This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
22ndnd EAP Regional Conference on PRS EAP Regional Conference on PRS
Phnom Penh, CAMBODIA – 16-18 October 2003Phnom Penh, CAMBODIA – 16-18 October 2003
Participation Process: 4 national workshops, 3 regional Participation Process: 4 national workshops, 3 regional consultations, several technical meetings and consultations, several technical meetings and consultations with all stakeholdersconsultations with all stakeholders
NPRS 2003-2005 was consistent with SEDPII 2001-NPRS 2003-2005 was consistent with SEDPII 2001-20052005
NPRS 03-05 was approved on 20 December 2002NPRS 03-05 was approved on 20 December 2002
NPRS dissemination workshops at 7 poorest provincesNPRS dissemination workshops at 7 poorest provinces
2,000 NPRS full documents and 5,000 executive 2,000 NPRS full documents and 5,000 executive summarysummary
20,000 “Reducing Poverty” booklet of 20 strategic 20,000 “Reducing Poverty” booklet of 20 strategic actions for the poor, village chiefs, commune councils, actions for the poor, village chiefs, commune councils, district and provincial authoritiesdistrict and provincial authorities
PR Mobile show at 50 poorest communes in 13 poor PR Mobile show at 50 poorest communes in 13 poor provincesprovinces
PR Video 20 mn, TV spot, Radio spot, CalendarPR Video 20 mn, TV spot, Radio spot, Calendar
NPRS need NPRS need $5,240 M$5,240 M while country available budget while country available budget has only has only $1,500 M$1,500 M for 2003-2004-2005 for 2003-2004-2005
PIP 2003-2005: Ongoing & committed projects spent PIP 2003-2005: Ongoing & committed projects spent most for health sectormost for health sector
PIP targeting PIP targeting 65% to rural65% to rural and and 35% to urban35% to urban
Village/commune/district/provincial own budgets for Village/commune/district/provincial own budgets for their pro-poor programs/projectstheir pro-poor programs/projects
GAP I 2000: Governance Action Plan IGAP I 2000: Governance Action Plan I
Finalization of GAP II 2003: Governance Action Plan IIFinalization of GAP II 2003: Governance Action Plan II
Commune Council Election – Feb 2002: Commune Council Election – Feb 2002: Decentralization of Administration, Planning and Decentralization of Administration, Planning and FinancingFinancing
CHALLENGESCHALLENGESCHALLENGESCHALLENGES
1. ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT ON IMPL1. ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT ON IMPL1. ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT ON IMPL1. ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT ON IMPL
PIS: Project Information Sheet (costing)PIS: Project Information Sheet (costing)
Project appraisal system in PIP process – 11 pro-poor Project appraisal system in PIP process – 11 pro-poor criteria, weighting, scoring and rankingcriteria, weighting, scoring and ranking
Prioritizing APM of $5.2 B to match with available Prioritizing APM of $5.2 B to match with available budget of $1.5 Bbudget of $1.5 B
Identify priority actions for 2004 and 2005Identify priority actions for 2004 and 2005
Make PIP more pro-poor and pro-MDGMake PIP more pro-poor and pro-MDG
CG benchmark responding (Jun 02 – Feb 04)CG benchmark responding (Jun 02 – Feb 04)
Donor alignment through Government-Donor Donor alignment through Government-Donor coordination WG and their Sub-WG full operationcoordination WG and their Sub-WG full operation
Merging SEDP III & NPRS II 2006-2010Merging SEDP III & NPRS II 2006-2010
CHALLENGESCHALLENGESCHALLENGESCHALLENGES
4. NPRS LINK TO BUDGET & MTEF4. NPRS LINK TO BUDGET & MTEF4. NPRS LINK TO BUDGET & MTEF4. NPRS LINK TO BUDGET & MTEF
Social sector allocation increasingSocial sector allocation increasing
Agriculture and Rural development need to be Agriculture and Rural development need to be increased significantlyincreased significantly