Top Banner

of 30

2008_Y10_Exam

Apr 03, 2018

Download

Documents

Coolman Poon
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
  • 7/28/2019 2008_Y10_Exam

    1/30

    Garfield graphics reproduced with kind permission from PAWS Inc.

    All rights reserved

    LOJ June 2008

    Y10 Mock

    ExamJune

    2008

  • 7/28/2019 2008_Y10_Exam

    2/30

    Garfield graphics reproduced with kind permission from PAWS Inc.

    All rights reserved

    LOJ June 2008

  • 7/28/2019 2008_Y10_Exam

    3/30

    Garfield graphics reproduced with kind permission from PAWS Inc.

    All rights reserved

    LOJ June 2008

    Saving in kWh = 350 (old one) 225 (new one) = 125 kWh (1 mark)

    Cost = 125 x 12p = 1500p (1 mark) = 15-00

    ORwork out cost of running each one: old one = 350 x 12p = 42- 00;

    new one 27-00 saving = 42-00 - 27-00 = 15-00

  • 7/28/2019 2008_Y10_Exam

    4/30

    Garfield graphics reproduced with kind permission from PAWS Inc.

    All rights reserved

    LOJ June 2008

  • 7/28/2019 2008_Y10_Exam

    5/30

    Garfield graphics reproduced with kind permission from PAWS Inc.

    All rights reserved

    LOJ June 2008

    This is another maths/economics problem NOT physics sorry guys it is the

    way the subject is going they think it makes it more relevant!You save 15 per year and they say the payback time is 12 years that meansit costs 15 x 12 = 180

    When it is reduced the payback time is 9 years so it costs 15 x 9 = 135

    You save three years of payback (1 mark) 3 x 15 = 45 (1 mark)

    (Check: 180-135 = 45)

    If you got the answer to (a) wrong they let you have 2 marks for this bit if youmultiplied your answer to (a) by three.

  • 7/28/2019 2008_Y10_Exam

    6/30

    Garfield graphics reproduced with kind permission from PAWS Inc.

    All rights reserved

    LOJ June 2008

  • 7/28/2019 2008_Y10_Exam

    7/30

    Garfield graphics reproduced with kind permission from PAWS Inc.

    All rights reserved

    LOJ June 2008

    Yes: with the new freezer you will use less electricity and most of our electricity in theUK is produced by burning fossil fuels (1). This releases carbon dioxide into theatmosphere that contributes to global warming (1). OR less nuclear fuel is used to makeelectricity (1) so less radioactive waste (1)

    No: The manufacture of the new unit will have used more energy than you will save. Youshould only buy new appliances when it is necessary to decrease the total amount of globalenergy use. (1) Also the old unit will have to be disposed of and it contains pollutants (e.g.CFCs that affect the ozone layer) (1)

    You need to make a choice and then make two points!

  • 7/28/2019 2008_Y10_Exam

    8/30

    Garfield graphics reproduced with kind permission from PAWS Inc.

    All rights reserved

    LOJ June 2008

  • 7/28/2019 2008_Y10_Exam

    9/30

    Garfield graphics reproduced with kind permission from PAWS Inc.

    All rights reserved

    LOJ June 2008

    It will raise its temperature it will get hotter.

    They also gave a mark for set up a convection current in it or decrease the density ofthe air

    The rate of energy transfer would decrease. (1 mark) (It would still be transferred butat a slower rate because the speed it moves at depends on the difference in

    temperature)

  • 7/28/2019 2008_Y10_Exam

    10/30

    Garfield graphics reproduced with kind permission from PAWS Inc.

    All rights reserved

    LOJ June 2008

  • 7/28/2019 2008_Y10_Exam

    11/30

    Garfield graphics reproduced with kind permission from PAWS Inc.

    All rights reserved

    LOJ June 2008

  • 7/28/2019 2008_Y10_Exam

    12/30

    Garfield graphics reproduced with kind permission from PAWS Inc.

    All rights reserved

    LOJ June 2008

    It is powered by an electric pump you have to pay for electricity.

    If this confused you dont worry it did me too! When it is warm outside we usuallywant it cool inside and vice versa so when/where this would be used I havent a clue!

    Seems like a daft idea to me! Even though we lose energy to the outside, the airoutside our houses in winter is not warm compared to the air inside.

    I checked on the web and couldnt find anything like this system! If it had included acondenser and worked like a refrigeration unit I would get it, but this??? The diagramdoesnt make sense to me if any of you can explain it to me I would be grateful!

    But even if it confused you, you should still get the marks on this question Lookcarefully at the question they TELL you it is cost effective and want you to say why not how it works.All they wanted you to say was that more heat energy wastransferred into the house than was used in operating the pump (1 mark) (they told

    you it was efficient so that must be the case!) so the overall energy bills were reduced(1 mark) the report said this was badly answered I wonder why! Stupid question!

  • 7/28/2019 2008_Y10_Exam

    13/30

    Garfield graphics reproduced with kind permission from PAWS Inc.

    All rights reserved

    LOJ June 2008

  • 7/28/2019 2008_Y10_Exam

    14/30

    Garfield graphics reproduced with kind permission from PAWS Inc.

    All rights reserved

    LOJ June 2008

    Gamma and beta

    Alpha and beta (because they are charged)

    Gamma

  • 7/28/2019 2008_Y10_Exam

    15/30

    Garfield graphics reproduced with kind permission from PAWS Inc.

    All rights reserved

    LOJ June 2008

  • 7/28/2019 2008_Y10_Exam

    16/30

    Garfield graphics reproduced with kind permission from PAWS Inc.

    All rights reserved

    LOJ June 2008

    External conditions (pressure, temperature etc) have no effect on the rate ofdecayof a sample so changing the temperature will have no effect.

  • 7/28/2019 2008_Y10_Exam

    17/30

    Garfield graphics reproduced with kind permission from PAWS Inc.

    All rights reserved

    LOJ June 2008

  • 7/28/2019 2008_Y10_Exam

    18/30

    Garfield graphics reproduced with kind permission from PAWS Inc.

    All rights reserved

    LOJ June 2008

    It has one more neutron in the nucleus (1 mark). They did NOT ask you whatan isotope was they did not want a general definition type of answer. Theywanted you to answer the specific question. Saying they had differentnumbers of neutrons got you no mark.

  • 7/28/2019 2008_Y10_Exam

    19/30

    Garfield graphics reproduced with kind permission from PAWS Inc.

    All rights reserved

    LOJ June 2008

  • 7/28/2019 2008_Y10_Exam

    20/30

    Garfield graphics reproduced with kind permission from PAWS Inc.

    All rights reserved

    LOJ June 2008

    Time to halve from 300 to 150 counts per minute is 14 days

    Time to halve from 200 to 100 counts per minute is 14 days (they only expected youto do it once just do it twice to double check your maths but go with the simplehalving from the initial value)

    Half life is 14 days (1 mark for answer and 1 mark for marking it on the graph how

    you did it)

  • 7/28/2019 2008_Y10_Exam

    21/30

    Garfield graphics reproduced with kind permission from PAWS Inc.

    All rights reserved

    LOJ June 2008

  • 7/28/2019 2008_Y10_Exam

    22/30

    Garfield graphics reproduced with kind permission from PAWS Inc.

    All rights reserved

    LOJ June 2008

    A tracer has to be an atom that the system being investigated will use. Theradioactive isotope of phosphorus will be taken into the plant in exactly the samewas a non-radioactive phosphorus would be (1 mark) as it is chemically identical toit (1 mark).

    The beta particles are penetrating enough to travel out through the plant andreach the geiger counter. (1 mark). They can be detected externally (1 mark).

    The half life is long enough for a detailed study of growth to be carried out overthe lifetime of the plant (1 mark) any two required.

    Again a biology questionusing some physics youhave to think like a

    biologist thatunderstandsradioactivity. It is likethe medical use of it as atracer only we wouldnever use b-emitters likethis on humans thecancer risk would be too

    great.

  • 7/28/2019 2008_Y10_Exam

    23/30

    Garfield graphics reproduced with kind permission from PAWS Inc.

    All rights reserved

    LOJ June 2008

  • 7/28/2019 2008_Y10_Exam

    24/30

    Garfield graphics reproduced with kind permission from PAWS Inc.

    All rights reserved

    LOJ June 2008

    Infra red has a longer wavelength than visible light but only just longer C is theanswer.

    B is 10cm that would be microwaves A would be radiowaves.

  • 7/28/2019 2008_Y10_Exam

    25/30

    Garfield graphics reproduced with kind permission from PAWS Inc.

    All rights reserved

    LOJ June 2008

  • 7/28/2019 2008_Y10_Exam

    26/30

    Garfield graphics reproduced with kind permission from PAWS Inc.

    All rights reserved

    LOJ June 2008

    500 000 kHz is 500 000 000 Hz (1 mark) - YOU MUST KNOW YOURPREFIXES!!!

    wavelength = wavespeed/frequency (1 mark)

    = 300 000 000/500 000 000 = 0.6m

  • 7/28/2019 2008_Y10_Exam

    27/30

    Garfield graphics reproduced with kind permission from PAWS Inc.

    All rights reserved

    LOJ June 2008

  • 7/28/2019 2008_Y10_Exam

    28/30

    Garfield graphics reproduced with kind permission from PAWS Inc.

    All rights reserved

    LOJ June 2008

    The electrons in the metal vibrate at the same frequency as the radiowaves. Thiscreates an alternating voltage (1 mark) in the aerial ac voltage and/or makes analternating current flow at the same frequency (1 mark) as the radiowaves.

    (They also allowed a mark for makes the aerial hotter)

    This is straight from the syllabus wording! Base your revision around the syllabus it tells you what they expect you to know/recall.

  • 7/28/2019 2008_Y10_Exam

    29/30

    Garfield graphics reproduced with kind permission from PAWS Inc.

    All rights reserved

    LOJ June 2008

  • 7/28/2019 2008_Y10_Exam

    30/30

    Garfield graphics reproduced with kind permission from PAWS Inc.

    All rights reserved

    LOJ June 2008

    X-rays are absorbed by the atmosphere so they wouldnt reach the telescope if itwas on Earths surface.

    interferred by, reflected by etc. got no mark! Some thought the telescope gaveout the X-rays! Telescopes detect e.m. radiation!