 92,94, 99

collective, 92diasporic units, 99home-like, 62

Identity, 7, 11, 38, 53, 59, 69, 71, 88,93, 95, 99, 101

vs. communality, 60national, 38place, 38source, 59

Inclusion, 8, 75, 82, 88, 89, 91, 97,98, 101

In-depth interviews, 37, 39–41Inequality, 19, 34, 43, 87, 90

attendant patterns, 90forms of, 55patterns, 96social, 8

Insidedness, 10, 26Integration, 21, 38, 45, 56–58, 67,

74, 97, 112civic, 97immigrant, 80, 98local pattern, 21long-term, 56patterns, 58trajectories, 45, 59

JJourney, 17, 40

KKind of home, 16Kind of place, 50

LLabour migrants, 15, 50, 54, 79, 110Language, 5, 37, 52, 53, 69, 75, 76,

79, 98, 100learning, 79native, 52, 69, 75, 98

Left-behinds, 44, 46, 52, 58, 62, 77,94, 111

Life course, 4, 7, 12, 15, 24–26,37, 38, 40, 41, 51, 56, 61, 66, 68,72, 77, 78, 82, 102, 106, 110,112

family role, 7housing and, 41importance, 61linear, 69mobile, 7multi-sited, 72

Locality, 108, 111Location, 12, 15–17, 19, 27, 39, 40,

49–51degree of freedom, 54

132 INDEX

geographics, 51interaction, 15material, 4residence, 5response, 16spatial, 54

Loss, 17, 56, 74–77, 92, 109

MMajority-minority relations, 91Map, 3, 9, 36, 108, 113

conceptual, 3Material culture, 6, 15, 32, 37, 71, 77Materiality, 10–13, 34, 36, 51, 55, 74,

106, 108, 109Membership, 60, 88Memories, 38, 40, 52, 59, 70–73, 77

personal, 13warehouse of, 4

Migrant houses, 55–62Migration, 1–26, 30–33, 36–40,

49–64, 65–84biographic rupture, 112development of, 51drivers, 79housing careers, 50international, 2, 6, 15, 16, 19, 26,

29, 33, 36–38, 41, 43, 55, 56,70–74, 89, 92, 93, 106–109

labour, 50, 54, 58return, 52, 78, 81stages, 50temporal engagement, 40transnational, 20, 22transnational approach, 5

Migration-home nexus, 2, 17, 19–22,37, 46, 55, 62, 67, 88, 94, 106

Mixed methods, 29, 30, 44, 46Mobile, 3, 6, 18, 51, 52, 54, 82, 93,

99, 101, 102, 110, 111, 113biographic trajectories, 3

Mobility, 16–18, 25, 26, 34, 36, 38,44, 52, 54, 62, 67

conditions of, 36extended, 3, 26, 52, 62, 67, 72, 88,

92, 100homewards, 25human, 44, 106, 112residential, 55, 59spatial, 109upwards, 59

Mobilization, 44, 57, 82, 88, 89, 91,93, 99–103

Moral ownership, 63, 91Multiscalarity, 8, 21, 22, 95Multi-sited, 18, 21, 36, 37, 51, 72, 93,

102, 103, 109Myth of return, 81

NNation, 16, 22, 53, 70, 88, 89, 92,

93, 95Natives, 10, 17, 22, 26, 44, 52, 56, 62,

69, 73–75, 78, 84, 89–94,98–102

Nativism, 100Naturalized, 8, 102Neighbourhood, 7, 32, 50Non-migrants, 106, 109Nostalgia, 73, 90, 92

PParticipant observation, 42, 44, 67Past

being-at-home, 18emotional retention, 52emotional storage of, 77home culture, 53home experience, 52homeland experience, 94

INDEX 133

Past (cont.)normality and security, 80reminiscent of, 43retention of, 109significance of, 77traits, 52trajectories, 40

Permanence, 7, 45Phenomenology, 9, 26, 33,

69, 110Pictures, 45, 58Place

appropriation of, 84attachment, 63autobiographies, 41de-link, 52domestic, 2, 12, 101as home, 16, 91identity, 38integrity, 7marker of, 5physical, 11rootedness, 16social actors, 8

Place-making, 12, 50–55Policy, 80, 89, 91, 98, 100, 101

inclusive, 100local, 100public, 98

Political, 5, 7, 13, 32, 63, 83, 87–95,97, 99–103

actors, 88, 91, 93agendas, 10, 63, 83, 85, 91, 100dimension, 14, 89, 91discriminatory, 95factors, 12implications, 26, 62, 90institutional purpose, 92mobilization, 89, 101–102relevance, 87–88right-wing nativism, 100

salience of migrants', 99significance of home, 88

Politics, 90, 91, 100Portability, 12, 52, 55, 61, 108Prescriptive, 13–15, 29, 31Present, 14, 36, 41, 43, 50–53, 58, 66,

70, 77–84being-without-it, 18connect with past, 10home condition, 80home environment, 43home experience, 13, 78home risks, 79home situations, 40housing condition, 58sense of home, 52

Private/public, 14, 95Procrastination, 66, 78Progressive, 10, 63, 91, 102,

107, 108Protection, 56, 58, 72, 97, 101–103

homeland, 97personal, 7

Public space, 44, 60, 63, 90, 95

QQualitative research, 17, 37Quantitative research, 38Quasi-public, 63

RReal home, 12, 14, 17, 71Receiving society, 52, 55–57, 66,

73, 75, 76, 81, 97, 98, 100,106, 107

frames and culture, 75language, 98recognition, 97society, 69

Reception centres, 54

134 INDEX

Recognition, 63, 82, 88, 91, 96, 97,100–103

struggle, 82, 88Refugees, 2, 17, 66, 68, 73, 96–99Regrounding, 82Relational, 3, 6, 8, 10–13, 20–22, 34,

36, 41, 51, 68, 70, 74, 76, 105,106, 108–111

arrangements, 8dimensions of home, 6scales, 62underpinnings of home, 11variables, 68

Relocations, 15, 19, 40Remittance houses, 20, 42, 50, 58–61,

66, 72, 75, 81, 88, 107Remittances, 20, 50, 58–62, 66, 72,

75, 78, 107, 111Replacement, 18Reproducibility, 52Research, 3–15, 29–46, 53–55, 70,

76, 81, 89, 91alternative, 30, 37biographically oriented, 39comparative, 37, 46, 60empirical, 8ethnographic, 55fieldwork, 31heterogeneous, 31home as a, 6ideal, 62, 81matrix, 34rubrics, 20setting of, 11social, 3, 19, 26, 31, 33, 77tools, 38

Research agenda, 22–26, 32, 46,110–112

Residence, 5, 68, 71, 94Residential mobility, 55, 59Rootedness, 5, 16, 99

SScale, 10, 16, 20, 30, 45, 50, 62–64,

89, 90, 93–95cross-scale, 62local, 62macro, 31–32mirco, 31–32, 45out-of-scale, 58transnational, 62

Search for home, 19, 22–26, 44, 67,68, 83, 88, 94, 99, 106, 113

Security, 17, 32, 36, 42, 57, 58, 63,72, 79, 80–82

attribution of, 57internal, 95, 96internal homogeneity and, 88normality and, 80personal, 81, 96, 102place-bound, 79public, 96routines of, 72sense of, 32, 63, 90social, 95source, 17, 42

Segregation, 14, 20, 56Semi-public space, 44Sense of home, 2, 3, 6, 9, 17, 20, 23,

24, 31, 32, 34, 37–39, 50, 52–54,61–63, 66–69, 73, 76, 77–84

Sensorial, 43, 45, 74, 75, 92Setting, 4–6, 11–12, 17–19,

22–23, 26material, 111meaningful, 22private, 30privileged, 12, 17unique, 43

Shelter, 43, 57, 72, 80, 112Sociability, 44, 52, 75, 94, 98Social class, 34, 38, 110Social inequality, 8, 108

INDEX 135

Socialization, 67, 81Social practice, 5, 14, 26, 43, 57, 75,

76, 106, 112Social relationship, 12, 22, 31–33, 42,

53, 54, 56, 60, 102, 109disembedding, 53embedded, 12ethno-racial markers of, 56horizontal forms of, 102micro-expressions of, 42open-ended, 4reliance of, 34

Social remittances, 22, 61, 111Social stratification, 16, 55, 87Sociology, 6Space, 5, 8–16, 49–64

appropriation of, 49, 99, 106biographic, 16domestic, 8, 14, 22, 30, 40, 54,

69–71, 75, 80, 83, 102,107, 113

dwelling, 54emotional, 67external, 21home, 43, 60, 67, 73, 89, 95physical, 12privileged, 93public, 60, 63, 90, 95social, 34social reality, 10

Spatiality, 16, 26, 34, 36, 67, 69,71, 111

Squats, 54, 72State, 26, 32, 36, 53, 69, 79, 89,

95–98, 107immobile, 19inclusive, 13

Stratification, 16, 55, 87, 108Survey, 30, 32, 37–38

TTemporality, 29, 34, 36, 40, 66,

67, 69Temporary, 43, 65, 80, 81Territorial, 5, 7, 19, 50, 62, 93, 100,

102, 108, 109Time, 2–5, 10–15, 26, 34, 38,

39–42, 45, 46, 50–52, 61,65–84, 89, 92, 93, 103,106–109, 111–113

Translocality, 111Transnational engagement, 45,

62, 112Transnationalism, 21, 46, 50Transnational relationships, 52

UUprooting, 82Urban environment, 44Urban studies, 4, 6

VVernacular architecture, 60Video ethnography, 46Virtual space, 44Visual methods, 30

WWays of circulating home, 111Ways of constructing home, 66,

69, 111Ways of emplacing home, 39, 111Ways of homing, 26, 50, 62, 106,

107, 111

136 INDEX