Top Banner
2010-2011 AMAOs Scott W. Beaudry Testing Policy and Operations NC Department of Public Instruction
12

2010-2011 AMAOs

Feb 25, 2016

Download

Documents

Ozil Ozil

2010-2011 AMAOs. Scott W. Beaudry Testing Policy and Operations NC Department of Public Instruction. Today’s topics. AMAO Outcomes Definitions Timeline Tidbits Other reports Watchlist Title III Improvement Untested Questions. AMAO Outcomes - Definitions. AMAO 1 (Progress) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: 2010-2011 AMAOs

2010-2011 AMAOs

Scott W. BeaudryTesting Policy and Operations

NC Department of Public Instruction

Page 2: 2010-2011 AMAOs

Today’s topics• AMAO Outcomes

– Definitions– Timeline– Tidbits

• Other reports– Watchlist– Title III Improvement– Untested

• Questions

Page 3: 2010-2011 AMAOs

AMAO Outcomes - DefinitionsAMAO 1 (Progress)

Definition: one or more of the following in terms of the overall composite proficiency score on the annual English language proficiency test:

1) increase to the next English language proficiency level; 2) increase the previous score by 0.5; or 3) reach the Comprehensive Objective Composite (COC).

2010-2011 target: 55.1%

Changes since last year: redefined

Page 4: 2010-2011 AMAOs

AMAO Outcomes - DefinitionsAMAO 2 (Proficiency)

Definition: meet the Comprehensive Objective Composite (COC) by reaching an overall composite score of 4.8 or above, with at least a 4.0 on the reading subtest and at least a 4.0 on the writing subtest on the state’s annual English language proficiency test for kindergarten and Tiers B or C in grades 1-12

2010-2011 target:12.4%

Changes since last year: none (year 2)

Page 5: 2010-2011 AMAOs

AMAO Outcomes - DefinitionsAMAO 3 (AYP)

Definition: Status on AMAO 3 is based on the performance of the LEP subgroup (using the same decision rules used for AYP at the LEA level for Title I ) on four sub-targets (two subject areas at two grade spans). Performance on each subtarget is shown by functioning on two goals: Proficiency and 95% Participation

2010-2011 target: All subject/grade span/goal combinations “met”

Changes since last year: none

Page 6: 2010-2011 AMAOs

AMAO Outcomes - Timeline

Preliminary AMAO Outcomes Report sent to LEP Coordinators yesterday (9/14/2011)

LEAs have until 9/30 to review (2.5 weeks)

Final AMAO Outcomes Report presented to November SBE meeting

Page 7: 2010-2011 AMAOs

AMAO Outcomes - Tidbits

Tidbits (preliminary)– There were 90 Title III sub grantees– 105,507 K-13 students enrolled during

testing– 3,549 (3.4%) of those students do not have

test results (aka they are untested).

Page 8: 2010-2011 AMAOs

AMAO Outcomes - Tidbits

37 LEAs did not meet AMAO 16 LEAs did not meet AMAO 255 LEAs did not meet AMAO 366 LEAs did not meet the AMAOs*

*29 of these did not meet AMAO 3 only.

Page 9: 2010-2011 AMAOs

Other Reports

Title III Watchlist– Derived from the AMAO Outcomes report.– Only includes LEAs who met the AMAOs in

the previous year, but did not meet the AMAOs this year.

– A preliminary Watchlist will be sent out this week.

Page 10: 2010-2011 AMAOs

Other Reports cont’d

Title III Improvement– Derived from the AMAO Outcomes report

• Includes LEAs who did not meet the AMAOs for 2 or more years

• Is presented to the SBE

Page 11: 2010-2011 AMAOs

Other Reports cont’d

ACCESS Untested– A count of students enrolled during the

testing window who do not have ACCESS test scores; presented by LEA

– LEP staff factor these results into a risk-based analysis for monitoring

– LEP staff contact LEAs with unacceptably high percentages

Page 12: 2010-2011 AMAOs

Questions?

Scott W. [email protected]