Top Banner

of 32

3 Week, Use of Language logical and critical thinking

Jul 07, 2018

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
  • 8/18/2019 3 Week, Use of Language logical and critical thinking

    1/32

    USE OF LANGUAGE

    Ms. Amna Rafque

  • 8/18/2019 3 Week, Use of Language logical and critical thinking

    2/32

    • Language can serve three basic functions;

     – Informative

     – Expressive

     – Directive

  • 8/18/2019 3 Week, Use of Language logical and critical thinking

    3/32

    Informative function of language

    • The first use of language is tocommunicate information. Ordinaril! thisis accomplished b formulating andaffirming "or dening# proposition.

    • Language used to affirm or denpropositions! or to present arguments! issaid to be serving the informative function.

  • 8/18/2019 3 Week, Use of Language logical and critical thinking

    4/32

    • $ere the %ord &information& includesmisinformation! false as %ell as truepropositions! incorrect as %ell as correct

    arguments.• Informative discourse is used to describe

    the %orld! and to reason about it. 'hether

    the alleged facts are important orunimportant! general or particular! doesnot matter.

  • 8/18/2019 3 Week, Use of Language logical and critical thinking

    5/32

    For example

  • 8/18/2019 3 Week, Use of Language logical and critical thinking

    6/32

    Expressive function of language

    • (ses of language of this second tpe arenot intended to communicate informationbut to express emotions! feelings! or

    attitudes.• )ust as the clearest examples of

    informative discourse come from the

    reports of courts or laboratories! the bestexamples of language serving anexpressive function come from lric poetr.

  • 8/18/2019 3 Week, Use of Language logical and critical thinking

    7/32

    For example;

    • *atch me such marvel! save in eastern+lime,,,,, 

    •  - rose red cit,,, &half as old as time&

  • 8/18/2019 3 Week, Use of Language logical and critical thinking

    8/32

    • Expressive language is not intened to toinform us of an facts or theoriesconcerning the %orld! but to manifest the

    poets feelings of admiration and a%e.• 'ith these lines! %e are told somethingabout the scene before him! true! but theircheif purpose %as not to report information.

    • The lines express the emotions felt b the%riter and aim to evo/e similar feelings inthe reader.

  • 8/18/2019 3 Week, Use of Language logical and critical thinking

    9/32

    • Expression ma be anal0ed into t%o

    components; %hen it is used to manifest

    the spea/ers feeling! e.g someone pras

    in solitude! the language used functions to

    express the feelings of the spea/er or

    %riter! but it is not intended to evo/esimilar feelings in anone else.

  • 8/18/2019 3 Week, Use of Language logical and critical thinking

    10/32

    • On the other hand! %hen orator see/s to

    move others and %hen the cro%d cheers

    its athletic team! the language used not

    onl expresses the feeling of the spea/er

    but is intended to evo/e similar feelings in

    the hearers.

  • 8/18/2019 3 Week, Use of Language logical and critical thinking

    11/32

    Directive function of language

    • Language serves the third! directive function %hen it is intended to cause orprevent overt action.

    • The clearest examples are commandsand re1uests.

    • 'hen a parent teaches a child to %ash upfor dinner! the intention is not to

    communicate the information or toexpress or evo/e an particular emotion.

    • The language is intened to get results.

  • 8/18/2019 3 Week, Use of Language logical and critical thinking

    12/32

    • Directive discourse in neither true nor false.

    •  - command such as &close the %indo%&cannot be either true or false. 'e madisagree about about %hether a command

    has been obeed or disobeed! but %enever disagree about %hether a commandis true or false.

  • 8/18/2019 3 Week, Use of Language logical and critical thinking

    13/32

    DISCOURSE SERVING MULTIPLEFUNCTIONS

    • The examples of informative! expressiveand directive discourse offered in thepreceding sections %ere chemicall pure

    specimens! so to spea/. 2ut almost anordinar communication %ill probablexhibit all three uses of language.

    • Thus a poem! %hich ma be primarilexpressive discourse! also ma have amoral and thus also direct the reader.

  • 8/18/2019 3 Week, Use of Language logical and critical thinking

    14/32

    • 'hen languge serves mixed or multiple

    functions the %riter or poet is not confused

    but effective communication demands

    certain combinations on functions.

  • 8/18/2019 3 Week, Use of Language logical and critical thinking

    15/32

    For example;

  • 8/18/2019 3 Week, Use of Language logical and critical thinking

    16/32

    THE FORMS OF DISCOURSE

    •  - setence is defined as the unit oflanguage that expresses a completethought.

    • 3etences are commonl divided into fourcategories; – declarative

     – interrogative – imperative and

     – exclamator

  • 8/18/2019 3 Week, Use of Language logical and critical thinking

    17/32

    DECLARATIVE SENTENCES

    • Declarative sentences ma/e up most of

    %hat ou read. The are setting the scene!

    giving the bac/ground! telling %hat is

    going on in plain! simple facts. If thesentence doesn4t involve as/ing a

    1uestion! telling someone to do something

    or someone4s excited! emotionalstatements then it is a declarative

    statement.

  • 8/18/2019 3 Week, Use of Language logical and critical thinking

    18/32

    INTERROGATIVESENTENCES

    • The interrogative sentence is one that

    ends in a 1uestion mar/ and is al%as

    as/ing a 1uestion.

    • 5or example! an interrogative sentence is!6$o% are ou78

  • 8/18/2019 3 Week, Use of Language logical and critical thinking

    19/32

    Imperative Sentences

    • The imperative sentence is one that gives

    a command to someone or something. If

    someone %al/s into our office and ou

    tell them! 69lease! sit do%n.8 That is an

    imperative sentence.

  • 8/18/2019 3 Week, Use of Language logical and critical thinking

    20/32

    EXCLAMATOR SENTENCES

    • This sentence al%as ends in an

    exclamation point and it is said %hen a

    %hole lot of excitement is going on. If ou

    %al/ into the /itchen and find our childsetting the curtains on fire then ou are

    probabl going to use a fe% exclamator

    sentences.

  • 8/18/2019 3 Week, Use of Language logical and critical thinking

    21/32

    • 5orm often gives an indication of

    function,, but there is no sure connection

    bet%een the grammatical form and the

    use or uses intended. Language serving

    an one of three principal functions ma

    ta/e an one of the four grammaticalforms.

  • 8/18/2019 3 Week, Use of Language logical and critical thinking

    22/32

    EMOTIVE !ORDS

    •  - single sentence can serve aninformative and an expressive functionsimultaneousl. To do this! its %ords must

    have literal and descriptive meaning!referring to ob:ects or events! and to theirattributes or relations.

    • 'hen the sentence expresses an attitudeor feeling! it ma also have emotionalsuggestions or impact.

  • 8/18/2019 3 Week, Use of Language logical and critical thinking

    23/32

    • The literal and emotive meaning of a %ord

    are independent of each other.

    • 5or example the terms &bureaucrat&

    &government official& and &public servanthave almost identical literal meaning but

    their emotive meanings are ver different.

  • 8/18/2019 3 Week, Use of Language logical and critical thinking

    24/32

    • &2ureaucrat& tends to express resentment

    and disapproval %hile public servant

    expresses respect and approval.

    • &overnment official& is more nearlneutral than either of the others.

  • 8/18/2019 3 Week, Use of Language logical and critical thinking

    25/32

    • It is clear that the %ords %e use to refer to

    things have a mar/ed effect upon our

    attitudes to%ard those things.

  • 8/18/2019 3 Week, Use of Language logical and critical thinking

    26/32

    "INDS OF AGREEMENT ANDDISAGREEMENT

    • To the extent that anthing or some

    activit can be described b using

    alternative phrases,, one conveing

    approval! another disapproval! still another

    neutralit,, different /inds of agreement

    and of disagreement ma becommunicated about anthing.

  • 8/18/2019 3 Week, Use of Language logical and critical thinking

    27/32

    • Disagreement in belief 

    • T%o people ma disagree about %hether something hasin fact ta/en place! and %hen the do! the ma be saidto have &disagreement in belief" (disagreement about

    the facts of the matter, different literal significance).• Disagreement in attitude

    • On the other hand! the ma agree that an event hasactuall occured! thus agreeing in belief! and et the

    ma have different or even opposite attitudes to%ardsan event! this is /no%n as disagreement in attitude"there is an emotional difference bet%een thedisputants.#.

  • 8/18/2019 3 Week, Use of Language logical and critical thinking

    28/32

    •  

    • 3ince the degrees of agreement in beliefand attitude are independent of each

    other! there are four possible

    combinations at %or/ here<

  • 8/18/2019 3 Week, Use of Language logical and critical thinking

    29/32

    • Agreement in belief and agreement inattitude 

    • There arent an problems in this instance! since

    both parties hold the same positions and havethe same feelings about them.

    • Agreement in belief but disagreementin attitude 

    • This case! if unnoticed! ma become the causeof endless "but pointless# shouting bet%eenpeople %hose feelings differ sharpl about somefact upon %hich the are in total agreement.

  • 8/18/2019 3 Week, Use of Language logical and critical thinking

    30/32

    • Disagreement in belief but agreementin attitude 

    • In this situation! parties ma never recogni0e!

    much less resolve! their fundamental differenceof opinion! since their attitude is same.

    • Disagreement in belief anddisagreement in attitude

    • $ere the parties have so little in common thatcommunication bet%een them often brea/sdo%n entirel.

  • 8/18/2019 3 Week, Use of Language logical and critical thinking

    31/32

     +onsider the follo%ing four situations

    concerning &The Distance to the 3un.&

  • 8/18/2019 3 Week, Use of Language logical and critical thinking

    32/32