Top Banner
©2006 University of California Prepublication Data September 2006 Towards Autonomous Jumping Microrobots Sarah Bergbreiter Prof. Kris Pister Berkeley Sensor and Actuator Center University of California, Berkeley
12

©2006 University of California Prepublication Data September 2006 Towards Autonomous Jumping Microrobots Sarah Bergbreiter Prof. Kris Pister Berkeley Sensor.

Dec 21, 2015

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: ©2006 University of California Prepublication Data September 2006 Towards Autonomous Jumping Microrobots Sarah Bergbreiter Prof. Kris Pister Berkeley Sensor.

©2006 University of California Prepublication Data September 2006

Towards Autonomous Jumping Microrobots

Sarah BergbreiterProf. Kris Pister

Berkeley Sensor and Actuator CenterUniversity of California, Berkeley

Page 2: ©2006 University of California Prepublication Data September 2006 Towards Autonomous Jumping Microrobots Sarah Bergbreiter Prof. Kris Pister Berkeley Sensor.

©2006 University of California Prepublication Data September 2006

Motivation

• Applications– Mobile Sensor Networks– Planetary Exploration– MEMS Catapults– Bi-Modal Transportation

• Key Technologies– Energy storage– Large force, large

displacement actuators– “High output power for

short time” actuated MEMS system

Size

Input Power

Speed

Target Space

Size ~ mm

Input Power ~ 10s W

Speed ~ 10 sec / jump

Page 3: ©2006 University of California Prepublication Data September 2006 Towards Autonomous Jumping Microrobots Sarah Bergbreiter Prof. Kris Pister Berkeley Sensor.

©2006 University of California Prepublication Data September 2006

Why Jumping?

• Improve Mobility– Obstacles are large!

• Improve Efficiency– What time and energy is required to move a microrobot

1 m and what size obstacles can these robots overcome?

Ant (Walking)

Proposed (Jumping)

Hollar (Walking)

Ebefors (Walking)

Mass 11.9 mg 10 mg 10 mg 80 mg

Time 15 sec 1 min 417 min 2.8 min

Energy 1.5 mJ 5 mJ 130 mJ 180 J

Obstacle Size ** 1 cm 50 m 100 m

Page 4: ©2006 University of California Prepublication Data September 2006 Towards Autonomous Jumping Microrobots Sarah Bergbreiter Prof. Kris Pister Berkeley Sensor.

©2006 University of California Prepublication Data September 2006

• Spring for energy storage– short legs imply short

acceleration times

• High force, long stroke motor– Store energy in springs

• Power for motors and control

• Controller to direct motors

• Landing and resetting for next jump are NOT discussed

Building a Jumping Microrobot

Page 5: ©2006 University of California Prepublication Data September 2006 Towards Autonomous Jumping Microrobots Sarah Bergbreiter Prof. Kris Pister Berkeley Sensor.

©2006 University of California Prepublication Data September 2006

How Much Energy?

• Motor work kinetic energy for jump– Drag is not large effect

at smaller energies

• Spring requirements– High energy density– Large deflection (5mm)– Large forces (10mN)– Simple process

integration

• Elastomer springs– High energy density– Large strains

Material E (Pa) Maximum Strain (%)

Tensile Strength (Pa)

Energy Density (mJ/mm3)

Silicon 169x109 0.6 1x109 3

Silicone 750x103 350 2.6x106 4.5

Resilin 2x106 190 4x106 4

Page 6: ©2006 University of California Prepublication Data September 2006 Towards Autonomous Jumping Microrobots Sarah Bergbreiter Prof. Kris Pister Berkeley Sensor.

©2006 University of California Prepublication Data September 2006

Integration Elastomer With Silicon

• Fabricate separately and assemble– Simple fabrication– Allows larger variety of

spring material

• Silicon Process– High force electrostatic

inchworm motors– Hooks to assemble

silicone

• Elastomer Process– Two methods

demonstrated

Page 7: ©2006 University of California Prepublication Data September 2006 Towards Autonomous Jumping Microrobots Sarah Bergbreiter Prof. Kris Pister Berkeley Sensor.

©2006 University of California Prepublication Data September 2006

Elastomer Fabrication

Laser Cut

• Simple Fabrication– Spin on Sylgard® 186

and cut with VersaLaserTM

• Poor quality– Mean 250% elongation

at break

Molded

• Complex Fabrication– DRIE silicon mold– Pour on Sylgard® 186

• High quality– Mean 350% elongation

at break

Page 8: ©2006 University of California Prepublication Data September 2006 Towards Autonomous Jumping Microrobots Sarah Bergbreiter Prof. Kris Pister Berkeley Sensor.

©2006 University of California Prepublication Data September 2006

Assembly

• Fine-tip tweezers under an inspection microscope

• Mobile pieces need to be tethered during assembly

• Yield > 80% and improving

Page 9: ©2006 University of California Prepublication Data September 2006 Towards Autonomous Jumping Microrobots Sarah Bergbreiter Prof. Kris Pister Berkeley Sensor.

©2006 University of California Prepublication Data September 2006

Spring Performance: Molded

• Using force gauge shown previously, pull with probe tip to load and unload spring

• Trial #1– 200% strain– 10.4 J– 92% recovered

• Trial #2– 220% strain– 19.4 J– 85% recovered

• 20 J would propel a 10mg microrobot 20 cm

Page 10: ©2006 University of California Prepublication Data September 2006 Towards Autonomous Jumping Microrobots Sarah Bergbreiter Prof. Kris Pister Berkeley Sensor.

©2006 University of California Prepublication Data September 2006

Quick Release of Energy

• Electrostatic clamps designed to hold leg in place for quick release– Normally-closed

configuration for portability

• Shot a 0.6 mg 0402-sized capacitor 1.5 cm along a glass slide

• Energy released in less than one video frame (66ms)

Page 11: ©2006 University of California Prepublication Data September 2006 Towards Autonomous Jumping Microrobots Sarah Bergbreiter Prof. Kris Pister Berkeley Sensor.

©2006 University of California Prepublication Data September 2006

Full System Demonstration

• Electrostatic inchworm motor translates 30m to store an estimated 4.9nJ of energy and release it quickly

• Motors will be more aggressively designed in the future to substantially increase this number

Page 12: ©2006 University of California Prepublication Data September 2006 Towards Autonomous Jumping Microrobots Sarah Bergbreiter Prof. Kris Pister Berkeley Sensor.

©2006 University of California Prepublication Data September 2006

Conclusions and Future Work

• Process developed for integrating elastomer springs with silicon microstructures

• Almost 20 J of energy stored in molded micro rubber bands– Equivalent jump height of 20 cm for 10 mg microrobot

• Build higher force motors to store this energy• Keep the leg in-plane

through integrated staples• Put it all together for an

autonomous jumping microrobot!

Subramaniam Venkatraman, 2006