Page 1
IN THIS ISSUE
Judiciary
Regulations
Errata
Special Documents
General Notices
Volume 38 • Issue 24 • Pages 1483—1554
Pursuant to State Government Article, §7-206, Annotated Code of Maryland, this issue contains all previously unpublished documents required to be published, and filed on or before October 31, 2011, 5 p.m. Pursuant to State Government Article, §7-206, Annotated Code of Maryland, I hereby certify that this issue contains all documents required to be codified as of October 31, 2011.
Brian Morris Acting Administrator, Division of State Documents
Office of the Secretary of State
Issue Date: November 18, 2011
Page 2
Information About the Maryland Register and COMAR
MARYLAND REGISTER
The Maryland Register is an official State publication published
every other week throughout the year. A cumulative index is
published quarterly.
The Maryland Register is the temporary supplement to the Code of
Maryland Regulations. Any change to the text of regulations
published in COMAR, whether by adoption, amendment, repeal, or
emergency action, must first be published in the Register.
The following information is also published regularly in the
Register:
• Governor‘s Executive Orders
• Attorney General‘s Opinions in full text
• Open Meetings Compliance Board Opinions in full text
• State Ethics Commission Opinions in full text
• Court Rules
• District Court Administrative Memoranda
• Courts of Appeal Hearing Calendars
• Agency Hearing and Meeting Notices
• Synopses of Bills Introduced and Enacted by the General
Assembly
• Other documents considered to be in the public interest
CITATION TO THE MARYLAND REGISTER
The Maryland Register is cited by volume, issue, page number, and
date. Example:
• 19:8 Md. R. 815—817 (April 17, 1992) refers to Volume 19, Issue
8, pages 815—817 of the Maryland Register issued on April 17,
1992.
CODE OF MARYLAND REGULATIONS (COMAR)
COMAR is the official compilation of all regulations issued by
agencies of the State of Maryland. The Maryland Register is
COMAR‘s temporary supplement, printing all changes to regulations
as soon as they occur. At least once annually, the changes to
regulations printed in the Maryland Register are incorporated into
COMAR by means of permanent supplements.
CITATION TO COMAR REGULATIONS
COMAR regulations are cited by title number, subtitle number,
chapter number, and regulation number. Example: COMAR
10.08.01.03 refers to Title 10, Subtitle 08, Chapter 01, Regulation 03.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Incorporation by reference is a legal device by which a document is
made part of COMAR simply by referring to it. While the text of an
incorporated document does not appear in COMAR, the provisions of
the incorporated document are as fully enforceable as any other
COMAR regulation. Each regulation that proposes to incorporate a
document is identified in the Maryland Register by an Editor‘s Note.
The Cumulative Table of COMAR Regulations Adopted, Amended
or Repealed, found online, also identifies each regulation
incorporating a document. Documents incorporated by reference are
available for inspection in various depository libraries located
throughout the State and at the Division of State Documents. These
depositories are listed in the first issue of the Maryland Register
published each year. For further information, call 410-974-2486.
HOW TO RESEARCH REGULATIONS
An Administrative History at the end of every COMAR chapter gives
information about past changes to regulations. To determine if there have
been any subsequent changes, check the ‗‗Cumulative Table of COMAR
Regulations Adopted, Amended, or Repealed‘‘ which is found online at
www.dsd.state.md.us/CumulativeIndex.pdf. This table lists the regulations
in numerical order, by their COMAR number, followed by the citation to
the Maryland Register in which the change occurred. The Maryland
Register serves as a temporary supplement to COMAR, and the two
publications must always be used together. A Research Guide for Maryland
Regulations is available. For further information, call 410-260-3876.
SUBSCRIPTION INFORMATION
For subscription forms for the Maryland Register and COMAR, see
the back pages of the Maryland Register. Single issues of the
Maryland Register are $15.00 per issue.
CITIZEN PARTICIPATION IN
THE REGULATION-MAKING PROCESS
Maryland citizens and other interested persons may participate in
the process by which administrative regulations are adopted,
amended, or repealed, and may also initiate the process by which the
validity and applicability of regulations is determined. Listed below
are some of the ways in which citizens may participate (references
are to State Government Article (SG),
Annotated Code of Maryland):
• By submitting data or views on proposed regulations either orally
or in writing, to the proposing agency (see ‗‗Opportunity for Public
Comment‘‘ at the beginning of all regulations appearing in the
Proposed Action on Regulations section of the Maryland Register).
(See SG, §10-112)
• By petitioning an agency to adopt, amend, or repeal regulations.
The agency must respond to the petition. (See SG §10-123)
• By petitioning an agency to issue a declaratory ruling with respect
to how any regulation, order, or statute enforced by the agency
applies. (SG, Title 10, Subtitle 3)
• By petitioning the circuit court for a declaratory judgment
on the validity of a regulation when it appears that the regulation
interferes with or impairs the legal rights or privileges of the
petitioner. (SG, §10-125)
• By inspecting a certified copy of any document filed with the
Division of State Documents for publication in the Maryland
Register. (See SG, §7-213)
Maryland Register (ISSN 0360-2834). Postmaster: Send address changes and other mail to: Maryland Register, State House, Annapolis, Maryland
21401. Tel. 410-260-3876; Fax 410-280-5647. Published biweekly, with
cumulative indexes published quarterly, by the State of Maryland, Division of State Documents, State House, Annapolis, Maryland 21401. The subscription
rate for the Maryland Register is $225 per year (first class mail). All
subscriptions post-paid to points in the U.S. periodicals postage paid at Annapolis, Maryland and additional mailing offices.
Martin O’Malley, Governor; John P. McDonough, Secretary of State;
Brian Morris, Acting Administrator; Gail S. Klakring, Senior Editor; Mary
D. MacDonald, Editor, Maryland Register and COMAR; Elizabeth Ramsey,
Editor, COMAR Online, and Subscription Manager; Tami Cathell, Help
Desk, COMAR and Maryland Register Online. Front cover: State House, Annapolis, MD, built 1772—79.
Illustrations by Carolyn Anderson, Dept. of General Services
Note: All products purchased are for individual use only. Resale or other compensated transfer of the information in printed or electronic
form is a prohibited commercial purpose (see State Government Article, §7-206.2, Annotated Code of Maryland). By purchasing a product, the
buyer agrees that the purchase is for individual use only and will not sell the product to another individual or entity.
Page 3
Contents 1485
MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 38, ISSUE 24, FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2011
Closing Dates for the Maryland Register Schedule of Closing Dates and Issue Dates for the
Maryland Register .................................................................. 1487
COMAR Research Aids Table of Pending Proposals ........................................................ 1488
Index of COMAR Titles Affected in This Issue COMAR Title Number and Name Page
03 Comptroller of the Treasury ............................................ 1499
05 Department of Housing and Community Development .... 1499
08 Department of Natural Resources ................................... 1500
09 Department of Labor, Licensing, and Regulation ........... 1501
10 Department of Health and Mental Hygiene .... 1495, 1501, 1505
12 Department of Public Safety and Correctional
Services ............................................................. 1496, 1518
13A State Board of Education ................................................ 1540
14 Independent Agencies ................................. 1496, 1503, 1541
20 Public Service Commission ............................................ 1503
30 Maryland Institute for Emergency Medical Services
Systems (MIEMSS) .................................................... 1503
31 Maryland Insurance Administration ............................... 1548
34 Department of Planning .................................................. 1504
PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES Individuals with disabilities who desire assistance in using the
publications and services of the Division of State Documents are
encouraged to call (410) 974-2486, or (800) 633-9657, or FAX to
(410) 974-2546, or through Maryland Relay.
The Judiciary
COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND ATTORNEYS TO BE ADMITTED TO THE BAR ........ 1491
COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS SCHEDULE FOR DECEMBER 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 13, 14,
AND 15, 2011 ............................................................... 1492
Emergency Action on Regulations
10 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND MENTAL HYGIENE DANGEROUS DEVICES AND SUBSTANCES
Controlled Dangerous Substances ................................... 1495 MARYLAND HEALTH CARE COMMISSION
Electronic Health Record Incentives ................................ 1495 BOARD OF PHARMACY
Pharmacist Administration of Vaccinations ..................... 1495 12 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND
CORRECTIONAL SERVICES PATUXENT INSTITUTION
Inmate Discipline ............................................................. 1496 14 INDEPENDENT AGENCIES
MARYLAND ENERGY ADMINISTRATION Green Building Tax Credit Program ................................ 1496
Final Action on Regulations
03 COMPTROLLER OF THE TREASURY ALCOHOL AND TOBACCO TAX
Tobacco Tax .................................................................... 1499
05 DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT BUILDING AND MATERIAL CODES
Model Performance Code ................................................ 1499 Maryland Accessibility Code .......................................... 1499 Maryland Building Performance Standards ..................... 1500
08 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES FISHERIES SERVICE
Striped Bass ..................................................................... 1500 BOATING
Certificate of Title ........................................................... 1500 Documented Vessels ....................................................... 1501
BOATING — SPEED LIMITS AND OPERATION OF
VESSELS Noise Level Limits of Vessels ......................................... 1501
09 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, LICENSING, AND
REGULATION WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT AND ADULT LEARNING
Alternative Ways to Earn a High School Diploma .......... 1501 10 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND MENTAL HYGIENE
PROCEDURES Nursing Facility Quality Assessment .............................. 1501
MEDICAL CARE PROGRAMS Pharmacy Services .......................................................... 1502 Hospital Services ............................................................. 1502 Hospital Services ............................................................. 1502 Nursing Facility Services ................................................ 1502
DANGEROUS DEVICES AND SUBSTANCES Prohibition of Bisphenol-A in Child Care Articles .......... 1502
14 INDEPENDENT AGENCIES WORKERS‘ COMPENSATION COMMISSION
Procedural Regulations .................................................... 1503 20 PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
SERVICE SUPPLIED BY ELECTRIC COMPANIES General ............................................................................ 1503 Deanna Camille Green Rule — Contact Voltage Survey
Requirement and Reporting .......................................... 1503 30 MARYLAND INSTITUTE FOR EMERGENCY
MEDICAL SERVICES SYSTEMS (MIEMSS) PUBLIC ACCESS AUTOMATED EXTERNAL
DEFIBRILLATOR PROGRAM Protocol ........................................................................... 1503
34 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING HISTORICAL AND CULTURAL PROGRAMS
Sustainable Communities Tax Credit Certification ......... 1504
Proposed Action on Regulations
10 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND MENTAL HYGIENE BOARD OF EXAMINERS OF NURSING HOME
ADMINISTRATORS Nursing Home Administrators ......................................... 1505
BOARD OF EXAMINERS OF PSYCHOLOGISTS Disciplinary Sanctions and Monetary Penalties .............. 1513
SPECIAL SUPPLEMENTAL NUTRITION PROGRAM FOR
WOMEN, INFANTS, AND CHILDREN (WIC) Eligibility, Participation, and Benefits ............................. 1515 Local Agency .................................................................. 1515
12 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND
CORRECTIONAL SERVICES PATUXENT INSTITUTION
Inmate Discipline ............................................................ 1518
Page 4
Contents 1486
MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 38, ISSUE 24, FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2011
13A STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION CHILD CARE CENTERS
Scope and Definitions ...................................................... 1540 License Application and Maintenance ............................. 1540 Child Protection ............................................................... 1540 Administrative Hearings .................................................. 1540
14 INDEPENDENT AGENCIES WORKERS‘ COMPENSATION COMMISSION
Guide of Medical and Surgical Fees ................................ 1541 PUBLIC SCHOOL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Recognition of Employee Organizations ......................... 1541 General Procedures .......................................................... 1541
31 MARYLAND INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION HEALTH INSURANCE — GENERAL
Health Insurance .............................................................. 1548
Errata
COMAR 09.03.12 ................................................................ 1550 COMAR 10.54.03 ................................................................ 1550 COMAR 11.18.02 ................................................................ 1550 COMAR 34.04.07 ................................................................ 1550 COMAR 10.07.05 ................................................................ 1550
Special Documents
MARYLAND HEALTH CARE COMMISSION Application for Waiver to Provide Primary Percutaneous
Coronary Intervention (pPCI) Services ......................... 1551
General Notices
ATHLETIC COMMISSION Public Meeting ................................................................. 1552
BOARD FOR THE CERTIFICATION OF RESIDENTIAL
CHILD CARE PROGRAM ADMINISTRATORS Public Meeting ................................................................. 1552
BOARD OF CHIROPRACTIC AND MASSAGE THERAPY
EXAMINERS Public Meeting ................................................................. 1552
CONSUMER COUNCIL OF MARYLAND Public Meeting ................................................................. 1552
CRIMINAL JUSTICE INFORMATION ADVISORY BOARD Public Meeting ................................................................. 1552
COMMISSION ON CRIMINAL SENTENCING POLICY Public Meeting ................................................................. 1552 Public Hearing ................................................................. 1552
PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS AND TEACHER
EDUCATION BOARD Public Meeting ................................................................. 1552
MARYLAND STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION Public Meeting ................................................................. 1552
ELEVATOR SAFETY REVIEW BOARD Public Meeting ................................................................. 1552
STATEWIDE EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES
ADVISORY COUNCIL (SEMSAC) Public Meeting ................................................................. 1552
BOARD FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS Public Meeting ................................................................. 1552
FIRE PREVENTION COMMISSION Public Meeting ................................................................. 1552
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND MENTAL
HYGIENE/OFFICE OF HEALTH SERVICES Draft Special Needs Trust Regulations ............................ 1553
BOARD OF HEATING, VENTILATION, AIR-
CONDITIONING, AND REFRIGERATION
CONTRACTORS (HVACR) Public Meeting ................................................................ 1553
HOME IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION Public Meeting ................................................................ 1553
MARYLAND INSURANCE ADMINSTRATION Public Hearing ................................................................. 1553
BOARD FOR PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS Public Meeting ................................................................ 1553
MARYLAND HEALTH CARE COMMISSION Public Meeting ................................................................ 1553 Receipt of Application..................................................... 1553 Formal Start of Review ................................................... 1553
MINORITY BUSINESS ENTERPRISE ADVISORY
COMMITTEE Public Meeting ................................................................ 1554
BOARD OF EXAMINERS OF NURSING HOME
ADMINISTRATORS Public Meeting ................................................................ 1554
BOARD OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY PRACTICE Public Meeting ................................................................ 1554
BOARD OF PODIATRIC MEDICAL EXAMINERS Public Meeting ................................................................ 1554
PROCUREMENT ADVISORY COUNCIL (PAC) Public Meeting ................................................................ 1554
BOARD OF EXAMINERS OF PSYCHOLOGISTS Public Meeting ................................................................ 1554
STATE BOARD OF INDIVIDUAL TAX PREPARERS Public Meeting ................................................................ 1554
MARYLAND TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY Public Meeting ................................................................ 1554
WORKERS‘ COMPENSATION COMMISSION Public Meeting ................................................................ 1554
COMAR Online The Code of Maryland Regulations is available at
www.dsd.state.md.us as a free service of the Office of the
Secretary of State, Division of State Documents. The full text
of regulations is available and searchable. Note, however, that
the printed COMAR continues to be the only official and
enforceable version of COMAR.
The Maryland Register is also available at
www.dsd.state.md.us.
For additional information, visit www.sos.state.md.us,
Division of State Documents, or call us at (410) 974-2486 or 1
(800) 633-9657.
Page 5
Contents 1487
MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 38, ISSUE 24, FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2011
Availability of Monthly List of
Maryland Documents The Maryland Department of Legislative Services
receives copies of all publications issued by State officers and
agencies. The Department prepares and distributes, for a fee, a
list of these publications under the title ‗‗Maryland
Documents‘‘. This list is published monthly, and contains
bibliographic information concerning regular and special
reports, bulletins, serials, periodicals, catalogues, and a variety
of other State publications. ‗‗Maryland Documents‘‘ also
includes local publications.
Anyone wishing to receive ‗‗Maryland Documents‘‘
should write to: Legislative Sales, Maryland Department of
Legislative Services, 90 State Circle, Annapolis, MD 21401.
CLOSING DATES AND ISSUE DATES
through JULY 27, 2012
Issue
Date
Emergency
and Proposed
Regulations
5:00 p.m.*
Final
Regulations
10:30 a.m.
Notices, etc.
10:30 a.m.
December 2** November 14 November 18 November 16
December 16 November 28 December 7 December 5
December 30 December 12 December 21 December 19
January 13** December 22 January 4 December 30
January 27** January 9 January 18 January 13
February 10 January 23 February 1 January 30
February 24** February 6 February 14 February 13
March 9** February 17 February 29 February 27
March 23 March 5 March 14 March 12
April 6 March 19 March 28 March 26
April 20 April 2 April 11 April 9
May 4 April 16 April 25 April 23
May 18 April 30 May 9 May 7
June 1** May 14 May 21 May 18
June 15** May 24 June 6 June 4
June 29 June 11 June 20 June 18
July 13** June 25 July 3 July 2
July 27 July 9 July 18 July 16
* Due date for documents containing 8 to 18 pages — 48 hours
before date shown
Due date for documents exceeding 18 pages — 1 week before date
shown
NOTE: ALL DOCUMENTS MUST BE SUBMITTED IN
TIMES NEW ROMAN, 9-POINT, SINGLE-SPACED
FORMAT. THE REVISED PAGE COUNT REFLECTS THIS
FORMATTING.
** Note closing date changes
The regular closing date for Proposals and Emergencies is
Monday.
Page 6
1488
MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 38, ISSUE 24, FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2011
Cumulative Table of COMAR Regulations
Adopted, Amended, or Repealed This table, previously printed in the Maryland Register lists the regulations, by COMAR title, that have been adopted, amended, or repealed in
the Maryland Register since the regulations were originally published or last supplemented in the Code of Maryland Regulations (COMAR).
The table is no longer printed here but may be found on the Division of State Documents website at www.dsd.state.md.us.
Table of Pending Proposals The table below lists proposed changes to COMAR regulations. The proposed changes are listed by their COMAR number, followed by a
citation to that issue of the Maryland Register in which the proposal appeared. Errata pertaining to proposed regulations are listed, followed by
―(err)‖. Regulations referencing a document incorporated by reference are followed by ―(ibr)‖. None of the proposals listed in this table have
been adopted. A list of adopted proposals appears in the Cumulative Table of COMAR Regulations Adopted, Amended, or Repealed.
03 COMPTROLLER OF THE TREASURY
03.06.01.43 • 38:23 Md. R. 1425 (11-4-11)
03.06.01.44 • 38:13 Md. R. 758 (6-17-11)
05 DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
05.05.07.01—.31 • 37:20 Md. R. 1398 (09-24-10)
05.17.01.01—.13 • 38:21 Md. R. 1282 (10-7-11)
05.17.02.01—.07 • 38:21 Md. R. 1282 (10-7-11)
07 DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES
07.02.13.01,.02,.04 • 38:22 Md. R. 1348 (10-21-11)
08 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
08.02.04.03,.04,.06,.16 • 38:23 Md. R. 1426 (11-4-11)
08.02.04.15 • 38:16 Md. R. 950 (7-29-11)
08.02.04.17 • 38:22 Md. R. 1349 (10-21-11)
08.02.05.09 • 38:22 Md. R. 1350 (10-21-11)
08.02.08.02 • 38:23 Md. R. 1426 (11-4-11)
08.02.23.02—.04,.07 • 38:23 Md. R. 1429 (11-4-11)
08.04.03.01—.18 • 38:19 Md. R. 1151 (9-9-11)
08.04.09.01 • 38:19 Md. R. 1153 (9-9-11)
09 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, LICENSING, AND
REGULATION
09.03.01.17 • 38:21 Md. R. 1288 (10-7-11)
09.03.12.01—12 • 38:21 Md. R. 1289 (10-7-11)
09.12.01.16-1 • 38:22 Md. R. 1351 (10-21-11)
09.12.28.01—.07 •38:14 Md. R. 794 (7-1-11) (ibr)
09.12.81.01 • 38:21 Md. R. 1292 (10-7-11) (ibr)
09.15.02.12 •37:23 Md. R. 1614 (11-5-10)
09.16.01.05,.06 • 38:15 Md. R. 901 (7-15-11)
09.19.07.01 • 38:17 Md. R. 1028 (8-12-11)
09.20.04.01,.02 • 37:4 Md. R. 346 (2-12-10)
38:3 Md. R. 176 (1-28-11)
09.22.01.10,.11 • 38:15 Md. R. 901 (7-15-11)
09.23.04.03 • 38:21 Md. R. 1294 (10-7-11)
10 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND MENTAL HYGIENE
Subtitles 01 — 08 (1st Volume)
10.01.04.01—.11 • 38:3 Md. R. 180 (1-28-11)
38:14 Md. R. 800 (7-1-11)
10.01.21.01—.07 • 38:20 Md. R. 1213 (9-23-11)
10.03.01.02—.07,.07-1,.08—.15 • 38:22 Md. R. 1352 (10-21-11)
Subtitle 09 (2nd Volume)
10.09.04.01,.03 • 38:9 Md. R. 555 (4-22-11)
10.09.09.07 • 38:20 Md. R. 1215 (9-23-11) (ibr)
10.09.24.13 • 38:3 Md. R. 180 (1-28-11)
38:14 Md. R. 800 (7-1-11)
10.09.30.06 • 38:21 Md. R. 1295 (10-7-11)
10.09.63.06 • 38:22 Md. R. 1354 (10-21-11)
10.09.65.02 • 38:22 Md. R. 1357 (10-21-11)
10.09.65.03,.13,.17,.18,.28 •38:22 Md. R. 1354 (10-21-11)
10.09.66.05,.06,.07 • 38:22 Md. R. 1354 (10-21-11)
10.09.67.04,.28 • 38:22 Md. R. 1354 (10-21-11)
10.09.81.01—.07 • 37:20 Md. R. 1409 (09-24-10)
Subtitles 10 — 22 (3rd Volume)
10.10.01.03 • 37:25 Md. R. 1745 (12-3-10)
10.10.03.02 • 37:25 Md. R. 1745 (12-3-10)
10.10.06.02 • 37:25 Md. R. 1745 (12-3-10)
10.10.11.02—.05,.07—.16,.19,
.23 • 38:23 Md. R. 1430 (11-4-11) (ibr)
10.15.03.02,.14,.23,.27,.28,.33 • 38:23 Md. R. 1433 (11-4-11)
10.19.03.13 • 38:19 Md. R. 1163 (9-9-11)
Page 7
PENDING PROPOSALS
1489
MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 38, ISSUE 24, FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2011
Subtitles 23 — 36 (4th Volume)
10.25.16.01—.07 • 38:22 Md. R. 1357 (10-21-11)
10.32.08.01—.11 • 38:22 Md. R. 1360 (10-21-11)
10.33.01.12,.15—.17,.17-1,.18—.29 • 38:24 Md. R. 1505 (11-18-11)
10.34.25.01—.03 • 38:22 Md. R. 1365 (10-21-11)
10.34.28.01,.02,.04—.12 • 36:25 Md. R. 1965 (12-4-09)
10.34.28.01,.02,.04—.14 • 38:2 Md. R. 93 (1-14-11)
10.34.32.03 • 38:23 Md. R. 1435 (11-4-11)
10.36.08.01—.06 • 38:24 Md. R. 1513 (11-18-11)
Subtitles 37—59 (5th Volume)
10.38.10.01—.07 • 38:23 Md. R. 1436 (11-4-11)
10.44.21.01,.02,.04,.05,.10,.11 • 38:11 Md. R. 674 (5-20-11)
38:18 Md. R. 1086 (8-26-11)
10.44.30.01—.05 •38:14 Md. R. 812 (7-1-11)
10.44.31.01—.06 • 38:22 Md. R. 1367 (10-21-11)
10.44.33.01—.06 • 38:19 Md. R. 1164 (9-9-11)
10.50.01.10 • 38:22 Md. R. 1373 (10-21-11)
10.54.01.03,.04,.07 • 38:24 Md. R. 1515 (11-18-11)
10.54.02.09,.10,.14 • 38:24 Md. R. 1515 (11-18-11)
10.54.03.03,.09-1,.10,.13—.16 • 38:21 Md. R. 1296 (10-7-11)
11 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
11.02.08.01—.10 • 38:20 Md. R. 1216 (9-23-11)
11.11.05.03 • 38:20 Md. R. 1220 (9-23-11)
11.11.11.02 • 38:20 Md. R. 1220 (9-23-11)
11.11.13.01,.03,.05,.07 • 38:20 Md. R. 1220 (9-23-11)
11.14.01.01,.03,.04,.06,.07,.10,.11,
.14—.16 • 38:23 Md. R. 1440 (11-4-11)
11.14.02.01,.06,.12,.14,.17 • 38:23 Md. R. 1440 (11-4-11)
11.14.04.14,.16,.19 • 38:23 Md. R. 1440 (11-4-11)
11.18.02.01,.08 • 38:22 Md. R. 1374 (10-21-11)
11.21.01.01—.03 • 38:23 Md. R. 1458 (11-4-11)
12 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND
CORRECTIONAL SERVICES
12.02.27.02—.05,.07—.09,.12,.13,.15—.27,.30—.37,
.39 • 38:20 Md. R. 1222 (9-23-11)
12.04.01.04—.12,.14—.21 • 38:21 Md. R. 1297 (10-7-11)
12.04.02.01—.03,.11—13 • 38:21 Md. R. 1297 (10-7-11)
12.04.05.01,.06 • 38:21 Md. R. 1297 (10-7-11)
12.04.06.01—.18 • 38:21 Md. R. 1297 (10-7-11)
12.10.01.04—.06,.08,.09,.14—.17,
.19—.27 • 38:15 Md. R. 904 (7-15-11)
12.10.04.01—.31 • 38:15 Md. R. 904 (7-15-11)
12.10.05.01 • 38:15 Md. R. 904 (7-15-11)
12.10.06.01—.16 • 38:15 Md. R. 904 (7-15-11)
12.12.30.02—.09,.12,.13,.15—27,.30—.37,
.39 • 38:24 Md. R. 1518 (11-18-11)
13A STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION
13A.02.06.02 • 38:20 Md. R. 1244 (9-23-11)
13A.03.04.07 • 38:22 Md. R. 1374 (10-21-11)
13A.05.09.02 • 38:23 Md. R. 1459 (11-4-11)
13A.07.04.01.,01-1,.05,.06 •37:16 Md. R. 1082 (7-30-10) (ibr)
13A.08.01.01 • 38:20 Md. R. 1244 (9-23-11)
13A.08.01.17 • 38:22 Md. R. 1375 (10-21-11)
13A.08.02.01 • 38:20 Md. R. 1244 (9-23-11) (ibr)
13A.12.02.27 • 38:14 Md. R. 815 (7-1-11)
13A.12.03.02,.03,.11 • 38:17 Md. R. 1038 (8-12-11)
13A.16.01.02 • 38:24 Md. R. 1540 (11-18-11)
13A.16.02.01 • 38:24 Md. R. 1540 (11-18-11)
13A.16.07.06 • 38:24 Md. R. 1540 (11-18-11)
13A.16.18.01,.02 • 38:24 Md. R. 1540 (11-18-11)
14 INDEPENDENT AGENCIES
14.01.11.04 • 38:23 Md. R. 1459 (11-4-11)
14.01.11.08 • 38:23 Md. R. 1460 (11-4-11)
14.01.14.47 • 38:23 Md. R. 1460 (11-4-11)
14.01.16.03,.04,.08,.09,.11 • 38:23 Md. R. 1460 (11-4-11)
14.01.18.03 • 38:23 Md. R. 1459 (11-4-11)
14.09.03.01,.04,.09 • 38:23 Md. R. 1462 (11-4-11)
14.34.01.01—.03 • 38:24 Md. R. 1541 (11-18-11)
14.34.02.01—.03 • 38:24 Md. R. 1541 (11-18-11)
20 PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
20.50.01.03,.05 • 38:5 Md. R. 332 (2-25-11)
38:22 Md. R. 1377 (10-21-11)
20.50.10.05 • 38:5 Md. R. 332 (2-25-11)
38:22 Md. R. 1377 (10-21-11)
20.90.02.19 • 38:20 Md. R. 1245 (9-23-11)
20.90.03.17 • 38:20 Md. R. 1245 (9-23-11)
21 STATE PROCUREMENT REGULATIONS
21.11.03.01,.08,.09,.12,.12-1,.14 • 38:20 Md. R. 1247 (9-23-11)
21.11.12.01—.09 • 38:20 Md. R. 1249 (9-23-11)
26 DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT
Subtitles 13—18 (Part 3)
26.17.01.01 • 37:19 Md. R. 1329 (9-10-10) (err)
26.17.01.01—.11 • 37:18 Md. R. 1244 (8-27-10) (ibr)
38:18 Md. R. 1101 (8-26-11) (ibr)
29 MARYLAND STATE POLICE
29.02.01.01,.02,.11,.14 • 38:23 Md. R. 1465 (11-4-11)
29.06.04.03—.07 • 38:21 Md. R. 1310 (10-7-11)
30 MARYLAND INSTITUTE FOR EMERGENCY MEDICAL
SERVICES SYSTEMS (MIEMSS)
30.03.05.02 • 38:19 Md. R. 1172 (9-9-11)
31 MARYLAND INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION
31.10.01.01—.03 • 38:24 Md. R. 1548 (11-18-11)
31.12.08.04 • 38:17 Md. R. 1039 (8-12-11)
31.14.03.10 • 38:20 Md. R. 1251 (9-23-11)
33 STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS
33.01.01.01 • 38:23 Md. R. 1468 (11-4-11)
33.07.07.01—.04 • 38:23 Md. R. 1468 (11-4-11)
33.07.08.01,.03 • 38:23 Md. R. 1468 (11-4-11)
33.07.09.01—.06 • 38:23 Md. R. 1468 (11-4-11)
33.11.03.08 • 38:23 Md. R. 1470 (11-4-11)
33.11.04.03 • 38:23 Md. R. 1470 (11-4-11)
33.13.02.02 • 38:21 Md. R. 1313 (10-7-11)
33.13.03.02 • 38:21 Md. R. 1313 (10-7-11)
33.13.05.01,.02 • 38:21 Md. R. 1313 (10-7-11)
Page 8
PENDING PROPOSALS
1490
MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 38, ISSUE 24, FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2011
33.13.06.03—.05 • 38:21 Md. R. 1313 (10-7-11)
33.13.06.03,.05 • 38:23 Md. R. 1471 (11-4-11)
33.13.08.01—.05 • 38:21 Md. R. 1313 (10-7-11)
33.13.09.01—.05 • 38:21 Md. R. 1313 (10-7-11)
33.13.10.01,.02 • 38:23 Md. R. 1471 (11-4-11)
33.17.06.08—.11 • 38:23 Md. R. 1468 (11-4-11)
Page 9
1491
MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 38, ISSUE 24, FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2011
The Judiciary
COURT OF APPEALS OF
MARYLAND
ATTORNEYS TO BE ADMITTED TO
THE BAR The State Board of Law Examiners, after careful consideration of
their qualifications, has by report to the Court recommended that the
applicants named on Exhibit A attached hereto be admitted to the
Bar, conditioned upon successful completion of the Professionalism
Course pursuant to Rule 11 of Rules Governing Admission to the Bar
of Maryland. As to certain applicants named in an attachment to the
Report, the favorable recommendation also is conditioned upon the
outcome of proceedings pending under Section (j) of Rule 13 (Out-
of-State Attorneys) of Rules Governing Admission to the Bar of
Maryland.
It is thereupon the 28th day of October 2011, by the Court of
Appeals of Maryland ORDERED that the Board‘s recommendation
be ratified subject to the conditions therein stated on the 28th day of
November 2011, unless exceptions to the Board‘s recommendation of
any applicant be filed on or before said date, provided a copy of this
Order be published at least one time in the Maryland Register before
such ratification.
ROBERT M. BELL
Chief Judge
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Filed: October 28, 2011
BESSIE M. DECKER
Clerk
Court of Appeals of Maryland
EXHIBIT A
OUT-OF-STATE ATTORNEYS EXAM
JULY 2011
Amber, Syh Aji-Mvo, 7307 Goddard Drive, Lanham, MD, 20706
Barry, Kathleen Mary, 5313 Woodfield Lake Road, Cary, NC, 27518
Bennett, Jamie Michele, 8 Creek Side Court, Middle River, MD,
21220
Bridges, Gregory, 1616 N. Calvert Street, Baltimore, MD, 21202
Burke, Rachel Denger, 4917 Jamestown Road, Bethesda, MD, 20816
Caleb, Joseph Patrick Louis, 5210 3rd St., NE, Apt. #T-10,
Washington, DC, 20011
Calem, Andrea Rae, 6514 Bradley Blvd., Bethesda, MD, 20817
Cantrell, Constance Helen, 7305 Radnor Road, Bethesda, MD, 20817
Canty, Charles Gregory, 9436 Bluefield Road, Upper Marlboro, MD,
20774
Celestin-Antonin, Lynn Michele, 5366 Smooth Meadow Way, Unit
2, Columbia, MD, 21044
Chuang, Theodore David, 7508 Sebago Road, Bethesda, MD, 20817
Clapman, Alice Joanna, 4411 39th St., NW, Washington, DC, 20016
Cohen, Leslie Ruben, 9632 Trailridge Terrace, Potomac, MD, 20854
Componovo, William Christopher, PO Box 494, Hockessin, DE,
19707
Coppula, Christopher Andrew, 12423 Sky Blue Drive, Germantown,
MD, 20874
Crowell IV, James Andrew, U.S. Atty‘s Office, Suite 400, 6500
Cherrywood Ln, Greenbelt, MD, 20770
Cunningham Jr., Robert Joseph, Rees Broome PC, Ninth Floor,8133
Leesburg Pike, Vienna, VA, 22182
Daly Jr., William Patrick, 301 Blair Court, Vienna, VA, 22180
De Jesus, Gilberto, 110 East Northern Parkway, Baltimore, MD,
21212
Feld, Tamara Shari, 3302 Fallstaff Road, Baltimore, MD, 21215
Ferrette, Chelsea Philippa, 931 Farragut Street, NW, Washington,
DC, 20011
Finto, Kevin John, Hunton & Williams LLP, 951 E. Byrd Street,
Richmond, VA, 23219
Gartland II, Charles Arthur, 1661 La France St. NE, Unit 324,
Atlanta, GA, 30307
Gold, Sara Ellen, 8619 Lancaster Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20814
Grannis, Mark Andrew, 1200 Eighteenth St., NW, Suite 1200,
Washington, DC, 20036
Hazel, George Jarrod, 14512 Omaha Court, North Potomac, MD,
20878
Heimann, Robin Adele, 1752 Rosaleigh Court, Vienna, VA, 22182
Henderson, Reid Donalan, 1203 Rhode Island Avenue NW,
Washington, DC, 20005
Hibey, Michael Kelley, 303 Whitestone Road, Silver Spring, MD,
20901
Hill, Eve Lynne, 1819 N. Hollister Street, Arlington, VA, 22205
Hopkins, Jacqueline Denise, 9200 Bustleton Ave., Apt. 2009,
Philadelphia, PA, 19115
Hur, Robert Kyoung, 1219 Clement Place, Silver Spring, MD, 20910
Jackson, Eric Sean, 701 Gleneagles Drive, Fort Washington, MD,
20744
Kelly, Robert Edward, 4541 Saucon Valley Court, Alexandria, VA,
22312
Kieval, Michael Ya‘akov, 4702 Glenbrook Parkway, Bethesda, MD,
20814
Kling, Virginia A.S., 4610 West Virginia Avenue, Bethesda, MD,
20814
Koenig, Elizabeth Joanna, 13701 Colgate Way, Apt. #1137, Silver
Spring, MD, 20904
Lannan III, Robert Woodrow, 8904 Saddle Lane, Potomac, MD,
20854
Larsen, Louis Nikolaus, PO Box 1455, Jensen Beach, FL, 34958
Lebowitz, Donna Sue, 1440 Veteran Ave., #534, Los Angeles, CA,
90024
Mahood, David Raymond, PO Box 315, Savage, MD, 20763
Martin Jr., Jeffery Thomas, 610 Madison Street, #200, Alexandria,
VA, 22314
McNichols, John Marcus, 105 E. Oxford Avenue, Alexandria, VA,
22301
Micheel, Douglas Edward, 8410 Grubb Road, Chevy Chase, MD,
20815
Mihalic, Ryan Michael, 20 Ichabod Road, Simsbury, CT, 06070
Miller, Benjamin Mark, 3460 14th St., NW, Apt. #37, Washington,
DC, 20010
Milligan, Justin Ogden, 3212 Dynasty Drive, District Heights, MD,
20747
Mirkes, Craig Allen, 4508 Mahan Road, Silver Spring, MD, 20906
Morris, Jennifer Rose, 800 4th Street SW N212, Washington, DC,
20024
Munasifi, Dina Samar, 1301 N. Troy St., Apt. 1201, Arlington, VA,
22201
Naylor, Richard Nash Pratt, 3253 Landria Drive, Richmond, VA,
23225
Page 10
JUDICIARY
1492
MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 38, ISSUE 24, FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2011
Nazareth-Phelps, Natasha Marina, 1020 Urban Avenue, Durham, NC,
27701
Perlow, Jarrett Benjamin, 9707 Cedar Lane, Bethesda, MD, 20000
Perry, Stephanie L. Terry, 2400 24th Road South, #305, Arlington,
VA, 22206
Pitts, James Thurman, 5233 Strathmore Avenue, Kensington, MD,
20895
Powell, Karon Joy, 9315 Frensham Court, Laurel, MD, 20708
Prentiss, Gail Randolph, 8035 Cobble Creek Circle, Potomac, MD,
20854
Renner, Richard Randolph, 921 Loxford Terrace, Silver Spring, MD,
20901
Robins, Ann, 1661 Crescent Place NW, #302, Washington, DC,
20009
Roche, Sean Patrick, 2831 Linden Lane, Falls Church, VA, 22042
Schroth, John Henry, 380 South Military Hwy., Apt. E, Norfolk, VA,
23502
Schultz, Mark Charles, 161 Washington St., Suite 400,
Conshohocken, PA, 19428
Shakow, Thomas Edward, 4618 Yuma Street, NW, Washington, DC,
20016
Smith, David Coventry, 7102 Magdalene Court, Easton, MD, 21601
Spotts, Michael Kevin, 300 Colorado Ave., Suite 203, Stuart, FL,
34994
Swank, Sarah Elizabeth, 1701 16th Street, N.W. #638, Washington,
DC, 20009
Vernet, Ruth Janet, 7107 Old Stage Road, Rockville, MD, 20852
Whyte, Megan Kathleen, 555 Massachusetts Ave., NW, Unit 1107,
Washington, DC, 20001
Wonderlick, David Brian, 8593 Raglan Road, Vienna, VA, 22182
[11-24-27]
COURT OF SPECIAL
APPEALS
SCHEDULE FOR DECEMBER 1, 2, 5, 6,
7, 8, 9, 12, 13, 14, AND 15, 2011 Thursday, December 1, 2011
Courtroom No. 1
No. 01876/10 Phillip Murray, Esq. et al. vs. Indoor Range
Operating Company, LLC
No. 01003/10 William Larry Corey vs. Bettie Corey
No. 01160/11* In Re: Adoption/Guardianship of Michael S.
No. 01928/10 Myesha Curtis et al. vs. Tarin Gabrielson et al.
No. 01882/10 Martin Chaikin t/a US Aluminum Co., vs. Janet
Athos et al.
*8-207(a)
Courtroom No. 2
No. 00836/10 Lori L. Andochick vs. Keith A. Lee
No. 00980/10 Jeffrey L. Hurd vs. Eric P. Haberkorn et al.
No. 01264/10 Michael A. Randall et ux. vs. Bradly A. Franzen et
ux.
No. 01884/10 Oakmont Green, Inc. vs. Town of Hampstead
No. 02213/10 Travis Everett Jones vs. State of Maryland
Friday, December 2, 2011
Courtroom No. 1
No. 00211/10 Rodger Johnson et ux. vs. Queen Anne‘s County
Commissioners
No. 02689/10 Daniel Marshall vs. State of Maryland
No. 01853/10 Ricky Edwards vs. Stephen Fisher, et al.
No. 01982/10 Dana Williams vs. State of Maryland***
No. 02503/10 Dana Williams vs. State of Maryland***
No. 01374/10 Tyres Kennard Taylor vs. State of Maryland
No. 01823/10 Mark Elliott Korn vs. Kelly Jo Savage
***Consolidated Cases
Courtroom No. 2
No. 00751/10 Georgia-Pacific, LLC. f/k/a Georgia-Pacific
Corporation vs. Jocelyn Anne Farrar
No. 01791/10 Bryson Murray, a minor et al. vs. Transcare
Maryland Inc. et al.
No. 01813/10 Mary Myers vs. Donald Tomanek et al.
No. 02736/10 The Pham Minh Nguyen vs. State of Maryland
No. 01915/10 Council of Unit Owners of the Fairway Courtyards
II at Waverly Woods, Condominium, Inc. vs.
Courtyards II, LLC et al.
No. 01822/10 Ronald Haibach vs. Nikki Allison O‘Connell
Monday, December 5, 2011
Courtroom No. 1
No. 01115/10 James J. Flamish vs. Carol D. Flamish
No. 01712/10 West Haven Homeowners Association, Inc. vs.
Jeffrey Smith
No. 01824/09 Benjamin Morgan Hawkes vs. State of Maryland
No. 00538/11 James Catler et al. vs. Arent Fox, LLP et al.
No. 01974/10 Louis Brock a/k/a Lewis Brock vs. State of
Maryland
No. 02546/10 Katherine T. Tiong vs. State of Maryland
Courtroom No. 2
No. 01831/10 Cherie Ross vs. Housing Authority of Baltimore
City
No. 01878/10 Anne Arundel County, Maryland vs. Teamsters
Local Union No. 355 et al.
No. 01280/10 Bennett Homes, LLC vs. John O. Thompson et al.
No. 01868/10 Steven F. Ottenstein, Trustee et al. vs. Promenade
Towers Mutual Housing Corporation et al.
No. 01613/10 Samuel R. VanSickle vs. K Bank f/k/a Key Bank
and Trust
No. 02716/10 Troy Traylor vs. State of Maryland
Tuesday, December 6, 2011
Courtroom No. 1
No. 02017/10 Gilgem, LLC et al. vs. Stonebridge Bank
No. 01935/10 Calin Constantinescu vs. Annie Constantinescu
No. 01941/10 James Beggs et al. vs. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. et al.
No. 01929/10 Charissa Stumpf vs. Provident Bank
No. 00883/11* In Re: Adoption/Guardianship of Na‘Imah S.
*8-207(a)
Courtroom No. 2
No. 01931/10 Wayne H. Goss et al. vs. Estate of Bertha Jennings
et al.
No. 01814/10 Demetrius Nickens vs. Mount Vernon Realty et al.
No. 02235/10 Marc Lee Weinstein vs. State of Maryland
No. 00734/10 Adam S. Drescher vs. Darian L. Drescher
No. 01730/10 Kyvelle Jamaas Martin vs. State of Maryland
No. 00682/11 Reginald McCraken vs. State of Maryland
Page 11
JUDICIARY
1493
MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 38, ISSUE 24, FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2011
Wednesday, December 7, 2011
Courtroom No. 1
No. 01940/10 Tracy Clayton King vs. Gary Bosley et al.
No. 01860/10 Long Green Valley Association et al. vs. Bellevale
Farms, Inc. et al.
No. 01944/10 Theodore Harris vs. University Baptist Church
No. 01907/10 Irving Groat vs. Kristin E. Sundberg et al.
No. 01423/10 Erie Insurance Exchange vs. H. T. Harrison &
Sons, Inc. et al.
Courtroom No. 2
No. 01983/10 Marisa Milton et al. vs. Alpha Kappa Alpha
Sorority, Inc. et al.
No. 01629/10 Jackie N. Perry, Jr. vs. State of Maryland
No. 01242/11** State of Maryland vs. Konnyack A. Thomas
No. 02459/10 Melvin Alford vs. State of Maryland
No. 00401/10 Demetrius Smith vs. State of Maryland
**120 DAY RULE
Thursday, December 8, 2011
Courtroom No. 1
No. 01741/10 Nail Trix, Inc. et al. vs. Mills-Kan Am Sawgrass
Phase 3 Limited Partnership
No. 01291/11* In Re: Jayden G.
No. 01571/10 Tawanda Adeleye vs. Norbert Myslinski
No. 01841/10 Guillermo Aguilera-Tovar vs. State of Maryland
No. 01932/10 Anacostia Riverkeeper et al. vs. Maryland
Department of the Environment et al.
No. 01642/10 Hailei Dai vs. Bing Gui
*8-207(a)
Courtroom No. 2
No. 00996/11* In Re: Adoption/Guardianship of Isis Y., Malik Y.
and Asia Y.
No. 01820/10 Quewetta Fernando et al. vs. Joel Marrero et al.
No. 01972/10 Board of Appeals, Department of Labor, Licensing
and Regulations et al. vs. Kenneth B. Judkin
No. 01452/10 Ginza Japanese Steakhouse No. 5, Inc. et al. vs.
McGill Development Limited Partnership No. 3
No. 01786/10 NAFA USA, INC. vs. Diane P. Tracey et al.
No. 01976/10 Maurice Hill vs. State of Maryland
*8-207(a)
Friday, December 9, 2011
Courtroom No. 1
No. 01975/10 Rahim I. Williams vs. Mayor & City Council of
Baltimore
No. 02241/10* Joanna Davis vs. Michael A. Petito
No. 02497/10 Dontae Yates vs. State of Maryland
No. 02432/10 Dominick Shavaz Williams vs. State of Maryland
No. 02436/10 James Aaron Kimble vs. State of Maryland
No. 00837/10 CSX Transportation Inc. vs. Edward L. Pitts, Sr.
*8-207(a)
Courtroom No. 2
No. 01735/10 Colonial Distributors, Inc. et al. vs. Dura Supreme,
Inc.
No. 01988/10 Noreen Bryan et al. vs. Victory Housing, Inc. et al.
No. 01990/10 Deborah A. Vollmer vs. Montgomery County,
Maryland et al.
No. 02016/10 Eric Case vs. Laura Glynn
No. 00539/10 Jean R. Antoine vs. Jacob Geesing et al.
Monday, December 12, 2011
Courtroom No. 1
No. 00225/10 Silo Point II LLC et al. vs. Benfield Electric
Company, Inc.
No. 02098/08 Bryan Lamont Poole vs. State of Maryland
No. 01512/10 Clifton Leroy Phair, Jr. vs. Department of Human
Resources, Baltimore City Office of Child
Support Enforcement ex rel. Michelle Garnett
No. 01315/10 Ming Xi Zhang vs. State of Maryland
No. 00894/10 Suzanne Shayt et al. vs. City of Gaithersburg et al.
No. 01539/10 Dante Wilson vs. Maryland Department of Human
Resources
Courtroom No. 2
No. 01683/10 Maryland Insurance Administration ex rel vs.
Tiffany Burton et al.
No. 01756/10 Bruce Ziemann vs. Safeway Stores, Inc.
No. 01614/10 Pamela Potaczek et al. vs. Board of County
Commissioners for Charles County
No. 02924/08 Erin Lamont Washington vs. State of Maryland
No. 01678/10 John Trangsrud vs. Prince George‘s County
Department of vs.
No. 02733/10 Karl Marshall Walker, Jr. vs. State of Maryland
Tuesday, December 13, 2011
All cases submitted on brief
Courtroom No. 1
No. 01059/10 Mark Phillip French vs. State of Maryland et al.
No. 01661/10 Richard Katz vs. Elizabeth Katz
No. 02193/10 Alan Jay Hetrick vs. State of Maryland
No. 02226/10 John Americo Giorgilli vs. State of Maryland
No. 02228/10 Quintin Ranard Yellowdy vs. State of Maryland
No. 02231/10 Moadian Bratton-Bey vs. State of Maryland
No. 02238/10 Rahymeen J. Barber vs. State of Maryland
No. 02246/10 Ernest Johnson vs. State of Maryland
No. 02293/10 Steven Doby, Sr. vs. State of Maryland
No. 02438/10 Lamont George Smith vs. State of Maryland
Courtroom No. 2
No. 01766/10 Shannon Causion vs. State of Maryland
No. 01584/10 John B. Atcheson vs. Linda E. Atcheson
No. 01220/10 John Trzoniec vs. University of Maryland
University College et al.
No. 01818/09 Vincent Jiles Bowen vs. State of Maryland
No. 01621/10 Charles Freeman vs. State of Maryland
No. 00681/10 David Ward Turner vs. State of Maryland
No. 01095/10 Roger Lamont Prophet vs. State of Maryland
No. 01360/10 Garrett Maurice Moreland vs. State of Maryland
No. 01363/10 Ernest Rivers vs. State of Maryland
Wednesday, December 14, 2011
All cases submitted on brief
Courtroom No. 1
No. 02079/09 Richard J. Bedingfield vs. Personnel Board of
Anne Arundel County
No. 02847/10* Kim Muhammad vs. Scott Muhammad
No. 02454/10 Anthony Shirriel vs. State of Maryland
No. 02479/10 Wesley Torrance Kelly vs. State of Maryland
No. 02481/10 Andre Miller vs. State of Maryland
No. 02482/10 Zjuonta Hammett vs. State of Maryland
No. 02544/10 David Boccabella vs. State of Maryland
Page 12
JUDICIARY
1494
MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 38, ISSUE 24, FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2011
No. 02679/10 Wesley Torrence Kelly vs. State of Maryland
No. 02680/10 Earl D. Johnson, Jr. vs. State of Maryland
*8-207(a)
Courtroom No. 2
No. 02817/10* Nathaniel Costley, Sr. vs. Christina Steiner
No. 00747/10 Martial Gaston vs. Correctional Officer Jenkins et
al.
No. 00660/10 Shanicole Saphire Burks vs. State of Maryland
No. 01480/10 Carlton Carvel Dixon vs. State of Maryland
No. 01484/10 Dashaun Marquis Elliott vs. State of Maryland
No. 02688/10 Keenan Bunch vs. State of Maryland
No. 01541/10 Wydell Eugene Butler vs. State of Maryland
No. 01705/10 Mark Charles Morris vs. State of Maryland
No. 01706/10 Nicholas Jermaine Harris vs. State of Maryland
*8-207(a)
Thursday, December 15, 2011
All cases submitted on brief
Courtroom No. 1
No. 02731/10 Richard Carroll Teague, Jr. vs. State of Maryland
No. 02408/10 Tibebe Samuel vs. Bezuayehu Yenefanta
No. 02738/10 Ranard Nichols vs. State of Maryland
No. 02785/10 Paulicia King vs. State of Maryland
No. 02791/10 Warren James Pitts, Jr. vs. State of Maryland
No. 02796/10 William B. Bolton vs. State of Maryland
No. 02946/10 Amit A. Kanasagra vs. State of Maryland
No. 03003/10 Danny Franklin Jones vs. State of Maryland
No. 03042/10 Pernell Matthew McMillan vs. State of Maryland
Courtroom No. 2
No. 02590/10 Anthony McMillian vs. Bobby Shearin, Warden
No. 02586/10 David E. Fuster vs. Shady Grove Adventist
Hospital et al.
No. 00690/10 Rommel Saxena vs. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al.
No. 01725/10 Parrish Marcellus Valentine vs. State of Maryland
No. 02064/10 Fletcher Anderson Worrell vs. State of Maryland
No. 02088/10 James Tanner vs. State of Maryland
No. 01892/10 In Re: Kavonte D.
No. 02104/10 Edward W. Smith, Jr. vs. State of Maryland
No. 02078/10 Mary Arung vs. State of Maryland
On the day of argument, counsel are instructed to register in the
Office of the Clerk no later than 9 a.m. The Court is located at 361
Rowe Boulevard, in the Robert C. Murphy Courts of Appeals
Building. After December, 2011, the Court will recess until January,
2012.
LESLIE D. GRADET
Clerk
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER
Pursuant to Maryland Rule 8-522(a), I hereby direct that oral
argument in the month of December be limited to 20 minutes per
side, subject to the discretion of the hearing panel to allow additional
argument, not exceeding a total of 30 minutes per side.
This directive applies only to cases scheduled in December, 2011.
Chief Judge‘s signature appears on
original Administrative Order
Dated: October 24, 2011
[11-24-23]
Page 13
1495
MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 38, ISSUE 24, FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2011
Emergency Action on Regulations Symbol Key
• Roman type indicates text existing before emergency status was granted.
• Italic type indicates new text.
• [Single brackets] indicate deleted text.
Emergency Regulations
Under State Government Article, §10-111(b), Annotated Code of Maryland, an agency may petition the Joint Committee on Administrative,
Executive, and Legislative Review (AELR), asking that the usual procedures for adopting regulations be set aside because emergency conditions
exist. If the Committee approves the request, the regulations are given emergency status. Emergency status means that the regulations become
effective immediately, or at a later time specified by the Committee. After the Committee has granted emergency status, the regulations are
published in the next available issue of the Maryland Register. The approval of emergency status may be subject to one or more conditions,
including a time limit. During the time the emergency status is in effect, the agency may adopt the regulations through the usual promulgation
process. If the agency chooses not to adopt the regulations, the emergency status expires when the time limit on the emergency regulations ends.
When emergency status expires, the text of the regulations reverts to its original language.
Title 10
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
AND MENTAL HYGIENE
Subtitle 19 DANGEROUS DEVICES
AND SUBSTANCES
10.19.03 Controlled Dangerous Substances
Authority: Criminal Law Article, §5-202(b) and 5-203, Annotated Code of
Maryland
Notice of Emergency Action
[11-232-E]
The Joint Committee on Administrative, Executive, and
Legislative Review has granted emergency status to new Regulation
.13 under COMAR 10.19.03 Controlled Dangerous Substances.
Emergency status began: October 18, 2011.
Emergency status expires: April 16, 2012.
Editor‘s Note: The text of this document will not be printed here
because it appeared as a Notice of Proposed Action in 38:23 Md. R.
1163—1134 (September 9, 2011), referenced as [11-232-P].
JOSHUA M. SHARFSTEIN, M.D.
Secretary of Health and Mental Hygiene
Subtitle 25 MARYLAND HEALTH
CARE COMMISSION
10.25.16 Electronic Health Record Incentives
Authority: Health–General Article, §§19-103(c)(2)(i) and (ii), 19-109(a)(1),
19–143(d)(1), (2), (3), and (4)[,] and (i), Annotated Code of Maryland
Notice of Emergency Action
[11-292-E]
The Joint Committee on Administrative, Executive, and
Legislative Review has granted emergency status to amendments to
Regulations .01— .07 under COMAR 10.25.16 Electronic Health
Record Incentives.
Emergency status began: October 21, 2011.
Emergency status expires: March 12, 2012.
Editor‘s Note: The text of this document will not be printed here
because it appeared as a Notice of Proposed Action in 38:21 Md. R.
1357—1360 (October 21, 2011), referenced as [11-292-P].
MARILYN MOON, Ph.D.
Chair
Maryland Health Care Commission
Subtitle 34 BOARD OF PHARMACY
10.34.32 Pharmacist Administration of
Vaccinations
Authority: Health Occupations Article, §§12-101, 12-102(b), 12-508, and 12-
6A-10, Annotated Code of Maryland
Notice of Emergency Action
[11-313-E]
The Joint Committee on Administrative, Executive, and
Legislative Review has granted emergency status to amendments to
Regulation .03 under COMAR 10.34.32 Pharmacist
Administration of Vaccinations.
Emergency status began: October 1, 2011.
Emergency status expires: March 28, 2012.
Editor‘s Note: The text of this document will not be printed here
because it appeared as a Notice of Proposed Action in 38:23 Md. R.
1435—1436 (November 4, 2011), referenced as [11-313-P].
JOSHUA M. SHARFSTEIN, M.D.
Secretary of Health and Mental Hygiene
Page 14
EMERGENCY ACTION ON REGULATIONS
1496
MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 38, ISSUE 24, FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2011
Title 12
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC
SAFETY AND
CORRECTIONAL SERVICES
Subtitle 12 PATUXENT INSTITUTION
12.12.30 Inmate Discipline
Authority: Correctional Services Article, §4-208, Annotated Code of
Maryland
Notice of Emergency Action
[11-329-E]
The Joint Committee on Administrative, Executive, and
Legislative Review has granted emergency status to the repeal of
existing Regulations .02—.09, .12, .13, .16, .18, .19, .26, .31, .35, and
.36, the adoption of new Regulations .02—.09, .12, .13, .16, .18, .19,
.26, .31, .35, and .36, and amendments to Regulations .15, .17, .20—
.25, .27, .30, .32, .33, .34, .37, and .39 under COMAR 12.12.30
Inmate Discipline.
Emergency status began: October 20, 2011.
Emergency status expires: March 8, 2012.
Editor‘s Note: The text of this document will not be printed here
because it appears as a Notice of Proposed Action on pages 1518 —
1540 of this issue, referenced as [11-329-P].
GARY D. MAYNARD
Secretary of Public Safety and Correctional Services
Title 14
INDEPENDENT AGENCIES
Subtitle 26 MARYLAND ENERGY
ADMINISTRATION
14.26.02 Green Building Tax Credit Program
Authority: Tax-General Article, §10-722, Annotated Code of Maryland
Notice of Emergency Action
[11-331-E]
The Joint Committee on Administrative, Executive, and
Legislative Review has granted emergency status to amendments to
Regulations .02 and .04, the repeal of existing Regulation .05,
amendments to and the recodification of existing Regulations .06 —
.08 and .10 to be Regulations .05 — .07 and .09, respectively, and the
recodification of existing Regulation .09 to be .08 under COMAR
14.26.02 Green Building Tax Credit Program.
Emergency status began: October 20, 2011.
Emergency status expires: December 31, 2011.
Comparison to Federal Standards
There is no corresponding federal standard to this emergency
action.
Economic Impact on Small Businesses
The emergency action has minimal or no economic impact on
small businesses.
.02 Incorporation by Reference.
A. (text unchanged)
B. Documents Incorporated.
(1) (text unchanged)
(2) [LEED Rating System Version 2.0 Including the Project
Checklist (Leadership in Energy & Environmental Design, June
2001)] LEED Rating System LEED 2009 (Leadership in Energy &
Environmental Design, 2009) including the Project List (Project list
is applicable for LEED 2009).
(3) [LEED for Existing Buildings/The LEED Green Building
Rating System for Improving Building Performance through
Upgrades and Operations Version 2.0 Un-balloted Draft for Pilot
Program (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design, January
2002] LEED for Existing Buildings/The LEED Green Building Rating
System (tm) for Improving Building Performance Through Upgrades
and Operations LEED 2009.
(4) [LEED-NC ―Green Building Rating System for New
Construction and Major Renovations‖ Version 2.1 (November 2002]
LEED-NC ―Green Building Rating System for New Construction and
Major Renovations‖ LEED 2009.
(5) [LEED-EB ―Green Building Rating System for Existing
Buildings—Upgrades, Operations, and Maintenance‖ Version 2
(October 2004)] LEED-EB ―Green Building Rating System for
Existing Buildings — Upgrades, Operations, and Maintenance‖
LEED 2009.
(6) [LEED-CI ―Green Building Rating System for Commercial
Interiors‖ Version 2 (November 2004)] LEED-CI ―Green Building
Rating System for Commercial Interiors‖ LEED 2009.
(7) [LEED-CS ―Green Building Rating System for Core and
Shell Development‖ Un-balloted Draft for Pilot Version (September
2003)] LEED-CS ―Green Building Rating System for Core and Shell
Development‖ LEED 2009.
[(8) LEED-NC ―Green Building Rating System for New
Construction & Major Renovations‖ Version 2.2 (October 2005).
(9) LEED-EB ―Green Building Rating System for Existing
Buildings—Upgrades, Operations, and Maintenance‖ Version 2
(Updated July 2005).
(10) LEED-CI ―Green Building Rating System for Commercial
Interiors‖ Version 2.0 (Updated December 2005).
(11) LEED ―Green Building Rating System for Core & Shell
Development‖ Version 2.0 (July 2006).]
.04 Green Whole Buildings New Construction: Standards and
Methods for Determining Compliance.
A. A green whole building, newly constructed, is a building that:
(1) Uses not more than 65 percent of the energy attributable to
a reference building which meets the requirements of applicable
energy efficiency standards under ASHRAE 90.1-1999; and
[(2) At a minimum, is certified as meeting the requirements to
qualify for a rating of ―Silver‖ in either the LEED Rating System
Version 2.0 or the LEED-NC Version 2.1;
(3) Is certified as meeting the requirements to qualify for the
following credits in either the LEED Rating System Version 2.0 or
the LEED Rating System Version 2.1:
(a) Sustainable Sites, Credit 8, Light Pollution Reduction;
(b) Water Efficiency, Credit 3.1, Water Use Reduction; and
(c) Materials and Resources, Credit 2.1, Construction Waste
Management;
(4) At a minimum, is certified as meeting the requirements to
qualify for a rating of ―Silver‖ in either the LEED Rating System
Version 2.0 or the LEED-NC Version 2.2; and
(5) Is certified as meeting the requirements to qualify for the
following credits in either the LEED Rating System Version 2.0 or
the LEED Rating Version 2.2:
(a) Sustainable Sites, Credit 8, Light Pollution Reduction;
Page 15
EMERGENCY ACTION ON REGULATIONS
1497
MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 38, ISSUE 24, FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2011
(b) Water Efficiency, Credit 3.1, Water Use Reduction: 20
percent reduction; and
(c) Materials and Resources, Credit 2.1, Construction Waste
Management: Divert 50 percent from disposal.]
(2) At a minimum, is certified as meeting the requirements to
qualify for a rating of ―Gold‖ in the LEED Rating System LEED
2009 for New Construction and Major Renovations in the following
categories, if the whole building includes green tenant space:
(a) Sustainable Sites, Credit 8—Light Pollution Reduction;
(b) Water Efficiency, Credit 3—Water Use Reduction;
(c) Materials and Resources, Credit 2—Construction Waste
Management; and
(d) Energy and Atmosphere: Credits 1 through 6, with at
least 15 points.
B. A green whole building, rehabilitated, is a building that:
(1) Uses no more than 75 percent of the energy attributable to
a reference building which meets the requirements of applicable
energy efficiency standards under ASHRAE 90.1-1999 and, at a
minimum, is certified as meeting the requirements to qualify for a
rating of ―Gold‖ in the LEED Rating System LEED 2009 for New
Construction and Major Renovations in the following categories, if
the rehabilitated space includes green rented space:
(a) Sustainable Sites, Credit 8—Light Pollution Reduction;
(b) Water Efficiency, Credit 3—Water Use Reduction;
(c) Materials and Resources, Credit 2—Construction Waste
Management; and
(d) Energy and Atmosphere: Credits 1 through 6, with at
least 15 points;
(2) At a minimum, is certified as meeting the requirements to
qualify for a rating of ―Gold‖ in the LEED Rating System LEED
2009 for Core and Shell Development in the following categories, if
the rehabilitated space does not include green tenant space:
(a) Sustainable Sites, Credit 8—Light Pollution Reductions;
(b) Water Efficiency, Credit 3—Water Use Reduction;
(c) Materials and Resources, Credit 2—Construction Waste
Management; and
(d) Energy and Atmosphere Credits 1 through 6, with at
least 15 points; or
(3) At a minimum, is certified as meeting the requirements to
qualify for a rating of ―Gold‖ in the LEED 2009 for Existing
Buildings: Operations and Maintenance in the following categories,
if the rehabilitated space is upgraded to maintain occupancy:
(a) Sustainable Sites, Credit 8—Light Pollution Reduction;
(b) Water Efficiency, Credit 3—Water Efficient Landscaping
(c) Materials and Resources, Credit 3—Sustainable
Purchasing – Facility Alternations and Additions; and
(d) Energy and Atmosphere: Credits 1 through 6, with at
least 15 points.
[B.] C. (text unchanged)
[.06] .05 Green Base Buildings: Standards and Methods for
Determining Compliance.
[A.]—[B.] (proposed for repeal)
A. A green base building, newly constructed, is a building that:
(1) Uses not more than 65 percent of the energy attributable to
a reference building that meets the requirements of applicable energy
efficiency standards under ASHRAE 90.1-1999; and
(2) At a minimum, is certified as meeting the requirements to
qualify for a rating of ―Gold‖ in the LEED Rating System 2009 for
Core and Shell Development in the following categories, if the
occupancy does not include green tenant space:
(a) Sustainable Sites, Credit 8—Light Pollution Reductions;
(b) Water Efficiency, Credit 3—Water Use Reduction;
(c) Materials and Resources, Credit 2—Construction Waste
Management; and
(d) Energy and Atmosphere Credits 1 through 6, with at
least 15 points.
B. A green base building, rehabilitated, is a building that:
(1) Uses not more than 75 percent of the energy attributable to
a reference building that meets the requirements of applicable energy
efficiency standards under ASHRAE 90.1-1999; and
(2) At a minimum, is certified as meeting the requirements to
qualify for a rating of ―Gold‖ in the LEED Rating System 2009 for
Core and Shell Development in the following categories, if the
occupancy does not include green tenant space:
(a) Sustainable Sites, Credit 8—Light Pollution Reductions;
(b) Water Efficiency, Credit 3—Water Use Reduction;
(c) Materials and Resources, Credit 2—Construction Waste
Management; and
(d) Energy and Atmosphere Credits 1 through 6, with at
least 15 points.
[.07] .06 Green Tenant Space: Standards and Methods for
Determining Compliance.
[A green tenant space is a building interior that:]
[A.]—[B.] (proposed for repeal) A. A green tenant space, newly constructed, is a building space
that uses not more than 65 percent of the energy attributable to a
reference building that meets the requirements of applicable energy
efficiency standards under ASHRAE 90.1-1999 and, at a minimum, is
certified as meeting the requirements to qualify for a rating of
―Gold‖ in the LEED Rating System for LEED 2009 for Commercial
Interiors in the following categories:
(1) Water Efficiency, Credit 1—Water Use Reduction;
(2) Materials and Resources, Credit 2—Construction Waste
Management; and
(3) Energy and Atmosphere: Credits 1 through 6, with at least
15 points.
B. A green tenant space, rehabilitated, is a building space that
uses not more than 75 percent of the energy attributable to a
reference building that meets the requirements of applicable energy
efficiency standards under ASHRAE 90.1-1999 and, at a minimum, is
certified as meeting the requirements to qualify for a rating of
―Gold‖ in the LEED 2009 Commercial Interiors in the following
categories:
(1) Water Efficiency, Credit 1—Water Use Reduction;
(2) Materials and Resources, Credit 2—Construction Waste
Management; and
(3) Energy and Atmosphere: Credits 1 through 6, with at least
15 points.
[.08] .07 Initial Credit Certificate.
[A.]—[E.] (proposed for repeal)
A. On application by a taxpayer, the Administration shall issue an
initial credit certificate if the taxpayer has made a showing that the
taxpayer is likely, within 3 years of submitting the initial tax credit
application, to place in service property for which a credit under this
chapter is allowed.
B. The Administration may require the taxpayer to provide
additional information as necessary.
C. In determining the amount of credits, a cost paid or incurred
may not be the basis for more than one credit.
D. The initial credit certificate shall state:
(1) The maximum amount of credit allowable in the aggregate
for all credits allowed under this section;
(2) The earliest taxable year for which the credit may be
claimed; and
(3) An expiration date.
E. Expiration and Extension of the Initial Credit Certificate.
(1) The initial credit certificate shall expire no more than 9
months after the date the property is expected to be placed in service
Page 16
EMERGENCY ACTION ON REGULATIONS
1498
MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 38, ISSUE 24, FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2011
as stated on the initial credit certificate unless extended by the
Administration.
(2) The holder of an initial credit certificate may request an
extension of the expiration date if the holder:
(a) Applies for the extension in writing to the
Administration; and
(b) Demonstrates that the extension is necessary to avoid
undue hardship.
F. Abandonment and Reissuance of an Initial Credit Certificate.
(1) The Administration may declare an initial credit certificate
to be abandoned if:
(a) The holder voluntarily returns the initial credit
certificate and notifies the Administration that the holder does not
intend to construct the property as originally proposed to meet the
standards for which the certificate was issued; or
(b) The property is not constructed and in service before the
expiration of the initial credit certificate and the holder has not
demonstrated good cause to issue an extension to avoid undue
hardship.
(2) Prior to declaring an initial credit certificate abandoned,
the Administration will notify the holder in writing, by certified mail,
that the Administration intends to declare the certificate abandoned
unless the holder demonstrates in writing to the Administration
within 2 weeks of the date of the letter that:
(a) An extension of the certificate is warranted to avoid
undue hardship; and
(b) The property can be placed in service within a
reasonable time frame.
(3) If the Administration declares an initial credit certificate
abandoned, the Administration may reissue the initial credit
certificate to a new holder that meets the qualifications for issuing an
initial credit certificate.
(4) The Administration may issue notification that the initial
credit certificate is available on a first-come, first-served basis.
G. Prior to claiming a tax credit for green buildings and green
building components, the taxpayer shall:
(1) Provide in writing to the Administration the as-built details
of the property related to Tax-General Article, §10-722(c) — (h),
Annotated Code of Maryland. If such as-built details are identical to
what was provided in the initial credit certificate application
materials as the basis for the amount of tax credit allowed, the
taxpayer shall so indicate in writing to the Administration, rather
than providing the as-built details.
(2) If the as-built property differs from how the property was
represented in the initial tax credit application such that the as-built
property is not eligible for the full amount of tax credit stated in the
initial credit certificate, MEA shall correct the initial credit
certificate to reflect the amount of tax credit allowable based on the
as-built project.
[.10] .09 Filing.
[The taxpayer shall file the eligibility certificate and the initial
credit certificate with the taxpayer‘s income tax return]
The taxpayer shall file the initial credit certificate and eligibility
certificate with the taxpayer’s income tax return and provide a
duplicate copy to the Maryland Energy Administration.
MALCOLM D. WOOLF
Director
Maryland Energy Administration
Page 17
1499
MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 38, ISSUE 24, FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2011
Final Action on Regulations
Symbol Key
• Roman type indicates text already existing at the time of the proposed action.
• Italic type indicates new text added at the time of proposed action.
• Single underline, italic indicates new text added at the time of final action.
• Single underline, roman indicates existing text added at the time of final action.
• [[Double brackets]] indicate text deleted at the time of final action.
Title 03
COMPTROLLER OF THE
TREASURY
Subtitle 02 ALCOHOL AND TOBACCO
TAX
03.02.02 Tobacco Tax
Authority: Tax-General Article, §§2-103 and 12-306, Annotated Code of Maryland
Notice of Final Action
[11-134-F]
On October 27, 2011, the Comptroller of the Treasury adopted the
repeal of Regulation .08 under COMAR 03.02.02 Tobacco Tax.
This action, which was proposed for adoption in 38:19 Md. R. 1150
(September 9, 2011), has been adopted as proposed.
Effective Date: November 28, 2011.
PETER FRANCHOT
Comptroller of the Treasury
Title 05
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING
AND COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
Subtitle 02 BUILDING AND
MATERIAL CODES
05.02.01 Model Performance Code
Authority: Public Safety Article, §§12-201—12-204, Annotated Code of
Maryland
Notice of Final Action
[11-268-F-I]
On November 8, 2011, the Secretary of Housing and Community
Development adopted amendments to Regulations .01 — .04 under
COMAR 05.02.01 Model Performance Code. This action, which
was proposed for adoption in 38:20 Md. R. 1206—1207 (September
23, 2011), has been adopted with the nonsubstantive changes shown
below.
Effective Date: January 1, 2012.
Attorney General’s Certification
In accordance with State Government Article, §10-113, Annotated
Code of Maryland, the Attorney General certifies that the following
changes do not differ substantively from the proposed text. The
nature of the changes and the basis for this conclusion are as follows:
Regulation 05.02.01.03A(1)(e): It is unnecessary to delete Chapter
11 of the International Residential Code because the requirements of
Chapter 11 are the same as the requirements in the International
Energy Conservation Code, which is also incorporated by reference.
Retaining Chapter 11 does not change any code requirement.
.03 Model Performance Code.
A. The standards incorporated by reference in Regulation .02-1 of
this chapter, and modified as follows, constitute the Model
Performance Code for building construction in the State:
(1) For industrialized building construction:
(a) — (d) (proposed text unchanged)
(e) International Residential Code for One- and Two-Family
Dwellings with the following [[modifications]] modification:
[[(i)]] Chapter 1. Delete the Section 102.5 Appendices
and replace with the following:
102.5 Appendices: All the provisions in the Appendices
are adopted as part of the IRC except those in Appendices E, J, and
L;
[[(ii) Chapter 11 of the IRC is deleted and replaced with
the 2012 International Energy Conservation Code; and]]
(f) 2012 International Energy Conservation Code; and
(g) The Department encourages home builders to construct
new high-performance homes.
(2) (proposed text unchanged)
B. (proposed text unchanged)
RAYMOND A SKINNER
Secretary of Housing and Community Development
Subtitle 02 BUILDING AND
MATERIAL CODES
05.02.02 Maryland Accessibility Code
Authority: Housing and Community Development Article, §§2-111 and 3-103; Public Safety Article, §12-202; Annotated Code of Maryland
Notice of Final Action
[11-280-F]
On November 8, 2011, the Secretary of Housing and Community
Development adopted amendments to Regulations .05, .07, and .08
under COMAR 05.02.02 Maryland Accessibility Code. This action,
which was proposed for adoption in 38:20 Md. R. 1207—1208
(September 23, 2011), has been adopted as proposed.
Effective Date: January 1, 2012.
RAYMOND A. SKINNER
Secretary of Housing and Community Development
Page 18
FINAL ACTION ON REGULATIONS
1500
MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 38, ISSUE 24, FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2011
Subtitle 02 BUILDING AND
MATERIAL CODES
05.02.07 Maryland Building Performance
Standards
Authority: Public Safety Article §§12-501—12-508, Annotated Code of
Maryland
Notice of Final Action
[11-267-F-I]
On November 8, 2011, the Secretary of Housing and Community
Development adopted amendments to Regulations .03 and .04 under
COMAR 05.02.07 Maryland Building Performance Standards.
This action, which was proposed for adoption in 38:20 Md. R.
1208—1210 (September 23, 2011), has been adopted with the
nonsubstantive changes shown below.
Effective Date: January 1, 2012.
Attorney General’s Certification
In accordance with State Government Article, §10-113, Annotated
Code of Maryland, the Attorney General certifies that the following
changes do not differ substantively from the proposed text. The
nature of the changes and the basis for this conclusion are as follows:
Regulation 05.02.07.04C(2): It is unnecessary to delete Chapter 11
of the International Residential Code because the requirements of
Chapter 11 are the same as the requirements in the International
Energy Conservation Code, which is also incorporated by reference.
Retaining Chapter 11 does not change any code requirement.
.04 Incorporation by Reference.
A. — B. (proposed text unchanged)
C. Modifications to the 2012 International Residential Code for
One- and Two-Family Dwellings:
(1) Chapter 1. Delete the Section 102.5 Appendices and replace
with the following:
102.5 Appendices: All the provisions in the Appendices are
adopted as part of the IRC except those in Appendices E, J, and L.
[[(2) Chapter 11 of the IRC is deleted and replaced with
the2012 International Energy Conservation Code.]]
[[(3)]] (2) — [[(5)]] (4)
D. — E. (proposed text unchanged)
RAYMOND A. SKINNER
Secretary of Housing and Community Development
Title 08
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL
RESOURCES
Subtitle 02 FISHERIES SERVICE
08.02.15 Striped Bass
Authority: Natural Resources Article, §§4-206 and 4-215, Annotated Code of
Maryland
Notice of Final Action
[11-278-F]
On November 8, 2011, the Secretary of Natural Resources adopted
amendments to Regulations .06, .07, and .12 under COMAR
08.02.15 Striped Bass. This action, which was proposed for adoption
in 38:20 Md. R. 1210—2013 (September 23, 2011), has been adopted
as proposed.
Effective Date: November 28, 2011.
JOHN R. GRIFFIN
Secretary of Natural Resources
Subtitle 04 BOATING
08.04.10 Certificate of Title
Authority: Natural Resources Article, [[§§8-704(b), 8-712,]] §§8-704(c), 8-
716, and 8-722, Annotated Code of Maryland
Notice of Final Action
[11-253-F]
On October 25, 2011, the Secretary of Natural Resources adopted
new Regulation .01, amendments to and the recodification of existing
Regulation .01 to be Regulation .02, the repeal of existing Regulation
.02, and new Regulations .03—.05 under COMAR 08.04.10
Certificate of Title. This action, which was proposed for adoption in
38:19 Md. R. 1154—1155 (September 9, 2011), has been adopted
with the nonsubstantive changes shown below.
Effective Date: November 28, 2011.
Attorney General’s Certification
In accordance with State Government Article, §10-113, Annotated
Code of Maryland, the Attorney General certifies that the following
changes do not differ substantively from the proposed text. The
nature of the changes and the basis for this conclusion are as follows:
Regulations .01, .02, and .05: Corrected authority citation and
incorporated minor wording changes from public comment.
.01 Titling Documents.
A. — D. (proposed text unchanged)
E. The following documents are required to title a used vessel:
(1) — (2) (proposed text unchanged)
(3) When the vessel was previously [[federally-documented]]
federally documented:
(a) Copy of the last effective federal certificate of
documentation;
(b) — (d) (proposed text unchanged)
.02 Taxable Value of Vessels.
A. — D. (proposed text unchanged)
E. A vessel duly registered in another jurisdiction may use
Maryland waters for a cumulative total of 90 days in a calendar year
without incurring a vessel excise tax liability. A vessel may remain
longer than 90 days without incurring a vessel excise tax liability as
long as a greater portion of the year is spent in another single
jurisdiction.
.05 Abandoned [[Boat]] Vessel Title.
A. An application for abandoned [[boat]] vessel title under
Natural Resources Article, §8-721 et seq., Annotated Code of
Maryland, shall include:
(1) — (4) (proposed text unchanged)
B — E. (proposed text unchanged)
JOHN R. GRIFFIN
Secretary of Natural Resources
Page 19
FINAL ACTION ON REGULATIONS
1501
MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 38, ISSUE 24, FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2011
Subtitle 04 BOATING
08.04.14 Documented Vessels
Authority: Natural Resources Article, [[§§8-704(b-1)]] §§8-704(c) and 8-
712.1, Annotated Code of Maryland
Notice of Final Action
[11-255-F]
On October 25, 2011, the Secretary of Natural Resources adopted
amendments to Regulations .01 and .02 under COMAR 08.04.14
Documented Vessels. This action, which was proposed for adoption
in 38:19 Md. R. 1156—1157 (September 9, 2011), has been adopted
with the nonsubstantive changes shown below.
Effective Date: November 28, 2011.
Attorney General’s Certification
In accordance with State Government Article, §10-113, Annotated
Code of Maryland, the Attorney General certifies that the following
changes do not differ substantively from the proposed text. The
nature of the changes and the basis for this conclusion are as follows:
Corrected authority citation and minor rewording of Regulation
.01C and D.
.01 Validation Stickers.
A. — B. (proposed text unchanged)
C. [[Stickers]] Validation stickers expire December 31 of the year
following issuance.
D. The color of the stickers shall represent the year the decals
[[expire.
E. Decals shall be colored red,]] expire, with red for stickers that
expire in 2012, followed by blue, international orange, and green, in
rotation.
[[F.]] E. If the validation stickers are defaced, lost, or destroyed, a
sworn affidavit to that effect shall be filed within 15 days with the
Department by the vessel owner and application made for
replacements. A service fee of $1 will be charged for the
replacements.
JOHN R. GRIFFIN
Secretary of Natural Resources
Subtitle 18 BOATING — SPEED
LIMITS AND OPERATION OF
VESSELS
08.18.03 Noise Level Limits of Vessels
Authority: Natural Resources Article, §8-725.4, Annotated Code of Maryland
Notice of Final Action
[11-277-F]
On November 8, 2011, the Secretary of Natural Resources adopted
amendments to Regulations .03 and .08 under COMAR 08.18.03
Noise Level Limits of Vessels. This action, which was proposed for
adoption in 38:20 Md. R. 1213 (September 23, 2011), has been
adopted as proposed.
Effective Date: November 28, 2011.
JOHN R. GRIFFIN
Secretary of Natural Resources
Title 09
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,
LICENSING, AND
REGULATION
Subtitle 37 WORKFORCE
DEVELOPMENT AND ADULT
LEARNING
09.37.01 Alternative Ways to Earn a High School
Diploma
Authority: Labor and Employment Article, §§11-807 and 11-808, Annotated
Code of Maryland
Notice of Final Action
[11-180-F]
On September 30, 2011, the Secretary of Labor, Licensing, and
Regulation, in consultation with the State Board of Education,
adopted amendments to Regulations .04, .06, .08, .11, .17, and .18
under COMAR 09.37.01 Alternate Ways to Earn A High School
Diploma. This action, which was proposed for adoption in 38:16 Md.
R. 954—955 (July 29, 2011), has been adopted as proposed.
Effective Date: November 28, 2011.
ALEXANDER M. SANCHEZ
Secretary of Labor, Licensing, and Regulation
Title 10
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
AND MENTAL HYGIENE
Subtitle 01 PROCEDURES
10.01.20 Nursing Facility Quality Assessment
Authority: Health-General Article, §19-310.1, Annotated Code of Maryland
Notice of Final Action
[11-262-F]
On October 31, 2011, the Secretary of Health and Mental Hygiene
adopted amendments to Regulation .03 under COMAR 10.01.20
Nursing Facility Quality Assessment. This action, which was
proposed for adoption in 38:19 Md. R. 1158—1159 (September 9,
2011), has been adopted as proposed.
Effective Date: November 28, 2011.
JOSHUA M. SHARFSTEIN
Secretary of Health and Mental Hygiene
Page 20
FINAL ACTION ON REGULATIONS
1502
MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 38, ISSUE 24, FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2011
Subtitle 09 MEDICAL CARE
PROGRAMS
10.09.03 Pharmacy Services
Authority: Health-General Article, §§2-104(b), 15-103, 15-103.1, 15-105, and
15-118, Annotated Code of Maryland
Notice of Final Action
[11-190-F]
On October 31, 2011, the Secretary of Health and Mental Hygiene
adopted amendments to Regulations .01, .03—.05, .05-1, .06, and
.07, under COMAR 10.09.03 Pharmacy Services. This action,
which was proposed for adoption in 38:16 Md. R. 955—961 (July 29,
2011), has been adopted with the nonsubstantive changes shown
below.
Effective Date: November 28, 2011.
Attorney General’s Certification
In accordance with State Government Article, §10-113, Annotated
Code of Maryland, the Attorney General certifies that the following
changes do not differ substantively from the proposed text. The
nature of the changes and the basis for this conclusion are as follows:
Regulation .05-1B: The amendment corrects a drafting error and
eliminates a conflict with controlling federal law.
.05-1 Expanded Limitations.
A. (proposed text unchanged)
B. A manufacturer or its designee may not dispute or request
repayment of any rebate paid under §A(1) of this regulation or under
42 U.S.C. §1396r-8(c) more than [[1 year]] 3 years after the date the
rebate was paid.
JOSHUA M. SHARFSTEIN, M.D.
Secretary of Health and Mental Hygiene
Subtitle 09 MEDICAL CARE
PROGRAMS
10.09.06 Hospital Services
Authority: Health-General Article, §§2-104(b), 15-103, and 15-105,
Annotated Code of Maryland
Notice of Final Action
[11-248-F]
On October 31, 2011, the Secretary of Health and Mental Hygiene
adopted amendments to Regulation .09 under COMAR 10.09.06
Hospital Services. This action, which was proposed for adoption in
38:19 Md. R. 1159—1160 (September 9, 2011), has been adopted as
proposed.
Effective Date: November 28, 2011.
JOSHUA M. SHARFSTEIN, M.D.
Secretary of Health and Mental Hygiene
Subtitle 09 MEDICAL CARE
PROGRAMS
10.09.06 Hospital Services
Authority: Health-General Article, §§2-104(b), 15-103, and 15-105,
Annotated Code of Maryland
Notice of Final Action
[11-247-F]
On October 31, 2011, the Secretary of Health and Mental Hygiene
adopted amendments to Regulations .15 and .15-1 under COMAR
10.09.06 Hospital Services. This action, which was proposed for
adoption in 38:19 Md. R. 1160 (September 9, 2011), has been
adopted as proposed.
Effective Date: November 28, 2011.
JOSHUA M. SHARFSTEIN, M.D.
Secretary of Health and Mental Hygiene
Subtitle 09 MEDICAL CARE
PROGRAMS
10.09.10 Nursing Facility Services
Authority: Health-General Article, §§2-104(b), 15-103, and 15-105,
Annotated Code of Maryland
Notice of Final Action
[11-257-F]
On October 31, 2011, the Secretary of Health and Mental Hygiene
adopted amendments to Regulations .07, .08, .09, .10, .11-1, .11-2,
and .16 under COMAR 10.09.10 Nursing Facility Services. This
action, which was proposed for adoption in 38:19 Md. R. 1160—
1162 (September 9, 2011), has been adopted as proposed.
Effective Date: November 28, 2011.
JOSHUA M. SHARFSTEIN, M.D.
Secretary of Health and Mental Hygiene
Subtitle 19 DANGEROUS DEVICES
AND SUBSTANCES
10.19.01 Prohibition of Bisphenol-A in Child Care
Articles
Authority: Health-General Article, §24-304, Annotated Code of Maryland
Notice of Final Action
[11-246-F]
On November 3, 2011, the Secretary of Health and Mental
Hygiene adopted new Regulations .01—.05 under a new chapter,
COMAR 10.19. 01 Prohibition of Bisphenol-A in Child Care
Articles. This action, which was proposed for adoption in 38:19 Md.
R. 1162—1163 (September 9, 2011), has been adopted as proposed.
Effective Date: November 28, 2011.
JOSHUA M. SHARFSTEIN, M.D.
Secretary of Health and Mental Hygiene
Page 21
FINAL ACTION ON REGULATIONS
1503
MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 38, ISSUE 24, FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2011
Title 14
INDEPENDENT AGENCIES
Subtitle 09 WORKERS’
COMPENSATION COMMISSION
14.09.01 Procedural Regulations
Authority: Health-General Article, §4-303; Labor and Employment Article,
§§9-307, 9-309, 9-310.2, 9-314, 9-404, 9-405, 9-410, 9-603, 9-625, 9-635, 9-689, 9-701, 9-709, 9-710, 9-711, 9-721, 9-731, 9-739, and 9-6A-07; Insurance
Article, §§19-405 and 19-406; State Government Article, §10-1103;
Annotated Code of Maryland
Notice of Final Action
[11-258-F]
On October 27, 2011, the Workers‘ Compensation Commission
adopted amendments to Regulations .01 and .19 under COMAR
14.09.01 Procedural Regulations to clarify the procedures for
reviewing settlements to ensure compliance with the Medicare
Secondary Payer Act when settling claims involving future medical
benefits. This action, which was proposed for adoption in 38:19 Md.
R. 1167—1168 (September 9, 2011), has been adopted as proposed.
Effective Date: November 28, 2011.
R. KARL AUMANN
Chairman
Workers‘ Compensation Commission
Title 20
PUBLIC SERVICE
COMMISSION
Subtitle 50 SERVICE SUPPLIED BY
ELECTRIC COMPANIES
Notice of Final Action
[11-249-F]
On October 28, 2011, the Public Service Commission adopted:
(1) Amendments to Regulation .03 under COMAR 20.50.01
General; and
(2) New Regulations .01 — .06 under a new chapter, COMAR
20.50.11 Deanna Camille Green Rule — Contact Voltage Survey
Requirement and Reporting.
This action, which was proposed for adoption in 38:19 Md. R.
1170—1172 (September 9, 2011), has been adopted with the
nonsubstantive changes shown below.
Effective Date: November 28, 2011.
Attorney General’s Certification
In accordance with State Government Article, §10-113, Annotated
Code of Maryland, the Attorney General certifies that the following
changes do not differ substantively from the proposed text. The
nature of the changes and the basis for this conclusion are as follows:
COMAR 20.50.11: The changes in the new chapter name are
corrective and clarifying in nature and are nonsubstantive. This
clarification comports with the understanding of all participants and
with the Commission’s original intent, and such clarification would
have been reasonably anticipated by the participants in the rule-
making process.
20.50.11 Deanna Camille Green Rule — Contact
Voltage Survey Requirement and Reporting [[(In
Memory of Deanna Camille Green)]]
Authority: Public Utilities Article, §§2-113, 2-121, 5-101, and 5-303,
Annotated Code of Maryland
.01 — .06 (proposed text unchanged)
TERRY J. ROMINE
Executive Secretary
Public Service Commission
Title 30
MARYLAND INSTITUTE
FOR EMERGENCY
MEDICAL SERVICES
SYSTEMS (MIEMSS)
Subtitle 06 PUBLIC ACCESS
AUTOMATED EXTERNAL
DEFIBRILLATOR PROGRAM
30.06.03 Protocol
Authority: Education Article, §13-517, Annotated Code of Maryland
Notice of Final Action
[11-237-F]
On November 8, 2011, the Emergency Medical Services Board
adopted amendments to Regulation .01 under COMAR 30.06.03
Protocol. This action, which was proposed for adoption in 38:18 Md.
R. 1106 (August 26, 2011), has been adopted as proposed.
Effective Date: November 28, 2011.
ROBERT R. BASS, M.D.
Executive Director
Maryland Institute for Emergency Medical Services Systems
Page 22
FINAL ACTION ON REGULATIONS
1504
MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 38, ISSUE 24, FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2011
Title 34
DEPARTMENT OF
PLANNING
Subtitle 04 HISTORICAL AND
CULTURAL PROGRAMS
34.04.07 Sustainable Communities Tax Credit
Certification
Authority: State Finance and Procurement Article, §5A-303, Annotated Code of Maryland; and Ch. 383, Acts of 2011
Notice of Final Action
[11-265-F]
On November 8, 2011, the Maryland Department of Planning
adopted amendments to Regulation .04 under COMAR 34.04.07
Sustainable Communities Tax Credit Certification. This action,
which was proposed for adoption in 38:20 Md. R. 1252 (September
23, 2011), has been adopted as proposed.
Effective Date: November 28, 2011.
RICHARD E. HALL
Secretary of Planning
Page 23
1505
MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 38, ISSUE 24, FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2011
Proposed Action on Regulations
Title 10
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
AND MENTAL HYGIENE
Subtitle 33 BOARD OF EXAMINERS
OF NURSING HOME
ADMINISTRATORS
10.33.01 Nursing Home Administrators
Authority: Health Occupations Article, §§1-606, 9-205, 9-311, 9-313, 9-314,
9-407; State Government Article, §10-226; Annotated Code of Maryland
Notice of Proposed Action
[11-330-P]
The Secretary of Health and Mental Hygiene proposes to repeal
existing Regulations .12 and .16, adopt new Regulations .12, .16, and
.19—.24, amend Regulations .15 .and .17, and recodify existing
Regulations .17-1 and .18—.22 to be Regulations .18 and .25—.29,
respectively, under COMAR 10.33.01 Nursing Home
Administrators. This action was considered at a public meeting held
on September 14, 2011, notice of which was given by publication in
38:18 Md. R. 1115 (August 26, 2011), pursuant to State Government
Article, §10-506(c)(1), Annotated Code of Maryland.
Statement of Purpose
The purpose of this action is to:
(1) Establish sanctioning guidelines for the Board of Examiners
of Nursing Home Administrators to follow when a licensee is found
to have violated the provisions of COMAR 10.33.01 or of the
Maryland Nursing Home Administrators Licensing Act;
(2) Alter continuing education requirements and to allow
continuing education units (CEUs) to be earned by certain means;
(3) Establish that a licensee may be disciplined for falsifying
continuing education records; and
(4) Establish new procedures for addressing and investigating
complaints, charging a licensee, and conducting disciplinary
proceedings.
Comparison to Federal Standards
There is no corresponding federal standard to this proposed action.
Estimate of Economic Impact
The proposed action has no economic impact.
Economic Impact on Small Businesses
The proposed action has minimal or no economic impact on small
businesses.
Impact on Individuals with Disabilities
The proposed action has no impact on individuals with disabilities.
Opportunity for Public Comment
Comments may be sent to Michele Phinney, Director, Office of
Regulations and Policy Coordination, Department of Health and
Mental Hygiene, 201 W. Preston Street, Room 512, Baltimore,
Maryland 21201, or call 410-767-6499 (TTY 800-735-2258), or
email to [email protected] , or fax to 410-767-6483. Comments
will be accepted through December 19, 2011. A public hearing has
not been scheduled.
.12 Continuing Education.
A. Before relicensure, an individual shall submit satisfactory
evidence of having completed a minimum of 40 hours, unless
otherwise specified by State or federal law, of continuing education,
approved by the Board, within the 2-year period before the
relicensure date. The approval of the continuing education shall be at
the discretion of the Board.
B. The Board shall audit a percentage of nursing home
administrators, to be determined by the Board, for each reporting
period.
C. On request by the Board, a nursing home administrator shall
provide full documentation of the credit hours completed in
accordance with the requirements of this regulation.
D. All continuing education shall be completed in courses
approved by the National Association of Long Term Care
For information concerning citizen participation in the regulation-making process, see inside front cover.
Symbol Key
• Roman type indicates existing text of regulation.
• Italic type indicates proposed new text.
• [Single brackets] indicate text proposed for deletion.
Promulgation of Regulations
An agency wishing to adopt, amend, or repeal regulations must first publish in the Maryland Register a notice of proposed action, a
statement of purpose, a comparison to federal standards, an estimate of economic impact, an economic impact on small businesses, a notice
giving the public an opportunity to comment on the proposal, and the text of the proposed regulations. The opportunity for public comment
must be held open for at least 30 days after the proposal is published in the Maryland Register.
Following publication of the proposal in the Maryland Register, 45 days must pass before the agency may take final action on the
proposal. When final action is taken, the agency must publish a notice in the Maryland Register. Final action takes effect 10 days after the
notice is published, unless the agency specifies a later date. An agency may make changes in the text of a proposal. If the changes are not
substantive, these changes are included in the notice of final action and published in the Maryland Register. If the changes are substantive,
the agency must repropose the regulations, showing the changes that were made to the originally proposed text.
Proposed action on regulations may be withdrawn by the proposing agency any time before final action is taken. When an agency
proposes action on regulations, but does not take final action within 1 year, the proposal is automatically withdrawn by operation of law,
and a notice of withdrawal is published in the Maryland Register.
Page 24
PROPOSED ACTION ON REGULATIONS
1506
MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 38, ISSUE 24, FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2011
Administrator Boards (NAB), except as provided in §§E, F and G of
this regulation.
E. The Board shall award 10 clock hours of continuing education
for each completed accredited college credit that falls within the core
of knowledge outlined in Regulation .09 of this chapter.
F. The Board shall award 1 hour of continuing education for each
month a preceptor serves as an instructor in an AIT program, up to a
maximum of 12 credit hours per renewal cycle.
G. A licensee suspended for disciplinary reasons is not exempt
from the continuing education requirement in §A of this regulation.
.15 Suspension and Revocation of Licenses.
A. Pursuant to Health Occupations Article, §9-314(b)(3),
Annotated Code of Maryland, the Board may deny a license or
limited license to any applicant, suspend or revoke a license of a
nursing home administrator, or reprimand or otherwise discipline an
applicant or a licensee after due notice and an opportunity to be heard
at a formal hearing, upon evidence that the applicant or licensee:
(1)—(9) (text unchanged)
(10) Has failed to oversee and facilitate the nursing [facilities]
facility’s quality improvement processes to the extent that the safety,
health, or life of any patient has been endangered;
(11)—(13) (text unchanged)
(14) Has engaged in sexual behavior that would be considered
unethical or unprofessional according to the professional standards of
conduct, including but not limited to:
(a)—(m) (text unchanged)
(n) Offering to provide services, such as drugs, in exchange
for sexual favors; [or]
(15) Has practiced as a nursing home administrator without
holding a license to practice nursing home administration in the
State;
(16) Has falsified continuing education records; or
(17) Has failed to cooperate with investigations, proceedings,
and other requirements of the Board.
B. (text unchanged)
C. A licensee shall notify the Board in writing within 30 days if
any license, certificate, permit, or registration granted by another
state for the practice of a nursing home administrator has been
limited, restricted, suspended, revoked, or subjected to other
disciplinary action by the licensing or certifying authority.
.16 Complaints and Hearing Procedures.
A. Filing of Complaints. Any person, public officer, or association
or the Board may submit a complaint against any licensee or AIT for
due cause.
B. Representation by Counsel.
(1) A respondent may be represented by counsel in any matter
before the Board and at any stage of the proceedings.
(2) If the matter goes to a hearing, a respondent shall be
represented by:
(a) The respondent; or
(b) By an attorney who is:
(i) Admitted to the Maryland Bar; or
(ii) Specially admitted to practice law pursuant to
Maryland Rule 14.
(3) An administrative prosecutor assigned to the Board by the
Office of the Attorney General shall prosecute disciplinary matters in
Board proceedings.
(4) The Board may be represented by and obtain advice of
counsel assigned to it by the Office of the Attorney General in all
proceedings.
C. Confidentiality of Proceedings.
(1) Except as otherwise provided by law, the proceedings of the
Board are confidential. The parties may not waive the confidentiality
provided by this regulation.
(2) The Office of Administrative Hearings’ proceedings
involving the adjudication of a Board-contested case and the
administrative law judge’s recommended decision are confidential.
The respondent may not waive the confidentiality of the proceedings
or of the residents whose medical records or care are reflected in the
record of the proceedings.
(3) To the extent possible, even after a final order is issued by
the Board, the parties may not reveal the identity of any residents
referred to in the Board’s order.
D. Investigation of Complaints.
(1) On receipt of a complaint, the administrative personnel
shall:
(a) Send an acknowledgement letter to the complainant; and
(b) Present the complaint to the disciplinary subcommittee
of the Board.
(2) The Board’s disciplinary subcommittee shall:
(a) Review a complaint over which the Board has
jurisdiction; and
(b) Make a recommendation to the Board as to the
disposition of the complaint.
(3) The Board may send a copy of the complaint, either in its
entirety or redacted, to the licensee who is the subject of the
complaint to obtain a response to the allegations made in the
complaint.
(4) Participation in review of complaints made to the Board is
not a basis for recusal of a Board member, Board counsel, or the
administrative prosecutor from further proceedings in the case.
(5) The Board may issue subpoenas over the signature of:
(a) The Board’s executive director; or
(b) A Board member.
E. Prosecution of Complaint.
(1) For each complaint, after reviewing the complaint and any
investigative material, the Board, through its disciplinary
subcommittee, shall:
(a) Close the case;
(b) Close the case with a nonpublic informal advisory letter
to the licensee; or
(c) Vote to take the following disciplinary action or actions:
(i) Charge the licensee with a violation or violations of
Health Occupations Article, §9-314, Annotated Code of Maryland, or
a violation or violations of COMAR 10.33.01.15;
(ii) Summarily suspend a license or issue a Notice of
Intent to Summarily Suspend;
(iii) Deny an application for licensure; or
(iv) Issue a cease and desist order.
(2) After a vote for disciplinary action or actions, the matter
shall be referred to an administrative prosecutor for prosecutorial
action.
(3) After the administrative prosecutor has drafted the notice or
order of the disciplinary action or actions, if acceptable, a Board
officer or the Board executive director shall sign the notice or order
of the disciplinary action or actions and the licensee, applicant, or
individual shall be served.
.17 Procedure of Board Hearings.
A. (text unchanged)
[B.] — [D.] (proposed for repeal)
B. Charges and Notice of Initial Denial.
(1) If the Board issues charges or a notice of initial denial, the
document shall be served upon the respondent.
(2) Service is completed when the document is:
(a) Sent by first-class regular mail;
(b) Sent by certified mail to the address the respondent is
required to maintain with the Board; or
(c) Hand delivered in person.
Page 25
PROPOSED ACTION ON REGULATIONS
1507
MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 38, ISSUE 24, FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2011
(3) Charges or a notice of initial denial shall:
(a) Inform the respondent of the statutory basis for the
charges or denial of licensure;
(b) Allege sufficient facts which the Board believes
constitute a basis for:
(i) Violation of the Maryland Nursing Home
Administrators Act or COMAR 10.33.01.15; or
(ii) Denial of licensure;
(c) Notify the respondent of any proceedings scheduled
before the Board or of an opportunity to request a hearing within a
certain period of time and the consequences of failing to appear for
those proceedings or to request a hearing; and
(d) Be accompanied by a letter of procedure notifying the
respondent of the applicability of the Administrative Procedure Act to
the Board’s proceedings.
(4) If the respondent has not acknowledged receipt of the
charges or notice of initial denial, the Board may nevertheless
proceed in prosecuting the case if it has complied with §B(2) of this
regulation.
(5) If the Board issues a notice of initial denial to an applicant
for a license, the applicant may not withdraw the application without
approval of the Board.
C. Representation of Parties. All parties appearing at formal
hearings shall have the right to appear in person, with counsel, or to
be represented by counsel.
D. Case Resolution Conference.
(1) After service of charges or notice of initial denial, the
Board shall offer a respondent the opportunity for a case resolution
conference.
(2) Matters admitted, revealed, negotiated, or otherwise
discussed at a case resolution conference are without prejudice and
may not be used by the respondent, administrative prosecutor, or
Board in any subsequent proceedings, unless the information is
otherwise discovered or available by appropriate means.
(3) Recommendations of the case resolution conference
committee are not binding on the Board, which may:
(a) Accept the proposed resolution; or
(b) Modify a proposed settlement.
(4) If the respondent and the administrative prosecutor are
unable to reach an agreement for settlement that is recommended by
the case resolution conference committee, the matter shall proceed to
a hearing on the charges or notice of initial denial.
(5) Participation in a case resolution conference is not a basis
for recusal of a Board member, Board counsel, or Board prosecutor
from further proceedings in a case.
E.—H. (text unchanged)
I. Discovery on Request. By written request served on the other
party and filed with the Board or the Office of Administrative
Hearings, as appropriate, a party may require another party to
produce copies of documents intended to be produced at the hearing
within 30 days of service.
J. Mandatory Discovery.
(1) At least15 days before the prehearing conference, if
scheduled, or 45 days before the scheduled hearing date, whichever
is earlier, each party shall provide to the other party:
(a) The name and curriculum vitae of any expert witness
who will testify at the hearing; and
(b) A detailed written report summarizing the expert’s
testimony, which includes the opinion offered and the factual basis
and reasons underlying the opinion.
(2) If the Board or the Office of Administrative Hearings, as
appropriate, finds that the report is not sufficiently specific, or
otherwise fails to comply with the requirements of this section, the
testimony of the expert and any report of the expert shall be excluded
from the hearing.
(3) The Board or the Office of Administrative Hearings, as
appropriate, shall consider and decide arguments regarding the
sufficiency of the report:
(a) At the prehearing conference, if scheduled; or
(b) Immediately before the scheduled hearing.
(4) If an expert adopts a sufficiently specific charging
document as the expert’s report, that adoption shall satisfy the
requirements set forth in this section.
(5) Parties are not entitled to discovery of items other than as
listed in §K(3) and (4) of this regulation.
(6) Both parties have a continuing duty to supplement their
disclosures of witnesses and documents.
(7) Absent unforeseen circumstances which would otherwise
impose an extraordinary hardship on a party:
(a) If a prehearing conference is scheduled, witnesses or
documents may not be added to the list after the prehearing
conference; or
(b) If no prehearing conference is scheduled, witnesses or
documents may not be added to the list later than 15 days before the
hearing.
(8) The prohibition against adding witnesses does not apply to
witnesses or documents to be used for impeachment or rebuttal
purposes.
(9) Construction.
(a) In hearings conducted by an administrative law judge of
the Office of Administrative Hearings, this section shall, whenever
possible, be construed as supplementing and being in harmony with
COMAR 28.02.01.
(b) In the event of a conflict between this section and
COMAR 28.02.01, this section applies.
.19 Sanctions, Hearings, and Final Order.
A. Surrender of License.
(1) The Board may require conditions for surrender of a
license, including:
(a) An admission of a violation of the Maryland Nursing
Home Administrators Act;
(b) An admission of facts;
(c) A statement of the circumstances under which the
surrender was offered or accepted;
(d) Restrictions on future licensure;
(e) Conditions for reinstatement of the license; or
(f) An agreement that the respondent may not apply for
reinstatement of the license.
(2) Unless the Board determines that disclosure of the
surrender is not in the public interest, a letter of surrender is a:
(a) Final order of the Board; and
(b) Public record under State Government Article, §10-611,
Annotated Code of Maryland.
B. Hearings on Charges or Notice of Initial Denial.
(1) Hearings shall be conducted under State Government
Article, Title 10, Annotated Code of Maryland.
(2) The Board may delegate the Board’s authority to hear
contested cases to the Office of Administrative Hearings on a case-
by-case basis.
(3) Proceedings may not be open to the public.
(4) All records, including the recommended decision, shall be
confidential and sealed.
(5) If a matter has been delegated to the Office of
Administrative Hearings, the administrative law judge presiding over
the proceedings shall issue to the Board a recommended decision
containing:
(a) Proposed or final findings of fact;
(b) Proposed or final conclusions of law;
(c) A proposed sanction; or
Page 26
PROPOSED ACTION ON REGULATIONS
1508
MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 38, ISSUE 24, FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2011
(d) Pursuant to the Board’s delegation, any combination of
§B(5)(a)—(c) of this regulation.
C. Burden of Proof.
(1) An applicant or licensee issued a notice of initial denial by
the Board has the burden to demonstrate by a preponderance of the
evidence that the applicant or licensee is entitled to licensure or
other benefit the Board has initially denied.
(2) The administrative prosecutor has the burden to
demonstrate by a preponderance of the evidence that the licensee has
committed a violation or violations of the Maryland Nursing Home
Administrators Act.
D. Exceptions and Exceptions Hearing.
(1) If a matter has been delegated by the Board to the Office of
Administrative Hearings, a party may file exceptions to the
administrative law judge’s proposed findings of fact, proposed
conclusions of law, and proposed sanction, as set out in the
recommended decision, before the Board makes a final decision.
(2) Unless otherwise permitted by the Board, within 15 days
after the issuance of the recommended decision, or as otherwise
specified by the administrative law judge in the recommended
decision, either party may file written exceptions with the Board.
(3) Unless otherwise permitted by the Board, a party’s written
exceptions may not be longer than 25 double-spaced pages and shall
state with particularity the:
(a) Finding of fact;
(b) Conclusion of law or other matter excepted to; and
(c) Relevant portions of the record supporting the party’s
exception.
(4) Unless otherwise permitted by the Board, within 10 days
after a party’s exceptions are filed with the Board, the opposing party
may file an answer to exceptions.
(5) Unless otherwise permitted by the Board, a party’s answer
to exceptions may not be longer than 25 double-spaced pages and
shall state with particularity:
(a) A response to an exception; and
(b) The relevant portions of the record supporting that
response.
(6) Unless otherwise permitted, the Board may not consider a
party’s response to an answer to exceptions.
(7) Unless otherwise agreed to by the parties and permitted by
the Board, an exceptions hearing shall be scheduled for the next
meeting of the Board after receipt of the parties’ exceptions and any
answer to exceptions.
(8) Exceptions Hearing.
(a) An exceptions hearing shall be held before the Board.
(b) The hearing shall be a nonevidentiary hearing to provide
the parties with an opportunity for oral argument on the exceptions
and answers to exceptions.
(c) The Board member presiding at the hearing shall
determine all procedural issues and may impose reasonable time
limits on each party’s oral argument.
(d) The presiding Board member shall make rulings
reasonably necessary to facilitate the effective and efficient progress
of the hearing.
(e) The respondent and the administrative prosecutor each
may not exceed 30 minutes to present oral argument.
(f) The party who filed the exceptions shall proceed first and
may reserve part of the allotted time for rebuttal.
(9) Unless otherwise agreed to by the parties and permitted by
the Board, in an answer to exceptions or in the hearing on
exceptions, the parties may not reference any document or other
evidence or offer an exhibit that is outside the record of the
evidentiary hearing before the administrative law judge.
(10) If neither party files exceptions within the time specified in
§D(2) of this regulation, in making the Board’s final decision, the
Board shall consider only the:
(a) Recommended decision of the administrative law judge;
and
(b) Record of the evidentiary hearing.
E. Board Final Decision and Order.
(1) After review of the record and deliberation, the Board shall
issue a final order consisting of:
(a) Findings of fact;
(b) Conclusions of law; and
(c) The sanction or disposition to be imposed.
(2) On finding that there has been a violation of the Maryland
Nursing Home Administrators Act, the Board may order that the:
(a) Licensee be:
(i) Fined;
(ii) Reprimanded;
(iii) Placed on probation; or
(iv) Subjected to any combination of §E(2)(a)(i)—(iii) of
this regulation; or
(b) The licensee’s license be:
(i) Suspended; or
(ii) Revoked.
.20 Summary Suspension of a License.
A. Pursuant to its authority under State Government Article, §10-
226(c), Annotated Code of Maryland, the Board shall order the
summary suspension of a license if the Board determines that there is
a substantial likelihood that a licensee poses a risk of harm to the
public health, safety, or welfare.
B. Notice of Intent to Summarily Suspend.
(1) Based on information gathered in an investigation or
otherwise provided to the Board, the Board may vote to issue:
(a) A notice of intent to summarily suspend a license; or
(b) An order of summary suspension.
(2) If the Board votes to issue a notice of intent to summarily
suspend a license or an order of summary suspension, the Board
shall refer the matter to an administrative prosecutor for prosecution.
(3) A notice of intent to summarily suspend a license shall
include:
(a) A proposed order of summary suspension which is
unexecuted by the Board and includes:
(i) The statutory authority on which the action has been
taken;
(ii) Allegations of fact that the Board believes
demonstrate a substantial likelihood that the licensee poses a risk of
harm to the public health, safety, or welfare; and
(iii) Notice to the respondent of the right to request a full
hearing on the merits of the summary suspension if the Board
executes the proposed order of summary suspension; and
(b) An order or summons to appear before the Board to
show cause why the Board should not execute the order of summary
suspension and which notifies the respondent of the consequences of
failing to appear.
(4) Service.
(a) The Board shall serve a respondent with a notice of
intent to summarily suspend a license not later than 5 days before a
predeprivation show cause hearing is scheduled before the Board.
(b) Service of the notice of intent to summarily suspend shall
be made:
(i) Personally upon the respondent;
(ii) By certified mail to the address the respondent is
required to maintain with the Board; or
(iii) By other reasonable means to effect service.
Page 27
PROPOSED ACTION ON REGULATIONS
1509
MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 38, ISSUE 24, FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2011
(c) If the Board is unable to serve the notice of intent to
summarily suspend a license upon the respondent as described in
§B(4)(a) and (b) of this regulation, the Board may nevertheless
proceed to prosecute the case.
C. Predeprivation Opportunity to Be Heard.
(1) If the Board issues a notice of intent to summarily suspend
a license, the Board shall offer the respondent the opportunity to
appear before the Board to show cause why the respondent’s license
should not be suspended before the Board executes the order of
summary suspension.
(2) A Predeprivation Show Cause Hearing Before the Board.
(a) The hearing shall be a nonevidentiary hearing to provide
the parties with an opportunity for oral argument on the proposed
summary suspension.
(b) The Board member presiding at the hearing shall
determine all procedural issues and may impose reasonable time
limits on each party’s oral argument.
(c) The presiding Board member shall make rulings
reasonably necessary to facilitate the effective and efficient operation
of the hearing.
(d) The respondent and the administrative prosecutor may
not exceed 30 minutes each to present oral argument.
(e) The respondent shall proceed first and may reserve part
of the allotted time for rebuttal.
(3) The Board member who presides at the hearing:
(a) May allow either the respondent or the administrative
prosecutor to present documents or exhibits which are relevant and
material to the proceedings and which are not unduly repetitious, if
the presiding Board member believes that the documents or exhibits
are necessary for a fair hearing; and
(b) May not allow testimony by any witness unless agreed to
by the parties and approved by the Board in advance of the hearing.
(4) A Board member may be recognized by the presiding
member to ask questions of either party appearing before the Board.
D. Summary Suspension Without Prior Notice or an Opportunity
to Be Heard.
(1) Extraordinary Circumstances. The Board may, after
consultation with Board counsel, order the summary suspension of a
license without first issuing a notice of intent to summarily suspend a
license or providing a respondent with an opportunity for a
predeprivation hearing if the Board determines that:
(a) The public health, safety, or welfare requires the
immediate suspension of the license; and
(b) Prior notice and an opportunity to be heard are not
feasible.
(2) Time — Service and Hearing.
(a) An order of summary suspension under §D(1) of this
regulation shall be served on the respondent promptly after its
execution.
(b) The respondent shall be provided an opportunity for a
hearing before the Board within 15 days after the effective date of the
summary suspension.
(3) If the respondent requests a hearing under §B(3)(a)(iii) of
this regulation, that hearing shall:
(a) Be conducted before the Board; and
(b) Provide the respondent with an opportunity to show
cause why the Board should lift the summary suspension and
reinstate the license.
E. Burdens of Production and Persuasion.
(1) In a show cause proceeding under §C of this regulation, the
respondent may present argument in opposition to the allegations
presented in the order for summary suspension or which otherwise
demonstrate that the public health, safety, or welfare is not at risk.
(2) The administrative prosecutor bears the burden of
demonstrating by a preponderance of the evidence that the health,
safety, or welfare of the public imperatively requires the Board to
summarily suspend the respondent’s license.
F. Disposition.
(1) If the Board issues a notice of intent to summarily suspend
a license before summarily suspending a license, the Board may,
after the show cause hearing, vote to:
(a) Order a summary suspension;
(b) Deny the summary suspension; or
(c) Issue an order agreed to by the parties.
(2) If the Board orders a summary suspension before a show
cause hearing, the Board may, at the conclusion of the hearing, vote
to:
(a) Affirm its order of summary suspension;
(b) Rescind the order for summary suspension; or
(c) Issue an order agreed to by the parties.
(3) An order for summary suspension or other order issued by
the Board after the initiation of summary suspension proceedings are
final orders of the Board and public records under State Government
Article, §10-611, Annotated Code of Maryland.
G. Postdeprivation Opportunity for an Evidentiary Hearing.
(1) If the Board orders the summary suspension of a license
under §C or D of this regulation, the respondent shall have an
opportunity for an evidentiary hearing before the Board, or, if the
Board delegates the matter to the Office of Administrative Hearings,
before an administrative law judge.
(2) The respondent may request an evidentiary hearing within
10 days after the Board issues the order of summary suspension.
(3) Unless otherwise agreed to by the parties, a hearing shall
be provided within 60 days after the respondent’s request.
(4) An evidentiary hearing may be consolidated with a hearing
on charges issued by the Board that include the facts which form the
basis for the summary suspension.
(5) An evidentiary hearing shall be conducted under the
contested case provisions of State Government Article, Title 10,
Subtitle 2, Annotated Code of Maryland.
(6) If the Board delegates the matter to the Office of
Administrative Hearings, the administrative law judge shall issue a
recommended decision to the Board with:
(a) Proposed or final findings of fact;
(b) Proposed or final conclusions of law;
(c) A proposed disposition; or
(d) Any combination of §G(6)(a)—(c) of this regulation,
pursuant to the Board’s delegation of the matter to the Office of
Administrative Hearings.
(7) If the hearing is one combined with charges, the
administrative law judge’s determination of the merits of the
summary suspension shall be based only on the parts of the record
available to the Board when the Board voted for summary
suspension.
(8) The parties may file exceptions to the recommended
decision, as provided in State Government Article, §10-216,
Annotated Code of Maryland.
(9) An order issued by the Board after a postdeprivation
evidentiary hearing is a final order of the Board and is a public
record under State Government Article, §10-611, Annotated Code of
Maryland.
.21 Probation and Violation of Probation Proceedings.
A. If the Board imposes a period of probation as a sanction, the
Board may impose conditions of probation which the Board
considers appropriate, including but not limited to:
(1) Re-education or completion of approved courses;
(2) Payment of a fine;
(3) Practicing under supervision;
Page 28
PROPOSED ACTION ON REGULATIONS
1510
MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 38, ISSUE 24, FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2011
(4) Monitoring by the Board or by an individual or entity
approved by the Board, with periodic reporting to the Board;
(5) An examination by a physician or other appropriate health
care provider;
(6) Limitation of the licensee’s practice;
(7) Obtaining a passing score on an appropriate examination;
or
(8) Any other condition the Board considers appropriate for the
rehabilitation or retraining of a licensee.
B. A term of probation may be defined by a specific period of time
or the successful completion of certain conditions or acts by the
licensee.
C. A licensee seeking termination of probation shall do so only by
petitioning the Board to lift the probation when:
(1) The specific period of time has passed; and
(2) The licensee has successfully completed the conditions or
acts required for termination.
D. If the Board determines that the licensee is not in compliance
with the conditions of probation, the Board shall:
(1) Charge the licensee with a violation of probation;
(2) Take any action the final order or consent order provides
for a violation of probation, including suspension of the license;
(3) Summarily suspend the license; or
(4) Take any other action the Board considers appropriate and
may take by law.
E. Charges for Violation of Probation.
(1) If the Board issues charges for a violation of probation, the
service shall be as provided for in Regulation .17B(2) of this chapter.
(2) The charging document for a violation of probation shall:
(a) Inform the respondent of the statutory provision,
condition of probation, or provision of the Board’s order which the
Board believes has been violated;
(b) Allege facts that constitute a basis for a violation of
probation; and
(c) Notify the respondent of:
(i) Any proceedings scheduled before the Board or of an
opportunity to request a hearing within a certain period of time; and
(ii) The consequences of failing to appear for those
proceedings or to request a hearing.
(3) If the respondent requests a hearing on the charge of a
violation of probation, the Board shall, before the hearing, provide
the respondent with a case resolution conference as provided in
Regulation .17C of this chapter, to discuss settlement of the matter.
F. Violation of Probation Hearing. A hearing for a violation of
probation shall be held as set out in Regulation .17D of this chapter.
G. If the Board determines that a respondent has violated
probation, the Board shall:
(1) Take any action the consent order or final order provides
for a violation of probation;
(2) Impose additional conditions of probation; or
(3) Impose a sanction or take any other action the Board
considers appropriate and may take by law.
.22 Sanctioning Guidelines.
A. General Application of Sanctioning Guidelines.
(1) After concluding that a licensee has violated a ground for
discipline under Health Occupations Article, §9-314(b), Annotated
Code of Maryland, or under COMAR 10.33.01.15A, the Board shall
determine the applicable sanction range according to the range of
sanctions set forth in §B of this regulation. The Board shall then
consider the applicable aggravating and mitigating factors, set forth
in §C of this regulation, to determine whether the sanction should fall
outside the indicated range of sanctions. After considering the
applicable aggravating and mitigating factors, the Board shall
impose the appropriate sanction.
(2) The Board is not required to make findings of fact with
respect to any of the factors for determining the sanction indicated by
the sanctioning guidelines.
(3) In the event that a licensee’s violation of the Board’s
statutes or regulation does not fall within a sanction range, the Board
shall so indicate and use its best judgment to determine the
appropriate sanction and consider, to the extent possible, the factors
in the sanctioning guidelines.
(4) The Board shall state its reasons if it deviates from the
sanctioning guidelines.
(5) A departure from the sanctioning guidelines alone is not a
ground for any hearing or appeal of a Board action.
(6) Notwithstanding this regulation, in order to resolve a
disciplinary proceeding, the Board and the licensee may agree to a
surrender of license or a Consent Order with terms and sanction
agreed to by the Board and the licensee.
(7) In a case where there are multiple and distinct violations,
the Board may impose a sanction greater than the maximum
indicated by the sanctioning guidelines for each individual violation.
(8) If probation is imposed, the Board may impose appropriate
terms and conditions of probation. If a licensee violates the terms or
conditions of probation, the Board may take further disciplinary
action against the licensee.
(9) Pursuant to Health Occupations Article, §9-314.1,
Annotated Code of Maryland, if a civil fine is imposed, the fine may
not exceed $1,000 for a first violation or $5,000 for any subsequent
violation of the same provision.
________________________________
Page 29
PROPOSED ACTION ON REGULATIONS
1511
MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 38, ISSUE 24, FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2011
B. Range of Sanctions.
(1) Patient Safety.
Severity Tier Conduct
Sanction Range
Minimum Maximum
Least
to
Greatest
1
(a) Committed a violation which resulted in no or little potential
harm to a resident; or
(b) Made an immediate and significant effort to remedy the
violation.
Reprimand Probation for 2 years
2
(a) Committed a violation which resulted in moderate potential for
resident harm;
(b) Had been given prior warning of facility errors;
(c) Made no significant or immediate attempt to remedy the
facility errors; or
(d) Failed to oversee a quality improvement process.
$500 fine and probation
for 1 year
Maximum fine
allowable under §A(9)
of this regulation,
suspension for 2 years,
and probation for 3
years
3
(a) Committed a violation resulting in actual or potentially serious
harm to a resident;
(b) Had been given repeated warnings of facility errors;
(c) Committed a violation affecting two or more residents; or
(d) Was under the influence of alcohol or drugs at the time the
licensee committed the violation.
Suspension for 1 year Revocation
4 A licensee is not competent to practice as a nursing home
administrator.
Suspension until Board
determines competent
Revocation
(2) Fraud, Deceit, or Misrepresentation.
Severity Tier Conduct Sanction Range
Minimum Maximum
Least
to
Greatest
1
(a) Committed a singular fraudulent or deceptive act, limited in
nature; and
(b) Neither achieved nor attempted to achieve personal financial
or material gain from the violation.
Reprimand Maximum fine
allowable under §A(9)
of this regulation and
probation for 3 years
2
(a) Achieved or attempted to achieve a material or financial gain
as a result of the fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation.
(b) Targeted or harmed residents of the facility administered;
(c) Committed multiple acts of fraud or deceit or perpetrated an
elaborate scheme involving fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation;
(d) Used false impersonation or identification in furtherance of
the violation; or
(e) Committed a violation in order to obtain a license for the
licensee or another.
$500 fine, suspension
for 2 years, and
probation for 3 years
Revocation
(3) General Misconduct.
Severity Tier Conduct Sanction Range
Minimum Maximum
Least
to
Greatest
1
(a) Made a singular inappropriate sexual comment during the
licensee’s practice as a nursing home administrator; or
(b) Committed a violation resulting in no harm or having
potentially minimal harm.
Reprimand Maximum fine
allowable under §A(9)
of this regulation and
probation for 2 years
2
(a) Has made multiple inappropriate sexual comments not rising
to the level of harassment;
(b) Was under the influence of alcohol or drugs at the time the
licensee committed the violation; or
(c) Committed a violation act resulting in a moderate potential for
harm.
$500 fine, and
probation for 1 year
Maximum fine
allowable under §A(9)
of this regulation,
suspension for 2 years,
and probation for 3
years
3
(a) Diverted or stole drugs from a facility or a resident;
(b) Committed an act of sexual misconduct involving touching,
inappropriate contact, observation, recording, or harassment;
(c) Committed or threatened to commit an act of violence;
(d) Committed an act resulting in actual harm or the serious
potential for harm;
(e) Discriminated against a person; or
(f) Recorded a resident or residents, without authorization from
the resident or residents, using, but not limited to, a camera,
phone, or video recorder.
$500 fine, suspension
for 1 year, and
probation for 3 years
Revocation
Page 30
PROPOSED ACTION ON REGULATIONS
1512
MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 38, ISSUE 24, FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2011
(4) Records Violation Without Fraudulent or Deceitful Intent.
Severity Tier Conduct Sanction Range
Minimum Maximum
Least
to
Greatest
1
Licensee made limited errors in completing or maintaining a
resident’s or the facility’s record, resulting in no harm to a
resident.
Reprimand Reprimand
2
(a) Produced a significant pattern of inaccurate records;
(b) Improperly disclosed or authorized the disclosure of
confidential medical records without intent to violate the
governing confidentiality laws or regulations; or
(c) Committed an act of false advertising.
$500 fine, and
probation for 1 year
Maximum fine
allowable under §A(9)
of this regulation,
suspension for 1 year,
and probation for 3
years
3
Willfully releasing or willfully authorizing the release of
confidential medical records to unauthorized recipients.
$500 fine, suspension
for 1 year, and
probation for 3 years
Revocation
(5) Administrator-In-Training Violations by Nursing Home Administrator,
Severity Tier Conduct Sanction Range
Minimum Maximum
Least
to
Greatest
1
Licensee failed to fulfill requirements related to the supervising of
an administrator-in-training, but was in general compliance.
Reprimand Maximum fine
allowable under §A(9)
of this regulation and
probation for 3 years
2
(a) Committed an act involving deliberate falsification or deceit;
(b) Failed to achieve significant compliance with regulatory
requirements of the administrator-in-training program.
$500 fine, suspension
for 1 year, and
probation for 3 years
Revocation
________________________________
C. Aggravating and Mitigating Factors.
(1) Mitigating Factors. In determining whether the sanction
falls outside the indicated range of sanctions listed in §B of this
regulation, the Board may consider the following mitigating factors:
(a) Absence of a prior disciplinary record;
(b) The licensee reported the violation to the Board;
(c) The licensee:
(i) Voluntarily admitted violation;
(ii) Provided full disclosure to the Board; and
(iii) Cooperated during Board proceedings;
(d) The licensee implemented remedial measures to correct
or mitigate harm arising from the violation;
(e) The licensee made a timely good-faith effort to make
restitution or otherwise rectify the consequences of the violation;
(f) Evidence of rehabilitation or potential for rehabilitation;
(g) Absence of premeditation to commit the violation;
(h) Absence of potential harm to or adverse impact on the
public or adverse impact on the public;
(i) Isolated incident and not likely to recur; or
(j) If the licensee had worked at the nursing facility for a
limited period and violation was present before beginning work at the
facility.
(2) Aggravating Factors. In determining whether the sanction
of the licensee falls outside the indicated range of sanctions listed in
§B of this regulation, the Board may consider the following
aggravating factors:
(a) Previous criminal or administrative disciplinary history;
(b) The violation was committed deliberately or with gross
negligence or recklessness;
(c) The violation had the potential for, or caused, serious
resident harm;
(d) The violation was part of a pattern of detrimental
conduct;
(e) The licensee pursued the licensee’s financial gain over a
resident’s welfare;
(f) The resident was especially vulnerable;
(g) The licensee attempted to:
(i) Conceal the violation;
(ii) Falsify or destroy evidence; or
(iii) Present false testimony or evidence;
(h) The licensee failed to cooperate with the Board’s
investigation; or
(i) Previous attempts at rehabilitation were unsuccessful.
.23 Petitions for Reinstatement of License Following Revocation.
A. In order for a revoked license to be reinstated, the individual
whose license was revoked shall petition the Board for reinstatement.
B. An individual who petitions the Board for reinstatement
following the revocation of his or her license may petition for
reinstatement only pursuant to the terms of the Board’s order
revoking the license. The Board may set conditions precedent and a
time period for petitioning for reinstatement or may permanently
revoke.
C. If the Board’s order revoking the license does not contain a
time period for petitioning for reinstatement, the individual may
petition for reinstatement after 3 years from revocation.
D. A petitioner for reinstatement shall comply with all reasonable
requests for information by the Board.
E. The decision of the Board on whether to grant to deny the
petition for reinstatement is a discretionary decision by the Board.
F. If the Board denies a petition for reinstatement, the Board may
set conditions precedent and a time period for further petitions for
reinstatement.
G. If the Board grants reinstatement, the Board may impose
probationary conditions and restrictions along with the
reinstatement.
Page 31
PROPOSED ACTION ON REGULATIONS
1513
MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 38, ISSUE 24, FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2011
.24 Fines.
A. This chapter establishes the standards by which the Board may
impose a fine not exceeding:
(1) $1,000 for a first offense; or
(2) $5,000 for any subsequent violation of the same provision.
B. After a hearing under Health Occupations Article, §9-314,
Annotated Code of Maryland, and COMAR 10.33.01.15, the Board
may impose a fine, in addition to, or instead of:
(1) Reprimanding a licensee;
(2) Placing a licensee on probation; or
(3) Suspending or revoking a license.
C. In determining whether to impose a fine and the amount of the
fine, the Board shall consider the following factors:
(1) The cost of investigating and prosecuting the case against
the individual;
(2) The extent of actual or potential public harm caused by the
violation;
(3) The extent to which the individual derived a financial
benefit from the violation;
(4) The history of a previous violation or violations;
(5) The willfulness of the improper conduct; and
(6) Mitigating factors as presented by the licensee.
D. An individual shall pay the fine to the Board under the terms of
the Board’s order.
E. The Board shall pay all money collected under this chapter to
the General Fund of the State.
F. Unless the Board’s order provides otherwise, if an individual
fails to pay in whole or in part a fine imposed by the Board, the
Board may not restore, reinstate, or renew the license of the
individual until the individual pays the fine in full.
G. The Board may refer all cases of delinquent payment to the
Central Collection Unit of the Department of Budget and
Management to institute and maintain proceedings and ensure
prompt payment.
JOSHUA M. SHARFSTEIN, M.D.
Secretary of Health and Mental Hygiene
Subtitle 36 BOARD OF EXAMINERS
OF PSYCHOLOGISTS
10.36.08 Disciplinary Sanctions and Monetary
Penalties
Authority: Health Occupations Article, §§1-606, 18-313, and 18-313.1, Annotated Code of Maryland
Notice of Proposed Action
[11-326-P]
The Secretary of Health and Mental Hygiene proposes to repeal
existing Regulations .01—.06 and adopt new Regulations .01—.06 under
COMAR 10.36.08 Disciplinary Sanctions and Monetary Penalties.
This action was considered at a public meeting on September 9, 2011,
notice of which was given on the Board of Examiners of Psychologists‘
website, http://www.dhmh.state.md.us/psych/index.html, since January 1,
2011, pursuant to State Government Article, §10-506(c)(1), Annotated
Code of Maryland.
Statement of Purpose
The purpose of this action is to establish sanctioning guidelines for
disciplining a licensee for a violation of COMAR 10.36 or of the
Maryland Psychologists Act.
Comparison to Federal Standards
There is no corresponding federal standard to this proposed action.
Estimate of Economic Impact
The proposed action has no economic impact.
Economic Impact on Small Businesses
The proposed action has minimal or no economic impact on small
businesses.
Impact on Individuals with Disabilities
The proposed action has no impact on individuals with disabilities.
Opportunity for Public Comment
Comments may be sent to Michele Phinney, Director, Office of
Regulation and Policy Coordination, Department of Health and
Mental Hygiene, 201 W. Preston Street, Room 512, Baltimore,
Maryland 21201, or call 410-767-6499 (TTY 800-735-2258), or
email to [email protected] , or fax to 410-767-6483. Comments
will be accepted through December 19, 2011. A public hearing has
not been scheduled.
.01 Scope.
This chapter establishes standards for the imposition of sanctions
and monetary penalties for violations of the Maryland Psychologists
Act.
.02 Definitions.
A. In this chapter, the following terms have the meanings
indicated.
B. Terms Defined.
(1) ―Board‖ means the State Board of Examiners of
Psychologists.
(2) ―License‖ means a license issued by the Board to practice
psychology.
(3) ―Licensee‖ means a psychologist who is licensed by the
Board to practice psychology.
(4) ―Penalty‖ means monetary penalty.
(5) ―Sanction‖ means a formal disciplinary action against a
license such as a reprimand, probation, suspension, or revocation.
.03 Imposition of a Penalty After a Hearing.
If the Board finds that there are grounds under Health
Occupations Article, §18-313, Annotated Code of Maryland, to
suspend or revoke a license or to reprimand a licensee, the Board
may impose a penalty as set forth in this chapter:
A. Instead of suspending the license; or
B. In addition to suspending or revoking the license.
Page 32
PROPOSED ACTION ON REGULATIONS
1514
MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 38, ISSUE 24, FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2011
.04 Guidelines for Disciplinary Sanctions and Imposition of Penalties.
A. Subject to the provisions of this chapter, the Board may impose sanctions and penalties for violations of the Maryland Psychologists Act
and its regulations according to the guidelines set forth in the following categories:
Violation Minimum Sanction Maximum Sanction Minimum Penalty Maximum Penalty
(1) Assessment violation Reprimand Probation for 1 year N/A N/A
(2) Violation of child custody
evaluation standards
Reprimand Active suspension for 2 years $100 $5,000
(3) Criminally convicted of, or
pled guilty to, a felony or
crime of moral turpitude
Probation for 1 year Denial of license application
or revocation
$100 $10,000
(4) Disclosure of confidential
information
Reprimand Revocation N/A N/A
(5) Engaging in dual
relationships
Reprimand Active suspension for 1 year $500 $5,000
(6) Exploitation or undue
influence of a client
Active suspension for 1 year Revocation $1,000 $10,000
(7) Submitting a false statement
to collect a fee
Probation for 1 year Revocation $5,000 $10,000
(8) Fraudulently or deceptively
obtaining, attempting to
obtain, or using a license
Active suspension for 90 days Denial of license application
or revocation
$1,000 $10,000
(9) Willfully making or filing a
false report or record in the
practice of psychology
Active suspension for 90 days Denial of license application
or revocation
$1,000 $10,000
(10) Professional incompetence Reprimand Revocation $1,000 $10,000
(11) Physical or mental
incompetence
Probation for 1 year Denial of license application
or revocation
N/A N/A
(12) Improper termination of
services
Reprimand Active suspension for 1 year N/A N/A
(13) Misrepresentation of services
or fees
Reprimand Active suspension for 1 year $500 $5,000
(14) Plagiarism Reprimand Probation for 2 years $500 $5,000
(15) Reciprocal discipline Reprimand Denial of license application
or revocation
$100 $10,000
(16) Record-keeping violation Reprimand Probation for 2 years N/A N/A
(17) Sexual misconduct Active suspension for 2 years Denial of license application
or revocation for 10 years
$5,000 $10,000
(18) Standard of practice violation
not specifically enumerated in
this chapter
Reprimand Revocation $100 $10,000
(19) Supervision violation Reprimand Revocation $500 $5,000
(20) Violation of the Psychology
Associate requirements
Reprimand Revocation $500 $5,000
(21) Aiding another to practice
without a license or
misrepresenting to the public
that a person is a licensed
psychologist
Reprimand Denial of license application
or revocation
$500 $5,000
(22) Willfully failing to file or
record any report as required
under law, willfully impeding
or obstructing the filing or
recording of the report, or
inducing another to fail to file
or record the report
Reprimand Revocation $100 $5,000
(23) Failure to cooperate in a
Board investigation or comply
with a Board order
Reprimand Denial of license application
or revocation
$100 $10,000
(24) Failure to comply with
informed consent
requirements
Reprimand Probation for 2 years $100 $1,000
Page 33
PROPOSED ACTION ON REGULATIONS
1515
MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 38, ISSUE 24, FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2011
(25) Violation of provisions
regarding duty to commit,
treat, or warn
Reprimand Revocation $100 $1,000
(26) Discrimination Reprimand Probation for 2 years $100 $1,000
(27) Other violation of the Act not
specifically enumerated in this
chapter
Reprimand Denial of license application
or revocation
$100 $10,000
________________________________
B. If a licensee is found in violation of more than one category
enumerated in this regulation, the category or categories containing
the highest maximum sanction and penalty shall control.
C. Notwithstanding the guidelines set forth in this regulation, in
order to resolve a pending disciplinary action, the Board and
licensee may agree to a surrender of license or a consent order with
terms, sanction, and penalty agreed to by the Board and the licensee.
D. A departure from the guidelines set forth in this regulation
alone is not grounds for any hearing or appeal of a Board action.
.05 Mitigating and Aggravating Factors to Be Considered in the
Assessment of the Sanction.
A. Depending on the facts and circumstances of each case, and to
the extent that they apply, the Board may consider the following
mitigating and aggravating factors in determining whether the
sanction in a particular case should fall outside the range of
sanctions established by the guidelines. These factors may include,
but are not limited to, the following:
(1) Mitigating Factors:
(a) The licensee’s lack of a prior disciplinary record;
(b) The licensee self-reported the violation to the Board;
(c) The licensee’s full and voluntary admissions of
misconduct to the Board and cooperation during Board proceedings;
(d) Implementation of remedial measures to correct or
mitigate harm arising from the misconduct;
(e) Timely good-faith effort to make restitution or to rectify
consequences of misconduct;
(f) Evidence of rehabilitation or rehabilitative potential;
(g) Absence of premeditation to commit the misconduct;
(h) Absence of potential harm to public or adverse impact;
and
(i) The licensee’s conduct was an isolated incident and not
likely to recur; and
(2) Aggravating Factors:
(a) The licensee has a previous criminal or administrative
disciplinary history;
(b) The violation was committed deliberately or with gross
negligence or recklessness;
(c) The violation had the potential for, or caused, serious
patient or public harm;
(d) The violation was part of a pattern of detrimental
conduct;
(e) The licensee was motivated to perform the violation for
financial gain;
(f) The vulnerability of the patient or patients;
(g) The licensee lacked insight into the wrongfulness of the
conduct;
(h) The licensee committed the violation under the guise of
treatment; and
(i) Previous attempts at rehabilitation of the licensee were
unsuccessful.
B. The existence of one or more of these factors does not impose
on the Board or an Administrative Law Judge any requirement to
articulate its reasoning for not exercising its discretion to impose a
sanction outside of the range of sanctions set forth in this chapter.
C. Nothing in this regulation requires the Board or an
Administrative Law Judge to make findings of fact with respect to any
of these factors.
.06 Payment of a Penalty.
A. A licensee shall pay to the Board a penalty imposed under this
chapter as of the date the Board’s order is issued, unless the Board’s
order specifies otherwise.
B. Filing an appeal under State Government Article, §10-222,
Annotated Code of Maryland, or Health Occupations Article, §18-
316, Annotated Code of Maryland, does not automatically stay
payment of a penalty imposed by the Board under this chapter.
C. If a licensee fails to pay, in whole or in part, a penalty imposed
by the Board under this chapter, the Board may not restore, reinstate,
or renew a license until the penalty has been paid in full.
D. In its discretion, the Board may refer all cases of delinquent
payment to the Central Collection Unit of the Department of Budget
and Management to institute and maintain proceedings to ensure
prompt payment.
E. The Board shall pay all monies collected under this chapter
into the State’s General Fund.
JOSHUA M. SHARFSTEIN, M.D.
Secretary of Health and Mental Hygiene
Subtitle 54 SPECIAL SUPPLEMENTAL
NUTRITION PROGRAM FOR
WOMEN, INFANTS, AND
CHILDREN (WIC)
Notice of Proposed Action
[11-325-P]
The Secretary of Health and Mental Hygiene proposes to:
(1) Amend Regulations .03, .04, and .07 under COMAR
10.54.01 Eligibility, Participation, and Benefits; and
(2) Repeal existing Regulation .09, adopt new Regulation .09,
and amend Regulations .10 and .14 under COMAR 10.54.02 Local
Agency.
Statement of Purpose
The purpose of this action is to amend Maryland‘s WIC
regulations to conform with the federal WIC regulations under 7 CFR
§246. The revisions include:
(1) Adding electronic benefits transfer (EBT) cards to the
definition of food instruments to be used for the purchase of WIC
authorized food (7 CFR §246.2);
(2) Adding types of payments that are excluded from
determination of income by federal legislative prohibition (7 CFR
246.7);
(3) Altering the definitions of participation data, nutrition
education, and nutritional risk (7 CFR §246.2);
Page 34
PROPOSED ACTION ON REGULATIONS
1516
MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 38, ISSUE 24, FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2011
(4) Shortening the period of time allowed for an individual to
provide income documentation (USDA Public Law 105-336, USDA
guideline Supplemental Foods Program (SFP) 99-078);
(5) Removing certain restrictions on costs for local agencies (7
CFR §246.14);
(6) Eliminating an allowance for a local agency to request an
exemption for not meeting spending requirements for nutrition
education (7 CFR §246.14); and
(7) Changing requirements for expenditure reports to a lower
frequency, and to be due within a shorter period of time from the end
of the quarter being reported (7 CFR §246.16(d)).
Comparison to Federal Standards
There is a corresponding federal standard to this proposed action,
but the proposed action is not more restrictive or stringent.
Estimate of Economic Impact
The proposed action has no economic impact.
Economic Impact on Small Businesses
The proposed action has minimal or no economic impact on small
businesses.
Impact on Individuals with Disabilities
The proposed action has no impact on individuals with disabilities.
Opportunity for Public Comment
Comments may be sent to Michele Phinney, Director, Office of
Regulation and Policy Coordination, Department of Health and
Mental Hygiene, 201 W. Preston Street, Room 512, Baltimore,
Maryland 21201, or call 410-767-6499 (TTY 800-735-2258), or
email to [email protected] , or fax to 410-767-6483. Comments
will be accepted through December 19, 2011. A public hearing has
not been scheduled.
10.54.01 Eligibility, Participation, and Benefits
Authority: Health-General Article, §18-107(a), Annotated Code of Maryland
.03 Incorporations by Reference.
In this chapter, the following are incorporated by reference:
A. 42 U.S.C. §1786, as amended;
B. 7 CFR 246 [(2001)], as amended; and
C. 7 CFR 15, 15a, and 15b [(1995)], as amended.
.04 Definitions.
A. (text unchanged)
B. Terms Defined.
(1)—(15) (text unchanged)
(16) ―Food instrument‖ means a voucher, check, electronic
benefits transfer (EBT) card, coupon, or other document that is used
by a participant to obtain supplemental foods.
(17) (text unchanged)
(18) Income.
(a)—(b) (text unchanged)
(c) ―Income‖ does not include payments or benefits
excluded [by federal legislative prohibition including, but not limited
to:
(i) Reimbursements from the Uniform Relocation
Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (42
U.S.C. §4636);
(ii) Payment to volunteers under Title I (VISTA and
others) and Title II (RSVP, foster grandparents, and others) of the
Domestic Volunteer Service Act of 1973 (42 U.S.C. §5044(g)) to the
extent excluded by that Act;
(iii) Payment to volunteers under §8(b)(1)(B) of the
Small Business Act (SCORE and ACE) (15 U.S.C. §637(b)(1)(D));
(iv) Income derived from certain submarginal land of the
United States that is held in trust for certain Indian tribes, pursuant to
25 U.S.C. §459(e);
(v) Payments received under the Job Training Partnership
Act, (29 U.S.C. §1552(b));
(vi) Income derived from the disposition of funds to the
Grand River Band of Ottawa Indians, pursuant to Public Law 94-540,
§6;
(vii) Payments received under the Alaska Native Claims
Settlement Act (43 U.S.C. §1626(c));
(viii) The value of assistance to a child or the child‘s
family under the National School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. §1760(e)),
the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 (42 U.S.C. §1780(b)), and the Food
Stamp Act of 1977 (7 U.S.C. §2017(b));
(ix) Payments by the Indian Claims Commission to the
Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakima Indian Nation or the
Apache Tribe of the Mescalero Reservation pursuant to 25 U.S.C.
§609c-1;
(x) Payments to the Passomaquoddy Tribe and the
Penobscot Nation or any of their members, received pursuant to the
Maine Indian Claims Settlement Act of 1980 (25 U.S.C. §§1725(i)
and 1728(c));
(xi) Payments under the Low-Income Home Energy
Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. §8624(f));
(xii) Student financial assistance received from a program
funded in whole or part under Title IV of the Higher Education Act
of 1965, which is used for costs described in §472(1) and (2) of that
Act (20 U.S.C. §1087uu), including the Pell Grant, Supplemental
Educational Opportunity Grant, State Student Incentive Grants,
National Direct Student Loan, PLUS, College Work Study, and Byrd
Honor Scholarship programs;
(xiii) Payments under the Disaster Relief Act of 1974, as
amended by the Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance
Amendments of 1989 (42 U.S.C. §5155(d));
(xiv) Payments received under the Carl D. Perkins
Vocational Education Act, as amended by the Carl D. Perkins
Vocational and Applied Technology Education Act Amendments of
1990 (20 U.S.C. §2466(d));
(xv) Payments pursuant to the Agent Orange
Compensation Exclusion Act (Public Law 101-201, §1);
(xvi) Payments received for Wartime Relocation of
Civilians under the Civil Liberties Act of 1988 (50 U.S.C. app.
§1989b4(f)(2));
(xvii) The value of child care payments made under
§402(g)(1)(E) of the Social Security Act, as amended by the Family
Support Act (42 U.S.C. §602(g)(1)(E));
(xviii) The value of ―at-risk‖ block grant child care
payments made under §5081 of Public Law 101-508, which amended
§402(i) of the Social Security Act;
(xix) The value of child care provided or paid for under
the Child Care and Development Block Grant Act, 42 U.S.C.
§9858(q);
(xx) Mandatory salary reduction amount for military
service personnel that is used to fund the Veterans‘ Educational
Assistance Act of 1984 (GI Bill), as amended (38 U.S.C. §1411(b));
(xxi) Payments received under the Old Age Assistance
Claims Settlement Act, except for per capita shares in excess of
$2,000 (25 U.S.C. §2307);
(xxii) Payments received under the Cranston-Gonzales
National Affordable Housing Act, unless the income of the family
equals or exceeds 80 percent of the median income of the area (42
U.S.C. §1437f nt);
(xxiii) Payments received under the Housing and
Community Development Act of 1987, unless the income of the
Page 35
PROPOSED ACTION ON REGULATIONS
1517
MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 38, ISSUE 24, FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2011
family increases at any time to not less than 50 percent of the median
income of the area (25 U.S.C. §2307);
(xxiv) Payments received under the Sac and Fox Indian
Claims Agreement pursuant to Public Law 94-189, §6;
(xxv) Payments received under the Judgment Award
Authorization Act, as amended (25 U.S.C. §1407 and 25 U.S.C.
§117b(b));
(xxvi) Payments for relocation assistance of members of
Navajo and Hopi Tribes, pursuant to 22 U.S.C. §640d-21;
(xxvii) Payments to the Turtle Mountain Band of
Chippewas, Arizona, pursuant to Public Law 97-403, §9;
(xxviii) Payments to the Blackfeet, Grosventre, and
Assiniboine Tribes (Montana) and the Papago (Arizona), pursuant to
Public Law 97-408, §8(d);
(xxix) Payments to the Assiniboine Tribe of the Fort
Belknap Indian community and the Assiniboine Tribe of the Fort
Peck Indian Reservation (Montana), pursuant to Public Law 98-124,
§5;
(xxx) Payments to the Red Lake Band of Chippewas,
pursuant to Public Law 98-123, §3;
(xxxi) Payments received under the Saginaw Chippewa
Indian Tribe of Michigan Distribution of Judgment Funds Act (Public
Law 99-346, §6(b)(2)); and
(xxxii) Payments to the Chippewas of Mississippi,
pursuant to Public Law 99-377, §4(b)] under 7 CFR §246.7(d)(2)(iv).
(19)—(22) (text unchanged)
(23) ―Nutritional risk‖ means:
(a)—(b) (text unchanged)
(c) Dietary deficiencies that impair or endanger health; [or]
(d) Conditions that directly affect the nutritional health of
an individual, including alcoholism or drug abuse; or
[(d)] (e) Conditions that [directly affect nutritional health of
an individual,] predispose individuals to inadequate nutritional
patterns or nutritionally related medical conditions, including[,] but
not limited to [, alcoholism, drug abuse,] homelessness[, or] and
migrancy.
(24) ―Nutrition education‖ means individual or group education
sessions and the provision of information and educational materials
designed to improve health status, achieve positive change in dietary
and physical activity habits, and emphasize relationships between
nutrition, physical activity, and health, all in keeping with the
individual‘s personal[,] and cultural[, and socioeconomic]
preferences.
(25)—(27) (text unchanged)
(28) ―Participation data‖ means information concerning the
number of [individuals]:
(a) Individuals who received supplemental foods or food
instruments during a reporting period[,and the number of infants];
(b) Infants who received no supplemental foods or food
instruments during a reporting period, but who were breastfed by
participant breastfeeding women; and
(c) Breastfeeding women who did not receive supplemental
foods or food instruments but whose infant received supplemental
foods or food instruments during the reporting period.
(29)—(39) (text unchanged)
.07 Income Eligibility Determination Process.
A.—D. (text unchanged)
E. Documentation of Income.
(1)—(3) (text unchanged)
(4) A local agency shall deny Program participation to an
applicant who fails to provide income documentation within [60] 30
days of the date that the individual applied for Program benefits.
10.54.02 Local Agency
Authority: Health-General Article, §§18-107(a) and 18-108, Annotated Code
of Maryland
.09 Program Costs — General.
A local agency may have the following administrative and
program services costs:
A. Direct costs, as allowed under 7 CFR Part 3016, which are
identifiable costs incurred exclusively for the purpose of the
Program; and
B. Indirect costs, as allowed by 7 CFR Part 3016, which are those
costs incurred for a common purpose benefitting more than one
program.
.10 Allowable Administrative and Program Service Costs.
A. Expenditures for Nutrition Education.
(1) During each federal fiscal year, a local agency shall use for
nutrition education an amount equal to at least 20 percent of the
administrative award set forth in §B of this regulation.
[(2) A local agency may request prior written permission from
the State agency to spend less than 20 percent of the administrative
and program services expenditures on nutrition education if the local
agency can document that a total of funds from other sources and
program funds will be expended for nutrition education at an amount
equal to 20 percent of the administrative and program services
expenditures.]
[(3)] (2)—[(4)] (3) (text unchanged)
B.—D. (text unchanged)
.14 Records and Reports.
A. A local agency shall:
(1)—(4) (text unchanged)
(5) Submit a [monthly] quarterly expenditure report on a form
specified by the Department within [50] 30 days after the end of the
[month] quarter being reported;
(6) Ensure that, for the purposes of an audit, the [monthly]
quarterly expenditure report is documented so that it can be traced to
its source; and
(7) Designate a person who shall certify the [monthly]
quarterly expenditure report as to its completeness and accuracy.
B.—D. (text unchanged)
JOSHUA M. SHARFSTEIN, M.D.
Secretary of Health and Mental Hygiene
Page 36
PROPOSED ACTION ON REGULATIONS
1518
MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 38, ISSUE 24, FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2011
Title 12
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC
SAFETY AND
CORRECTIONAL SERVICES
Subtitle 12 PATUXENT INSTITUTION
12.12.30 Inmate Discipline
Authority: Correctional Services Article, §4-208, Annotated Code of
Maryland
Notice of Proposed Action
[11-329-P]
The Secretary of Public Safety and Correctional Services proposes
to repeal existing Regulations .02—.09, .12, .13, .16, .18, .19, .26,
.31, .35, and .36, adopt new Regulations .02—.09, .12, .13, .16, .18,
.19, .26, .31, .35, and .36, and amend Regulations .15, .17, .20—.25,
.27, .30, .32, .33, .34, .37, and .39 under COMAR 12.12.30 Inmate
Discipline.
Statement of Purpose
The purpose of this action is to update current regulations to align
with procedures followed by the Patuxent Institution.
Comparison to Federal Standards
There is no corresponding federal standard to this proposed action.
Estimate of Economic Impact
The proposed action has no economic impact.
Economic Impact on Small Businesses
The proposed action has minimal or no economic impact on small
businesses.
Impact on Individuals with Disabilities
The proposed action has no impact on individuals with disabilities.
Opportunity for Public Comment
Comments may be sent to Kristina Donnelly, Administrator,
Patuxent Institution, 7555 Waterloo Road Jessup, MD 20794, or call
410-799-3314. Comments will be accepted through December 28,
2011. A public hearing has not been scheduled.
.02 Definitions.
A. In this subtitle, the following terms have the meanings
indicated.
B. Terms Defined.
(1)‖Assault‖ means an unlawful or impermissible threat or
attempt to do bodily injury to another.
(2) ―Assigned area‖ means a location where an inmate is
authorized and permitted.
(3) ―Battery‖ means the unlawful or impermissible touching or
striking of an individual by another with or without consent.
(4) ―Business day‖ means a day of the week excluding
Saturday, Sunday, State Holiday, or day on which the Division of
Correction’s administrative offices are closed.
(5) ―Calendar day‖ means a day of a week.
(6) ―Category of Rule Violation‖ means inmate rule violations
grouped according to the severity of the offense.
(7) ―CMHC-J‖ means the Correctional Mental Health
Center—Jessup.
(8) ―Competent‖ means, when used in reference to a defendant
inmate, the inmate is able to:
(a) Appreciate and understand the alleged rule violation;
and
(b) Participate in a disciplinary hearing.
(9) ―Controlled dangerous substance (CDS)‖ means:
(a) A substance listed in schedules I through V as defined in
Criminal Law Article, §§ 5-101(f) and 5-401 through 5-406,
Annotated Code of Maryland; or
(b) Other substance not identified in the Annotated Code of
Maryland that has psychotropic or hallucinogenic properties.
(10) ―Cumulative witness‖ means an individual who can only
testify to facts already in the record of a hearing.
(11) ―Department‖ means the Department of Public Safety and
Correctional Services.
(12) ―Disrespect‖ means an act of insolence that is arrogant,
presumptuous, impudent, or insulting in manner, or demonstrates a
lack of respect, directly or indirectly, toward another individual.
(13) ―Disruptive act‖ means an act that may disturb the peace,
prevent the orderly operation, or interfere with or threaten the
security of a facility or the community.
(14) Escape means:
(a) The unlawful or unauthorized absence or departure from
a facility or the grounds of a facility by an inmate;
(b) The unlawful or unauthorized absence or departure from
an assigned area by an inmate while in the community;
(c) The unlawful or unauthorized failure to follow or
departure from the staff itinerary for travel or movement by an
inmate while in the community; or
(d) Failure by an inmate to return at a specified time to a
place of assignment, custody, or confinement.
(15) ―Facility representative‖ means a staff member
designated by the warden, or a designee, to represent the interests of
the facility at a preliminary review or hearing.
(16) ―Fraud or misrepresentation‖ means an intentionally
false, misleading, or deceptive act or expression or omission.
(17) ―Hearing‖ means a facility inmate disciplinary
administrative proceeding.
(18) ―Hearing officer‖ means an impartial, non-advocate, fact-
finder who presides over a hearing.
(19) ―Hostage‖ means an individual whose freedom of
movement is restricted without authority or justification.
(20) ―Indecent exposure‖ means the willful display of the
genitals, buttocks, or female breast to another individual as an act of
disrespect, vulgarity, or sexual gratification.
(21) ―Informal resolution‖ means the informal process, when
there is evidence a rule violation has occurred, by which facility staff
or a hearing officer and a defendant inmate reach an agreement to
resolve the inmate’s rule violation charged by either an:
(a) ―Informal disposition‖ where by the inmate has:
(i) Waived a hearing and hearing rights for the rule
violation charged;
(ii) Agreed to accept a sanction in accordance with the
procedures of Regulation .39 of this chapter; and
(iii) Agreed to the placement of the inmate’s Notice of
Inmate Rule Violation and Disciplinary Hearing form as informal
disposition in the inmate’s case record file, or
(b) ―Incident report‖ whereby the inmate has:
(i) Waived a hearing and hearing rights for the rule
violation charged;
(ii) Agreed that no sanction will be imposed for the rule
violation charged; and
(iii) Agreed to placement of the inmate’s Notice of Inmate
Rule Violation and Disciplinary Hearing form as an incident report
in the inmate’s case record file.
Page 37
PROPOSED ACTION ON REGULATIONS
1519
MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 38, ISSUE 24, FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2011
(22) ―Inmate‖ means an individual who is under commitment
to the Director, the federal government, a local government, a
municipality, or another state government and is housed in or
otherwise in the actual or constructive custody of the Department or
Patuxent Institution.
(23) ―Inmate representative‖ means a staff member or inmate
permitted in accordance with the procedures of this chapter to
represent a defendant inmate during a hearing.
(24) ―May not‖ means an absolute prohibition.
(25) ―Order‖ means a command, direction, or instruction
given by staff to an inmate that is consistent with the policies of the
Department and Patuxent Institution.
(26) ―Psychiatry staff‖ means a physician who has been issued
a license to practice medicine by the Maryland Board of Physician
Quality Assurance and who has successfully completed an accredited
4 year residency in psychiatry.
(27) ―Psychology staff‖ means a clinician holding a current
license as a psychologist issued by the Maryland Board of Examiners
of Psychologists or approved by the Maryland Board of Examiners of
Psychologists as a psychology associate.
(28) ―Plea agreement‖ means a settlement arrangement
between the defendant inmate and facility representative for a rule
violation charged, which implementation is subject to the discretion
of the hearing officer.
(29) ―Preliminary review‖ means an initial appearance by a
defendant inmate before the hearing officer for the purpose of
reviewing the Notice of Inmate Rule Violation and Disciplinary
Hearing form.
(30) ―Restitution‖ means payment for documented, reasonable
expenses associated with fraud, misrepresentation, or false
information; or an illegal, unauthorized, or unreasonable expense
incurred to the State; or the repair or replacement of altered,
damaged, destroyed, stolen, or missing property, tools, or equipment.
(31) ―Sanitation assignment‖ means an inmate job assignment
imposed as a sanction for which neither work credits nor pay is
awarded to the defendant inmate.
(32) ―Sexual act‖ means two or more individuals involved in
an act for sexual arousal or gratification.
(33) ―Staff‖ means a permanent, contractual, or temporary
employee or other individual under contract or agreement providing
goods or services to the Department or an agency, facility, or inmate.
(34) ―Special needs inmate‖ means a defendant inmate whose
ability to participate in a preliminary review or hearing is affected by
illiteracy or a mental health, speech, hearing, or language condition.
(35) ―Telecommunication device‖ means:
(a) A device that is able to transmit telephonic, electrical,
digital, cellular, or radio communications;
(b) A part of a device that is able to transmit telephonic,
electrical, digital, cellular, or radio communications, regardless of
whether the part itself is able to transmit such communication; or
(c) An item including, but not limited to a:
(i) Cellular telephone;
(ii) Digital telephone;
(iii) Picture telephone;
(iv) Modem equipped device; and
(v) Component of or accessory for the items under
§B(33)(c) of this regulation, such as a SIM card, Bluetooth
equipment, charger, earpiece, or carrying case.
(36) Unauthorized Financial Account.
(a) ―Unauthorized financial account‖ means a financial,
account other than a spending account or reserve account
maintained under Correctional Services Article, §3-609, Annotated
Code of Maryland or a bank savings account.
(b) ―Unauthorized financial account‖ includes, but may not
be limited to the following:
(i) Checking account;
(ii) Credit card account;
(iii) Green Dot card;
(iv) Debit card account;
(v) Money order; and
(vi) Gift card.
.03 Inmate Compliance Requirement and Sanction — General. A. An inmate who commits a rule violation under Regulation .04
of this chapter shall be subject to the inmate disciplinary process of
the Department or Patuxent Institution.
B An inmate shall comply with the rules of:
(1) The Department or Patuxent Institution;
(2) The facility to which the inmate is assigned; or
(3) A program to which the inmate is assigned.
C. The rules of conduct of the Department or Patuxent Institution
under Regulation .04 of this chapter shall apply to an inmate whether
the inmate is on the grounds of a facility, in the community, or
another location other than the facility or community.
D. Soliciting, conspiring to commit, attempting to commit, or
aiding in the commission of a rule violation shall:
(1) Constitute a commission of that rule violation; and
(2) Subject the defendant inmate to the prescribed sanctions for
that rule violation in accordance with the regulations of this chapter.
E. Sanctions.
(1) To maintain the orderly operation and security of a facility,
deter inmate misconduct, and avoid disparate sanctioning of an
inmate, the Department or Patuxent Institution shall establish under
this chapter specific penalties identified as sanctions to be imposed
for an inmate rule violation.
(2)Whenever an inmate is released from the custody of the
Department or Patuxent Institution, for example, due to a transfer to
another jurisdiction’s custody, mandatory release, detainer,
hospitalization, parole supervision, pending legal matter, or mental
health treatment and has a balance of disciplinary segregation
remaining to serve, the disciplinary segregation period shall:
(a) Be stayed upon the inmate’s release; and
(b) Resume upon the inmate’s return to a Department or
Patuxent Institution facility, irrespective of the reason for the return
to Department or Patuxent Institution custody including service of a
new sentence.
(3) Inmate sanctions include:
(a) Placement of an inmate on disciplinary segregation;
(b) Revocation of good conduct and special projects credit;
(c) Suspension of inmate privileges; or
(d) Restitution for lost, stolen, altered, damaged, or
destroyed property of the State, a person, or an entity.
.04 Inmate Rule Violation Summary.
A. Category of Inmate Rule Violations.
(1) The category for a rule violation is determined by the
severity of offense.
(2) The categories of rule violations are organized by the level
of severity as follows:
(a) Category I—most severe;
(b) Category II;
(c) Category III;
(d) Category IV; and
(e) Category V—least severe.
B. Category I Inmate Rule Violations. An inmate may not:
(1) 100 — Engage in a disruptive act;
(2) 101—Commit assault or battery on staff;
(3) 102—Commit assault or battery on an inmate;
Page 38
PROPOSED ACTION ON REGULATIONS
1520
MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 38, ISSUE 24, FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2011
(4) 103 – Commit assault or battery on a person who is neither
staff or an inmate, be involved in any manner with taking a hostage,
or be involved in any manner with the willful killing of another
person;
(5) 104 — Use intimidating, coercive, or threatening language;
(6) 105 — Possess, use, or manufacture a weapon;
(7) 106 — Escape when assigned maximum or medium security
status;
(8) 107—Escape when assigned minimum security status;
(9) 108—Escape when assigned pre-release security status;
(10) 109—Escape while in the community;
(11) 110—Possess an implement or article that may be used in
an escape;
(12) 111—Possess or use an unauthorized medication, drug, or
substance identified as an intoxicant, excluding alcohol and a
controlled dangerous substance from this rule violation;
(13) 112—Possess or use a drug or controlled dangerous
substance;
(14) 113—Possess or use paraphernalia that may be for the use
of an intoxicant, drug, or controlled dangerous substance;
(15) 114—Possess a controlled dangerous substance,
intoxicant, drug, or alcohol in sufficient quantity or packaging
materials that suggests an intent to distribute or distribution;
(16) 115—Refuse or fail to provide a required volume of urine
necessary for urinalysis testing or provide a diluted or adulterated
urine sample;
(17) 116—Possess, misuse, tamper with, damage, or destroy
security equipment or property, detection equipment, or fire
suppression equipment or alarm;
(18) 117—In any manner, arrange, commit, perform, or engage
in a sexual act;
(19) 118—Make application for, obtain, possess articles or
materials for the use of, or use an unauthorized financial account;
possess currency in a facility where currency is not permitted; or
possess currency in an amount that is greater than fifty dollars in
excess of the authorized amount specified by the rules of a facility in
which an inmate is permitted to possess currency;
(20) 119—In any manner, commit, perform, or engage in an act
of indecent exposure or masturbation;
(21) 120—Disobey a specifically cited facility Category I rule
not listed in this regulation as a rule violation;
(22) 121—Possess tobacco in sufficient quantity or the
materials necessary for packaging tobacco, or other related products
that suggests an intent to distribute or distribution; or
(23) 122—Possess a telecommunication device, SIM card,
battery charger, carry case, or other device or article identified with
a telecommunication device.
C. Category II Inmate Rule Violations. An inmate may not:
(1) 200―Vacant;
(2) 201—Refuse to participate in or engage in behavior that
results in removal from the mandatory remediation Regimented
Offender Treatment Center program;
(3) 202—Refuse to participate in or engage in behavior that
results in removal from the mandatory Residential Substance Abuse
Treatment Program;
(4) 203—Refuse to participate in or engage in behavior that
results in removal from the mandatory education program;
(5) 204—Refuse to participate in or engage in behavior that
results in removal from a mandatory remediation program not cited
in the rule violations of this regulation;
(6) 205—Refuse a required medical examination or test or
deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) sampling collection; or
(7) 206—Disobey a specifically cited facility Category II rule
not listed in this regulation as a rule violation.
D. Category III Inmate Rule Violations. An inmate may not:
(1) 300—Administer or receive a tattoo or possess tattoo
paraphernalia;
(2) 301—Possess or use alcohol without authorization;
(3) 302—Possess equipment, material, or paraphernalia that
may be used for manufacturing alcohol;
(4) 303—Refuse to submit to alcohol detection testing;
(5) 304—Possess, use, hoard, or accumulate medication
without authorization;
(6) 305—Violate a law, statute, ordinance, or postal law;
(7) 306—Gamble or possess gambling paraphernalia;
(8) 307—Commit an act of extortion, bribery, or coercion;
(9) 308—Steal State property or possess State property
identified as stolen;
(10) 309—Steal the property of an individual or possess
property of an individual identified as stolen;
(11) 310—Violate a rule of a Department or Division of
Correction program or directive that is not listed as a rule violation
in this regulation;
(12) 311—Possess currency in an amount that is greater than
$20 but does not exceed $50 in excess of the authorized amount
specified by the rules of a facility in which an inmate is permitted to
possess currency;
(13) 312—Interfere with or resist the performance of staff
duties to include a search of a person, item, area, or location; or
(14) 313—Disobey a specifically cited facility Category III rule
not listed in this regulation as a rule violation.
E. Category IV Inmate Rule Violations. An inmate may not:
(1) 400—Disobey an order;
(2) 401—Refuse to work, carry out an assignment, or accept a
housing assignment;
(3) 402—Be in a location without authorization; leave an
assigned location without authorization; be absent from or late
reporting to an assigned location without authorization; loiter or
linger in a location without authorization; or refuse or fail to obey or
follow an order or a rule, policy, or procedure for inmate facility
movement or inmate travel outside of a facility;
(4) 403—Provide false information or alter, misrepresent, or
forge a document;
(5) 404—Possess currency in an amount that does not exceed
$20 in excess of the authorized amount specified by the rules of a
facility in which an inmate is permitted to possess currency;
(6) 405—Demonstrate disrespect or use vulgar language;
(7) 406—Possess or pass contraband;
(8) 407—Perform an unauthorized personal service or conduct
an unauthorized business;
(9) 408—Misuse, alter, tamper with, damage, or destroy State
property or property of another;
(10) 409—Use a telephone without authorization, make a
telephone call without authorization, call for a purpose not
authorized, or be involved with an unauthorized three way telephone
call;
(11) 410—Disobey a specifically cited facility Category IV rule
not listed in this regulation as a rule violation; or
(12) 411—Possess tobacco in a limited quantity that may
suggest personal use and there is no other evidence to suggest an
intent to distribute or distribution.
F. Category V Inmate Rule Violations. An inmate may not:
(1) 500—Fail to possess or properly display, as directed by the
rules of the facility, a required inmate identification badge;
(2) 501—Engage in reckless behavior or horseplay;
(3) 502—Fail to maintain:
(a) Personal cleanliness;
(b) The cleanliness of the facility and assigned housing
area; or
Page 39
PROPOSED ACTION ON REGULATIONS
1521
MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 38, ISSUE 24, FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2011
(c) The cleanliness of an area outside the facility; or
(4) 503—Disobey a specifically cited facility Category V rule
not listed in this regulation as a rule violation.
G. The term ―disruptive act‖ under §B(1) of this regulation shall
include:
(1) Disorderly conduct;
(2) Language use that is disruptive or incendiary;
(3) An unauthorized gathering;
(4) A demonstration or disturbance;
(5) Misuse or damage of property during a disruptive act;
(6) Setting a fire; or
(7) Possessing or using an explosive or flammable device.
H. The term weapon under §B(6) of this regulation shall include:
(1) An instrument for offensive or defensive combat that may be
used in physically threatening, harming, or injuring an individual;
and
(2) An unauthorized material, substance, article, instrument, or
tool that may be manufactured into or used as a weapon regardless
of it being used for a purpose other than as a weapon or whether its
original character has been altered.
I. The term‖ threatening language‖ under §B(5) of this regulation
shall include:
(1) A use of language that implies intimidation, coercion, or a
threat of harm toward an individual or property;
(2) Regardless of the ability to carry out a threat; and
(3) May be conveyed:
(a) Verbally;
(b) In writing;
(c) By gesture;
(d) By drawing; or
(e) By display or projection of an image.
J. The term ―contraband‖ under §E(7) of this regulation shall
include property, an article, or a substance (other than a controlled
dangerous substance) that an inmate, by law or correctional policy
or procedure, is not permitted to possess, pass, or receive and that is: (1) Allowable property that requires registration to be in the
possession of an inmate;
(2) Otherwise allowable property or an authorized article in an
area where an inmate is not permitted to possess or use the
authorized article; or
(3) Allowable property that is identified as belonging to an
individual other than the inmate in possession of the property.
K. A charge of ―battery‖ under §B(2), (3) or (4) of this
regulation:
(1) May not be automatically excused by a claim of ―self-
defense‖; and
(2) A claim of ―self-defense‖ may be considered in the
disposition of a charge of battery.
L. Horseplay.
(1) The term ―horseplay‖ under §F(2) of this regulation shall
include unauthorized rowdy or rough:
(a) Consensual play;
(b) Amusement; or
(c) Recreation.
(2) A claim of the defense of ―horseplay‖ to a charge that
includes intentional physical contact between individuals may not be
considered under §F(2) of this regulation and shall be considered a
battery violation under §B(2)(3) or (4) of this regulation.
M. A charge of participation in a sex act under §B(18) of this
regulation may not be excused by a claim of ―consent‖.
N. A charge of refusal under §E(2) of this regulation may not be
excused by an unsubstantiated claim of ―danger‖ or‖ threat of
harm.‖
O. The language ―possess a telecommunication device‖ under
§B(23) of this regulation shall include an inmate who:
(1) Willfully poses for the taking of an unauthorized picture or
video recording by an individual using a telecommunication device
or camera; and
(2) Failed to report the taking of the picture or video recording
along with the name of the individual using the telecommunication
device or camera to staff.
.05 Prehearing Procedures ― Investigating and Reporting an
Inmate Rule Violation.
A. Investigation. When an event occurs causing staff to believe
that an inmate has committed an inmate rule violation under
Regulation .04 of this chapter, staff shall initiate an investigation
within one calendar day of the reported event to:
(1) Determine the facts and circumstances of the event;
(2) Identify the violator;
(3) Identify witnesses; and
(4) Preserve physical evidence.
B. Notice of Inmate Rule Violation and Disciplinary Hearing
Form.
(1) If there is evidence indicating that an inmate’s conduct
constitutes a rule violation, staff shall utilize the Notice of Inmate
Rule Violation and Disciplinary Hearing form to draft a rule
violation report and recommend the inmate rule violation to be
charged and shall include the:
(a) Date and time of the alleged violation;
(b) Location of the alleged violation;
(c) Identification of an inmate accused of committing a rule
violation;
(d) Facts of the alleged rule violation; and
(e)The inmate rule violation that the shift supervisor should
charge.
(2) The reporting staff member shall forward the Notice of
Inmate Rule Violation and Disciplinary Hearing form to a shift
supervisor for review.
C. Shift Supervisor Responsibilities. Upon receipt of a Notice of
Inmate Rule Violation and Disciplinary Hearing form reporting an
inmate rule violation, the shift supervisor shall:
(1) Indicate on the Notice of Inmate Rule Violation and
Disciplinary Hearing form if there was a use of force involved with
the reported event;
(2) Indicate on the Notice of Inmate Rule Violation and
Disciplinary Hearing form if there was a seizure of contraband
involved in the reported event;
(3) Review the Notice of Inmate Rule Violation and
Disciplinary Hearing form to determine if the case warrants:
(a) A hearing;
(b) Informal disposition; or
(c) Reducing the narrative to an incident report;
(4) If the decision is to conduct a hearing, indicate formal
hearing in the appropriate place on the Notice of Inmate Rule
Violation and Disciplinary Hearing form:
(a) The alleged rule violation; and
(b) If the alleged violator’s conduct constitutes a security
threat, a recommendation to the shift commander for placement on
administrative segregation;
(5) Upon completing the Notice of Inmate Rule Violation and
Disciplinary Hearing form, forward the completed Notice of Inmate
Rule Violation and Disciplinary Hearing form to the shift commander
and maintain possession of an attachment and other evidence that
staff may have submitted with the Notice of Inmate Rule Violation
and Disciplinary Hearing form.
Page 40
PROPOSED ACTION ON REGULATIONS
1522
MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 38, ISSUE 24, FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2011
D. Shift Commander Responsibilities: Upon receipt of the Notice
of Inmate Rule Violation and Disciplinary Hearing form, the shift
commander shall:
(1) Review the Notice of Inmate Rule Violation and
Disciplinary Hearing form to determine if the alleged violator is a
threat to security;
(2) If the shift commander determines there is a security threat,
approve placement of the alleged violator on administrative
segregation status; and
(3) Complete the appropriate section of the Notice of Inmate
Rule Violation and Disciplinary Hearing form regarding the action
taken and forward the Notice of Inmate Rule Violation and
Disciplinary Hearing form to the shift supervisor.
E. Drafting and Serving a Corrected Notice of Inmate Rule
Violation and Disciplinary Hearing form.
(1) If staff determines that the Notice of Inmate Rule Violation
and Disciplinary Hearing form is technically in error or evidentially
insufficient after the defendant inmate has been served the Notice of
Inmate Rule Violation and Disciplinary Hearing form, staff shall:
(a) Draft a new Notice of Inmate Rule Violation and
Disciplinary Hearing form that may include the evidentiary
information, evidentiary corrections, additional evidentiary
information, or technical or formatting corrections; and
(b) After completion of the new Notice of Inmate Rule
Violation and Disciplinary Hearing form, serve the Notice of Inmate
Rule Violation and Disciplinary Hearing form on the defendant
inmate.
(2) For a minor correction due to an error (for example a name
or date or the absence of a signature or date) or new or additional
information, staff may rely on a correspondence addressed to the
defendant inmate explaining the correction or additional information.
(3) If a new Notice of Inmate Rule Violation and Disciplinary
Hearing form is drafted, staff shall, if applicable, include in the new
draft that it supersedes the previously served Notice of Inmate Rule
Violation and Disciplinary Hearing form regarding the reported
event and rule violation charged.
(4) Staff shall insure that a copy of the new Notice of Inmate
Rule Violation and Disciplinary Hearing form or correspondence is
present when the defendant inmate appears before the hearing
officer.
.07 Hearing Procedures — General.
A. [Due Process.] Waiver. Unless specified otherwise, a defendant
inmate who does not exercise, during the inmate disciplinary
process, a right provided by due process [is] or fails, at the
preliminary review of the inmate’s Notice of Inmate Rule Violation
and Disciplinary Hearing form, to raise a lack of compliance with a
time requirement or procedure of a regulation of this chapter or
Department or Patuxent Institution directive shall be considered to
have waived that right or the claim of a failure to comply with a time
requirement or procedure.
B. Authority of the Hearing Officer. The hearing officer [shall]
may:
(1) Weigh the evidence presented and make fact findings for an
inmate disciplinary case being heard;
(2) Not make a finding of law;
[(1)] (3) [Be the final arbiter for hearing proceedings, findings,
decisions, and sanctions] Make a determination regarding
compliance with a time requirement or procedure under this chapter
or a Patuxent Institution directive; and
[(2)] (4) [Decide] Determine whether the inmate has committed
the rule violation charged and the number [of], [the] period [of], and
[the] effective date of [any] sanctions to be imposed.
C. The hearing officer shall:
(1) Interpret policy and [procedures] procedure;
(2) — (4) (text unchanged)
D. Except where stated otherwise, a hearing officer:
(1) (text unchanged)
(2) [May not discuss the merits of a pending case with another
non-specified individual without all hearing participants present] May
discuss a non-evidentiary matter without a hearing participant
present that may include:
(a) Security or safety;
(b) A plea agreement;
(c) An informal resolution;
(d) A postponement;
(e) A time requirement or procedure of a regulation under
this chapter or Department or Division of Correction directive; or
(f) Representation or witness request;
(3) May not discuss without all hearing participants present the
evidentiary merits of a pending case, unless otherwise specified in
§D(1) of this regulation; or
(4) May, in the presence of staff necessary for security and
safety and without an inmate, question or take testimony from a
witness or informant witness whose identity may not be revealed to
an inmate or review or examine security sensitive evidence that may
include a document, video record, or other record.
E. Testimony.
(1) (text unchanged)
(2) The hearing officer shall use the following oath to swear in
[an individual providing testimony] a witness at a disciplinary
hearing: ―Do you solemnly promise and affirm under the penalties of
perjury that the testimony you are about to give at this disciplinary
hearing shall be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth?‖
(3) After the administration of the oath, the witness shall
provide an affirmative response before being permitted to testify.
F. Facility Representative.
(1) The warden, or a designee, shall determine [which cases
require a] if a pending disciplinary case requires facility
[representative] representation.
(2) (text unchanged)
G. Witnesses.
(1) It shall be the responsibility of the defendant inmate or
facility representative, and not that of the hearing officer, to call a
requested witness as part of the case presentation during a hearing.
(2) A witness shall:
(a) Not be compelled to appear or give testimony at a
hearing;
(b) Be permitted to testify if that testimony is not a threat to
security or safety; and
(c) Provide testimony that is relevant, material, and non-
cumulative to a hearing.
(3) A witness may be questioned by the defendant inmate
representative, the defendant inmate in the absence of a
representative, or facility representative if the hearing officer
determines the question:
(a) Not to be disrespectful or offensive;
(b) Not to be a threat to security or safety;
(c) Not to be repetitive or cumulative; and
(d) To be relevant and material.
(4) The hearing officer may question a person giving testimony
at a hearing.
(5) The hearing officer may call a witness to testify or be
questioned regarding:
(a) An evidentiary matter;
(b) A fact in evidence; or
(c) A policy, procedure, or practice.
H. Facility Hearing Officer.
(1) The warden, or a designee, may designate facility staff to
act as a hearing officer.
Page 41
PROPOSED ACTION ON REGULATIONS
1523
MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 38, ISSUE 24, FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2011
(2) A facility hearing officer conducting a hearing shall be
empowered with the duties and responsibilities of a hearing officer as
enumerated by this chapter.
(a) The facility hearing officer may conduct a hearing in the
absence of a hearing officer or when a hearing officer is conducting
facility hearings.
(b) The facility hearing officer shall conduct a hearing in
accordance with the procedures of this chapter.
I. Preliminary Review.
(1) An inmate shall appear before a hearing officer for a
preliminary review of the inmate’s Notice of Inmate Rule Violation
and Disciplinary Hearing form.
(2) A preliminary review shall be conducted before an
evidentiary hearing being held.
(3) Matters to be addressed at the preliminary review may
include, but are not limited to:
(a) A rule violation charged;
(b) Representation request;
(c) Witness request;
(d) Evidence request;
(e) Postponement request;
(f) A time requirement or procedure in accordance with a
regulation of this chapter or Department or Patuxent Institution
directive;
(g) An attachment to or other evidence submitted with the
Notice of Inmate Rule Violation and Disciplinary Hearing form;
(h) A plea agreement or informal resolution; and
(i) A plea by the defendant inmate to each rule violation
charged.
(4) At the conclusion of the preliminary review, the hearing
officer shall inquire of the hearing participants if the participants are
prepared to proceed with a hearing on the rule violation charged.
(a) If a hearing participant is not prepared to proceed, the
hearing officer shall provide the hearing participants an opportunity
to comment on the issue.
(b) The hearing officer shall determine the merits of a
hearing participant’s claim of not being prepared to proceed and
may postpone the case at the request of a participant.
(c) If the hearing officer does not find that a postponement
of the proceeding is warranted, the hearing officer shall proceed with
a hearing.
(d) If a hearing is postponed at the request of a participant,
facility staff shall reschedule the hearing for a date when
circumstances permit.
J. Plea Agreement.
(1) The facility representative may negotiate with the defendant
inmate a plea agreement for a rule violation charged.
(2) The facility representative or defendant inmate is not
obligated to offer or accept a plea agreement.
(3) The plea agreement shall be presented to the hearing
officer during the preliminary phase of a hearing.
(4) A hearing officer is not obligated to accept a plea or
sanction negotiated through a plea agreement.
(5) A plea agreement shall include:
(a) The waiver of a hearing and hearing rights by the
defendant inmate;
(b) A recommendation to the hearing officer regarding the
period and sanctions to be imposed;
(c) The hearing officer shall, before entering a guilty plea,
advise the defendant inmate that:
(i) The hearing officer is not obligated to accept the
sanction recommended under the plea agreement;
(ii) The hearing officer may increase the period of the
recommended sanction; or
(iii) The hearing officer and warden may impose an
additional sanction; and
(d) A voluntary plea of guilty is entered into the hearing
record by the defendant inmate to a rule violation charged.
(6) The hearing officer upon accepting a plea of guilty shall
determine a sanction to impose.
(7) In the absence of a plea agreement, the hearing officer
shall:
(a) Continue with the preliminary review; or
(b) Proceed to the evidentiary phase of the hearing if the
preliminary review has been completed.
K. Informal Resolution.
(1) A shift supervisor or hearing officer on review of a Notice
of Inmate Rule Violation and Disciplinary Hearing form may offer a
defendant inmate an informal resolution in lieu of a hearing for a
rule violation charged under Regulations .06 and .16 of this chapter.
(2)The offer to the defendant inmate of an informal resolution
may only be made when the offense charged is a:
(a) Category IV rule violation; or
(b) Category V rule violation.
(3) Upon discovery that an informal resolution action is not in
compliance with the procedures of this regulation, Regulation .06 or
.16 of this chapter, the warden, or a designee, may remand the matter
to a hearing officer for further action.
(4) The hearing officer upon receipt of a remanded informal
resolution action shall:
(a) Determine if there was an error in the informal
resolution action;
(b) Conduct a preliminary review and hearing of the rule
violation charged if finding an error in the informal resolution
process did occur; and
(c) If finding no error occurred affirm the informal
resolution action in a written decision.
L. Inmate Handcuffing.
(1) For the purposes of maintaining security, control, and
safety during a hearing, inmate hearing participants shall be
handcuffed.
(2) The defendant inmate shall be handcuffed from behind
unless prohibited by a documented medical reason.
(3) If security staff determines that security, control, and safety
permits or due to a documented medical reason, an inmate
representative or witness may be handcuffed from the front.
M. Forfeiture of Property.
(1) Unauthorized property, to include property whose
ownership cannot be determined, authorized property used for
unauthorized purposes, and unauthorized currency found in the
possession of an inmate, may be forfeited to the State.
(2) The policy and procedures of a facility, directive, or
regulation of the Department or Patuxent Institution shall determine
what property is unauthorized for an inmate to possess and may be
forfeited to the State.
(3) An inmate under the requirements of this chapter may not
possess currency in:
(a) A facility not permitting an inmate to possess currency;
(b) Excess of the amount of currency permitted by the rules
of a facility permitting an inmate to possess currency; or
(c) Violation of a policy, procedure, or directive or
regulation of the Department or Patuxent Institution.
(4) Unauthorized property in the possession of an inmate may
be referred for forfeiture and disposal by a facility through the
inmate disciplinary process as enumerated under this chapter.
(5) Forfeiture of property under the procedures of this chapter
is an administrative disposition by a hearing officer and may not be
imposed as a sanction.
Page 42
PROPOSED ACTION ON REGULATIONS
1524
MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 38, ISSUE 24, FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2011
(6) A disciplinary hearing conducted under the procedures of
this chapter may authorize the forfeiture of property under the
following conditions:
(a) Facility staff shall provide to a defendant inmate, prior
to the inmate’s disciplinary hearing, required notice in a format
approved by the Department or Patuxent Institution advising the
defendant inmate that the property is:
(i) Confiscated; and
(ii) Recommended for forfeiture to the State.
(b) A hearing officer shall, during the defendant inmate’s
disciplinary hearing, where forfeiture of property has been requested
by a facility, advise the inmate of the forfeiture request and permit
the inmate the opportunity to address the matter of forfeiture.
(c) After making a decision regarding the defendant
inmate’s rule violations charged, the hearing officer shall advise the
inmate of the forfeiture disposition regarding the unauthorized
property and:
(i) If the hearing officer concludes the defendant inmate
possessed unauthorized property of value in violation of a policy or
procedure of a facility, directive, or regulation of the Department or
Patuxent Institution, the written record of the proceedings shall
include documentation of the property to be forfeited to the State for
the use of or sale by the State;
(ii) If the hearing officer concludes the defendant inmate
possessed unauthorized property of little or no value in violation of a
policy or procedure of a facility, directive, or regulation of the
Department or Patuxent Institution, the written record of the
proceedings shall include documentation of the property to be
forfeited to the State and referred to the facility for disposal of the
property under the facility’s procedures for the disposal of
unauthorized property; and
(iii) In the event a hearing officer finds a defendant
inmate not guilty or dismisses the charge and determines the inmate
is not permitted to possess the property or cannot determine
ownership of the property, the hearing officer shall forfeit the
property to the State as enumerated under §§M(6)(c)(i) and (ii) of
this regulation.
(7) Property Ownership.
(a) A hearing officer, before the conclusion of a disciplinary
hearing, shall make a determination of property ownership before
rendering a forfeiture disposition.
(b) When determining property ownership and potential
forfeiture of that property, a hearing officer shall consider if the
defendant inmate found in possession of the property can or cannot
prove ownership of the property.
(i) If the hearing officer can determine through the
evidence presented at the disciplinary hearing that the inmate had
authorized ownership of the property, but the property was being
used for an unauthorized purpose, the hearing officer shall forfeit the
property to the State as established under §§M(6)(c)(i) and (ii) of this
regulation.
(ii) If the hearing officer determines through the
evidence presented during the disciplinary hearing that the inmate
possessed unauthorized property and the rightful ownership of that
property cannot be determined, the hearing officer shall forfeit that
property to the State as established under §§M(6)(c)(i) and (ii) of this
regulation.
(iii) If the hearing officer is able to determine through
the evidence presented during the disciplinary hearing that the
property in the defendant inmate’s possession belonged to another
person without the authorization of that person, the hearing officer
shall make a disposition that the property be returned to the rightful
owner.
(iv) If the hearing officer is able to determine through the
evidence presented during the disciplinary hearing that the property
in the defendant inmate’s possession belonged to another person with
the permission of that person, the hearing officer shall refer the
property to the facility for investigation and appropriate action taken
against the person authorizing the defendant inmate to possess the
property and the property shall be forfeited to the State.
(c) Currency Ownership.
(i) If an inmate is found in possession of unauthorized
currency and no other individual can claim rightful ownership, the
hearing officer shall forfeit that currency to the State as established
under §§M(6)(c)(i) and (ii) of this regulation.
(ii) If an inmate is found in possession of unauthorized
currency and the hearing officer determines that the currency was the
property of an individual who did not authorize the defendant inmate
to possess the currency, the hearing officer shall make a disposition
that the currency is to be returned to the rightful owner.
(iii) If the hearing officer determines that the rightful
owner of the unauthorized currency found in the possession of the
defendant inmate knowingly transferred the currency to the defendant
inmate, the hearing officer shall refer the currency to the facility for
investigation and appropriate action to be taken against the
transferring individual and the currency shall be forfeited to the
State.
(8) A warden, or a designee, may not disturb a hearing
officer’s disposition regarding unauthorized property, but may
appeal that disposition to the Director, or a designee, to determine if
the disposition is in compliance with this regulation.
(9) An appeal under §M(7) of this regulation shall suspend the
property disposition until a decision is made by the Director, or a
designee, as to the propriety of the hearing officer’s decision
concerning forfeiture.
N. Security Sensitive Information.
(1) When preparing a disciplinary case based on a defendant
inmate’s conduct in an event, facility staff before providing
information to a defendant inmate through a Notice of Inmate Rule
Violation and Disciplinary Hearing form, record, report, document,
or other form of evidence, shall evaluate and determine if that
information is security sensitive.
(a) To determine if information is security sensitive, facility
staff shall consider the potential negative impact divulging the
information could have on facility security operations or intelligence
gathering, the Department or Patuxent Institution investigation
methods and techniques, public safety, or an individual providing the
information. When determining if information is security sensitive,
facility staff may consider that the information:
(i) Was provided by an inmate informant or individual
whose identity, if revealed, would be harmful to the safety or security
of that inmate or individual;
(ii) Reveals the method, technique, or factual detail of a
security or intelligence investigation;
(iii) Would reveal to the defendant inmate the method,
quality, and extent of coverage from facility security monitoring
equipment or systems;
(iv) Relates to or reveals facility security staffing plans,
emergency plans, or security operations; or
(v) Was obtained by a law enforcement agency, a State
or federal intelligence office or unit, or the Department’s Internal
Investigation Unit.
(b) If facility staff have a reasonable belief that releasing the
information arising from an investigation of a defendant inmate’s
conduct in an event would compromise facility security operations or
intelligence gathering, the Department or Patuxent Institution
investigation methods and techniques, public safety, or an individual
providing the information, facility staff shall present the information
to a shift supervisor for evaluation as to whether the information is
security sensitive.
Page 43
PROPOSED ACTION ON REGULATIONS
1525
MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 38, ISSUE 24, FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2011
(c) A shift supervisor, notified under §N(1)(b) of this
regulation, shall:
(i) Evaluate the information in terms of being security
sensitive as provided under §N(1)(a) of this regulation;
(ii) If there is a reasonable belief that the information is
security sensitive, classify the information as security sensitive; and
(iii) Document the rationale for classifying the
information as security sensitive.
(d) Once a shift supervisor classifies information as being
security sensitive, facility staff may not provide a defendant inmate
with the information classified as security sensitive.
(2) Hearing Officer Review.
(a) A hearing officer shall review information classified as
security sensitive under §N(1) of this regulation.
(b) The hearing officer shall determine if the classification of
the information as security sensitive is in accordance with the
requirements of this regulation.
(i) If the hearing officer determines that the information
has been properly classified as security sensitive, the hearing officer
shall inform the defendant inmate that the information is security
sensitive and is not available to the defendant inmate as enumerated
under the procedures of Regulation .26 of this chapter.
(ii) If raised by the defendant inmate, the hearing officer
shall provide the hearing participants the opportunity to address the
merits of the classification of the information as security sensitive.
(iii) After discussing a security sensitive classification of
information under §N(2)(b)(ii) of this regulation, the hearing officer
shall advise the hearing participants as to a decision regarding the
merits of the classification of the information as being security
sensitive.
(c) A hearing officer may not reveal information deemed
classified as security sensitive under the provisions of this regulation.
(d) If a hearing officer does not determine that the
information is security sensitive, the hearing officer shall:
(i) Postpone the defendant inmate’s disciplinary hearing;
(ii) Refer the information classified as security sensitive
by the shift supervisor to the Director, or a designee, through the
facility representative or hearing coordinator for a review as to
whether or not the information is security sensitive; and
(iii) Provide the Director, or a designee, a written
explanation as to the reasons the hearing officer did not determine
the information is security sensitive.
(e) A postponement of the defendant inmate’s disciplinary
hearing for the review by the Director, or a designee, is good cause
for the delay of the defendant inmate’s disciplinary hearing.
(f) Once a decision by the Director, or designee, regarding the
classification of the information as security sensitive has been
received by the facility, the defendant inmate’s disciplinary hearing
shall be rescheduled.
(g) When the defendant inmate’s disciplinary hearing resumes, the
facility representative or hearing coordinator shall provide a hearing
officer the Director’s, or a designee’s, decision as to the
classification of the information as security sensitive.
(h) If the Director or a designee determines the information not to
be security sensitive, the hearing officer shall upon the defendant
inmate’s appearance before the hearing officer present that
information to the inmate as enumerated under the procedures of
Regulation .24 of this chapter.
(3) Presentation of Security Sensitive Information at a Hearing.
(a) The hearing officer shall inform a defendant inmate of
the presence of security sensitive information at a hearing. The
hearing officer may:
(i) Not provide detail regarding investigation methods or
techniques used to obtain the security sensitive information, the
specific content of security sensitive information, or from whom the
security sensitive information security sensitive was obtained; and
(ii) May summarize the content of the security sensitive
information that specifically constitutes the rule violation charged as
long as that summary does not compromise security or safety.
(b) The specific content and details of information obtained
through a facility security monitoring system may not be revealed to
a defendant inmate, however, the hearing officer may summarize for
the defendant inmate the security sensitive information that
specifically constitutes the rule violation charged as long as that
summary does not compromise security or safety.
(c) The hearing officer may provide a defendant inmate with
specific content information from a document the defendant inmate
authored.
(d) A hearing officer may not provide a defendant inmate
with information for review that constitutes security operations:
(i) Directive;
(ii) Policy;
(iii) Procedure;
(iv) Photographic record not classified for inmate
examination; or
(v) Other material, file, record, or document not
classified for inmate examination.
(e) A hearing officer may summarize for a defendant inmate
security operations material, file, record, or document not classified
for inmate examination that have been deemed relevant to the
outcome of a hearing as long as that summary does not reveal the
specific content of the security sensitive information under review.
(f) When a hearing officer is presented security sensitive
information obtained from a confidential informant, the hearing
officer shall ensure compliance with the procedures as enumerated
under Regulation .21 of this chapter.
(4) When issuing a written decision that includes security
sensitive information, a hearing officer shall summarize for the
record the security sensitive information relied on in the process of
rendering a decision and ensure that the summary does not reveal the
content of that security sensitive information.
(5) Post Hearing Procedures.
(a) A facility representative or hearing coordinator, at the
conclusion of a defendant inmate’s hearing, shall forward, with the
records of the defendant inmate’s hearing, evidence identified as
security sensitive to the facility warden for the warden’s, or a
designee’s, review of the hearing officer’s decision.
(b) The warden after the review of a defendant inmate’s
disciplinary case shall ensure that security sensitive information
presented at the defendant inmate’s disciplinary hearing is returned
to the facility staff responsible for the storage and preservation of the
information and not be placed in the defendant inmate’s case record
file.
(c) Security sensitive information presented at a defendant
inmate’s hearing shall be preserved by a facility.
.08 Prehearing Procedures — Facility Representative.
A. The facility representative assigned to an inmate rule violation
case as a hearing participant shall:
[A.] (1) Prepare the facility‘s case for presentation at the
hearing that may include, but is not limited to:
(a) Reviewing a facility disciplinary case for evidentiary
sufficiency;
(b) Correcting a technical, procedural, evidentiary, or
formatting error found in a Notice of Inmate Rule Violation and
Disciplinary Hearing form:
(i) The facility representative may consult with a shift
supervisor as to what action is required to correct the Notice of
Inmate Rule Violation and Disciplinary Hearing form or return the
Page 44
PROPOSED ACTION ON REGULATIONS
1526
MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 38, ISSUE 24, FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2011
Notice of Inmate Rule Violation and Disciplinary Hearing form to a
shift supervisor for the purpose of the supervisor taking corrective
action; or
(ii) The facility representative may, without consultation
of a shift supervisor, take that action necessary to correct the Notice
of Inmate Rule Violation and Disciplinary Hearing form;
(c) Correcting or adding a rule violation charge to the
Notice of Inmate Rule Violation and Disciplinary Hearing form;
(d) Determining what questions to ask of a scheduled
witness who may appear and the arguments to make in support of the
facility case;
(e) Determining the need for a witness to be called in
support of the facility’s case; and
(f)Determining the need for evidence to be presented in
support of the facility’s case; and
(2) Ensure, upon the defendant inmate’s appearance before the
hearing officer, that the inmate has a copy of a Notice of Inmate Rule
Violation and Disciplinary Hearing form in which:
(a) A corrective action has occurred; or
(b) A rule violation charge has been corrected or added.
B. [If appropriate,] In addition, a facility representative may:
(1) [make] Make an offer to a defendant inmate of an informal
[disposition] resolution for the inmate’s rule violation charged; [and]
[C.] (2) [If authorized by the warden, or a designee, offer]
Make a plea agreement presentation, negotiated with the defendant
inmate, to the hearing officer [, in accord with the defendant inmate,
a] for a rule violation charged that includes a recommendation as to
the decision [resolution] and [sanctions] sanction for the rule
violation charged[.];
(3) Make the case presentation for the facility to the hearing
officer in support of the defendant inmate’s rule violation charged;
(4) Question a witness permitted to testify; and
(5) Appeal a hearing officer’s decision or sanction to the
warden if it is believed the action was in error.
.09 Prehearing Procedures — Service of Notice of Inmate Rule
Violation and Disciplinary Hearing Form.
A. When a shift supervisor refers a defendant inmate’s Notice of
Inmate Rule Violation and Disciplinary Hearing form for a hearing
or a defendant inmate has declined an offer of informal resolution in
lieu of a hearing, the shift supervisor shall:
(1) Direct staff to schedule the inmate for an appearance
before a hearing officer;
(2) Designate staff to serve the defendant inmate with a copy of
the Notice of Inmate Rule Violation and Disciplinary Hearing form;
(3) Inform the staff to only serve a copy of the Notice of Inmate
Rule Violation and Disciplinary Hearing form on the defendant
inmate; and
(4) Retain possession of an attachment to or other evidence
that may have been submitted by staff with the Notice of Inmate Rule
Violation and Disciplinary Hearing form which may include, but is
not limited to a:
(a) Report;
(b) Record;
(c) Form;
(d) Statement;
(e) Document; and
(f) Photograph.
B. At service of a copy of the Notice of Inmate Rule Violation and
Disciplinary Hearing form, staff may not permit the defendant inmate
an opportunity to review or receive a copy of an attachment or other
evidence that may by mistake have been forwarded with Notice of
Inmate Rule Violation and Disciplinary Hearing form.
C. Staff shall serve the Notice of Inmate Rule Violation and
Disciplinary Hearing form on the defendant inmate within one
business day after the date when the following events have concluded
in the specified order:
(1) The investigation of the reported event has been completed;
(2) The Notice of Inmate Rule Violation and Disciplinary
Hearing form has been completed; and
(3) The review of the Notice of Inmate Rule Violation and
Disciplinary Hearing form by a shift supervisor has been completed.
D. For the purposes of this chapter, the date of the shift
supervisor’s review when the rule violation to be charged is
determined shall be considered the date of the defendant inmate’s
rule violation.
E. Delay of Service.
(1) Good cause shall justify the delay of service by staff on a
defendant inmate.
(2) If a defendant inmate has escaped and subsequently
returned to custody of the Patuxent Institution, staff shall serve a
Notice of Inmate Rule Violation and Disciplinary Hearing form
within three business days of the inmate’s return to the facility.
(3) Unless the warden, or a designee, otherwise directs, staff
may not serve the Notice of Inmate Rule Violation and Disciplinary
Hearing form on a defendant inmate who is housed:
(a) As a patient in a community hospital; or
(b) In a facility medical infirmary.
(4) Staff shall serve a defendant inmate who has been released
from either a community hospital or facility medical infirmary with a
Notice of Inmate Rule Violation and Disciplinary Hearing form
within three business days of the inmate’s return to the inmate
population of the facility.
(5) Service shall be delayed on a defendant inmate who is
assigned to mental health housing and determined to be incompetent
by mental health staff.
(6) Service shall be rendered on a defendant inmate assigned to
mental health housing only when mental health staff have determined
the inmate to be competent.
(7) When good cause exists that delays service of the Notice of
Inmate Rule Violation and Disciplinary Hearing form within the time
requirement of this regulation, staff shall:
(a) Serve the Notice of Inmate Rule Violation and
Disciplinary Hearing form on the defendant inmate as soon as the
cause of delay no longer exists;
(b) Make a record of the cause that delayed service; and
(c) Inform the hearing officer of the cause if the delay is
raised by the defendant inmate at the preliminary review or hearing.
(8) The hearing officer shall determine during a preliminary
review whether there is good cause to justify a service delay of a
Notice of Inmate Rule Violation and Disciplinary Hearing form.
F. Staff serving the Notice of Inmate Rule Violation and
Disciplinary Hearing form, unless prevented by a security or safety
reason or a time constraint, shall:
(1) Inform the defendant inmate that staff are present to serve
the Notice of Inmate Rule Violation and Disciplinary Hearing form
and:
(a) Provide the inmate an opportunity to read the Notice of
Inmate Rule Violation and Disciplinary Hearing form;
(b) Advise the inmate of the opportunity to request
representation or a witness on the Notice of Inmate Rule Violation
and Disciplinary Hearing form;
(c) Advise the inmate of the opportunity to request evidence
on the Notice of Inmate Rule Violation and Disciplinary Hearing
form; and
(d) Provide the inmate an opportunity to sign for receipt of
the Notice of Inmate Rule Violation and Disciplinary Hearing form;
(2) Make a record of a cause that may prevent service of the
Notice of Inmate Rule Violation and Disciplinary Hearing form; and
Page 45
PROPOSED ACTION ON REGULATIONS
1527
MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 38, ISSUE 24, FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2011
(3) Sign and date the record of service in the designated section
provided on the Notice of Inmate Rule Violation and Disciplinary
Hearing form for the name of the serving staff.
G. A defendant inmate when served with a Notice of Inmate Rule
Violation and Disciplinary Hearing form shall:
(1) Notify the serving staff if the defendant inmate is unable to
read or understand the document;
(2) If requesting representation for the hearing, list the
representative by name in the designated section of the Notice of
Inmate Rule Violation and Disciplinary Hearing form provided for
the name of a representative;
(3) If requesting a witness for the hearing, list the witness by
name in the designated section of the Notice of Inmate Rule Violation
and Disciplinary Hearing form provided for the name of a witness;
(4) If requesting evidence for the hearing, list the evidence by
name in the designated section of the Notice of Inmate Rule Violation
and Disciplinary Hearing form provided for the name of the
evidence;
(5) Sign and date for receipt of the inmate’s copy of the Notice
of Inmate Rule Violation and Disciplinary Hearing form in the
designated section provided for the inmate’s signature and date of
receipt; and
(6) Return the facility’s copy of the Notice of Inmate Rule
Violation and Disciplinary Hearing form to the serving staff.
H. Defendant Inmate’s Refusal to Sign or Return the Notice of
Inmate Rule Violation and Disciplinary Hearing form.
(1) A defendant inmate’s refusal to sign at service for receipt of
the inmate’s copy of the Notice of Inmate Rule Violation and
Disciplinary Hearing form shall be considered waiver of the
Patuxent Institution’s obligation enumerated in this regulation to
timely serve the Notice of Inmate Rule Violation and Disciplinary
Hearing form.
(2) The failure of a defendant inmate to return at service the
facility’s copy of the Notice of Inmate Rule Violation and
Disciplinary Hearing form to the serving staff shall be considered
waiver of the service process enumerated in this regulation.
I. With the return of the facility’s copy of the Notice of Inmate
Rule Violation and Disciplinary Hearing form by the defendant
inmate to the serving staff, the serving staff shall then:
(1) Provide the inmate with a copy of the Notice of Inmate Rule
Violation and Disciplinary Hearing form; and
(2) Return the facility’s copy of the Notice of Inmate Rule
Violation and Disciplinary Hearing form to the shift supervisor.
J. The shift supervisor shall, upon receipt of the Notice of Inmate
Rule Violation and Disciplinary Hearing form, review the Notice of
Inmate Rule Violation and Disciplinary Hearing form and:
(1) Ensure that the service process of the Notice of Inmate Rule
Violation and Disciplinary Hearing form has been completed;
(2) Ensure that the content of the Notice of Inmate Rule
Violation and Disciplinary Hearing form has not been altered by the
defendant inmate; and
(3) Forward the Notice of Inmate Rule Violation and
Disciplinary Hearing form to designated staff for data entry and
scheduling the defendant inmate for an appearance before a hearing
officer for a preliminary review of the Notice of Inmate Rule
Violation and Disciplinary Hearing form.
.12 Prehearing and Hearing Procedures — Preliminary and
Evidentiary Phase — Inmate Appearance or Waiver of
Appearance Before a Hearing Officer.
A. A defendant inmate [may elect to] referred by the shift
supervisor for a formal hearing or who declined an offer of an
informal resolution in lieu of a hearing for a rule violation charged
shall appear before a hearing officer for a preliminary review of the
Notice of Inmate Rule Violation and Disciplinary Hearing form.
B. [If a defendant inmate elects to appear before a hearing officer,
the warden, or a designee, responsible for scheduling the hearing for
the defendant inmate shall schedule the hearing to take place within 7
days of the date the initial investigation of the inmate rule violation
and the notice of inmate rule violation and disciplinary hearing report
are completed] A defendant inmate shall appear before the hearing
officer for a preliminary review of the rule violations charged within
7 business days after the date when the following events have
concluded in the specified order:
(1) The investigation of the reported event and misconduct is
completed;
(2) The Notice of Inmate Rule Violation and Disciplinary
Hearing form is completed; and
(3) The Notice of Inmate Rule Violation and Disciplinary
Hearing form is reviewed by a shift supervisor.
C. For the purposes of this chapter, the date of the shift
supervisor’s review when the rule violation to be charged is
determined shall be considered the date of the defendant inmate’s
rule violation.
D. Good cause shall justify the delay of the defendant inmate’s
timely appearance and, in such a case, staff shall:
(1) Schedule the inmate’s appearance as soon as circumstances
permit;
(2) Make a record of the cause that delayed the appearance;
and
(3) Provide the reason for the delay if raised at the inmate’s
hearing.
E. The hearing officer shall determine whether a cited cause
justified a delayed appearance.
[C.] F. A defendant inmate [may voluntarily waive the right to
appear at a hearing and any rights associated with the conduct of a
hearing.] who willfully fails or voluntarily elects not to appear before
a hearing officer for a preliminary review or hearing shall be:
(1) Deemed to have waived an appearance before the hearing
officer and the process provided for the conduct of a preliminary
review and hearing; and
(2) Heard on the rule violation charged in the inmate’s
absence.
[D.] G. For a voluntary waiver under this regulation, the following
apply:
(1) The defendant inmate shall use the waiver of rights and in
in absentia hearing form to communicate to the hearing officer the
defendant inmate‘s waiver of appearance at the preliminary review or
a hearing [to the hearing officer];
(2) Upon receipt of the waiver of rights and in in absentia
hearing form, the hearing officer shall determine if the defendant
inmate has properly waived [the right to appear] an appearance at
the preliminary review or [a] hearing;
(3) — (4) (text unchanged)
(5) After determining the defendant inmate has [properly]
waived [the right to appear] an appearance at the preliminary review
or a hearing, the hearing officer shall:
(a) [Shall conduct] Conduct a hearing on the rule violation
charged [the case in absentia] and consider the evidence presented by
the facility representative without the presence of the defendant
inmate;
(b) [Shall make] Make fact findings and a decision based on
the [facts and] evidence presented; and
(c) [May impose the appropriate] Impose a sanction or
sanctions if finding that a rule violation occurred.
H. A defendant inmate properly notified of the hearing who does
not submit a waiver of appearance form and does not appear at a
scheduled preliminary hearing or a hearing is considered to have
waived the right to appear at the preliminary hearing or hearing.
Page 46
PROPOSED ACTION ON REGULATIONS
1528
MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 38, ISSUE 24, FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2011
[E.] I. [A] The hearing officer may determine that the defendant
inmate waived [the right to appear] an appearance at or participation
in the preliminary review or hearing [at a hearing and other hearing
rights] if the defendant inmate:
(1) (text unchanged)
(2) Willfully delays or [does not] fails to appear [at the
hearing];
(3) (text unchanged)
(4) Violates security procedures for escort to the preliminary
review or hearing location;
(5) [Once in the hearing room, voluntarily leaves the hearing
before a decision of the case] Elects to leave the preliminary review
or hearing prior to conclusion of the proceedings;
(6) Becomes disruptive [in the hearing area];
[(7) Exhibits behavior that is a safety issue for those in the
hearing room;]
[(8)] (7) [Becomes a security or safety threat at the hearing]
Poses a threat to the safety or security of the facility or others; or
[(9)] (8) Is involuntarily removed at the direction of the hearing
officer or under the authority of [the correctional] staff because of
conditions under [§F(6)—(8)] §I(6)—(7) of this regulation.
[F.] J. If the defendant inmate is [on] assigned to mental health
[status] housing and the hearing officer has been advised that the
defendant inmate has waived [rights to a hearing] an appearance, the
hearing officer shall:
(1) (text unchanged)
(2) Postpone the preliminary review or hearing if the
competence of the inmate to make a waiver is in question and require
the facility to conduct and document a mental health prehearing
assessment for [consideration by] the consideration of the hearing
officer when the [hearing] proceeding is reconvened; and
(3) [If, at the time the hearing is reconvened, the record of the
mental health prehearing assessment is provided and the defendant
inmate refuses to appear, determine the competency of the defendant
inmate according to Regulation .18 of this chapter before proceeding
with the hearing without the inmate present at the hearing] Determine
the competence of the defendant inmate in accordance with
Regulation .18 of this chapter and proceed with the preliminary
review or hearing without the presence of the inmate if the:
(a) Record of the mental health pre-hearing assessment is
provided and the inmate is deemed competent; and
(b) Defendant inmate still refuses to appear.
.13 Prehearing Procedures — Preliminary Phase — Dismissing a
Charge of an Inmate Rule Violation.
A. A hearing officer may only dismiss a rule violation charged
under the procedures established in this regulation.
B. Procedural Error. If the defendant inmate raises a time
requirement or procedural violation by staff under this chapter or
Department or Patuxent Institution directive and requests the rule
violation charged be dismissed, a rule violation may only be
dismissed if the hearing officer finds:
(1) A time requirement or procedure established in this chapter
for the hearing process has been denied the inmate;
(2) The denial is not based on good cause; and
(3) The defendant inmate has demonstrated that the denial has
substantially harmed the inmate’s ability to make a case presentation
as to the rule violation charged.
C. Failure to Substantiate a Rule Violation Charge.
(1) The hearing officer on review of a Notice of Inmate Rule
Violation and Disciplinary Hearing form may only dismiss the rule
violation charged if:
(a) The facts as stated in the report section of the Notice of
Inmate Rule Violation and Disciplinary Hearing form considered in
the light most favorable to the facility; and
(b) Reasonable inferences resulting from those facts do not
support a finding that the defendant inmate has committed the rule
violation.
(2) The hearing officer shall inform the hearing participants of
the dismissal of, or denial of a dismissal for, a rule violation charged.
D. Technical Error.
(1) A non-evidentiary defect or error in the Notice of Inmate
Rule Violation and Disciplinary Hearing form may not support a
dismissal of the rule violation charged under this regulation.
(2) Examples of a defect or error may include, but are not
limited to a:
(a) Rule violation number;
(b) Date or time reference;
(c) Defendant inmate’s Department or Patuxent Institution
identification number or name; or
(d) Signature of reporting staff.
(3) The defect or error shall be corrected by the hearing officer
returning the Notice of Inmate Rule Violation and Disciplinary
Hearing form to the facility representative or staff for correction.
(4) After correction, facility staff shall serve the corrected
Notice of Inmate Rule Violation and Disciplinary Hearing form on
the defendant inmate and schedule the inmate for an appearance
before the hearing officer.
(5) The defect or error in a Notice of Inmate Rule Violation and
Disciplinary Hearing form and the required return of the Notice of
Inmate Rule Violation and Disciplinary Hearing form for correction
shall be considered good cause for delay of the service of the Notice
of Inmate Rule Violation and Disciplinary Hearing form and
appearance of the defendant inmate before the hearing officer.
E. Absence of the Shift Supervisor’s Review.
(1) The absence of a shift supervisor’s review on the Notice of
Inmate Rule Violation and Disciplinary Hearing form may not
support a dismissal of the rule violation charged under this
regulation.
(2) In the absence of a shift supervisor’s review, the hearing
officer shall return the Notice of Inmate Rule Violation and
Disciplinary Hearing form to the facility representative or staff in
accordance with the procedures of Regulation .17 of this chapter.
(3) The return of a Notice of Inmate Rule Violation and
Disciplinary Hearing form to facility staff for a review by a shift
supervisor shall be considered good cause for delay of the service of
the Notice of Inmate Rule Violation and Disciplinary Hearing form
and appearance of the defendant inmate before the hearing officer.
F. Failure to Serve the Defendant Inmate the Notice of Inmate
Rule Violation and Disciplinary Hearing form.
(1) If raised by the defendant inmate during a preliminary
review, the hearing officer shall determine if the facility staff have
complied with service process.
(2) The hearing officer may rely on the defendant inmate’s
presentation regarding the claim of not being served, the written
record of service if stated on the Notice of Inmate Rule Violation and
Disciplinary Hearing form, or a rebuttal presentation by the facility
representative in determining whether there was compliance by
facility staff with the service process.
(3) The failure of the defendant inmate to be served a copy of
the Notice of Inmate Rule Violation and Disciplinary Hearing form
prior to the inmate’s appearance before the hearing officer may not
support a dismissal under the procedures of this regulation.
(a) If the hearing officer determines a Notice of Inmate Rule
Violation and Disciplinary Hearing form was not served on the
defendant inmate, the hearing officer may refer the matter to facility
staff in accordance with the procedures under Regulation .17 of this
chapter; or
(b) If the defendant inmate waives service in writing, the
hearing officer shall proceed with the preliminary review.
Page 47
PROPOSED ACTION ON REGULATIONS
1529
MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 38, ISSUE 24, FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2011
(4) The failure of staff to serve a copy of the Notice of Inmate
Rule Violation and Disciplinary Hearing form on a defendant inmate
shall be considered good cause for delay of the service of the Notice
of Inmate Rule Violation and Disciplinary Hearing form and
appearance of the defendant inmate before the hearing officer.
.15 Prehearing and Hearing Procedures — Preliminary and
Evidentiary Phase — Written Record and Audio
Recording [Requirement].
A. [Written Record.] The hearing officer shall produce a written
record [of] that summarizes a hearing for each case [before] heard by
the hearing officer.
B. Audio Recording.
(1) Except [for the provisions under] as provided in §B(3) of
this regulation, the hearing officer shall:
(a) (text unchanged)
(b) Document each case [recorded on the disciplinary
proceedings tape log] on the audio recording of a hearing that
includes the:
(i) Defendant inmate’s name and commitment number;
(ii) Date and time of hearing;
(iii) Name of the facility; and
(iv) Name of the hearing officer of record.
(2) The absence of audio recording equipment [does not] shall
preclude conducting a hearing.
(3) Under the conditions specified in §B(2) of this regulation,
the hearing officer shall:
(a) (text unchanged)
[(b) Offer the defendant inmate the option of:
(i) Continuing without the audio recording;
(ii) Postponing the proceeding until it can be audio
recorded; and
(c) If the defendant inmate:
(i) Elects to proceed without the audio recording, request
that the defendant inmate sign a waiver and include the signed waiver
in the written record of the hearing; or
(ii) Refuses to waive the audio recording or refuses to
sign a waiver, postpone the hearing until it can be audio recorded and
document the postponement.]
(b) Postpone the case; and
(c) Advise the facility staff to reschedule the defendant
inmate’s appearance before a hearing officer when circumstances
permit.
(4) The postponement of a facility disciplinary case due to an
inability to audio record a preliminary review or hearing:
(a) May not support the dismissal of the facility disciplinary
case; and
(b) Shall be considered good cause for the delay of the
defendant inmate’s appearance before the hearing officer or a
hearing.
.16 Prehearing and Hearing Procedures — Preliminary and
Evidentiary Phase — Informal Disposition or Reduction to
Incident Report.
A. The hearing officer may only offer the defendant inmate an
informal disposition for a Category IV rule violation or Category V
rule violation charge in accordance with the procedures under
Regulation .06 of this chapter.
B. The hearing officer may only offer the defendant inmate a
reduction to incident report for a Category IV rule violation or
Category V rule violation charge in accordance with the procedures
under Regulation .06 of this chapter.
.17 Hearing Procedures — Preliminary Phase — Objection to
Notice of Inmate Rule Violation and Disciplinary Hearing
[Report] Form.
A. [The hearing officer shall review the notice of inmate rule
violation and disciplinary hearing report with the hearing
participants.] Only during the preliminary review of the Notice of
Inmate Rule Violation and Disciplinary Hearing form, may a hearing
officer consider an objection by a hearing participant to the Notice of
Inmate Rule Violation and Disciplinary Hearing form.
B. The hearing officer may only consider an objection that is
raised in accordance with the procedures of this regulation.
C. The hearing officer may permit a hearing participant an
opportunity to comment on the merits of the objection.
D. The hearing officer, when weighing the merits of the objection,
may:
(1) Consider a citation by a participant from a procedure of a
regulation under this chapter or Department or Division of
Correction directive; and
(2) Not consider a reference to a legal authority or other
authority when reaching a decision regarding the merits of the
objection.
E. The hearing officer shall be the arbiter in determining the
merits of the objection.
[B] F. [Objections] An objection with respect to the [notice of
inmate rule violation and disciplinary hearing report are] Notice of
Inmate Rule Violation and Disciplinary Hearing form shall be limited
to [claims that:] the procedures under Regulation .13 §§D(1)—(4)
and F(1)—(4) of this chapter.
[(1) The notice of inmate rule violation and disciplinary hearing
report form was not served;
(2) There is an error in the format or completion of the notice
of inmate rule violation and disciplinary hearing report form that is
not deemed a minor defect under Regulation .13 C(2) of this chapter;
or
(3) The alleged inmate rule violation charged is incorrect.
C. If an issue under §B of this regulation is raised and not
resolved, the hearing officer shall:
(1) Postpone the case;
(2) Refer the matter to the appropriate facility or staff member
for resolution; and
(3) Notify the facility to reschedule the hearing upon resolution
of the identified issues.]
.18 Prehearing and Hearing Procedures — Preliminary and
Evidentiary Phase — Special Needs Inmate.
A. A special needs inmate is an inmate with a condition that may
be due to:
(1) Mental health;
(2) A hearing or speech impairment;
(3) English language proficiency; or
(4) Illiteracy.
B. Mental Health Condition.
(1) If the defendant inmate’s behavior indicates that the inmate
may not be competent to participate in a preliminary review or
hearing, the defendant inmate shall be referred by the hearing officer
or facility representative or staff to mental health staff to assess the
inmate’s mental health status.
(2) The mental health staff shall:
(a) Conduct an assessment to determine the defendant
inmate’s ability to participate in the proceedings;
(b) Document the assessment; and
(c) Forward the assessment to the hearing officer.
Page 48
PROPOSED ACTION ON REGULATIONS
1530
MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 38, ISSUE 24, FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2011
(3) If the mental health prehearing assessment indicates that
the defendant inmate is not competent to participate in the
proceedings, the hearing officer:
(a) Shall postpone the proceedings;
(b) May consult with the mental health staff without hearing
participants present; and
(c) Shall direct the facility representative or staff to
reschedule the proceedings after notification that the mental health
staff has determined the defendant inmate to be competent to
participate.
(4) If the mental health prehearing assessment indicates that
the defendant inmate is competent to participate in the proceeding,
the hearing officer may:
(a) Proceed with the preliminary review or hearing; or
(b) Postpone the proceedings if:
(i) The hearing officer determines that, with due
consideration of the assessment, the inmate’s behavior at the
proceedings indicates that the inmate is not competent to participate
in the proceedings in which case the hearing officer shall state on the
record the specific basis for that determination; or
(ii) The defendant inmate requires additional time to
prepare for the proceedings.
(5) If the defendant inmate is determined to be competent to
participate in a preliminary review or hearing, the hearing officer
shall proceed with the preliminary review or hearing.
(6) If the hearing officer, at a hearing, finds the inmate guilty of
the rule violation charged, the hearing officer may consider the
inmate’s competency at the time of the rule violation as a mitigating
circumstance when determining the sanction.
C. Hearing or Speech Condition.
(1) If a defendant inmate, claiming to have or is identified as
having a hearing or speech condition affecting the inmate’s ability to
participate in the proceedings, appears before the hearing officer
without a sign language interpreter, the hearing officer shall
postpone the proceedings.
(2) If it cannot be verified at the proceedings that the inmate
has a hearing or speech condition affecting the inmate’s ability to
participate in the proceedings, the hearing officer shall direct the
facility representative or staff to consult with medical staff to
determine if the inmate has such a hearing or speech condition.
(3) When the hearing officer determines that the inmate has a
hearing and or speech condition described under §C(2) of this
regulation, the hearing officer shall instruct the facility
representative or staff to arrange for a sign language interpreter.
(a) If the State has a contract with a vendor to provide sign
language interpreter services, only an interpreter provided through
that vendor may assist the inmate at the proceedings.
(b) In the absence of a contract as specified in §C(3)(a) of
this regulation or if a sign language interpreter is not available
through the vendor, staff authorized by the Commissioner, or a
designee, may act as the sign language interpreter.
(c) An inmate may not act as the interpreter.
(4) After making arrangements for a sign language interpreter,
the facility representative or staff shall reschedule the inmate’s
appearance before the hearing officer.
D. Language.
(1) If a defendant inmate, who requests or is identified by staff
as needing a language interpreter, appears before the hearing officer
without an interpreter, the hearing officer shall postpone the
proceedings.
(2) If it cannot be verified at the proceedings that because of an
inability or limited ability to communicate in English the inmate
needs a language interpreter to participate in the proceedings, the
hearing officer shall direct the facility representative or staff to
consult with the facility case management program to assist in
determining the inmate’s English language limitations.
(3) When the hearing officer determines that a language
interpreter is needed, the hearing officer shall instruct the facility
representative or staff to arrange for an interpreter and postpone the
proceeding.
(a) If the facility has staff who are proficient in the language
of the defendant inmate, the warden, or a designee, may assign that
staff to act in the capacity of the defendant inmate’s language
interpreter at the hearing.
(b) In the absence of staff who may act as an interpreter, the
facility shall contact the vendor contracted by the State to provide an
interpreter.
(c) An inmate may not act as the interpreter.
(4) After arranging for a language interpreter, facility staff
shall reschedule the inmate’s appearance before the hearing officer.
E. Illiteracy.
(1) If a defendant inmate, who claims to be or is identified as
being illiterate, appears before the hearing officer without
representation, the hearing officer shall postpone the proceedings.
(2) If the facility representative or staff cannot verify at the
proceedings that the inmate is illiterate, the hearing officer shall
direct the facility representative or staff to consult with the facility’s
education program staff to determine if the inmate has an inability to
read or write that would affect the inmate’s ability to participate in
the proceedings.
(3) If the hearing officer determines that the inmate has an
inability or limited ability to read or write that would affect the
inmate’s ability to participate in the proceedings, the hearing officer
shall direct the facility representative or staff to arrange
representation for the inmate in accordance with the Regulation .19
of this chapter.
(4) After making arrangements for representation, facility staff
shall reschedule the inmate’s appearance before the hearing officer.
F. The hearing officer may grant a special needs defendant inmate
additional time or greater procedural latitude to:
(1) Prepare a case presentation before a hearing;
(2) Request representation or a witness; or
(3) Address other specific issues affected by the special needs
of the inmate.
G. The delay or denial of a time requirement or procedure in
accordance with this chapter due to the special needs of the
defendant inmate shall be deemed good cause for that delay or denial
and may not support a dismissal of a rule violation charged.
.19 Prehearing and Hearing Procedures — Preliminary and
Evidentiary Phase — Representation Request.
A. A defendant inmate may request representation to assist the
inmate during the preliminary review and case presentation phase of
the inmate’s hearing.
B. A defendant inmate’s representation request shall be:
(1) Made timely by the defendant inmate; and
(2) In accordance with the procedures of this chapter.
C. A warden, or a designee, may designate a facility staff member
under Regulation .08 of this chapter to act as a facility representative
at the facility’s defendant inmate preliminary reviews and hearings.
D. Inmate Representation Request.
(1) When served with the Notice of Inmate Rule Violation and
Disciplinary Hearing form and requesting representation for a
preliminary review or hearing, the defendant inmate shall list the
name of the inmate’s requested representative in the section
designated on the Notice of Inmate Rule Violation and Disciplinary
Hearing form for the name of a representative.
(2) The defendant inmate’s failure to list by name a requested
representative on the Notice of Inmate Rule Violation and
Page 49
PROPOSED ACTION ON REGULATIONS
1531
MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 38, ISSUE 24, FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2011
Disciplinary Hearing form under §D(1) of this regulation, shall be
considered a waiver by the defendant inmate of representation.
E. Upon the appearance of the defendant inmate at a preliminary
review or hearing proceeding, the hearing officer shall review the
defendant inmate’s Notice of Inmate Rule Violation and Disciplinary
Hearing form to determine if the:
(1) Inmate has requested representation; and
(2) Request is in accordance with the procedures of this
chapter.
F. Inmate representation is voluntary on the part of the requested
individual and a request does not obligate that individual to appear
at a proceeding.
G. If a requested individual declines to act as a defendant
inmate’s representative, a hearing officer may not compel that
individual to appear or act in the capacity as the inmate’s
representative.
H. A hearing officer shall only permit an individual to appear as a
representative for a defendant inmate who is either:
(1) An inmate assigned to the general population of the facility
where the proceeding is to be held; or
(2) A staff member employed at the facility where the
proceeding is to be held.
I. A hearing officer may not permit an individual to appear as a
representative for a defendant inmate who is:
(1) The facility warden, assistant warden, chief of security, or
shift commander or supervisor;
(2) Banned as a representative by the Director, or a designee,
or warden, or a designee;
(3) Identified by security staff as a security or safety risk;
(4) Serving a sentence of death;
(5) Assigned to disciplinary or administrative segregation, cell
restriction, protective custody, or mental health housing; or
(6) In a location where staff escort or vehicular transportation
to the proceeding is required.
J. A hearing officer shall, unless prohibited by a reason of security
or safety, inform the hearing participants of the reason when denying
a requested representative.
K. If a defendant inmate has failed to request representation on
the Notice of Inmate Rule Violation and Disciplinary Hearing form
and subsequently at an appearance before a hearing officer requests
representation, the hearing officer may elect to waive §D(2) of this
regulation and permit the representation request only if:
(1) The requested individual qualifies under §F and §G of this
regulation;
(2) The requested individual is present at the location of the
proceeding;
(3) A postponement for case presentation preparation is not
required; and
(4) The defendant inmate is prepared to participate in the
proceeding.
L. If a defendant inmate has requested representation in
accordance with the procedures of this regulation, but the requested
individual declines to accept the request and the inmate then requests
the opportunity to obtain other representation, a hearing officer may:
(1) Permit the inmate a one calendar day postponement to
obtain other representation;
(2) Not grant the inmate a subsequent postponement after an
initial postponement if representation could not be obtained; or
(3) Deny a postponement to obtain other representation and
proceed with the proceeding.
M. A requested individual who appears as a defendant inmate’s
representative is obligated to remain as a participant in the
preliminary review and hearing until the conclusion of the
proceeding.
N. If the defendant inmate’s representative, in the course of the
proceeding, voluntarily refuses to continue as a representative in or
is removed from the proceeding for a reason of conduct, security, or
safety, the hearing officer shall:
(1) Determine the defendant inmate has waived representation;
and
(2) Continue the proceeding without postponement to obtain
other representation.
.20 [Hearing] Prehearing Procedures — Preliminary Phase —
Defendant Inmate Requests for Witnesses.
A. — C. (text unchanged)
.21 [Hearing] Prehearing Procedures — Preliminary Phase —
Confidential Informants.
A. — B. (text unchanged)
.22 [Hearing] Prehearing Procedures — Preliminary Phase —
Motions.
A. [Hearing participants may present challenges through a motion
alleging violation of the defendant inmate‘s rights or procedural
aspects of the hearing process.] A hearing participant may only
present a procedural challenge by means of a motion to the hearing
officer during a preliminary review of a defendant inmate’s Notice of
Inmate Rule Violation and Disciplinary Hearing form that is in
accordance with the procedures established under this regulation.
B. A motion may only allege:
(1)The violation of a pertinent time requirement or procedure
of a regulation of this chapter;
(2) The violation of a pertinent time requirement or procedure
of a Department or Division of Correction directive; or
(3) Insufficient evidence to substantiate a rule violation
charged.
[B.] C. The hearing officer [shall]:
(1) [Consider] Shall consider the [objection] motion;
(2) Shall permit the hearing participants an opportunity to
comment on the merits of the motion;
(3) When considering the merits of the motion, may:
(a) Consider a citation of a procedure under this chapter or
Department or Division of Correction directive; and
(b) Not consider a reference to a legal authority or other
authority when reaching a decision regarding the merits of a motion;
[(2)] (4) [Determine the relevance of the objection] Shall
determine the merits of the motion; and
[(3)] (5) (text unchanged)
.23 [Hearing] Prehearing Procedures—Preliminary Phase —
Postponement.
A. — F. (text unchanged)
G. A hearing officer may, with good cause and without the request
of a hearing participant, postpone a case.
.24 [Hearing] Prehearing Procedures—Preliminary Phase —
Review of Attachments.
[A. When a defendant inmate is served with a notice of inmate
rule violation and disciplinary hearing report the inmate is not
entitled to review attachments at the time of service.]
[B.] A. [At the time] When a defendant inmate appears before a
hearing officer for the preliminary review of the inmate’s Notice of
Inmate Rule Violation and Disciplinary Hearing form, [the] a hearing
officer, when security and safety permit, may provide [the] a
defendant inmate an opportunity to review [attachments] an
attachment and other evidence that may be submitted by the facility
[to] with the [notice of inmate rule violation and disciplinary hearing
report before hearing arguments concerning evidence or testimony on
the case] Notice of Inmate Rule Violation and Disciplinary Hearing
form.
Page 50
PROPOSED ACTION ON REGULATIONS
1532
MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 38, ISSUE 24, FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2011
B. An attachment may include, but is not limited to:
(1) Report;
(2)Document;
(3) Record;
(4) Form;
(5) Statement; and
(6) Photograph.
C. [After] If the defendant inmate is permitted to review
[attachments] an attachment to the [notice of inmate rule violation
and disciplinary hearing report] Notice of Inmate Rule Violation and
Disciplinary Hearing form:
(1) If raised, the hearing officer may permit the hearing
participants an opportunity to comment on the merits of the
attachment or other evidence submitted by the staff;
[(1)] (2) If the defendant inmate is prepared to [begin the
hearing] proceed, the hearing officer shall [conduct the disciplinary
hearing] continue with the proceedings; or
[(2)] (3) If the defendant inmate is not prepared to [begin the
hearing] continue with the proceedings because of issues with [the
attachments] an attachment or other evidence submitted by the
facility staff, the inmate may request [the hearing officer to postpone
the hearing] a postponement of the proceedings to permit the
defendant inmate [to] an opportunity to further prepare a case
presentation for the hearing [based on the review of the attachments].
[D.] (a) If the defendant inmate makes a request under
§[C(2)] C(3) of this regulation, the hearing officer may postpone the
[hearing] proceedings [and the warden, or a designee, of the
correctional facility responsible for scheduling disciplinary hearings
shall reschedule the case to take place as soon as possible after the
original date].
(b) When the proceedings are postponed to permit the
defendant inmate additional time to prepare, facility staff shall
reschedule the inmate’s appearance for a hearing date when the
circumstances permit.
(c) If the defendant inmate does not request a postponement,
the hearing officer shall continue with the proceedings unless
postponed by the hearing officer under Regulation .23G of this
chapter.
.25 [Hearing] Prehearing Procedures — Preliminary Phase —
Defendant Inmate Plea.
A. — D. (text unchanged)
.26 Prehearing and Hearing Procedures — Preliminary and
Evidentiary Phase: Rules of Evidence Presentation.
A. A defendant inmate or facility representative may request
evidence to present as part of a case presentation at a hearing.
B. A hearing officer shall deny a request for evidence or a witness
otherwise qualified if security staff have reason to believe the
evidence or witness poses a risk to facility security or safety.
C. A defendant inmate evidence request shall be:
(1) Made in a timely fashion by the defendant inmate; and
(2) In accordance with the procedures of this regulation.
D. Evidence Request.
(1) When served with a Notice of Inmate Rule Violation and
Disciplinary Hearing form and if requesting evidence for a pending
hearing, a defendant inmate shall list by name the requested evidence
on the Notice of Inmate Rule Violation and Disciplinary Hearing
form in the section of the Inmate Rule Violation and Disciplinary
Hearing form designated for listing the evidence requested.
(2) The defendant inmate’s failure to list the name of the
requested evidence on the Notice of Inmate Rule Violation and
Disciplinary Hearing form as enumerated in §D(1) of this regulation,
shall be considered a waiver of that evidence by the defendant
inmate.
E. Upon the appearance of a defendant inmate at a proceeding, a
hearing officer shall review the inmate’s Notice of Inmate Rule
Violation and Disciplinary Hearing form to determine if a request for
evidence has been made by the inmate and if that request is in
compliance with the procedures of this regulation.
F. A hearing officer shall determine the relevancy and material
value of the evidence requested and if there is a security or safety risk
posed by permitting the evidence requested.
G. A hearing officer may allow the introduction of evidence at the
hearing by a participant when security and safety permit and the
request is in accordance with the procedures of this regulation.
(1) A hearing officer may not compel the production of
evidence requested by a hearing participant.
(2) A hearing officer shall deny an evidentiary request deemed:
(a) Irrelevant;
(b) Immaterial;
(c) Cumulative; or
(d) A threat to safety or security.
(3) A hearing officer shall for a security and safety reason deny
a request for evidence that includes, but is not limited to security:
(a) Documents;
(b) Records;
(c) Post orders;
(d) Emergency plans;
(e) Photographs;
(f) Video monitoring records;
(g) Equipment;
(h) Directives not authorized for review by an inmate;
(i) Testing equipment and supplies; or
(j) Confidential statements.
(4) A hearing officer shall, for a reason of security and safety,
deny an evidence request for contraband that includes, but is not
limited to:
(a) Tools;
(b) Drugs, medication, or alcohol;
(c) Weapons;
(d) Controlled dangerous substance;
(d) Cellular telephones;
(e) Tobacco, or currency; or
(f) Escape or drug paraphernalia.
(5) When a hearing officer determines the examination of
security or contraband evidence is necessary, the hearing officer
shall, in the presence of staff deemed necessary for security, conduct
the examination without the presence of an inmate.
(6) When the hearing officer determines that the review of a
video record is necessary, the hearing officer shall, in the presence of
staff deemed necessary for security and the operation of the video
equipment needed for the review, conduct the review without the
presence of an inmate.
H. Testimony.
(1) A hearing participant may present witness testimony as an
evidentiary presentation.
(2) A hearing participant is responsible, and not a hearing
officer, to call a requested witness for the participant’s case
presentation.
(3) A hearing officer may call a witness to provide testimony or
be questioned concerning:
(a) Evidence presented;
(b) A fact in evidence; and
(c) A policy, procedure, or practice.
(4) A witness may not be compelled by a hearing officer to
answer a question regarding testimony given.
(5) Only a defendant inmate representative, facility
representative, or a hearing officer may question a witness giving
testimony.
Page 51
PROPOSED ACTION ON REGULATIONS
1533
MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 38, ISSUE 24, FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2011
(6) In the absence of a representative, a defendant inmate may
question a witness giving testimony.
(7) A hearing officer may limit the testimony and questioning of
a witness consistent with:
(a) The procedures in accordance with Regulation .20 of
this chapter; or
(b) Security and safety.
(8) If a witness, requested by a hearing participant, refuses to
appear or testify, a hearing officer may not dismiss a rule violation
charged for the failure of the witness to appear or testify.
I. When denying an evidentiary request, a hearing officer shall
provide to the hearing participants an explanation for the denial, if
security and safety permit.
J. A hearing officer may consider the defendant inmate’s
disciplinary conviction history or the lack thereof for each rule
violation charged.
K. A hearing officer may not render a decision as to a rule
violation charged based solely on a defendant inmate’s disciplinary
conviction history or the lack thereof for a rule violation charged.
L. Except for the Notice of Inmate Rule Violation and Disciplinary
Hearing form, facility staff may not be required to provide, prior to a
defendant inmate’s appearance, the inmate with notification of the
facility evidence to be presented as part of the facility case
presentation at the hearing.
.27 Hearing Procedures — Evidentiary Phase — Case
Presentation.
A. [The] At the conclusion of the preliminary review, a hearing
officer shall determine if a defendant inmate and facility
representative are prepared to proceed with a hearing and if
prepared, the hearing officer shall [read] ensure that the rule
violation report found in the [notice of inmate rule violation and
disciplinary hearing report] Notice of Inmate Rule Violation and
Disciplinary Hearing form, and attachments along with other related
documents or evidence submitted by the facility staff are read into or
described for the hearing record.
B. A hearing participant may make a case presentation to a
hearing officer that may include, but is not limited to:
(1) An argument on the merits of the case;
(2) Evidence in accordance with the procedures of Regulation
.26 of this chapter; and
(3) Challenges to and arguments regarding an evidentiary
presentation.
[B.] C. Facility Representative.
(1) A facility representative may present:
(a) Additional documents [relevant to the issues before] to
the hearing officer that do not present a security risk;
(b) (text unchanged)
(c) [Testimonial evidence from witnesses approved]
Testimony from a witness permitted by the hearing officer.
(2) — (3) (text unchanged)
[C.] D. Defendant Inmate Presentation.
(1) — (3) (text unchanged)
(4) The hearing officer may draw an adverse inference if the
defendant inmate:
(a) [does] Does not present a defense; or[,]
(b) [after testifying, declines] Declines to respond to
questioning by the hearing officer or the facility representative after
testifying.
(5) If the defendant inmate is represented, only the inmate‘s
representative may:
(a) [present] Present the defendant inmate‘s case[,];
(b) [examine] Examine evidence[,]; or
(c) [question] Question a witness.
(6) If the defendant inmate is not represented, the defendant
inmate may:
(a) [present] Present the defendant inmate’s case[,];
(b) [examine] Examine evidence[, and]; or
(c) [question] Question a witness.
(7) The defendant [inmate‘s use of a witness is limited to the
witnesses] inmate may call a requested witness only if:
(a) The [requested] request was made in accordance with
the procedures of Regulation .20 of this chapter [on the notice of
inmate rule violation and disciplinary hearing report]; and
(b) [approved by the] The hearing officer permits the
request.
(8) The defendant inmate may present evidence requested on
the Notice of Inmate Rule Violation and Disciplinary Hearing form
and permitted by the hearing officer.
[(8)] (9) The presentation by, or on behalf of, the defendant
inmate is subject to the provisions established for the facility‘s
presentation under [§B] §C of this regulation.
E. The hearing officer may use a conference call for the purpose
of taking testimony by a witness.
(1) When there is a concern for security or safety, testimony
shall be taken by conference call.
(2) The testimony of a witness requiring vehicular transport or
staff escort to the hearing location may be taken by conference call.
(3) For reasons of security and safety, a witness not identified
as staff or an inmate shall testify by use of a conference call.
(4) The hearing officer shall advise an individual giving
testimony by conference call that the testimony is being audio
recorded.
[D.] F. Rebuttal and Closing Arguments.
(1) The hearing officer shall provide the facility representative
an opportunity to [offer evidence to] rebut the evidence presented by,
or on behalf of, the defendant inmate.
(2) The hearing officer [shall] may provide the facility
representative and the defendant inmate‘s representative or, if not
represented, the defendant inmate, an opportunity for a closing
presentation.
G. The hearing officer shall advise the hearing participants when
deciding to close the evidentiary record.
H. Before closing the evidentiary record, the hearing officer may
inquire if the hearing participants have any other matter to be
considered and if raised by a hearing participant provide the hearing
participants an opportunity to present an evidentiary matter not
previously presented or considered.
.30 Post Hearing Procedures — Case Record.
A. Upon concluding a hearing, the hearing officer shall issue a
written decision that includes:
(1) A statement of the credible evidence relied on;
[(1)] (2) (text unchanged)
[(2)] (3) The verdict for each [charge of an inmate] rule
violation charged; and
[(3)] (4) The [sanctions, if applicable] sanction for each rule
violation with a guilty decision.
B. [The hearing officer shall ensure that the staff at the defendant
inmate‘s facility is notified to serve the defendant inmate with a copy
of the hearing officer‘s written decision within 3 workdays of the
completion of the hearing] Facility staff shall serve the defendant
inmate with a copy of the hearing officer’s written decision within
three business days following the date of a hearing officer’s decision.
Page 52
PROPOSED ACTION ON REGULATIONS
1534
MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 38, ISSUE 24, FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2011
C. If [the] a facility representative presents the facility‘s case, the
facility representative shall follow [procedures] the process
established by the warden, or a designee, of the defendant inmate‘s
facility for distribution of the hearing disposition that [include]
includes:
(1) — (2) (text unchanged)
D. [Written Records] Inmate Case Record.
(1) [Except for a case resulting in a not guilty decision, records
related to a hearing, dismissal, and informal disposition shall be
placed in the defendant inmate‘s base file] An inmate’s case record
shall include the following information, if applicable, for a defendant
inmate’s disciplinary case:
(a) A guilty decision;
(b) A not guilty decision;
(c) A dismissal of the rule violation charged; and
(d) An informal resolution.
(2) The defendant inmate‘s [base file] case record shall
[contain a record of] include the date and disposition of the hearing.
(3) [Records] A case record related to inmate discipline may be
reviewed by:
(a) (text unchanged)
(b) [Authorized individuals] An individual authorized by
statute; and
(c) (text unchanged)
E. Audio Recordings.
(1) The primary purpose for an audio recording of a hearing is
for the use of the Department or Patuxent Institution in the conduct of
the Agency’s business and may not be considered a right, interest,
benefit or entitlement for a defendant inmate.
[(1)] (2) The [hearing officer] inmate hearings program shall
ensure that:
(a) [A] The recording of a hearing is maintained [in a secure
location for 5 years from the date of the final decision of the case]
according to the records retention schedule; and
(b) Access to [the hearing] an audio recording [storage
locker] is restricted.
[(2)] (3) [Copies] A copy of [a hearing] an audio recording may
be requested as provided under COMAR 12.11.02.
[(3)] (4) [Copies] A copy of [a hearing] an audio recording may
not be denied [and] or a fee [may not be] charged to a representative
of:
(a) — (f) (text unchanged)
.31 Post Hearing Procedures — Warden’s Review.
A. Review by the Warden.
(1) The warden, or a designee, shall review a guilty, not guilty,
and dismissal hearing decision and may review an informal
disposition or incident report reduction hearing decision.
(2) The warden, or a designee, shall:
(a) Document the review; and
(b) Sign the document of review as the reviewing authority.
(3) Except as provided under §A(4) of this regulation, the
warden, or a designee:
(a) May not review a hearing decision until the lapse of 15
calendar days from the date the inmate received a hearing officer’s
decision;
(b) May initiate an immediate review if receiving an appeal
by a defendant inmate of a hearing officer’s decision or sanction
impose; or
(c) May initiate an immediate review of a sanction imposed,
regardless of the time or procedural requirement of this regulation, if
the intent is to modify by reduction that sanction.
(4) A warden, or a designee, may conduct an immediate review
when a hearing disposition results in:
(a) Dismissal of the rule violations charged;
(b) Reduction to an incident report;
(c) An informal disposition; or
(d) A not guilty decision.
(5) A warden, or a designee, shall complete the review of a
disciplinary case by the 30th calendar day following the date the
defendant inmate received the hearing officer’s decision.
(6) A warden, or a designee, may remand a hearing officer’s
decision to the hearing officer for clarification by the hearing officer,
in writing, regarding:
(a) Hearing procedures;
(b) Evidence considered;
(c) Findings of fact;
(d) Hearing decision; and
(e) Sanctions imposed or not imposed.
(7) The time requirement and procedures for the warden’s
review enumerated in this regulation shall be suspended pending the
review by the hearing officer of a warden’s remand of a decision for
clarification and not to resume until the warden receives the hearing
officer’s written response.
(8) A warden, or a designee, may appeal a hearing officer’s
decision to the Director, or a designee, with a recommendation that
the decision be reversed and the disciplinary case remanded for a
new hearing.
(a) The time period and procedures for the warden’s review
enumerated in this regulation shall be suspended pending the review
of a warden’s, or a designee’s, remand request appeal by the
Director, or a designee; and
(b) Resume on the date the Director’s, or a designee’s,
written decision is received by the warden, or a designee.
B. Actions.
(1) When reviewing a hearing officer’s decision, the warden, or
a designee:
(a) May not weigh the merits of the evidence in the record to
reconsider the hearing officer’s findings of fact;
(b) May not substitute judgment for that of the hearing
officer as to findings of fact for the case under review;
(c) Shall review the evidence in the record and determine
whether a reasonable-minded individual could have reached the
decision rendered by the hearing officer in the hearing; and
(d) Shall consider an alleged procedural violation identified
in an appeal by a defendant inmate, facility representative, or staff
member and determine whether the hearing was in compliance with
the procedural requirements of this chapter.
(2) A warden, or a designee, conducting a review under this
regulation, and without explanation, may:
(a) Reduce a sentencing matrix, alternative, credit
revocation, or informal disposition sanction period regardless of a
sanction period procedurally imposed in accordance with a
regulation of this chapter;
(b) Impose an additional informal or alternative sanction
regardless of sanctions and periods imposed by the hearing officer;
(c) Affirm the hearing officer’s decision and or sanction
imposed;
(d) Vacate the decision and sanction imposed and reduce a
rule violation charged to an incident report;
(e) Affirm a decision, but modify the sanction imposed by:
(i) Reducing a sanction period to less than a period
specified by a hearing officer or adjustment history sentencing matrix
procedure under a regulation of this chapter;
(ii) Increasing a sentencing matrix sanction incorrectly
imposed or impose an additional alternative sanction; or
(iii) Vacating or modifying an informal disposition; or
(f) Recommend to the Director, or a designee, the remand of
the case if a hearing officer’s decision:
(i) Is arbitrary or capricious;
Page 53
PROPOSED ACTION ON REGULATIONS
1535
MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 38, ISSUE 24, FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2011
(ii) Is based on clearly erroneous findings of fact;
(iii) Is based on an erroneous interpretation of a policy,
time requirement, or procedure;
(iv) Relies on evidence presented through fraud or
misrepresentation; or
(v) Was made without evidence that should have been
considered at the hearing by the hearing officer, but was not or had
not been considered or presented during the course of the hearing.
C. Notification of the Defendant Inmate.
(1) Staff shall serve the completed warden’s or designee’s
review documentation on the defendant inmate by the 30th calendar
day following the date on which the hearing officer’s decision was
served on the defendant inmate.
(2) If the review form is not received by the defendant inmate
on the 30th calendar day, the:
(a) Review process is complete; and
(b) Hearing officer’s decision and sanction affirmed.
.32 Post Hearing Procedures — Rehearing a Case.
A. Only the Director, or a designee, may remand a defendant
inmate disciplinary case for a new hearing.
B. The warden, or a designee, may without regard for a time
requirement or procedure of a regulation of this chapter appeal to
the Director, or a designee, a hearing officer’s decision, that may
include a decision previously reviewed and affirmed by a warden.
C. A warden, or a designee, may refer a hearing officer’s decision
to the Director, or a designee, with a recommendation for a remand
if there is cause to question the decision, regardless of a time
requirement or procedure of this chapter.
(1) The recommendation shall include the cause for the remand
that is in accordance with Regulation .31B(2)(f) of this chapter.
(2) When forwarded to the Director, or a designee, the appeal
shall include copies of the hearing documents and related records for
the case under appeal.
D. If the Director, or a designee, does not approve the warden’s
recommendation to remand the case for a new hearing:
(1) The Director, or a designee, shall notify the warden that the
hearing officer’s original action is affirmed; and
(2) The review by the warden is complete.
E. If the Commissioner, or a designee, approves the warden’s
recommendation to remand the case for a new hearing, the Director,
or a designee, shall notify the warden.
F. A warden receiving notification under §E of this regulation
shall ensure that the remanded case:
(1) Is heard anew (de novo) under the procedures contained in
this chapter; and
(2) Is not heard by the original hearing officer.
G. Rehearing Procedure.
(1) The time requirements and procedures that are in
accordance with this chapter for investigation, drafting and service
of the Notice of Inmate Rule Violation and Disciplinary Hearing
form, and the defendant inmate’s appearance before the hearing
officer are suspended for the process of a remanded hearing.
(2) Staff shall serve a defendant inmate with notification
advising the inmate of the order that the Commissioner, or a
designee, Secretary, or a court has remanded the inmate’s Notice of
Inmate Rule Violation and Disciplinary Hearing form for a new
hearing.
(3) When serving the notice of a remand order on the defendant
inmate, staff shall provide the inmate with a copy of the inmate’s
Notice of Inmate Rule Violation and Disciplinary Hearing form that
is the basis for the rehearing order within 7 business days of the date
a warden, or a designee, received notification of the order to rehear
the case.
H. When the defendant inmate is served with the completed notice
of a remanded hearing order indicating that the Director, or a
designee, the Secretary, or a court has remanded the case for a new
hearing, the defendant inmate shall:
(1) Indicate on the notice of a remanded hearing order in the
designated section a request by name for representation, witnesses,
or evidence for the inmate’s remanded hearing; and
(2) Be provided a copy of the original Notice of Inmate Rule
Violation Disciplinary Hearing form that is the basis of the remanded
hearing order.
(3) A failure to list representation, a witness, or evidence by
name on the notice of a remanded hearing order shall constitute a
waiver of representation, a witness, or evidence by the defendant
inmate for the rehearing.
(4) After service on a defendant inmate of both a copy of the
notice of a remanded hearing order and the inmate’s Notice of
Inmate Rule Violation Disciplinary Hearing form that is the basis of
the rehearing, the inmate shall be scheduled to appear before a
hearing officer within 7 business days following the date the inmate
received the notice of a remanded hearing order.
I. Once the remanded hearing is completed and if a warden
disagrees with the decision of the hearing officer, the warden may not
appeal the decision under the procedures of this regulation.
J. The warden may appeal a remanded hearing decision to the
Director, or a designee, in accordance with the procedures under
Regulation .34 of this chapter.
.33 Post Hearing Procedures — Appeal.
A. Appeal to the Warden—Defendant Inmate.
(1) A defendant inmate may only appeal a hearing officer’s
guilty decision or [related] imposed sanction [resulting from a
hearing].
(2) — (5) (text unchanged)
B. (text unchanged)
C. The inmate appeal process under this chapter shall be
considered concluded on the 30th calendar day following the date the
inmate was served the hearing officer’s decision.
D. A defendant inmate who elects to appeal a warden’s
affirmation of a hearing officer’s decision or sanction in the inmate’s
disciplinary case may file an appeal to the Inmate Grievance Office
as provided under COMAR 12.07.01.05 and .06C.
.34 Post Hearing Procedures — Review by the Director.
A. The Director, or a designee, has:
(1) Absolute discretion to modify, suspend, or terminate the
inmate disciplinary process; and
(2) Final authority to interpret the provisions of the inmate
disciplinary process.
B. The Director, or a designee, without regard for procedures or
time limits established under this chapter, may review a disciplinary
case or hearing officer decision.
C. The Director, or a designee, without regard for a procedure or
time requirement established under this chapter, may take an action,
that includes, but is not limited to:
(1) Remanding a decision for a new hearing or other action;
(2) Modifying or vacating a sanction;
(3) Reversing a decision;
(4) Reducing a decision to an incident report; or
(5) Expunging a decision.
.35 Adjustment History Sentencing Matrix.
A. The adjustment history sentencing matrix shall specify the
disciplinary segregation or credit revocation penalties that may be
imposed as sanctions on a defendant inmate found guilty of an inmate
rule violation.
Page 54
PROPOSED ACTION ON REGULATIONS
1536
MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 38, ISSUE 24, FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2011
B. When a segregation and or credit revocation sanction is
imposed, the imposition shall be according to the procedures for the
adjustment history sentencing matrix.
C. The process of determining a sanction for imposition on a
defendant inmate shall be based on identifying the appropriate
sanction cell in the adjustment history sentencing matrix in which the
sanction is found.
D. A hearing officer shall determine an appropriate sanction cell
by using the defendant inmate’s category of rule violation and
adjustment history specified by the adjustment history sentencing
matrix.
E. Category of Inmate Rule Violation. The categories of inmate
rule violations shall be stated in the adjustment history sentencing
matrix by the classification of inmate rule violations enumerated in
Regulation .04 of this chapter.
F. Classification of Sanction. A sanction plotted in a sanction cell
of the adjustment history sentencing matrix may be stated as either:
(1) Optional and may be imposed; or
(2) Mandatory and shall be imposed.
G. Severity of Sanction. The severity of a sanction plotted in a
sanction cell is determined by:
(1) The category of a defendant inmate’s rule violation; and
(2) The adjustment history of the defendant inmate.
H. When a defendant inmate is convicted of an inmate rule
violation, a hearing officer shall:
(1) Review the adjustment history sentencing matrix;
(2) Identify the category of the inmate’s rule violation;
(3) Determine the adjustment history of the inmate;
(4) Identify the appropriate sanction cell where the category of
the rule violation and adjustment history of the inmate intersect in the
adjustment history sentencing matrix; and
(5) When plotted, determine if the sanction is optional or
mandatory for imposition.
I. Adjustment History. The adjustment history sentencing matrix
shall classify inmate adjustment history as:
(1) Poor, if the current inmate rule violation:
(a) Occurs 3 months or less since the date of the last guilty
decision for the last inmate rule violation on record in the defendant
inmate’s case record file or the Department or Patuxent Institution’s
data management system; or
(b) The current guilty decision involves a finding for an
inmate rule violation listed under §§I(1)(b)(i)—(vii) of this regulation
and the defendant inmate’s case record or the Department or
Patuxent Institution’s data management system includes a previous
guilty finding for the current or another inmate rule violation listed
under §§I(1)(b)(i)—(vii) of this regulation occurring in the stated
time frame:
(i) Killing, assaulting, battering, or using threatening
language if the previous inmate rule violation guilty decision is
within 5 years or less of the current inmate rule violation;
(ii) Engaging in a disruptive act if the previous inmate
rule violation guilty decision is within 3 years or less of the current
inmate rule violation;
(iii) Possessing a weapon or an article modified into a
weapon, manufacturing a weapon, or possessing an implement,
article, or tool that reasonably could be used as a weapon if the
previous inmate rule violation guilty decision is within 4 years or less
of the current inmate rule violation;
(iv) Holding another individual hostage if the previous
inmate rule violation guilty decision is within 5 years or less of the
current inmate rule violation;
(v) Possession of a telecommunication device if the
previous inmate rule violation guilty decision is within 4 years or less
of the current inmate rule violation;
(vi) Unauthorized use, possession, or distribution of a
substance that reasonably could be used as an intoxicant, a
controlled dangerous substance, or a counterfeit substance, and
paraphernalia used to administer an intoxicant, a controlled
dangerous substance, or a counterfeit substance if the previous
inmate rule violation guilty decision is within 3 years or less of the
current inmate rule violation; or
(vii) Refusing or failing to submit to an authorized urine,
breath, or medical test if the previous inmate rule violation guilty
decision is within 3 years or less of the current inmate rule violation;
(2) Fair, if the current inmate rule violation occurs more than 3
months but less than 12 months from the last guilty decision for an
inmate rule violation;
(3) Good, if the current inmate rule violation occurs more than
12 months from the last guilty decision for an inmate rule violation;
or
(4) Violation free, if the inmate does not have a previous guilty
decision for an inmate rule violation.
J. Overriding an Adjustment History Matrix Sanction.
(1) A hearing officer, if in disagreement with a sanction
determined by the adjustment history sentencing matrix, may
override the adjustment history of a defendant inmate identified by
the procedures of the adjustment history sentencing matrix.
(2) An override may be for the purpose of either enhancing or
reducing the severity of a sanction due to an aggravating or
mitigating factor, as specified in §§J 3―4 of this regulation, and
shall be made by the hearing officer:
(a) Rejecting the adjustment history determined by the
adjustment history sentencing matrix; and
(b) Selecting an alternative adjustment history from the
adjustment history sentencing matrix.
(3) The override to enhance the severity of a sanction may be
based on one or more of the following aggravating factors:
(a) A prior conviction history for the rule violation;
(b) An act of violence;
(c) Assault or battery;
(d) Escape, attempted escape, or escape paraphernalia;
(e) Weapon;
(f) Drug, controlled dangerous substance, or intoxicant;
(g)Telecommunication device;
(h) Disruptive act;
(i) Threat to security or safety;
(j) Coercive, intimidating, or threatening language;
(k) Sex act, masturbation, or indecent exposure;
(l) The inmate visiting privilege; or
(m) The need for progressive discipline.
(4) The override to reduce the severity of a sanction may be
based on one or more of the following mitigating factors:
(a) No prior guilty conviction history of an inmate rule
violation;
(b) The time period since a previous conviction for the
current inmate rule violation;
(c) Minor severity of the inmate rule violation;
(d) The need for progressive discipline; or
(e) Acceptance of responsibility by the defendant inmate for
the inmate rule violation found.
(5) A hearing officer may not override an adjustment history
sentencing matrix sanction by suspending the specified sanction and
imposing probation.
(6) When employing an override, a hearing officer shall cite in
the written and audio inmate hearing records an aggravating or
mitigating cause as specified under this regulation.
K. A sanction once imposed may not be affected by a later
modification of the defendant inmate’s disciplinary adjustment
history record.
Page 55
PROPOSED ACTION ON REGULATIONS
1537
MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 38, ISSUE 24, FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2011
.36 Interpreting Adjustment History Sentencing Matrix
Sanctions.
A. Plotted Sanction.
(1) Only disciplinary segregation and credit revocation periods
are plotted as sanctions in the adjustment history sentencing matrix.
(a) Sanctions are plotted in the sanction cells of the
adjustment history sentencing matrix.
(b) After finding a defendant inmate guilty of an inmate rule
violation, a hearing officer shall first determine the appropriate
sanction cell identified by the intersection of the category of the
inmate’s rule violation horizontal column and adjustment history
vertical column in the adjustment history sentencing matrix to
establish the severity of a sanction that may or shall be imposed.
(2) A sanction plotted in a sanction cell may be stated as either
a specific time period or the range of a sanction with a minimum to a
maximum period that may be imposed.
(3) Sanctions plotted in the adjustment history sentencing
matrix may be either optional or mandatory for imposition.
B. Numerical Value Plotted in the Adjustment History Sentencing
Matrix.
(1) If the numerical value plotted in an adjustment history
sentencing matrix sanction is stated as:
(a) ―0‖, there is no sanction to impose for the inmate rule
violation;
(b) ―0 or ...‖, the sanction is optional and within the
discretionary judgment of a hearing officer; or
(c) Not ―0‖ or ―0 or ...‖, a sanction within the range
provided is mandatory and shall be imposed by a hearing officer.
(2) A hearing officer may not, in lieu of an imposition, suspend
for a period of probation an adjustment history sentencing matrix
sanction.
(3) A segregation or credit revocation period sanction not
plotted in a sanction cell identified by the adjustment history
sentencing matrix may not be imposed by a hearing officer.
[A.] C. Segregation Sanction.
[(1) If the applicable adjustment history sentencing matrix
sanction is:
(a) ―0‖, there is no sanction to impose for the violation;
(b) ―0 or ...‖, the sanction is discretionary; or
(c) Not ―0‖ or ―0 or ...‖, a sanction within the range provided
is mandatory and shall be imposed.]
(1) A segregation sanction may only be imposed when
permitted under the procedures of the adjustment history sentencing
matrix.
(2) A hearing officer, when imposing a segregation sanction,
may not impose a period of segregation less than the stated range of
the sanction unless employing an adjustment history override as
permitted under Regulation .35 of this chapter.
(3) When a segregation sanction is plotted in a sanction cell as
a range, it is within the discretionary judgment of a hearing officer as
to what period of the sanction may be imposed.
[(3)] (4) If a defendant inmate [is] was placed on administrative
segregation [or cell restriction] for an inmate rule violation charged
pending [a] the outcome of the inmate’s disciplinary hearing, the
hearing officer shall credit the defendant inmate for the period of
administrative segregation [or cell restriction] from the date of
placement on administrative segregation [or cell restriction] when
determining the effective date for a sanction imposed on the inmate
as either cell restriction or segregation.
D. Consecutive Segregation Sanction.
(1) A segregation sanction may be imposed consecutively by a
hearing officer under the procedures enumerated in §D(2)—(3) of
this regulation.
(2) A segregation sanction may be imposed consecutively to a
segregation period imposed on a defendant inmate for a previous
guilty finding of an inmate rule violation when a hearing officer
determines the inmate’s current guilty finding is separate and distinct
(by date, time, or finding of fact) of the reported event that
constituted the basis for the previous guilty finding.
(3) A segregation sanction may be imposed consecutively to
another sanction when a guilty finding for an inmate rule violation
charged involves one or more of the following aggravating factors:
(a) Violence;
(b) Assault or battery;
(c) A willful and wrongful act causing injury to another;
(d) Disruptive act;
(e) Weapon;
(f) Threat to security or safety;
(g) Drug, controlled dangerous substance, or intoxicant;
(h) Coercive, intimidating, or threatening language;
(i) Telecommunication device;
(j) Escape, attempted escape, or escape paraphernalia;
(k) Visiting privilege;
(l) Sex act, masturbation, or indecent exposure;
(m) Collection or testing of a urine specimen; or
(n) Tobacco where there is intent to distribute.
(4) When a finding of guilt involves more than one category of
inmate rule violation that occurred during a single reported event, a
segregation period may not be imposed consecutively for each rule
violation unless that finding involves an aggravating factor cited in
§D(3) of this regulation.
(5) If a sanction imposed by a hearing officer is not specifically
stated as consecutive, the sanction shall be interpreted to read as
concurrent.
E. Concurrent Segregation Sanctions.
(1)A segregation sanction may be imposed concurrently.
(2) When a finding of guilt involves more than one category of
inmate rule violation that occurred during a single reported event,
the segregation periods imposed for each inmate rule violation shall
be concurrent.
(a) For purposes of imposing a sanction, when a finding of
guilt involves more than one category of inmate rule violation that
occurred during a single reported event, the most severe category of
inmate rule violation shall determine the maximum period of the
sanction to impose.
(b) A hearing officer may waive the concurrent period
policy stated in this section and impose a consecutive segregation
period if the guilty finding for a rule violation involves an
aggravating factor cited in §D(3) of this regulation.
(3) A hearing officer shall indicate an effective date for a
segregation sanction or sanctions imposed concurrently to another
sanction.
(4) When a sanction imposed has not been specifically stated as
either concurrent or consecutive, the sanction shall be interpreted to
read as concurrent.
[B.] F. Credit Revocation [of Good Conduct or Special Projects
Credit] Sanction.
(1) [The hearing officer may revoke good conduct or special
projects credit indicated in the adjustment history sentencing matrix]
A credit revocation may only be imposed as a sanction when
permitted by the adjustment history sentencing matrix.
(2) [If a defendant inmate is guilty of multiple inmate rule
violations in a single incident, the hearing officer shall only impose
revocation of good conduct or special projects credit determined by
the adjustment history sentencing matrix based on the most serious
inmate rule violation] The revocation of credits plotted in a sanction
cell of the adjustment history sentencing matrix is optional by a
hearing officer unless that sanction is specifically cited as a
mandatory revocation under the procedures §F(4) of this regulation.
Page 56
PROPOSED ACTION ON REGULATIONS
1538
MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 38, ISSUE 24, FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2011
(3) [If a defendant inmate‘s good conduct credit is less than the
amount to be revoked, the deduction shall be applied in whole, or in
part, against the defendant inmate‘s special projects credit balance]
When a credit revocation sanction is plotted in a sanction cell as a
range, it is within the discretion of a hearing officer as to the period
of the sanction imposed.
(4) Mandatory Credit Revocation. A hearing officer shall
impose as a sanction the minimum or greater credit revocation
period plotted in the adjustment history sentencing matrix when a
guilty finding for an inmate rule violation charged involves one or
more of the following aggravating factors:
(a) Violence;
(b) Assault or battery;
(c) Disruptive act;
(d) Weapon;
(e) Drug, controlled dangerous substance, or intoxicant;
(f) A urine specimen;
(g) Telecommunication device;
(h) Escape, attempted escape, or escape paraphernalia;
(i) Coercive, intimidating, or threatening language;
(j) Sex act, masturbation, or indecent exposure;
(k) Inmate visiting privilege; and
(l) Tobacco, where there is an intent to distribute.
(5) When a finding guilt involves more than one category of
inmate rule violation that occurred during a single reported event,
the hearing officer may only impose the period of plotted credits for
the most severe category of inmate rule violation as the balance of
credits to be revoked for the event.
(6) If a defendant inmate’s good conduct credit balance is
found to be insufficient for the period of a credit revocation imposed,
a deduction for the negative balance of credits due shall be applied,
in whole or in part, by staff against the balance of the inmate’s
earned special project credits.
G. A sanction imposed becomes effective on the date determined
by a hearing officer.
________________________________
.37 Adjustment History Sentencing Matrix.
A. Adult Adjustment History Sentencing Matrix.
Category Violation Free Good Fair Poor
I [GCC] Credits 30—60 60—90 90—120 120—ALL CREDITS
SEG 30—60 60—[90] 120 90—[120] 180 [150] 180—365
II [GCC] Credits ALL [GCC/SPC] CREDITS
ALL [GCC/SPC]
CREDITS ALL [GCC/SPC] CREDITS ALL [GCC/SPC] CREDITS
SEG 0 0 0 or 15[—30] 30[—60]
III
[GCC] Credits 5—10
[0 or ]
10—20
[0 or ]
20—30 30—60
SEG 0 or15[—30 ] 0 or 30[—60 ] [60—90] 0 or 45 [90—150 ] 60
IV
[GCC] Credits [0 or ]5
[0 or]
5—10
[0 or ]
10—20
[0 or ]
20—40
SEG [5] 0 0 or 15[—30 ] 0 or 30[—60 ] [60—90 ] 45
V [GCC] Credits [0 ] 5 [0 ] 5 [0 ] 10 [0—5] 15—30
SEG 0 0 [0 or] 15 [15—]30
Symbols:
[GCC] Credits = Good conduct or special projects credit range [(stated as optional periods)] that may be [revoked] optional or mandatory for
revocation.
SEG = Disciplinary segregation period range [(stated as optional or mandatory periods)] that may be [imposed] optional or mandatory for
imposition.
Numerical value in [any cell] a Sanction Cell = [Number of days (stated as optional or mandatory periods) that may be imposed] Number of
days or credits (stated as optional or mandatory periods) that may be optional or mandatory for imposition or revocation.
―0‖ or ―0 or‖ = No matrix sanctions, or the matrix sanctions are optional.
Definitions of Adjustment History:
Violation-Free = No prior rule violation history
Good = 12 months since the date of the last rule violation
Fair = Less than 12 but more than 3 months since the date of the last rule violation
Poor = 3 months or less since the date of the last rule violation or the [hearing officer‘s] override of the matrix adjustment history to poor
history under the procedures of §I(1)(b) of Regulation .35 of this chapter
Page 57
PROPOSED ACTION ON REGULATIONS
1539
MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 38, ISSUE 24, FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2011
B. Eligible Person and Youth Program Adjustment History Sentencing Matrix.
Category Violation Free Good Fair Poor
I
[GCC]
Credits 30—60 60—90 90—120 120—ALL CREDITS
SEG 5—[10]20 [7]10—[14]30 [10]20—[21]30 14—[28]60
II
[GCC]
Credits
ALL [GCC/SPC]
CREDITS
ALL [GCC/SPC]
CREDITS
ALL [GCC/SPC]
CREDITS
ALL [GCC/SPC]
CREDITS
SEG 0 0 0 0
III
[GCC]
Credits 5—10 10—20 20—30 30—60
SEG 3—7 5—10 7—14 10—21
IV
[GCC]
Credits 0 [or]—5 5—10 10—20 20—40
SEG 0—7 0—10 5—12 7—21
V
[GCC]
Credits 0 0 0 0—5
SEG 0—3 0—5 3 [or]— 10 5—21
* Nothing in this chart means that any special projects have been adopted within the Patuxent Program. References to SPC are made for
Department consistency.
Symbols:
[GCC]Credits = Good conduct or special projects credit range (stated as optional periods) that may be revoked.
SEG = Disciplinary segregation period range (stated as optional or mandatory periods) that may be imposed.
Numerical value in any cell = Number of days (stated as optional or mandatory periods) that may be imposed.
―0‖ or ―0 or‖ = No matrix sanctions, or the matrix sanctions are optional.
Definitions of Adjustment History:
Violation-Free = No prior violation history
Good = 12 months since last violation
Fair = Less than 12 but more than 3 months since last violation
Poor = 3 months or less since last violation or the hearing officer‘s override of the matrix adjustment history to poor history
________________________________
.39 Alternative Disciplinary and Informal Sanctions.
A. Alternative disciplinary and informal sanctions are separate
and distinct from the sanctions plotted in the adjustment history
sentencing matrix.
B. An alternative disciplinary sanction may be imposed
independently of or in conjunction with:
(1) Another alternative disciplinary sanction; or
(2) An adjustment history sentencing matrix sanction.
C. An informal sanction is included in an informal disposition
accepted by a defendant inmate in accordance with the procedures of
Regulation .06 of this chapter.
D. The following [sanctions] may be imposed as sanctions for an
informal [dispositions or] disposition, or in conjunction with [other]
an adjustment history sentencing matrix [sanctions] sanction:
[A.] (1) — [C.] (3) (text unchanged)
[D.] (4) Suspension of [any of] the following privileges:
[(1)] (a) Radio, compact disc (CD) or tape player, television,
telephone, or commissary, excluding personal hygiene and legal
correspondence items, privileges for a specific period not to exceed
[15] 60 calendar days as an informal sanction or 3 months as an
alternative sanction;
[(2)] (b) (text unchanged)
[(3)] (c) [Visiting] Visitation [privileges] privilege, except
legal and clergy, for a specific period not less than 15 calendar days
but not more than 2 months as an informal sanction or not less than 2
months but not more than 6 months as an alternative sanction; or
[(4)] (d) [Any other] A specified facility privilege not
included in this regulation for a specific period not to exceed [45] 90
calendar days as an informal sanction or 3 — 6 months as an
alternative sanction;
[E.] (5) Cell restriction for a specific period not to exceed 1
month an informal sanction or 2 months as an alternative sanction[;
or].
[F. Forfeiture of property, that is confiscation of an article,
item, or property determined to be contraband, including confiscation
of unauthorized currency or currency in excess of allowable
amounts.]
E. The term cell restriction under §D(5) of this regulation:
(1) Includes the requirement that an inmate be restricted to a
designated location and prohibited from participation in inmate
privileges and activities to include recreation and commissary; but
(2) Does not prohibit the inmate from participation in:
(a) Work, program, or school assignments;
(b) Meals;
(c) Shower periods as permitted by a facility’s rules for an
inmate designated cell restriction status;
(d) Visitation periods as permitted by a facility’s rules for an
inmate designated cell restriction status;
(e) Facility passes;
Page 58
PROPOSED ACTION ON REGULATIONS
1540
MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 38, ISSUE 24, FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2011
(f) A religious service as permitted by a facility’s rules for
an inmate designated cell restriction status; and
(g) Case management, medical, or psychological
appointments.
GARY D. MAYNARD
Secretary of Public Safety and Correctional Services
Title 13A
STATE BOARD OF
EDUCATION
Subtitle 16 CHILD CARE CENTERS
Notice of Proposed Action
[11-324-P]
The Interim State Superintendent of Schools proposes to amend:
(1) Regulation .02 under COMAR 13A.16.01 Scope and
Definitions;
(2) Regulation .01 under COMAR 13A.16.02 License
Application and Maintenance;
(3) Regulation .06 under COMAR 13A.16.07 Child
Protection; and
(4) Regulations .01 and .02 under COMAR 13A.16.18
Administrative Hearings.
Statement of Purpose
The purpose of this action is to make licensed child care center
regulations consistent with proposed COMAR 13A.18 Large Family
Child Care Homes by modifying the existing definition of family
child care and by restricting first-time licensure as a small center to
persons who submit a licensing application for that purpose before
January 1, 2012. In addition, certain requirements regarding abuse
and neglect clearances and the administrative hearing process have
been made consistent with corresponding provisions in COMAR
13A.15 Family Child Care and proposed COMAR 13A.18.
Comparison to Federal Standards
There is no corresponding federal standard to this proposed action.
Estimate of Economic Impact
The proposed action has no economic impact.
Economic Impact on Small Businesses
The proposed action has minimal or no economic impact on small
businesses.
Impact on Individuals with Disabilities
The proposed action has no impact on individuals with disabilities.
Opportunity for Public Comment
Comments may be sent to Liz Kelley, Director, Office of Child
Care, Division of Early Childhood Development, Maryland State
Department of Education, 200 West Baltimore Street, Baltimore MD
21201, or call 410-767-7128 (TTY 410-333-6442), or email to
[email protected] , or fax to 410-333-6226. Comments will
be accepted through December 19, 2011. A public hearing has not
been scheduled.
13A.16.01 Scope and Definitions
Authority: Family Law Article, §§5-560, 5-564, and 5-570—5-585; State
Government Article, §10-617; Human Services Article, §1-202; Annotated
Code of Maryland Agency Note: Federal Statutory Reference—Americans with Disabilities Act
of 1990 (42 U.S.C. §12101 et seq.); Pro-Children Act of 1994 (20 U.S.C.
§6081 et seq.)
.02 Definitions.
A. (text unchanged)
B. Terms Defined.
(1)—(24) (text unchanged)
(25) ―Family child care‖ [has the same meaning as family day
care as defined in Family Law Article, §5-501(e), Annotated Code of
Maryland, and] means the care given to a child younger than 13 years
old or to a developmentally disabled person younger than 21 years
old, in place of parental care for less than 24 hours a day, in a
residence other than the child‘s residence and for which the provider
is paid, in accordance with Family Law Article, §§5-550—5-557.1,
Annotated Code of Maryland.
(26)—(54) (text unchanged)
(55) ―Successfully passed‖ means, when used in connection
with:
(a) (text unchanged)
(b) A review of records of abuse and neglect of children [or
adults], that if an individual is:
(i)—(ii) (text unchanged)
(56)—(58) (text unchanged)
13A.16.02 License Application and Maintenance
Authority: Family Law Article, §§5-560, 5-564, and 5-570—5-585; State
Government Article, §10-617; Human Services Article, §1-202; Annotated Code of Maryland
Agency Note: Federal Statutory Reference—Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. §12101 et seq.); Pro-Children Act of 1994 (20 U.S.C.
§6081 et seq.)
.01 License — General Requirements.
A.—F. (text unchanged)
G. Effective January 1, 2012, the office may not:
(1) Accept an application for an initial license as a small
center; or
(2) Issue a license to operate a small center, except that a
license may be issued to:
(a) An applicant for a license from whom the office received
the license application before January 1, 2012; or
(b) An operator already licensed to operate a small center
before January 1, 2012.
13A.16.07 Child Protection
Authority: Family Law Article, §§5-560, 5-564, and 5-570—5-585; State
Government Article, §10-617; Human Services Article, §1-202; Annotated
Code of Maryland
Agency Note: Federal Statutory Reference—Americans with Disabilities Act
of 1990 (42 U.S.C. §12101 et seq.); Pro-Children Act of 1994 (20 U.S.C. §6081 et seq.)
.06 Child Security.
A.—B. (text unchanged)
C. Unless an employee or staff member has successfully passed
federal and State criminal background checks and, if hired on or after
October 1, 2005, a review of child [and adult] abuse and neglect
records, the individual may not be alone with an unrelated child in
care.
Page 59
PROPOSED ACTION ON REGULATIONS
1541
MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 38, ISSUE 24, FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2011
D. An employee or staff member who has successfully passed
federal and State criminal background checks and, if hired on or after
October 1, 2005, a review of child [and adult] abuse and neglect
records[,] shall:
(1) (text unchanged)
(2) Unless documentation is on file at the center that an
independent contractor performing a service at the center has
successfully passed federal and State criminal background checks and
a review of child [and adult] abuse and neglect records, remain within
sight and sound of the contractor whenever the contractor is in an
area where children are present.
E. (text unchanged)
13A.16.18 Administrative Hearings
Authority: Family Law Article §§5-573 and 5-580; State Government Article, §10-204; Annotated Code of Maryland
.01 Scope.
A. This chapter applies to hearings concerning actions taken by
the Office of Child Care which adversely impact [on] child care
center licenses and letters of compliance. These actions include
denials, suspensions, or revocations of licenses or letters of
compliance, [as well as] reductions in capacity or limitations on the
ages or numbers of children who may be admitted to the child care
center, and employment exclusions pursuant to COMAR
13A.16.06.03A or B.
B. (text unchanged)
.02 Definitions.
A. (text unchanged)
B. Terms Defined.
(1)—(6) (text unchanged)
(7) Emergency Action.
(a) (text unchanged)
(b) ―Emergency action‖ may include an emergency
suspension, an immediate reduction in capacity, an immediate
limitation on the ages or numbers of children who may be admitted to
care, an employment exclusion pursuant to COMAR 13A.16.06.03A
or B, [and] or an appeal filed by an individual pursuant to COMAR
13A.14.02.19-1D or 13A.14.05.19-1D.
(8)—(16) (text unchanged)
BERNARD J. SADUSKY, ED.D.
Interim State Superintendent of Schools
Title 14
INDEPENDENT AGENCIES
Subtitle 09 WORKERS’
COMPENSATION COMMISSION
14.09.03 Guide of Medical and Surgical Fees
Authority: Labor and Employment Article, §§ 9-309, 9-663, and 9-731,
Annotated Code of Maryland
Notice of Change to Statement of Purpose
[11-305-P]
In Md. R. 38:23 1462—1465 (November 4, 2011), an incorrect
Statement of Purpose was published in the proposal to amend
Regulations .01 and .04 and adopt new Regulation .09 under
COMAR 14.09.03 Guide of Medical and Surgical Fees. The
corrected Statement follows.
Statement of Purpose
The purpose of this action is to establish a uniform fee or pricing
schedule for reimbursing prescription drugs required to treat an
injured covered employee irrespective of the identity of the person or
entity that dispenses the prescription drug. Specifically, the
pharmaceutical fee schedule is designed to eliminate the existing
disparity in reimbursement rates between physician-dispensed and
pharmacy-dispensed prescriptions by establishing a single
reimbursement rate tied to the average wholesale price (―AWP‖). In a
recent study, the Workers Compensation Research Institute found
that ―for several common physician-dispensed drugs, workers [in
Maryland] received more prescriptions and pills than in other states
where physician dispensing was not common. For these medications,
physician-dispensers [in Maryland] were paid nearly double or triple
the price paid to a pharmacy for the same prescription.‖ Workers
Compensation Research Institute, Prescription Benchmarks for
Maryland, at 11 (March 2010). ―Maryland physicians were paid an
average of $2.59 per pill when they dispensed, while retail
pharmacies were paid $0.67 per pill.‖ Id., at 14.
Under the proposed fee schedule, the reimbursement rate a
dispenser will be reimbursed for a brand drug is calculated by
subtracting 10% of the AWP from the AWP and adding a $3
dispensing fee: BR = AWP – (0.10 x AWP) + 3. Similarly, the
reimbursement rate a dispenser will be reimbursed for a generic drug
is calculated by subtracting 10% of the AWP from the AWP and
adding a $5 dispensing fee as follows: GR = AWP – (0.10 x AWP) +
5. For repackaged or compounded drugs, the AWP utilized in
calculating the reimbursement shall be the AWP and corresponding
NDC (National Drug Code) number, or AWP of the primary
underlying active drug product used in the repackaging or
compounding. This action further directs the Commission to
designate a nationally recognized pharmaceutical publication as the
source of AWP pricing and recognizes that a pharmacy and payer, or
a pharmacy and a pharmacy benefits manager (―PBM‖), may
continue to enter into private contracts for pharmaceutical
reimbursement.
R. KARL AUMANN
Chairman
Workers‘ Compensation Commission
Subtitle 34 PUBLIC SCHOOL LABOR
RELATIONS BOARD
Notice of Proposed Action
[11-328-P]
The Maryland Public School Labor Relations Board proposes to
adopt:
(1) Regulations .01—.03 under a new chapter, COMAR
14.34.01 Recognition of Employee Organizations; and
(2) Regulations .01—.03 under a new chapter, COMAR
14.34.02 General Procedures.
These two new chapters are being proposed under a new subtitle,
Subtitle 34 Public School Labor Relations Board. This action was
considered at a combination of two public meetings, one held on July
15, 2011, and the other held on September 16, 2011.
Statement of Purpose
The purpose of this action is to clarify the role of the Public
School Labor Relations Board in the process of recognizing
employee organizations that represent public school employees in the
State of Maryland. This action also clarifies the general procedures to
be used when bringing claims before the Board.
Page 60
PROPOSED ACTION ON REGULATIONS
1542
MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 38, ISSUE 24, FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2011
Comparison to Federal Standards
There is no corresponding federal standard to this proposed action.
Estimate of Economic Impact
The proposed action has no economic impact.
Economic Impact on Small Businesses
The proposed action has minimal or no economic impact on small
businesses.
Impact on Individuals with Disabilities
The proposed action has no impact on individuals with disabilities.
Opportunity for Public Comment
Comments may be sent to Erica Snipes, Executive Director, Public
School Labor Relations Board, 839 Bestgate Road, Suite 400,
Annapolis, MD 21401, or call 410-260-3216, or email to
[email protected] , or fax to 410-260-3219.
Comments will be accepted through December 19, 2011. A public
hearing has not been scheduled.
14.34.01 Recognition of Employee Organizations
Authority: Education Article, §§6-405, 6-505, and 6-506 and Title 6, Subtitle 8, Annotated Code of Maryland
.01 Substantial Incorporation of State Board of Education COMAR
Provisions.
COMAR Title 13A.02.08 has been used as the primary source for
this chapter; however, many internal references have changed to
reflect the jurisdiction of the Public School Labor Relations Board
over matters surrounding Recognition of Employee Organizations.
.02 Certification of Eligible Representative or Organizations.
A. Units Where There Is an Incumbent Exclusive Representative.
(1) Written Petition.
(a) All public school employees who desire a representation
election shall advise, by written petition to the local superintendent of
schools (Form 1) signed by more than 20 percent of the public school
employees in the unit, of this desire not later than May 15 (in
Baltimore City, October 15). Form 1 may be submitted in single card
or multiple signature petition format, or a combination of both.
(b) A public school employee’s signature on the written
petition may afterwards be revoked in writing (Form 2). Revocation
shall be submitted to the public school employer not later than May
15 (in Baltimore City, October 15). However, after executing a
written revocation, the public school employee may not once again
sign the written petition.
(c) Once filed with the public school employer, the written
petition may not be available for inspection or copying. The public
school employer shall immediately notify the Public School Labor
Relations Board and the State Superintendent of Schools of the filing
of the petition. The Public School Labor Relations Board shall
promptly appoint an election judge, who will meet with
representatives of the public school employer, the incumbent
exclusive representative, and any other employee organization which
has previously filed Form 4, in order to select an appropriate
election date.
(d) The public school employer shall compare the signatures
and Social Security numbers on the written petition with the
employer’s payroll records and shall, on or before May 25 (in
Baltimore City, October 25), verify to the election judge that the
written petition contains valid signatures from the requisite number
of public school employees specified in §A(1)(a) of this regulation.
The public school employer shall simultaneously submit to the
election judge the original of the petition, as well as the originals of
any revocations which have been filed. The election judge shall
determine the validity of the revocations and their effect upon the
petition.
(e) A petition under this regulation may not be considered
valid if it is filed during the first year of a 2-year, or during the first
or second year of a 3-year, written agreement between a public
school employer and an incumbent exclusive representative.
However, this paragraph may not be used in combination with any
other law or regulation to bar an election for more than 3
consecutive calendar years.
(f) All forms referenced in this chapter and set forth in it are
mandatory. All appropriate blanks contained in the forms shall be
completed before filing in order for the form, or signature, as
appropriate, to be valid.
(2) Not later than May 20 (in Baltimore City, October 20), the
public school employer shall give reasonable notice (Form 3) to all
public school employees as defined in Education Article, §6-401(c)
or 6-501(c), Annotated Code of Maryland, as to the unit or units in
which the subsequent election shall be held and the date of the
election. A copy of the notice shall be sent to the Public School Labor
Relations Board and the State Superintendent of Schools.
(3) Not later than May 25 (in Baltimore City, October 25), all
organizations, other than the incumbent exclusive representative,
wishing to be the exclusive representative of the public school
employees in a specified unit shall file with the public school
employer a written certification of membership of at least 10 percent
of the public school employees in the specified unit as of June 1
(Form 4). The election judge shall examine the records of any
organization filing this certification and shall verify that the
organization has as members the requisite number of public school
employees as specified in this subsection in accordance with that
organization’s membership requirements.
(4) The incumbent exclusive representative shall be
automatically placed on the ballot.
B. Units Where There Is No Exclusive Representative.
(1) Original requests for exclusive recognition shall be filed
with the public school employer no later than May 25 (in Baltimore
City, October 25), by any employee organization certifying that it has
at least 30 percent of the public school employees in a given unit as
of June 1 (Form 5). When an organization makes an original request
for exclusive recognition and has filed Form 5, all other employee
organizations wishing a representation election shall file with the
public school employer a written certificate of membership of at least
10 percent of the public school employees in the specified unit as of
June 1 (Form 6). This form shall be submitted no later than May 28
(in Baltimore City, October 28). Subject to §B(2) of this regulation, if
one or more organizations of public school employees certifies a
membership of public school employees, pursuant to this section, the
public school employer shall, no later than May 31 (in Baltimore
City, October 31), give reasonable notice (Form 3) to the Public
School Labor Relations Board and all public school employees as to
the unit or units in which the subsequent election shall be held and
the date of the election.
(2) If no organization certifies a 10 percent membership under
§B(1) of this regulation by May 28 (in Baltimore City, October 28),
the organization which has certified 30 percent membership may
petition by May 31 (in Baltimore City, October 31) that it has a
membership enrollment of the majority of the public school
employees in the unit in the county or Baltimore City (Form 7). In
this event, an election may not be held and the public school
employer shall designate the employee organization as the exclusive
representative of all public school employees in the unit in the county
or Baltimore City (Form 8).
C. Elections may be held on any working day for public school
employees no earlier than June 1 (in Baltimore City, November 1),
Page 61
PROPOSED ACTION ON REGULATIONS
1543
MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 38, ISSUE 24, FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2011
and no later than June 15 (in Baltimore City, November 15), except
for the last working day in any school system.
D. Immediately following the tabulation of the election results, the
election judge shall certify the results of the election to the Public
School Labor Relations Board by certified mail (see Form 9).
E. No later than June 15 (in Baltimore City, November 15) the
public school employer in accordance with the provisions of
Education Article, Title 6, Subtitle 4 or 5, Annotated Code of
Maryland, and the regulations of the Public School Labor Relations
Board shall designate the exclusive representative of all public
school employees in a given unit and so notify the appropriate
organizations (Form 8).
.03 Conduct of Elections.
A. Subsequent to the filing of a 10 percent certification in
accordance with Regulation .02A(3) or B(1) of this chapter, the local
superintendent of schools shall assign reasonable bulletin board
space and other display areas in all school facilities to all qualifying
competing organizations of public school employees. Each
organization shall be provided with equal space.
B. Each competing organization shall be permitted to use
whatever distribution systems are normally available through the
local board of education in accordance with its existing policies.
C. Materials from representatives of the competing organizations
shall be appropriately distributed to all affected employees.
D. Representatives of competing organizations shall be permitted
to meet with employees, individually and in groups, on school
premises, but the meetings may not interfere in any way with work
schedules, but shall be permitted during non-duty breaks or
immediately preceding or following the work day.
E. Voting without intimidation, duress, or coercion will take place
within every school facility where eligible public school employees
normally work. A person may not be in the vicinity of the balloting
box when voting is taking place, except those permitted to vote, the
clerk, and the designated challengers or the election judge. The
polling place location shall be posted on the school bulletin board at
the same time as the election notice is posted. The designation of the
polling place in each facility shall be the responsibility of the local
superintendent of schools. The polling facilities will be designed to
assure a secret ballot for each voter.
F. Lists of eligible voters for each polling place shall be provided
by the local superintendent of schools to all competing organizations
and the Public School Labor Relations Board. Only regularly
employed school personnel shall be eligible to vote.
G. The local board of education shall designate at least one
election clerk for each polling place. Except in cases of emergency,
as determined by the election judge, or upon mutual agreement of the
competing organizations, election clerks shall be persons who are not
eligible to vote in any public school employee representative election
under the provisions of Education Article, Title 6, Subtitle 4 or 5,
Annotated Code of Maryland. This person shall have custody of all
ballots and eligibility lists, shall determine the eligibility of each
voter, shall issue a ballot (Form 10) to each eligible voter, and shall
require the voter to sign the eligibility list. At the close of the polls,
the election clerk shall return the ballot box, the unused ballots, and
the voters’ lists to the central tabulating station.
H. The Public School Labor Relations Board shall appoint for
each election an election judge who shall have the responsibility and
authority to resolve any matters in dispute regarding the election.
The election judge may not be a member of or an employee of the
local board of education or of any organization seeking exclusive
representation in that school system.
I. A ―notice of election‖ shall be posted in each school facility
before election day. This notice of election shall designate the
employee unit, date, time, place of election in each school facility,
and instructions to voters (see Form 3).
J. The local board of education shall establish an office for the
election judge. All competing organizations shall be notified of the
location and telephone numbers of the election office.
K. The local board of education shall assist the Public School
Labor Relations Board in designating a central location for the
collection and tabulation of ballots following the election. Competing
organizations shall be notified of the location of this tabulation
center.
L. Election hours shall be during the regular working hours for
the employees in the unit for which the election is held. The local
superintendent of schools, with the concurrence of representatives of
the organizations who will appear on the ballot, or, if the
superintendent has failed to act, the election judge shall determine
the hours during which the polls will be open at each school. Except
as otherwise determined by the election judge, the polls at each
school shall be open for an amount of time at least equal to the
number of eligible voters multiplied by 5 minutes, but this may not
exceed the working day.
M. Absentee ballots shall be made available by the election judge
only to those otherwise eligible voters who are away from their
assigned work locations on the day of the election at the direction of
the public school employer.
N. Each organization may have an observer at each polling place
during the election. At the conclusion of the election, the observers
may accompany the election clerk in the return of the ballot box to
the central tabulating office. Two observers from each competing
organization may be present during the counting and tabulating of
ballots. If it is necessary to employ substitutes for employees who are
serving as observers, the competing organizations shall pay the
necessary compensation.
O. A ballot box shall be provided by the local board of education
for each polling place. The ballot boxes shall be of such construction
as to safeguard the secrecy of the ballots and their security. Slots in
the ballot boxes shall be sealed before the opening of the polls. The
election clerk shall break the seals and examine the boxes, in the
presence of the observers, if any, when the polls are opened. The
election clerks shall reseal the slots at the close of the polls in such a
manner that the ballots within are absolutely secure. The seal on the
ballot box shall be signed by the election clerk and the observers, if
any, and examined by the election judge before opening the ballot
box for tabulation.
P. Ballot boxes shall be distributed to the polling places by a
procedure established by the election judge.
Q. Printed paper ballots shall be furnished by the local board of
education, with a copy of the ballot forwarded to the Public School
Labor Relations Board in accordance with the attached
recommended form (see Form 10).
R. Placement of the exact official names of organizations on the
ballots shall be determined by the election judge after discussion with
the competing organizations.
S. Every eligible voter shall be notified by the local board of
education that he or she shall be required to show some form of
identification, such as social security card, driver’s license, charge
plate, credit card, or other document to which his or her signature is
affixed in order to obtain an official ballot and vote in the election.
Organizational or membership cards may not be accepted as
identification, even if the signature appears on it. If the voter does not
have proper identification and if the observers from the organizations
listed on the ballot agree to the voter’s eligibility, the voter may vote
a regular ballot. Otherwise, a challenge ballot shall be used.
T. A challenge ballot shall be a regular ballot which is folded,
placed first in an unmarked envelope, which is in turn placed in an
envelope clearly marked with the word ―challenge‖. The
Page 62
PROPOSED ACTION ON REGULATIONS
1544
MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 38, ISSUE 24, FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2011
―challenge‖ envelope shall be signed by the voter, sealed by the
election clerk, with the reason for the challenge noted, and placed in
the ballot box.
U. Eligible voters not appearing on the voting lists shall vote a
challenge ballot. The election judge shall determine the eligibility of
the voter casting such a challenged ballot and the election judge’s
determination shall be final.
V. Signed ballots and those bearing written comments shall be
declared void. The election judge shall determine the validity of all
other ballots, and the election judge’s determination shall be final.
W. On election day, campaigning may not be allowed in the
building or within 75 feet of the entrance to the building where voting
takes place. Membership buttons may be worn.
________________________________
Form 1
Request for Representation Election Must Be Signed by More than 20 Percent of Public School Employees in a Unit
(Must be filed prior to the Close of Business on May 15, or October 15 in Baltimore City) (Year)
Pursuant to the provisions of Education Article, Title 6, Subtitle 4 (or Subtitle 5), Annotated Code of Maryland, the undersigned employee(s)
of the _______1 unit of employees of the Board of Education of _______ hereby request(s) that an election be held in June (or November in
Baltimore City) (Year) to designate an exclusive bargaining representative for the aforesaid unit.
NOTE: ALL ITEMS MUST BE COMPLETED IN ORDER FOR YOUR SIGNATURE TO BE VALID.
Printed Name of Public School
Employee
Signature of Public School
Employee
Social Security No. of Public
School Employee Date
________________ ________________ ________________ ________________
________________ ________________ ________________ ________________
________________ ________________ ________________ ________________
________________ ________________ ________________ ________________ 1 (e.g., professional, administrative, or classified unit(s))
Form 2
Revocation of Signature on Form 1
I hereby revoke my prior signature on the election petition known as the ―Request for Representation Election‖. I understand that by
revoking this signature I am waiving my right to once again sign the petition during the present school year.
NOTE: ALL ITEMS MUST BE COMPLETED IN ORDER FOR THIS REVOCATION TO BE VALID.
____________________ _____________________ ___________________ ________________
Printed Name of Public School
Employee
Signature of Public School
Employee
Social Security No. of Public
School Employee
Date
Form 3
Notice of Election
Date, Time, and Place of Election
Date: _____________________
Time: Regular working day for employees
Place: Each school or educational facility
Secret Ballot
Voting will take place within every school or facility where eligible public school employees normally work. The designation of the polling
place in each facility shall be determined by the election judge in consultation with the person in charge of each school or facility. The polling
place shall permit each individual to vote free from observation by other individuals.
Authorized Observers
Each organization may have an observer at each polling place during the duration of the election. At the conclusion of the election the
observers may accompany the election clerk to the central tabulating office.
Tally
A ballot box shall be provided by the local board of education for each polling place. The ballot boxes shall be of such construction as to
safeguard the secrecy of the ballots and their security. Slots in the ballot boxes shall be sealed before the opening of the polls. The boxes shall
be unsealed and examined by the election clerks, in the presence of the observers, if any, when the polls are opened. The slots shall be resealed
by the election clerks at the close of the polls in such a manner that the ballots within are absolutely secure. The seal on the ballot box shall be
signed by the election clerk and the observers, if any, and examined by the election judge before opening the ballot box for tabulation.
Page 63
PROPOSED ACTION ON REGULATIONS
1545
MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 38, ISSUE 24, FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2011
Identification
Every eligible voter shall be required to show some form of identification, such as driver’s license, charge plate, credit card, or other
document to which the voter’s signature is affixed in order to obtain an official ballot and vote in the election. Organizational or membership
cards may not be accepted as identification. If the voter does not have proper identification and if the observers from the organizations listed on
the ballot agree to the voter’s eligibility, the voter may vote a regular ballot. Otherwise, a challenge ballot shall be used.
Challenge Ballots
A challenge ballot shall be a regular ballot cast, which is folded, placed first in an unmarked envelope, which is in turn placed in an
envelope clearly marked with the word ―challenge‖. The ―challenge‖ envelope shall be signed by the voter, sealed by the election clerk, with
the reason for the challenge noted, and placed in the ballot box.
Eligible voters not appearing on the voting lists shall cast a challenge ballot.
Validity of Ballots
Signed ballots and those bearing written comments shall be declared void. The election judge shall determine the validity of all other ballots.
Campaigning
On election day, campaigning may not be allowed in the building or within 75 feet of the entrance to the building where voting takes place.
Membership buttons may be worn. If a voter presents himself wearing anything which appears to be of a campaigning nature, the election clerk
shall request the voter to remove it.
Form 4
Request for Exclusive Representation by an Organization Certifying at Least 10 Percent of the Public School Employees of a Designated
Unit
(Must be filed prior to the Close of Business on May 25, or October 25 in Baltimore City) (Year)
Pursuant to the provisions of Education Article, Title 6, Subtitle 4 (or Subtitle 5), Annotated Code of Maryland, ____________1 hereby
certifies to __________________ 2 through its duly authorized agents that it is a public school employee organization which has a member
enrollment of at least 10 percent of the total number of public school employees in ____________ 3 as of June 1, (Year) and requests that an
election be held, in which the public school employees in this unit shall be offered a choice among all qualifying employee organizations as the
exclusive representative of all public school employees in the unit or of no exclusive representation.
By this certification and request it is hereby agreed by the above stated public school employee organization that the Public School Labor
Relations Board may at any reasonable time and in any reasonable manner verify the facts of membership certified to in this request before the
designation of an exclusive representative, if any, as requested.
Witness our hands and seals as the duly authorized representatives of the above named public school employee organization this _______
day of May (or October in Baltimore City) (Year).
___________________________________________________________
Name of Organization
By:__________________________________ By:_________________________________
Signature of Authorized Representative Signature of Authorized Representative
________________________ ________________________
Official Organization Position Official Organization Position
_________________________ _________________________
Date Signed Date Signed
1 Public school employee organization 2 Local school board 3 Designated public school employee unit
Form 5 (Only to be filed where there is no incumbent exclusive representative)
Request for Exclusive Representation by an Organization Certifying at Least 30 Percent of the Public School Employees of a Designated
Unit
(Must be filed prior to the Close of Business on May 25, or October 25 in Baltimore City) (Year)
Pursuant to the provisions of Education Article, Title 6, Subtitle 4 (or Subtitle 5), Annotated Code of Maryland, _________1 hereby certifies
to __________ 2 through its duly authorized agents that it is a public school employee organization which has a member enrollment of at least
30 percent of the total number of public school employees in _________ 3 as of June 1, (Year) and hereby states that this certification shall
constitute a request for recognition as exclusive representative for all public school employees in this unit.
Page 64
PROPOSED ACTION ON REGULATIONS
1546
MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 38, ISSUE 24, FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2011
By this certification and request it is hereby agreed by the above stated public school employee organization that the Public School Labor
Relations Board may at any reasonable time and in any reasonable manner verify the facts of membership certified to in this request before the
designation of an exclusive representative, if any, as requested.
Witness our hands and seals as the duly authorized representatives of the above named public school employee organization this _______
day of May (or October in Baltimore City) (Year).
___________________________________________________________
Name of Organization
By:__________________________________ By:__________________________________
Signature of Authorized Representative Signature of Authorized Representative
________________________ ________________________
Official Organization Position Official Organization Position
_________________________ _________________________
Date Signed Date Signed
1 Public school employee organization 2 Local school board 3 Designated public school employee unit
Form 6 (Only to be filed if Form 5 is filed)
Request for Exclusive Representation by an Organization Certifying at Least 10 Percent of the Public School Employees of a Designated
Unit (where Form 5 is filed)
(Must be filed prior to the Close of Business on May 28 or October 28 in Baltimore City) (Year)
Pursuant to the provisions of Education Article, Title 6, Subtitle 4 (or Subtitle 5), Annotated Code of Maryland, ________1 hereby certifies to
__________ 2 through its duly authorized agents that it is a public school employee organization which has a member enrollment of at least 10
percent of the total number of public school employees in _______3 as of June 1, (Year) and requests that an election be held, in which the
public school employees in this unit shall be offered a choice among all qualifying employee organizations as the exclusive representative of all
public school employees in the unit or of no exclusive representation.
By this certification and request it is hereby agreed by the above stated public school employee organization that the Public School Labor
Relations Board may at any reasonable time and in any reasonable manner verify the facts of membership certified to in this request before the
designation of an exclusive representative, if any, as requested.
Witness our hands and seals as the duly authorized representatives of the above named public school employee organization this _____ day
of May (or October in Baltimore City) (Year).
___________________________________________________________
Name of Organization
By:__________________________________ By:__________________________________
Signature of Authorized Representative Signature of Authorized Representative
________________________ ________________________
Official Organization Position Official Organization Position
_________________________ _________________________
Date Signed Date Signed
1 Public school employee organization 2 Local school board 3 Designated public school employee unit
Form 7
Petition by an Organization that It Has a Membership of a Majority of the Public School Employees in a Designated Unit, Where It Has
Filed a 30 Percent Membership Certification and No Other Organization Certified a 10 Percent Membership of Unit Members
(Must be filed by May 31 or October 31 in Baltimore City) (Year)
Pursuant to the provisions of Education Article, Title 6, Subtitle 4 (or Subtitle 5), Annotated Code of Maryland, _________1 hereby certifies
to ________2 through its duly authorized agents that it has previously filed Form 5, certifying that it has at least 30 percent of the public school
employees in _________3 as of June 1, (Year); that no other organization has certified that it has a membership of 10 percent of the members of
said unit; and that _________1 hereby certifies that it has a membership enrollment of the majority of the public school employees in said unit.
Page 65
PROPOSED ACTION ON REGULATIONS
1547
MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 38, ISSUE 24, FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2011
By this certification, it is requested that _________2 designate _________1 as the exclusive representative of all public school employees in
said unit.
___________________________________________________________
Name of Organization
By:__________________________________ By:__________________________________
Signature of Authorized Representative Signature of Authorized Representative
________________________ ________________________
Official Organization Position Official Organization \Position
_________________________ _________________________
Date Signed Date Signed
1 Public school employee organization 2 Local school board 3 Designated public school employee unit
Form 8
Designation of Exclusive Public School Employee Organization by Local School Board
On the aforegoing certification the ______1 by resolution hereby designates ______2 as the exclusive public school employee organization
for the ______3 beginning June (November) _____, (Year) and continuing as provided by law.
___________________________________________________________
Name of Organization
By:__________________________________ By:__________________________________
Signature of Authorized Representative Signature of Authorized Representative
________________________ ________________________
Official Organization Position Official Organization Position
_________________________ _________________________
Date Signed Date Signed
1 Local school board 2 Employee organization 3 Designated public school employee unit
Form 9
Certification of Election Results in the Matter of the Election __________ 1
Pursuant to the provisions of Education Article, Title 6, Subtitle 4 (or Subtitle 5), Annotated Code of Maryland, ______2 conducted a
representation election to determine whether eligible public school employees of ______1 wished to be represented by ______3 or neither
organization.
The Public School Labor Relations Board duly designated the undersigned to supervise and preside over the election and to issue a
certification of the results thereof.
The balloting took place at all school and other educational facilities on June (November) __________, (Year) from ______ to ______.4 The
vote was by paper ballot.
The tally took place immediately after the closing of the polls at _____.5
Challenged ballots neither ruled on nor counted: _______.6
Results are certified to be as follows:
Public School Employee Organization3 _____________________
Public School Employee Organization3 _____________________
No Exclusive Representation _____________________
Void _____________________
Blank _____________________
Dated7: June (November) __ (Year)
____________________8
Election Judge (printed)
____________________
Election Judge (signature)
1 Designated public school employee unit (include County (City) in designation) 2 Local school board
Page 66
PROPOSED ACTION ON REGULATIONS
1548
MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 38, ISSUE 24, FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2011
3 Competing public school employee organizations 4 Hours for balloting 5 Location of central ballot counting 6 Ballots not counted 7 Date of election tally 8 Printed name and signature of election judge
Form 10
Representation Election Ballot
____________________________
(Unit)
____________________________
(Local Board)
____________________________
(Date of Election)
Mark your choice with (X) in one box only. Do not sign ballot or make any other marks
[ ] _______________________________________________
(Name of Organization)
[ ] _______________________________________________
(Name of Organization)
[ ] No Exclusive Representation
________________________________
14.34.02 General Procedures
Authority: Education Article, §§2-205(e), 6-403, 6-407, 6-408(a)(1), 6-
408(c)(5), 6-408(e)(1), 6-409, 6-504(a), 6-509, 6-510(a)(1), 6-510(c)(5), 6-
510(e)(1), and 6-512 and Title 6, Subtitle 8, Annotated Code of Maryland
NOTE: All forms referenced in the following regulations
appear at the end of the Proposed Action on Regulations
section of this issue of the Maryland Register.
.01 Charge of violation of Title 6, Subtitle 4 or Subtitle 5, of
Education Article.
A. A party alleging a violation of Education Article, Title 6,
Subtitle 4 or Subtitle 5, Annotated Code of Maryland, may request
relief from the Public School Labor Relations Board by completing
Form PSLRB-05 and filing it with the Executive Director of the
Board.
B. In order to be timely, Form PSLRB-05 must be filed with the
Executive Director of the PSLRB within 60 days after the charging
party knew, or reasonably should have known, of the statutory
violation alleged.
C. The Board or the Executive Director may extend this time
period:
(1) Before the initial time period ends, without motion or
notice, if good cause for the extension is shown; and
(2) After the initial time period ends, upon written motion filed
with the Executive Director, if the failure to act was the result of
excusable neglect or good cause.
.02 Requests to Resolve a Dispute as to Negotiability.
A party requesting a resolution of a dispute as to negotiability
may request relief from the Public School Labor Relations Board by
completing Form PSLRB-04 and filing it with the Executive Director
of the Board.
.03 Requests for Determination that an Impasse in Negotiations
Has Been Reached.
A. A party requesting a determination that an impasse in
negotiations has been reached may request relief from the Public
School Labor Relations Board by completing Form PSLRB-01 and
filing it with the Executive Director of the Board.
B. In response to a filing of Form PSLRB-01, the Public School
Labor Relations Board may, after internal deliberations and
investigation, as appropriate, issue Form PSLRB-02 (Notice of
Determination that an Impasse in Negotiations Has Been Reached)
or Form PSLRB-03 (Notice of Determination that an Impasse in
Negotiations Has Not Been Reached).
ERICA SNIPES
Executive Director
Public School Labor Relations Board
Title 31
MARYLAND INSURANCE
ADMINISTRATION
Subtitle 10 HEALTH INSURANCE —
GENERAL
31.10.01 Health Insurance
Authority: Insurance Article, §§2-109, 12-203, [13-110(a), 13-111(b), 14-
109(3)(iv), 14-405(b)(9), 14-410(c), 15-903, 15-904, 15-906—15-908, and 15-911; Health-General Article, §19-713;] 12-205, and §14-126(a)(1),
Annotated Code of Maryland
Notice of Proposed Action
[11-327-P]
The Insurance Commissioner proposes to amend Regulation .01,
adopt new Regulation .02, and amend and recodify existing
Regulation .02 to be Regulation .03 under COMAR 31.10.01 Health
Insurance.
Statement of Purpose
The purpose of this action is to require notice of a rate increase to
a health benefit plan policyholder in the individual market at least 45
Page 67
PROPOSED ACTION ON REGULATIONS
1549
MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 38, ISSUE 24, FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2011
days before the change in premium rates is proposed to be effective,
to make technical corrections, and to add clarifying definitions. The
45-day notice is the same notice that already exists for health benefit
plans issued by health maintenance organizations in the individual
market and is the same time frame for health benefit plans in the
group market.
Prior to this amendment the notice period was 40 days before the
expiration of the grace period applicable to the first increased
premium. The grace period is 31 days for individual health benefit
plans, so the health benefit plan policyholder was receiving notice
only 9 days prior to the premium increase taking effect. This action
provides consistent notice periods for all health benefit plan
policyholders.
The Commissioner is proposing this change so that the
notification period is uniformly 45 days for health benefit plans in the
individual and group markets. This change was also a
recommendation from Oliver Wyman Actuarial Consulting, Inc., the
firm retained by the Commissioner to recommend changes to the rate
review process in Maryland.
Comparison to Federal Standards
There is no corresponding federal standard to this proposed action.
Estimate of Economic Impact
The proposed action has no economic impact.
Economic Impact on Small Businesses
The proposed action has minimal or no economic impact on small
businesses.
Impact on Individuals with Disabilities
The proposed action has no impact on individuals with disabilities.
Opportunity for Public Comment
Comments may be sent to Katrina Lawhorn, Regulations
Coordinator, Maryland Insurance Administration, 200 St. Paul Place,
Suite 2700, Baltimore, Maryland 21202, or call 410-468-2450, or
email to [email protected] , or fax to 410-468-
2020. Comments will be accepted through December 19, 2011. A
public hearing has not been scheduled.
.01 Applicability.
Every health insurance policy issued under Insurance Article, Title
15, Annotated Code of Maryland, as amended to date, shall comply
with this chapter (except that Regulation [.02D] .03D and J of this
chapter are not applicable to policies issued under Insurance Article,
Title 13, Subtitle 3), as well as with any other regulations
promulgated under Insurance Article, §12-203, concerning the
submission of forms. As used in these regulations, the word [―form‖]
―forms‖ includes applications, policies, certificates, contracts, riders,
and endorsements except when the context indicates otherwise.
.02 Definition.
A. In this chapter, the following terms have the meanings
indicated.
B. Terms Defined.
(1) ―Carrier‖ means a person that is:
(a) An insurer; or
(b) A nonprofit health service plan.
(2) ―Health benefit plan‖ has the meaning stated in Insurance
Article, §15-1301, Annotated Code of Maryland.
(3) ―Individual health benefit plan‖ means a health benefit
plan issued by a carrier to a policyholder to cover:
(a) The policyholder;
(b) The policyholder’s dependents; or
(c) The policyholder and the policyholder’s dependents.
(4) ―Policyholder‖ means the person to whom the carrier’s
contract is issued.
[.02] .03 Filing of Health Insurance Forms for Approval.
A. (text unchanged)
A-1. [An insurer] A carrier submitting forms for approval, or
premiums for forms pending approval or previously approved, shall
print or type in a conspicuous manner immediately below the name
of the [insurer] carrier on the letter of transmittal the [insurer‘s]
carrier’s National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC)
company code number.
B. Any name or title of a policy should be printed in a size of type
smaller than that used for the name of the [insurer] carrier.
C.—Q. (text unchanged)
R. [In] Except in the case of a health benefit plan, in any policy
form in which the [insurer] carrier has the right to change premium
rates, the policy shall provide that notice of any increase in rates shall
be given to the policyholder by mail at least 40 days before the
expiration of the grace period applicable to the first increased
premium.
S. In any individual health benefit plan in which the carrier has
the right to change premium rates, the health benefit plan shall
provide that notice of any increase in premium rates shall be given to
the policyholder by mail at least 45 days before the change in
premium rates is proposed to become effective.
[S.] T. (text unchanged)
THERESE M. GOLDSMITH
Insurance Commissioner
Page 84
1550
MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 38, ISSUE 24, FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2011
Errata
COMAR 09.03.12 At 38:23 Md. R. 1416 (November 4, 2011), column 2, after line 5
from the top, insert:
Editor‘s Note: The text of this document will not be printed here
because it appeared as a Notice of Proposed Action in 38:21 Md. R.
1289—1292 (October 7, 2011), referenced as [11-264-P].
COMAR 10.54.03 At 38:23 Md. R. 1416 (November 4, 2011), column 2, before line
2 from the bottom, insert:
Editor‘s Note: The text of this document will not be printed here
because it appeared as a Notice of Proposed Action in 38:21 Md. R.
1296—1297 (October 7, 2011), referenced as [11-283-P].
COMAR 11.18.02 At 38:23 Md. R. 1417 (November 4, 2011), column 1, after line
17 from the top, insert:
Editor‘s Note: The text of this document will not be printed here
because it appeared as a Notice of Proposed Action in 38:22 Md. R.
1374 (October 21, 2011), referenced as [11-299-P].
COMAR 34.04.07 At 38:23 Md. R. 1418 (November 4, 2011), column 2, before line
2 from the bottom, insert:
Editor‘s Note: The text of this document will not be printed here
because it appeared as a Notice of Proposed Action in 38:20 Md. R.
1252 (September 23, 2011), referenced as [11-265-P].
[11-24-39]
COMAR 10.07.05 At 38:21 Md. R. 1277 (October 7, 2011), column 2, delete lines
14—16 from the top.
[11-24-40]
Page 85
1551
MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 38, ISSUE 24, FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2011
Special Documents
MARYLAND HEALTH CARE
COMMISSION
Application for Waiver to Provide
Primary Percutaneous Coronary
Intervention (pPCI) Services The Maryland Health Care Commission hereby publishes this
schedule for the submission of applications to request a waiver to
provide primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) services
in a hospital without on-site cardiac surgery. The Commission will
receive applications on the dates listed below. This schedule extends
the schedule published in 38:4 Md. R. 301 (February 11, 2011). A
hospital that seeks to initiate pPCI services without on-site cardiac
surgery must submit an application for a waiver. A hospital with a 2-
year pPCI waiver must submit an application for the renewal of its
waiver. A hospital that has received a 1-year waiver to initiate a pPCI
program must provide pPCI services for a 1-year period before
receiving a 2-year waiver. An applicant must demonstrate the ability
to comply with all requirements for pPCI programs without on-site
cardiac surgery as specified in the regulations. The general procedure
to obtain a pPCI waiver is set forth at COMAR 10.24.17.05D(1). For
further information about this schedule, call Christina Daw, Health
Policy Analyst, Specialized Services Policy and Planning, at 410-
764-8790.
Applications from Hospitals Seeking to Initiate pPCI Services
Metropolitan Baltimore — January 11, 2012
Metropolitan Washington — April 12, 2012
Eastern Shore — July 12, 2012
Western Maryland — October 11, 2012
Metropolitan Baltimore — January 10, 2013
Renewal Applications from Hospitals with 2-Year pPCI Waivers
Waiver Issued in February 2011 — November 14, 2012
Waiver Issued in March 2011 — December 12, 2012
Waiver Issued in May 2011 — February 13, 2013
Waiver Issued in June 2011 — March 13, 2013
Waiver Issued in September 2011 — June 12, 2013
Waiver Issued in December 2011 — September 11, 2013
Applications for 2-Year Waivers from Hospitals with 1-Year pPCI
Waivers
A hospital with a 1-year pPCI waiver must file an application
seeking a 2-year waiver 90 days before the anniversary date of its
initiation of primary PCI services at the hospital.
[11-24-38]
Page 86
1552
MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 38, ISSUE 24, FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2011
General Notices
Notice of ADA Compliance
The State of Maryland is committed to ensuring that individuals with disabilities are able to fully participate in public meetings. Anyone
planning to attend a meeting announced below who wishes to receive auxiliary aids, services, or accommodations is invited to contact the
agency representative at least 48 hours in advance, at the telephone number listed in the notice or through Maryland Relay.
ATHLETIC COMMISSION
Subject: Public Meeting
Date and Time: December 2, 2011, 2 — 4
p.m.
Place: 500 N. Calvert St., 3rd Fl. Conf.
Rm., Baltimore, MD
Contact: Patrick Pannella (410) 230-6223
[11-24-22]
BOARD FOR THE CERTIFICATION
OF RESIDENTIAL CHILD CARE
PROGRAM ADMINISTRATORS
Subject: Public Meeting
Date and Time: December 9, 2011, 9 a.m.
Place: 4201 Patterson Ave., Rms. 100/107,
Baltimore, MD
Contact: Carol Johnson (410) 764-5996
[11-24-07]
BOARD OF CHIROPRACTIC AND
MASSAGE THERAPY EXAMINERS
Subject: Public Meeting
Date and Time: December 8, 2011, 10
a.m. — 1 p.m.
Place: Dept. of Health and Mental
Hygiene, 4201 Patterson Ave., Rm.
108/109, Baltimore, MD
Contact: Maria Ware (410) 764-5902
[11-24-25]
CONSUMER COUNCIL OF
MARYLAND
Subject: Public Meeting
Date and Time: December 2, 2011, 9:15
— 11 a.m.
Place: 200 St. Paul Pl., 16th Fl., Baltimore,
MD
Contact: Stephanie A. Hodge (410) 576-
6557
[11-24-31]
CRIMINAL JUSTICE INFORMATION
ADVISORY BOARD
Subject: Public Meeting
Date and Time: December 12, 2011, 1 —
3 p.m.
Place: Judicial Training Center, 2009D
Commerce Park Dr., Rm. 5-6, Annapolis,
MD
Contact: Robyn Lyles (410) 585-3185
[11-24-32]
COMMISSION ON CRIMINAL
SENTENCING POLICY
Subject: Public Meeting
Date and Time: December 13, 2011, 5 —
5:45 p.m.
Place: Judiciary Committee Hearing Rm.,
House Office Bldg., Annapolis, MD
Contact: David Soule (301) 403-4165
[11-24-16]
COMMISSION ON CRIMINAL
SENTENCING POLICY
Subject: Public Hearing
Date and Time: December 13, 2011, 6:15
— 8 p.m.
Place: Judiciary Committee Hearing Rm.,
House Office Bldg., Annapolis, MD
Contact: David Soule (301) 403-4165
[11-24-17]
PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS AND
TEACHER EDUCATION BOARD
Subject: Public Meeting
Date and Time: December 1, 2011, 9 a.m.
— 12 p.m.
Place: 200 W. Baltimore St., Baltimore,
MD
Contact: Madeline Koum (410) 767-0385
[11-24-06]
MARYLAND STATE BOARD OF
EDUCATION
Subject: Public Meeting
Date and Time: December 6, 2011, 9 a.m.
— 5 p.m.; December 7, 2011
Place: 200 W. Baltimore St., Baltimore,
MD
Add’l. Info: The State Board of Education
is pleased to receive oral public comment
at each of its regular monthly meetings. In
order to allow the State Board sufficient
time for its other business, the total time
allotted to public comment will generally
be limited to 30 minutes. Individuals
seeking to speak to the Board will
be given 3 minutes each. Persons
desiring to speak to the State Board,
must call (410-767-0467) or e-mail
([email protected] ) the Board
office no earlier than 1 week prior to the
meeting to register to speak. Registration
will be accepted on a first-come, first-
served basis. In order to make the limited
time available most effective, speakers are
urged to provide multiple written copies of
their comments or other material
amplifying their views.
Contact: Charlene L. Necessary (410) 767-
0467
[11-24-05]
ELEVATOR SAFETY REVIEW
BOARD
Subject: Public Meeting
Date and Time: December 1, 2011, 1:30
— 5 p.m.
Place: 500 N. Calvert St., 2nd Fl. Conf.
Rm., Baltimore, MD
Contact: Raquel M. Meyers (410) 230-
6379
[11-24-01]
STATEWIDE EMERGENCY
MEDICAL SERVICES ADVISORY
COUNCIL (SEMSAC)
Subject: Public Meeting
Date and Time: December 1, 2011, 1 — 3
p.m.
Place: 653 W. Pratt St., Ste. 212,
Baltimore, MD
Add’l. Info: The State Emergency Medical
Services Advisory Council (SEMSAC)
meets regularly the 1st Thursday of each
month.
Contact: Leandrea Gilliam (410) 706-4449
[11-24-10]
BOARD FOR PROFESSIONAL
ENGINEERS
Subject: Public Meeting
Date and Time: December 8, 2011, 9 a.m.
Place: 500 N. Calvert St, 3rd Floor,
Financial Regulation Conf. Rm., Baltimore,
MD
Contact: Pamela J. Edwards (410) 230-
6262
[11-24-34]
FIRE PREVENTION COMMISSION
Subject: Public Meeting
Date and Time: December 13, 2011, 10:30
a.m.
Place: Waldorf Fire Station, 3245 Old
Washington Rd., Waldorf, MD
Add’l. Info: If public schools in Charles
County are closed due to inclement
weather, the meeting will be rescheduled.
Contact: Heidi Ritchie (877) 890-0199
[11-24-36]
Page 87
GENERAL NOTICES
1553
MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 38, ISSUE 24, FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2011
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
MENTAL HYGIENE/OFFICE OF
HEALTH SERVICES
Subject: Draft Special Needs Trust
Regulations
Add’l. Info: Pursuant to the enactment of
Estates and Trusts Article, §14-115,
Annotated Code of Maryland, the Department
of Health and Mental Hygiene (DHMH) has
developed a draft series of regulations that
reflect Estates and Trusts Article, §14-115,
Annotated Code of Maryland, and clean up
existing trust regulations at COMAR
10.09.24.08-2C. A copy of the Draft Special
Needs Trust Regulations is available on the
DHMH home page, located at
www.dhmh.state.md.us, on the left side of the
page under the Hot Topics area.
DHMH seeks public comment from
members of the public, interested parties, and
persons knowledgeable about special needs
trusts. DHMH is seeking these comments
prior to commencing the formal regulation
promulgation process and DHMH intends to
take these comments into account when it
subsequently commences the formal
regulatory process. Specifically, DHMH is
seeking comments by December 16, 2011, on
draft regulations the Department has
developed and posted. Comments may be
submitted by mail to Michele Phinney,
Director, Department of Health and Mental
Hygiene, 201 W. Preston St., Room 512,
Baltimore, MD 21201; by calling 410-767-
6499 (TTY 800-735-2258); by email to
[email protected] , or by fax to 410-
767-6483.
Contact: Michele Phinney (410) 767-6499
[11-24-35]
BOARD OF HEATING,
VENTILATION, AIR-
CONDITIONING, AND
REFRIGERATION CONTRACTORS
(HVACR)
Subject: Public Meeting
Date and Time: December 14, 2011, 9:30
a.m. — 12 p.m.
Place: 500 N. Calvert St., 3rd Fl. Conf.
Rm., Baltimore, MD
Contact: Steve Smitson (410) 230-6169
[11-23-12]
HOME IMPROVEMENT
COMMISSION
Subject: Public Meeting
Date and Time: December 1, 2011, 10
a.m. — 12:30 p.m.
Place: 500 N. Calvert St., 2nd Fl. Conf.
Rm., Baltimore, MD
Contact: Steven Smitson (410) 230-6169
[11-24-04]
MARYLAND INSURANCE
ADMINSTRATION
Subject: Public Hearing
Date and Time: December 13 and 14,
2011, 10 a.m.
Place: Maryland Insurance Administration,
200 St. Paul Pl., 24th Fl., Hearing Rm.,
Baltimore, MD
Add’l. Info: The purpose of this hearing is
to receive information regarding the current
availability and affordability of personal
and commercial property and casualty
insurance in Maryland‘s coastal areas.
Contact: Megan Hayes (410) 468-2018
[11-24-21]
BOARD FOR PROFESSIONAL LAND
SURVEYORS
Subject: Public Meeting
Date and Time: December 7, 2011, 10
a.m.
Place: 500 N. Calvert St., 3rd Fl. Conf.
Rm., Baltimore, MD
Contact: Pamela J. Edwards (410) 230-
6262
[11-24-33]
MARYLAND HEALTH CARE
COMMISSION
Subject: Public Meeting
Date and Time: December 15, 2011, 1
p.m.
Place: Maryland Health Care Commission,
4160 Patterson Ave., Conf. Rm. 100,
Baltimore, MD
Add’l. Info: Individuals requiring special
accommodations are requested to contact
Valerie Wooding at (410) 764-3460, or the
Department of Health and Mental Hygiene
TTY at (410) 383-7755, not later than 20
days the meeting to make arrangements.
Contact: Valerie Wooding (410) 764-3460
[11-24-02]
MARYLAND HEALTH CARE
COMMISSION
Subject: Receipt of Application
Add’l. Info: On October 7, 2011 the
Maryland Health Care Commission
(MHCC) received an application for
Certificate of Need submitted by Waldorf
Health & Rehabilitation Center — Matter
No. 11-08-2324 — Application for the
relocation of a previously approved
Certificate of Need, Docket No. 10-08-
2309 for the construction of a new 67-bed
nursing home facility with 80 assisted
living beds from 3735 Leonardtown Road
in Waldorf to Lot 1, Part of Parcel AA,
Fairway Village in St. Charles
Communities, located off Demarr Road
near the intersection with St. Charles
Parkway, Waldorf.
The MHCC shall review the application
under Health-General Article, §19-101 et
seq., Annotated Code of Maryland, and
COMAR 10.24.01.
Any affected person may make a written
request to the Commission to receive
copies of relevant notices concerning the
application. All further notices of
proceedings on the application will be sent
only to affected persons who have
registered as interested parties.
Please refer to the Matter No. listed
above in any correspondence on the
application. A copy of the application is
available for review in the office of the
MHCC, during regular business hours by
appointment. All correspondence should be
addressed to Paul Parker, Acting Director,
Center for Hospital Services, MHCC, 4160
Patterson Avenue, Baltimore, Maryland
21215
Contact: Ruby Potter (410) 764-3276
[11-24-26]
MARYLAND HEALTH CARE
COMMISSION
Subject: Formal Start of Review
Add’l. Info: Genesis Bayview SNF —
Docket No. 11-24-2323 — Construction of
a new skilled nursing facility on the
campus of Johns Hopkins Bayview
Medical Center, where the existing Johns
Hopkins Bayview Care center is located.
The new facility will include 132 CCF beds
purchased from the care center. Cost:
$26,150,769
Pursuant to COMAR 10.24.01 et seq. on
November 18, 2011, the Maryland Health
Care Commission hereby gives notice of
docketing of the above-referenced
applications.
Persons desiring to become interested
parties in the Commission‘s review of the
above-referenced application must meet the
requirements of COMAR 10.24.01.01B(2)
and (20) and must also submit written
comments to the Commission no later than
close of business on December 19, 2011.
These comments must state with
particularity the State Health Plan
standards or review criteria that you believe
have not been met by the applicant as
stated in COMAR 10.24.01.08F.
Questions may be directed to Paul
Parker, Acting Deputy Director, Center for
Hospital Services at (410) 764-3261, or
send to MHCC, 4160 Patterson Avenue,
Baltimore, Maryland 21215.
Contact: Ruby Potter (410) 764-3261
[11-24-37]
Page 88
GENERAL NOTICES
1554
MARYLAND REGISTER, VOLUME 38, ISSUE 24, FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2011
MINORITY BUSINESS ENTERPRISE
ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Subject: Public Meeting
Date and Time: December 7, 2011, 8:30
a.m. — 5 p.m.
Place: Harry R. Hughes Dept. of
Transportation Bldg., 7201 Corporate
Center Dr., Hanover, MD
Contact: Pam Gregory (410) 865-1253
[11-24-11]
BOARD OF EXAMINERS OF
NURSING HOME ADMINISTRATORS
Subject: Public Meeting
Date and Time: December 14, 2011, 9:30
a.m.
Place: 4201 Patterson Ave., Rm. 110,
Baltimore, MD
Contact: Patricia A. Hannigan (410) 764-
4750
[11-24-15]
BOARD OF OCCUPATIONAL
THERAPY PRACTICE
Subject: Public Meeting
Date and Time: December 16, 2011, 8:30
a.m. — 2 p.m.
Place: Spring Grove Hospital Center, 55
Wade Ave., Catonsville, MD
Add’l. Info: Health Occupations Article,
Title 10, Annotated Code of Maryland, and
COMAR 10.46 amendments, additions,
and revisions, including fee changes, may
be discussed/voted on. Budget information
may also be discussed. It may be necessary
to go into executive session. Sign language
interpreters and/or appropriate
accommodations for qualified individuals
with disabilities will be provided upon
request. Please call 1-800-735-2255.
Contact: Marilyn Pinkney (410) 402-8556
[11-24-13]
BOARD OF PODIATRIC MEDICAL
EXAMINERS
Subject: Public Meeting
Date and Time: December 8, 2011, 1 p.m.
Place: 4201 Patterson Ave., Rm. 110,
Baltimore, MD
Contact: Sheri Henderson (410) 764-4785
[11-24-03]
PROCUREMENT ADVISORY
COUNCIL (PAC)
Subject: Public Meeting
Date and Time: November 29, 2011, 1 —
3 p.m.
Place: Inn and Conference Center, 3501
University Blvd. E., Rm. ICC-3114,
Adelphi, MD
Contact: Melissa Hodges (410) 260-7335
[11-24-20]
BOARD OF EXAMINERS OF
PSYCHOLOGISTS
Subject: Public Meeting
Date and Time: December 9, 2011, 9 a.m.
— 1 p.m.
Place: Loyola University, Columbia
Graduate Center, 8890 McGraw Rd.,
Columbia, MD
Add’l. Info: Sign language interpreters/other
appropriate accommodations for qualified
individuals with disabilities will be provided
upon request.
Contact: Dorothy Kutcherman (410) 764-
4703
[11-24-19]
STATE BOARD OF INDIVIDUAL TAX
PREPARERS
Subject: Public Meeting
Date and Time: December 12, 2011, 1:30
— 5 p.m.
Place: 500 N. Calvert St., 3rd Fl. Conf.
Rm., Baltimore, MD
Contact: Douglas Blackstone (410) 230-
6257
[11-24-30]
MARYLAND TRANSPORTATION
AUTHORITY
Subject: Public Meeting
Date and Time: November 30, 2011, 10
a.m. — 12 p.m.
Place: Maryland Transportation Authority,
Point Breeze Complex, 2310 Broening
Hwy., Ste. 160, Baltimore, MD
Add’l. Info: A portion of this meeting may
be held in closed session.
Contact: Cindy Taylor (410) 537-1002
[11-24-28]
WORKERS’ COMPENSATION
COMMISSION
Subject: Public Meeting
Date and Time: December 8, 2011, 9 —
11 a.m.
Place: 10 E. Baltimore St., Baltimore, MD
Add’l. Info: Portions of this meeting may
be held in closed session.
Contact: Amy Lackington (410) 864-5300
[11-24-08]
Page 89
Updated on 4/27/2011
COMAR PDF ORDER FORM
Titles Agency Name Price1 Subscription2 Quantity Total
Complete set of COMAR PDF format $1,000 $500 _____ _____ Title 01 Executive Department $35 $24 _____ _____ Title 02 Office of the Attorney General $22 $13 _____ _____ Title 03 Comptroller of the Treasury $30 $20 _____ _____ Title 04 General Services $16 $10 _____ _____ Title 05 Housing and Community Development $78 $50 _____ _____ Title 07 Human Resources $80 $53 _____ _____ Title 08 Natural Resources $78 $51 _____ _____ Title 09 Labor, Licensing and Regulation $89 $60 _____ _____ Title 10 Health & Mental Hygiene (All parts) ** $272 $180 _____ _____ Title 10 Part 1 ** $48 $32 _____ _____ Title 10 Part 2 ** $75 $50 _____ _____ Title 10 Part 3 ** $75 $50 _____ _____ Title 10 Part 4 ** $50 $35 _____ _____ Title 10 Part 5 ** $69 $50 _____ _____ Title 11 Transportation (All parts) ** $106 $75 _____ _____ Title 11 Part 1 (Transportation) ** $42 $25 _____ _____ Title 11 Parts 2 & 3 (MVA)** $74 $50 _____ _____ Title 12 Public Safety and Correctional Services $67 $43 _____ _____
Title 13A Board of Education $63 $42 _____ _____ Title 13B Higher Education Commission $25 $15 _____ _____ Title 14 Independent Agencies $87 $60 _____ _____ Title 15 Agriculture $48 $30 _____ _____ Title 16 Juvenile Service $23 $15 _____ _____ Title 17 Budget and Management $28 $16 _____ _____ Title 18 Assessments and Taxation $20 $12 _____ _____
Title 19A State Ethics Commission $24 $14 _____ _____ Title 20 Public Service Commission $49 $32 _____ _____ Title 21 State Procurement Regulations $48 $30 _____ _____ Title 22 State Retirement and Pension System $22 $13 _____ _____ Title 23 Board of Public Works $18 $11 _____ _____ Title 24 Business and Economic Development $34 $20 _____ _____ Title 25 State Treasurer $16 $9 _____ _____ Title 26 Environment (All parts) ** $189 $125 _____ _____ Title 26 Part 1 ** $54 $35 _____ _____ Title 26 Part 2 ** $83 $52 _____ _____ Title 26 Part 3 ** $57 $38 _____ _____ Title 26 Part 4 ** $37 $24 _____ _____ Title 27 Critical Area Comm. for the Chesapeake and Atlantic Coastal Bays $18 $10 _____ _____ Title 28 Office of Administrative Hearings $16 $9 _____ _____ Title 29 State Police $30 $18 _____ _____ Title 30 MD Institute for Emergency Medical Services Systems $25 $17 _____ _____ Title 31 Maryland Insurance Administration $68 $45 _____ _____ Title 32 Aging $25 $15 _____ _____ Title 33 State Board of Elections $42 $25 _____ _____ Title 34 Planning $31 $18 _____ _____ Title 35 Veterans Affairs $16 $9 _____ _____
Individual Binders (COMAR PDF’s binders not included) $15 S & H $9.00 _____ _____ Total: _____
Prices are for single user license only ~ Multi-user licenses are available. Please call 410-260-3876 for pricing information. 1 Price is per copy of each Title 2 Subscription (optional) - Receive updated information quarterly. ~ If ordered, subscription quantities MUST match Title quantities. ** See the following pages for description of contents
Page 90
COMAR PRINT ORDER FORM (8 ½ x 11 format) Titles Agency Name Price1 Subscription2 Quantity Total
Complete set of COMAR (includes binders) $1,400 $700 _____ _____ Title 01 Executive Department $47 $30 _____ _____ Title 02 Office of the Attorney General $31 $20 _____ _____ Title 03 Comptroller of the Treasury $41 $25 _____ _____ Title 04 General Services $23 $12 _____ _____ Title 05 Housing and Community Development $103 $70 _____ _____ Title 07 Human Resources $104 $70 _____ _____ Title 08 Natural Resources $102 $70 _____ _____ Title 09 Labor, Licensing and Regulation $116 $75 _____ _____ Title 10 Health & Mental Hygiene (All Parts)** $345 $230 _____ _____ Title 10 Part 1 ** $65 $40 _____ _____ Title 10 Part 2 ** $99 $70 _____ _____ Title 10 Part 3 ** $99 $70 _____ _____ Title 10 Part 4 ** $69 $42 _____ _____ Title 10 Part 5 ** $91 $62 _____ _____ Title 11 Transportation (All parts) ** $137 $85 _____ _____ Title 11 Part 1 (Transportation)** $55 $35 _____ _____ Title 11 Parts 2 & 3 (MVA) ** $102 $70 _____ _____ Title 12 Public Safety and Correctional Services $86 $55 _____ _____
Title 13A Board of Education $83 $60 _____ _____ Title 13B Higher Education Commission $34 $20 _____ _____ Title 14 Independent Agencies $112 $75 _____ _____ Title 15 Agriculture $63 $40 _____ _____ Title 16 Juvenile Service $32 $20 _____ _____ Title 17 Budget and Management $38 $25 _____ _____ Title 18 Assessments and Taxation $28 $18 _____ _____
Title 19A State Ethics Commission $33 $20 _____ _____ Title 20 Public Service Commission $64 $42 _____ _____ Title 21 State Procurement Regulations $65 $42 _____ _____ Title 22 State Retirement and Pension System $33 $18 _____ _____ Title 23 Board of Public Works $26 $15 _____ _____ Title 24 Business and Economic Development $47 $25 _____ _____ Title 25 State Treasurer $23 $12 _____ _____ Title 26 Environment (All parts) ** $241 $160 _____ _____ Title 26 Part 1 ** $72 $42 _____ _____ Title 26 Part 2 ** $109 $72 _____ _____ Title 26 Part 3 ** $76 $50 _____ _____ Title 26 Part 4 ** $51 $30 _____ _____ Title 27 Critical Area Comm. for the Chesapeake and Atlantic Coastal Bays $26 $15 _____ _____ Title 28 Office of Administrative Hearings $23 $12 _____ _____ Title 29 State Police $40 $22 _____ _____ Title 30 MD Institute for Emergency Medical Services Systems $34 $20 _____ _____ Title 31 Maryland Insurance Administration $90 $62 _____ _____ Title 32 Aging $34 $18 _____ _____ Title 33 State Board of Elections $57 $35 _____ _____ Title 34 Planning $42 $25 _____ _____ Title 35 Veterans Affairs $23 $12 _____ _____
Binders $15 S & H $9.00 _____ _____ Shipping & Handling Total: _________ Order Total: _____
1 Price is per copy of each Title Binder included with purchase of Title 2 Subscription (optional) - Receive updated information bi-annually ~ If ordered, subscription quantities MUST match Title quantities. ** See the following pages for description of contents
Shipping/Handling Publication Total Shipping $ 0-50 $15 $ 51-150 $20 $ 151-300 $25 $ 301-400 $35 $400 + please call Subscription Department. State agencies using courier, may omit
Note: COMAR prices are subject to change. Check the date on the lower right hand corner of this form. If the form is more than two months old, call the COMAR Subscription Manager (410-974-2486) to confirm prices. Fees are not refundable.
Updated on 4/27/2011
Page 91
Updated on 4/27/2011
SPECIAL PUBLICATIONS
Publication / Handbook Print Price S & H Quantity Total
Preventive Maintenance Handbook (PM Handbook) $15 $5 _____ _____ Vehicle Inspection Handbook $40 $9 _____ _____ Forest Conservation Technical Manual 3rd Edition, 1997 $25 $9 _____ _____ Forest Conservation Law $20 $9 _____ _____ Control of Ionizing Radiation (including supplements up to 19) $130 $12 _____ _____ Total _____ If more than one quantity, shipping charges may vary, please call 410-260-3876 for pricing information.
Just In 26.12.01.01 Print Price S & H Quantity Total
Control of Ionizing Radiation supplements 18 & 19 ONLY $42 $9 _____ _____ If more than one quantity, shipping charges may vary, please call 410-260-3876 for pricing information.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Date ____________________________ Account Number _____________________________ Name________________________________________________________________________ Company_____________________________________________________________________ Address______________________________________________________________________ City______________________________State____________Zip_________________________ Tel.___________________________________ Fax___________________________________ Email: _______________________________________________________________________ _______ Check enclosed, made payable to Division of State Documents _______ Visa/Master Card/American Express/Discover card payment: Acct.#_________________________________________ Exp.____________
Signature __________________________Tel:_____________________________ Return form & payment to: Office of the Secretary of State, Division of State Documents ~ State House ~ Annapolis, MD 21401 ~ Tel: 410-260-3876 ~ 800-633-9657 ext. 3876 ~ Fax: 410-280-5647
Page 92
CODE OF MARYLAND REGULATIONS
Titles 10, 11, and 26 consist of more than one volume. Each volume may be purchased separately.
Title 10 Department of Health and Mental Hygiene: Part & Subtitles
Part 1 01 Procedures 02 Division of Reimbursements 03 Health Statistics 04 Fiscal 05 Freestanding Ambulatory Care Facilities 06 Diseases 07 Hospitals 08 Health Facilities Grants Part 2 09 Medical Care Programs Part 3 10 Laboratories 11 Maternal and Child Health 12 Adult Health 13 Drugs 14 Cancer Control 15 Food 16 Housing 17 Sanitation 18 Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Infection and Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS) 19 Dangerous Devices and Substances 20 Kidney Disease Program 21 Mental Hygiene Regulations 22 Developmental Disabilities Part 4 23 Advance Directive Registry 24 Maryland Health Care Commission 25 Maryland Health Care Commission 26 Board of Acupuncture 27 Board of Nursing 28 Board of Examiners in Optometry 29 Board of Morticians and Funeral Directors 30 Commission on Kidney Disease 31 Health Occupation Boards 32 Board of Physicians 33 Board of Examiners of Nursing Home Administrators 34 Board of Pharmacy 35 Postmortem Examiners Commission 36 Board of Examiners of Psychologists Part 5 37 Health Services Cost Review Commission 38 Board of Physical Therapy Examiners 39 Board of Nursing – Certified Nursing Assistants 40 Board of Podiatric Medical Examiners 41 Board of Examiners for Audiologists, Hearing Aid Dispensers, and Speech-Language Pathologists 42 Board of Social Work Examiners 43 Board of Chiropractic Examiners 44 Board of Dental Examiners 45 Maryland Community Health Resources Commission 46 Board of Occupational Therapy Practice 47 Alcohol and Drug Abuse Administration 48 Child Abuse and Neglect Medical Reimbursement Program 49 State Anatomy Board 50 Tissue Banks 51 Vacant 52 Preventive Medicine 53 Board of Nursing—Electrology Practice Committee 54 Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) 55 State Board of Spinal Cord Injury Research 56 Board of Dietetic Practice 57 Board for Certification of Residential Child Care Program Professionals 58 Board of Professional Counselors and Therapists 59 Catastrophic Health Emergencies
Title 11 Department of Transportation – Volume & Subtitles Volume 1 01 Office of the Secretary 02 Transportation Service Human Resources System 03 Maryland Aviation Administration 04 State Highway Administration 05 Maryland Port Administration 06 Mass Transit Administration 07 Maryland Transportation Authority 08 Vacant 09 Vacant 10 Vacant Volume 2 and Volume 3 11 Motor Vehicle Administration – Administrative Procedures 12 MVA – Licensing of Businesses and Occupations 13 MVA – Vehicle Equipment 14 MVA – Vehicle Inspections 15 MVA – Vehicle Registration 16 MVA – Vehicle Operations 17 MVA – Driver Licensing and Identification Documents 18 MVA – Financial Responsibility Requirements 19 MVA – School Vehicles 20 MVA – Motorcycle Safety Program 21 MVA – Commercial Motor Vehicles 22 MVA – Preventive Maintenance Program 23 MVA – Drivers’ Schools, Instructors, Driver Education Program Title 26 Department of the Environment – Part & Subtitles Part 1 01 General Provisions 02 Occupational, Industrial, and Residential Hazards 03 Water Supply, Sewerage, Solid Waste, and Pollution Control
Planning and Funding 04 Regulation of Water Supply, Sewage Disposal, and Solid Waste 05 Board of Well Drillers 06 Waterworks and Waste Systems Operators 07 Board of Environmental Sanitarians Part 2 08 Water Pollution 09 Maryland CO2 Budget Trading Program 10 Oil Pollution and Tank Management 11 Air Quality 12 Radiation Management Part 3 13 Disposal of Controlled Hazardous Substances 14 Hazardous Substance Response Plan 15 Disposal of Controlled Hazardous Substances ― Radioactive Hazardous Substances 16 Lead 17 Water Management 18 Susquehanna River Basin Commission Part 4 19 Oil and Gas Resources 20 Surface Coal Mining and Reclamation under Federally Approved Program 21 Mining 22 Coastal Facilities Review 23 Nontidal Wetlands 24 Tidal Wetlands 25 Ballast Water Management 26 Community Right-to-Know Fund 27 Hazardous Material Security
Last Updated 4/2010
Page 93
Maryland Register Print and E-Version Order Form
The Maryland Register is a biweekly publication containing proposed, emergency, and final administrative regulations as well as other State government information. The Register serves as the temporary supplement to the Code of Maryland Regulations (COMAR). Any change to the text of regulations published in COMAR, whether by adoption, amendment, repeal, or emergency action, must first be published in the Register.
See separate Order Form for the Maryland Register Archive Issues from 1974 — 2010.
_____ $225 A single year of print 1st Class Mail Delivery.
_____ $190 A single-user annual eSubscription, which would provide a searchable pdf text file of each issue, emailed directly to one recipient’s email address.
_____ $130 Per additional user, per account subscription. Call 410-260-3876 for details.
Note: All products purchased are for individual use only. Resale or other compensated transfer of the information in printed or electronic form is a prohibited commercial purpose (see State Government Article, §7-206.2, Annotated Code of Maryland).
By purchasing a product, the buyer agrees that the purchase is for individual use only and will not sell or give the product to another individual or entity.
Please order by faxing the completed form to: Fax: 410-280-5647
By mailing it to: Division of State Documents State House Annapolis, MD 21401
By email to:
[email protected]
By calling: 410-260-3876
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Business/Firm: ___________________________________________
Name: __________________________________________________
Billing Address: __________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
City, State, Zip ___________________________________________
Tel: _______________________Fax:_________________________
Recipient’s Email:_________________________________________
Last updated on 1/2011
(Please circle payment choice and complete the order form)
Money Order or Check # ____________ Amount: $___________ or
VISA, MasterCard, American Express, Discover ~ Amount: $______________
Card # ______________________________________________________ Card Exp. Date: ____________
Signature: __________________________________________ Phone: _______________________
Date: ________________________
Acct.# _______________________
Page 94
Date: ____________
Existing Account#: _____________
eCOMAR Order Form
Name: __________________________________________________________________ Business Name: __________________________________________________________ Address: ________________________________________________________________ City: _______________________ State: ____________ Zip Code: ________________ Phone: __________________ Fax: _________________ Email: ______________________________________________ COMAR codification: ______________________ ;
(ex: 08.02.02*) ______________________ ;
______________________ ;
______________________ ;
______________________ ;
* Each codification entered is considered a separate document
Payment Method: _____ Check enclosed and made payable to "Division of State Documents" _____ Charge to my Visa / MasterCard / American Express / Discover Account# ________________________________________________ Expiration Date: _____________________ Signature: ______________________________ Phone No. ________________________
Return Options: Mail to: Fax: Division of State Documents 410-280-5647 State House Annapolis, Maryland 21401
* For documents containing tables, maps, graphics etc. additional fees may apply. —————— • For additional information, please call 410-974-2486 ext. 3876 or 800-633-6957 ext. 3876 or email your questions and inquiries to: [email protected] • Please allow up to 2 business days for turnaround.
Basic Page Pricing per Document*
1 — 20 $10 21— 40 $15 41 — 60 $20 61 — 80 $25 81 — 100 $30 101 — 120 $40 121 — 140 $50 141 — 160 $60 161 — 180 $70 181 — 200 $80 201 — 220 $90 221 — 240 $100 241 — 260 $110 260 — 280 $120 281 — 300 $130 Over 300 Call for pricing
Page 95
Maryland Register Archive Order Form The Division of State Documents has created pdf files of all the Maryland
Register issues since 1974. The issues from 1974—2003 are scanned images in pdf format of the actual Register and, as such, are not searchable, while the issues beginning with 2004 are searchable text in pdf format.
Single issues of the Maryland Register from 1974—present
_____ $10 Per issue of the Register from 1974—present via emailed pdf file. Please specify Issue(s): _______________________________________
_____ $15 Per issue of the Maryland Register from 1974—present via mailed hard-copy Please specify Issue(s): _______________________________________ An archival library of all Maryland Register issues from 1974—2003:
_____ $375 2 DVDs (1974 — 2010)
_____ $50 One year of the Maryland Register from 1974—2003 (unsearchable): Please specify Year(s): ______________________________
_____ $100 A single year of issues from 2004 forward will be available in January of the year following their publication. These will be searchable, on CD. Please specify: 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Note: All products purchased are for individual use only. Resale or other compensated transfer of the information in printed or electronic form is a prohibited commercial purpose (see State Government Article, §7-206.2, Annotated Code of Maryland).
By purchasing a product, the buyer agrees that the purchase is for individual use only and will not sell or give the product to another individual or entity.
Please order by faxing the completed form to: Fax: 410-280-5647
By mailing it to: Division of State Documents State House Annapolis, MD 21401
By email to:
[email protected]
Business/Firm: ___________________________________________
Name: __________________________________________________
Billing Address: __________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
City, State, Zip ___________________________________________
Tel: _______________________Fax:_________________________
By calling: 410-260-3876
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Recipient’s Email:_________________________________________
1/2011
(Please circle payment choice and complete the order form)
Money Order or Check # ____________ Amount: $___________ or
VISA, MasterCard, American Express, Discover ~ Amount: $______________
Card # ______________________________________________________ Card Exp. Date: ____________
Signature: __________________________________________ Phone: _______________________
Date: ________________________
Acct.# _______________________