2014 NVT Results Steven Tilbrook; Rachel Thomson Kalyx Australia
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
2014 NVT ResultsSteven Tilbrook; Rachel ThomsonKalyx Australia
OverviewWhat is “Production Value PLUS” Season 2014: Regional SummaryPV Plus applied to NVTVariety ComparisonsNew Varieties
Production Value PLUS System
New methodology = Production Value PLUS System
Produces “Production Values” (PVs) in t/ha for all varieties for each environment (NVT year & site combination)
Basic definitions:
Variety PVs: are positive or negative differences relative to a base-line (PV = 0)
PV = 0 Reflects the average expected yield of all the varieties in the current NVT data set, if grown in that particular environment
PV-PLUS is available on NVT online via the
Yield App
Area Sown to Wheat Varieties
Mace Calingiri Wyalkatchem Yitpi Magenta Stiletto Cobra Corack Bonnie Rock Westonia0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
12/1313/1414/15
Area
sow
n to
Whe
at V
arie
ties %
Northern Snapshot of 2014
Best break since 1999 & 2012 then dry spell
Above average minimum temps
Hi temps & 22km/hr winds 24/7 for 2 weeks, yields suffered
Ideal harvest conditions
50
100
0
Game changing rains for some
Below to average Season
Rain
fall
(mm
)
Eneabba
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov0.0
15.0
30.0
45.0
60.0
75.0
90.0
105.0
sown 29/5
2014 Rainfall (mm) Average Rainfall (mm)
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.00.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
f(x) = 0.993029627216458 x + 0.111108217109095R² = 0.981806796009565f(x) = 0.996092119356155 x + 0.124735797871681R² = 0.977427218968546
CorackLinear (Corack)
Mace Yield (t/ha)
Co
rack
Yie
ld (
t/h
a)
86 trials: 2013 (44), 2014 (42) WA NVT sites
Mace vs Corack
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.00.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
f(x) = 1.12815458315448 x − 0.242218865376699R² = 0.985494465557155f(x) = 0.993029627216458 x + 0.111108217109095R² = 0.981806796009565
MaceLinear (Mace)
Mace Yield (t/ha)
Co
bra
Yie
ld (
t/h
a)
86 trials: 2013 (44), 2014 (42) WA NVT sites
Mace vs Cobra
Corack or Mace???
New main season (mid maturity) Varieties to watch…
Hydra APW: Bonnie Rock/ Strzelecki, mid season, good disease package, regional adaptability.Impress CL Plus APW: Very much a Wyalkatchem type. Great foliar package especially yellow spot, good grain size.
Emerging varieties
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.00.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
f(x) = 1.06484386486006 x + 0.000230774067878414R² = 0.984834742135063f(x) = 0.993029627216458 x + 0.111108217109095R² = 0.981806796009565
MaceLinear (Mace)
Mace Yield (t/ha)
Hyd
ra Y
ield
(t/
ha)
86 trials: 2013 (44), 2014 (42) WA NVT sites
Mace vs Hydra
New Noodle VarietiesZEN: Calingiri/Wyalkatchem longer season,
watch stem rust. Supreme: Arrino derivative, shorter season,
expressive dwarf gene, good disease.
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.00.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
f(x) = 1.07958817735801 x − 0.134687756476917R² = 0.97203329375077f(x) = 1.03287867750647 x − 0.154039002808398R² = 0.977264816423965
Calingiri
Calingiri Yield (t/ha)
Zen
Yie
ld (
t/h
a)
83 trials: 2013 (44), 2014 (39) WA NVT sites
Zen vs Calingiri
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.00.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
f(x) = 0.99156082362293 x + 0.0528773466617185R² = 0.982572499372847
f(x) = 1.03287867750647 x − 0.154039002808398R² = 0.977264816423965
Calingiri
Calingiri Yield (t/ha)
Su
pre
me
Yie
ld (
t/h
a)
83 trials: 2013 (44), 2014 (39) WA NVT sites
Supreme vs Calingiri
Harper: Yitpi/Stylet derivative, Yield advantage over Yitpi (different phenology)Prefers a good finish (longer season)Watch yellow spot
Trojan: LPB00LR000041/Sentinal derivativeYield advantage over Yitpi (different phenology)Watch Yellow SpotRequires a good finish (longer finish
Long Season Varieties
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.00.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
f(x) = 1.08320146915949 x − 0.154281783055209R² = 0.978075469359233f(x) = 0.980253891760823 x − 0.0312953741868123R² = 0.975591779569406
YitpiLinear (Yitpi)
Yitpi Yield (t/ha)
Tro
jan
Yie
ld (
t/h
a)
56 trials sown in 2013 (14), 2014 (42) WA NVT sites
Trojan vs Yitpi
CLEARFIELD
2014 Barley NVT ResultsSteven Tillbrook; Rachel ThomsonKalyx Australia
IMI tolerant barley• Observe label timings for MRL’s• Scope CL Plus
– Very close to Buloke, head loss an issue. – Lower yielding than Hindmarsh.– Hindmarsh would have averaged a $70/ha greater return
in the NVT trials over the last 5 years. • New IMI tolerant varieties on the horizon (Intergrain)
Variety development• Flinders
– Accredited for malting– Good disease, longer season, yields well.
• La Trobe– Yields = Hindmarsh– Accredited for malting
• Compass– Malting accreditation due 2016, top of MET analysis, mid-maturity
similar to Commander.
Litmus update• Litmus recognised as having blue aleurone
– Only completely white aleurone varieties meet current standards
• Yield advantage on acid soils• Geraldton PZ has established a trial segregation for Litmus. • AEGIC have been commissioned by Barely Australia to
investigate market sensitivity to blue aleurone.
Key messages• Hindmarsh still the a good option • Awaiting market development of Flinders, La Trobe and
Compass. • Flinders and Compass are longer season may be suited to
Eneabba and Badgingarra area.• Malting varieties require more favourable premium to be
competitive with Hindmarsh.
Hybrids
RR$
44% Oil in 2014 Increased
Yields
Recognition and thanks to:
Grower co-operatorsGrower Group Staff
Kalyx StaffDini Ganesalingam: SAGI
Matu PeipiGRDCACAS
www.nvtonline.com.au
Related Documents
