IN THE COUNTY COURT OF THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MIAMI DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA GENERAL JURISDICTION DIVISION CASE NO. 11 20527 CA 21 LTA LOGISTICS, INC. LESTER TRIMINO, et a/ ; Plaintiff, V. Enrique Varona, Defendant, "When a judge acts were he or she does not have jurisdiction to act, th e judge is engaged in an act of treason" Cohen v s . Virginia9 U.S. 264, 404, 5 L. Ed. 257, 6 Wheat. 2 6 4 (1821). DEFENDANT'S ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT HERE COMES THE DEFENDANT, Enrique Varona, who is S u i Juris o n this cause an d states on the record in the interest o f justice th e following. The Honorable Judge Antonio Arzola is deemed to know the law and has acted with malice, intent, a n d knowledge to violate it. By h is "Oath o f Office" Judge Antonio Arzola is bound to support the Constitutions for the United States o f America and the State o f Florida,
17
Embed
30. LTA LOGISTICS v Enrique Varona (Answer to LTA Amended Complaint)
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
7/28/2019 30. LTA LOGISTICS v Enrique Varona (Answer to LTA Amended Complaint)
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I, Enrique Varona, Sui Juris, solemnly affirm an d verify
that I have read the foregoing, and know its contents to be true to the best of my
knowledge, except as to the matters which are therein stated on my information or
belief, and as to those m atters, I believe them to be true. This instrument is submitted
upon good faith effort that is grounded in fact, warranted by existing law for the
modification or reversal of existing law and submitted for proper purposes, and not to
cause harassment and unnecessary delay or costs, so help me God.See Supremacy
Clause (C onstitution, Laws and Treaties are all the supreme Law of the Land).
I declare under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the STATE OF FLORIDA, that
the foregoing is true an d correct:
Enrique Varona, Sui Juris
14823 SW 125 Court
Miami, F lorida 33 186
O n this da y came before me the Affiant, a living flesh an d blood man/woman to oath
an d attest and affirm the signature is true, complete, and correct on the foregoingaffidavit. Enrique Varona, the above signed, who is personally know n by me or upon
proper oath an d identification, personally came before me, the subscriber, a notary
public in and for said Miami-Dade County and the State of Florida, and Duly
Affirmed the truth of the foregoing Affidavit in my presence. Th e Affiant also
acknowledged the signing thereof to be his own voluntary act and deed, signing the
within instrument in my presence and for the purpose therein stated.
Date
/ /:£/
3 O ff 3
Identification provided:
Notary Public: ^̂^̂Q̂
s x̂ " /—r
My co
^>
fl <£>r,vf, / .&>/» Sf
NOTARY PUBLIC STATE O F FLORIDA
exmres on: i/̂ £
Notice to agent is notice to principal, notice to principal is notice to agent.
> JUAN V . HERNANDEZ
I Commission #FF014667
Expires: May 5, 2017
BONDED THRUAARON NOTARY
7/28/2019 30. LTA LOGISTICS v Enrique Varona (Answer to LTA Amended Complaint)
IN REFERENCE TO AN EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT and/or AGREEEMENT known as the;
"LTA LOGISTICS. INC.
NONDISCLOSURE ANT) NDNSOLIC1TATION AGREEMENT"
From here on called the "AGREEMENT' (see attached); Signed on the 9 of June, 2009 between
Annette Trimino, as an Officer for LTA, Logistics, Inc. And all it's officers, directors and
stockholders; and, Enrique Varona; an employee.
Please be advised that such "AGREEMENT' is now NULL AND VOID. On account of the
following:
1) The fixed term "agreement" was unfairly negotiated to conceal the TRUE intentions of the parties.
2) The "agreement'' is being used to deny the employee his legal rights.
3) The "agreement" has been allowed to overrun the end of the fixed period,
II-.1-
THE UNDERSIGNED Common Law Citizen, Enrique Varona, Hereby certifies, by rights
secured under provisions of the Constitution, of the United States of America, the Constitution of the
Several States, Common Law, Nature and the Laws of Natures God, that these Rights are retained
FEE SIMPLE ABSOLUTE, and held andpgfptscted with special regard to rights designated and/or
set forth as follows: -\
1) The Right to WORK FREELY, UNENCUMBERED, and UNFETETTERED is guaranteed as aRight and not a mere privilege. That the Right to WORK, is a BASIC pONCOMMITANT of a FREE
PEOPLE TO EXIST IN FACT. ,
ii- ' ' •
2) The undersigned has never willingly and knowingly entered into .ANY "Agreement" or Contract
giving up ANY Constitutional Rights whic^ar&^ecured by the CONSTITUTION, THE SUPREME
LAW OF THE LAND, This Common Law citizen has NOT uamuii any party, has NOT threatened
any party, and that includes has NOT threatened or caused any endangerment to the safety and well
being of any party and would leave any claimant otherwise to their strictest proofs otherwise IN A
COURT OF LAW. The above named Common Law Citizen is merely excercising the BASIC
RIGHT TO WORK UNENCUMBERED AND UNFETTERED, which is their RIGHT TO DO SO!! 1
3) Conversion of a RIGHT TO WORK into a PRIVILEGE and/or crime is a FRAUD and is in
clear and direct CONFLICT or REPUGNANCY are UNCONSTITUTIONAL and are NOT WITH
STANDING IN LAW AND ARE BEING CHALLENGED AS SUCH HERE ANDTHEREBY ARENULL AND VOID ON THEIR FACE. NO COURTS ARE BOUND TO UPHOLD SUCH
FICTIONS OF LAW AND NO CITIZEN is bound to obey such a FICTION OF LAW. SUCH
"AGREEMENT' OPERATES AS A MERE NULLITY AND FICTION OF LAW AS IF ITNEVER
EXISTED IN LAW, NO CITIZEN IS BOUND TO OBEY SUCH UNCONSTITUTIONAL
"AGREEMENT*. Contract or Law.
7/28/2019 30. LTA LOGISTICS v Enrique Varona (Answer to LTA Amended Complaint)
4) Further, LTA, is FORBIDEN BY LAW frnm converting a BASIC RIGHT into a PRIVILEGEand requiring a FEE CHARGED, COMPENSATION AND/OR REPARATION for the exercise of a
BASIC RIGHT. And if LTA, does ERRONIOUSLY convert BASIC RIGHTS into PRIVILEGES
and requires any form of FEES, COMPENSATION AND/OR REPARATION a citizen may IGNORE
THE FEES. COMPENSATION AND/OR REPARATIONS WITH TOTAL IMMUNITY FOR SUCHEXERCISE OF A BASIC RIGHT.
5) The payment for a Privilege requires a . benefit to be received As the RIGHT TO WORK isalready secured it is clearly unlawful to cite any charges or fees or compensation without directdamage to the specific party. NOR may a Citizen be charged with an offense for the excercise of a
CONSTITUTIONALRIGHT, in this case the RIGHT TO WORK.
6) OBVIOUSLY THERE IS NO LAWFUL CHARGE AGAINST EXERCISING A BASICRIGHT TO WORK, for a regular Common Law Citizen. THAT IS THE LAW!!! The abovenamed citizen IS IMMUNE FROM ANY CHARGE TO THE CONTRARY AND ANY PARTYMAKING SUCH CHARGE SHOULD BE DULY WARNED OF THE TORT OFTRESPASS'!!
YOU ARE TRESPASSING ONTHIS Common Law Citizen!!!
7) THE undersigned does hereby claim, declare, an d certify ANY AND ALL theirCONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS INVIOLATE from GOD and secured in the UNITED STATESCONSTITUTION and the CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA wherein they abode as a
SOVEREIGN COMMON LAW CITIZEN existing and acting entirely AT THE COMMON LAW,and retains ALL BASIC RIGHTS under the CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF
AMERICA, NATURE AND NATURE'S GOD AND UNDER THE LAWS OF GOD THE
SUPREME LAW GIVER.
8) ANY VIOLATION OF THE ABOVE CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE AND CLAIM IS
CRIMINALLY TRESPASSING UPON THIS ABOVE NAMED COMMON LAW Citizen and
WILL BE PROSECUTED TO THE FULLEST EXTENT UNDER THE SUPREME LAW OF
THE LAND, BEWARNED OF THE TRESPASS AND THE ATTACHED CAVEATS. ALSOTAKE CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE, IGNORANCE OF THE LAW IS NOT ANEXCUSE!!!
)TE: "Rights and Property are ONE AND THE SAME THING"- by the Honorable