Workshop: TPACK-related competences of teachers in the 21st century, a challenging development! Petra Fisser University of Twente Curriculum Design & Educational Innovation 13 December 2010
Oct 30, 2014
Workshop: TPACK-related competences of teachers in the 21st century, a challenging development!
Petra FisserUniversity of Twente
Curriculum Design & Educational Innovation13 December 2010
21st century skills for students/children
Cooperation
Communication
ICT literacy
Social and/or cultural skills
Creativity
Critical thinking skills
Problem solving skills
Productivity
Learning to learn
Self steering
Planning
Flexibility
Math, Science, Languages
Taking risks
Metacognition
Controlling / solving conflicts
Initiative and entrepreneurism
Interdisciplinary themes
21st century competences of the teacher
Effective teaching depends on flexible access to rich, well-organized and integrated knowledge from different domains, including
knowledge of student thinking and learning,
knowledge of subject matter, and increasingly,
knowledge of technology
“At the heart of good teaching with technology are three core components: content, pedagogy, and technology, plus the relationships among and between them.”
(Koehler & Mishra, 2006)
TPACK
Content or Subject matter knowledge•Knowledge of central facts, concepts, theories & procedures•Explanatory frameworks•Evidence for proof
Pedagogical knowledge•Students’ prior knowledge•How to use resources•Classroom management•Lesson plan development & implementation•Student evaluation
Technological (ICT) Knowledge•Skills necessary to operate particular technologies•The ability to learn and adapt to new technologies•A functional understanding of technologies
Pedagogical Content Knowledge: How particular aspects of subject matter are organized, adapted and represented for instruction
Technological Content Knowledge:How subject matter changes because of ICT (or how ict can support subject matter!)
Technological pedagogical Knowledge: How pedagogies change because of ICT (or how ict can support pedagogy)
How can we use the TPACK model?
As a guide and a reflection tool to make sure that there is always a careful selection of content, pedagogy and technology
Using the TPACK model to design courses may give some directions in how to design professional development programs
Try it…
In the TPACK game!
Make groups of 4
Pick a piece of paper from all 3 envelopes, and think of a sound classroom activity that uses that technology, content, and pedagogy
How does the technology support the content and the pedagogy?
Is there an ICT-application that fits the content and/or the pedagogy in a better way? Which one? Why? How?
Reasons to do the TPACK game
It is fun..
It starts a discussion about the relation between technology, pedagogy and content
As facilitator of the game you can see/hear how people think about technology in education
It can be used to develop a vision on learning
It can be adapted to specific needs (content, pedagogy and technology)
It can be used in a professional development program(pre-service and in-service)
Professional development..
Important:
Introducing new educational technologies into the learning process changes more than the tools used
It has deep implications for the nature of content-area learning, as well as the pedagogical approaches among which teachers can select
This is often an overlooked aspect of many technology integration approaches used to date
How to proceed?
Opportunity: Activity types (Harris, Mishra & Koehler, 2009)
TPACK and Activity types
Identification of 42 distinct learning activity types
The activity types are divided into 13 knowledge-building and 29 knowledge-expression structures.
Knowledge-expression activity types were further divided into activities that emphasize either convergent (6 types) or divergent (23 types) thinking processes
In the article of Harris, Mishra & Koehler these content-driven pedagogical strategies are connected with specific technologies
(Part of)
Technology for knowledge-building
Technology for convergent knowledge expression
Technology for divergent knowledge expression
(Part of)
Why all these lists?
The goal in identifying activity types and specific technologies is
to help teachers become aware of the full range of possible curriculum-based learning activity options and
the different ways that digital and non-digital tools support this
This can help teachers efficiently select among, customize, and combine activity types that are well matched to
students’ differentiated learning needs and
students’ differentiated preferences and
classroom contextual realities (such as computer access, class time, etc.)
Try it...
Think about your discussions during the TPACK Game
Does the list of activity types help you in making more or other choices?
Why? How?
And.. Just curious… is this approach something that can work in Poland?
Want to know more?
Literature study (in translation at the moment)
Development of TPACK interventions & instruments
Studies in the Netherlands, Belgium, Kuwait, Tanzania, Ghana, ….. and Poland????
Please contact me!
Petra FisserUniversity of Twentehttp://users.gw.utwente.nl/[email protected]