A New Approach to Public Health Monday 28 th February 2011 Jim McManus Joint Director of Public Health, Birmingham City Council The Local Authority as Strategic Driver on Health and Wellbeing Boards
Jun 25, 2015
A New Approach to Public HealthMonday 28th February 2011
Jim McManusJoint Director of Public Health, Birmingham City Council
The Local Authority as Strategic Driver on Health and Wellbeing Boards
Issues
• Strategic Practical and statutory issues for getting public
health into local government – role of DPH
• Understanding local authorities as strategic health partner
• Taking forward joint working with HWBB
• New governance focus for public health
• How will boards be monitored for compliance and be
accountable
Networks not Deficits
• Much wider than the DPH although the DPH role is important
• AND
• The DPH is not bringing health into local government for the first time. Understanding the Polity and politics of this will be crucial
Health Improvement
Health Protection
Service Quality andImprovement
Commissioning priorities, Evidence, making it work, supporting implementation
Ensuring we have the right frameworks in place
Long term, medium term, short term, matrix
Domains of Public Health
Local Government Public Health
IS• A portfolio of activities
• part of a Matrix
• About doing our Core Business in a Healthy Way as well as these new functions
• About complex and strategic working
• About partnership
• About People, and Places, and Exposures
IS NOT
• A replacement for the NHS or good primary care
• Going to improve life expectancy tomorrow
• Lacking in Evidence• Lacking in Implementation• Always Short Term• About shifting all energy
from NHS to Local Authority services
The Vision as I see it
1. Public health at heart of strategic role for LA
2. JSNA – Outcomes, Commissioning and system wide
3. Opportunities for health improvement short, medium and long term
4. The big prize is not the 20% ringfenced budget
1. In the LA, but not focused solely on the LA
2. Get this right for primary care
3. Take to heart the NAO criticisms
The new public health duties
Coming into Las where….• Money has been removed
and services cut. Whole landscape changed
• There’s a ring-fenced budget and everybody wants some of it
• Public health is not a known or necessarily trusted quantity (just how joint is your joint DPH?)
Implications
• DsPH need a lot of preparation
• Identify value and priorities with clear business case linked to core authority priorities
• Identify what you can add to LA core agenda and what outcomes
• Identify other outcomes too
So what does it mean?
The Core Business
• Doing the core business of the Local Authority in a way which– improves the health of the
population– Reduces inequalities in
health caused or acted on by social determinants
The Ringfenced Budget
• Opportunities but need to be seen in the context of the core business
• The DPH is “MORETHAN” the 20% of the 4%
• The DPH is not EVERYTHING in LA terms though
Transition
Models
• Directorate• Corporate• Commissioned• Outsourced• Matrix
Issues
• Balance between corporate role and PH core role
• Person-organisation fit• The Outcomes
frameworks do NOT align
The Accountability Challenge for the DPH
• Either everyone wants you or you wonder which Lion will bite you first…
• At least some of that is down to the System, and some of it is down to the DPH
• Which type of DPH will you be – control, enable, make, share or buy?
You might have got it wrong if…
Elected Members
HWBB
SoS / CMO / DH / A-Z
LA CMT
NPHS
Staff Team ?
GP Consortia
PROVIDERS
DPH
Vision, but what about outcomes?
Health minded andhealth-seeking peopleBoth workers and citizens
(Self care, and self management reduces reliance on services)
SHAREDOUTCOMES
JSNA
Shared DataSets
Commissioning Priorities
H & WB Strategy
High Quality Strategy
SHAREDOUTCOMES
Governance, Leadership and Organisation
High Quality PartnershipStructure
HWBB Others
CitizenEngagement & Co-Production
Delivery Areas
ProvideIntegratedServices
Deliver shared outcomes
CitizenEngagement & Co-Production
Adapted with thanks from Newcastle Model
Issues for us to work out
System• Clarity of governance• Boundaries• Deliverables• Outcomes Framework• Early Wins with HWBB• Systems Working, Matrix
Working• Pressure Valves• Complexity
Person• Capacity v DASS/DCS• Partnership Oriented• Strengths• Support• Boundaries• Working with elected members• Working with GPs• Resilience• The myth of independence• Political Restriction
An OD Programme for the Organisation and the DPH
Some Golden Rules
• Position – Council Plan, Directorate Plans, HI Plan
• A good time to refresh outcomes, strategies and delivery – keep momentum and morale
• Phased Positions
• Formation/Learning/Preparation
– Members– GPs– DsPH– LA Directors – PH Staff
Birmingham Policy Framework
• Council’s Big Three includes Behaviour Change by Services AND Citizens
• The Council Plan – Be Healthy
• The Prevention Framework and Prevention Strategy for Birmingham
• The Public Health Strategy 2011
• Transition Programme but day job
Models for new services
• Provide
• Outsource
• Commission
• Matrix
• Network
• Mixed Economy
• Stimulate Social Enterprise
Some Must dos
• Ensure a robust JSNA
• Ensure HWBB have outcomes
• Support effective commissioning at GP consortium and LA level
• Monitor outcomes
• Control big risks – Health protection, contraception
Context
• Birmingham’s support for the White Paper
• Desire to do things differently
• View of members and GPs that public health isn’t working optimally
• PH refreshing and reshaping its vision
Some History• Public Health Acts 1836 and 36 subsequently• Public Health into NHS in 1974• LA Public Health Movement since• Environmental Health• Promotion of Health 1984 Act• Range of Public Health Functions endured in LA:
– Communicable disease– Social care– Housing– Waste disposal, sewage, waste collection
• Marmott !
The Opportunities
• System wide outcomes
• Wider networks and systems approaches
• Interface between GPs and Social care to save both sides of the system money
• Behavioural solutions to thorny and expensive problems
Our Burdens of Disease
Primary Secondary Tertiary
Role for corporate and roles for core here
The Challenge
• We are doing tertiary prevention first because of where we are epidemiologically
• Understand which levers pull short, medium and long term
Short Term – primary careEXPOSURESLIFESTYLE
Medium to Long Term – LA and other playersEXPOSURES. PLACES. LIVES
Time
So what is the Birmingham approach since 2008/9?
• Policy Commitment– The Council Plan
• An assessment of work and priorities across the council
• Each service area playing its part
• Corporate areas playing their part
• Scrutiny of Delivery
Each Service Area Playing its Part
• Regulatory services – workplace health and also nutrition through food outlets serving food to people in low paid/deprived areas (the healthy food sales awards)and work on young people and tobacco/alcohol
• Housing and Health• Adult Social Care and Health including our strong work on
prevention and integration between health and social care• Childrens’ JSNA and helping to reshape commissioning and the
work they are doing on emotional development• Worklessness and health, work just starting• The Core Strategy including clear commitments on health
Corporate Area Playing its Part
• Shaping the Place to reduce risk and exposure – Protective Factors (Good Housing, Good
Education, Good Economy, Decent Public Realm)
– Vulnerability Factors • Be Healthy as a Key Priority (for our CORE
business)• Health of our staff as a key part of a corporate
strategy for our human resources
Birmingham Approach to theWhite Paper
• Shadow HWBB• GP Engagement• Public Health
Strategy• Transitional
Programmes• Shared Leadership
across City• develop HWBB
• Public Engagement• Member and GP
shared learning • Prediction &
Prevention– Falls prevention in
social care– Telecare
Some approaches to a Board
Loose, Strategic, Agree Priorities
Task GroupOther Agency or Partnership (CDRP)
What is more important for the Board? Governance or Agreement?
Outcomes and monitoring them
Health minded andhealth-seeking peopleBoth workers and citizens
(Self care, and self management reduces reliance on services)
SHAREDOUTCOMES
JSNA
Shared DataSets
Commissioning Priorities
H & WB Strategy
High Quality Strategy
SHAREDOUTCOMES
Governance, Leadership and Organisation
High Quality PartnershipStructure
HWBBOthers
CitizenEngagement & Co-Production
Delivery Areas
ProvideIntegratedServices
Deliver shared outcomes
CitizenEngagement & Co-Production
Adapted with thanks from Newcastle Model
Transition Streams
Thank you!A copy of a supporting paper “some thoughts on the DPH transition” should be in your pack
Or
Email – a lesson in joint working???