•2015 Leadership Conference •“All In: Achieving Results Together” •Developing and Implementing a •Comprehensive System of Personnel • Development • Mary Beth Bruder, Director ECPC, University of Connecticut •Stephanie Parks, Instructor, University of Kansas • ECPCTA.org
65
Embed
2015 Leadership Conference “All In: Achieving Results Together” Developing and Implementing a Comprehensive System of Personnel Development Mary Beth Bruder,
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
•Mary Beth Bruder, Director ECPC, University of Connecticut
•Stephanie Parks, Instructor, University of Kansas
•ECPCTA.org
LOGIC: If we want improved outcomes for infants and young children with disabilities and their families, THEN…………
2
Improved outcomes for children and
families
Improved effectiveness of EI, ECSE, and
EC services and supports
More EC leaders and practitioners
have the requisite
knowledge and skills.
States have high quality
CSPD
How improved CSPDleads toimproved outcomesNote: The working assumption is that the blue box will produce the green boxes. Large scale change will occur after the 5 years of the Center.
ECPC’s focus
Early Childhood Systems (BUILD initiative)
Early Childhood Personnel Center
to facilitate the implementation of integrated and comprehensive early childhood
systems of personnel development (CSPD) for all disciplines serving infants and young
children with disabilities
Comprehensive System of Personnel Development
Personnel Standards
Recruitment and Retention
Preservice Training
Inservice Training
Leadership, Coordination & Sustainability
EvaluationEvaluation
A Comprehensive System of Personal Development
for the early childhood workforce who serve infants, toddlers and preschool children with
disabilities and their families
is a necessary and integral quality indicator of
an early childhood service system
ECPC Framework
Knowledge Generation
Technical Assistance and Dissemination
Leadership and Collaboration
Personnel Standards
Outcomes and Accountability
Evidenced Based Practice
Model CSPD Development
Scaling Up CSPD Elements
Technology
State Agency and Certification Personnel
IHE Faculty
And Other
PD Staff
Admin-istratorsAnd EC Service
Providers
Families Graduate Students
Evaluation
ECPC Goals and Objectives
Knowledge Development
Technical Assistance
Leadership and Coordination
Cross-disciplinary
and EB personnel standards
Joint activities
with OSEP TA centers and EC
leadership organizations
Integrated and Comprehensive
System of Personnel
Development
Guidance to states &
IHEs on per-sonnel standards
Outputs of the Center
• Knowledge Development
• Technical Assistance
• Leadership and Coordination
1) Knowledge Development
• National Data Base of State Personnel Standards
• National Data Base of CSPD Components as Reported by all State Part C and 619
Coordinators
• Research Syntheses on Personnel Issues• National Initiative on Cross Disciplinary
Personnel Standards
National Data Base of Personnel Standards13 disciplines20 variablesA two-step procedure was implemented:
• Step 1: Internet-based data collection (with inter-rater reliability)
• Step 2: Telephone interview for verification. Analysis: Frequency count and percentageFindings:
• Each state dramatically varied in personnel standards.• Related service disciplines had less variance.• Less than 1/3 of the states specified additional requirements
for working in Part C.
Licensing, and certification of personnel who provide services to infants and young children with disabilities and their families
Personnel Standards
Products:• Data report (will be uploaded to ecpcta.org)• At-a-glance one page summary (in your folder).• Web-based personnel standards search tool:
National Data Base of CSPD ComponentsTelephone interviews with 619/Part C coordinators
• CSPD components and needs• Additional information
Analysis:• 3-step thematic coding: Initial coding; collapse areas; final coding.• Frequency count and percentage.
Findings:• 1/4 of the states do not have all components in place for Part C.• Top components in place: Appropriate licensure and certification;
and technical assistance availability• Top areas of need: Evaluation; ongoing, systematic, and effective in-
service opportunities; and ongoing needs assessment.• Other concerns: Recruitment and retention; and systemic concerns.
Products:• Data report (will be uploaded to ecpcta.org)• At-a-glance one page summary (in your folder).• Selection of intensive and targeted technical assistance states:
• Intensive TA: Delaware, Iowa, Kansas, and Oregon• Targeted TA: Rhode Island, Massachusetts, Florida, Utah, and Hawaii
Literature Syntheses
• #1: Systematic Review of Models of State Agency and Institutions of Higher Education (IHE) Practices Leading to Alignment of State Personnel Standards and Competencies with Curricula at Institutions of Higher Education
• #2: Systematic Review of Models of State Agency and Institutions of Higher Education Practices Leading to Alignment of Preservice and Inservice Training for Early Childhood Interventionists
→ 0 articles met inclusion criteria.
Knowledge Development Cross-Disciplinary Activities
• Two National Meetings of the Organizations to Share Information and Priorities
• Presentations at DEC, ASHA in Year 2; More in Year 3• Completed Crosswalks of Personnel Standards Across:
DEC; NAEYC; AOTA; APTA: ASHA
• Manuscripts Completed by Disciplines Organizations(IYC Current Issue)
• DEC Workgroup Validated a Refined Item by Item Analysis of DEC/NAEYC Personnel Standards……..
National Initiative on Cross Disciplinary Standards• Crosswalk the personnel standards of DEC, NAEYC, ASHA,
AOTA and APTA. • Across 7 practice areas:
• Assessment Practices• Family Centered Care• Collaboration/Teaming• Natural Environments• Achieving individualized family service plan and individualized
• General: Across audiences, regions, and states: To provide information and resources on personnel development
• Targeted: State specific CSPD components: To align national personnel standards and state personnel standards and/or to align preservice preparation with inservice preparation:
MA, RI, UT, HI
• Intensive: State specific: To develop CSPD framework within 8 states:
DE, Iowa, KS, OR
Comprehensive System of Personnel Development
Personnel Standards
Recruitment and Retention
Preservice Training
Inservice Training
Leadership, Coordination & Sustainability
EvaluationEvaluation
Strategic Planning
• Vision
• Mission
• Goals/Objectives
• Self Assessment
• Action/Implementation Plan
• Implement
• Evaluate
Building a Model
• Operational definition and reliable measurement of the outcomes
• Socially valid relationship between intervention and socially valid outcome: if/then
• Consistency of effects across users
• Advantage of alternative service delivery
• Fidelity of Implementation
Paine, Bellamy & Wilcox, 1984
How Will We Do This ?
• Content: CSPD
• Method: Implementation frame through
strategic planning• Outcome:
Scaling up of effective practices for personnel development
Comprehensive System of Personnel Development
Personnel Standards
Recruitment and Retention
Preservice Training
Inservice Training
Leadership, Coordination & Sustainability
EvaluationEvaluation
Method:Implementation Framework
To facilitate the adoption of effective practices through strategic planning
for a CSPD
What Do We Mean by Implementation?
• A specified set of activities designed to put into practice a policy, activity, or program of known dimensions.
• Implementation processes are purposeful and defined in sufficient detail such that independent observers can detect the presence and strength of these “specified activities”
Major Themes in Implementation Literature
1. Assessing readiness and capacity 2. Structure of the implementation process3. Engagement and buy-in4. Program installation 5. Outcome evaluation and fidelity
monitoring 6. Feedback and quality improvement7. Innovation and adaptation
Through Strategic Planning
Strategic Planning for a CSPD
1. Process by which CSPD:• Sets its direction• States its intent• Establishes parameters for implementation
2. CSPD should include:• Clear statement of the problem the strategic plan intends to
address• Broad goal statement of what to be accomplished• Outcome-oriented objectives which move toward that
accomplishment• Strategies and actions which will enable the accomplishment of
objectives• Operational guidelines for implementation
Principles of Strategic Planning
• Strategic planning is directed toward creating a future that could be, rather than reacting to a future that will be.
• The process of strategic planning is as important as the product because the process is designed to create understanding, consensus, and commitment through interactions of leaders and stakeholders.
• Strategic plans must be sufficiently broad to provide flexibility and sufficiently specific to provide direction for functional and operational planning.
The Strategic Planning Process: Key Characteristics
• Focused and Decision Related
• Future Oriented
• Fact-Based
• Avoids Over-Generalization
• Explores Alternative Solutions
• Reassesses Decisions Over Time
• Politically Realistic
VISION via Outcome
MISSION of the Group
CAPACITY of the State
OBJECTIVES AND ACTION PLAN
EVALUATION
Phase I Sequence
• Exploration
• Installation
• Initial Implementation
• Full Implementation
Phase II: Model Replication
We Will
Scale Up Effective Practices for Comprehensive and Integrated Early
Childhood Systems of Personnel Development
AND EFFECT SUSTAINABLECHANGE
WHEN WE…….
• Demonstrate a Reliable Relationship Between and
Among Variables
• Replicate across……..
• Evaluate Fidelity and Outcomes
• Isolate Model Components that are Effective Across
Multiple Exemplars
Scaling UP a CSPD with Fidelity
• Accuracy of Procedures
• Consistency Across Users
•1
•Personnel Development
•Ongoing Professional Development
• Inservice /Technical Assistance
Mentoring & Coaching
•Preservice
• College / University
Degree Programs
•̀ ~ t~-~y~~~~~.~F'~i'f1~T.FT~.~'
Recruitment & Retention
•Evaluation
•Comprehensive System of
•Personnel Development (CSPD)
Leadership,
Coordination,
& Sustainability
Quality Indicator 1: A cross sector leadership team is in place that can set priorities and make policy, governance, and financial decisions.
Quality Indicator 2: There is a written multi-year plan in place to address all sub-components of the CSPD.
State Personnel
Standards
Quality Indicator 3: State personnel standards across disciplines are aligned to national professional organization personnel standards.
Quality Indicator 4: The criteria for state certification, licensure, credentialing and/or endorsement are aligned to state personnel standards and national professional organization personnel standards across disciplines.
Preservice
Personnel
Development
Quality Indicator 5: Institution of higher education (IHE) programs and curricula across disciplines are aligned with both national professional organization personnel standards and state personnel standards.
Quality Indicator 6: Institution of higher education programs and curricula address early childhood development and discipline specific pedagogy.
Inservice
Personnel
Development
Quality Indicator 7: A statewide system for inservice personnel development and technical assistance is in place for personnel across disciplines
Quality Indicator 8: A statewide system for inservice personnel development and technical assistance is aligned and coordinated with higher education program and curricula across disciplines
Recruitment
and Retention
Quality Indicator 9: Comprehensive recruitment and retention strategies are based on multiple data sources, and revised as necessary.
Quality Indicator 10: Comprehensive recruitment and retention strategies are being implemented across disciplines.
Evaluation
Quality Indicator 11: The evaluation plan for the CSPD includes processes and mechanisms to collect, store, and analyze data across all subcomponents
Quality Indicator 12: The evaluation plan is implemented, continuously monitored, and revised as necessary based on multiple data sources
•KANSAS
•
•Kansas Strategic Planning
•Team
•Part C Coordinator* •Part B, 619 Coordinator* •Early Childhood Coordinator* •IHE Faculty •Family Member •Head Start T/TA •Local Part C Coordinator / Provider •School District Part B, 619 Coordinator •Licensure Representative •Budget Representative •Inservice / TA •Childcare PD Provider
•Strategic Planning Process
•Vision
•Mission
•SWOT Analysis
•Goals
•
•
• •
•
•I. •ua I t Life-long-learning
•build-capacity-families-child re n
••
• p r o v i d e •strong-commitment-to evidenced-based
•resew rch •intentional quality-services based lam% the-greater-good
•invested family-centered Far •high-quality-work professional-standards comprehensive evidence-based
•competent/skilled-workforce •a l i g n m e n t e •
CD
•eb p co tence 0 positive-
i' evidence
•positive-child-outcomes AL' id•Pic •
child-outcomes support collaboration family \€ (1)." positive-outcomes •coaching outcomes tools —
•highly-qua lifted-and-a ppropria tely-va lu ed-wo rkfo rce
•better-outcomes-for-child re n-a nd-families
•
•WI-IY ARE WE
•DOING THIS?
•"It's not a great mission statement, but we'll revise it if things get better."
·Templates for Vision & Mission Statements
111 Early Childhood Personnel
Center Mission
www.ecpcta.org
·A mission statement is a clear statement about the purpose of the organization. The mission statement should include the
essential purpose of the organization and inform why it is in existence It should be meaningful. focused and at the same time
flexible.
·The purpose of an organization's mission/philosophy statement is to relate
·WHAT is going to be done
·WHO is going to be served
·WHY it is done
·Examples of Mission Statements:
·(1) The mission of the Kansas Coordinating Council on Early Childhood Developmental Services is to ensure that a
comprehensive service delivery system of integrated services is available in Kansas to all children with or at risk of developmental
delays from birth through age five and their families. 2.The Massachusetts Department of Early
Edr foundation that supports all children in their
devi contributing members of the community, and
sy parents and caregivers.
3.The Newark Public Schools Office of Early C
, . .
In order to accomplish our vision, the Kansas ECPC Strategic Planning Team
(What / action)
(Who)
(Why / so that)
•KS Mission Statement •In order to accomplish our vision,
•the Kansas CSPD Strategic Planning Team will design a cohesive •personnel development system that ensures high quality
early childhood programs and services leading to positive outcomes
for all children and families.
•Silos •Cohesive
•Components •System
•
•
•Threats •Opportunities
•Weaknesses
•SWOT
•Strengths
•Kansas CSPD Team Goals
•1. EC Higher Education Survey ,1111111111111111rik, •2. Analysis and Dissemination
•3. Linking Preservice & Inservice
•4. Evaluation Plan
•Kansas
CSPD
Plan
•
•
•
•
•KansasCSPD.ku.edu
•-11—
•Kansas Early Childhood Comprehensive System of Personnel Development
•About Us Components Future Plans Links Our Work Contact Page
•0,
•Quote from Dave Lindeman
"Our intent is to build a
high-quality, cohesive
personnel development
system designed to
strengthen the capacity
of early childhood
professionals in
Kansas across
disciplines, resulting in
positive outcomes for
young children and
families. It takes time,
but here in Kansas, we
have a good
foundation,"
Dave Lindeman, Director of the
Life Span Institute at Parsons
•Vision
•Kansas' early childhood CSPD will result in positive outcomes for young children and families.
•Mission
•In order to accomplish our vision, the Kansas ECPC Strategic Planning Team will design a cohesive personnel development system that ensures high quality early childhood programs and services leading to positive outcomes for all children and families.
•"Can you tell me please which way I ought to go from here?"
•"That depends a good deal on where you want to get to," said the Cat.
•"I don't much care where," said Alice.
•"Then it doesn't matter which way you walk," said the Cat.
•Lewis Carroii •Alice's Adventures in Wonderland
State: Nevada Period Covered By Plan: Dec 31, 2015 Outcome: Develop a CSPD that creates and supports a system of early childhood continuum of learning Objective Strategies/Action Steps Resources Responsibility Timeline Evaluation
1.By July 15, 2015,Nevada will develop a cross sector ECSoL (EC System of Learning) State Leadership Team. 2. By July 15, 2015 Nevada will develop a ECSoL Vision and Mission statement. 3. By June 30, 2015, Nevada will submit letter of interest for intensive TA to ECPC. 4. By December 31, 2015, Nevada will create a ECSoL strategic plan.
Complete Financial Framework
Consider Data System
Evaluation
1. Identify additional members
2. Meet 2 X per year in person.
3. Meet monthly via technology.
-------------- Share with: ECAC (8/4/15) ICC (7/16/15) NvAEYC (9/17/15) DEC TACSEI (7/31/15) EI Statewide Mgmt Edie will draft and send to ECSoL for apprioval. Submit to MaryBeth.