3 d+in+film

IS 3-D AN ART FORM OR A GIMMICK?

Zach RussoBerta Flath

CSIS

3-D: A unique technique

3-D enhances the illusion of depth perception.

Prominently featured in the 1950’s 3-D’s “Golden Era”

Time goes on

Revival from 1960-1984. Mainstream Resurgence from 2003-

Present. “Avatar” played a huge part in

revitalizing 3D.

The Question Again

3-D: An art form or a gimmick?

Is it the best way to enhance movies?

“Yes” Side

3-D immerses you in the movie. Not just the occasional random object. 3-D is part of cinema’s evolution.

“No” Side

Conversion is a far cry from true 3-D. Reports of motion sickness. IMAX is gaining popularity.

Is this really necessary?

Many older movies are re-released in 3-D. “Titanic 3-D” timed with anniversary of

sinking. Did the rest of these have a good reason?

“Answer Recommended”: Graphs

Motion Sick? Not need 3-D?

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

Yes No

“Answer Recommended”: Charts

Top 25 Biggest Films Ever

3-DNot 3-D

“Answer Recommended”: Graphs

3-D en-

hancement

3-D or IMAX?

0

5

10

15

20

25

Yes (1st) 3-D (2nd)No (1st) IMAX (2nd)

“Answer Recommended”: Conclusion

The answer is “No”. Most believe that 3-D is a gimmick. Most are a cash-in. 3-D is not the best way to enhance

movie-going.

References

http://www.physics.org/article-questions.asp?id=56 http://www.welcometo3d.tv/the-1950s-golden-era-of-3d/ http://

www.rollingstone.com/movies/news/can-gravity-save-3d-20131012

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/heat-vision/clash-titans-director-calls-3d-559105

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/09/health/09really.html?_r=0 http://boxofficemojo.com/