Top Banner
µg/L In-Situ Remediation of Hexavalent Chromium, Antimony and Nickel with Sub-Micron (Nano)-Scale Ferrous Sulfide Slurry Jim V. Rouse, Richard H. Christensen, PhD LPG, & Steven R. Irvin (AcuityES, Fishers, IN) © AcuityES 2013
55

2013 acuity es case study reduced

Jan 28, 2018

Download

Documents

richcphd
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: 2013 acuity es case study   reduced

µg/L

In-Situ Remediation of Hexavalent Chromium, Antimony and Nickel with Sub-Micron (Nano)-Scale Ferrous Sulfide Slurry

Jim V. Rouse, Richard H. Christensen, PhD LPG,

& Steven R. Irvin (AcuityES, Fishers, IN)

© AcuityES 2013

Page 2: 2013 acuity es case study   reduced

Company’s Primary Focus: • Environmental Liability Consulting (how to manage liabilities) • Site Investigation – Soil, Groundwater, Air • Remediation of contaminated Sites • Expert Witness Testimony

Company’s Secondary Focus: • Environmental Permitting – Air, Water, Waste • Environmental Compliance

Acuity Environmental Solutions

© AcuityES 2013

Page 3: 2013 acuity es case study   reduced

Presented At: • International Seminar on Remediation and Redevelopment of

Contaminated Sites, Sao Paulo, Brazil • AEHS West Coast Conference, San Diego, CA • USEPA’s Sustainable Remediation International Conference, Amherst, MA • AWPA National Conference, Ft. Lauderdale, FL & Nashville, TN • Midwest States Environmental Consulting Assoc., Indianapolis, IN • Battelle Conference, Monterey, California

In-Situ Remediation of Hexavalent Chromium, Antimony and Nickel with Nano-Scale Ferrous

Sulfide Slurry

© AcuityES 2013

Page 4: 2013 acuity es case study   reduced

Case Study In… In Situ Geochemical Reduction

Stabilization (i.e., immobilizing) of metal constituents by chemically reducing the metals of concern to less soluble forms through the manipulation of geochemical factors such as:

• pH • Oxidation potential (Eh or ORP) • Complexation • Sorption • Ion exchange

Resulting in the elimination of metallic contaminants by: • Precipitation • Dissolution • Oxidation • Complexation

© AcuityES 2013

Page 5: 2013 acuity es case study   reduced

Key Project Considerations Competitor’s Proposals for Project included: • Off-site disposal of hazardous soils • 15 - 20 year pump and treat remedy for groundwater • >$8 Million

Note: original estimates based on >50% smaller source area Our Solution: • In Situ remediation of impacted soils and groundwater • Goal: 2 year total remedy - 1/8th the time - • Cost: $4.5 Million - Nearly 50% below competitor’s bids -

© AcuityES 2013

Page 6: 2013 acuity es case study   reduced

Chrome Plating

Gone Wild!

© AcuityES 2013

Page 7: 2013 acuity es case study   reduced

First things first…

Interior Building Decontamination

Segregation of Waste for Disposal

Building Demolition

© AcuityES 2013

Page 8: 2013 acuity es case study   reduced

Soil Boring & Well Installation

Groundwater Sampling

Soil Sampling

First things first…

© AcuityES 2013

Page 9: 2013 acuity es case study   reduced

Site Location -- Muncie, IN

Source Areas

GW Impacts

© AcuityES 2013

Page 10: 2013 acuity es case study   reduced

Site Plan for X-Section Line

Site Conditions First investigation – 2005 AcuityES - 2009

A’

A

© AcuityES 2013

Page 11: 2013 acuity es case study   reduced

Geologic X-Section

FORMER BASEMENT

SOURCE AREA

© AcuityES 2013

Page 12: 2013 acuity es case study   reduced

Hydrogeology

Unconfined Aquifer Clay to 15 feet (w/stringers) Sands & fine gravels Static Water at 15’ bgl Saturated thickness 5’ in SE to > 25’ in NW

© AcuityES 2013

Page 13: 2013 acuity es case study   reduced

Soil Impacts

• Two Adjacent Source Areas • 5,400 cubic yards of impact • Perched water sand stringers

7,900 mg/Kg maximum Cr+6

3,600 mg/Kg Cr+6 at 12’ bgl

State Cleanup Goal - 38 mg/Kg

© AcuityES 2013

Page 14: 2013 acuity es case study   reduced

Groundwater Impacts

Groundwater COCs Cr+6, Sb, As, and Ni

On-Site Cr+6

800,000 µg/L

9,700,000 µg/L

66,000 sq ft (320 ft long) Plume Offsite Cr+6 at 58,800 µg/L

State Cleanup Goal- 100 µg/L Cr+6

© AcuityES 2013

Page 15: 2013 acuity es case study   reduced

In Situ Chemical Reduction

•Ferrous Sulfate : FeSO4·7H2O

•Ferrous Sulfide : FeS

•Calcium Polysulfide (CPS) : CaSx

•Sodium Thiosulfate : Na2S2O3

•Sodium Metabisulfite : Na2S2O5

•Sodium Sulfite : Na2SO3

•Zero Valent Iron

BENCH TESTED CHEMICALS REDUCTANTS

© AcuityES 2013

Page 16: 2013 acuity es case study   reduced

Selected Ferrous Sulfide (FeS)

FeS, Hybrid Form (aka precipitated pyrite)

Liquid suspension of 7% FeS FeS, hybrid - With additional 2% free Sulfide to simulate CaSx Nanoscale: 98% crystals <5 microns Cationic (Iron) 4 H2O + Cr04

2- + 3 Fe2- + 4 OH- 3 Fe(OH)3+ Cr(OH)3 (Solid) Anionic (sulfide) 17 H2O + 8 Cr04

2- + 3 HS- 3 S + 8 Cr(OH)3 (Solid) + 12 OH-

© AcuityES 2013

Page 17: 2013 acuity es case study   reduced

In Situ Soil Blending

Dual Axis Blender – 15’ Plunge Total Area – 130’ x 110’

GPS Grid Network – 10’ x 10’ (100’ x 70’ to 15’) & Shallow to 5’

Computerized Dosing

© AcuityES 2013

Page 18: 2013 acuity es case study   reduced

In Situ Soil Blending

Dual Axis Blender

FeS injection/mixing

© AcuityES 2013

Page 19: 2013 acuity es case study   reduced

In Situ Soil Blending

Thorough Mixing to 15’ BGL

© AcuityES 2013

Page 20: 2013 acuity es case study   reduced

In Situ Soil Blending Completed in 2 weeks Total FeS = 78,300 gallons Subsequent stabilization with aglime required

© AcuityES 2013

Page 21: 2013 acuity es case study   reduced

Confirmation Sampling

© AcuityES 2013

Page 22: 2013 acuity es case study   reduced

Groundwater Injections – FeS

THE NUMBERS

155 Inject Pts

15 ft ROI

6 wks complete

© AcuityES 2013

Page 23: 2013 acuity es case study   reduced

Groundwater Injections

Difficult Injections

Boulder Fields

6’ caliche

(calcified silt)

Lodgement till

© AcuityES 2013

Page 24: 2013 acuity es case study   reduced

Groundwater Injections

FeS Injection Totes 35,385 gallons injected

Rotosonic Drilling Top Down Injection – 5ft intervals

© AcuityES 2013

Page 25: 2013 acuity es case study   reduced

Groundwater Injections

Sensitivity to the Community

Required

Residential Hours

© AcuityES 2013

Page 26: 2013 acuity es case study   reduced

Preferential Flow Paths 15 – 20’ bgl Sand Unit

© AcuityES 2013

Page 27: 2013 acuity es case study   reduced

Preferential Flow Paths 20 - 25’ bgl Sand Unit

© AcuityES 2013

Page 28: 2013 acuity es case study   reduced

Pre-Treatment Cr+6

State Cleanup Goal of

100 µg/L

© AcuityES 2013

Page 29: 2013 acuity es case study   reduced

FeS Reductant Injection

© AcuityES 2013

Page 30: 2013 acuity es case study   reduced

1st Q Post-Treatment Cr+6

© AcuityES 2013

Page 31: 2013 acuity es case study   reduced

2nd Q Post-Treatment Cr+6

© AcuityES 2013

Page 32: 2013 acuity es case study   reduced

3rd Q Post-Treatment Cr+6

© AcuityES 2013

Page 33: 2013 acuity es case study   reduced

1st Supplemental Injection

© AcuityES 2013

Page 34: 2013 acuity es case study   reduced

4th Q Post-Treatment Cr+6

© AcuityES 2013

Page 35: 2013 acuity es case study   reduced

5th Q Post-Treatment Cr+6

© AcuityES 2013

Page 36: 2013 acuity es case study   reduced

6th Q Post-Treatment Cr+6

© AcuityES 2013

Page 37: 2013 acuity es case study   reduced

7th Q Post-Treatment Cr+6

© AcuityES 2013

Page 38: 2013 acuity es case study   reduced

2nd Supplemental Injection

© AcuityES 2013

Page 39: 2013 acuity es case study   reduced

8th – 10th Q Post-Treatment Cr+6

© AcuityES 2013

Page 40: 2013 acuity es case study   reduced

Antimony Treatment Antimony Concentrations: Detected in 25 monitoring wells on-Site up to 30,000 µg/L off-Site up to 4,700 µg/L State Industrial Cleanup level - 41 µg/L State Residential Cleanup Level - 6 µg/L Goal for Antimony: Fixate onto Goethite (FeO(OH)) or Precipitate as stibnite (Sb2S3)

© AcuityES 2013

Page 41: 2013 acuity es case study   reduced

Pre-Treatment Antimony

State Cleanup Goal of 6 µg/L

© AcuityES 2013

Page 42: 2013 acuity es case study   reduced

FeS Reductant Injection

© AcuityES 2013

Page 43: 2013 acuity es case study   reduced

1st Q Post-Treatment Antimony

© AcuityES 2013

Page 44: 2013 acuity es case study   reduced

2nd Q Post-Treatment Antimony

© AcuityES 2013

Page 45: 2013 acuity es case study   reduced

3rd Q Post-Treatment Antimony

© AcuityES 2013

Page 46: 2013 acuity es case study   reduced

1st Supplemental Injection

© AcuityES 2013

Page 47: 2013 acuity es case study   reduced

4th - 10th Q Post-Treatment Antimony

All results less than method

detection level of

6 µg/L

© AcuityES 2013

Page 48: 2013 acuity es case study   reduced

Nickel Treatment Nickel Concentrations Detected in 10 wells exceeding cleanup levels off-Site up to 4,100 µg/L on-Site up to 50,000 µg/L State Industrial Cleanup level – 2,000 µg/L State Residential Cleanup Level - 730 µg/L Goal for Nickel: Fixate as: westerveldite ([FeNiCo]As) or pentlandite (FeNiS)

© AcuityES 2013

Page 49: 2013 acuity es case study   reduced

Pre-Treatment Nickel

State Cleanup Goal of

730 µg/L

© AcuityES 2013

Page 50: 2013 acuity es case study   reduced

FeS Reductant Injection

© AcuityES 2013

Page 51: 2013 acuity es case study   reduced

1st Q Post-Treatment Nickel

All results less than method

detection level of

50 µg/L

No subsequent detections

© AcuityES 2013

Page 52: 2013 acuity es case study   reduced

Arsenic Arsenic – Pre-treatment As detected in 13 wells @ concentrations of 11 µg/L to 360 µg/L 10th Quarter Sampling results: only 2 wells @ 11 & 12 µg/L Goal for Arsenic Fixate as: orpiment (As2S3) or arsenopyrite (FeAsS)

© AcuityES 2013

Page 53: 2013 acuity es case study   reduced

The Site Today

© AcuityES 2013

Page 54: 2013 acuity es case study   reduced

ISCR Benefits 1. In situ soil blending eliminated need for off-Site

hazardous waste disposal. (> 10,000 Tons)

2. In situ groundwater geochemical reduction eliminated need for prolonged pump and treat.

3. In situ geochemical reduction reduced time period of remediation from > 15 years to about 2 years.

© AcuityES 2013

Page 55: 2013 acuity es case study   reduced

CONTACT Richard H. Christensen, PhD, LPG – [email protected]

Steven R. Irvin – [email protected] Jim V. Rouse – [email protected]

317-570-4919

Past Teaming Partners

CDM Mundell & Associates Burns & McDonnell CALIBRE Professional Engineers MWH Global Malcom Pirnie V3 Consultants

www.acuityes.com © AcuityES 2013