This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Various analytical techniques have been employed for this purpose. To identify crystalline materials in the samples, X-ray
diffracto grams were recorded on Philips PW3710 X-ray Diffracto meter using Cu Kα (alpha) radiations with tube voltage 45
Influence of Curing Temperature and Time on Complete Conversion of Fly Ash in to 21 a Framework Aluminosilicate Utilizing Alkalinehydrothermal Synthetic Methodology
Influence of Curing Temperature and Time on Complete Conversion of Fly Ash in to 23 a Framework Aluminosilicate Utilizing Alkalinehydrothermal Synthetic Methodology
Figure 2: FT-IR Patterns of Fly Ash and the Product Obtained at Various Temperatures of Curing
Scanning Electron Microscopic Studies
Scanning electron micrographs (“Figure 3” a, b, c and d) of fly ash (S-01) and the synthesized products (S-02,
S-03 and S-04) indicates the conversion of fly ash to crystalline aluminosilicates. Spherical particles with smooth
surface have been observed for the fly ash [32]. The appearance of sharp edges on the spherical surface suggesting
the conversion of fly ash in to the crystalline material for S-02 sample (“Figure 3” b). In case of S-03 (“Figure 3”c), cubic
crystals indicate the complete conversion of fly ash in to a crystalline product. The further decrease in particle size and
deformation of cubic structure in case of sample S-04 (“Figure 3” d) has been observed which indicates the presence of
other zeolitic product. The XRD, FTIR data is also supportive of this observation.
24 Hema Kundra & Monika Datta
Impact Factor (JCC): 1.9028 Index Copernicus Value(ICV) : 3.0
Figure 3: SEM Patterns of Fly Ash and the Product Obtained at Various Temperatures of Curing
Thermo gravimetric Studies
The thermo-grams (“Figure 4”a, b, c and d) of fly ash (S-01) and the synthesized products (S-02, S-03 and S-04) indicates
the conversion of fly ash to crystalline aluminosilicates. In case of fly ash (“Figure 4”a) first weight loss of 0.2% is observed in
the temperature range of 35-200°C (corresponding to the loss of physically adsorbed water) followed by a weight loss of
1.8% in the temperature range of 200-550°C (attributed to the decomposition of hydrated salts such as Ca
(OH)2. xH2O, CaSO3.xH2O, etc. present in fly ash). In the temperature range of 550-700°C 0.8% weight loss (attributed to
the loss due to the oxidation of unburnt carbon and decomposition of metal carbonates in fly ash) has been observed [39,
40]. Two step weight losses in each case were observed for the samples S-02, S-03 and S-04. The first step, 30°C to 100°C, amounts
to a loss of ~3%, ~3.2% and ~2.5% corresponds to physically adsorbed water and the second step, 100°C to 250°C, amounting to a
loss of ~ 4.9%, ~ 4.6% and ~ 4.5% corresponds to metal bound water and water present in zeolitic cavity for S-02, S-03 and S-04
respectively (“Figure 4” b-d) [41]. On the basis of all investigations it has been found that the best product is obtained with curing at
40°C. Therefore, further work was carried out using 40°C as the curing temperature and variation in curing time period was
investigated.
Influence of Curing Temperature and Time on Complete Conversion of Fly Ash in to 25 a Framework Aluminosilicate Utilizing Alkalinehydrothermal Synthetic Methodology
The FTIR spectra (“Figure 6” a, b, c, d, e and f) of fly ash (S-01) and the synthesized products (S-05, S-06, S-07, S-08
and S-09) indicate the conversion of fly ash to crystalline aluminosilicates. The strongest band appears at 999, 999, 989, 997 and
999 cm-1 in case of the synthesized product S-05, S-06, S-07, S-08 and S-09 respectively (“Figure 6”b – f). This observed shift
towards lower wave number from fly ash (“Figure 6” b–d), indicates the presence of more number of Al+3 in to the frame work.
Three well-defined medium intensity bands at 718, 696, 661cm-1 and the bands at 463 and 434 cm-1 has been observed for the S-04
sample (“Figure 6” d) and are in good agreement with the literature reported bands for hydroxysodalite structure. The observed shift
towards higher wave number and appearance of the band at 567 and 569 cm-1 because of the double 6 ring, is indicative of
the appearance of some other zeolitic product in case of sample S-08 and S-09 (“Figure 6”e and f).
Influence of Curing Temperature and Time on Complete Conversion of Fly Ash in to 27 a Framework Aluminosilicate Utilizing Alkalinehydrothermal Synthetic Methodology
Figure 6: FT-IR Patterns of Fly Ash and the Product Obtained at Different Time Periods of Curing
Scanning Electron Microscopic Studies
Scanning electron micrographs (“Figure 7” a, b, c, d, e and f) of the fly ash (S-01) and the synthesized products (S-05, S-
06, S-07, S-08 and S-09) indicates the conversion of fly ash to crystalline aluminosilicates. Deformation of the smooth spherical
surface has been observed in the sampleS-05 (“Figure 7”b). The appearance of sharp edges on the spherical surface suggesting
the conversion of fly ash in to the crystalline material for S-06 sample (“Figure 7”c). In case of S-07 (“Figure 7”d), well defined
cubic crystals indicates the conversion of fly ash into a crystalline product. The further decrease in particle size and deformation
of cubic structure in case of sample S-08 and S-09 (“Figure 7” e and f) suggests the presence of the amorphous material.
28 Hema Kundra & Monika Datta
Impact Factor (JCC): 1.9028 Index Copernicus Value(ICV) : 3.0
Figure 7: SEM Patterns of Fly Ash and the Product Obtained at Different Time Periods of Curing
Thermo gravimetric Studies
The thermo-grams (“Figure 8” b, c, d, e and f) of the synthesized products (S-05, S-06, S-07, S-08 and S-09) show two
step weight losses. The first step, 30°C to 100°C amounts to a loss of 3.8%, 2.3%, 3.2%, 3% and 6% and the second step 100°C
to 250°C, amounting to a loss of 6.7%, 6.2%, 4.6%, 6.8% and 8.9% for S-05, S-06, S-07, S-08 and S-09 respectively (“Figure 8”
b-f). It was observed that the prolonged crystallization time indicates the increase in intensity counts and crystallinity of the
synthesized product up to an optimal time of 72 hrs. Beyond this period, there is decrease in the amount of the crystalline
phase/material.
Influence of Curing Temperature and Time on Complete Conversion of Fly Ash in to 29 a Framework Aluminosilicate Utilizing Alkalinehydrothermal Synthetic Methodology
Figure 8: Thermo grams of Fly Ash and the Product Obtained at Different Time Periods of Curing
CONCLUSIONS
So by compiling all the studies it is concluded that complete conversion of fly ash into a crystalline, single product (zeolite)
has been achieved and it has been found to have cubic hydroxysodalite type structure [42] and the best result was found to be
curing at 40°C for 72 hours. Present process has the advantages of conservation of raw materials, cost effectiveness, technically
convenient, economical and non-tedious process, milder conditions and also partially solving the fly ash disposal problem. So, the
outcome of the proposed research work would lead to a cleaner and healthier environment.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We express our sincere thanks to the following persons for providing instrumentation and other facilities to
Department of Chemistry, University of Delhi, Dr. S. C. Datta, IARI, PUSA for extending XRD facility, AIIMS for
extending the SEM facility, UGC for the financial support, NTPC for providing the fly ash samples, Dr. Shreedhar, IICT,
Hyderabad for extending Solid State MAS NMR facility.
REFERENCES
1. S. R. Michal ski et al (2001). Ash Disposal-Mine Fires-Environment: An Indian Dilemma. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the
Environment, 60, 23–29
2. Parisara, Envis Newsletter, Utility bonanza from dust, State Environment Related Issues (2007). 2(6), 1-8
3. D. Rungsul et al (2006). Zeolite Synthesis from Fly ash from Coal Fired Power Plant by Fusion Method. The 2nd International
Conference on “Sustainable Energy and Environment (SEE-2006)”, Bangkok, Thialand.
4. U. Bhattacharjee et al (2002). Potential of Fly ash Utilization in India. Energy, 27, 151-166
30 Hema Kundra & Monika Datta
Impact Factor (JCC): 1.9028 Index Copernicus Value(ICV) : 3.0
5. A Moutsatsou et.al (2006). The Utilization of Ca-rich and Ca-Si-rich Fly ashes in Zeolites Production. Fuel, 85, 657- 663.
6. K. S. Hui et al (2006). Effect of step-change of synthesis temperature on synthesis of zeolite 4A from coal fly ash. Microporous
and mesoporous material, 145-151.
7. K. Shigemato et al (1993). Selective formation of Na-X Zeolite from Fly ash by Fusion with Sodium Hydroxide Prior to
Hydrothermal Reaction. Journal of Material Science, 28, 4693-4703.
8. S. S. Rayalu et al (2006). Fly ash Based Zeolite Analogues: Versatile Materials for Energy and Environment Conservation.
Catalysis Surveys from Asia,10(2),74-88
9. www.bza.org/zeoltes.html
10. L.R.G. Araújo et al (1999). Synthesis of Cubic Y Zeolite Using a Pulsed Microwave Heating System. Materials Research, 2 (2),
105-109
11. X. Querol et al (2002). Synthesis of Zeolites from Coal Fly ash: An Overview. International Journal of Coal Geology, 50, 413-
423
12. N. Murayama et al (2002).Mechanism of Zeolite Synthesis from Coal Fly ash by Alkali Hydrothermal Reaction. International
Journal of Mineral Processing, 64, 1-17
13. V. Berkgaut et al (1995). Cation Exchange Properties of Hydrothermally Treated Coal Fly ash. Environmental Science and
Technology, 29, 1748-1753
14. H.L. Chang et al (1996). Conversion of Fly ash into Zeolites for Ion-Exchange Applications. Materials Letters, 28, 263-268
15. J. Chen et al (2006). Removal of Phosphate from Aqueous solution by Zeolite Synthesized from Fly ash. Journal of Colloid
and Interface Science, 300, 491-497
16. S. Furusawa et al (2002). Synthesis, Characterization and Formation Process of Na-X Zeolite from Coal Fly ash. Journal of
Materials Synthesis and Processing, 10(3), 143-148
17. M. Miyake (2002). Resource Recovery of Waste Incineration Fly ash: Synthesis of Zeolites A and P. Journal of American
Ceramic Society,85 (7), 1873-1875
18. K. Ojha et al (2004). Zeolite from Fly ash: Synthesis and Characterization. Bulletin of Material Science, 27(6), 555-564
19. K. Petrus et al (2000). The use of a Modified Fly ash As an Adsorbent for Lead. Water SA, 26(4), 531-536
20. C.Poole et al (2004). A Comparative Study Using Two Methods to Produce Zeolites from Fly ash. Minerals Engineering, 17,
167-173
21. S. Sang et al (2006). Synthesis of Small Crystals Zeolite NaY. Materials Letters, 60, 1131-1133
22. V. S. Somerset et al (2005). Alkaline Hydrothermal Zeolites Synthesized from High SiO2 and Al2O3 Co-disposal Fly ash
Filtrates. Fuel, 84, 2324-2329
23. V. Somerset et al (2005). Alkaline Hydrothermal Conversion of Fly Ash Filtrates Into Zeolites 2: Utilization in Wastewater
Treatment. Journal of Environmental Science and Health,40, 1627-1636
24. Arieh Singer et al (1995).Cation Exchange Properties of Hydrothermally Treated Coal Fly ash. Environmental Science and
Technology, 29,1748-1753
25. G. Steenbruggen et al (1998). The Synthesis of Zeolites from Fly ash and The Properties of Zeolite Products. Journal of
Geochemical Exploration,62,305-309
Influence of Curing Temperature and Time on Complete Conversion of Fly Ash in to 31 a Framework Aluminosilicate Utilizing Alkalinehydrothermal Synthetic Methodology