Sara Cortesi Politecnico di Milano / Dip. INDACO / DIS / Facoltà del Design / Italia sara cortesi politecnico di milano . INDACO dpt. . DIS . school of design . Italy Learning Network on Sustainability course System Design for Sustainability subject 2. Introduction to product Life Cicle Design (LCD) learning resource 2.2 Life Cycle Design Criteria
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Sara CortesiPolitecnico di Milano / Dip. INDACO / DIS / Facoltà del Design / Italia
sara cortesipolitecnico di milano . INDACO dpt. . DIS . school of design . Italy
Learning Network on Sustainability
course System Design for Sustainabilitysubject 2. Introduction to product Life Cicle Design (LCD)
learning resource 2.2Life Cycle Design Criteria
Sara CortesiPolitecnico di Milano / Dip. INDACO / DIS / Facoltà del Design / Italia
CONTENTS:
Life Cycle Design criteria:. resources minimisation. low impact resources selection. product lifespan optimisation. material lifespan extension. design for disassembly
Sara CortesiPolitecnico di Milano / Dip. INDACO / DIS / Facoltà del Design / Italia
RESOURCES MINIMISATION
Sara CortesiPolitecnico di Milano / Dip. INDACO / DIS / Facoltà del Design / Italia
RESOURCES MINIMISATIONWHAT DOES IT MEAN
QUANTITATIVE SAVINGREDUCTION IN THE CONSUMPTION OF MATERIALS AND ENERGY. in all life cycle phases
. for a specific function
Sara CortesiPolitecnico di Milano / Dip. INDACO / DIS / Facoltà del Design / Italia
RESOURCES CONSERVATIONfor future generation
AVOIDED (ENVIRONMENTAL) IMPACTpre-production, production, distribution and disposal of the amount of resources not used
RESOURCES MINIMISATIONENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES
Sara CortesiPolitecnico di Milano / Dip. INDACO / DIS / Facoltà del Design / Italia
LOW IMPACT RESOURCES SELECTION
Sara CortesiPolitecnico di Milano / Dip. INDACO / DIS / Facoltà del Design / Italia
LOW IMPACT RESOURCES SELECTIONWHAT DOES IT MEAN
orient design choices towards materials and energies with the lowest environmental impact
. OFFERED FUNCTION BEING EQUAL
. CONSIDERING THE WHOLE LIFE CYCLE
QUALITATIVE SAVING
Sara CortesiPolitecnico di Milano / Dip. INDACO / DIS / Facoltà del Design / Italia
LOW IMPACT RESOURCES SELECTIONTWO APPROACHES
SELECT RESOURCES WITH NO/LOW TOXICITY
SELECT HIGHLY RENEWABLE RESOURCES
Sara CortesiPolitecnico di Milano / Dip. INDACO / DIS / Facoltà del Design / Italia
LOW IMPACT RESOURCES SELECTIONSELECT RESOURCES WITH NO/LOW TOXICITY
Sara CortesiPolitecnico di Milano / Dip. INDACO / DIS / Facoltà del Design / Italia
DO NOT USE MATERIALS AND ENERGY(see: resources minimisation)
DO NOT USE RESOURCES WHOSE HIGH ENVIRONMENTAL HARMFULNESS IS WELL KNOWN
(e.g.: asbestos)
SELECT RESOURCES WITH A REDUCED HARMFULNESS
LOW IMPACT RESOURCES SELECTIONSELECT RESOURCES WITH NO/LOW TOXICITY
Sara CortesiPolitecnico di Milano / Dip. INDACO / DIS / Facoltà del Design / Italia
Harmfulness of materials and energies has to be considered in relation to:
. THE WHOLE LIFE CYCLE(not only pre-production)
. THE FUNCTION(useful life span, weight, efficiency, ...)
. PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION CONTEXTS(use, disposal, ...)
. ADDITIVES AND AUXILIARY MATERIALS
LOW IMPACT RESOURCES SELECTIONSELECT RESOURCES WITH NO/LOW TOXICITY
Sara CortesiPolitecnico di Milano / Dip. INDACO / DIS / Facoltà del Design / Italia