Top Banner

of 24

2009 07 00 Author Unknown CSCSWG Incentives Presentation

Apr 05, 2018

Download

Documents

isalliance
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
  • 7/31/2019 2009 07 00 Author Unknown CSCSWG Incentives Presentation

    1/24

    StartwithNa*onalStrategytoSecure

    CyberSpace2002

    Na*onalStrategyproposedprivatesectorwouldseeROI(e.g.businessefficiencyetc.)ininves*ngincybersecurity.

    Somarketforceswouldefficientlyevolveandsolve---noincen*vesinNatStrategy

    2009wehavebiggerproblemw/cybersecurityincludingna*onalsecurityissues

    Thereforetherehasbeenamarketfailureincybersecurity

  • 7/31/2019 2009 07 00 Author Unknown CSCSWG Incentives Presentation

    2/24

    LackofCyberInvestmentisnotthe

    resultofMarketFailure

    EfficientMarketHypothisis(popularearly80-firsthalforthisdecade)saysmarketsactra*onallyasprovenbymathmodels

    Henceprivatesectorshouldseethewisdomandefficientlyinvestincybersecurity EfficientmarkethasbeenreplacedbyBehavioralEconomics

    Behavioraleconomicsholdsthatmarketsareeffectedbynon-ra*onalac*onsandrequireac*onstomovetheme.g.incen*ves&regula*on

  • 7/31/2019 2009 07 00 Author Unknown CSCSWG Incentives Presentation

    3/24

    CyberSecurityFitsintoBehavioral

    Economics

    Markethasworkedtoimprovecybersecurity---justnotefficiently(i.e.not100%)

    NatSecurityisnotaPriv.SectorGoalhenceinvestmentisnotefficient(orsufficient)tofullymeetNa*onalSecuritydemands

    Cybersystemsarenotbroken---theyareundera[ack,i.e.effectedbyindependentbehaviors

    Goalofcybera[ackmaynotbepointofvulnerabilityexploited,henceinsufficientmarketincen*veatpointofini*ala[ack

  • 7/31/2019 2009 07 00 Author Unknown CSCSWG Incentives Presentation

    4/24

    Goals:BasedonComprehensive

    Na*onalCyberIni*a*ve(Proj.12)Recommendasetofincen.ves,acrossallCri.calInfrastructureandKey

    Resources(CIKR)sectors,todriveimprovementintheprivatesectorscybersecurityposturewheremarket

    forcesaloneyieldaninsufficientvalue

    proposi.on

  • 7/31/2019 2009 07 00 Author Unknown CSCSWG Incentives Presentation

    5/24

    ObamaCyberSpacePolicyReview

    Ac*onPlanItem14:Refinegovernment

    procurementstrategiesandimprovemarket

    incen*vesforsecureandresilienthardware

    andsowareproducts,newsecurity

    innova*onandmanagementservices.

  • 7/31/2019 2009 07 00 Author Unknown CSCSWG Incentives Presentation

    6/24

    ObamaCyberSpacePolicyReview

    Ac*onPlans

    Ac*onPlanItem2:Prepareanupdatedstrategytosecureinforma*oninfrastructure.

    Thisstrategyshouldincludecon*nued

    evalua*onoftheComprehensiveNa*onal

    CyberIni*a*ve(CNCI)ac*vi*esandbuildon

    itssuccesses.

  • 7/31/2019 2009 07 00 Author Unknown CSCSWG Incentives Presentation

    7/24

    ObamaCyberSpacePolicyReview

    Thegovernmentshouldiden*fyprocurement

    strategiesthatwillincen*vizethemarketto

    makemoresecureproductsandservices

    availabletothepublic.Addi*onalincen*ve

    mechanismsthatthegovernmentshould

    exploreincludeadjustmentstoliability

    indemnifica*on,taxincen*ves,newregulatoryrequirementsandcompliance

    mechanisms.

  • 7/31/2019 2009 07 00 Author Unknown CSCSWG Incentives Presentation

    8/24

    CSCSWGProcess&Findings

    Beganbi-weeklymee*ngsinFebruary Concluded:TheGovernmentcan,throughtheadop*onofincen*ves,changethevalue

    proposi*onforcompaniesandencouragethebroadadop*onofsoundcybersecurityprac*cesacrossallCIKRsectors.

    Differentincen*vesmaybeappropriatefordifferentsectors---orbusinesses

    Researchshowsexis*ngprac*cescanproducedrama*cimprovementsincybersecurity

  • 7/31/2019 2009 07 00 Author Unknown CSCSWG Incentives Presentation

    9/24

    MacroIssuestobeAddressed

    Aretherebehaviorsthatdeservetobeincented?

    Howdowedecidewhatistobeincented Istherearoleforregulatorybodiesinthisprocess?

    Whatshouldtheincen*vesbe?

    Howdowemonitorcompliance?

  • 7/31/2019 2009 07 00 Author Unknown CSCSWG Incentives Presentation

    10/24

    Whodeterminesandrolefor

    Regulators

    Incen*vesoughttobeavailabletoproventechniquesasdeterminedby:

    Federalregulators;or Recognizedstandardsengorganiza*ons(NIST/ANSI/ISOetc.);or

    Accreditedsecuritycer*fiedorselfregulatoryorganiza*onssuchasPCI/NASD/insurance

  • 7/31/2019 2009 07 00 Author Unknown CSCSWG Incentives Presentation

    11/24

    HighRecommend/Recommend/

    Consider/NotRecommended

    BASEDON

    Cost(money/people/*meetc.todevelopandimplement)

    BreadthofImpact DepthofImpact Immediacyanddura*onofimpact Nega*veeffectsofadop*on

  • 7/31/2019 2009 07 00 Author Unknown CSCSWG Incentives Presentation

    12/24

    High:TieFed$toadop*ngproven

    prac*ces/standardsandtech

    Pros:lowcosttocompanies/nosigimpactonfedbudget/quickimpact/evolvetestfor

    complianceas$isrenewed/reachbeyond

    CIKR

    Cons:Administra*vetodeterminewhatqualifies/Requirescoordina*onacrossgovt/

    possiblebudgetincreaseifexpanded

  • 7/31/2019 2009 07 00 Author Unknown CSCSWG Incentives Presentation

    13/24

    High:DevelopCyberInsurance

    Pros:Insurerswillrequireadequatesecuritybecausetheirmoneyisatstake/privatesectorcompliancetes*ngsavesgovt.$/Canquicklyevolverequirementstomeetnewthreats/off

    setsgovt.riskinmajorevent/distributesriskbroadly

    Cons:Marketneedsdevelopment.(butdatanowavailable)Mayrequireini*alGovt.revolvingfundasw/cropandfloodinsur.Mustbeperceivedbusinesscaseforbuyers

  • 7/31/2019 2009 07 00 Author Unknown CSCSWG Incentives Presentation

    14/24

    LeveragePurchasingPowerofFed

    Govt.

    Pros:Increasessecurityinhighvaluesystems/Buildsmarketforbakedinsecurity,thus

    loweringcostsforothers.MakesUSaposi*ve

    example

    Cons:Willincreasecosttogovt./Couldpushoutotherwisequalifiedsuppliers/Requires

    changestoFARandDFAR/Needinter-agencysupport

  • 7/31/2019 2009 07 00 Author Unknown CSCSWG Incentives Presentation

    15/24

    High:CreateCyberSafetyAct

    Pros:Alreadyasuccessfulprogramforphysicalsecurity(providesmarke*ngandinsurancebenefits)BuildsonGovt.

    cer*fica*on.Woulddrivedevelopmentandacceptanceofnewtechnologies&prac*ceskeepingupwiththreat.Inexpensive

    Cons:NeedtoamendcurrentSAFETYAct.Mustdevelopcyberbasedcer*fica*onproceduresw/inDHS

  • 7/31/2019 2009 07 00 Author Unknown CSCSWG Incentives Presentation

    16/24

    Recommend:LinkCybersecurityto

    smallbusinesscontracts/loans

    Pros:Addressacri*calundersecuredarea.Lowcost.Fitswithoveralleduca*on

    objec*ves

    Cons:Couldraisecostofloans/contracts/Requiresbroadinter-agencybuyin/requires

    changestoFARandDFAR

  • 7/31/2019 2009 07 00 Author Unknown CSCSWG Incentives Presentation

    17/24

    Recommended:Liabilityreformand

    safeharbors

    Pros:AppealstothehighestlevelsofbusinessEncouragesinnova*on.Rewardsgoodactors.Reducecostlyli*ga*on.Virtuallynoeconomic

    cost.Canprovidevariouslevelsofprotec*onforlevelsofsecurity

    Cons:Assessingliabilityisdifficult.Possiblypoli*callydifficult.Govt.orprivatesystemtocer*fyneedstobecreated

  • 7/31/2019 2009 07 00 Author Unknown CSCSWG Incentives Presentation

    18/24

    Recommend:GrantsforCyberR&D

    Pros:Reducecosttoprivatesectorfordevelopinganddeployingtechnologies.

    AllowsGovt.totargetR&Dmoney.Pushes

    gamechangingtechnologies.

    Cons:Increasedspending/Ques*onsastoifthisisproperroleforgovt(compe*ngwith

    privatesector)andifitiscosteffec*ve

  • 7/31/2019 2009 07 00 Author Unknown CSCSWG Incentives Presentation

    19/24

    Recommended:Directfundingfor

    CyberR&D

    Pros:Reducecosttoprivatesectorfordevelopinganddeployingtechnologies.

    AllowsGovt.totargetR&Dmoney.Pushes

    gamechangingtechnologies.

    Cons:Increasedspending/Ques*onsastoifthisisproperroleforgovt(compe*ngwith

    privatesector)andifitiscosteffec*ve

  • 7/31/2019 2009 07 00 Author Unknown CSCSWG Incentives Presentation

    20/24

    Consider:TaxIncen*ves

    Pros:Lowerscostofimprovingsecurity/rela*velyimmediateimpact/canbeadapted

    tosizeandneedsastheychange/broadreach.

    Cons:Costswouldbehigh/Ques*onablecosteffec*veness/poli*caldifficulty/newgovt.

    audi*ng.

  • 7/31/2019 2009 07 00 Author Unknown CSCSWG Incentives Presentation

    21/24

    Consider:StreamlineRegula*on

    Pros:Focusonsecurityasopposedtocompliance/increasedclarityreducecostsfor

    industryincreasingcompliance/Eliminate

    confusion

    Cons:Difficulttoalignmul*tudeoflaws/Wouldchangesbesignificantenoughto

    improvesecurity/pushbackfromstates&locals.Couldcreatealowceiling

  • 7/31/2019 2009 07 00 Author Unknown CSCSWG Incentives Presentation

    22/24

    Consider:AwardsforCyberSecurity

    Pros:Consistentwitheduca*on/awarenesstheme/lowcost/providesmarketorienta*on

    (Baldridge)

    Cons:Ques*onableimpact/Createnewtargets/difficultyinsengcriteriaforawards

  • 7/31/2019 2009 07 00 Author Unknown CSCSWG Incentives Presentation

    23/24

    Consider:IncludeCybersecurityin

    regulatorybase

    Pros:Capturestruecostofservice/allowsratepayerstodeterminemarketvalueforcybersecurity

    Cons:Strictratebaseregula*onislargelyoutmoded/newtechnologiessuchasVOIP

    dontfitwellintoratebasecriteria/Mostsuchdetermina*onsareatstate&locallevelrequiringeduca*onofregulators

  • 7/31/2019 2009 07 00 Author Unknown CSCSWG Incentives Presentation

    24/24

    NotRecommended:Manda*ng

    Standards

    Pros;Easilyadaptedtoregulatedsectors/Establishesminimumcriteria/promotescertainty

    andclarity/Canactfast

    Cons:Currentstandardshavelowcompliance/Complianceisoenchecktheboxw/nolinkto

    improvedsecurity/costlyforgovt.andindustry/

    failstokeeppacew/techandthreats/limitedscope/poli*callyweakened/woulddrivebusiness

    offshore/providesfloorswhenweneedceilings