Top Banner
Bone Histomorphometry Wei-Ju Tseng July 11 th , 2019 PCMD Histology Core Learning Lunch Series Mckay Orthopaedic Research Laboratory Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, PA
30

20190711 histocore learning lunch

Jun 21, 2022

Download

Documents

dariahiddleston
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: 20190711 histocore learning lunch

Bone Histomorphometry

Wei-Ju Tseng

July 11th, 2019

PCMD Histology Core Learning Lunch Series

Mckay Orthopaedic Research LaboratoryDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery

Perelman School of MedicineUniversity of Pennsylvania

Philadelphia, PA

Page 2: 20190711 histocore learning lunch

Bone Histomorphometry• Histological methods to assess bone phenotype

• Methylmethacrylate (MMA) embedding (Erben 1997)

– Mineralized (undecalcified) bone

– Good penetration into tissue

– Easy to be removed

• Static histomorphometry (5-µm section)– Goldner’s Trichrome staining– Toluidine blue staining – Von Kossa staining

• Dynamic histomorphometry (8-µm section)– Fluorochrome labeling

Penn

Page 3: 20190711 histocore learning lunch

Standardized Nomenclature

Penn

Recommended Reading:Standardized Nomenclature, Symbols, and Units for Bone Histomorphometry: A 2012 Update of the Report ofthe ASBMR Histomorphometry Nomenclature CommitteeDempster DW, Compston JE, Drezner MK, Glorieux FH, Kanis JA, Malluche H, Meunier PJ, Ott SM, Recker RR, Parfitt AM.

J Bone Miner Res. 2013 Jan;28(1):2-17. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.1805.

Page 4: 20190711 histocore learning lunch

Choice of Skeletal Sites

Penn

Page 5: 20190711 histocore learning lunch

• Specimens– Harvest (Open the samples)

– Fixation

– Dehydration

– MMA embedding

• Preparation Time– 10-14 days

Sample Preparation and Sectioning

Penn

Solutions

Page 6: 20190711 histocore learning lunch

• Specimens– Harvest (Open the samples)

– Fixation

– Dehydration

– MMA embedding

• Preparation Time– 10-14 days

• Sectioning– Polycut-S motorized microtome

Sample Preparation and Sectioning

Penn

Solutions

Page 7: 20190711 histocore learning lunch

Region of Interest (ROI)

Penn Lin et al. Bone Res. 2015; 3: 15028.

Page 8: 20190711 histocore learning lunch

Region of Interest (ROI)

Penn Lin et al. Bone Res. 2015; 3: 15028.

Page 9: 20190711 histocore learning lunch

Region of Interest (ROI)

Penn Lin et al. Bone Res. 2015; 3: 15028.

Page 10: 20190711 histocore learning lunch

• Goldner’s Trichrome staining– Osteoblasts, Osteoclasts, Osteoid– Parameters: N.Ob/BS, Ob.S/BS, N.Oc/BS, Oc.S/BS, OS/BS

Group

Penn

VEH (n=6) PTH (n=6)

Static Histomorphometry

Page 11: 20190711 histocore learning lunch

• Goldner’s Trichrome staining– Osteoblasts, Osteoclasts, Osteoid– Parameters: N.Ob/BS, Ob.S/BS, N.Oc/BS, Oc.S/BS, OS/BS

Group

Penn

VEH (n=6) PTH (n=6)

Static Histomorphometry

Page 12: 20190711 histocore learning lunch

• Toluidine staining– Osteoblasts, Osteoclasts, Osteoid– Parameters: N.Ob/BS, Ob.S/BS, N.Oc/BS, Oc.S/BS, OS/BS

Penn

Static Histomorphometry

http://medcell.med.yale.edu/systems_cell_biology/bone_lab.phphttps://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/medicine-and-dentistry/osteoid

Page 13: 20190711 histocore learning lunch

• Von Kossa staining– Osteoid– Parameters: OS/BS

Penn

Static Histomorphometry

https://www.leicabiosystems.com/pathologyleaders/an-introduction-to-decalcification/

Page 14: 20190711 histocore learning lunch

Dynamic Histomorphometry

Penn

• Measurement of bone formation• Fluorochromes

– Calcium-seeking molecules that bind to the mineralization fronts in bone formation sites

• Fluorochrome labeling injection– Calcien (Subq or IP) (5-25 mg/kg)

-9 -2 Sac

Altman et al. Bone. 2014 Apr; 61: 149–157.

Page 15: 20190711 histocore learning lunch

Dynamic Histomorphometry

Penn

• Measurement of bone formation• Fluorochromes

– Calcium-seeking molecules that bind to the mineralization fronts in bone formation sites

• Fluorochrome labeling injection– Calcien (Subq or IP) (5-25 mg/kg)– Alizarin Red (IP) (25 mg/kg)– Xylenol Orange (IP) (70-90 mg/kg)– Tetracycline (IP) (30 mg/kg)

http://microspheres.us/microsphere-basics/fluorochromes-excitation-emission-wavelengths/248.html

Fluorochromes Excitation (nm) Emission (nm)

Calcein Green 505 532

Alizarin Red 530-560 580

Xylenol Orange 546 580

Tetracycline 390 560

Page 16: 20190711 histocore learning lunch

Dynamic Histomorphometry

Penn

• Measurement of bone formation • Fluorochrome labeling injection

– Calcien (Subq or IP) (5-25 mg/kg)– Alizarin Red (IP) (25 mg/kg)– Xylenol Orange (IP) (70-90 mg/kg)– Tetracycline (IP) (30 mg/kg)

Chandra et al. FASEB J. 2018 Jan;32(1):52-62.

-9 -2 Sac

Page 17: 20190711 histocore learning lunch

Dynamic Histomorphometry

Penn

• Measurement of bone formation • Fluorochrome labeling injection

– Calcien (Subq or IP) (5-25 mg/kg)– Alizarin Red (IP) (25 mg/kg)– Xylenol Orange (IP) (70-90 mg/kg)– Tetracycline (IP) (30 mg/kg)

-9 -2 Sac

Courtesy by Yu Shi

Page 18: 20190711 histocore learning lunch

Dynamic Histomorphometry

Penn

• Measurement of bone formation • Fluorochrome labeling injection

– Calcien (Subq or IP) (5-25 mg/kg)– Alizarin Red (IP) (25 mg/kg)– Xylenol Orange (IP) (70-90 mg/kg)– Tetracycline (IP) (30 mg/kg)

• Injection interval based on the age the animals– Young animals: 2-4 days

– Adult animals: 5-7 days

– Old animals: 7-10 days -9 -2 Sac

Chandra et al. FASEB J. 2018 Jan;32(1):52-62.

Page 19: 20190711 histocore learning lunch

Dynamic Histomorphometry

Penn

• Dynamic histomorphometry analyses– Parameters: Bone Surface (BS)

Page 20: 20190711 histocore learning lunch

Dynamic Histomorphometry

Penn

• Dynamic histomorphometry analyses– Parameters: Single Label Surface/Bone Surface (sLS/BS)

Page 21: 20190711 histocore learning lunch

Dynamic Histomorphometry

Penn

• Dynamic histomorphometry analyses– Parameters: Single Label Surface/Bone Surface (sLS/BS)

Page 22: 20190711 histocore learning lunch

Dynamic Histomorphometry

Penn

• Dynamic histomorphometry analyses– Parameters: Mineralizing Surface/Bone Surface (MS/BS)

• The extent of bone surface actively mineralizing

Page 23: 20190711 histocore learning lunch

Dynamic Histomorphometry

Penn

• Dynamic histomorphometry analyses– Parameters: Mineralizing Surface/Bone Surface (MS/BS)

• The extent of bone surface actively mineralizing

• MS/BS– report actual value (zero is proper)

Page 24: 20190711 histocore learning lunch

Dynamic Histomorphometry

Penn

• Dynamic histomorphometry analyses– Parameters: Mineral apposition rate (MAR) = Ir.L.Th/Ir.L.T

• The distance between the midpoints or between the corresponding edges of two consecutive labels (Interlabel thickness, Ir.L.Th), divided by the time between the midpoints of the labeling periods

– Unit: µm/d

Page 25: 20190711 histocore learning lunch

Dynamic Histomorphometry

Penn

• Dynamic histomorphometry analyses– Parameters: Mineral apposition rate (MAR) = Ir.L.Th/Ir.L.T

• The distance between the midpoints or between the corresponding edges of two consecutive labels (Interlabel thickness, Ir.L.Th), divided by the time between the midpoints of the labeling periods

– Unit: µm/d

• MAR: – report “missing value” when no double labels– the option of assigning (imputing) a minimum value to MAR

» 0.1 µm/d or 0.3 µm/d (lowest measurable average value)– report actual data but with notes with insufficient double labels

Page 26: 20190711 histocore learning lunch

Dynamic Histomorphometry

Penn

• Dynamic histomorphometry analyses– Parameters: Bone formation rate (BFR/BS) = MAR*(MS/BS)– Unit: µm3/µm2/d

• BFR/BS:– report “missing value” when no double labels– report actual data but with notes with insufficient double labels

Page 27: 20190711 histocore learning lunch

Dynamic Histomorphometry

Penn Courtesy by Yihan Li

Page 28: 20190711 histocore learning lunch

Penn

• Plastic (methylmethacrylate) embedding/sectioning– mineralized (undecalcified) bone

– 8µm section (dynamic histomorphometry)

– 5µm section (static histomorphometry)

• Cons– 10-14 days to process the samples (ready to section)

– difficult to section (wrinkling)

• Frozen sectioning with tape technique – 2-3 days to process the samples

– relatively easy to section

– only for dynamic histomorphometry

Alternative Methods

Page 29: 20190711 histocore learning lunch

Analysis Software

Penn

• ImageJ software• Bioquant Osteo software

– PCMD Histology Core

Page 30: 20190711 histocore learning lunch

Questions?

Penn