3/22/05 APS Meeting 2005 - Los An geles 1 Magneto-optical properties of excitons confined to single magnetic and non-magnetic quantum dots Supported by NSF and Centre of Excellence CELDIS (Poland) Thang B. Hoang, Sebastian Mackowski, Lyubov Titova, Howard E. Jackson, Leigh M. Smith University of Cincinnati Piotr Wojnar, Grzegorz Karczewski, Jacek Kossut Institute of Physics PAS, Warsaw, Poland
11
Embed
3/22/05APS Meeting 2005 - Los Angeles1 Magneto-optical properties of excitons confined to single magnetic and non-magnetic quantum dots Supported by NSF.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
3/22/05 APS Meeting 2005 - Los Angeles 1
Magneto-optical properties of excitons confined to single magnetic and
non-magnetic quantum dots
Supported by NSF and Centre of Excellence CELDIS (Poland)
Thang B. Hoang, Sebastian Mackowski, Lyubov Titova, Howard E. Jackson, Leigh M. Smith
University of Cincinnati
Piotr Wojnar, Grzegorz Karczewski, Jacek Kossut
Institute of Physics PAS, Warsaw, Poland
3/22/05 APS Meeting 2005 - Los Angeles 2
Motivation
Study of single magnetic (CdMnTe/Cd0.4Zn0.6Te) and non-magnetic (CdTe/ZnTe) quantum dots by using magneto-optical characterization
+1/2-1/2
-3/2
+1/2
+3/2
σ -σ +
-1/2
+3/2
-3/2
Eg
VB
CBNon-DMS
DMS
B>0 B=0 B>0
σ -σ +
Emission of and give information about g*-factor,
and size of a quantum dot.
3/22/05 APS Meeting 2005 - Los Angeles 3
Samples
GaAs
ZnTe
[001]
Molecular Beam Epitaxy:
CdTe
280oC
2D
CdTe/ZnTe CdMnTe/Cd0.4Zn0.6Te
GaAs
Cd0.4Zn0.6Te
CdMnTeQDs
Te
25oC UHV
CdTeCdTeQDs
220oC
n~100-1000 dots/µm2
CdTeQDs
ZnTe
New technique: (Mariette et al., App. Phy. Lett. 82, 4340 (2003))
Can’t obtain without new technique!!
3/22/05 APS Meeting 2005 - Los Angeles 4
Solid Immersion Lens (SIL)
To look at a small area on sample surface
- SIL with index of refraction n will reduce laser spot size by factor of n
- Increase collection efficiency (due to increase of numerical aperture and reduce of total internal reflection)
Hemispherical SIL
(LAFN9 glass
n=1.83)
laser luminescence
Resolution~400nm
(S.Mansfield and G. Kino et al.,App. Phy. Lett. 57, 2615 (1990))
sample
5
Imaging method
1.78 1.79 1.80 1.81 1.820.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
Emission Energy (eV)
Sp
ati
al
po
sit
ion
(
m)
x-position
y-po
sitio
n
Defocused laser
sample
x-position
y-po
sitio
n
Emiss
ion e
nerg
y
3D imageSingle dot:
- spatial position
- emission energy
3/22/05 APS Meeting 2005 - Los Angeles 6
Non-magnetic CdTe dots: Image
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
0 1 2 30.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
x-position (m)
y-p
os
itio
n (
m)
2.04 2.05 2.06
100
200
300
400
500
600
Inte
nsit
y (a
rb)
Energy (eV)
3
1
2
2
1
3
-0.4 -0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
Inte
ns
ity
(N
orm
)
Spatial positions (m)
x-position y-positionDot 1
~400nm
1
3/22/05 APS Meeting 2005 - Los Angeles 7
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
y-p
os
itio
n (
m)
x-position (m)
Non-magnetic CdTe dots: Dot size
22 56.13*2
1
T
eVBgBE B
12.3*
B
Eg
B(B=3T)
nmrrm
e
eff
7~.8
22
22.052 2.053 2.054 2.055 2.056
0.0
0.3
0.6
0.9
1.2
Dot 2
No
rmal
ized
Inte
nsi
ty
Energy (eV)
3T- +
0T
3T- -
E
(E=0.6meV)
(aB ~ 10nm)
3/22/05 APS Meeting 2005 - Los Angeles 8
Non-magnetic CdTe dots: g*-factor
2.207 2.208 2.209 2.210
6x103
7x103
8x103
9x103
3T E2
+
Inte
ns
ity
(a
rb)
Energy (eV)
E2
-
g2=-3.65
QD2
1.960 1.961 1.962 1.9631.4x103
1.6x103
1.8x103
2.0x103
2.2x103
3T
Inte
ns
ity
(a
rb)
Energy (eV)
+
-
E1
-
E1
+
g*1=-2.04
QD1
-600 -300 0 300 6000.0
0.5
1.0
E2
+
E1
+E
1
-E2
-B=3Tg*
1=-2.04
g*2=-3.65
No
rma
lize
d In
ten
sit
y
Energy (eV)
1.9 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
CdTe QDs3MLs T=6K
QD1
QD2
|g*|
-fa
cto
r
Energy (eV)
B=3T
Small dotsLarge dots ?
3/22/05 APS Meeting 2005 - Los Angeles 9
Magnetic CdMnTe dots: Splitting
1.78 1.79 1.80 1.81 1.821.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
Energy (eV)
Sp
ati
al p
osit
ion
(
m)
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0
1.794
1.796
1.798
1.800
1.802
1.804
+
-
En
erg
y (e
V)
Magnetic field (T)
CdMnTeT=5K
Dot 2
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
3T
2T
1T
0T
0T
1T
2T
+
3T
1.79 1.80 1.811000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
-
Inte
nsit
y (
arb
)
Energy (eV)
3x
2
1
1.780 1.785 1.790 1.795 1.800
1200
1500
1800
2100
Inte
nsi
ty (
arb
)
Energy (eV)
5K
CdTe
CdMnTe
0.2meV
5meV
3/22/05 APS Meeting 2005 - Los Angeles 10
Magnetic dot vs. non-magnetic dot
-20 -10 0 10 20
1200
1600
2000
2400
Inte
ns
ity
(a
rb)
Energy (meV)
-
CdTe
CdMnTe
kBT = 0.43 meVB=3T
T=5K +
7meV
0.6 meV
x3
(g = -3.65)
(g = 41)Magnetic dot
Non- magnetic dot
sp-d exchange interaction
-1/2
-3/2
+1/2
+3/2
σ -
σ +
+1/2-1/2
+3/2
-3/2
Eg
VB
CBNon-DMS DMS
B>0 B=0 B>0
σ -σ +
3/22/05 APS Meeting 2005 - Los Angeles 11
Conclusions
Studied single magnetic and non-magnetic QDs grown by new technique
Non-magnetic dots: show dependence of exciton g*-factor on emission energy (g* changes from -4 to -1.9)
Magnetic quantum dots exhibit much larger energy splitting (g*=41) (due to sp-d exchange interaction)
Magnetic dots: large line-width due to the fluctuation of Mn+ ions