2010 Wisconsin Safe Routes to School Funding
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
2010 Wisconsin Safe Routes to School
Funding
2010 SRTS Project Application Cycle
• Applications available January 2010• Applications due April 2, 2010
• Approximately $6 million awarded
Eligible Projects
• Within two miles of a grade or middle school (kindergarten through eighth grade)
• Benefit is for walking/biking
• Can include education, encouragement, enforcement, engineering and evaluation.
• Projects are 100% fundable to the limit of the project award.
• For Infrastructure and Non-Infrastructure projects communities will be required to complete the project and then request reimbursement from WisDOT.
Eligible Applicants• Planning
– Municipality, School, Indian Tribe – Non-Profit organization
• Infrastructure: – State, local, or regional governmental unit
with jurisdiction over property– Indian Tribe with jurisdiction over property
• Non-infrastructure:– Municipality, School, Indian Tribe – Non-Profit organization
Project Timeline• Planning – Projects will begin in Fall 2010• Infrastructure - Small Infrastructure projects
with few issues and completed design may be able to begin construction in late 2011. The majority of Infrastructure projects should plan for construction in 2012 or 2013.
• Non-Infrastructure – Projects should anticipate starting no sooner than Spring 2011. Some projects may want to request funds for some activities before construction and some after.
Application Options
• Planning Assistance
OR• Non-Infrastructure and Infrastructure
Projects
Planning Assistance
• Communities will receive the services of a Wisconsin DOT hired consulting firm or their RPC/MPO
• Firm will assist with tasks such as:– Walk/Bike Audits– Community Meeting facilitation– Existing conditions evaluation– Survey data analysis– Report Writing
Non-Infrastructure and Infrastructure Projects
Activities that include:• Education• Encouragement• Enforcement• Engineering• Evaluation
Safe Routes to School Selection Committee
Committee comprised of program experts from the following type of organizations -
• DOT Bureau of Transit and Local Roads• DOT Bureau of Transportation Safety• Department of Health and Family Service • Department of Public Instruction• A Police Department • A Health Department • A Safe Routes to School Program • Safe Kids Coalition• Bicycle Federation of Wisconsin
Planning Assistance
Selection CriteriaPlanning Assistance
• Strength of Task Force – 30%• Potential for development of successful
SRTS Program – 20%• Severity of identified problems – 20%• Community and school support for
SRTS, biking and walking – 15%• Community need for assistance and
community demographics – 15%
Strength of Task Force
Committee looked for:• Inclusion of committee members from key areas such
as schools, engineering/public works department, health, and police.
• Diversity of committee membership such as bringing in parents, business owners, or other members that bring important perspectives.
• Activities committee has already undertaken that show their ability to successfully undertake the planning
process.
Potential for development of successful SRTS Program
Things committee looked for include:• Showing how SRTS will fit into larger city planning.• Activities they are already undertaking to build support
for SRTS.• Other programs related to physical activity, wellness or
safety that the school or community has started and that has been successful.
• Recognition of need for continuing evaluation and updating of plan.
• Success with similar planning efforts or programming efforts.
Severity of identified problems
Things committee looked for include:• Crash or injuries near school or in community involving children.• Lack of or poorly maintained bicycle or pedestrian facilities.• Documented traffic problems such as speeding or high traffic
volume roads near school.• High level of parent concerns shown by conducting survey.• Lack of any children that currently walk or bike.• Hazard bussing situations.
Community and school support for SRTS, biking and walking
Things committee looked for include:• Bicycle and pedestrian friendly policies (or willingness
to change or add policies as part of planning process).• Wellness policy that promotes physical activity.• Involvement with programs such as the Green and
Healthy Schools, Governor’s School Health Award, Movin’ and Muchin’ Program or other programs that promote issues of physical fitness, health, etc.
• Promotion of biking and walking through Walk to School Day, bike rodeos, physical education classes or other similar events.
Community need for assistance and community demographics
Things committee looked for include:• High percentage of low-income students in school
(based on number of students eligible for free or reduced cost lunch).
• Community has few professional staff that could provide the necessary planning assistance.
• Community would be unlikely to be able to undertake the planning process without a grant.
Infrastructure and Non-Infrastructure Projects
Infrastructure Questions• Historic buildings or area• Wetlands • Railroad within 1000 feet of project• Recreational area, park or wildlife refuge• State or Federal Highway• Real Estate Issues
Selection CriteriaInfrastructure and Non-infrastructure
• SRTS Plan or similar assessment – 25%• Severity of identified problems – 15%• Effective and Comprehensive Solutions – 15%• Increases walking, biking and/or safety – 15%• Community and school support for SRTS, biking
and walking and future sustainability of SRTS efforts – 15%
• Community need – 5%• Overall quality and creativity of projects/activities
– 4%• Evaluation plan – 4%• Time table – 2%
SRTS Plan or similar assessment
Things committee looked for include:• Community has a completed SRTS Plan that assesses
the issues that keep children from biking and walking to school. The requested projects and activities were recommended actions in the plan.
• The community has a Bicycle and/or Pedestrian Plan or Comprehensive Plan that looked at pedestrian and bicycle issues near the community’s schools. The
requested projects or activities were recommended actions in the plan.
• The community has undertaken some planning efforts such as walk or bike audits, assessment of the school facilities and problems at pick-up and drop-off time, parent surveys, traffic volume and speed studies or other SRTS assessments.
Severity of identified problems
Things committee looked for include:• Crash or injuries near school or in community involving
children.• Lack of or unsafe bicycle or pedestrian facilities.• Documented traffic problems such as speeding or high
traffic volume roads near school.• High level of parent concerns shown by conducting
survey.• Hazard bussing situations.
Effective and Comprehensive Solutions
Things committee looked for include:• The project or activity described addresses the
problems that were identified.• Community/school has given consideration to
necessary engineering, education, enforcement and encouragement that is needed to encourage and enable children to walk and bike to school safely.
Increases walking, biking and/or safety
Things committee looked for include:• Project has strong potential to get more children
walking and biking to school. • Project will significantly increase the safety of children
who are currently walking to school.
Community and school support for SRTS, biking and walking and future
sustainability of SRTS efforts
Things committee looked for include:• Bicycle and pedestrian friendly policies (or plan in
place to change policies) at school and community level.
• Wellness policy that promotes physical activity.• Involvement with programs such as the Green and
Healthy Schools, Governor’s School Health Award, Movin’ and Muchin’ Program or other programs that promote issues of physical fitness, health, etc.
• Promotion of biking and walking through Walk to School Day, bike rodeos, physical education classes or other similar events.
• Activities they are already undertaking that support for SRTS.
Community and school support for SRTS, biking and walking and future
sustainability of SRTS efforts
• Other programs related to physical activity, wellness or safety that the school or community has started and that has been successful.
• Recognition of need for continuing evaluation and updating of plan.
• Success with similar planning efforts or programming efforts.
• Policies related to sidewalk provision or development of trails for new developments
• Prior provision of facilities such as sidewalks, traffic calming, trails, etc
Community need
Things committee looked for include:• High percentage of low-income students in school
(based on number of students eligible for free or reduced cost lunch or other provided data).
• Community would be unlikely to be able to undertake the project without SRTS funding.
Overall quality and creativity of projects/activities
Things committee looked for include: • Community has shown that they understand their
community’s specific needs and have approached the solution creatively.
In addition, consideration was given to the federal objectives of:
• Project likely to decrease traffic congestion.• Project likely to improve childhood health.• Project likely to reduce childhood obesity.• Project likely to encourage a healthy and active
lifestyle.• Project likely to improve partnerships between schools,
municipalities, parents and other community groups.• Project likely to increase a community’s interest in
bicycle/pedestrian facilities.
Overall quality and creativity of projects/activities
• Project likely to improve air quality.• Project likely to improve community safety.• Project likely to reduce fuel consumption.• Project likely to increase community security.• Project likely to enhance community accessibility.• Project likely to increase community involvement.
Evaluation plan
Things committee looked for include:• Community will be able to complete required Student
and Parent surveys.• Project includes additional evaluation activities that are
appropriate to the size and complexity of the project.
Time table
Things committee looked for include:• Project has necessary approvals to begin as soon as
funding is available.• Project can be completed within three years.
Website
www.dot.wisconsin.gov/localgov/aid/saferoutes.htm
Related Documents
