Top Banner
29 September 2013 Jesse Redding | Cameron Kirby | Sam Johnson
31

29 September 2013 Jesse Redding | Cameron Kirby | Sam Johnson.

Dec 11, 2015

Download

Documents

Phoebe Alton
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: 29 September 2013 Jesse Redding | Cameron Kirby | Sam Johnson.

29 September 2013Jesse Redding | Cameron Kirby | Sam

Johnson

Page 2: 29 September 2013 Jesse Redding | Cameron Kirby | Sam Johnson.

Thesis

Large growth opportunity in

ecigs

Solid core business with room for

expansion

Fundamental Undervaluation

Undervalued share price

Page 3: 29 September 2013 Jesse Redding | Cameron Kirby | Sam Johnson.

Valuation

Revenue = $530mmP/S = 3

Equity Value = $1.59 bn

EBIT = $2.033bnEV/EBIT = 12EV = $24.4 bn

Equity Value = $1.59 bn + $24.4 bn - $3.1bn= $23 bn (35% upside)

E-Cigarettes Traditional

Page 4: 29 September 2013 Jesse Redding | Cameron Kirby | Sam Johnson.

Opportunity in E-Cigs

Page 5: 29 September 2013 Jesse Redding | Cameron Kirby | Sam Johnson.

Value Proposition• eCigarettes offer to the consumer:– Freedom to smoke whenever and

wherever one chooses to–No smell– Decreased social stigma– Significantly reduced health risks

Page 6: 29 September 2013 Jesse Redding | Cameron Kirby | Sam Johnson.

Addressable Market• Almost 100% of ecig customers were

or are smokers.• Total cigarette industry: ~$80b

retail revenue, ~$30b manufacturer revenue

• Total Volume of 290b cigarettes/year• 2012 ecig industry: ~$1b retail

revenue

Page 7: 29 September 2013 Jesse Redding | Cameron Kirby | Sam Johnson.

How we Quantified Market Growth

2012 Cigarettes sold: 290b

4% Annual Volume Decrease

~8.5b fewer cigarettes sold in 2013

~8.5b fewer cigarettes sold in 2013

30% of volume moves to ecigs

ecig market grows by ~2.55b cigarette equivalents

Page 8: 29 September 2013 Jesse Redding | Cameron Kirby | Sam Johnson.

Competitors• eCigarette industry is

large and highly fragmented

• Currently, Blu commands ~40% market share followed by NJOY which has ~30% market share

• Quickly changing industry with recent entry of Reynolds and Altria

Page 9: 29 September 2013 Jesse Redding | Cameron Kirby | Sam Johnson.

E-Cig Economics

Page 10: 29 September 2013 Jesse Redding | Cameron Kirby | Sam Johnson.

Razor/BladE ModelRazor Blade

$35

Page 11: 29 September 2013 Jesse Redding | Cameron Kirby | Sam Johnson.

Margins

Low Margins on Starter Packs

High Margins on Cartridges

Margin Expansion as product matures

Page 12: 29 September 2013 Jesse Redding | Cameron Kirby | Sam Johnson.

Distribution Channels

Lorillard

Retailers

Customers

Page 13: 29 September 2013 Jesse Redding | Cameron Kirby | Sam Johnson.

E-Cig Regulation

Page 14: 29 September 2013 Jesse Redding | Cameron Kirby | Sam Johnson.

Regulation• Currently, eCigarette regulation is state by

state with the only restrictions being on sales to minors

• FDA has them listed as tobacco products, and they are thus subject to fewer regulations

• Since eCigarettes are under laxer FDA regulations, they can be advertised on television and radio

• Due to the appeal of flavors to children, many have called for the ban of the different flavors of eCigarette cartridge

Page 15: 29 September 2013 Jesse Redding | Cameron Kirby | Sam Johnson.

Valuation

Page 16: 29 September 2013 Jesse Redding | Cameron Kirby | Sam Johnson.

Valuation of Blu

(Revenue) $530 mm * (P/S) 3

Equity Value = $1.59 bn

Page 17: 29 September 2013 Jesse Redding | Cameron Kirby | Sam Johnson.

P/S Comps

GMCR: 2.7ISRG: 6.26SODA: 2.68SSYS: 12.50

Page 18: 29 September 2013 Jesse Redding | Cameron Kirby | Sam Johnson.

Legacy Business

Page 19: 29 September 2013 Jesse Redding | Cameron Kirby | Sam Johnson.

Cigarette Industry• The largest firms within

industry are Altria, Reynolds, and Lorillard

• Huge variety within cigarette industry, but menthol and regular are the most commonly used

• Additionally, there are light and medium cigarettes which have less nicotine and tar than the regular

• Decline within cigarette industry but slower within menthol category

2% annualized decline for Menthol vs. 4% for non-Menthol

Page 20: 29 September 2013 Jesse Redding | Cameron Kirby | Sam Johnson.

Lorillard is Menthol

• Newports are the menthol brand

• Sustained dominance without discounting

Page 21: 29 September 2013 Jesse Redding | Cameron Kirby | Sam Johnson.

Menthol is Resistant• Menthol caters to a

lower socio-economic demographic

• More deeply embedded smoking habits

• Little crossover between flavors

• Minimal cannibalization from shift to ecigs

Page 22: 29 September 2013 Jesse Redding | Cameron Kirby | Sam Johnson.

Expansion into Non-Menthol• No existing presence means easy market share

gains• Small upfront costs mitigate risk• Much larger non-menthol market means small

gains are profitable

Page 23: 29 September 2013 Jesse Redding | Cameron Kirby | Sam Johnson.

Regulation• Menthol-specific regulation has been

tossed around for a long time• Current efforts remain stalled• Science does not appear to support

difference in damage between menthol and non-menthol

• clearing of overhang would help stock

Page 24: 29 September 2013 Jesse Redding | Cameron Kirby | Sam Johnson.

Segment Projections

Proven ability to increase prices

Flat volume due to new markets

~1-2% annual revenue growth

Page 25: 29 September 2013 Jesse Redding | Cameron Kirby | Sam Johnson.

Segment Valuation• Currently Trades at 10.6 EV/EBITDA• MO10.4 EV/EBITDA, RAI 11.9• We believe a fair valuation is 12x

Page 26: 29 September 2013 Jesse Redding | Cameron Kirby | Sam Johnson.

Valuation

Page 27: 29 September 2013 Jesse Redding | Cameron Kirby | Sam Johnson.

Variant Perception• Market sees E-Cigs as too small• This segment should be valued at a

premium to the rest of the business

Page 28: 29 September 2013 Jesse Redding | Cameron Kirby | Sam Johnson.

Traditional Metrics• Other tobacco companies are

trading at:– P/E (industry average): 14– P/CF (industry average): 16

• On these metrics, LO should trade for:– $54 based on P/E (20% upside)– $58 based on P/CF (28% upside)

Page 29: 29 September 2013 Jesse Redding | Cameron Kirby | Sam Johnson.

Optionalities• Lorillard can expand into:–Non-Menthol Non-Full Flavor–Non-Menthol Full Flavor

Page 30: 29 September 2013 Jesse Redding | Cameron Kirby | Sam Johnson.

Valuation

Revenue = $530mmP/S = 3

Equity Value = $1.59 bn

EBIT = $2.033bnEV/EBIT = 12EV = $24.4 bn

Equity Value = $1.59 bn + $24.4 bn - $3.1bn= $23 bn (35% upside)

E-Cigarettes Traditional

Page 31: 29 September 2013 Jesse Redding | Cameron Kirby | Sam Johnson.

Recommendation• BIG should take a 5% position on

Wednesday morning