Top Banner
compositesworld.com POWER PALLET DECEMBER 2010 Double Bagging: Double Infusion Benefits Life Cycle Assessment: Are Composites “Green”? IBEX Show Highlights/ COMPOSITES 2011 Preview Static load : 4,124 kg/ 9,094 lb Static load: 4,124 kg/ 9,094 lb
60

2010_dec

Apr 05, 2015

Download

Documents

brkappa
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: 2010_dec

com

positesw

orld

.com

PO

WER P

ALLET

DECEMBER 2010

Double Bagging: Double

Infusion Benefits

Life Cycle Assessment:

Are Composites “Green”?

IBEX Show Highlights/

COMPOSITES 2011 Preview

Static load:

4,124 kg/

9,094 lb

Static load:

4,124 kg/

9,094 lb

Page 2: 2010_dec

SAERTEX GermanyE-Mail: [email protected]

SAERTEX Stade, GermanyE-Mail: [email protected]

SAERTEX FranceE-Mail: [email protected]

SAERTEX PortugalE-Mail: [email protected]

SAERTEX USAE-Mail: [email protected]

SAERTEX South AfricaE-Mail: [email protected]

SAERTEX IndiaE-Mail: [email protected]

SAERTEX China E-Mail: [email protected]

WIND ENERGY

BOAT AND SHIPBUILDING

RAILWAY

AUTOMOTIVE

AEROSPACE

PIPE RELINING

CIVIL ENGINEERING

RECREATION

MULTIAXIALS

CLOSED MOULD REINFORCEMENTS

SELF ADHESIVE FABRICS

KITTED-FABRICS

PREFORMS

COMPOSITE PARTS

BOAT

CLCLOSOSEDE MOULD

SEELFLF

���������������������������������������3FJOGPSDJOH�ZPVS�*EFBT�����������������������������JO�UIF�"NFSJDBT�GPS����:FBST��

www.saertex.comSAERTEX worldwide��������������������������������7JTJU�VT�BU�$PNQPTJUFT��������#PPUI����

Page 3: 2010_dec

Table of Contents

FEATURES

December 2010 | Vol. 16 | No. 6

CT

D

EC

EM

BE

R 2

01

0

1

34

40

54

The complex, one-piece PP/glass LFT pallets on the bottom and in the middle of this stack of bagged materials (a static load totaling 4,124 kg/9,094 lb) are the product of a new LFT molding process developed by LOMOLD Group (Cape Town, South Africa). The composite pallets each weigh only 16 kg/35 lb — 60 percent less than comparable wood pallets. The rugged composite material is designed to provide service life of 10 years vs. three-to-four years for wood, and they are 100-percent recyclable. Source | LOMOLD Group

24

26

34

40

54

COMPOSITES

WATCH

Energy | 10

Automotive | 18

News | 23

COLUMNS

Editor | 2Automotive: On the fence

Composites: Past, | 5Present & Future

DEPARTMENTS

Applications | 46

New Products | 47

Calendar | 50

Showcase | 51

Marketplace | 52

Ad Index | 53

Publisher’s Statement | 53

COVER PHOTO

COMPOSITES 2011 PreviewThe annual ACMA event returns to Florida, with a keynote look at composites from a military point of view.

IBEX 2010: Looking Up in LouisvilleA new venue helps regenerate a recession-battered industry, drawing in more exhibitors and attendees than in 2009.

Q&A Forum: Composites in AutomotiveHow will fi ber-reinforced polymers fare in a post-recession auto market obsessed with cost and fuel-economy?

Life Cycle Assessment: Are Composites Green?Methods for calculating the impact composites have on the environment are enabling data-driven comparisons to traditional materials. By Sara Black

Inside Manufacturing: Maintaining Fiber Length in Complex 3-D DesignsAward-winning composite pallet showcases new LFT molding process from South Africa.By Peggy Malnati

Engineering Insights | Double-bag Infusion | 70% Fiber Volume?A double vacuum-bag system and tight process control enable repeatable fi ber volumes of 60 to 70 percent and improves consistency of infused laminates.By Ginger Gardiner

30

Page 4: 2010_dec

2

CO

MP

OS

IT

ES

WO

RL

D.C

OM

Editor

Composites Technology (ISSN 1083-4117) is published bimonthly (February, April, June, August, October & December) by Gardner Publications Inc. Corporate and production offi ces: 6915 Valley Ave., Cincinnati, OH 45244. Editorial offi ces: PO Box 992, Morrison, CO 80465. Periodicals postage paid at Cincinnati, OH and additional mailing offi ces. Copyright © 2010 by Gardner Publications Inc. All rights reserved.

Canada Post: Publications Mail Agreement #40612608. Canada Returns to be sent to Bleuchip International, PO Box 25542, London, ON N6C 6B2 Canada.

Postmaster: Send address changes to Composites Technology, 6915 Valley Ave., Cincinnati, OH 45244-3029. If undeliverable, send Form 3579.

Subscription rates: Nonqualifi ed $45 (USD) per year in the United States, $49 (USD) per year in Canada, $100 (USD) per year airmail for all other countries. Single issue prepaid, $10 (USD) per copy in North America, $25 (USD) in all other countries. Send payment directly to Composites Technology at Cincinnati offi ces, (800) 950-8020; fax: (513) 527-8801.

PUBLISHER: MEMBERSHIPS:

CORPORATE OFFICES

Gardner Publications Inc.6915 Valley Ave. / Cincinnati, OH 45244-3029p: 513.527.8800 / f: 513.527.8801 / www.gardnerweb.com

Group Publisher Richard G. Kline II / [email protected]

Publisher Ryan Delahanty / [email protected]

Marketing Manager Kimberly A. Hoodin / [email protected]

Graphic Designer Susan Kraus / [email protected]

EDITORIAL OFFICES

CompositesWorldPO Box 992 / Morrison, CO 80465

p: 719.242.3330 / f: 513.527.8801 / www.compositesworld.com

Editor-in-Chief Jeff Sloan / [email protected] / 719.242.3330

Managing Editor Mike Musselman / [email protected]

Technical Editor Sara Black / [email protected]

Contributing Writers Dale Brosius / [email protected]

Ginger Gardiner / [email protected]

Michael R. LeGault / [email protected]

Peggy Malnati / [email protected]

John Winkel / [email protected]

Karen Wood / [email protected]

SALES OFFICES

Mountain U.S., Texas & International Sales OfficePublisher Ryan Delahanty / [email protected] p: 630.584.2025 / f: 630.232.5076

Eastern U.S. Sales OfficeDistrict Manager Barbara Businger / [email protected] p: 330.239.0318 / f: 330.239.0326

Western U.S. Sales Office (CA, ID, NV, UT, WA)Regional Vice President Steve Kosloff / [email protected] p: 818.865.8881 / f: 818.865.8181

Western U.S. Sales Office (AZ, CA, MT, OR)District Manager Rick Brandt / [email protected] p: 310.792.0255 / f: 800.527.8801

European Sales OfficeEuropean Manager Eddie Kania / [email protected] p/f: +44 1663 750242

CIRCULATION

Direct all Composites Technology circulation changes to:p: 800.950.8020 / f: 513.527.8801 / [email protected]

The automotive

industry could as

easily fall into old

habits as tip over into

new possibilities.

Jeff Sloan

Automotive:

On the fence

It’s hard, looking at the fast-evolving automotive industry, not to get a little excited

about the real and potential change at work that favors substantially increased use of

composites in cars and trucks over the next couple of decades.

Increasing fuel prices, changing Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) stan-

dards, peak oil, rapid growth in developing countries, focus on sustainability and

increasing consumer demand for alternate energy vehicles all seem to signal a new

and diff erent automotive industry. On top of this is evidence that composites of

almost every ilk provide the best method of decreasing vehicle weight and increasing

fuel effi ciency. T is is thanks not only to part-by-part weight loss, but also the ripple

eff ect it provides — a lighter chassis, for example, requires a smaller engine and a less

robust braking system. Indeed, a 2007 report issued by engineering and consulting

fi rm Ricardo (West Sussex, U.K.) noted that on a small car, a 20 percent weight loss

increases fuel effi ciency 8.4 percent. And if the engine on that small car is downsized,

fuel effi ciency increases 13 percent. T is means a car that averages 39 mpg could see

that number jump to 44 mpg.

T e automotive industry, it appears, is responding. As we’ve reported in CT over

the past few months, there are scores of new and emerging automakers working with

composites to develop hybrid and electric cars that could be on the road soon. Even

established carmakers (e.g., BMW, with its Mega-

city Vehicle) promise to make new and innovative

use of composites in auto structures.

Despite all of this apparent momentum,

however, I think it’s clear that the automotive

industry is still sitting uncertainly on the evolu-

tionary fence, and could as easily fall back into

old habits as tip over into new possibilities. T e

reasons for this tipping point can be found in the

auto market and in the culture of auto manufacturing.

Auto market: Growth of smaller, alternatively powered cars relies fi rst on the

consumer, who, in the U.S., still prefers relatively large, powerful, comfortable vehicles

that are easy to fuel and maintain. Will that preference change? If so, what will change

it? My view: T e wallet guides much American decision-making. As long as gas prices

remain competitive with other energy sources, the combustion engine reigns. Rising

gas prices ushered in many of the auto industry changes we’re seeing now, but prices

since have stabilized. T at, coupled with the recession, has slowed the rate of change.

Auto culture: GM, Ford, Chrysler, Toyota, Honda and other legacy automakers use

established manufacturing materials and systems reinforced by decades of reliance on

steel. If increased use of composites required only that metallic structures be replaced

by a glass- or carbon-reinforced plastic, then adapting to this changing market would

be simple. But optimal use of composites in a vehicle requires from-scratch design and

engineering work, along with adoption of manufacturing processes that don’t exist in

a steel-dominated environment — not a trivial matter.

Automakers will change their ways and embrace composites integration only if the

market demands it. And the market will demand it only if the cost of ownership and

operation of a vehicle tips the consumer toward smaller, more effi cient cars. T e next

few years, I suspect, will show us just how much change this important market will

embrace — and on which side of the evolutionary fence.

Page 5: 2010_dec
Page 6: 2010_dec
Page 7: 2010_dec

5

Composites: Past, Present & Future

CT

D

EC

EM

BE

R 2

01

0

Bio | Cedric Ball

For more than 15 years, Cedric Ball has led marketing

and new business development efforts related to the use

of composite materials in the transportation, building and

alternative-energy markets. Currently, he holds the position

of global marketing director at Bulk Molding Compounds

Inc., headquartered in West Chicago, Ill.

Fuel cells (fi nally) set to power composites growth

Sour

ce: G

BI R

esea

rch

Cumulative commercial installations by fuel cell type, through 2009. The

clear front-runner is the proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cell.

CUMULATIVE INSTALLATIONS BY FUEL CELL TYPE (2009)

SOFC 22.9%

PAFC 13.8%

MCFC 5.4%

DMFC 1.3%Other 0.1%

PEM 56.3%

A single fuel cell could contain hundreds of plates made from corro-

sion-resistant composite materials. T at fact has stirred the imagi-

nation of many in this industry, but until recently, had not stirred a

great deal of commercial activity. T at is changing.

Although the fuel cell market is relatively small and lags behind

some of the other energy-conversion technologies now in wide-

spread commercialization, it is beginning to move beyond its in-

fancy. Fuel cells and related technologies will form a sizable new

market as they move past the phase of demonstration projects,

overcome longstanding technology hurdles and gain momentum in

their progress toward aff ordability.

THE MARKET

T e fuel cell market can be divided into three major segments:

portable, transportation and stationary. Each of these can be further

segmented into a variety of broad and niche applications. Although

the majority of attention has been paid to the potential for fuel cell-

powered vehicles in the automotive market, most observers agree

that signifi cant cost and technology barriers remain to widespread

use of fuel cells in passenger cars. Not so well known is the fact that

stationary units have already reached aff ordable levels and are being

sold for residential, light commercial and some industrial uses.

According to GBI Research (New York, N.Y.), global revenues

for fuel cell systems grew to $521 million (USD) in 2009. About

two-thirds of that total was for stationary fuel cell systems, with the

balance going to portable applications, including transportation.

Drivers for the adoption of fuel cell technology include not only the

increasing environmental concerns about fossil-fuel power sources

(e.g., coal- and fuel-oil-fi red electric, gasoline and diesel automotive

systems), but also the need for power sources with long life and low

maintenance as well as the ever-increasing need for more compact

and effi cient power systems.

As advances in electrochemical and materials technologies have

made fuel cells attractive, and more importantly, aff ordable enough

to compete with conventional power sources, large players, such as

Coca-Cola, Wal-Mart, FedEx and most of the major car manufac-

turers, have announced plans to expand their use of fuel cells be-

yond demonstration projects. Some programs are already underway.

Most programs will begin full-scale production in the 2013-2015

timeframe, with scale-ups beginning in 2011. New installations are

expected to grow from ~2,500 units, today, to more than 200,000

units annually by 2015, based on industry announcements.

THE TECHNOLOGY

A basic fuel cell is an electrochemical device that combines hydrogen

and oxygen to produce electricity, with water and heat as its only

by-products. Fuel cells are similar to batteries electrochemically, but

diff er in that they use less toxic materials and do not need to be

recharged. As long as fuel is supplied, the fuel cell will generate elec-

tiricity. Because the fuel-to-energy conversion is electrochemical

and involves no combustion, the process is clean, quiet and two to

three times more effi cient than burning fuel.

T ere are perhaps a dozen derivative fuel cell designs. Each of

these could emerge as suitable for specifi c applications (see chart

below). T e front-running fuel cell design for high-volume ap-

plications, however, is the proton exchange membrane (PEM)

fuel cell. T is type operates at relatively low temperatures (about

175°F/79°C), has high power density and can vary its output quickly

to meet shif s in power demand. PEM fuel cells are well suited for

applications in which quick startup is required, such as automobiles

or back-up stationary power supplies.

High-temperature proton exchange membrane (HT-PEM) fuel

cells are a variant of the standard PEM fuel cells. Both include mem-

brane electrode assemblies (MEAs). However, HT-PEM fuel cells

operate at higher temperatures (250°F/121°C to 390°F/199°C) and

are more tolerant to impurities that can build up within the cell over

time, reducing its effi ciency. HT-PEM fuel cells are a preferred fuel

cell technology for integration with fuel reformers (mechanisms

that extract hydrogen from other fuel sources). HT-PEM fuel cells

outfi tted with reformers allow the units to use standard propane or

natural gas, for example, as its source of hydrogen. Because direct

hydrogen storage and the lack of a hydrogen infrastructure have

AFC 0.2%

Page 8: 2010_dec

Looking for Longer, Lighter Blades?It’s Time to Talk.

Progressively larger wind turbines powered by even

larger blades are the industry’s future—and its biggest

challenge. Momentive* is helping fabricators build

these blades with proven epoxy resin systems that

maximize fatigue performance while optimizing

processing speeds. For over 25 years, our EPIKOTE™

Resin systems have powered blade and turbine

growth. Now we’re working on the next big

breakthroughs in fi ber wetting, transverse tensile

and compressive strengths, and other areas that

will enable even bigger advances. Let’s talk about it.

Contact us at momentive.com/epoxywind.

Tests show new Momentive resins can

improve transverse tensile strength by up to 15%.

New epoxy resin systems are making longer, lighter blades a reality.

© 2010 Momentive Specialty Chemicals Inc. momentive.com

*Hexion has a new name. We’re now Momentive.

Page 9: 2010_dec

A schematic of a typical PEM fuel cell. This type is fi nding use in high-volume

applications is are well suited for applications in which quick startup is

required.

been major obstacles to greater fuel cell adoption, HT-PEM fuel

cells fi tted with onboard fuel reformers and connected to existing

natural gas lines are proving to be a practical near-term solution.

It also is possible to capture and use the fuel cell’s generated heat.

Combined heat and power (CHP) fuel cell systems provide heat for

some water and climate-control systems, accelerating the payback

to building owners.

THE AGE-OLD BATTLE

In an individual PEM fuel cell, electric power is generated in

MEAs that contain fl ow fi eld (bi-polar) plates and gas diff usion

(anode and cathode) layers. T ese components control the mix of

hydrogen and oxygen in the electrochemical reaction. Individual

cells are combined into stacks to scale the power of a given fuel

cell module (larger stacks generate greater power). Bi-polar plates

can be made from metals or composites. Because each material has

inherent advantages and disadvantages, much study is devoted to

determining which materials are best suited to a given application.

With metals, platinum is a common catalyst used for the an-

ode and cathode of the fuel cell. Stainless steel alloys can be, and

are, used for bipolar plates. T e principal advantage of metals is the

ease with which they can be produced in very thin cross-sections,

allowing for compact stacks and greater power densities, an im-

portant attribute for transportation and portable applications. T e

disadvantages of metals are their high cost and eventual corrosion,

causing failure of the cell. In the case of platinum, concern focuses

not only on cost, but also the adequacy of the world supply of plati-

num if fuel cell vehicles, for example, were to make up signifi cant

portion of the global automotive fl eet. Scientists continue to search

for methods to reduce platinum loading through the use of alloys,

platinum nanoparticles and fi lm applications.

It turns out that thermoset compounds are nearly ideal for the

acidic electrolyte environment of a fuel cell. Chopped carbon fi ber

and graphite particles added to the compound provide conduc-

Source: Ballard Power Systems

Easy Release

Visit frekote.comor call 1.800.562.8483 to consult

with a mold release application expert.

Superior Mold Release.All The Time.

Unlike sacrificial waxes or silicones, Frekote® semi-permanent mold release agents chemically bond to the mold surface, allowing the parts to release cleanly with no mold release transfer.

Frekote® semipermanent release agents offer:• more releases per application• lower overall cost & increased profitability• support from a dedicated & experienced team• reduced downtime & increased productivity• lower rejection rates & higher quality products

Exc

ept

as o

ther

wis

e not

ed, a

ll m

arks

use

d a

re t

radem

arks

and/o

r re

gis

tere

d t

radem

arks

of

Hen

kel a

nd/o

r its

affi

liat

es in

the

U.S

. and e

lsew

her

e. ®

= r

egis

tere

d in

the

U.S

. Pat

ent

and T

radem

ark

Offi

ce.

©

Hen

kel C

orpor

atio

n, 2

010. A

ll ri

ghts

res

erve

d. 6

554 (5/1

0)

Page 10: 2010_dec

Work for Vestas

and make a

differenceOur wind turbines generate CO2-free electricity

to millions of households worldwide.

Read more and apply at vestas.com/jobs

Power your life - Vestas offers you challenging

career opportunities within a global organisation.

As the world’s leading supplier of wind power

solutions, we have delivered more than 41,000

wind turbines in 65 countries. Over 20,000

employees are eager to welcome new, dedicated

colleagues on our journey to a more sustainable

future. Would you like to join us?

Immediate opportunities at Vestas include more

than 150 challenging positions globally within

composite design engineering, materials, pro-

ject management, quality engineering, products

and design engineering, systems engineering,

mechanics, electrical and power plant engineer-

ing, construction management and various other

specialist fields.

Page 11: 2010_dec

tivity, and for many years, such compounds have been used in fl ow

fi eld (bi-polar) plates. As advancements have been made in control-

ling formulation and processing, compounders have extended the

use of composites to the anode and cathode layers as well. T ermo-

set composites off er corrosion resistance and dimensional stability

at high temperature at a relatively low cost compared to precious

metal or graphitic sheet materials.

In the past, thermoset materials were thought to be limited to

lower volume and stationary applications, due to longer cycle times,

higher scrap rates and an inability to produce molded composite

plates as thin as stamped metal plates. More recently, however, these

issues have been overcome, providing a clear advantage over metals in

high-temperature and low-temperature PEM fuel cells where power

density is a secondary requirement (i.e., stationary applications).

Chopped carbon fi ber and graphite particle fi lled/vinyl ester

bulk molding compounds (BMCs) are fi nding wide use in bi-polar

plates for low-temperature PEM fuel cells. When introduced in

1998, the cost of composite plates made with BMC was high — in

the neighborhood of $25/lb — for reasons related to compound

cost, throughput and operational quality. Compound costs have de-

clined signifi cantly since that time and as volumes have increased.

Similarly, molding cycles once measured in minutes are now rou-

tinely completed in seconds, due to formulation improvements and

thinner plate cross-sections. T e latter, in fact, have been reduced

from 7.0 mm to as thin as 1.7 mm (0.276 inch to 0.067 inch) to-

day, improving on the power/volume ratios possible with composite

plates. Another advantage of composites over metals is in the de-

sign and production of fl ow fi eld patterns, considered by each OEM

to be a key and proprietary aspect of its fuel cell’s operation. With

composites, one can produce diff erent and more complex fl ow fi eld

designs on opposite sides of the plate. With thin, stamped metal

plates, it is only possible to have a mirror-image design on opposing

sides of the plate.

Finally, experienced composite plate molders, such as Dana

(Paris, Tenn.), Metro Mold and Design (Rogers, Minn.), Entegris

Fuel Cells (Chaska, Minn.) and InnoVentures (Willoughby, Ohio),

have improved quality and throughput. Similar advances have been

made with graphite-fi lled/phenolic compounds, which are suitable

for use in the high operating temperatures and corrosive environ-

ment of CHP HT-PEM fuel cells.

THE DECISION POINT

In some ways, the question of “composite vs. metal” is misguided

when it comes to determining which is the “best” fuel cell mate-

rial. Classically trained engineers tend toward linear thinking when

selecting materials. Fuel cells, however, are complex, interactive

systems that require a holistic approach to their development. T e

design, material choice and the manufacturing process must be

taken into account to deliver an end product that performs eff ec-

tively, effi ciently and aff ordably. T e more successful fuel cell OEMs

have discovered — or are discovering — that composites are well

suited for such designs. T e key is to work with molders and mate-

rial suppliers, helping them understand the design possibilities.

Although much work remains, composites already are playing a

central role in shaping the future of the fuel cell market. | CT |

Frekote® high performance semipermanent moldrelease agents will increase your productivity and reduce the overall cost of your molding processes. These reliable products are backed by the most experienced mold release application experts, to help you perfect your manufacturing process and gain the most releasesper application.

Frekote® semipermanent release agents offer:• more releases per application• lower overall cost & increased profitability• support from a dedicated & experienced team• reduced downtime & increased productivity• lower rejection rates & higher quality products

SaveSome

Coin

Visit frekote.comor call 1.800.562.8483 to consult

with a mold release application expert.

Overall Lower Cost.

All The Time.

Exc

ept

as o

ther

wis

e not

ed, a

ll m

arks

use

d a

re t

radem

arks

and/o

r re

gis

tere

d t

radem

arks

of

Hen

kel a

nd/o

r its

affi

liat

es in

the

U.S

. and e

lsew

her

e. ®

= r

egis

tere

d in

the

U.S

. Pat

ent

and T

radem

ark

Offi

ce.

©

Hen

kel C

orpor

atio

n, 2

010. A

ll ri

ghts

res

erve

d. 6

554 (5/1

0)

Page 12: 2010_dec

COMPOSITES WATCH

10

CO

MP

OS

IT

ES

WO

RL

D.C

OM

Composites WATCH

Tidal turbines, wind turbines and electric vehicles: How will they and their composite

components fare in the post-recession future?

ENERGY

Gamesa triples in China, Nordex starts up in U.S. despite slowdown

Wind turbine manufacturer Gamesa

(Madrid, Spain) announced on

Sept. 14 that it will triple its invest-

ment in China through 2012 to expand and adapt the

company’s manufacturing centers for the develop-

ment of its new turbine systems. By 2009, Gamesa had

invested a total of €42 million on facilities in China.

T e company’s investment plan involves more than €90

million more from 2010 through 2012, bringing its

cumulative investments to more than  €130 million

($182 million USD), to meet rising demand from

China’s wind energy industry and to address medium-

term local production needs for its new G9X-2.0 MW,

G10X-4.5 MW and off shore turbine systems.

Gamesa chairman Jorge Calvet says the company in-

tends to “cement its position as one of the top fi ve play-

ers in the Chinese wind energy industry … and meet the

needs of its customers … in the regions with the greatest potential

for the wind energy business.” Gamesa’s forecasts indicate that in

2011, the Chinese market will account for more than 30 percent

of the total wind energy sold (vs. 15 percent in 2009). As a result,

Gamesa expects to nearly double sales in China within two years.

Gamesa also broke ground on its sixth manufacturing center

in China, in the province of Inner Mongolia, one of China’s wind

energy development hubs. A nacelle assembly site for the G8X-2

MW turbine, the factory will have an annual production capacity

of 500 MW. T e plant is scheduled to begin operating in 2011. Just

four months ago, Gamesa celebrated the groundbreaking of its fi f h

manufacturing plant in China (equipped with an annual produc-

tion capacity of 500 MW of G8X-2 MW wind turbines) in the city

of Da’an, Jilin Province (northwest China), a region boasting some

of the richest wind energy resources in China. When the Jilin and

Inner Mongolia facilities come online in 2011, Gamesa’s production

capacity in China will total 1,500 MW per year. 

Meanwhile, turbine builder Nordex (Chicago, Ill.) announced

on Oct. 4 that it has begun production at its turbine manufacturing

plant in Jonesboro, Ark. T e fi rst Jonesboro production crew has

completed a 10-week intensive training program at the company’s

fl agship plant in Rostock, Germany. T e crew’s initial work pack-

age will involve a turbine nacelle. Training will continue during the

early phase of production, with the team’s German counterparts

taking up residence in Jonesboro for several months to work along-

side their U.S. colleagues. Nordex broke ground on its manufactur-

ing plant in September 2009 and completed construction in July

of this year.

“Two years ago, we announced our intention to make Nordex

wind turbines in the U.S., for the U.S.,” said Ralf Sigrist, president

and CEO of Nordex USA Inc. “Today we’re doing it. We hope Con-

gress will do the same,” he added, “by fi nally passing meaningful

renewable energy legislation.”

Sigrist’s remarks coincided with the American Wind En-

ergy Assn.’s (AWEA, Washington, D.C.) recent call for action to

strengthen the policies that unleashed a wave of private investment

in 2008 and 2009. AWEA reports that the U.S. added only 395 MW

of wind-powered electric generating capacity in the third quarter

of 2010, its poorest quarterly showing since 2007. Year-to-date in-

stallations stood at 1,634 MW, down 72 percent from 2009 and the

fewest since 2006. AWEA identifi ed the lack of long-term U.S. en-

ergy policies, such as a renewable electricity standard (RES), as a

signifi cant factor in the slowdown. T e resulting uncertainty has

discouraged U.S. electric utilities from moving forward with wind

build-out plans. Already in place in China and Europe, renewable

energy policies have resulted in more than $35 billion of invest-

ment in 2010 — nearly four times the investment the U.S. will see

this year. A second factor in the slowdown is the U.S. government’s

need to deal with concerns about turbine interference with aircraf

radar. Without a national policy, these concerns delay wind farm

startups because regional governments must address the issue on a

case-by-case basis.

Sourc

e: N

ord

ex

Page 13: 2010_dec

Visit frekote.comor call 1.800.562.8483 to consult

with a mold release application expert.

Dedicated Specialists.All The Time.

Backed by mold release application experts and factory trained distribution partners, we’ll ensure you have the right product for your application, and help you perfect your manufacturing process. Scalability, testing and training will make sure you operate smoothly.

Frekote® semipermanent release agents offer:• more releases per application• lower overall cost & increased profitability• support from a dedicated & experienced team• reduced downtime & increased productivity• lower rejection rates & higher quality products

Exc

ept

as o

ther

wis

e not

ed, a

ll m

arks

use

d a

re t

radem

arks

and/o

r re

gis

tere

d t

radem

arks

of

Hen

kel a

nd/o

r its

affi

liat

es in

the

U.S

. and e

lsew

her

e. ®

= r

egis

tere

d in

the

U.S

. Pat

ent

and T

radem

ark

Offi

ce.

©

Hen

kel C

orpor

atio

n, 2

010. A

ll ri

ghts

res

erve

d. 6

554 (5/1

0)

Loyal Experts

U.S. Department of Energy

to fund tidal turbine

energy projects

U.S. Energy Secretary Steven Chu announced the recipients of

more than $37 million (USD) in funding awarded to accelerate

the technological and commercial readiness of emerging marine

and hydrokinetic technologies, which seek to generate renew-

able electricity from oceans, rivers and streams. T e 27 projects

range from concept studies and component design research to

prototype development and in-water device testing. T e Depart-

ment of Energy (DoE) funding, it is hoped, will advance the ability

of marine hydrokinetic energy technologies to contribute to the

nation’s electric power supply.

“T is represents the largest single investment of federal fund-

ing to date in the development of marine and hydrokinetic energy

technologies,” said Chu. “T ese innovative projects will help grow

water power’s contribution to America’s clean energy economy.”

Selected turbine projects and the companies chosen to build, in-

stall, operate, monitor and evaluate them include the following:

Ocean Power Technologies Inc.’s (Pennington, N.J.) full-scale, 15-

kW PowerBuoy system, which will be deployed in the Oregon Terri-

torial Sea to collect two years of detailed operating data. DoE funding

for the project is $2.4 million of a total project cost of $4.8 million.

Ocean Renewable Power Co.’s (ORPC, Portland, Maine) com-

mercial-scale array of fi ve grid-connected TidGen Project devices

on the sea fl oor in Cobscook Bay off Eastport, Maine, which will

be deployed in two phases over three years. T e project is designed

to advance ORPC’s cross-fl ow turbine tidal energy technology and

produce a full-scale, grid-connected energy system. T e complet-

ed project will comprise an array of interconnected TidGen hydro-

kinetic energy conversion devices in moderate- to high-velocity

tidal currents in water as deep as 150 f /45.7m. DoE will fund $10

million of the projected total cost of $21.1 million.

Two 10m/32.8-f diameter Open-Centre Turbines, developed

and manufactured by OpenHydro Group Ltd. (Dublin, Ireland),

will be deployed by the Public Utility District No.1 of Snohom-

ish County (Everett, Wash.). T e project is expected to generate 1

MW of electricity during peak tides, with an average energy out-

put of approximately 100 kW. DoE funding is $10 million of a total

project cost of $20.1 million.

See “Composites Tap Tide Energy,” CT October 2010 (p. 28) |

http://short.compositesworld.com/FQuUgcEb.

ENERGY

IPS Structural Adhesives Corp. (Durham, N.C.) announced on Oct. 18

its acquisition of Holdtite Adhesives Ltd. (Newcastle, U.K.). The prod-

uct offering of the merged companies will include 10:1 and 1:1 methyl

methacrylate (MMA), cyanoacrylate (CA) and ultraviolet (UV) cure

adhesives.  IPS plans immediate investment in Holdtite to implement

manufacturing and technical service models that have proven success-

ful in North America. IPS will adopt the information systems currently

employed by Holdtite.

BIZ BRIEF

Page 14: 2010_dec

Low odor. High shine.We’ve got your molding process covered.Trigonox® 524

Trigonox® 524 is now formulated for low VOCs and emissions, so you’ll achieve beautiful results without the odor.

AkzoNobel is one of the world’s largest producers of organic peroxides. We supply industries and consumers worldwide with innovative products and are passionate about developing sustainable answers for our customers. With operations in more than 80 countries, our 55,000 people around the world are committed to excellence and delivering Tomorrow’s Answers Today.™

Visit our website at www.akzonobel.com/pc or call (800) 828-7929 to fi nd out more.

Page 15: 2010_dec

CT

D

EC

EM

ER

2

01

0

13

COMPOSITES WATCH

PRO SET® The science of epoxy

Laminating SystemsAdhesives

Fairing CompoundsProcess Equipment

MJM 40

Doug Zurn

Boston Boatworks

Z

Designer

Builder

Pro-Set Inc.

888-377-6738www.prosetepoxy.com

AEWC/DeepCwind launch

offshore wind conference

for state of Maine

T e University of Maine’s (UMaine) AEWC Advanced Structures

and Composites Center and the DeepCwind Consortium hosted

the fi rst annual Maine Deepwater Off shore Wind Conference on

Oct. 19 at Point Lookout Resort in Northport, Maine.

Conference session topics included deepwater off shore wind

and economic development, responsible siting of deepwater

off shore wind turbines, environmental and ecological moni-

toring activities at the University of Maine Deepwater Off shore

Wind Test Site and deepwater fl oating wind turbine technology

development. Attendees heard AEWC director Dr. Habib Dagher

report that large off shore turbines, deployed 20 to 50 miles (32.2

to 80.5 km) out to sea, appear to be viable, given the abundant

wind resources available in the Gulf of Maine. Given the favorable

conditions, fl oating turbine designs and construction methods are

said to be under development. Notably, a small-scale test wind

turbine is scheduled for off shore deployment near Monhegan,

Maine, in 2012.

T e DeepCwind Consortium was established by UMaine’s

AEWC in 2009 through a competitive grant program awarded by

the U.S. Department of Energy to advance renewable energy goals

within the state of Maine.

ENERGY

Page 16: 2010_dec

©2010 Wabash National, L.P. All rights reserved. Wabash,® Wabash National® and DuraPlate® are marks owned by Wabash National, L.P.

THE COMPOSITE THAT’LL SHAKE UP YOUR THINKING.

The DuraPlate® composite – a different kind of material that doesn’t fall

into the traditional composite categories. While the name may be new

to you, DuraPlate has been the leading structural composite material for

over 15 years in transportation products – such as semi-trailers, storage

containers and box trucks. So, if you want a proven, cost-effective,

durable solution for your product or application, take a closer look at

DuraPlate. It will give you a new perspective on composites.

Go to www.thinkduraplate.com or

call 1-888-480-4157 to learn how

DuraPlate can work for you.

Pre-Coated,

Galvanized

Steel Skins

Foamed

HDPE Core

Page 17: 2010_dec

CT

D

EC

EM

ER

2

01

0

15

COMPOSITES WATCH

Composite materials and tooling supplier Gurit (Zurich, Switzerland)

announced on Sept. 29 that it has won its fi rst contract for a wind tur-

bine blade mold to be delivered to a customer in Europe from Gurit’s

Red Maple tooling plant in Taicang, China. The European order is a result

of Gurit’s global tooling strategy. The strategy was initiated following

shipments of several well-received blade molds to European-controlled

customers in China as well as the delivery of molds to two customers

in India. Red Maple’s new production facility is designed for the manu-

facture of next-generation blade molds for wind turbines up to 7 MW.

Red Maple is an independent, fully integrated and highly specialized

moldmaker that emphasizes attractively priced, solid quality tooling

equipment with very short lead times. 

Resin manufacturer AOC LLC (Collierville, Tenn.) reports that its parent

company, The Alpha Corp., is celebrating its 50th anniversary with the

grand opening of its new world headquarters in Piperton, Tenn. Fred

Norman, Alpha Corp.’s president and COO, says, “Building the new

headquarters here reaffi rms our commitment to the future of western

Tennessee. Because of the way the building incorporates green solu-

tions, it has been certifi ed under the Leadership in Energy and Environ-

ment Design [LEED] system of the U.S. Green Building Council. These

actions recognize how we strive to be a responsible business neighbor

of this region as well as a model environmental steward.”

BIZ BRIEF

800.621.8003 www.compositesone.com

Tff!uxp!ebzt!pg!Dmptfe!Npme!xpsl!dfmmt!

qspevdjoh!qbsut-!jodmvejoh!xjoe!fofshz!

dpnqpofout!ÑMJWF-!jo!qfstpo-!sjhiu!po!uif!

tipx!à!pps/!Mjtufo!bt!Dmptfe!Npme!fyqfsut!

sfwfbm!uifjs!upq!tfdsfut/!Hfu!botxfst!up!zpvs!

ibse.ijuujoh!Dmptfe!Npme!rvftujpot/!Uifo!

efdjef!xijdi!qspdftt!jt!sjhiu!gps!zpv/

Qsftfoufe!MJWF!cz!Dpnqptjuft!Pof!xjui!uif!Dmptfe!Npme!Bmmjbodf!boe!pwfs!26!upq!tvqqmjfst!bu!DPNQPTJUFT!3122-!Cppui!$!:28-!Gfcsvbsz!4!.5/

MIRteqmicrofiber composites

Fort Lauderdale, February 3-4, Booth #917

www.closedmoldalliance.com

Page 18: 2010_dec

With good chemistry great things happen.™

Energize your business with 30,000 new prospects!Come “grow” with us on CompositeBuild.com.

At Ashland, we are committed to growing the composites industry. If you produce or supply a composite

material that innovative builders would want to use, contact Ashland to link your product into

CompositeBuild.com. For more information, contact Bob Moffit at [email protected].

® Registered trademark, Ashland or its subsidiaries, registered in various countries™ Trademark, Ashland or its subsidiaries, registered in various countries* Trademark owned by a third party© 2010, AshlandAD-10746

Page 19: 2010_dec

CT

D

EC

EM

ER

2

01

0

17

COMPOSITES WATCH

Precision Quincy / 1625 West Lake Shore Dr. / Woodstock, IL

Made in USA / 800.338.0079 / www.precisionquincy.com

The Engineering Services Branch of Firehole Composites (formerly

Firehole Technologies, Laramie, Wyo.) has announced a contract rela-

tionship with Farr Yacht Design Ltd. (Annapolis, Md.) that entails ana-

lytical evaluation, design review and modifi cation recommendations

for a high-performance ocean racing yacht. Mark Bishop, a Farr Yacht

senior design engineer, says that Firehole’s Helius:MCT software reduces

the gap between technical analysis and physical design. “This makes it

possible for us to interface directly with their staff and make real-time

corrections and modifi cations to the design, saving us hours, money

and frustration,” he reports. “Tools like this allow us to maximize per-

formance and optimize weight while still maintaining safety margins.”

Technical fabrics manufacturer SAERTEX USA LLC (Huntersville, N.C.)

has planned a $6.5 million, three-year expansion of its facility in Hunt-

ersville, a result of growing demand for lighter components that save

energy. The expansion is expected to create 178 jobs. The project was

made possible in part by a $110,000 grant from the One North Carolina

Fund. Founded in 1982, SAERTEX is headquartered in Saerbeck, Germa-

ny, and has locations in France, Germany, Portugal, South Africa, India,

China and the U.S. The company opened its fi rst North Carolina facility

in 2000 and currently employs 126 people in Huntersville. “SAERTEX

USA appreciates the support of Gov. Bev Perdue and the State of North

Carolina in helping increase our footprint in North Carolina, while sup-

porting wind and other green industries in the United States,” notes

general manager Dr. Christian Kissinger.

BIZ BRIEF

Page 20: 2010_dec

COMPOSITES WATCH

18

CO

MP

OS

IT

ES

WO

RL

D.C

OM

Engineeringand Design of

Advanced Composites

7 7 5 - 8 2 7 - 6 5 6 8 t w w w. a b a r i s . c o m

t several different classes to choose fromt world-class instructorst intensive curriculum t up to 4.0 CEU’s per 5 day classt highly interractive hands-on experience

o f fe r i n g s h o r t c o u r s e s

EVs: Will the public buy?

Global sales of hybrid electric vehicles

(HEVs) and battery electric vehicles (BEVs) is

expected to total 5.2 million units — a mere

7.3 percent — of the 70.9 million passenger vehicles that will be

sold worldwide in the next decade, according to Drive Green 2020:

More Hope than Reality, a report from J.D. Power and Associates

(Westlake Village, Calif.). By comparison, J.D. Power projects that

global HEV/BEV sales in 2010 will be 954,500 vehicles, or 2.2

percent of the projected 44.7 million sold through this year.

T e report considers factors that will aff ect the potential of

green vehicles, many of which will be lightweighted with compos-

ites. It will be diffi cult, the report says, to convince large numbers

of consumers to switch to HEVs and BEVs. Signifi cant consumer

migration likely will be stimulated by a signifi cant increase in the

global price of petroleum-based fuels by 2020; a substantial break-

through in green technologies that would reduce vehicle costs

and improve consumer confi dence; and government policy that

encourages consumers to purchase EVs. J.D. Power insists that,

based on currently information, none of these scenarios is likely

during the next 10 years.

Another study, by Bloomberg New Energy Finance (Wash-

ington, D.C.), is more upbeat. It claims that Nissan’s Leaf battery-

electric model and the Chevrolet Volt plug-in hybrid could com-

prise 9 percent of annual auto sales in 2020 and 22 percent in 2030

AUTOMOTIVE

Page 21: 2010_dec

CT

D

EC

EM

ER

2

01

0

19

COMPOSITES WATCH

40 years of Recognizing the Plastics Innovation that

Keeps Families Safe, Saves Fuel, Adds Functionality,

& Makes Vehicles More Stylish & Durable.

See this year’s SPE Automotive Innovation Awards

Competition winners at http://speautomotive.com/inno

and http://speautomotive.com/awa.

The Companies of North CoastCOMMITTED TO ADVANCING THE COMPOSITE INDUSTRY

www.nctm.com www.northcoastcomposites.com

Phone (216) 398-8550

North Coast Tool & Mold Corp.Mold design and manufacturing

North Coast Composites Inc.RTM process development and

serial part manufacturing

ISO9001-2000AS9100B

C o m p o s i t e s

(1.6 million and 4 million units, respectively). T at will depend on

two key factors: aggressive reductions in battery costs and rising

gasoline prices, the company says. In the short term, the sticker

price and access to appropriate charging locations will be the most

signifi cant limitation to acceptance of HEVs and BEVs.

On that subject, Eldib Engineering & Research Inc.’s (Berkeley

Heights, N.J.) new study discusses electric vehicle charging sta-

tions. It estimates that 5 million charging stations will be in use by

2015. Station cost (from $1,500 to $35,000, depending on charger

power) will be defrayed, in part, by the U.S. government. Eldib

says the top provider is Roth Capital Partners (Newport Beach,

Calif.) closely followed by Coulomb Technologies (Campbell,

Calif.). For more information, contact Dr. Andrew Eldib: eldib@

eldib.com. Read more about electric vehicles in CT April 2010 (p.

28) | http://short.compositesworld.com/wODV21GH.

Sour

ce }

Cou

lom

b Te

chno

logi

es

Page 22: 2010_dec

COMPOSITES WATCH

20

CO

MP

OS

IT

ES

WO

RL

D.C

OM

SPE Automotive Innovation Awards

In the Chassis/

Hardware category,

Hyundai won for

its integrated car-

rier rail for the rear

plastic door module

(bottom-lef photo)

on its 2010 Sonata.

T e rail is produced

via injection mold-

ing by PYEONG

HWA Automotive

(Daegu, South Ko-

rea) using Stamax

30YM240 long glass fi ber (LGF)-reinforced polypropylene (PP)

provided by SABIC Innovative Plastics (Pittsfi eld, Mass.). Previous

plastic door-module designs had separate metal rails attached to the

module af er molding. T e new design features a window-regulator

guide rail molded as part of the plastic door module. Wire-harness

clips, the drum housing, the location pin and the door-handle brack-

et also are molded in.

A fi nalist in Chassis/Hardware was the structural composite

radiator support (top-right photo) on the 2010 Ford Taurus, fea-

turing LGF-PP from Dow Automotive (Auburn Hills, Mich.) and

AUTOMOTIVE

T e Society of Plastics Engineers (SPE) Auto-

motive Div. (Troy, Mich.) hosted the 40th

Annual Automotive Innovation Awards

Competition and Gala on Nov. 9 in the Detroit suburb of Livonia.

Winners and fi nalists in this competition highlighted current and

emerging design, materials, tooling and processing trends in cate-

gories covering body exterior, interior, hardware, safety, powertrain,

performance and others.

Composite products were among those honored. In the Body

Interior category, the winner was a self-reinforced airbag door

system (top-lef photo) on the 2007 PST Citroën C5 Sedan, manu-

factured by Visteon Corp. (Van Buren Township, Mich.). T is is

the auto industry’s fi rst airbag door system that integrates a self-

reinforced polymer construction (polypropylene fi ber-reinforced

polypropylene), which is supplied by LyondellBasell (Auburn Hills,

Mich.) and Propex Fabrics (Gronau, Germany). T e door system

is fully recyclable and does not require typical postmold scoring/

weakening of the door fl ap. T e mold required a multizone tem-

perature control system and a vacuum holding system to fi x the

fabric insert in place during the molding process. T e program also

required development of a specialized fi ber-reinforced material to

facilitate overmolding and subsequent adhesion. T e resulting sys-

tem is lighter than competing systems and saves approximately $5

per part as compared to welded systems.

Teijin Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan) announced plans

to build a high-performance polyethylene

(HP-PE) facility in Emmen, The Netherlands,

with commercial production to start in the

second half of 2011. Teijin’s HP-PE, which

will be available in fi ber or tape forms, is

produced with ultra-high-molecular-weight

polyethylene (UHMWPE) polymers. Targeted

applications include reinforced plastics,

protective materials, ropes, nets and medical

materials.

Resin manufacturers DSM Composite Res-

ins AG (Schaffhausen, Switzerland) and

Kemrock Industries & Exports Ltd. (Vado-

dara, India) have signed a memorandum of

understanding (MOU) to form a joint venture

in India for the manufacture of unsaturated

polyester and vinyl ester specialty resins.

Through the alliance with DSM, Kemrock is

expected to fortify its expertise in compos-

ites manufacturing and align it with global

standards. DSM is expected to strengthen its

presence in India.

BIZ BRIEFS

Sourc

e (f

or

all) S

PE

Auto

moti

ve D

iv.

[email protected] mclube.com

1.800.2.MCLUBE

Page 23: 2010_dec

CT

D

EC

EM

ER

2

01

0

21

COMPOSITES WATCH

Composites One (Ar-

lington Heights, Ill.).

T is compression-

molded part passed

a 5,340N hood-latch

pull test. It features a

glass mat overlay for

extra strength and

reduces weight by 33

percent and direct

costs by 20 percent.

It also consolidates

part count, simplifi es

materials handling

and shortens assem-

bly time compared to

the coated steel and cast magnesium parts it replaced.

Chrysler’s on-engine oil fi lter module (bottom-right photo) on

its 2010 Pentastar was a fi nalist in the Materials category. Made by

Hengst North America (Camen, S.C.), the module incorporates

BASF’s (Ludwigshafen, Germany) Ultramid A3WG7 HRX BK, a

PA 6/6 with 35 percent glass reinforcement. T e material’s supe-

rior heat and chemical resistance reportedly enabled engineers to

eliminate 148 parts and locate the large, spin-on oil-fi lter module

directly in the engine valley. T is reduced the weight by 43 percent

and saves more than 60 percent in direct costs.

INTEGRITY™

No other gel coat has thismuch Integrity.Integrity™ is more than the name of our gel coat. It’s a performance promise.

It’s your assurance of the most advanced MACT-compliant technology available.

Test after rigorous test has proved Integrity gel coat’s ultrahigh resistance to

porosity, blistering, blushing and fading.

Choose from our bold, lustrous colors or ask our experts to customize colors to

any need. Integrity also stands for consistent quality and color from batch to batch

for superior application and repair performance.

You won’t find another gel coat with this much Integrity. That’s a promise.

© 2008 Interplastic Corporation. All rights reserved.

Contact us for more information, to order samples or locate a distributor.

1.800.736.5497www.interplastic.com/integrity

Page 24: 2010_dec

Register for our newest CompositesWorld Conference

2011 Wind & Ocean Energy Seminar

IN ASSOCIATION WITH

LEARN MORE AT: compositesworld.com/conferences

The wind blade and ocean energy markets

are growing! Attend Wind Blades & Ocean

Energy 2011 and ready yourself to enter

the composites wind energy market!

• Market Overview & Future Opportunities

• Tabletop Exhibits

• Technology, Design & Manufacturing

• Installation, Maintenance & Repair

2-DayEvent

2011 WIND & OCEAN ENERGY SEMINARApril 13-14 — Wyndham Portland Airport, Portland, ME

Page 25: 2010_dec

CT

D

EC

EM

BE

R 2

01

0

23

COMPOSITES WATCH

Composites NEWS

Momentive Performance Materials Holdings Inc. (Albany, N.Y.),

the parent company of Momentive Performance Materials Inc.,

and Hexion LLC (Columbus, Ohio), the parent company of epoxy

manufacturer Hexion Specialty Chemicals Inc., completed a previ-

ously announced merger on Oct. 1. T e resulting fi rm will retain

the Momentive name. T e combination creates a company with

117 production facilities, more than 10,000 employees, annualized

sales of approximately $7.5 billion (USD) and a pro forma adjusted

EBITDA of $1.24 billion. Headquartered in Columbus, Ohio, the

new Momentive makes approximately 28 percent of its sales in

fast-growing regions, including the BRIC countries (Brazil, Russia,

India and China), with the balance in more mature markets (33

percent in Europe and 39 percent in North America).

T e combined company is organized into three global busi-

ness divisions: Silicones and Quartz, led by president Steven

Delarge and headquartered in Albany, N.Y.; Epoxy, Phenolic

and Coating Resins, led by president Joseph Bevilaqua; and For-

est Products, under president Dale Plante. “Our new combined

enterprise now can off er a broader portfolio of specialty technolo-

gies and products to meet the diverse applications needs of our

global customers,” says Momentive chairman and CEO Craig O.

Morrison. “T ese technologies include silicones, epoxies, quartz,

phenolics, acrylics, aminos, acids and others that are used alone,

or in combination, across thousands of critical industrial and con-

sumer applications where superior performance is required.”

Momentive Performance Materials was formed in 2006

through the acquisition of GE Advanced Materials. Hexion Spe-

cialty Chemicals was formed in 2005, when the previously inde-

pendent Borden Chemical Inc., Resolution Performance Products

Inc., Resolution Specialty Materials Inc. and Bakelite AG merged

into a single entity.  Hexion’s (formerly Resolution Performance

Product’s) epoxy resin systems are well-established in the com-

posites industry, including EPIKOTE and EPIKURE epoxy sys-

tems formulated for wind turbine blade fabrication.

Hexion/Momentive merger made offi cial

LASER PROJECTION SYSTEMS FOR

OUTLINES, TEMPLATES, SHAPES

High precision laser template projection

and laser measurement on fl at and cur-

ved surfaces. Red, green or multicolor.

www.LAP-LASER.com

Finally, there’s a fire retardant, low smoke/low smoke toxicity phenolic FRP that’s processed as easily as polyester. It’s called Cellobond FRP and it’s processed from phenolic resins available in a wide range of viscosities for:

• Hand lay-up/spray-up* • RTM• Filament winding* • SCRIMP• Press molding • Pultrusion

*FM approved

Gel coated Cellobond Phenolic FRP far exceeds DOT and FAA requirements and meets all stringent European fire perfor-mance tests with ease.

The low density, high temperature resis-tance, low flame and low smoke / smoketoxicity properties make Cellobond thehottest new material for fire retardantapplications. For the aircraft and aerospaceindustries that require ablative materials, we also offer Durite resins from Hexion.

Call or write today for more information.

Finally, a fire retardant FRP with unmatched processability.

Mektech Composites Inc.Distributor for Hexion Specialty Chemicals, Inc.

40 Strawberry Hill Rd. • Hillsdale, NJ 07642Tel: (201) 666-4880 Fax: (201) 666-4303E-Mail: [email protected] • www.hexion.comCellobond and Durite are registered trademarks of Hexion Specialty Chemicals, Inc.

Page 26: 2010_dec

24

CO

MP

OS

IT

ES

WO

RL

D.C

OM

Show Coverage

A

COMPOSITES 2011

PREVIEW

f er taking its 2010 show to Las Vegas, Nev., the American

Composites Manufacturers Association (ACMA, Arlington,

Va.) is hosting COMPOSITES 2011, its annual trade show

and conference, in sunny, warm Ft. Lauderdale, Fla., Feb. 2-4 at

the Greater Ft. Lauderdale Convention Center. As it does each

year, ACMA’s show features a mix of conference sessions, keynotes,

networking sessions, awards and exhibitions.

ACMA is kicking off the show this year with another high-

profi le keynote speaker. U.S. Army Gen. Stanley McChrystal

(ret.), former commander of U.S. and International Forces in Af-

ghanistan, will speak on Wednesday, Feb. 2, 1:30 to 2:45 p.m.

McChrystal is expected to share insight, experience and stories

that will help composite companies understand the importance

of openness, teamwork and forward thinking. He also will ad-

The annual ACMA event returns to Florida, with a keynote

look at composites from a military point of view.

THE SHOW IN BRIEF

WHAT: COMPOSITES 2011

WHERE: Greater Ft. Lauderdale Convention Center, Ft. Lauderdale, Fla.

WHEN: Feb. 2-4, 2011

Information: www.acmashow.org or (847) 620-4481

SCHEDULE: WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 2

Education Sessions (technical papers, workshops) 9:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.

Keynote, Gen. Stanley McChrystal (U.S. Army ret.) 1:30 p.m. to 2:45 p.m.

Education Sessions (technical papers, workshops) 3:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.

Welcome Reception 5:30 p.m. to 7:00 p.m.

THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 3

General Session Keynote (Speaker TBD) 8:30 a.m. to 9:30 a.m.

Exhibit Hall Open 9:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.

ACE & Pinnacle Awards Luncheon 12:30 p.m. to 1:30 p.m.

Education Sessions (technical papers, workshops) 2:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.

Networking Receptions 5:30 p.m. to 6:30 p.m.

FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 4

Education Sessions (technical papers) 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.

Exhibit Hall Open 9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.

Networking Activity 5:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m.

The ACMA’s COMPOSITES

2011 trade show returns to

the East Coast at the

Greater Ft. Lauderdale

Convention Center in Ft.

Lauderdale, Fla.

T

Page 27: 2010_dec

CT

D

EC

EM

BE

R 2

01

0

25

800.621.8003 www.compositesone.com www.b2bcomposites.com

Pof!dbmm/!Pof!tpvsdf/!Dpnqptjuft!Pof/f!dbmpnq

!Poftjuf

Pof!dbmm!up!Dpnqptjuft!Pof!qvut!zpv!jo!upvdi!

xjui!b!tjohmf!tpvsdf!pggfsjoh!uif!cspbeftu!bssbz!

pg!qspevdut!gspn!uif!joevtuszÖt!upq!tvqqmjfst/!

Ju!dpoofdut!zpv!xjui!ufdiojdbm!fyqfsut!boe!

mpdbm!dvtupnfs!tfswjdf!sfqt!ifmqjoh!zpv!ß!oe!

uif!qspevdut!zpv!offe!gps!cpui!usbejujpobm!boe!

fnfshjoh!nbslfut/!Ju!fnqpxfst!zpv!up!cfdpnf!

mfbofs-!hsffofs!boe!npsf!qspevdujwf!uispvhi!

iboet.po!usbjojoh!jo!Dmptfe!Npme!boe!puifs!

npsf!fgß!djfou!qspdfttft/!Boe!ju!hjwft!zpv!

bddftt!up!cbdl.vq!tvqqpsu!boe!wbmvf.beefe!

tfswjdft!uibu!dbo!ifmq!esjwf!ofx!cvtjoftt!

hspxui/

UibuÖt!uif!qpxfs!pg!pof/!Dpnqptjuft!Pof/!

Tff!uif!Mfbo!Nfbo!Dmptfe!Npme!Nbdijof!Efnpt!bu!DPNQPTJUFT!3122!Ñ!MJWF!bu!cppui!$:28-!Gfc/!4.5/

dress use of composite materials in military applications. T e day

ends with the annual Opening Welcome Reception, sponsored

by resin supplier Reichhold Inc. (Research Triangle Park, N.C.)

at the Hilton Ft. Lauderdale Marina, from 5:30 p.m. to 7:00 p.m.

T e show’s second keynote address is scheduled form 8:30 a.m.

to 9:30 a.m. on T ursday, Feb. 3 and open to all attendees. At CT press

time, the second speaker had not yet been determined. T e exhibit

hall opens T ursday as well, from 9:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., and fea-

tures more than 200 exhibitors representing all aspects of the com-

posites manufacturing supply chain, from resins to tooling to fi ber.

T e annual awards lunch starts at noon on T ursday and fea-

tures winners from one of the show’s

biggest attractions: the Award for Com-

posites Excellence (ACE) and Pinnacle

Product Showcase and Competition, with

products in several categories, including

Creative Design, Innovation in Green,

Process Innovation, Equipment Innova-

tion and Sustainability. Winning prod-

ucts will be on display in the exhibit hall.

T ursday evening, look for network-

ing receptions, sponsored by distribu-

tor Composites One (Arlington Hts.,

Ill.), emphasizing cast polymers, emerg-

ing markets, pultrusion, infrastructure/

corrosion, building and construction,

and international business. Composites

One and closed molding systems devel-

oper Magnum Venus Plastech (MVP,

Clearwater, Fla.) will bring their closed

molding road show to Ft. Lauderdale,

repeating a demonstration of MVP’s

new Flex Molding Process, which made

its debut at the IBEX Show in Septem-

ber (see CT’s postshow review on p. 26).

PAPERS, EDUCATION

SESSIONS

Education sessions and technical papers

are being presented throughout all three

days of the show, starting Wednesday

morning and fi nishing Friday af ernoon.

Broad education topics include de-

sign and engineering, business strategy,

traditional and emerging markets, green

composites, manufacturing, materials,

regulation and legislation, and cast poly-

mers. Notable presentation topics will in-

clude lightweight boat fabrication, robotic

trimming, gel coat repair, mold release

selection, resin transfer molding (RTM)

and light RTM, plus sessions devoted to

fi berglass sizing, control of combustible

dust, the issue of styrene exposure, and

techniques for lifecycle analysis. Addition-

ally, there will be a presentation outlining the U.S. Department of

Energy’s approach to the wind power industry.

Technical papers will deal with a variety of issues related to de-

sign and engineering, green composites, manufacturing, traditional

and emerging markets, materials and pultrusion. Notable areas of

investigation will include collaborative engineering, vacuum infu-

sion of complex shapes, reducing the fl ammability of cellulosic fi -

bers, styrene-free resins, bio-composites, bond line read-through,

waterjet cutting, epoxy prepregs with bio-based curing agents, the

infl uence of glass on part design and performance, and evaluation

of high temperature for pultruded composites. | CT |

Page 28: 2010_dec

26

CO

MP

OS

IT

ES

WO

RL

D.C

OM

Show Coverage

O

IBEX 2010

FLEXIBLE, INFUSIBLE 3-D CORE

3A Composites, a division of Schweitzer Technologies Group (Sins,

Switzerland) exhibited BALTEK, AIREX and Lantor products. New

this year is LANCORE, a “true 3-D fl exible core material,” for resin

transfer molding (RTM) Lite and vacuum infusion processes. T e

infusible core combines a polyester nonwoven with synthetic micro-

spheres, then sandwiches that between two layers of chopped strand

mat. T e result reportedly off ers improved cosmetics and part thick-

ness consistency, but consumes less resin than other infusible cores,

thus yielding a part that exhibits better quality at less weight. T e

material features a random printed-dot cell structure, so that the

channels between cells act as a fl ow medium, but the material itself

resists compression like a foam or balsa core. It is available in thick-

nesses from 2 mm to 5 mm (0.079 inch to 0.197 inch) and reportedly

saves up to 25 percent in resin use compared to conventional RTM

Lite mat products. www.corematerials.3acomposites.com

FATIGUE-RESISTANT VINYL ESTERS

Ashland Performance Materials (Dublin, Ohio) exhibited the

AME 6001-, AME 5001- and AME 1001-series vinyl ester resins.

AME 6001 is said to off er a 50 percent increase in tensile elonga-

tion and a 15 percent increase in tensile and fl exural strengths over

n the occasion of its 20th anniversary, the International BoatBuild-

ers’ Exhibition & Conference (IBEX) was hosted, for the fi rst time

ever, outside southern Florida. The new location, the Kentucky Ex-

position Center in Louisville, Ky., on the banks of the Ohio River, appeared

to be a plus: IBEX reported a 14 percent increase over 2009 in the number

of exhibitors — to 546 companies, including 70 fi rst-time participants. At-

tendance also was up, 13 percent to 5,161, and this show marked the

fi rst IBEX appearance of the Marine Aftermarket Accessories Trade Shows

(MAATS) Aftermarket Pavilion. The positive statistics echoed the marine in-

dustry’s overall mood: glad to have the worst of the economic recession

over and cautiously positive about the slow upturn as it begins to gain trac-

tion. The show’s theme, “Where the Business of Boating Gets Done,” was

appreciated in the aisles by exhibitors and visitors who often described the

show as the “three most productive days of the year” for boatbuilders.

CT was on hand for the event, and found a variety of new composites

products and technologies on display.

Looking

Up in

Louisville

previous formulations and, as a result, off ers greater resistance to

fatigue failure. A reformulated version of AME 1001 also delivers

signifi cant improvements in fatigue life. AME 5001 is designed to

provide excellent blister resistance. All three are intended for appli-

cations that require low hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) content.

AME 6001 exceeds DNV Grade “1” mechanical properties, while

AME 1001’s mechanical properties exceed DNV Grade “2” require-

ments. All three resins may be used in layup, sprayup or closed

molding processes. www.ashland.com/businesses/apm

REUSABLE BAGGING SYSTEM

Composites One (Arlington Heights, Ill.) maintained its leadership

role in closed-molding demonstrations, featuring the new Flex

Molding Process developed by Magnum Venus Plastech (MVP,

Clearwater, Fla.). Flex Molding is a turnkey setup, which includes a

mix/meter resin infusion system (eliminates mixed resin in buckets)

that feeds directly into one or more Turbo Autosprue (TAS) units,

which are easily fl ushed with solvent (they reduce the use of consum-

able tubing). In combination with aff ordable reusable bags featuring

silicone products by Wacker Silicones (div. of Wacker Chemie AG,

Munich, Germany), and new accessories, such as the Pneumatic

Pressure Vacuum Sensor (PPVS), Flex Molding is designed to

A new venue helps regenerate a recession-battered industry,

drawing in more exhibitors and attendees than in 2009.

Page 29: 2010_dec

CT

D

EC

EM

BE

R 2

01

0

27

achieve better process control, reduce labor for tubing set-up and

post-process clean up, and slash cost through the use of fewer

consumables. Wacker Silicones’ Elastosil C is a fast-curing, no-odor,

minimum-shrinkage bagging system that can be brushed on or

sprayed, off ering easier application. Composites One announced

that it will perform another large demo at the American Compos-

ites Manufacturers Assn. (ACMA) COMPOSITES 2011 trade show

in February next year, where, among other closed-molding tech-

nologies, new temperature-controlled mold technology will be used

to build a rotor blade and nacelle parts for a wind turbine. www.

compositesone.com | www.mvpind.com | www.wacker.com

The new IBEX location, the

Kentucky Exposition Center in

Louisville, Ky., attracted 14

percent more attendees than

in 2009. Exhibitors numbered

546 while the visitor total

surpassed 5,100.

Sour

ce |

NM

MA

Composites One (Arlington Heights, Ill.) continued its tradition of closed-

molding demonstrations, featuring the new Flex Molding Process developed

by Magnum Venus Plastech (MVP, Clearwater, Fla.).

Sour

ce |

NM

MA

CC

l

Sour

Sou

TT

Acrylic AdhesivesLORD Maxlok

��0DQXIDFWXULQJ�FRVWV�DQG�WKURXJK�SXW

��3URGXFW�DHVWKHWLFV

��'XUDELOLW\�DQG�IDWLJXH�OLIH

��:HLJKW�UHGXFWLRQ

��9LEUDWLRQ�GDPSLQJ

For Maximum

Performance ...

Make it Maxlok

�����/25'�&RUSRUDWLRQ��$OO�5LJKWV�5HVHUYHG�6$����

������$6.�/25'�RU�YLVLW�ZZZ�ORUGPD[ORN�FRP�

For Maximum

Performance ...

Make it Maxlok

0D[ORN70�DGKHVLYHV�LPSURYH�\RXU�PDQXIDFWXULQJ�

SURFHVV�DQG�XOWLPDWHO\�\RXU�ILQDO�SURGXFW��:KHQ�

ZRUNLQJ�ZLWK�0D[ORN�DGKHVLYHV��\RX�ZLOO�JDLQ�

LPSURYHPHQWV�LQ��

2IIHULQJ�VLJQLILFDQWO\�KLJKHU�SHHO�VWUHQJWK�DQG�

H[WHQGHG�VKHOI�OLIH��/25'�0D[ORN70�DGKHVLYHV�

GHOLYHU�WKH�SHUIRUPDQFH�\RX�QHHG��H[DFWO\�

ZKHQ�DQG�ZKHUH�\RX�QHHG�LW�

Page 30: 2010_dec

28

CO

MP

OS

IT

ES

WO

RL

D.C

OM

Show Coverage

T h e Eagle SL Dual Laser

and Cutting System, from

Eastman Machine Co. (Buffalo, N.Y.)

combines laser cutting, angle and rotary blades,

plus punch- and notch-tool cutting and labeling

into one touch-screen controlled unit.

Source | Eastman Machine Co.

TTT

dd

MARINE METHACRYLATE ADHESIVE

IPS Structural Adhesives (Durham, N.C.) introduced two products

for structural bonding of hulls, decks and other marine laminates

and composite parts: WELD-ON SS230 HV and the WELD-ON

SS300 Series. T ese two-component, room-temperature-cure meth-

acrylate adhesives are designed to produce, with minimal surface

preparation, high-performance structural bonds characterized by

superior tensile strength and elongation, low shrinkage and gap-

fi lling properties. Both systems off er adjustable cure times of 5 to

130 minutes. www.ipscorp.com

LONG OPEN-TIME METHACRYLATES

ITW Plexus (Danvers, Mass.) displayed its MA 2000 series of

long open-time, 10:1 mix-ratio methacrylate adhesives and its

new universal cartridge system for use in standard hardware store

caulking guns, the latter touted as more aff ordable for smaller appli-

cations, including repairs. T e company says the MA 2000 series

is EU-compatible, meeting all of the European Union’s health

and safety requirements, and also is GREENGUARD-certifi ed for

indoor air quality. www.itwplexus.com

PRODUCTS FOR SANDWICH CONSTRUCTION

Nida-Core (Port St. Lucie, Fla.) showed off its NidaFusion SXO/SXF

3D core material designed for applications that specify isotropic

properties, such as wind blades. Its three-walled, pyramid-shaped

truss network is formed by stitched fi berglass within polyurethane,

polyester or phenolic closed-cell foam. It provides better sandwich

MULTIFUNCTIONAL

MACHINING

HEAD DESIGN

Eastman Machine

Co. (Buff alo, N.Y.)

promoted its Eagle SL

dual laser and cutting

system, new for 2010,

which features a tool

head equipped with

a 200-watt gas-assist

laser, three tool spin-

dles (for rotary and angled blades, notching tools and/or punches)

and a pneumatic pen/marker for labeling. Combining all three of

these functions into a single gantry design reportedly minimizes

changeover time and enables integration with most CAD packages,

further increasing effi ciency and precision. www.eastmancuts.com

NANO-TOUGHENED EPOXY INFUSION RESIN

Endurance Technologies (formerly Epoxical Inc., St. Paul, Minn.),

introduced a new 4505-series epoxy infusion resin system that is

part of its Composite Polymer Design (CPD) product line. T e new

product features a nano-toughened resin with several gel-time hard-

eners for room temperature applications, and a high-temperature

hardener for applications that require service temperatures closer

to 250˚F/121˚C. T ese systems reportedly exhibit excellent fracture

toughness, peel strength and lap shear values. www.epoxi.com

Page 31: 2010_dec

CT

D

EC

EM

BE

R 2

01

0

29

WTF

yomingest

ixturesINC.

2960 E. Millcreek Canyon RoadSalt Lake City, UT 84109

Phone (801) 484.5055Fax (801) 484.6008

email: [email protected]

Dr. Donald F. Adams

President45 years of Composite Testing Experience

• Over 40 types of

fixtures in stock,

ready to be shipped.

• Expert consultation

with Dr. Adams

• Email or call today

to discuss your fixture

and custom design needs.

Setting the

Standard

in the

Composite

Testing Industry

WYOMING COMBINED LOADING

COMPRESSION TEST

(ASTM D 6641)

ASTM Standards D 5379, D 6641 and D 7078 were

developed by Dr Adams and his colleaques at the

Universities of Wyoming and Utah.

UTAH V-NOTCHED

SHEAR TEST

(ASTM D 7078)

WYOMING

IOSIPESCU SHEAR TEST

(ASTM D 5379)

panel properties at a low cost for infusion and RTM Lite processing.

Also on display was a prefabricated Nida-Core sandwich panel with

integrated non-skid surface. Designed to replace decks in work-

boats, the panels measure up to 10 f in width, 23 f in length and

0.5-inch thickness (3m by 7m by 12.7 mm), at a cost of roughly $5/

f 2 for a fi nished panel. Nida-Core also introduced NidaTack (pat.

pend.), an engineered tack adhesive for infusion and RTM applica-

tions, which reportedly can be applied directly to the mold surface

or behind a gel coat surface without the risk of print-through.

www.nida-core.com

EPOXY INFUSION RESIN

Pro-Set Inc. (Bay City, Mich.) promoted its

new PRO SET M1027/M2027 and M1027/

M2028 epoxy infusion resin and hardener

combinations. Described as “industrial

grade,” these infusion systems are designed

to off er very good mechanical and thermal

properties at a high-value price point,

with cure temperatures ranging from

room temperature up to 125˚F/52˚C. T e

company reported that it has seen signifi -

cant growth in use of its M1012/M2010

epoxy resin and hardener combination for

building molds capable (when tooling is

properly cured) of handling cure tempera-

tures as high as between 250˚F and 275˚F

(121˚C and 135˚C). Additionally, PRO-SET

M1019 surface coat, when applied to such

tools, is said to form a low-porosity, buff able

mold surface. www.prosetepoxy.com

INFUSION/RTM EXPERTISE

First-time IBEX exhibitor SYBO Compos-

ites (St. Augustine, Fla.) consults with

customers on composite product devel-

opment (concept through prototyping

and tooling fabrication to full production

runs). T e company claims wide experi-

ence in composite processes and applica-

tions, with greatest expertise in infusion

and resin transfer molding (RTM) and the

use of advanced reinforcements — carbon,

aramid and metal fi bers — such as those

off ered by Hardwire LLC (Pocomoke City,

Md.). T e company also produces parts

for U.S. Homeland Security projects and

builds the Islamorada line of 18-f /5.5m

fl atbottom fi shing boats for Chittum Skiff s

(Fort Lauderdale, Fla.) See “Engineering

Insights” on p. 54. SYBO’s facilities are

equipped with one 3-axis and two 5-axis

CNC routers for rapid prototyping and

quicker turnaround. www.sybocompos-

ites.com | CT |

Read this article online | http://short.compositesworld.com/kL25fW8T.

Contributing Writer

Ginger Gardiner is a freelance writer and regu-

lar CT contributor based in Washington, N.C.

[email protected]

Page 32: 2010_dec

raditional automakers are caught between a rock and a hard place. T ey need to reinvent

personal transportation in the wake of industry’s worst downturn since the Great Depres-

sion. And there is pressure from startups that are launching passenger cars and special-

purpose vehicles at lower price points (e.g.,Tata Motor’s Nano) or lower tailpipe emissions

(Tesla Motors’ all-electric Tesla Roadster, for one). Established automakers must innovate

or surrender marketshare. Further, much tougher fuel-effi ciency requirements are bearing down on all

automakers as governments try to curb CO2 emissions and consumers and fl eet owners demand greener

vehicles with lower cost of ownership.

Despite these challenges, OEMs are emerging from the recession on better fi nancial footing, and

upstart automakers and legacy OEMs alike are preparing to fi eld hybrid-electric and all-electric ve-

hicles. Composites have an unprecedented opening for substantial expansion in the automotive market.

CT closes out the year and looks ahead by asking experts who work in and around the auto industry

whether or not composites proponents will be able to seize that opportunity. T e

panelists, CT’s questions and their answers follow.

David Dyke, director of advanced engineering, Magna Exteriors and Interiors

(Aurora, Ontario, Canada).

Dr. Joerg Pohlman, managing director, SGL Automotive Carbon Fibers LLC

(Wiesbaden, Germany)

Martin Starkey, managing director — Automotive, Gurit UK (Isle of Wight, U.K.)

Donald Lasell, principal, T ink Composites (Palm Harbor, Fla.)

Peter Oswald, formerly VP marketing, Toho Tenax America Inc. (Rockwood, Tenn.)

Mike Shinedling, Dodge Viper program manager, in Chrysler Group LLC’s (Auburn Hills, Mich.) SRT

Performance Group.

Tadge Jeuchter, Chevrolet Corvette vehicle chief engineer at General Motors Co. (Detroit, Mich.).

William Harney, executive director R&D, Decoma International (an operating unit of Magna Interna-

tional, Aurora, Ontario, Canada),

Andy Rich, R&D engineer, Plasan Carbon Composites (Bennington, Vt.)

What factors most limit wider adoption of composites in automotive

applications?

David Dyke: Building of confi dence in engineers is a large challenge. Engi-

neers in today’s development process typically use computer-aided predic-

tive analysis to make decisions, and there is very little hand calculation, [as

in] the past. Predictive analysis of fi ber-reinforced polymers is a large chal-

lenge, due to fi ber orientation af er fl ow when molding with a random glass

matrix. Better sof ware-analysis tools to confi rm the engineer’s assump-

tions would greatly help in providing data for sound decision-making at a

reduced rate of risk. By removing the risk for the engineer, the decision for

wide use becomes a point of fact, not an opinion.

How will fi ber-reinforced polymers fare in a post-recession auto

market obsessed with cost and fuel economy?

Automotive Composites

Q & AForum

Will the unprecedented

automotive composites

opportunities be seized?

T

David Dyke

CT

30

CO

MP

OS

ITE

SW

OR

LD

.C

OM

FEATURE | Q & A Forum

Page 33: 2010_dec

Joerg Pohlman: [T e c]ost of carbon fi ber is too high for use in series

car applications. Series manufacturing processes and know-how are

unavailable at [the] OEM.

Martin Starkey: T e purchase of an automobile represents one of the

most signifi cant decisions we make

as consumers, and the products we

demand are a challenging blend of

cost, quality, design, [and] perfor-

mance. Quite rightly, the world’s

leading OEMs of en work on an

evolution approach rather than revo-

lution, each new model representing

a refi ned version of the previous one.

T is makes the adoption of any new

technology in automotive a cautious

one. T is is no diff erent for compos-

ites. As with other novel technolo-

gies that have managed to achieve this transition, we see an ever-

widening adoption of composites migrating down from supercars,

to the premium sector, to performance salons [sedans], etc.

Don Lasell: T e fi rst important enabler is the need to demonstrate the

ability to produce high-quality automotive components at excep-

tionally high volume. Obviously, the major enabler is cost. But,

demonstrating production of high-volume, quality components,

dimensionally stable, etc., is just as important. Once high-volume is

shown, then cost will rapidly come down with demand.

Peter Oswald: [Lack of] cost-eff ective materials, material forms and

fabrication techniques. [Lack of] damage detection for large struc-

tural parts in carbon fi ber composite.

Which automotive parts that are currently made of metal do you

think are best suited for conversion to composites, and why?

DD: T e military and aerospace markets have proven that compos-

ites are unmatched when used in structural applications. With the

need to lightweight vehicles, and the limitless options of being able

to locally reinforce composite parts, the obvious choice is to target

body-in-white for metals replacement. Ultimately, a combination of

body-in-white and body-in-black (composite material substitution)

is likely to be the fi rst wave of components to proliferate composites

alternatives.

JP: OEMs producing battery electric vehicles likely will focus on

weight savings by use of lightweight materials.

MS: Composites have some very specifi c advantages and disad-

vantages over their metallic counterparts, which means there is a

natural selection process that earmarks composites for some appli-

cations. For instance, lower tooling costs for composites means they

are viable for lower production volumes. Signifi cantly higher mate-

rial cost, however, eliminates high-volume or low-cost platforms.

High specifi c properties are naturally attractive to weight-sensitive

vehicles. Compared to steel, slow cycle times for composites limit

volume, but they are virtually unconstrained in the shapes to which

they can be molded, allowing part integration and design freedom.

DL: Automotive body structure seems best suited for compos-

ites. Ultralight weight enables signifi cant improvements in fuel

economy. Also, a well-designed composite-intensive vehicle will be

safer than any of its metal counterparts. T is has been proven in the

motorsports racing business. T e marketing of the value of carbon

fi ber in the vehicle will encourage many people to demand their car

have that material.

PO: For carbon fi ber composites, best targets for conversion are large

structural components that do not require Class A fi nish and off er bene-

fi ts from part consolidation. A good example would be the fl oor pan.

If you had an audience with the lead engineers of the world’s top

automakers, what would you tell them that they must understand

about composites to use them successfully?

DD: [To deliver] solutions that meet their aggressive mass-reduction

initiatives, they must think diff erently and change the paradigm

of current BOM/BOP [bill of material/bill of process] to consider

alternative materials and manufacturing processes. Once the initial

material comparison evaluation is complete, the OEM can run a

business case comparison of cost/performance/investment to deter-

mine future direction. Af er establishing direction, the OEM should

select a capable supplier/partner very early in the product develop-

ment process to take advantage of the supplier’s intellectual prop-

erty and development knowledge. Innovation is achieved by the

departure of past paradigms.

JP: New design principles and production technologies have to be

developed. Expertise has to be built up within automakers. T us, hire

experts who really understand the materials and the value chain.

MS: Composites are as eff ective and effi cient at replacing more estab-

lished materials as those materials are at replacing composites. For

example, if you try to apply a composite material to a steel design,

you make little of the true advantages and carry all the disadvantages.

For composite uptake to grow, the world’s leading OEMs will have to

re-invent car design, looking at how composites ca, be truly integrated

in the production of the vehicle. T is, in turn, will take an in-depth

understanding of not only composite design considerations, but

composite manufacturing processes as well.

DL: Automotive engineers need to

understand how to design with compos-

ites, what typical sections to use, how a

composite part will be manufactured

and assembled, who will manufacture

it, how to attach it, and what it will cost

to produce and tool up.

PO: T ink big! Simply replacing sheet

metal with composites will reduce

weight somewhat, but meeting

economic targets will be diffi cult,

particularly where Class A is required.

Large structural parts could off er

signifi cant weight savings [and] part consolidation savings as well

as fabrication and lifecycle savings.

What do you think the average car will look like in 20 years?

DD: Much diff erent due to technology, ,legislation and social

conscience. Using new technology to signifi cantly shif the drive-

train and propulsion systems, we will open up more packaging

space that was occupied by powertrain components of the

Martin Starkey

Donald Lasell

CT

CT

CT

CT

D

EC

EM

BE

R 2

01

0

31

Page 34: 2010_dec

AR: In the short term, the early adopters will be those applications where

performance is more important than cost (such as high-end sports

cars). However, when fuel economy becomes a major driver to save

weight, the cost-benefi t analysis will start to move in our direction.

What, in your opinion, is the single largest hurdle to greater accep-

tance and use of CFRP in the automotive industry?

MS: Material cost. It will depend on the cost per pound of weight

saved ….. An average passenger car can usually aff ord $1 to $2

in cost for every pound saved. For a higher priced performance

car, that weight-saving value can be anywhere from $5 to $30 per

pound saved. With the high price of carbon fi ber, it’s very diffi cult

to save weight at the rate of less than $5/lb. Also, in addition to

weight, there is marketing value for a performance car to off er a

carbon fi ber part. Not so much in a conventional passenger car.

TJ: Net cost per panel is a real issue. We’d love to engineer every

panel we make with it. However, at today’s cost, it just doesn’t

offset the business case. With 100 years of industry inertia and

legacy costs, and an entire infrastructure

optimized around the steel solution, it’s

hard to see anything else. On the other

hand, when you clean the balance sheets

of 100 years of history and have a chance

to deal with the more-subtle aspects

of legacy costs, then that can affect

the business case for everything in the

corporation.

AR: Cost and manufacturing comfort. Cost is always a big chal-

lenge in the automotive market, especially in the higher volume

cars, but the challenge of making the OEMs feel comfortable with

these materials is hard to quantify. All the OEMs’ designers are very

familiar with the properties and the manufacturing processes for

metals, but we have rarely been given a part to bid on that was actu-

ally designed to be carbon fi ber. We have to educate the customers

most of the time, even the companies that have had some experi-

ence with CF. Any big company making cars has diff erent depart-

ments with diff erent levels of understanding of composites, and

they don’t always consult with their own composites experts before

they design a part. So we always see parts that are designed to be

sheet metal, and the customers will ask, “Can you make this in

carbon fi ber”? T is lack of comfort level … is a signifi cant hurdle

for the technology. Even where the costs make sense, car companies

are naturally hesitant to take a risk on using a material they are not

familiar with.

What technological challenges and/

or misperceptions must be addressed

before we see greater usage?

MS: Processing and molding cycle

time are a big challenge in prepreg

applications when you get above

10,000 units/year. Conventional

forming methods like compression

and injection molding don’t utilize

all of the potential benefi ts of carbon

past. As a result, we can take advan-

tage of valuable real estate and turn

it into customer surprise-and-delight

features. Mass reduction, fuel effi -

ciency and consumer/customer-rele-

vant innovations will dictate architec-

ture decisions and material choices.

JP: A combination of lightweight mate-

rials will dominate car manufacturing.

CFRP will be a standard material. T e

need to save weight is coming from

legislation. I expect a high number of electric vehicles.

MS: T e only thing I can be sure of here is what the car won’t look

like in 20 years! I don’t think in the late ’80s, anyone would have

predicted the designs of today. T e only thing I believe would be

true is that consumer demands will be even more focused.

DL: Lots of Priuses, but there will still be a lot of pick-up trucks.

Aerodynamics only does so much — the mass must come down!

Also, I know most people would always

prefer a larger car. T ese could benefi t

from carbon fi ber lightening just as much

as the little

ones. Profi t

margins would

be higher too!

PO: In the U.S.,

the average car

would still have room for four people,

plus dog and luggage and golf clubs.

[T e] car would have lightweight body

structure (due to composites), be more

aerodynamic (due to composites) and

have a lightweight power unit and drive

train (due to composites). Internal

combustion is still likely to be the dominant power unit due to fl ex-

ibility, power and range, but CNG [compressed natural gas] fuel likely

will be more common.

We’ve mentioned CFRP along the way, but let’s focus on it:

There was a lot of momentum and innovative new uses of CFRP

on production automobiles in the 2003-2004 timeframe, but since

then, with the exception of the 50th-anniversary Corvette hood,

the Mustang Cobra, the Viper ACR, and Corvette ZR1, we haven’t

seen a lot of new CFRP applications on mass-produced vehicles and

virtually all of them have been on performance platforms. Will that

change? If so, how?

William Harney: Although carbon fi ber provides signifi cant and

necessary mass reduction for BEVs and PHEVs [battery-electric

vehicles and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles], the cost of carbon

fi ber becomes a greater issue when stacked up against the cost of

EV technology itself. T e paradox will to some extent be solved

with advanced D-LFT and other thermoplastic composites in the

medium term. New fuel-economy standards will create pull for

more composites, but they will be based initially on high-perfor-

mance glass with increasing use of thermoplastics.

Dr. Joerg Pohlman

Mike Shinedling

Peter Oswald

“Even when the costs make

sense, car companies are

naturally hesitant to take a

risk on ... a new material.”

— Andy Rich

CT

CT

CT

32

CO

MP

OS

ITE

SW

OR

LD

.C

OM

FEATURE | Q & A Forum

Page 35: 2010_dec

because they typically use chopped [instead of continuous] fi bers

and have greater minimum thickness requirements. Finding resin

systems with good adhesion to carbon and good processability is

also a challenge. T e current chemistry hasn’t delivered suffi cient

adhesion to the fi ber yet, but I believe

it will at some point. A big reason

more research isn’t put into solving

this issue is the cost of the fi ber. Once

carbon fi ber is more of a mass-market

material, there will be more research

and discoveries to solve the current

problems.

TJ: T e manufacturing process has a lot

of little technical issues, like cycle time,

labor time, consistent part quality, and

surface fi nish. Individually, these are

not insurmountable challenges, but the

combination of all these little issues coupled with the fact that it is a

nonstandard material to make a car, makes

for an uphill battle fi nding acceptance …

in a risk-averse market.

WH: T e biggest hurdle, once pricing of

carbon fi ber is at target, is the challenge

of modeling and designing CFRP compo-

nents and subsystems to interface with

a conventional body-in-white architec-

ture — particularly with respect to crash

requirements. One reason most CFRP

applications in niche vehicles are limited

to hoods and removable panels is that they are bolt-on. Once all

bolt-on opportunities are exploited, the going will get really tough.

How will CFRP fare in competition with workhorse composites like

SMC, BMC, GMT, LFT and D-LFT?

MS: In the near term, I would guess traditional glass-reinforced

composites will do better because of the current economic pres-

sures. In the long term, high performance composites should

have strong growth as carbon fi ber capacity expands and costs

are reduced.

AR: The less costly composites have all been around for a long

time, and very little has changed to make them “new.” They have

a 20 percent lighter SMC formulation or in-line compounding,

and they seem to have solved a lot of the paint pop issues, but for

the most part, it’s still the same SMC/GMT that has been around

a long time. It will have its niche in places where volumes are

more than 20,000/yr and less than 90,000/yr. In general, these

are not structural parts either, and never could be, due to the

inherent strength of the material. It’s a complementary tech-

nology, but not a direct competitor for carbon fiber in most

applications.

WH: T ere is still signifi cant opportunity and more performance

headroom in SMC and D-LFT components and advanced closed

structures that have yet to be exploited. T is includes high-perfor-

mance matrices, tactical local reinforcing, fi ber orientation and

composite-welding techniques.

What role will CFRP play in alternative powertrain vehicles —

hybrid electric, plug-in electric, and fuel-cell vehicles?

MS: Many new alternative powertrain vehicles are in the exclusive

niche market — Tesla, Fisker. Carbon will play a larger role in these

vehicles. For mass-market alternative vehicles ( theVolt, etc.), it is

still a question of cost per pound of weight saved.

AR: T e newer powertrains are a risk

in themselves, so car companies are

taking one step at a time. If they build

a new vehicle with a new powertrain

and a whole lot of CFRP, they have

signifi cantly increased their risk to

the success of that vehicle. I think

that’s why we are seeing CFRP on

gas-powered cars for the most part,

and [see] steel being used to make the

hybrids. T at may change as the risk of

both composites and hybrid engines

comes down.

What applications will see the greatest

growth in CFRP materials in the next fi ve

years? If there were no other barriers to entry

(price, availability, production speeds, etc.),

which applications on a typical passenger

vehicle would benefi t most from conversion

to CFRP?

MS: I see the greatest automotive growth in

Class A panels and exposed weave interior

trim on performance and luxury vehicles. If those barriers were

removed, applications might include front crush structures, front

cross members, seat structures, Class-A panels — actually the sky is

the limit. Carbon fi ber has incredible material properties and would

revolutionize the automobile if those barriers were removed.

TJ: We think we’ve pretty much overcome the technical challenges

and there’s no downside we see. T ere is a learning curve, obviously,

and new criteria you have to get used to, but integration into the

vehicle poses no technical challenges now if the other issues were

resolved.

WH: Bolt-on will be the fi rst wave, followed by body-in-white inte-

grated components, but the greatest growth will occur with high

mass-reduction opportunities on components like the vehicle front,

where you can lightweight without creating polar-moment (driv-

ability) issues. Also, CFRP will do well when compared against

metals in lifecycle analyses when the true energy cost of using one

system vs. the other is compared. | CT |

Read this article online | http://short.gardnerweb.com/sreWIza3.

Read CT’s Web-only featurette “Why CFRP?” | http://short.gardnerweb.

com/Uu6ivbCH.

Andy Rich

Tadge Jeuchter

“There is still signifi cant

opportunity and more

performance headroom in

SMC and D-LFT ... that have

yet to be exploited.”

— William Harney

CT

CT

CT

CT

D

EC

EM

BE

R 2

01

0

33

Page 36: 2010_dec

H

ow green are composites? T at question is asked more of en

than ever by consumers concerned with the environmental

impacts of manufacturing. “T e public has the perception

that composites, many of which come from oil, are not green and

are polluting,” observes Bill Kreysler, president of Kreysler & Assoc.

(American Canyon, Calif.). “But this is a myth. T ey can be much

greener than you think in the right applications because of their

strength and light weight.”

Life Cycle Assessment

ARE COMPOSITES

Methods for calculating the impact

composites have on the environment

are enabling data-driven comparisons

to traditional materials.

H

34

CO

MP

OS

IT

ES

WO

RL

D.C

OM

FEATURE: Life Cycle Assessment

Page 37: 2010_dec

GREEN?Debunking that myth, however, is no simple task. Myriad fac-

tors determine a product’s environmental impact but manufactur-

ers increasingly use Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) to help quantify

their products’ environmental footprint.

Also known as “cradle-to-grave” analysis, LCA seeks to deter-

mine and evaluate every environmental impact represented by the

manufacture, use and disposal of a product. Impact data give man-

ufacturers a convincing way to market a product as environmen-

tally sensitive and demonstrate to both customers and shareholders

their commitments to sustainability, says LCA expert Dr. Michael

Lepech, an assistant professor in the Department of Civil and Envi-

ronmental Engineering at Stanford University.

LCA gives composites a data-driven leg to stand on, says Cheryl

Richards, chair of the American Composites Manufacturers Assn.’s

(ACMA, Arlington, Va.) Green Composites Committee and the

global marketing manager for wind energy at PPG Industries (Pitts-

burgh, Pa.). “We can tout the advantages with real data — it fi nally

gives composites equal footing with traditional materials when you

consider all parts of the product’s life cycle.”

A MEANS TO DEFINE GREEN

LCA was popularized decades ago, when environmentalists raised

concerns about diminishing material and energy resources coupled

with a growing world population. First used in the food and beverage

industry, LCA has spread to other sectors, driven in part by the

European Commission’s Environment Directorate, which requires

manufacturers to monitor energy and raw-material consumption

and solid waste generation.

Today, LCA methodology is spelled out in the International Or-

ganization for Standardization (ISO) 14040 environmental manage-

ment series standard, which consists of four major steps: 1) goal and

scope defi nition (§4.2 ISO 14044); 2) inventory analysis (§4.3 ISO

14044); 3) impact assessment (§4.4 ISO 14044); and 4) interpreta-

tion (§4.5 ISO 14044). Each step, as noted in the following para-

graphs, presents considerable challenges, say LCA practitioners.

Goal and scope defi nition. According to Lepech, each LCA starts

by defi ning a goal and the “functional unit” of the study — that is,

the service provided by the material, component or system and its

performance characteristics. For example, to compare the impacts of

two desks — one made with steel, aluminum and laminate and the

other with wood — a researcher must defi ne a quantifi able unit in

A recent Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) demonstrated that prefabricated

building panels, such as these (above) used in the house at left, from InnoVida

Holdings LLC (Miami Beach, Fla.), have less impact on the environment than

traditional wood-frame building materials and methods.

AA

CT

D

EC

EM

BE

R 2

01

0

35

Page 38: 2010_dec

ence, in part because the required data inputs,

while available for some processes, are absent

for others. Further, assumptions about data in-

puts and the relative weights of environmental

impacts diff er among the sof ware packages.

Interpretation. T is step is a challenge be-

cause assumptions about data input and the

relative weight of impacts also diff er among

those who use the sof ware. “Interpretation

of LCA results can vary,” confi rms Bob Mof-

fi t, product manager at Ashland Performance

Materials (Columbus, Ohio), who heads the

company’s green resin eff orts. “Some results

are weighted more than others, depending on

their importance to the manufacturer or end-

user,” he explains. “Some people might put

more emphasis on carbon dioxide [CO2] emis-

sions, for example, than solid wastes.” Given

the potential for interpretive variation, an LCA

study typically undergoes a third-party review

to ensure that the results are credible.

T e LCA provides a means for modifying

designs to optimize environmental friendli-

ness. In Lepech’s desk example, the wood desk

consumes more materials in total and produces more solid waste, but

more than 60 percent of the steel and aluminum desk’s total life cycle

energy use is taken up by the highly energy-intensive aluminum ex-

trusion process needed to produce the castors on the desk’s legs. T at

energy use could be decreased somewhat by increasing the amount

of recycled aluminum in the desk, he points out, or by eliminating

the castors. Likewise, the impacts of composite materials and manu-

facturing of en can be mitigated with judicious material selection or

small changes in design, he emphasizes.

As consumers demand more environmental information about

new products, LCAs are expected to grow in importance. Environ-

mental Product Declarations (EPDs), for example, inform purchas-

ers about the environmental impacts, based on LCA data prepared

in accordance with ISO 14025 guidance. EPDs are the equivalent of

the nutritional information now standard on food packaging. Rich-

ards says that many U.S. companies, particularly those in the build-

ing materials market, are scrambling to market products with green

labels, including not only EPDs but also the Leadership in Energy

and Environmental Design (LEED) Green Building Rating System,

developed by the U.S. Green Building Council, and the Energy Star

program, a long-standing joint eff ort of the U.S. Environmental

Protection Agency and the U.S. Department of Energy.

“Right now, building material specifi cations are listing LCA as

an option,” reports Gary Jakubcin, Owens Corning’s (Toledo, Ohio)

LCA process head and the cochairman of ACMA’s Green Compos-

ites Committee Life Cycle Inventory subcommittee. But he warns

that “in the near future, it might become a requirement for selling

your product.” Beginning Jan. 1, 2011, for example, EPDs will be

required for products sold in France. “Learning about LCAs and

performing them to document your product’s impacts is becoming

a business necessity,” he maintains.

order to compare the parts, such as the desk’s working surface area.

“T e functional unit is needed in order to establish a quantitative

equivalent between two comparable products or processes, so that

the impacts can be assessed,” Lepech explains. For an LCA that com-

pares building materials, the functional unit might be one board-foot

or other dimensional unit large enough to meet the project require-

ments for stiff ness. Although the LCA’s scope of investigation ideally

is cradle to grave, there are situations in which the scope may be lim-

ited, for practicality’s sake, without compromising study conclusions.

Inventory analysis. T is step requires legwork. Investigators

must determine all of the possible inputs to and outputs from the

functional unit that have an impact on the environment. Inputs

include the upstream impacts of raw materials (e.g., sand for glass

manufacture); the energy used to mine or extract the raw materials;

the fuel costs to transport the raw materials to the manufacturing

site; the energy used to transform the raw materials into the prod-

uct (e.g., from natural gas or coal); the energy use associated with

any recycled materials in the product; and so forth. Outputs include

the downstream impacts of air pollutants (e.g., greenhouse gases);

water pollutants; solid waste (e.g., disposal and/or recycling of the

product itself); any coproducts that can be benefi cially reused; and

more. For a list of published data sources for conducting life cycle

inventories, see “Learn More,” p. 39.

Impact assessment. Sof ware is available to help LCA inves-

tigators navigate the somewhat arduous process of the inventory

analysis and assessment steps, including SimaPro and ECO-it from

PRé Consultants (Amersfoort, T e Netherlands) and GaBi from PE

International (Stuttgart, Germany), among others. T ere also are

many options for limiting the scope of a study with a streamlined

or partial LCA that reportedly still provides suffi cient information

for assessment. T at said, the process remains as much an art as sci-

This generalized fl ow diagram shows the basic steps considered in preparing an LCA for a part made

in a manufacturing process.

Sour

ce |

Mic

hael

Lep

ech,

Ph.

D

Primary

Materials

(e.g., ores,

biotic

resources)

Recycled

Materials

(open loop

recycling)

Primary

Energy

(e.g., coal)

Raw Material

Acquistion

Material

Processing

Retirement

& Recovery

Disposal Service

Use

Manufacture

& Assembly

Air pollutants

(e.g., Hg)

Water

pollutants

(e.g., BOD)

Solid Waste

(e.g., MSW)

Products

(e.g., goods,

services)

Coproducts

(e.g., recyclables,

energy)

recycling

reuse

remanufacture

36

CO

MP

OS

IT

ES

WO

RL

D.C

OM

FEATURE: Life Cycle Assessment

Page 39: 2010_dec

LCAs ENABLE COMPOSITES MARKETING

Several composite materials suppliers have conducted or partici-

pated in studies of their own products to facilitate green marketing

campaigns. Others, typically university researchers and students,

have conducted LCAs focused on the use phase to compare

composite products with those made from other materials.

An example of the former are studies conducted since 2006 by

Owens Corning on its internal processes. T e company’s core busi-

ness strategy includes reducing the negative impacts of its manu-

facturing operations, increasing the positive impacts of its products

and assisting customers in reducing their carbon footprints, says

Frank O’Brien-Bernini, the company’s chief sustainability offi cer. A

case in point involves Owens Corning’s Advantex E-CR corrosion-

resistant E-glass product. According to O’Brien-Bernini, an LCA

demonstrated that the fi ber’s total life cycle environmental impact

could be mitigated if the company replaced its glass melting fur-

naces with new units that use more fossil-fuel-effi cient gas/oxygen

fi ring technology. T e new furnaces were installed and now reduce

CO2 emissions by 40 percent, nitrogen oxides by 75 percent, sul-

fur oxide by 40 percent and particulates by 90 percent. At Owens

Corning, greenhouse gas emissions at plants equipped with the new

technology are, on average, 23 percent lower. Says O’Brien-Bernini,

“T anks to these LCAs, we can now transcend narrow, single-attri-

bute material comparisons, like recycled content, to represent the

true sustainability benefi ts of composite applications.”

Owens Corning recently worked with its customer Strongwell

(Bristol, Va.) to produce a “cradle-to-gate” LCA. T is partial study

stopped at Strongwell’s front gate and did not consider transpor-

tation to downstream customers or specifi c end applications that

might have required additional procedures (e.g., fastening). Nor

did it consider use and end-of-life impacts. It compared pultruded

composites with aluminum and steel for fi ve structural parts: grat-

ing, handrail, U-shaped channel, channel-and-tubing combination

and fl oor plate. T e functional units were 100 f 2/9.3m2 for the grat-

ing and fl oor plate and 100 linear f /30.5 linear m

for the handrail, channel and channel-and-tubing

combination. Developed by an industry consul-

tant who used SimaPro7 LCA sof ware, the study

examined the embodied energy of the raw materi-

als and processing needed to create each product.

Among the materials under consideration were

Advantex glass fi ber, a general-purpose polyes-

ter resin, A517I low-carbon steel, three grades of

aluminum (ranging from virgin to 80 percent re-

cycled content) and kiln-dried pine.

According to the study results, the embod-

ied energy represented by the composite parts is

lower when compared to aluminum parts made

with virgin aluminum and steel primarily be-

cause the composite delivers better strength-to-

weight. T e report assumes that as more recycled

content is added to the aluminum and steel, their

energy use and environmental footprint would

be closer to the composite components. As might

be expected, the wood materials had a signifi cant

advantage over composites, with a 50 percent lower embodied-

energy footprint. A take-home message from the report is that the

impacts represented by a composite part increase as its percent-

age of resin increases. T erefore, increasing fi ber content and/or

reducing styrene in the resin can “green” the product. Strongwell’s

environmental manager, John Barker, notes, “We have chosen LCA

for determining our environmental impacts because of its quanti-

tative nature and scope and because the resulting reports are peer-

reviewed for objectivity.”

Ashland’s Envirez 1807 bio-resin, made with soy oil and corn eth-

anol, was the subject of an LCA performed by consultant Jim Pollack

(Omnitech International, Midland, Mich.) for the United Soybean

Board (USB, St. Louis, Mo.). Pollack explains that LCAs of bio-based

materials involve evaluating additional factors, such as the ability of

the source plants to fi x nitrogen, how much fertilizer and fuel is re-

quired for cultivation and the sequestration of carbon within plants,

among others. “Because soybeans are nitrogen-fi xing plants, nitrous

oxide emissions from soybean fi elds are lower than for other crops.

T is helped keep the global warming potential [GWP] of the Envirez

resin lower than the equivalent petrochemical resin.”

T e USB LCA, like the Strongwell study, included only up-

stream and resin production impacts and stopped at the facility gate.

Downstream delivery, application and use phases were considered

equivalent and, therefore, out of scope. T e results showed that the

GWP for the Envirez resin, when compared to a petrochemical resin

(also manufactured by Ashland), was 4.1 kg/9 lb of CO2 equivalents

per kilogram or pound of resin produced vs. 5.2 kg/11.5 lb of CO2

equivalents for the petrochemical-based resin (“CO2 equivalents” is

a common LCA term that expresses greenhouse gas emissions, and

thus GWP, referenced to CO2). In terms of energy impact, Pollack re-

ports that Envirez consumes 2,567 fewer BTUs/lb of resin produced

during manufacture than the petrochemical resin. Moffi t says that

fact enables Ashland to state with confi dence that resins made with

renewables off er tangible environmental benefi ts for their customers.

Graphed data from an Owens Corning/Strongwell cradle-to-gate LCA that compared pultruded

composite components to similar products made from aluminum and steel shows the environmental

advantage of a composite handrail, due primarily to its greater strength-to weight-ratio.

110

100

90

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

SAFRAILSAFRAILTM TM FRP HFRP Handrail v s. S teel a nd A luminum H andrailandrail vs. Steel and Aluminum Handrail

Global Warming Acidifi cation Eutrophication Ozone Depletion Smog Metered Water Energy

Aluminum Handrail-100 Lineal Feet SAFRAIL FRP HANDRAIL-

100 Lineal Feet-Review 6-2-09

Steel Handrail-100 lineal feet

perc

ecnta

ge

Comparing 1p ‘Aluminum Handrail-100 Lineal Feet’, 1p ‘SAFRAIL FRP HANDRAIL-100 Lineal Feet’ Revision 6-2-09 and 1p

‘Steel Handrail-100 Lineal feet’; Method: TRAC/IMPACT 2002+/IPCC/Energy (Feb 09) OCVStrong V11.08/characterization

Sour

ce |

Stro

ngw

ell

CT

D

EC

EM

BE

R 2

01

0

37

Page 40: 2010_dec

A much-discussed LCA, performed by Lepech and a group of

his students at Stanford University, examined a fi sh tank for the

Monterey Bay Aquarium in Monterey, Calif. T e aquarium wanted

a large, freestanding, seismic-resistant tank, approximately 20 f by

40 f by 10 f (6.1m by 12.2m by 3m), capable of sustaining a saltwa-

ter aquatic ecosystem for 20 years. A glass/polyester tank designed

by Kreysler’s fi rm was one option; the other was a concrete design

with a smooth “shotcrete” (sprayed concrete) lining. Lepech devel-

oped a detailed process fl ow diagram for both material systems.

For the concrete tank, the raw materials — including limestone,

gypsum, cement rock and aggregate — and the extraction activi-

ties associated with them were identifi ed, as were the raw materials

for the formwork (timber and glues to make the plywood) and the

reinforcing bar (pig iron and other metals to make the steel). Envi-

ronmental impact estimates were made of the equipment needed to

produce the concrete tank (cement mixer, pumps, etc.), maintain it

over its life span (cleaning equipment) and, fi nally, demolish it and

transport it to a landfi ll.

T e same process components were developed for the glass fi ber-

reinforced polymer tank, including the raw materials to produce the

fi berglass fi laments (sand, feldspar, sodium sulfate, borax, etc.); the

energy consumed to melt the raw materials and extrude and wind the

glass fi ber fi laments; and the raw ingredients and processing steps to

produce the polyester resin. Ashland was actively involved in the tank

study and provided resin process data to Lepech, notes Moffi t.

Lepech and Kreysler confi rm that the data showed the fi ber-

glass/polyester tank solution had signifi cantly less impact than the

concrete tank on many environmental fronts (see diagram on this

page) because the mining and extraction of the cement and other

concrete materials is not only energy-intensive, but it also involves

more shipping and generates more air pollution.

A recent LCA study funded by InnoVida Holdings LLC (Miami

Beach, Fla.) and conducted by Florida International University Col-

lege of Engineering and Computing (Miami, Fla.) compared the envi-

ronmental performance of InnoVida’s manufactured composite house

panels with conventional house construction methods. Two graduate

students, supervised by Drs. Yong Tao and Yimin Zhu, developed a

1,200-f 2/111.5m2 fi ve-room, single-story “patio reference house.” T e

conventional version featured masonry block reinforced by rebar and

cement grout, with gypsum wallboard over batt insulation on the inte-

rior walls. T e roof trusses were structural lumber beams covered with

plywood panels and R-30 batt insulation.

In contrast, the InnoVida house was constructed entirely of the

company’s proprietary 4-inch/101.6-mm thick sandwich panels for

the roof and exterior walls and similar 2.5-inch/63.5-mm thick pan-

els for interior walls. T e panels feature an insulating polyurethane

core with integral stiff eners between glass fi ber/epoxy skins. T e

panels were bonded onsite with Innovida’s proprietary adhesive.

Tao and Zhu developed a basic life cycle inventory of only the

raw material inputs and manufacturing processes necessary to create

one board-foot of panel vs. one board-foot of traditional masonry

construction. T en they calculated the GWP (in CO2 equivalents) of

both construction types using the ATHENA Impact Estimator, pub-

lished by the Athena Institute (Merrickville, Ontario, Canada). Al-

though the study’s scope was limited, it showed that if the eff ects of

3A Composites (Sins, Switzerland) has gone a step further and

developed an LCA tool called the Hybrid Core Calculator. T e tool

calculates a simplifi ed LCA, based on inventory data for typical

sandwich panel components, core and skin. Af er inputting data

on a project’s sandwich design requirements (panel size and thick-

ness) and the performance loads, the calculator quickly produces

environmental impacts for each phase of a core product’s life cycle.

It then displays energy consumption, greenhouse gas potential (in

CO2 equivalents), water consumption and other ecological indica-

tors, says the company. In one example, a double-decker city bus

with a composite sandwich (instead of steel) upper fl oor has 30 per-

cent lower weight, says 3A, and its ecological impact is reduced by

30 percent over the bus’ life cycle because of greater fuel effi ciency.

LCAS AND AUTOMOTIVE COMPOSITES

Krishnan Jayaraman of the Department of Mechanical Engineering

at the University of Auckland (Auckland, New Zealand) says that

end-of-life directives in Europe and Japan are forcing automotive

OEMs to apply LCA techniques to their manufacturing processes to

better understand the environmental eff ects at all stages of produc-

tion. In a recent paper, he and coauthor Xun Xu described a study

that compared automotive doors, hoods and trunk lids made with

steel, aluminum, fi berglass/polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and

carbon fi ber/epoxy (30 percent fi ber volume). T e LCA results

showed that the carbon fi ber/epoxy panels had the lowest environ-

mental impact scores, primarily, says Jayaraman, because of their

lower weight and higher strength.

He notes, however, that in the event of a crash, the panel replace-

ment would overshadow the environmental benefi ts because alumi-

num and steel panels can be readily repaired. In another automo-

tive LCA, adds Jayaraman, a bumper beam made of unidirectional

fi berglass in a polypropylene matrix had a lower environmental

impact than a steel bumper beam. As was true with the previously

discussed bus fl oor, the lighter composite beam consumed less en-

ergy by enabling greater fuel economy over the vehicle’s useful life,

a key point emphasized by many LCA proponents.

ACIDIFICATION

CARCINOGENS

ENERGY

RESOURCES

EUTRO-

PHICATION

GREENHOUSE

HEAVY METALSOZONE LAYER

PESTICIDES

SOLID WASTE

CONCRETE

FRP

SUMMER

SMOG

WINTER

SMOG 80%

60%

40%

20%

0%

This spider diagram, which depicts the relative importance of many factors on

a single fi gure, superimposes the impacts of a composite fi sh tank on those

of a concrete tank proposed for the Monterey Bay Aquarium. The composite

tank (green area) generated far fewer impacts for this application.

Sour

ce |

Krey

sler

and

Ass

oc.

38

CO

MP

OS

IT

ES

WO

RL

D.C

OM

FEATURE: Life Cycle Assessment

Page 41: 2010_dec

the bonding adhesive are ignored, the total impact of the composite

panel house is signifi cantly lower — by about 50 percent — than the

reference house. When the adhesive is included, the impact of the

composite panel house is 25 percent less than the traditionally con-

structed house. Zachary Waksal, InnoVida’s VP of business devel-

opment, says, “We are trying to change the construction paradigm

by using innovative composite technology that allows for greater

speed of construction, aff ordability and sustainability.”

Kreysler tells a cautionary tale about an LCA that compared real

stonework with a proprietary fi ber-reinforced (FRP) cladding mate-

rial engineered to look like stone. Says Kreysler, “It seemed on the

surface like the FRP solution had to be better,

when you considered the extraction of the

stone from the quarry, the shipping logistics,

not to mention part weight.” But the LCA

showed that the medium-density fi berboard

(MDF) used to make the molds for the FRP

parts made the composite solution much less

environmentally sustainable because of the

energy-intensive process used to produce

the MDF. “It proved that you have to look at

the entire process ... from beginning to end,”

Kreysler adds.

WHAT’S NEXT?

LCA is immensely promising and very new

to composites. “We’re at the start of the

journey right now,” says Richards. T ere is,

necessarily, much work to be done. Indeed,

the ACMA Green Composites Committee’s

Life Cycle Inventory subcommittee headed

by Jakubcin is focused on developing more

inventory data specifi c to composites,

something that is in short supply at present,

using a standard pultrusion process as the

fi rst model. ACMA also is in the process

of educating its members about LCAs and

their benefi ts. Green training sessions will

be held at its COMPOSITES 2011 trade

event, which commences Feb. 4, 2011,

in Fort Lauderdale, Fla. (see CT’s ACMA

COMPOSITES 2011 show preview, p. 24).

T e most important factor, however,

is that LCAs need to come into wide use.

“Everyone in the composites industry

needs to get in the game,” says Owens

Corning’s O’Brien-Bernini. “T is is a posi-

tive thing for composites — it’s not emo-

tional anymore. We can now compete with

traditional materials on fact-based green

attributes.”

“Our industry needs to show the life cycle

benefi ts of composites,” concludes Ashland’s

Moffi t. “We’ve made some progress, but as an

industry, we need to do much more.” | CT |

Technical Editor

Sara Black is CT’s technical editor and has

served on the CT staff for 10 years.

[email protected]

THE SUPERIOR METHOD FOR MACHINING

LARGE AND SMALL COMPOSITE PARTS

The Best Composites Edge Finish:

Non-contact cold cutting, no delamination,

microcracks or edge fraying.

The Most Productive Machining Method:

Simple fixturing, high cutting speed, tight

corners, thin or thick machining of any

composite, and virtually any material!

5"

4"

3"

2"

1"

The Inventor and Global Leader in Abrasive Waterjet

Read this article and fi nd a list of LCA published data resources online |

http://short.compositesworld.com/UBYusVqz.

CT

D

EC

EM

BE

R 2

01

0

39

Page 42: 2010_dec

iscontinuous glass fi ber-reinforced polypropylene

(PP) is a popular composite material in automo-

tive, building and construction, and lawn and garden

applications. It off ers a good balance of high stiff ness-to-

weight, broad chemical resistance, good weatherability, all-

around toughness and durability and, of course, low cost.

Maintenance of postmold fi ber length is critical to

achieving good mechanicals, and is what has moved glass/

PP from commodity to engineering resin status. Much work

in the past two decades has focused on getting longer fi bers

into the matrix prior to its being placed in a tool, and then

preserving that fi ber length during the molding process.

T is led to technology developments that drove an evolu-

tionary shif from precompounded short-glass pellets for

conventional injection molding to so-called long-fi ber ther-

moplastic (LFT) pellets (also precompounded) for injection

and compression molding and a more recent development,

the inline compounding of charges/logs of glass and resin

at press side just prior to placement of the charge into an

injection or compression press. Ironically, compression-

moldable, glass-mat thermoplastic (GMT) composite in

sheet form experienced a parallel but opposite trend. Origi-

nally off ered in continuous-strand, randomly oriented glass

mat, which delivered high mechanicals but exhibited less

than desirable glass penetration in deep ribs, bosses and

intricate design features, the material evolved to shorter

chopped-glass mats with optional unidirectional glass and/

or engineering fabrics for locations that required additional

stiff ness. Although molders now have access to all of these

diverse material forms and molding processes, no material/

process combination is without issues that tend to compro-

mise part design complexity, cost and/or mechanical per-

formance.

Award-winning composite pallet showcases new LFT molding process from South Africa.

MAINTAINING

FIBER LENGTH

IN COMPLEX

3-D DESIGNS

D

A LOMOLD LFT pallet (bottom) bears the brunt of a static load

totaling 4,124 kg/9,094 lb.40

CO

MP

OS

IT

ES

WO

RL

D.C

OM

INSIDE MANUFACTURING

Page 43: 2010_dec

Four views of the highly complex, one-piece glass/

polypropylene pallet demonstrate the effectiveness of new

LFT molding process developed by LOMOLD Group of Cape

Town, South Africa.

Injection molding of short- or long-glass pellets

provides the opportunity for rapid cycle times, excel-

lent repeatability and reproducibility (R&R), and the

option to create extremely complex three-dimensional

(3-D) designs thanks to tooling action. On the down-

side, feedthroat issues limit the ultimate length of glass

that can be injected, and production volumes need to

be great enough to justify the high cost of equipment/

press time and tooling. Additionally, all the “plumb-

ing” and tooling action that enables production of

such complex parts also tends to break glass fi bers,

reducing mechanical properties in fi nished parts.

Because there is less fl ow with D-LFT and very

little fl ow with GMT in compression molding, fewer

fi bers are broken, so mechanicals are typically higher

than those achieved using injection molding. Ad-

ditionally, tooling and press time are less costly, it’s

easier and more economical to mold large parts, and

the process is fast and can be semi-automated. Simi-

lar to GMT, newer work in D-LFT allows fabrics and

unidirectional glass to be added to the charge as it’s

placed in the tool. However, compression molding is

unable to reproduce the intricate and complex 3-D de-

signs possible with injection molding. For example, in

ribs deeper than 55 mm/2.2 inches, glass bridging im-

pedes desired glass penetration. Further, the process

cannot produce through-holes. T ese must be cut or punched af er

removal. Unless the compression tool is equipped with shear edges,

parts also require edge trimming af er demolding. Each secondary

operation adds cost and time to the production process.

T e compression molding/GMT combination best preserves

the initial fi ber length and, therefore, typically achieves the high-

est mechanicals in glass/PP parts but also is most likely to limit de-

sign complexity. And, as a semifi nished good, GMT sheet can be

pricier than LFT and D-LFT materials. Unless higher mechanicals

and lighter, thinner parts are critical instead of just desirable, the

customer may be unwilling to pay the premium.

DESIGN COMPLEXITY AND HIGH MECHANICALS

Now, a new, modifi ed-LFT injection process called Lomolding seems

poised to render unnecessary the trade-off between 3-D design

complexity and fi ber length/mechanicals that is typically required

for large parts in PP/glass and other LFT composites. Ten years in

development by the LOMOLD Group (Cape Town, South Africa),

the patented process can rapidly produce large, highly complex parts

with the intricate design features of injection molding, yet maintains

post-mold fi ber lengths typically seen only in compression molding.

Fiber lengths of 10 to 50 mm (0.4 to 2.0 inches) can be maintained

with the new process vs. 3.0 to 4.0 mm (0.1 to 0.2 inch) for conven-

tional LFT injection.

T e process also can produce parts with higher mechanicals but

with thinner walls and lower mass, which presents cost-reduction

opportunities. Because it better preserves initial fi ber length, it also

improves low-temperature impact strength, a traditional weakness

of short-glass PP. Additionally, parts have higher mechanicals at el-

evated temperatures, greater dimensional stability at any wall thick-

ness, and enhanced creep and fatigue resistance. T e upshot is that

processors and OEMs get more out of the investment they’ve made

in the composite’s reinforcement system.

T e Lomolding process also duplicates several unique advantag-

es of injection molding: It is automated, fast-cycling, and has high

R&R. And company founder and CEO Pieter du Toit is quick to

point out that it is a closed-mold system, so resin is never exposed

to air as it is when D-LFT charges are moved from the ILC unit,

or when GMT sheet is moved from the oven into the compression

molding tool. T is eliminates a potential issue with hydroscopic

materials, such as nylon and thermoplastic polyester.

Further, the Lomolding process has no trouble producing deep

ribs, through-holes, and surfaces with complex geometry, and it

eliminates the secondary fi nishing associated with compression

molding. Like compression molding, however, Lomolding lever-

ages the benefi ts of lower molding pressures, which permit molding

against sof skins without tearing or damaging grain, and against

polymer fabrics or natural fi ber mats without melting or burn-

CT

D

EC

EM

BE

R 2

01

0

41

Page 44: 2010_dec

1 Lomolder machine schematic: Pellets are

introduced and metered for delivery into the

tool using two pistons instead of a screw.

2 The Lomolder injection unit, coupled to the

clamping unit.

3 The control panel allows the process to be

monitored and adjusted precisely.

4 Packing and metering pistons replace screw

and hot-runner systems on Lomolder

machine.

5 In this view, the tie bars pulled back prior to

loading the pallet tool into the press.

6 This view, with platens open, shows the core

side of tool as it is sprayed with mold release

prior to the molding cycle.

7 As the cycle ends, the platens open, and

ejector pins push the part off of the tool.

8 A robot pulls fi nished pallet from tool

(ejector pins fully out).

9 The robot lays a pallet on a conveyor to cool

as it is moved away from press.

10 Demolded pallets cool prior to packing

and shipping.

Sourc

e (a

ll st

ep p

hoto

s): L

OM

OLD

Gro

up

42

CO

MP

OS

IT

ES

WO

RL

D.C

OM

INSIDE MANUFACTURING

Page 45: 2010_dec

EXHIBITS | DEMONSTRATIONS | EDUCATION | NETWORKING | BUSINESS MEETINGS | AWARDS SHOWCASE

COMPOSITES 2011 connects the entire composites industry to

provide you the broadest range of education, cutting-edge products,

and innovative processing technologies—face-to-face and under

one roof. Find the information and expertise you need to meet the

growing demand for quality, cost-effective products in multiple

end-use applications. COMPOSITES 2011 offers in-depth education

and demonstrations focusing on real world applications and

innovations.

You’re invited to connect, learn and grow with the composites

industry at COMPOSITES 2011. Plan to Attend!

Connect. Learn. Grow.

FEBRUARY 2–4, 2011

FT. LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA

www.acmashow.org

Page 46: 2010_dec

ing. A vented tool avoids air-entrapment that can lead to part poros-

ity and dieseling (burning of plastic as heated gases become trapped

between solidifying plastic and the tool).

Lomolding diff ers from conventional injection in two respects:

LOMOLD has customized the control systems and modifi ed the

melt-delivery system. Much like bulk molding, a large piston (rath-

er than a screw) is used as a plunger to force the melt into the tool

through a single gate (up to 100 mm/3.94 inches diameter; gate size

is determined by press size rather than size of shot). T e fi ll segment

of the molding cycle is short: a 16-kg/35-lb part can be injected in 7

seconds. T at’s a rate 60 percent faster than straight injection mold-

ing. Moreover, to injection mold a comparably sized part would re-

quire a tool with hot runners and at least eight gates.

Signifi cantly, the melt is delivered at 500 to 700 bar (7,250 to

10,150 psi). T is generates far less shear and, at 1/20th the melt veloc-

ity of conventional injection, uses roughly half of the latter’s clamp

tonnage (1,800 tons vs. almost 3,600 tons). All of this helps prevent

glass breakage and reduce shear heating. T e resulting reduction in

internal part stress also lowers the risk of post-mold warpage.

T e plunger/piston face closes off the mold’s bounding wall at

the end of the stroke, sealing the tool. During pack-and-hold, a

second piston meters out the next shot, so there is no lag between

fi nished part ejection (during mold open) and setup for the next

shot (once the tool closes again). Additionally, hot runners are elim-

inated, which saves capital tooling costs and material, which oth-

erwise would be lost as sprues. Lack of sprues shortens cycle times

and eliminates post-mold sprue trimming. Plus, Du Toit says, the

long glass fi bers help conduct heat away the center of the part. Use

of a single gate reduces the number of weld lines and strengthens

the weld interface because the fast fi ll means the material is still hot

when fl ow fronts converge. T e one downside of the process, at least

from an aesthetics standpoint, is that gate vestige is far larger than

with conventional injection. T e company, however, has exploited

this as a marketing tool by putting a large “L” on the piston’s front

face, which leaves an impression in the vestige — LOMOLD Group’s

equivalent of “Intel Inside.”

Although the bulk of parts likely to run on the system will be

glass-reinforced, Du Toit says the process is equally amenable to

carbon fi ber, natural fi bers or wood fl our, because resin temperature

can be closely controlled and shear-heating of the melt at the gate

is eff ectively eliminated. T is can help processors avoid the cost of

thermal-stabilizer packages when molding with reinforcements or

resins that are temperature-sensitive.

PROOF OF CONCEPT: ONE-PIECE PALLET

Af er investing considerable time, money and eff ort developing the

Lomolding process, the company looked for a good application

to demonstrate the process’ capabilities. It settled on a composite

pallet, the veritable “holy grail” of the materials-handling industry.

Designed in-house with input from materials-handling insiders, the

one-piece, 21 percent glass-reinforced LFT PP pallet has a complex

design and ribbing pattern and is intended to solve a host of prob-

lems that long have plagued plastic/metal and composite pallets,

totes and dunnage.

T ere are many reasons why composite pallets should long ago

have replaced wood: T e generally have far more repeatable dimen-

sions than hand-built wood pallets, and because it is easy to attach

tracking devices to the plastic, they are more easily adapted to au-

tomated warehousing systems. Composite pallets weigh less than

wood pallets, reducing shipping costs for outbound and inbound

legs without exceeding legal loading limits.

Wood pallets also can harbor insects and bacteria and, there-

fore, require costly fumigation and/or heat treatment before cross-

ing international borders. Composite pallets are immune to pests,

eliminating border treatments. And composite pallets are more sus-

tainable. Typically, one large tree produces only 6.4 pallets, many

of which are used once and then burned or landfi lled. Composite

pallets off er longer service life —10 years on average vs. three to

four years for wood. Finally, they are potentially tougher and, there-

fore, less prone to breakage or other damage. T us, they require less

maintenance (reusable wood pallets spend up to 25 percent of their

service life out of circulation awaiting inspection and repairs). In the

case of pallet rental pools, there is greater use of pallets at a given

point in time, since far fewer pallets are awaiting repairs.

Racking is the most important performance requirement for pallets,

because many pallet customers use racking systems in their warehouses to

maximize fl oor usage. Racking strength indicates how much weight a pallet

can carry over time while it is supported only on its edges in a rack. In this

photo, an edge-racked LOMOLD pallet (bottom) holds (2,790 kilograms/6,151

pounds) without cracking, breaking, or taking a permanent defl ection. 44

CO

MP

OS

IT

ES

WO

RL

D.C

OM

INSIDE MANUFACTURING

Page 47: 2010_dec

INSIDE MANUFACTURING

Despite these benefi ts and numerous attempts to introduce new

designs during the past few decades, composite pallets have failed

to penetrate deeply into the materials handling and logistics indus-

tries owing to higher cost and, in some cases, lower mechanicals.

LOMOLD believes it has addressed the cost and performance

challenges through its unique design and Lomolding materials/pro-

cess technologies. T e company’s one-piece, 122-cm by 102-cm (48-

inch by 40-inch) pallet weighs only 16 kg/35 lb and can be produced

at injection molding rates, yet off ers impact strength of 2.03 J/cm

and tensile strength of 88 MPa/13,000 psi. Further, it can bear rack-

ing loads greater than 2,750 kg/6,000 lb with defl ection of less than

10 mm/0.4 inch, and it can hold a static load greater than 10 metric

tonnes/22,000 lb. It delivers mechanical performance and service

life far superior to comparably sized/rated wood pallets that weighs

60 percent more (40 kg/88 lb).

PALLET PROCESSING STEPS

For the pallet, the Lomolding process begins like conventional injec-

tion molding. Pelletized long-glass/PP is melted and transported via

a low-shear extruder into the metering section of the unit. Here, a

metering piston pulls back to prepare a measured volume of melt,

which is then sent on to a second packing piston, which rapidly,

but with low shear, forces the melt into the tool through the unit’s

single large gate. Upon mold close, as noted earlier, it seals off the

bounding wall of the tool.

T e tool used to form LOMOLD’s one-piece pallets weighs al-

most 25 metric tonnes/55,116 lb and — with 4,382 components,

including slides, gate, shutoff , and hardware — is said to be one of

the most complex pallet molds in the world. Total cycle time is only

70 seconds. Demolded and cooled parts can be packed for shipping,

with no secondary operations required.

CONTRIBUTING WRITER

Peggy Malnati covers the automotive and

infrastructure beats for CT and provides commu-

nications services for plastics- and composites-

industry clients. [email protected]

Read this article online | http://short.compositesworld.com/fXjHZ1t4.

Read more about LOMOLD Group’s 2010 JEC award | “JEC 2010 Product Showcase” | CT June 2010 (p. 20) | http://short.compositesworld.com/GvkPByej.

Rapid cycling enables production of commercial pallets priced

competitively with wood pallets on a lifecycle-cost basis but with far

more functionality. Slots for radio-frequency identifi cation (RFID)

chip can be molded into the part, allowing easy tracking of the pal-

let and its contents throughout its use-life. T e pallet is fully recy-

clable at end of life, which is estimated to be a decade or longer.

Taken together, these accomplishments earned LOMOLD

Group’s pallet top honors in the Transportation category, during

the 2010 JEC Innovation Awards competition this past April. Not

content to rest on its laurels, the LOMOLD team has developed a

second, multipiece pallet that is lighter, has higher glass loading (for

higher performance), and provides greater

functionality and cost-savings. T ese fea-

tures make it suitable for export use and for

single-ownership or pallet pools, particularly

when shipping fast-moving consumer goods

(FMCGs) — commodities that are shipped

and consumed quickly, such as food).

T e company’s fi rst pallet production

plant, in Huzhou, China, is projected to go

online fi rst quarter 2011 and will produce sin-

gle- and multipiece pallets. Additional plants

for pallets and/or LFT pellets are planned in

Malta, South Africa, and the U.S. Other proj-

ects in the offi ng include pressure vessels and auto components.

T e company has found that its Lomolder injection unit works

equally well whether receiving and injecting material from a con-

ventional single-screw extruder that is fed precompounded pellets

from a hopper, or from a twin-screw extruder coupled to an inline

compounding (D-LFT) unit. T e company, therefore, sells its Lo-

molder injection molding systems fi tted for either LFT or D-LFT,

together with pultruded LFT pellets (olefi n and engineering plas-

tics) for the system, greatly expanding the number of processors

who can take advantage of the technology. Machines for both types

are produced by Chuan Lih Fa Machinery Works Co. Ltd. (Tainan,

Taiwan). Licensing opportunities are available. Additionally, the

company is South Africa’s largest rigid-plastics recycler (providing a

source of reprocessed resin for less-critical Lomolding applications)

as well as Africa’s largest producer of rotomolding powders. | CT |

Lomolding achieves post-mold fi ber lengths that

are usually only possible in compression molding,

but can reproduce design complexity usually

restricted to injection molding. Shown here is the

glass fi ber reinforcement that remained after a

ribbed section (see inset) was subjected to a resin-

burnout test. The result (top) shows the excellent

retained glass length and high glass penetration

achieved in complex ribs, which were positioned

more than 1 m/3.3 ft from the injection gate.

CT

D

EC

EM

BE

R 2

01

0

45

Page 48: 2010_dec

46

CO

MP

OS

IT

ES

WO

RL

D.C

OM

Applications

Applications

INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE Meeting requirements for interior composites

Phot

ogra

pher

| W

illia

m C

.K. W

ong

(use

d by

per

mis

son)In a giant leap forward for the composites

industry, the 2009 update to the Interna-

tional Code Council’s (ICC) International

Building Code (IBC) explicitly permits the

use of fi ber-reinforced polymer (FRP) in

interior and exterior building construc-

tion. For the fi rst time, FRP can compete

with traditional materials on a relatively

level standards playing fi eld. T e IBC

code requires that, for interior use, FRP

must be fi re tested and meet both fl ame-

spread and smoke-obscuration criteria,

says John Rowen of Avtec Industries

(Hudson, Mass.). IBC Chapter 8 speci-

fi es the fi re test criteria, and IBC Chapter

26 requires that FRP components carry

an ICC-sanctioned label indicating that

the material has passed the required fi re

tests. T ese labels are affi xed only when

the material is listed with an independent

product safety testing organization that

has certifi ed the fi re test results (e.g, Underwriters Laboratories,

Southwest Research Institute, Intertek). When an FRP component

bears a testing laboratory’s label, architects and professional engi-

neers may call out the credentialed FRP in construction plans.

T e critical issue, of course, is how to produce FRP parts that

can meet IBC fl ame-spread and smoke-obscuration specifi cations.

Rowen and collaborator Nicholas Dembsey of Worcester Polytech-

nic Institute’s (WPI) Department of Fire Protection Engineering

(Worcester, Mass.) have developed some specifi c recommendations

for a “systems approach,” whereby fi re spread and smoke problems

are attacked simultaneously.

First, high-viscosity commodity resins are modifi ed with specifi c

additives to reduce the propensity of the fi nished material to com-

bust. Second, a fi re-retardant-coated surfacing veil that dramatically

suppresses smoke is added to the part layup, greatly reducing fl ame

and smoke generation. Use of both strategies in concert can produce

a part that passes the IBC Chapter 8 criteria, declares Dembsey.

“Bromine has been an excellent fi re retardant,” adds Rowen, “but

it produces a lot of acrid black smoke, so bromine additives can’t pass

the smoke obscuration criterion.” Under the new systems approach,

one should start with an economical commodity resin in which the

styrene content has been reduced to less than 27 percent. Methyl

methacrylate (MMA) should be added to reduce resin viscosity so it

will accept a high loading of aluminum trihydrate (ATH), anywhere

from 25 to 150 parts per hundred parts of resin. To accommodate

the high ATH fi ller loading, a fi re-retardant liquid-phosphorus

plasticizer, such as that manufactured by Supresta (Ardsley, N.Y.),

can be added to reduce resin viscosity.

Rowen and Dembsey stress that the ratio of resin to fi ber in the

part should be reduced as much as possible because more reinforce-

ment means less resin to fuel the fi re. T e glass content should be

38 percent or more, says Rowen. “Composite parts with less than

38 percent glass,” he explains, “are unlikely to pass the IBC tests, re-

gardless of how the resin is modifi ed.” He adds that typical chopped

strand mats should be avoided because they absorb a dispropor-

tionate quantity of resin. Woven materials, new high-density mats

or stitched woven roving mats should be substituted.

T e second step, the addition of an intumescent surface veil at

the part surface or just beneath the gel coat or painted surface, slows

burning and subsequent smoke generation, says Rowen. Avtec’s

FireWall veil, Technical Fibre Products Inc.’s (Newburgh, N.Y.)

TechnoFire and Regina Glass Fibre Tissue and Veil’s (Ballarat, Vic-

toria, Australia) FireShield are three available products. T e Avtec

veil provides not only the additional protection of an intumescent

additive, which forms an insulating char barrier layer, but it can,

depending on part design, enable a Class A surface as well.

Rowen and Dembsey have extensively tested their fi reworthy de-

sign thesis. A composite test panel constructed in accordance with

the systems approach was tested for fi re and smoke production, per

ASTM E84, “Standard Test Method for Surface Burning Character-

istics of Building Materials” (also called NFPA 255 and UL 723). T e

E84 test is of en referred to as the “tunnel test,” and it measures fl ame

propagation and smoke obscuration as compared to a sample of red

oak fl ooring. T e test panel produced almost no smoke and posted

a remarkable fl ame spread index (FSI) of 20 and a smoke developed

index (SDI) of 125, a vast improvement over a typical composite

part. T e use of this approach for composite building and construc-

tion elements should help FRP materials gain wider acceptance with

architects and engineers. Complete details of the test program can be

found at www.avtecindustries.com/news.html. | CT |

Page 49: 2010_dec

CT

D

EC

EM

BE

R 2

01

0

47

New Products

Bio-fi ber composite makes debut

Thermoplastics compounder RheTech Inc. (Whitmore Lake, Mich.) has

launched a new bio-composite material called RheVision, a sustainable

alternative to traditional mineral- or glass-reinforced polypropylene. Rhe-

Vision uses bio-fi bers from waste materials (initially wood fi ber, fl ax fi ber

and rice hulls) to produce materials for use in automotive, consumer and

construction applications. The resin can be molded or extruded and report-

edly is easily colored. www.rhetech.com

ProductsNEW

Unsaturated polyester for wind blades

DSM Composite Resins (Schaffhausen, Switzerland) has developed Syn-

olite 1790-G-3, an unsaturated polyester resin system specifi cally formu-

lated for wind turbine blade applications. The new high-performance resin

reportedly was developed and tested in cooperation with wind industry

manufacturers. The low-viscosity resin system is designed for vacuum infu-

sion and is said to offer a range of performance improvements over other

commonly used unsaturated polyester and epoxy resin solutions. Reported

benefi ts include better wetout, room temperature cure with no necessity

for postcure,  very low exotherm and fast through-cure in thin-laminate

parts. The new specialty resin is commercially available and will be pro-

duced in China and Europe. www.dsmcompositeresins.com

Mineral-fi lled liquid crystal polymer

Ticona Engineering Polymers (Florence, Ky. and Kelsterbach, Germany)

has added a new material to its family of inherently fl ame-resistant liquid

crystal polymers (LCP). Vectra T. rex LCP is designed for thermal forming

processes and offers high dimensional stability, good high-temperature per-

formance and chemical resistance. The material’s  high melt viscosity and

melt strength make it well suited for extrusion and thermoforming. Initially,

the company is offering a 40 percent mineral-fi lled grade, Vectra T. rex 541,

which provides impact and notched-impact strengths that, the company re-

ports, are signifi cantly higher than those of other mineral-fi lled grades. Oth-

er benefi ts include a heat defl ection temperature (HDT) of 245°C/473°F, 20

percent improvement in impact performance vs. standard 40 percent min-

eral-fi lled LCP and melt viscosity up to three times greater than standard

40 percent mineral-fi lled LCP. Target applications include medical trays and

equipment, aircraft interiors (good fl ame/smoke/toxicity data has been re-

ported) and semiconductor chip carriers. www.ticona.com

Graphene oxide platelets

Nanographene platelet (NGP) manufacturer Angstron Materials Inc.

(Dayton, Ohio) has introduced a new high-quality graphene oxide product

that is available in a 0.5 percent water or solvent dispersion for processing

fl exibility. The single-layer graphene, with a thickness about 50,000 times

smaller than the diameter of a human hair (17 microns), is said to be the

thinnest, toughest material known. This single-layer graphene oxide is 0.34

to 1.0 nm thick and nearly transparent under visible light, making it suitable

for use in transparent coatings. It can be used to improve thermal, electrical

and mechanical properties of polymers and composites. It also enhances en-

ergy and power density in batteries and supercapacitors, enabling a higher

charge storage capacity. Its average x, y dimension, based on light scatter-

ing, is 530 nm. Element analysis shows that its oxygen content is up to 46

percent. The new platelets are in stock and next-day delivery is available.

www.angstronmaterials.com

CNTs in thermoplastic concentrates

Carbon nanotube (CNT) manufacturer Nanocyl (Sambreville, Belgium)

has expanded its line of masterbatches that feature its highly conduc-

tive  NC7000 CNTs.  PLASTICYL thermoplastic concentrates now include

new masterbatches for thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) and poly-

etherehterketone (PEEK) resins, along with proven masterbatches for

polycarbonate, polypropylene, polyamide, high- and low-density poly-

ethylene (HDPE and LDPE) and polybutylene terephthalate resins. When

incorporated into TPU or HDPE, the CNTs reportedly help produce more

durable materials that have a smoother surface and a greater resistance

to chemicals, abrasion and heat. The product also offers good conductivity

when integrated into elastomers, and it signifi cantly enhances the me-

chanical properties and durability in O-rings, conveyor belts and timing

belts. www.nanocyl.com

Turnkey infusion molding system

Magnum Venus Plastech (Kent, Wash.) has introduced their Flex Mold-

ing Process, a system  that consists of injection systems, accessories and

seals designed to optimize infusion with a better control of production.

It eliminates large resin reservoirs and the need to premix resin, and it

reduces the use of consumable tubing and fi ttings by using a mix/meter

infusion system that provides a direct feed to the infusion membrane. Pre-

cision is enhanced by new accessories, including the Pneumatic Pressure

Vacuum Sensor (PPVS-Infusion) and the infusion-specifi c Turbo Autosprue

(TAS-14). Other features include  a new “lockable” reusable bag mem-

brane, large-bore feed pipes that reduce costs and consumable waste, Uni-

versal Membrane Fittings that provide a secure connection for the valves

and a training package that covers the process, accessories and systems.

www.mvpind.com

Page 50: 2010_dec

48

CO

MP

OS

IT

ES

WO

RL

D.C

OM

New Products

Injection-molded composite sheet

Injection molding machine manufacturer ENGEL (Schwertberg, Austria)

exhibited a new composite product, developed using carbon and glass fi -

ber sheets supplied by Bond-Laminates (Brilon, Germany), at the K 2010

plastics show in Düsseldorf, Germany (Oct. 27-Nov. 3). Designed to replace

metallic products in automotive applications, the organic composite sheets

were produced live at the show on an ENGEL duo 2050/500 injection mold-

ing machine. A polyamide (PA) thermoplastic resin was injected onto and

around sheets of glass fi ber or carbon fi ber. The system also allows for the

injection of polypropylene (PP). Tooling for the demonstration product at

the show — an automobile steering column — was provided by moldmak-

er Siebenwurst (Zwickau, Germany). www.engelglobal.com | www.

bond-laminates.com | www.siebenwurst-wzb.de

Continuous fi ber-reinforced polyamides

Rhodia (Paris, France) has introduced Evolite by Technyl, a product line

of continuous fi ber-reinforced polyamides for transportation and indus-

trial and consumer applications, including  transport seating, car bumper

beams and front-end structures, racing bicycle frames, window frames

and tanks. The material features what the company says is the  lowest

viscosity of any polyamide, which allows fi ber volume fractions as high

as 62 percent.  Available as recyclable prepreg fabrics or consolidated

plates, Evolite can be made of glass, carbon and other continuous fi bers.

www.rhodia.com

Long-fi ber thermoplastic compound

PolyOne Corp.’s (Avon Lake, Ohio) new OnForce LFT long-fi ber thermoplas-

tic compounds are optimized for surface fi nish, stiffness and impact strength,

and are said to offer higher performance and better aesthetics than similar

products in applications that involve metal replacement and structural ele-

ments. They retain properties across a wide temperature range, from -20°C

to 160°C (-4°F to 320°F). Benefi ts include better high chemical, creep and

fatigue resistance and dimensional stability than

highly fi lled short-fi ber products and other long-

fi ber thermoplastics. The compounds are currently

available in a range of base polymer/reinforce-

ment combinations, including polypropylene,

polyamide 6.6, and thermoplastic polyurethane.

www.polyone.com

New aramid for armor

DuPont (Wilmington, Del.) has launched Kevlar

XP for hard armor applications. Initially targeted

to military and police helmets and tactical plates

used in ballistic protective vests, the material is

said to offer 20 percent greater ballistic perfor-

mance and increased protection, without sacri-

fi cing other performance requirements. For the

U.S. military‘s Advanced Combat Helmet, which

weighs almost 4 lb/1.8 kg, it reduces weight by

0.5 lb/0.23 kg. The new product combines Kev-

lar KM2 Plus fi ber and a new thermoplastic resin

that improves upon the original Kevlar technolo-

gy. Kevlar KM2 Plus will be produced at DuPont’s

new $500 million Kevlar facility under construc-

tion near Charleston, S.C. The site is expected to

be fully operational by the beginning of 2012 and

will help increase worldwide production of Kevlar

by 25 percent. www.kevlar.com

Wind blade repair system

Gurit’s (Zurich, Switzerland) new, trademarked RENUVO wind blade repair

system is designed to address many of the practical issues that have pre-

vented more effective and expedient maintenance programs. The system

reportedly provides the option to create a wider weather window for repair,

with a working temperature range starting at 5°C/41°F, and it is designed

to reduce structural repair time by 50 percent. Its low-odor, zero-VOC (sty-

rene- and amine-free), UV-curable resin systems prevents these problems.

Summer and winter grades of RENUVO MPS (Multi-Purpose System) and

RENUVO PP (Prepreg) are available to cope with most conditions, making

the system compatible with prepreg, epoxy infusion and polyester infusion

molding methods. The repair system includes RENUVO Lamp Technology

(available in “spot” lamp format and in a high-intensity confi guration) that

enables technicians to expose laminate patches to UV light and cure the

matrix in minutes, without the need for a postcure. Gurit says Germanischer

Lloyd (GL) certifi cation is pending. www.gurit.com

Page 51: 2010_dec

CT

D

EC

EM

BE

R 2

01

0

49

New Products

Postprocessor upgraded for CATIA

Numerical Control Computer Sciences (NCCS, Irvine, Calif.) reports

that the latest version of its postprocessor, PostWorks, can be integrated to

run within CATIA V5. A universal postprocessor that can generate precise

NC code for a variety of machine makes, the program supports mills, lathes

and multitasking machining centers. In addition, the software is compat-

ible with several brands of CNC controls, including Heidenhain, Siemens

and Fanuc. PostWorks can convert complex 5-axis tool paths to NC code

and features a look-ahead function that automatically reduces excessive

rotary axis movement and prevents potential machine over-travel. Optional

features include software that simulates the material removal process and

machine movement while performing interference checking between all

relevant components of the machining environ-

ment. Besides CATIA, PostWorks is compatible

with NCL, UG and Mastercam. www.nccs.com

Multipurpose core fabric

Formax (Narborough, U.K.) launched its Mul-

tiCore product at the Composites Europe 2010

show (Sept. 14-16 in Essen, Germany). A multi-

purpose core fabric for the marine, automotive,

industrial and construction markets, the product

is a range of stitched fabrics that combine lay-

ers of reinforcement with infusible core materi-

als. The reported benefi ts include optimized resin

fl ow that enables controlled usage; high drapabil-

ity that allows for complex mold forms; uniform

and consistent behavior in the vacuum process;

and high-quality surface fi nishes. It reportedly can

be adapted to maximize performance for any ap-

plication with a choice of core materials, densities

and thicknesses. The reinforcements, offered on

either side of the core, include standard chopped

mats or continuous fi lament mats. The com-

pany’s multiaxial fabrics can be integrated with

the core fabric in the laminate design to provide

directional reinforcement and optimize strength.

www.formax.co.uk

Pourable high-temp foam core

Stepan Co.’s (Northfi eld, Ill.) newest STEPANFOAM pourable urethane

foam is a polyurethane/polyisocyanurate hybrid that reportedly combines

excellent fl ow capabilities with the ability to withstand temperatures of

at least 200°C/392°F in resin transfer molding (RTM) and autoclave cure

processes. In a thermogravimetric analysis conducted by the company to

determine the foam’s percent weight loss as the temperature increased,

polyurethane (PUR), polyisocyanurate (PIR), polymethacrylimide (PMI) and

the new HTC foams were compared. Weight data (measured as a percent-

age of weight) was collected as a function of temperature. As expected, the

polyurethane foam showed the fi rst signs of degradation as the temperature

increased, followed by the polyisocyanurate foam. From 200°C/392°F to

325°C/617°F, the HTC foam also outperformed the polymethacrylimide foam.

www.stepan.com

Ignition-resistant polymer coating

Industrial Technology Research Institute’s (Hsinchu, Taiwan) Reddex,

a non-toxic, fi re-resistant material, offers ignition resistance and fi re pro-

tection in one system. This inorganic polymer can be applied as a paint

and chars and burns, eventually converting into a bound inorganic porous

structure with low thermal conductivity, thereby insulating the structure

The formulation contains no halogen, sulfur or phosphor components. The

material will be tested in the U.S. within one year and ITRI expects it to be

globally commercialized within three years. www.itri.org.tw

Page 52: 2010_dec

Calendar

50

CO

MP

OS

IT

ES

WO

RLD

.C

OM

Calendar

DEC

Dec. 7-9, 2010 Carbon Fiber 2010

La Jolla, Calif. | www.compositesworld.

com/conferences/carbon-fi ber-2010

Dec. 27-30, 2010 2nd Int’l Conference on Composites

Kish Island, Iran | http://ccfa.iust.ac.ir

Feb. 1-2, 2011 2nd Annual Offshore Wind Power USA

Boston, Mass. www.greenconferences.com

Feb. 2-4, 2011 COMPOSITES 2011

Ft. Lauderdale, Fla. | www.acmashow.org

Feb.16-18, 2011 Nano Tech 2011 International

Nanotechnology Exhibition

and Conference

Tokyo, Japan | www.nanotechexpo.jp/en/

FEB

Mar. 1-3, 2011 4th International Composite-Expo 2011

Moscow, Russia | www.mirexpo.ru/eng/

exhibitions/composite11.shtml

Mar. 7-9, 2011 25th Annual Commercial Aviation

Industry Suppliers Conference

Beverly Hills, Calif. | www.speednews.com

Mar. 15-17, 2011 Techtextil North America

Las Vegas, Nev. | www.techtextilNA.com

Mar. 22-24, 2011 ICMAC, the International Conference on

Manufacturing of Advanced Composites

Belfast, U.K. | www.iom3.org/events/

icmac2011

Mar. 29-31, 2011 JEC Composites Show 2011

Paris, France | www.jeccomposites.com

MA

R

April 5-7, 2011 AeroDef Manufacturing

Anaheim, Calif. | www.aerodefevent.com

April 12-14, Composites Manufacturing 2011

2011 Dayton, Ohio | www.sme.org/compositesAPRIL

May 16-18, 11th Int’l Conference on Wood and

2011 Biofi ber Plastic Composites

Madison, Wis. |www.woodandbio

fi bercomposites.org

May 22-25, Windpower 2011

2011 Anaheim, Calif. | www.windpowerexpo.org

May 23-26, SAMPE 2011

2011 Long Beach, Calif. | www.sampe.org

MAY

June 9-10, 2011 Composites in Fire

Newcastle upon Tyne, U.K. |

www.compositesinfi re.com

June 20-26, 2011 International Paris Air Show

Le Bourget, France | www.paris-air-show.com

JU

NE

Page 53: 2010_dec

CT

D

EC

EM

BE

R 2

01

0

51

Showcase

CT

D

EC

EM

BE

R 2

01

0

51

Showcase

Product & LiteratureSHOWCASE

Tel: 253-473-5000Fax: 253-473-5104generalplastics.gocomp.biz/26

Manufacturers and molders of

LAST-A-FOAM® high-density rigid

and flexible polyurethane foams,

fabricators of foam and plastics for

aircraft, aerospace, defense, industrial,

construction, nuclear shipping, marine,

and design modeling applications.

General Plastics Manufacturing Co.

PERFORMANCE PTFE RELEASE AGENTS/DRY LUBRICANTS FOR COMPOSITESPTFE Release Agents provide a superior release forcomposite molding and fabrication. These products aredesigned to give multiple releases between applica-tions. They have no discernible transfer, no migrationand contain no silicones. We offer a complete line ofEPONTM epoxy resins/curing agents as well as chillersfor composite forming.

For technical information and sample, call 203 743-4447

MILLER-STEPHENSON CHEMICAL COMPANY, INC.

California – Illinois – Connecticut – Canadaemail: [email protected]

�����������

�� ��������

��������

Obtain the pertinent

information and quality

contacts that you’ve

come to expect from

CompositesWorld

Conferences!

2011 HIGH-PERFORMANCE FIBERSNovember 9-10 — Embassy Suites, Charleston, SC

2011 CARBON FIBERDecember 5-7 — Washington Marriott, Washington, DC

2011 INVESTMENT FORUMOctober 17-18 — Embassy Suites, Ft. Worth, TX

2011 HIGH-PERFORMANCE RESINSDate and location to be detemined.

2011 WIND & OCEAN ENERGY SEMINARApril 13-14 — Wyndham Portland Airport, Portland, ME

IN ASSOCIATION WITH

www.compositesworld.com/conferences

Join us for the

CompositesWorld Conferences 2011 Series

Page 54: 2010_dec

Marketplace

Marketplace

52

CO

MP

OS

IT

ES

WO

RLD

.C

OM

Available in various temperature ranges

��� ��� ����s��� ��� ����s Fax ��� ��� ����

Website: http//:www.generalsealants.comE-mail: [email protected]

Used world wide by composite manufacturers

Distributed by:AIRTECH INTERNATIONAL INC.

Tel: (714) ��� ����s &AX�������� ����

Website: http//:www.airtechintl.com

Manufactured by:

MANUFACTURING SUPPLIES |TOOLING SERVICES/SUPPLIES |

Design, Development,

and Testing of

Composites for

Marine, Military, and

Commercial Applications

7705 Technology Drive Tel (321) 951-9464

W. Melbourne, FL 32904-1576 Fax (321) 728-9071

www.structuralcomposites.com

Structural Composites, Inc.

www.forcomposites.comComposites Industry Recruiting and Placement

COMPOSITES SOURCES14726 Avalon Avenue, Baton Rouge, LA 70816

Phone (225) 273-4001 • Fax (225) 275-5807

Email: [email protected]

The Companies of North CoastCOMMITTED TO ADVANCING THE COMPOSITE INDUSTRY

www.nctm.com www.northcoastcomposites.com

Phone (216) 398-8550

CUSTOM FABRICATION |

To Advertise in the

Composites Technology

Marketplace,

contact Becky Helton

[email protected]

513.527.8800 x224

Workholding Solutions for Metal, Composites, Ceramic and Glass.

800-810-2482 • www.northfield.com

JOB OPPORTUNITIES

Employees sought - part-time

account representatives, sales

payment representatives, and

bookkeepers. Computer literacy,

1-2 hours of internet access

weekly, effi ciency, and dedication

required. If you are interested or

would like further information,

please contact:

[email protected]

Page 55: 2010_dec

CT

D

EC

EM

BE

R 2

01

0

53

Ad Index

INDEX OF ADVERTISERS

A&P Technology Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3

Abaris Training . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18

Ahlstrom Specialty Reinforcement Bishopville . . . . . . . . . . . 15

Akzo Nobel Polymer Chemicals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12

American Composites Manufacturers Assn. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43

AOC LLC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18

Ashland Performance Materials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16

CCP-Cook Composites & Polymers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

Composites One LLC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15, 25

De-Comp Composites Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50

Duraplate Products Group . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14

Elliott Co. of Indianapolis Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48, 49

Flow International Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39

General Plastics Manufacturing Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . Back Cover

Gerber Technology Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28

Henkel Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7, 9, 11

Hexion Specialty Chemicals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6

Interplastic Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21

LAP Laser LLC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23

LMT Onsrud LP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21

Lord Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27

McLube . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20

Mektech Composites Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23

Nida-Core Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13

North Coast Composites . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19

Precision Quincy Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17

Pro-Set Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13

Saertex USA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Inside Cover

SPE Automotive Division . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19

Superior Tool Service, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17

Technical Fibre Products Ltd. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50

Vestas Wind Systems A/S . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8

Wisconsin Oven Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Inside Back Cover

Wyoming Test Fixtures Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29

Page 56: 2010_dec

CO

MP

OS

IT

ES

WO

RL

D.C

OM

Engineering Insights

54

D

70% FIBER

VOLUME?

Double-baginfusion

ouble vacuum bagging was fi rst used in the 1980s to reduce

porosity and increase mechanical properties in prepreg and

wet-layup composite repairs. More recently, NASA and T e

Boeing Co. (Seattle, Wash.) applied its basic principles to vaccum-

assisted resin transfer molding (VARTM) and infusion, achieving

aerospace-quality composites out of the autoclave. Unaware of the

NASA and Boeing eff orts, Russell Emanis tried double bagging

with resin infusion more than 15 years ago. Excited by the results,

this former composite process manager on Lockheed Martin Aero-

nautics’ (Forth Worth, Texas) F-22 program and now district sales

manager for JB Martin (St. Jean Sur Richelieu, Quebec, Canada),

developed his own process and subsequently recommended it to a

variety of companies, including SYBO Composites (St. Augustine,

Fla.) and Air Command International (Caddo Mills, Texas). Each

reports that the process has achieved lighter but stronger parts.

DOUBLE BAGGING DEFINED

T e basic technique is to apply two discrete vacuum bags, an inner

bag, next to the laminate, and an outer bag, which is sealed to the

tool outside of the sealed inner bag perimeter. From there, however,

the technique’s details and explanations of why it works diff er with

almost everyone who uses it. T e most successful applications use

what Emanis calls a venting layer to separate the inner and outer

vacuum bags, “Otherwise,” he explains, “they will suck down

together and act as one bag.” But the means to do so range from

a solid tool (caul plate) to fl exible material (breather cloth, fl ow

media or noncrimp fabric). Practitioners also diff er about when

and how much vacuum to apply to each bag, but Emanis believes it

is essential to split the two main vacuum functions, assigning vola-

tiles extraction (removal of entrapped air, ambient moisture and/or

solvents) to the inner bag and then using the outer bag for compac-

tion. All who use the process agree it improves volatiles extraction

and compaction, and they report lower void content and higher

fi ber volume.

GRASS ROOTS DOUBLE-BAG INFUSION

Emanis’ double-bag technique was developed while he worked to

mitigate infusion’s high labor cost at Lockheed Martin. Emanis

fi rst took infusion in this direction when he tried to help his wife’s

company make small composite dishes for satellite TV applica-

tions. “We were pursuing an RTM Light type of process that was

tight enough to give us the stiff ness and cost we needed,” Emanis

explains. He tried placing dissolving resin bags — small polystyrene

fi lm bags fi lled with resin — into deep draw corners with bagging

fi lm on top, to act as pressure concentrators. Once the resin was

fed in during infusion, the bags would dissolve and the extra resin

was there to wet out the problem areas, but Emanis still could not

generate enough consolidation. A second bag enabled him to apply

the pressure he had been seeking and squeeze resin out from the

laminate under the inner vacuum bag.

Emanis’ process is unique, however, in that he applies two discrete

vacuum pressures: T e inner bag pressure is set for the optimum resin

fl ow, given the materials and infusion setup. Vacuum pressure in the

outer bag is defi ned to achieve desired fi ber volume and is applied

only af er the laminate is completely infused. At this point, the resin

feed valve is closed and Emanis opens a valve installed in front of the

resin feed shutoff , giving the resin two out-fl ow paths (from the resin

inlet and the vacuum inlet with catch pots) as the outer bag applies

A double vacuum-bag system and tight process control enable repeatable fi ber

volumes of 60 to 70 percent and improve the consistency of infused laminates.

SYBO Composites uses double-bagged infusion for the Islamorada 18’

fl ats fi shing boat because it enabled production of an extremely lightweight

260-lb/118-kg hull, which enables owners to fi sh in shallower waters.

Sour

ce |

SYBO

Com

posi

tes

& C

hitt

um S

kiff

s | P

hoto

grap

her:

John

Kip

p

Page 57: 2010_dec

CT

D

EC

EM

BE

R 2

01

0

55

compaction pressure. Emanis says this setup consistently achieves

close to 70 percent fi ber volume (see “Learn More.”).

LIGHTER, STRONGER, CHEAPER

On a recent composite box structure for a military application,

Doug Smith, founder and owner of Air Command International

(ACI), says double-bag infusion enabled ACI “to beat our custom-

er’s weight specifi cation by almost 50 percent while still meeting

strength and rigidity requirements.” ACI’s part weighs 6.4 lb/2.9 kg

vs. the customer’s request for 11.6 lb/5.3kg. T e box uses JB Martin

6-oz/yd2 (203 g/m2) carbon fi ber 2x2 twill, 6-oz/yd2 3K carbon fi ber

plain weave, and 3oz/yd2 (102 g/m2) fabric made from Innegra fi ber

(Innegrity, Simpsonville, S.C.) on either side of a closed-cell foam

core with fl ow media next to the Innegra on the tool-side skin.

ACI infuses this sandwich with a newly developed 4505 toughened

epoxy ambient-cure infusion resin from Endurance Technologies

(St. Paul, Minn.). T e box passed empty and weighted drop tests.

In the latter, a 35 lb/16 kg weight was placed in the box and it was

dropped 48 inches/1.2m. T e box survived undamaged.

Smith comments that double-bag infusion enables a higher fi -

ber-to-resin ratio. “We did a lot of our own testing in-house,” he

explains, “to develop our own process method that works best for

us.” Additionally, trial runs defi ned exactly how much resin is need-

ed, and reduced the amount of resin used in production, avoiding

wasteful overages.

Most of the parts ACI makes are small, under 4-f by 8-f (1.2m

by 2.4m) in size, but the process also handles ultra lightweight

18-f /5.5m hulls that SYBO Composites manufactures for Chittum

Skiff s’ (Fort Lauderdale, Fla.) Islamorada fl ats boat. At one time, the

hulls were infused with a single vacuum bag, but SYBO switched

to double bagging, says CEO Dana Greenwood, because “the more

weight we take out of the structure, the less draf the boat has, which

enables it to go into shallower water and access fi sh others can’t.”

SYBO started with a hull that weighed 320 lb/145 kg and dropped

that to 280 lb/127 kg by optimizing core and other materials. “Dou-

ble bagging enabled us to reach 260 lb /118kg without having to take

materials out that we need for performance,” Greenwood claims.

SYBO notes one additional benefi t. “For us, the ability to put an

intensifi er where the bag is not compacting the laminate suffi ciently

is key.” Intensifi ers are silicone rubber inserts placed between the

inner and outer vacuum bag in areas where resin tends to pool or

where the bag tends to bridge (see drawing, this page). SYBO uses

ENGINEERING CHALLENGE:

Develop a method for vacuum infusing a laminate that increases

its strength but reduces its weight by simultaneously reducing the

laminate’s void content and increasing its fi ber volume beyond that

possible with conventional vacuum-bagging regimes.

DESIGN SOLUTION:

The double-bag infusion technique, which splits the two main vacuum

functions, assigning volatiles extraction (removal of entrapped air,

ambient moisture and/or solvents) to the inner bag and then using

the outer bag for compaction.

Illustration | Karl Reque

Vacuum Resin feedBag-separation media: Breather and/or wire screen

Vacuum

Intensifi er (helps eliminate bridging)

Resin feed

Spiral wrap

Inner bag seal

Outer bag seal (at mold periphery)

Overlapped peel ply accounts for expansion

induced by intensifi er

Excess resin, due to bridging

Part layup

MOLD TOOL

Optional breather/fl ow

media

Peel plyTacky tape

Inner bag

Outer bag

Peel ply

SYBO COMPOSITES’ DOUBLE-BAG INFUSION PROCESS

(Bagging design includes intensifi er)

Spiral wrap

Page 58: 2010_dec

CO

MP

OS

IT

ES

WO

RL

D.C

OM

Engineering Insights

56

Read this article online | http://short.compositesworld.com/SpGmPFm9.

Read the full results of Russell Emanis’ side-by-side double-bag infusion

test | http://short.compositesworld.com/gviPUXrX.

Read more about vacuum control | http://short.compositesworld.com/

CUzqBZ7Q | http://short.compositesworld.com/BR0GsK6J.

Read a detailed backgrounder on double-bagging developments since the

1980s | http://short.compositesworld.com/gNwNt7sV.

Contributing Writer

Ginger Gardiner is a freelance writer

and regular CT contributor based in

Washington, N.C.

[email protected]

Big Blue L-100 vacuum bag fi lm from Airtech (Huntington Beach,

Calif.), which has more than 350 percent elongation and the extra

toughness necessary in large infusion projects.

SYBO also uses Ashland’s (Columbus, Ohio) AME 6001 vinyl

ester infusion resin as well as epoxy infusion resins from Endurance

Technologies and engineered fabrics from JB Martin and Owens

Corning Composite Materials (Toledo, Ohio). Greenwood cautions,

“We stay under 19 in. Hg vacuum pressure … to avoid resin outgas-

sing.” He has found that highly styrenated infusion resins tend to

“boil” at around that pressure. “It looks like you have a leak in the

bag,” says Greenwood, “but, of course, that’s not the problem at all.”

Lower vacuum pressure during infusion reduces the propensity for

problems. “Your goal with vacuum pressure in the inner bag is really

only to pull resin through the laminate and achieve wet out,” says

Emanis. “Using a second bag to achieve compaction reduces the risk

for moving materials around and vaporizing your resin.”

DOUBLE BAGGING SOLVES PROBLEMS

A typical double-bag infusion for a 20-f boat hull starts at the keel

and fl ows outward, using vertical feed lines to achieve wet-out to

the top edges. “Of en you end up with a resin-rich laminate lower

in the boat and a drier laminate as you move up the hull sides,” says

Emanis. Similarly, there is a change from vacuum pressure to hydro-

static pressure on the fi bers as the resin front moves forward. He

illustrates, “If you take a fl at piece of plate glass with fi ber under

vacuum on top of it, and you measure the thickness of the fi berglass

before and af er the resin fl ow front, you will see that it is thicker

behind because there is no vacuum pressure lef there to hold it

down.” Emanis asserts that even with full vacuum, the pressure

diff erence in the bag could be 15 in. Hg over 4 f /1.2m. In other

words, the pressure in the bag drops even when the vacuum gauge

at the pump reads 29 to 30 in. Hg. Emanis believes double bagging

overcomes this because there are no eff ects from fl uid dynamics in

the outer bag; it acts purely to achieve compaction, pushing the inner

bag down. T e outer bag enables a positive pressure not possible in

the inner bag and, Emanis contends, is also the cheapest insurance

against a blown bag and laminate inconsistency.

PROCESS CONTROL REQUIRED

Emanis points out that those who use the process must be attentive

to infusion process and environmental variables. Few processors, he

observes, recognize that a change in barometric pressure can vary

infusion results. T e key is to identify the average barometric pres-

sure for a given climate and geographic location, and account for

it when specifying a part’s materials and process. Emanis explains,

“If your part requires a 980 mbar [28.9 in. Hg] pressure to achieve

the specifi ed fi ber volume, and you know the average pressure is 965

mbar [28.5 in. Hg] where you are operating, you’re probably not going

to hit your specifi cation consistently.” Further, measuring the diff er-

ence in vacuum is not possible with typical vacuum gauges. Emanis

uses an absolute pressure gauge, which measures the exact pressure

in mbars and to within 0.001 in. Hg. (See “Learn More.”) Unlike dial-

type vacuum gauges, absolute gauges are unvented (venting report-

edly introduces errors) and incur no delay, providing a more accurate

understanding of pressure-change dynamics. Emanis notes, “I can

repeat a particular laminate time and time again, consistently.”

Likewise, changes in ambient temperature and moisture and any

diff erences between resin and tool temperatures will change the res-

in fl ow profi le, making it impossible to replicate results consistently.

Stored core and reinforcement materials must be protected against

ambient moisture absorption and/or dried before infusion to avoid

outgassing during infusion and cure, which causes voids. Even light

can elevate temperature, if only a little, causing resin to react more

quickly. According to Emanis, “If you test panels … in a very well lit

lab and then move to a dimly lit open shop to run the full infusion,

you won’t get the results you tested for.” | CT |

An Islamorada 18’ fl ats boat hull, with inner bag

vacuum infusion setup in place, in preparation for

double-bag infusion.

The Islamorada hull, after placement of the

outer bag, is ready for application of discrete

vacuum pressure to each bag.

This close-up of a vacuum line for outer bag

shows how it is sealed where it exits to its vacuum

source.

Sour

ce |

SYBO

Com

posi

tes

Page 59: 2010_dec
Page 60: 2010_dec

Your great idea starts here.

A I R C R A F T ✇ I N D U S T R I A L ✇ C O N S T R U C T I O N ✇ M A R I N E ✇ N U C L E A R ✇ S H I P P I N G ✇ M O D E L I N G

Whatever you’re planning, LAST-A-FOAM® high-density

rigid and fl exible polyurethane foams have the durability

and versatility to turn your idea into reality. As the creators

of LAST-A-FOAM®, we’re not just the industry leaders,

we’re the standard setters. Rely on the consistent high

quality of our materials, and our experience in precisely

manufacturing products to meet your most exacting

specifi cations. Need help? We’ve been advising customers

like you in the creative use of polyurethane foams and

plastics since 1941.

W W W. G E N E R A L P L A S T I C S . C O M C A L L : ( 8 0 0 ) 8 0 6 . 6 0 5 1 E M A I L : S A L E S @ G E N E R A L P L A S T I C S . C O M

G E N E R A L P L A S T I C S M A N U F A C T U R I N G C O M PA N Y