Top Banner
7/21/2019 2015 District Report Card http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2015-district-report-card 1/19 NATCHITOCHES PARISH 2014-2015 District Report Card • LEA Code: 035 2013-2014 C DPS: 77.2 2014-2015 C DPS: 81.4 6525 Enrolled • 10% Special Education • 76% Economically Disadvantaged LETTER GRADES DID THIS DISTRICT MAKE PROGRESS WITH STUDENTS WHO STRUGGLED ACADEMICALLY? District earn a maximum of 10 progress po for students previously non-procient but exceeded expectations in the current year TOTAL POINTS EARNED 10.0 NUMBER OF SCHOOLS PERCENT OF SCHOOLS ELEMENTARY/MIDDLE HIGH COMBINATION TOTAL 3 0 0 3 20% 2 0 0 2 13% 3 1 1 5 33% 3 0 0 3 20% 1 0 1 2 13% HOW DID STUDENTS IN GRADES 3-8 PERFORM ON STATE ASSESSMENTS? tudents performing at Basic may need additional support to be fully prepared for the next level of studies. Students performing at Mastery and bove have met or exceeded the expectations, and are well prepared for the next level of studies. By 2025, A-rated schools must have an average erformance of Mastery. SCORE DISTRICT STATE MINORITY STUDENTS STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED STUDEN MASTERY + 24% 27% 15% 7% 17% BASIC + 58% 65% 47% 30% 51% HOW PREPARED ARE STUDENTS FOR COLLEGE & CAREER SUCCESS? END-OF-COURSE EXAMS: PROFICIENT Students are assessed on their performance towards meeting grade-level expectations. ACT: AVERAGE SCORE Average score is based on all enrolled twelfth grade students *National average includes both public and nonpublic studen DISTRICT STATE MINORITY STUDENTS STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED STUDENTS AVERAGE SCORE STATE NATIONAL 61% 62% 49% 18% 52% 17.0 19.2 19.7 WHAT PERCENT OF STUDENTS ARE EARNING COLLEGE AND CAREER CREDIT? tudents have the opportunity to earn college & career credits prior to graduation. GRADUATES SCORING 3+ ON ADVANCED PLACEMENT TEST GRADUATES EARNING DUAL ENROLLMENT CREDIT DISTRICT STATE NATIONAL DISTRICT STATE <5% 5.3% 21.6% 40% 28% WHAT PERCENT OF STUDENTS GRADUATED IN FOUR YEARS WITH A DIPLOMA? he cohort graduation rate is the percent of students who enter the ninth grade and successfully graduate within four years. DISTRICT STATE NATIONAL 12/13 MINORITY STUDENTS STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED STUDENT 72% 75% 81% 67% 29% 66% During transition years (2013-2016), expectations for all students have been raised by increasing the quality of ELA and math ssessments and phasing out of the LAA 2 assessments. During this transitional learning year, a curve policy is in place to ensure th he distribution of letter grades remains stable. More information about transition policies is available here.
19

2015 District Report Card

Mar 05, 2016

Download

Documents

Natchitoches Parish 2014-2015 District Report Card
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: 2015 District Report Card

7/21/2019 2015 District Report Card

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2015-district-report-card 1/19

NATCHITOCHES PARISH

2014-2015 District Report Card • LEA Code: 035

2013-2014

CDPS: 77.2

2014-2015

CDPS: 81.46525 Enrolled • 10% Special Education • 76% Economically Disadvantaged

LETTER GRADES DID THIS DISTRICT MAKE

PROGRESS WITH STUDENTSWHO STRUGGLED

ACADEMICALLY?District earn a maximum of 10 progress po

for students previously non-procient but

exceeded expectations in the current year

TOTAL POINTS EARNED

10.0

NUMBER OF SCHOOLSPERCENT OF

SCHOOLSELEMENTARY/MIDDLE HIGH COMBINATION TOTAL

3 0 0 3 20%

2 0 0 2 13%

3 1 1 5 33%

3 0 0 3 20%

1 0 1 2 13%

HOW DID STUDENTS IN GRADES 3-8 PERFORM ON STATE ASSESSMENTS?tudents performing at Basic may need additional support to be fully prepared for the next level of studies. Students performing at Mastery andbove have met or exceeded the expectations, and are well prepared for the next level of studies. By 2025, A-rated schools must have an averageerformance of Mastery.

SCORE DISTRICT STATEMINORITY

STUDENTS

STUDENTS

WITH DISABILITIES

ECONOMICALLY

DISADVANTAGED STUDEN

MASTERY + 24% 27% 15% 7% 17%BASIC + 58% 65% 47% 30% 51%

HOW PREPARED ARE STUDENTS FOR COLLEGE & CAREER SUCCESS?

END-OF-COURSE EXAMS: PROFICIENTStudents are assessed on their performance towards meeting grade-levelexpectations.

ACT: AVERAGE SCOREAverage score is based on all enrolled twelfth grade students*National average includes both public and nonpublic studen

DISTRICT STATEMINORITY

STUDENTS

STUDENTS

WITH

DISABILITIES

ECONOMICALLY

DISADVANTAGED

STUDENTS

AVERAGE SCORE STATE NATIONAL

61% 62% 49% 18% 52% 17.0 19.2 19.7

WHAT PERCENT OF STUDENTS ARE EARNING COLLEGE AND CAREER CREDIT?tudents have the opportunity to earn college & career credits prior to graduation.

GRADUATES SCORING 3+

ON ADVANCED PLACEMENT TESTGRADUATES EARNING DUAL ENROLLMENT CREDIT

DISTRICT STATE NATIONAL DISTRICT STATE

<5% 5.3% 21.6% 40% 28%

WHAT PERCENT OF STUDENTS GRADUATED IN FOUR YEARS WITH A DIPLOMA?he cohort graduation rate is the percent of students who enter the ninth grade and successfully graduate within four years.

DISTRICT STATE NATIONAL 12/13 MINORITY STUDENTS STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIESECONOMICALLY

DISADVANTAGED STUDENT

72% 75% 81% 67% 29% 66%

During transition years (2013-2016), expectations for all students have been raised by increasing the quality of ELA and mathssessments and phasing out of the LAA 2 assessments. During this transitional learning year, a curve policy is in place to ensure thhe distribution of letter grades remains stable. More information about transition policies is available here.

Page 2: 2015 District Report Card

7/21/2019 2015 District Report Card

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2015-district-report-card 2/19

NATCHITOCHES CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL014-2015 • Natchitoches Parish • Grades PK,9-12 • 035009 COW PREPARED ARE STUDENTS FOR COLLEGE & CAREER SUCCESS?

ND-OF-COURSE EXAMS: PROFICIENTudents are assessed on their performance towards meeting grade-level expectations.

SCHOOL 14/15 vs 13/14

65%

DISTRICT

61%

STATE MINORITY

STUDENTS14/15 vs 13/14

53%62%

14/15 vs 13/14STUDENTS

WITHDISABILITIES

22%

ECONOMICALLYDISADVANTAGED

STUDENTS14/15 vs

56%

SPS = 81.7

CHOOL 14/15 vs 13/14

48%

DISTRICT

44%

STATE MINORITYSTUDENTS

40%62%

STUDENTSWITH

DISABILITIES

N/A

ECONOMICALLYDISADVANTAGED

STUDENTS

43%

AVERAGESCORE

17.3

DISTRICT

17.0

STATE

19.2

NAT

19

CT: COLLEGE-GOING SCORE OF 18

score of 18 or above on the ACT indicates twelfth grade students have minimumoficiency for college & career success.

ACT: AVERAGE SCORE

Average score is based on all enrolled twelftgrade students.

WHAT PERCENT OF STUDENTS ARE EARNING COLLEGE AND CAREER CREDIT?

RADUATES SCORING 3+ ON ADVANCED PLACEMENT TEST

udents have the opportunity to earn college & career credits prior to graduation.

GRADUATES EARNING DUAL ENROLLMENT CREDIT

*Does not include students already represented as earning AP cre

CHOOL 13/14 vs 12/13 STATE NATIONAL SCHOOL 13/14 vs 12/13 STATEDISTRICT DISTRICT

WHAT PERCENT OF STUDENTS GRADUATED IN FOUR YEARS WITH A DIPLOMA?e cohort graduation rate is the percent of students who enter the ninth grade and successfully graduate within four years.

SCHOOL 13/14 vs 12/13

80%

DISTRICT

72%

STATE MINORITYSTUDENTS

75%75%

STUDENTSWITH

DISABILITIES

32%

ECONOMICALLDISADVANTAGE

STUDENTS

74%

NATIONAL 12/13

81%

WHAT PERCENT OF STUDENTS ENROLLED INOLLEGE AFTER GRADUATING?

DID THIS SCHOOL MAKE PROGRESS WITH STUDENTSWHO STRUGGLED ACADEMICALLY?

tudents enrolling in two- or four-year colleges within the 2ndall semester after high school graduation.

Schools earn a maximum of 10 progress points for students previously nproficient but who exceeded expectations in the current year.

SCHOOL

62%

DISTRICT

57%

STATE

59%

TOTAL POINTS EARNED

0.0

14/15 vs 13/14

2013-2014 2014-2015

C

21 Enrolled • 9% Special Education • 67% Economically Disadvantaged

<5% <5% 5.3% 21.6% 47% 40% 28%

ADDITIONAL PERFORMANCEINFORMATION DATA CENTERSPS

75.8

SPS81.7C

Page 3: 2015 District Report Card

7/21/2019 2015 District Report Card

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2015-district-report-card 3/19

EAST NATCHITOCHES ELEMENTARY & MIDDLE SCH

014-2015 • Natchitoches Parish • Grades 4-8 • 035005 COW DID STUDENTS PERFORM ON STATE ASSESSMENTS?udents performing at Basic may need additional support to be fully prepared for the next level of studies. Students performing at Mastery a

bove have met or exceeded the expectations, and are well prepared for the next level of studies. By 2025, A-rated schools must have an aver

erformance of Mastery.

SCHOOL DISTRICT

24%

STATE

MINORITY STUDENTS

9%

27%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIESECONOMICALLY

DISADVANTAGED STUDENTS

SPS = 67.2

OW MANY CREDITS DID STUDENTS EARN BY THE END OF FRESHMAN YEAR?

D THIS SCHOOL MAKE PROGRESS WITH STUDENTS WHO STRUGGLED ACADEMICALLY?

hools with grade 8 are accountable for the number of credits earned and the number of students who dropout by the end of grade 9.

hools earn a maximum of 10 progress points for students previously non-proficient but who exceeded expectations in the current year.

SCHOOL

87%

DISTRICT

86%

STATE

83%

TOTAL POINTSEARNED

10.0

14/15 vs 13

2013-2014 2014-2015

D

70 Enrolled • 15% Special Education • 91% Economically Disadvantaged

ADDITIONAL PERFORMANCE

INFORMATION DATA CENTERSPS59.6

SPS67.2C

48% 58%

SCORE

MASTERY +

BASIC +

11%

65%

The table above includes students who take LAA 1. View how their performance is measured here.

HOW DID DIFFERENT GROUPS OF STUDENTS PERFORM?

SCORE

MASTERY +

BASIC + 45%

CREDITS

6 +

OTE:

SCHOOL DISTRICT STATE SCHOOL DISTRICT STATE SCHOOL DISTRICT STA

15%

47%

18%

55%

<5%

27%

7%

30%

10%

35%

11%

48%

17%

51%

19

57

uring transition years (2013-2016), expectations for all students have been raised by increasing the quality of ELA and mathsessments and phasing out of the LAA 2 assessments. During this transitional learning year, a curve policy is in place to ensure thae distribution of letter grades remains stable. More information about transition policies is available here.

14/15 vs 13/14STATEDISTRICTEXCEEDING

EXPECTATIONSNON-PROFICIENT

STUDENTS

50%

49%

57%

58%

60%

60%

161

171

ELA

MATH

Page 4: 2015 District Report Card

7/21/2019 2015 District Report Card

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2015-district-report-card 4/19

NATCHITOCHES MAGNET SCHOOL

014-2015 • Natchitoches Parish • Grades 1-8 • 035031

Magnet School AOW DID STUDENTS PERFORM ON STATE ASSESSMENTS?udents performing at Basic may need additional support to be fully prepared for the next level of studies. Students performing at Mastery a

bove have met or exceeded the expectations, and are well prepared for the next level of studies. By 2025, A-rated schools must have an aver

erformance of Mastery.

SCHOOL DISTRICT

24%

STATE

MINORITY STUDENTS

63%

27%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIESECONOMICALLY

DISADVANTAGED STUDENTS

SPS = 123.5

OW MANY CREDITS DID STUDENTS EARN BY THE END OF FRESHMAN YEAR?

D THIS SCHOOL MAKE PROGRESS WITH STUDENTS WHO STRUGGLED ACADEMICALLY?

hools with grade 8 are accountable for the number of credits earned and the number of students who dropout by the end of grade 9.

hools earn a maximum of 10 progress points for students previously non-proficient but who exceeded expectations in the current year.

SCHOOL

>95%

DISTRICT

86%

STATE

83%

TOTAL POINTSEARNED

N/A

14/15 vs 13

2013-2014 2014-2015

A

09 Enrolled • <5% Special Education • 56% Economically Disadvantaged

ADDITIONAL PERFORMANCE

INFORMATION DATA CENTERSPS121.7

SPS123.5A

>95% 58%

SCORE

MASTERY +

BASIC +

69%

65%

The table above includes students who take LAA 1. View how their performance is measured here.

HOW DID DIFFERENT GROUPS OF STUDENTS PERFORM?

SCORE

MASTERY +

BASIC + >95%

CREDITS

6 +

OTE:

SCHOOL DISTRICT STATE SCHOOL DISTRICT STATE SCHOOL DISTRICT STA

15%

47%

18%

55%

N/A

N/A

7%

30%

10%

35%

63%

>95%

17%

51%

19

57

uring transition years (2013-2016), expectations for all students have been raised by increasing the quality of ELA and mathsessments and phasing out of the LAA 2 assessments. During this transitional learning year, a curve policy is in place to ensure tha

e distribution of letter grades remains stable. More information about transition policies is available here.

14/15 vs 13/14STATEDISTRICTEXCEEDINGEXPECTATIONS

NON-PROFICIENTSTUDENTS

50%

49%

57%

58%

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

ELA

MATH

Page 5: 2015 District Report Card

7/21/2019 2015 District Report Card

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2015-district-report-card 5/19

N.S.U. ELEMENTARY LAB SCHOOL

014-2015 • Natchitoches Parish • Grades PK,K-5 • 035013 AOW DID STUDENTS PERFORM ON STATE ASSESSMENTS?

udents performing at Basic may need additional support to be fully prepared for the next level of studies. Students performingMastery and above have met or exceeded the expectations, and are well prepared for the next level of studies. By 2025, A-rated

hools must have an average performance of Mastery.

SCHOOL DISTRICT

24%

STATE

MINORITY STUDENTS

41%

27%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIESECONOMICALLY

DISADVANTAGED STUDENTS

SPS = 109.7

D THIS SCHOOL MAKE PROGRESS WITH STUDENTS WHO STRUGGLED ACADEMICALLY?hools earn a maximum of 10 progress points for students previously non-proficient but who exceeded expectations in the current year.

TOTAL POINTSEARNED

N/A

14/15 vs 13

2013-2014 2014-2015

A

94 Enrolled • 9% Special Education • 22% Economically Disadvantaged

ADDITIONAL PERFORMANCEINFORMATION DATA CENTERSPS

111.5

SPS109.7A

92% 58%

SCORE

MASTERY +

BASIC +

55%

65%

The table above includes students who take LAA 1. View how their performance is measured here.

Schools that are K-2 configurations have accountability data based on a paired school, designated by its district.

HOW DID DIFFERENT GROUPS OF STUDENTS PERFORM?

SCORE

MASTERY +

BASIC + 86%

OTE:

SCHOOL DISTRICT STATE SCHOOL DISTRICT STATE SCHOOL DISTRICT STA

15%

47%

18%

55%

19%

58%

7%

30%

10%

35%

42%

88%

17%

51%

19

57

uring transition years (2013-2016), expectations for all students have been raised by increasing the quality of ELA and mathsessments and phasing out of the LAA 2 assessments. During this transitional learning year, a curve policy is in place to ensure thae distribution of letter grades remains stable. More information about transition policies is available here.

STATEDISTRICTEXCEEDING

EXPECTATIONSNON-PROFICIENT

STUDENTS

50%

49%

57%

58%

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

ELA

MATH

Page 6: 2015 District Report Card

7/21/2019 2015 District Report Card

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2015-district-report-card 6/19

N.S.U. MIDDLE LAB SCHOOL

014-2015 • Natchitoches Parish • Grades 6-8 • 035014 AOW DID STUDENTS PERFORM ON STATE ASSESSMENTS?udents performing at Basic may need additional support to be fully prepared for the next level of studies. Students performing at Mastery a

bove have met or exceeded the expectations, and are well prepared for the next level of studies. By 2025, A-rated schools must have an aver

erformance of Mastery.

SCHOOL DISTRICT

24%

STATE

MINORITY STUDENTS

46%

27%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIESECONOMICALLY

DISADVANTAGED STUDENTS

SPS = 123.2

OW MANY CREDITS DID STUDENTS EARN BY THE END OF FRESHMAN YEAR?

D THIS SCHOOL MAKE PROGRESS WITH STUDENTS WHO STRUGGLED ACADEMICALLY?

hools with grade 8 are accountable for the number of credits earned and the number of students who dropout by the end of grade 9.

hools earn a maximum of 10 progress points for students previously non-proficient but who exceeded expectations in the current year.

SCHOOL

>95%

DISTRICT

86%

STATE

83%

TOTAL POINTSEARNED

10.0

14/15 vs 13

2013-2014 2014-2015

A

6 Enrolled • 5% Special Education • 27% Economically Disadvantaged

ADDITIONAL PERFORMANCE

INFORMATION DATA CENTERSPS111.3

SPS123.2A

92% 58%

SCORE

MASTERY +

BASIC +

56%

65%

The table above includes students who take LAA 1. View how their performance is measured here.

HOW DID DIFFERENT GROUPS OF STUDENTS PERFORM?

SCORE

MASTERY +

BASIC + 85%

CREDITS

6 +

OTE:

SCHOOL DISTRICT STATE SCHOOL DISTRICT STATE SCHOOL DISTRICT STA

15%

47%

18%

55%

N/A

N/A

7%

30%

10%

35%

45%

85%

17%

51%

19

57

uring transition years (2013-2016), expectations for all students have been raised by increasing the quality of ELA and mathsessments and phasing out of the LAA 2 assessments. During this transitional learning year, a curve policy is in place to ensure thae distribution of letter grades remains stable. More information about transition policies is available here.

14/15 vs 13/14STATEDISTRICTEXCEEDING

EXPECTATIONSNON-PROFICIENT

STUDENTS

50%

49%

57%

58%

80%

73%

15

15

ELA

MATH

Page 7: 2015 District Report Card

7/21/2019 2015 District Report Card

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2015-district-report-card 7/19

M.R. WEAVER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

014-2015 • Natchitoches Parish • Grades PK,K-3 • 035021 DOW DID STUDENTS PERFORM ON STATE ASSESSMENTS?

udents performing at Basic may need additional support to be fully prepared for the next level of studies. Students performingMastery and above have met or exceeded the expectations, and are well prepared for the next level of studies. By 2025, A-rated

hools must have an average performance of Mastery.

SCHOOL DISTRICT

24%

STATE

MINORITY STUDENTS

17%

27%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIESECONOMICALLY

DISADVANTAGED STUDENTS

SPS = 62.5

D THIS SCHOOL MAKE PROGRESS WITH STUDENTS WHO STRUGGLED ACADEMICALLY?hools earn a maximum of 10 progress points for students previously non-proficient but who exceeded expectations in the current year.

TOTAL POINTSEARNED

N/A

14/15 vs 13

2013-2014 2014-2015

D

64 Enrolled • 11% Special Education • 88% Economically Disadvantaged

ADDITIONAL PERFORMANCEINFORMATION DATA CENTERSPS

66.0

SPS62.5D

55% 58%

SCORE

MASTERY +

BASIC +

18%

65%

The table above includes students who take LAA 1. View how their performance is measured here.

Schools that are K-2 configurations have accountability data based on a paired school, designated by its district.

HOW DID DIFFERENT GROUPS OF STUDENTS PERFORM?

SCORE

MASTERY +

BASIC + 53%

OTE:

SCHOOL DISTRICT STATE SCHOOL DISTRICT STATE SCHOOL DISTRICT STA

15%

47%

18%

55%

11%

41%

7%

30%

10%

35%

18%

55%

17%

51%

19

57

uring transition years (2013-2016), expectations for all students have been raised by increasing the quality of ELA and mathsessments and phasing out of the LAA 2 assessments. During this transitional learning year, a curve policy is in place to ensure thae distribution of letter grades remains stable. More information about transition policies is available here.

STATEDISTRICTEXCEEDING

EXPECTATIONSNON-PROFICIENT

STUDENTS

50%

49%

57%

58%

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

ELA

MATH

Page 8: 2015 District Report Card

7/21/2019 2015 District Report Card

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2015-district-report-card 8/19

L.P. VAUGHN ELEMENTARY & MIDDLE SCHOOL

014-2015 • Natchitoches Parish • Grades PK,K-8 • 035012 DOW DID STUDENTS PERFORM ON STATE ASSESSMENTS?udents performing at Basic may need additional support to be fully prepared for the next level of studies. Students performing at Mastery a

bove have met or exceeded the expectations, and are well prepared for the next level of studies. By 2025, A-rated schools must have an aver

erformance of Mastery.

SCHOOL DISTRICT

24%

STATE

MINORITY STUDENTS

10%

27%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIESECONOMICALLY

DISADVANTAGED STUDENTS

SPS = 51.1

OW MANY CREDITS DID STUDENTS EARN BY THE END OF FRESHMAN YEAR?

D THIS SCHOOL MAKE PROGRESS WITH STUDENTS WHO STRUGGLED ACADEMICALLY?

hools with grade 8 are accountable for the number of credits earned and the number of students who dropout by the end of grade 9.

hools earn a maximum of 10 progress points for students previously non-proficient but who exceeded expectations in the current year.

SCHOOL

85%

DISTRICT

86%

STATE

83%

TOTAL POINTSEARNED

0.0

14/15 vs 13

2013-2014 2014-2015

D

4 Enrolled • 12% Special Education • 94% Economically Disadvantaged

ADDITIONAL PERFORMANCE

INFORMATION DATA CENTERSPS64.0

SPS51.1D

42% 58%

SCORE

MASTERY +

BASIC +

11%

65%

The table above includes students who take LAA 1. View how their performance is measured here.

HOW DID DIFFERENT GROUPS OF STUDENTS PERFORM?

SCORE

MASTERY +

BASIC + 40%

CREDITS

6 +

OTE:

SCHOOL DISTRICT STATE SCHOOL DISTRICT STATE SCHOOL DISTRICT STA

15%

47%

18%

55%

9%

27%

7%

30%

10%

35%

11%

41%

17%

51%

19

57

uring transition years (2013-2016), expectations for all students have been raised by increasing the quality of ELA and mathsessments and phasing out of the LAA 2 assessments. During this transitional learning year, a curve policy is in place to ensure thae distribution of letter grades remains stable. More information about transition policies is available here.

14/15 vs 13/14STATEDISTRICTEXCEEDING

EXPECTATIONSNON-PROFICIENT

STUDENTS

50%

49%

57%

58%

48%

48%

126

120

ELA

MATH

Page 9: 2015 District Report Card

7/21/2019 2015 District Report Card

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2015-district-report-card 9/19

GEORGE L. PARKS ELEMENTARY & MIDDLE SCHOOL

014-2015 • Natchitoches Parish • Grades PK,K-8 • 035015 FOW DID STUDENTS PERFORM ON STATE ASSESSMENTS?udents performing at Basic may need additional support to be fully prepared for the next level of studies. Students performing at Mastery a

bove have met or exceeded the expectations, and are well prepared for the next level of studies. By 2025, A-rated schools must have an aver

erformance of Mastery.

SCHOOL DISTRICT

24%

STATE

MINORITY STUDENTS

<5%

27%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIESECONOMICALLY

DISADVANTAGED STUDENTS

SPS = 32.6

OW MANY CREDITS DID STUDENTS EARN BY THE END OF FRESHMAN YEAR?

D THIS SCHOOL MAKE PROGRESS WITH STUDENTS WHO STRUGGLED ACADEMICALLY?

hools with grade 8 are accountable for the number of credits earned and the number of students who dropout by the end of grade 9.

hools earn a maximum of 10 progress points for students previously non-proficient but who exceeded expectations in the current year.

SCHOOL

88%

DISTRICT

86%

STATE

83%

TOTAL POINTSEARNED

0.0

14/15 vs 13

2013-2014 2014-2015

F

36 Enrolled • 11% Special Education • >95% Economically Disadvantaged

ADDITIONAL PERFORMANCE

INFORMATION DATA CENTERSPS36.1

SPS32.6F

26% 58%

SCORE

MASTERY +

BASIC +

<5%

65%

The table above includes students who take LAA 1. View how their performance is measured here.

HOW DID DIFFERENT GROUPS OF STUDENTS PERFORM?

SCORE

MASTERY +

BASIC + 26%

CREDITS

6 +

OTE:

SCHOOL DISTRICT STATE SCHOOL DISTRICT STATE SCHOOL DISTRICT STA

15%

47%

18%

55%

<5%

<5%

7%

30%

10%

35%

<5%

26%

17%

51%

19

57

uring transition years (2013-2016), expectations for all students have been raised by increasing the quality of ELA and mathsessments and phasing out of the LAA 2 assessments. During this transitional learning year, a curve policy is in place to ensure thae distribution of letter grades remains stable. More information about transition policies is available here.

14/15 vs 13/14STATEDISTRICTEXCEEDING

EXPECTATIONSNON-PROFICIENT

STUDENTS

50%

49%

57%

58%

41%

42%

108

103

ELA

MATH

Page 10: 2015 District Report Card

7/21/2019 2015 District Report Card

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2015-district-report-card 10/19

FRANKIE RAY JACKSON SR. TECHNICAL CENTER

014-2015 • Natchitoches Parish • Grades PK,4-12 • 035030

lternative School FOW DID STUDENTS PERFORM ON STATE ASSESSMENTS?udents performing at Basic may need additional support to be fully prepared for the next level of studies. Students performing at Mastery a

bove have met or exceeded the expectations, and are well prepared for the next level of studies. By 2025, A-rated schools must have an avererformance of Mastery.

SCHOOL DISTRICT

24%

STATE

MINORITY STUDENTS

<5%

27%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIESECONOMICALLY

DISADVANTAGED STUDENTS

SPS = 13.7

OW MANY CREDITS DID STUDENTS EARN BY THE END OF FRESHMAN YEAR?

D THIS SCHOOL MAKE PROGRESS WITH STUDENTS WHO STRUGGLED ACADEMICALLY?

hools with grade 8 are accountable for the number of credits earned and the number of students who dropout by the end of grade 9.

hools earn a maximum of 10 progress points for students previously non-proficient but who exceeded expectations in the current year.

SCHOOL

60%

DISTRICT

86%

STATE

83%

2013-2014 2014-2015

F

2 Enrolled • 18% Special Education • >95% Economically Disadvantaged

ADDITIONAL PERFORMANCEINFORMATION DATA CENTERSPS

22.8

SPS13.7F

15% 58%

SCORE

MASTERY +

BASIC +

<5%

65%

The table above includes students who take LAA 1. View how their performance is measured here.Schools that are K-2 configurations have accountability data based on a paired school, designated by its district.

HOW DID DIFFERENT GROUPS OF STUDENTS PERFORM?

SCORE

MASTERY +

BASIC + 14%

CREDITS

6 +

OTE:

SCHOOL DISTRICT STATE SCHOOL DISTRICT STATE SCHOOL DISTRICT STA

15%

47%

18%

55%

<5%

18%

7%

30%

10%

35%

<5%

14%

17%

51%

19

57

uring transition years (2013-2016), expectations for all students have been raised by increasing the quality of ELA and mathsessments and phasing out of the LAA 2 assessments. During this transitional learning year, a curve policy is in place to ensure thae distribution of letter grades remains stable. More information about transition policies is available here.

Page 1 of 2

Page 11: 2015 District Report Card

7/21/2019 2015 District Report Card

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2015-district-report-card 11/19

RANKIE RAY JACKSON SR. TECHNICAL CENTER

014-2015 • Natchitoches Parish • Grades PK,4-12 • 035030

ternative School FOW PREPARED ARE STUDENTS FOR COLLEGE & CAREER SUCCESS?

ND-OF-COURSE EXAMS: PROFICIENTdents are assessed on their performance towards meeting grade-level expectations.

CHOOL 14/15 vs 13/14

%

DISTRICT

61%

STATE MINORITYSTUDENTS

14/15 vs 13/14

6%62%

14/15 vs 13/14STUDENTS

WITHDISABILITIES

N/A

ECONOMICALLYDISADVANTAGED

STUDENTS14/15 vs 13

10%

SPS = 13.7

HOOL 14/15 vs 13/14

/A

DISTRICT

44%

STATE MINORITYSTUDENTS

N/A62%

STUDENTSWITH

DISABILITIES

N/A

ECONOMICALLYDISADVANTAGED

STUDENTS

N/A

AVERAGESCORE

8.4

DISTRICT

17.0

STATE

19.2

NATIO

19

T: COLLEGE-GOING SCORE OF 18

core of 18 or above on the ACT indicates twelfth grade students have minimumficiency for college & career success.

ACT: AVERAGE SCORE

Average score is based on all enrolled twelfth

grade students.

HAT PERCENT OF STUDENTS ARE EARNING COLLEGE AND CAREER CREDIT?

ADUATES SCORING 3+ ON ADVANCED PLACEMENT TEST

dents have the opportunity to earn college & career credits prior to graduation.

GRADUATES EARNING DUAL ENROLLMENT CREDIT

*Does not include students already represented as earning AP cred

HOOL 13/14 vs 12/13 STATE NATIONAL SCHOOL 13/14 vs 12/13 STATEDISTRICT DISTRICT

HAT PERCENT OF STUDENTS GRADUATED IN FOUR YEARS WITH A DIPLOMA?cohort graduation rate is the percent of students who enter the ninth grade and successfully graduate within four years.

CHOOL 13/14 vs 12/13

5%

DISTRICT

72%

STATE MINORITYSTUDENTS

<5%75%

STUDENTSWITH

DISABILITIES

N/A

ECONOMICALLYDISADVANTAGED

STUDENTS

<5%

NATIONAL 12/13

81%

HAT PERCENT OF STUDENTS ENROLLED INOLLEGE AFTER GRADUATING?

DID THIS SCHOOL MAKE PROGRESS WITH STUDENTSWHO STRUGGLED ACADEMICALLY?

udents enrolling in two- or four-year colleges within the 2nd

l semester after high school graduation.

Schools earn a maximum of 10 progress points for students previously no

proficient but who exceeded expectations in the current year.

SCHOOL DISTRICT

57%

STATE

59%

TOTAL POINTS EARNED

0.0

14/15 vs 13/14

Enrolled • 18% Special Education • >95% Economically Disadvantaged

5% <5% 5.3% 21.6% <5% 40% 28%

Page 2 of 2

Page 12: 2015 District Report Card

7/21/2019 2015 District Report Card

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2015-district-report-card 12/19

FRANKIE RAY JACKSON SR. TECHNICAL CENTER

2014-2015 • Natchitoches Parish • Grades PK,4-12 • Site Code: 035030

Alternative School Supplemental Report FSPS = 1382 Enrolled • 18% Special Education • >95% Economically Disadvantaged

DEMOGRAPHIC & GENERAL INFORMATION

WHAT PERCENTAGE OF STUDENTS ARE OVERAGE?The percentage of students who are two or more years older

than students typically enrolled at a grade level.

SCHOOLALTERNATIVE

SCHOOLSALL SCHOOLS

86% 83% 21%

WHAT PERCENTAGE OF STUDENTS RECEIVE

SPECIAL EDUCATION SERVICES?

SCHOOLALTERNATIVE

SCHOOLSALL SCHOOLS

18% 19% 10%

WHAT PERCENTAGE OF STUDENTS

ARE ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED?

SCHOOLALTERNATIVE

SCHOOLSALL SCHOOLS

>95% 91% 69%

PERSISTENCE COMPARISON

CONTINUED ENROLLMENT RATEThe percentage of students who continue to be enrolled

in school at the end of the year

SCHOOLALTERNATIVE

SCHOOLSALL SCHOOLS

87% 83% >95%

CREDIT ACCUMULATIONAverage number of credits earned by the end of the freshman year.

SCHOOLALTERNATIVE

SCHOOLSALL SCHOOLS

6.9 4.8 7.1

ACADEMIC COMPARISON

AVERAGE SCHOOL PERFORMANCE SCORE

SCHOOLALTERNATIVE

SCHOOLSALL SCHOOL

13.7 18.9 88.8

HOW DID STUDENTS PERFORM

ON GRADES 3-8 ASSESSMENTS?

LEVEL SCHOOL ALTERNATIVESCHOOLS ALLSCHOO

Mastery + <5% <5% 27%

Basic 13% 13% 38%

Below Basic 85% 84% 35%

HOW DID STUDENTS PERFORM

ON HIGH SCHOOL EXAMS?

LEVEL SCHOOL ALTERNATIVESCHOOLS

ALLSCHOO

Excellent <5% 5% 22%

Good 8% 15% 39%

Fair 27% 26% 25%

Needs

Improvement 65% 54% 13%

HOW DID STUDENTS EXIT HIGH SCHOOL?

LEVEL SCHOOLALTERNATIVE

SCHOOLS

ALL

SCHOO

High School Diploma <5% 11% 75%

GED/HiSET 26% 14% <5%

Certicate of

Achievement <5% <5% <5%

Other Nongraduates 72% 71% 20%

Page 13: 2015 District Report Card

7/21/2019 2015 District Report Card

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2015-district-report-card 13/19

LAKEVIEW JUNIOR & SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL

014-2015 • Natchitoches Parish • Grades 7-12 • 035026 COW DID STUDENTS PERFORM ON STATE ASSESSMENTS?udents performing at Basic may need additional support to be fully prepared for the next level of studies. Students performing at Mastery a

bove have met or exceeded the expectations, and are well prepared for the next level of studies. By 2025, A-rated schools must have an avererformance of Mastery.

SCHOOL DISTRICT

24%

STATE

MINORITY STUDENTS

8%

27%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIESECONOMICALLY

DISADVANTAGED STUDENTS

SPS = 75.2

OW MANY CREDITS DID STUDENTS EARN BY THE END OF FRESHMAN YEAR?

D THIS SCHOOL MAKE PROGRESS WITH STUDENTS WHO STRUGGLED ACADEMICALLY?

hools with grade 8 are accountable for the number of credits earned and the number of students who dropout by the end of grade 9.

hools earn a maximum of 10 progress points for students previously non-proficient but who exceeded expectations in the current year.

SCHOOL

93%

DISTRICT

86%

STATE

83%

2013-2014 2014-2015

D

27 Enrolled • 12% Special Education • 77% Economically Disadvantaged

ADDITIONAL PERFORMANCEINFORMATION DATA CENTERSPS

67.3

SPS75.2C

34% 58%

SCORE

MASTERY +

BASIC +

8%

65%

The table above includes students who take LAA 1. View how their performance is measured here.Schools that are K-2 configurations have accountability data based on a paired school, designated by its district.

HOW DID DIFFERENT GROUPS OF STUDENTS PERFORM?

SCORE

MASTERY +

BASIC + 31%

CREDITS

6 +

OTE:

SCHOOL DISTRICT STATE SCHOOL DISTRICT STATE SCHOOL DISTRICT STA

15%

47%

18%

55%

<5%

12%

7%

30%

10%

35%

8%

34%

17%

51%

19

57

uring transition years (2013-2016), expectations for all students have been raised by increasing the quality of ELA and mathsessments and phasing out of the LAA 2 assessments. During this transitional learning year, a curve policy is in place to ensure thae distribution of letter grades remains stable. More information about transition policies is available here.

Page 1 of 2

Page 14: 2015 District Report Card

7/21/2019 2015 District Report Card

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2015-district-report-card 14/19

AKEVIEW JUNIOR & SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL

014-2015 • Natchitoches Parish • Grades 7-12 • 035026 COW PREPARED ARE STUDENTS FOR COLLEGE & CAREER SUCCESS?

ND-OF-COURSE EXAMS: PROFICIENTdents are assessed on their performance towards meeting grade-level expectations.

CHOOL 14/15 vs 13/14

0%

DISTRICT

61%

STATE MINORITYSTUDENTS

14/15 vs 13/14

42%62%

14/15 vs 13/14STUDENTS

WITHDISABILITIES

13%

ECONOMICALLYDISADVANTAGED

STUDENTS14/15 vs 13

44%

SPS = 75.2

HOOL 14/15 vs 13/14

1%

DISTRICT

44%

STATE MINORITYSTUDENTS

19%62%

STUDENTSWITH

DISABILITIES

N/A

ECONOMICALLYDISADVANTAGED

STUDENTS

27%

AVERAGESCORE

16.4

DISTRICT

17.0

STATE

19.2

NATIO

19

T: COLLEGE-GOING SCORE OF 18

core of 18 or above on the ACT indicates twelfth grade students have minimum

ficiency for college & career success.

ACT: AVERAGE SCORE

Average score is based on all enrolled twelfthgrade students.

HAT PERCENT OF STUDENTS ARE EARNING COLLEGE AND CAREER CREDIT?

ADUATES SCORING 3+ ON ADVANCED PLACEMENT TEST

dents have the opportunity to earn college & career credits prior to graduation.

GRADUATES EARNING DUAL ENROLLMENT CREDIT

*Does not include students already represented as earning AP cred

HOOL 13/14 vs 12/13 STATE NATIONAL SCHOOL 13/14 vs 12/13 STATEDISTRICT DISTRICT

HAT PERCENT OF STUDENTS GRADUATED IN FOUR YEARS WITH A DIPLOMA?cohort graduation rate is the percent of students who enter the ninth grade and successfully graduate within four years.

CHOOL 13/14 vs 12/13

5%

DISTRICT

72%

STATE MINORITYSTUDENTS

83%75%

STUDENTSWITH

DISABILITIES

46%

ECONOMICALLYDISADVANTAGED

STUDENTS

89%

NATIONAL 12/13

81%

HAT PERCENT OF STUDENTS ENROLLED INOLLEGE AFTER GRADUATING?

DID THIS SCHOOL MAKE PROGRESS WITH STUDENTSWHO STRUGGLED ACADEMICALLY?

udents enrolling in two- or four-year colleges within the 2ndl semester after high school graduation.

Schools earn a maximum of 10 progress points for students previously noproficient but who exceeded expectations in the current year.

SCHOOL

41%

DISTRICT

57%

STATE

59%

TOTAL POINTS EARNED

8.5

14/15 vs 13/14

7 Enrolled • 12% Special Education • 77% Economically Disadvantaged

5% <5% 5.3% 21.6% 40% 40% 28%

Page 2 of 2

Page 15: 2015 District Report Card

7/21/2019 2015 District Report Card

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2015-district-report-card 15/19

PROVENCAL ELEMENTARY & JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL

014-2015 • Natchitoches Parish • Grades PK,K-8 • 035017 BOW DID STUDENTS PERFORM ON STATE ASSESSMENTS?udents performing at Basic may need additional support to be fully prepared for the next level of studies. Students performing at Mastery a

bove have met or exceeded the expectations, and are well prepared for the next level of studies. By 2025, A-rated schools must have an aver

erformance of Mastery.

SCHOOL DISTRICT

24%

STATE

MINORITY STUDENTS

24%

27%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIESECONOMICALLY

DISADVANTAGED STUDENTS

SPS = 99.1

OW MANY CREDITS DID STUDENTS EARN BY THE END OF FRESHMAN YEAR?

D THIS SCHOOL MAKE PROGRESS WITH STUDENTS WHO STRUGGLED ACADEMICALLY?

hools with grade 8 are accountable for the number of credits earned and the number of students who dropout by the end of grade 9.

hools earn a maximum of 10 progress points for students previously non-proficient but who exceeded expectations in the current year.

SCHOOL

84%

DISTRICT

86%

STATE

83%

TOTAL POINTSEARNED

8.9

14/15 vs 13

2013-2014 2014-2015

B

68 Enrolled • 10% Special Education • 69% Economically Disadvantaged

ADDITIONAL PERFORMANCE

INFORMATION DATA CENTERSPS99.9

SPS99.1B

77% 58%

SCORE

MASTERY +

BASIC +

35%

65%

The table above includes students who take LAA 1. View how their performance is measured here.

HOW DID DIFFERENT GROUPS OF STUDENTS PERFORM?

SCORE

MASTERY +

BASIC + 66%

CREDITS

6 +

OTE:

SCHOOL DISTRICT STATE SCHOOL DISTRICT STATE SCHOOL DISTRICT STA

15%

47%

18%

55%

5%

28%

7%

30%

10%

35%

29%

73%

17%

51%

19

57

uring transition years (2013-2016), expectations for all students have been raised by increasing the quality of ELA and mathsessments and phasing out of the LAA 2 assessments. During this transitional learning year, a curve policy is in place to ensure thae distribution of letter grades remains stable. More information about transition policies is available here.

14/15 vs 13/14STATEDISTRICTEXCEEDING

EXPECTATIONSNON-PROFICIENT

STUDENTS

50%

49%

57%

58%

67%

62%

51

29

ELA

MATH

Page 16: 2015 District Report Card

7/21/2019 2015 District Report Card

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2015-district-report-card 16/19

MARTHAVILLE ELEMENTARY & JUNIOR HIGH SCHO

014-2015 • Natchitoches Parish • Grades PK,K-8 • 035008 COW DID STUDENTS PERFORM ON STATE ASSESSMENTS?udents performing at Basic may need additional support to be fully prepared for the next level of studies. Students performing at Mastery a

bove have met or exceeded the expectations, and are well prepared for the next level of studies. By 2025, A-rated schools must have an aver

erformance of Mastery.

SCHOOL DISTRICT

24%

STATE

MINORITY STUDENTS

11%

27%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIESECONOMICALLY

DISADVANTAGED STUDENTS

SPS = 82.2

OW MANY CREDITS DID STUDENTS EARN BY THE END OF FRESHMAN YEAR?

D THIS SCHOOL MAKE PROGRESS WITH STUDENTS WHO STRUGGLED ACADEMICALLY?

hools with grade 8 are accountable for the number of credits earned and the number of students who dropout by the end of grade 9.

hools earn a maximum of 10 progress points for students previously non-proficient but who exceeded expectations in the current year.

SCHOOL

>95%

DISTRICT

86%

STATE

83%

TOTAL POINTSEARNED

4.6

14/15 vs 13

2013-2014 2014-2015

B

76 Enrolled • 11% Special Education • 67% Economically Disadvantaged

ADDITIONAL PERFORMANCE

INFORMATION DATA CENTERSPS89.5

SPS82.2C

65% 58%

SCORE

MASTERY +

BASIC +

27%

65%

The table above includes students who take LAA 1. View how their performance is measured here.

HOW DID DIFFERENT GROUPS OF STUDENTS PERFORM?

SCORE

MASTERY +

BASIC + 41%

CREDITS

6 +

OTE:

SCHOOL DISTRICT STATE SCHOOL DISTRICT STATE SCHOOL DISTRICT STA

15%

47%

18%

55%

6%

38%

7%

30%

10%

35%

22%

59%

17%

51%

19

57

uring transition years (2013-2016), expectations for all students have been raised by increasing the quality of ELA and mathsessments and phasing out of the LAA 2 assessments. During this transitional learning year, a curve policy is in place to ensure thae distribution of letter grades remains stable. More information about transition policies is available here.

14/15 vs 13/14STATEDISTRICTEXCEEDING

EXPECTATIONSNON-PROFICIENT

STUDENTS

50%

49%

57%

58%

68%

47%

25

19

ELA

MATH

Page 17: 2015 District Report Card

7/21/2019 2015 District Report Card

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2015-district-report-card 17/19

GOLDONNA ELEMENTARY & JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL

014-2015 • Natchitoches Parish • Grades PK,K-8 • 035007 BOW DID STUDENTS PERFORM ON STATE ASSESSMENTS?udents performing at Basic may need additional support to be fully prepared for the next level of studies. Students performing at Mastery a

bove have met or exceeded the expectations, and are well prepared for the next level of studies. By 2025, A-rated schools must have an aver

erformance of Mastery.

SCHOOL DISTRICT

24%

STATE

MINORITY STUDENTS

23%

27%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIESECONOMICALLY

DISADVANTAGED STUDENTS

SPS = 91.8

OW MANY CREDITS DID STUDENTS EARN BY THE END OF FRESHMAN YEAR?

D THIS SCHOOL MAKE PROGRESS WITH STUDENTS WHO STRUGGLED ACADEMICALLY?

hools with grade 8 are accountable for the number of credits earned and the number of students who dropout by the end of grade 9.

hools earn a maximum of 10 progress points for students previously non-proficient but who exceeded expectations in the current year.

SCHOOL

91%

DISTRICT

86%

STATE

83%

TOTAL POINTSEARNED

10.0

14/15 vs 13

2013-2014 2014-2015

D

6 Enrolled • 13% Special Education • 79% Economically Disadvantaged

ADDITIONAL PERFORMANCE

INFORMATION DATA CENTERSPS65.4

SPS91.8B

71% 58%

SCORE

MASTERY +

BASIC +

24%

65%

The table above includes students who take LAA 1. View how their performance is measured here.

HOW DID DIFFERENT GROUPS OF STUDENTS PERFORM?

SCORE

MASTERY +

BASIC + 83%

CREDITS

6 +

OTE:

SCHOOL DISTRICT STATE SCHOOL DISTRICT STATE SCHOOL DISTRICT STA

15%

47%

18%

55%

13%

47%

7%

30%

10%

35%

21%

67%

17%

51%

19

57

uring transition years (2013-2016), expectations for all students have been raised by increasing the quality of ELA and mathsessments and phasing out of the LAA 2 assessments. During this transitional learning year, a curve policy is in place to ensure thae distribution of letter grades remains stable. More information about transition policies is available here.

14/15 vs 13/14STATEDISTRICTEXCEEDING

EXPECTATIONSNON-PROFICIENT

STUDENTS

50%

49%

57%

58%

81%

80%

48

45

ELA

MATH

Page 18: 2015 District Report Card

7/21/2019 2015 District Report Card

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2015-district-report-card 18/19

CLOUTIERVILLE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

014-2015 • Natchitoches Parish • Grades PK,K-8 • 035024 COW DID STUDENTS PERFORM ON STATE ASSESSMENTS?udents performing at Basic may need additional support to be fully prepared for the next level of studies. Students performing at Mastery a

bove have met or exceeded the expectations, and are well prepared for the next level of studies. By 2025, A-rated schools must have an aver

erformance of Mastery.

SCHOOL DISTRICT

24%

STATE

MINORITY STUDENTS

12%

27%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIESECONOMICALLY

DISADVANTAGED STUDENTS

SPS = 76.5

OW MANY CREDITS DID STUDENTS EARN BY THE END OF FRESHMAN YEAR?

D THIS SCHOOL MAKE PROGRESS WITH STUDENTS WHO STRUGGLED ACADEMICALLY?

hools with grade 8 are accountable for the number of credits earned and the number of students who dropout by the end of grade 9.

hools earn a maximum of 10 progress points for students previously non-proficient but who exceeded expectations in the current year.

SCHOOL

75%

DISTRICT

86%

STATE

83%

TOTAL POINTSEARNED

9.5

14/15 vs 13

2013-2014 2014-2015

D

65 Enrolled • 15% Special Education • 89% Economically Disadvantaged

ADDITIONAL PERFORMANCE

INFORMATION DATA CENTERSPS68.5

SPS76.5C

58% 58%

SCORE

MASTERY +

BASIC +

14%

65%

The table above includes students who take LAA 1. View how their performance is measured here.

HOW DID DIFFERENT GROUPS OF STUDENTS PERFORM?

SCORE

MASTERY +

BASIC + 56%

CREDITS

6 +

OTE:

SCHOOL DISTRICT STATE SCHOOL DISTRICT STATE SCHOOL DISTRICT STA

15%

47%

18%

55%

7%

32%

7%

30%

10%

35%

14%

57%

17%

51%

19

57

uring transition years (2013-2016), expectations for all students have been raised by increasing the quality of ELA and mathsessments and phasing out of the LAA 2 assessments. During this transitional learning year, a curve policy is in place to ensure thae distribution of letter grades remains stable. More information about transition policies is available here.

14/15 vs 13/14STATEDISTRICTEXCEEDING

EXPECTATIONSNON-PROFICIENT

STUDENTS

50%

49%

57%

58%

63%

72%

62

46

ELA

MATH

Page 19: 2015 District Report Card

7/21/2019 2015 District Report Card

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2015-district-report-card 19/19

FAIRVIEW-ALPHA ELEMENTARY & JUNIOR HIGH SC

014-2015 • Natchitoches Parish • Grades PK4,K-6 • 035006 DOW DID STUDENTS PERFORM ON STATE ASSESSMENTS?

udents performing at Basic may need additional support to be fully prepared for the next level of studies. Students performing

Mastery and above have met or exceeded the expectations, and are well prepared for the next level of studies. By 2025, A-rated

hools must have an average performance of Mastery.

SCHOOL DISTRICT

24%

STATE

MINORITY STUDENTS

8%

27%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIESECONOMICALLY

DISADVANTAGED STUDENTS

SPS = 60.3

D THIS SCHOOL MAKE PROGRESS WITH STUDENTS WHO STRUGGLED ACADEMICALLY?hools earn a maximum of 10 progress points for students previously non-proficient but who exceeded expectations in the current year.

TOTAL POINTSEARNED

10.0

14/15 vs 13

2013-2014 2014-2015

F

5 Enrolled • 9% Special Education • 89% Economically Disadvantaged

ADDITIONAL PERFORMANCE

INFORMATION DATA CENTERSPS38.4

SPS60.3D

46% 58%

SCORE

MASTERY +

BASIC +

12%

65%

The table above includes students who take LAA 1. View how their performance is measured here.

Schools that are K-2 configurations have accountability data based on a paired school, designated by its district.

HOW DID DIFFERENT GROUPS OF STUDENTS PERFORM?

SCORE

MASTERY +

BASIC + 38%

OTE:

SCHOOL DISTRICT STATE SCHOOL DISTRICT STATE SCHOOL DISTRICT STA

15%

47%

18%

55%

<5%

28%

7%

30%

10%

35%

11%

43%

17%

51%

19

57

uring transition years (2013-2016), expectations for all students have been raised by increasing the quality of ELA and mathsessments and phasing out of the LAA 2 assessments. During this transitional learning year, a curve policy is in place to ensure thae distribution of letter grades remains stable. More information about transition policies is available here.

STATEDISTRICTEXCEEDING

EXPECTATIONSNON-PROFICIENT

STUDENTS

50%

49%

57%

58%

64%

71%

85

85

ELA

MATH