Top Banner
CONTEXT SENSITIVE SOLUTIONS NM Infrastructure & Finance Conference 2006 Right Sizing A Project for our Home Towns Joe J. Sanchez, PE. NMDOT CSS Division Manager
17
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: 2006 Infrastructure Conference

CONTEXT SENSITIVE

SOLUTIONS

NM Infrastructure & Finance Conference 2006

Right Sizing A Project for our Home Towns

Joe J. Sanchez, PE.

NMDOT CSS Division Manager

Page 2: 2006 Infrastructure Conference

NMDOT CSS Status

• Context Sensitive Solutions

– Transportation Solutions +

Community

• Integrated Transportation Services

– Pavement Design Solutions

– Professional Services Contracting

– Environmental and Urban Design

Page 3: 2006 Infrastructure Conference

Who are our Clients?

• You are our Clients- the citizens who use our transportation facilities

• Why do we care- we need to provide multimodal transportation Facilities that equally address safety, mobility, the environment, historic and local values and the respect the cultural uniqueness of our State.

Page 4: 2006 Infrastructure Conference

Environmental & Urban

Design Unit

• New Initiative at NMDOT

• CSS Guidance Document for Planning, Development, Design, Construction, & Maintenance-ATRI

• Visual and Architectural Design Guide-UNM

• Artists on Call for Aesthetic Guidance-

• Engineering and Architectural Perspective for “Balanced design”

– Engineer, and two Landscape Architects, plus collaboration with design teams for CSS Management Plans for development & design

Page 5: 2006 Infrastructure Conference

Why is this important to me?

• FHWA CSS CRITERIA Level 4

– Level 4: Meets CSS/CSD Criteria

– (from the 2/27/2003 CSS/CSD Game Plan)

Criteria A - there is a written commitment or policy.

Criteria B - technical staff is trained in CSS approach, both in field and central offices and across disciplines (planning, environment, design, right-of-way, operations, maintenance).

Criteria C - most projects are being implemented using CSS approach, tools, and methodologies.

Criteria D - there is early, continuing, and iterative public involvement throughout the project development process.

Criteria E - interdisciplinary teams are involved in the process from the beginning to the end.

Page 6: 2006 Infrastructure Conference

Measurement Framework for CSS

Multi-disciplinary teams Community engagement Agreement on project problems & needs Alternatives analysis Construction

Training Manuals Policies Motivation

Timeframe and Budget Stakeholder satisfaction

Achievement of Project Vision & Goals Stakeholder satisfaction Quality Assurance Review

Page 7: 2006 Infrastructure Conference

From small towns to

urban centers Arterials ( Rural/Urban)

higher mobility

low degree of access

Collectors (Rural/Urban)

balance between mobility and access

Locals (Rural/Urban)

lower mobility

high degree of access

Page 8: 2006 Infrastructure Conference

What’s that Chart got to do

with Me?

• Characterize the Roadway and

Land Use

– Cars

– Cars & Trucks

– Cars/Trucks/People

– Cars/Trucks/People/Farms &

Ranches/Industry/Zoning

– Cars/Trucks/People/City

Life/Industry/Zoning

Page 9: 2006 Infrastructure Conference
Page 10: 2006 Infrastructure Conference

Designing for the Facility

• Identify Design Controls – Functional Classification

– Terrain

– Location ( Rural/Urban-mixed)

– Traffic Volume

– LOS

– Design Driver and Vehicle

• Speed

• Project Type – New Construction

– Reconstruction of Existing

– 3R ( Resurfacing, Restoration, & Rehabilitation

Page 11: 2006 Infrastructure Conference

Are we to smart for our own good?

• The Engineers Trap.

– We really want to help!

– We think we can solve everything!

– We think we can design a solution right away!

• Do our stakeholders really what us to help that

much?

– Stakeholders want to be heard!

– Stakeholders want to understand why we design the

way we do!

– This doesn’t mean giving up responsible engineering

charge!

Page 12: 2006 Infrastructure Conference

Role of the Design Professional

• Develop safe, effective, creative

alternatives

• Communicate Stakeholder concerns &

issues for Decision Makers

• Participate in the Project Decision

Process

• Incorporate Public Input w/Env. Doc’s

• Document Project Decision’s

• Assure Community Issues are addressed

through the construction phase

Page 13: 2006 Infrastructure Conference

We don’t want to end up all

Wet because we didn’t

listen!

Page 14: 2006 Infrastructure Conference

Applying CSS in Terms of

Design And Flexibility

• Sustainability

– Adapt to Facility

– Resources ( Public/Agency)

– Community Traditions and

Roles

Page 15: 2006 Infrastructure Conference

Context Sensitive Solutions

• Planning,

• Development

• Design

• Construction

• Maintenance

• And integrating NEPA along the way

for Safe, multimodal, designs that

integrate, enhance and preserve

our unique environmental heritage

Page 16: 2006 Infrastructure Conference

Its about making choices

That are safe, feasible, respect

the environment and fit your

community.

Page 17: 2006 Infrastructure Conference

Time for a little group

interaction