Top Banner
Kazuyo NAGAHAMA Forest Management, Utilization, and People's Perception of a Van Panchayat in Garhwal, Uttarakhand, India
10
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: 2013.2.15 nagahama.pptx

Kazuyo NAGAHAMA

Forest Management, Utilization, and People's Perception of a

Van Panchayat in Garhwal, Uttarakhand, India

Page 2: 2013.2.15 nagahama.pptx

BACKGROUNDVan Panchayat (VP) : Community based forest management,

self-governed institution of forestry in Uttarakhand state, India

Background Objectives Method Result

VPs are in quantitative and qualitative decline in the once dense and well-managed Van

Panchayat in the Kumaon hills. (Balooni et al., 2007)

Van Panchayat (VP) sare increasing the practice to gain people’s confidence.

(Gairola, H. & Negi, A.S. ,2011) Van Panchayat

How is the forest management and utilization and people’s perception in newly generated VPs on the Garhwal hills?

Why? ➢ Why are VPs on the decline, although VP’s number are increasing?    This is the case of VP forest on the Kumaon hills in Uttarakhand.

Forest degradation

Page 3: 2013.2.15 nagahama.pptx

5.Management committee In total 225

participants identified

Uttarakhand(UK)

Forest Department

Local People

〈 Objectives〉

〈Methodology〉

〈 Data collection 〉

InterviewDocuments, Acts and Rules

↓Review

41 household (HH) sampling from 51 HH in total

↓Structured interview

Impact of VP on sustainable forest management and livelihood improvement

4.Livelihood

VP leader

1.Forest utilization

2.Forest management

3.People’s perception

〈 Discussion〉

Background Objectives Method Result

OBJECTIVES & METHOD

Page 4: 2013.2.15 nagahama.pptx

➢ The reason of selection D village :Present Sarpanch (VP head) is a Block Committee leader of 151 VPs in Mussoire, supporting VP association and the assumption of active VP.

➢ Number of household (HH) interview :41 HH data (80% HH in the village)

➢ Total area of the village : 137 ha

➢ Altitude : 1850 m ➢ Year the VP

established : 1993 ➢ Total VP area : 20 ha ➢ Total HH : 51

(Population : 348)

The VP name: D village Block: Mussorie

District :Tehri GarhwalState: Uttarakhand in India

Sampling

STUDY SITEStudy period: From July to August, 2012

Page 5: 2013.2.15 nagahama.pptx

1. Forest utilization in D village VPLogging; Ban on felling of living treesGrazing animals; UnrestrictedGrass cutting ; UnrestrictedCollection of dry and fallen branches twigs and leaves;

Unrestricted

Type of forest ;Dominated forest With Oak (Quercus spp.),some patches of Chir Pine (Pinus roxburghii):

RESULTS

Background Objectives Method Result

Oak(Author, 2012)

100% respondents utilize firewood which is necessary, 78% respondents collect firewood routinely,

for maintaining their livelihood.

Page 6: 2013.2.15 nagahama.pptx

… continued

Background Objectives Method Result

Constitution of VP (UKF, 2005)

2. Forest management

MC has jurisdiction (duty) and responsible for managing to VP.

Page 7: 2013.2.15 nagahama.pptx

Agriculture is their main livelihood.

All of the People in D village are listed as Below Poverty Line. (B.P.L. Survey, 2002)

Background Objectives Method Result

… continued

Forest is important to maintain people’s livelihood, but not a direct source of income.

3. Livelihood activity

4. People’s perception

Respondents are satisfied with the activities of MC.

The current VP condition is highly improved.

After VP was formed…

Page 8: 2013.2.15 nagahama.pptx

( Critical value: χ² >4.06 ( 5% ), p<0.05 )

… continued

Relation between MC member’s composition and the factors

The consistence of caste is not fair to consider the proportion of the villagers.-LPG is the indicator of the independence of firewood,

MC members depend on firewood.

Background Objectives Method Result

Factors Explained valuable : MC members or not

  χ² Fishers p Result Caste 4.04 - RejectedMigrant 0.303 0.27 AcceptedOutside study 0.74 0.23 AcceptedCell phone - 0.50 AcceptedDish TV - 0.17 AcceptedLPG - 0.0003 RejectedVP distance - 1.32 AcceptedCollecting firewood - 0.37 AcceptedGrazing animals - 0.29 Accepted

5. Characteristics of Management committee (MC)

Page 9: 2013.2.15 nagahama.pptx

Background Objectives Method Result

DISCUSSION

1.Forest manage-

ment

2.Forest utilization

3.People’s perception

4.Livelihood activity

5. Manage-ment

Committee

Increasing VP number(Rawat, 1999; UFD, 2009 )

Livelihood improvement

Effective impact Low performanceB.P.L.

VP in Garhwal Division Forest degradation

(Ballabh et al., 2002)

⇒Grant for plantation VP in Kumaon Division

Support from Forest Department(FD)

⇒ Oppression

Sustainable Forest management Sustainable Development

Page 10: 2013.2.15 nagahama.pptx

Thank you very much for your attention