IT-Symposium 2006 17. Mai 2006 www.decus.de 1 DECUS IT-Symposium 2006 in Neuss – Andreas Roos Potentials and challenges of multi-hop networks May 17th, 2006, slide 1 DECUS IT-Symposium 2006 Potentials and challenges of multi-hop networks considering as example ad hoc and mesh networks Andreas Roos, Profn. Sabine Wieland, Michael Flegl Düsseldorf/Neuss May 17th, 2006 DECUS IT-Symposium 2006 in Neuss – Andreas Roos Potentials and challenges of multi-hop networks May 17th, 2006, slide 2 Content Overview Introduction to wireless multi-hop networks Ad hoc networks Mesh networks Benefit of wireless multi-hop networks Routing mechanisms Application scenarios and existing solutions Standardisation activities Challenges Conclusions
15
Embed
2C04 DECUS IT-Symposium 2006 Andreas-Roos · Consideration of extended and novel security & privacy mechanisms Consideration Integration of Quality of Service (QoS) mechanisms Consideration
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
IT-Symposium 2006 17. Mai 2006
www.decus.de 1
DECUS IT-Symposium 2006 in Neuss – Andreas RoosPotentials and challenges of multi-hop networksMay 17th, 2006, slide 1
DECUS IT-Symposium 2006
Potentials and challenges of multi-hop networks considering as example ad hoc and mesh networks
Andreas Roos, Profn. Sabine Wieland, Michael Flegl
Düsseldorf/NeussMay 17th, 2006
DECUS IT-Symposium 2006 in Neuss – Andreas RoosPotentials and challenges of multi-hop networksMay 17th, 2006, slide 2
ContentOverview
� Introduction to wireless multi-hop networks� Ad hoc networks
� Mesh networks
� Benefit of wireless multi-hop networks
� Routing mechanisms
� Application scenarios and existing solutions
� Standardisation activities
� Challenges
� Conclusions
IT-Symposium 2006 17. Mai 2006
www.decus.de 2
DECUS IT-Symposium 2006 in Neuss – Andreas RoosPotentials and challenges of multi-hop networksMay 17th, 2006, slide 3
Wireless multi-hop networksWhat are wireless multi-hop networks?
� Wireless communication between nodes – no wired connectivity.
� Multipoint-to-multipoint communication.
� Communication among nodes.� Single-hop communication – always possible.
� Multi-hop communication – usage of suitable routing protocols.
� Each node contains routing functionalities.
� Self-organizing network structure.� Distributed intelligence – no centralized managing.
� Each node is responsible for routing and connection establishment.
� Dynamic network topology.� Each node can be source, router and destination.
� Technologies for setup multi-hop networks� E.g. Bluetooth, WLAN, WiMAX.
Node (Source)
Node (Destination)
Node
DECUS IT-Symposium 2006 in Neuss – Andreas RoosPotentials and challenges of multi-hop networksMay 17th, 2006, slide 4
Wireless multi-hop networksClassification of multi-hop networks
There are different kinds of multi-hop networks with different characteristics and
applications:
� Mobile Ad hoc Networks (MANETs)
� Wireless Mesh Networks (WMNs)
� Sensor networks
Important differences between ad hoc, wireless mesh networks and sensor networks:
� Routing protocols
� Networks equipment
� Energy behaviour
� Mobility support
IT-Symposium 2006 17. Mai 2006
www.decus.de 3
DECUS IT-Symposium 2006 in Neuss – Andreas RoosPotentials and challenges of multi-hop networksMay 17th, 2006, slide 5
InternetInternet
Wireless multi-hop networksAd hoc network – characteristics
Mobile Ad hoc networks (MANETs) – client mesh networks
� Spontaneous formed networks consisting of mobile and wireless devices, e.g.
laptops, PDAs or mobile phones.
� High mobility – mobile and wireless devices.
� Limited energy supply – usage of battery or rechargeable battery.
� No infrastructure equipment necessary, e.g. base station, access point.
� Limited bandwidth.
� Application scenarios� Mainly used for local communications – connectivity to external networks needs special
gateways.
Gateway
DECUS IT-Symposium 2006 in Neuss – Andreas RoosPotentials and challenges of multi-hop networksMay 17th, 2006, slide 6
� RREQ message is broadcasted within the network (nodes).
� Destination (blue node) receives RREQ message.
Node (Source)
Node (Destination)
Node
DECUS IT-Symposium 2006 in Neuss – Andreas RoosPotentials and challenges of multi-hop networksMay 17th, 2006, slide 12
RREP
AODV Route Discovery – part 2:
� Destination (blue node) sends Route Reply message (RREP) to source via unicast.
� RREP is send to source via shortest route.
Node (Source)
Node (Destination)
Node
Routing in ad hoc networks (part 2)Considering as example AODV
IT-Symposium 2006 17. Mai 2006
www.decus.de 7
DECUS IT-Symposium 2006 in Neuss – Andreas RoosPotentials and challenges of multi-hop networksMay 17th, 2006, slide 13
Routing in mesh networks (part 1)Considering as example OLSR
Benefit of Multipoint Relaying within OLSR (Optimized Link State Routing)
� Reduce the number of duplicate retransmissions while forwarding a
broadcast packet.
� Restricts the set of nodes retransmitting a packet from all nodes to a
subset of all nodes.
Multipoint Relay (MPR) selection
� Each node selects and keeps its own set of Multipoint relays.
� Rule of OSLR:� For all 2 hop neighbors n there must exist a MPR m.
� So n can be contacted via m.
Forwarding of traffic
� All nodes registers and maintains their MPR selectors.
� Rule of OSLR:� If OLSR-packet is received from a MPR selector
� Then all messages contained in that packet are to be forwarded if TTL > 0.
m
m
n
n
n
n
m
m
n
n
n
nForwarded traffic
DECUS IT-Symposium 2006 in Neuss – Andreas RoosPotentials and challenges of multi-hop networksMay 17th, 2006, slide 14
Routing in mesh networks (part 2)Considering as example OLSR
Distribution of link-state information
� Traditional link-state routing protocols flood the network with link-state information
(Regular flooding).
� OLSR optimises this behaviour – Multipoint Relay flooding (MPR flooding)� Only MPRs selectors are declared in link-state messages – minimises size of link-state messages.
� Only nodes selected as MPRs generate link-state messages – minimises amount of link-state
messages.
� All nodes select their own MPRs� Number of MPR subset depends on network topology.
Regular flooding MPR floodingNetwork structure
IT-Symposium 2006 17. Mai 2006
www.decus.de 8
DECUS IT-Symposium 2006 in Neuss – Andreas RoosPotentials and challenges of multi-hop networksMay 17th, 2006, slide 15
Application scenarios of wireless multi-hop networksOverview