35 Measuring Agency-Level Results Part II: Mission Metrics April 10, 2013 Presented by Barbara Willett Director of Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning.

35Measuring Agency-Level Results Part II: Mission Metrics

April 10, 2013

Presented by Barbara WillettDirector of Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning

Mercy Corps

What is Mission Metrics

An agency initiative to

understand how we – collectively –

are achieving our mission.Mission StatementMercy Corps exists to alleviate suffering,

poverty and oppression by helping people build secure, productive and just

communities.

3

Mission Indicators: How They Work

• Program indicators are aligned with Mission Indicators

• Results are reported• Data is reviewed for quality and

methodology• Results aggregated, analyzed,

discussed, presented• Recommendations for action• Monitoring of actions and

learnings

Program Indicators

Mission Indicator

AGENCY RESULTS

35

Mission Metrics Learning Cycle

Reflect/ DiscussAnalyze

Revi

ew

Resu

lts/L

earn

Make

Decisions

Take Action

Incoming Data

Cycle of Learning

10.2-Accountable Governance

10.1-Communities Engaged in Governance9.3-Improved Relationships

9.2-Mechanisms to Manage Conflict9.1-Improved Peace/Security

8.1-Sectors Interacting7.2-Participation of Marginalized

7.1-Improved Capacity - Marginalized6.2-Jobs Created

6.1-Improved Markets

5.2-Partner Capacity5.1-Community Action

4.1-Household Prosperity3.2-Improved Health

3.1-Access to Health2.2-Reduced Vulnerability

2.1-Mechanisms to Manage Disasters1.2-Change in Emergency Condition

1.1-Basic Needs

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Number of Results by Mission Indicator

2012 2011

1.1 - Emergency Relief

1.2 - Change in Condition

2.1 - Mechanisms to Manage Disasters

2.2 - Reduced Vunerability to Disasters

3.1 - Access to Health

3.2 - Improved Health

4.1 - Household Prosperity

5.1 - Collective Action

5.2 - Partner Capacity

6.1 - Improved Markets

6.2 - New Jobs Created

7.1 - Marginalized Capacity

7.2 - Marginalized Participation

8.1 - Sectors Interacting

9.1 - Improved Peace and Security

9.2 - Mechanisms to Manage Conflict

9.3 - Improved Relationships

10.1 - Communities Engaged

10.2 - Accountable Government

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200

2012 MM Indicator Results - Reported vs. Aligned

Reported Aligned

35

10

Emergency Beneficiaries

2010 2011 20120

1,000,000

2,000,000

3,000,000

4,000,000

Water & Sanitation Cash Health Shelter/NFI Food

35

11

Results - Economic Development

35

12

Results - Economic Development

35

Benefits and Strengths - Agency

- Demonstrates commitment to accountability and critical self-

reflection

- Fosters shared language and values between Agency and field

programs

- ‘Real data’ behind the meaningful change we affect

- Means for assessing strategic impact when reviewing and planning

- Highlights gaps we might not have seen otherwise

35

Benefits and Strengths - Field

- Connection to agency Mission and other program achievements

- Opportunity to review collective results at country and regional

level

- Lens for reflecting on measurement quality and practices

- Platform for standardization and improvement of indicators and

tools

- Higher profile for M&E staff and responsibilities

Lessons Learned

Focus early and often on use – what questions do you want to answer?

Engage everyone you can in the process – all stages

Link closely to program M&E processes - no extra data

Allocate quality IT and data management systems

Give it time – it may take years to develop and fully embed

Limit expectations as you go – can’t be all things to all people

Keep track of the successes and examples of how it is used