2016-2017 QUARTER 4 ACADEMIC PROGRESS …...skills that are below grade level expectations) Number of Students (K-6) Below Achievement for Grade Level on Report Cards 1 course 2 courses

1

2016-2017 QUARTER 4ACADEMIC PROGRESS REPORTPRESENTATION TO THE BOESEPTEMBER 20, 2017SCHENECTADY CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT

2

OUTLINE OF PRESENTATION

Summary

Academic Data:

• Reading Achievement• ELA Achievement• NYS ELA 3-8 Achievement• NYS Common Core ELA Regents Achievement• Math Achievement• NYS Math 3-8 Achievement• NYS Common Core Math Regents Achievement• NYS Science 4th and 8th Grade Achievement• NYS Additional Achievement• Report Card Achievement• Additional Academic • Graduation Rate• Summer School

Non-Academic Data:

• Student Behavior

• Student Attendance

• Teacher Attendance

3

ReadingAchievement

Total Tested

353 282 218 210 326 286 214 223 250 218 196 161 188 176

HAMILTON HOWE KEANE LINCOLN MLK PAIGE PLVY VC WDLN YATES ZOLLER CPNK(6) MTPL(6) ONDA(6)

63.75

87.14

76.7068.90

61.26

79.08

58.3864.59

83.06

57.04

85.83

127.47

114.32119.15

96.90

114.15109.47

102.4794.84

107.91

85.98

100.22

117.07

101.15

117.73

151.75145.43

139.86

0.00

20.00

40.00

60.00

80.00

100.00

120.00

140.00

160.00

2016-17 Fall to Spring Average Benchmark Score Comparison AIMS Web Reading/Literacy Grades 2-6

Fall Avg ScoreSpring Avg Score

4

The Testing Administration for the Fall runs from Sept through Nov

The Testing Administration for the Spring runs from Mar through Jun

33.6

Points

31.9

Points

5.275.05

5.72

6.65

5.955.6

6.49

7.11

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

CENTRAL PARK MS MONT PLEASANT MS ONEIDA MS SCHENECTADY HIGHSCHOOL

Average Instructional Reading Level**based on STAR Reading National Norms

Fall Avg IRL Spring Avg IRL

5

The testing administration for the Fall runs from Sept through Nov

The testing administration for the Spring runs from Apr through Jun

6

ELAAchievement

3.73%

12.28%

7.53%

3.55% 3.48%

13.35%

5.53% 6.40%

16.88%

5.15%

10.83%

17.15%

22.55%

13.90%

11.15%

8.78%

19.68%

7.68%

11.35%

21.70%

8.48%

34.38%

22%

35%

19%

11%13%

22%

13%

21%

31%

21%

28%

0.00%

5.00%

10.00%

15.00%

20.00%

25.00%

30.00%

35.00%

40.00%

45.00%

50.00% ELA Interims - October to February Comparison to NYS ExamsAverage Proficiency, Interims - Grades 2-5, NYS Exams 3-5

October February State Exam

7

Total Tested 263 203 192 206 329 306 182 196 207 209 231HAMILTON HOWE KEANE LINCOLN MLK PAIGE PLEASANT

VALLEYVAN

CORLAERWOODLAWN YATES ZOLLER

39.8% Proficient, State-wide combined average, Grades 3-8 ELA

18.63%17.37%

15.20%

22.80%

17.17%

25.30%

20%

10%

19%

0.00%

5.00%

10.00%

15.00%

20.00%

25.00%

30.00%

35.00%

40.00%

45.00%

50.00%

CENTRAL PARK MS MONT PLEASANT MS ONEIDA MS

ELA Interims - October to February Comparison to NYS ExamsAverage Proficiency, Interims - Grades 6-8, NYS Exams 6-8

October November State Exam

8

Total Tested 570 377 502CENTRAL PARK MS MONT PLEASANT MS ONEIDA MS

39.8% Proficient, State-wide combined average, Grades 3-8 ELA

9

74% 73%

80%

69%

76% 77% 78%

37%

71%68%

78%

63%

68%

75%77%

34%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

All SES NON-SES Black Hispanic Asian White SWD

ELA Common Core Regents Percent Proficient Year to Year Comparison

2015-16 ELA CC 2016-17 ELA CC

Total N 2015-16 634 495 139 234 83 138 173 101

Total N 2016-17 553 412 141 179 59 140 162 99

All SES NON-SES Black Hispanic Asian White SWD

10

LITERACY WORK K-8

208 Teachers and Administrators Attended the Summer Literacy Institute 2017!

11

ELA ACHIEVEMENT

Text Ranges: 1215-1355 LexileCraft and Structure:

meaning of words, part to whole of stories, POV/perspective taking

Integration of Knowledge and Ideas: mood/tone, claims supported with reasons and evidence, text features, and intertextuality

12

MathematicsAchievement

13

11.29

16.8315.53

12.76 11.87

15.56

12.33 12.36

19.75

14.03

17.11

20.53

16.05 15.16

29.14

33.92 32.88

36.64

30.10

37.34

31.7429.22

43.21

29.53

38.14

26.29

20.55 20.49

0.00

5.00

10.00

15.00

20.00

25.00

30.00

35.00

40.00

45.00

50.00

2016-17 Fall to Spring Average Benchmark Score Comparison AIMS Web Math Computation Grades 2-6

Fall Avg Score Spring Avg Score

Total Tested

279 277 194 263 396 393 172 296 248 236 296 189 149 166

HAMILTON HOWE KEANE LINCOLN MLK PAIGE PLVY VC WDLN YATES ZOLLER CNPK(6) MTPLS (6) ONDA(6)

The testing administration for the Fall runs from September through November

The testing administration for the Spring runs from April through June

17.85Points

23.46Points

5.33

Points

18.23Points

14

Total Tested 181 156 155 156 248 221 120 171 142 135 176HAMILTON HOWE KEANE LINCOLN MLK PAIGE PLEASANT

VALLEYVAN

CORLAERWOODLAWN YATES ZOLLER

8.70%

17.20%

13.10%

5.97%7.77%

20.37%

7.77%

4.60%

41.00%

7.03%

15.57%

12.27%

25.13%

18.47%

7.77%

13.93%

29.47%

9.03% 9.23%

42.40%

12.77%

40.43%

14%

22%

11%7%

6%

16%11%

8%

35%

9%

31%

0.00%

5.00%

10.00%

15.00%

20.00%

25.00%

30.00%

35.00%

40.00%

45.00%

50.00%

HAMILTON HOWE KEANE LINCOLN MARTINLUTHER KING

PAIGE PLEASANTVALLEY

VAN CORLAER WOODLAWN YATES ZOLLER

Math Interims - November to March Comparison to NYS ExamsAverage Proficiency, Interims - Grades 2-5, NYS Exams 3-5

November March State Exam

40.2% Proficient, State-wide combined average, Grades 3-8 Math

15

Total Tested 487 376 381


14.87%

8.20%9.40%

11.90%

5.97%

10.37%

11%

5%

8%

0.00%

5.00%

10.00%

15.00%

20.00%

25.00%

30.00%

35.00%

40.00%

45.00%

50.00%


Math Interims - November to March Comparison to NYS Exams Average Proficiency, Grades 6-8

November March State Exam

40.2% Proficient, State-wide combined average, Grades 3-8 Math

16

69%71%

33%

82%

63%61%

71%

23%

67%71%

48%

83%

61%63%

66%

44%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

SCSD SES SWD ASIAN BLACK HISPANIC WHITE ENL

SHS August Graduation Rate

2016 2017

17

50%

81%85%

50%

60%

84%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Algebra I CC Geometry CC Algebra II CC

Math Common Core Percent Proficient Year to Year Comparison

2015-16 2016-17

Algebra I CC

Geometry CC

Algebra II CC

Total Tested 2015-16 1002 152 72Total Tested 2016-17 858 219 115

Level

21%Points

1%

Points

18

NYS ScienceAchievement

194th Grade Science Assessment Percent Proficient Year to Year Comparison

62% All Students 2015-16

58%

Poverty

60%

Non-Poverty

77%

Black

53%

Hispanic

61%

Asian

66% White

70%

ENL

34%

SWD

21%

All Students 2016-17

Poverty

56%

Non-Poverty

74%

Black

45%

Hispanic

47%

Asian

73% White

71%

ENL

15%

SWD

26%

All Poverty Non-Poverty Black Hispanic Asian White ENL SWD

Total Tested 2015-16 698 602 96 216 143 115 190 35 108

Total Tested 2016-17 692 593 100 203 152 122 156 41 117

4%

Points

7%

Points

5%

Points

208th Grade Science Assessment Percent Proficient Year to Year Comparison

42%

All Students 2015-1629%

Poverty

40%

Non-Poverty

54%

Black

34%

Asian

48%

White

50%

ENL

15%

SWD

13%

All Students 2016-17

Poverty

27%

Non-Poverty

40%

Black

25%

Asian

31%

White

34%

ENL

10%

SWD

9%

All SES Non-Poverty Black Asian White ENL SWD

Total Tested 2015-16 486 412 74 182 98 128 13 98

Total Tested 2016-17 428 366 62 139 87 106 29 102

13%

Points

16%

Points

5%

Points

21Accelerated/Advanced Course Numbers

83

102

131

97

49 50

123

61

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

8th Grade Algebra 1 8th Grade LivingEnvironment

Geometry Algebra 2

2016 (# of students passing) 2017 (# of students passing)

22Math/Science Action Plans

23

NYS AdditionalRegents Exam Data

57%

76%

64%

69%

61%

51%49%

70%

49%

42%

61%

55%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Global U.S Hist and Gov't Living Environment Earth Science Chemistry Physics

NYS Additional Regents Summary Year to Year Comparison

2015-16 2016-17

8%

Points

15%

PointsLevel

Social Studies Action Plans

26Social Studies Action Plans

27

Report CardAchievement

28Number of Students (7-12) with Report Cards <65

1 course 2 courses 3 or > courses

Building Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

Central Park Middle School (7 & 8 Grade) 138 121 116 94 88 75 64 70 80 117 91 93

Mont Pleasant Middle School (7 & 8 Grade) 120 106 98 90 86 69 49 46 142 199 147 175

Oneida Middle School (7 & 8 Grade) 99 104 80

84 72 76 43 50 138 162 121 149

Schenectady High School 457 408 393 252 245 268 276 203 611 856 891 872

SCLA 33 37 20 10 30 22 32 11 100 118 121 125n= CNPK78 MTPL78 ONDA78 SCHS SCLA

Total 487 466 432 1846 188

5

buildings

3

buildings

1

buildings

29

(i.e. Working on key concepts, processes and skills that are below grade level expectations)

Number of Students (K-6) Below Achievement for Grade Level on Report Cards

1 course 2 courses 3 or > courses

Building Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

Hamilton 66 57 40 44 50 35 30 30 87 72 78 62Howe 34 40 45 44 27 17 26 25 53 57 45 42Keane 25 23 23 18 17 15 9 8 29 33 28 20Lincoln 51 67 56 44 43 30 23 23 72 79 64 51M. L. King 73 76 70 66 50 50 46 34 83 75 58 55Paige 71 79 82 71 46 48 38 38 92 87 80 70

Pleasant Valley 85 85 65 70 41 38 44 30 64 55 70 74Van Corlaer 47 33 44 36 27 40 37 23 63 53 36 37Woodlawn 47 50 48 43 26 32 24 19 59 52 43 43Yates 50 53 64 62 49 34 39 32 80 69 73 66Zoller 32 36 27 22 18 19 16 15 27 35 27 23Central Park (6th Grade) 32 23 30 17 16 11 5 8 12 15 13 12Mont Pleasant (6th Grade) 38 22 33 37 30 19 14 13 31 33 25 35Oneida (6th Grade) 32 28 44 43 28 26 17 13 36 33 26 30

n= HAML HOWE KEAN LINC MLK PAIG PLVY VCLR WDLN YATE ZOLR CNPK6 MTPL6 ONDA6Total 451 360 315 350 554 530 406 382 391 390 425 235 216 218

11

buildings

13

buildings

10

buildings

30

31

Graduation Rate

65%67%

25%

77%

55%58%

64%

23%

62%64%

46%

76%

52%

63% 62%

39%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

SHS SES SWD ASIAN BLACK HISPANIC WHITE ENL

Schenectady High School June Graduation Rate

2015-16 2016-17

32

Total in Cohort

SHS

2015-16 689

2016-17 726

3%

21%

16%

33

ACTION PLANS FOR GRADUATION

34

SUMMARY OF DATA

Summer SchoolAchievement Data

35

109

5 4

177

6

17

2

142

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

0 0.25 0.5 1 1.25 1.5 1.75 2

Total Number of Students Earning Summer School Credit

Total

36

Algebra I Algebra II ELA Geometry Global HistoryLiving

Environment Chemistry Earth SciUS History &

Gov'tTotal Tested 2016 136 6 54 21 97 99 35 15 51Total Tested 2017 134 1 70 24 108 142 21 33 42

41.90%

33.30% 31.50%

76.20%

14.40%

21.20%

48.60%

20.00% 19.60%

35.80%

0.00%

27.10%

33.30%

1.90%

30.30%

42.90%

6.10%2.40%

0.00%

10.00%

20.00%

30.00%

40.00%

50.00%

60.00%

70.00%

80.00%

90.00%

100.00%

Algebra I -Aug

Algebra II -Aug

ELA - Aug Geometry -Aug

Global History- Aug

LivingEnvironment -

Aug

PhySet/Chemistry

- Aug

Phy Set/EarthSci - Aug

USHistory&Gov't

- Aug

Percent Proficient on August Regents by Content Area Year to Year Comparison

2016 2017

Summer School Action Plans

38

STUDENT BEHAVIOR DATAOFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT

CNPK MTPL ONDA SCHS SCLAQ1 Students 100 281 150 833 91

Q2 Students 137 304 153 736 69

Q3Students 148 311 123 851 38

Q4Students 150 330 133 730 68

Q1 Incidents 201 941 446 1967 173

Q2 Incidents 444 1021 446 2103 169

Q3 Incidents 398 893 280 2890 53

Q4 Incidents 357 766 316 2140 155

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

Number of Unique Students and Incidents by Building Grades 6-12

Q1 Students Q2 Students Q3Students Q4Students Q1 Incidents Q2 Incidents Q3 Incidents Q4 Incidents

39

n= CNPK MTPL ONDA SCHS SCLA703 703 650 2291 228

Incident = something that violated the code of conduct and can vary, e.g.:• Being tardy or cutting class• Fighting• Possessing a weapon• Using drugs

HAML HOWE KEAN LINC MLK PAIG PLVY VCLR WDLN YATE ZOLRQ1 Students 9 5 9 19 3 38 26 27 19 35 12

Q2 Students 12 6 15 15 25 49 34 21 22 33 23

Q3Students 21 2 15 19 2 35 52 27 26 27 18

Q4Students 29 18 15 18 23 35 19 35 30 23 16

Q1 Incidents 15 5 16 29 3 99 32 46 21 67 22

Q2 Incidents 22 11 28 22 28 167 59 41 27 59 39

Q3 Incidents 20 3 25 33 2 85 74 45 33 37 23

Q4 Incidents 31 34 17 33 26 92 34 58 42 30 26

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

Number of Unique Students and Incidents by Building Grades K-5 40

n= HAML HOWE KEAN LINC MLK PAIG PLVY VCLR WDLN YATE ZOLR451 360 315 350 554 530 407 382 391 390 425

6 out of 11 Elementary Buildings had a decrease in the number of students involved in an incident

4 out of 11 Elementary Buildings had a decrease in the number of overall incidents

Q1 SWD Q2 SWD Q3 SWD Q4 SWD Q1 ENL Q2 ENL Q3 ENL Q4 ENL Q1 SES Q2 SES Q3 SES Q4 SES Q1Homelss

Q2Homeless

Q3Homeless

Q4Homeless

Elem 0.75% 1.62% 2.85% 8.09% 0.42% 1.27% 3.11% 3.02% 0.78% 1.46% 4.51% 6.22% 3.51% 1.75% 9.49% 9.56%

Middle 15.81% 13.76% 19.23% 31.65% 13.10% 14.29% 21.84% 21.43% 19.54% 20.36% 23.56% 31.83% 8.33% 25.00% 31.70% 32.65%

High 23.22% 21.30% 22.97% 36.02% 33.33% 32.32% 32.99% 32.56% 42.55% 36.94% 26.02% 34.67% 22.22% 22.22% 34.78% 28.13%

0.75%1.62%

2.85%

8.09%

0.42%1.27%

3.11% 3.02%

0.78% 1.46%

4.51%6.22%

3.51%1.75%

9.49% 9.56%

15.81%

13.76%

19.23%

31.65%

13.10%14.29%

21.84% 21.43%19.54%

20.36%

23.56%

31.83%

8.33%

25.00%

31.70%32.65%

23.22%

21.30%22.97%

36.02%

33.33%32.32% 32.99% 32.56%

42.55%

36.94%

26.02%

34.67%

22.22% 22.22%

34.78%

28.13%

0.00%

5.00%

10.00%

15.00%

20.00%

25.00%

30.00%

35.00%

40.00%

45.00%

Percentage of Students (within subgroup) that had an Incident, K-12

Elem Middle High

41

n= SWD ENL SES HOMELESSELEM 717 265 3727 136HIGH 447 86 2048 32

MIDDLE 455 84 1772 49

Total Enrollment by subgroup

42Number of (Unique) Student Suspensions by Building

n= HAML HOWE KEAN LINC MLK PAIG PLVY VCLR WDLN YATE ZOLR CNPK MTPL ONDA SCHS SCLA451 360 315 350 554 530 407 382 391 390 425 703 703 650 2291 228Total enrollment

HAM

HOW

KEA

MLK LIN PAI

G PV VC WL YATE

ZOLR

CPMS

MPMS

OMS

SCHS

SCLA

Q1 1-5 Days 1 0 2 1 7 11 19 7 1 20 2 59 100 29 124 20

Q2 1-5 Days 4 0 8 5 7 16 26 8 3 16 8 63 121 50 157 21

Q3 1-5 Days 10 3 2 15 7 13 30 13 6 17 5 59 122 33 181 18

Q4 1-5 Days 10 4 4 24 0 18 29 17 6 18 3 49 111 38 184 26

020406080

100120140160180200

1-5 Days

HAM

HOW

KEA

MLK LIN PAI

G PV VC WL YATE

ZOLR

CPMS

MPMS

OMS

SCHS

SCLA

Q1 6-10 Days 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 8 34 2 17 0

Q2 6-10 Days 0 0 0 1 0 2 3 0 1 0 3 9 32 6 27 4

Q3 6-10 Days 0 0 1 1 2 4 4 0 0 1 0 9 41 6 30 3

Q4 6-10 Days 1 0 0 1 2 1 3 2 0 1 1 11 41 11 45 1

05

101520253035404550

6-10 Days

HAM

HOW

KEA

MLK LIN PAI

G PV VC WL YATE

ZOLR

CPMS

MPMS

OMS

SCHS

SCLA

Q1 11-19 Days 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 11 0 9 1

Q2 11-19 Days 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 14 1 10 2

Q3 11-19 Days 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 16 3 21 2

Q4 11-19 Days 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 3 15 3 10 0

05

101520253035404550

11-19 Days

HAM

HOW

KEA

MLK LIN PAI

G PV VC WL YATE

ZOLR

CPMS

MPMS

OMS

SCHS

SCLA

Q1 20+ Days 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 8 0 11 1

Q2 20+ Days 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 24 9 24 1

Q3 20+ Days 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 32 15 22 3

Q4 20+ Days 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 10 31 14 28 4

05

101520253035404550

20+ Days

DECREASE or LEVELin student suspensions of

1-5 days in 7 buildingsGrades K-12

DECREASE or LEVELin student suspensions of 6-10 days in 10 buildings

Grades K-12

DECREASE or LEVELin student suspensions of 11-19 days in 14 buildings

Grades K-12

DECREASE or LEVELin student suspensions of 20+ days in 11 buildings

Grades K-12

43

STUDENT BEHAVIOR ACTION PLANS

SYST

EMS

PRACTICES

DATA

OUTCOMES

Supporting Important Culturally Equitable Academic & Social Behavior Competence

Supporting Culturally Relevant Evidence-based Interventions

Supporting Culturally Knowledgeable Staff Behavior

Supporting Culturally Valid Decision Making

SCHENECTADY CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT

SCHOOL BASED DIVERSIONA Model Pathway for At Risk Youth with Behavioral Health Needs

44

STUDENT ATTENDANCE DATAOFFICE OF PUPIL PERSONNEL SERVICES

HAML HOWE KEAN LINC MLK PAIG PLVY VCLR WDLN YATE ZOLR CNPK MTPL ONDA SCHS SCLAQ1 Perfect Attendance 189 104 63 108 187 161 138 113 115 120 127 189 187 163 397 30

Q2 Perfect Attendance 64 40 39 56 66 85 58 47 56 33 45 41 79 87 256 27



0

200

400

600

800

1000

Perfect Attendance by Building

Q1 Perfect Attendance Q2 Perfect Attendance Q3 Perfect Attendance Q4 Perfect Attendance

45

Students with perfect attendance or = 15 buildings



HAML

HOWE

KEAN

LINC

MLK

PAIG

PLVY

VCLR

WDLN

YATE

ZOLR

CNPK

MTPL

ONDA

SCHS

SCLA

Q1 1-5 Days 274 200 211 231 326 301 239 263 233 215 255 416 380 379 1301100

Q2 1-5 Days 312 251 214 246 376 332 289 273 287 275 278 479 431 443 1297106

Q3 1-5 Days 308 262 206 261 416 352 303 279 267 256 301 449 430 432 1340103

Q4 1-5 Days 319 270 205 271 375 363 299 251 265 265 308 478 384 437 1299110

0200400600800

1000120014001600

Student Absences, 1-5 Days

HAML

HOWE

KEAN

LINC

MLK

PAIG

PLVY

VCLR

WDLN

YATE

ZOLR

CNPK

MTPL

ONDA

SCHS

SCLA

Q1 6-10 Days 16 6 32 5 12 22 16 7 15 10 26 31 50 40 215 29

Q2 6-10 Days 46 26 39 36 78 63 53 54 39 35 63 82 75 66 330 34

Q3 6-10 Days 26 24 10 29 41 31 33 44 26 35 48 69 65 71 286 34

Q4 6-10 Days 53 29 21 29 47 49 54 65 40 49 47 81 94 79 301 30

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350


HAML

HOWE

KEAN

LINC

MLK

PAIG

PLVY

VCLR

WDLN

YATE

ZOLR

CNPK

MTPL

ONDA

SCHS

SCLA

Q1 11-19 Days 0 3 9 1 1 2 0 0 1 3 3 12 13 10 98 29

Q2 11-19 Days 7 8 20 0 4 17 13 14 3 8 19 24 25 30 180 29

Q3 11-19 Days 8 9 1 2 9 11 4 9 8 4 10 22 31 22 180 31

Q4 11-19 Days 10 11 2 8 14 20 11 21 15 10 8 33 47 35 218 27

0

50

100

150

200

250


HAML

HOWE

KEAN

LINC

MLK

PAIG

PLVY

VCLR

WDLN

YATE

ZOLR

CNPK

MTPL

ONDA

SCHS

SCLA

Q1 20+ Days 0 0 2 0 1 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 42 9

Q2 20+ Days 0 1 1 1 1 2 0 1 0 1 0 5 9 1 89 24

Q3 20+ Days 0 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 4 7 4 100 26

Q4 20+ Days 3 4 0 0 4 6 0 6 4 1 3 16 19 15 150 36

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

Student Absences, 20+ Days

Intensive Support

Community Agency Task Force

Personalized Plan-SBSTFamily Outreach Mentor ProgramEarly OutreachIdentify Barriers

Educate & Engage FamiliesTrack Data to Intervene Early

Media Campaign Recognize & Reduce Barriers

(ex. Health Care, Dental, Transportation, & Homelessness)

47

Tier 3 Students who missed 20% of school‐chronic

absence

Tier 2Students who

missed 10‐19% of school

Tier 1All students –

students missing 5‐9% of school

RtI Chart Attendance

Attendance Action Plans

48

SCHENECTADY FEDERATION OF TEACHERS ATTENDANCEOFFICE OF HUMAN RESOURCES

49

5658

65

52

65

47

5955

38

47

42

47

52

4346

44

54 5452 52

49

32

68

29

44

5350

4345

51

6159

43

31

3942 43

26

59

2931

44

28

4347

58

4953

38

8

23 24

43

21

32

19 19

3128

3533 32

42 41

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Percent of SFT with Less than 2 AbsencesQuarters 1-4

% of SFT with less than 2 absences (9/7/2016 - 11/30/2016 % of SFT with less than 2 absences (12/1/16 - 1/27/17)

% of SFT with less than 2 absences (1/28/17 - 4/6/17) % of SFT with less than 2 absences (4/7/17-6/23/17)

2016-2017 QUARTER 4 ACADEMIC PROGRESS …...skills that are below grade level expectations) Number of Students (K-6) Below Achievement for Grade Level on Report Cards 1 course 2 courses

Documents