3. パイ - JICA · 2012. 5. 14. · Overview of programmatic CDM (PoA) 21/09/2010 CDM7 8. Exercise: Programmatic CDM (PoA) 21/09/2010 CDM8 9. ... 4th Qtr 3rd Qtr 2nd Qtr A1-2. The

Page 1

成果品成果品成果品成果品

1. 研修用プレゼンテーション資料研修用プレゼンテーション資料研修用プレゼンテーション資料研修用プレゼンテーション資料

2. 研修教材、トレーナー訓練用ガイドライン研修教材、トレーナー訓練用ガイドライン研修教材、トレーナー訓練用ガイドライン研修教材、トレーナー訓練用ガイドライン

3. パイロットプロジェクトのパイロットプロジェクトのパイロットプロジェクトのパイロットプロジェクトの PIN/PDD

4. データベース仕様データベース仕様データベース仕様データベース仕様

Page 2

成果品成果品成果品成果品 1111：研修用プレゼンテーション資料：研修用プレゼンテーション資料：研修用プレゼンテーション資料：研修用プレゼンテーション資料

Page 3

Items Training Topics Date No.1. Background and history of CDM/ current situation and issues 20/04/2010 CDM12. Technical aspects of baseline determination 27/04/2010 CDM23. Overview of large-scale/small-scale methodologies 25/05/2010 CDM34. Technical aspects of additionality demonstration 06/07/2010 CDM45. Measures to obtain CER of CDM project 07/09/2010 CDM56. Validation and Verification including communication with DOE 07/09/2010 CDM67. Overview of programmatic CDM (PoA) 21/09/2010 CDM78. Exercise: Programmatic CDM (PoA) 21/09/2010 CDM89. Development of CDM project activity 28/09/2010 CDM910. AR-CDM/current situation and issues 23/11/2010 CDM101. Background, history and overview of carbon trading markets in the world 20/04/2010 CT12. Overview of European Emission Trading System (EU-ETS) and Tokyo ETS 27/04/2010 CT23. Overview of emission trading systems in the United States, and future internationaltrading system in post 2012 22/06/2010 CT34. Overview of voluntary emission trading system in Japan - J-VER 29/06/2010 CT45. Overview of national registry system 06/07/2010 CT56. Japan's Voluntary Emission trading Scheme (J-VETS) 10/05/2011 CT6

1. Overview of UNFCCC and international negotiations: from establishment to present 20/04/2010 UN12. UNFCCC and key international negotiations after COP 3 27/04/2010 UN23. Overview of international negotiations over post-2012 mechanisms 25/05/2010 UN34. Overview of international negotiations by EU and the United States over post-2012mechanisms 22/06/2010 UN45. MRV/NAMA/ SCM 29/06/2010 UN56. Exercise: MRV/NAMA/SCM 29/06/2010 UN67. REDD/ carbon sink 06/07/2010 UN78. Exercise: REDD/ carbon sink 06/07/2010 UN89. UNFCCC Structure & Negotiations :Technology Transfer 11/01/2011 UN910. Exercise: UNFCCC Structure & Negotiations :Technology Transfer 11/01/2011 UN101. International trend in GHG mitigation measures 28/09/2010 GHG12. Monitoring of contribution to the sustainable development by mitigation measures,including co-benefit approach 19/10/2010 GHG23. Importance of low carbon society/low carbon city 19/10/2010 GHG34. Mitigation measures in commercial building and residential sectors 23/11/2010 GHG45. Exercise: Quantification of GHG emission reduction with MRV (commercial buildingand residential sectors) 23/11/2010 GHG56. Mitigation measures in waste management sector 23/11/2010 GHG67. Exercise: Quantification of GHG emission reduction with MRV (waste managementsector) 23/11/2010 GHG78. Mitigation measures in energy and industry sectors 18/01/2011 GHG89. Exercise: Quantification of GHG emission reduction with MRV (energy and industrysectors) 18/01/2011 GHG910. Mitigation measures in transportation sector 15/02/2011 GHG10

11. Exercise: Quantification of GHG emission reduction with MRV (transportation sector) 15/02/2011 GHG111. Overview of carbon footprint concept and current situation of the system in the world 12/10/2010 FP12. LCA related issues 12/10/2010 FP23. Calculation of carbon footprint 12/10/2010 FP34. Issues in implementation and dissemination of carbon footprint system 19/10/2010 FP45. Issues in carbon footprint system for sevices -Example of printing servises- 22/02/2011 FP56. Carbon footprint for organization 10/05/2011 FP61. Overview of IPCC Guideline 07/09/2010 INV12. Introduction of GHG inventory of Japan and Thailand 14/09/2010 INV2

3. Overview of energy sector 14/09/2010 INV34. Overview of industrial processes and product use sector (IPPU) 14/09/2010 INV4

5. Overview of agriculture, forestry, and other land-use sector (AFOLU) 21/09/2010 INV56. Overview of waste sector 28/09/2010 INV67. Overview of QA/QC of IPCC Guidelines and example of QA/QC measures taken in Japan11/01/2011 INV7

8. Analysis of key categories and assessment of uncertainties, example from Japanese cases 15/02/2011 INV89. Review and Practice of Greenhouse Gas Inventory 22/02/2011 INV910. Exercise: Review and Practice of Greenhouse Gas Inventory 22/02/2011 INV10

JICA Training SeminarSession Topics

CDM

Carbon Trading

GHG Inventory

UNFCCCStructure andNegotiations

CarbonFootprint

GHGMitigation in

relevant sectors

A1-1

Page 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 XThu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri X

10:00-12:00 CDM1 CDM2

13:00-15:00 CT1 CT215:00-17:00 UN1 UN2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon

10:00-12:00

13:00-15:00 CDM3

15:00-17:00 UN3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 XTue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed X

10:00-12:00 CDM4 CT413:00-15:00 CT3 UN515:00-17:00 UN4 UN6

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

10:00-12:00 CT513:00-15:00 UN715:00-17:00 UN8

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 XWed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu X

10:00-12:00 CDM5 INV2 INV5 GHG1

13:00-15:00 CDM6 INV3 CDM7 CDM9

15:00-17:00 INV1 INV4 CDM8 INV6

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun

10:00-12:00 FP1 FP413:00-15:00 FP2 GHG2

15:00-17:00 FP3 GHG3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 XMon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue X

10:00-12:00 GHG4/5

13:00-15:00 GHG6/7

15:00-17:00 CDM10

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon

10:00-12:00 UN9 GHG8

13:00-15:00 UN10 GHG9

15:00-17:00 INV7

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 X X XTue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon X X X

10:00-12:00 GHG10 INV913:00-15:00 GHG11 INV1015:00-17:00 INV8 FP5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue

10:00-12:00 CT613:00-15:00 FP615:00-17:00

：CDM ：carbon trading ：GHG mitigation ：UNFCCC structure and negotiation

：carbon footprint ：GHG inventory

1st Qtr

Training hours

Training hours

JICA Training SeminarSession Schedule

Training hours

April

Training hours

Training hours

May

June

July

August

October

November

September

DecemberJanuary 2011

MarchApril

February

May

Training hours

Training hours

Training hours

Training hours

Training hours

Training hours

Training hours

Training hours

Training hours4thQtr

3rdQtr

2ndQtr

A1-2

Page 5

Th

e P

roje

ct

for

Ca

pa

cit

y D

eve

lopm

en

t a

nd

Inst

itu

tion

al

Str

ength

enin

g f

or

GH

G M

itig

ati

on

in t

he K

ing

do

m o

f T

ha

ila

nd

CD

M 1

Bac

kgro

un

d a

nd

his

tory

of

CD

M/

curr

ent

situ

atio

n a

nd i

ssu

es

20th

April 2010

Chie

f Advis

or

of JI

CA E

xpert

Team

Masa

hik

o F

UJI

MO

TO

The P

roje

ct for

Capaci

ty D

evelo

pm

ent

and I

nst

itutional Str

ength

enin

g for

GH

G M

itig

ation in t

he K

ingdom

of Thaila

nd

2

Co

nte

nts

•Back

gro

und o

f CD

M e

stablis

hm

ent

•H

isto

ry o

f ch

angin

g C

DM

•Curr

ent

situ

ation o

f CD

M

•Is

sues

about

CD

M

The P

roje

ct for

Capaci

ty D

evelo

pm

ent

and I

nst

itutional Str

ength

enin

g for

GH

G M

itig

ation in t

he K

ingdom

of Thaila

nd

3

Bac

kgro

un

d

•IP

CC

Fir

st

Asse

ssm

en

t R

ep

ort

(FA

R)

(19

90

)

–In

terg

overn

menta

l Panel on C

limate

Change (

IPCC)

–Pro

vis

ion o

f F

AR

was

deci

ded in t

he 1

stco

nfe

rence

of

IPCC h

eld

in

Geneva,

in N

ovem

ber

1988

–Clim

ate

expert

s aro

und t

he w

orld a

ssess

ed a

nd s

ynth

esi

zed t

he m

ost

re

cent

clim

ate

-change iss

ues

in F

AR

–FAR

warn

ed t

hat

if a

nth

ropogenic

gre

enhouse

gase

s w

ill c

ontinue t

o b

e

em

itte

d t

o t

he a

tmosp

here

, cl

imate

change c

an o

ccur

that

may im

pose

m

ajo

r im

pact

s on e

cosy

stem

and h

um

an s

peci

es

•T

he

esta

bli

sh

me

nt

of

the

Un

ite

d N

ati

on

s F

ram

ew

ork

C

on

ve

nti

on

on

Cli

ma

te C

ha

ng

e (

UN

FC

CC

) （1

99

2）

–The F

irst

Ass

ess

ment

Report

(FAR

) of

the I

PCC s

upport

ed t

he

est

ablis

hm

ent

of

the (

UN

FCCC a

t th

e U

nited N

ations

Confe

rence

on

Environm

ent

and D

evelo

pm

ent

(UN

CED

, co

mm

only

know

n a

s “T

he

Eart

h S

um

mit”)

held

in R

io d

e J

aneiro,

Bra

zil, in 1

992.

The P

roje

ct for

Capaci

ty D

evelo

pm

ent

and I

nst

itutional Str

ength

enin

g for

GH

G M

itig

ation in t

he K

ingdom

of Thaila

nd

4

His

tory

of

CD

M (

1)

•Berlin

Mandate（CO

P1, 1995)

–The B

erlin

Mandate

est

ablis

hes

a p

roce

ss t

hat

would

enable

the A

nnex I

co

untr

ies

to t

ake a

ppro

priate

act

ion f

or

the p

eriod b

eyond 2

000

•in

cludin

g a

str

ength

enin

g o

f develo

ped c

ountr

y c

om

mitm

ents

, th

rough t

he

adoption o

f a p

roto

col or

oth

er

legal in

stru

ments

–The B

erlin

Mandate

exem

pte

d n

on-A

nnex I

countr

ies

from

additio

nal

bin

din

g o

blig

ations

•Kyoto

Pro

toco

land C

DM

est

ablis

hm

ent（

CO

P3, 1997)

–M

ost

indust

rializ

ed n

ations

and s

om

e c

entr

al Euro

pean e

conom

ies

in

transi

tion (

all

defined a

s Annex B

countr

ies)

agre

ed t

o legally

bin

din

g

reduct

ions

in g

reenhouse

gas

em

issi

ons

of

an a

vera

ge o

f 6 t

o 8

% b

elo

w

1990 levels

betw

een t

he y

ears

2008-2

012

–K

yo

to P

roto

co

lpro

vid

es

for

severa

l flexib

le m

ech

anis

ms

(“Kyoto

M

ech

anis

m”)

whic

h e

nable

Annex I

countr

ies

to m

eet

their G

HG

em

issi

on t

arg

ets

by a

cquirin

g G

HG

em

issi

on r

educt

ions

credits

•Fle

xib

le m

ech

anis

ms

are

em

issi

ons

tradin

g, th

e c

lean d

evelo

pm

ent

mech

anis

m (

CD

M)

and join

t im

ple

menta

tion

(JI)

A1-3

Page 6

The P

roje

ct for

Capaci

ty D

evelo

pm

ent

and I

nst

itutional Str

ength

enin

g for

GH

G M

itig

ation in t

he K

ingdom

of Thaila

nd

5

•D

iscu

ssio

ns

on inst

itutional desi

gn o

f CD

M (

CO

P4～

CO

P 6

bis

)–

CO

P3 left

many

issu

es

about

inst

itutional desi

gn o

f CD

M r

em

ain

ed

unre

solv

ed.

�Aft

er

CO

P3, te

chnic

al analy

sis

and p

olit

ical negotiations

were

carr

ied

out

in C

OP a

nd s

ubsi

dia

ry b

ody (

SB).

-M

ajo

r poin

ts o

f dis

cuss

ion a

nd c

orr

esp

ondin

g d

eci

sions

are

as

belo

w:

•1 m

em

ber

from

each

of th

e f

ive U

nited N

ations

regio

nal gro

ups,

•1 m

em

ber

from

the s

mall

isla

nd d

evelo

pin

g S

tate

s,

•2 m

em

bers

fro

m A

nnex I

countr

ies,

•2 m

em

bers

fro

m n

on-A

nnex I

countr

ies

(plu

s one “

altern

ate

mem

ber”

from

each

of

the a

bove

gro

ups)

Mem

bers

of th

e C

DM

execu

tive b

oard

:

Option1:

8 m

em

bers

fro

m A

nnex I

countr

ies,

and

8 m

em

bers

fro

m n

on-A

nnex I

countr

ies

Option2:

3 m

em

bers

fro

m e

ach

of

the f

ive U

nited

Nations

regio

nal gro

ups

•The c

once

pt

of

‘fungib

ility

’am

ong t

he t

hre

e

mech

anis

ms

(ET, CD

M,

JI)

was

acc

epte

d.

The c

once

pt

of

‘fungib

ility

’am

ong t

he t

hre

e

mech

anis

ms

(ET, CD

M,

JI)

of th

e P

roto

col is

unacc

epta

ble

. (F

CCC/

SB/1

999/8

)

•Lim

itation o

f ca

rbon c

redits

acq

uired w

as

not

defined.

Lim

itation o

f am

ounts

of ca

rbon c

redits

acq

uired b

y

Annex I

Part

ies

from

all

thre

e m

ech

anis

ms

(ET, CD

M,

JI)

should

be s

et

if t

hey u

tiliz

e c

arb

on c

redits

to

com

ply

with p

art

of

quantified e

mis

sion lim

itation o

r re

duct

ion c

om

mitm

ents

. (F

CCC/

SB/1

999/8

)

Deci

sion

Poin

ts o

f D

iscu

ssio

n

His

tory

of

CD

M (

2)

The P

roje

ct for

Capaci

ty D

evelo

pm

ent

and I

nst

itutional Str

ength

enin

g for

GH

G M

itig

ation in t

he K

ingdom

of Thaila

nd

6

Public

fundin

g f

or

CD

M p

roje

cts

from

Annex I

Part

ies

is n

ot

to r

esu

lt in t

he

div

ers

ion o

f off

icia

l develo

pm

ent

ass

ista

nce

(O

DA).

[Curr

ently, O

DA c

an b

e u

sed f

or

CD

M

pro

ject

s as

long a

s host

countr

y a

nd

invest

ing c

ountr

y d

ecl

are

such

OD

A is

not

div

ert

ed.]

If f

undin

g p

rovid

ed t

hro

ugh o

ffic

ial develo

pm

ent

ass

ista

nce

(O

DA)

is a

dditio

nal to

the c

urr

ent

OD

A, its

fundin

g c

an b

e

utiliz

ed f

or

CD

M p

roje

cts.

It is

the h

ost

Part

y’s

pre

rogative t

o

confirm

wheth

er

a C

DM

pro

ject

act

ivity

ass

ists

it

in a

chie

vin

g s

ust

ain

able

develo

pm

ent

[Sin

ce S

D c

ontr

ibution h

as

not

been

evalu

ate

d,

altern

ative a

ppro

ach

such

as

co-b

enefit

appro

ach

is

dra

win

g incr

easi

ng

att

ention.]

Crite

ria

for

dete

rmin

ation o

f w

heth

er

a p

ropose

d p

roje

ct a

ctiv

ity

contr

ibute

s to

the s

ust

ain

able

develo

pm

ent:

•O

ption 1

: it is

made s

ole

ly b

y n

on-A

nnex I

countr

y

•O

ption 2

: it is

speci

fied b

y n

on-A

nnex I

countr

y in its

lett

er

of Endors

em

ent

•O

ption 3

: it is

made b

y n

on-A

nnex I

countr

y u

sing

pro

cedure

s develo

ped b

y t

he U

nited N

ations

Environm

ent

Pro

gra

mm

e(U

NEP)

and t

he C

om

mis

sion o

n S

ust

ain

able

D

evelo

pm

ent

(CSD

) as

they b

eco

me a

vaila

ble

•O

ption 4

:It

is m

ade b

y n

on-A

nnex I

countr

y u

sing

inte

rnational guid

elin

es,

indic

ato

rs a

nd/o

r st

andard

s develo

ped b

y t

he P

art

ies

•O

ption 5

:It

is m

ade b

y n

on-A

nnex I

countr

y a

nd c

onfirm

ed in

a w

ritt

en s

tate

ment

Deci

sion

Poin

ts o

f D

iscu

ssio

n

His

tory

of

CD

M (

3)

The P

roje

ct for

Capaci

ty D

evelo

pm

ent

and I

nst

itutional Str

ength

enin

g for

GH

G M

itig

ation in t

he K

ingdom

of Thaila

nd

7

His

tory

of

CD

M (

4)

Base

lines

are

est

ablis

hed o

n a

pro

ject

-sp

eci

fic

basi

s.

[Curr

ently, dis

cuss

ions

are

resu

med in

the p

ost

-2012 fra

mew

ork

, su

ch a

s in

SCM

.]

Base

line e

stablis

hm

ent:

Option 1

: Base

lines

shall

be e

stablis

hed o

n a

pro

ject

-speci

fic

basi

s

Option2 :

Base

lines

may u

se e

ither

pro

ject

-speci

fic

or

multi-

pro

ject

base

line m

eth

odolo

gie

s

The r

isk-a

dju

sted inte

rnal ra

te o

f re

turn

and t

he t

hre

shold

crite

rion f

or

additio

nalit

y w

ere

not

adopte

d.

[Curr

ently,

in d

em

onst

rating

additio

nalit

y o

f a p

roje

ct t

hat

genera

tes

inco

me o

ther

than C

ER s

ale

s, it

is

ess

ential to

show

in P

DD

the f

inanci

al

perf

orm

ance

of th

e p

roje

ct u

sing I

RR.]

Crite

ria o

f in

vest

ment

additio

nalit

y:

Option 1

: In

vest

ment

additio

nalit

y is

giv

en if th

e r

isk-a

dju

sted

inte

rnal ra

te o

f re

turn

of

the C

DM

pro

ject

act

ivity is

belo

w X

%. The e

xecu

tive b

oard

dete

rmin

es

a c

ountr

y-

speci

fic

risk

adju

stm

ent

fact

or

and t

he v

alu

e o

f X %

.

Option 2

: The t

hre

shold

crite

rion f

or

additio

nalit

y is

est

ablis

hed.

The d

esi

gnate

d o

pera

tional entity

dete

rmin

es

it is

pro

perly a

pplie

d.

Deci

sion

Poin

ts o

f D

iscu

ssio

n

The P

roje

ct for

Capaci

ty D

evelo

pm

ent

and I

nst

itutional Str

ength

enin

g for

GH

G M

itig

ation in t

he K

ingdom

of Thaila

nd

8

It w

as

not

adopte

d.

A b

ase

line c

hose

nfo

r a n

ew

act

ivity o

r fa

cilit

y in s

ect

ors

of

heavy

indust

ry a

nd h

eat

and/o

r pow

er

supply

shall

at

least

reach

a

level of

stringency

equal to

the t

op [

20%

] of

all

such

sourc

es

const

ruct

ed in t

he last

3 y

ears

in P

art

ies

incl

uded in A

nnex I

I.

Pro

ject

part

icip

ants

shall

sele

ct f

rom

am

ong t

he f

ollo

win

g a

ppro

ach

es

the o

ne

deem

ed m

ost

appro

priate

for

the p

roje

ct

act

ivity.

(a)

Exis

ting a

ctual or

his

torical em

issi

ons,

as

applic

able

; or

(b)

Em

issi

ons

from

a t

echnolo

gy t

hat

repre

sents

an e

conom

ically

att

ract

ive c

ours

e

of act

ion, ta

kin

g into

acc

ount

barr

iers

to

invest

ment;

or

(c)

The a

vera

ge e

mis

sion o

r re

moval

rate

s of

sim

ilar

pro

ject

s act

ivitie

s undert

aken in t

he p

revio

us

five y

ears

, in

si

mila

r so

cial, e

conom

ic, environm

enta

l and t

ech

nolo

gic

al ci

rcum

stance

s, a

nd

whose

perf

orm

ance

is

am

ong t

he t

op 2

0

perc

ent

of th

eir c

ate

gory

.

Appro

ach

for

sele

ctin

g b

ase

line m

eth

odolo

gy:

Pro

ject

part

icip

ants

shall

sele

ct t

he low

est

fro

m a

mong t

he

follo

win

g a

ppro

ach

es.

(a)

Exis

ting a

ctual or

his

torica

l em

issi

ons,

as

applic

able

;

(b)

Em

issi

ons

from

a t

ech

nolo

gy t

hat

repre

sents

an e

conom

ically

att

ract

ive c

ours

e o

f act

ion, ta

kin

g into

acc

ount

barr

iers

to

invest

ment;

or

(c)

Option 1

: The a

vera

ge e

mis

sions

of th

e t

op [

20%

] of su

ch

act

ivitie

s in

the A

nnex I

or

host

Part

y o

r an a

ppro

priate

regio

nundert

aken d

uring t

he p

revio

us

two y

ears

.

Option 2

: Rece

ntly u

ndert

aken c

om

para

ble

act

ivitie

s or

faci

litie

s,

such

as,

for

exam

ple

, th

e a

vera

ge e

mis

sions

rate

of

com

para

ble

pro

ject

s act

ivitie

s th

at

were

undert

aken d

uring t

he p

revio

us

five

years

in A

nnex I

or

host

Part

y o

r an a

ppro

priate

regio

n.

Deci

sion

Poin

ts o

f D

iscu

ssio

n

His

tory

of

CD

M (

5)

A1-4

Page 7

The P

roje

ct for

Capaci

ty D

evelo

pm

ent

and I

nst

itutional Str

ength

enin

g for

GH

G M

itig

ation in t

he K

ingdom

of Thaila

nd

9

Posi

tive lis

t w

as

not

pro

vid

ed.

The c

ate

gories

of sm

all

scale

CD

M

(renew

able

energ

y, energ

y e

ffic

iency

im

pro

vem

ent,

and o

thers

) and t

heir

limitation w

ere

est

ablis

hed.

[Curr

ently, sm

all-

scale

CD

M s

truct

ure

in

the p

ost

-2012 fra

mew

ork

is

dis

cuss

ed]

Posi

tive lis

t of sa

fe a

nd e

nvironm

enta

lly s

ound e

ligib

le p

roje

cts

in C

DM

, base

d o

n t

he f

ollo

win

g c

ate

gories,

takin

g into

acc

ount

the n

ational priority

needs

of each

Non-A

nnex I

Part

y:

(a)

Renew

able

energ

y,

(b)

Energ

y e

ffic

iency

,

(c)

Dem

and-s

ide m

anagem

ent,

(d)

Sust

ain

able

land-u

se, la

nd-u

se c

hange a

nd f

ore

stry

act

ivitie

s

Part

ies

incl

uded in A

nnex I

are

to r

efr

ain

fr

om

usi

ng c

ert

ifie

d e

mis

sion r

educt

ions

genera

ted f

rom

nucl

ear

faci

litie

s to

meet

their c

om

mitm

ents

.

[Curr

ently, w

heth

er

to incl

ude n

ucl

ear

faci

litie

s in

CD

M a

fter

2012 is

dis

cuss

ed.]

CD

M p

roje

ct a

ctiv

itie

s sh

all

not

incl

ude t

he u

se o

f nucl

ear

pow

er

and larg

e s

cale

hydro

pow

er

pla

nt.

Deci

sion

Poin

ts o

f D

iscu

ssio

n

His

tory

of

CD

M (

6)

The P

roje

ct for

Capaci

ty D

evelo

pm

ent

and I

nst

itutional Str

ength

enin

g for

GH

G M

itig

ation in t

he K

ingdom

of Thaila

nd

10

•M

arr

akech

Acc

ord

（CO

P7)

2001

–Bonn A

gre

em

ent

in C

OP6 b

isw

as

adopte

d

•In

stitutional desi

gn o

f CD

M w

as

appro

ved

–Show

n in “

Deci

sions”

colu

mns

in p

revio

us

slid

es

–Speci

fic

CD

M o

pera

tional ru

les

were

deci

ded

–1stCD

M E

xecu

tive B

oard

meeting w

as

held

His

tory

of

CD

M (

7)

The P

roje

ct for

Capaci

ty D

evelo

pm

ent

and I

nst

itutional Str

ength

enin

g for

GH

G M

itig

ation in t

he K

ingdom

of Thaila

nd

11

Ch

ang

ing

CD

M (

1)

Majo

r deci

sions/

changes

in C

DM

syst

em

(post

-M

arr

akech

Acc

ord

2008 t

o p

rese

nt)

Maxim

um

ceili

ng for

small-

scale

pro

ject

act

ivity w

as

rais

ed f

or

energ

y e

ffic

iency

(Type I

I) a

nd

oth

er

types

(Type I

II).

Expansi

on o

f sm

all-

scale

elig

ibili

ty

Nov 2

006

(CO

P/

MO

P2)

EB p

rese

nte

d d

efinitio

n a

nd

princi

ple

of bundlin

g. M

ultip

le

small-

scale

pro

ject

s ca

n b

e

regis

tere

d a

s a s

ingle

CD

M p

roje

ct.

Bundlin

gof

pro

ject

act

ivitie

s

Sep 2

005

(EB 2

1)

First

com

pre

hensi

ve g

uid

elin

e fro

m

CD

M-E

B d

esc

ribin

g h

ow

to p

rove

additio

nalit

y

Intr

oduct

ion o

f Additio

nalit

y T

ool

Oct

2004

(EB 1

6)

The P

roje

ct for

Capaci

ty D

evelo

pm

ent

and I

nst

itutional Str

ength

enin

g for

GH

G M

itig

ation in t

he K

ingdom

of Thaila

nd

12

Ch

ang

ing

CD

M (

2)

First

com

pre

hensi

ve g

uid

elin

e b

y E

B

show

ing h

ow

to p

erf

orm

fin

anci

al

analy

sis

in o

rder

to a

ssess

and

dem

onst

rate

additio

nalit

y u

sing

invest

ment

analy

sis.

Intr

oduct

ion o

f in

vest

ment

analy

sis

guid

ance

May 2

008

(EB 3

9)

Sim

plif

ied c

onsi

dera

tion o

f pre

-pro

ject

act

ivitie

s and s

implif

ied

monitoring a

ctiv

itie

s are

appro

ved

by C

DM

-EB.

Sim

plif

ied A

/R

meth

odolo

gie

s

2009

A p

rogra

mm

eof act

ivitie

s ca

n b

e

regis

tere

d a

s a s

ingle

CD

M p

roje

ct

act

ivity.

Intr

oduct

ion o

f pro

gra

mm

atic

CD

M (

PoA)

June 2

007

(EB 3

2)

A1-5

Page 8

The P

roje

ct for

Capaci

ty D

evelo

pm

ent

and I

nst

itutional Str

ength

enin

g for

GH

G M

itig

ation in t

he K

ingdom

of Thaila

nd

13

Curr

ent

situ

atio

n o

f C

DM

: S

tati

stic

s an

d A

nal

ysi

s

–Regis

tere

d C

DM

pro

ject

s

–Countr

ies

host

ing C

DM

pro

ject

s

–Countr

ies

genera

ting C

ERs

–In

vest

ing c

ounties

–Appro

ved m

eth

odolo

gie

s by s

ect

or

and s

cale

–Fre

quently u

sed m

eth

odolo

gie

s

–Reje

cted p

roje

cts

and r

easo

n

The P

roje

ct for

Capaci

ty D

evelo

pm

ent

and I

nst

itutional Str

ength

enin

g for

GH

G M

itig

ation in t

he K

ingdom

of Thaila

nd

14

124

(15)

Agriculture

13

(14)

Affore

sta

tion

and r

efo

resta

tion

466

(13)

Waste

handlin

g a

nd d

isposal

0(1

2)

Solv

ent use

22

(11)

Fugitiv

e e

mis

sio

ns fro

m p

roduction

and c

onsum

ption o

f halo

carb

ons

and s

ulp

hur

hexafluoride

136

(10)

Fugitiv

e e

mis

sio

ns fro

m fuels

(solid

,

oil

and g

as)

7(0

9)

Meta

l pro

duction

26

(08)

Min

ing/m

inera

l pro

duction

2(0

7)

Tra

nsport

0(0

6)

Constr

uction

66

(05)

Chem

ical in

dustr

ies

124

(04)

Manufa

ctu

ring industr

ies

25

(03)

Energ

y d

em

and

0(0

2)

Energ

y d

istr

ibution

1578

(01)

Energ

y industr

ies (

renew

able

-/

non-r

enew

able

sourc

es)

No.

Secto

ral S

cope

Sta

ts (

1):

Num

ber

of

regis

tere

d C

DM

pro

ject

s by s

ecto

ral

scope

(worl

d)

(Sourc

e: U

NF

CC

C)

(01

) E

ne

rgy in

du

str

ies

(re

ne

wab

le -

/ n

on-r

en

ew

ab

le

so

urc

es)

(60

.95

%)

The P

roje

ct for

Capaci

ty D

evelo

pm

ent

and I

nst

itutional Str

ength

enin

g for

GH

G M

itig

ation in t

he K

ingdom

of Thaila

nd

15

1(1

5) A

griculture

-(1

4)

Affore

sta

tion

and r

efo

resta

tion

24

(13) W

aste

handlin

g a

nd d

isposal

-(1

2)

Solv

ent use

-

(11)

Fugitiv

e e

mis

sio

ns fro

m p

roduction

and c

onsum

ption o

f halo

carb

ons

and s

ulp

hur

hexafluoride

-(1

0)

Fugitiv

e e

mis

sio

ns fro

m fuels

(solid

,

oil

and g

as)

-(0

9)

Meta

l pro

duction

-(0

8)

Min

ing/m

inera

l pro

duction

-(0

7)

Tra

nsport

-(0

6)

Constr

uction

1(0

5) C

hem

ical in

dustrie

s

2(0

4) M

anufa

ctu

ring industrie

s

-(0

3)

Energ

y d

em

and

-(0

2)

Energ

y d

istr

ibution

23

(01) E

nerg

y industrie

s (re

new

able

-/

non-r

enew

able

sourc

es)

No.

Secto

ral S

cope

Sta

ts (

2):

Num

ber

of

regis

tere

d C

DM

pro

ject

s by s

ecto

ral

scope

(Thai

land)

(01

) E

ne

rgy

ind

ustr

ies

(re

new

ab

le -

/ n

on

-

ren

ew

able

so

urc

es),

45

%

(13

) W

aste

ha

nd

ling

an

d

dis

po

sa

l,4

7

%

(15

)

Agricu

ltu

re,

2%

(05

)

Ch

em

ica

l

ind

ustr

ies,

2%

(04

)

Ma

nu

fac-

turing

ind

ustr

ies,

4%

(Sourc

e: U

NF

CC

C)

The P

roje

ct for

Capaci

ty D

evelo

pm

ent

and I

nst

itutional Str

ength

enin

g for

GH

G M

itig

ation in t

he K

ingdom

of Thaila

nd

16

352

Oth

ers

498

India

787

Chin

a

120

Mexic

o

171

Bra

zil

45

Indonesi

a

80

Mala

ysi

a

35

Thailand

41

Phili

ppin

es

Countr

yN

um

ber

Of

Pro

ject

s

Sta

ts (

3):

Num

ber

of

regis

tere

d p

roje

cts

by

host

countr

y

(Sourc

e:

UN

FC

CC

)

A1-6

Page 9

The P

roje

ct for

Capaci

ty D

evelo

pm

ent

and I

nst

itutional Str

ength

enin

g for

GH

G M

itig

ation in t

he K

ingdom

of Thaila

nd

17

4,7

02,4

00

Chile

4,9

29,4

44

Mala

ysi

a

9,3

85,7

34

Mexic

o

31,2

30,4

26

Oth

ers

42,2

08,7

58

India

209,4

03,1

47

Chin

a

14,9

05,1

64

Kore

a

21,0

12,8

56

Bra

zil

4,1

77,7

42

Indonesi

a

4,2

06,7

91

Arg

entina

2,095,745

Thailand

4,1

54,9

78

Nig

eria

Countr

yAnnual avera

ge

reduct

ion

Sta

ts (

4):

Am

ount

of

expec

ted C

ER

sby h

ost

countr

y

Un

it:

ton

CO

2e

qu

iva

len

t

(So

urc

e:

UN

FC

CC

)The P

roje

ct for

Capaci

ty D

evelo

pm

ent

and I

nst

itutional Str

ength

enin

g for

GH

G M

itig

ation in t

he K

ingdom

of Thaila

nd

18

76

Spain

146

Germ

any

165

Sw

eden

156

Oth

ers

518

Sw

itze

rland

707

UK

295

Japan

302

Neth

erlands

47

Aust

ria

48

Fra

nce

46

Canada

47

Italy

Countr

yN

um

ber

of

pro

ject

s

Sta

ts (

5):

Num

ber

of

regis

tere

d p

roje

cts

by

inves

ting c

ountr

y

(So

urc

e:

UN

FC

CC

)

The P

roje

ct for

Capaci

ty D

evelo

pm

ent

and I

nst

itutional Str

ength

enin

g for

GH

G M

itig

ation in t

he K

ingdom

of Thaila

nd

19

00

00

Solv

ent use

12

22

20

6F

ugitiv

e e

mis

sio

ns f

rom

pro

duction/

consum

ption o

f halo

carb

ons/ sulp

hur

hexafluoride

11

136

11

6F

ugitiv

e e

mis

sio

ns fro

m fuels

(solid

, oil

and g

as)

10

01

01

Energ

y d

istr

ibution

2

1,5

78

99

32

"Energ

y industr

ies (

renew

able

-/

non-r

enew

able

sourc

es)"

1

124

10

511

Manufa

ctu

ring industr

ies

4

25

70

7E

nerg

y d

em

and

3

00

00

Constr

uction

6

66

51

12

Chem

ical in

dustr

ies

5

26

01

0M

inin

g/m

inera

l pro

duction

8

25

11

Tra

nsport

7

466

93

6W

aste

handlin

g a

nd d

isposal

13

70

07

Meta

l pro

duction

9

19

Appro

ved

Meth

odolo

gy

12

Appro

ved

Consolid

ate

d

Meth

odolo

gy

Agriculture

Affore

sta

tion

and r

efo

resta

tion

Secto

ral S

cope

36

Appro

ved

Sm

all

Scale

Meth

odolo

gy

124

15

13

14

Nu

mbe

r o

f

Regis

tere

d

Pro

jects

Scope

No.

Sta

ts (

6):

Num

ber

of

appro

ved

m

ethodolo

gie

s

(Sourc

e: U

NF

CC

C)

The P

roje

ct for

Capaci

ty D

evelo

pm

ent

and I

nst

itutional Str

ength

enin

g for

GH

G M

itig

ation in t

he K

ingdom

of Thaila

nd

20

494

Oth

ers

Oth

ers

40

Anim

al m

anure

managem

ent

AM

0016

592

Grid c

onnect

ed r

enew

able

ele

ctrici

tyACM

0002

615

Grid c

onnect

ed r

enew

able

ele

ctrici

tyAM

S-I

.D.

113

Landfill

gas

pro

ject

ACM

0001

134

Meth

ane r

eco

very

in a

nim

al m

anure

m

anagem

ent

syst

em

sAM

S-I

II.D

.

96

Therm

al energ

y p

roduct

ion w

ith o

r w

ithout

ele

ctrici

tyAM

S-I

.C.

111

Wast

e g

as

for

pow

er

genera

tion

ACM

0004

65

Ele

ctrici

ty g

enera

tion f

rom

bio

mass

re

sidues

ACM

0006

80

Meth

ane r

eco

very

in w

ast

ew

ate

rAM

S-I

II.H

.

48

Reduct

ion o

f N

2O

at

nitric

aci

d p

lants

AM

0034

Technolo

gy/ M

easure

Num

ber

of R

eg.

Pro

jects

Meth

odolo

-

gy

Num

be

r

Sta

ts (

7):

Reg

iste

red p

roje

cts

by

met

hodolo

gie

s

AM

S:

appro

ved m

eth

odolo

gy for

sm

all-

scale

AC

M-

appro

ved c

onsolid

ate

d m

eth

odolo

gy

AM

: appro

ved m

eth

odolo

gy

AMS-I.D.

25%

ACM0002

24%

AMS-III.D

.

6%

ACM0001

5%

ACM0004

5%

AMS-I.C

.

4%

AMS-III.H

.

3%

ACM0006

3%

AM0034

2%

AM0016

2%

Others

21%

A1-7

Page 10

The P

roje

ct for

Capaci

ty D

evelo

pm

ent

and I

nst

itutional Str

ength

enin

g for

GH

G M

itig

ation in t

he K

ingdom

of Thaila

nd

21

Sta

ts (

8):

Num

ber

of

reje

cted

pro

ject

s by

sect

or/

mea

sure

Bio

mass

pow

er;

45 Hydro

; 34

Win

d;

65

Bio

gas;

3

Energ

y

effic

iency;

34

Wast

e e

nerg

y;

45

Fuel s

witch;

8Wast

e/

wast

ew

ate

r; 4

Cem

ent;

18

Bio

mass

pow

er

Hydro

Win

d

Bio

gas

Energ

y e

fficie

ncy

Wast

e e

nerg

y

Fuel s

witch

Wast

e/ w

ast

ew

ate

r

Cem

ent

(Un

it:

nu

mb

er

of

pro

jects

)(S

ourc

e: U

NF

CC

C a

nd IG

ES

)

The P

roje

ct for

Capaci

ty D

evelo

pm

ent

and I

nst

itutional Str

ength

enin

g for

GH

G M

itig

ation in t

he K

ingdom

of Thaila

nd

22

Sta

ts (

9):

Num

ber

of

reje

cted

pro

ject

s by

reas

on

(Un

it:

nu

mb

er

of

pro

jects

)Bench

mark

analy

sis,

59

E p

olicy

, 16

Oth

ers

, 28

Monitoring

pla

n,

17

Oth

ers

, 21

,,,,,,,Oth

er

reaso

ns,

11

Oth

er

rea

so

ns,

11

Ad

dit

ion

a-

lity

, 1

53

Me

tho

-

do

log

y,

64

Barr

iers

due

to p

revailin

g

pra

ctic

e,

22

Base

line

scenari

o, 13

Tech

nolo

gic

al

barr

iers

, 16

CDM

consideration,

12

Applica

tion o

f

meth

odolo

gy,

13

(Sourc

e: U

NF

CC

C a

nd IG

ES

)

The P

roje

ct for

Capaci

ty D

evelo

pm

ent

and I

nst

itutional Str

ength

enin

g for

GH

G M

itig

ation in t

he K

ingdom

of Thaila

nd

23

Issu

es i

n C

DM

(1

)

•Is

sues

in a

dditio

nalit

y d

em

onst

ration

–In

acc

ord

ance

with d

eci

sion 3

/CM

P.1

, annex, para

gra

ph 4

3

“A C

DM

pro

ject

act

ivity is

additio

nal if a

nth

ropogenic

em

issi

ons

of gre

enhouse

gase

s by s

ourc

es

are

reduce

d b

elo

w t

hose

that

would

have o

ccurr

ed in t

he

abse

nce

of th

e r

egis

tere

d C

DM

pro

ject

act

ivity”.

–H

ow

ever,

taken into

more

acc

ount

was

how

to d

em

onst

rate

that

“Without

CD

M, th

e p

ropose

d p

roje

ct w

ould

not

have b

een

realiz

ed”

by a

ssess

ing b

arr

iers

the p

roje

ct a

ctiv

ity is

faci

ng.

–As

a r

esu

lt, so

me s

ect

ors

whose

additio

nalit

y is

easi

er

to b

e

dem

onst

rate

d w

ere

faci

litate

d;

•in

cludin

g C

H4

reco

very

and u

tiliz

ation, N2O

dest

ruct

ion, and H

FC23

dest

ruct

ion.

–O

n t

he c

ontr

ary

, oth

er

sect

ors

whose

additio

nalit

y is

difficu

lt t

o

be d

em

onst

rate

d b

ut

safe

and e

nvironm

enta

lly s

ound in n

atu

rew

ere

not

faci

litate

das

CD

M

•energ

y e

ffic

iency

im

pro

vem

ent

pro

ject

s

•Pro

ject

that

genera

tes

financi

al benefit

oth

er

than C

ER

sale

s

The P

roje

ct for

Capaci

ty D

evelo

pm

ent

and I

nst

itutional Str

ength

enin

g for

GH

G M

itig

ation in t

he K

ingdom

of Thaila

nd

24

Issu

es i

n C

DM

(2

)

•D

om

inance

by n

on-C

O2

CD

M p

roje

cts

–N

on-C

O2

CD

M p

roje

cts

take a

dvanta

ge o

f st

rong c

om

merc

ial

ince

ntive b

y s

elli

ng b

ig v

olu

me o

f CER

•CH

4, N2O

, and H

FC23 (

hig

h g

lobal w

arm

ing p

ote

ntial)

–In

additio

n, non-C

O2

CD

M is

easy

to d

em

onst

rate

its

additio

nalit

y a

nd t

hus

easy

to b

e r

egis

tere

d

�G

enera

te a

bout

80%

of

tota

l CERs

from

regis

tere

d C

DM

pro

ject

s

–H

ow

ever,

such

gase

s (C

H4, N

2O

, and H

FC23)

const

itute

s only

le

ss t

han 5

% o

f overa

ll G

HG

em

issi

ons

on e

art

h, and

more

than 6

0%

of all

GH

G e

mis

sions

in d

evelo

pin

g c

ountr

ies

are

CO

2

–As

a p

ote

ntial in

such

non-C

O2

pro

ject

s is

lim

ited, in

creasi

ng

num

bers

of CO

2pro

ject

s have b

een p

ropose

d a

nd r

egis

tere

d in

these

days

A1-8

Page 11

The P

roje

ct for

Capaci

ty D

evelo

pm

ent

and I

nst

itutional Str

ength

enin

g for

GH

G M

itig

ation in t

he K

ingdom

of Thaila

nd

25

Issu

es i

n C

DM

(3

)

•Lack

of

auth

entica

tion o

f SD

ach

ievem

ent

by h

ost

countr

y

–It

is

the h

ost

Part

y’s

pre

rogative t

o d

ete

rmin

e w

heth

er

a C

DM

pro

ject

act

ivity a

ssis

ts it

in a

chie

vin

g s

ust

ain

able

develo

pm

ent

(SD

)

–Curr

ent

CD

M s

yst

em

is

not

requirin

g p

roje

ct a

ctiv

ity t

o c

heck

SD

contr

ibution t

o h

ost

countr

y

–Thaila

nd e

valu

ate

s SD

contr

ibution b

y a

pply

ing C

row

n S

tandard

syst

em

•U

neven d

istr

ibution

of

host

countr

ies

–M

ore

than 8

0%

of

CER

sth

at

will

be g

enera

ted b

y 2

012 c

om

e f

rom

5

host

countr

ies

•Chin

a, In

dia

, Bra

zil, M

exic

o, Kore

a

–M

any c

ountr

ies

that

have low

fore

ign d

irect

invest

ment

rate

and G

NP

have n

o C

DM

pro

ject

act

ivity r

egis

tere

d

–CD

M p

roje

cts

should

be m

ore

evenly

dis

trib

ute

d g

eogra

phic

ally

A1-9

Page 12

Th

e P

roje

ct f

or

Ca

pa

city

Dev

elo

pm

en

t a

nd

Inst

itu

tion

al

Str

ength

enin

g f

or

GH

G M

itig

ati

on

in t

he

Kin

gd

om

of

Th

ail

an

d

CD

M 2

Tec

hn

ica

l a

spec

ts o

f

Ba

seli

ne

det

erm

ina

tio

n

27th

April 2010

Chie

f Advis

or

of JI

CA E

xpert

Team

Masa

hik

o F

UJI

MO

TO

The P

roje

ct for

Capaci

ty D

evelo

pm

ent

and I

nst

itutional Str

ength

enin

g for

GH

G M

itig

ation in t

he K

ingdom

of Thaila

nd

2

Co

nte

nts

1.

What

is b

ase

line?

2.

Why b

ase

line n

eeds

to b

e identified?

3.

How

to identify

base

line?

4.

Meth

od t

o identify

base

line

5.

Gro

up d

iscu

ssio

n u

sing a

ctual bio

gas

pro

ject

The P

roje

ct for

Capaci

ty D

evelo

pm

ent

and I

nst

itutional Str

ength

enin

g for

GH

G M

itig

ation in t

he K

ingdom

of Thaila

nd

3

Wh

at i

s b

asel

ine?

Base

line S

cenario:

“the s

cenario t

hat

reaso

nably

repre

sents

the

anth

ropogenic

em

issi

ons

by s

ourc

es

of

gre

enhouse

gase

s th

at

would

occ

ur

in t

he a

bse

nce

of

the

pro

pose

d p

roje

ct a

ctiv

ity”

•P

roje

ct

pro

po

ne

nt

sh

ou

ld d

ete

rmin

e p

roje

ct-

sp

ecif

ic

ba

se

lin

e i

n a

cco

rda

nce

wit

h t

he

me

tho

do

log

y(i

es)

•T

ak

ing

in

to a

cco

un

t n

ati

on

al/

se

cto

ral

po

licie

s a

nd

cir

cu

msta

nce

s

The P

roje

ct for

Capaci

ty D

evelo

pm

ent

and I

nst

itutional Str

ength

enin

g for

GH

G M

itig

ation in t

he K

ingdom

of Thaila

nd

4

Wh

at i

s b

asel

ine?

Base

line is

diffe

rent

by e

ach

pro

ject

, dependin

g o

n

tech

nolo

gy/

measu

re, pro

ject

type, co

nditio

n, polic

y, etc

.

emissions

time

Ba

se

lin

e e

mis

sio

ns

Baselin

e e

mis

sio

ns

Pro

ject

em

iss

ion

s

Em

issio

ns r

ed

ucti

on

Em

issio

ns r

ed

ucti

on

Case 1

Case 2

emissions

time

A1-10

Page 13

The P

roje

ct for

Capaci

ty D

evelo

pm

ent

and I

nst

itutional Str

ength

enin

g for

GH

G M

itig

ation in t

he K

ingdom

of Thaila

nd

5

Why

bas

elin

e n

eed

s to

be

iden

tifi

ed?

•Let’s

dis

cuss

the r

easo

n w

hy w

e h

ave t

o

identify

base

line in C

DM

.

–Beca

use

PD

D r

equires

it ?

–W

hat

do y

ou t

hin

k a

bout

it?

The P

roje

ct for

Capaci

ty D

evelo

pm

ent

and I

nst

itutional Str

ength

enin

g for

GH

G M

itig

ation in t

he K

ingdom

of Thaila

nd

6

Ho

w t

o i

den

tify

bas

elin

e (1

)

•Pro

ject

pro

ponent

(PP)

must

identify

base

line u

sing t

he

meth

ods

and s

teps

speci

fied in t

he b

ase

line m

eth

odolo

gy(ies)

that

is a

pplie

d t

o t

he p

roje

ct a

ctiv

ity.

•Base

line m

eth

odolo

gie

s sh

all

require n

arr

ative d

esc

riptions

of

pro

ject

. PP m

ust

analy

zeall

reaso

nable

base

line s

cenario

options,

whic

h m

ay incl

ude:

–Continuation o

f th

e c

urr

ent

act

ivity

–Im

ple

menta

tion o

f th

e p

ropose

d p

roje

ct a

ctiv

ity

–O

ther

scenarios

•PP m

ust

desc

ribe h

ow

a b

ase

line s

cenario is

sele

cted a

mong

poss

ible

base

line s

cenario o

ptions.

The P

roje

ct for

Capaci

ty D

evelo

pm

ent

and I

nst

itutional Str

ength

enin

g for

GH

G M

itig

ation in t

he K

ingdom

of Thaila

nd

7

Ho

w t

o i

den

tify

bas

elin

e (2

)

Base

line is

dete

rmin

ed b

y a

pply

ing o

ne o

f th

e f

ollo

win

g

3 p

att

ern

s, d

ependin

g o

n t

he b

ase

line m

eth

odolo

gie

s applie

d;

Case

1 :

Meth

odolo

gy p

rese

nts

a f

ixed

base

line

scenario.

�PP

dem

onst

rate

s th

at

the b

ase

line s

cenario is

the o

nly

rele

vant

and

pla

usi

ble

busi

ness

-as-

usu

al sc

enario.

�Sm

all-

scale

meth

odolo

gie

s and s

om

e larg

e-s

cale

meth

odolo

gie

s

Case

2 :

Meth

odolo

gy p

rese

nts

severa

l poss

ible

base

line

options

for

various

com

ponents

of

the p

roje

ct a

ctiv

ity.

�PP identifies

the m

ost

pla

usi

ble

base

line s

cenario, w

hic

h is

a

com

bin

ation o

f base

line o

ptions.

The P

roje

ct for

Capaci

ty D

evelo

pm

ent

and I

nst

itutional Str

ength

enin

g for

GH

G M

itig

ation in t

he K

ingdom

of Thaila

nd

8

Ho

w t

o i

den

tify

bas

elin

e (3

)

Case

3:

Meth

odolo

gy d

oes

not

pre

sent

any b

ase

line o

ption

and P

P m

ust

pre

sent

poss

ible

base

line o

ptions

usi

ng

a s

tep-w

ise a

ppro

ach

rese

mblin

g t

he a

dditio

nalit

y/

com

bin

ed t

ool fo

r th

e identifica

tion o

f a b

ase

line s

cenario.

�To a

pply

ste

p 1

a o

f th

e “

Com

bin

ed t

ool to

identify

the b

ase

line

scenario a

nd d

em

onst

rate

additio

nalit

y”

�O

nly

applic

able

if all

pote

ntial altern

ative s

cenarios

are

availa

ble

options

to p

roje

ct p

art

icip

ants

, su

ch a

s

-M

odific

ations

to a

n e

xis

ting inst

alla

tion o

pera

ted b

y P

P

-Const

ruct

ion o

f new

faci

litie

s, if

all

altern

ative s

cenarios

are

availa

ble

options

to P

P

A1-11

Page 14

The P

roje

ct for

Capaci

ty D

evelo

pm

ent

and I

nst

itutional Str

ength

enin

g for

GH

G M

itig

ation in t

he K

ingdom

of Thaila

nd

9

Met

ho

d t

o i

den

tify

bas

elin

e

When u

sing C

ase

2, PP m

ust

follo

w m

eth

odolo

gy t

o

identify

base

line.

•For

exam

ple

, ACM0014

: “M

itig

ation o

f gre

enhouse

gas

em

issi

ons

from

tre

atm

ent

of

indust

rial w

ast

ew

ate

r”

AC

M0

01

4 r

equ

ires to

app

ly t

he

fo

llow

ing

4 s

tep

s;

Ste

p 1

. Id

entification o

f altern

ative s

cenarios

Ste

p 2

. E

limin

ate

altern

atives that are

not com

ply

ing w

ith a

pplic

able

law

s a

nd r

egula

tions

Ste

p 3

. E

limin

ate

altern

atives that fa

ce p

rohib

itiv

e b

arr

iers

(B

arr

ier

Analy

sis

)

Ste

p 4

. C

om

pare

econom

ic a

ttra

ctiveness o

f re

main

ing a

ltern

atives (

Investm

ent A

naly

sis

)

The P

roje

ct for

Capaci

ty D

evelo

pm

ent

and I

nst

itutional Str

ength

enin

g for

GH

G M

itig

ation in t

he K

ingdom

of Thaila

nd

10

Ste

p 1

. Id

en

tifi

cati

on

of

alt

ern

ati

ve s

cen

ari

os

Identify

realis

tic

and c

redib

le a

ltern

ative

scenarios

to t

he p

roje

ct a

ctiv

ity

–M

eth

odolo

gy p

rovid

es

list

of

altern

atives

that

pro

vid

e o

utp

uts

or

serv

ices

com

para

ble

to t

he

pro

pose

d C

DM

pro

ject

, in

cludin

g;

•Continuation o

f cu

rrent

pra

ctic

e

•Pro

pose

d p

roje

ct a

ctiv

ity u

ndert

aken w

ithout

CD

M

•All

oth

er

pla

usi

ble

and c

redib

le a

ltern

ative s

cenarios

The P

roje

ct for

Capaci

ty D

evelo

pm

ent

and I

nst

itutional Str

ength

enin

g for

GH

G M

itig

ation in t

he K

ingdom

of Thaila

nd

11

Ste

p 2

. E

lim

inate

alt

ern

ati

ves

that

are n

ot

com

ply

ing w

ith

ap

pli

cab

le l

aw

s an

d r

egu

lati

on

s

Check

wheth

er

the lis

ted a

ltern

atives

are

in

com

plia

nce

with a

ll le

gal re

quirem

ents

of th

e

countr

y/

regio

n

•Legal re

quirem

ents

incl

ude t

hose

not

rela

ted t

o G

HG

em

issi

on r

educt

ions

(e.g

. air, w

ate

r, e

tc.)

•If

only

a p

ropose

d C

DM

pro

ject

act

ivity c

an c

om

ply

with law

s,th

e p

roje

ct w

ill b

e u

ndert

aken a

nyw

ay,

and t

hus,

NO

T a

dditio

naland w

ill n

ot

be e

ligib

le t

o

be r

egis

tere

d a

s a C

DM

pro

ject

The P

roje

ct for

Capaci

ty D

evelo

pm

ent

and I

nst

itutional Str

ength

enin

g for

GH

G M

itig

ation in t

he K

ingdom

of Thaila

nd

12

Ste

p 3

.E

lim

inate

alt

ern

ati

ves

that

face

proh

ibit

ive b

arr

iers

(1)

Identify

barr

iers

that

would

pre

vent

the im

ple

menta

tion o

f

altern

ative s

cenarios（B

arr

ier

An

aly

sis）

–For

each

of

the a

ltern

ative s

cenarios

identified in S

tep 1

, id

entify

realis

tic

and c

redib

le b

arr

iers

that

may p

revent

altern

ative s

cenarios

to o

ccur

–Barr

iers

may incl

ude t

he f

ollo

win

g 4

barr

iers

.

1.

Invest

ment

barr

iers

–Sim

ilar

act

ivitie

s have b

een im

ple

mente

d o

nly

with g

rants

or

oth

er

non-c

om

merc

ial finance

–N

o p

rivate

capital is

availa

ble

from

dom

est

ic o

r in

tern

ational

capital m

ark

ets

due t

o r

eal or

perc

eiv

ed r

isks

ass

oci

ate

d w

ith

invest

ment

in T

haila

nd

A1-12

Page 15

The P

roje

ct for

Capaci

ty D

evelo

pm

ent

and I

nst

itutional Str

ength

enin

g for

GH

G M

itig

ation in t

he K

ingdom

of Thaila

nd

13

Ste

p 3

.E

lim

inate

alt

ern

ati

ves

that

face

proh

ibit

ive b

arr

iers

(2)

2.

Tech

nolo

gic

al barr

iers

–Skill

ed/

pro

perly t

rain

ed labor

to o

pera

te a

nd m

ain

tain

the

tech

nolo

gy is

not

availa

ble

in t

he c

ountr

y/r

egio

n

–Lack

of

infr

ast

ruct

ure

for

imple

menta

tion a

nd logis

tics

for

main

tenance

of

the t

ech

nolo

gy

–The p

art

icula

r te

chnolo

gy

use

d in t

he p

ropose

d p

roje

ct a

ctiv

ity is

not

availa

ble

in t

he r

egio

n

–R

isk o

f te

chnolo

gic

al fa

ilure

in t

he loca

l ci

rcum

stance

s is

sig

nific

antly

gre

ate

r th

an f

or

oth

er

tech

nolo

gie

s

3.Barr

iers

due t

o p

revaili

ng p

ract

ice

–The p

roje

ct a

ctiv

ity is

the “

firs

t of

its

kin

d”

４．O

ther

barr

iers

Note

: PP m

ust

pro

vid

e t

ransp

are

nt

and d

ocu

mente

d e

vid

ence

The P

roje

ct for

Capaci

ty D

evelo

pm

ent

and I

nst

itutional Str

ength

enin

g for

GH

G M

itig

ation in t

he K

ingdom

of Thaila

nd

14

Ste

p 3

.E

lim

inate

alt

ern

ati

ves

that

face

proh

ibit

ive b

arr

iers

(3)

Elim

inate

altern

ative s

cenarios

whic

h a

re p

revente

d b

y t

he

identified b

arr

iers

–Id

entify

whic

h a

ltern

ative s

cenarios

are

difficu

lt t

o b

e r

ealiz

ed

due t

o t

he

barr

iers

lis

ted,

whic

are

pre

venting r

ealiz

ation o

f sc

enarios

–Elim

inate

such

altern

ative s

cenarios

from

furt

her

consi

dera

tion (

such

scenarios

will

not

be b

ase

line)

–All

altern

ative s

cenarios

shall

be c

om

pare

d t

o t

he s

am

e s

et

of

barr

iers

.

Note

: PP m

ust

pro

vid

e t

ransp

are

nt

and d

ocu

mente

d e

vid

ence

If

on

ly o

ne

sce

na

rio

is r

em

ain

ed

, it

is c

on

sid

ere

d a

s b

ase

lin

e s

ce

na

rio

IF

there

are

still

severa

l altern

ative s

cenarios

rem

ain

ing,

Go t

o S

tep 3

(in

vest

ment

com

pariso

n a

naly

sis)

The P

roje

ct for

Capaci

ty D

evelo

pm

ent

and I

nst

itutional Str

ength

enin

g for

GH

G M

itig

ation in t

he K

ingdom

of Thaila

nd

15

Ste

p 4

. C

om

pare

econ

om

ic a

ttra

cti

ven

ess

of

rem

ain

ing a

ltern

ati

ves

Check

whic

h a

ltern

ative is

most

fin

anci

ally

att

ract

ive

without

revenues

from

CERs,

or

have h

ighest

poss

ibili

ty

to o

ccur

as

busi

ness

as

usu

al

（In

vest

ment

com

pariso

n a

naly

sis）

1.

Dete

rmin

e f

inanci

al in

dic

ato

r :

IRR

(Inte

rnal ra

te o

f re

turn

)

2.

Calc

ula

te f

inanci

al perf

orm

ance

for

the r

em

ain

ing s

cenarios

3.

Com

pare

resu

lts

The m

ost

eco

nom

ically

or

financi

ally

att

ract

ive a

ltern

ative s

cenario (

e.g

.

the s

cenario t

hat

has

hig

hest

IRR)

is c

onsi

dere

d a

s base

line s

cenario.

The P

roje

ct for

Capaci

ty D

evelo

pm

ent

and I

nst

itutional Str

ength

enin

g for

GH

G M

itig

ation in t

he K

ingdom

of Thaila

nd

16

Gro

up

Dis

cuss

ion

Ca

se o

f b

ioga

s p

roje

ct i

n T

ha

ila

nd

•Let’

s dete

rmin

ebase

line b

y y

ours

elf

usi

ng

“TBEC T

ha

Chang B

iogas

Pro

ject

”.

–G

roup D

iscu

ssio

n a

nd f

ill o

ut

bla

nk t

able

(30 m

in)

–Pre

senta

tion f

rom

each

gro

up (

30 m

in)

A1-13

Page 16

The Project for Capacity Development and Institutional Strengthening for GHG Mitigation in the Kingdom of Thailand

1) Which is baseline scenario for the treatment of wastewater? What is the reason?

Options W1: The use of open

lagoons for the treatment

of the wastewater

W2: Direct release of

wastewaters to a nearby

water body;

W3: Aerobic wastewater

treatment facilities (e.g.,

activated sludge or filter

bed type treatment);

W4: Anaerobic digester

with methane recovery

and flaring

W5: Anaerobic digester

with methane recovery

and utilization for

electricity or heat

generation 1. compliance with all legal requirements

Investment barrier

Technological barrier

Barriers due to prevailing practice

Other barriers

2. Barrier Analysis

Result

3. Investment Comparison analysis, if necessary

Result of baseline selection

The Project for Capacity Development and Institutional Strengthening for GHG Mitigation in the Kingdom of Thailand

2) Which is baseline scenario for the generation of electricity? What is the reason?

Options E1: Power generation using fossil fuels in a

captive power plant

E2: Electricity generation in the grid E3: Electricity generation using renewable

sources

1. compliance with all legal

requirements

Investment

barrier

Technological

barrier

Barriers due to

prevailing

practice

Other barriers

2. Barrier

Analysis

Result

3. Investment Comparison

analysis, if necessary

Result of baseline selection

.

A1-14

Page 17

Th

e P

roje

ct

for

Ca

pa

cit

y D

eve

lopm

en

t a

nd

Inst

itu

tion

al

Str

ength

enin

g f

or

GH

G M

itig

ati

on

in t

he K

ing

do

m o

f T

ha

ila

nd

CD

M3

:

Ove

rvie

w o

f L

arg

e-s

ca

le/

Sm

all-s

ca

le M

eth

od

olo

gie

s

25

May, 2

010

Dep

uty

Ch

ief

Ad

vis

or

of

JIC

A E

xp

ert

Tea

m

KazuhitoYAMADA

2The P

roje

ct for

Capaci

ty D

evelo

pm

ent

and I

nst

itutional Str

ength

enin

g for

GH

G M

itig

ation in t

he K

ingdom

of Thaila

nd

Ob

jecti

ves o

f th

is s

ecti

on

Ob

jecti

ve

s o

f th

is s

ecti

on

are

:

To u

nders

tand larg

e a

nd s

mall

scale

BL m

eth

odolo

gie

s,

To d

iscu

ss:

At

the p

rese

nt

stage, w

hic

h m

eth

odolo

gy w

ill b

e u

sefu

l fo

r su

stain

able

develo

pm

ent

in T

haila

nd?

In t

he f

utu

re, w

hat

kin

d o

f B

L m

eth

odolo

gy d

o w

e n

eed

in T

haila

nd?

3The P

roje

ct for

Capaci

ty D

evelo

pm

ent

and I

nst

itutional Str

ength

enin

g for

GH

G M

itig

ation in t

he K

ingdom

of Thaila

nd

CD

M 3

: L

arg

e/s

ma

ll s

ca

le B

L M

eth

od

olo

gie

s:

�W

hat

are

the r

ole

s of

BL m

eth

odolo

gie

s?

�W

hat

is t

he p

roce

dure

to a

ppro

ve B

L m

eth

odolo

gie

s?

�In

troduct

ion o

f la

rge s

cale

BL m

eth

odolo

gie

s

�In

troduct

ion o

f sm

all

scale

BL m

eth

odolo

gie

s

�Pre

sent

statu

s of

regis

tere

d C

DM

pro

ject

s in

Thaila

nd

�D

iscu

ssio

n

4The P

roje

ct for

Capaci

ty D

evelo

pm

ent

and I

nst

itutional Str

ength

enin

g for

GH

G M

itig

ation in t

he K

ingdom

of Thaila

nd

Wh

at

are

th

e r

ole

s o

f B

L m

eth

od

olo

gie

s?

Th

e r

ole

s o

f B

L m

eth

od

olo

gie

s a

re:

to e

nsu

re t

hat

CD

M p

roje

ct a

ctiv

itie

s have:

�re

al, m

ea

su

rab

le,

and l

on

g-t

erm

benefits

rela

ted t

o

the m

itig

ation o

f cl

imate

change (

GH

G e

mis

sion

reduct

ions)

;

�re

duct

ions

in e

mis

sions

that

are

ad

dit

ion

alto

any t

hat

would

occ

ur

in t

he a

bse

nce

of

the c

ert

ifie

d p

roje

ct

act

ivity.

Briefly s

peakin

g, B

L m

eth

odolo

gie

s inclu

de a

ppro

priate

B

riefly s

peakin

g, B

L m

eth

odolo

gie

s inclu

de a

ppro

priate

form

ula

e h

ow

to q

uantify

BL a

nd P

J e

mis

sio

ns, and leakage.

form

ula

e h

ow

to q

uantify

BL a

nd P

J e

mis

sio

ns, and leakage.

A1-15

Page 18

5The P

roje

ct for

Capaci

ty D

evelo

pm

ent

and I

nst

itutional Str

ength

enin

g for

GH

G M

itig

ation in t

he K

ingdom

of Thaila

nd

Wh

at

is t

he

pro

ce

du

re t

o a

pp

rove

BL

me

tho

do

log

ies

?

Th

e p

roce

du

re (

larg

e)

is:

�PPs

shall

pro

pose

a n

ew

BL m

eth

odolo

gy,

thro

ug

h a

DO

E/A

E,

subm

itting t

he d

raft

CD

M-P

DD

, CD

M-N

M;

�The

DO

E/

AE

shall

dete

rmin

e w

heth

er

the p

ropose

d p

roje

ct a

ctiv

ity

inte

nds

to u

se a

new

BL m

eth

odolo

gy, and c

he

ck

wh

eth

er

the

d

ocu

me

nts

are

co

mp

lete

and forw

ard

them

to E

B f

or

its

consi

dera

tion a

nd a

ppro

val;

�The U

NFC

CC

se

cre

tari

at

shall

forw

ard

them

to E

Band M

eth

Pa

ne

laft

er

havin

g c

heck

ed t

hat

the d

ocu

menta

tion is

com

ple

te;

�T

he

se

cre

tari

at

shall

make t

he n

ew

BL m

eth

odolo

gy p

ub

licly

a

va

ila

ble

on

th

e U

NFC

CC

CD

M w

eb

sit

eand invite p

ublic

inputs

fo

r a p

eriod o

f 15 w

ork

ing d

ays.

Com

ments

shall

be f

orw

ard

ed t

o

Meth

Panel;

6The P

roje

ct for

Capaci

ty D

evelo

pm

ent

and I

nst

itutional Str

ength

enin

g for

GH

G M

itig

ation in t

he K

ingdom

of Thaila

nd

Wh

at

is t

he

pro

ce

du

re t

o a

pp

rove

BL

me

tho

do

log

ies

?

Th

e p

roce

du

re (

larg

e)

is (

co

nti

nu

ed

):

Meth

Panel sh

all

make :

(a)

A fin

al re

com

mendation t

o E

B t

o a

ppro

ve t

he B

L m

eth

odolo

gy

(refe

rred t

o a

s A

);

(b)

A fin

al re

com

mendation t

o E

B n

ot

to a

ppro

ve t

he B

L m

eth

odolo

gy

(refe

rred t

o a

s C

); o

r

(c)

A p

reli

min

ary

re

co

mm

en

da

tio

nto

PPs

who m

ay p

rovid

e

clarifica

tion r

egard

ing t

he iss

ues

rais

ed, or

Meth

Panel co

ntinues

the c

onsi

dera

tion o

f th

e P

NM

(re

ferr

ed t

o a

s w

ork

-in

-pro

gre

ss

WIP

)

EB

fin

ally d

ecid

e w

heth

er

the B

L m

eth

. is

accepta

ble

or

not.

EB

fin

ally d

ecid

e w

heth

er

the B

L m

eth

. is

accepta

ble

or

not.

7The P

roje

ct for

Capaci

ty D

evelo

pm

ent

and I

nst

itutional Str

ength

enin

g for

GH

G M

itig

ation in t

he K

ingdom

of Thaila

nd

Wh

at

is t

he

pro

ce

du

re t

o a

pp

rove

BL

me

tho

do

log

ies

?

Th

e p

roce

du

re (

sm

all

) is

:

�P

Ps,

DO

Es,

DN

As

or

sta

ke

ho

lde

rssh

all

pro

pose

a n

ew

SSC-B

L

meth

odolo

gy, su

bm

itting t

he d

raft

CD

M-S

SC-P

DD

, CD

M-S

SC-N

M;

�Aft

er

perf

orm

ing a

com

ple

teness

check

, th

e U

NF

CC

C s

ecre

tari

at

shall

forw

ard

the d

ocu

menta

tion t

o E

Band S

SC

-WG

;

�T

he

se

cre

tari

at

als

o s

hall

make t

he p

ropose

d n

ew

SSC

meth

odolo

gy p

ub

licly

ava

ila

ble

on

th

e U

NF

CC

C C

DM

we

bsit

eand invite p

ublic

inputs

for

a p

eriod o

f te

n (

10)

work

ing d

ays;

�P

ub

lic i

np

uts

shall

be f

orw

ard

ed t

o S

SC

WG

soon a

fter

rece

ipt

and m

ade p

ublic

ly a

vaila

ble

;

�S

SC

WG

shall

make a

reco

mm

en

da

tio

nre

gard

ing t

he a

ppro

val

of th

e p

ropose

d n

ew

SSC m

eth

odolo

gy t

o E

B a

t its

next

meeting;

EB

fin

ally d

ecid

e w

heth

er

the B

L m

eth

. is

accepta

ble

or

not.

EB

fin

ally d

ecid

e w

heth

er

the B

L m

eth

. is

accepta

ble

or

not.

8The P

roje

ct for

Capaci

ty D

evelo

pm

ent

and I

nst

itutional Str

ength

enin

g for

GH

G M

itig

ation in t

he K

ingdom

of Thaila

nd

Intr

od

ucti

on

of

larg

e s

cale

BL

meth

od

olo

gie

s

La

rge

sca

le:

�Appro

ved M

eth

odolo

gie

s (A

M0001-8

7):

69 m

eth

. act

ive;

�Appro

ved C

onso

lidate

d M

eth

odolo

gie

s (A

CM

0001-1

8):

17 m

eth

. act

ive;

�10 t

ools

such

as

‘additio

nalit

y t

ool’

are

availa

ble

;

�ACM

0002 is

use

d b

y 6

47 r

egis

tere

d p

roje

cts;

�O

n t

he o

ther

hand, 46 A

M a

nd 5

ACM

have n

o

regis

tere

d p

roje

ct;

�N

on-C

O2

meth

odolo

gie

s su

ch a

s H

FC23, N

2O

and C

H4

have b

een u

sed c

om

pare

to C

O2

meth

odolo

gie

s.

A1-16