3 Opp - NJCourts · l-1132 limit pmk 16 baker v. cemex dep 765 yes gibbons szaferman/simon denied protective order to l--i~l9j i ... l-1464 gambino v. union 17 carbide l-1464 gambino

1

Judge Ana Viscomi, J.S.C. Master Motion List

Moti~ns Returna~le ( 02 1

02 ~018 ) 1

I I

Docket

L-2977 13

Case Name

ABUHOURAN V. KAISERKANE

L-29771 ABUHOURAN V. NORTH 13 AMERICAN ROOFING

Motion Type

S/J

S/J

L-29771ABUHOURAN V. NORTH I RELIEVED AS 13 AMERICAN ROOFING COUNSEL

L-334-ADDESSO V. A&M

L-,546> . 17 IALDERDib)!}1\7{Cµ>RUS

L-f46-'l· .. ·····vi•··/< }~1N1!/1r/2 ··. •·• .•, i11 ALDERDicib,fJJMERYs

,'1,

'1.::s1~7 • • • . .····. ;i, .1 ALI>ERD1¢ilr,:\i:.11'firiivs'

½5~6~1 !···········.: ,;} if.;).· ... /.;. ·\t7ii\ '•ALDERJ)ICEVHJ'&Jy1

½~ffl/ ).(•· .. · ' • ·.·. >•·:••1:·t· • 17.i .; ALDERDICE,V/iJ'&J /

Opp Motion # I recd ] MOYbNTS A TINY

84 I YES I Saiber

209 Marks O'Neill

170 Morton Law

Wilentz

PLAINTIFF'S ATTNY I DISPOSITION

DENIEDw/o Morton Law I prejudice

Morton Law

Morton Law

Wilentz

DENIEDw/o prej~dice

GRANTED

2

Opp

f,.;370 '.~~~1?~1°sft 1r · :;;. L'Aviu:N'ri ·

L--588- ARVELLO V. R.E.

17 CARROLL I S/J

I 239

I I McGivney

I Szaferman/Levy I GR.4-NTED

PROTECTIVE ORDER TO

L-1132 LIMIT PMK

16 BAKER V. CEMEX DEP 765 YES Gibbons Szaferman/Simon DENIED

PROTECTIVE ORDER TO

L--i~l9j I LIMIT PMK

STASKO V. CEMEX DEP I 767 [YES[ Gibbons I Szaferman/Simon I DENIED

PROTECTIVE ORDER TO

L-45041 I LIMITPMK

16 YURCHAK V. CEMEX DEP I 768 [YES[ Gibbons I Szaferman/Simon I DENIED

3

Opp

Docket C~se Nam~

i,:;~oqc'J• QAIBO}'; AMJ;:W:C:Al'l , · · · INTL · · · 4lt AMb cp-r.>

, .•. , 1R5CO~~l[)ER •ATIONOF

>( 12119/17. '; ORDER()!' <01sMISSAt . RECQNSll)ER

·~1191-f.OF;· />12/1~/1J • [

(ORDEROFi' . DISI\IIISSA.\3

• ;M;~j~1kl;, Nl:W.&A.Dl)l;\, evm1:ij9e1N; •. ;; DEfl"'Si(\''

'~OTIQNiPR. REcotis10ER ·· • ·.aJ·roi-1.'.t . ·-·-- - -

~~~i:~~~i~, ':t;;: . . •,,_,·. ,-;/.,,_ ,. __ .,._,,,,_ .. ,,-;. " -· -- - ----'--

P~oaucTs couNcfir/.?1 tPf'Jiqr.c':.: ·, i,//ifr ,~,•

4

Opp MOV ANTS ATTNX_

1·

·.•·.·1·.ll .... 1IM. :.i.l,F······b·.··.···.·.···R········' ••• l:2ACKOF PERSONA.L.Jxk

~~";rt .. · REC()MMEND AJ'IONOF, S.M.

1)1s~;~~• F()R ··

, .. · • >'•.·i•• .. •·.·•·"••f ~CJ:< .. Q~ .:.·, • ; .. · ... ···•t<•jf•(•·••.• } PER!>Ot:IJ).L?

l"~Yt?IC:O.R~.INV.•G~~ljl~t ·i :J~~ISIJICJIO··· PARJ'S>•H_•·•,•t.·•x.J•·C•:c- N>- ·

• ... •.·.•.· •. ·.·.···" ................ · ••·•·•••.•.·· •. · .. ··•.•.••.•. ·.·R···. E .• ··.c ... o·.· .. ·· N .•.• s.·J·D·······.· •. ~ .•. · •. ·.R .... •··• .• •\': ,-.,.;-. .. · ·• AJ'ION.OF, ·.· • ..

L'./}' •••::··.··.- .. ;• ;;Jt ... :i,f 13/'1.9f~?ii ')I. 6101:< CRAYN~Y,,> .. ··.·.··;;; ;J• • pRDER.PF'z \·/ 11 -•·-- CYPRUSIIMERv;s:.; .. :; L,/I D1sM1ssAL<·• •

;~60-l'··.·.···i . ye ;(t-iicz 15;) CUPANOV,CALON"i L-1991-13 \DENGEL V. A.P.S. PLBG \SJJ

Opp

18

5

Margolis Edelstein Wilentz GRANTED

L- . 52.'/'9-17{

_!;:aseNam~ Motion_Iy_pe I Motion# RECONSIDER - -

p.tio~.~ft7 121191H ,. ORDEROF,

1DISMISSAL. ~EC:ONSJ[)~R it. ATIOt.1qr=+.I i\. 12.(19(17 } i< ...... ORDE~Of, ..

. i I DISMISSAL /<.

.··

·. I~6LudE BANKRUPT

ENTITIES/ON · ...... ,ve~d)c:.r\· .. SHE.ET FOR Al.:1.:09Al"ION OF,LIABILlTY

6

Opp

M_otion T1 _l\llotion # -,-~·~*i~:Jt!Jitl}:iilf I 1;f .(:j· . SOMERVILLE LUMBER ;\L '..MOTION .. . • ; :1142

L-1464 GAMBINO V. UNION

17 CARBIDE


17 CARBIDE


17 CARBIDE

PHVMICHAEL G. TERRY I

PHVTHOMAS J. MOREL I

PHVW.CLAY MASSEY I

J,fist~J&j ·. CONSUMER;; bJSNJISSTCT~ · .... 1-;SA~.T()·

Jl)Hl'-l~ON'S. L <BABY ,,

1 >poWDER ',', """',, ,', /

691

703

704

7

Caruso Smith Szaferman/Levy !GRANTED

Caruso Smith Szaferman/Levy !GRANTED

Caruso Smith Szafer_man/Levy I GRANTED

DISMISS BASEDClN LACl<:OF <

PER.SOf11.AL,JX ANDFNC·.t,

AMDCPT

DISMISS.· sA.s eti oN . LACKOF.

~ERSONAC JX·.FNC .

',, ,_, ', ,,,;

8

Opp

9

Opp

QQcket

L-

C~_Name

·. HE~tY Ji~~iN~+:J·:

. .·· }. i.>ci.>• .... u oli~,s~FoR· <····'... . .... ·/··.······ .. · .. · .. · .. • U\CKOF.·

iio9.1~RAy.l"t,1~UMO\ • PERSPNAL .•. . . :' · ABE:X',. ·c.; ••..• • i /JURiSDICJIO

. :i;t~~~"'····· ... ··. CYPRUS/IMERYS

-:-'t:<i:,<( ,,/," >j,-;

• :iA'2,~fo.v: EIAsF

. '.. N]L·

PROTECTIVE

6918-( JUNG V. BEAZER EAST

15

ORDER QUASHING RE-DEPOF VICTORIA

JUNG

L-28811 KAZARY V. BAYONNE

14 PLBG SJ

10

Opp

467 YES

Szaferman/Le

101

Marks O'Neill

Szaferman/Le·

Cohen Placitella

<ir:l·~t;~;i• adj to a mutually agreeable date to be prnvided

GRANTED

~

;is~1 ·14•!'

L-2881 14

KAZARY V. DAP

L-!!811 KAZARY V. DUCTMATE

02ss1j f I<Az,\lli{,_D.··.u ...... Nl'HE,X 14( f . SMI'fH >

~iW1j>'·,.t,;/1 r,x·· .. ·· •··· ..... · ...•. , 14!;-~~~¥,,~;J.>~ll~.D~

t;2s~tl·· 14•)

L-2881 14

~z,A-1~:S[y: J;W. GOODLIFFE

KAZARY V. FIRST ENERGY (JCP&L)

L-28811 KAZARY V. RARITAN 14 SUPPLY

11

Opp

SJ 267

McGivne)'._ Cohen Placitella GRANTED

SJ 240

22{Y

SJ 105

Marks O'Neill Cohen Placitella GRANTED

SJ 254

McGivne)_'._ Cohen Placitella

Docket

L-2881 14

Case Name

KAZARY V. W.A. BIRDSALL

Motion T1

SJ

12

Opp

Mo@n# re~ / MOVANTS ATTNY PLAINTIFF'S ATTNY / DISPOSITION

234

13

Opp

L-6245 PHVSAM 317

Marshall Dennehey ! Maune Raichle !GRANTED LINK V. LEVITON

RUGGERI 17

LINK V. AIW-2010 PHVSAM

318 L-6245 (AMERICAN

RUGGERI 'Marshall Dennehey/Maune Raichle 17 T,.U"1TTT • ......,TC'..,_ ... , ... ,..,.r,~ -

--~-------"''"'"'""''"'" -- ·----- ----";;··;,• ·--··

-- ·"" L'623-17 L~ . 4547ii' 13

17

14

Opp

!J'f~·~Jii! &.()PPS .. · ..

Case Name

_'.): ?-::/'.L' --;3(<":\'.'()':'-i\

~21>:ti~J~~~~ ~;z4gi{If ~CDEi¾Ih;. { .

; , .J' AIRB.Al'IKS ' ··1s/;:1

i;.I4os1I;~»Eilir1{y;~Q&t:~~ 1s l WHEELER

/::-:-<_'.:;: -_~i{(;ti:,::--):\'!_'::-,>- :' 'i,

,i).z4o~l }.Mc»Ell¥JPY:> '15/j ,.GENERALcELECTJUQ/

J~J.~.li, .....•.•. ·,MfDt~t~fi;''· v.15/~JN:J>USTRIAI}WELDJNG

15

Opp

Dock~ rase Na_!!!e

f~.3 .. 101.~.•.· ·.•.M .. ·.···c· .. '.G .. E ...•.. ~<SA·)·m .... QUJ:.?);Y\I, · 16\I /. CHEVRON ..... ·

l-.? .. fi'7 ..... -.•.· .. ·.t.M .. ·.·.·.C.··.··· .. G ..... E .... E.· .. (C .... AllR ... j:)UI,Ory, •16·:· •·: ';'•SUNOCO

L-2809 NELSON V. PHELPS 12 DODGE

L-4257- OROSZ V. ALCATEL-

15 LUCENT I

S/J

S/J

16

Opp MQY ANTS ATTNX DISPOSITION

tis.liit£.1t~~Q ·

77 Day Pitney Szaferman/Levy [GRANTED

I 223[ [Porzio I Early Law [GRANTED

Docket

L-3378-

14 L-

3378-14 L-

3378-14 L-

3378-14 L-

3378-14 L-

3378-14 L-

3378-14

17

Case Name I Motion Type I Motion# Opp I

I recd MOV ANTS ATTNY 1 PLAINTIFF'S A TTNY I _!?ISPOSITION

PAFLITZKO V. AMERICAN OPTICAL S/J 831 I Drinker Biddle I Napoli Bern !GRANTED

PAFLITZKO V. ARVINMERITOR S/J 2321 I Reilly Janiczek I Napoli Bern !GRANTED

PAFLITZKO V. BMI REFRACTORY S/J I 1001 I Marks O'Neill I Napoli Bern !GRANTED

PAFLITZKO V. CHARLES A.WAGNER S/J 92 Kent & McBride Naooli Bern GRANTED

PAFLITZKO V. FERRO S/J 98 Kent & McBride Naooli Bern GRANTED

PAFLITZKO V. FORD S/J 80 Leclair Ryan Napoli Bern GRANTED

PAFLITZKO V. FOSECO S/J

, C> .. ·. • <. .:<C ,STRli(EANS.·

····•·· .;t)\}t<.• ..• ;s ;; . '::ii~~.~~~. fl·· .•..•••••.•. · .PAIGEY.A.0.SMITH: / SANCTIONS

p~()VJN~~J:· I1MERYS'

··1.XMT() ~El).L '.· AND OPP TO.,:

J&Ji

.,,. /).... c·.·•,,/.•>•;'J.J; .• },~~,~;c'~f ;$12~· ~r~~N;~6&i~~ioN~Li +@~j~{lieYf I:

COl:JNClli (PCPCY · ··· ·· CJ..AJMi/i

18

Opp

L•. 6996-15 L-

Case Name

SCHULTZ V.,CHICAGO BR.IDGEBtiR.6N···.

7697- ISIMMONS V. CHARLES 13 A. WAGNER lstJ L-7697-13 I SIMMONS V. DAP L-5667- I STAFFORD V. THOMAS 15 SCIENTIFIC L-3121-17 L-3121-17 L-

ST;~*~;V.~'r~fuRICAN ' BILTRITE; .

STONACK V. CGM DASH PATCH}

3121- ISTONACK V. FOSTER 17 WHEELER L-3121- ISTONACK V. 17 INGERSOLL RAND

1-~--:/:·,·-·<. '> ::>.-:<-?,ti/:}f}1,;;r:._,;:1z)::x:--.\t:/:/:J;_;;\. l121'' STOIIIACK\f·····•>'><·.:,,, 17 .• •. MA.NNiNdt6~·AAim2,r ' L-3121-

S/J

S/J

S/J

17 STONACK V. TARKETT IS/J

Opp

91

245

708

C/f,X·l/:liC,> /J~

227

243

61

19

Kent & McBride I Napoli Bern

McGivne·

Marshall Dennehe

Napoli Bern

Wilentz

I Rawle Henderson Earl

Margolis Edelstein

Tannenbaum Keale

McCarter

Early Law

Early Law

Early Law

GRANTED

GRANTED

GRANTED

GRANTED

GRANTED

Docket I Case Name

L~ < •···"'; ·• ·\:/. '. • 7249' TEUSCHERV, IMERYS . 16 .. -rAtc• .'.,

+JGs9~~;;~: .{ .·. \\BRENNTAG ..

TEUS~i~~~.•2f G;·····

I.); ii 7249' TEUSCHER V; 16 BRENNTAG ; La 7249· 16\; Le 4190-' 15 L·, 4190-15''

;:(·:: )i :' ';_; ·. . __ :·; >_·jr_'.·.··>)?i

TEUSCflER\i.wco .... ,/;.i-?"-·· -----.';.---·.

' -.·-·.·,''·

TOTfl v. CHEVRON

20

Opp

MID-L-002977-13 08/01/2017 10:18:54 AM Pg 1 of2 Trans ID: LCV201789463

Robert L. Ritter, Esq. (Bar No. 011391979) Robert B. Nussbaum, Esq. (Bar No. 025651987) SAIBERLLC 18 Columbia Turnpike, Suite 200 Florham Park, New Jersey 07932 (973) 622-3333 Attorneys for Defendant KaiserKane, Inc.

HTTHAM HOURAN

ABUHOURAN a/k/a STEVE : SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY : LAW DIVISION: MIDDLESEX COUNTY

Plaintiff,

vs.

KAISERKANE, INC., NORTH AMERICAN ROOFING SERVICES, INC., BRIAN VERBLE, ROD RICHARDSON, BRIGGS CONTRACTING SERVICES, INC. and DAVID DONALDSON,

Defendants.

: DOCKET NO. MID-L-2977-13

Civil Action - Asbestos Litigation

d~"''4''~ ORDER GRANTIHC MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

w,H.w ~ ......

THIS MATTER having been opened to the Court by Saiber LLC, attorneys for

Defendant KaiserKane, Inc. ("KaiserKane"), on notice to counsel for all parties, for an Order,

pursuant to Rule 4:46-1 of the Rules Governing the Courts of the State of New Jersey, entering

summary judgment in favor ofKaiserKane and dismissing the Complaint of plaintiff, and the

Court having considered all of the papers submitted in support of the motion and any opposition

thereto, and the Court having heard oral argument, if any, and for good cause having been

shown,

IT IS on this ;)r:!.. day ofb, 201d, - ~

ORDERED that Kaiser Kane's motion for summary judgment is hereby grnnteel all el the

IM'HMJ- ~C...-plailltiffs o~against Kaige1Klltle is dismissed with iirajudiee, and it is further

01231776.DOCX

?_ •. MID-L-002977-13 08/01/2017 10:18:54 AM Pg 2 of 2 Trans ID: LCV201789463

ORDERED that a copy of this Order shall be served upon all counsel of record

within seven (7) days ofreceipt by Kaiser Kane's counsel.

(h,,C.J~· , J.S.C. •

ANA C. VISCOMI, J.S.C.

On :2. • 2 · 2-aCl the court's statement of reasons have been set forth on the record.

01231776.DOCX

FILED FEB -2 2018

ANA C. VISCOM/, J.S.C,

MARKS, O'NEILL, O'BRIEN,

DOHERTY & KELLY, P,C. BY: SEBASTIAN A. GOLDSTEIN, ESQ.

ATTORNEY ID: 040052001 535 ROUTE 38 EAST, SUITE 501 CHERRY HILL, NJ 08002 (856) 663-4300

1017-894-1.l(SAG)

PLAINTIFFS,

ABUHOURAN, HITHAM

V.

DEFENDANTS,

NORTH AMERICAN ROOFING,

DAVID DONALDSON, AND BRIAN

VERBLE, ET, AL.

ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANTS,

NORTH AMERICAN ROOFING DAVID DONALDSON, AND BRIAN VERBLE

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION

MIDDLESEX COUNTY

Docket No.: MID-L-2977-13 AS

ASBESTOS LITIGATION Civil Action

J er> $f< VJ-<;)< ORDER FeH SUMhl:ARY ,TlJDGMENT FOR

DEFENDANT NORTH AMERICAN

ROOFING DAVID DONALDSON AND BRIAN VERBLE c,; 1 fl->o,J;'

f '"'''J'"H,.._

THIS MATTER having come before the court on Motion of Marks, O'Neill, O'Brien,

Doherty & Kelly, P.C., attorneys for defendant, The North American Roofing Defendants, and the

Court having reviewed the moving and opposition papers, ifany, and for good cause shown;

JTISONTHIS~2.."ccl- DAYOFi=e}w:,t/jG)...I ,201~,

ORDERED the motion of. Defendantl .Th~ North AmeJ:an Roofing Defendants, for ~ IN'~ ~'UL

summary judgment is hereby granted and tlte Complai@and'wtyCow1tc1elaims and Cross Claims

are berelay dismissed with prejudice.

ORDERED that a copy of this Order shall be served on all counsel within seven (7) days

of the date hereof.

/NJ4l\JIJO.!}

- ~c.J~· Honorable Ana Viscomi, J,S.C.

On Oz_. o'Z.- 20\I? the court's statement of reasons have been set forth on the record.

The Morton Law Group, LLC Attn: Benjamin Morton, Esq. 744 Broad Street, 16th Floor Newark, NJ 07102 Office: 973.947-7460 Fax: 973-947-7461 Email: [email protected] Counsel for Plaintiff, Hitham Abuhouran

HITHAM ABUHOURAN,

Plaintiff,

v.

NORTH AMERICAN ROOFING, BRIAN VERBLE and DAVID DONALDSON, et al

Defendants.

: SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY MIDDLESEX COUNTY:

: DOCKET NO.: L-2977-13 (AS)

ORDER

THIS MATTER having been brought before the Court by Plaintiffs Counsel, Benjamin

Morton, Esq., requesting permission to withdraw as counsel for the Plaitiff, Hitham Abuhouran,

and the Court for good cause showing, does hereby ORDER as follows:

J ~ 1 IT IS on this,21!.- day of NIW<'-.i!r 201Jf ORDERED:

l. That Plaintiff's counsel is granted permission to withdraw as counsel in the above

entitled matter.

2. Mr. Abuhouran is hereby granted_"""::..._ oays from the date of entry of this Order for

his new counsel to submit

attorney ofrecord.

proper documentation for the purpose of becoming

{Lc.J~-The Honorable Ana C. Viscomi, J.S.C.

On 8. ;2.. • 2v1K the court's statement of reasons have been set forth on the record.

I

WILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZER, P.A. 90 Woodbridge Center Drive P.O. Box 10 Woodbridge, New Jersey 07095 (732) 636-8000 Attorneys for Plaintiff LYNNE M. KIZIS, ESQ. (ID No. 037831987)

I

J:'11.. rte i:D 'l

SUPERIOR co~il:"4 (JJ§EW .EY LAW DIVISION-MID COUNTY DOCKET No. MID-L-03 ,~~

---------------------------------------x ANIELLO ADDESSO;

Plaintiff, ASBESTOS LITIGATION

vs. Civil Action

A&M WHOLESALE HARDWARE CO . , et al . ; ORDER

Defendants. ---------------------------------------x

THIS MATTER having been opened to the Court upon the motion of

Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, P.A., counsel for Plaintiff, and the Court

having considered the moving papers, and for other good and just cause

shown;

IT IS on the

ORDERED that

(\J_ '2 day of ~e \?,vA.Cl.,\

Plaintiff is hereby granteG

, 2018;

leave to file and serve

an Amended Complaint, as set forth in the accompanying Certification, to

name Manufacturers Edge, Inc., individually, as successor to and doing

business as Tri-State Pump & Equipment Corp., as an additional defendant;

and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all Defendants who have been served

with the motion papers shall be deemed to have been served with the Amended

Complaint and Defendants' previously filed Answers and Cross-Claims shall be

deemed responsive to the amended pleadings; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Order be served upon

all counsel of record within ~days of the date of its entry.


#9684607.1 (165172.002)

MCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.c. t:it i:::-0.

23 Vreeland Road, Suite 220 a;; 4126-003

Florham Park, New Jersey 07932 f£B _ 2 2018

(973) 822-1110

Attorneys for Defendant, ANA C. VJSCOMt _R_.E_. _C_a_rr_ol~l,_In_c_. __________ , J.S.C.

Donna M. Arvello,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

Asbestos Corporation, Ltd., et al.,

Defendants.

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY

LAW DIVISION-MIDDLESEX COUNTY

DOCKET NO.: MID-L-588-17 AS

Civil Action Asbestos Litigation

ORDER

·_•·,_:TfllS,MAT:fllif,ha,ving,\x;en.openedto the Court on Motion ofMcGivney and Kluger,

P.C,, attorneys for Defendant;· R.E:·Carroll, Inc., for an Order granting said Defendant summary

judgment in the within cause of action, and the Court having reviewed the moving papers and for

good cause shown;

IT IS on this 2,rd_day of 'fe. 6(l)?IJ2018;

.ORDERED that the Motion for Summa: Judgment of Defendant, R.E. Carroll, Inc. is

hereby granted in favor of said Defendant and that plaintiff's claims and any and all cross claims

and/or third-party complaints asserted against this Defendant are hereby dismissed with

prejudice; and it is further;

ORDERED that a copy of this Order shall be served upon all attorneys of record within

seven (7} days of the date hereof.

____...()pposed ~Unopposed

(kc.~-Honorable Ana C. Viscomi, J.S.C,

"Having revi~w~d the above motion, I find it

to be meritorious on its face and is

unopposed. Pursuant to R.1 :6-2, it therefore will be granted essentially for the

reasons set forth in the moving papers."

GIBBONS P.C. By: Robert D. Brown, Jr. (NJ ID No.:· 033131998) /:'/1

One Gateway Center «../:/''!> Newark, New Jersey 07102-5496 f:'(B ~ U (973) 596-4500 -4N.,qc . 2 <Ot{J Attorneys for Defendant ·WscnA, CEMEX Materials LLC V.vff

LEROY R. BAKER, JR., Individually and as Expected Administrator and Administrator ad Prosequendum for the Estate of DOLORES L. BAKER, Deceased,

Plaintiff

v.

ANOVA HOLDING AG, et al.

Defendants

t,J <, ·o.c, SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY

LAW DIVISION: MIDDLESEX COUNTY DOCKET NO. MID-L-1132-16 AS

- Asbestos Litigation -

Civil Action

d ervi:t;,'vi,"'v' ORDER GRJ<N N~ ENTRY OF

PROTECTIVE ORDER PURSUANT TO R. 4:10-3(D)

This matter having come before the Court on Motion of

Gibbons P.C., attorneys for Defendant CEMEX Materials LLC, and

the Court having reviewed the moving and opposition papers, if

any, and for good cause shown;

IT IS on this ;)"~ day

ORDERED that Defendant CEMEX Materials LLC's Motion for

~ Protective Order pursuant to R. 4: 10-3 (d) is hereby ~~~nd

Topics 9, 14, ±€-,--17, 18, 19, 2Q, 21, 22, 23, 24, and 25 are

h e,-tr:--eerrb;,'Jr,snt::11:cii'cc'kkEecrnr,,--:l:lc'ii,,im~.:iW,t;;.,;i.i.;' ni:.gg__ctt.hh.ee-:aSGGGOJSpeEe>---eo4f'-fl!?c,l,l,;;aeii. .. ol.1t:.:1Li' f~ d ep as i ti on -----.

in(J:i:i±-ries to the remaining deposition topics outl.L!1ec:I-- in

Plainti ff:a' notice for the ··cteposition of CEMEX Materials LLC' s

ORDERED that a copy of this Order shall be served on all

counsel within seven (7) days of the rie hereofJ . '

~ C . ~

/ Hon. Ana C. Viscomi, J.S.C.

Opposed Unopposed

On 2. 2, 20,8: the court's statement of reasons have been set forth on the record.

2

GIBBONS P.C. By: Robert D. Brown, Jr. (NJ

One Gateway Center ID No.: 033131998)

Newark, New Jersey 07102-5496 (973) 596-4500 Attorneys for Defendant CEMEX Materials LLC

THERESA LONDENBERG, Individually and Executrix to the Estate of THERESA L. STASKO

Plaintiff

v.

ANOVA HOLDING AG, individually and as successor to Amiantus and Eternit AG, et al.

Defendants

/:11.. f:'£'9 ~I)

.fN,4c ,, .. ; <Ute '"781" '-0,w;

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JE~i~~ LAW DIVISION: MIDDLESEX COUNTY

DOCKET NO. MID-L-3519-16 AS


Civil Action &eJ'> ';f •'"'),-

ORDER GRRN~ENTRY OF PROTECTIVE ORDER PURSUANT TO

R. 4:10-3(0)


Gibbons P. C., attorneys for Defendant CEMEX Materials LLC, and



IT IS on this 1'.~ ., "~ ---'""'"'-------- day of .J:>i= ,

ORDERED that Defendant CEMEX Materials LLC's

Protective Order pursuant to R. 4:10-3(d) is hereby

24 '

Motion for

~ gra .. to,:;1 aP.d

and 25 are

hereby :,;trigkon, lim4ting the acope of Flaintiff' a deposition

inquid e-. i:o l:he temainiP.g eepo.iit:i.en ~l~ in

Plaint~e for the deposrn· of CEMEX Mate:u.als- LLC' s

corpor~te representatJ..lze; and


counsel within seven (7) days of the date hereof.

_L Opposed __ _ Unopposed

2

a, .. c (J~-Hon. Ana C. Visoomi, J.S.C.

On 2 . 2.. 20\$ the court's statement of reasons have been set forth on the record.

' '

GIBBONS P.C. By: Robert D. Brown, Jr. (NJ

One Gateway Center ID No.: 033131998)

/:11._~D f:ta ~,~ Newark, New Jersey 07102-5496

(973) 596-4500 Attorneys for Defendant CEMEX Materials LLC

ANTHONY MICHAEL YURCHAK and ELEANOR YURCHAK

Plaintiffs

v.

ANOVA HOLDING AG, individually and as successor to Amiantus and Eternit AG, et al.

Defendants

JIN,4 ~ c. v1sco41, ~J.B.c

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION: MIDDLESEX COUNTY



Civil Action d,ev-~·'ly

ORDER ~J:NQ ENTRY OF PROTECTIVE ORDER PURSUANT TO

R. 4:10-3(D)


Gibbons P.C., attorneys for Defendant CEMEX Materials LLC, and



IT IS on this day of~, 201/

ORDERED that Defendant CEMEX Materials LLC's Motion for

~ Protective Order pursuant to R. 4: 10-3 (d) is hereby g.;:,anted and

Top:i.os 9, 14, 16, 1'1, 18, 19, Z0, 21, 22, 23, 24, ana7'5"-are

hereby stricken, limiting the scope of l"laintiff' s deposi Lion

inqu;Lries to the r@ma:i.ni119 deposition topics outlined in

Plaintiff1J.' notice for tb@ de~MEX "Materials LLC' s

corporate representi,j;.i.ve; and

----


counsel within seven (7) days of the date hereof.

{k.c.J~-Hon. Ana C. Viscomi, J.S.C.

Unopposed

On 2,,'.2..20R the court's statement of reasons have been set forth on the record.

2

I ; (

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

MARGOLIS EDELSTEIN SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY 100 Century Parkway, Suite 200 LAW DIVISION: MIDDLESEX COUNTY Mount Laurel, New Jersey 08054 (856) 727-6000 DOCKET NO.: MID-L-1991-13AS By: Jeanine D. Clark Attorney I.D. #: 016331998 l:'f l. Attorneys for Defendant, A.P.S. Plumbing & t:s i:D Heating Supply, Inc. 8 ~; Our File No.: 59200.1-10557 4N4 0 2t>t,> . ., ~ Dennis Dengel AsBEsTos LITIGA~&R! J.s_c

Plaintiff, Civil Action

V. ORDER FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

A&M Wholesale Hardware Co., et al. BY DEFENDANT, A.P.S. PLUMBING & Defendants. HEATING SUPPLY, INC.

This matter having been brought before the Court on Motion of Margolis Edelstein,

attorneys for defendant, A.P.S. Plumbing & Heating Supply, Inc., and the Court having reviewed

the moving and opposition papers, if any, and for good cause shown:

IT IS on this C. (\d day of 7=e bru/Ji,~ , 2018,

ORDERED the motion of defendant, A.P.S. Plumbing & Heating Supply, Inc., for

summary judgment is hereby granted and the Complaint and any Counterclaims and Crossclaims

are hereby dismissed with prejudice.

A copy of the within Order shall be sent to all counsel within seven (7) days of the date hereof.

[ J 9pposed [ \']Unopposed

(kC.J~· HONORABLE ANA C. VISCOMI, J.S.C.

"Having reviewed the above motion, I find it to be meritorious on its face and is unopposed. Pursuant to R.1 :6-2, it therefore will be granted essentially for the reasons set fol'lh in the moving papers."

CARUSO SMITH PICINI Richard D. Picini, Esq. Attorney I.D. No. 036521983 60 Route 46 East Fairfield, New Jersey 07004 (973) 667-6000 Attorneys for Defendant, Union Carbide Corporation

RENATO GAMBINO and ALICE GAMBINO,

Plaintiffs, vs.

DAP PRODUCTS, et al.,

Defendants.

SUPERJOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION: MIDDLESEX COUNTY DOCKETNO.: MID-L-1464-17AS

Civil Action

Asbestos Litigation

ORDER

THIS MATTER having been opened to the Court by CARUSO SMITH PICINI,

attorneys for Defendant Union Carbide Corporation for an Order pursuant to R. 1 :21-2, granting

pro hac vice admission to Michael G. Terry, Esq., and the Court having considered the

submissions of the parties:

IT IS on this ,) l\ld, day of_fe'--"' .. '...!b:v"". "-""0"'-"-'wl.c.i-----' 2018;

\ ORDERED that:

(1) The application of Michael G. Terry, Esq., for admission pro hac vice be and

hereby is granted; and

(2) Michael. G. Terry, Esq. shall abide by the Rules of the New Jersey Courts,

including, but not limited to, all disciplinary mies and Rules 1:20-l(b), 1:28-2 and 1:28B-l(e);

and

(3) TI1at Michael G. Terry, Esq. 's long-standing relationship with Defendant Union

Carbide Corporation constitutes good cause; and

(4) That Michael G. Terry, Esq. shall consent to the appointment of the Clerk of the

Supreme Court as an agent upon whom service of process may be made for all actions against

her or her firm that may arise out of the attorney's participation in the matter; and

(5) Michael G. Terry, Esq. shall notify the court i1mnediately of any matter affecting

the attorney's standing at the bar of any other court in any jurisdiction; and

( 6) That all pleadings, briefs and other papers filed with the Court shall be signed by

an attorney of record authorized to practice in this State who shall be responsible for the conduct

of this case and of counsel admitted pro hac vice by virtue of this Order; and

(7) That Michael G. Terry, Esq. shall be designated as trial counsel; and

(8) No adjournment or delay in discovery, motions, trial, or any other proceedings

will be requested by reason of Michael G. Teny, Esq.'s inability to appear; and

(9) Michael G. Teny, Esq. shall send a copy of this Order granting her pro hac vice

admission with the required annual fees to the New Jersey Lawyers Fund; and

(10) Shall within 10 days of the date of this Order comply with R. 1 :20-1 (b ), R. 1 :28B-

1 ( e) and R. 1 :28-2 and shall submit an affidavit of compliance; and that

(11) Automatic termination of pro hac vice admission shall occur for failure to make

the required annual payment of the Annual Fee and the annual payment to the Lawyer's

Assistance Fund, the New Jersey Lawyer's Fund for Client Protection and the Disciplinary

Oversight Committee. Proof of such payment, after filing proof of the initial payment, shall be

made no later than February 1 of each year; and

(12) Noncompliance with any of these requirements shall constitute grounds for

removal; and

(13) CARUSO SMITH PICINI shall serve a copy of this Order upon all counsel of

record within ~days of the date of entry hereof.

Opposed

Unopposed

Hon. Ana C. Viscomi, J.S.C.

CARUSO SMITH PICINI Richard D. Picini, Esq. Attorney LD. No. 036521983 60 Route 46 East Fairfield, New Jersey 07004 (973) 667-6000 Attorneys for Defendant, Union Carbide Corporation

RENA TO GAMBINO and ALICE GAMBINO,

Plaintiffs, vs.


Defendants.

(

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION: MIDDLESEX COUNTY DOCKET NO.: MID-L-1464-17 AS

Civil Action

Asbestos Litigation

ORDER


attorneys for Defendant Union Carbide Co1poration for an Order pursuant to R. I :21-2, granting

pro hac vice admission to Thomas J. Morel, Esq., and the Cou1t having considered the

submissions of the patties:

IT IS on this 'a"ci day of_}e_,_..=-k~:tu=l"'1~· =61-'-1/\c-------' 2018;

ORDERED that:

(!) The application of Thomas J. Morel, Esq., for admission pro hac vice be and


(2) Thomas J. Morel, Esq. shall abide by the Rules of the New Jersey Courts,

including, but not limited to, all disciplinary rules and Rules 1:20-l(b), 1:28-2 and l:28B-l(e);

and

(3) That Thomas J. Morel, Esq.'s long-standing relationship with Defendant Union


( 4) That Thomas J. Morel, Esq. shall consent to the appointment of the Clerk of the



(5) Thomas J. Morel, Esq. shall notify the comt immediately of any matter affecting

the attorney's standing at the bar of any other comt in any jurisdiction; and

(6) That all pleadings, briefs and other papers filed with the Court shall be signed by

an attorney ofrecord authorized to practice in this State who shall be responsible for the conduct

of this case and of counsel admitted pro hac vice by vi1tue of this Order; and

(7) That Thomas J. Morel, Esq. shall be designated as trial counsel; and


will be requested by reason of Thomas J. Morel, Esq. 's inability to appear; and

(9) Thomas J. Morel, Esq. shall send a copy of this Order granting her pro hac vice


(10) Shall within 10 days of the date of this Order comply with R. 1 :20-1 (b ), R. 1 :28B

l ( e) and R. 1 :28-2 and shall submit an affidavit of compliance; and that

(11) Automatic termination of pro hac vice admission shall occur for failure to make




made no later than February I of each year; and


removal; and


record within~ days of the date of entry hereof.

Opposed

Unopposed


CARUSO SMITH PICINI Richard D. Picini, Esq. Attomeyl.D. No. 036521983 60 Route 46 East Fairfield, New Jersey 07004 (973) 667-6000 Attorneys for Defendant, Union Carbide Corporation

RENATO GAMBINO and ALICE GAMBINO,

Plaintiffs, vs.


Defendants.

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION: MIDDLESEX COUNTY DOCKET NO.: MID-L-1464-17 AS

Civil Action

Asbestos Litigation

ORDER


attorneys for Defendant Union Carbide Corporation for an Order pursuant to R. 1 :21-2, granting

pro hac vice admission to W. Clay Massey, Esq., and the Court having considered the

submissions of the parties:

IT IS on this 2,0d. day of<$bG\JtlGJ,,,/

ORDERED that: \

, 2018;

(]) The application of W. Clay Massey, Esq., for admission pro liac vice be and


(2) W. Clay Massey, Esq. shall abide by the Rules of the New Jersey Courts,

including, but not limited to, all disciplinary rules and Rules 1:20-l(b), 1:28-2 and l:28B-l(e);

and

(3) That W. Clay Massey, Esq.'s long-standing relationship with Defendant Union


(4) That W. Clay Massey, Esq. shall consent to the appointment of the Clerk of the



(5) W. Clay Massey, Esq. shall notify the comt immediately of any matter affecting

the attorney's standing at the bar of any other court in any jurisdiction; and

( 6) That all pleadings, briefs and other papers filed with the Comt shall be signed by

an attorney of record authorized to practice in this State who shall be responsible for the conduct

of this case and of counsel admitted pro hac vice by virtue of this Order; and

(7) That W. Clay Massey, Esq. shall be designated as trial counsel; and


will be requested by reason ofW. Clay Massey, Esq. 's inability to appear; and

(9) W. Clay Massey, Esq. shall send a copy of this Order granting her pro hac vice


(I 0) Shall within 10 days of the date of this Order comply with R. 1 :20-1 (b ), R. I :28B-

1 ( e) and R. 1 :28-2 and shall submit an affidavit of compliance; and that

(11) Automatic tennination of pro /we vice admission shall occur for failure to make




made no later than Febmary 1 of each year; and


removal; and


record within 1-- days of the date of entry hereof.

Opposed

Unopposed


PHILLIPS & PAO LI CELLI, LLP Quakerbridge Executive Center

101 Grovers Mill Road

Lawrenceville, NJ 08648

(609) 789-5600

MEIROWITZ & WASSERBERG, LLP

233 Broadway, Suite #2070

New York, NY 10279 (212) 897-1988

By: Perry L. Shusterman, Esq. (ID #183462017)

Daniel J. Woodard, Esq. (ID #020132006)

- - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - X

ANITA F. GORDON,

Plaintiff,

-against-

JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON

CONSUMER, INC.; John Doe Corporations 1-50; John

Doe Corporations 51-75,

- - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - X

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW

JERSEY LAW DIVISION

MIDDLESEX COUNTY

DOCKETNO,~~~-lr.s: k. 1 CIVIL ACTION ASBESTOS LITIGATION

ORDER PERMITTING FILING OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

This matter having been opened to the court by Meirowitz & Wasserberg, LLP and

Phillips & Paolicelli, LLP, attorneys for Plaintiff, for an Order permitting the filing of a First

Amended Complaint, pursuant to the standing General Order of this Court, and the Court having

considered the Certification of Counsel in Support of the request, and for other good cause

shown;

rd IT IS on this '2. day o(:Ee6ruc-1.ct.,{ '2018 ORDERED that:

\ The motion of Plaintiff to file and serve the Amended Complaint in the form attached to

the Motion is granted as to add the following party as Defendant:

{00036142}

• BRENNTAG NORTH AMERICA, INC., individually and as successor in

interest to MINERAL PIGMENT SOLUTIONS, INC., as successor in interest

to WHITTAKER, CLARK & DANIELS, INC.;

• BRENNTAG SPECIALTIES, INC., f/lc/a MINERAL PIGMENT SOLUTIONS,

INC. and as successor in interest to WHITTAKER, CLARK & DANIELS;

• CYPRUS AMAX MINERALS COMP ANY, individually and as successor to

SIERRA TALC COMPANY and UNITED TALC COMPANY;

• IMERYS TALC AMERICA INC., f/k/a LUZENAC AMERICA INC. and

UNITED SIERRA TALC CO.;

• MINERAL AND PIGMENT SOLUTIONS, INC., f/k/a WHITT AKER,

CLARK & DANIELS, INC.; WHITTAKER, CLARI( & DANIELS, INC.;

FURTHER ORDERED that all Defendants who have been served with the motion papers

shall be deemed to have been served the Amended Complaint and Defendants' previously filed

Answers and Cross-Claims shall be deemed responsive to the amended pleadings; and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Amended Complaint shall be filed and served within

twenty (20) days of the date hereof; and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of the within Order shall be served upon all counsel

of record within seven (7) days of the date of entry.

i\ c.J~-By: --~--------~

Ana C. Viscomi, J.S.C.

OPPOSED:

UNOPPOSED:~/ ______ _

{00036142}

MARKS, O'NEILL, O'BRIEN, DOHERTY & KELLY, P.C.

11· /ai z..z-1f

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT, BAYONNE PLUMBING SUPPLY, INC.

BY: SEBASTIAN A. GOLDSTEIN, ESQUIRE CHERRY TREE CORPORA TE CENTER 535 ROUTE 38 EAST, SUITE 501 l:'11..;,..,

t:"('19 lf:i) CHERilY HILL, NJ 08002 (856) 663-4300

242-101876(SAG)

Plaintiffs,

EDWARD KAZARY

v.

Defendants,

BAYONNE PLUMBING SUPPLY, INC., ct. al.

41\14 C [I, ',? <01t9 . 7sca

~~s SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW .JERSE~

LAW DIVISION MIDDLESEX COUNTY

Docket No. L-2881-14 AS


ORDER FOR SUMMARY ,JUDGMENT FOR DEFENDANT BAYONNE

PLUMBING SUPPLY, INC.


Doherty & Kelly, P.C., attorneys for defendant, BAYONNE PLUMBING SUPPLY, INC., and the

Court having reviewed the moving and opposition papers, if any, and for good cause shown;

?{\CL ...-:: IT IS ON THIS i,.. DAY OF S::C- \orut.\41.A , 2018, ~~~ \

ORDERED the motion of Defendant, BAYONNE PLUMBING SUPPLY, INC., for

summary judgment is hereby granted and the Complaint and any Counterclaims and Cross-Claims



of the date hereof.

{NJ817382.l I

Hon r ble Ana Viscomi, J.S.C.

"Having reviewed the above motion, I find_il to be meritorious on ,ts face and ,s unopposed. Pursuant to R.1:6·2, it therelore will be granted e~sentially lo;, the reasons set forth in the moving papers.

McGivney Kluger & Cook, P.C. Marc J. Wise!, Esq. NJ ID #031052004

/ill Zt.'7

z _z-1J

23 Vreeland Road, Suite 220 /,:',

Florham Park, New Jersey 07932 P, l[. l::-,1,",

(973) 822-1110 i:I} 14; V

Attorneys for Defendant, DAP, Inc. kin/a La Mirada Products Co., In~l' VJ '2 ?0{9 . ~""'-

EDWARD KAZARY; -4.t~

SUPERIOR COURT OF NE . JERSEY

LAW DIVISION: MIDDLESEX COUNTY

Plaintiffs, DOCKET NO. MID-L-2881-14(AS)

-vs-Civil Action

3M COMPANY; et.al. Asbestos Litigation

Defendants. ORDER

THIS MATTER having been opened to the court on motion by McGivney Kluger &

Cook, P.C., attorneys for defendant DAP, Inc. kin/a La Mirada Products Co., Inc. for an order

granting summary judgment, and the court having reviewed the moving papers, and any

opposition thereto and for good cause having been shown;

IT IS on this i_f\dziay of J-e. bl\JO..ov\

\ , 2018;

ORDERED that summary judgment shall be and hereby is granted in favor of defendant

DAP, Inc. k/n/a La Mirada Products Co., Inc.; and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that all claims and all crossclaims against DAP, Inc. kin/a La

Mirada Products Co., Inc. shall be and hereby are dismissed with prejudice; and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order shall be served upon all attorneys of

record within~ days of receipt by counsel for the moving pa1ty.

i;/upposed Unopposed

Honorable Ana C. Viscomi, J.S.C.

{Fl658436-I}

"Having reviewed the above motion, I find ii to be meritorious on its face and is unopposed. Pursuant to R.1 :6-2, it therefore will be granted essentially tor the reasons set forth in the moving papers."

DELANY McBRIDE, P.C. John J. Delany, Ill, Esquire Attorney ID No.: 036091985 Gaston P. Loomis, Esquire Attorney ID No. 230672017 36 Euclid Street Woodbury, New Jersey 08096 (856) 202-8100

l:'11 ~ Pf:t9 q,.,JSi)

t

Attorneys for Defendant, Ductmate Industries, Inc.

4!114 C. /I, ~? <Ok;> 7sca

rit;_J , ·.S:c

EDWARD KAZARY,

Plaintiffs vs.

DUCTMATE INDUSTRIES, INC., ET AL.

Defendants

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION: MIDDLESEX COUNTY DOCKET NO. MID-L-2881-14AS

Civil Action

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON BEHALF OF DUCTMATE INDUSTRIES,

INC.

This matter having come before the Court on Defendant Ductmate IndustTies, Inc.' s Motion

for Summary Judgment, and the Court having reviewed the moving and opposition papers, if any,

and for good cause shown:

ITIS ON THIS c;fld. DAY OF "t=e,bGLJAct.,\ ,2018,

ORDERED the motion of Defendant Ductmate Industries, Inc. }or summary judgment is

hereby granted and the Complaint and any Counterclaims and Cross-Claims are hereby dismissed

with prejudice. ..,:; .

ORDERED that a copy of this Order shall serve on all counsel within seven ('l)days of the

date hereof.

() Opposed

(/unopposed cc-_c--


"Having reviewed the above motion, I find 11 - 10 be meritorious on Its lace and Is

unopposed, Pursuant to R.1 :6·2, It --lherefore will be granti,d-essentlally for the

reasons set forth In the moving papers."

MARKS, O'NEILL, O'BRIEN, DOHERTY & KELLY, P.C.

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT, FIRST ENERGY CORPORATION

BY: SEBASTIAN A. GOLDSTEIN, ESQUIRE

CHERRY TREE CORPORATE CENTER

535 ROUTE 38 EAST, SUITE 501 P'/l.i:D CHERRY HILL, NJ 08002 (856) 663-4300

1058-9772l(SAG)

Plaintiffs,

EDWARD KAZARY

v.

Defendants,

r-ts · 4iV4 c ~ l 20/1]

· 11sc0 ,, tv/f, J.s

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW ,JERSfY LAW DIVISION

MIDDLESEX COUNTY



FIRST ENERGY CORPORATION (f/k/a/

JERSEY CENTRAL POWER & LIGHT),

et. al.

ORDER FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

FOR DEFENDANT FIRST ENERGY CORPORATION (f/k/a/ JERSEY CENTRAL POWER & LIGHT)


Doherty & Kelly, P.C., attorneys for defendant, FIRST ENERGY CORPORATION (f/k/a/

JERSEY CENTRAL POWER & LIGHT), and the Court having reviewed the moving and

opposition papers, if any, and for good cause shown;

ITISONTHIS '2_(\J DAYOFj=ebQlt\cbd ,2018,

ORDERED the motion of Defendant, FIRST ENERGY ORPORATION (f/k/a/ JERSEY

CENTRAL POWER & LIGHT), for summary judgment is hereby granted and the Complaint and

any Counterclaims and Cross-Claims are hereby dismissed with prejudice.

0 RD ERED that a copy of this Order shall be served on all counsel within seven (7) days

of the date hereof.

{NJ8l738U}

I

{kC.u~ Honorable Ana Viscomi, J.S.C.

"Having reviewed the above motion, I find it to be meritorious on its face and is unopposed. Pursuant to R.1 :6-2, It therefore will be granted essentially for the reasons set forth In the moving papers."

MCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C. SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY Pooja R. Patel (014922010) LAW DIVISION-MIDDLESEX COUNTY 23 Vreeland Road, Suite 220 DOCKET NO.: MID-L-2881-14AS Florham Park, New Jersey 07932

l:'1, (973) 822-1110 Attorneys for Defendant, Raritan Snpply /:"(', 'l. ,:;. Comoanv . 6 ~ -Edward Kazary, "114 C <: , '/Jf; · 0s.

Plaintiff(s), ASBESTOS MOTION CG~, I, ~ C.

Civil Action

v. ORDER

3M Company, et al.

Defendants

THIS MATTER having been opened to the Court on Motion of McGivney, Kluger & Cook, P.C.,

attorneys for Defendant, Raritan Supply Company, for an Order granting said defendant summary

judgment in the within cause of action, and the Court having reviewed the moving papers and for good

cause shown~

IT IS on this t-.rid day of'fe bn> O\o J • 2018; ~ I

ORDERED that the Motion for Summary Judgment of Defendant, Raritan Supply Company, is

hereby granted in favor of said Defendant and that the Plaintiffs claim and any and all cross claims

asserted against this Defendant are hereby dismissed with prejudice; and it is further;

ORDERED that a copy of this Order shall be served upon all attorneys of record within seven (7)

days of the date hereof.

Opposed XUnopposed

{Fl657974·1}

~c.J~· Honorable Ana Viscomi, J.S.C.

"Having reviewed the above motion, I find It lo be meritorious on its face and is unopposed. Pursuant to R.1 :6-2, it therefore will be granted essentially for the reasons set forth in the moving papers."

O'T00LE Scruvo FERNANDEZ WEINER VAN LIEU, LLC Gruy Van Lieu (Attorney No. 019971990) 14 Village Park Road Cedru· Grove, New Jersey 07009 (973) 239-5700 Attorneys for Defendant, W A. Birdsall & Company

EDWARD KAZARY,

Plaintiff,


DOCKET NO. MID-L-2881-14AS

V.

Asbestos Litigation Civil Action

3M COMP ANY, et. al., ORDER

Defendants.

THIS MATTER, having been opened by Defendant, W. A. Birdsall & Company

("Birdsall"), for an Order pursuant to Rule 4:46-1, granting summary judgment in favor of

Birdsall, dismissing the Complaint and all claims, counter-claims, and cross-claims, with

prejudice, and the Court havmg reviewed the moving papers of counsel, -aoo the Court having

he81el erfll mgttll:leflt, and for other good cause shown;

IT IS ON TIDS 2. () c\day of ::f-e 6<fL) 0 ,0 ..t

\ ORDERED as follows:

, 2018;

1. Birdsall's motion for summary judgment is hereby GRANTED;

2. The Complaint ru1d all claims filed by Plaintiff against Birdsall are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice;

3. Any and all cross-claims filed by any Co-Defendat1ts against Birdsall are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice;

4. Any at1d all clain1S, cross-claims ru1d counterclaims asse1ted now at1d hereafter are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice, as to Birdsall; at1d

1

5. Counsel for Birdsall shall serve one copy ofthis Order on all counsel within '::{days of receiving a conformed copy.

Opposed

Unopposed

SO ORDERED.

HONORABLE ANA C. VISCO MI, J.S.C.

"Having reviewed the above motion I find it to be meritorious on its face 'and is unopposed. Pursuant to R.1 :6-2, it therefore will be granted essentially for the reasons set forth in the moving papers."

2

MARSHALL DENNEHEY WARNER COLEMAN & GOGGIN By: Arthur D. Bromberg, Esq. Attorney I.D. No. 001931979 425 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 302 Roseland, NJ 07068 1il973-618-4100 ~973-618-0685 @ [email protected] Attorneys for Defendant, Leviton Manufacturing Co., Inc.

GEORGE A. LINK and DIANE E. LINK, SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION: MIDDLESEX COUNTY DOCKET NO. MID-L-6245-17 AS

Plaintiffs, ASBESTOS MOTION

vs. Civil Action

ABB, INC., ET AL., ORDER GRANTING PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION OF SAM V. RUGGERI, ESQ.

Defendants.

THIS MATTER having come before the Court on motion by Marshall Dennehey Warner

Coleman & Goggin, attorneys for defendant Leviton Manufacturing Co. Inc. ("Leviton"), to admit

Sam V. Ruggeri, Esq. pro hac vice, a licensed attorney in good standing of the Bar of the State o

New York, to participate with other counsel for defendant Leviton in all phases of the litigation and

trial; and it appearing that the defendant Leviton has requested that Sam V. Ruggeri, Esq., who has a

long standing attorney-client relationship represent them in this action; and the Coutt having

considered the papers submitted in support of the motion, as well as any opposition papers and oral

argument of counsel, if any; and foi:.,gQod and sufficient cause; d l.:'. bn.lt\Gt./

IT IS on this C. () day of Ja.R.uacy, 2018,

ORDERED that Sam V. Ruggeri, Esq. be and hereby is admitted pro hac vice and is

authorized to appear and participate for other counsel on behalf of Leviton, in all phases of the

litigation and trial; and it is further

ORDERED that:

l. Sam V. Ruggeri, Esq. shall abide by the New Jersey Coutt Rules, including all

Disciplinary Rules;

2. Sam V. Ruggeri, Esq. shall and hereby does consent to the appointment of the Clerk o

the Superior Court of New Jersey as his agent upon whom service of process may be

made for all actions against Sam V. Ruggeri, Esq. or his firm, Marshall Dennehey

Warner Coleman & Goggin, which may arise out of his participation in this matter;

3. Sam V. Ruggeri, Esq. shall immediately notify the Comt of any matter effecting his

standing at the Bar of any jurisdiction;

4. Sam V. Ruggeri, Esq. shall have all pleadings, briefs and other papers filed with the

Court signed by an attorney of record authorized to practice in New Jersey, who shall be

responsible for them as well as for the conduct and cause of litigation and the attorney

admitted herein;

5. Sam V. Ruggeri, Esq. must, within ten (10) days of the date hereof, pay the fees required

by R, I :20-l(b), R, I :28-2(a) and .B,. I :28B-l(e);

6. Pro hac vice admission will automatically terminate for failure to make the initial and

required annual payment of the Annual Fee and the annual payment to the Disciplinary

Oversight Committee, New Jersey Lawyers Assistance Fund, and the New Jersey

Lawyer's Fund for Client Protection. Proof of such payment, after filing proof o

payment, shall be made no later than February I of each year;

7. Sam V. Ruggeri, Esq. will not be designated trial Counsel;

8. No delay in the trial will occur as a result of Sam V. Ruggeri, Esq.'s pro hac vice

admission;

9. Non-compliance with any terms of this Order shall constitute grounds for removal; and it

is further

ORDERED that a copy of this Order shall be served upon all patties in this case within

seven (7) days of the date hereof.

Opposed_ Unopposed/

AC. VISCOMI, J.S.C.

2

MARSHALL DENNEHEY WARNER COLEMAN & GOGGIN

By: Arthur D. Bromberg, Esq. Attorney I.D. No. 001931979 /:'./

425 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 302 {J:l) Roseland, NJ 07068 F'[B 'if973-618-4100 ~973-618-0685 A.N, ~ 2 2.(/fg @ [email protected] '4 C. Vise Attorneys for Defendant, AIW-2010 Wind Down Corp., inc'Q#,~Mcsued herein as American

Insulated Wire Cor . · ·

GEORGE A. LINK and DIANE E. LINK,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

ABB, INC., ET AL.,

Defendants.

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION: MIDDLESEX COUNTY DOCKET NO. MID-L-6245-17 AS

ASBESTOS MOTION

Civi I Action

ORDER GRANTING PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION OF SAM V. RUGGERI, ESQ.

THIS MATTER having come before the Court on motion by Marshall Dennehey Warner

Coleman & Goggin, attorneys for defendant AIW-2010 Wind Down Corp., incorrectly sued herein

as American Insulated Wire Corp., ("AIW"), to admit Sam V. Ruggeri, Esq. pro hac vice, a licensed

attorney in good standing of the Bar of the State of New York, to participate with other counsel for

defendant AIW in all phases of the litigation and trial; and it appearing that the defendant AIW has

requested that Sam V. Ruggeri, Esq., who has a long standing attorney-client relationship represent

them in this action; and the Court having considered the papers submitted in support of the motion,

as well as any opposition papers and oral argument of counsel, if any; and for good and sufficient

cause; \ febwtt,;,v( IT IS on this ~day of J.arnlffio/; 2018,

ORDERED that Sam V. Ruggeri, Esq. be and hereby is admitted pro hac vice and is

authorized to appear and participate for other counsel on behalf of AIW, in all phases of the

litigation and trial; and it is further

ORDERED that:

1. Sam V. Ruggeri, Esq. shall abide by the New Jersey Court Rules, including all

Disciplinary Rules;

2. Sam V. Ruggeri, Esq. shall and hereby does consent to the appointment of the Clerk o

the Superior Coutt of New Jersey as his agent upon whom service of process may be

made for all actions against Sam V. Ruggeri, Esq. or his firm, Marshall Dennehey

Warner Coleman & Goggin, which may arise out of his participation in this matter;

3. Sam V. Ruggeri, Esq. shall immediately notify the Court of any matter effecting his

standing at the Bar of any jurisdiction;

4. Sam V. Ruggeri, Esq. shall have all pleadings, briefs and other papers filed with the

Court signed by an attorney of record authorized to practice in New Jersey, who shall be

responsible for them as well as for the conduct and cause of litigation and the attorney

admitted herein;

5. Sam V. Ruggeri, Esq. must, within ten (JO) days of the date hereof, pay the fees required

by R, 1:20-l(b), R, l:28-2(a) and R, 1:28B-l(e);

6. Pro hac vice admission will automatically terminate for failure to make the initial and

required annual payment of the Annual Fee and the annual payment to the Disciplinary

Oversight Committee, New Jersey Lawyers Assistance Fund, and the New Jersey

Lawyer's Fund for Client Protection. Proof of such payment, after filing proof o

payment, shall be made no later than February 1 of each year;

7. Sam V. Ruggeri, Esq. will not be designated trial Counsel;

8. No delay in the trial will occur as a result of Sam V. Ruggeri, Esq.'s pro hac vice

admission;

9. Non-compliance with any terms of this Order shall constitute grounds for removal; and it

is further

ORDERED that a copy of this Order shall be served upon all patties in this case within


Opposed_ Unopposed I ~ c.J~-

AC. VISCOMI, J.S.C.

2

JACQUELINE BUSHWACK, ESQ. (027562007)

BRIANS. SCHLOSSER (admitted pro hac vice) RIVKIN RADLER LLP 21 MAIN STREET, SUITE 158 COURT PLAZA SOUTH- WEST WING HACKENSACK, NEW JERSEY 07601 (201) 287-2460 Attorneys for Defendant Avon Products, Inc.

KAYLA MARTINEZ,

Plaintiff,

V.

A VON PRODUCTS INC., et al.,

Defendants.

f:fLEo F£e -z 2ma

ANAc V · tscoM,, J.s.c.

f

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION - MIDDLESEX COUNTY

DOCKET NO. MID-L-1120-17

CIVIL LITIGATION ASBESTOS LITIGATION

ORDER ADMITTING KATHRYN JENSEN, ESQ.

THIS MATTER having come before the Court on the motion of Rivkin Radler LLP on behalf

of Defendant, Avon Products, Inc. (hereinafter "Avon") and the Court having reviewedthe moving and


IT IS, ON THIS t;c4AY OF~2018

ORDERED that the motion by Avon is h~rely granted and Kathryn S. Jensen, Esq. is admitted

pro hac vice in the above-captioned matter and is authorized to appear and participate in all phases of

defense of this matter, including trial; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that movant established a long standing attorney-client

relationship and that this is a complex area oflaw and the attorney is a specialist; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Kathryn S. Jensen, Esq. shall, within ten (10) days of the

date of this Order, pay the fees required by R. 1 :20-1 (b ), R. l:28B-1 ( e) and R. 1 :28-2, and shall submit

an Affidavit of Compliance; and

2

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED Automatic termination of Pro Hae Vice admission shall occur

for failure to make the required payment of the annual fee to the Lawyer's Assistance Fund and the NJ

Lawyer's Fund for Client Protection. Proof of such payment, after filing proof of payment, shall be

made no later than February 1 of each year; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Katlu·yn S. Jensen, Esq. shall not be designated as trial

counsel; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Kathryn S. Jensen, Esq. shall abide by the New Jersey Court

Rules including all disciplinary rules, and shall specifically comply with Rules 1 :20-1 and 1 :28-2;

and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Katlu·yn S. Jensen, Esq. shall notify this Comi

immediately of any matter affecting her standing with the bar of any other Comi; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Ka1hryn S. Jensen, Esq. shall consent to the appointment of

the Clerk of the Supreme Comt as the ageni. upon whom service of process may be made for all

actions against the attorney or the attorney's firm that may arise out of the attorney's participation in

this matter; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all pleadings, briefs, and other papers filed with the

Court be signed by an attorney of record authorized to practice in this State, who shall be responsible

for them and for the conduct of the cause and of the admitted attorney therein; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that there will be no delay in any proceedings and no

adjournment requested by reason of the inability of Katlu·yn S. Jensen, Esq. to be in attendance; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that automatic termination of pro hac vice admission shall

occur for failure to make the required payment of the Annual Fee, and the annual payrneuls tu the

New Jersey Lawyers Assistance Fund, Disciplinary Oversight Committee, and the New Jersey

3

Lawyers' Fund for Client Protection; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that noncompliance with any of these requirements shall

constitute grounds for removal; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Order shall be served on all counsel

within seven (7) days of the date hereof.

Opposed

Unopposed

4

Hon. Ana C. Viscomi, J.S.C

DAY PITNEY LLP

ONE JEFFERSON ROAD, PARSIPPANY, NJ 07054-2891 (973) 966-6300

I:'/{ '"ta i2f)

41\14 C %2 <0/p . 0.s: IJ

Cqlt, ATTORNEYS FOR Defendant Phelps Dodge Industries, Inc., 1/,J.,SC as successor to Phelps Dodge Copper Products Corporation · ·

GAIL LOUISE ANDRU, individually and as Executrix and Executrix ad Prosequendum of the Estate of Andrew Nelson and DOROTHY NELSON,

Plaintiffs,

v.

3M COMPANY f/k/a Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co., et al.,

Defendants.

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION: MIDDLESEX COUNTY DOCKET NO. L-3809-12AS

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

Civil Action

ORDER FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT PHELPS DODGE

INDUSTRIES, INC.

THIS MATTER having come before the Court on Motion of Day

Pitney LLP, attorneys for Phelps Dodge Industries, Inc., as

successor to Phelps Dodge Copper Products Corporation (incorrectly

named in the Complaint as "Phelps Dodge Cooper Products Corp."),

and the Court having reviewed the moving and opposition papers, if


IT IS on this _".fe-<---=:c.-bv=-o,=.=l'.ll~•--"vl+----' 2018,

\ of

1. ORDERED that the motion of defendant Phelps Dodge

Industries, Inc., as successor to Phelps Dodge Copper Products

Corporation, for summary judgment is hereby GRANTED, and the

Complaint and any Counterclaims and Cross-Claims are hereby

dismissed with prejudice; and it is further

98814348,1

2. ORDERED that a copy of this Order shall be served upon

all counsel of record within seven (7) days of the date of this

Order.

2 98814348.1

c:.J~ H~ C. VISCOMI, J.S.C.

"Having reviewed the above motion, I findU to be meritorious on its face and 1s unopposed. Pursuant to R.1 :6-2, it therefore will be granted essentially for the reasons set forth in the moving papers."

PORZIO, BROMBERG & NEWMAN, P.C. Christopher P. DePhillips (022151992) 100 Southgate Parkway Monistown, NJ 07962-1997 f::'/ J.. ;-,,, [email protected] PfB f:i) (973) 538-4006 4N. ~ J 20 Attorneys for Defendant Alcatel-Lucent USA, Inc. '4 C. 11& • 'Ill

ESTATE OF ALBERT E. OROSZ and ESTATE OF PEGGY P. OROSZ,

Plaintiffs,

V.

ALCATEL LUCENT USA INC., et al.,

Defendants.

Co!W/ SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JER~ LAW DIVISION: MIDDLESEX COUNTY DOCKET NO.-MID-b..§741-14-A.S--

CIVIL ACTION Ml)l. Q 4 2 5 7i 1 5 ASBESTOS LITIGATION

ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT TO ALCATEL-LUCENT USA,

INC.

THIS MATTER having been opened to the Court upon application by Porzio, Bromberg

& Newman, P.C., attorneys for the Defendant, Alcatel-Lucent USA, Inc., and the Court having

read and reviewed the moving papers submitted and any opposition thereto and for good cause

having been shown;

It is on this "2_ (\d day of 'fe_b,t.10\(JL1, 2017,

ORDERED that the motion of Defendant Alcatel-Lucent USA, Inc. for summary

judgment is hereby GRANTED; and it is hereby

ORDERED that Plaintiffs Complaint and all cross-claims against Alcatel-Lucent USA,

Inc., are hereby dismissed with prejudice.

A copy of the within Order shall be served upon all counsel within 1= days from

the date of entry.

3620836

Ana C. Viscomi, J.S.C.

"Having reviewed the above motion, I find it to be meritorious on its face and is unopposed. Pursuant to R.1 :6-2, it therefore will be granted essentially for the reasons set forth in the moving papers."

Jack N. Frost, Jr. (025312005) DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP A Delaware Limited Liability Partnership 600 Campus Drive Florham Park, NJ 07932-1047 (973) 549-7000 Attorneys for Defendant, American Optical Corporation

JOE P AFLITZKO, Individually, and as Personal Representative of the Estate of THOMAS P AFLITZKO, deceased,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

AMERICAN OPTICAL CORP., et al.,

Defendants.

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION: MIDDLESEX COUNTY DOCKET NO: L-3378-14 AS

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

CNILACTION

ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT FOR DEFENDANT

AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION

THIS MA TIER having come before the Court on motion of Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP,

attorneys for Defendant American Optical Corporation, and the Court having reviewed the moving

and opposition papers, if any, and for good cause shown;

IT IS ON THIS afldnA Y OF ---e. k:,,v 2018;

ORDERED the motion of Defendant American tical Corporation for summary judgment

is hereby granted and the Complaint, as amended, and any Counterclaims and Cross-Claims are

hereby dismissed with prejudice.

ORDERED that a copy of this Order shall be served on all counsel within seven (7) days of

the date hereof

--/ Opposed V Unopposed

91038836.1


"Having reviewed the above motion, I find it to be meritorious on its face and is unopposed. Pursuant to R.1 :6-2, it therefore will be granted essentially for the reasons set forth In the moving papers."

REILLY, JANICZEK, MCDEVITT,

HENRICH & CHOLDEN, P.C. J::'jil ,._, BRANDY L. HARRIS h I{,,, 11:D

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT,

ARVINMERITOR, INC., INDIVIDUALLY AND AS

SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO

THE FORMER AUTOMOTIVE

PRODUCTS SEGMENT OF

ROCKWELL INTERNATIONAL

(PROPERLY NAMED ARVINMERITOR, INC.)

IDENTIFICATION NO. 046352004 Cit ~ 1

RYAN A. NOTARANGELO A1\f,q c ,,?{},'/)

IDENTIFICATION NO. 143912015 C. Vfscaw, 3 EXECUTIVE CAMPUS, SUITE 310

1 1/, J.s_C

CHERRY HILL, NEW JERSEY 08002 .

(856) 317-7180

OUR FILE NO.: 805-1003

EST ATE OF THOMAS P AFLITZKO ,

PLAINTIFF(S)

V.

ARVINMERITOR, INC., ET AL.

DEFENDANT(S)

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY

LAW DIVISION MIDDLESEX COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

DOCKET NO.: MID-L-3378-14 AS

ORDER

This Matter comes before the Court on Motion of Reilly, Janiczek, McDevitt, Henrich &

Cholden, P.C., attorneys for Defendant, ArvinMeritor, Inc., individually and as successor in interest

to the former Automotive Products Segment of Rockwell International (properly named

ArvinMeritor, Inc.), and the Court having reviewed the moving and opposition papers, if any, and for

good cause shown;

IT IS ON THIS __ e,--'---o'l'.'.i __ DAY OF 1=e_ b6VA , 2018, ORDERED

that the Motion of Defendant, ArvinMeritor, Inc., individually and s successor in interest to the

former Automotive Products Segment of Rockwell International (properly named ArvinMeritor, Inc.)

for summary judgment is hereby GRANTED;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Complaint and any Counterclaims and Cross

Claims are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as to ArvinMeritor, Inc., individually and as

successor in interest to the former Automotive Products Segment of Rockwell International (properly

named ArvinMeritor, Inc.), only; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Order shall be served on all counsel within


_ _____/)pposed _V_- TJ Unopposed

~c.J~: Honorable Ana C. Viscomi, J.S.C.

"Having reviewed the above motion, I find it to be meritorious on its face and is unopposed. Pursuant to A .1 :6-2, it

therefore will be granted essentially for the reasons set forth In the moving papers."

MARKS, O'NEILL, O'BRIEN, DOHERTY & KELLY, P.C. BY: SEBASTIAN A. GOLDSTEIN, ESQUIRE CHERRY TREE CORPORA TE CENTER 535 ROUTE 38 EAST, SUITE 501 CHERRY HILL, NJ 08002 (856) 663-4300

1067-97872(SAG)

Plaintiffs,

THOMAS J. PAFLITZKO

v.

Defendants,

BMI REFRACTORY SERVICES, INC., ct. al.

/1ll I OD

z-2-1f

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT, BMI REFRACTORY SERVICES, INC.

FILED FEB -2 20;8

ANA C. VISCOMJ, J.S.C

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION

MIDDLESEX COUNTY



ORDER FOR SUMMARY .JUDGMENT FOR DEFENDANT BMI REFRACTORY

SERVICES, INC.


Doherty & Kelly, P.C., attorneys for defendant, BMI REFRACTORY SERVICES, INC., and the

Cami having reviewed the moving and opposition papers, if any, and for good cause shown;

IT IS ON THIS ~ncl DAY OF -e. bcvti -~~--- , 2018,

ORDERED the motion of Defendant, BMI REFRAC ORY SERVICES, INC., for

summary judgment is hereby granted and the Complaint and any Counterclaims and Cross-Claims



of the date hereof.

"Having reviewed the above motion, I find it to be meritorious on its face and is unopposed. Pursuant to R.1 :6-2, it therefore will be granted essentially for the ,·easons set forth in the moving papers."

iNJS\7357.1)

1~ Viscomi, J.S.C.

KENT & McBRIDE, P.C. BY: BRADLEY R. LAWRENCE, ESQ. ATTORNEY ID# 045082006 1715 Highway 35, Suite 305 Middletown, NJ 07748 (732) 326-1711 Attorney for Defendant

F'iLED FEB -2 wra

AN,1 C. VISCOM/, ,J.s.c. Charles A. Wagner, Inc., Improperly pleaded as Charles A. Wagner Co., Inc.

File Number: 354.90682

Joi Paflitzko, Individually, and as Personal Representative of the estate of Thomas Paflitzko, deceased,

Plaintiffs,

V.

American Optical Co., et.als.

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY MIDDLESEX COUNTY-LAW DIVISION DOCKET NO. L-3378-14AS

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

CIVIL ACTION

ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT TO DEFENDANT CHARLES A. WAGNER, INC.

THIS MATTER having come before the Court on Motion of Kent & McBride, P.C.,

attorneys for Defendant, Charles A. Wagner, Inc., improperly pleaded as Charles A.

Wagner Co., Inc., and the Court having reviewed the moving and opposition papers, if any,

and for good cause having been shown;

IT IS on this ~"ci day of-i=e-lo<'Vll~ , 2018;

ORDERED the motion of defendant, Charles A. Wagner, Inc., improperly pleaded

as Charles A. Wagner Co., Inc., for summary judgment is hereby granted and that the

Complaint, any amendments thereto, and any Counterclaims and/or Cross-Claims of co

defendants are hereby dismissed with prejudice.

ORDERED that a copy of this Order shall be served upon plaintiff's counsel within


ieAna C. Viscomi, J.S.C.

"Having reviewed the above motion I find it to be meritorious on its face 'and is unoppose~. Pursuant to R.1 :6-2, it therefore will be granted essentially for the reasons setiorth in the moving pApers."

f1 11 9K 2.2-1f

KENT & McBRIDE, P.C. BY: BRADLEY R. LAWRENCE, ESQ. f:'Jl,u;:., ATTORNEY ID# 045082006 ,;., V

1715 Highway 35, Suite 305 F£8 -2 , I J 7 ~010

Midd etown, N 0 748 ANA (732) 326-1111 c. vise Attorney for Defendant OMJ,J,s.c Ferro Engineering, a Division of ON Marine Services Co., A Delaware LLC, · incorrectly named as Oglebay Norton Company, Ferraro Engineering Division improperly pleaded as On Marine Services Co. A Delaware Corporation ad a Wholly Owned Subsidiary of Oglebay Norton Co. And Ohio Corporation


Joi Paflitzko, Individually, and as Personal Representative of the estate of Thomas Paflitzko, deceased,

Plaintiffs,

V.

American Optical Co., et.als.


ASBESTOS LITIGATION

CIVIL ACTION

ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT TO DEFENDANT

FERRO ENGINEERING, A DIVISION OF ON MARINE SERVICES CO., A

DELAWARE LLC


attorneys for Defendant, Ferro Engineering, a Division of ON Marine services Co., A

Delaware LLC, incorrectly named as Oglebay Norton Company, Ferro Engineering Division

improperly pleaded as On Marine Services Co. A Delaware Corporation and Wholly Owned

Subsidiary of Olgebay Norton Co. And Ohio Corporation, and the Court having reviewed

the moving and opposition papers, if any, and for good cause having been shown;

IT IS on this 9-,f'd day of re b>Lic:\H-,j , 2018;

ORDERED the motion of defendant, Ferro kngineering, a Division of ON Marine

services Co., A Delaware LLC, incorrectly named as Oglebay Norton Company, Ferro

Engineering Division improperly pleaded as On Marine Services Co. A Delaware

Corporation and Wholly Owned Subsidiary of Olgebay Norton Co. And Ohio Corporation,

for summary judgment is hereby granted and that the Complaint, any amendments thereto,

and any Counterclaims and/or Cross-Claims of co-defendants are hereby dismissed with

prejudice.




"Having reviewed the above motion, I find it to be meritorious on its face and is unopposed. Pursuant to R.1:6-2, it therefore will be granted essentially for the reasons set forth in the moving papers."

LECLAIRRYAN Adam G. Husik (NJ 1.D: 015082004) One Riverfront Plaza I 03 7 Raymond Boulevard Sixteenth Floor Newark, New Jersey 07102 (973) 491-3600 Attorneys for Defendant Ford Motor Company

JOI PAFLITZKO, Individually, and as Personal Representative of the estate of THOMAS PAFLITZKO, deceased,

Plaintiff,

V.

AMERICAN OPTICAL COMPANY, et al.,

Defendants.


DOCKET: MID-L-3378-14 AS

CIVIL ACTION - ASBESTOS LITIGATION

ORDER FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT FORD MOTOR COMPANY

THIS MATTER having been brought before the Court by LeClairRyan, counsel for

Defendant Ford Motor Company, and the Court having considered the papers submitted,

argument in opposition and response, if any, and for other good cause shown,

IT IS on this 2.0d day of :'fe bcu0a ,1 , 2018,

ORDERED that the Motion for Summary Judgmen\ as to Defendant Ford Motor

Company is hereby granted and the Complaint and all Counterclaims and Cross-Claims are

hereby dismissed with prejudice, and it is further,

ORDERED that a copy of this Order be served upon all counsel, and upon the pro se

Plaintiff, within seven (7) days from the date hereof.

___ Opposed

_L Unopposed

Uv=-CJ~-ANA C. VISCOMI, J.S.C.

"Having reviewed the above motion, I find it to be meritorious on its face and is unopposed. Pursuant to R.1 :6-2, it therefore will be granted essentially for the reasons set forth In the moving papers."

E/0 THOMAS J. P AFLITZKO,

Plaintiff,

v.

AMERICAN OPTICAL COMPANY, et al.

Defendants.

---------------------------------------



CIVIL ACTION ASBESTOS LITIGATION

l:'11., F£a fS'l)

'11\1,4 C ~ 2 20/IJ . VJ& co,lf,;

, J.s_e,

ORDER

This matter having come before the Court on behalf of defendant, Foseco, Inc., and the

court having reviewed the moving and opposition papers, if any, and for good cause shown;

IT IS ON THIS '.2, (\d DAY OF 'fe bruc{ rt-1 , 2018,

ORDERED that the motion of defendant Foseco, Inc., ~r summary judgment be and is

hereby granted, and that the Complaint and any Counterclaims and Cross-Claims fil'e hereby

dismissed with prejudice.


of the date hereof.


"Having reviewed the above motion, I find it to be meritorious on its face and is unopposed. Pursuant to R.1 :6-2, it therefore will be granted essentially for the reasons set forth In the moving papers.''

KENT & McBRIDE, P.C. BY: BRADLEY R. LAWRENCE, ESQ. ATTORNEY ID# 045082006 1715 Highway 35, Suite 305 Middletown, NJ 07748 (732) 326-1711 Attorney for Defendant

t:11..1::IJ F£EJ Charles A. Wagner, Inc.,

Improperly pleaded as Charles A. Wagner Co., Inc. AN.,q ~2 20/0

c. V1scoM1, J.s.c



Brenda Stadelmaier, individually and as personal representative for the Estate of John A. Simmons,

Plaintiffs,

V.

BorgWarner Morse Tee., Inc. As successor by merger to Borg-Warner Corporation, et.als.

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

CIVIL ACTION

ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT TO DEFENDANT CHARLES A. WAGNER, INC.


attorneys for Defendant, Charles A. Wagner, Inc., improperly pleaded as Charles A.

Wagner Co., Inc., and the Court having reviewed the moving and opposition papers, if any,

and for good cause having been shown;

ITISonthis ·a_()d dayof "'/=eb.-vt'ln\ ,2018;

ORDERED the motion of defendant, Charles A. Wagner, Inc., improperly pleaded

as Charles A. Wagner Co., Inc., for summary judgment is hereby granted and that the

Complaint, any amendments thereto, and any Counterclaims and/or Cross-Claims of co

defendants are hereby dismissed with prejudice.


seven (7) days of the date hereof. ;L,_c.J~, ~Ho-n~bieAna C. Viscomi, J.S.C.

"Having reviewed lhe above motion I find it to be meritorious on ils face 'and is unoppose~. Pursuant 10 R.1 :6-2, it lherefore will be granted essentially for the reasons set forth in the moving papers."

McGivney Kluger & Cook, P.C. Marc J. Wise!, Esq. NJ ID #031052004 23 Vreeland Road, Suite 220 Florham Park, New Jersey 07932 (973) 822-1110 Attorneys for Defendant, OAP, Inc. kin/a La Mirada Products Co., Inc.

01'·· .,, v.s . . () BRENDA STADELMAIER, Individually SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY and as Personal Representative for The LAW DIVISION: MIDDLESEX COUNTY Estate of John A. Simmons; DOCKET NO. MID-L-7697-13(AS)

Plaintiffs, Civil Action -vs- Asbestos Litigation

BORGW ARNER MORSE TEC, INC., as Successor by Merger to BORG-WARNER ORDER CORPORATION; et.al.

Defendants.

THIS MATTER having been opened to the court on motion by McGivney Kluger &

Cook, P.C., attorneys for defendant OAP, Inc. kin/a La Mirada Products Co., Inc. for an order

granting summary judgment, and the court having reviewed the moving papers, and any

opposition thereto and for good cause having been shown;

ITISonthis 8,C\~ayof "fe,b(l)C\uW ,2018;

ORDERED that summary judgment shall be kd hereby is granted in favor of defendant

OAP, Inc. kin/a La Mirada Products Co., Inc.; and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that all claims and all crossclaims against OAP, Inc. kin/a La

Mirada Products Co., Inc. shall be and hereby are dismissed with prejudice; and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order shall be served upon all attorneys of

record within '::j-- days of receipt by counsel for the moving party.

Opposed Zunopposed

~I \ Ci ,I -. -u~· rable Ana C. Viscomi, J.S.C.

(Fl658421-l) "Having reviewed the above motion, I find it to be meritorious on its face and is unopposed. Pursuant to R.1 :6-2, it therefore will be granted essentially for the reasons set forth in the moving papers."

. ·:·,;

13149-00121-PCJ MARSHALL, DENNEHEY, WARNER, COLEMAN & GOGGIN BY: Paul C. Johnson, Esquire - NJ Attorney ID#: 023861991 ~/l 15000 Midlantic Drive, Ste. 200, P.O. Box 5429 f:rn _ <../:D Mount Laurel, NJ 08054 Cb -'ir 856-414-6000 ®856-414-6077 -41\14 C v, -< .?{},t;J 0 [email protected]

18COJ1?1,

Attorney for Defendant(s), Thomas Scientific, individually, as successor to and doing busltt'ID)vas Atihur H. Thomas Company · ROBERT A. STAFFORD and RENA YE SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY STAFFORD, his wife LAW DIVISION

ASBESTOS LITIGATION Plaintiff(s), MIDDLESEX COUNTY

vs.

BADGER COMPANY, INC.; ET AL

Defendant(s).

DOCKET NO.: MID-L-5667-15-AS

CIVIL ACTION

ORDER ADMITTING MICHAEL TURNER, ESQUIRE

PRO HACE VICE

THIS MATTER having been brought before the Couti by Paul C. Johnson, Esquire, of

the law firn1 of Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin, a New Jersey attorney, and the

attorney of record for Thomas Scientific, to permit Michael Turner, Esquire, an attorney

admitted to practice law in the State of Pennsylvania to pmiicipate with other counsel for the

defense of this matter and all phases of discovery and trial, a11d it appearing that Michael Turner,

Esquire, is a licensed attorney in good standing in the State of Pennsylvania, and it appearing that

the defendant specifically requests that Michael Turner, Esquire represents the defendant;

i;,(1, 'r:'. . IT IS on this 'c; day of 1---e\oct)Clov\ , 2018; ORDERED that

I Michael Turner, Esquire, be and hereby is admitted pro hac vice a11d is authorized to appear and

participate with other counsel for the defense of the above-captioned defendant, Thomas

Scientific, in all phases of discovery and trial subject to the following conditions:

1. Michael Turner, Esquire has a long standing relationship with Thomas Scientific,

which constitutes good cause;

2. Michael Turner, Esquire shall abide by the New Jersey Comi Rules including all

disciplinary rules;

3. Michael Turner, Esquire shall consent to the appointment of the Clerk of the Supreme

Court as an agent upon whom service of process may be made for all actions against his firm that

may arise out of his participation in this matter;

4. Michael Turner, Esquire shall notify the Court immediately of any matter affecting

his standing at the bar of any other Court;

5. Michael Turner, Esquire shall have all pleading, briefs and other papers filed with the

Court signed by an attorney of record authorized to practice in this State, who shall be held

responsible for them, the conduct of the cause and the admitted attorney;

6. Michael Turner, Esquire shall, within 10 days of the date of this Order, pay the fees

required by R. I :20-1 (b ), R. 1 :28B-1 ( e) and R. I :28-2 and shall submit an affidavit of

compliance;

7. Michael Turner, Esquire shall not be designated as trial counsel;

8. No adjournment or delay in discovery, motions, trial or any other proceeding will be

requested by reason of the attorney's inability to appear.

9. Automatic termination of Pro Hae Vice admission shall occur for failure to make the

required annual payment of the Annual Fee and the annual payment to the Lawyer's Assistance

Fund and the New Jersey Lawyer's Fund for Client Protection. Proof of such payment, after

filing proof of the initial payment, shall be made no later than February 1 of each year.

10. Noncompliance with any of these requirements shall constitute grounds for removal.

11. A copy of this Order shal I be served on all parties within seven (7) days of the date of

this Order.

~ C.u~ HONORABLE ANA C. VISCOMI, J.S.C.

MARGOLIS EDELSTEIN 100 Century Parkway, Suite 200 Mount Laurel, NJ 08054 (856) 727-6034 By: Jeanine D. Clark, Esquire Attorney for Defendant, CGM, INC., IMPROPERLY PLED AS SUCCESSOR TO DASH PATCH 28400.1-0511

Plaintiffs, EDWARD R. STONACK, JR. and MARILYN STONACK

vs.

Defendant, AMERICAN BILTRITE, INC.

111~ zz7

z~z~,r

ASBESTOS LITIGATION


DOCKET NO. MID-L-3121-l?AS

f::'111. "" Ftl} lf:/:J)

,//A,, ',? );,,

ASBESTOS LITI oAtr~/f, "'ff

1/,Js Civil Action

. .q

ORDER FOR SUMMARY ,JUDGMENT FOR DEFENDANT, CGM, INC. INAPPROPRIATELY PLED AS SUCCESSOR TO DASH PATCH

This matter having come before the Cami on Motion of Margolis Edelstein, attorneys for

COM, Inc. inappropriately pied as successor to Dash Patch, and the Court having reviewed the

moving and opposition papers, if any, and for good cause show:

ORDERED the motion of Defendant, COM, Inc. inappro riately pied as successor to

Dash Patch, for summary judgment is hereby granted and the Complaint and any Counterclaims

and Crossclaims are hereby dismissed with prejudice.


of the date hereof.

ANAC. VISCOMl,J.S.C.

"Having reviewed the above motion, I find i1 to be meritorious on its face and is unopposed. Pursuant to R.1 :6-2, it therefore will be granted essentially for the reasons set forth in the moving papers."

Afigo I. Fadahunsi Attorney I.D. No: 39372003 TANENBAUM KEALE LLP One Newark Center, 16th Floor Newark, New Jersey 07102 (973) 242-0002 Attorneys for Defendant, Faster Wheeler LLC, survivor to a merger with Foster Wheeler Corporation

EDWARD R. STONACK, JR. AND MARILYN STONACK,

Plaintiffs,

-against-

AMERICAN BILTRITE, INC., et al.,

Defendants. :

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION: MIDDLESEX COUNTY DOCKET NO. MID-L-03121-17AS

Civil Action

ORDER FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FOR DEFENDANT FOSTER WHEELER LLC

THIS MATTER having come before the Court on Motion of Tanenbaum Keale LLP,

attorneys for defendant Foster Wheeler, LLC survivor to a merger with Foster Wheeler

Corporation (hereinafter "Foster Wheeler"), and the Court having reviewed the moving and


IT IS ON THIS 2 ~ day of 7=e.60Jg Cl ,A , 2018,

ORDERED that the motion of Defendant Foster Wheeler ~or summary judgment is

hereby GRANTED and the Complaint and any Counterclaims and Cross-Claims are hereby

dismissed with prejudice;

ORDERED that a copy of this Order shall be served on all counsel within seven (7)

days of the date hereof.


"Having reviewed the above motion, I find ii to be meritorious on Its face and is unopposed. Pursuant te R.1 :ll-2, 11 therefore will be granted essentially for the reasons set forth In the moving papers."

PASCARELLA DIVITA, PLLC 2137 Route 35, Suite 290 Holmdel, New Jersey 07733 732) 837-9019 Joshua A. Greeley -Attorney ID: 023032010 Attorneys for: Ingersoll Rand Company i/s/h/a Ingersoll-Rand Company (individually and as successor in interest to Aldrich Pump Company and Terry Steam Turbine Company)

EDWARD R. STONACK, JR. AND MARILYN STONACK,

Plaintiff(s),

vs.

AMERICAN BILTRITE INC., ET AL.,

Defendants.


Docket No: MID- L- 03121-17AS CIVIL ACTION ASBESTOS LITIGATION

ORDER

THIS MATTER having come before the Comi on Motion of Pascarella DiVita, PLLC

and the Court having reviewed the moving and opposition papers, if any, and for good cause

shown;

IT IS ON THIS a (\d. DAY OF Ji',b,-v11Q\ 2018;

ORDERED that the Motion of Defendant, Ingersoll Rand Company, for Summary Judgment

is hereby granted and the Complaint and any Counterclaims and Cross-Claims are hereby dismissed

with prejudice.


of the date hereof. /

Opposed __ Unopposed_V_ ~c.J~-Honorable Ana C. Viscomi, J.S.C.

"Having reviewed the above motion, I find. It to be meritorious on its face and 1~ unopposed. Pursuant to R.1:6-2, 1t therefore will be granted essentially for the reasons set forth In the moving papers."

John C. Garde, Esq.- N.J. Attorney ID #014171986 McCARTER & ENGLISH, LLP

FILED FEB ~ 20l'b

Four Gateway Center 100 Mulberry Street Newark, New Jersey 07102 (973) 622-4444

ANA C. VISCOM/, J.s.c

Attorneys for Defendant Tarkett, Inc. (Improperly named as Tarkett, Inc., Individually and· as Successor to Azrock Industries)

EDWARD R. STONACK, JR. AND MARILYN : SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION: MIDDLESEX COUNTY DOCKET NO.: MID-L-03121-17 AS CIVIL ACTION

STONACK,

PLAINTIFFS,

vs.

AMERICAN BILTRITE, INC., et al.,

DEFENDANTS.

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

ORDER FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FOR DEFENDANT TARKETT, INC.

This matter having come before the Court on Motion for Summary Judgment for Tarkett,

Inc. (Improperly named as Tarkett, Inc., Individually and as Successor to Azrock Industries)

("Tarkett") and the Court having reviewed the moving and opposition papers, if any, and for

good cause shown:

IT IS ON THIS c,%A Y OF ]=e.b NC\67 ,1 , 2018,

ORDERED, that the motion of Defendant Tar~ett for summary judgment is hereby

GRANTED and the Complaint, any Amended Complaints, and any Cross-Claims and/or

Counterclaims against it be and hereby are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE .

.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that a copy of the within Order shall be served on all

counsel within seven (7) days of its receipt by movant's counsel.

~c.J~-_______J)pposed _yUnopposed

ME! 26389776v.l

HONORABLE ANA C. VISCOMI, J.S.C.

"Having reviewed the above motion, I find it to be meritorious on Its face and 1~ unop.posed. Pursuant to R.1 :6·2, 11 therefore wlll be granted essentially for the reasons set forth In the moving papers."

WILBRAHAM, LAWLER & BUBA By: Edward J. Wilbraham, Esq. (Atty# 024951975)

FILED FEB o 2 2018 J. Patrick Bradley, Esq. (Atty# 014061996)

30 Washington Avenue, Suite B3 l'ni\\ip Lewis Pale~

r\011, Haddonfield, NJ 08033-3341 (856) 795-4422 Attorneys for Defendant, PSEG Power LLC

Dolores Toth, Individually and as Executrix of the Estate of Joseph Toth, Jr.,

Plaintiffs, v.

PSEG Power LLC, et al.

Defendants.

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAWDNISION MIDDLESEX COUNTY


CIVIL ACTION ASBESTOS LITIGATION

ORDER FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BY DEFENDANT PSEG POWER LLC

This matter having come before the Court by Motion of Wilbraham, Lawler & Buba,

attorneys for Defendant PSEG Power LLC, and the Court having reviewed the moving and

opposition papers, if any, and for good cause shown:

2,td CA l? IT IS ON THIS ____ day of /'"&tft/'vti('t,, 20vf,

7 ORDERED that the motion of Defendant PSEG Power LLC for summary judgment is

hereby granted and the Complaint and any Counterclaims and Cross-Claims are hereby dismissed

with prejudice.

ORDERED that a copy of this Or r shall e served on all counsel within seven (7) days

of the date hereof

___ Opposed

__£Unopposed llON. PHILLIP LEWIS PAL.EV. J ,:; C ' .i:;). ~

3 Opp - NJCourts · l-1132 limit pmk 16 baker v. cemex dep 765 yes gibbons szaferman/simon denied protective order to l--i~l9j i ... l-1464 gambino v. union 17 carbide l-1464 gambino

Documents