PRELIMINARY PROJECT REPORT (PPR) PRELIMINARY PROJECT REPORT (PPR) PRELIMINARY PROJECT REPORT (PPR) PRELIMINARY PROJECT REPORT (PPR) NATIONAL BANK FOR AGRICULTURE AND RURAL NATIONAL BANK FOR AGRICULTURE AND RURAL NATIONAL BANK FOR AGRICULTURE AND RURAL NATIONAL BANK FOR AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT (NABARD) (NABARD) (NABARD) (NABARD) BLOCK: BLOCK: BLOCK: BLOCK: MOHANPUR MOHANPUR MOHANPUR MOHANPUR DISTRICT: DISTRICT: DISTRICT: DISTRICT: DEOGHAR DEOGHAR DEOGHAR DEOGHAR PIA PIA PIA PIA SOIL CONSERVATION SOIL CONSERVATION SOIL CONSERVATION SOIL CONSERVATION OFFICER OFFICER OFFICER OFFICER DEOGHAR DEOGHAR DEOGHAR DEOGHAR, JHARKHAND , JHARKHAND , JHARKHAND , JHARKHAND NAME OF THE PROJECT: NAME OF THE PROJECT: NAME OF THE PROJECT: NAME OF THE PROJECT: DEOGHAR DEOGHAR DEOGHAR DEOGHAR- - -NABARD NABARD NABARD NABARD- - -2 2 2/ / /20 20 20 201 1 15 5 5- - -1 1 16 6 6 SUBMITTED TO SUBMITTED TO SUBMITTED TO SUBMITTED TO NATIONAL BANK FOR AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT RANCHI RANCHI RANCHI RANCHI STATE LEVEL NODAL AGENCY STATE LEVEL NODAL AGENCY STATE LEVEL NODAL AGENCY STATE LEVEL NODAL AGENCY- - - JHARKHAND STATE WATERSHED MISSION JHARKHAND STATE WATERSHED MISSION JHARKHAND STATE WATERSHED MISSION JHARKHAND STATE WATERSHED MISSION DEPARTMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT 4 4 4 TH TH TH TH F F FLOOR, FFP BUILDING, DHURWA, RANCHI LOOR, FFP BUILDING, DHURWA, RANCHI LOOR, FFP BUILDING, DHURWA, RANCHI LOOR, FFP BUILDING, DHURWA, RANCHI- - - 834004 834004 834004 834004 TELEPHONE/ FAX: 91 TELEPHONE/ FAX: 91 TELEPHONE/ FAX: 91 TELEPHONE/ FAX: 91 - - - 651 651 651 651- - -2401974 2401974 2401974 2401974, 2403017 , 2403017 , 2403017 , 2403017 E E E- - -MAIL : MAIL : MAIL : MAIL : [email protected], Website: www.jswm.nic.in
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
NATIONAL BANK FOR AGRICULTURE AND RURAL NATIONAL BANK FOR AGRICULTURE AND RURAL NATIONAL BANK FOR AGRICULTURE AND RURAL NATIONAL BANK FOR AGRICULTURE AND RURAL
NAME OF THE PROJECT: NAME OF THE PROJECT: NAME OF THE PROJECT: NAME OF THE PROJECT: DEOGHARDEOGHARDEOGHARDEOGHAR----NABARDNABARDNABARDNABARD----2222////2020202011115555----11116666
SUBMITTED TOSUBMITTED TOSUBMITTED TOSUBMITTED TO
NATIONAL BANK FOR AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT
RANCHIRANCHIRANCHIRANCHI
STATE LEVEL NODAL AGENCYSTATE LEVEL NODAL AGENCYSTATE LEVEL NODAL AGENCYSTATE LEVEL NODAL AGENCY---- JHARKHAND STATE WATERSHED MISSIONJHARKHAND STATE WATERSHED MISSIONJHARKHAND STATE WATERSHED MISSIONJHARKHAND STATE WATERSHED MISSION
DEPARTMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENTDEPARTMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENTDEPARTMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENTDEPARTMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT
Note: 1. Total outlay per Month for 12 SLNA-JSWM staffs under IWMP is Rs. 4.40 Lakhs
R – Recurring; NR- Non-recurring
* From column no. 3, totals no. of persons, from column no. 7 to 9, totals, may be indicated for the State at the end of the table.
6
Table PPR-3: Details of State Level Data Cell (SLDC) functionaries
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
S.
No
Total no. of
the persons
working in
the SLNA for
IWMP
Name &
Designation
Qualification Experience Work allocation Monthly
remuner
ation
(Rs.)
Total budget of
SLDC
(Rs. In Lakh)
Funding expected
from DoLR
(Rs. In Lakh)
R NR R NR
1
1
Shri. Vinod Kumar. V. H, Project Co-ordinator
M Tech (Water Resources)
6 years Creation and updation of Geodatabase under IWMP Project using satellite data
30,000.00
2
1
Shri. Anuj Shankar, MIS State Coordinator
MCA 4 years Updation of all the thematic layer using MIS Software development
15000.00
3
3
Shri. Abdul Saqoor, Field Supervisor
M Sc (IT) 5 years Updation of data using GIS & Remote Sensing software and collection of field level data under watershed project
10000.00
4 Vishal Kumar Assistant
B Sc (Fisheries), MBA, Rural Management
5 years Updation of data using GIS & Remote Sensing software and collection of field level data under watershed project
10000.00
5 Ratnesh Kumar Sharma Field Supervisor
M Sc (Math), Advance Diploma in Computer Application
6 years Updation of data using GIS & Remote Sensing software and collection of field level data under watershed project
10000.00
Total 5 65,000.00
Note: 1. Payment of above experts / staffs is being paid by state budget of JSAC 2. SLDC has been established at JSAC. However it is planning to establish SLDC in the office of JSWM. R – Recurring; NR- Non-recurring
* From column no. 3, totals no. of persons, from column no. 7 to 9, totals, may be indicated for the State at the end of the table.
7
I. B. District Level Watershed Units Table-PPR 4: Details of functionaries in the Watershed Cell cum Data Center
S. No.
Name of the
District
Name of the
executing Agency#
Status of Chairman
@
Date of signing of MoU
with SLNA
Total no. of persons
working for Watershed programme
Names & Designation
Qualification Experience Work allocation
24
IWMP Districts
WCDC D.C NA 3 ( in each
district)
1. Technical Expert
Bachelor degree in the fields of agriculture/ horticulture/hydrology/soil engineering and animal husbandry with goog academic records
The candidate should have at least 5 years field / research experience in the fields of soil and water conservation/ forestry/ dry land agriculture/horticulture/ watershed management or related fields like assessment, management and mitigation of drought climatic and other associated risks, crop husbandry, crop specific technology, horticultural practices, livelihoods, animal husbandry etc
Remarks: 1. The committee will advice the district data cell for monitoring and evaluation. 2. The committee will facilitate for preparing of prospective plan 3. The committee will identify voluntary organization
2. Accountant
A serving govt. officer on deputation or a retd. Govt. officer from a finance/ accounts service
5 years experience in related work at reputed firm/organization
3. Data Entry Operator
BSc Hons (Computer Science) or BCA or PGDCA or MCA will be preferred.
2 years experience in field of MIS
11 12
Monthly remuneration/year in each district (in Rs.)
Total Annual budget of Watershed Cell in each district (Rs. In Lakh)
R NR
1. Technical Expert : 25000 / 3 Lakh
2. Accountant : 10000/1.20 Lakh
3. DEO : 7500/0.9 Lakh 5.10 lakh 4.00 lakh
R – Recurring; NR- Non-recurring
*From column no. 2, no. of districts; from column no. 3, no. of executive agencies; from column no. 6, no. of persons working in the executive agencies of watershed programme; from column no.7, total no. of personnel engaged in the watershed cells, from column no. 11 to 13, totals for the State may be indicated at the end of the table. WCDC/ DRDA/Zilla Parishad (ZP)/ State Department (please specify)/ Any other (Please specify) @collector/CEO ZP/ CDO/ DDO/ PD/ Any other (please specify)
8
II. SELECTION OF WATERSHED PROJECTS
Table-PPR 5: Status of District-wise area covered under the watershed programme* (MIS Table-M (SP) 2)
S. No. Names of Districts
Total micro-watersheds in the District
Micro-watersheds covered so far Net watersheds to be covered
Dept. of Land Resources Other Ministries/ Depts. Total watersheds covered
Pre-IWMP projects (DPAP +
DDP + IWDP) Any other watershed project
No. Area (Ha.) No. Area (Ha.) No. Area (Ha.) No. Area (Ha.) No. Area (Ha.)
7 Names & Census Code of micro- watersheds Sl. No.
Micro-Watershed Code
Geographical Area of the Micro Watershed
Proposed Area to be treated
Budget (Proposed Area X 0.20) (Rs.in Lakh)
Remarks
1. 2A4A3b2f 689.0121 594.7617 118.9523
Proposed Area to be treated = RF + PF/Other +Rainfed +Permanent Pasture +Cultivable Wasteland
2. 2A4A3c2a 423.7360 368.1110 73.6222
3. 2A4A3c2b 749.3742 679.6449 135.9290
4. 2A4A3c2c 485.5196 454.7068 90.9414
5. 2A4A3c2d 534.4080 484.4533 96.8907
6. 2A4A3c3a 623.5816 575.0446 115.0089
7. 2A4A3c3b 646.2164 576.1833 115.2367
8. 2A4A3c3c 804.7837 691.0786 138.2157
9. 2A4A3c3d 785.3094 687.5519 137.5104
Grand Total 5741.9409 5111.5361 1022.3072
8 Four major reasons for selection of watershed � Lack of irrigation facilities
� Rain Fed area
� The area is mostly populated with S.C & S.T
� Productivity potential of the land. 9 Area of the Project (ha.) 5741.9409 10 Area proposed to be treated (ha.) 5111.5361 11 Project cost (Rs. In Lakhs) 1022.3072 12 Name & Address of proposed PIA SOIL CONSERVATION OFFICER, DEOGHAR 13 Any other (please specify)
12
Table – PPR 8: Details of previously identified DPAP /DDP areas proposed under IWMP (ha.) during the financial year 2015-16
Data Source: Jharkhand Space Application Center, Department of IT, Govt. of Jharkhand
Grand Total 5741.9409 1012.8821 0.0000 1012.8821 3076.7783 2744.9720 331.8063 6.7559 1346.9261 298.5985 5111.5361 1022.3072
Data Source: Jharkhand Space Application Center, Department of IT, Govt. of Jharkhand
20
IV. AGRO–CLIMATIC CONDITION Briefly describe the agro- climatic condition of project area including the Agro-climatic zone of project area, soil types, rainfall, major crops, etc.
Table – PPR 10: Details of Agro – climatic condition
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
S. No.
Name of the Project
Name of the Agro-climatic zone
covers project area Area in ha
Names of the villages
Major soil types Topography
Average rainfall in mm (preceding 5
years average)
Major crops
a) Type b) Area in ha a) Name b) Area in
ha
1 NABARD
Zone IV Central and
North Eastern Plateau
5741.9409 Detailed
enclosed in
Table-PPR-7
Sandy, Sandy loam
Red laterite soil
5741.9409 Undulating
moderate to steep
Slope
1162 mm
Paddy 2400
Wheat 275
Pulses 165
Vegetables 130
TOTAL 2970
Table-PPR 11: Details of flood and drought in the project area
1 2 3 4 5
Sl. No. Particulars Villages Periodicity
Not affected Annual Any other (please specify)
1 Flood No. of villages NA NA NA
Name(s) of villages
2 Drought
No. of villages 111
Name(s) of villages Detailed enclosed in
Table-PPR 7
Drought prone Area affected by severe scarcity in rain fall annually
Rain shadow area
21
Table-PPR 12: Details of soil erosion in the project area
1 2 3 4 5
Cause Type of erosion Area affected (ha) Run off
(mm/ year) Average soil loss (Tones/ ha/ year)
Water erosion a Sheet 825
950 49.80 b Rill 150 c Gully 45
Sub-Total 1020
Wind erosion -
Total 1020 950
22
V. DEMOGRAPHY AND LAND DISTRIBUTION
Growth in population during the last three census’, per capita availability of land, sex ratio, population age group in the project area, literacy level, migration, workforce available in different sectors of the economy, demography of SC, ST, BPL and landless families in the project area in the last ten years, etc.
Demography and Land Distribution
Population
Sl. No.
Name of Village HH Total Male Female SC ST Others Sex Ratio Total Male Female Total Male Female
TOTAL 6970 40129 21066 19040 8106 4234 3878 1966 1003 1246 30197 Source: Census of India
26
VI. LIVELIHOODS Briefly describe the existing livelihoods, raw material available, possible livelihood interventions, scope for capacity building etc. in the project area
1 2 3 4 5 6
S. No.
Names of the villages
Existing livelihood activities Possible livelihood interventions under
the project
Current status of migration (No. of
people) Main reasons for migration
1. Detailed
enclosed in PPR-7
• Agriculture: Kharif and Rabi
• Wage labour
• Non- Timber Forest Produce (NTFP)
• Agriculture (High Value cash crop & increase in productivity of Food crop)
• Lac
• Entrepreneur development
• Horticulture
• Wage generation in INRM infrastructure creation.
1250
Acute poverty in the area and rain-fed agriculture, mono-crop pattern of agriculture which ensure just 5-6 months average food sufficiency forced the villagers to migrate from their villages in off agriculture seasons to the near by places in cement factories, rice
mills, brick factories and
27
VII. EXPECTED PROJECT OUTCOMES
VII. (i). Expected employment related outcomes:
Table – PPR 14: Employment Generation
Sl.
No. Name of Village
Man days Wage employment Self employment
No. Of man days No. Of Beneficiaries No. Of beneficiaries
SC ST Others Women Total SC ST Others Women Total SC ST Others Women Total
Table – PPR 15: Details of migration from project area
SI.
No Name of Village No of persons migrating
No of days per year of
Migration Major reason(s) for Migrating
Expected reduction no of
person in Migration
1 2 3 4 5
6
1 Detailed enclosed in
PPR-7 1250 75 days -135 days
Acute poverty in the area and rain-fed agriculture, mono-crop pattern of agriculture which
ensure just 5-6 months average food sufficiency forced the
villagers to migrate from their villages in off agriculture
seasons to the near by places in cement factories, rice mills,
brick factories and
850
32
VII. (ii). Water related outcomes: Table – PPR 16: Details of average ground water table depth in the project areas (in meters)
1 2 3 4 5 6
Sl. No. Names of villages Sources Pre – Project level Expected post – project level Remarks
1. Detailed enclosed in Table PPR-7
Open wells 12-14 M 9-11 M
Bore wells 60-75 M 50-60 M Over exploitation of ground water resources
Others (Pond+ Check Dam) - -
Table – PPR 17: Status of Drinking water*
1 2 3 4 5
S. No. Names of the Villages Availability of drinking water (no. of months in a year) Quality of drinking water
Comments Pre- project Expected Post - Project Pre- project Expected Post - Project
1. Detailed enclosed in Table PPR-7
8-10 10-12
Contaminated with fluoride, potassium, calcium etc.
.
Fresh drinking water
Filtered drinking water by using bleaching
powder, mini filtration
devices attached with borewell,s
33
VII. (i). Expected employment related outcomes:
Table-PPR 18: Major crops grown and their productivity in the project area
1 2 3 4
S. No. Name of the Crop Current status Expected post project status
Area (ha.) Productivity (kg/ ha.) Area (ha.) Productivity (kg/ ha.)
Kharif Paddy
2400
2600
2700
3000
Rabi
Wheat Pulses
Vegetables
275 165
130
1400 900
250
310 185
150
1800 1050
300
Zaid / other season
Potato
150
275 200 320
34
VIII: MANDATORY CERTIFICATION “It is certified that the State Government of Jharkhand will abide by the following mandatory conditions laid down by DoLR”
1 The area of the proposed projects are not covered under assured irrigation
2 The area of the proposed project is not covered or overlapping with any other watershed projects sanctioned by the central govt./ state govt./ autonomous bodies & others
3 The State must sign all the mandatory MoUs before implementing the project
4 The timeframes and milestones of the projects will be followed
5 The Budget requested for must follow the criteria laid down in the Common Guidelines, 2008
6 The State must release matching State Share within 15 days from release of each installment of central funds
7 Purchase of vehicles and other equipments are not permitted and nor is construction of buildings allowed. Only purchase of computers and related software is permitted
8 Savings, if any, in each component of the project cost can be utilized only for activities in the Watershed works
9 The WCDC will have one Member exclusively responsible for monitoring
10 All works will be evaluated after each phase of completion. Fund release will depend on favourable reports received from evaluators
11 Evaluators must include only institutions and agencies and not individuals
12 The State and DRDA cell will furnish monitoring reports and periodical reports as desired by DoLR
13 Composition of the WDT must be clearly spelt out and the team Members must be fully in place at the time of signing of the MoU of contract between the PIA and DRDA Cell
14 That DRDA shall release the funds to the PIAs and the watershed committees within 15 days of receipt of the funds
15 The Watershed Committee must be a registered society under the Societies Registration Act, 1860
16 At least one of the WDT Members must be a woman
17 The Gram Sabhas of the proposed project areas have passed resolutions for people’s contribution towards WDF
18 Resource-use agreements on the principles of equity and sustainability must be worked out among the User Groups prior to the concerned work being undertaken
19 The DPR must give detailed justification for the proposed project duration
20 No works on private lands will be repaired/ maintained from the WDF 21 The PIA will start project work within three months of the receipt of first installment by DWDU/agency or else
it can come under the purview of foreclosure
35
22 The State will not undertake unnecessary foreclosure of the projects. In the event of foreclosure, the State will refund the amount and furnish all necessary documents as desired by DoLR. The State shall also take administrative and legal action against any defalcation, misappropriation, mis-utilization, deliberate negligence and laxity which has caused foreclosure of the project.
Date:
Signature of officer authorized by State Govt.* NAME OF OFFICER (IN CAPITAL LETTERS)
DESIGNATION
36
IX. STATUS OF ON-GOING PROJECTS (DPAP/ DDP/ IWDP) Table- PPR 19: Details of pending UCs: Statewise
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
S. No. District Project Instal-
ment no.
Financial year of
release of fund
Amount released (Rs. in lakh)
Amount utilized (Rs.in lakhs)
Submission of UC Date of submission of
UC Reasons for not submitting/ delayed submission of UC
Pending UCs
Due date
Amount (Rs. in lakhs)
Date Amount (Rs.
in lakhs) Period
Amount (Rs. in lakhs)
1 DEOGHAR IWMP NA
Table- PPR 20: Details of Unspent balance as on
1 2 3 4 5 6
S. No. District Name of the
Project Total cost (Rs. in lakh)
Total funds released (Rs. in lakh) Unspent balance
(Rs. in lakhs) DoLR State
1 DEOGHAR IWMP NA
37
X. ABSTRACT OF PROJECTS PROPOSED FOR SANCTION DURING FINANCIAL YEAR 2015-16
1 Number of districts to be covered under the present proposal
1
2 No. of Watersheds projects proposed to be taken up under NABARD
Hilly/Desert Others 2
3 Total area to be covered under proposed projects (in ha) (a) Hilly & Desert areas# (b) Others
Total
5741.9409
4 Area to be treated (in ha) 5111.5361
5 Total cost of the proposed Watershed projects (Rs. in lakhs)
(a) Hilly & Desert areas# (c) Others
Total
1022.3072 Lakhs
6 First installment required from central funds for the proposed watershed projects