2013-2014 Storm Water Annual Report

(This page intentionally left blank)

(Please print or copy double sided when possible)

STORMWATER ANNUAL REPORT JULY 2013 – JUNE 2014

September 30, 2014

IMPORTANT NOTE: This annual report has been prepared by the City of Mesa (City) in response to the conditions established by the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality’s (ADEQ) Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) permit issued to the City, effective August 30, 2010 (herein referred to as the 2010 MS4 Permit). This report is designed to meet all the requirements established under Appendix B as provided in the 2010 MS4 Permit and is required to be submitted to the ADEQ on or before September 30th of each year. This report incorporates the requirements under the 2010 MS4 Permit for the previous reporting year, which also coincides with the City’s fiscal year.

This document can be found on the ESD Server at the following location: I:\STORMWATER\Annual Reports\2013-2014 Annual Report\Document Text\2014-09 Stormwater Annual Report - Final.docx

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PAGE

1.0 GENERAL INFORMATION ............................................................................... 1-1 2.0 ANNUAL REPORT CERTIFICATION ............................................................... 2-1 3.0 NARRATIVE SUMMARY OF STORMWATER PROGRAM ACTIVITIES ......... 3-1

3.1 PUBLIC EDUCATION & OUTREACH ....................................................... 3-1 3.1.1 General Public ................................................................................ 3-2 3.1.2 Business Sectors ............................................................................ 3-3 3.1.3 Additional Education & Outreach Activities ..................................... 3-4

3.2 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT ........................................................................... 3-4 3.2.1 Environmental Hotline ..................................................................... 3-4 3.2.2 Stormwater Website ....................................................................... 3-5 3.2.3 Household Hazardous Waste Program .......................................... 3-5

3.3 NON-STORMWATER FLOWS TO THE CITY’S STORM SEWER SYSTEM .................................................................................................... 3-7 3.3.1 Non-Stormwater Flow Prevention Activities .................................... 3-7 3.3.2 Training Dates and Topics .............................................................. 3-8 3.3.3 Investigations .................................................................................. 3-8

3.4 MUNICIPAL FACILITIES ......................................................................... 3-10 3.4.1 Description & Status of Inventory .................................................. 3-11 3.4.2 Overview of Findings .................................................................... 3-11 3.4.3 Response Actions ......................................................................... 3-11 3.4.4 Facilities Covered under the Multi-Sector General Permit ............ 3-11

3.5 INVENTORIES, MAPS, AND MAP STUDIES ......................................... 3-11 3.5.1 Inventories .................................................................................... 3-11 3.5.2 Maps ............................................................................................. 3-12 3.5.3 Map Studies .................................................................................. 3-13

3.6 INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES ....................................................................... 3-13 3.6.1 Identification and Inventory of Private Commercial and

Industrial Facilities ........................................................................ 3-14 3.6.1.1 Commercial Facilities ...................................................... 3-14 3.6.1.2 Industrial Facilities ........................................................... 3-14

3.6.2 Overview of Inspection Findings and Significant Findings ............ 3-15 3.6.2.1 Commercial Facilities Inspection & Prioritization ............. 3-15 3.6.2.2 Industrial Facilities Inspection & Prioritization .................. 3-16

3.6.3 Summary of Corrective and Enforcement Actions ........................ 3-17 3.6.3.1 Commercial Facility Corrective & Enforcement Actions... 3-17 3.6.3.2 Industrial Facility Corrective & Enforcement Actions ....... 3-18

PAGE

3.7 CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM ACTIVITIES ............................................ 3-19 3.7.1 Status of Inventory and Plan Review of Construction

Operations .................................................................................... 3-19 3.7.1.1 Private Construction Projects .......................................... 3-20 3.7.1.2 City Projects .................................................................... 3-20

3.7.2 Overview of Inspection Findings and Significant Findings ............ 3-20 3.7.2.1 Private Construction Projects .......................................... 3-21 3.7.2.2 City Projects .................................................................... 3-22

3.7.3 Summary of Corrective and Enforcement Actions ........................ 3-23 3.7.3.1 Private Construction Projects .......................................... 3-23 3.7.3.2 City Projects .................................................................... 3-24

3.8 POST-CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM ACTIVITIES ................................. 3-25 3.8.1 New or Revised Post-Construction Controls ................................. 3-25 3.8.2 Overview of Post-Construction Inspection Program ..................... 3-25 3.8.3 Summary of Corrective and Enforcement Actions ........................ 3-26

3.9 DRY-WEATHER SCREENING ................................................................ 3-26 3.9.1 Staff Training ................................................................................ 3-26 3.9.2 Outfall and Field Screening Point Inventory .................................. 3-27 3.9.3 Inspection Tracking System .......................................................... 3-27 3.9.4 Inspection and Screening Procedures and Significant Findings ... 3-27

3.10 ORDINANCES, RULES, & POLICIES ..................................................... 3-28 3.11 FISCAL EXPENDITURES ....................................................................... 3-28

4.0 STORMWATER PROGRAM NUMERIC SUMMARY ........................................ 4-1 5.0 EVALUATION OF THE STORMWATER PROGRAM ...................................... 5-1

5.1 PROGRAM PROGRESS ........................................................................... 5-1 5.2 PROGRAM SUCCESSES ......................................................................... 5-2 5.3 REDUCTION OF POLLUTANTS TO THE CITY’S STORM SEWER

SYSTEM .................................................................................................... 5-2 5.3.1 Public Education & Outreach .......................................................... 5-2 5.3.2 Public Reporting ............................................................................. 5-2 5.3.3 Household Hazardous Waste Events ............................................. 5-3 5.3.4 Commercial & Industrial Facility Inspections ................................... 5-3 5.3.5 Construction Site Inspections ......................................................... 5-3

5.4 REDUCTION OF POLLUTANTS FROM THE CITY’S STORM SEWER SYSTEM .................................................................................................... 5-4 5.4.1 Storm Sewer Systerm Infrastructure Maintenance ......................... 5-4

5.4.1.1 Street Sweeping ................................................................ 5-4 5.4.1.2 Storm Sewer Components ................................................ 5-4 5.4.1.3 Detention/Retention Basins ............................................... 5-4

PAGE

5.4.2 Post-Construction Requirements .................................................... 5-5 6.0 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM MODIFICATIONS .................... 6-1

6.1 ADDITION OF NEW CONTROL MEASURES .......................................... 6-1 6.2 ADDITION OF TEMPORARY CONTROL MEASURES ............................ 6-1 6.3 INCREASE OF EXISTING CONTROL MEASURES ................................. 6-1 6.4 REPLACEMENT OF EXISTING CONTROL MEASURES ........................ 6-1 6.5 FOURTH YEAR ANNUAL REPORT ......................................................... 6-1

7.0 MONITORING LOCATIONS ............................................................................. 7-1

7.1 AS-US60 ................................................................................................... 7-2 7.2 SS-US60 ................................................................................................... 7-2 7.3 54-EMF ...................................................................................................... 7-2 7.4 UN-EMF .................................................................................................... 7-3 7.5 FF-ACES ................................................................................................... 7-3

8.0 STORM EVENT RECORDS .............................................................................. 8-1 9.0 SUMMARY OF MONITORING DATA ............................................................... 9-1 10.0 ASSESSMENT OF MONITORING DATA ....................................................... 10-1

10.1 SURFACE WATER QUALITY STANDARDS .......................................... 10-1 10.2 EXCEEDANCES OF SURFACE WATER QUALITY STANDARDS ........ 10-1 10.3 STORMWATER QUALITY EVALUATION - BY LOCATION ................... 10-2

10.3.1 Station AS-US60 ........................................................................... 10-2 10.3.2 Station SS-US60 ........................................................................... 10-2 10.3.3 Station 54-EMF ............................................................................. 10-3 10.3.4 Station UN-EMF ............................................................................ 10-3 10.3.5 Station FF-ACES .......................................................................... 10-4

10.4 SWQS EXCEEDANCE INVESTIGATIONS ............................................. 10-4 11.0 ESTIMATE OF POLLUTANT LOADING ........................................................ 11-1

11.1 POLLUTANT LOADING MODELING, DATA ANALYSIS, AND CALCULATIONS ..................................................................................... 11-1 11.1.1 Event Mean Concentration ........................................................... 11-2 11.1.2 Rainfall Data Evaluation ............................................................... 11-2 11.1.3 Drainage Area Runoff Volumes .................................................... 11-3

11.1.3.1 Drainage Area Evaluation ................................................ 11-3 11.1.3.2 Weighted Average Runoff Coefficient ............................. 11-4

11.1.4 Annual Pollutant Loading Estimate ............................................... 11-4

PAGE

11.2 COMPARISON OF POLLUTANT LOADING ESTIMATES ...................... 11-5 12.0 ANNUAL EXPENDITURES............................................................................. 12-1 13.0 ATTACHMENTS ............................................................................................. 13-1

13.1 DRAINAGE SYSTEM MAPS ................................................................... 13-1 13.2 LISTING OF OUTFALLS & FIELD SCREENING POINTS ...................... 13-1 13.3 LIST OF CHANGES TO OUTFALL & FIELD SCREENING POINTS ...... 13-1 13.4 STORMWATER MONITORING ANALYTICAL LABORATORY

REPORTS ............................................................................................... 13-2 13.5 NEW OR REVISED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT ORDINANCES ... 13-2 13.6 NEW OR REVISED PUBLIC EDUCATION & OUTREACH

DOCUMENTS ......................................................................................... 13-2 13.7 HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE EVENT REPORTS ..................... 13-2 13.8 UPDATED CITY FACILITY INVENTORY ................................................ 13-2 13.9 ANNUAL EXPENDITURE REPORTS ..................................................... 13-2

ADDENDUM NO. 1 – PERMIT RE-APPLICATION, SEPTEMBER 2014 ADDENDUM NO. 2 – STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN, SEPTEMBER 2014

ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS 2010 MS4 Permit – City of Mesa MS4 Stormwater Permit, AZS000004-2010

ADEQ – Arizona Department of Environmental Quality

APP – Aquifer Protection Permit

AZPDES - Arizona Pollutant Discharge Elimination System

BMP – Best Management Practice(s)

City – City of Mesa

CGP – Construction General Permit

FCDMC – Flood Control District of Maricopa County

FOG – Fats, Oils, and Greases

GRD – Grease Removal Device

HHW – Household Hazardous Waste

IDDE – Illicit Discharge Detection & Elimination

LID – Low-Impact Development

MS4 – Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System

MSGP – Multi-Sector General Permit

NAICS - North American Industry Classification System

NOI - Notice of Intent

NOT – Notice to Terminate

PSA – Public Service Announcement

SARA – Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act

SIC – Standard Industrial Code

Stormwater Code - Title 8, Chapter 5, of the Mesa City Code

STORM – STormwater Outreach for Regional Municipalities

SWMP – Storm Water Management Plan

SWPPP – Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan

SWQS – Surface Water Quality Standard

TRI - Toxic Release Inventory

USEPA – United States Environmental Protection Agency

City of Mesa, Storm Water Annual Report Page 1-1

1.0 GENERAL INFORMATION

A. Name of Permittee: City of Mesa

B. Permit Number: AZS000004-2010

C. Reporting Period: July 1, 2013 through June 30, 2014

D. Program Contact: Scott Bouchie

Title: Deputy Director, Environmental & Sustainability Division

Mailing Address: P.O. Box 146

City: Mesa Zip: 85211-1466 Phone: 480-644-4366

Fax: 480-644-4774 Email Address: [email protected]

E. Certifying Official: Christopher J. Brady

Title: City Manager

Mailing Address: P.O. Box 1466

City: Mesa Zip: 85211-1466 Phone: 480-644-2066

Fax: 480-644-2175 Email Address: [email protected]

mailto:[email protected]

mailto:[email protected]






3.0 NARRATIVE SUMMARY OF STORMWATER PROGRAM ACTIVITIES

The 2010 MS4 Permit requires the City of Mesa (City) to provide a narrative describing the implementation, progress, and challenges associated with the stormwater program activities as provided in the following subsections. The permit also requires the City to explain any significant developments or changes to the number or type of activities or the priorities or procedures for specific management practices. 3.1 PUBLIC EDUCATION & OUTREACH The 2010 MS4 Permit requires the City to report outreach events, topics, number of people reached, number and type of materials distributed and the target groups in this Annual Report as it pertains to the City’s stormwater public education and outreach program. The City’s stormwater public education and outreach method is managed through the STormwater Outreach for Regional Municipality (STORM) organization. STORM is comprised of Phase I and Phase II MS4 operators in the greater Phoenix Metropolitan Area. STORM was founded in 2002 largely in response to the Phase II stormwater regulations and was spearheaded by the Phase I MS4 operators as a method of assisting all regulated MS4 operators in the development of their public education programs, among other things. As such, the City played a key role in the early years of the development of the STORM organization and continues to be a major participant and proud supporter to this day. The traditional approach to public stormwater education and outreach is for individual communities to work independently. STORM encourages a new perspective at a regional level to improve public outreach and education. Members meet monthly to discuss ideas, gather information, and share results of stormwater management tools, techniques, programs, and initiatives. The City realizes a great economic benefit from their membership investment. For a relatively small contribution, the City receives a significant return in public outreach and education, much more than the City would have gained working independently. Membership in STORM also provides increased buying power that helps achieve bulk pricing on storm water pollution awareness promotional items. Additionally, the ability to


cooperatively apply for grants and other financial assistance helps further the common goal of public education to reduce stormwater pollutants and ultimately improve the regional water quality. STORM uses a multimedia approach targeting audiences through radio, television, special events, and providing permit information to the general public and the regulated community. These approaches include, but are not limited to, radio and television public service announcements (PSAs), developing brochures and other handouts, and attending public events. Additionally, STORM has created a comprehensive website that includes the copies of outreach materials and PSAs which can be accessed at www.azstorm.org. 3.1.1 General Public The 2010 MS4 Permit requires the City to target at least one of the following groups during each permit year (August 30 through August 29th):

1. General Public 2. Residential Community 3. Home Owners 4. Home Owners Associations 5. Schools

The 2010 MS4 Permit requires that at least one of the following topics be addressed for these target groups:

• Post-construction ordinances and long-term maintenance requirements for permanent stormwater controls

• Stormwater runoff issues and residential stormwater management practices • Potential water quality impacts of application of pesticides, herbicides and

fertilizer and control measures to minimize runoff of pollutants in stormwater • Potential impacts of animal waste on water quality and the need to clean up and

properly dispose of pet waste to minimize runoff of pollutants in stormwater • Illicit discharges and illegal dumping, proper management of non-stormwater

discharges, and to provide information on reporting spills, dumping, and illicit discharges

http://www.azstorm.org/


• Spill prevention, proper handling and disposal of toxic and hazardous materials, and measures to contain and minimize discharges to the storm sewer system

• Installation of catch basin markers or stenciling of storm sewer inlets to minimize illicit discharges and illegal dumping to the storm sewer system

• Proper management and disposal of used oil STORM developed and ran a movie theater campaign between November 22, 2013 and January 2, 2014 (6 weeks) to correspond with the winter rain season. A new 15 second video advertisement targeting the general public in the topics of illicit discharges and stormwater quality was designed and produced and ran for 15 seconds prior to the start of the movie. The video was shown at seven AMC Theaters locations throughout the Phoenix metropolitan area, on 131 movie screens, averaging 5 movies per day. That attributes to 655 movies per day, 4,585 movies per week, and 27,510 movies over the 6 week campaign. Based upon historical movie admission rates, it is estimated that the campaign was shown to approximately 850,000 people. STORM expended $8,025 for the movie theater campaign. 3.1.2 Business Sectors The 2010 MS4 Permit also requires the City to target at least one of the following business sector groups during each permit year:

1. Development Community 2. Construction Site Operators 3. Targeted Sources 4. Types of Businesses (industrial or commercial)

The 2010 MS4 Permit requires that at least one of the following topics be addressed for these target groups:

• Planning ordinances, engineering standards and grading and drainage design standards for stormwater management in new developments and significant redevelopments

• Municipal stormwater requirements and stormwater management practices for construction sites

• Illicit discharges and proper management of non-stormwater discharges


• Spill prevention, proper handling of toxic and hazardous materials, and measures to contain and minimize discharges to the storm sewer system

• Proper management and disposal of used oil and other hazardous or toxic materials, including practices to minimize exposure of materials/wastes to rainfall and minimize contamination of stormwater runoff

• Stormwater management practices, pollution prevention plans, and facility maintenance procedures

STORM was a sponsor of the Construction General Permit seminar conducted on April 8, 2014. The purpose of the seminar was to provide education and outreach associated with the AZPDES Construction General Permit, including updates on the 2013 CGP, Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans, BMPs, local municipal requirements and networking opportunities. The Arizona Department of Transportation provided the seminar room at no charge. STORM contributed $500 towards supporting costs associated with the seminar. Approximately 141 people were in attendance at the seminar. Seminar details and presentations are posted on the STORM website. 3.1.3 Additional Education & Outreach Activities More information regarding the STORM organization’s public education and outreach program activities for the current reporting year can be found in the STORM Annual Report, FY 2011 available at the following address: http://www.azstorm.org/annual-reports. 3.2 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT The 2010 MS4 Permit requires the City to identify activities, number of people involved, number and type of materials distributed, if applicable and to describe a system for public reporting of spills, dumping, discharges, and related stormwater issues in this Annual Report as it pertains to the City’s public involvement stormwater program. 3.2.1 Environmental Hotline The 2010 MS4 Permit requires the City to provide and publicize a reporting system to facilitate and track public reporting of spills, discharges or dumping to the storm sewer system (i.e., storm water hotline, web page, etc.) on a continuous basis. The City established an Environmental Hotline as a method to receive calls regarding stormwater as well as other environmental issues [air quality, hazardous material disposal, illegal

http://www.azstorm.org/annual-reports

http://www.azstorm.org/annual-reports


dumping, and public nuisances (i.e. mosquitoes)]. During normal business hours, calls are answered by personnel trained to understand the nature of the types of calls they receive and can address questions that are informational in nature. Where a complaint is filed, the record is turned over to appropriate personnel trained in code enforcement procedures for inspection. All complaints are logged into the City’s Tidemark® database system for tracking purposes. During off-business hours, callers are provided an opportunity to leave a message which is retrieved and processed the following business day. 3.2.2 Stormwater Website The City maintains a website specifically for stormwater. That website has information specific to the City’s stormwater program. The 2010 MS4 Permit requires the City to post the Storm Water Management Plan (SWMP) and latest annual report on the City’s web site within one (1) year from the effective date of the permit. The draft version of the SWMP was posted on the City’s website within ten (10) business day of the end of the first permit term (August 30, 2011). The final version of the SWMP, after being approved of by the ADEQ, was uploaded to the website within ten (10) business days after the receipt of the ADEQ approval (date April 12, 2012). The City will also provide a link to this Annual Report within ten (10) business days of submittal of this document to the ADEQ. These documents are accessible through City’s Environmental & Sustainability Division website at http://www.mesaaz.gov/environ/. 3.2.3 Household Hazardous Waste Program The 2010 MS4 Permit requires the City to incorporate at least one of the following as fundamental support to its storm water program:

• An opportunity to involve the public in the City’s stormwater program and encourage public participation in monitoring and reporting spills, discharges, or dumping within their communities (such as facilitation of neighborhood watch groups) once per year.

• An opportunity to participate in the City’s stormwater program, such as voluntary litter control activities (e.g., facilitation of Adopt-A-Wash, Adopt-A-Park, and Adopt-A-Street litter control activities) or voluntary erosion control projects as a regular ongoing activity.

http://www.mesaaz.gov/environ/


• A household hazardous waste (HHW) program to facilitate proper disposal of used oil, antifreeze, pesticides, herbicides, paints, and other hazardous and toxic materials by city residents (such as scheduled household hazardous waste collection events or operation of full-time disposal facilities) a minimum of two (2) times per year for the first two (2) years of the permit, three (3) times per year for years three (3) and four (4) of the permit, and every year thereafter.

The City has selected to incorporate the HHW program into their stormwater program since the City has been conducting these types of events as part of meeting the requirements of their previous MS4 permit. The City’s HHW program facilitates proper disposal of used oil, antifreeze, pesticides, herbicides, paints, and other hazardous and toxic materials as well as electronics, tires, and prescription medicine generated by city residents. During this reporting period, the City provided four opportunities to residents to dispose of HHW. By providing a proper disposal option to the City’s residents, the City has kept this material from potentially being illegally dumped into the City’s storm sewer system, spilled onto City streets, or improperly disposed of into solid waste receptacles. The City’s HHW collection events are held at two different locations, one on the east side of the City, the other on the west. The events alternate between locations to ensure that all residents have adequate access to these events. Information, including the number of residents attending, amount and type of material received, is included as an attachment to this Annual Report (see Section 13.7 and Attachment B). At these events, the City distributes packets to residents as they enter. Based on the timing of each event, this information would have included some or all of the following:

• HHW Collection Event Date Flier • Additional Electronics Recycling Opportunities • Christmas tree recycling information • Environmental & Sustainability Information


3.3 NON-STORMWATER FLOWS TO THE CITY’S STORM SEWER SYSTEM The City’s 2010 MS4 Permit requires the City to summarize their program activities related to non-stormwater flows. This includes:

1. Prevention activities associated with the release of non-stormwater flows to the MS4;

2. Training dates and topics of City personnel addressing non-stormwater flow complaints; and,

3. Overview of identified sources resulting from industrial facility inspections, illicit releases, types of illicit connections identified, and significant corrective or enforcement actions.

For the overview of industrial facility inspections, see Section 3.6.2. 3.3.1 Non-Stormwater Flow Prevention Activities The City does not operate as a permitting agency for stormwater or non-stormwater flows. However, the City has identified the following non-stormwater releases to target through the development of fact sheets to reduce the pollutants from these sources to the maximum extent practicable.

Targeted Release Targeted Pollutant(s) Targeted Areas Flood Irrigation Water Sediment Irrigation over areas that are

exposed to bare soils. Individual Car Washing Sediment

Solvents

Washing heavily soiled trucks. Washing undercarriage or engine compartments.

Street Wash Water Sediment Oils

Washing paved surfaces impacted with dirt. Washing standing liquid oil spills from paved surfaces.

Swimming Pools & Hot Tub Water (generally not allowed)

Chlorine Bromine Sediment Bacteria

Flows must remain on site (irrigation usage) go to sanitary sewer, or be pumped and hauled away for disposal.


During this reporting period, the City finalized these documents which are accessible through City’s Environmental & Sustainability Division website at http://www.mesaaz.gov/environ/. 3.3.2 Training Dates and Topics The City developed an Environmental Program Training Standard Operating Procedures manual (dated February 2012) to meet the training requirements of the 2010 MS4 Permit and other environmental program areas. The City has developed a training module targeting inspectors/staff with no direct stormwater responsibilities (general awareness training). Topics included what types of discharges are allowed under the Title 8, Chapter 5 of the Mesa City Code (Stormwater Code) and the procedure for reporting suspected illicit discharges. The City has also developed a training module targeting stormwater inspectors/field staff (enforcement training). Topics include identifying illicit discharges, tracking illicit discharges, allowable stormwater discharges, and enforcement actions. 3.3.3 Investigations For stormwater complaints publically reported to the City, the 2010 MS4 Permit requires the City to:

1. Investigate reported releases to identify the source(s) of the release; 2. Respond to 90% of all reports of releases made to the City (i.e. called into the

Environmental Hotline, or other form of reporting) or other detection methods (i.e. pro-active inspections); and,

3. Initiate investigation of 80% of releases reported to the City within three (3) business days of the date of report.

The City has established an Environmental Hotline as a method to receive calls regarding stormwater as well as other environmental issues (see Section 3.2.1). It has been the City’s experience that non-stormwater releases reported to the Environmental Hotline are identified at locations prior to entering the subsurface portions of the City’s storm sewer system (primarily flowing down the curb and gutter system). Most connections that are reported to the Environmental Hotline are in the form of a pipe (usually PVC) installed through a block wall or a pump hose that is placed in the yard,

http://www.mesaaz.gov/environ/


through a fence, or directly in the street or alleyway; and are associated with swimming pool discharges. These surface flows and connections are generally easy to track down to the source through a drainage area investigative approach. In general, the City can utilize a corrective or enforcement action to obtain compliance with the Mesa City Code.

“Corrective actions” are generally those taken by the responsible party to remove pollutants or reduce the potential of pollutants from entering the City’s storm sewer system. “Enforcement actions” are those taken by the City to address any hazards associated with the violation, generally where a voluntary compliance option has failed to be an effective tool in gaining compliance, and includes reporting violations to other City departments or regulatory agencies having ultimate authority regarding the nature of the violation.

During this reporting period, the majority of the complaints received through public reporting involved draining and/or backwashing of swimming pools to the City’s storm sewer system. Other noted complaints involved sediment and debris in streets and/or storm sewer system, oil dumped on the ground, raw sewage discharges, track-out issues, broken sprinkler head and excessive irrigation runoff, and stagnant water in retention basins. Section 8-5-5 of the City’s Stormwater Code (Commencement of Action) provides for formal enforcement actions by issuing a notice of abatement under this Chapter or a citation for civil sanctions under this Chapter, or both. However, the code provides that City employees may seek voluntary compliance “through notices of violation, warnings, or other informal devices designed to achieve compliance in the most efficient and effective manner under the circumstances.” The City’s code enforcement procedure provides the option of voluntary compliance to responsible parties to implement corrective actions by issuing a courtesy notice. Where voluntary compliance is not obtained within a reasonable timeframe, the City has the ability to issue a civil violation and citation, issue a notice to abate, or suspend any


license issued by the City. Additionally, the City may impose criminal violations for responsible parties identified as habitual offenders. Most cases were closed with the issuance of a courtesy notice during this reporting period. 3.4 MUNICIPAL FACILITIES The 2010 MS4 Permit requires the City to report the following in the annual report as it relates to City facilities:

1. Description of the status of identification and inventory of these facilities. 2. Overview of inspection findings (i.e., number inspected, number with follow-up

actions needed, significant findings). 3. Description of activities needed and performed in response to inspections

(control measures implemented). 4. Description of the identification and tracking of municipally-owned and operated

facilities subject to permitting under the Multi-Sector General Permit (MSGP). In general, this program includes City facilities that meet the following conditions:

• City parks, golf courses, and other recreational facilities (where landscape maintenance, herbicide, pesticide, and fertilizer application, and waste management are implemented);

• Public swimming pools (pool maintenance/repair and chemical storage); • Water treatment plants; • Public septic systems (sanitary waste handling); • Fire stations and other city fleet maintenance facilities (vehicle washing and

maintenance, chemical handling, waste storage); • Publically-owned treatment works and sludge handling areas; • Material and waste storage and processing facilities, including oil collection

facilities; or, • Those facilities that handle, store, or otherwise use hazardous materials where

any single container exceeds five (5) gallons and where such materials are exposed or have the potential to be exposed to stormwater


3.4.1 Description & Status of Inventory A current version of the City facility inventory is included in the City’s updated SWMP dated September 2014 which is included as an addendum to this annual report. 3.4.2 Overview of Findings No additional facility assessments were conducted during this reporting period. A site specific spill plan was developed and implemented at one facility during this reporting period. No other City facilities have been identified as requiring this type of plan. 3.4.3 Response Actions No response actions were required at facilities required to have a site specific spill plan during this reporting period. 3.4.4 Facilities Covered under the Multi-Sector General Permit The City has one facility (i.e. Falcon Field Airport) that is covered under the Multi-Sector General Permit. 3.5 INVENTORIES, MAPS, AND MAP STUDIES The 2010 MS4 Permit requires the City to report the status of all inventories, maps, and map studies required by the permit to be developed including completion dates. 3.5.1 Inventories The 2010 MS4 Permit requires to City to develop “inventories” or other methods of identification of the following:

1. An inventory or map of all major outfalls, and of other field screening points (FSPs) if applicable, identified by Mesa as priority for illicit discharges or other non-stormwater flows (see Section 13.2);

2. An inventory, list, database or map of facilities owned and operated by Mesa (excluding office and administration buildings) that have the potential to discharge pollutants to waters of the United States (see Section 13.8);

3. An inventory, list, or database of private commercial and industrial facilities that have the potential to discharge pollutants to the city’s storm sewer system (see Section 3.6.1); and,


4. An inventory, list, database, or map of construction activities that result in land disturbance of one (1) or more acres and that have the potential to discharge to the city’s storm sewer system (see Section 3.7.1).

3.5.2 Maps Appendix A of the 2010 MS4 Permit requires the City to prepare and routinely update maps of the City’s storm sewer system that incorporates mapping of all of the following:

1. Linear Drainage Structures - Line layer showing the location of the City’s MS4 storm drain pipes and the direction of stormwater flow.

2. Storm Drain Inlets and Catch Basins - Point layer showing the locations of the City’s MS4 storm drain inlets and catch basins.

3. Major Outfalls, Field Screening Points, and Monitoring Locations a. Point layer showing the location of the City’s stormwater monitoring locations,

field screening points, and major outfalls (pipes or culverts). b. Layer showing the drainage area associated with each monitoring location

identified in the 2010 MS4 Permit. 4. Detention/Retention Basins - Point or polygon layer showing the locations of all

City-owned retention and detention basins that are connected to the municipal stormwater conveyance system (i.e., that receive drainage from or discharge to a stormwater conveyance).

5. Jurisdictional MS4 Boundary - Line or polygon layer showing the jurisdictional boundaries of the City’s MS4, including any new land annexations during the permit term.

The City is required to incorporate mapping of the above by the due date of the fourth (4th) year annual report (i.e. September 30, 2014). The City maintains Land and Utilities maps that are continually updated for use by City employees. The application provides the ability to view and print Land, Water, Gas, Sewer, or Storm Drain maps for each quarter section of the City. The City also maintains this information in ArcGIS software which is available for use by select City personnel. As of the date of the Annual Report, the City’s current mapping system includes all the information that is required under the 2010 MS4 Permit.


3.5.3 Map Studies Appendix A of the 2010 MS4 Permit requires the City to complete a study that evaluates the cost, method, and time it will take to complete the following:

1. Linear Drainage Structures a. Line layer showing the location of all streets used for stormwater conveyance

and the direction of stormwater flow. b. Line layer showing other linear stormwater conveyance structures (channels,

floodways, etc.) and the direction of stormwater flow. 2. Land Uses - Layer showing the land uses. 3. Detention/Retention Basins

a. Point or polygon layer showing the location of all privately-owned retention and detention basins that are connected to the municipal stormwater conveyance system (i.e., that receive drainage from or discharge to a stormwater conveyance).

b. Line layers showing the drainage infrastructure associated with each retention/detention basin.

4. Locations of Discharges to Waters of the United States - Line or polygon layer showing the location (and name) of all waters of the United States that may receive stormwater discharges from the MS4 and to clearly identify any listed Outstanding Arizona Water or Impaired Water.

The City is required to complete studies associated with the above mapping requirements by the due date of the fourth (4th) year annual report (i.e. September 30, 2014). As of the date of the Annual Report, the City’s stormwater mapping system includes all of the information identified in the 2010 MS4 Permit mapping studies requirements. Please note, the City does not discharge to waters of the United States that are considered to be an Outstanding Arizona Water or Impaired Water. 3.6 INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES The 2010 MS4 Permit requires the City to report the following in the Annual Report as it pertains to the inspection of private commercial and industrial facilities:

1. Status of identification and inventory of these facilities. 2. An overview of inspection findings and note significant findings.


3. Corrective and enforcement actions needed and taken in response to inspections.

3.6.1 Identification and Inventory of Private Commercial and Industrial Facilities The 2010 MS4 Permit requires the City to:

1. Develop and maintain an inventory, list, or database of commercial and industrial facilities that have the potential to discharge pollutants to the City’s MS4.

2. Maintain a system to collect and update this information on a routine basis. 3.6.1.1 Commercial Facilities The City inspects commercial facilities that require a grease removal device (GRD) as part of the City’s industrial pre-treatment fats, oils, and greases (FOG) program. These types of facilities are required to submit an industrial pretreatment survey to the City to determine the type of business (i.e. industrial, commercial, manufacturing, restaurant etc.) and the nature of the facilities discharges to the City’s sanitary sewer. This survey assists the City in determining what, if any, pretreatment devices are required. These facilities are entered into a database and tracked for inspection purposes. During these inspections, City inspectors also conduct a stormwater assessment associated with the operations of these facilities. 3.6.1.2 Industrial Facilities In December 2009, the City received information from InfoUSA, a private customer listing group commonly used by other regulated Phase I MS4 operators (i.e. City of Phoenix, City of Tempe), related to provide facilities subject to the MSGP based on standard industrial classification (SIC) codes. Additionally, the City conducts a review of the United State Environmental Protection Agency Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) database annually. The City operates an Industrial (Private) database that includes the information supplied by InfoUSA and incorporates the most recent listing of TRI facilities. As of June 30, 2014, the City’s industrial facility inventory included approximately 800 facilities, of which approximately 680 were active facilities, and of those approximately 480 facilities are currently listed as MSGP facilities (i.e. those having a SIC code identified in the 2011 MSGP).


3.6.2 Overview of Inspection Findings and Significant Findings The 2010 MS4 Permit requires the City to:

1. Develop an inspection and prioritization program. 2. Inspect at least 50 industrial facilities [Superfund Amendments and

Reauthorization Act (SARA) Title III and MSGP facilities] each year during the permit term.

3. Inspect other commercial and industrial sources (or category of sources) which the City determines to be a significant source of pollutants.

4. Verify implementation and maintenance of stormwater management practices in compliance with the City’s Stormwater Code.

5. Identify and eliminate potential discharges of pollutants to the system. 6. Confirm permit coverage to discharge stormwater associated with industrial

activity, as applicable. 7. Conduct follow-up inspections as necessary.

3.6.2.1 Commercial Facilities Inspection & Prioritization Inspections of commercial facilities are based on a geographical distributional approach. Commercial inspections are also conducted in response to complaints from other City staff and the general public. Priority is given to complaint responses, which are investigated without regard to the geographical distribution approach. Commercial inspections are conducted by City inspectors trained to identify stormwater compliance issues related to these types of facilities. Though all commercial facilities inspected under the FOG program are assessed for stormwater compliance, those that pose a higher risk include, but are not limited to:

• Auto Repair Shops; • Gasoline Stations; • Grocery Stores; • Restaurants; • Car Washes; and, • Movie Theaters


Stormwater issues that were identified as a result of follow-up inspections at commercial facilities during this reporting period included:

• Raw sewage flowing to stormwater collection system/drywells; and, • Used oil exposed to stormwater

3.6.2.2 Industrial Facilities Inspection & Prioritization The following criteria are used to determine categories and establishing a prioritization for conducting industrial inspections.

1. Complaints. 2. Newly identified TRI listed facilities that have not been previously inspected. 3. Current TRI listed facilities that were not previously inspected within the last 5

years. 4. Industrial facility sectors, SICs or North American Industry Classification System

(NAICS) groups that have a reasonable potential to conduct dust generating operations and that may require permit coverage for such operations (i.e. unlikely to be no-exposure facilities).

5. Other industrial facility sectors, SICs or NAICS groups that the City determines may be a significant source of pollutants.

During this reporting period, the City concentrated on industrial facilities involved in the following operations (also provided are the industrial subsector code):

• Fabricated Metal Products, Except Machinery and Transportation Equipment, and Coating, Engraving, and Allied Services. (AA1)

• Transportation Equipment Except Ship and Boat Building and Repairing (AB1) • Computer and Office Equipment (AC1) • Motor Freight Transportation and Warehousing (P1) • Fabricated Rubber Products, Not Elsewhere Classified (Y1)

Many of the industrial facilities in the City’s database that were inspected during this reporting period did not perform operations consistent with the SIC codes that were assigned to them from the information provided by InfoUSA. When contacted, the facilities operator was asked what types of operations took place there and assisted them with identifying the appropriate SIC. The City conducted an inspection to ensure


that these facilities did not require MSGP coverage and that their operations were being performed in compliance with the City’s Stormwater Code. The City’s industrial inspection database was updated for revised SIC codes. Issues at industrial facilities noted as part of the inspection process during this reporting period included:

• Open containers of oil/water exposed to stormwater; • General housekeeping issues; • Process water and trash discharged to drywell; • Private industries subject to MSGP but do nothing to comply

3.6.3 Summary of Corrective and Enforcement Actions The 2010 MS4 Permit requires the City to:

1. Establish an effective compliance and enforcement program that incorporates escalating actions for violations of the City’s Stormwater Code that provides timeframes and escalation for corrective actions; and,

2. Focus the escalated enforcement protocol on having the highest level of enforcement action resolved within one (1) year of the initial inspection/violation.

3.6.3.1 Commercial Facility Corrective & Enforcement Actions Corrective actions needed and taken at commercial facilities during this reporting period included:

• City of Mesa cleaned up stormwater collection system and reported to Maricopa County / Arizona Department of Environmental Quality

• The operator removed used oil stored in an area exposed to stormwater Section 8-5-5 (Commencement of Action) of the City’s Stormwater Code provides for formal enforcement actions by issuing a notice of abatement or a citation for civil sanctions, or both. However, the code provides that City employees may seek voluntary compliance through notices of violation, warnings, or other informal devices designed to achieve compliance in the most efficient and effective manner under the circumstances.


The City’s commercial and industrial facility enforcement procedure provides the option of voluntary compliance to responsible parties to implement corrective actions by issuing a courtesy notice. Where voluntary compliance is not obtained within a reasonable timeframe, the City has the ability to issue a civil violation and citation, issue a notice to abate, or suspend any license issued by the City. Additionally, the City may impose criminal violations for responsible parties identified as habitual offenders. Most cases were closed with the issuance of a courtesy notice during this reporting period. During this reporting period, no formal enforcement actions were needed or taken as a result of stormwater inspections conducted by the City of private commercial facilities. Some cases were closed without a violation being confirmed. The remaining cases were closed when the issue had been addressed or upon the issuance of a courtesy notice. 3.6.3.2 Industrial Facility Corrective & Enforcement Actions Corrective actions needed and taken at industrial facilities during this reporting period included:

• Open containers of oil and oil/water were removed • Reported drywell violations to ADEQ Aquifer Protection Permit (APP) Program

personnel • Report to ADEQ the private industries that are subject to the multi sector general

permit (MSGP) as non-filers Section 8-5-5 of the City’s Stormwater Code provides for formal enforcement actions by issuing a notice of abatement or a citation for civil sanctions under the code, or both. However, the code provides that City employees may seek voluntary compliance through notices of violation, warnings, or other informal devices designed to achieve compliance in the most efficient and effective manner under the circumstances. The City’s commercial and industrial facility enforcement procedure provides the option of voluntary compliance to responsible parties to implement corrective actions by issuing a courtesy notice. Where voluntary compliance is not obtained within a reasonable timeframe, the City has the ability to issue a civil violation and citation, issue


a notice to abate, or suspend any license issued by the City. Additionally, the City may impose criminal violations for responsible parties identified as habitual offenders. During this reporting period, no formal enforcement actions were needed or taken as a result of stormwater inspections conducted by the City of private industrial facilities. Some cases were closed without a violation being confirmed. The remaining cases were closed when the issue had been addressed or upon the issuance of a courtesy notice. 3.7 CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM ACTIVITIES The 2010 MS4 Permit requires the City to report the following in the Annual Report as it pertains to the review of plans and inspections of construction operations:

1. Status of inventory/plan review of these facilities. 2. An overview of inspection findings and significant findings. 3. Corrective and enforcement actions needed and taken in response to

inspections. 3.7.1 Status of Inventory and Plan Review of Construction Operations The 2010 MS4 Permit requires the City to:

1. Develop an inventory, list, or database, or map of construction activities that result in land disturbance of one (1) or more acres and that have the potential to discharge to the City’s storm sewer system within one (1) year of permit issuance (August 30, 2011) and to be updated at least annually;

2. Review at least 80% of plans for new development and redevelopment (such as grading and drainage plans) to verify conformance with the City requirements for stormwater, including erosion and sediment control, prior to issuing construction approvals or authorizations; and,

3. Require a copy of the ADEQ’s Authorization Certificate for non-municipal construction projects (as required by municipal stormwater requirements or ordinances or state stormwater requirements) be submitted prior to issuing construction approval or authorization.


3.7.1.1 Private Construction Projects When plans are submitted to the City, information on the construction project is entered into a database providing a detailed record of the construction operations from the point of plan submittal through inspection and approval (i.e. issuance of a Certificate of Completion or Certificate of Occupancy). The City reviews all construction plans for compliance with all aspects of the City’s Engineering and Design Standards Manual and the City Mesa Code. Stormwater drainage and infrastructure are generally detailed in grading and drainage plans. Approval of these plans is required before a building permit is issued by the City. A copy of the contractor’s ADEQ Authorization Certificate is also required before a building permit is issued by the City of Mesa for projects involving land disturbance of one or more acres. The City places a “hold” that prevents the issuance of a building permit where an ADEQ Authorization Certificate is required until it has been submitted. 3.7.1.2 City Projects For City projects, the City is deeply involved in the project through all phases of development (i.e. conception, planning, construction, and completion). Grading and drainage plans are required for most engineering projects, certainly any project that disturbs one or more acres of land. The City maintains a separate database for City construction projects that disturb more than 0.1 acres. This is the threshold disturbance limit where a dust control permit would be required from the Maricopa County Air Quality Department. The general contractor is required to submit a copy of their SWPPP for review and approval along with a copy of their ADEQ Authorization Certificate before the contractor is authorized to conduct any land disturbance activities for City projects that disturb one or more acres of land. The City files as a co-permittee under the ADEQ’s Construction General Permit (CGP) and is issued a separate Authorization Certificate. 3.7.2 Overview of Inspection Findings and Significant Findings The 2010 MS4 Permit requires the City to:


1. Establish a prioritization schedule for inspecting construction sites with a higher frequency of inspections for those sites that have a higher potential to discharge to the storm sewer system;

2. Routinely inspect construction projects to determine whether effective erosion and sediment controls are in place, and verify conformance with local stormwater requirements and approved construction plans;

3. Inspect higher priority sites, based on the prioritization schedule, a minimum of one (1) time every three (3) months and all other sites at least once every six (6) months until final stabilization is established; and,

4. Conduct follow-up inspection of construction sites within 30 days to ensure stormwater deficiencies/concerns/non-compliance identified as a result of a routine inspection were corrected

3.7.2.1 Private Construction Projects The City will generally first inspect a private construction operation within three (3) weeks of the issuance of any permit for projects that involve a surface/land disturbance of one (1) acre or more. During this visit, the City will review the operator’s plans to identify active areas and stormwater best management practices (BMPs), and inspects all active areas of the project to ensure that BMPs and other environmental ordinance issues identified on the operator’s plans are in place and maintained, and to ensure there are no illicit discharges to the City’s storm sewer system. These projects are inspected thereafter a minimum of one (1) time every three (3) months where construction activities are still active. Where deficiencies are noted and a re-inspection is required, the City will conduct this follow-up inspection within 30 calendar days. Inspection findings for private construction projects during this reporting period included:

1. Improper BMP Installation or Use: Wattles not staked around stockpiles 2. Inadequate BMP Maintenance: Poorly maintained track-out devices Poorly maintained silt fence

3. Lack of BMPs: No perimeter control


Unprotected catch basins No track-out control devices No erosion control BMPs around stockpiles

4. Non-Stormwater Discharges: Fugitive dust control issues Track-out onto City streets Sediment discharges to streets, sidewalks, and curb and gutter systems

5. Paperwork Issues: Authorization Certificate not available at the site 3.7.2.2 City Projects The City generally conducts a compliance audit within two (2) weeks of the issuance of approval by the City to the general contractor (i.e. issuance of a Notice to Proceed) and where the disturbance of land associated with the project has begun. These projects are inspected thereafter a minimum of one (1) time every three (3) months. Where deficiencies are noted and a re-inspection is required, the City will conduct this follow-up inspection within 30 calendar days. Inspection findings for City construction projects during this reporting period included:

1. Improper BMP Installation or Use: Wattles not staked around stockpiles 2. Inadequate BMP Maintenance: Poorly maintained track-out devices Poorly maintained silt fence

3. Lack of BMPs: No perimeter control Unprotected catch basins No track-out control devices No erosion control BMPs around stockpiles

4. Non-Stormwater Discharges: Track-out onto City streets Sediment discharges to streets, sidewalks, and curb and gutter systems

5. Paperwork Issues: Lack of updated SWPPP site inspection records SWPPP waiver not available at the site SWPPP not updated to show current BMPs


3.7.3 Summary of Corrective and Enforcement Actions The 2010 MS4 Permit requires the City to:

1. Establish an effective compliance and enforcement program that incorporates escalating actions for violations of the City’s Stormwater Code that provides timeframes and escalation for corrective actions; and,

2. Focus the escalated enforcement protocol on having the highest level of enforcement action resolved within one (1) year of the initial inspection/violation.

3.7.3.1 Private Construction Projects Corrective actions needed and taken at private construction projects during this reporting period included:

1. Improper BMP Installation or Use: Proper installation and usage of wattles was established

2. Inadequate BMP Maintenance: Track-out control device became properly maintained Silt fences became properly maintained

3. Lack of BMPs: Perimeter control was established Catch basin BMPs were installed Erosion control BMPs installed around stockpiles

4. Non-Stormwater Discharges: Fugitive dust control issues were addressed Track-out was cleaned up Sediment was removed from streets, sidewalks, and curb and gutter systems

5. Paperwork Issues: Authorization Certificate became available at the site Section 8-5-5 of the City’s Stormwater Code provides for formal enforcement actions by issuing a notice of abatement or a citation for civil sanctions under this Chapter, or both. However, the code provides that City employees may seek voluntary compliance through notices of violation, warnings, or other informal devices designed to achieve compliance in the most efficient and effective manner under the circumstances.


The City’s private construction enforcement procedure provides an option of obtaining voluntary compliance by allowing a reasonable timeframe for obtaining compliance and taking actions equivalent to issuing a stop work order (i.e. not approving site improvements until such time the issues have been adequately addressed) where necessary. Where voluntary compliance is not obtained within a reasonable timeframe, the City has the ability to take formal enforcement actions by issuing a civil violation and citation, issue a notice to abate, or suspend any license issued by the City. Additionally, the City may impose criminal violations for responsible parties identified as habitual offenders. 3.7.3.2 City Projects Corrective actions needed and taken at City construction projects during this reporting period included:

1. Improper BMP Installation or Use: Proper installation and usage of wattles was established

2. Inadequate BMP Maintenance: Track-out control device became properly maintained Silt fences became properly maintained

3. Lack of BMPs: Perimeter control was established Catch basin BMPs were installed Erosion control BMPs installed around stockpiles

4. Non-Stormwater Discharges: Track-out was cleaned up Sediment was removed from streets, sidewalks, and curb and gutter systems

5. Paperwork Issues: Updated SWPPP site inspection records were available SWPPP waiver became available at the site SWPPP was updated

Section 8-5-5 of the City’s Stormwater Code provides for formal enforcement actions by issuing a notice of abatement or a citation for civil sanctions under this Chapter, or both. However, the code provides that City employees may seek voluntary compliance


through notices of violation, warnings, or other informal devices designed to achieve compliance in the most efficient and effective manner under the circumstances. The City construction enforcement procedure provides for an option of obtaining voluntary compliance by allowing a reasonable timeframe for obtaining compliance and confirming during a follow-up inspection(s), and where compliance issues remain unresolved, initiating the stop work order process until such time the issues have been adequately addressed. 3.8 POST-CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM ACTIVITIES The 2010 MS4 Permit requires the City to report the following in the Annual Report as it pertains to the post-construction requirements associated with construction operations:

1. Summary of any new or revised post-construction controls for City projects or post-construction requirements related to permits the City issues.

2. An overview of the city’s post-construction inspection program. 3. Corrective and enforcement actions needed and taken in response to post-

construction inspections. 3.8.1 New or Revised Post-Construction Controls During this reporting period, no changes were made to the Engineering & Design Standards (2012) which incorporates the City’s stormwater drainage and retention standards. A copy of that document is available at the following link: http://www.mesaaz.gov/engineering/MesaStandardandSpecs.aspx 3.8.2 Overview of Post-Construction Inspection Program For private construction projects, the City requires developers to obtain a third party inspection of post-construction stormwater controls to determine effectiveness of these controls. These third party inspection are submitted to the City. For City projects, the City conducts a final stability inspection for projects involving land disturbance of one or more acres ensure the site has achieved permanent stabilization. An inspection of this nature is necessary in order to file a Notice of Termination (NOT) to end coverage under the CGP.

http://www.mesaaz.gov/engineering/MesaStandardandSpecs.aspx


3.8.3 Summary of Corrective and Enforcement Actions For private construction projects, a certificate of occupancy will not be issued until such a time that the developer provides a third party inspection of post-construction stormwater controls for projects requiring such an inspection. For City construction projects, the City files a NOT to end coverage under the CGP for each project that disturbed one or more acres of land based on the results of the final stability inspection. Where final stabilization has not been achieved, coverage under the CGP is maintained. This may occur in instances where one general contractor’s scope of work did not include final stabilization (e.g. application of ground cover) but that this would be achieved under another project phase, either by City personnel or another general contractor. 3.9 DRY-WEATHER SCREENING The 2010 MS4 Permit requires the City to report the status of the following in the Annual Report as it pertains to the dry-weather screening requirements:

1. Staff training. 2. Outfall and field screening point inventory. 3. Inspection tracking system. 4. Inspection and screening procedures and significant findings.

3.9.1 Staff Training The 2010 MS4 Permit requires the existing employees directly involved with stormwater management activities, including dry-weather screening and associated investigations, be trained at least once every two (2) years and to provide an opportunity for new employee training at least one (1) time per year. As such, all City staff who conduct these types of operations must meet the following requirements:

• Review the procedures detailed in the Environmental Code Violation Standard Operating Procedures;

• Have knowledge of:


Ordinances, rules, and regulations governing stormwater discharges, particulate pollution, and hazardous materials;

Principles and practices for field monitoring protocols, sample collection, preservation, analysis, and documentation requirements;

Occupational and safety precautions at industrial and construction work sites (position requirement; and,

• Have a basic knowledge of chemicals on human and ecological systems (position requirement).

Dry weather screening inspections involve two personnel for health and safety reasons among others. Dry-weather screening inspections conducted during this reporting period involved personnel that were hired during the reporting year. Training was provided to these personnel prior to conducting dry-weather screening activities. 3.9.2 Outfall and Field Screening Point Inventory Two newly installed FSPs were added to the City’s inventory during this reporting period. 3.9.3 Inspection Tracking System Dry-weather screening and associated investigations are documented on the Dry-Weather Screening Report Form specific for each location. The City has developed a database with the functionality to retrieve data and generating reports required for the annual report and to better track results at these locations. 3.9.4 Inspection and Screening Procedures and Significant Findings During this reporting period, the City completed the dry-weather screening process by inspecting all outfall and FSP locations that had not been inspected during the first three years reporting periods of the 2010 MS4 Permit. The push to complete dry-weather screening during the fourth year of the 2010 MS4 Permit term was conducted for the purpose of updating the City’s SWMP and for the preparation of the City’s 2010 MS4 Permit re-application (both included as addendums to this annual report). During this reporting period, dry-weather flows were detected at two FSP locations. One location was not flowing when re-inspected within 24 hours and therefore, no


inspection was required. The flow at other FSP location was determined to be resulting from a permitted de minimis source. 3.10 ORDINANCES, RULES, & POLICIES No changes to the City’s Stormwater Code were made during this reporting period. The most current version of the City’s Stormwater Code included in the City’s updated Storm Water Management Plan which is included as an addendum to the annual report. 3.11 FISCAL EXPENDITURES See Section 12.0.


4.0 STORMWATER PROGRAM NUMERIC SUMMARY The 2010 MS4 Permit requires the City to provide a summary of management practices and activities performed each year and to report that summary in a table as provided in that permit. Attached in this section is the table summarizing activities conducted under the City’s 2010 MS4 Permit.



City of Mesa, Storm Water Annual ReportNumeric Summary of Stormwater Management Program Activities

Page 1 of 3

2010 - 2011 2011 - 2012 2012 - 2013 2013 - 2014 2014 - 2015

Number of training sessions (on non-stormwater discharges and the IDDE program)

0 13 6 22

Number of employees attending training NA 358 59 531(1)(2)

Number of municipal facilities identified with hazardous materials 0 0 2 1(3)

Number of spills at municipal facilities with hazardous materials, that occurred in outside areas

NA 0 0 0

Number of facility assessments completed (identify any issues found requiring follow-up in narrative and summarize new practices to minimize exposure)

NA 230 55 0

Date of last review of site-specific materials handling and spill response procedures (identify participant(s) with stormwater expertise in narrative)

NA NA NA 05/06/14

Total number inspected (attach or forward electronic copy of inventory or map of major outfalls and field screening points and priority outfalls and field screening points)

41 30 44 56

Number of ‘priority outfalls’ and field screening points identified to date (summarize findings and follow-up actions in narrative)

0 0 0 0(4)

Number of ‘priority outfalls’ and field screening points inspected (summarize findings and follow-up actions in narrative)

NA NA NA NA(4)

Number of dry weather flows detected 0 0 0 2Number of dry weather flows investigated NA NA NA 1(5)

Number of outfalls and field screening points sampled NA NA NA 0(6)

Number of illicit discharges identified 12 9 25 34Number of illicit discharges eliminated 12 5 22 32Amount of storm drain inspected (length) NA NA NA 35,444(7)

Number of storm drain cross connection investigations 0 0 0 0Number of illicit connections detected 2 0 0 0Number of illicit connections eliminated 2 0 0 0Number of corrective or enforcement actions initiated within 60 days of identification

12 13 27 37

Percent of cases resolved within one (1) calendar year of original enforcement action

100 100 100 100

Number of illicit discharge reports received from public 28 16 32 43Percent of illicit discharge reports responded to 100 100 100 94Percent of responses initiated within three (3) business days of receipt 100 100 81 81

NUMERIC SUMMARY OF STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM ACTIVITIES

ANNUAL REPORTING YEAR (July 1 – June 30)STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PRACTICE OR ACTIVITY

3. Outfall and Field Screening Point Inspections

Illicit Discharge Detection & Elimination Program1. Municipal Employee Training

2. Spill Prevention


Page 2 of 3

2010 - 2011 2011 - 2012 2012 - 2013 2013 - 2014 2014 - 2015


Number of training events (dates and topics to be included in narrative) 0 7 4 10Number of staff trained NA 165 36 207(1)

Total number of facilities on inventory 96 286 285 286Date identification of ‘higher risk’ facilities completed NA NA 01/30/13 NADate prioritization of municipal facilities completed NA NA 07/22/13 NA

Miles of MS4 drainage system prioritized for inspection NA NA NA NA(8)

Miles visually inspected NA NA NA 3.2%(9)

Number of ‘higher risk’ municipal facilities inspected 0 0 2 0Number of ‘higher risk’ municipal facilities found needing improved stormwater controls

NA NA 1 NA

Linear miles of drainage system cleaned each year (city to maintain records documenting specific street cleaning events)

30,976 52,026 51,648 52,280

Record amount of waste collected from street and lot sweeping (reported in pounds, gallons, etc.)

1,769 3,235 3,330 3,356(10)

Total number of catch basins 8,508 10,042 9,951 10,084Number of retention/detention basins cleaned 19,146 21,586 22,862 17,340(11)

Number of catch basins cleaned 17,050 11,420 5,318 2,309(12)

Number of training events for MS4 staff 0 1 1 2Number of municipal staff trained NA 4 4 10(1)

Number of industrial facilities inventory inspected (see Appendix A, Part V.B) 1,117 1,146 1,169 828(13)

Number of corrective or enforcement actions initiated on industrial facilities 9 28 5 8Percent of cases resolved within one (1) calendar year of original enforcement action

NA 100 100 100

Number of training events for MS4 staff (include topics in narrative summary) 0 10 2 7Number of municipal staff trained NA 121 19 122(1)

Number of construction/grading plans submitted for review 80 89 121 176Number of construction/grading plans reviewed 88 122 134 99Number of construction sites inspected 113 58 73 103(13)

Number of corrective or enforcement actions initiated on construction facilities (identify the type of actions in narrative summary)

56 57 12 28

Construction Program Activities

Industrial and Commercial Sites Not Owned by the MS4

2. Inventory, Map, or Database of MS4 Owned & Operated Facilities

3. Inspections

4. Infrastructure Maintenance

Municipal Facilities1. Employee Training


Page 3 of 3

2010 - 2011 2011 - 2012 2012 - 2013 2013 - 2014 2014 - 2015


Number of post-construction inspections completed 18 23 4 39Number of corrective or enforcement actions initiated for post-construction activities (identify the type of actions in narrative summary)

0 0 0 0

Notes for current reporting period:

NA- Not Applicable

(7) Measured in linear feet.

(4) To date, the City has not identified any conditions at outfall or field screening point locations that meet the definition of a "priority outfall" as provided in the 2010 MS4 Permit.

(9) Reported as a percentage of the linear miles of drainage system cleaned.

(2) The increase in the number of people trained during this reporting period was the result of incorporating other departments into the training program following the results of the City facility assessments conducted during reporting period 2012-2013.

(5) Dryweather flows were detected at two FSP locations. One location was not flowing when reinspected within 24 hours and therefore, no inspection was required. The flow at other FSP location was determined to be resulting from a permitted de minimis source.

(10) Quantity reported in tons. Waste generated from access roadways and lot sweeping is estimated by adding 10% to the waste generated as part of the City's street sweeping program.

Post Construction Program Activities

(13) Number of inspections include follow-up inspections and is not indicative of the number of sites inspected.

(6) Flow was from a permitted source. No samples for analytical analysis were collected.

(1) Previous training numbers reported have been modified due to a database error. For some training, more than one module is presented. In these cases the number reported is the total number of employees trained for each module.

(12) Between summer 2008 and summer 2012 the City conducted a concentrated effort to target the cleaning of every City owned catch basin. The recent drop in numbers is attributed to the City returning to a regular preventative maintenance schedule.

(3) Hazardous materials over in quantities greater than 5 gallons were identified in 23 facilities. These materials were exposed to stormwater at only 2 of those facilities. One facility required a spill plan. The hazardous material storage at the other facility was addressed through a revised waste disposal protocal.

(8) The City does not measure linear miles of drainage system prioritized for inspection. Rather, these areas are provded in the SWMP.

(11) The City has 174 basins in its inventory. Some basins are cleaned more frequently than others. Reported value is the total number of times City owned and operated basins were cleaned.



5.0 EVALUATION OF THE STORMWATER PROGRAM The 2010 MS4 Permit requires the City to provide an evaluation of the progress and success of the City’s stormwater management program, including an assessment of the effectiveness of stormwater management practices in reducing the discharge of pollutants to and from the City’s storm sewer system in the Annual Report. 5.1 PROGRAM PROGRESS The City has drafted the following standard operating procedures addressing the requirements provided in the 2010 MS4 Permit. The most current date of these procedures is also provided.

• Commercial & Industrial Facility Inspection Standard Operating Procedures (September 2011)

• Environmental Code Violation Standard Operating Procedures (September 2011) • Environmental Program Training Standard Operating Procedures (February

2012) • Standard Operating Procedures for City Facility Compliance Assessments

(February 2012) • Standard Operating Procedures for City Field Operations Activities (September

2011) • Standard Operating Procedures for City Stormwater Infrastructure Operations

Activities (August 2014) • Standard Operating Procedures for Construction Activities of City Projects

(March 2014) • Standard Operating Procedures for Construction Activities of Private Projects

(February 2014) • Standard Operating Procedures for Stormwater Monitoring (October 2012) • Wet-Weather Stormwater Sampling & Analysis Plan (April 2011)

Many of these procedures incorporate other City requirements established under the Mesa City Code that are not specific to the City’s stormwater program.


5.2 PROGRAM SUCCESSES During this fiscal year, the following successes to the City’s stormwater program include:

• The STORM organization conducted a movie theater campaign that reached an estimated 850,000 people over the Greater Phoenix Metropolitan Area.

• STORM sponsored the Construction General Permit Seminar that attracted approximately 141 attendees.

5.3 REDUCTION OF POLLUTANTS TO THE CITY’S STORM SEWER SYSTEM Elements of the City’s stormwater program that the City identifies as having significantly reduced the release of pollutants to their storm sewer system include:

1. Public Education & Outreach 2. Public Reporting (i.e. Environmental Hotline) 3. Household Hazardous Waste Events 4. Commercial & Industrial Facility Inspections 5. Construction Site Inspections

5.3.1 Public Education & Outreach The STORM organization’s movie theater campaign was a major benefit to the City’s stormwater program by providing information pertaining to illicit discharges and stormwater quality. The Construction General Permit seminar was a major benefit to the City’s stormwater program by providing information regarding stormwater requirements directly to construction site operators. This seminar helps to reduce the amount of pollutants discharged to the City’s storm sewer system by providing industrial site operators with increased knowledge of what is required on their facilities. 5.3.2 Public Reporting By providing a public reporting method for complaints regarding stormwater issues, the City is able to identify and take timely action against persons who are responsible for releasing pollutants to the City’s storm sewer system. Additionally, this information can


be used to determine what topics need to be further addressed though the STORM organization’s public education and outreach program. 5.3.3 Household Hazardous Waste Events The City’s HHW events collected over 57,000 gallons of waste. It is not possible to quantify the amount of HHW that could be released into the storm sewer system if the HHW events were not held. However, since material collected at the events is disposed of properly, these events ultimately result in significantly reducing releases of these types of pollutants to the City’s storm sewer system. 5.3.4 Commercial & Industrial Facility Inspections City inspectors conduct inspections on a daily basis of commercial facilities that require permitting under the City’s FOG program. These inspectors are trained to identify violations of the City’s Stormwater Code and to report such violations to appropriate City personnel. The inspections of industrial facilities by qualified personnel to identify violations of the City’s Stormwater Code are also an effective method for reducing the release of pollutants to the City’s storm sewer system. Through the issuance of a courtesy notice requiring corrective actions, the City is able to have the source of pollutants removed by the responsible party while at the same time providing a public education opportunity to prevent future discharges and encourage public reporting. Where necessary, the City does have the authority to pursue civil and criminal actions against responsible parties if they refuse to take action, take action then recommit the offense, or commit offences in a manner that they are considered habitual offenders. These enforcement actions, or the threat of them, can be an effective tool in accelerating corrective actions by the responsible party. 5.3.5 Construction Site Inspections City inspectors conduct inspections of private construction projects to ensure they are operating in compliance with the City’s Stormwater Code. Where issues are identified, the City has the authority to issue a “Stop Work Order” or otherwise not approve contractor improvements (similar to a Stop Work Order) as a mean of obtaining compliance until such time that the issues have been adequately addressed.


Where necessary, the City does have the authority to pursue civil and criminal actions by establishing a code compliance case against responsible parties if the construction site operator refuses to take action, takes action but then recommits the offense, or commits offences in a manner that they are considered repeat offenders. These enforcement actions, or the threat of them, can be an effective tool in accelerating corrective actions by the responsible party. 5.4 REDUCTION OF POLLUTANTS FROM THE CITY’S STORM SEWER SYSTEM Elements of the City’s stormwater program that the City identifies as having significantly reduced the discharge of pollutants from their storm sewer system to waters of the United States include:

1. Storm Sewer System Infrastructure Maintenance 2. Post-Construction Requirements

5.4.1 Storm Sewer Systerm Infrastructure Maintenance Maintenance of the City’s storm sewer system results in the direct removal of pollutants from the system, thus keeping them from being discharged into a water of the United States. 5.4.1.1 Street Sweeping Sediment and debris that collects on paved streets owned and operated by the City is removed through the City’s street sweeping program. The estimated amount of pollutants removed from the City’s street sweeping program is provided in the Numeric Summary of Stormwater Management Program Activities table in Section 4.0. 5.4.1.2 Storm Sewer Components The City has a program to clean catch basins, storm pipes, open channels, headwalls and culverts that are owned and operated by the City. Removal of trash, debris and sediment from these structures prevents this material from being discharged to a water of the United States. 5.4.1.3 Detention/Retention Basins The City owns and operates several detention and retention basins installed throughout the City. Much of the City’s streets and storm pipes drain to a detention or retention


basin at some point before potentially draining to another regulated MS4 or a water of the United States. The City removes debris, trash, and sediment from detention basins to keep pollutants from discharging further into the City’s storm sewer systerm. The removal of these pollutants from retention basins keeps these basins operational and allows for the infiltration of stormwater. 5.4.2 Post-Construction Requirements The City has developed an Engineering and Design Standards Manual that provides specific direction and guidelines to the design professionals preparing construction documents for private land development projects. That manual adopts the Uniform Drainage Policies and Standards for Maricopa County as published by the Flood Control District of Maricopa County with modifications as specified within that manual. City regulations requiring the retention of the 50-year, 24-hour run-off volume were adopted in 1997 and were based on three (3) inches of precipitation. Retention standards requiring the 100-year 2-hour volume were adopted in the late 1980’s. The current design storm is based on the 100 year frequency, 2-hour duration storm event which is equivalent to 2.2 inches of rainfall, except in the Mesa Town Center where the retention standard only requires 2/3 of the 100 year, 2 hour rainfall depth, or 1.5 inches. The City’s retention standard results in the reduction of pollutants discharged from the City’s storm sewer system to a water of the United States.




6.0 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM MODIFICATIONS The 2010 MS4 Permit requires the City to provide a description of the modifications to the City’s SWMP for the areas described in the following subsections. No other changes to the City’s SWMP are allowed without permit modification. However, Section 8.1.4 of the 2010 MS4 Permit requires the 4th year annual report (this report) submittal to include an updated SWMP. 6.1 ADDITION OF NEW CONTROL MEASURES No additional control measures apart from those required in under the 2010 MS4 Permit were implemented during this reporting period. 6.2 ADDITION OF TEMPORARY CONTROL MEASURES No temporary control measures were implemented during this reporting period. 6.3 INCREASE OF EXISTING CONTROL MEASURES No increases to existing control measures were implemented during this reporting period. 6.4 REPLACEMENT OF EXISTING CONTROL MEASURES No existing controls were deemed to be ineffective and replaced with an alternate control measure that will continue to achieve an equivalent or increased reduction in pollutants during this reporting period. 6.5 FOURTH YEAR ANNUAL REPORT The first SWMP developed under the 2010 MS4 Permit was dated September 2011. The updated SWMP dated September 2014 is included as an addendum to this annual report.




7.0 MONITORING LOCATIONS The 2010 MS4 Permit requires the City to provide a brief description of the City’s wet-weather stormwater monitoring locations in the first annual report. Subsequent annual reports need only advise of any changes or updates that were required. The information required includes the following:

1. Name and description of water of the United States receiving discharges from the monitoring location;

2. Monitoring location identification number (see subsection titles); 3. Address or physical location of the monitoring locations; 4. Latitude and longitude of monitoring locations; 5. Size (acres) of drainage area associated with each monitoring location; 6. Estimated acreage of individual land uses with each drainage area; and, 7. Type of monitoring equipment

The City provided information regarding items 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7 in the Annual Report dated September 2011. Engineering & Environmental Consultants, Inc. (EEC) was contracted by the City under the request for proposal process for stormwater program development to conduct a study that would update the City’s pollutant loading model. The study included delineating drainage areas for each outfall and FPS location, estimating the total acreage of each drainage area, and estimating the acreage of each land use within each drainage area that results in a discharge to a water of the United States (see Section 11.0). EEC evaluated each outfall and FSP for the following land uses: streets, residential, commercial, industrial, lawns/parks, hillside/mountain, desert, and agricultural. Please note that the streets land use did not include streets incorporated in commercial and residential areas. This information was incorporated into the City’s Standard Operating Procedures for Stormwater Montioring manual. The following sections provide information for each sampling sampling location.


7.1 AS-US60 The total drainage area for this location is approximately 149.3 acres and is broken down as follows:

• Residential – 128.5 • Agricultural – 0.0 • Commercial – 20.8 • Industrial – 0.0 • Lawns/Parks – 0.0 • Desert – 0.0 • Hillside/Mountain – 0.0 • City Streets – 0.0

7.2 SS-US60 The total drainage area for this location is approximately 6.5 acres and is broken down as follows:


7.3 54-EMF The total drainage area for this location is approximately 29.3 acres and is broken down as follows:

• Residential – 29.3 • Agricultural – 0.0 • Commercial – 0.0 • Industrial – 0.0


• Lawns/Parks – 0.0 • Desert – 0.0 • Hillside/Mountain – 0.0 • City Streets – 0.0

7.4 UN-EMF The total drainage area for this location is approximately 352.4 acres and is broken down as follows:


7.5 FF-ACES The total drainage area for this location is approximately 73.78 acres. Land use data was not evaluated for this location since this sampling location did not meet the definition of an “outfall” or “FSP” as provided in the scope of work for the EEC study. However, this sampling location is interior to the Falcon Field Airport which is a regulated industry under the ADEQ’s Multi-Sector General Permit. As such, all this area is known to be industrial use.




8.0 STORM EVENT RECORDS The 2010 MS4 Permit requires the City to summarize all measurable storm events (0.10 inches or greater) at each monitoring location until such a time that stormwater samples have been collected at that particular monitoring location during that particular season. The information is to include the following:

• Date of each event; • Amount of precipitation of each event; • Indication of whether or not a sample was collected as part of the event; • Information on conditions that prevented the collection of a sample.

Attached in this section is a table summarizing storm event records obtained under the 2010 MS4 Permit.



Sto

rm E

vent

Rec

ords

Pag

e 1

of 2

STO

RM

EVE

NT

REC

OR

DS

- REP

OR

TIN

G P

ERIO

D 2

013-

2014

Even

t R

ainf

all

(inch

es)

Floo

d Ev

ent(2

)

(Y/N

)

Nor

mal

St

orm

(3)

(Y/N

)

Insu

ffici

ent

Rai

nfal

l(4)

(Y/N

)

Sam

ple

Col

lect

ion

Res

ult(5

)N

otes

Sam

ple

Col

lect

ion

Res

ult(5

)N

otes

7/15

/13

17:3

67/

15/1

3 19

:02

1:26

S0.

16N

YN

SC

Sum

mer

sea

son

com

posi

te s

ampl

ig c

ompl

ete

SC

Sum

mer

sea

son

disc

rete

sam

plin

g co

mpl

ete

11/4

/13

21:2

211

/4/1

3 21

:29

0:07

W0.

08N

YY

11/2

1/13

20:

0511

/22/

13 8

:22

12:1

7W

1.17

NY

NS

CW

inte

r sea

son

com

posi

te s

ampl

ing

com

plet

eS

CW

inte

r sea

son

disc

rete

sam

plin

g co

mpl

ete

7/12

/13

14:4

17/

12/1

3 15

:01

0:20

S0.

02N

YY

7/15

/13

17:3

8

7/16

/13

3:57

10:1

9S

0.82

NY

NE

MS

ampl

er in

take

blo

ck b

y de

bris

HE

Sam

plin

g cr

ew d

id n

ot re

aliz

e th

at th

ey c

ould

co

llect

dis

cret

e sa

mpl

es if

a c

ompo

site

sam

ple

was

not

or c

ould

not

be

colle

cted

. C

rew

was

re

train

ed in

this

requ

irem

ent.

7/16

/13

14:3

57/

16/1

3 14

:40

0:05

S0.

02N

YY

7/19

/13

0:09

7/19

/13

6:34

6:25

S0.

07N

YY

7/27

/13

0:12

7/27

/13

0:49

0:37

S0.

51N

YN

SC

Sum

mer

sea

son

com

posi

te s

ampl

ing

com

plet

eS

CS

umm

er s

easo

n di

scre

te s

ampl

ing

com

plet

e

11/2

1/13

20:

3711

/21/

13 2

2:24

1:47

W0.

18N

YN

SC

Win

ter s

easo

n co

mpo

site

sam

plin

g co

mpl

ete

SC

Win

ter s

easo

n di

scre

te s

ampl

ing

com

plet

e7/

11/1

3 9:

507/

11/1

3 10

:24

0:34

S0.

02N

YY

7/15

/13

17:4

77/

15/1

3 18

:19

0:32

S0.

03N

YY

7/16

/13

19:1

97/

16/1

3 22

:07

2:48

S0.

09N

YY

7/19

/13

0:10

7/19

/13

0:22

0:12

S0.

07N

YY

7/20

/13

20:2

77/

20/1

3 23

:00

2:33

S0.

16N

YN

EM

Sam

pler

col

lect

ed s

ampl

e on

7/1

9/13

form

non

-qu

alify

ing

even

t.S

CS

umm

er s

easo

n di

scre

te s

ampl

ing

com

plet

e

8/6/

13 5

:29

8/6/

13 1

0:07

4:38

S0.

06N

YY

8/18

/13

0:16

8/18

/13

0:29

0:13

S0.

02N

YY

8/24

/13

0:43

8/24

/13

0:43

0:00

S0.

01N

YY

8/30

/13

17:0

98/

30/1

3 20

:43

3:34

S0.

90N

YN

SC

Sum

mer

sea

son

com

posi

te s

ampl

ing

com

plet

e

11/2

1/13

20:

2211

/21/

13 2

3:24

3:02

W0.

27N

YN

SC

Win

ter s

easo

n co

mpo

site

sam

plin

g co

mpl

ete

IF12

/4/1

3 11

:59

12/4

/13

13:2

41:

25W

0.04

NY

Y12

/20/

13 2

:18

12/2

0/13

6:2

04:

02W

0.79

NY

NS

CW

inte

r sea

son

disc

rete

sam

plin

g co

mpl

ete

7/12

/13

14:4

77/

12/1

3 14

:47

0:00

S0.

01N

YY

7/16

/13

19:1

77/

16/1

3 19

:22

0:05

S0.

03N

YY

7/19

/13

0:19

7/19

/13

0:19

0:00

S0.

01N

YY

7/20

/13

20:3

17/

21/1

3 0:

113:

40S

0.20

NY

NS

CS

umm

er s

easo

n co

mpo

site

sam

plig

com

plet

eS

CS

umm

er s

easo

n di

scre

te s

ampl

ing

com

plet

e

11/4

/13

21:3

111

/4/1

3 21

:31

0:00

S0.

01N

YY

11/2

1/13

21:

1911

/22/

13 0

:54

3:35

W0.

34N

YN

SC

Win

ter s

easo

n co

mpo

site

sam

plin

g co

mpl

ete

SC

Win

ter s

easo

n di

scre

te s

ampl

ing

com

plet

e7/

12/1

3 14

:38

7/12

/13

14:5

00:

12S

0.02

NY

Y7/

15/1

3 18

:10

7/15

/13

18:1

00:

00S

0.01

NY

Y7/

16/1

3 0:

167/

16/1

3 0:

180:

02S

0.02

NY

Y7/

19/1

3 0:

547/

19/1

3 0:

540:

00S

0.01

NY

Y7/

20/1

3 20

:17

7/21

/13

14:3

718

:20

S0.

41N

YN

SC

Sum

mer

sea

son

com

posi

te s

ampl

ing

com

plet

eIF

7/27

/13

0:20

7/27

/13

0:32

0:12

S0.

08N

YY

8/6/

13 7

:28

8/6/

13 1

0:25

2:57

S0.

09N

YY

8/17

/13

22:3

28/

18/1

3 0:

171:

45S

0.07

NY

Y9/

6/13

15:

479/

6/13

16:

350:

48S

0.05

NY

Y9/

7/13

7:3

49/

7/13

8:5

21:

18S

0.03

NY

Y9/

8/13

7:4

29/

8/13

12:

234:

41S

0.40

NY

NS

CS

umm

er s

easo

n di

scre

te s

ampl

ing

com

plet

e11

/4/1

3 21

:32

11/4

/13

21:4

00:

08W

0.02

NY

Y11

/21/

13 2

1:17

11/2

2/13

14:

1216

:55

W1.

62N

YN

SC

Win

ter s

easo

n co

mpo

site

sam

plin

g co

mpl

ete

SC

Win

ter s

easo

n di

scre

te s

ampl

ing

com

plet

e

UN

-EM

F

FF-A

CE

S

Stor

m

Mon

itorin

g St

atio

n

Seas

on(1

)

(S/W

)

AS

-US

60

SS

-US

60

54-E

MF

Dis

cret

e Sa

mpl

e In

form

atio

nSt

orm

Sta

rt

Dat

e/Ti

me

Stor

m E

vent

Sto

p D

ate/

Tim

eD

urat

ion

Com

posi

te S

ampl

e In

form

atio

nSt

orm

Info

rmat

ion

Sto

rm E

vent

Rec

ords

Pag

e 2

of 2

Not

es:

(1

) Se

ason

s: S

umm

er (S

): J

une

1st t

hrou

gh O

ctob

er 3

0th

(hig

hlig

hted

yel

low

). W

inte

r (W

): N

ovem

ber 1

st th

roug

h M

ay 3

1st (

high

light

ed b

lue)

.(2

) Fl

ood

Even

t: S

torm

inte

nsity

exc

eedi

ng th

e 10

0 Ye

ar, 2

-Hou

r sto

rm e

vent

(i.e

. >2.

2 in

ches

in tw

o ho

urs)

.(3

) N

orm

al S

torm

: St

orm

inte

nsity

up

to a

nd in

clud

ing

the

100-

year

2-h

our d

urat

ion

stor

m e

vent

(i.e

. < 2

.2 in

ches

in tw

o ho

urs)

. (4

) In

suffi

cien

t Rai

nfal

l: R

ainf

all i

nten

sity

bel

ow d

esig

n st

orm

requ

irmen

ts (i

.e. l

ess

than

0.1

0 in

ches

per

hou

r for

the

sum

mer

eve

nts

and

less

than

0.1

0 in

ches

ove

r a th

ree

hour

per

iod

for t

he w

inte

r eve

nts)

.(5

) W

here

suf

ficie

nt ra

infa

ll di

d oc

cur,

indi

cate

one

of t

he fo

llow

ing

resu

lts a

nd/o

r des

crib

e in

the

"Not

es"

sect

ion:

DS

(Dan

gero

us S

torm

):A

dver

se c

limat

ic c

ondi

tions

exi

sted

that

cre

ated

a d

ange

rous

con

ditio

n fo

r sto

rmw

ater

mon

itorin

g st

aff (

e.g.

loca

l flo

odin

g, h

igh

win

ds, l

ight

enin

g, e

tc.).

Gen

eral

ly fo

r dis

cret

e sa

mpl

ing

only

. D

WF

(Dry

-Wea

ther

Flo

w):

Dry

-wea

ther

flow

s w

ere

iden

tifie

d pr

ior t

o ev

ent t

hat m

ay c

onta

in q

uant

ities

and

con

cent

ratio

ns o

f pol

luta

nts

that

wou

ld s

igni

fican

tly a

lter s

torm

wat

er s

ampl

es.

EM

(Equ

ipm

ent M

alfu

nctio

n):

Equ

ipm

ent f

aile

d to

ena

ble

to c

olle

ct a

com

posi

te s

ampl

e or

faile

d to

not

ify s

torm

wat

er m

onito

ring

pers

onne

l tha

t a re

pres

enta

tive

stor

m h

ad o

ccur

red.

HE

(Hum

an E

rror):

Sam

plin

g w

as n

ot c

ondu

cted

due

to h

uman

erro

r. H

T (H

old

Tim

e):

Per

mit

requ

ires

sam

plin

g ev

ents

for e

ach

loca

tion

to b

e at

leas

t 72

hour

s si

nce

the

last

sto

rm e

vent

dis

char

ge (i

.e. f

low

in re

spon

se to

rain

fall)

. I

F (In

suffi

cien

t Flo

w):

S

torm

did

not

resu

lt in

a le

vel r

eadi

ng o

f tw

o or

mor

e in

ches

at t

he m

onito

ring

loca

tion

or fl

ow w

as in

suffi

ent t

o co

llect

a s

ampl

e. I

M (I

nsuf

ficie

nt M

anpo

wer

);S

torm

occ

urre

d du

ring

off-h

ours

whe

re a

less

than

20%

cha

nce

of ra

in w

as fo

reca

sted

and

/or a

ppro

pria

te s

torm

wat

er m

onito

ring

pers

onne

l wer

e un

avai

labl

e to

resp

ond.

I

S (I

nsuf

ficie

nt S

ampl

e):

Did

not

col

lect

eno

ugh

aliq

uots

to q

ualif

y as

a fl

ow p

ropo

rtion

al c

ompo

site

sam

ple.

NR

(Not

Req

uire

d):

Sam

ples

hav

e be

en c

olle

cted

for a

ll an

alys

es fo

r cur

rent

sea

son.

S

C (S

ampl

e C

olle

cted

):

Sam

ple

was

col

lect

ed d

urin

g th

is s

torm

eve

nt.


9.0 SUMMARY OF MONITORING DATA The 2010 MS4 Permit requires the City to provide a summary of monitoring data (by location) using a table format as provided in Appendix B of that permit. Instructions stated that the City was to use a separate table for each monitoring location, to enter the analytical results for the stormwater samples collected for each season of the reporting period for each year, to enter subsequent monitoring data for each location on the same form, and to include, as an attachment, the laboratory reports for stormwater samples. The information in the table provided was to include the following:

• The monitoring location identification number; • The receiving water; • Designated uses; and, • The lowest surface water quality standards applicable to the receiving water.

Attached in this section are tables summarizing stormwater monitoring data obtained under the 2010 MS4 Permit. The laboratory analytical reports are included as an attachment to this Annual Report (see Section 13.4 and Attachment A). The 2010 MS4 Permit requires the City to collect samples for a full set of analyses (includes volatile organic compounds, semi-volatile organic compounds, and pesticides) once each wet season every other year and the remaining parameters once each wet season every year beginning in Winter 2010. Due to the time needed to relocate the four of the sampling locations and re-equipping the remaining location and the lack of rainfall once they did become active, the first set of samples were not collected until the summer 2011 sampling period. Also, due programming and trouble-shooting issues during the 2011 sampling period, the City was unable to collect the “full set” from most locations. Therefore, the first “full set” of analyses for all stations was collected during the winter 2011-2012 sampling season. The City will therefore be collecting samples for the full set of analyses during the following seasons:


• Winter 2011-12 • Summer 2012 • Winter 2013-14 • Summer 2014

Sum

mar

y of

Mon

itorin

g D

ata

- Mon

itorin

g S

tatio

n A

S-U

S60

Pag

e 1

of 2

0

SUM

MAR

Y O

F M

ON

ITO

RIN

G D

ATA

- MO

NIT

OR

ING

STA

TIO

N A

S-U

S60

Para

met

erU

nits

(1)

SWQ

SSa

lt(2)

Sum

mer

2011

Win

ter

2011

-12

Sum

mer

2012

Win

ter

2012

-13

Sum

mer

2013

Win

ter

2013

-14

Sum

mer

2014

Win

ter

2014

-15

Sum

mer

2015

Con

vent

iona

l Par

amet

ers

Aver

age

Flow

Rat

e(3)

gpm

NA

2097

2286

1643

1686

1178

781

pHSt

anda

rd U

nits

9.0/

6.5(4

)7.

77.

37.

57.

97.

27.

7Te

mpe

ratu

reD

egre

es C

elsi

usN

A(5)

28.9

13.5

30.3

17.0

33.0

19.0

Har

dnes

sm

g/L

NA

96.5

48.0

163

70.0

116

51.0

Tota

l Dis

solv

ed S

olid

s (T

DS)

mg/

LN

A34

213

658

017

656

415

8To

tal S

uspe

nded

Sol

ids

(TSS

)m

g/L

NA

114

135

228

168

196

80.0

Bioc

hem

ical

Oxy

gen

Dem

and

(BO

D)

mg/

LN

A47

.127

.811

141

.486

.030

.4C

hem

ical

Oxy

gen

Dem

and

(CO

D)

mg/

LN

A29

414

850

125

453

417

0M

icro

biol

ogic

alE

sche

richi

a co

li (E

. col

i) M

PN57

512

99.7

1732

.9>2

419

1120

.013

00.0

1460

0.0

Inor

gani

csC

yani

de, t

otal

(6)

ug/L

4120

850

2020

20To

tal M

etal

sAn

timon

yug

/L74

77

412

65

5Ar

seni

cug

/L28

02

24

25

2Ba

rium

ug/L

98,0

0011

278

150

8810

256

Bery

llium

ug/L

1,86

72

21

15

1C

adm

ium

ug/L

700(7

)2

21

14

1

Chr

omiu

m(8

)ug

/LN

A15

137

66

5C

oppe

rug

/L1,

300(7

)62

3410

066

4735

Lead

ug/L

15(7

)12

1013

179

8M

ercu

ryug

/L2.

40.

20.

20.

20.

200.

200.

20N

icke

lug

/L28

,000

(7)

77

179

178

Sele

nium

ug

/L4,

667

22

21

51

Silv

erug

/L4,

667(7

)2

21

14

1Th

alliu

mug

/L75

21

11

51

Zinc

ug/L

280,

000(7

)24

713

544

029

722

215

9N

utrie

nts

Nitr

ate

plus

Nitr

ite a

s N

mg/

LN

A1.

500.

792.

842.

002.

720.

807

Amm

onia

as

N

mg/

L36

.1(9

)1.

991.

904.

112.

353.

841.

37To

tal K

jeld

ahl N

itrog

en (T

KN) a

s N

mg/

LN

A7.

102.

709.

405.

6110

.63.

30To

tal P

hosp

horu

sm

g/L

NA

1.27

0.55

0.98

0.68

1.03

0.45

Orth

opho

spha

te (T

otal

)m

g/L

NA

0.35

00.

260

1.10

0.31

0.62

0.29

Org

anic

Tox

ic P

ollu

tant

s

Tota

l Pet

role

um H

ydro

carb

ons

(TP

H)

mg/

LN

A5

1010

105.

7011

Tota

l Oil

and

Gre

ase

mg/

LN

A5

55

55.

09.

4

Sum

mar

y of

Mon

itorin

g D

ata

- Mon

itorin

g S

tatio

n A

S-U

S60

Pag

e 2

of 2

0

Para

met

erU

nits

(1)

SWQ

SSa

lt(2)

Sum

mer

2011

Win

ter

2011

-12

Sum

mer

2012

Win

ter

2012

-13

Sum

mer

2013

Win

ter

2013

-14

Sum

mer

2014

Win

ter

2014

-15

Sum

mer

2015

Vola

tile

Org

anic

Com

poun

ds (V

OC

s)(1

0)

Acr

olei

nug

/L34

5050

15--

--30

Acr

ylon

itrile

ug/L

3,80

01

1017

----

1B

enze

neug

/L3,

733

0.5

202

----

0.5

Bro

mof

orm

ug/L

15,0

001

255

----

1.0

Car

bon

tetra

chlo

ride

ug/L

1,30

70.

520

2.5

----

0.5

Chl

orob

enze

neug

/L3,

800

0.5

202

----

0.5

Chl

orod

ibro

mom

etha

neug

/LN

A0.

550

2--

--0.

5C

hlor

oeth

ane

ug/L

NA

2.5

205

----

1.0

2-ch

loro

ethy

lvin

yl e

ther

ug/L

180,

000

55

1--

--1.

00C

hlor

ofor

mug

/L9,

333

0.5

202

----

0.5

Dic

hlor

obro

mom

etha

ne

(Bro

mod

ichl

orom

etha

ne)

ug/L

18,6

670.

550

2--

--0.

5

1,2-

dich

loro

benz

ene

ug/L

1,20

01

202

----

1.0

1,3-

dich

loro

benz

ene

ug/L

2,50

01

202

----

1.0

1,4-

dich

loro

benz

ene

ug/L

2,00

01

202

----

1.0

1,1-

dich

loro

etha

neug

/LN

A0.

550

2--

--0.

51,

2-di

chlo

roet

hane

ug/L

59,0

000.

520

2--

--0.

51,

1-di

chlo

roet

hyle

neug

/L15

,000

0.5

505

----

0.5

1,2-

dich

loro

prop

ane

ug/L

26,0

000.

520

2--

--0.

51,

3-di

chlo

ropr

opyl

ene

ug/L

NA

1.5

402

----

0.5

Eth

ylbe

nzen

eug

/L23

,000

0.5

202

----

0.5

Met

hyl b

rom

ide

ug/L

NA

150

2--

--1.

0M

ethy

l chl

orid

eug

/LN

A1

505

----

1.0

Met

hyle

ne c

hlor

ide

ug/L

NA

520

5--

--5.

01,

1,2,

2-te

trach

loro

etha

neug

/L4,

700

0.5

205

----

0.5

Tetra

chlo

roet

hyle

neug

/L6,

500

0.5

202

----

0.5

Tolu

ene

ug/L

8,70

00.

520

2--

--0.

51,

2-tra

ns-d

ichl

oroe

thyl

ene

ug/L

18,6

670.

520

2--

--0.

51,

1,1-

trich

loro

etha

neug

/L2,

600

0.5

202

----

0.5

1,1,

2-tri

chlo

roet

hane

ug/L

3,73

30.

520

2--

--0.

5Tr

ichl

oroe

thyl

ene

ug/L

280

120

2--

--0.

5Tr

imet

hylb

enze

neug

/LN

A2

202

----

2.0

Vin

yl c

hlor

ide

ug/L

2,80

01

100

2--

--0.

5

Xyl

ene

(11)

ug/L

186,

667

310

10--

--1.

5

Sem

i-Vol

atile

Aci

d C

ompo

unds

(10)

2-ch

loro

phen

olug

/L2,

200

4040

20--

--44

2,4-

dich

loro

phen

olug

/L1,

000

4040

20--

--44

2,4-

dim

ethy

lphe

nol

ug/L

1,00

040

4020

----

444,

6-di

nitro

-o-c

reso

lug

/L31

020

020

010

0--

--22

02,

4-di

nitro

phen

olug

/L11

020

020

020

----

220

2-ni

troph

enol

ug/L

NA

6060

30--

--67

4-ni

troph

enol

(12)

ug/L

4,10

010

010

050

----

110

p-ch

loro

-m-c

reso

lug

/L15

4040

20--

--44

Pent

achl

orop

heno

lug

/L9.

070(9

)20

020

010

0--

--22

0Ph

enol

ug/L

7,30

040

4020

----

442,

4,6-

trich

loro

phen

olug

/L13

040

4020

----

44

Sum

mar

y of

Mon

itorin

g D

ata

- Mon

itorin

g S

tatio

n A

S-U

S60

Pag

e 3

of 2

0

Para

met

erU

nits

(1)

SWQ

SSa

lt(2)

Sum

mer

2011

Win

ter

2011

-12

Sum

mer

2012

Win

ter

2012

-13

Sum

mer

2013

Win

ter

2013

-14

Sum

mer

2014

Win

ter

2014

-15

Sum

mer

2015

Sem

i-Vol

atile

Bas

e/N

eutr

als(1

0)

Acen

apht

hene

ug/L

850

4040

20--

--44

Acen

apht

hyle

neug

/LN

A40

4020

----

44An

thra

cene

ug/L

280,

000

4040

20--

--44

Benz

(a)a

nthr

acen

eug

/L0.

240

400.

2--

--0.

22Be

nzo(

a)py

rene

ug

/L0.

240

400.

05--

--0.

100

Benz

o(b)

fluor

anth

ene

ug/L

NA

4040

0.1

----

0.33

Benz

o(g,

h,i)p

eryl

ene

ug/L

NA

4020

0.1

----

0.11

Benz

o(k)

fluor

anth

ene

ug/L

1.9

4040

0.05

----

0.17

0C

hrys

ene

ug/L

1940

400.

1--

--0.

23D

iben

zo(a

,h)a

nthr

acen

e ug

/L1.

940

400.

1--

--0.

113,

3-di

chlo

robe

nzid

ine

ug/L

340

4020

----

44D

ieth

yl p

htha

late

ug/L

26,0

0060

4020

----

44D

imet

hyl p

htha

late

ug/L

17,0

0080

8040

----

89D

i-n-b

utyl

pht

hala

teug

/LN

A40

4020

----

442,

4-di

nitro

tolu

ene

ug/L

1,86

740

4020

----

442,

6-di

nitro

tolu

ene

ug/L

3,73

340

4020

----

44D

i-n-o

ctyl

pht

hala

teug

/L37

3,33

340

4020

----

441,

2-di

phen

ylhy

draz

ine

(as

azob

enze

ne)

ug/L

1.8

4040

20--

--44

Flur

oran

then

eug

/L2,

000

4040

20--

--44

Fluo

rene

ug/L

37,3

3340

4020

----

44H

exac

hlor

oben

zene

ug/L

640

4020

----

44H

exac

hlor

obut

adie

neug

/L45

4040

20--

--44

Hex

achl

oroc

yclo

pent

adie

neug

/L3.

540

4020

----

44H

exac

hlor

oeth

ane

ug/L

490

4040

20--

--44

Inde

no(1

,2,3

-cd)

pyre

neug

/L1.

940

400.

1--

--0.

11Is

opho

rone

ug/L

59,0

0040

4020

----

44N

apht

hale

neug

/L3,

200

4040

20--

--44

Nitr

oben

zene

ug/L

467

4040

20--

--44

N-n

itros

odim

ethy

lam

ine

ug/L

0.03

4040

20--

--44

N-n

itros

odi-n

-pro

pyla

min

eug

/L88

,667

4040

20--

--44

N-n

itros

odip

heny

lam

ine

ug/L

NA

4040

20--

--44

Phen

anth

rene

ug/L

6040

4020

----

44Py

rene

ug/L

28,0

0040

4020

----

441,

2,4-

trich

loro

benz

ene

ug/L

1,70

040

4020

----

44

Sum

mar

y of

Mon

itorin

g D

ata

- Mon

itorin

g S

tatio

n A

S-U

S60

Pag

e 4

of 2

0

Para

met

erU

nits

(1)

SWQ

SSa

lt(2)

Sum

mer

2011

Win

ter

2011

-12

Sum

mer

2012

Win

ter

2012

-13

Sum

mer

2013

Win

ter

2013

-14

Sum

mer

2014

Win

ter

2014

-15

Sum

mer

2015

Pest

icid

esAl

drin

ug/L

30.

50.

51

----

1.10

Alph

a-BH

Cug

/LN

A0.

50.

51

----

1.10

Beta

-BH

Cug

/LN

A0.

50.

51

----

1.10

Gam

ma-

BHC

(Lin

dane

)ug

/LN

A0.

50.

51

----

1.10

Del

ta-B

HC

ug/L

NA

0.5

0.5

1--

--1.

10C

hlor

dane

ug/L

2.4

0.5

0.5

10--

--1.

104,

4’-D

DT

ug

/L1.

10.

50.

51

----

1.10

4,4’

-DD

E

ug

/L1.

10.

50.

51

----

1.10

4,4’

-DD

Dug

/L1.

10.

50.

51

----

1.10

Die

ldrin

ug/L

0.2

0.5

0.5

1--

--1.

10Al

pha-

endo

sulfa

nug

/L0.

2(13)

0.5

0.5

1--

--1.

10Be

ta-e

ndos

ulfa

nug

/L0.

2(13)

0.5

0.5

1--

--1.

10En

dosu

lfan

sulfa

teug

/L0.

20.

050.

51

----

1.10

Endr

inug

/L0.

090.

50.

51

----

1.10

Endr

in a

ldeh

yde

ug/L

0.09

0.5

0.5

1--

--1.

10H

epta

chlo

rug

/L0.

60.

50.

51

----

1.10

Hep

tach

lor e

poxi

deug

/L0.

60.

50.

51

----

1.10

PCB-

1242

(AR

OC

LOR

124

2)ug

/L2(1

4)1

120

----

10.0

PCB-

1254

(AR

OC

LOR

125

4)ug

/L2(1

4)1

120

----

6.30

PCB-

1221

(AR

OC

LOR

122

1)ug

/L2(1

4)1

120

----

4.40

PCB-

1232

(AR

OC

LOR

123

2)ug

/L2(1

4)1

120

----

7.70

PCB-

1248

(AR

OC

LOR

124

8)ug

/L2(1

4)1

120

----

4.00

PCB-

1260

(AR

OC

LOR

126

0)ug

/L2(1

4)1

120

----

3.30

PCB-

1016

(AR

OC

LOR

101

6)ug

/L2(1

4)1

120

----

3.70

Toxa

phen

eug

/L0.

710

1020

----

22.0

Not

es:

Bol

d va

lues

wer

e re

porte

d at

leve

ls a

bove

the

labo

rato

ry m

etho

d re

porti

ng li

mit

(MR

L).

Non

-bol

d va

lues

are

the

MR

L. S

hade

d re

sults

wer

e de

tect

ed a

bove

the

SWQ

S.Se

e at

tach

ed la

bora

tory

ana

lytic

al re

ports

for f

lagg

ed d

ata.

1) A

naly

tical

resu

lts s

hall

be re

porte

d in

the

units

spe

cifie

d fo

r eac

h ca

tego

ry o

r par

amet

er.

Shad

ed C

ells

(res

ults

col

umns

): R

ed -

Det

ecte

d ab

ove

SWQ

S; O

rang

e - N

ot d

etec

ted,

but

repo

rted

abov

e ED

W S

WQ

S; G

reen

- N

ot d

etec

ted,

but

repo

rted

abov

e PB

C S

WQ

S.3)

Ave

rage

flow

rate

for t

he s

ampl

ing

perio

d (n

o m

ore

than

6 h

ours

).

4) p

H ra

nge

(max

imum

/min

imum

).5)

Com

paris

on o

f tem

pera

ture

at p

oint

of d

isch

arge

is u

pgra

dien

t fro

m th

e ne

ares

t stre

am s

egm

ent h

avin

g es

tabl

ishe

d SW

QSs

and

is th

us n

ot re

leva

nt a

t pro

pose

d sa

mpl

ing

loca

tions

.6)

Bas

ed o

n fre

e-cy

anid

e.

8) B

ased

on

tota

l chr

omiu

m.

9) D

epen

ds o

n pH

. R

epor

ted

valu

es a

re fo

r pH

of 7

.0.

Whe

re fi

eld

para

met

ers

(i.e.

dis

cret

e sa

mpl

es) a

re n

ot c

olle

cted

dur

ing

the

sam

e st

orm

eve

nt, t

he S

WQ

S as

soci

ated

with

a p

H 7

.0 w

ill b

e us

ed.

10)

Met

hods

: Th

ese

para

met

ers

may

be

run

usin

g th

e fo

llow

ing

met

hods

: VO

Cs,

624

or 8

260;

SVO

Cs,

625

or 8

270;

and

PC

B / P

estic

ides

, 608

/625

or 8

081/

8082

if th

e la

bora

tory

can

pas

s Q

A w

ith th

e m

etho

d.

11)

SWQ

Ss re

porte

d fo

r tot

al x

ylen

es.

12)

Also

kno

wn

as p

-nitr

ophe

nol.

13)

SWQ

Ss re

port

as to

tal e

ndos

ulfa

n.14

) SW

QSs

repo

rted

as P

CBs

7) S

WQ

S fo

r tot

al m

etal

s is

pro

vide

d an

d ba

sed

on p

artia

l bod

y co

ntac

t. T

he S

WQ

S fo

r dis

olve

d m

etal

con

cent

ratio

n fo

r effl

uent

dep

ende

nt w

ater

is d

epen

dant

on

the

hard

ness

val

ue fo

r eac

h sa

mpl

e an

d w

ill in

mos

t cas

es b

e

bel

ow th

e SW

QS

for p

artia

l bod

y co

ntac

t.

2) S

urfa

ce W

ater

Qua

lity

Stan

dard

s (S

WQ

Ss) e

stab

lishe

d fo

r Sal

t Riv

er s

egm

ent e

xten

ding

from

City

of M

esa

NW

WR

F ou

tfall

at 3

3°26

'45"

/111

°56'

35" t

o Te

mpe

Tow

n La

ke a

t 33°

26'0

1"/1

11°5

4'55

". P

artia

l Bod

y C

onta

ct (P

BC,

shad

ed in

bro

wn)

and

Aqu

atic

and

Wild

life

Efflu

ent D

epen

dent

Wat

er (A

&Wed

w, s

hade

d in

pin

k).

Sum

mar

y of

Mon

itorin

g D

ata

- Mon

itorin

g S

tatio

n S

S-U

S60

Pag

e 5

of 2

0

SUM

MAR

Y O

F M

ON

ITO

RIN

G D

ATA

- MO

NIT

OR

ING

STA

TIO

N S

S-U

S60

Para

met

erU

nits

1SW

QS

EMF(2

)Su

mm

er20

11W

inte

r20

11-1

2Su

mm

er20

12W

inte

r20

12-1

3Su

mm

er20

13W

inte

r20

13-1

4Su

mm

er20

14W

inte

r20

14-1

5Su

mm

er20

15C

onve

ntio

nal P

aram

eter

sAv

erag

e Fl

ow R

ate(3

)gp

mN

AN

A66

612

0744

816

0322

6pH

Stan

dard

Uni

ts9.

0/6.

5(4)

7.8

7.2

7.2

7.4

7.3

7.2

Tem

pera

ture

Deg

rees

Cel

sius

NA(5

)26

.513

.030

.019

.028

.221

Har

dnes

sm

g/L

NA

NA

28.0

17.0

42.0

12.0

47.0

Tota

l Dis

solv

ed S

olid

s (T

DS)

mg/

LN

AN

A62

.079

.097

.025

.016

9To

tal S

uspe

nded

Sol

ids

(TSS

)m

g/L

NA

NA

53.0

59.0

110

120

64.0

Bioc

hem

ical

Oxy

gen

Dem

and

(BO

D)

mg/

LN

AN

A9.

2011

.030

.69.

2023

.4C

hem

ical

Oxy

gen

Dem

and

(CO

D)

mg/

LN

AN

A56

9619

650

220

Mic

robi

olog

ical

Esc

heric

hia

coli

(E. c

oli)

MPN

575

8820

.019

86.3

2419

.261

319

90.0

218.

0In

orga

nics

Cya

nide

, tot

al(6

)ug

/L84

208

2020

208

Tota

l Met

als

Antim

ony

ug/L

747

NA

23

25

4Ar

seni

cug

/L28

0N

A2

21

51

Bariu

mug

/L98

,000

NA

3542

5621

37Be

rylli

umug

/L1,

867

NA

21

15

1C

adm

ium

ug/L

700(7

)N

A2

11

11

Chr

omiu

m(8

)ug

/LN

AN

A9

45

53

Cop

per

ug/L

1,30

0(7)

NA

2440

3128

63Le

adug

/L15

(7)

NA

45

65

4M

ercu

ryug

/L5

NA

0.2

0.2

0.20

0.20

0.20

Nic

kel

ug/L

28,0

00(7

)N

A3

46

56

Sele

nium

ug

/L33

NA

22

15

1Si

lver

ug/L

4,66

7(7)

NA

21

11

1Th

alliu

mug

/L75

NA

21

15

1Zi

ncug

/L28

0,00

0(7)

NA

8811

013

166

208

Nut

rient

sN

itrat

e pl

us N

itrite

as

Nm

g/L

NA

NA

0.4

0.49

2.00

0.82

61.

06Am

mon

ia a

s N

m

g/L

NA

NA

1.01

1.17

1.86

1.56

1.88

Tota

l Kje

ldah

l Nitr

ogen

(TKN

) as

Nm

g/L

NA

NA

1.60

1.40

4.10

2.30

4.40

Tota

l Pho

spho

rus

mg/

LN

AN

A0.

280.

330.

450.

350.

37O

rthop

hosp

hate

(Tot

al)

mg/

LN

AN

A0.

20.

20.

230.

200.

37O

rgan

ic T

oxic

Pol

luta

nts

To

tal P

etro

leum

Hyd

roca

rbon

s (T

PH

)m

g/L

NA

1010

1010

1011

Tota

l Oil

and

Gre

ase

mg/

LN

A5

55

55

5

Sum

mar

y of

Mon

itorin

g D

ata

- Mon

itorin

g S

tatio

n S

S-U

S60

Pag

e 6

of 2

0

Para

met

erU

nits

1SW

QS

EMF(2

)Su

mm

er20

11W

inte

r20

11-1

2Su

mm

er20

12W

inte

r20

12-1

3Su

mm

er20

13W

inte

r20

13-1

4Su

mm

er20

14W

inte

r20

14-1

5Su

mm

er20

15Vo

latil

e O

rgan

ic C

ompo

unds

(VO

Cs)

(10)

Acr

olei

nug

/L46

750

5050

----

50A

cryl

onitr

ileug

/L37

,333

1010

50--

--10

Ben

zene

ug/L

3,73

32

202

----

0.5

Bro

mof

orm

ug/L

18,6

675

505

----

1.0

Car

bon

tetra

chlo

ride

ug/L

1,30

72.

525

2.5

----

0.5

Chl

orob

enze

neug

/L18

,677

220

2--

--0.

5C

hlor

odib

rom

omet

hane

ug/L

NA

220

2--

--0.

5C

hlor

oeth

ane

ug/L

NA

550

5--

--1.

02-

chlo

roet

hylv

inyl

eth

erug

/LN

A5

15

----

5.00

Chl

orof

orm

ug/L

9,33

32

202

----

0.5

Dic

hlor

obro

mom

etha

ne

(Bro

mod

ichl

orom

etha

ne)

ug/L

18,6

672

202

----

0.5

1,2-

dich

loro

benz

ene

ug/L

5,90

02

202

----

1.0

1,3-

dich

loro

benz

ene

ug/L

NA

220

2--

--1.

01,

4-di

chlo

robe

nzen

eug

/L6,

500

220

2--

--1.

01,

1-di

chlo

roet

hane

ug/L

NA

250

2--

--0.

51,

2-di

chlo

roet

hane

ug/L

186,

667

220

2--

--0.

51,

1-di

chlo

roet

hyle

neug

/L46

,667

550

5--

--0.

51,

2-di

chlo

ropr

opan

eug

/L84

,000

220

2--

--0.

51,

3-di

chlo

ropr

opyl

ene

ug/L

NA

240

2--

--0.

5E

thyl

benz

ene

ug/L

93,3

332

202

----

0.5

Met

hyl b

rom

ide

ug/L

NA

220

2--

--1.

0M

ethy

l chl

orid

eug

/LN

A5

505

----

1.0

Met

hyle

ne c

hlor

ide

ug/L

NA

550

5--

--5.

01,

1,2,

2-te

trach

loro

etha

neug

/L93

,333

220

2--

--0.

5Te

trach

loro

ethy

lene

ug/L

9,33

32

202

----

0.5

Tolu

ene

ug/L

373,

333

220

2--

--0.

51,

2-tra

ns-d

ichl

oroe

thyl

ene

ug/L

18,6

672

202

----

0.5

1,1,

1-tri

chlo

roet

hane

ug/L

1,86

6,66

72

202

----

0.5

1,1,

2-tri

chlo

roet

hane

ug/L

3,73

32

202

----

0.5

Tric

hlor

oeth

ylen

eug

/L28

02

202

----

0.5

Trim

ethy

lben

zene

ug/L

NA

220

2--

--2.

0V

inyl

chl

orid

eug

/L2,

800

220

2--

--0.

5

Xyl

ene

(11)

ug/L

186,

667

1010

010

----

1.5

Sem

i-Vol

atile

Aci

d C

ompo

unds

(10)

2-ch

loro

phen

olug

/L4,

667

NA

1010

----

222,

4-di

chlo

roph

enol

ug/L

2,80

0N

A10

50--

--22

2,4-

dim

ethy

lphe

nol

ug/L

18,6

67N

A10

10--

--22

4,6-

dini

tro-o

-cre

sol

ug/L

3,73

3N

A20

50--

--11

02,

4-di

nitro

phen

olug

/L1,

867

NA

5050

----

110

2-ni

troph

enol

ug/L

NA

NA

1515

----

33

4-ni

troph

enol

(12)

ug/L

NA

NA

2525

----

54p-

chlo

ro-m

-cre

sol

ug/L

48,0

00N

A10

10--

--22

Pent

achl

orop

heno

lug

/L36

.760

(9)

NA

5050

----

110

Phen

olug

/L18

0,00

0N

A10

10--

--22

2,4,

6-tri

chlo

roph

enol

ug/L

130

NA

1010

----

22

Sum

mar

y of

Mon

itorin

g D

ata

- Mon

itorin

g S

tatio

n S

S-U

S60

Pag

e 7

of 2

0

Para

met

erU

nits

1SW

QS

EMF(2

)Su

mm

er20

11W

inte

r20

11-1

2Su

mm

er20

12W

inte

r20

12-1

3Su

mm

er20

13W

inte

r20

13-1

4Su

mm

er20

14W

inte

r20

14-1

5Su

mm

er20

15Se

mi-V

olat

ile B

ase/

Neu

tral

s(10)

Acen

apht

hene

ug/L

56,0

00N

A10

10--

--22

Acen

apht

hyle

neug

/LN

AN

A10

10--

--22

Anth

race

neug

/L28

0,00

0N

A10

10--

--22

Benz

(a)a

nthr

acen

eug

/L0.

2N

A10

0.2

----

0.23

Benz

o(a)

pyre

ne

ug/L

0.2

NA

100.

05--

--0.

330

Benz

o(b)

fluor

anth

ene

ug/L

NA

NA

100.

1--

--0.

89Be

nzo(

g,h,

i)per

ylen

eug

/LN

AN

A10

0.1

----

0.11

Benz

o(k)

fluor

anth

ene

ug/L

1.9

NA

100.

05--

--0.

41C

hrys

ene

ug/L

19N

A10

0.1

----

0.78

Dib

enzo

(a,h

)ant

hrac

ene

ug/L

1.9

NA

100.

1--

--0.

113,

3-di

chlo

robe

nzid

ine

ug/L

3N

A10

2.9

----

22D

ieth

yl p

htha

late

ug/L

746,

667

NA

1010

----

22D

imet

hyl p

htha

late

ug/L

NA

NA

1020

----

43D

i-n-b

utyl

pht

hala

teug

/LN

AN

A10

10--

--22

2,4-

dini

troto

luen

eug

/L1,

867

NA

1010

----

222,

6-di

nitro

tolu

ene

ug/L

3,73

3N

A10

10--

--22

Di-n

-oct

yl p

htha

late

ug/L

373,

333

NA

1010

----

221,

2-di

phen

ylhy

draz

ine

(as

azob

enze

ne)

ug/L

1.8

NA

102.

2--

--22

Flur

oran

then

eug

/L37

,333

NA

1010

----

22Fl

uore

neug

/L37

,333

NA

1010

----

22H

exac

hlor

oben

zene

ug/L

747

NA

1010

----

22H

exac

hlor

obut

adie

neug

/L18

7N

A10

10--

--22

Hex

achl

oroc

yclo

pent

adie

neug

/L11

,200

NA

1010

----

22H

exac

hlor

oeth

ane

ug/L

850

NA

1010

----

22In

deno

(1,2

,3-c

d)py

rene

ug/L

1.9

NA

100.

1--

--0.

32Is

opho

rone

ug/L

186,

667

NA

1010

----

22N

apht

hale

neug

/L18

,667

NA

1010

----

22N

itrob

enze

neug

/L46

7N

A10

10--

--22

N-n

itros

odim

ethy

lam

ine

ug/L

0.03

NA

1010

----

22N

-nitr

osod

i-n-p

ropy

lam

ine

ug/L

88,6

67N

A10

10--

--22

N-n

itros

odip

heny

lam

ine

ug/L

NA

NA

1010

----

22Ph

enan

thre

neug

/LN

AN

A10

10--

--22

Pyre

neug

/L28

,000

NA

1010

----

221,

2,4-

trich

loro

benz

ene

ug/L

9,33

3N

A10

10--

--22

Sum

mar

y of

Mon

itorin

g D

ata

- Mon

itorin

g S

tatio

n S

S-U

S60

Pag

e 8

of 2

0

Para

met

erU

nits

1SW

QS

EMF(2

)Su

mm

er20

11W

inte

r20

11-1

2Su

mm

er20

12W

inte

r20

12-1

3Su

mm

er20

13W

inte

r20

13-1

4Su

mm

er20

14W

inte

r20

14-1

5Su

mm

er20

15Pe

stic

ides

Aldr

inug

/L4.

5N

A0.

51

----

1.10

Alph

a-BH

Cug

/LN

AN

A0.

51

----

1.10

Beta

-BH

Cug

/LN

AN

A0.

51

----

1.10

Gam

ma-

BHC

(Lin

dane

)ug

/LN

AN

A0.

51

----

1.10

Del

ta-B

HC

ug/L

NA

NA

0.5

1--

--1.

10C

hlor

dane

ug/L

3.2

NA

0.5

1--

--11

.04,

4’-D

DT

ug

/L1.

1N

A0.

51

----

1.10

4,4’

-DD

E

ug

/L1.

1N

A0.

51

----

1.10

4,4’

-DD

Dug

/L1.

1N

A0.

51

----

1.10

Die

ldrin

ug/L

4N

A0.

51

----

1.10

Alph

a-en

dosu

lfan

ug/L

3(13)

NA

0.5

1--

--1.

10Be

ta-e

ndos

ulfa

nug

/L3(1

3)N

A0.

51

----

1.10

Endo

sulfa

n su

lfate

ug/L

3N

A0.

51

----

1.10

Endr

inug

/L0.

7N

A0.

50.

14--

--1.

10En

drin

ald

ehyd

eug

/L0.

7N

A0.

50.

18--

--1.

10H

epta

chlo

rug

/L0.

9N

A0.

50.

28--

--1.

10H

epta

chlo

r epo

xide

ug/L

0.9

NA

0.5

0.13

----

1.10

PCB-

1242

(AR

OC

LOR

124

2)ug

/L11

(14)

NA

109

----

21.0

PCB-

1254

(AR

OC

LOR

125

4)ug

/L11

(14)

NA

105.

6--

--21

.0PC

B-12

21 (A

RO

CLO

R 1

221)

ug/L

11(1

4)N

A10

4--

--21

.0PC

B-12

32 (A

RO

CLO

R 1

232)

ug/L

11(1

4)N

A10

6.8

----

21.0

PCB-

1248

(AR

OC

LOR

124

8)ug

/L11

(14)

NA

103.

5--

--21

.0PC

B-12

60 (A

RO

CLO

R 1

260)

ug/L

11(1

4)N

A10

2.9

----

21.0

PCB-

1016

(AR

OC

LOR

101

6)ug

/L11

(14)

NA

103.

3--

--21

.0To

xaph

ene

ug/L

11N

A10

1.6

----

21.0

Not

es:

Bol

d va

lues

wer

e re

porte

d at

leve

ls a

bove

the

labo

rato

ry m

etho

d re

porti

ng li

mit

(MR

L).

Non

-bol

d va

lues

are

the

MR

L. S

hade

d re

sults

wer

e de

tect

ed a

bove

the

SWQ

S.Se

e at

tach

ed la

bora

tory

ana

lytic

al re

ports

for f

lagg

ed d

ata.

1) A

naly

tical

resu

lts s

hall

be re

porte

d in

the

units

spe

cifie

d fo

r eac

h ca

tego

ry o

r par

amet

er.

Shad

ed C

ells

(res

ults

col

umns

): R

ed -

Det

ecte

d ab

ove

SWQ

S; O

rang

e - N

ot d

etec

ted,

but

repo

rted

abov

e Ep

hem

eral

SW

QS;

Gre

en -

Not

det

ecte

d, b

ut re

porte

d ab

ove

PBC

SW

QS.

3) A

vera

ge fl

ow ra

te fo

r the

sam

plin

g pe

riod

(no

mor

e th

an 6

hou

rs).

4)

pH

rang

e (m

axim

um/m

inim

um).

5) N

o su

rface

wat

er q

ualit

y st

anda

rd e

stab

lishe

d fo

r max

imum

allo

wab

le in

crea

se in

am

bien

t wat

er te

mpe

ratu

re fo

r eph

emer

al w

ater

s.6)

Bas

ed o

n fre

e-cy

anid

e.

8) B

ased

on

tota

l chr

omiu

m.

9) D

epen

ds o

n pH

. R

epor

ted

valu

es a

re fo

r pH

of 7

.0.

Whe

re fi

eld

para

met

ers

(i.e.

dis

cret

e sa

mpl

es) a

re n

ot c

olle

cted

dur

ing

the

sam

e st

orm

eve

nt, t

he S

WQ

S as

soci

ated

with

a p

H 7

.0 w

ill b

e us

ed.

10)

Met

hods

: Th

ese

para

met

ers

may

be

run

usin

g th

e fo

llow

ing

met

hods

: VO

Cs,

624

or 8

260;

SVO

Cs,

625

or 8

270;

and

PC

B / P

estic

ides

, 608

/625

or 8

081/

8082

if th

e la

bora

tory

can

pas

s Q

A w

ith th

e m

etho

d.

11)

SWQ

Ss re

porte

d fo

r tot

al x

ylen

es.

12)

Also

kno

wn

as p

-nitr

ophe

nol.

13)

SWQ

Ss re

port

as to

tal e

ndos

ulfa

n.14

) SW

QSs

repo

rted

as P

CBs

7) S

WQ

S fo

r tot

al m

etal

s is

pro

vide

d an

d ba

sed

on p

artia

l bod

y co

ntac

t. T

he S

WQ

S fo

r dis

olve

d m

etal

con

cent

ratio

n fo

r eph

emer

al w

ater

is d

epen

dant

on

the

hard

ness

val

ue fo

r eac

h sa

mpl

e an

d w

ill in

mos

t cas

es b

e be

low

the

S

WQ

S fo

r par

tial b

ody

cont

act.

2) S

urfa

ce W

ater

Qua

lity

Stan

dard

s (S

WQ

Ss) f

or E

MF

are

base

d on

that

pro

vide

d in

A.A

.C. R

18-1

1-10

5(1)

per

201

0 M

S4 P

erm

it AD

EQ R

espo

nse

to C

omm

ents

. Pa

rtial

Bod

y C

onta

ct (P

BC, s

hade

d in

bro

wn)

and

Aqu

atic

& W

ildlif

e

Ep

hem

eral

(A&W

e, s

hade

d in

blu

e).

Sum

mar

y of

Mon

itorin

g D

ata

- Mon

itorin

g S

tatio

n 54

-EM

FP

age

9 of

20

SUM

MAR

Y O

F M

ON

ITO

RIN

G D

ATA

- MO

NIT

OR

ING

STA

TIO

N 5

4-EM

F

Para

met

erU

nits

1SW

QS

EMF(2

)Su

mm

er20

11W

inte

r20

11-1

2Su

mm

er20

12W

inte

r20

12-1

3Su

mm

er20

13W

inte

r20

13-1

4Su

mm

er20

14W

inte

r20

14-1

5Su

mm

er20

15C

onve

ntio

nal P

aram

eter

sAv

erag

e Fl

ow R

ate(3

)gp

mN

A19

428

931

0682

211

54pH

Stan

dard

Uni

ts9.

0/6.

5(4)

7.6

7.4

7.0

7.4

7.6

7.4

Tem

pera

ture

Deg

rees

Cel

sius

NA(5

)28

.512

.029

.514

30.0

12.0

Har

dnes

sm

g/L

NA

151

44.8

25.0

30.0

28.0

42.0

Tota

l Dis

solv

ed S

olid

s (T

DS)

mg/

LN

A33

672

.093

.053

.012

211

8To

tal S

uspe

nded

Sol

ids

(TSS

)m

g/L

NA

252

156

219

118

62.0

248

Bioc

hem

ical

Oxy

gen

Dem

and

(BO

D)

mg/

LN

AN

A17

.214

.020

.113

.217

.6C

hem

ical

Oxy

gen

Dem

and

(CO

D)

mg/

LN

A29

116

023

210

586

140

Mic

robi

olog

ical

Esc

heric

hia

coli

(E. c

oli)

MPN

575

613.

181

6.4

1553

.124

00.0

7980

.019

90.0

Inor

gani

csC

yani

de, t

otal

(6)

ug/L

8420

820

2020

8To

tal M

etal

sAn

timon

yug

/L74

710

23

15

2Ar

seni

cug

/L28

04

13

15

3Ba

rium

ug/L

98,0

0012

447

120

4748

94Be

rylli

umug

/L1,

867

11

11

51

Cad

miu

mug

/L70

0(7)

11

11

51

Chr

omiu

m(8

)ug

/LN

A16

.07

94

57

Cop

per

ug/L

1,30

0(7)

3328

3919

1528

Lead

ug/L

15(7

)10

.04

177

712

Mer

cury

ug/L

50.

20.

20.

20.

200.

200.

20N

icke

lug

/L28

,000

(7)

416

125

69

Sele

nium

ug

/L33

11

21

51

Silv

erug

/L4,

667(7

)1

11

11

1Th

alliu

mug

/L75

11

11

51

Zinc

ug/L

280,

000(7

)26

310

215

088

6817

8N

utrie

nts

Nitr

ate

plus

Nitr

ite a

s N

mg/

LN

A0.

951.

190.

872.

001.

141.

02Am

mon

ia a

s N

m

g/L

NA

4.70

1.23

1.82

1.00

1.42

1.00

Tota

l Kje

ldah

l Nitr

ogen

(TKN

) as

Nm

g/L

NA

NA

2.70

1.80

2.90

2.80

3.20

Tota

l Pho

spho

rus

mg/

LN

A0.

620.

731.

710.

580.

441.

30O

rthop

hosp

hate

(Tot

al)

mg/

LN

AN

A0.

240

0.36

0.23

0.22

0.36

Org

anic

Tox

ic P

ollu

tant

s

Tota

l Pet

role

um H

ydro

carb

ons

(TP

H)

mg/

LN

A5

1010

1010

11To

tal O

il an

d G

reas

em

g/L

NA

55

55

55

Sum

mar

y of

Mon

itorin

g D

ata

- Mon

itorin

g S

tatio

n 54

-EM

FP

age

10 o

f 20

Para

met

erU

nits

1SW

QS

EMF(2

)Su

mm

er20

11W

inte

r20

11-1

2Su

mm

er20

12W

inte

r20

12-1

3Su

mm

er20

13W

inte

r20

13-1

4Su

mm

er20

14W

inte

r20

14-1

5Su

mm

er20

15Vo

latil

e O

rgan

ic C

ompo

unds

(VO

Cs)

(10)

Acr

olei

nug

/L46

750

504

----

50A

cryl

onitr

ileug

/L37

,333

110

50--

--10

Ben

zene

ug/L

3,73

30.

520

2--

--0.

5B

rom

ofor

mug

/L18

,667

150

5--

--1.

0C

arbo

n te

trach

lorid

eug

/L1,

307

0.5

252.

5--

--0.

5C

hlor

oben

zene

ug/L

18,6

770.

520

2--

--0.

5C

hlor

odib

rom

omet

hane

ug/L

NA

0.5

202

----

0.5

Chl

oroe

than

eug

/LN

A2.

550

5--

--1.

02-

chlo

roet

hylv

inyl

eth

erug

/LN

A5

51

----

5.00

Chl

orof

orm

ug/L

9,33

30.

520

2--

--0.

5D

ichl

orob

rom

omet

hane

(B

rom

odic

hlor

omet

hane

)ug

/L18

,667

0.5

202

----

0.5

1,2-

dich

loro

benz

ene

ug/L

5,90

01

202

----

0.5

1,3-

dich

loro

benz

ene

ug/L

NA

120

2--

--1.

01,

4-di

chlo

robe

nzen

eug

/L6,

500

120

2--

--1.

01,

1-di

chlo

roet

hane

ug/L

NA

0.5

202

----

1.0

1,2-

dich

loro

etha

neug

/L18

6,66

70.

520

2--

--0.

51,

1-di

chlo

roet

hyle

neug

/L46

,667

0.5

505

----

0.5

1,2-

dich

loro

prop

ane

ug/L

84,0

000.

520

2--

--0.

51,

3-di

chlo

ropr

opyl

ene

ug/L

NA

1.5

402

----

0.5

Eth

ylbe

nzen

eug

/L93

,333

0.5

202

----

0.5

Met

hyl b

rom

ide

ug/L

NA

150

2--

--1.

0M

ethy

l chl

orid

eug

/LN

A1

505

----

1.0

Met

hyle

ne c

hlor

ide

ug/L

NA

550

5--

--5.

01,

1,2,

2-te

trach

loro

etha

neug

/L93

,333

0.5

202

----

0.5

Tetra

chlo

roet

hyle

neug

/L9,

333

0.5

202

----

0.5

Tolu

ene

ug/L

373,

333

0.5

202

----

0.5

1,2-

trans

-dic

hlor

oeth

ylen

eug

/L18

,667

0.5

202

----

0.5

1,1,

1-tri

chlo

roet

hane

ug/L

1,86

6,66

70.

520

2--

--0.

51,

1,2-

trich

loro

etha

neug

/L3,

733

0.5

202

----

0.5

Tric

hlor

oeth

ylen

eug

/L28

01

202

----

0.5

Trim

ethy

lben

zene

ug/L

NA

220

2--

--2.

0V

inyl

chl

orid

eug

/L2,

800

120

2--

--0.

5

Xyl

ene

(11)

ug/L

186,

667

310

010

----

1.5

Sem

i-Vol

atile

Aci

d C

ompo

unds

(10)

2-ch

loro

phen

olug

/L4,

667

NA

2310

----

212,

4-di

chlo

roph

enol

ug/L

2,80

0N

A23

10--

--21

2,4-

dim

ethy

lphe

nol

ug/L

18,6

67N

A23

10--

--21

4,6-

dini

tro-o

-cre

sol

ug/L

3,73

3N

A11

050

----

212,

4-di

nitro

phen

olug

/L1,

867

NA

2350

----

212-

nitro

phen

olug

/LN

AN

A34

15--

--32

4-ni

troph

enol

(12)

ug/L

NA

NA

5725

----

53p-

chlo

ro-m

-cre

sol

ug/L

48,0

00N

A23

10--

--21

Pent

achl

orop

heno

lug

/L36

.760

(9)

NA

110

50--

--11

0Ph

enol

ug/L

180,

000

NA

2310

----

212,

4,6-

trich

loro

phen

olug

/L13

0N

A23

10--

--21

Sum

mar

y of

Mon

itorin

g D

ata

- Mon

itorin

g S

tatio

n 54

-EM

FP

age

11 o

f 20

Para

met

erU

nits

1SW

QS

EMF(2

)Su

mm

er20

11W

inte

r20

11-1

2Su

mm

er20

12W

inte

r20

12-1

3Su

mm

er20

13W

inte

r20

13-1

4Su

mm

er20

14W

inte

r20

14-1

5Su

mm

er20

15Se

mi-V

olat

ile B

ase/

Neu

tral

s(10)

Acen

apht

hene

ug/L

56,0

00N

A23

10--

--21

Acen

apht

hyle

neug

/LN

AN

A23

10--

--21

Anth

race

neug

/L28

0,00

0N

A23

10--

--21

Benz

(a)a

nthr

acen

eug

/L0.

2N

A23

0.2

----

0.21

Benz

o(a)

pyre

ne

ug/L

0.2

NA

230.

05--

--0.

052

Benz

o(b)

fluor

anth

ene

ug/L

NA

NA

230.

1--

--0.

10Be

nzo(

g,h,

i)per

ylen

eug

/LN

AN

A23

0.1

----

0.10

Benz

o(k)

fluor

anth

ene

ug/L

1.9

NA

230.

05--

--0.

052

Chr

ysen

eug

/L19

NA

230.

1--

--0.

10D

iben

zo(a

,h)a

nthr

acen

e ug

/L1.

9N

A23

0.1

----

0.10

3,3-

dich

loro

benz

idin

eug

/L3

NA

232.

9--

--21

Die

thyl

pht

hala

teug

/L74

6,66

7N

A23

10--

--21

Dim

ethy

l pht

hala

teug

/LN

AN

A23

20--

--43

Di-n

-but

yl p

htha

late

ug/L

NA

NA

2310

----

212,

4-di

nitro

tolu

ene

ug/L

1,86

7N

A23

10--

--11

02,

6-di

nitro

tolu

ene

ug/L

3,73

3N

A23

10--

--21

Di-n

-oct

yl p

htha

late

ug/L

373,

333

NA

2310

----

211,

2-di

phen

ylhy

draz

ine

(as

azob

enze

ne)

ug/L

1.8

NA

232.

2--

--21

Flur

oran

then

eug

/L37

,333

NA

2310

----

21Fl

uore

neug

/L37

,333

NA

2310

----

21H

exac

hlor

oben

zene

ug/L

747

NA

2310

----

21H

exac

hlor

obut

adie

neug

/L18

7N

A23

10--

--21

Hex

achl

oroc

yclo

pent

adie

neug

/L11

,200

NA

2310

----

21H

exac

hlor

oeth

ane

ug/L

850

NA

2310

----

21In

deno

(1,2

,3-c

d)py

rene

ug/L

1.9

NA

230.

1--

--0.

10Is

opho

rone

ug/L

186,

667

NA

2310

----

21N

apht

hale

neug

/L18

,667

NA

2310

----

21N

itrob

enze

neug

/L46

7N

A23

10--

--21

N-n

itros

odim

ethy

lam

ine

ug/L

0.03

NA

2310

----

21N

-nitr

osod

i-n-p

ropy

lam

ine

ug/L

88,6

67N

A23

10--

--21

N-n

itros

odip

heny

lam

ine

ug/L

NA

NA

2310

----

21Ph

enan

thre

neug

/LN

AN

A23

10--

--21

Pyre

neug

/L28

,000

NA

2310

----

211,

2,4-

trich

loro

benz

ene

ug/L

9,33

3N

A23

10--

--21

Sum

mar

y of

Mon

itorin

g D

ata

- Mon

itorin

g S

tatio

n 54

-EM

FP

age

12 o

f 20

Para

met

erU

nits

1SW

QS

EMF(2

)Su

mm

er20

11W

inte

r20

11-1

2Su

mm

er20

12W

inte

r20

12-1

3Su

mm

er20

13W

inte

r20

13-1

4Su

mm

er20

14W

inte

r20

14-1

5Su

mm

er20

15Pe

stic

ides

Aldr

inug

/L4.

5N

A0.

51

----

1.10

Alph

a-BH

Cug

/LN

AN

A0.

51

----

0.50

0Be

ta-B

HC

ug/L

NA

NA

0.5

1--

--0.

500

Gam

ma-

BHC

(Lin

dane

)ug

/LN

AN

A0.

51

----

0.50

0D

elta

-BH

Cug

/LN

AN

A0.

51

----

1.10

Chl

orda

neug

/L3.

2N

A0.

51

----

1.80

4,4’

-DD

T

ug/L

1.1

NA

0.5

1--

--1.

104,

4’-D

DE

ug/L

1.1

NA

0.5

1--

--1.

104,

4’-D

DD

ug/L

1.1

NA

0.5

1--

--1.

10D

ield

rinug

/L4

NA

0.5

1--

--1.

10Al

pha-

endo

sulfa

nug

/L3(1

3)N

A0.

51

----

1.10

Beta

-end

osul

fan

ug/L

3(13)

NA

0.5

1--

--1.

10En

dosu

lfan

sulfa

teug

/L3

NA

0.5

1--

--0.

500

Endr

inug

/L0.

7N

A0.

50.

14--

--1.

10En

drin

ald

ehyd

eug

/L0.

7N

A0.

50.

18--

--1.

10H

epta

chlo

rug

/L0.

9N

A0.

50.

28--

--1.

10H

epta

chlo

r epo

xide

ug/L

0.9

NA

0.5

0.13

----

1.10

PCB-

1242

(AR

OC

LOR

124

2)ug

/L11

(14)

NA

109

----

10.0

PCB-

1254

(AR

OC

LOR

125

4)ug

/L11

(14)

NA

105.

6--

--4.

00PC

B-12

21 (A

RO

CLO

R 1

221)

ug/L

11(1

4)N

A10

4--

--4.

40PC

B-12

32 (A

RO

CLO

R 1

232)

ug/L

11(1

4)N

A10

6.8

----

7.70

PCB-

1248

(AR

OC

LOR

124

8)ug

/L11

(14)

NA

103.

5--

--22

.0PC

B-12

60 (A

RO

CLO

R 1

260)

ug/L

11(1

4)N

A10

2.9

----

3.30

PCB-

1016

(AR

OC

LOR

101

6)ug

/L11

(14)

NA

103.

3--

--3.

70To

xaph

ene

ug/L

11N

A10

1.6

----

1.10

Not

es:

Bol

d va

lues

wer

e re

porte

d at

leve

ls a

bove

the

labo

rato

ry m

etho

d re

porti

ng li

mit

(MR

L).

Non

-bol

d va

lues

are

the

MR

L. S

hade

d re

sults

wer

e de

tect

ed a

bove

the

SWQ

S.Se

e at

tach

ed la

bora

tory

ana

lytic

al re

ports

for f

lagg

ed d

ata.

1) A

naly

tical

resu

lts s

hall

be re

porte

d in

the

units

spe

cifie

d fo

r eac

h ca

tego

ry o

r par

amet

er.

Shad

ed C

ells

(res

ults

col

umns

): R

ed -

Det

ecte

d ab

ove

SWQ

S; O

rang

e - N

ot d

etec

ted,

but

repo

rted

abov

e Ep

hem

eral

SW

QS;

Gre

en -

Not

det

ecte

d, b

ut re

porte

d ab

ove

PBC

SW

QS.

3) A

vera

ge fl

ow ra

te fo

r the

sam

plin

g pe

riod

(no

mor

e th

an 6

hou

rs).

4)

pH

rang

e (m

axim

um/m

inim

um).

5) N

o su

rface

wat

er q

ualit

y st

anda

rd e

stab

lishe

d fo

r max

imum

allo

wab

le in

crea

se in

am

bien

t wat

er te

mpe

ratu

re fo

r eph

emer

al w

ater

s.6)

Bas

ed o

n fre

e-cy

anid

e.

8) B

ased

on

tota

l chr

omiu

m.

9) D

epen

ds o

n pH

. R

epor

ted

valu

es a

re fo

r pH

of 7

.0.

Whe

re fi

eld

para

met

ers

(i.e.

dis

cret

e sa

mpl

es) a

re n

ot c

olle

cted

dur

ing

the

sam

e st

orm

eve

nt, t

he S

WQ

S as

soci

ated

with

a p

H 7

.0 w

ill b

e us

ed.

10)

Met

hods

: Th

ese

para

met

ers

may

be

run

usin

g th

e fo

llow

ing

met

hods

: VO

Cs,

624

or 8

260;

SVO

Cs,

625

or 8

270;

and

PC

B / P

estic

ides

, 608

/625

or 8

081/

8082

if th

e la

bora

tory

can

pas

s Q

A w

ith th

e m

etho

d.

11)

SWQ

Ss re

porte

d fo

r tot

al x

ylen

es.

12)

Also

kno

wn

as p

-nitr

ophe

nol.

13)

SWQ

Ss re

port

as to

tal e

ndos

ulfa

n.14

) SW

QSs

repo

rted

as P

CBs

7) S

WQ

S fo

r tot

al m

etal

s is

pro

vide

d an

d ba

sed

on p

artia

l bod

y co

ntac

t. T

he S

WQ

S fo

r dis

olve

d m

etal

con

cent

ratio

n fo

r eph

emer

al w

ater

is d

epen

dant

on

the

hard

ness

val

ue fo

r eac

h sa

mpl

e an

d w

ill in

mos

t cas

es b

e be

low

the

S

WQ

S fo

r par

tial b

ody

cont

act.

2) S

urfa

ce W

ater

Qua

lity

Stan

dard

s (S

WQ

Ss) f

or E

MF

are

base

d on

that

pro

vide

d in

A.A

.C. R

18-1

1-10

5(1)

per

201

0 M

S4 P

erm

it AD

EQ R

espo

nse

to C

omm

ents

. Pa

rtial

Bod

y C

onta

ct (P

BC, s

hade

d in

bro

wn)

and

Aqu

atic

& W

ildlif

e

Ep

hem

eral

(A&W

e, s

hade

d in

blu

e).

Sum

mar

y of

Mon

itorin

g D

ata

- Mon

itorin

g Lo

catio

n U

N-E

MF

Pag

e 13

of 2

0

SUM

MAR

Y O

F M

ON

ITO

RIN

G D

ATA

- MO

NIT

OR

ING

STA

TIO

N U

N-E

MF

Para

met

erU

nits

1SW

QS

EMF(2

)Su

mm

er20

11W

inte

r20

11-1

2Su

mm

er20

12W

inte

r20

12-1

3Su

mm

er20

13W

inte

r20

13-1

4Su

mm

er20

14W

inte

r20

14-1

5Su

mm

er20

15C

onve

ntio

nal P

aram

eter

sAv

erag

e Fl

ow R

ate(3

)gm

pN

AN

A69

035

,748

591

387

1412

pHSt

anda

rd U

nits

9.0/

6.5(4

)11

.37.

57.

67.

37.

17.

3Te

mpe

ratu

reD

egre

es C

elsi

usN

A(5)

24.0

14.5

31.0

16.5

29.5

19.5

Har

dnes

sm

g/L

NA

NA

33.5

32.0

41.0

87.0

77.0

Tota

l Dis

solv

ed S

olid

s (T

DS)

mg/

LN

AN

A10

269

.010

115

222

0To

tal S

uspe

nded

Sol

ids

(TSS

)m

g/L

NA

NA

120

201

106

180

88.0

Bioc

hem

ical

Oxy

gen

Dem

and

(BO

D)

mg/

LN

AN

A20

.011

.015

.441

.022

.2C

hem

ical

Oxy

gen

Dem

and

(CO

D)

mg/

LN

AN

A19

810

513

126

718

0M

icro

biol

ogic

alE

sche

richi

a co

li (E

. col

i) M

PN57

51,

986.

3012

,303

.30

1732

.914

10.0

2260

.024

20.0

Inor

gani

csC

yani

de, t

otal

(6)

ug/L

8420

2020

2020

20To

tal M

etal

sAn

timon

yug

/L74

7N

A3

32

52

Arse

nic

ug/L

280

NA

13

15

2Ba

rium

ug/L

98,0

00N

A45

8955

101

75Be

rylli

umug

/L1,

867

NA

11

15

1C

adm

ium

ug/L

700(7

)N

A1

11

11

Chr

omiu

m(8

)ug

/LN

AN

A5

75

74

Cop

per

ug/L

1,30

0(7)

NA

3133

3044

31Le

adug

/L15

(7)

NA

516

610

8M

ercu

ryug

/L5

NA

0.2

0.2

0.20

0.20

0.20

Nic

kel

ug/L

28,0

00(7

)N

A4

96

166

Sele

nium

ug

/L33

NA

22

15

1Si

lver

ug/L

4,66

7(7)

NA

11

11

1Th

alliu

mug

/L75

NA

11

15

1Zi

ncug

/L28

0,00

0(7)

NA

9716

013

921

516

9N

utrie

nts

Nitr

ate

plus

Nitr

ite a

s N

mg/

LN

AN

A2

0.69

2.00

0.40

01.

04Am

mon

ia a

s N

m

g/L

NA

NA

1.48

1.26

1.48

2.75

1.57

Tota

l Kje

ldah

l Nitr

ogen

(TKN

) as

Nm

g/L

NA

NA

3.00

1.30

2.95

6.27

4.70

Tota

l Pho

spho

rus

mg/

LN

AN

A0.

440.

510.

390.

710.

47O

rthop

hosp

hate

(Tot

al)

mg/

LN

AN

A0.

280.

220.

230.

220.

20O

rgan

ic T

oxic

Pol

luta

nts

To

tal P

etro

leum

Hyd

roca

rbon

s (T

PH

)m

g/L

NA

1010

1010

11.0

11To

tal O

il an

d G

reas

em

g/L

NA

55

19.1

55.

05

Sum

mar

y of

Mon

itorin

g D

ata

- Mon

itorin

g Lo

catio

n U

N-E

MF

Pag

e 14

of 2

0

Para

met

erU

nits

1SW

QS

EMF(2

)Su

mm

er20

11W

inte

r20

11-1

2Su

mm

er20

12W

inte

r20

12-1

3Su

mm

er20

13W

inte

r20

13-1

4Su

mm

er20

14W

inte

r20

14-1

5Su

mm

er20

15Vo

latil

e O

rgan

ic C

ompo

unds

(VO

Cs)

(10)

Acr

olei

nug

/L46

750

3050

----

50A

cryl

onitr

ileug

/L37

,333

101

50--

--10

Ben

zene

ug/L

3,73

32

22

----

0.5

Bro

mof

orm

ug/L

18,6

675

55

----

1.0

Car

bon

tetra

chlo

ride

ug/L

1,30

72.

52.

52.

5--

--0.

5C

hlor

oben

zene

ug/L

18,6

772

22

----

0.5

Chl

orod

ibro

mom

etha

neug

/LN

A2

22

----

0.5

Chl

oroe

than

eug

/LN

A5

55

----

1.0

2-ch

loro

ethy

lvin

yl e

ther

ug/L

NA

51

5--

--1.

00C

hlor

ofor

mug

/L9,

333

22

2--

--0.

5D

ichl

orob

rom

omet

hane

(B

rom

odic

hlor

omet

hane

)ug

/L18

,667

22

2--

--0.

5

1,2-

dich

loro

benz

ene

ug/L

5,90

02

22

----

0.5

1,3-

dich

loro

benz

ene

ug/L

NA

22

2--

--1.

01,

4-di

chlo

robe

nzen

eug

/L6,

500

22

2--

--1.

01,

1-di

chlo

roet

hane

ug/L

NA

22

2--

--1.

01,

2-di

chlo

roet

hane

ug/L

186,

667

22

2--

--0.

51,

1-di

chlo

roet

hyle

neug

/L46

,667

55

5--

--0.

51,

2-di

chlo

ropr

opan

eug

/L84

,000

22

2--

--0.

51,

3-di

chlo

ropr

opyl

ene

ug/L

NA

22

2--

--0.

5E

thyl

benz

ene

ug/L

93,3

332

22

----

0.5

Met

hyl b

rom

ide

ug/L

NA

22

2--

--1.

0M

ethy

l chl

orid

eug

/LN

A5

55

----

1.0

Met

hyle

ne c

hlor

ide

ug/L

NA

55

5--

--5.

01,

1,2,

2-te

trach

loro

etha

neug

/L93

,333

22

2--

--0.

5Te

trach

loro

ethy

lene

ug/L

9,33

32

22

----

0.5

Tolu

ene

ug/L

373,

333

22

2--

--0.

51,

2-tra

ns-d

ichl

oroe

thyl

ene

ug/L

18,6

672

22

----

0.5

1,1,

1-tri

chlo

roet

hane

ug/L

1,86

6,66

72

22

----

0.5

1,1,

2-tri

chlo

roet

hane

ug/L

3,73

32

22

----

0.5

Tric

hlor

oeth

ylen

eug

/L28

02

22

----

0.5

Trim

ethy

lben

zene

ug/L

NA

22

2--

--2.

0V

inyl

chl

orid

eug

/L2,

800

22

2--

--0.

5

Xyl

ene

(11)

ug/L

186,

667

1010

10--

--1.

5

Sem

i-Vol

atile

Aci

d C

ompo

unds

(10)

2-ch

loro

phen

olug

/L4,

667

NA

1020

----

442,

4-di

chlo

roph

enol

ug/L

2,80

0N

A10

20--

--44

2,4-

dim

ethy

lphe

nol

ug/L

18,6

67N

A10

20--

--44

4,6-

dini

tro-o

-cre

sol

ug/L

3,73

3N

A50

100

----

220

2,4-

dini

troph

enol

ug/L

1,86

7N

A50

100

----

220

2-ni

troph

enol

ug/L

NA

NA

1530

----

67

4-ni

troph

enol

(12)

ug/L

NA

NA

2550

----

110

p-ch

loro

-m-c

reso

lug

/L48

,000

NA

1020

----

44Pe

ntac

hlor

ophe

nol

ug/L

36.7

60(9

)N

A50

100

----

220

Phen

olug

/L18

0,00

0N

A10

20--

--24

2,4,

6-tri

chlo

roph

enol

ug/L

130

NA

1020

----

44

Sum

mar

y of

Mon

itorin

g D

ata

- Mon

itorin

g Lo

catio

n U

N-E

MF

Pag

e 15

of 2

0

Para

met

erU

nits

1SW

QS

EMF(2

)Su

mm

er20

11W

inte

r20

11-1

2Su

mm

er20

12W

inte

r20

12-1

3Su

mm

er20

13W

inte

r20

13-1

4Su

mm

er20

14W

inte

r20

14-1

5Su

mm

er20

15Se

mi-V

olat

ile B

ase/

Neu

tral

s(10)

Acen

apht

hene

ug/L

56,0

00N

A10

20--

--44

Acen

apht

hyle

neug

/LN

AN

A10

20--

--44

Anth

race

neug

/L28

0,00

0N

A10

20--

--44

Benz

(a)a

nthr

acen

eug

/L0.

2N

A0.

20.

2--

--0.

2Be

nzo(

a)py

rene

ug

/L0.

2N

A0.

050.

05--

--0.

051

Benz

o(b)

fluor

anth

ene

ug/L

NA

NA

0.1

0.1

----

0.19

Benz

o(g,

h,i)p

eryl

ene

ug/L

NA

NA

0.1

0.1

----

0.21

Benz

o(k)

fluor

anth

ene

ug/L

1.9

NA

0.05

0.05

----

0.09

3C

hrys

ene

ug/L

19N

A0.

10.

1--

--0.

12D

iben

zo(a

,h)a

nthr

acen

e ug

/L1.

9N

A0.

10.

1--

--0.

103,

3-di

chlo

robe

nzid

ine

ug/L

3N

A10

2.9

----

44D

ieth

yl p

htha

late

ug/L

746,

667

NA

1020

----

220

Dim

ethy

l pht

hala

teug

/LN

AN

A20

40--

--44

Di-n

-but

yl p

htha

late

ug/L

NA

NA

1020

----

442,

4-di

nitro

tolu

ene

ug/L

1,86

7N

A10

20--

--44

2,6-

dini

troto

luen

eug

/L3,

733

NA

1020

----

44D

i-n-o

ctyl

pht

hala

teug

/L37

3,33

3N

A10

20--

--44

1,2-

diph

enyl

hydr

azin

e (a

s az

oben

zene

)ug

/L1.

8N

A10

2.2

----

44Fl

uror

anth

ene

ug/L

37,3

33N

A10

20--

--44

Fluo

rene

ug/L

37,3

33N

A10

20--

--44

Hex

achl

orob

enze

neug

/L74

7N

A10

20--

--22

0H

exac

hlor

obut

adie

neug

/L18

7N

A10

20--

--44

Hex

achl

oroc

yclo

pent

adie

neug

/L11

,200

NA

1020

----

44H

exac

hlor

oeth

ane

ug/L

850

NA

1020

----

44In

deno

(1,2

,3-c

d)py

rene

ug/L

1.9

NA

0.1

0.1

----

0.1

Isop

horo

neug

/L18

6,66

7N

A10

20--

--44

Nap

htha

lene

ug/L

18,6

67N

A10

20--

--44

Nitr

oben

zene

ug/L

467

NA

1020

----

44N

-nitr

osod

imet

hyla

min

eug

/L0.

03N

A10

20--

--44

N-n

itros

odi-n

-pro

pyla

min

eug

/L88

,667

NA

1020

----

44N

-nitr

osod

iphe

nyla

min

eug

/LN

AN

A10

20--

--44

Phen

anth

rene

ug/L

NA

NA

1020

----

44Py

rene

ug/L

28,0

00N

A10

20--

--24

1,2,

4-tri

chlo

robe

nzen

eug

/L9,

333

NA

1020

----

44

Sum

mar

y of

Mon

itorin

g D

ata

- Mon

itorin

g Lo

catio

n U

N-E

MF

Pag

e 16

of 2

0

Para

met

erU

nits

1SW

QS

EMF(2

)Su

mm

er20

11W

inte

r20

11-1

2Su

mm

er20

12W

inte

r20

12-1

3Su

mm

er20

13W

inte

r20

13-1

4Su

mm

er20

14W

inte

r20

14-1

5Su

mm

er20

15Pe

stic

ides

Aldr

inug

/L4.

5N

A0.

051

----

1.10

Alph

a-BH

Cug

/LN

AN

A0.

051

----

1.10

Beta

-BH

Cug

/LN

AN

A0.

051

----

1.10

Gam

ma-

BHC

(Lin

dane

)ug

/LN

AN

A0.

051

----

1.10

Del

ta-B

HC

ug/L

NA

NA

0.05

1--

--1.

10C

hlor

dane

ug/L

3.2

NA

0.05

1--

--1.

104,

4’-D

DT

ug

/L1.

1N

A0.

051

----

1.10

4,4’

-DD

E

ug

/L1.

1N

A0.

051

----

1.10

4,4’

-DD

Dug

/L1.

1N

A0.

051

----

1.10

Die

ldrin

ug/L

4N

A0.

051

----

1.10

Alph

a-en

dosu

lfan

ug/L

3(13)

NA

0.05

1--

--1.

10Be

ta-e

ndos

ulfa

nug

/L3(1

3)N

A0.

051

----

1.10

Endo

sulfa

n su

lfate

ug/L

3N

A0.

051

----

1.10

Endr

inug

/L0.

7N

A0.

050.

14--

--1.

10En

drin

ald

ehyd

eug

/L0.

7N

A0.

050.

18--

--1.

10H

epta

chlo

rug

/L0.

9N

A0.

050.

28--

--1.

10H

epta

chlo

r epo

xide

ug/L

0.9

NA

0.05

0.13

----

1.10

PCB-

1242

(AR

OC

LOR

124

2)ug

/L11

(14)

NA

19

----

9.30

PCB-

1254

(AR

OC

LOR

125

4)ug

/L11

(14)

NA

15.

6--

--5.

80PC

B-12

21 (A

RO

CLO

R 1

221)

ug/L

11(1

4)N

A1

4--

--4.

10PC

B-12

32 (A

RO

CLO

R 1

232)

ug/L

11(1

4)N

A1

6.8

----

7.00

PCB-

1248

(AR

OC

LOR

124

8)ug

/L11

(14)

NA

13.

5--

--3.

70PC

B-12

60 (A

RO

CLO

R 1

260)

ug/L

11(1

4)N

A1

2.9

----

3.00

PCB-

1016

(AR

OC

LOR

101

6)ug

/L11

(14)

NA

13.

3--

--3.

40To

xaph

ene

ug/L

11N

A1

1.6

----

21.0

Not

es:

Bol

d va

lues

wer

e re

porte

d at

leve

ls a

bove

the

labo

rato

ry m

etho

d re

porti

ng li

mit

(MR

L).

Non

-bol

d va

lues

are

the

MR

L. S

hade

d re

sults

wer

e de

tect

ed a

bove

the

SWQ

S.Se

e at

tach

ed la

bora

tory

ana

lytic

al re

ports

for f

lagg

ed d

ata.

1) A

naly

tical

resu

lts s

hall

be re

porte

d in

the

units

spe

cifie

d fo

r eac

h ca

tego

ry o

r par

amet

er.

Shad

ed C

ells

(res

ults

col

umns

): R

ed -

Det

ecte

d ab

ove

SWQ

S; O

rang

e - N

ot d

etec

ted,

but

repo

rted

abov

e Ep

hem

eral

SW

QS;

Gre

en -

Not

det

ecte

d, b

ut re

porte

d ab

ove

PBC

SW

QS.

3) A

vera

ge fl

ow ra

te fo

r the

sam

plin

g pe

riod

(no

mor

e th

an 6

hou

rs).

4)

pH

rang

e (m

axim

um/m

inim

um).

5) N

o su

rface

wat

er q

ualit

y st

anda

rd e

stab

lishe

d fo

r max

imum

allo

wab

le in

crea

se in

am

bien

t wat

er te

mpe

ratu

re fo

r eph

emer

al w

ater

s.6)

Bas

ed o

n fre

e-cy

anid

e.

8) B

ased

on

tota

l chr

omiu

m.

9) D

epen

ds o

n pH

. R

epor

ted

valu

es a

re fo

r pH

of 7

.0.

Whe

re fi

eld

para

met

ers

(i.e.

dis

cret

e sa

mpl

es) a

re n

ot c

olle

cted

dur

ing

the

sam

e st

orm

eve

nt, t

he S

WQ

S as

soci

ated

with

a p

H 7

.0 w

ill b

e us

ed.

10)

Met

hods

: Th

ese

para

met

ers

may

be

run

usin

g th

e fo

llow

ing

met

hods

: VO

Cs,

624

or 8

260;

SVO

Cs,

625

or 8

270;

and

PC

B / P

estic

ides

, 608

/625

or 8

081/

8082

if th

e la

bora

tory

can

pas

s Q

A w

ith th

e m

etho

d.

11)

SWQ

Ss re

porte

d fo

r tot

al x

ylen

es.

12)

Also

kno

wn

as p

-nitr

ophe

nol.

13)

SWQ

Ss re

port

as to

tal e

ndos

ulfa

n.14

) SW

QSs

repo

rted

as P

CBs

7) S

WQ

S fo

r tot

al m

etal

s is

pro

vide

d an

d ba

sed

on p

artia

l bod

y co

ntac

t. T

he S

WQ

S fo

r dis

olve

d m

etal

con

cent

ratio

n fo

r eph

emer

al w

ater

is d

epen

dant

on

the

hard

ness

val

ue fo

r eac

h sa

mpl

e an

d w

ill in

mos

t cas

es b

e be

low

the

S

WQ

S fo

r par

tial b

ody

cont

act.

2) S

urfa

ce W

ater

Qua

lity

Stan

dard

s (S

WQ

Ss) f

or E

MF

are

base

d on

that

pro

vide

d in

A.A

.C. R

18-1

1-10

5(1)

per

201

0 M

S4 P

erm

it AD

EQ R

espo

nse

to C

omm

ents

. Pa

rtial

Bod

y C

onta

ct (P

BC, s

hade

d in

bro

wn)

and

Aqu

atic

& W

ildlif

e

Ep

hem

eral

(A&W

e, s

hade

d in

blu

e).

Sum

mar

y of

Mon

itorin

g D

ata

- Mon

itorin

g St

atio

n FF

-AC

ESPa

ge 1

7 of

20

SUM

MAR

Y O

F M

ON

ITO

RIN

G D

ATA

- MO

NIT

OR

ING

STA

TIO

N F

F-AC

ES

Para

met

erU

nits

1SW

QS

EMF(2

)Su

mm

er20

11W

inte

r20

11-1

2Su

mm

er20

12W

inte

r20

12-1

3Su

mm

er20

13W

inte

r20

13-1

4Su

mm

er20

14W

inte

r20

14-1

5Su

mm

er20

15C

onve

ntio

nal P

aram

eter

sA

vera

ge F

low

Rat

e(3)

gpm

NA

NA

896

6392

698

4048

7822

pHS

tand

ard

Uni

ts9.

0/6.

5(4)

11.2

7.6

8.5

8.6

7.3

7.4

Tem

pera

ture

Deg

rees

Cel

sius

NA

(5)

24.0

15.0

28.5

14.0

25.6

17.0

Har

dnes

sm

g/L

NA

NA

24.2

24.0

14.0

18.0

21.0

Tota

l Dis

solv

ed S

olid

s (T

DS

)m

g/L

NA

NA

72.0

50.0

20.0

192

49.0

Tota

l Sus

pend

ed S

olid

s (T

SS

)m

g/L

NA

NA

24.0

204

76.0

58.0

140

Bio

chem

ical

Oxy

gen

Dem

and

(BO

D)

mg/

LN

AN

A19

.77.

003.

707.

002.

10C

hem

ical

Oxy

gen

Dem

and

(CO

D)

mg/

LN

AN

A97

120

5056

38M

icro

biol

ogic

alE

sche

richi

a co

li (E

. col

i) M

PN

575

146.

744

.833

4.8

345.

051

.217

8.0

Inor

gani

csC

yani

de, t

otal

(6)

ug/L

8420

2020

2020

20To

tal M

etal

sA

ntim

ony

ug/L

747

NA

13

15

1A

rsen

icug

/L28

0N

A1

21

51

Bar

ium

ug/L

98,0

00N

A41

7627

3047

Ber

ylliu

mug

/L1,

867

NA

11

15

1C

adm

ium

ug/L

700(7

)N

A1

21

11

Chr

omiu

m(8

)ug

/LN

AN

A10

88

124

Cop

per

ug/L

1,30

0(7)

NA

2023

910

8Le

adug

/L15

(7)

NA

1623

812

8M

ercu

ryug

/L5

NA

0.2

0.2

0.20

0.20

0.20

Nic

kel

ug/L

28,0

00(7

)N

A6

94

55

Sel

eniu

m

ug/L

33N

A1

21

51

Silv

erug

/L4,

667(7

)N

A1

11

11

Thal

lium

ug/L

75N

A1

11

51

Zinc

ug/L

280,

000(7

)N

A24

619

011

112

360

Nut

rient

sN

itrat

e pl

us N

itrite

as

Nm

g/L

NA

NA

20.

422.

002.

000.

500

Am

mon

ia a

s N

m

g/L

NA

NA

1.16

1.28

0.46

1.56

0.29

Tota

l Kje

ldah

l Nitr

ogen

(TK

N) a

s N

mg/

LN

AN

A2.

401.

301.

232.

091.

10To

tal P

hosp

horu

sm

g/L

NA

NA

0.35

0.41

0.21

0.15

0.24

Orth

opho

spha

te (T

otal

)m

g/L

NA

NA

0.2

0.2

0.20

0.22

0.20

Org

anic

Tox

ic P

ollu

tant

s

Tota

l Pet

role

um H

ydro

carb

ons

(TP

H)

mg/

LN

A10

1010

1011

11To

tal O

il an

d G

reas

em

g/L

NA

55

55

55

Sum

mar

y of

Mon

itorin

g D

ata

- Mon

itorin

g St

atio

n FF

-AC

ESPa

ge 1

8 of

20

Para

met

erU

nits

1SW

QS

EMF(2

)Su

mm

er20

11W

inte

r20

11-1

2Su

mm

er20

12W

inte

r20

12-1

3Su

mm

er20

13W

inte

r20

13-1

4Su

mm

er20

14W

inte

r20

14-1

5Su

mm

er20

15Vo

latil

e O

rgan

ic C

ompo

unds

(VO

Cs)

(10)

Acr

olei

nug

/L46

750

3050

----

50A

cryl

onitr

ileug

/L37

,333

101

50--

--10

Ben

zene

ug/L

3,73

32

22

----

0.5

Bro

mof

orm

ug/L

18,6

675

55

----

1.0

Car

bon

tetra

chlo

ride

ug/L

1,30

72.

52.

52.

5--

--0.

5C

hlor

oben

zene

ug/L

18,6

772

22

----

0.5

Chl

orod

ibro

mom

etha

neug

/LN

A2

22

----

0.5

Chl

oroe

than

eug

/LN

A5

55

----

1.0

2-ch

loro

ethy

lvin

yl e

ther

ug/L

NA

51

5--

--5.

00C

hlor

ofor

mug

/L9,

333

22

2--

--0.

5D

ichl

orob

rom

omet

hane

(B

rom

odic

hlor

omet

hane

)ug

/L18

,667

22

2--

--0.

5

1,2-

dich

loro

benz

ene

ug/L

5,90

02

22

----

0.5

1,3-

dich

loro

benz

ene

ug/L

NA

22

2--

--1.

01,

4-di

chlo

robe

nzen

eug

/L6,

500

22

2--

--1.

01,

1-di

chlo

roet

hane

ug/L

NA

22

2--

--1.

01,

2-di

chlo

roet

hane

ug/L

186,

667

22

2--

--0.

51,

1-di

chlo

roet

hyle

neug

/L46

,667

55

5--

--0.

51,

2-di

chlo

ropr

opan

eug

/L84

,000

22

2--

--0.

51,

3-di

chlo

ropr

opyl

ene

ug/L

NA

22

2--

--0.

5E

thyl

benz

ene

ug/L

93,3

332

22

----

0.5

Met

hyl b

rom

ide

ug/L

NA

22

2--

--1.

0M

ethy

l chl

orid

eug

/LN

A5

55

----

1.0

Met

hyle

ne c

hlor

ide

ug/L

NA

55

5--

--5.

01,

1,2,

2-te

trach

loro

etha

neug

/L93

,333

22

2--

--0.

5Te

trach

loro

ethy

lene

ug/L

9,33

32

22

----

0.5

Tolu

ene

ug/L

373,

333

22

2--

--0.

51,

2-tra

ns-d

ichl

oroe

thyl

ene

ug/L

18,6

672

22

----

0.5

1,1,

1-tri

chlo

roet

hane

ug/L

1,86

6,66

72

22

----

0.5

1,1,

2-tri

chlo

roet

hane

ug/L

3,73

32

22

----

0.5

Tric

hlor

oeth

ylen

eug

/L28

02

22

----

0.5

Trim

ethy

lben

zene

ug/L

NA

22

2--

--2.

0V

inyl

chl

orid

eug

/L2,

800

22

2--

--0.

5

Xyl

ene

(11)

ug/L

186,

667

1010

10--

--1.

5

Sem

i-Vol

atile

Aci

d C

ompo

unds

(10)

2-ch

loro

phen

olug

/L4,

667

NA

2020

----

242,

4-di

chlo

roph

enol

ug/L

2,80

0N

A20

20--

--24

2,4-

dim

ethy

lphe

nol

ug/L

18,6

67N

A20

20--

--24

4,6-

dini

tro-o

-cre

sol

ug/L

3,73

3N

A10

010

0--

--12

02,

4-di

nitro

phen

olug

/L1,

867

NA

100

100

----

242-

nitro

phen

olug

/LN

AN

A30

30--

--35

4-ni

troph

enol

(12)

ug/L

NA

NA

5050

----

59p-

chlo

ro-m

-cre

sol

ug/L

48,0

00N

A20

20--

--24

Pen

tach

loro

phen

olug

/L36

.760

(9)

NA

100

100

----

120

Phe

nol

ug/L

180,

000

NA

2020

----

242,

4,6-

trich

loro

phen

olug

/L13

0N

A20

20--

--24

Sum

mar

y of

Mon

itorin

g D

ata

- Mon

itorin

g St

atio

n FF

-AC

ESPa

ge 1

9 of

20

Para

met

erU

nits

1SW

QS

EMF(2

)Su

mm

er20

11W

inte

r20

11-1

2Su

mm

er20

12W

inte

r20

12-1

3Su

mm

er20

13W

inte

r20

13-1

4Su

mm

er20

14W

inte

r20

14-1

5Su

mm

er20

15Se

mi-V

olat

ile B

ase/

Neu

tral

s(10)

Ace

naph

then

eug

/L56

,000

NA

2020

----

24A

cena

phth

ylen

eug

/LN

AN

A20

20--

--24

Ant

hrac

ene

ug/L

280,

000

NA

2020

----

24B

enz(

a)an

thra

cene

ug/L

0.2

NA

0.2

0.2

----

0.21

Ben

zo(a

)pyr

ene

ug/L

0.2

NA

0.05

0.05

----

0.05

3B

enzo

(b)fl

uora

nthe

neug

/LN

AN

A0.

10.

1--

--0.

11B

enzo

(g,h

,i)pe

ryle

neug

/LN

AN

A0.

10.

1--

--0.

11B

enzo

(k)fl

uora

nthe

neug

/L1.

9N

A0.

050.

05--

--0.

053

Chr

ysen

eug

/L19

NA

0.1

0.1

----

0.11

Dib

enzo

(a,h

)ant

hrac

ene

ug/L

1.9

NA

0.1

0.1

----

0.11

3,3-

dich

loro

benz

idin

eug

/L3

NA

202.

9--

--24

Die

thyl

pht

hala

teug

/L74

6,66

7N

A20

20--

--24

Dim

ethy

l pht

hala

teug

/LN

AN

A40

40--

--47

Di-n

-but

yl p

htha

late

ug/L

NA

NA

2020

----

242,

4-di

nitro

tolu

ene

ug/L

1,86

7N

A20

20--

--12

02,

6-di

nitro

tolu

ene

ug/L

3,73

3N

A20

20--

--24

Di-n

-oct

yl p

htha

late

ug/L

373,

333

NA

2020

----

241,

2-di

phen

ylhy

draz

ine

(as

azob

enze

ne)

ug/L

1.8

NA

202.

2--

--24

Flur

oran

then

eug

/L37

,333

NA

2020

----

24Fl

uore

neug

/L37

,333

NA

2020

----

24H

exac

hlor

oben

zene

ug/L

747

NA

2020

----

24H

exac

hlor

obut

adie

neug

/L18

7N

A20

20--

--24

Hex

achl

oroc

yclo

pent

adie

neug

/L11

,200

NA

2020

----

24H

exac

hlor

oeth

ane

ug/L

850

NA

2020

----

24In

deno

(1,2

,3-c

d)py

rene

ug/L

1.9

NA

0.1

0.1

----

0.11

Isop

horo

neug

/L18

6,66

7N

A20

20--

--24

Nap

htha

lene

ug/L

18,6

67N

A20

20--

--24

Nitr

oben

zene

ug/L

467

NA

2020

----

24N

-nitr

osod

imet

hyla

min

eug

/L0.

03N

A20

20--

--24

N-n

itros

odi-n

-pro

pyla

min

eug

/L88

,667

NA

2020

----

24N

-nitr

osod

iphe

nyla

min

eug

/LN

AN

A20

20--

--24

Phe

nant

hren

eug

/LN

AN

A20

20--

--24

Pyr

ene

ug/L

28,0

00N

A20

20--

--24

1,2,

4-tri

chlo

robe

nzen

eug

/L9,

333

NA

2020

----

24

Sum

mar

y of

Mon

itorin

g D

ata

- Mon

itorin

g St

atio

n FF

-AC

ESPa

ge 2

0 of

20

Para

met

erU

nits

1SW

QS

EMF(2

)Su

mm

er20

11W

inte

r20

11-1

2Su

mm

er20

12W

inte

r20

12-1

3Su

mm

er20

13W

inte

r20

13-1

4Su

mm

er20

14W

inte

r20

14-1

5Su

mm

er20

15Pe

stic

ides

Ald

rinug

/L4.

5N

A0.

007

1--

--0.

150

Alp

ha-B

HC

ug/L

NA

NA

0.01

101

----

0.25

0B

eta-

BH

Cug

/LN

AN

A0.

0074

01

----

0.16

0G

amm

a-B

HC

(Lin

dane

)ug

/LN

AN

A0.

0065

01

----

0.14

0D

elta

-BH

Cug

/LN

AN

A0.

0160

1--

--0.

200

Chl

orda

neug

/L3.

2N

A0.

081

----

1.80

4,4’

-DD

T

ug/L

1.1

NA

0.00

650

1--

--0.

140

4,4’

-DD

E

ug

/L1.

1N

A0.

0065

01

----

0.33

04,

4’-D

DD

ug/L

1.1

NA

0.04

901

----

0.27

0D

ield

rinug

/L4

NA

0.02

901

----

0.14

0A

lpha

-end

osul

fan

ug/L

3(13)

NA

0.00

830

1--

--0.

180

Bet

a-en

dosu

lfan

ug/L

3(13)

NA

0.00

650

1--

--0.

140

End

osul

fan

sulfa

teug

/L3

NA

0.04

101

----

0.14

0E

ndrin

ug/L

0.7

NA

0.00

720

0.14

----

0.16

0E

ndrin

ald

ehyd

eug

/L0.

7N

A0.

0089

00.

18--

--0.

200

Hep

tach

lor

ug/L

0.9

NA

0.01

400.

28--

--0.

310

Hep

tach

lor e

poxi

deug

/L0.

9N

A0.

0067

00.

13--

--0.

150

PC

B-1

242

(AR

OC

LOR

124

2)ug

/L11

(14)

NA

0.45

9--

--9.

90P

CB

-125

4 (A

RO

CLO

R 1

254)

ug/L

11(1

4)N

A0.

285.

6--

--6.

10P

CB

-122

1 (A

RO

CLO

R 1

221)

ug/L

11(1

4)N

A0.

24

----

4.40

PC

B-1

232

(AR

OC

LOR

123

2)ug

/L11

(14)

NA

0.34

6.8

----

7.50

PC

B-1

248

(AR

OC

LOR

124

8)ug

/L11

(14)

NA

0.18

3.5

----

3.90

PC

B-1

260

(AR

OC

LOR

126

0)ug

/L11

(14)

NA

0.15

2.9

----

3.20

PC

B-1

016

(AR

OC

LOR

101

6)ug

/L11

(14)

NA

0.17

3.3

----

3.70

Toxa

phen

eug

/L11

NA

0.5

1.6

----

0.11

0

Not

es:

Bol

d va

lues

wer

e re

porte

d at

leve

ls a

bove

the

labo

rato

ry m

etho

d re

porti

ng li

mit

(MR

L).

Non

-bol

d va

lues

are

the

MR

L. S

hade

d re

sults

wer

e de

tect

ed a

bove

the

SW

QS

.S

ee a

ttach

ed la

bora

tory

ana

lytic

al re

ports

for f

lagg

ed d

ata.

1) A

naly

tical

resu

lts s

hall

be re

porte

d in

the

units

spe

cifie

d fo

r eac

h ca

tego

ry o

r par

amet

er.

Sha

ded

Cel

ls (r

esul

ts c

olum

ns):

Red

- D

etec

ted

abov

e S

WQ

S; O

rang

e - N

ot d

etec

ted,

but

repo

rted

abov

e E

phem

eral

SW

QS

; Gre

en -

Not

det

ecte

d, b

ut re

porte

d ab

ove

PB

C S

WQ

S.

3) A

vera

ge fl

ow ra

te fo

r the

sam

plin

g pe

riod

(no

mor

e th

an 6

hou

rs).

4)

pH

rang

e (m

axim

um/m

inim

um).

5) N

o su

rface

wat

er q

ualit

y st

anda

rd e

stab

lishe

d fo

r max

imum

allo

wab

le in

crea

se in

am

bien

t wat

er te

mpe

ratu

re fo

r eph

emer

al w

ater

s.6)

Bas

ed o

n fre

e-cy

anid

e.

8) B

ased

on

tota

l chr

omiu

m.

9) D

epen

ds o

n pH

. R

epor

ted

valu

es a

re fo

r pH

of 7

.0.

Whe

re fi

eld

para

met

ers

(i.e.

dis

cret

e sa

mpl

es) a

re n

ot c

olle

cted

dur

ing

the

sam

e st

orm

eve

nt, t

he S

WQ

S a

ssoc

iate

d w

ith a

pH

7.0

will

be

used

.10

) M

etho

ds:

Thes

e pa

ram

eter

s m

ay b

e ru

n us

ing

the

follo

win

g m

etho

ds: V

OC

s, 6

24 o

r 826

0; S

VO

Cs,

625

or 8

270;

and

PC

B /

Pes

ticid

es, 6

08/6

25 o

r 808

1/80

82 if

the

labo

rato

ry c

an p

ass

QA

with

the

met

hod.

11

) S

WQ

Ss

repo

rted

for t

otal

xyl

enes

.12

) A

lso

know

n as

p-n

itrop

heno

l.13

) S

WQ

Ss

repo

rt as

tota

l end

osul

fan.

14)

SW

QS

s re

porte

d as

PC

Bs

7) S

WQ

S fo

r tot

al m

etal

s is

pro

vide

d an

d ba

sed

on p

artia

l bod

y co

ntac

t. T

he S

WQ

S fo

r dis

olve

d m

etal

con

cent

ratio

n fo

r eph

emer

al w

ater

is d

epen

dant

on

the

hard

ness

val

ue fo

r eac

h sa

mpl

e an

d w

ill in

mos

t cas

es b

e be

low

the

S

WQ

S fo

r par

tial b

ody

cont

act.

2) S

urfa

ce W

ater

Qua

lity

Sta

ndar

ds (S

WQ

Ss)

for E

MF

are

base

d on

that

pro

vide

d in

A.A

.C. R

18-1

1-10

5(1)

per

201

0 M

S4

Per

mit

AD

EQ

Res

pons

e to

Com

men

ts.

Par

tial B

ody

Con

tact

(PB

C, s

hade

d in

bro

wn)

and

Aqu

atic

&

Wild

life

(&

)


10.0 ASSESSMENT OF MONITORING DATA The 2010 MS4 Permit requires the City to:

1. Provide an evaluation of the sampling results for each monitoring location, including an assessment of any improvements or degradation of stormwater quality from each drainage area;

2. Compare the sampling results for each monitoring location with the applicable SWQSs; and,

3. Note any exceedance of SWQSs for the water of the United States receiving discharges during the reporting year.

Additionally, the 2010 MS4 Permit provides that where monitoring data results show a recurring (more than once) exceedance of a SWQS at a monitoring location, the City shall investigate and make all reasonable efforts to identify potential source(s) of the pollutant(s) and to report this information in the annual report (see Section 4.2 and Section 8.3 of the 2010 MS4 Permit). Furthermore, in the fourth year annual report (due September 30, 2014), the City was to include a discussion of possible explanations for stormwater quality trends, including the implementation of stormwater management practices to reduce the discharge of pollutants to and from the storm sewer system. 10.1 SURFACE WATER QUALITY STANDARDS SWQSs associated with the water of the United States that has a potential to receive discharges from each monitoring location is provided with the summary of monitoring data tables in Section 9.0. 10.2 EXCEEDANCES OF SURFACE WATER QUALITY STANDARDS Exceedances of SWQSs are identified in the summary of monitoring data tables in Section 9.0. Exceedances of established SWQSs are shaded in red. In some cases, the results were non-detection but the established method detection limits were reported above the SWQS. These are shaded in either orange for Aquatic & Wildlife SWQSs or green for Partial Body Contact SWQSs.


10.3 STORMWATER QUALITY EVALUATION - BY LOCATION The evaluation of stormwater quality for each monitoring location is provided below. An overall evaluation of stormwater quality based on the pollutants detected above applicable SWQSs is provided in Section 10.4. 10.3.1 Station AS-US60 Analytical results indicate that concentrations of E. coli, copper, lead, and zinc have been detected above the applicable SWQSs. All samples collected as part of the 2010 MS4 Permit exceeded the SWQSs for these parameters. E. coli results average 3,745 under the Most Probable Number (MPN) method with a standard deviation of 5,338. The high standard deviation in the data is due to the limited number of samples collected (6 samples) and the winter 2013-2014 result which was nearly four times the average value reported above. Copper results average 57 parts per billion (ppb) with a standard deviation of 25. Lead results average 12 ppb with a standard deviation of 3. Zinc concentrations average 250 ppb with a standard deviation of 110. With the exception of SS-US60, concentrations of lead are consistent with the other sites, and the reason these exceed the SWQSs at this location is solely due to the fact that this site discharges to an effluent dependent water where the other sites discharge to an ephemeral water. The average concentration of copper and zinc at this location tend to be higher than the average concentrations at the other monitoring locations and may be attributed to a denser population and a lower degree of on-site retention in the associated drainage area. The results do not appear to show a pattern for determining an improvement or degradation of stormwater quality. 10.3.2 Station SS-US60 Analytical results indicate that concentrations of E. coli and copper have been detected above the applicable SWQSs. All samples collected as part of the 2010 MS4 Permit exceeded the SWQSs for these parameters, except the winter 2013-2014 sample for E. coli. Additionally, the winter 2013-2014 sample results identified benz(a)anthracene and benzo(a)pyrene at concentrations slightly above SWQSs.


E. coli results average 2,674 MPN with a standard deviation of 3,132. The high standard deviation in the data is due to the limited number of samples collected (6 samples) and the summer 2011 result which was nearly three times the average value reported above. Copper results average 37 ppb with a standard deviation of 16. Benz(a)anthracene and benzo(a)pyrene have only been detected above SWQSs at this location once and have not been detected above SWQSs at the City’s other monitoring locations. The results do not appear to show a pattern for determining an improvement or degradation of stormwater quality. 10.3.3 Station 54-EMF Analytical results indicate that concentrations of E. coli and copper have been detected above the applicable SWQSs. All samples collected as part of the 2010 MS4 Permit exceeded the SWQSs for these parameters, except the summer 2011 and summer 2013 samples for copper. E. coli results average 2,559 MPN with a standard deviation of 2,741. The high standard deviation in the data is due to the limited number of samples collected (6 samples) and the summer 2013 result which was nearly three times the average value reported above. Copper results average 27 ppb with a standard deviation of 9. The results do not show a pattern for determining an improvement or degradation of stormwater quality. 10.3.4 Station UN-EMF Analytical results indicate that concentrations of E. coli and copper have been detected above the applicable SWQSs. All samples collected as part of the 2010 MS4 Permit exceeded the SWQSs for these parameters. E. coli results average 3,685 MPN with a standard deviation of 4,237. The high standard deviation in the data is due to the limited number of samples collected (6 samples) and the winter 2011-2012 result which was greater than three times the average value reported above. Copper results average 34 ppb with a standard deviation of 6. The results do not show a pattern for determining an improvement or degradation of stormwater quality.


10.3.5 Station FF-ACES Analytical results indicate that concentrations of copper have been detected above the applicable SWQSs. All samples collected as part of the 2010 MS4 Permit exceeded the SWQS for this parameter. Copper results average 14 ppb with a standard deviation of 7. The results do not show a pattern for determining an improvement or degradation of stormwater quality. 10.4 SWQS EXCEEDANCE INVESTIGATIONS When a reoccurring exceedance of a SWQS is identified, the City will conduct dry-weather screening to visually inspect the outfall/FSP for flow (similar to that for an IDDE investigation). If flow is present, then the City would conduct a dry-weather investigation as described in the City’s Environmental Program Training Standard Operating Procedures which may include:

• Conducting a drainage area investigation; • Conducting a storm drain network investigation; • Conducting a subsurface investigation (e.g. video survey); or • Conducting additional monitoring.

If dry-weather flow is absent, or if the source of the flow is identified but determined not be a contributing source of the pollutant(s) exceeding the SWQS, the City will conduct a modified drainage area investigation which goes beyond looking for dry-weather flows. In order to address the metals and E. coli concentrations detected at sampling stations AS-US60, SS-US60, 54-EMF, and UN-EMF, the City conducted dry-weather screening at each of the outfall/FSP locations. This investigation took place in May 2012. No dry-weather flow was identified. The City also conducted a modified drainage area investigation of each of these drainage areas. In conducting these investigations, City personnel drove through the drainage area in order to identify potential sources of the pollutants of interest, including roadway frontages, alleyways, and streets. This also included creating an inventory of


all commercial and industrial operations that exist in these areas and conducting a cursory inspection of these operations to determine if a point source could be linked to these operations. Based on the City’s drainage area investigation no point sources for metals or E. coli could be identified. The 2010 MS4 Permit requires the City to, where a source is identified that can be linked to a reoccurring exceedance of a SWQS, immediately either work to eliminate the source; or, modify existing control measures or implement additional control measures within the control of the City that may reduce a recurring discharge of the identified pollutant(s) to the maximum extent practicable in the area the exceedance has been identified. Since the City was unable to determine a source of these contaminates, no subsequent actions were taken by the City. Please note, for sampling station FF-ACES, this is installed in an interior location at the Falcon Field Airport. This facility is permitted under the ADEQ MSGP. As such, the “outfalls” at this facility are monitored for dry-weather flows annually, and an inspection of the facility is conducted annually to meet the requirements of the MSGP. As such, the City will not be conducting any additional investigations regarding SWQS exceedances for the purposes of this permit if/when and exceedance is identified.




11.0 ESTIMATE OF POLLUTANT LOADING The 2010 MS4 Permit requires the City to provide an estimate of the pollutant loadings each year from the City’s storm sewer system to waters of the United States for the following constituents:

• Biological Oxygen Demand; • Chemical Oxygen Demand; • Total Suspended Solids; • Total Dissolved Solids; • Total Nitrogen; • Total Ammonia; • Total Organic Nitrogen; • Total Phosphorous; and, • Metals.

The 2010 MS4 Permit also requires the City to include a description of the procedures for estimating pollutant loads and concentrations, including any modeling, data analysis, and calculation methods and to compare the pollutant loadings estimated each year to previous estimates of pollutant loadings. 11.1 POLLUTANT LOADING MODELING, DATA ANALYSIS, AND CALCULATIONS To meet the conditions of the 1997 Phase I Permit conditions, the City developed a model to estimate total pollutants discharged from the City’s storm sewer systerm using the “simple method” as described in EPA’s “Guidance Manual for the Preparation of Part 2 of the NPDES Permit Applications for Discharges from Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems.” As provided in the USEPA guidance, the regulation required system wide (cumulative) annual pollutant load calculation for each of the required pollutants, but that the single pollutant load values provide limited insights into potential problem areas and what BMPs might yield the best results. Consequently, the City decided to use the simple method to estimate “individual” pollutant loadings from drainage areas as referenced in the USEPA guidance. The individual pollutant loadings were then aggregated to derive a cumulative annual


pollutant loading for the City’s entire storm sewer system. The pollutant loading model developed by the City was managed in an Excel® format. The City contracted Engineering and Environmental Consultants, Inc. (EEC) to update the model by:

• Conducting an assessment of rainfall data; • Conducting an assessment of the drainage areas associated with each of the

outfall and FSP locations; • Evaluating weighted average of runoff coefficient data associated with land

uses; • Re-developing the City’s model to incorporate the results of the above studies;

and, • Providing a report summarizing the steps taken in preforming these analyses.

In addition, EEC worked with the City in re-designing the Event Mean Concentration (EMC) table that was used in the 1997 Phase I Permit. 11.1.1 Event Mean Concentration Sampling data duirng the 2010 MS4 Permit (September 2010 through August 2015) will be used to calculate the EMC as provided in the equation below.

EMC = Sum of Sampling Data Number of Data Points

The EMC table was modified to include parameters required in the 2010 MS4 Permit and to remove parameters that were previously modeled as part of the 1997 Phase I permit but were not required to be modeled in the 2010 MS4 Permit. 11.1.2 Rainfall Data Evaluation Rainfall data obtained from the FCDMC rain gages located within the City’s incorporated area were analyzed in two ways.

1. Using data from the last five years, excluding any rain events that exceeded the 100-year 2-hour storm event - estimated at 6.99 inches.


2. Using all available FCDMC data for the 12 rain gauges and did not exclude rain events exceeding the 100-year 2-hour storm event – estimated at 7.12 inches

Due to highly variable rainfall events from year to year and the impact of particularly dry or wet years is greater in smaller datasets, EEC recommended using 7.12 inches of rainfall for the average annual rainfall in the pollutant loading model. 11.1.3 Drainage Area Runoff Volumes Drainage areas runoff volumes were determined or each outfall and FSP using the following formula.

V = P * CF * WC * A 12 Where: V = Annual volume discharged from drainage area (acre-feet). P = Annual precipitation (7.12 inches/year, see Section 7.2.2). CF = Correction factor that adjusts for storms where no runoff occurs (0.9 used

per USEPA guidance). WC = Weighted average runoff coefficient. A = Drainage area. 11.1.3.1 Drainage Area Evaluation EEC evaluated the drainage areas of approximately 170 outfall and FSP locations identified by the City. The drainage area evaluation included deliniating the drainage areas included topography, storm drain line, and flow direction arrow data that was provided to EEC in the form of GIS layers of the City’s storm sewer system. This evaluation also included the use of aerial photos along with best professional judgment used to make assumptions on the probable grading and drainage patterns. The total acreage of each drainage area was then estimated and new GIS layers illustrating each drainage area were created. The drainage area evaluation also included determining various land uses whithin each drainage area. The land use areas were determined using City GIS land use data and information from the City’s the Storm Drain Master Plan. The land uses were simplified


into eight categories corresponding to land uses including streets, residential, commercial, industrial, lawns/parks, hillside/mountain, desert, and agricultural. Streets within residential and large commercial and industiral areas were not separated out from the surronding land uses. The streets land use was generally limited to drainage areas that primarily drained only City streets. 11.1.3.2 Weighted Average Runoff Coefficient EEC reveiwed published runoff coefficients and recommended using those provided in the FCDMC hydrology manual for the purposes of the City’s pollutant loading model. EEC also recommended using the runoff coefficients as listed in the FCDMC Manual corresponding with the selected land uses for the 2-year storm event. The only exception to this was the ‘Residential’ coefficients, since the FCDMC runoff coefficients published for residential land use did not include adjacent streets. For these, the average between the 2 and 10 year events was used. Based on EEC’s evaluation and recommendations, the City’s pollutant loading model has incorporated the weighted average runoff coefficients as provided below.

Land Use Wighted Average Runoff Coefficients Residential (very low or low density) 0.41 Residential (medium or high density) 0.63 Commercial 0.65 Industrial 0.65 Lawn/Parks 0.18 Desert 0.37 Hillside / Moutain 0.48 City Streets 0.75

11.1.4 Annual Pollutant Loading Estimate The City uses the following to calculate the annual loading.

L = V * C * 0.00136

L = Annual pollutant load (tons/year). V = Annual volume discharged (acre-feet). C = Pollutant Event Mean Concentration determined from the sampling

program (mg/L).


0.00136 = Conversion factor The pollutant loading is calculated for each required constituent, and volume discharged was the sum of individual drainage areas that discharged stormwater to the Salt River or the EMF. A copy of the pollutant loading estimates for each parameter required to be modeled is attached to back of this section. 11.2 COMPARISON OF POLLUTANT LOADING ESTIMATES A comparison between the 2011-2012 reporting year and this year’s pollutant loading estimates indicate consistency in the total pollutant loads and does not show a pattern for determining an improvement or degradation of stormwater quality.



Pollutant Loading Estimates

FALSE II IV I

Annual Load To Salt River

(tons)

Annual Load To EMF

(tons)

BOD5 26.52 82.73 47.74 130.47COD High Level 179.0 558.4 322.2 880.7TDS 129.8 404.9 233.7 638.6TSS 149 465 268 733Total Nitrogen (Nitrite + Nitrate) as N 0.531 1.657 0.956 2.612Total Ammonia as N 1.579 4.926 2.842 7.768Total Kjeldal Nitrogen (TKN) as N 3.199 9.980 5.759 15.739Phosphorous Total 0.625 1.950 1.125 3.075Antimony 0.003 0.008 0.005 0.012Arsenic 0.002 0.005 0.003 0.008Barium 0.0750 0.2340 0.1350 0.3690Beryillum 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Cadmium 0.0003 0.0009 0.0005 0.0015Chromium 0.006 0.020 0.011 0.031Copper 0.0390 0.1217 0.0702 0.1919Lead 0.012 0.037 0.021 0.058Mercury 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Nickel 0.008 0.025 0.015 0.040Selinium 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Silver 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Thalium 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Zinc 0.1816 0.5665 0.3269 0.8934

1,530 883 2,413

EMC (mg/l)

Total Annual Load(tons)

Total Pollutant Load (tons)

Pollutant

Ultimate Receiving Water



12.0 ANNUAL EXPENDITURES The 2010 MS4 Permit requires the City to provide a brief statement of the expenditures incurred each reporting period (July 1 – June 30) related exclusively to implementing and maintaining the stormwater management program, including associated monitoring and reporting activities. Additionally, the 2010 MS4 Permit requires the City to provide the estimated budget for implementing and maintaining the stormwater program in the subsequent reporting period and to include a statement of the funding sources used to support program expenditures. The City’s stormwater program during this reporting period was funded in part from an Environmental Fee that is assessed to City residents and businesses as part of their utility bills and the remaining was funded from the City’s General Fund. An Annual Expenditure Report is included as an attachment to this Annual Report (see Section 13.9 and Attachment C).




13.0 ATTACHMENTS The 2010 MS4 Permit requires the City to attach the following to the Annual Reports:

1. Drainage system maps 2. List of major outfalls and field screening points 3. List of changes to the major outfalls and field screening points inventory (new,

out of service, other changes), including drainage area and coordinates for the monitoring locations listed in Table 1 of the permit (4th year report)

4. Laboratory reports for stormwater monitoring performed in the reporting period 5. New or revised ordinances associated with stormwater management 6. New or revised public outreach documents

Other attachments include:

1. Household hazardous waste reports; and, 2. Annual expenditure reports.

13.1 DRAINAGE SYSTEM MAPS The City considers the exact location of its utility infrastructure to be confidential and for use by City personnel only. As such, the City cannot supply this information as an attachment to this document. The City would be able to supply this information to the ADEQ upon official request and only under a signed confidentiality agreement or provide a presentation of this information to the ADEQ upon request. 13.2 LISTING OF OUTFALLS & FIELD SCREENING POINTS A current version of the listing of outfalls and FSPs are included in the City’s updated SWMP dated September 2014 which is included as an addendum to this annual report. 13.3 LIST OF CHANGES TO OUTFALL & FIELD SCREENING POINTS Two FSP locations were added to the City’s inventory this reporting period. A current version of the listing of outfalls and FSPs are included in the City’s updated SWMP dated September 2014 which is included as an addendum to this annual report.


13.4 STORMWATER MONITORING ANALYTICAL LABORATORY REPORTS During this reporting period, the City collected a total of twenty-one (21) wet-weather stormwater samples for laboratory analysis. The analytical reports associated with those samples are included as Attachment A. These reports are arranged by Order ID/Sample Number. 13.5 NEW OR REVISED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT ORDINANCES A current version of the City’s Stormwater Code is provided in the City’s updated SWMP dated September 2014 which is included as an addendum to this annual report. 13.6 NEW OR REVISED PUBLIC EDUCATION & OUTREACH DOCUMENTS Public education and outreach materials developed by the STORM organization are available at the STORM website at the following addresses: http://www.azstorm.org/brochures/ http://www.azstorm.org/storm-drain-dan/ http://www.azstorm.org/other-fun-stuff/ 13.7 HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE EVENT REPORTS Reports for the four HHW events conducted this reporting period are provided in Attachment B. 13.8 UPDATED CITY FACILITY INVENTORY A current version of the City facility inventory is included in the City’s updated SWMP dated September 2014 which is included as an addendum to this annual report. 13.9 ANNUAL EXPENDITURE REPORTS Expenditures associated with the City’s stormwater management program for the current reporting year and the estimated expenditures for the subsequent reporting year are provided in Attachment C.

http://www.azstorm.org/brochures/

http://www.azstorm.org/storm-drain-dan/

http://www.azstorm.org/other-fun-stuff/

ATTACHMENT A

WET-WEATHER SAMPLING LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORTS


CITY OF MESA COMPLIANCE LABORATORY

640 NORTH MESA DRIVE MESA, ARIZONA 85211

LABORATORY SUPERVISOR: MATTHEW REXING Ph (480)644-5403QUALITY ASSURANCE COORDINATOR: KIM CAGGIANO Ph (480)644-5404

Environmental Laboratory License AZ0410

Attn: Scott Bouchie

OrderID: 130524005

Sample Number: 13050470

Parameter Method No Result AnalystAnalysis

DateMRL

RESULTS

Collection Time: 10:16:00 PMCollector: AC Project ID: 54 Discrete-Partial

Site: 54th St @ EMF

Customer Sample#:

Qualifier

Collection Date: 7/20/2013 Receive Date: 7/21/2013

PSERIA< 0.020Cyanide, Total SM4500-CN E 0.02 7/25/2013mg/Lmrexing7980.0E. Coli, MPN SM9223B 2.2 7/21/2013mpn/100mlNSILIDE5.3Oil and Grease EPA 1664A 5 7/30/2013mg/L

TAL< 10.0Petroleum Hyrodcarbons, Total EPA 1664A 10 8/1/2013mg/LACHAVEZ7.62pH-Field SM4500H B 1 7/20/2013S.U.ACHAVEZ30.0Temperature-Field SM2550B 1 7/20/2013°C

QUALIFIERS

COMMENTS

REVIEWED BY: _____________________________________________8/12/2013Date Signed:

Quality Control

SPIKE RESULTS Spike True

Value

mg/L

Sample Conc.

mg/L

%REC

Parameter

mg/L

Final Result Sample Number QC BATCH%RPD

MSCyanide, Total 130504761040.25 < 0.02 mg/L 0.2595 QC13072506MSOil and Grease 130504769240 < 5 mg/L 37.4 QC13073003

MSDCyanide, Total 130504761050.25 < 0.02 mg/L 0.2613 QC130725060.69

Standard Conc.

mg/L mg/L

%REC

Parameter

QC BATCH QC TYPEActual Conc.Standard

Cyanide, Total 0.25 101 QC13072506 ICV0.2526Cyanide, Total 0.25 104 QC13072506 CCV0.2612Oil and Grease 40 97 QC13073003 LCS38.7

BLANK

Parameter

mg/L QC BATCH

Oil and Grease < 5 mg/L QC13073003

Page 1 of 2

Page 2 of 2





Attn: Scott Bouchie

OrderID: 130524006



DateMRL

RESULTS

Collection Time: 7:40:00 PMCollector: AC Project ID: Alma Comp-Partial

Site: Alma School/ADOT Channel

Customer Sample#:

Qualifier


PSERIA3.84Nitrogen, Ammonia Total SM4500-NH3D D20.5 7/18/2013mg/LJPATTIS2.72Nitrogen, Nitrate-Nitrite Total EPA 300.0 2 7/18/2013mg/LNSILIDE86.0Biochemical Oxygen Demand SM5210B 2 7/17/2013mg/LNSILIDE534Chemical Oxygen Demand SM5220D 50 7/23/2013mg/LNSILIDE116Hardness, Total SM2340C 1 7/16/2013mg/L CaCO3

GSMITH2< 0.005Antimony, Total EPA 200.8 D10.005 8/9/2013mg/LGSMITH2< 0.005Arsenic, Total EPA 200.8 D10.005 8/9/2013mg/LGSMITH20.102Barium, Total EPA 200.8 D1/M20.005 8/9/2013mg/LGSMITH2< 0.005Beryllium, Total EPA 200.8 D10.005 8/9/2013mg/LGSMITH2< 0.004Cadmium, Total EPA 200.8 D10.004 8/9/2013mg/LGSMITH20.006Chromium, Total EPA 200.8 D1/M20.005 8/9/2013mg/LGSMITH20.047Copper, Total EPA 200.8 D1/M20.005 8/9/2013mg/LGSMITH20.009Lead, Total EPA 200.8 D10.005 8/9/2013mg/LGSMITH20.017Nickel, Total EPA 200.8 D10.005 8/9/2013mg/LGSMITH2< 0.005Selenium, Total EPA 200.8 D10.005 8/9/2013mg/LGSMITH2< 0.004Silver, Total EPA 200.8 D10.004 8/9/2013mg/LGSMITH2< 0.005Thallium, Total EPA 200.8 D1/L4/M20.005 8/9/2013mg/LGSMITH20.222Zinc, Total EPA 200.8 D1/M20.005 8/9/2013mg/L

TAL< 0.00020Mercury, Total EPA245.1 0.0002 7/23/2013mg/LPSERIA10.6Nitrogen, Kjeldahl Total SM4500-Norg 0.5 7/29/2013mg/L

TAL0.62Orthophosphate EPA 300.0 0.1 7/16/2013mg/LPSERIA1.03Phosphorus, Total SM4500-P D20.5 7/23/2013mg/LNSILIDE196Solids, Suspended Total SM2540D 10 7/17/2013mg/LNSILIDE564Solids, Total Dissolved SM2540C 20 7/17/2013mg/L

Quality Control

Page 1 of 5

Quality Control

Standard Conc.

mg/L mg/L

%REC

Parameter


Nitrogen, Ammonia Total 0.5 102 QC13072202 ICV0.508Nitrogen, Ammonia Total 0.5 103 QC13072202 CCV0.516

Nitrogen, Nitrate Total 0.5 100 QC13072205 LFB0.498Nitrogen, Nitrate Total 0.5 100 QC13072205 ICV0.502Nitrogen, Nitrate Total 0.5 101 QC13072205 CCV0.506

Biochemical Oxygen Demand 198 97 QC13072206 LCS193Chemical Oxygen Demand 500 98 QC13072403 ICV490Chemical Oxygen Demand 500 97 QC13072403 CCV484

Hardness, Total 100 102 QC13071602 LCS102.16Antimony, Total 0.05 97 QC13081201 LFB0.04853Antimony, Total 0.01 105 QC13081201 ICV0.01049Antimony, Total 0.05 106 QC13081201 CCV0.05305Arsenic, Total 0.05 91 QC13081201 LFB0.04553Arsenic, Total 0.01 102 QC13081201 ICV0.01020Arsenic, Total 0.05 99 QC13081201 CCV0.04939Barium, Total 0.05 90 QC13081201 LFB0.04515Barium, Total 0.01 103 QC13081201 ICV0.01028Barium, Total 0.05 101 QC13081201 CCV0.05029

Beryllium, Total 0.05 133 QC13081201 LFB0.06647Beryllium, Total 0.01 101 QC13081201 ICV0.01008Beryllium, Total 0.05 96 QC13081201 CCV0.04816Cadmium, Total 0.05 93 QC13081201 LFB0.04672Cadmium, Total 0.01 103 QC13081201 ICV0.01030Cadmium, Total 0.05 103 QC13081201 CCV0.05128Chromium, Total 0.05 87 QC13081201 LFB0.04371Chromium, Total 0.01 107 QC13081201 ICV0.01068Chromium, Total 0.05 96 QC13081201 CCV0.04775

Copper, Total 0.05 90 QC13081201 LFB0.04512Copper, Total 0.01 103 QC13081201 ICV0.01025Copper, Total 0.05 115 QC13081201 CCV0.05745Lead, Total 0.05 91 QC13081201 LFB0.04560

BLANK

Parameter

mg/L QC BATCH

Nitrogen, Ammonia Total < 0.5 mg/L QC13072202Biochemical Oxygen Demand < 2 mg/L QC13072206

Chemical Oxygen Demand < 50 mg/L QC13072403Hardness, Total < 1 mg/L CaCO3QC13071602Antimony, Total < 0.005 mg/L QC13081201Arsenic, Total < 0.005 mg/L QC13081201Barium, Total < 0.005 mg/L QC13081201

Beryllium, Total < 0.005 mg/L QC13081201Cadmium, Total < 0.004 mg/L QC13081201Chromium, Total < 0.005 mg/L QC13081201

Copper, Total < 0.005 mg/L QC13081201Lead, Total < 0.005 mg/L QC13081201Nickel, Total < 0.005 mg/L QC13081201

Selenium, Total < 0.005 mg/L QC13081201Silver, Total < 0.004 mg/L QC13081201

Thallium, Total < 0.005 mg/L QC13081201Zinc, Total < 0.005 mg/L QC13081201

Nitrogen, Kjeldahl Total < 0.5 mg/L QC13072908Phosphorus, Total < 0.5 mg/L QC13072404

Solids, Suspended Total < 10 mg/L QC13071703Solids, Total Dissolved < 20 mg/L QC13071801

Page 2 of 5

Duplicate Duplicate Conc.

mg/L

Actual Conc.

mg/L

%RPD

Parameter

Sample Number QC BATCH

Biochemical Oxygen Demand 13070330 197 mg/L 202 QC130722062.51Solids, Suspended Total 13050471 196 mg/L 192 QC130717032.06Solids, Total Dissolved 13050471 564 mg/L 582 QC130718013.14


Value

mg/L

Sample Conc.

mg/L

%REC

Parameter

mg/L


MSAntimony, Total 13050477810.05 < 0.025 mg/L 0.04059 QC13081201MSArsenic, Total 13050477780.05 < 0.025 mg/L 0.03922 QC13081201MSBarium, Total 13050477630.05 0.030 mg/L 0.06128 QC13081201MSBeryllium, Total 13050477890.05 < 0.025 mg/L 0.04431 QC13081201MSCadmium, Total 13050477760.05 0.001 mg/L 0.03999 QC13081201MSChemical Oxygen Demand 1305047795500 56 mg/L 533 QC13072403MSChromium, Total 13050477630.05 < 0.025 mg/L 0.04384 QC13081201MSCopper, Total 13050477670.05 < 0.025 mg/L 0.04339 QC13081201MSHardness, Total 1305047110550 116 mg/L CaCO3 168.88 QC13071602MSLead, Total 13050477730.05 < 0.025 mg/L 0.04910 QC13081201MSNickel, Total 13050477730.05 < 0.025 mg/L 0.04052 QC13081201MSNitrogen, Ammonia Total 130702031030.5 0.104 mg/L 0.620 QC13072202MSNitrogen, Kjeldahl Total 130504691005 3.63 mg/L 8.63 QC13072908MSPhosphorus, Total 13050477990.3 0.15 mg/L 0.4462 QC13072404MSSelenium, Total 13050477870.05 < 0.025 mg/L 0.04358 QC13081201MSSilver, Total 13050477960.05 < 0.001 mg/L 0.04785 QC13081201MSThallium, Total 13050477660.05 < 0.025 mg/L 0.03283 QC13081201MSZinc, Total 13050477220.05 0.123 mg/L 0.13415 QC13081201

MSDChemical Oxygen Demand 1305047793500 56 mg/L 522 QC130724032.09MSDHardness, Total 1305047110550 116 mg/L CaCO3 169.28 QC130716020.24MSDNitrogen, Ammonia Total 130702031050.5 0.104 mg/L 0.629 QC130722021.44MSDNitrogen, Kjeldahl Total 130504691025 3.63 mg/L 8.72 QC130729081.04MSDPhosphorus, Total 13050477980.3 0.15 mg/L 0.4442 QC130724040.45

Lead, Total 0.01 100 QC13081201 ICV0.00995Lead, Total 0.05 103 QC13081201 CCV0.05152Nickel, Total 0.05 88 QC13081201 LFB0.04411Nickel, Total 0.01 101 QC13081201 ICV0.01013Nickel, Total 0.05 100 QC13081201 CCV0.04997

Selenium, Total 0.05 98 QC13081201 LFB0.04916Selenium, Total 0.01 105 QC13081201 ICV0.01049Selenium, Total 0.05 100 QC13081201 CCV0.04989

Silver, Total 0.05 103 QC13081201 LFB0.05166Silver, Total 0.01 99 QC13081201 ICV0.00988Silver, Total 0.05 109 QC13081201 CCV0.05443

Thallium, Total 0.05 70 QC13081201 LFB0.03484Thallium, Total 0.01 97 QC13081201 ICV0.00967Thallium, Total 0.05 101 QC13081201 CCV0.05025

Zinc, Total 0.05 96 QC13081201 LFB0.04803Zinc, Total 0.01 105 QC13081201 ICV0.01045Zinc, Total 0.05 108 QC13081201 CCV0.05402

Nitrogen, Kjeldahl Total 5 98 QC13072908 LFB4.92Nitrogen, Kjeldahl Total 25 100 QC13072908 CCV24.94

Phosphorus, Total 0.3 102 QC13072404 ICV0.3054Phosphorus, Total 0.3 102 QC13072404 CCV0.3054

Solids, Suspended Total 200 102 QC13071703 LCS204Solids, Total Dissolved 495 100 QC13071801 LCS496

Page 3 of 5

QUALIFIERS

COMMENTS


D1 = Sample required dilution due to matrix. M2 = Matrix spike recovery low; the associated blank spike acceptable.

Analyzed 8/13/13, QC available upon request. GSD1 = Sample required dilution due to matrix. M2 = Matrix spike recovery low; the associated blank spike acceptable.

Analyzed 8/13/13, QC available upon request. GSD1 = Sample required dilution due to matrix. L4 = Associated blank spike (Tl) recovery was below method limits. M2 = Matrix spike recovery low.Zn, Cr, Cu, Ba, Tl: D1 = Sample required dilution due to matrix. M2 = Matrix spike recovery low; the associated blank spike is acceptable.

D1 Sample diluted due to matrix interference. D2 Sample diluted due to high concentration.

Page 4 of 5

Page 5 of 5





Attn: Scott Bouchie

OrderID: 130524007



DateMRL

RESULTS

Collection Time: 7:17:00 PMCollector: AC Project ID: Alma Discrete-Partial


Customer Sample#:

Qualifier


PSERIA< 0.020Cyanide, Total SM4500-CN E 0.02 7/25/2013mg/Lmrexing1300.0E. Coli, MPN SM9223B 2.2 7/15/2013mpn/100mlNSILIDE< 5.0Oil and Grease EPA 1664A 5 7/24/2013mg/L

TAL< 5.70Petroleum Hyrodcarbons, Total EPA 1664A 5.7 7/25/2013mg/LACHAVEZ7.15pH-Field SM4500H B 1 7/15/2013S.U.ACHAVEZ33.0Temperature-Field SM2550B 1 7/15/2013°C

QUALIFIERS

COMMENTS


Quality Control


Value

mg/L

Sample Conc.

mg/L

%REC

Parameter

mg/L




Standard Conc.

mg/L mg/L

%REC

Parameter



BLANK

Parameter

mg/L QC BATCH


Page 1 of 2

Page 2 of 2





Attn: Scott Bouchie

OrderID: 130524012



DateMRL

RESULTS

Collection Time: 11:45:00 AMCollector: D. Cameron Project ID: FF Comp-Partial

Site: Falcon Field

Customer Sample#:

Qualifier


PSERIA1.56Nitrogen, Ammonia Total SM4500-NH3D D20.5 7/31/2013mg/LJPATTIS< 2.00Nitrogen, Nitrate-Nitrite Total EPA 300.0 2 7/24/2013mg/LPSERIA7.00Biochemical Oxygen Demand SM5210B 2 7/27/2013mg/LNSILIDE56Chemical Oxygen Demand SM5220D 50 7/23/2013mg/LNSILIDE18.0Hardness, Total SM2340C 1 7/23/2013mg/L CaCO3

GSMITH2< 0.005Antimony, Total EPA 200.8 D10.005 8/2/2013mg/LGSMITH2< 0.005Arsenic, Total EPA 200.8 D10.005 8/2/2013mg/LGSMITH20.030Barium, Total EPA 200.8 D1/M20.005 8/2/2013mg/LGSMITH2< 0.005Beryllium, Total EPA 200.8 D10.005 8/2/2013mg/LGSMITH20.001Cadmium, Total EPA 200.8 0.001 8/2/2013mg/LGSMITH20.012Chromium, Total EPA 200.8 D1/M20.005 8/2/2013mg/LGSMITH20.010Copper, Total EPA 200.8 D1/M20.005 8/2/2013mg/LGSMITH20.012Lead, Total EPA 200.8 D10.005 8/2/2013mg/LGSMITH2< 0.005Nickel, Total EPA 200.8 D10.005 8/2/2013mg/LGSMITH2< 0.005Selenium, Total EPA 200.8 D10.005 8/2/2013mg/LGSMITH2< 0.001Silver, Total EPA 200.8 0.001 8/2/2013mg/LGSMITH2< 0.005Thallium, Total EPA 200.8 D1/L4/M20.005 8/2/2013mg/LGSMITH20.123Zinc, Total EPA 200.8 D1/M20.005 8/2/2013mg/L


TAL0.22Orthophosphate EPA 300.0 0.2 7/22/2013mg/LPSERIA0.15Phosphorus, Total SM4500-P 0.1 7/23/2013mg/LNSILIDE58.0Solids, Suspended Total SM2540D 10 7/23/2013mg/LNSILIDE192Solids, Total Dissolved SM2540C 20 7/23/2013mg/L

Quality Control

Page 1 of 5

Quality Control

Standard Conc.

mg/L mg/L

%REC

Parameter



Fluoride 0.5 97 QC13072501 LFB0.486Fluoride 0.5 98 QC13072501 ICV0.489Fluoride 0.5 98 QC13072501 CCV0.491



Hardness, Total 100 102 QC13072301 LCS102Antimony, Total 0.05 97 QC13081201 LFB0.04853Antimony, Total 0.01 105 QC13081201 ICV0.01049Antimony, Total 0.05 106 QC13081201 CCV0.05305Arsenic, Total 0.05 91 QC13081201 LFB0.04553Arsenic, Total 0.01 102 QC13081201 ICV0.01020Arsenic, Total 0.05 99 QC13081201 CCV0.04939Barium, Total 0.05 90 QC13081201 LFB0.04515Barium, Total 0.01 103 QC13081201 ICV0.01028Barium, Total 0.05 101 QC13081201 CCV0.05029


Copper, Total 0.05 90 QC13081201 LFB0.04512

BLANK

Parameter

mg/L QC BATCH

Nitrogen, Ammonia Total < 0.5 mg/L QC13073103Biochemical Oxygen Demand < 2 mg/L QC13072801








Page 2 of 5


mg/L

Actual Conc.

mg/L

%RPD

Parameter


Biochemical Oxygen Demand 13050481 41.0 mg/L 38 QC130728017.59Solids, Suspended Total 13070263 4060 mg/L 4140 QC130724021.95Solids, Total Dissolved 13050469 212 mg/L 206 QC130724052.87


Value

mg/L

Sample Conc.

mg/L

%REC

Parameter

mg/L


MSAntimony, Total 13050477810.05 < 0.025 mg/L 0.04059 QC13081201MSArsenic, Total 13050477780.05 < 0.025 mg/L 0.03922 QC13081201MSBarium, Total 13050477630.05 0.030 mg/L 0.06128 QC13081201MSBeryllium, Total 13050477890.05 < 0.025 mg/L 0.04431 QC13081201MSCadmium, Total 13050477760.05 0.001 mg/L 0.03999 QC13081201MSChemical Oxygen Demand 1305047795500 56 mg/L 533 QC13072403MSChromium, Total 13050477630.05 < 0.025 mg/L 0.04384 QC13081201MSCopper, Total 13050477670.05 < 0.025 mg/L 0.04339 QC13081201MSHardness, Total 1305047710450 18.0 mg/L CaCO3 70 QC13072301MSLead, Total 13050477730.05 < 0.025 mg/L 0.04910 QC13081201MSNickel, Total 13050477730.05 < 0.025 mg/L 0.04052 QC13081201MSNitrogen, Ammonia Total 13050479992.5 < 2.5 mg/L 4.03 QC13073103MSNitrogen, Kjeldahl Total 130504691005 3.63 mg/L 8.63 QC13072908MSPhosphorus, Total 13050477990.3 0.15 mg/L 0.4462 QC13072404MSSelenium, Total 13050477870.05 < 0.025 mg/L 0.04358 QC13081201MSSilver, Total 13050477960.05 < 0.001 mg/L 0.04785 QC13081201MSThallium, Total 13050477660.05 < 0.025 mg/L 0.03283 QC13081201MSZinc, Total 13050477220.05 0.123 mg/L 0.13415 QC13081201

MSDChemical Oxygen Demand 1305047793500 56 mg/L 522 QC130724032.09MSDHardness, Total 1305047710250 18.0 mg/L CaCO3 69 QC130723011.44MSDNitrogen, Ammonia Total 130504791002.5 < 2.5 mg/L 4.065 QC130731030.86MSDNitrogen, Kjeldahl Total 130504691025 3.63 mg/L 8.72 QC130729081.04

Copper, Total 0.01 103 QC13081201 ICV0.01025Copper, Total 0.05 115 QC13081201 CCV0.05745Lead, Total 0.05 91 QC13081201 LFB0.04560Lead, Total 0.01 100 QC13081201 ICV0.00995Lead, Total 0.05 103 QC13081201 CCV0.05152Nickel, Total 0.05 88 QC13081201 LFB0.04411Nickel, Total 0.01 101 QC13081201 ICV0.01013Nickel, Total 0.05 100 QC13081201 CCV0.04997








Page 3 of 5

QUALIFIERS

COMMENTS



Analyzed 8/13/13, QC available upon request. GSD1 = Sample required dilution due to matrix. M2 = Matrix spike recovery low; the associated blank spike acceptable.

Analyzed 8/13/13, QC available upon request. GSD1 = Sample required dilution due to matrix. L4 = Associated blank spike (Tl) recovery was below method limits. M2 = Matrix spike recovery low.D1 = Sample required dilution due to matrix. M2 = Matrix spike recovery low; the associated blank spike acceptable.


MSDPhosphorus, Total 13050477980.3 0.15 mg/L 0.4442 QC130724040.45

Page 4 of 5

Page 5 of 5





Attn: Scott Bouchie

OrderID: 130524013



DateMRL

RESULTS

Collection Time: 9:55:00 AMCollector: AC Project ID: FF Discrete-Partial

Site: Falcon Field

Customer Sample#:

Qualifier



TAL< 11.0Petroleum Hyrodcarbons, Total EPA 1664A 11 9/20/2013mg/LDCAMERO7.32pH-Field SM4500H B 1 9/8/2013S.U.DCAMERO25.6Temperature-Field SM2550B 1 9/8/2013°C

QUALIFIERS

COMMENTS

Quality Control


Value

mg/L

Sample Conc.

mg/L

%REC

Parameter

mg/L




Standard Conc.

mg/L mg/L

%REC

Parameter



BLANK

Parameter

mg/L QC BATCH

Cyanide, Total < 0.02 mg/L QC13091602Oil and Grease < 5 mg/L QC13091101

Page 1 of 2


Page 2 of 2





Attn: Scott Bouchie

OrderID: 130524014



DateMRL

RESULTS

Collection Time: 1:23:00 AMCollector: J. Meyer Project ID: SS Comp-Partial

Site: Superstition Springs/US 60

Customer Sample#:

Qualifier


PSERIA1.56Nitrogen, Ammonia Total SM4500-NH3D D20.5 7/31/2013mg/LJPATTIS0.828Nitrogen, Nitrate-Nitrite Total EPA 300.0 D10.5 7/31/2013mg/L

KHUNTER9.20Biochemical Oxygen Demand SM5210B 2 7/27/2013mg/LNSILIDE< 50Chemical Oxygen Demand SM5220D 50 8/15/2013mg/LNSILIDE12.0Hardness, Total SM2340C 1 7/29/2013mg/L CaCO3

GSMITH2< 0.005Antimony, Total EPA 200.8 D10.005 8/9/2013mg/LGSMITH2< 0.005Arsenic, Total EPA 200.8 D10.005 8/9/2013mg/LGSMITH20.021Barium, Total EPA 200.8 D1/M20.005 8/9/2013mg/LGSMITH2< 0.005Beryllium, Total EPA 200.8 D10.005 8/9/2013mg/LGSMITH2< 0.001Cadmium, Total EPA 200.8 0.001 8/9/2013mg/LGSMITH20.005Chromium, Total EPA 200.8 D1/M20.005 8/9/2013mg/LGSMITH20.028Copper, Total EPA 200.8 D1/M20.005 8/9/2013mg/LGSMITH2< 0.005Lead, Total EPA 200.8 D10.005 8/9/2013mg/LGSMITH2< 0.005Nickel, Total EPA 200.8 D10.005 8/9/2013mg/LGSMITH2< 0.005Selenium, Total EPA 200.8 D10.005 8/9/2013mg/LGSMITH2< 0.001Silver, Total EPA 200.8 0.001 8/9/2013mg/LGSMITH2< 0.005Thallium, Total EPA 200.8 D1/L4/M20.005 8/9/2013mg/LGSMITH20.066Zinc, Total EPA 200.8 D1/M20.005 8/9/2013mg/L


TAL< 0.20Orthophosphate EPA 300.0 0.2 7/27/2013mg/LPSERIA0.35Phosphorus, Total SM4500-P 0.1 8/2/2013mg/LNSILIDE25.0Solids, Suspended Total SM2540D 10 8/1/2013mg/LNSILIDE120Solids, Total Dissolved SM2540C 20 7/31/2013mg/L

Quality Control

Page 1 of 5

Quality Control

Standard Conc.

mg/L mg/L

%REC

Parameter



Nitrogen, Nitrate-Nitrite Total 0.5 99 QC13080202 LFB0.495Nitrogen, Nitrate-Nitrite Total 0.5 101 QC13080202 CCV0.503Biochemical Oxygen Demand 198 101 QC13080101 LCS199

Chemical Oxygen Demand 500 99 QC13081506 ICV493Chemical Oxygen Demand 500 102 QC13081506 CCV512

Hardness, Total 100 100 QC13072904 LCS99.80Antimony, Total 0.05 97 QC13081201 LFB0.04853Antimony, Total 0.01 105 QC13081201 ICV0.01049Antimony, Total 0.05 106 QC13081201 CCV0.05305Arsenic, Total 0.05 91 QC13081201 LFB0.04553Arsenic, Total 0.01 102 QC13081201 ICV0.01020Arsenic, Total 0.05 99 QC13081201 CCV0.04939Barium, Total 0.05 90 QC13081201 LFB0.04515Barium, Total 0.01 103 QC13081201 ICV0.01028Barium, Total 0.05 101 QC13081201 CCV0.05029


Copper, Total 0.05 90 QC13081201 LFB0.04512Copper, Total 0.01 103 QC13081201 ICV0.01025Copper, Total 0.05 115 QC13081201 CCV0.05745Lead, Total 0.05 91 QC13081201 LFB0.04560Lead, Total 0.01 100 QC13081201 ICV0.00995

BLANK

Parameter

mg/L QC BATCH

Nitrogen, Ammonia Total < 0.5 mg/L QC13073103Nitrogen, Nitrate-Nitrite Total < 0.5 mg/L QC13080202Biochemical Oxygen Demand < 2 mg/L QC13080101

Chemical Oxygen Demand < 50 mg/L QC13081506Antimony, Total < 0.005 mg/L QC13081201Arsenic, Total < 0.005 mg/L QC13081201Barium, Total < 0.005 mg/L QC13081201







Page 2 of 5

QUALIFIERS


mg/L

Actual Conc.

mg/L

%RPD

Parameter


Biochemical Oxygen Demand 13050479 9.20 mg/L 9.3 QC130801011.08Solids, Suspended Total 13070837 228 mg/L 230 QC130801030.87Solids, Total Dissolved 13050479 120 mg/L 126 QC130801024.88


Value

mg/L

Sample Conc.

mg/L

%REC

Parameter

mg/L


MSAntimony, Total 13050477810.05 < 0.025 mg/L 0.04059 QC13081201MSArsenic, Total 13050477780.05 < 0.025 mg/L 0.03922 QC13081201MSBarium, Total 13050477630.05 0.030 mg/L 0.06128 QC13081201MSBeryllium, Total 13050477890.05 < 0.025 mg/L 0.04431 QC13081201MSCadmium, Total 13050477760.05 0.001 mg/L 0.03999 QC13081201MSChemical Oxygen Demand 1305047997500 < 50 mg/L 533 QC13081506MSChromium, Total 13050477630.05 < 0.025 mg/L 0.04384 QC13081201MSCopper, Total 13050477670.05 < 0.025 mg/L 0.04339 QC13081201MSHardness, Total 1305047910150 12.0 mg/L CaCO3 62.84 QC13072904MSLead, Total 13050477730.05 < 0.025 mg/L 0.04910 QC13081201MSNickel, Total 13050477730.05 < 0.025 mg/L 0.04052 QC13081201MSNitrogen, Ammonia Total 13050479992.5 < 2.5 mg/L 4.03 QC13073103MSNitrogen, Nitrate-Nitrite Total 13050479910.5 < 1 mg/L 1.281 QC13080202MSPhosphorus, Total 130504791020.3 0.35 mg/L 0.6603 QC13080205MSSelenium, Total 13050477870.05 < 0.025 mg/L 0.04358 QC13081201MSSilver, Total 13050477960.05 < 0.001 mg/L 0.04785 QC13081201MSThallium, Total 13050477660.05 < 0.025 mg/L 0.03283 QC13081201MSZinc, Total 13050477220.05 0.123 mg/L 0.13415 QC13081201

MSDChemical Oxygen Demand 1305047997500 < 50 mg/L 532 QC130815060.19MSDHardness, Total 1305047910350 12.0 mg/L CaCO3 64.08 QC130729041.95MSDNitrogen, Ammonia Total 130504791002.5 < 2.5 mg/L 4.065 QC130731030.86MSDNitrogen, Nitrate-Nitrite Total 13050479910.5 < 1 mg/L 1.284 QC130802020.23MSDPhosphorus, Total 130504791010.3 0.35 mg/L 0.6585 QC130802050.27

Lead, Total 0.05 103 QC13081201 CCV0.05152Nickel, Total 0.05 88 QC13081201 LFB0.04411Nickel, Total 0.01 101 QC13081201 ICV0.01013Nickel, Total 0.05 100 QC13081201 CCV0.04997








Page 3 of 5

COMMENTS


NO3 ICV = 99% recovery.D1 = Sample required dilution due to matrix. M2 = Matrix spike recovery low; the associated blank spike acceptable.D1 = Sample required dilution due to matrix.Analyzed 8/13/13, QC available upon request. GSD1 = Sample required dilution due to matrix. M2 = Matrix spike recovery low; the associated blank spike acceptable.

Analyzed 8/13/13, QC available upon request. GSD1 = Sample required dilution due to matrix. L4 = Associated blank spike (Tl) recovery was below method limits. M2 = Matrix spike recovery low.D1 = Sample required dilution due to matrix. M2 = Matrix spike recovery low; the associated blank spike acceptable.


Page 4 of 5

Page 5 of 5





Attn: Scott Bouchie

OrderID: 130524015



DateMRL

RESULTS

Collection Time: 1:35:00 AMCollector: J. Meyer Project ID: SS Discrete-Partial


Customer Sample#:

Qualifier


PSERIA< 0.020Cyanide, Total SM4500-CN E 0.02 8/8/2013mg/L

mrexing1990.0E. Coli, MPN SM9223B 2.2 7/27/2013mpn/100ml

NSILIDE< 5.0Oil and Grease EPA 1664A 5 8/12/2013mg/L

TAL< 10.0Petroleum Hyrodcarbons, Total EPA 1664A 10 8/7/2013mg/L

AC7.28pH-Field SM4500H B 1 7/27/2013S.U.

AC28.2Temperature-Field SM2550B 1 7/27/2013°C

QUALIFIERS

COMMENTS

Quality Control


Value

mg/L

Sample Conc.

mg/L

%REC

Parameter

mg/L




Standard Conc.

mg/L mg/L

%REC

Parameter



BLANK

Parameter

mg/L QC BATCH

Cyanide, Total < 0.02 mg/L QC13080804Oil and Grease < 5 mg/L QC13081207

Page 1 of 2


Page 2 of 2





Attn: Scott Bouchie

OrderID: 130524016



DateMRL

RESULTS

Collection Time: 10:45:00 PMCollector: AC Project ID: Univ Comp-Partial

Site: Univ Dr @ EMF

Customer Sample#:

Qualifier


PSERIA2.75Nitrogen, Ammonia Total SM4500-NH3D D21 7/31/2013mg/LJPATTIS< 0.400Nitrogen, Nitrate-Nitrite Total EPA 300.0 0.4 7/24/2013mg/LPSERIA41.0Biochemical Oxygen Demand SM5210B 2 7/27/2013mg/LNSILIDE267Chemical Oxygen Demand SM5220D 50 7/23/2013mg/LNSILIDE87.0Hardness, Total SM2340C 1 7/23/2013mg/L CaCO3

GSMITH2< 0.005Antimony, Total EPA 200.8 D10.005 8/9/2013mg/LGSMITH2< 0.005Arsenic, Total EPA 200.8 D10.005 8/9/2013mg/LGSMITH20.101Barium, Total EPA 200.8 D1/M20.005 8/9/2013mg/LGSMITH2< 0.005Beryllium, Total EPA 200.8 D10.005 8/9/2013mg/LGSMITH2< 0.001Cadmium, Total EPA 200.8 0.001 8/9/2013mg/LGSMITH20.007Chromium, Total EPA 200.8 D1/M20.005 8/9/2013mg/LGSMITH20.044Copper, Total EPA 200.8 D1/M20.005 8/9/2013mg/LGSMITH20.010Lead, Total EPA 200.8 D10.005 8/9/2013mg/LGSMITH20.016Nickel, Total EPA 200.8 D10.005 8/9/2013mg/LGSMITH2< 0.005Selenium, Total EPA 200.8 D10.005 8/9/2013mg/LGSMITH2< 0.001Silver, Total EPA 200.8 0.001 8/9/2013mg/LGSMITH2< 0.005Thallium, Total EPA 200.8 D1/L4/M20.005 8/9/2013mg/LGSMITH20.215Zinc, Total EPA 200.8 D1/M20.005 8/9/2013mg/L


TAL0.22Orthophosphate EPA 300.0 0.2 7/22/2013mg/LPSERIA0.71Phosphorus, Total SM4500-P 0.1 7/23/2013mg/LNSILIDE152Solids, Suspended Total SM2540D 10 7/23/2013mg/LNSILIDE180Solids, Total Dissolved SM2540C 20 7/23/2013mg/L

Quality Control

Page 1 of 5

Quality Control

Standard Conc.

mg/L mg/L

%REC

Parameter



Fluoride 0.5 97 QC13072501 LFB0.486Fluoride 0.5 98 QC13072501 ICV0.489Fluoride 0.5 98 QC13072501 CCV0.491





Copper, Total 0.05 90 QC13081201 LFB0.04512

BLANK

Parameter

mg/L QC BATCH

Nitrogen, Ammonia Total < 1 mg/L QC13073103Biochemical Oxygen Demand < 2 mg/L QC13072801








Page 2 of 5


mg/L

Actual Conc.

mg/L

%RPD

Parameter


Biochemical Oxygen Demand 13050481 41.0 mg/L 38 QC130728017.59Solids, Suspended Total 13070263 4060 mg/L 4140 QC130724021.95Solids, Total Dissolved 13050469 212 mg/L 206 QC130724052.87


Value

mg/L

Sample Conc.

mg/L

%REC

Parameter

mg/L


MSAntimony, Total 13050477810.05 < 0.025 mg/L 0.04059 QC13081201MSArsenic, Total 13050477780.05 < 0.025 mg/L 0.03922 QC13081201MSBarium, Total 13050477630.05 0.030 mg/L 0.06128 QC13081201MSBeryllium, Total 13050477890.05 < 0.025 mg/L 0.04431 QC13081201MSCadmium, Total 13050477760.05 0.001 mg/L 0.03999 QC13081201MSChemical Oxygen Demand 1305047795500 56 mg/L 533 QC13072403MSChromium, Total 13050477630.05 < 0.025 mg/L 0.04384 QC13081201MSCopper, Total 13050477670.05 < 0.025 mg/L 0.04339 QC13081201MSHardness, Total 1305047710450 18.0 mg/L CaCO3 70 QC13072301MSLead, Total 13050477730.05 < 0.025 mg/L 0.04910 QC13081201MSNickel, Total 13050477730.05 < 0.025 mg/L 0.04052 QC13081201MSNitrogen, Ammonia Total 13050479992.5 < 2.5 mg/L 4.03 QC13073103MSNitrogen, Kjeldahl Total 130504691005 3.63 mg/L 8.63 QC13072908MSPhosphorus, Total 13050477990.3 0.15 mg/L 0.4462 QC13072404MSSelenium, Total 13050477870.05 < 0.025 mg/L 0.04358 QC13081201MSSilver, Total 13050477960.05 < 0.001 mg/L 0.04785 QC13081201MSThallium, Total 13050477660.05 < 0.025 mg/L 0.03283 QC13081201MSZinc, Total 13050477220.05 0.123 mg/L 0.13415 QC13081201

MSDChemical Oxygen Demand 1305047793500 56 mg/L 522 QC130724032.09MSDHardness, Total 1305047710250 18.0 mg/L CaCO3 69 QC130723011.44MSDNitrogen, Ammonia Total 130504791002.5 < 2.5 mg/L 4.065 QC130731030.86MSDNitrogen, Kjeldahl Total 130504691025 3.63 mg/L 8.72 QC130729081.04

Copper, Total 0.01 103 QC13081201 ICV0.01025Copper, Total 0.05 115 QC13081201 CCV0.05745Lead, Total 0.05 91 QC13081201 LFB0.04560Lead, Total 0.01 100 QC13081201 ICV0.00995Lead, Total 0.05 103 QC13081201 CCV0.05152Nickel, Total 0.05 88 QC13081201 LFB0.04411Nickel, Total 0.01 101 QC13081201 ICV0.01013Nickel, Total 0.05 100 QC13081201 CCV0.04997








Page 3 of 5

QUALIFIERS

COMMENTS



Cd analyzed 8/13/13, QC available upon request. GSD1 = Sample required dilution due to matrix. M2 = Matrix spike recovery low; the associated blank spike acceptable.

Ag analyzed 8/13/13, QC available upon request. GSD1 = Sample required dilution due to matrix. L4 = Associated blank spike (Tl) recovery was below method limits. M2 = Matrix spike recovery low.D1 = Sample required dilution due to matrix. M2 = Matrix spike recovery low; the associated blank spike acceptable.


MSDPhosphorus, Total 13050477980.3 0.15 mg/L 0.4442 QC130724040.45

Page 4 of 5

Page 5 of 5





Attn: Scott Bouchie

OrderID: 130524017



DateMRL

RESULTS

Collection Time: 10:50:00 PMCollector: AC Project ID: Univ Discrete-Partial

Site: Univ Dr @ EMF

Customer Sample#:

Qualifier



TAL< 11.0Petroleum Hyrodcarbons, Total EPA 1664A 11 8/1/2013mg/LACHAVEZ7.07pH-Field SM4500H B 1 7/20/2013S.U.ACHAVEZ29.5Temperature-Field SM2550B 1 7/20/2013°C

QUALIFIERS

COMMENTS


Quality Control


Value

mg/L

Sample Conc.

mg/L

%REC

Parameter

mg/L




Standard Conc.

mg/L mg/L

%REC

Parameter



BLANK

Parameter

mg/L QC BATCH


Page 1 of 2

Page 2 of 2





Attn: John Meyer

OrderID: 130815016



DateMRL

RESULTS

Collection Time: 7:10:00 PMCollector: D. Cameron Project ID: 54 Comp-Partial

Site: 54th St @ EMF

Customer Sample#:

Qualifier


PSERIA1.42Nitrogen, Ammonia Total SM4500-NH3D D20.2 9/5/2013mg/LJPATTIS1.14Nitrogen, Nitrate-Nitrite Total EPA 300.0 D10.5 9/10/2013mg/LKH/GS13.2Biochemical Oxygen Demand SM5210B K52 9/6/2013mg/L

NSILIDE86Chemical Oxygen Demand SM5220D 50 9/3/2013mg/LNSILIDE28.0Hardness, Total SM2340C 1 9/3/2013mg/L CaCO3

GSMITH2< 0.005Antimony, Total EPA 200.8 D10.005 9/4/2013mg/LGSMITH2< 0.005Arsenic, Total EPA 200.8 D10.005 9/4/2013mg/LGSMITH20.048Barium, Total EPA 200.8 D10.005 9/4/2013mg/LGSMITH2< 0.005Beryllium, Total EPA 200.8 D10.005 9/4/2013mg/LGSMITH2< 0.005Cadmium, Total EPA 200.8 D10.005 9/4/2013mg/LGSMITH2< 0.005Chromium, Total EPA 200.8 D10.005 9/4/2013mg/LGSMITH20.015Copper, Total EPA 200.8 D10.005 9/4/2013mg/LGSMITH20.007Lead, Total EPA 200.8 D10.005 9/4/2013mg/LGSMITH20.006Nickel, Total EPA 200.8 D10.005 9/4/2013mg/LGSMITH2< 0.005Selenium, Total EPA 200.8 D1/M1/V30.005 9/4/2013mg/LGSMITH2< 0.001Silver, Total EPA 200.8 D10.001 9/4/2013mg/LGSMITH2< 0.005Thallium, Total EPA 200.8 D10.005 9/4/2013mg/LGSMITH20.068Zinc, Total EPA 200.8 D1/M10.005 9/4/2013mg/L

TAL< 0.00020Mercury, Total EPA245.1 D10.0002 9/10/2013mg/LPSERIA2.80Nitrogen, Kjeldahl Total SM4500-Norg 0.5 9/5/2013mg/L

TAL0.22Orthophosphate EPA 300.0 D10.2 8/31/2013mg/LPSERIA0.44Phosphorus, Total SM4500-P 0.1 9/3/2013mg/LNSILIDE62.0Solids, Suspended Total SM2540D 10 9/5/2013mg/LNSILIDE122Solids, Total Dissolved SM2540C 20 9/4/2013mg/L

Quality Control

Page 1 of 5

Quality Control

Standard Conc.

mg/L mg/L

%REC

Parameter



Nitrogen, Nitrate-Nitrite Total 1.25 95 QC13091201 LFB1.19Nitrogen, Nitrate-Nitrite Total 1.25 94 QC13091201 ICV1.18Nitrogen, Nitrate-Nitrite Total 1.25 97 QC13091201 CCV1.213Biochemical Oxygen Demand 198 105 QC13090901 LCS208.0

Chemical Oxygen Demand 500 99 QC13090307 ICV496Chemical Oxygen Demand 500 100 QC13090307 CCV498



Copper, Total 0.05 101 QC13091001 LFB0.05066Copper, Total 0.01 97 QC13091001 ICV0.00972Copper, Total 0.05 101 QC13091001 CCV0.05034

BLANK

Parameter

mg/L QC BATCH









Page 2 of 5


mg/L

Actual Conc.

mg/L

%RPD

Parameter


Biochemical Oxygen Demand 13080554 13.2 mg/L 13.3 QC130909010.75Solids, Suspended Total 13080554 62.0 mg/L 64 QC130905023.17Solids, Total Dissolved 13080554 122 mg/L 120 QC130905031.65


Value

mg/L

Sample Conc.

mg/L

%REC

Parameter

mg/L


MSAntimony, Total 13080554870.05 < 0.025 mg/L 0.04454 QC13091001MSArsenic, Total 130805541280.05 < 0.025 mg/L 0.06391 QC13091001MSBarium, Total 130805541260.05 0.048 mg/L 0.11071 QC13091001MSBeryllium, Total 13080554970.05 < 0.025 mg/L 0.0483 QC13091001MSCadmium, Total 130805541020.05 < 0.025 mg/L 0.05075 QC13091001MSChemical Oxygen Demand 1308055495500 86 mg/L 559 QC13090307MSChromium, Total 13080554940.05 < 0.025 mg/L 0.05127 QC13091001MSCopper, Total 130805541130.05 < 0.025 mg/L 0.07114 QC13091001MSHardness, Total 1308055410450 28.0 mg/L CaCO3 80.2 QC13090304MSLead, Total 130805541080.05 < 0.025 mg/L 0.06155 QC13091001MSNickel, Total 130805541090.05 < 0.025 mg/L 0.06017 QC13091001MSNitrogen, Ammonia Total 130807571000.5 0.380 mg/L 0.886 QC13090506MSNitrogen, Kjeldahl Total 130805541025 2.80 mg/L 7.89 QC13090507MSNitrogen, Nitrate-Nitrite Total 13080554841 1.14 mg/L 1.974 QC13091201MSPhosphorus, Total 130805541080.3 0.44 mg/L 0.7654 QC13090309MSSelenium, Total 130805541450.05 < 0.025 mg/L 0.07345 QC13091001MSSilver, Total 130805541150.05 < 0.005 mg/L 0.05740 QC13091001MSThallium, Total 13080554910.05 < 0.025 mg/L 0.04548 QC13091001MSZinc, Total 130805541420.05 0.068 mg/L 0.13923 QC13091001

MSDAntimony, Total 13080554830.05 < 0.025 mg/L 0.04258 QC130910014.50MSDArsenic, Total 130805541220.05 < 0.025 mg/L 0.06120 QC130910014.33MSDBarium, Total 130805541190.05 0.048 mg/L 0.10733 QC130910016.36MSDBeryllium, Total 13080554960.05 < 0.025 mg/L 0.04780 QC130910011.04MSDCadmium, Total 13080554990.05 < 0.025 mg/L 0.04970 QC130910012.09

Lead, Total 0.05 98 QC13091001 LFB0.04885Lead, Total 0.01 97 QC13091001 ICV0.00967Lead, Total 0.05 98 QC13091001 CCV0.04914Nickel, Total 0.05 101 QC13091001 LFB0.05063Nickel, Total 0.01 96 QC13091001 ICV0.00962Nickel, Total 0.05 101 QC13091001 CCV0.05065








Page 3 of 5

QUALIFIERS

COMMENTS


D1 = Sample required dilution due to matrix. V3 = (Se) CCV recovery was above method acceptance limits. M1 = (Se/Zn) matrix spike recovery was high; the associated blank spike recovery was acceptable.

D1 = Sample required dilution due to matrix. M1 = (Se/Zn) matrix spike recovery was high; the associated blank spike recovery was acceptable.


K5 The dilution water D.O. depletion was > 0.2 mg/L.

MSDChemical Oxygen Demand 1308055495500 86 mg/L 559 QC130903070.00MSDChromium, Total 13080554920.05 < 0.025 mg/L 0.04997 QC130910012.57MSDCopper, Total 130805541080.05 < 0.025 mg/L 0.06877 QC130910013.39MSDHardness, Total 1308055410450 28.0 mg/L CaCO3 79.9 QC130903040.37MSDLead, Total 130805541010.05 < 0.025 mg/L 0.05794 QC130910016.04MSDNickel, Total 130805541050.05 < 0.025 mg/L 0.05817 QC130910013.38MSDNitrogen, Ammonia Total 130807571040.5 0.380 mg/L 0.902 QC130905061.79MSDNitrogen, Kjeldahl Total 130805541025 2.80 mg/L 7.91 QC130905070.25MSDNitrogen, Nitrate-Nitrite Total 13080554851 1.14 mg/L 1.991 QC130912010.86MSDPhosphorus, Total 130805541060.3 0.44 mg/L 0.7611 QC130903090.56MSDSelenium, Total 130805541390.05 < 0.025 mg/L 0.07066 QC130910013.87MSDSilver, Total 130805541110.05 < 0.005 mg/L 0.05566 QC130910013.08MSDThallium, Total 13080554890.05 < 0.025 mg/L 0.04457 QC130910012.02MSDZinc, Total 130805541400.05 0.068 mg/L 0.13860 QC130910010.45

Page 4 of 5

Page 5 of 5





Attn: John Meyer

OrderID: 131101004



DateMRL

RESULTS

Collection Time: 12:30:00 AMCollector: AC Project ID: 54 Comp-Full

Site: 54th St @ EMF

Customer Sample#:

Qualifier


PSERIA1.00Nitrogen, Ammonia Total SM4500-NH3D D20.5 11/27/2013mg/LPSERIA1.02Nitrogen, Nitrate-Nitrite Total EPA 300.0 D10.5 11/26/2013mg/L

TAL< 0.0211,2,4-Trichlorobenzene EPA625TAL 0.021 11/30/2013mg/LTAL< 0.0211,2-Diphenylhydrazine EPA625TAL 0.021 11/30/2013mg/LTAL< 0.0212,4,6-Trichlorophenol EPA625TAL 0.021 11/30/2013mg/LTAL< 0.0212,4-Dichlorophenol EPA625TAL 0.021 11/30/2013mg/LTAL< 0.0212,4-Dimethylphenol EPA625TAL 0.021 11/30/2013mg/LTAL< 0.0212,4-Dinitrophenol EPA625TAL 0.021 11/30/2013mg/LTAL< 0.1102,4-Dinitrotoluene EPA625TAL 0.11 11/30/2013mg/LTAL< 0.0212,6-Dinitrotoluene EPA625TAL 0.021 11/30/2013mg/LTAL< 0.0212-Chlorophenol EPA625TAL 0.021 11/30/2013mg/LTAL< 0.0322-Nitrophenol EPA625TAL 0.032 11/30/2013mg/LTAL< 0.0213,3-Dichlorobenzidine EPA625TAL 0.021 11/30/2013mg/LTAL< 0.0214,6-Dinitro-o-cresol EPA625TAL 0.021 11/30/2013mg/LTAL< 0.0534-Nitrophenol EPA625TAL 0.053 11/30/2013mg/LTAL< 0.021Acenaphthene EPA625TAL 0.021 11/30/2013mg/LTAL< 0.021Acenaphthylene EPA625TAL 0.021 11/30/2013mg/LTAL< 0.021Anthracene EPA625TAL 0.021 11/30/2013mg/LTAL< 0.021Diethyl phthalate EPA625TAL 0.021 11/30/2013mg/LTAL< 0.043Dimethyl phthalate EPA625TAL 0.043 11/30/2013mg/LTAL< 0.021Di-n-butylphthalate EPA625TAL 0.021 11/30/2013mg/LTAL< 0.021Di-n-octyl phthalate EPA625TAL 0.021 11/30/2013mg/LTAL< 0.021Flouranthene EPA625TAL 0.021 11/30/2013mg/LTAL< 0.021Flourene EPA625TAL 0.021 11/30/2013mg/LTAL< 0.021Hexachlorobenzene EPA625TAL 0.021 11/30/2013mg/LTAL< 0.021Hexachlorobutadiene EPA625TAL 0.021 11/30/2013mg/LTAL< 0.021Hexachlorocyclopentadiene EPA625TAL 0.021 11/30/2013mg/LTAL< 0.021Hexachloroethane EPA625TAL 0.021 11/30/2013mg/L

Page 1 of 6

TAL< 0.021Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene EPA625TAL 0.021 11/30/2013mg/LTAL< 0.021Isophorone EPA625TAL 0.021 11/30/2013mg/LTAL< 0.021Naphthalene EPA625TAL 0.021 11/30/2013mg/LTAL< 0.021Nitrobenzene EPA625TAL 0.021 11/30/2013mg/LTAL< 0.021n-Nitrosodimethylamine EPA625TAL 0.021 11/30/2013mg/LTAL< 0.021n-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine EPA625TAL 0.021 11/30/2013mg/LTAL< 0.021n-Nitrosodiphenylamine EPA625TAL 0.021 11/30/2013mg/LTAL< 0.021p-Chloro-m-cresol EPA625TAL 0.021 11/30/2013mg/LTAL< 0.110Pentachlorophenol EPA625TAL 0.11 11/30/2013mg/LTAL< 0.021Phenanthrene EPA625TAL 0.021 11/30/2013mg/LTAL< 0.021Phenol EPA625TAL 0.021 11/30/2013mg/LTAL< 0.021Pyrene EPA625TAL 0.021 11/30/2013mg/L

GSMITH217.6Biochemical Oxygen Demand SM5210B 2 11/22/2013mg/LTAL140Chemical Oxygen Demand SM5220D 20 11/25/2013mg/L

NSILIDE42.0Hardness, Total SM2340C 1 11/25/2013mg/L CaCO3GSMITH20.002Antimony, Total EPA 200.8 0.001 12/12/2013mg/LGSMITH20.003Arsenic, Total EPA 200.8 M10.001 12/12/2013mg/LGSMITH20.094Barium, Total EPA 200.8 0.001 12/12/2013mg/LGSMITH2< 0.001Beryllium, Total EPA 200.8 0.001 12/12/2013mg/LGSMITH2< 0.001Cadmium, Total EPA 200.8 0.001 12/12/2013mg/LGSMITH20.007Chromium, Total EPA 200.8 0.001 12/12/2013mg/LGSMITH20.028Copper, Total EPA 200.8 0.001 12/12/2013mg/LGSMITH20.012Lead, Total EPA 200.8 0.001 12/12/2013mg/LGSMITH20.009Nickel, Total EPA 200.8 0.001 12/12/2013mg/LGSMITH2< 0.001Selenium, Total EPA 200.8 M10.001 12/12/2013mg/LGSMITH2< 0.001Silver, Total EPA 200.8 V90.001 12/12/2013mg/LGSMITH2< 0.001Thallium, Total EPA 200.8 0.001 12/12/2013mg/LGSMITH20.178Zinc, Total EPA 200.8 0.001 12/12/2013mg/L

TAL< 0.00020Mercury, Total EPA245.1 0.0002 11/26/2013mg/LTAL3.20Nitrogen, Kjeldahl Total SM4500-Norg 1 12/2/2013mg/LTAL< 0.001104,4'-DDD EPA608TAL 0.0011 12/4/2013mg/LTAL< 0.001104,4'-DDE EPA608TAL 0.0011 12/4/2013mg/LTAL< 0.001104,4'-DDT EPA608TAL 0.0011 12/4/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00110Aldrin EPA608TAL 0.0011 12/4/2013mg/LTAL< 0.000500alpha-BHC EPA608TAL 0.0005 12/4/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00370Aroclor 1016 EPA608TAL 0.0037 12/4/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00440Aroclor 1221 EPA608TAL 0.0044 12/4/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00770Aroclor 1232 EPA608TAL 0.0077 12/4/2013mg/LTAL< 0.0100Aroclor 1242 EPA608TAL 0.01 12/4/2013mg/LTAL< 0.0220Aroclor 1248 EPA608TAL 0.022 12/4/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00400Aroclor 1254 EPA608TAL 0.004 12/4/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00330Aroclor 1260 EPA608TAL 0.0033 12/4/2013mg/LTAL< 0.000500beta-BHC EPA608TAL 0.0005 12/4/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00180Chlordane EPA608TAL 0.0018 12/4/2013mg/L

Page 2 of 6

TAL< 0.00110delta-BHC EPA608TAL 0.0011 12/4/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00110Dieldrin EPA608TAL 0.0011 12/4/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00110Endosulfan I (Alpha) EPA608TAL 0.0011 12/4/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00110Endosulfan II (Beta) EPA608TAL 0.0011 12/4/2013mg/LTAL< 0.000500Endosulfan sulfate EPA608TAL 0.0005 12/4/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00110Endrin EPA608TAL 0.0011 12/4/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00110Endrin aldehyde EPA608TAL 0.0011 12/4/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00110Heptachlor EPA608TAL 0.0011 12/4/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00110Heptachlor epoxide EPA608TAL 0.0011 12/4/2013mg/LTAL< 0.000500Lindane EPA608TAL 0.0005 12/4/2013mg/LTAL< 0.0110Toxaphene EPA608TAL 0.011 12/4/2013mg/LTAL0.36Orthophosphate EPA 300.0 0.2 11/22/2013mg/LTAL< 0.000052Benzo (a) pyrene EPA 8310 0.000052 11/26/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00021Benzo(a)anthracene EPA 8310 0.00021 11/26/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00010Benzo(b)fluoranthene EPA 8310 0.0001 11/26/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00010Benzo(g,h,i)perylene EPA 8310 0.0001 11/26/2013mg/LTAL< 0.000052Benzo(k)fluoranthene EPA 8310 0.000052 11/26/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00010Chrysene EPA 8310 0.0001 11/26/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00010Dibenz(a,h)anthracene EPA 8310 0.0001 11/26/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00010Ideno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene EPA 8310 0.0001 11/26/2013mg/LTAL1.30Phosphorus, Total SM4500-P 0.5 11/25/2013mg/L

NSILIDE248Solids, Suspended Total SM2540D 10 11/25/2013mg/LNSILIDE118Solids, Total Dissolved SM2540C 20 11/25/2013mg/L

Quality Control

BLANK

Parameter

mg/L QC BATCH


Hardness, Total < 1 mg/L CaCO3QC13112502Antimony, Total < 0.001 mg/L QC13121801Arsenic, Total < 0.001 mg/L QC13121801Barium, Total < 0.001 mg/L QC13121801






Page 3 of 6

Standard Conc.

mg/L mg/L

%REC

Parameter



Nitrogen, Nitrate Total 1 0 QC13120304 LFBN/ANitrogen, Nitrate Total 20 0 QC13120304 ICVN/ANitrogen, Nitrate Total 1 0 QC13120304 CCVN/A

Nitrogen, Nitrate-Nitrite Total 2 97 QC13120304 LFB1.944Nitrogen, Nitrate-Nitrite Total 2 94 QC13120304 ICV1.884Nitrogen, Nitrate-Nitrite Total 2 98 QC13120304 CCV1.957

Nitrogen, Nitrite Total 1 0 QC13120304 LFBN/ANitrogen, Nitrite Total 1 0 QC13120304 ICVN/ANitrogen, Nitrite Total 1 0 QC13120304 CCVN/A

Biochemical Oxygen Demand 198 111 QC13112701 LCS219Hardness, Total 100 100 QC13112502 LCS100.48Antimony, Total 0.05 110 QC13121801 LFB0.05521Antimony, Total 0.01 100 QC13121801 ICV0.01004Antimony, Total 0.05 97 QC13121801 CCV0.04857Arsenic, Total 0.05 111 QC13121801 LFB0.05534Arsenic, Total 0.01 98 QC13121801 ICV0.00975Arsenic, Total 0.05 96 QC13121801 CCV0.04779Barium, Total 0.05 107 QC13121801 LFB0.05372Barium, Total 0.01 100 QC13121801 ICV0.01001Barium, Total 0.05 100 QC13121801 CCV0.04993


Copper, Total 0.05 111 QC13121801 LFB0.05557Copper, Total 0.01 92 QC13121801 ICV0.00922Copper, Total 0.05 95 QC13121801 CCV0.04773Lead, Total 0.05 107 QC13121801 LFB0.05374Lead, Total 0.01 97 QC13121801 ICV0.00965Lead, Total 0.05 101 QC13121801 CCV0.05051Nickel, Total 0.05 113 QC13121801 LFB0.05630Nickel, Total 0.01 97 QC13121801 ICV0.00966Nickel, Total 0.05 101 QC13121801 CCV0.05072






Page 4 of 6

QUALIFIERS

COMMENTS


M1 = As/Se MS/MSD spike recoveries high; associated blank spike recovery was acceptable.

V9 = Ag CCV recovery was below method limits; target analyte was not detected in samples.

D2 Sample diluted due to high concentration. D1 Sample diluted due to matrix interference.

M1 Matrix spike rec. high, control rec. acceptable. V9 CCV recovery below method limits.


mg/L

Actual Conc.

mg/L

%RPD

Parameter




Value

mg/L

Sample Conc.

mg/L

%REC

Parameter

mg/L


MSAntimony, Total 131100101040.05 0.004 mg/L 0.05615 QC13121801MSArsenic, Total 131100101310.05 0.001 mg/L 0.06682 QC13121801MSBarium, Total 131100101070.05 0.037 mg/L 0.09089 QC13121801MSBeryllium, Total 131100101030.05 < 0.001 mg/L 0.05140 QC13121801MSCadmium, Total 131100101090.05 < 0.001 mg/L 0.05444 QC13121801MSChromium, Total 131100101050.05 0.003 mg/L 0.05618 QC13121801MSCopper, Total 13110010990.05 0.063 mg/L 0.11215 QC13121801MSHardness, Total 1311024010650 279 mg/L CaCO3 332 QC13112502MSLead, Total 131100101110.05 0.004 mg/L 0.05941 QC13121801MSNickel, Total 131100101050.05 0.006 mg/L 0.05814 QC13121801MSNitrogen, Ammonia Total 131102081040.5 < 0.1 mg/L 0.571 QC13120301MSNitrogen, Nitrate-Nitrite Total 13110371972 4.85 mg/L 6.799 QC13120304MSSelenium, Total 131100101470.05 < 0.001 mg/L 0.07340 QC13121801MSSilver, Total 131100101230.05 < 0.001 mg/L 0.06164 QC13121801MSThallium, Total 131100101140.05 < 0.001 mg/L 0.05720 QC13121801MSZinc, Total 13110010910.05 0.208 mg/L 0.25304 QC13121801

MSDAntimony, Total 131100101010.05 0.004 mg/L 0.05431 QC131218013.33MSDArsenic, Total 131100101260.05 0.001 mg/L 0.06427 QC131218013.89MSDBarium, Total 131100101020.05 0.037 mg/L 0.08803 QC131218013.20MSDBeryllium, Total 13110010960.05 < 0.001 mg/L 0.04824 QC131218016.34MSDCadmium, Total 131100101060.05 < 0.001 mg/L 0.05279 QC131218013.08MSDChromium, Total 131100101040.05 0.003 mg/L 0.05547 QC131218011.27MSDCopper, Total 13110010920.05 0.063 mg/L 0.10852 QC131218013.29MSDHardness, Total 1311024010850 279 mg/L CaCO3 333 QC131125020.30MSDLead, Total 131100101070.05 0.004 mg/L 0.05717 QC131218013.84MSDNickel, Total 131100101010.05 0.006 mg/L 0.05642 QC131218013.00MSDNitrogen, Ammonia Total 131102081020.5 < 0.1 mg/L 0.561 QC131203011.77MSDNitrogen, Nitrate-Nitrite Total 13110371972 4.85 mg/L 6.787 QC131203040.18MSDSelenium, Total 131100101400.05 < 0.001 mg/L 0.07010 QC131218014.60MSDSilver, Total 131100101120.05 < 0.001 mg/L 0.05604 QC131218019.52MSDThallium, Total 131100101100.05 < 0.001 mg/L 0.05513 QC131218013.69MSDZinc, Total 13110010760.05 0.208 mg/L 0.24567 QC131218012.96

Page 5 of 6

Page 6 of 6





Attn: John Meyer

OrderID: 131101006



DateMRL

RESULTS

Collection Time: 10:48:00 PMCollector: D. Cameron Project ID: Alma Comp-Full


Customer Sample#:

Qualifier




Page 1 of 6

TAL< 0.044Isophorone EPA625TAL 0.044 11/30/2013mg/LTAL< 0.044Naphthalene EPA625TAL 0.044 11/30/2013mg/LTAL< 0.044Nitrobenzene EPA625TAL 0.044 11/30/2013mg/LTAL< 0.044n-Nitrosodimethylamine EPA625TAL 0.044 11/30/2013mg/LTAL< 0.044n-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine EPA625TAL 0.044 11/30/2013mg/LTAL< 0.044n-Nitrosodiphenylamine EPA625TAL 0.044 11/30/2013mg/LTAL< 0.044p-Chloro-m-cresol EPA625TAL 0.044 11/30/2013mg/LTAL< 0.220Pentachlorophenol EPA625TAL 0.22 11/30/2013mg/LTAL< 0.044Phenanthrene EPA625TAL 0.044 11/30/2013mg/LTAL< 0.044Phenol EPA625TAL 0.044 11/30/2013mg/LTAL< 0.044Pyrene EPA625TAL 0.044 11/30/2013mg/L

GSMITH230.4Biochemical Oxygen Demand SM5210B 2 11/22/2013mg/L170Chemical Oxygen Demand SM5220D 20 11/25/2013mg/L


TAL< 0.00020Mercury, Total EPA245.1 0.0002 11/26/2013mg/LTAL3.30Nitrogen, Kjeldahl Total SM4500-Norg 1 12/2/2013mg/LTAL< 0.001104,4'-DDD EPA608TAL 0.0011 12/4/2013mg/LTAL< 0.001104,4'-DDE EPA608TAL 0.0011 12/4/2013mg/LTAL< 0.001104,4'-DDT EPA608TAL 0.0011 12/4/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00110Aldrin EPA608TAL 0.0011 12/4/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00110alpha-BHC EPA608TAL 0.0011 12/4/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00370Aroclor 1016 EPA608TAL 0.0037 12/4/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00440Aroclor 1221 EPA608TAL 0.0044 12/4/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00770Aroclor 1232 EPA608TAL 0.0077 12/4/2013mg/LTAL< 0.0100Aroclor 1242 EPA608TAL 0.01 12/4/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00400Aroclor 1248 EPA608TAL 0.004 12/4/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00630Aroclor 1254 EPA608TAL 0.0063 12/4/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00330Aroclor 1260 EPA608TAL 0.0033 12/4/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00110beta-BHC EPA608TAL 0.0011 12/4/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00110Chlordane EPA608TAL 0.0011 12/4/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00110delta-BHC EPA608TAL 0.0011 12/4/2013mg/L

Page 2 of 6

TAL< 0.00110Dieldrin EPA608TAL 0.0011 12/4/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00110Endosulfan I (Alpha) EPA608TAL 0.0011 12/4/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00110Endosulfan II (Beta) EPA608TAL 0.0011 12/4/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00110Endosulfan sulfate EPA608TAL 0.0011 12/4/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00110Endrin EPA608TAL 0.0011 12/4/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00110Endrin aldehyde EPA608TAL 0.0011 12/4/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00110Heptachlor EPA608TAL 0.0011 12/4/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00110Heptachlor epoxide EPA608TAL 0.0011 12/4/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00110Lindane EPA608TAL 0.0011 12/4/2013mg/LTAL< 0.0220Toxaphene EPA608TAL 0.022 12/4/2013mg/LTAL0.29Orthophosphate EPA 300.0 0.2 11/22/2013mg/LTAL0.000100Benzo (a) pyrene EPA 8310 0.000055 11/27/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00022Benzo(a)anthracene EPA 8310 0.00022 11/27/2013mg/LTAL0.00033Benzo(b)fluoranthene EPA 8310 0.00011 11/27/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00011Benzo(g,h,i)perylene EPA 8310 0.00011 11/27/2013mg/LTAL0.000170Benzo(k)fluoranthene EPA 8310 0.000055 11/27/2013mg/LTAL0.00023Chrysene EPA 8310 0.00018 11/27/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00011Dibenz(a,h)anthracene EPA 8310 0.00011 11/27/2013mg/LTAL0.00011Ideno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene EPA 8310 0.00011 11/27/2013mg/LTAL0.45Phosphorus, Total SM4500-P 0.1 11/25/2013mg/L

NSILIDE80.0Solids, Suspended Total SM2540D 10 11/25/2013mg/LNSILIDE158Solids, Total Dissolved SM2540C 20 11/25/2013mg/L

Quality Control

BLANK

Parameter

mg/L QC BATCH








Page 3 of 6

Standard Conc.

mg/L mg/L

%REC

Parameter














Page 4 of 6

QUALIFIERS

COMMENTS







mg/L

Actual Conc.

mg/L

%RPD

Parameter




Value

mg/L

Sample Conc.

mg/L

%REC

Parameter

mg/L




Page 5 of 6

Page 6 of 6





Attn: John Meyer

OrderID: 131101007



DateMRL

RESULTS

Collection Time: 10:48:00 PMCollector: AC Project ID: Alma Discrete-Full


Customer Sample#:

Qualifier


TAL< 0.001002-Chloroethyl vinyl ether EPA624TAL 0.001 11/23/2013mg/LTAL< 0.030Acrolein EPA624TAL 0.03 11/23/2013mg/LTAL< 0.001Acrylonitrile EPA624TAL 0.001 11/23/2013mg/LTAL< 0.020Cyanide, Total SM4500-CN E 0.02 11/29/2013mg/L

mrexing14600.0E. Coli, MPN SM9223B 2.2 11/22/2013mpn/100mlNSILIDE9.4Oil and Grease EPA 1664A 5 12/10/2013mg/L


TAL< 0.00051,1,1-Trichloroethane EPA624_LL 0.0005 12/2/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00051,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane EPA624_LL 0.0005 12/2/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00051,1,2-Trichloroethane EPA624_LL 0.0005 12/2/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00051,1-Dichloroethane EPA624_LL 0.0005 12/2/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00051,1-Dichloroethylene EPA624_LL 0.0005 12/2/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00201,2,4-Trimethylbenzene EPA624_LL 0.002 12/2/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00101,2-Dichlorobenzene EPA624_LL 0.001 12/2/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00051,2-Dichloroethane EPA624_LL 0.0005 12/2/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00051,2-Dichloropropane EPA624_LL 0.0005 12/2/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00101,3-Dichlorobenzene EPA624_LL 0.001 12/2/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00051,3-Dichloropropene, Total EPA624_LL 0.0005 12/2/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00101,4-Dichlorobenzene EPA624_LL 0.001 12/2/2013mg/LTAL< 0.0005Benzene EPA624_LL 0.0005 12/2/2013mg/LTAL< 0.0005Bromodichloromethane EPA624_LL 0.0005 12/2/2013mg/LTAL< 0.0010Bromoform EPA624_LL 0.001 12/2/2013mg/LTAL< 0.0005Carbon Tetrachloride EPA624_LL 0.0005 12/2/2013mg/LTAL< 0.0005Chlorobenzene EPA624_LL 0.0005 12/2/2013mg/LTAL< 0.0005Chlorodibromomethane EPA624_LL 0.0005 12/2/2013mg/LTAL< 0.0010Chloroethane EPA624_LL 0.001 12/2/2013mg/L

Page 1 of 3

TAL< 0.0005Chloroform EPA624_LL 0.0005 12/2/2013mg/LTAL< 0.0005Ethyl Benzene EPA624_LL 0.0005 12/2/2013mg/LTAL< 0.0010Methyl Bromide EPA624_LL 0.001 12/2/2013mg/LTAL< 0.0010Methyl Chloride EPA624_LL 0.001 12/2/2013mg/LTAL< 0.0050Methylene chloride EPA624_LL 0.005 12/2/2013mg/LTAL< 0.0005Tetrachloroethylene (PCE) EPA624_LL 0.0005 12/2/2013mg/LTAL< 0.0005Toluene EPA624_LL 0.0005 12/2/2013mg/LTAL< 0.0005trans-1,2-Dichloroethene EPA624_LL 0.0005 12/2/2013mg/LTAL< 0.0005Trichloroethylene (TCE) EPA624_LL 0.0005 12/2/2013mg/LTAL< 0.0005Vinyl Chloride EPA624_LL 0.0005 12/2/2013mg/LTAL< 0.0015Xylene, Total EPA624_LL 0.0015 12/2/2013mg/L

QUALIFIERS

COMMENTS


Quality Control


Value

mg/L

Sample Conc.

mg/L

%REC

Parameter

mg/L


MSOil and Grease 131102408940 < 5 mg/L 36.6 QC13121203

Standard Conc.

mg/L mg/L

%REC

Parameter


Oil and Grease 40 94 QC13121203 LCS37.4

BLANK

Parameter

mg/L QC BATCH


Page 2 of 3

Page 3 of 3





Attn: John Meyer

OrderID: 131101008



DateMRL

RESULTS

Collection Time: 5:14:00 AMCollector: D. Cameron Project ID: FF Comp-Full

Site: Falcon Field

Customer Sample#:

Qualifier


PSERIA0.29Nitrogen, Ammonia Total SM4500-NH3D 0.1 11/27/2013mg/LPSERIA< 0.500Nitrogen, Nitrate-Nitrite Total EPA 300.0 D10.5 11/26/2013mg/L


Page 1 of 6



NSILIDE21.0Hardness, Total SM2340C 1 11/25/2013mg/L CaCO3GSMITH2< 0.001Antimony, Total EPA 200.8 0.001 12/12/2013mg/LGSMITH20.001Arsenic, Total EPA 200.8 M10.001 12/12/2013mg/LGSMITH20.047Barium, Total EPA 200.8 0.001 12/12/2013mg/LGSMITH2< 0.001Beryllium, Total EPA 200.8 0.001 12/12/2013mg/LGSMITH2< 0.001Cadmium, Total EPA 200.8 0.001 12/12/2013mg/LGSMITH20.004Chromium, Total EPA 200.8 0.001 12/12/2013mg/LGSMITH20.008Copper, Total EPA 200.8 0.001 12/12/2013mg/LGSMITH20.008Lead, Total EPA 200.8 0.001 12/12/2013mg/LGSMITH20.005Nickel, Total EPA 200.8 0.001 12/12/2013mg/LGSMITH2< 0.001Selenium, Total EPA 200.8 M10.001 12/12/2013mg/LGSMITH2< 0.001Silver, Total EPA 200.8 V90.001 12/12/2013mg/LGSMITH2< 0.001Thallium, Total EPA 200.8 0.001 12/12/2013mg/LGSMITH20.060Zinc, Total EPA 200.8 0.001 12/12/2013mg/L

TAL< 0.00020Mercury, Total EPA245.1 0.0002 11/26/2013mg/LTAL1.10Nitrogen, Kjeldahl Total SM4500-Norg 0.16 12/2/2013mg/LTAL< 0.0002704,4'-DDD EPA608TAL 0.00027 12/4/2013mg/LTAL0.0003304,4'-DDE EPA608TAL 0.00014 12/4/2013mg/LTAL< 0.0001404,4'-DDT EPA608TAL 0.00014 12/4/2013mg/LTAL< 0.000150Aldrin EPA608TAL 0.00015 12/4/2013mg/LTAL< 0.000250alpha-BHC EPA608TAL 0.00025 12/4/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00370Aroclor 1016 EPA608TAL 0.0037 12/4/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00440Aroclor 1221 EPA608TAL 0.0044 12/4/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00750Aroclor 1232 EPA608TAL 0.0075 12/4/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00990Aroclor 1242 EPA608TAL 0.0099 12/4/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00390Aroclor 1248 EPA608TAL 0.0039 12/4/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00610Aroclor 1254 EPA608TAL 0.0061 12/4/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00320Aroclor 1260 EPA608TAL 0.0032 12/4/2013mg/LTAL< 0.000160beta-BHC EPA608TAL 0.00016 12/4/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00180Chlordane EPA608TAL 0.0018 12/4/2013mg/LTAL< 0.000200delta-BHC EPA608TAL 0.0002 12/4/2013mg/L

Page 2 of 6

TAL< 0.000140Dieldrin EPA608TAL 0.00014 12/4/2013mg/LTAL< 0.000180Endosulfan I (Alpha) EPA608TAL 0.00018 12/4/2013mg/LTAL< 0.000140Endosulfan II (Beta) EPA608TAL 0.00014 12/4/2013mg/LTAL< 0.000140Endosulfan sulfate EPA608TAL 0.00014 12/4/2013mg/LTAL< 0.000160Endrin EPA608TAL 0.00016 12/4/2013mg/LTAL< 0.000200Endrin aldehyde EPA608TAL 0.0002 12/4/2013mg/LTAL< 0.000310Heptachlor EPA608TAL 0.00031 12/4/2013mg/LTAL< 0.000150Heptachlor epoxide EPA608TAL 0.00015 12/4/2013mg/LTAL< 0.000140Lindane EPA608TAL 0.00014 12/4/2013mg/LTAL< 0.000110Toxaphene EPA608TAL 0.00011 12/4/2013mg/LTAL< 0.20Orthophosphate EPA 300.0 0.2 11/22/2013mg/LTAL< 0.000053Benzo (a) pyrene EPA 8310 0.000053 11/26/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00021Benzo(a)anthracene EPA 8310 0.00021 11/26/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00011Benzo(b)fluoranthene EPA 8310 0.00011 11/26/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00011Benzo(g,h,i)perylene EPA 8310 0.00011 11/26/2013mg/LTAL< 0.000053Benzo(k)fluoranthene EPA 8310 0.000053 11/26/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00011Chrysene EPA 8310 0.00011 11/26/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00011Dibenz(a,h)anthracene EPA 8310 0.00011 11/26/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00011Ideno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene EPA 8310 0.00011 11/26/2013mg/LTAL0.24Phosphorus, Total SM4500-P 0.1 11/25/2013mg/L

NSILIDE140Solids, Suspended Total SM2540D 10 11/25/2013mg/LNSILIDE49.0Solids, Total Dissolved SM2540C 20 11/25/2013mg/L

Quality Control

BLANK

Parameter

mg/L QC BATCH








Page 3 of 6

Standard Conc.

mg/L mg/L

%REC

Parameter














Page 4 of 6

QUALIFIERS

COMMENTS


D1 Sample diluted due to matrix interference. M1 Matrix spike rec. high, control rec. acceptable.

V9 CCV recovery below method limits.


mg/L

Actual Conc.

mg/L

%RPD

Parameter




Value

mg/L

Sample Conc.

mg/L

%REC

Parameter

mg/L




Page 5 of 6

Page 6 of 6





Attn: John Meyer

OrderID: 131101009



DateMRL

RESULTS

Collection Time: 1:20:00 AMCollector: AC Project ID: FF Discrete-Full

Site: Falcon Field

Customer Sample#:

Qualifier



mrexing178.0E. Coli, MPN SM9223B 2.2 11/22/2013mpn/100mlNSILIDE< 5.0Oil and Grease EPA 1664A 5 12/9/2013mg/L



Page 1 of 3


QUALIFIERS

COMMENTS


Quality Control

Standard Conc.

mg/L mg/L

%REC

Parameter



BLANK

Parameter

mg/L QC BATCH


Page 2 of 3

Page 3 of 3





Attn: John Meyer

OrderID: 131101010



DateMRL

RESULTS

Collection Time: 12:05:00 AMCollector: AC Project ID: SS Comp-Full


Customer Sample#:

Qualifier




Page 1 of 6


GSMITH223.4Biochemical Oxygen Demand SM5210B K22 11/22/2013mg/LTAL220Chemical Oxygen Demand SM5220D 20 11/25/2013mg/L



Page 2 of 6

TAL< 0.00110Dieldrin EPA608TAL 0.0011 12/4/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00110Endosulfan I (Alpha) EPA608TAL 0.0011 12/4/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00110Endosulfan II (Beta) EPA608TAL 0.0011 12/4/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00110Endosulfan sulfate EPA608TAL 0.0011 12/4/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00110Endrin EPA608TAL 0.0011 12/4/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00110Endrin aldehyde EPA608TAL 0.0011 12/4/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00110Heptachlor EPA608TAL 0.0011 12/4/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00110Heptachlor epoxide EPA608TAL 0.0011 12/4/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00110Lindane EPA608TAL 0.0011 12/4/2013mg/LTAL< 0.0210Toxaphene EPA608TAL 0.021 12/4/2013mg/LTAL0.37Orthophosphate EPA 300.0 0.2 11/22/2013mg/LTAL0.000330Benzo (a) pyrene EPA 8310 0.000055 11/26/2013mg/LTAL0.00023Benzo(a)anthracene EPA 8310 0.00022 11/26/2013mg/LTAL0.00089Benzo(b)fluoranthene EPA 8310 0.00011 11/26/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00011Benzo(g,h,i)perylene EPA 8310 0.00011 11/26/2013mg/LTAL0.000410Benzo(k)fluoranthene EPA 8310 0.000055 11/26/2013mg/LTAL0.00078Chrysene EPA 8310 0.00011 11/26/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00011Dibenz(a,h)anthracene EPA 8310 0.00011 11/26/2013mg/LTAL0.00032Ideno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene EPA 8310 0.00011 11/26/2013mg/LTAL0.37Phosphorus, Total SM4500-P 0.1 11/25/2013mg/L


Quality Control

BLANK

Parameter

mg/L QC BATCH








Page 3 of 6

Standard Conc.

mg/L mg/L

%REC

Parameter














Page 4 of 6

QUALIFIERS

COMMENTS

Residual D.O. was 0.08 mg/L. Reported result is an estimated value.

K2 Analysis didn't meet residual DO >/= 1 mg/L. D2 Sample diluted due to high concentration.

D1 Sample diluted due to matrix interference. M1 Matrix spike rec. high, control rec. acceptable.

V9 CCV recovery below method limits.


mg/L

Actual Conc.

mg/L

%RPD

Parameter




Value

mg/L

Sample Conc.

mg/L

%REC

Parameter

mg/L




Page 5 of 6


Page 6 of 6





Attn: John Meyer

OrderID: 131101011



DateMRL

RESULTS

Collection Time: 12:05:00 AMCollector: AC Project ID: SS Discrete-Full


Customer Sample#:

Qualifier





QUALIFIERS

COMMENTS


Quality Control

Separate order ID needed for 624s due to LIMS error.Oil&Grease MS recovered at 86.5%. Sample 12070746 spiked. (Stormwater FB) Kc 123013

Standard Conc.

mg/L mg/L

%REC

Parameter



BLANK

Parameter

mg/L QC BATCH


Page 1 of 2

Page 2 of 2





Attn: John Meyer

OrderID: 131101012



DateMRL

RESULTS

Collection Time: 1:05:00 AMCollector: AC Project ID: Univ Comp-Full

Site: Univ Dr @ EMF

Customer Sample#:

Qualifier




Page 1 of 6





Page 2 of 6

TAL< 0.00100Dieldrin EPA608TAL 0.001 12/4/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00100Endosulfan I (Alpha) EPA608TAL 0.001 12/4/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00100Endosulfan II (Beta) EPA608TAL 0.001 12/4/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00100Endosulfan sulfate EPA608TAL 0.001 12/4/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00100Endrin EPA608TAL 0.001 12/4/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00100Endrin aldehyde EPA608TAL 0.001 12/4/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00100Heptachlor EPA608TAL 0.001 12/4/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00100Heptachlor epoxide EPA608TAL 0.001 12/4/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00100Lindane EPA608TAL 0.001 12/4/2013mg/LTAL< 0.0210Toxaphene EPA608TAL 0.021 12/4/2013mg/LTAL< 0.20Orthophosphate EPA 300.0 0.2 11/22/2013mg/LTAL< 0.000051Benzo (a) pyrene EPA 8310 0.000051 11/27/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00020Benzo(a)anthracene EPA 8310 0.0002 11/27/2013mg/LTAL0.00019Benzo(b)fluoranthene EPA 8310 0.0001 11/27/2013mg/LTAL0.00021Benzo(g,h,i)perylene EPA 8310 0.0001 11/27/2013mg/LTAL0.000093Benzo(k)fluoranthene EPA 8310 0.000051 11/27/2013mg/LTAL0.00012Chrysene EPA 8310 0.0001 11/27/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00010Dibenz(a,h)anthracene EPA 8310 0.0001 11/27/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00010Ideno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene EPA 8310 0.0001 11/27/2013mg/LTAL0.47Phosphorus, Total SM4500-P 0.1 11/25/2013mg/L


Quality Control

BLANK

Parameter

mg/L QC BATCH








Page 3 of 6

Standard Conc.

mg/L mg/L

%REC

Parameter














Page 4 of 6

QUALIFIERS

COMMENTS







mg/L

Actual Conc.

mg/L

%RPD

Parameter




Value

mg/L

Sample Conc.

mg/L

%REC

Parameter

mg/L




Page 5 of 6

Page 6 of 6





Attn: John Meyer

OrderID: 131101013



DateMRL

RESULTS

Collection Time: 1:05:00 AMCollector: AC Project ID: Univ Discrete-Full

Site: Univ Dr @ EMF

Customer Sample#:

Qualifier






Page 1 of 3


QUALIFIERS

COMMENTS


Quality Control

Standard Conc.

mg/L mg/L

%REC

Parameter



BLANK

Parameter

mg/L QC BATCH


Page 2 of 3

Page 3 of 3





Attn: John Meyer

OrderID: 131219007



DateMRL

RESULTS

Collection Time: 12:05:00 PMCollector: AC Project ID: SS Discrete-Full


Customer Sample#:

Qualifier


TAL< 0.00051,1,1-Trichloroethane EPA624_LL 0.0005 11/27/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00051,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane EPA624_LL 0.0005 11/27/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00051,1,2-Trichloroethane EPA624_LL 0.0005 11/27/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00051,1-Dichloroethane EPA624_LL 0.0005 11/27/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00051,1-Dichloroethylene EPA624_LL 0.0005 11/27/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00201,2,4-Trimethylbenzene EPA624_LL 0.002 11/27/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00101,2-Dichlorobenzene EPA624_LL 0.001 11/27/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00051,2-Dichloroethane EPA624_LL 0.0005 11/27/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00051,2-Dichloropropane EPA624_LL 0.0005 11/27/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00101,3-Dichlorobenzene EPA624_LL 0.001 11/27/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00051,3-Dichloropropene, Total EPA624_LL 0.0005 11/27/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00101,4-Dichlorobenzene EPA624_LL 0.001 11/27/2013mg/LTAL< 0.0005Benzene EPA624_LL 0.0005 11/27/2013mg/LTAL< 0.0005Bromodichloromethane EPA624_LL 0.0005 11/27/2013mg/LTAL< 0.0010Bromoform EPA624_LL 0.001 11/27/2013mg/LTAL< 0.0005Carbon Tetrachloride EPA624_LL 0.0005 11/27/2013mg/LTAL< 0.0005Chlorobenzene EPA624_LL 0.0005 11/27/2013mg/LTAL< 0.0005Chlorodibromomethane EPA624_LL 0.0005 11/27/2013mg/LTAL< 0.0010Chloroethane EPA624_LL 0.001 11/27/2013mg/LTAL< 0.0005Chloroform EPA624_LL 0.0005 11/27/2013mg/LTAL< 0.0005Ethyl Benzene EPA624_LL 0.0005 11/27/2013mg/LTAL< 0.0010Methyl Bromide EPA624_LL 0.001 11/27/2013mg/LTAL< 0.0010Methyl Chloride EPA624_LL 0.001 11/27/2013mg/LTAL< 0.0050Methylene chloride EPA624_LL 0.005 11/27/2013mg/LTAL< 0.0005Tetrachloroethylene (PCE) EPA624_LL 0.0005 11/27/2013mg/LTAL< 0.0005Toluene EPA624_LL 0.0005 11/27/2013mg/LTAL< 0.0005trans-1,2-Dichloroethene EPA624_LL 0.0005 11/27/2013mg/LTAL< 0.0005Trichloroethylene (TCE) EPA624_LL 0.0005 11/27/2013mg/L

Page 1 of 2

TAL< 0.0005Vinyl Chloride EPA624_LL 0.0005 11/27/2013mg/LTAL< 0.0015Xylene, Total EPA624_LL 0.0015 11/27/2013mg/L

QUALIFIERS

COMMENTS


Quality Control

Page 2 of 2





Attn: John Meyer

OrderID: 131223007



DateMRL

RESULTS

Collection Time: 4:30:00 AMCollector: AC Project ID: 54 Discrete-Full

Site: 54th St @ EMF

Customer Sample#:

Qualifier



GSMITH21990.0E. Coli, MPN SM9223B 2.2 12/20/2013mpn/100mlNSILIDE< 5.0Oil and Grease EPA 1664A 5 12/26/2013mg/L


TAL< 0.00051,1,1-Trichloroethane EPA624_LL 0.0005 12/27/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00051,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane EPA624_LL 0.0005 12/27/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00051,1,2-Trichloroethane EPA624_LL 0.0005 12/27/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00051,1-Dichloroethane EPA624_LL 0.0005 12/27/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00201,2,4-Trimethylbenzene EPA624_LL 0.002 12/27/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00101,2-Dichlorobenzene EPA624_LL 0.001 12/27/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00051,2-Dichloroethane EPA624_LL 0.0005 12/27/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00051,2-Dichloropropane EPA624_LL 0.0005 12/27/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00101,3-Dichlorobenzene EPA624_LL 0.001 12/27/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00051,3-Dichloropropene, Total EPA624_LL 0.0005 12/27/2013mg/LTAL< 0.00101,4-Dichlorobenzene EPA624_LL 0.001 12/27/2013mg/LTAL< 0.0005Benzene EPA624_LL 0.0005 12/27/2013mg/LTAL< 0.0005Bromodichloromethane EPA624_LL 0.0005 12/27/2013mg/LTAL< 0.0010Bromoform EPA624_LL 0.001 12/27/2013mg/LTAL< 0.0005Carbon Tetrachloride EPA624_LL 0.0005 12/27/2013mg/LTAL< 0.0005Chlorobenzene EPA624_LL 0.0005 12/27/2013mg/LTAL< 0.0005Chlorodibromomethane EPA624_LL 0.0005 12/27/2013mg/LTAL< 0.0010Chloroethane EPA624_LL 0.001 12/27/2013mg/LTAL< 0.0005Chloroform EPA624_LL 0.0005 12/27/2013mg/L

Page 1 of 3

TAL< 0.0005Ethyl Benzene EPA624_LL 0.0005 12/27/2013mg/LTAL< 0.0010Methyl Bromide EPA624_LL 0.001 12/27/2013mg/LTAL< 0.0010Methyl Chloride EPA624_LL 0.001 12/27/2013mg/LTAL< 0.0050Methylene chloride EPA624_LL 0.005 12/27/2013mg/LTAL< 0.0005Tetrachloroethylene (PCE) EPA624_LL 0.0005 12/27/2013mg/LTAL< 0.0005Toluene EPA624_LL 0.0005 12/27/2013mg/LTAL< 0.0005trans-1,2-Dichloroethene EPA624_LL 0.0005 12/27/2013mg/LTAL< 0.0005Trichloroethylene (TCE) EPA624_LL 0.0005 12/27/2013mg/LTAL< 0.0005Vinyl Chloride EPA624_LL 0.0005 12/27/2013mg/LTAL< 0.0015Xylene, Total EPA624_LL 0.0015 12/27/2013mg/L

QUALIFIERS

COMMENTS


Quality Control


Value

mg/L

Sample Conc.

mg/L

%REC

Parameter

mg/L


MSOil and Grease 130704789140 < 5 mg/L 36.6 QC13122602

Standard Conc.

mg/L mg/L

%REC

Parameter



BLANK

Parameter

mg/L QC BATCH


Page 2 of 3

Page 3 of 3


ATTACHMENT B

HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE EVENT REPORTS


HHW Event ReportDate of Event October 19, 2013 Event Lead Greg Edwards

Location East Mesa Waste Storage Area

Vehicle Information

Hazardous Waste Collected

Mesa 1495

County 0

Gilbert 0

Chandler 0

Other 0

TOTAL 1495

Customers came from...

DOT Description Gallons

Aerosols, 2.1, UN1950 1616

Ammonia solutions, corrosive, 8, 8, UN2672 55

Batteries, wet, filled with acid, electric storage, 8, UN2794 85

Batteries, wet, filled with acid, electric storage, 8, UN2794 160

Batteries, wet, non-spillable, electric storage, 8, UN2800 15

Consumer Commodity, ORM-D 130

Corrosive liquid, acidic, inorganic, n.o.s., 8, UN3264 330

Corrosive liquid, basic, inorganic, n.o.s., 8, UN3266 165

Environmentally Hazardous substance, solid, 9, UN3077 90



Environmentally Hazardous substances, liquid, 9, UN3082 330


Flammable liquids, n.o.s., 3, UN1993 110


Flammable solids, organic, n.o.s., 4.1, UN1325 55

Hydrofluoric acid, solution, 8, UN1790 15

Mercury contained in manufactured articles, 8, UN2809 5

Non-DOT Regulated Material 55

February 10, 2014Page 1 of 3




Non-RCRA/Non-DOT Solid 5

Oxidizing solid, n.o.s., 5.1, UN1479 165

Paint related material, 3, UN1263 55


Pesticides, liquid, flammable, toxic, 3, 6.1, UN3021 1210


Propane, 2.1, UN1978 47

Refrigerant gases, n.o.s., 2.2, UN1078 1

Regulated medical waste, 6.2, UN3291 15


Toxic solids, organic, n.o.s., 6.1, UN2811 55


Used AntiFreeze 55

Used AntiFreeze 165

Used Oil 950

Total for this event = 12116 gallonsWaste disposal cost of this event = $92,352.00




Other Waste Collected Appliances Collected

Total Gallons of Hazardous Waste Diverted = 19081Hazardous Waste, Latex Paint, Ammunition & Prescription Drugs

Batteries 2700

Tires w/o rims 220

Tires w/ rims 37

Latex Paint 6950

Electronics 18427

Fire Extinguishers 37

Propane Tanks 70

Helium Tanks 11

Oxygen Tanks 5

Fluorescent Tubes 0

Carbon Monoxide Tanks 0

5-gal / 20-lb tanks

pounds

Number collected unless otherwise indicated

gallons

linear feet

Prescription Medication 15 gallons

pounds

Compact Fluorescents

Ammunition NA gallons

Smoke Detectors

Air Conditioners 0

Clothes Dryers 0

Clothes Washers 0

Coolers 0

Dishwashers 0

Freezers 0

Other 0

Ranges 0

Refrigerators 0

Water Heaters 0

Water Softeners 0

9,930 Pounds*may include Electronics

Total for event 0


HHW Event ReportDate of Event December 07, 2013 Event Lead Greg Edwards

Location Center Street Yard

Vehicle Information


Mesa 715

County 0

Gilbert 0

Chandler 0

Other 0

TOTAL 715



Aerosols, 2.1, UN1950 606


Batteries, dry, containing potassium hydroxide solid, electric storage (Alkaline), 8, UN3028

120







Fusee (railway or highway), 4.1, NA1325 5

Lighters, 2.1, UN1057 5

Lithium batteries, 9, UN3090 60



Methyl acetylene and propadiene mixtures, stabilized, 2.1, UN1060 5



Organic peroxide type E, liquid, 5.2, UN3107 5

Oxidizing liquid, n.o.s., 5.1, UN3139 55

April 14, 2014Page 1 of 3





Propane, 2.1, UN1978 110


Self-heating, solid, organic, 4.2, UN3088 30

Toxic liquids, flammable, organic, n.o.s., 6.1, 3, UN2929 495


Universal Waste 40

Used Oil 550

Water-reactive solid, n.o.s., 4.3, UN2813 5







Batteries 29

Tires w/o rims 12

Tires w/ rims 111

Latex Paint 2970

Electronics 10291


Propane Tanks 23

Helium Tanks 0

Oxygen Tanks 1

Other Fluorescent Tubes 180


5-gal / 20-lb tanks

pounds


gallons

pounds


pounds

Compact Fluorescents 135

Ammunition 5 gallons

Smoke Detectors

pounds

Air Conditioners 0

Clothes Dryers 0

Clothes Washers 0

Coolers 0

Dishwashers 0

Freezers 0

Other 0

Ranges 0

Refrigerators 0

Water Heaters 0

Water Softeners 0


Total for event 0


HHW Event ReportDate of Event February 08, 2014 Event Lead Greg Edwards


Vehicle Information


Mesa 1388

County 0

Gilbert 0

Chandler 0

Other 0

TOTAL 1388



Aerosols, 2.1, UN1950 1212

Batteries, wet, filled with alkali, electrict storage, 8, UN2795 90

Batteries, wet, filled with alkali, electrict storage, 8, UN2795 90


Calcium carbide, 4.3, UN1402 5














Flammable solids, inorganic, n.o.s., 4.1, UN3178 5






Hydrofluoric acid, solution, 8, UN1790 5

Lighters, non-ressurized, 3, NA1057 5


Matches, safety, 4.1, UN1944 5







Non-RCRA/Non-DOT Solid 5

Organic peroxide, Type E, solid, 5.2, UN3108 5






Propane, 2.1, UN1978 30

Propane, 2.1, UN1978 55




Used Oil 825







Batteries 1293

Tires w/o rims 198

Tires w/ rims 34

Latex Paint 4835

Electronics 20382


Propane Tanks 63

Helium Tanks 10

Oxygen Tanks 1



5-gal / 20-lb tanks

pounds


gallons

pounds


pounds



Smoke Detectors 2

pounds

Air Conditioners 0

Clothes Dryers 0

Clothes Washers 0

Coolers 0

Dishwashers 0

Freezers 0

Other 0

Ranges 0

Refrigerators 0

Water Heaters 0

Water Softeners 0


Total for event 0


HHW Event ReportDate of Event April 05, 2014 Event Lead Greg Edwards


Vehicle Information


Mesa 1030

County 0

Gilbert 0

Chandler 0

Other 0

TOTAL 1030



Acetylene, dissolved, 2.1, UN1001 1


Batteries, dry, containing potassium hydroxide solid, electric storage (Alkaline), 8, UN3028

100










Flammable solids, organic, n.o.s., 4.1, UN1325 5


Lighters, non-ressurized, 3, NA1057 5

Liquified gas, flammable, n.o.s., 2.1, UN3161 5




June 16, 2014Page 1 of 3




Nitrogen, compressed, 2.2, UN1066 1






Pesticides, solid, toxic, n.o.s., 6.1, UN2588 404

Propane, 2.1, UN1978 60




Universal Waste 60

Used AntiFreeze 275

Used Oil 140

Used Oil 825

Waste Chlorodifluoromethane or Refrigerant Gas R22, 2.2, UN1018 1







Batteries 1598

Tires w/o rims 293

Tires w/ rims 50

Latex Paint 4400

Electronics 13974


Propane Tanks 39

Helium Tanks 9

Oxygen Tanks 4



5-gal / 20-lb tanks

pounds


gallons

pounds


pounds



Smoke Detectors 1

pounds

Air Conditioners 0

Clothes Dryers 0

Clothes Washers 0

Coolers 0

Dishwashers 0

Freezers 0

Other 0

Ranges 0

Refrigerators 0

Water Heaters 0

Water Softeners 0


Total for event 0


ATTACHMENT C

ANNUAL EXPENDITURE REPORTS


Annual Expenditure/Budget Report Page 1 of 2

City of Mesa Stormwater Program Budget vs Expenditures for Budget Fiscal Year 2013/2014

Budget Expenses

Storm Drain Maintenance • Repair of Damaged Facilities • Sediment Removal from Catch Basins • Clearing Debris from Inlet/Outlets • Regrading and Stabilizing Earthen Channels • Installation of Erosion Control Measures • Silt Removal from Retention Basins

$ 1,554,987 $ 864,552

Retention Basin Maintenance • Regular Litter and Debris Removal • Turf Maintenance • Erosion Control and Bank Stabilization • Repair of Damaged Facilities

$ 5,216,985 $ 5,175,015

Street Cleaning • Sweeping of Arterial Streets • Sweeping of Residential Streets

$ 2,499,386 $ 1,317,402

Emergency Response • Spill Clean-Up • Material Dumping Clean-Up

$ 346,101 $ 64,010

Household Hazardous Waste Management Program $ 217,711 $ 391,031 Administration, Inspection and Enforcement, Monitoring Program • General Program Management • Annual Field Screening • Inspection of Construction and Industrial Sites • Preparation of Annual Program Summaries • Public Information and Education • Soil Stabilization Activities (Personal and Professional Services)

818,858 653,956

Total Proposed Annual Expenditures $ 10,654,028

$ 8,465,966

Annual Expenditure/Budget Report Page 2 of 2

City of Mesa Stormwater Program Proposed Budget for Fiscal Year 2014/2015

Proposed

Budget

Storm Drain Maintenance • Repair of Damaged Facilities • Sediment Removal from Catch Basins • Clearing Debris from Inlet/Outlets • Regrading and Stabilizing Earthen Channels • Installation of Erosion Control Measures • Silt Removal from Retention Basins

$ 1,911,000

Retention Basin Maintenance • Regular Litter and Debris Removal • Turf Maintenance • Erosion Control and Bank Stabilization • Repair of Damaged Facilities

$ 6,125,541

Street Cleaning • Sweeping of Arterial Streets • Sweeping of Residential Streets

$ 2,713,408

Emergency Response • Spill Clean-Up • Material Dumping Clean-Up

$ 178,112

Household Hazardous Waste Management Program $ 330,000 Administration, Inspection and Enforcement, Monitoring Program • General Program Management • Annual Field Screening • Inspection of Construction and Industrial Sites • Preparation of Annual Program Summaries • Public Information and Education • Soil Stabilization Activities (Personal and Professional Services)

$ 1,181,120

Total Proposed Annual Budget $ 12,439,181

2013-2014 Storm Water Annual Report

Documents

stormwater annual report

annual report certification

stormwater flows

stormwater website

sector general permit

general public

annual reportdocument

city of mesa city