Top Banner
India: Post-Election Credit Outlook MAY, 2014 ATSI SHETH, VICE PRESIDENT – SENIOR CREDIT OFFICER, SOVEREIGN RISK GROUP
30
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
  • India: Post-Election Credit Outlook

    MAY, 2014ATSI SHETH, VICE PRESIDENT SENIOR CREDIT OFFICER, SOVEREIGN RISK GROUP

  • 2India Post-Election Credit Outlook 2014

    Agenda

    1. Credit implications of BJP/NDA parliamentary majority

    2. What underpins current market expectations?

    3. Moodys Baseline Scenario: Slow improvement in overall credit metrics

    4. Credit implications of Alternative Scenarios

    5. Key Takeaways

  • 3India Post-Election Credit Outlook 2014

    Credit Implications of BJP/NDA Parliamentary Victory

    Source: Election Commission of India

    While Lok Sabha majority supports implementation of cohesive policy agenda:

    -- BJP/NDA majority in Lok Sabha is not replicated in Rajya Sabha-- Several policy measures require state government cooperation

    182 182138 116

    282

    72 88

    4343

    54141 114

    145 206

    44

    3 2173

    56 14

    147 140 144 122 149

    1998 1999 2004 2009 2014

    BJP Other NDA INC Other INC Allies/UPA Other

  • 4India Post-Election Credit Outlook 2014

    Market Expectations Are HighComparing Economic Performance Across Regimes

    Source: Haver Analytics, Reserve Bank of India, Moodys

    NDA UPA 1 UPA 2Average % change, unless otherwise noted 1998 - 2004 2005 - 2009 2010 - 2013Growth and Inflation Real GDP 5.97 8.59 6.60Per Capita Income (PPP) 6.56 9.03 6.76Gross Fixed Capital Formation 9.38 11.48 6.05Personal Consumption 5.13 8.22 6.77Exports 16.03 12.45 12.04Imports 11.92 16.97 10.40Wholesale Price Index Inflation 4.95 5.31 8.23Agricultural Output 2.52 3.20 4.92Industrial Output 5.27 9.15 3.82Service Output 7.96 10.19 7.19Fiscal MetricsFiscal Deficit/GDP (average over the period) 5.18 4.45 5.14Central Government Debt (average annual increases in INR) 10.31 11.87 12.70ExternalForeign Direct Investment (increase over period, US$ mn.) 29,032 125,397 21,146Portfolio Investment (increase over period, US$ mn.) 32,857 69,751 10,221External Debt (% yoy, US$) 5.45 14.84 14.36INR/USD (% yoy) -1.62 -1.99 -7.67Change in 10 Yr Gov't Bond Yield (in real terms) -3.68 1.52 1.41Change in Banks' Prime Lending Rate (in real terms) -2.05 2.82 2.87

  • 5India Post-Election Credit Outlook 2014

    Market Expectations Are HighGujarats Performance vs All-India Average

    Source: Haver Analytics, Reserve Bank of India, Central Statistics Office

    Gujarat IndiaReal GDP Growth (2000-11) 10.2 7.4Real Agriculture (2005-11) 8.0 4.2Real Industry (2005-11) 11.1 8.6Real Services (2005-11) 11.3 9.6CPI Inflation (2010-2013 CAGR) 12.2 9.8Government Debt/GDP (end March 2013) 23.5 45.4Gross Fiscal Deficit/GDP (2004-13) 2.7 4.7Foreign Direct Investment (avg. growth 2010-13) 10.6 18.9

  • 6India Post-Election Credit Outlook 2014

    Baseline Forecasts: Indias Credit Metrics will Improve Slowly

    Source: Haver Analytics, Reserve Bank of India, Ministry of Finance, Moodys

    2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15F 2015/16FReal GDP Growth (% yoy) 6.7 8.6 8.9 6.7 4.5 4.9 5.0 5.6CPI Inflation (% change, end-March) [2] 8.0 11.9 9.7 9.4 10.4 8.3 8.2 8.0General Government Balance/GDP (%) -8.3 -9.4 -6.8 -8.1 -7.2 -7.6 -7.8 -7.4General Government Debt/GDP (%) 72.2 70.6 65.6 65.3 65.4 68.7 67.9 67.2General Government Debt/Revenues (%) 359.0 367.7 316.5 328.3 313.7 335.4 325.3 314.7General Government Interest Payments/Gen. Gov. Rev 25.0 25.3 21.6 22.6 22.1 24.1 25.3 24.3Current Acct. Bal./GDP (%) -2.3 -2.8 -2.8 -4.2 -4.7 -1.7 -2.8 -3.0External Debt/Current Account Receipts (%) 62.9 75.4 68.5 65.3 76.3 74.1 74.3 74.6External Vulnerability Indicator [3] 32.2 43.7 46.1 53.4 65.1 83.9 78.5 82.5[1] Fiscal years beginning April 1[2] CPI for Inbdustrial Workers[3] (Short-term External Debt + Currently Maturing Long-Term Debt + Nonresident Deposits Over One Year)/ Official Foreign Exchange Reserves

  • 7India Post-Election Credit Outlook 2014

    What Would Support Credit Improvement? Lower Fiscal Deficits and Government Debt Ratios

    Source: National Sources, Moodys

    General Government Debt (2013) General Government Fiscal Deficit (2010-13 Avg.)

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    India (Baa3) Philippines (Baa3)

    Turkey (Baa3)

    Baa3 Median

    Indonesia (Baa3)

    % o

    f GDP

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    India (Baa3) Baa3 Median

    Philippines (Baa3)

    Turkey (Baa3)

    Indonesia (Baa3)

    % o

    f GD

    P

  • 8India Post-Election Credit Outlook 2014

    Macro-Economic Balance, Not Growth Alone, Determines Credit Profile

    Source: Haver Analytics, Moodys

    CPI InflationCurrent Account

    Balance/GDP

    External Debt/GDP

    External Vulnerability

    Indicator

    Net International Investment

    Position/GDP

    Real Effective Exchange Rate

    Domestic Credit Growth

    Domestic Credit/GDP

    Real GDP Growth

    Avg. 2010-13 Avg. 2010-13 2013 2013 2013 Avg. 2010-13 Avg. 2010-13 2013 Avg. 2010-13India (Baa3) 9.4 -3.4 21.8 83.9 -16.8 -1.7 14.1 73.9 6.2Indonesia (Baa3) 5.6 -1.3 30.4 51.9 -41.3 2.5 19.1 40.1 6.2Philippines (Baa3) 3.7 3.1 28.8 28.7 -13.6 -4.7 9.9 51.9 6.3Turkey (Baa3) 7.6 -7.5 47.3 163.1 -47.5 -1.8 20.4 79.0 6.0Colombia (Baa3) 2.8 -3.2 24.3 46.9 -24.5 3.2 14.3 45.4 4.7Romania (Baa3) 4.5 -3.6 70.1 103.0 -63.8 1.0 4.1 42.2 1.3Uruguay (Baa3) 7.9 -4.0 42.9 82.9 -14.5 7.8 20.4 36.5 6.0Baa3 Median 5.1 -3.4 30.4 75.5 -20.6 2.6 13.2 46.6 5.3

  • 9India Post-Election Credit Outlook 2014

    Key Takeaways

    Indias Baa3 and stable outlook anticipates economic recovery Growth could accelerate in FY 2016 based on:

    Global growth recovery + improved sentiment + policy actions

    But growth alone is unlikely to drive the rating outlook Fiscal, inflation, and balance of payments metrics key to the credit profile

    A significant increase in government and external debt ratios would be credit negative

    Credit profile improvements depend on Measures that will lower fiscal deficits and government debt over the long term

    Alleviation of supply constraints that limit investment and fuel inflation

  • 10India Post-Election Credit Outlook 2014

    Atsi ShethVice President Senior Credit OfficerSovereign Risk [email protected]

    Andrew SchneiderAssociate AnalystSovereign Risk Group [email protected]

  • 11India Post-Election Credit Outlook 2014

    2014 Moodys Corporation, Moodys Investors Service, Inc., Moodys Analytics, Inc. and/or their licensors and affiliates (collectively, MOODYS). All rights reserved.

    CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC. (MIS) AND ITS AFFILIATES ARE MOODYS CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND RESEARCH PUBLICATIONS PUBLISHED BY MOODYS (MOODYS PUBLICATIONS) MAY INCLUDE MOODYS CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES. MOODYS DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL, FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODYS OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODYS PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. MOODYS PUBLICATIONS MAY ALSO INCLUDE QUANTITATIVE MODEL-BASED ESTIMATES OF CREDIT RISK AND RELATED OPINIONS OR COMMENTARY PUBLISHED BY MOODYS ANALYTICS, INC. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODYS PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODYS PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. NEITHER CREDIT RATINGS NOR MOODYS PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODYS ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS AND PUBLISHES MOODYS PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL, WITH DUE CARE, MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE. MOODYS CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODYS PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY RETAIL INVESTORS AND IT WOULD BE RECKLESS FOR RETAIL INVESTORS TO CONSIDER MOODYS CREDIT RATINGS OR MOODYS PUBLICATIONS IN MAKING ANY INVESTMENT DECISION. IF IN DOUBT YOU SHOULD CONTACT YOUR FINANCIAL OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL ADVISER.

    ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODYS PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.

    All information contained herein is obtained by MOODYS from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided AS IS without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODYS is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing the Moodys Publications.

    To the extent permitted by law, MOODYS and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability to any person or entity for any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information, even if MOODYS or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers is advised in advance of the possibility of such losses or damages, including but not limited to: (a) any loss of present or prospective profits or (b) any loss or damage arising where the relevant financial instrument is not the subject of a particular credit rating assigned by MOODYS.

    To the extent permitted by law, MOODYS and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for any direct or compensatory losses or damages caused to any person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud, willful misconduct or any other type of liability that, for the avoidance of doubt, by law cannot be excluded) on the part of, or any contingency within or beyond the control of, MOODYS or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information.

    NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY SUCH RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODYS IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER.

    MIS, a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moodys Corporation (MCO), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MIS have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MIS for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,500 to approximately $2,500,000. MCO and MIS also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of MISs ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold ratings from MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com under the heading Shareholder Relations Corporate Governance Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy.

    For Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the Australian Financial Services License of MOODYS affiliate, Moodys Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657AFSL 336969 and/or Moodys Analytics Australia Pty Ltd ABN 94 105 136 972 AFSL 383569 (as applicable). This document is intended to be provided only to wholesale clients within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODYS that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a wholesale client and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to retail clients within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. MOODYS credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail clients. It would be dangerous for retail clients to make any investment decision based on MOODYS credit rating. If in doubt you should contact your financial or other professional adviser.

  • ICRA Limited

    India Post-ElectionSignificant Improvement in Sentiments;

    Macroeconomic Fundamentals to Pickup

    May, 2014Aditi Nayar- Senior Economist, ICRA Limited

    12

  • ICRA Limited

    Agenda

    Is a sharp revival in GDP growth anticipated in 2014-15?

    What is the likely macroeconomic impact of a potentiallyunfavorable monsoon?

    Are external sector concerns expected to resurface inthe near term?

    13

  • ICRA Limited

    Structural Constraints to Impede Immediate Return to High GDP Growth in 2014-15

    14

  • ICRA Limited

    Investment activity remains sluggish so far in 2014

    Positives Project implementation relatively healthy in some

    sectors, driven by State Governments: Statehighways, metro rail, urban infrastructure, powertransmission.

    Few attempts by private sector to deleveragethrough divestment of assets, exit fromaggressively bid projects.

    Clearances from Cabinet Committee onInvestments (CCI), Ministry of Environment.

    Activity held back by model code of conduct topickup post elections.

    -30%

    -20%

    -10%

    0%

    10%

    20%Growth of Capital Goods Output

    2012-13 2013-14

    Source: CSO; ICRA Research

    -5%

    0%

    5%

    10%

    15%

    20% Growth of Gross Fixed Capital Formation

    Negatives Contraction in capital goods output: key

    lead indicator. Fiscal tightening by the Central

    Government to comply with its fiscaldeficit target for 2013-14.

    Y-o-y decline in new projectannouncements, slow progress ofongoing projects.

    15

  • ICRA Limited

    CCI clearances partly de-clogged project pipeline

    431 projects with cost of Rs. 21.2 trillion accepted by CCI; all issues resolved for 155 projects. Majority of projects for which concerns have been resolved belong to power sector. Availability of feedstock (domestic or imported coal, natural gas) continues to be a constraint.

    o Policy actions required: allocation of coal blocks; reorganization of Coal India Limited; natural gas pricing. Offtake by Discoms remains a risk

    o Weak finances of Discoms; setting of remunerative tariffs by ERCs; ability and willingness of consumers to absorb sustained tariff increases.

    All Issues Resolved* Number of Projects Cost (Rs. billion) Cost (% of Total)Total 155 5,390 100%Power 89 4,018 75%Steel 4 258 5%Petroleum 9 180 3%Commerce & Industry 4 117 2%Coal 23 116 2%Mines 2 118 2%Civil Aviation 1 120 2%Railways 5 114 2%Road Transport and Highways 7 96 2%Shipping 6 84 2%Chemicals 1 50 1%Source: CCI; ICRA Research; *: As per CCI

    16

  • ICRA Limited

    Pace of pickup in project implementation to take a cue from resolution of structural hurdles

    Clearances required from State Governments. Availability of contiguous tracts of land at viable cost post enactment of new Land Acquisition

    Act (Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation andResettlement Act, 2013).

    Ability of Corporates to take on debt-funded capex:o High leverage levels.o Firm domestic interest rates; high hedging costs related to foreign currency borrowings. o Risk aversion of some Banks to infrastructure lending; concerns regarding asset quality.

    Issues Unresolved Number of Projects Cost (Rs. billion) Cost (% of Total)Total 276 15,821 100%Power 76 5,190 33%Steel 44 4,662 29%Petroleum 36 3,431 22%Coal 41 616 4%Roads 28 428 3%Mines 6 344 2%Railways 19 327 2%Commerce & Industry 12 330 2%Chemicals 4 282 2%Shipping 10 211 1%Source: CCI; ICRA Research

    17

  • ICRA Limited

    Fiscal space needs to be created to stimulate economy Fiscal space needs to be created for

    implementation of new projects and schemes,as well as capital infusion into Banks, whileadhering to fiscal consolidation path.

    Moderate uptick in GDP growth to limit rise inFY15 tax revenue.o Clarity on approach to tax reform and

    disinvestment awaited. Salaries, pensions, interest form substantial

    share of revenue expenditure, which is largelyinflexible.

    Reorganization of schemes to reduceexpenses needs to be prioritized.

    Fuel subsidies to depend on global crude oilprices, policy on diesel price revision, cappingof subsidized LPG.

    Fertilizer subsidies to take a cue from naturalgas pricing.

    Pan-India rollout of National Food Security Actto add to food subsidy bill.

    Performance/ Targets in Budget

    2014-15

    Targets set in October 2012

    2012-13 -4.9% -5.3% 2013-14 -4.6% -4.8% 2014-15 -4.1% -4.2% 2015-16 -3.6% -3.6% 2016-17 -3.0% -3.0%

    Composition of Revenue Expenditure in 2014-15 Interim Budget

    Interest PensionsSubsidies DefenceGrants for capital assets BalanceSource: GoI; ICRA Research

    18

  • ICRA Limited

    Agricultural growth to range between 0-2% in 2014-15, depending on monsoon dynamics. High food inflation to keep interest rates sticky, limit improvement in consumption demand and

    delay capacity expansion in consumer-oriented sectors. o Caveat: PV, M&HCV, gems & jewellery likely to record a positive growth in FY15 following

    sustained contraction in FY14, and support mild improvement in manufacturing growth. Strengthening global growth to support exports in FY15; however, elevated inflation may erode

    competitiveness. Broad-based investment revival to be influenced by pace of resolution of aforementioned

    concerns.

    GDP growth likely to improve somewhat to 5.0-5.5% in FY15, factoring in a mild improvement in manufacturing growth and a pickup in investment activity in H2FY15.

    5.0-5.5% economic growth likely in 2014-15

    Source: CSO; ICRA Research

    2013-14 2014-15Q4 (exp.) FY (exp.) H1(exp.) H2 (exp.) FY (exp.)

    Agriculture 2.5% 3.3% 0.0-2.0% 0.0-2.0% 0.0-2.0%

    Industry 0.4% 0.5% 2.0-2.5% 4.0-4.5% 2.5-3.5%

    Services 6.6% 6.7% 6.5-7.0% 7.2-7.7% 6.7-7.2%

    GDP at factor Cost 4.4% 4.5-4.6% 4.8-5.2% 5.5-6.0% 5.0-5.5%

    19

  • ICRA Limited

    Unfavorable Monsoon may Inflame Food Prices, delay Monetary Easing

    20

  • ICRA Limited

    Below normal monsoon emerges as key risk Higher-than-normal temperatures of water in

    equatorial Pacific Ocean, termed El Nino.

    IMD forecast 60% likelihood of EL Nino in 2014.

    El Nino years often but not always associated with deficient or below-normal rainfall in India.

    In April 2014, IMD forecast south west monsoon rainfall in 2014 at 95% +/- 5%.

    This is similar to its April 2009 forecast of 96% +/-5%. However, actual rainfall in 2009 was 22% below LPA.

    Accordingly, macro-economic concerns arising from possibility of weaker-than-anticipated monsoon not fully assuaged.

    Monsoon Remains Vital Given Moderate Irrigation Coverage.

    YearEl Nino

    (Yes/No)

    IMD AprilForecast for

    SW Monsoon

    Actual Rainfall

    (% of LPA)

    2003 No 96% +/-5% of LPA 102% Normal

    2004 No 100% +/-5% of LPA 86% Deficient

    2005 No 98% +/- 5% of LPA 99% Normal

    2006 Yes 93% +/- 5% of LPA 100% Normal

    2007 No 95% +/- 5% of LPA 106% Above Normal

    2008 No 99% +/- 5% of LPA 99% Normal

    2009 Yes 96% +/- 5% of LPA 78% Deficient

    2010 No 98% +/- 5% of LPA 102% Normal

    2011 No 98% +/- 5% of LPA 101% Normal

    2012 No 99% +/- 5% of LPA 92% Below Normal

    2013 No 98% +/- 5% of LPA 105% Above NormalSource: Indian Meteorological Department (IMD); Australian Meteorological Bureau; ICRA Research^ LPA: Long Period Average

    21

  • ICRA Limited

    Limited impact of weak monsoon on GDP growth

    Source: CSO; IMD; ICRA Research

    -25%

    -20%

    -15%

    -10%

    -5%

    0%

    5%

    10%

    2005-06 2007-08 2009-10 2011-12 9M 2013-14

    Agri, Consumption Growth Positive even in Years of Below Normal Monsoon

    Monsoon Variation from Normal Agriculture & Allied Activities Private Final Consumption Expenditure GDP Growth

    First Round Impact Limited:o Share of Agriculture in GDP low at ~14%.o Agricultural output growth while low, was not

    sub-zero, in years of below-normal monsoon. Second Round Impact: Other factors bolstered

    consumption in years of unfavourable monsoon.o Pay Commission 2008-10;o High growth of minimum support prices (MSP) in

    some years;o Automatic stabilisers such as employment under

    National Rural Employment Guarantee Act(NREGA).

    Despite good monsoon, consumption growth eased in9MFY14; differentiated impact on rural and urbanconsumers.o Rural consumption demand picked up post 2013

    kharif harvest, as evidenced by trends for tractors,two-wheelers in H2FY14.

    o However, high food prices squeezed disposableincome for urban consumers.

    22

  • ICRA Limited

    substantial impact on food inflation

    9.6%7.0%

    9.1%

    15.3% 15.6%

    7.3%9.9%

    12.8%

    0%

    5%

    10%

    15%

    20%

    FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14

    Annual Average WPI Inflation

    WPI Core Inflation Primary Food Inflation

    Food inflation accelerated in 2009-10 and 2012-13. However, food inflation was in double-digits even in years when monsoon was above LPA: 2010-11, 2013-14. Factors Imparting Rigidity to WPI and CPI Food Inflation:

    o Increase in MSP- cereals, pulses, oilseeds, sugarcane.o Rising demand for food products with greater nutritional content following growth of incomes - protein

    items (pulses, milk and non-vegetarian products), fresh produce (vegetables and fruit). Inadequate supply response of former and substantial wastages of latter impart rigidity to prices.

    o Inadequate storage infrastructure and cold chains- prices of perishables follow seasonal trends. Even small, short-lived supply disruptions cause large price spikes, e.g. Aug-Nov 2013.

    o Import dependence for pulses and edible oils- exposure to forex variations.

    Source: Office of the Economic Advisor, Government of India (GoI); ICRA Research

    23

  • ICRA Limited

    Food, beverages & tobacco account for ~50% of CPI basket, will crucially impact headline CPI inflation,designated as nominal anchor for monetary policy.

    Certain factors may cushion impact of weak monsoon rainfall:o Adequate rainfall in June-July may lessen impact of overall monsoon deficiency.o Enhanced moisture in sub-soil;o Relatively healthy reservoir levels; o Considerable buffer stocks of cereals.

    However, prices may rise in the event of sizable MSP hikes. Pan-India rollout of entitlements under National Food Security Act may boost prices of non-cereals. Additionally, temporary spikes in prices of perishables cant be ruled out.

    Factors other than food also impart rigidity to CPI.o Generalization of higher food prices to wages. o Non-tradable nature of some services affords higher pricing power to producers. o Likely rise in electricity tariffs to reduce gap between cost of supply and revenues.o Expectation of continued hikes to offset under-recoveries on sale of diesel.

    CPI food inflation elevated at ~10% in April 2014

    24

  • ICRA Limited

    CPI to be reduced from current 8.6% along Glide Path described by Dr. Patel Committee to 8% byJanuary 2015 and 6% by January 2016.

    In April 2014, RBI signaled end to further tightening if CPI moderates along glide path. Expectation of below-average rainfall in conjunction with structural factors that exert stickiness on

    food and non-food CPI inflation, suggest that containing CPI inflation below 8% by January 2015would be challenging.

    Accordingly, the most likely scenario appears to be an extended pause for policy rates, withmonetary easing delayed until at least early-2015.

    Inherent rigidities suggest CPI may miss Jan15 target

    Source: RBI; ICRA Research

    22%

    23%

    24%

    25%

    3%4%5%6%7%8%9%

    10%11%

    Apr

    -13

    May

    -13

    Jun-

    13

    Jul-1

    3

    Aug

    -13

    Sep

    -13

    Oct

    -13

    Nov

    -13

    Dec

    -13

    Jan-

    14

    Feb-

    14

    Mar

    -14

    Apr

    -14

    May

    -14

    Movement in Key Rates

    CRR Repo MSF SLR (Right Scale)

    25

  • ICRA Limited

    Indias External Sector unlikely to Pose Substantial Concerns in FY15

    26

  • ICRA Limited

    Current account deficit may widen in FY15

    Current account deficit eased to ~USD 31-33 billion in 2013-14 (exp.) from USD 88 billion in 2012-13. Even if gold imports restrictions continue, current account deficit may widen to USD 40-45 billion in FY15.

    o Capacity constraints, high inflation to cap merchandise exports growth; weak monsoon clouding outlook for exports of agricultural & allied products.

    o Energy imports (crude oil, coal) to remain substantial.o Revival in domestic consumption or investment in H2FY15 would boost growth of non-oil, non-gold

    imports.

    10.3%11.3% 11.9%

    9.0%

    11.3%

    7.9% 6.9%

    4.0% 4.9%6.5%

    3.6% 4.9%

    1.2%0.9%

    0%2%4%6%8%

    10%12%14%

    Q1FY13 Q2FY13 Q3FY13 Q4FY13 Q1FY14 Q2FY14 Q3FY14

    Merchandise Trade and Current Account Balances

    Merchandise Trade Deficit Current Account Deficit

    Source: RBI; ICRA Research

    27

  • ICRA Limited

    although financing unlikely to pose much concern

    Notwithstanding continuation of QE taper, FII flows in 2014-15 likely to exceed level in 2013-14. Forex reserves have risen to USD 314 billion, over 8 months of merchandise imports in 2013-14. Increase in external debt in April-December 2013 driven by NRI deposits, bulk of which have minimum

    tenure of three years, limiting near-term refinancing risk.

    0%20%40%60%80%100%120%140%160%

    050

    100150200250300350400450

    External Debt

    External Debt (USD billion)

    Ratio of foreign Exhange Reserves to External Debt (RHS)

    270275280285290295300305310315Rs. billion Foreign Exchange Reserves

    2012-13 2013-14 2014-15

    Source: Ministry of Finance; RBI; ICRA Research Source: RBI; ICRA Research

    28

  • ICRA Limited

    Relatively high inflation to exert pressure on INR

    Source: Central Statistics Office (CSO)

    Source: Bloomberg; ICRA Research

    Indias relatively high inflation would exert pressure on the INR, rendering a sustained appreciation in FY15 unlikely.

    Sustained INR strength would reduce competitiveness of Indian exports, stoking concerns regarding size of current account deficit.

    RBI may choose to utilize phases of INR appreciation to build up forex reserves further, which would also exert check on the Rupee.

    5052545658606264666870 INR/USD

    29

  • ICRA Limited

    Thank You

    India: Post-Election Credit OutlookAgendaCredit Implications of BJP/NDA Parliamentary VictoryMarket Expectations Are HighComparing Economic Performance Across RegimesMarket Expectations Are HighGujarats Performance vs All-India AverageBaseline Forecasts: Indias Credit Metrics will Improve SlowlyWhat Would Support Credit Improvement? Lower Fiscal Deficits and Government Debt RatiosMacro-Economic Balance, Not Growth Alone, Determines Credit ProfileKey TakeawaysSlide Number 10Slide Number 11Slide Number 12Slide Number 13Slide Number 14Investment activity remains sluggish so far in 2014CCI clearances partly de-clogged project pipelinePace of pickup in project implementation to take a cue from resolution of structural hurdlesFiscal space needs to be created to stimulate economy5.0-5.5% economic growth likely in 2014-15Slide Number 20Below normal monsoon emerges as key riskLimited impact of weak monsoon on GDP growth substantial impact on food inflationCPI food inflation elevated at ~10% in April 2014Inherent rigidities suggest CPI may miss Jan15 targetSlide Number 26Current account deficit may widen in FY15although financing unlikely to pose much concernRelatively high inflation to exert pressure on INRSlide Number 30