ASSESSMENT REPORT including Soil and Rock Sampling and Geological Reconnaissance on the STIKINE PROPERTY LAIRD MINING DIVISION, British Columbia NTS: 104G/13 Latitude 57°47' N, Longitude 131°35' W Prepared for Operators: SERENGETI RESOURCES INC 1700-750 West Pender Street Vancouver, BC, Canada V6C 2T8 By: Hilary Clarke Hugh Samson, 1 st November, 2012 Vancouver, B.C.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
ASSESSMENT REPORT
including
Soil and Rock Sampling and
Geological Reconnaissance
on the
STIKINE PROPERTY
LAIRD MINING DIVISION,
British Columbia
NTS: 104G/13
Latitude 57°47' N, Longitude 131°35' W
Prepared for Operators:
SERENGETI RESOURCES INC
1700-750 West Pender Street
Vancouver, BC, Canada V6C 2T8
By:
Hilary Clarke
Hugh Samson,
1st November, 2012
Vancouver, B.C.
ldegroot
Text Box
BC Geological Survey Assessment Report 33350
2
Table of Contents
List of Tables .................................................................................................................................... 2
List of Figures ................................................................................................................................... 2
List of Appendices............................................................................................................................ 3
Figure 18 – 2012 Ag ppb Soil Sample Geochemistry Labeled
Figure 19 – Serengeti 2012 Rock Sample Locations over Property Geology
Figure 20 –2012 Rock Samples by Au ppb over Property Geology
Figure 21 – 2012 Rock Samples by Cu ppm over Property Geology
List of Appendices
Appendix A - Expenditure Statement
Appendix B - Geologist’s Certificate
Appendix C – Field Notes and Selected Element Assay Results
Appendix D – Analytical Certificates
4
(1) Introduction
Serengeti Resources Inc. (Serengeti) acquired the initial Stikine claims by staking in January of 2011. Based on the results of work completed in summer 2011, additional claims were added in August 2011 and again in January of 2012. The Stikine claims were acquired because the property lies within the prospective Stikine Terrane and is considered prospective to contain alkalic porphyry targets. Importantly, the property is thought to be the source of a prominent cluster of strongly copper and gold anomalous silt samples collected by the BC government Regional Geochemical Survey (RGS) (Figure 3). The project is located on a northeast trending magnetic anomaly, which occurs on a 100 km long northeast striking break or lineament observed in the regional magnetics. In addition, previous work and government mapping had indicated the presence of Cu-Au-Ag mineralization associated with a Juarssic-aged syenite intruding into Upper Triassic Stuhini Group sediments and volcanics. This geological setting is believed to be similar to that which hosts the Galore Creek deposit, 75 km to the South. See Serengeti 2011 Work Assessment report for a full description of past work completed at the project, geological maps, and target descriptions.
In 2012 Serengeti financed a $28,778 work program to continue to investigate the
possible bedrock source for the RGS anomalism, to follow-up on the 2011 work and further examine the potential for the property to host a mineralised system.
The goal of the 2012 program was to follow up on a cluster of Cu showings
observed on a steep ridge during the 2011 recce program. Fracture controlled and rarely disseminated Cu-Ag (+Au) mineralization was encountered in a locally K’Spar and weakly albite altered portion of a larger syenite body. This syenite (Jurassic aged?) intrudes Hazelton Volcanic country rocks. See attached Figures 5, 6, 7 and 8 for the significant rock sample locations and results from the 2011 program.
On July 14th, 2012, a crew of two Serengeti geologists and two field assistants mobilized to the site from Dease Lake. From July 14th to 19th, the crew completed a “B” Horizon soil sampling program of 139 of samples on 6 east-west lines, additional geological mapping and reconnaissance over the central portion of the project area, in addition to collecting 5 rock samples. On July 19th, the crew de-mobilized back to Dease Lake. The details of this program are discussed in Section 5 and 6 of this report.
5
(2) Property Description and Location
The Stikine property is 100% owned by Serengeti and covers 4,192 Ha. The property is located in the Laird Mining Division of northwest British Columbia, Canada, 28 km west southwest of Telegraph Creek. The property is located on NTS map sheet 104G/13 at geographic coordinates; 57° 47’ north latitude and 131° 35’ west longitude (Figure 1). The ten (10) contiguous mineral claims which comprise the Stikine property cover an area of 4,192 hectares. The current tenure outline and current mineral tenures are shown in Figure 2. These claims are set to lapse on October 17th 2014. Additional information regarding the individual claims can be referenced in Table 1.
(3) Accessibility, Local Resources, Infrastructure, Climate and
Physiography
The Stikine claims are located on the south and southeast slopes of Rugged Mountain, approximately 25 km southwest of Telegraph Creek, BC. This is located in the Stikine Terrane of northwestern BC, host to several significant porphyry deposits; including Galore Creek, Schaft Creek, and Red Chris. Access is to the property is via a 10 km helicopter flight from the end of the road travelling southwest from Telegraph Creek.
A staging area is located near Glenora, at the end of the main road travelling west of Telegraph Creek, approximately 15 km west of Telegraph Creek. Relief on the property rises steeply from 500 m in the surrounding valleys to 1800 m at the top of Rugged Mountain. The higher elevations are alpine and sub-alpine meadows while the lower elevation are covered by thick pine, fir and spruce forests.
Climate is typical of the Pacific Northwest as summer temperatures range from
10-25º C. Winters are well below 0º C and snow lasts from October to June. The field crew used a small ranch owned by Bonnie and Wes Gwilliam as a
helicopter staging area. This homestead is located at the end of the road southwest of Telegraph Creek, just past the Glenora recreational area, at 0357340 E, 6412645 N (UTM NAD83 zone 9).
A fly camp was erected on a small marshy lake at the base of the southern slope of Rugged Mountain, at 0346575 E, 6407857 N (UTM NAD83 zone 9). Access to traverses and soil lines for the 2012 program was by foot from this fly camp.
59 °
57 °
-132 °
56 °
58 °
60 °
-129 °
-128 °
56 °
-130 °
-131 °
-133 °
-134 °
57 °
58 °
60 °
59 °
Drawing:
Date: 29/03/2012
Scale: 1:2000000 Projection: Longitude / Latitude (NAD 27 for Alaska)
Office:
Author: HS
kilometres
20 40
Serengeti Resources Inc
Stikine Project Location
Figure 1
20 0
BC
Yukon
6,404,000 mN
348,000 m
E
346,000 m
E346,000 m
E
344,000 m
E344,000 m
E
6,408,000 mN
6,410,000 mN
6,412,000 mN
342,000 m
E
340,000 m
E340,000 m
E
342,000 m
E
6,410,000 mN
6,406,000 mN
348,000 m
E
350,000 m
E350,000 m
E
6,412,000 mN
6,408,000 mN
6,406,000 mN
6,404,000 mN
400
metres
800
Office:
Serengeti Resources
Author: hclarke
0
Drawing:
Date: 05/11/2012
Scale: 1:20000 Projection: UTM Zone 9 (NAD 83)
200
Stikine PropertyClaim and Tenure Details
Figure 2
Current Stikine Claim Outline
Current Stikine Tenures
N
Table 1
Stikine Claim Details
Project Tenure # Claim Name Hectares Expiry Date NTS Record Date
The Stikine Property lies within the early Mesozoic-aged Stikine terrane, within the Stikinia Arch, which is a series of Late Triassic to Early Jurassic aged island arc assemblages that have been accreted onto the western edge of the North American continental margin (Brown et. al, 1996). The Stikine assemblage hosts numerous important deposits of porphyry gold-copper style mineralization, including the Galore Creek deposit and Red-Chris deposit, located 75 km to the south and 105 km to the east, respectively. These and other significant deposits are generally associated with intrusion of Early Jurassic alkalic bodies (syenite to monzonite) into the Upper Triassic Stuhuni Group volcanics and sediments. Property Geology:
D.A Brown from the BCGS has mapped the property and he describes the
occurrence of the Early Jurassic Rugged Mountain Pluton intruding into Stuhini Group country rock. Figure 4 shows the simplified, property-wide BCGS geology. Figure 5 illustrates the geology in the area of interest as mapped by Serengeti, which agrees well with Brown’s interpretation. The following description of The Rugged Mountain pluton is taken BCGS open file 1992-2:
Brown describes the pluton as a composite, pink to light grey, potassic body which intrudes into Stuhini volcaniclastic rocks. It is characterised by late phase leucocratic, potassium feldspar megacrystic dyke swarms, referred to as the ‘Shakes Creek mass’. The dominant phase consists of biotite pyroxene alkali-feldspar syenite. Potassium feldspar phenocrysts range from medium grained and equigranular to megacrystic. Mafic mineral contents range from 10 to 30 per cent in the central and eastern areas of the pluton and increase from 50 to 80 per cent toward the border and western edge. Tabular and lath-shaped orthoclase phenocrysts range up to 7 centimetres in length. Ferromagnesian and accessory minerals, identified by Kerr include biotite, aegirine-augite, bronzite, brown garnet and traces of magnetite. apatite and titanite. Pyroxenes are relatively fresh feldspars exhibit some sericite and chlorite alteration (Brown et. al, 92).
The Rugged Mountain alkali-feldspar syenite has a partially preserved biotite-
clinopyroxenite border phase 10 to 15 metres wide, which outcrops along the northern edge of the intrusion. Similar material, with higher biotite and magnetite contents, occurs as a large, discrete body to the east. Smaller pyroxenite bodies have also been mapped along the pluton's northeast and southeast borders. The contact between the pyroxenite and syenite is sharp and shows no evidence of faulting (Brown et. al, 92).
10
No mineral occurrences in the BC Ministry of Energy and Mines' Minfile database are listed on the property; however, this may be attributed to the limited bedrock exposure in the current areas of interest.
(5) History
Previous work on the property has mostly focused on small copper+/-gold+/-silver showings exposed along ridge tops immediately east of southeast of the Rugged Mountain peak. The historical work completed in the immediate area of the project is summarized below and is illustrated in Figure 4:
1989: Homestake Mineral Development and Equity Silver Mines (AR19072) Homestake completed a prospecting survey and collected 10 rock samples and 5 silt and soil samples. Grab samples from the pyroxenite phase are 31019 and 31329. These samples are anomalous in copper (10979 ppm and 3704 ppm), silver (6.9 ppm and 2.2 ppm), and gold (700 ppb and 81 ppb). Grab samples 31023 and 31031 are anomalous in copper (552 ppm and 600 ppm). Grab sample 31417 is from the syenitic intrusion and is anomalous in copper (2204 ppm), silver (1.6 ppm), and gold (98 ppb).
1990: Candela Resources and Continental Gold Corp (AR 20414) Candela completed an initial 159 sample soil survey. Seven of the 159 assayed greater than 100 ppb gold. Anomalous sites were investigated by trenching to bedrock or by sampling exposed rock. The highest value returned was 55 ppb Au. In follow up work, more anomalous soil samples were taken (up to 1010 ppb Au) but the highest rock value was only 215 ppb Au over 1m. The sites of the 1989 survey were resampled and only one significant sample (440 ppb over m) was returned. This sample included a 5-20 cm wide vein. Gold mineralization was found to be spatially related to syenite dykes in the Stuhini host rock. The reporting of samples within this report seems to have a bias towards only reporting anomalous gold values. There are several rock samples with highly anomalous Cu/Mo values (>1000 ppm for Cu or Mo) with no reference in the report. The values were reported in the report appendix and do not have any description of the sampling context or location. 2008: Rimfire Minerals (AR 30666) Rimfire completed a prospecting, mapping, soil and silt sampling program. They defined a Cu- soil anomaly over a strike of 530 m where 33% of the samples within it were above the calculated 95th percentile. Neither Au nor Ag was significantly anomalous within this region. The Cu anomaly was down slope from syenite porphyry dykes. The target was
11
not followed up with mapping or prospecting and no rock samples were taken. Soil sampling on the rest of the property returned only slightly anomalous samples. Silt sampling returned values similar to previous values and did not provide any new information. The majority of their work program was focused on areas to the NW of the syenitic intrusion and within a visible colour anomaly in the vicinity of Rugged Mountain. Serengeti Work Completed in 2011
Serengeti acquired the initial Stikine claims in 2011 based on the location of the
property within the prospective Stikine Terrane. In addition, the property is also thought to be the source of a prominent cluster of strongly copper and gold anomalous silt samples collected by the BC government Regional Geochemical Survey (RGS) (Figure 3). A northeast trending magnetic anomaly is also present on the property, which is observed in the regional magnetics and previous work and government mapping had indicated the presence of Cu-Au-Ag mineralization.
Serengeti began field work in July 2011; see Serengeti’s 2011 Work Assessment
report for a more complete description of this past work completed at the project, geological maps, and target descriptions. A summary of the findings of the 2011 work is given below.
Work carried out by Serengeti in July 2011 included geological reconnaissance, rock sampling and mapping of the Stikine claims over three days. The geological reconnaissance yielded the following observations (see Figure 4 for reference): The dominant lithologies occurring on the property are tuffs and flows of andesitic volcanics, presumed to be part of the upper Triassic aged Stuhini Group. The andesites are unaltered and contain no observed economic mineralization. In the vicinity of the peak of Rugged Mountain and in several places along the main northwest trending ridge, the andesites are intruded by several fresh, megacrystic feldspar porphyry dykes, referred to by Brown as the ‘Shakes Creek mass’. The contacts between the dykes and the country andesite are weakly hornfelsed and pyritic. While the hornfelsing creates small gossans at the dyke contact zones, no mineralization was observed either in hand sample or in the assays or hornfelsed material.
Of more economic interest, several syenite and minor pyroxenite bodies (likely
lower Jurassic aged) locally intrude the andesite country rock. Along the northwest trending ridge top, the syenites (and much lessor pyroxenites) are locally copper mineralized along what appear to be structural zones, generally 1 to 3 m in width, while the bulk of the syenite bodies are unmineralized. These relatively narrow, mineralized zones are likely the only observed mineralization at the project prior to Serengeti’s visit, based on the rock assay results and rock sampling distribution observed in the historical work files.
The 2011 work program was highly successful in identifying the probable source of the RGS anomalies as the field crew discovered a body of previously unknown
12
potassic and locally sodic (albite) altered and copper mineralized syenite. Figures 6, 7, and 8 show thematic maps of Cu, Au, and Ag assay results of the rock sampling. Mineralization in this previously unknown occurrence is fracture controlled with locally disseminated chalcopyrite and malachite, observed over a variably exposed 200 x 250 m area. There is a notably low pyrite content and lack of associated color anomaly. Several composite rock samples assayed approximately 1,000-4,000 ppm Cu with locally significant Au and Ag values.
Out of 17 composite grab rock samples collected from this area, 5 rock samples collected averaged 2,966 ppm Cu (from 1,291 to 4,337 ppm Cu), 111 ppb Au (up to 435 ppb) and 1.9 ppm Ag. The remainder of the samples from this area, except for 1, assayed from 501 to 932 ppm Cu. Importantly, these samples were all composite grab samples over large areas (5 to 15 m) and were not selected, high grade grab samples. The main mineralized area was determined to be open to the south where the outcrop exposure dips under soil cover and represents an attractive alkalic porphyry target.
This property was therefore regarded to be highly prospective to host a previously unknown Cu+-Au+/-Ag bearing alkali porphyry body. There are two main reasons that the main mineralized exposures may not have been recognized in the past; i) the topography is very steep in the outcropping area and no one may have walked down there, and ii) the low pyrite content does not oxidize and form a visible gossan. The second point is very important as it is well recognized that alkalic porphyries commonly have much smaller alteration (and sulfide-bearing) footprints than typical porphyry bodies. Further mapping, prospecting and sampling was therefore recommended to further define the alteration and mineralization of the project area.
Serengeti Work Completed in 2012
A field crew from Serengeti established a base camp in the sub-alpine and
completed a field program on the Stikine project on July 14th, and from the 14th to 18th, 2012. The Serengeti crew consisted of two geologists and two field assistants. Access to traverses and sample locations was by foot.
The intention of the soil sampling crew of 4 was to collect 360 B-horizon soil samples along 6 lines at 400m spacing (see Figure 9). Travel at the project proved exceptionally slow and difficult due to very steep slopes on the southern portion of Rugged Mountain, thick brush and slide alder that limited lateral movement, and a very large amount of vertical relief between the camp and the upper lines (>600 metres). The end result was that the crew collected 138 soil samples (See Figure 9) and completed a partial geological reconnaissance and mapping of the Stikine Claims within the area of soil sampling where a fair amount of outcrop and subcrop was observed. Five rock samples were also taken at this time (Figure 15). See Figure 9 for the locations of the five annotated geological domains within the study area referenced below.
13
It would certainly be possible to complete a more comprehensive soil sampling program at the project, but sufficient time and money would be required to account for the challenging conditions.
LTrJCsyTriassic to Jurassicsyenitic to monzonitic intrusive rocks
Triassic to Jurassic
Neogenealkaline volcanic rocks
LTrJCum
mTrchTriassic
uTrSs
MiPiTvk
350,000 mE
346,000 mE
348,000 mE
346,000 mE
348,000 mE
342,000 mE
344,000 mE
344,000 mE
6,408,000 mN
6,404,000 mN
6,406,000 mN
6,410,000 mN
6,412,000 mN 6,412,000 mN
6,408,000 mN
6,410,000 mN
350,000 mE
6,404,000 mN
6,406,000 mN
342,000 mE
340,000 mE
340,000 mE
1
kilometres
2
Office:
Serengeti Resources
Author: hclarke
Drawing:
Date: 02/11/2012
Scale: 1:50000 Projection: UTM Zone 9 (NAD 83)
0 0.5
Historical Compilation
over BCGS Geology
Figure 4
BCGS RGS - 2011Copper (ppm) Au (ppb)
160 to 3,600
130 to 160
100 to 130
70 to 100
40 to 70
-10 to 40
Equity Rock Samples
Homestake Rock Samples
(Cu ppm)
(Cu ppm)
Current Stikine Claim
N
20
(6) Results and Discussion
‘B’ Horizon Soil Sampling
The “B” Horizon soil sampling identified a number of areas of relatively anomalous geochemistry for some elements, although the more anomalous samples were found to be isolated in occurrence. Given the challenges in terms of access and the relatively widely spaced soil grid lines, this area of interest is not considered to be fully tested at this point.
Area 1 - Area of known syenite hosted Cu (+Ag+Au) mineralization. In 2011 prospecting samples here returned anomalous values for copper with five samples collected here averaging 2,966 ppm Cu (between 1.291 and 4,337 ppm Cu) and average gold values of 111 ppb Au (up to 435 ppb Au) and 1.9 ppm Ag (Figure 6, 7 and 8). It is important to note, these samples were all composite grab samples over large areas (5 to 15 m) and were not selected, high grade grab samples. The main mineralized area is open to the south where the outcrop exposure dips under soil cover and represents an attractive alkalic porphyry target. This area returned a Cu in soil anomaly- 8 samples averaging 400 ppm Cu (between 195 ppm and 923 ppm Cu) on one soil line with weakly anomalous Au values averaging 15.5 ppb Au (Figures 10 to 14). Interestingly, 1 km east of this area soils returned anomalous results for Pb and Zn that requires follow-up taking into consideration the geological context that may be affecting the anomalies with respect to Pb and Zn in this area. Area 2 - Along the ridge to the south of Area 1, several outcrops of weakly epidote altered hornblende syenite are exposed. No significant Cu mineralization or porphyry alteration was observed, downgrading the potential to expand mineralization in this direction. Only one soil sample here returned 116.8 ppb Au with only spot highs of supporting Cu, Pb, Zn and Ag values (See Figures 10 to 14).
Area 3 - Further south on the ridge, a fairly interesting looking zone of strongly bleached syenite was observed. No sulfides were observed however. This area did not return soil values of note other than a spot high sample with coincident Cu, Pb and Ag values (See Figures 10 to 14).
Area 4 - On the lower (southern) portions of the main slope, extensive outcrops of fresh andesitic volcanics were observed. No significant alteration or sulfide mineralization was observed, downgrading the potential of this area. Soils sampling returned scattered spot highs for Au (169 ppb Au) and 7 samples in total returning over 200 ppm Cu. The western end of the sampling grid is broadly anomalous with a coincident cluster of 14 samples running average 172 ppm Cu, 9.2 ppm Pb and 219 ppb Ag.
Area 5 – At the break in slope and start of valley bottom, only limited outcrops of fresh andesitic volcanics were observed. While there were fresh rocks exposed, there was
21
enough cover that this area cannot be deemed to be fully investigated. This area returned scattered gold values with one more anomalous value of 255 ppb Au but an average of only 13.8 ppb Au over 40 samples. Average Cu values of 92 ppm Cu with two samples over 200 ppm (267.1 and 254.5 ppm Cu). This area returned the most anomalous values for Zinc with an average of 206 ppm Zn over 40 samples ranging between 53 and 339 ppm Zn. This may be a function of lithology with fresh andesitic volcanics in this area but warrants further investigation in the field.
In terms of the distribution of anomalous soil samples, gold values are restricted to spot highs on each soil line and form a linear trend that can be interpreted to correlate across the soil grid in a northeast southwest orientation (see Figure 10). The possibility of the source for these anomalous samples to be structurally controlled should be taken into consideration during a successive field program. Infill soil sample lines would also assist with this interpretation. The main focus for copper anomalism is in Area 1 in the vicinity of the mineralized showings hosted within the syenite unit as mapped in 2011 thus supporting the notion that this may be an exposed part of an underlying mineralized system given the anomalous rock samples also taken here (see Figure 11). It was planned that the soil sampling program would assist with tracing mineralization away from the existing possible source point with this program. However, due to lack of access, this proposed soil grid was not completed and therefore the area remains open to the west and south west from this point. This area continues to be an attractive alkali porphyry target.
Copper values on successive grid lines to the south also show anomalies in soil samples that could lead to the interpretation of a north south mineralization source and should be considered in follow up field programs. This trend occurs along the edge of a ridge and is not considered to be an effect of the drainage to the west of this.
Anomalies in lead values could also be interpreted to be highlighting a northeast southwest trend given the distribution of the anomalous soil samples and are possibly correlatable with gold, this would also warrant in-fill soil sampling to support this and outline this more specifically. Zinc, on the other hand, occurs inversely to lead and anomalies are encountered on the two soil lines on the most southern portion of the grid. Further detailed geological mapping is warranted to determine the geological significance of these anomalies and examine the possibility of a cause for this distribution.
Rock Sampling
A total of five rock samples were taken during this field program, the majority in Areas 2, 3 and 4 and within the areas of soil sampling (see Figure 15). A more comprehensive rock sampling program was previously carried out in 2011 over Area 1 (Figures 6, 7 and 8). The 2011 Assessment Report should be referred to for more information on this sampling program.
22
The 2012 rock samples were collected during the soil sampling program and are mainly composite grab samples of syenite with one andesite sample. Rationale for sampling is presence of strong bleaching and epidote alteration and occasionally traces of sulphide in a number of samples. Overall the samples returned low values with copper averaging 167 ppm Cu in 5 samples (from 24 ppm to 387 ppm Cu in a fresh syenite with trace cpy). One sample (sample 1446136) returned 67 ppm Pb in strongly bleached sericite altered syenite. See Figures 15, 16 and 17. None of the samples returned significant gold values.
6,411,000 mN
6,409,000 mN
6,410,000 mN
34
7,0
00
mE
34
8,0
00
mE
34
8,0
00
mE
34
7,0
00
mE
34
6,0
00
mE
34
6,0
00
mE
6,410,000 mN
6,411,000 mN
6,412,000 mN 6,412,000 mN
6,408,000 mN
6,407,000 mN
6,406,000 mN
34
5,0
00
mE
34
4,0
00
mE
34
5,0
00
mE
6,409,000 mN
6,408,000 mN
6,407,000 mN
6,406,000 mN
34
4,0
00
mE
Drawing:
Date: 05/11/2012
Scale: 1:20000 Projection: UTM Zone 9 (NAD 83)
Office:
Serengeti Resources
Author: hclarke
2012 Fieldwork
Proposed Soil Sample Grid
and Reported Areas
Actual Soil Grid
Proposed Soil Grid
N
348,500 mE
348,500 mE
348,000 mE
347,500 mE
346,500 mE
347,000 mE
6,409,500 mN
6,408,500 mN 6,408,500 mN
6,409,000 mN 6,409,000 mN
6,406,500 mN
346,000 mE
348,000 mE
346,000 mE
346,500 mE
347,000 mE
347,500 mE
6,407,500 mN 6,407,500 mN
6,408,000 mN 6,408,000 mN
6,407,000 mN
6,406,500 mN
6,407,000 mN
6,409,500 mN
1965252
1965253
1965254
1965351
1965352
1965301
1965302
1965303
1965304
1965305
1965255
1965256
1965353
1965354
1965306
1965307
1965308
1965309
1965310
1965311
1965257
1965258
1965355
1965356
1965357
1965312
1965313
1965314
1965315
1965316
1965317
1965275
1965276
1965277
1965278
1965386
1965387
1965388
1965389
1965390
1965279
1965280
1965281
1965259
1965261
1965358
1965359
1965360
1965272
1965271
1965384
1965385
1965262
1965263
1965361
1965283
1965282
1965284
1965285
1965286
1965287
1965393
1965391
1965392
1965394
1965395
1965396
1965397
1965398
1965399
1965325
1965326
1965327
1965328
1965329
1965330
1965331
1965332
1965333
1965334
1965336
1965337
1965338
1965339
1965380
1965378
1965379
1965381
1965382
1965383
1965293
1965288
1965289
1965290
1965291
1965292
1965201
1965202
1965203
1965400
1965372
1965373
1965374
1965375
1965376
1965377
1965269
1965270
1965324
1965204
1965294
1965295
1965296
1965323
1965267
1965268
1965322
1965298
1965205
1965297
1965366
1965367
1965368
1965369
1965370
1965371
1965320
1965266
1965321
1965362
1965363
1965364
1965365
1965264
1965265
1965318
1965319
Serengeti Resources
Author: hclarke
Office:
Drawing:
Date: 12/03/2013
Scale: 1:14000 Projection: UTM Zone 9 (NAD 83)
2012 Soil Samples
by Sample Number
5000 125 250
metres
34
8,0
00
mE
34
7,0
00
mE
6,409,000 mN
6,408,000 mN 6,408,000 mN
6,409,000 mN
6,407,000 mN
34
7,0
00
mE
34
6,0
00
mE
34
8,0
00
mE
6,407,000 mN
34
6,0
00
mE
2.43.2
2.91.6 1.7
2.64.42.8
2.93.3 2.12.1
2.13.741.7
0.82.72.4 4.3
3.11.82
2.15.7 5.36.48.2
2.73.58.71.9
22.21.62.5123.8
2.92.24.14.2
7.5 6.6 4.911.9
4.6834.3
1.72.30.9
5.9 103.842.2
2.93.8116.8
4.92.51.1
14.13.8
3.24.2
1692.60.81.84.34.8
6.424.43 1.3
2.4 4.11.95.97.4
1311.3
25.97.8
3.213.6
2.38.213.9
5.64.2
2.31.84.1 5.2
3.7 4.2 1.5
4.83.47.91.9
8.95.1 1.6
8.65 3.93.4
7.6 1.8 4.1 1.62.7 2.3 4.3
353.3
11.92.57.4
8
8.53.3
1.524.2
4.8
5.632.53.2
28.42 3.4 4.4
1.6254.9
Serengeti Resources
Author: hclarke
Office:
Drawing:
Date: 12/03/2013
Scale: 1:14000 Projection: UTM Zone 9 (NAD 83)
500
Soil Geochemistryby Au ppbFigure 14
0 125 250
metres
Soil Geochemistryby Au ppb
100 to 255 (3)
25 to 100 (6)
10 to 25 (11)
0 to 10 (117)
34
8,0
00
mE
34
7,0
00
mE
6,409,000 mN
6,408,000 mN 6,408,000 mN
6,409,000 mN
6,407,000 mN
34
7,0
00
mE
34
6,0
00
mE
34
8,0
00
mE
6,407,000 mN
34
6,0
00
mE
105.25
54.49
42.02
23.43
70.58
31.04
58.1
17.34
51.66
49.78
74.89
124.49
88.47
97.47
52.13
68.82
44.88
62.59
100.47
99.01
68.2
133.26
182.81
186.48
182.09
179.02
82.8
79.59
150.3
37.11
86.43
57.68
48.33
76.01
59.71
86.63
71.66
167.84
326.28
98.92
288.66
247.68
180.19
161
211.25
124.34
158.82
60.42
190.23
8258.6
3
107.79
58.52
90.72
625.29
58.29
162.5
74.95
51.16
103.29
83.69
343.55
295.54
154.22
166.66
126.4
168.18
117.61
195.09
90.75
95.07
62.85
66.91
695.986.1
194.59
923.76
318.41
588.6
424.38
265.6
85.86
91.33
102.19
46.33
52.81
84.3
181.08
303.92
375.52
80.57
131.15
148.37
61.13
257.23
310.37
49.64
155.55
58.52
254.53
118.23
158.01
99.21
38.62
93.16
62.47
81.47
32.35
54.08
100.15
90.8
73.16
41.94
52.15
62.61
88.52
338.56
60.8
222.63
80.39
94.34
267.18
53.88
52.89
66.74
65.73
100.69
59.91
179.11
26.85
33.79
103.33
85.09
46.4
40.16
42.88
174.8
Serengeti Resources
Author: hclarke
Office:
Drawing:
Date: 12/03/2013
Scale: 1:14000 Projection: UTM Zone 9 (NAD 83)
500
Soil Geochemistryby Cu ppmFigure 15
0 125 250
metres
Soil Geochemistryby Cu ppm
350 to 924 (6)
200 to 350 (15)
50 to 200 (98)
17 to 50 (18)
34
8,0
00
mE
34
7,0
00
mE
6,409,000 mN
6,408,000 mN 6,408,000 mN
6,409,000 mN
6,407,000 mN
34
7,0
00
mE
34
6,0
00
mE
34
8,0
00
mE
6,407,000 mN
34
6,0
00
mE
7.16
5.04
7.58
9.16
9.53
9.49
7.36
6.75
8.64
12.06
7.3
12.96
10.43
12.05
13.79
6.01
5.25
6.99
7.59
9.12
12.58
6.95
13.91
13.13
7.97
13.62
11.27
7.62
8.39.5
18.5
49.2
9
10.24
7.37.0
97.4
78.5
6
9.44
11.58
14.22
11.07
10.82
11.11
7.94
10.85
7.62
5.62
8.68
8.88
8.65
10.13
7.77
6.79
9.89.5
3
7.66
10.81
8.92
9.02
13.7
109.42
6.55
6.63
9.85
13.04
7.27
13.95
5.84
5.49
6.54
6.17
7.35
5.28
7.11
6.97
10.57
7.83
12.32
9.83
8.51
9.02
8.72
8.08
7.74
6.89
5.29
5.94
12.87
6.94
6.37
5.93
6.54
5.99
7.88
7.17
10.54
9.42
13.21
9.91
9.53
13.81
7.64
6.06
6.81
5.5
7.24
13.95
6.18
6.18
5.81
6.24
8.13
14.03
4.77
5.06
7.71
8.92
5.66.3
65.8
85.9
26.8
65.7
26.9
14.3
1
8.36
7.55
8.2
5.87
5.38
4.77
76.8
96.1
35.8
6
6.51
7.18
Serengeti Resources
Author: hclarke
Office:
Drawing:
Date: 12/03/2013
Scale: 1:14000 Projection: UTM Zone 9 (NAD 83)
500
Soil Geochemistryby Pb ppmFigure 16
0 125 250
metres
Soil Geochemistryby Pb ppm
12 to 110 (19)
8 to 12 (43)
4 to 8 (75)
34
8,0
00
mE
34
7,0
00
mE
6,409,000 mN
6,408,000 mN 6,408,000 mN
6,409,000 mN
6,407,000 mN
34
7,0
00
mE
34
6,0
00
mE
34
8,0
00
mE
6,407,000 mN
34
6,0
00
mE
118.563.4
128.5
156.3
159.2
108.1
158.2
100.767
79.584.8
89.874.1
143.3
225.9
148.2
257.4
88.5
106.2
135.1
105.1
89.688.2
102.3105
102.6
107.9
112.4
119.5
174.7
129.4
159.988.6
142.6
139.6
107.3
160.4
8497.7
102.194.7
179.7
129.194.4
194.4
108.1
106.4
7184.1
100.4
108.7
90.3105
107.978.7
97.7
74.792.1
105.5
102.4
171.4
104.4
103.9
133.1
103.3
152.3
102.5
72.2
471.1
177.8
107.184.289
82.6
86.4
174.280
80.173.9
120.480.2
73.473.9
82.284.7
10282.289
726.8
146.2
191.2
129.3
186.6
196.5
99.497.7
98.278.6
71.293.1
238.5
247.7
339.5
319.7
154.6
247.153.5
34.873.2
260.9
191.2
224.3
277232.5
258.3
178.4285
224.8
281.2
85.842.6
68.385.6
212.2
160.7
315.3
218.7
215.3
246.6
262.9
137.9
164.7
258.7
199.3
186.4
252.1
146.6
Serengeti Resources
Author: hclarke
Office:
Drawing:
Date: 12/03/2013
Scale: 1:14000 Projection: UTM Zone 9 (NAD 83)
500
Soil Geochemistryby Zn ppmFigure 17
0 125 250
metres
Soil Geochemistryby Zn ppm
250 to 727 (14)
150 to 250 (33)
50 to 150 (88)
34 to 50 (2)
348,000 mE
347,000 mE
6,409,000 mN
6,408,000 mN 6,408,000 mN
6,409,000 mN
6,407,000 mN
347,000 mE
346,000 mE
348,000 mE
6,407,000 mN
346,000 mE
83115
58 86
87
170
14860
193
103
126
141123
148
163
155
171
123
143151
135109
227141
199
176
184
326
123
196
103
217
290
68183
71151
304
165
141
165
116
179
177
208
122
69
224
196
99100
195
172
141
441
7073
208143221238
124
270
156
103
81
84
158
108
515
136
85
135
109
128
213
253
427
217
92106
124
124
109
82146
145
102
155147
118
15010680
245
136
315281
241
211152100168
302251
85
144173
26074 90
373
300
182
311
163
332197
130
180
192776
112
131
122
171253116
257
231
121
237136177156
168
462
Serengeti Resources
Author: hclarke
Office:
Drawing:
Date: 12/03/2013
Scale: 1:14000 Projection: UTM Zone 9 (NAD 83)
500
Soil Geochemistryby Ag ppbFigure 18
0 125 250
metres
Soil Geochemistryby Ag ppb
300 to 776 (13)
150 to 300 (57)
58 to 150 (67)
34
8,0
00
mE
34
7,0
00
mE
6,409,000 mN
6,408,000 mN 6,408,000 mN
6,409,000 mN
6,407,000 mN
34
7,0
00
mE
34
6,0
00
mE
34
8,0
00
mE
6,407,000 mN
34
6,0
00
mE
Serengeti Resources
Author: hclarke
Office:
Drawing:
Date: 12/03/2013
Scale: 1:14000 Projection: UTM Zone 9 (NAD 83)
500
Serengeti 2012Rock Samples
by Sample NumberFigure 19
0 125 250
metres
Andesite with FPY Dykes
Stikine Rock Sample 2012
(Shakes Creek Mass)Hornfelsed Contacts
Andesite
Syenite
Stikine Claim Outline
(Sample ID)
34
8,0
00
mE
34
7,0
00
mE
6,409,000 mN
6,408,000 mN 6,408,000 mN
6,409,000 mN
6,407,000 mN
34
7,0
00
mE
34
6,0
00
mE
34
8,0
00
mE
6,407,000 mN
34
6,0
00
mE
Serengeti Resources
Author: hclarke
Office:
Drawing:
Date: 12/03/2013
Scale: 1:14000 Projection: UTM Zone 9 (NAD 83)
500
Serengeti 2012Rock Samples
by Au ppb (value labelled)Figure 20
0 125 250
metres
Andesite with FPY Dykes
Stikine Rock Sample 2012
(Shakes Creek Mass)Hornfelsed Contacts
Andesite
Syenite
Stikine Claim Outline
(Au ppb)
34
8,0
00
mE
34
7,0
00
mE
6,409,000 mN
6,408,000 mN 6,408,000 mN
6,409,000 mN
6,407,000 mN
34
7,0
00
mE
34
6,0
00
mE
34
8,0
00
mE
6,407,000 mN
34
6,0
00
mE
Serengeti Resources
Author: hclarke
Office:
Drawing:
Date: 12/03/2013
Scale: 1:14000 Projection: UTM Zone 9 (NAD 83)
500
Serengeti 2012Rock Samples
by Cu ppm (value labelled)Figure 21
0 125 250
metres
Andesite with FPY Dykes
Stikine Rock Sample 2012
(Shakes Creek Mass)Hornfelsed Contacts
Andesite
Syenite
Stikine Claim Outline
(Cu ppm)
32
(7) Summary and Recommendations
Ground investigation by the Serengeti geologists has downgraded the potential of several areas within the area of study to host a significant mineral deposit; however, there is still enough cover around to possibly conceal an area of interest. An incomplete soil sampling program has left areas of anomalous soil values that are open to the west and south where sampling had been planned. While the known anomalies are interpreted with respect to the above geological observations to determine their significance, a follow-up field program would greatly improve the current understanding of the future prospectivity of the Stikine project. A strong anomaly in an area that is not well exposed may be of interest.
Overall Serengeti’s work programs in 2011 and 2012 have been successful in identifying the probable source of the RGS anomalies with the identification of a body of previously unknown potassic and locally sodic (albite) altered and copper mineralized syenite. The main mineralized area is open to the south where the outcrop exposure dips under soil cover and represents an attractive alkalic porphyry target.
With regards to overall potential of this target area, Serengeti believes this project to continue to be prospective to host a previously unknown Cu+-Au+/-Ag bearing alkali porphyry body. The challenges associated with this area may contribute to the lack of definition of a mineralized system here. These challenges include the steep terrain in the outcropping area the low pyrite content recognized in the area does not oxidize and form a visible gossan. Further mapping, prospecting and sampling will be required to further define the alteration and mineralization of what may be a system with a small alteration and low-sulphide bearing footprint.
Further mapping, prospecting and geochemical sampling should be completed to further define the footprint and potential grade of alteration and mineralization at the project- bearing in mind that further work may incur significant costs. It is important to note that while access to this property is reasonable, given the short helicopter flight from a road, any significant work completed at the project will be expensive, due to the topography and undeniably remote location. ie. estimated $10,000 per line km for IP, drilling at +$400 per metre. Field observations made by the Serengeti Project Geologist at this time are not entirely indicative that incurring these types of costs to conduct further exploration is recommended. Therefore an initial ground truthing of current target areas 1 to 5 (Figure 9) should be carried out prior to further sampling and exploration.
33
It is for this reason that it is suggested to follow up on the 2012 soil and rock sampling program. The following is recommended:
1) Recognize that follow up will be expensive, therefore determination of the quality
of the existing anomalies will be imperative. It is suggested that an initial few days in the field be spent on following-up on ground truthing the 2012 findings with a view to then decide if the quality of the targets warrant further extensional and in-fill soil sampling. Geological mapping and observation, structural mapping and specific follow up on the 2012 soil anomaly areas will be required for this. Only then it is recommended to follow up with further soil sampling on an in fill and extension basis.
2) Long term suggested follow-up to include ground geophysics- bearing in mind the low overall sulphide content of the system, as it is known to date. And reconnaissance diamond drilling could also be considered if better target definition is achieved.
Phase I Budget:
Follow-up and ground truthing targets
Geological Mapping and Prospecting - $25,000 Total - $25,000
Phase II Budget: Soil Sampling- In-Fill and Extension
Collect 400 soil samples in soil covered area to south of exposed mineralization at a cost of $75/sample- $30,000 Total - $30,000 Phase III Budget: IP and Drilling
IP Survey- 6 Line Km IP Survey at a cost of $10,000/line km - $60,000 Total - $60,000 Reconnaissance Diamond Drilling – 4 holes, 1,000 m @ $350/m - $350,000 Total - $350,000
34
References
Brown, D.A., Fox, F.E. L., Harvey-Kelley, I. Neill and J. Timmerman (1992): Geology
of the Chutine River – Tahltan Lake Area, Northwestern British Columbia (104G/12W
and 13), Province of British Columbia, Geological Survey Branch, Open File 1992-2,
pages 179-196.
Brown, D., Gunning, M. & Greig, C. (1996). The Stikine Project: Geology of Western Telegraph Creek Map Area, Northwestern British Columbia (NTS 104G/5, 6, 11W, 12, and 13). British Columbia, Ministry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources, Bulletin, 95, 175.
Ministry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources Assessment Reports, Several as listed in the body of this report; Assessment Report #’s 19072, 20414, and 30666.
Appendix A – Expenditure Statement
Stikine Property - Cost Statement - July 2012 Work
Staff:
Senior Geologist - 8 days at $450/day 3,600.00$
Junior Geologist - 8 days at $220/day 880.00$
Two Samplers - 7 days @ $250/day each 3,500.00$
Camp Costs and Supplies:
Food for Crew 750.00$
Supplies 405.00$
Fuel 180.00$
Accomodation 1,000.00$
Communications - incl sat phone time 100.00$
Hotel - 5 man days@ $140 room and board 700.00$
Helicopter:
Jet Ranger - 3.9 Hours @ ~$1150/hr wet 4,485.00$
Samples:
Soil Samples: 138 samples @$25/sample 3,450.00$
Rock Samples: 5 samples @$25/sample 125.00$
Freight 50.00$
Report:
2 days @ $450/day 900.00$
Sub-Total Expenditure 20,125.00$
Admin (10%) 2,012.50$
Net Expenditure 22,137.50$
PAC- Portable Assessment Credits (30%) 6,641.25$
Total 28,778.75$
Dates - July 14-19, 2012
Claims - 890709, 844461, 844459, 844458, 844463
Appendix B – Geologist’s Certificate
GEOLOGIST`S CERTIFICATE
I, Hilary C. Clarke of #803-1200 West Georgia Street, Vancouver, in the province of British Columbia, DO HEREBY CERTIFY:
1. THAT I am Serengeti Resources Inc.’s Senior Project Geologist.
2. THAT I am a 2004 graduate of Trinity College Dublin with an Honours BA.
3. THAT I have practised in the field of Geosciences since my graduation from University.
4. THAT this report is based on fieldwork carried out on July 14th to 19th, 2012, by Hugh Samson and staff of Serengeti Resources Inc. This work was supervised by the co-Author Hugh Samson.
5. THAT this report was written by myself under the supervision and direction of David W. Moore, President and CEO of Serengeti Resources Inc. and a Professional Geoscientist (P. Geo) registered and in good standing with the Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of the Province of British Columbia (#28163).
DATED at Vancouver, British Columbia this 7th day of November, 2012.
Hilary C. Clarke, B.A. (Hons.)
David W. Moore, P. Geo
Appendix C – Field Notes and Selected Element Assay Results
B- Horizon Soil Sample Notes and Analytical Results
Property Sample ID Ticket # Zone
Easting
(NAD83)
Northing(
NAD83) Date Slope Moisture Sampler ACME Job # Sample # (2) Mo (ppm) Cu (ppm) Pb (ppm) Zn (ppm) Ag (ppb) Ni (ppm) Co (ppm) Mn (ppm) Fe (%) As (ppm) U (ppm) Au (ppb) Th (ppm) Sr (ppm) Cd (ppm) Sb (ppm) Bi (ppm) V (ppm) Ca (%) P (%) La (ppm)
Cr (ppm) Mg Ba (ppm) Ti (%) B (ppm) Al (%) Na (%) K (%) W (ppm) Sc (ppm) Tl (ppm) S (%) Hg (ppm) Se (ppm) Te (ppm) Ga (ppm) Cs (ppm) Ge (ppm) Hf (ppm) Nb (ppm) Rb (ppm) Sn (ppm) Ta (ppm) Zr (ppm) Y (ppm) Ce (ppm) In (ppm) Re (ppb) Be (ppm) Li (ppm) Pd (ppb) Pt (ppb)
NAD83) Date Slope Moisture Sampler ACME Job # Sample # (2) Mo (ppm) Cu (ppm) Pb (ppm) Zn (ppm) Ag (ppb) Ni (ppm) Co (ppm) Mn (ppm) Fe (%) As (ppm) U (ppm) Au (ppb) Th (ppm) Sr (ppm) Cd (ppm) Sb (ppm) Bi (ppm) V (ppm) Ca (%) P (%) La (ppm)
Cr (ppm) Mg Ba (ppm) Ti (%) B (ppm) Al (%) Na (%) K (%) W (ppm) Sc (ppm) Tl (ppm) S (%) Hg (ppm) Se (ppm) Te (ppm) Ga (ppm) Cs (ppm) Ge (ppm) Hf (ppm) Nb (ppm) Rb (ppm) Sn (ppm) Ta (ppm) Zr (ppm) Y (ppm) Ce (ppm) In (ppm) Re (ppb) Be (ppm) Li (ppm) Pd (ppb) Pt (ppb)
1F05 1:1:1 Aqua Regia digestion Ultratrace ICP-MS analysis Completed15138 VAN
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS
Dave Moore
Hilary ClarkeCC:
Invoice To:
This report supersedes all previous preliminary and final reports with this file number dated prior to the date on this certificate. Signature indicates final approval; preliminary reports are unsigned and should be used for reference only.All results are considered the confidential property of the client. Acme assumes the liabilities for actual cost of analysis only. Results apply to samples as submitted.“*” asterisk indicates that an analytical result could not be provided due to unusually high levels of interference from other elements.
Acme does not accept responsibility for samples left at the laboratory after 90
days without prior written instructions for sample storage or return.
Immediate Disposal of Soil Reject
Return
DISP-RJT-SOIL
RTRN-PLP
138
Stikine 1
Stikine
Number of Samples:
P.O. Number
Shipment ID:
Project:
SAMPLE DISPOSAL
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS SMI12000105.1
CLIENT JOB INFORMATION
Serengeti Resources
1700 - 750 W. Pender Street
Vancouver BC V6C 2T8
Canada
1 of 6
August 03, 2012www.acmelab.com
Serengeti Resources
Acme Analytical Laboratories (Vancouver) Ltd.
2 of 6
Stikine
1700 - 750 W. Pender Street
Vancouver BC V6C 2T8 Canada
Project:
Page:
Report Date:
Phone (604) 253-3158 Fax (604) 253-1716
1020 Cordova St. East Vancouver BC V6A 4A3 Canada
1Part:
August 03, 2012
www.acmelab.com
Client: Serengeti Resources
Acme Analytical Laboratories (Vancouver) Ltd.
of 3
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS SMI12000105.1 CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS SMI12000105.1
This report supersedes all previous preliminary and final reports with this file number dated prior to the date on this certificate. Signature indicates final approval; preliminary reports are unsigned and should be used for reference only. This report supersedes all previous preliminary and final reports with this file number dated prior to the date on this certificate. Signature indicates final approval; preliminary reports are unsigned and should be used for reference only.
2 of 6
Stikine
1700 - 750 W. Pender Street
Vancouver BC V6C 2T8 Canada
Project:
Page:
Report Date:
Phone (604) 253-3158 Fax (604) 253-1716
1020 Cordova St. East Vancouver BC V6A 4A3 Canada
2Part:
August 03, 2012
www.acmelab.com
Client: Serengeti Resources
Acme Analytical Laboratories (Vancouver) Ltd.
of 3
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS SMI12000105.1 CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS SMI12000105.1
This report supersedes all previous preliminary and final reports with this file number dated prior to the date on this certificate. Signature indicates final approval; preliminary reports are unsigned and should be used for reference only. This report supersedes all previous preliminary and final reports with this file number dated prior to the date on this certificate. Signature indicates final approval; preliminary reports are unsigned and should be used for reference only.
This report supersedes all previous preliminary and final reports with this file number dated prior to the date on this certificate. Signature indicates final approval; preliminary reports are unsigned and should be used for reference only.
3 of 6
Stikine
1700 - 750 W. Pender Street
Vancouver BC V6C 2T8 Canada
Project:
Page:
Report Date:
Phone (604) 253-3158 Fax (604) 253-1716
1020 Cordova St. East Vancouver BC V6A 4A3 Canada
1Part:
August 03, 2012
www.acmelab.com
Client: Serengeti Resources
Acme Analytical Laboratories (Vancouver) Ltd.
of 3
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS SMI12000105.1 CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS SMI12000105.1
This report supersedes all previous preliminary and final reports with this file number dated prior to the date on this certificate. Signature indicates final approval; preliminary reports are unsigned and should be used for reference only. This report supersedes all previous preliminary and final reports with this file number dated prior to the date on this certificate. Signature indicates final approval; preliminary reports are unsigned and should be used for reference only.
3 of 6
Stikine
1700 - 750 W. Pender Street
Vancouver BC V6C 2T8 Canada
Project:
Page:
Report Date:
Phone (604) 253-3158 Fax (604) 253-1716
1020 Cordova St. East Vancouver BC V6A 4A3 Canada
2Part:
August 03, 2012
www.acmelab.com
Client: Serengeti Resources
Acme Analytical Laboratories (Vancouver) Ltd.
of 3
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS SMI12000105.1 CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS SMI12000105.1
This report supersedes all previous preliminary and final reports with this file number dated prior to the date on this certificate. Signature indicates final approval; preliminary reports are unsigned and should be used for reference only. This report supersedes all previous preliminary and final reports with this file number dated prior to the date on this certificate. Signature indicates final approval; preliminary reports are unsigned and should be used for reference only.
This report supersedes all previous preliminary and final reports with this file number dated prior to the date on this certificate. Signature indicates final approval; preliminary reports are unsigned and should be used for reference only.
4 of 6
Stikine
1700 - 750 W. Pender Street
Vancouver BC V6C 2T8 Canada
Project:
Page:
Report Date:
Phone (604) 253-3158 Fax (604) 253-1716
1020 Cordova St. East Vancouver BC V6A 4A3 Canada
1Part:
August 03, 2012
www.acmelab.com
Client: Serengeti Resources
Acme Analytical Laboratories (Vancouver) Ltd.
of 3
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS SMI12000105.1 CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS SMI12000105.1
This report supersedes all previous preliminary and final reports with this file number dated prior to the date on this certificate. Signature indicates final approval; preliminary reports are unsigned and should be used for reference only. This report supersedes all previous preliminary and final reports with this file number dated prior to the date on this certificate. Signature indicates final approval; preliminary reports are unsigned and should be used for reference only.
4 of 6
Stikine
1700 - 750 W. Pender Street
Vancouver BC V6C 2T8 Canada
Project:
Page:
Report Date:
Phone (604) 253-3158 Fax (604) 253-1716
1020 Cordova St. East Vancouver BC V6A 4A3 Canada
2Part:
August 03, 2012
www.acmelab.com
Client: Serengeti Resources
Acme Analytical Laboratories (Vancouver) Ltd.
of 3
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS SMI12000105.1 CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS SMI12000105.1
This report supersedes all previous preliminary and final reports with this file number dated prior to the date on this certificate. Signature indicates final approval; preliminary reports are unsigned and should be used for reference only. This report supersedes all previous preliminary and final reports with this file number dated prior to the date on this certificate. Signature indicates final approval; preliminary reports are unsigned and should be used for reference only.
This report supersedes all previous preliminary and final reports with this file number dated prior to the date on this certificate. Signature indicates final approval; preliminary reports are unsigned and should be used for reference only.
5 of 6
Stikine
1700 - 750 W. Pender Street
Vancouver BC V6C 2T8 Canada
Project:
Page:
Report Date:
Phone (604) 253-3158 Fax (604) 253-1716
1020 Cordova St. East Vancouver BC V6A 4A3 Canada
1Part:
August 03, 2012
www.acmelab.com
Client: Serengeti Resources
Acme Analytical Laboratories (Vancouver) Ltd.
of 3
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS SMI12000105.1 CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS SMI12000105.1
This report supersedes all previous preliminary and final reports with this file number dated prior to the date on this certificate. Signature indicates final approval; preliminary reports are unsigned and should be used for reference only. This report supersedes all previous preliminary and final reports with this file number dated prior to the date on this certificate. Signature indicates final approval; preliminary reports are unsigned and should be used for reference only.
5 of 6
Stikine
1700 - 750 W. Pender Street
Vancouver BC V6C 2T8 Canada
Project:
Page:
Report Date:
Phone (604) 253-3158 Fax (604) 253-1716
1020 Cordova St. East Vancouver BC V6A 4A3 Canada
2Part:
August 03, 2012
www.acmelab.com
Client: Serengeti Resources
Acme Analytical Laboratories (Vancouver) Ltd.
of 3
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS SMI12000105.1 CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS SMI12000105.1
This report supersedes all previous preliminary and final reports with this file number dated prior to the date on this certificate. Signature indicates final approval; preliminary reports are unsigned and should be used for reference only. This report supersedes all previous preliminary and final reports with this file number dated prior to the date on this certificate. Signature indicates final approval; preliminary reports are unsigned and should be used for reference only.
This report supersedes all previous preliminary and final reports with this file number dated prior to the date on this certificate. Signature indicates final approval; preliminary reports are unsigned and should be used for reference only.
6 of 6
Stikine
1700 - 750 W. Pender Street
Vancouver BC V6C 2T8 Canada
Project:
Page:
Report Date:
Phone (604) 253-3158 Fax (604) 253-1716
1020 Cordova St. East Vancouver BC V6A 4A3 Canada
1Part:
August 03, 2012
www.acmelab.com
Client: Serengeti Resources
Acme Analytical Laboratories (Vancouver) Ltd.
of 3
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS SMI12000105.1 CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS SMI12000105.1
This report supersedes all previous preliminary and final reports with this file number dated prior to the date on this certificate. Signature indicates final approval; preliminary reports are unsigned and should be used for reference only. This report supersedes all previous preliminary and final reports with this file number dated prior to the date on this certificate. Signature indicates final approval; preliminary reports are unsigned and should be used for reference only.
6 of 6
Stikine
1700 - 750 W. Pender Street
Vancouver BC V6C 2T8 Canada
Project:
Page:
Report Date:
Phone (604) 253-3158 Fax (604) 253-1716
1020 Cordova St. East Vancouver BC V6A 4A3 Canada
2Part:
August 03, 2012
www.acmelab.com
Client: Serengeti Resources
Acme Analytical Laboratories (Vancouver) Ltd.
of 3
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS SMI12000105.1 CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS SMI12000105.1
This report supersedes all previous preliminary and final reports with this file number dated prior to the date on this certificate. Signature indicates final approval; preliminary reports are unsigned and should be used for reference only. This report supersedes all previous preliminary and final reports with this file number dated prior to the date on this certificate. Signature indicates final approval; preliminary reports are unsigned and should be used for reference only.
This report supersedes all previous preliminary and final reports with this file number dated prior to the date on this certificate. Signature indicates final approval; preliminary reports are unsigned and should be used for reference only.
Stikine
1700 - 750 W. Pender Street
Vancouver BC V6C 2T8 Canada
Serengeti ResourcesClient:
Project:
Report Date:
www.acmelab.com
Phone (604) 253-3158 Fax (604) 253-1716
1020 Cordova St. East Vancouver BC V6A 4A3 Canada August 03, 2012
This report supersedes all previous preliminary and final reports with this file number dated prior to the date on this certificate. Signature indicates final approval; preliminary reports are unsigned and should be used for reference only.
Stikine
1700 - 750 W. Pender Street
Vancouver BC V6C 2T8 Canada
Serengeti ResourcesClient:
Project:
Report Date:
www.acmelab.com
Phone (604) 253-3158 Fax (604) 253-1716
1020 Cordova St. East Vancouver BC V6A 4A3 Canada August 03, 2012
This report supersedes all previous preliminary and final reports with this file number dated prior to the date on this certificate. Signature indicates final approval; preliminary reports are unsigned and should be used for reference only.
Stikine
1700 - 750 W. Pender Street
Vancouver BC V6C 2T8 Canada
Serengeti ResourcesClient:
Project:
Report Date:
www.acmelab.com
Phone (604) 253-3158 Fax (604) 253-1716
1020 Cordova St. East Vancouver BC V6A 4A3 Canada August 03, 2012
This report supersedes all previous preliminary and final reports with this file number dated prior to the date on this certificate. Signature indicates final approval; preliminary reports are unsigned and should be used for reference only.
1020 Cordova St. East Vancouver BC V6A 4A3 Canada
Client:
Submitted By:
Receiving Lab:
Received:
Report Date:
Page:
1700 - 750 W. Pender Street
Vancouver BC V6C 2T8 Canada
Hugh Samson
Canada-Smithers
July 20, 2012
Method
Code
Code Description Report
Status
SAMPLE PREPARATION AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
Test
Wgt (g)
Number of
Samples
Lab
R200-250 Crush, split and pulverize 250 g rock to 200 mesh5 SMI
1DX2 1:1:1 Aqua Regia digestion ICP-MS analysis Completed155 VAN
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS
Hilary Clarke
Dave MooreCC:
Invoice To:
This report supersedes all previous preliminary and final reports with this file number dated prior to the date on this certificate. Signature indicates final approval; preliminary reports are unsigned and should be used for reference only.All results are considered the confidential property of the client. Acme assumes the liabilities for actual cost of analysis only. Results apply to samples as submitted.“*” asterisk indicates that an analytical result could not be provided due to unusually high levels of interference from other elements.
Acme does not accept responsibility for samples left at the laboratory after 90
days without prior written instructions for sample storage or return.
Dispose of Reject After 90 days
Return
DISP-RJT
RTRN-PLP
5
Stikine 1
Stikine
Number of Samples:
P.O. Number
Shipment ID:
Project:
SAMPLE DISPOSAL
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS SMI12000106.1
CLIENT JOB INFORMATION
Serengeti Resources
1700 - 750 W. Pender Street
Vancouver BC V6C 2T8
Canada
1 of 2
August 03, 2012www.acmelab.com
Serengeti Resources
Acme Analytical Laboratories (Vancouver) Ltd.
2 of 2
Stikine
1700 - 750 W. Pender Street
Vancouver BC V6C 2T8 Canada
Project:
Page:
Report Date:
Phone (604) 253-3158 Fax (604) 253-1716
1020 Cordova St. East Vancouver BC V6A 4A3 Canada
1Part:
August 03, 2012
www.acmelab.com
Client: Serengeti Resources
Acme Analytical Laboratories (Vancouver) Ltd.
of 2
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS SMI12000106.1 CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS SMI12000106.1
This report supersedes all previous preliminary and final reports with this file number dated prior to the date on this certificate. Signature indicates final approval; preliminary reports are unsigned and should be used for reference only. This report supersedes all previous preliminary and final reports with this file number dated prior to the date on this certificate. Signature indicates final approval; preliminary reports are unsigned and should be used for reference only.
This report supersedes all previous preliminary and final reports with this file number dated prior to the date on this certificate. Signature indicates final approval; preliminary reports are unsigned and should be used for reference only.
Stikine
1700 - 750 W. Pender Street
Vancouver BC V6C 2T8 Canada
Serengeti ResourcesClient:
Project:
Report Date:
www.acmelab.com
Phone (604) 253-3158 Fax (604) 253-1716
1020 Cordova St. East Vancouver BC V6A 4A3 Canada August 03, 2012
This report supersedes all previous preliminary and final reports with this file number dated prior to the date on this certificate. Signature indicates final approval; preliminary reports are unsigned and should be used for reference only.
Stikine
1700 - 750 W. Pender Street
Vancouver BC V6C 2T8 Canada
Serengeti ResourcesClient:
Project:
Report Date:
www.acmelab.com
Phone (604) 253-3158 Fax (604) 253-1716
1020 Cordova St. East Vancouver BC V6A 4A3 Canada August 03, 2012
This report supersedes all previous preliminary and final reports with this file number dated prior to the date on this certificate. Signature indicates final approval; preliminary reports are unsigned and should be used for reference only.