21.1.2008 H Laugesen 1 1 st ELFE 2 SC meeting, Brussels 21.1.08 Agenda for 1st SC meeting 1.Presentation of SC members 2.Welcome by Martin Rømer 3.Outlines.

21.1.2008H Laugesen

1

1st E

LFE 2

SC

meeti

ng

, B

russ

els

21

.1.0

8Agenda for 1st SC meeting

1. Presentation of SC members2. Welcome by Martin Rømer3. Outlines of project by Hans4. Roles of experts, external evaluator and

other SC members5. National reports on ICT in education6. Criteria for selection of schools / teacher

training institutions7. Amendments of ELFE 1 instruments8. Amendments in project time schedule9. Conditions for travelling by Iva10.Planning of internal evaluation,11.Project web-site www.elfe-eu.net by Hans12.Next meeting – purpose and objectives

13. Any other business

21.1.2008H Laugesen

2

1st E

LFE 2

SC

meeti

ng

, B

russ

els

21

.1.0

8

The ELFE project

Hans LaugesenELFE project coordinator

Educational Policy officer andInternational Secretary in GL,

Denmark

21.1.2008H Laugesen

3

1st E

LFE 2

SC

meeti

ng

, B

russ

els

21

.1.0

8Purpose of ELFE 1

A European project created to achieve a better understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of using ICT in (primary and) secondary education

The ELFE project aims at investigating good practice in the use of ICT, which supports the teaching and learning

process encourages students to develop new skills

and competences promotes an inclusive education for all

students

21.1.2008H Laugesen

4

1st E

LFE 2

SC

meeti

ng

, B

russ

els

21

.1.0

8Purpose of ELFE 2

Building on ELFE 1 findings ELFE 2 aims at Identify methodologies used to favor a use

of ICT that promotes an added learning value Develop recommendations to policy-makers,

to schools and teacher education institutions and to trade unions on ICT and teacher education ICT and school management ICT and strategic use of available financial

means

21.1.2008H Laugesen

5

1st E

LFE 2

SC

meeti

ng

, B

russ

els

21

.1.0

8ELFE 1’s Pedagogical questions

Promoting relevance, meaningfulness and engagement in both teaching and learning

Use of ICT to train new competences Virtual lessons as a mean of variation in

normal class lessons: blended face to face ed. Use of ICT as a catalyst for a Whole School

Development Providing more educational options for

students in remote areas Are there pedagogical and social costs?

how do we avoid loosing the low performing students?

ELFE 2 must also identify methodologies used to favour added learning value and internal evaluation of methodologies chosen.

21.1.2008H Laugesen

6

1st E

LFE 2

SC

meeti

ng

, B

russ

els

21

.1.0

8ELFE structure

M ain activitiesG o an d stu d y v is its : 10 scho o ls+ 5 te a ch e r e d uca tio n in s titu tes

2 re g io n a l sem in ars + 1 con fe re n ce

PartnersE T U C E

5 T e a ch e rs ' U n io n s (U K ,D K E )P e da g og ica l E xp e rts

Chief Rapporteura c rit ica l frie nd

ELFE-eu.net w eb-site

Political ApproachP e da g og ica l q ue stio ns a nd ob serva tio ns

P o lic y d e b a te in T e a che rs ' U n io nsP o lic y su g ge s tion s to th e C o m m iss ion

ELFEE xch a ng e o f e xpe rien ce

S tu dy tran s fe r to o th er scho o lsc re a te E u ro p ea n d e ba te o n p ed a go g ica l u se o f IC T

21.1.2008H Laugesen

7

1st E

LFE 2

SC

meeti

ng

, B

russ

els

21

.1.0

8ELFE 2 partners

ETUCE and 5 ETUCE-organisations: NUT, UK GL, Denmark LIZDA, Latvia ZNP, Poland ESTUS, Slovenia

Researchers: Ulf Fedriksson, Mid Sweden University Elzbieta Gajek-Kawecka, Warzaw

University Gunilla Jedeskog, Linköping Univ., Sweden -

Evaluator

21.1.2008H Laugesen

8

1st E

LFE 2

SC

meeti

ng

, B

russ

els

21

.1.0

8Target groups and approach

Target groups: teachers teachers’ unions researchers

Visits to schools and teacher education institutions: steering group visit to 2 schools + 1 teacher

education institutions in each 5 countries Two regional seminars

One for EU 15 after visits to DK and UK - and One for EU 12 after visits to LV, Pl and Slo.

A final conference: teachers’ unions debate ICT-policy proposals

Process supported on www.ELFE-eu.net website

21.1.2008H Laugesen

9

1st E

LFE 2

SC

meeti

ng

, B

russ

els

21

.1.0

8ELFE web-site

Information on ELFE Progress of the ELFE-project Small reports from school visits

and meetings in Steering Committee

Debate forum on Pedagogical use of ICT in education Contact between schools involved in

ELFE Policy debate among teachers

unions on ICT in ed.

Useful links

21.1.2008H Laugesen

10

1st E

LFE 2

SC

meeti

ng

, B

russ

els

21

.1.0

8www.ELFE-eu.net

21.1.2008H Laugesen

11

1st E

LFE 2

SC

meeti

ng

, B

russ

els

21

.1.0

8Debate-furum at ELFE web-site

21.1.2008H Laugesen

12

1st E

LFE 2

SC

meeti

ng

, B

russ

els

21

.1.0

8Education-policy questions

Do we have recommendations in the end?: Is there an ideal balance between

virtual lessons and normal lessons? Teachers’ use of ICT: Balance between

frontrunners and a minimum level Which kind of pre-service education and

in-service training is necessary? Physical requirements at schools? Suggestions for relevant indicators

regarding the use of ICT in education? etc.

21.1.2008H Laugesen

13

1st E

LFE 2

SC

meeti

ng

, B

russ

els

21

.1.0

8ELFE 1 observations 1

After the Steering Group’s visits to 12 schools: Make ICT-use part of school policy and create

a Whole School Development environment Evident effect of Pedagogical ICT driver

licence Create conditions for teachers use of ICT and Have a vision, debate minimum performance,

and leave room for frontrunners Distance education in remote areas or in

small schools means more educ. options and can be combined with a social learning environment

21.1.2008H Laugesen

14

1st E

LFE 2

SC

meeti

ng

, B

russ

els

21

.1.0

8ELFE 1 observations 2

So far we have not seen any hard-core proofs that the use of ICT is increasing the quality of education

There is a feeling among teachers that the use of ICT contributes to strengthen the students ability to work in an independent way

A risk that the need to train oral skills is forgotten – written dimension increases workload

A risk of less opportunity to have direct face to face discussions in the classrooms

You do not need to loose the low performing students – but be aware not to do so