HYPOTHETICAL INVERTED CRITICAL ZONES FOR SUBSURFACE BIOSPHERES ON DESERT PLANETS AND ICY OCEAN WORLDS. P. J. Boston, 1,2 . 1 Earth & Environmental Science Dept., New Mexico Institute of Mining & Technology, Socorro, NM 87801, [email protected]; 2 National Cave & Karst Research Insti- tute, Carlsbad, NM 88222. Introduction: On Earth, Conditions in cave interiors are typically radically different from and in many ways more benign than the surface environment [1]. Howev- er, the biggest problem for life in caves on Earth is the limitation on energy which for heterotrophic macro- scopic and microscopic cave organisms is largely de- livered as organic material derived from the highly productive surface biosphere to the subsurface by large scale fluid transport, seepage through the rock fracture network, aerial transport into entrances, or biological importation by organisms that forage on the surface but leave fecal and other remains in caves. However, there are many microorganisms who can make their living without this organic nutrient base by making use of the inorganic chemical energy that is present in re- duced gases (e.g. H 2 S, CO, CH 4 , H 2 etc.) that can come from geological sources below, and oxidation of min- erals particularly those containing metals like iron or manganese. These sources of energy for microbial life have come to be partly understood and discussed for caves on Earth [1-6]. And such a situation has been suggested for the subsurface of Mars [1, 7-9] and no- tionally included in the recent reassessment of Special Regions on Mars [10]. Planet Types with Exclusively Subsurface Bio- spheres: To date, we know of only one type of bio- sphere, namely our own on Earth. Our type of bio- sphere is driven from the outside in by a significant amount of solar energy because we are within the so- called habitable zone of our Sun [11-12] which is de- fined by whether a type of star and distance of a planet from that star can deliver adequate solar energy to sus- tain a photosynthetically driven biosphere. Thus, the scientific community justifiably continues to spend most of its thinking about life in our Solar System and life on exoplanets based on the assumption that all biospheres should behave in this way [13]. However, perhaps we must reconsider this assumption in light of what we have been learning about the subsurface mi- crobial biosphere of Earth, which is reputed to have a biomass that scales at least as large as that of the sur- face and extends to depths of 5km and perhaps further [14, 15]. If this is true, then Earth has both a top-down energy engine (the sun), and a bottom-up energy en- gine (geologically produced energy sources). We have framed this distinction as a Type 1 Biosphere repre- sented by Earth, and a Type 2 Biosphere that could hypothetically be the case on Mars and ice-covered ocean worlds like Europa, Enceladus, and possibly others within our Solar System (Figure 1). Such a no- tion could also be extended to some of the new classes of planets that are emerging from exoplanet studies for which we have no representatives within our own sys- tem. Earth as a Hybrid Case: In Earth’s subsurface, a host of still poorly understood microorganisms conduct their affairs in a dark world typically under extreme energy limitation, both organic and inorganic. This is often accompanied by extreme temperatures, pressures, or highly reactive gases. Are these organisms just evo- lution’s “losers” who have retreated to the subsurface because they simply can’t compete for delicious sur- face organics? Or are they part of a subterranean mi- crobial biosphere that has persisted over much of Earth’s history and may even have originated there [3,16]? If the latter notion of a permanent indigenous subsurface biosphere is correct, then this suggests an inversion of the ecological concept of a “critical zone” as it is usually applied to surface systems. The concept of critical zone encompasses the lower atmosphere (troposphere and possibly lower stratosphere), the oceans, the continental and island land surfaces, and some depth below the crust that is affected by life and life-derived geochemical and physical processes [17]. The picture that is emerging is that Earth is really a hybrid of a Type 1 and Type 2 Biosphere, but that this has been obscured by the fact that we are surface- inhabiting creatures and are learning about nature be- ginning with what we know and where we live on the surface. Of course, our ignorance about our biosphere and planet is not confined to the terrestrial subsurface but notably applies to the deep oceans and the subsur- face of the ocean crust as well [18]. Microbial Diversity Sweet Spots? Studies of natural caves, both shallow (a few meters) and deep (>1-2 km), and in mines (some >4 km deep) are providing data about the nutritional and evolutionary status of subsurface microbiota although the database so far is very sparse. Although subsurface microbial environ- ments are frequently lumped together, they span a tre- mendous range of different environmental conditions, just as surface habitats do. Are there systematic differ- ences in microbial biodiversity, nutritional strategy, and other properties with depth that may be distin- guishable between shallow, mid-range, and deep crus- tal levels? While it is still early days, predictions can be made and tested as we continue to explore the 9039.pdf 2nd International Planetary Caves Conference (2015)