Top Banner
2013 Accountability Ratings for NISD September 9, 2013
20

2013 Accountability Ratings for NISD

Feb 04, 2016

Download

Documents

jada

2013 Accountability Ratings for NISD. September 9, 2013. Performance Index System. Comprised of 4 Indexes Each Index is scored from 0-100 No single rating as of 2013 Each Index is a separate rating. Additional Information. ELL/LEP - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: 2013 Accountability Ratings for NISD

2013 Accountability Ratings for NISD

September 9, 2013

Page 2: 2013 Accountability Ratings for NISD

Performance Index System

• Comprised of 4 Indexes• Each Index is scored from 0-100• No single rating as of 2013

– Each Index is a separate rating

Page 3: 2013 Accountability Ratings for NISD

Additional Information

• ELL/LEP– 2013 ELL students are excluded

completely if they have been in US schools three years or less.

• Retest Results– EOC retest and SSI 1st and 2nd

administration results are included in all index calculations.

Page 4: 2013 Accountability Ratings for NISD

2013 Northwest ISD Accountability Rating (Met

Standard in All 4 Index Standards)

Index

1: St

uden

t Ach

ievem

ent (T

arge

t=50

)

Index

2: St

uden

t Pro

gres

s (Ta

rget=21

)

Index

3: Clos

ing Pe

rform

ance

Gap

s (Ta

rget=55

)

Index

4: Po

stsec

onda

ry Rea

dines

s (Ta

rget=75

)0

20406080

100

NISD Scores

NISD Scores

Page 5: 2013 Accountability Ratings for NISD

Index 1

Student Achievement Student performance based on satisfactory student

achievement across all subjects for all students

Student Group: All Students onlyMinimum Size Criteria: None

Target: • 50 for campuses and districts; • NISD: 87

Page 6: 2013 Accountability Ratings for NISD

NISD Student Achievement Table: All NISD Students

NISD Student Performance

Reading Mathematics

Writing Science Social Studies

% at Phase-in 1 Level II or above

90% 87% 74% 92% 89%

# at Phase-in 1 Level II or above

10,361 9,971 3,997 5,427 4,260

Total number of Tests

11,542 11,440 5,389 5,874 4,781

Page 7: 2013 Accountability Ratings for NISD

Index 2

Student ProgressMeasure of actual student growth independent of overall achievement

levels for race/ethnicity student groups, student with disabilities served by special education, and English Language Learners

Subjects: Reading and Mathematics; Writing for available grades

Student Groups: 10 which include All students, ELL, Sped, Af. Am. , Am. Ind., Asian, Hispanic, Pac. Isl., White, Two or More Races

Minimum Size Criteria: • All Students > 10• Race/Ethnicity, ELL, Sped > 25

Page 8: 2013 Accountability Ratings for NISD

Index 2

Methodology: 1. For each student group, the % of students at the growth level on

the assessment is multiplied by the weight for that growth level – each subject• One point for each % of student at the Met growth level• Two points for each % of students at the Exceeded growth

level2. Combine all subjects and points for a final index score

Target: • High Schools > 17• Middle Schools > 29• Elementary Schools > 30 • District > 21 • NISD: 36

Page 9: 2013 Accountability Ratings for NISD

Index 3

Closing Performance GapsMethodology: Each subject contributes points from each student group:

• One point for each % of tests that meet Phase-In I Level II Performance and above

1. Combine all subjects and points for a final index score

Target: • Index Score of 55 for campuses and districts• NISD: 82

Page 10: 2013 Accountability Ratings for NISD

Index 4

Postsecondary ReadinessPurpose is to emphasize the

importance for students to receive a high school diploma that provides the foundation necessary for success in college, the workforce, job training

programs, or the military; and the role of the elementary and middle schools in preparing students for high school.

Page 11: 2013 Accountability Ratings for NISD

Index 4

Graduation Score: Combined performance across the graduation rates from either the 4-Year or 5-Year Graduation rate

Methodology: 3 Step Process1. Determine the number of students who completed High School (graduated) in 4 years

(2012):• RHSP/DAP Graduates for All Students and race/ethnicity student groups

2. Determine the number of students who completed High School (graduated) in 5 years (2011):• RHSP/DAP Graduates for All Students and race/ethnicity student groups

3. Compare 4 & 5 year graduation rate. Determine which group size is greater.

4. If a campus does not have a four or five year graduation rate, the high school dropout rate is used instead.• RHSP/DAP Graduates for All Students and race/ethnicity student groups

Target: • Index Score of 75 • NISD: 86

Page 12: 2013 Accountability Ratings for NISD

2013 Ratings Criteria

• Transition year – Ratings criteria and targets designed to apply to 2013 only.

• Rating Labels– Met Standard– Met Alternative Standard– Improvement Required (Did not meet 1 or more index targets)

– Not Rated– Not Rated: Data Integrity Issues

• Ratings Criteria – Campuses and districts must meet the Accountability Targets in all indexes for which they have performance data to receive a Met Standard.

• 24 schools met standard• 1 Improvement Required• Denton Creek is not rated – TJJD Facility

Page 13: 2013 Accountability Ratings for NISD

Steele Accelerated High School

0

30

60

90

NISD Scores

NISD Scores

SAHS = 87

SAHS=24

SAHS =83

SAHS=58

Page 14: 2013 Accountability Ratings for NISD

2013 Distinctions

Campuses that receive an accountability rating of Met Standard are eligible for the following distinction designations in 2013.

• Top 25%: Student Progress• Academic Achievement: Reading/ELA• Academic Achievement: Mathematics

Page 15: 2013 Accountability Ratings for NISD

Distinctions

Top 25%: Student Progress– Based on performance on Index 2: Student Progress.

Campuses that are in the top quartile of their campus comparison group in performance on Index 2

– Campus Comparison Group: 40 campuses across the state that look demographically similar based on:• School Type: Elementary, Middle, High• Numbers of students enrolled• Percentage of English Language Learners• Percentage of economically disadvantaged students• Mobility Rate of studentsEach campus has a unique group of 40. No two campuses has an identical group.

Page 16: 2013 Accountability Ratings for NISD

NISD Schools with Top 25% Student Progress

• Hatfield Elementary School• Nance Elementary School• Hughes Elementary School

Page 17: 2013 Accountability Ratings for NISD

Academic Achievement Distinction Designation Reading/ELA

Schools needed to be in quartile 1 of their comparison campuses in 2 of the following:• Greater Than Expected Student Growth

in Reading/ELA• Grade 3 Reading Performance • Grade 4 Writing Performance • Grade 7 Writing Performance • Grade 8 Reading Performance • Overall Attendance Rate

Page 18: 2013 Accountability Ratings for NISD

NISD Schools with Reading/ELA Distinctions

• Medlin Middle School• Tidwell Middle School

Page 19: 2013 Accountability Ratings for NISD

Academic Achievement Distinction Designation Mathematics

Schools needed to be in quartile 1 of their comparison campuses in 2 of the following:• Greater Than Expected Student

Growth in Mathematics• Grade 5 Mathematics Performance • Algebra I by Grade 8 - Participation• Algebra I by Grade 8 - Performance • Overall Attendance Rate

Page 20: 2013 Accountability Ratings for NISD

NISD Schools with Mathematics Distinctions

• Chisholm Trail Middle School• Hatfield Elementary School