8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis
1/61
STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS
With Wisdom We Explore
www.uthm.edu.my
By:
Masni A. [email protected]
8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis
2/61
The primary purpose of structural analysis is to establish thedistribution of internal forces and moments over the wholepart of a structure and to identify the critical designconditions at all sections.The type of analysis should be appropriate to the problembeing considered. The following may be used: linear elasticanalysis, linear elastic analysis with limited redistribution, andplastic analysis.
Linear elastic analysis may be carried out assuming crosssections are uncracked (i.e. concrete section properties), usinglinear stress-strain relationships, and assuming means valuesof elastic modulus.
With Wisdom We Explore
Introductionwww.uthm.edu.my
8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis
3/61
Actions that applied on a beam may consist of beams self-weight , permanent and variable actions from slabs, actionsfrom secondary beams and other structural or non-structuralmembers supported by the beam.The distribution of slab actions on beams depends on the slabdimension, supporting system and boundary condition .Beam supporting slabs designed as spanning one-way can beconsidered to be uniformly load as shown in figure below.
With Wisdom We Explore
Analysis of Actionswww.uthm.edu.my
8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis
4/61
With Wisdom We Explore
Analysis of Actionswww.uthm.edu.my
l x
l y
A B
C D
l y
w = 0.5.n.l x kN/m
Beam AC and BD
l x
w = 0 kN/m
Beam AB and CD
8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis
5/61
For beam supporting a two-way slab panel freely supported alongfour edge.
With Wisdom We Explore
Analysis of Actionswww.uthm.edu.my
l x
l y
AB
C D
l y
mkN l l nl
w y
x x / 36
2
Beam AC and BD
l x
mk N nl
w x / 3
Beam AB and CD
8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis
6/61
There are alternatives methods which consider various supportconditions and slab continuity. The methods are, (i). Slab shearcoefficient from Table 3.15 BS 8110 , (ii). Yield line analysis and (iii).Table 63 Reinforced Concrete Designers Handbook by Reynold.
With Wisdom We Explore
Analysis of Actionswww.uthm.edu.my
8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis
7/61
With Wisdom We Explore
Analysis of Actionswww.uthm.edu.my
l x
l y
A B
C D
l y
w = vx.n.l x kN/m
Beam AC
l x
Beam CD
w = vy.n.l x kN/m
8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis
8/61
With Wisdom We Explore
Example 2.1www.uthm.edu.my
3000 4500
2 5 0 0
4 0 0 0
1 2 3
A
B
C
200 x 500
200 x 500 200 x 500
200 x 500 200 x 500
2 0 0
x 5
0 0
2 0 0
x
5 0 0
2 0 0
x 5
0 0
2 0 0
x
5 0 0
FS1 (150 thk.)
FS2 (150 thk.) FS3 (150 thk.)
Determine the characteristic permanent and
variable action act on beam B/1-3.
Weight of concrete = 25 kN/m 3
Finishes, ceiling = 2.0 kN/m 2 and services
Variable action = 3.0 kN/m 2 (All slab)
8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis
9/61
Action on slabSelfweight = 0.15 x 25 = 3.75 kN/m 2
Finishes, ceiling and services = 2.0 kN/m 2
Chac. Permanent action, G k = 5.75 kN/m2
Chac. Variable action, Q k = 3.0 kN/m 2
Distribution of actions from slabs are as follows;FS1 : l y /l x = 7.5 / 2.5 = 3 > 2.0, One-way slabFS2 : l y /l x = 4.0 / 3.0 = 1.33 < 2.0, Two-way slabFS3 : l y /l x = 4.5 / 4.0 = 1.13 < 2.0, Two-way slab
With Wisdom We Explore
Solution of Example 2.1www.uthm.edu.my
8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis
10/61
With Wisdom We Explore
Solution of Example 2.1www.uthm.edu.my
3000 4500
2 5 0 0
4 0 0 0
1 2 3
A
B
C
w1 = 0.5.n.l x
w2 = vy.n.l x w3 = vx.n.l x
8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis
11/61
Action from slabw1 Gk = 0.5 x 5.75 x 2.5 = 7.19 kN/mw1 Qk = 0.5 x 3.00 x 2.5 = 3.75 kN/m
From Table 3.15: BS 8110: Part 1: 1997
w2 Gk = 0.4 x 5.75 x 3.0 = 6.90 kN/mw2 Qk = 0.4 x 3.00 x 3.0 = 3.60 kN/m
w3 Gk = 0.44 x 5.75 x 4.0 = 10.12 kN/mw3 Qk = 0.44 x 3.00 x 4.0 = 5.28 kN/m
With Wisdom We Explore
Solution of Example 2.1www.uthm.edu.my
8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis
12/61
Actions on beamBeam selfweight = 0.20 x (0.5 0.15) x 25 = 1.75 kN/m
Span 1-2Permanent action,G k = 7.19 + 6.90 + 1.75 = 15.84 kN/mVariable action, Q k = 3.75 + 3.60 = 7.35 kN/m
Span 2-3Permanent action, G k = 7.19 + 10.12 + 1.75 = 19.06 kN/mVariable action, Q k = 3.75 + 5.28 = 9.03 kN/m
With Wisdom We Explore
Solution of Example 2.1www.uthm.edu.my
3000 4500
Gk = 15.84 kN/mQk = 7.35 kN/m
G k = 19.06 kN/mQ k = 9.03 kN/m
8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis
13/61
Combination of action is specifically used for the definition of themagnitude of actions to be used when a limit state is under theinfluence of different actions.For continuous beam , Load cases is concerned with the
arrangement of the variable actions to give the most unfavourable conditions.If there is only one variable actions (e.g. Imposed load) in acombination, the magnitude of the actions can be obtained bymultiplying them by the appropriate factors.
If there is more than one variable actions in combination, it isnecessary to identify the leading action( Qk,1) and otheraccompanying actions (Qk,i). The accompanying actions is alwaystaken as the combination value.
With Wisdom We Explore
Combination of Actionswww.uthm.edu.my
8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis
14/61
Design values of actions, ultimate limit state-persistent andtransient design situations
With Wisdom We Explore
Combination of Actionswww.uthm.edu.my
8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis
15/61
/
In considering the combinations of actions, the relevant casesshall be considered to enable the critical design conditions tobe established at all sections, within the structure or part ofthe structure considered.For simply supported beam , the analysis for bending andshear force can be carried out using statically determinateapproach. For the ultimate limit state we need only considerthe maximum load of 1.35G k + 1.5Q k on the span.While for continuous beam a simplification in the number ofload arrangements for use in a Country is required, referenceis made to its National Annex . The following simplified loadarrangements are recommended for buildings:
With Wisdom We Explore
Load Cases and Combination www.uthm.edu.my Clause 5.1.3 : MS EN 1992-1-1
8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis
16/61
Load set 1: Alternate or adjacent spans loaded (ContinuousBeam)Alternate span carrying the design permanent and variable
load (1.35 Gk + 1.5Qk), other spans carrying only the design permanent loads (1.35Gk)
Any two adjacent spans carrying the design permanent and
variable loads (1.35 Gk + 1.5Qk), all other spans carrying onlythe design permanent load (1.35Gk)
With Wisdom We Explore
Load Cases and Combination www.uthm.edu.my Section 5.1.3 : MS EN 1992-1-1
8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis
17/61
Alternate spans loaded
With Wisdom We Explore
Load Cases and Combination www.uthm.edu.my
1.35Gk + 1.5Qk1.35Gk
1.35Gk + 1.5Qk1.35Gk
1.35Gk + 1.5Qk1.35Gk
1.35Gk + 1.5Qk1.35Gk
8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis
18/61
8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis
19/61
Load set 2: All or alternate spans loaded (Continuous Beam)All span carrying the design permanent and variable loads(1.35 Gk+ 1.5Qk)
Alternate span carrying the design permanent and variableload (1.35 Gk+ 1.5Qk), other spans carrying only the design
permanent loads (1.35Gk)
With Wisdom We Explore
Load Cases and Combination www.uthm.edu.my UK National Annex & Malaysia National Annex
8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis
20/61
All span loaded
Alternate span loaded
With Wisdom We Explore
Load Cases and Combination www.uthm.edu.my
1.35Gk + 1.5Qk 1.35Gk + 1.5Qk 1.35Gk + 1.5Qk 1.35Gk + 1.5Qk
1.35Gk + 1.5Qk 1.35Gk + 1.5Qk1.35Gk 1.35Gk
1.35Gk1.35Gk + 1.5Qk 1.35Gk + 1.5Qk
1.35Gk
8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis
21/61
8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis
22/61
8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis
23/61
With Wisdom We Explore
Load Cases and Combination www.uthm.edu.my
Load Case 3
SFD
BMD
SHEAR FORCE DIAGRAM ENVELOPE
BENDING MOMENT DIAGRAM ENVELOPE
8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis
24/61
Three analysis methods may be used in order to obtain shearforce and bending moment for design purposes. There are;
Elastic analysis using moment distribution method
(Modified Stiffness Method)Simplified method using shear and moment coefficientfrom Table 3.6: BS 8110: Part 1.Using commercial analysis software such as Staad Pro,
Esteem, Ansys, Lusas, etc.
With Wisdom We Explore
Method of Structural Analysiswww.uthm.edu.my
8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis
25/61
Moment distribution method is only involving distributionmoments to joint repetitively.The accuracy of moment distribution method is dependent to
the number repeat which does and usually more than 5repeat real enough. Right value will be acquired when nomore moments that need distributed.In general the value is dependent to several factor as :
Fixed end moment Carry over factor Member Stiffness Factor (distribution factor)
With Wisdom We Explore
Moment Distribution Methodwww.uthm.edu.my
8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis
26/61
Fixed end moment (FEM)The moment at the fixed joints of a loaded member are calledfixed-end moment.
This moment can be determined from table below, dependingupon the type of loading on the member.
Carry over factor (CO)
The carry-over factor to a fixed end is always 0.5, otherwise itis 0.0.
With Wisdom We Explore
Moment Distribution Methodwww.uthm.edu.my
8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis
27/61
With Wisdom We Explore
Moment Distribution Methodwww.uthm.edu.my Fixed End Moment
8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis
28/61
With Wisdom We Explore
Moment Distribution Methodwww.uthm.edu.my
8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis
29/61
With Wisdom We Explore
Moment Distribution Methodwww.uthm.edu.my
8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis
30/61
With Wisdom We Explore
Moment Distribution Methodwww.uthm.edu.my
8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis
31/61
With Wisdom We Explore
Moment Distribution Methodwww.uthm.edu.my
8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis
32/61
A series of 250 x 400 mm reinforced concrete beams spaced at 3 mcentres and spanning 7.5 m support a 175 mm thick reinforced concreteslab as shown in Figure 2.1. If the variable floor action is 3 kN/m 2 and theload induced by the weight of concrete is 25 kN/m 3, calculate the
maximum shear force and bending moment of beam B/1-2.
With Wisdom We Explore
Example 2.2www.uthm.edu.my
8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis
33/61
8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis
34/61
Figure below shows the first floor layout plan of commercialbuilding. If all beams size are 300 x 500 mm, determine thefollowing;
1. Characteristic permanent and variable action act on the beam 2/A-Eif all slab thickness are 150 mm and the brickwall heights is 3m.
2. Shear force and bending moment envelope of beam 2/A-E.
Given the following data;Variable load on slab = 4.0 kN/m 2
Finishes, ceiling & services = 1.5 kN/m 2
Unit weight of concrete = 25 kN/m 3
With Wisdom We Explore
Example 2.3www.uthm.edu.my
8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis
35/61
With Wisdom We Explore
Example 2.3www.uthm.edu.my
8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis
36/61
8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis
37/61
2) Shear force and bending moment envelope of beam 2/A-E.Loading
With Wisdom We Explore
Solution of Example 2.3www.uthm.edu.my
8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis
38/61
Moment of Inertia, II = bh 3/12 = 300 x 500 3/12 = 3.125 x 10 9 mm4
Stiffness, KA-B K AB = K BA= 3I/L = 3 x 3.125 x 10 9/8000 = 1.17 x 10 6 mm3
B-C K BC = K CB = 4I/L = 4 x 3.125 x 109/8000 = 1.56 x 10
6 mm
3
C-D K CD = K DC = 4I/L = 4 x 3.125 x 10 9/8000 = 1.56 x 10 6 mm3
D-E K DE = K ED= 3I/L = 3 x 3.125 x 10 9/8000 = 1.17 x 10 6 mm3
Distribution Factor, DFJoint A & E ~ DF AB & DF ED = K AB / (K AB + 0) = 1.17 / (1.17 + 0) = 1.0
Joint B ~ DF BA = K BA / (K BA + K BC) = 1.17 / (1.17 + 1.56) = 0.43DF BC = K BC / (K BA + K BC) = 1.56 / (1.17 + 1.56) = 0.57
Joint C ~ DF CB = K CB / (K CB + K CD) = 1.56 / (1.56 + 1.56) = 0.50DF CD = K CD / (K CB + K CD) = 1.56 / (1.56 + 1.56) = 0.50
Joint D ~ DF DC = K DC / (K DC + K DE) = 1.56 / (1.17 + 1.56) = 0.57DF DE = K DE / (K DC + K DE) = 1.17 / (1.17 + 1.56) = 0.43
With Wisdom We Explore
Solution of Example 2.3www.uthm.edu.my
8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis
39/61
With Wisdom We Explore
Solution of Example 2.3www.uthm.edu.my
Fix End Moment, FEM
- M AB = M BA = wL 2 /12= 33.72 x 82 /12= 179.84 kNm
- M BC = M CB = wL 2 /12= 33.72 x 82 /12= 179.84 kNm
- M CD = M DC = wL 2 /12= 33.72 x 82 /12= 179.84 kNm
- M DE = M ED = wL 2 /12= 33.72 x 82 /12= 179.84 kNm
Load Case 1
8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis
40/61
With Wisdom We Explore
Solution of Example 2.3www.uthm.edu.my
8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis
41/61
8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis
42/61
With Wisdom We Explore
Solution of Example 2.3www.uthm.edu.my
8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis
43/61
With Wisdom We Explore
Solution of Example 2.3www.uthm.edu.my
Fix End Moment, FEM
- M AB = M BA = wL 2 /12= 24.72 x 82 /12= 131.84 kNm
- M BC = M CB = wL 2 /12= 33.72 x 82 /12= 179.84 kNm
- M CD = M DC = wL 2 /12= 24.72 x 82 /12= 131.84 kNm
- M DE = M ED = wL 2 /12= 33.72 x 82 /12= 179.84 kNm
Load Case 3
8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis
44/61
With Wisdom We Explore
Solution of Example 2.3www.uthm.edu.my
8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis
45/61
With Wisdom We Explore
Solution of Example 2.3www.uthm.edu.my
SFD Envelope
BMD Envelope
8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis
46/61
The analysis using moment distribution method is timeconsuming and is more conveniently carried out usingstandard computer technique.
Therefore, as a simplification BS 8110 cl. 3.4.3 can be use.Table 3.5 are given in BS 8110 which enable a conservativeestimate of shear force and bending moment values to bedetermined for the design of continuous beam.
There are conditions which must be satisfied in each casebefore these tables can be used. They are:
With Wisdom We Explore
Simplified Methodwww.uthm.edu.my
8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis
47/61
The beams should be approximately equal span. The characteristic variable action Qk may not exceed the characteristic
permanent action Gk. Load should be substantially uniformly distributed over three or more
spans. Variation in span length should not exceed 15% of the longest span.
With Wisdom We Explore
Simplified Methodwww.uthm.edu.my
(1.35Gk + 1.5Qk)
8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis
48/61
With Wisdom We Explore
Simplified Methodwww.uthm.edu.my
-0.11FL
0.09FL
-0.08FL -0.08FL
0.07FL
0.45F
0.60F
0.55F
0.55F
End Span Interior Span
BendingMoments
ShearingForces
8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis
49/61
By using simplified method, analyze the beams shown below.
F = 1.35G k + 1.5Q k = 1.35(18.31) + 1.5(6.00) = 33.72 kN/m x 8 m = 269.75 kN
With Wisdom We Explore
Example 2.4www.uthm.edu.my
8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis
50/61
Shear force and bending moment diagrams
With Wisdom We Explore
Solution of Example 2.4www.uthm.edu.my
0.45F =121.39 kN
0.60F =161.85 kN
0.55F =148.36 kN 0.55F =148.36 kN
0.55F =148.36 kN 0.55F =148.36 kN
0.60F =161.85 kN
0.45F =121.39 kN
0.09FL =194.22 kNm
0.11FL =2 37.38 kNm 0.08FL =172.64kNm 0.11FL =237.38 kNm
0.07FL =151.06 kNm 0.07FL =151.06 kNm 0.09FL =194.22 kNm
8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis
51/61
8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis
52/61
EC2: Section 5.5 permit the moment redistribution with thefollowing requirement;
The resulting distribution remains in equilibrium with the load.The continuous beam are predominantly subject to flexural.
The ratio of adjacent span should be in the range of 0.5 to 2
There are other restrictions on the amount of momentredistribution in order to ensure ductility of the beam such as gradeof reinforcing steel and area of tensile reinforcement and hence the
depth of neutral axis.Class A reinforcement; redistribution should 20%Class B and C reinforcement; redistribution should 30%
With Wisdom We Explore
Moment Redistributionwww.uthm.edu.my
8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis
53/61
8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis
54/61
Load Case 1
With Wisdom We Explore
Solution of Example 2.5www.uthm.edu.my
33.72 kN/m
8 m
184.97 kNm
V A
VB1
MB = 0VA(8) 33.72(8) 2/2 + 184.97 = 0VA = 894.07 / 8 = 111.76 kN
Fy = 0111.76 + V B1 33.72(8) = 0VB1 = 158.0 kN
MC = 0VB2(8) 33.72(8) 2/2 + 123.21 - 184.97 = 0VB2 = 1140.8 / 8 = 142.60 kN
Fy = 0142.60 + V C1 33.72(8) = 0VC1 = 127.16 kN
33.72 kN/m
8 m
123.21 kNm
VC1VB2
184.97 kNm
Span A - B
Span B - C
8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis
55/61
With Wisdom We Explore
Solution of Example 2.5www.uthm.edu.my
33.72 kN/m
8 m
184.97 kNm
VC2
VD1
MD = 0VC2(8) 33.72(8) 2/2 - 123.21 +184.97 = 0VC2 = 1017.28 / 8 = 127.16 kN
Fy = 0127.16 + V D1 33.72(8) = 0VD1 = 142.60 kN
ME = 0
VD2(8)
33.72(8)2
/2 - 184.97 = 0VD2 = 1264.01 / 8 = 158.0 kN
Fy = 0158.0 + V E 33.72(8) = 0VE = 111.76 kN
33.72 kN/m
8 m
VEVD2
184.97 kNm
123.21 kNmSpan C - D
Span D - E
8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis
56/61
Load Case 2
With Wisdom We Explore
Solution of Example 2.5www.uthm.edu.my
33.72 kN/m
8 m
184.97 kNm
V A
VB1
MB = 0VA(8) 33.72(8) 2/2 + 184.97 = 0VA = 894.07 / 8 = 111.76 kN
Fy = 0111.76 + V B1 33.72(8) = 0VB1 = 158.0 kN
MC = 0VB2(8) 24.72(8) 2/2 + 123.21 - 184.97 = 0VB2 = 852.8 / 8 = 106.60 kN
Fy = 0106.60 + V C1 24.72(8) = 0VC1 = 91.16 kN
24.72 kN/m
8 m
123.21 kNm
VC1VB2
184.97 kNm
Span A - B
Span B - C
8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis
57/61
With Wisdom We Explore
Solution of Example 2.5www.uthm.edu.my
33.72 kN/m
8 m
184.97 kNm
VC2
VD1
MD = 0VC2(8) 33.72(8) 2/2 - 123.21 +184.97 = 0VC2 = 1017.28 / 8 = 127.16 kN
Fy = 0127.16 + V D1 33.72(8) = 0VD1 = 142.60 kN
ME = 0
VD2(8)
24.72(8)2
/2 - 184.97 = 0VD2 = 976.01 / 8 = 122.0 kN
Fy = 0122.0 + V E 24.72(8) = 0VE = 75.76 kN
24.72 kN/m
8 m
VEVD2
184.97 kNm
123.21 kNmSpan C - D
Span D - E
8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis
58/61
Load Case 3
With Wisdom We Explore
Solution of Example 2.5www.uthm.edu.my
24.72 kN/m
8 m
184.97 kNm
V A
VB1
MB = 0VA(8) 24.72(8) 2/2 + 184.97 = 0VA = 606.07 / 8 = 75.76 kN
Fy = 075.76 + V B1 24.72(8) = 0VB1 = 122.0 kN
MC = 0VB2(8) 33.72(8) 2/2 + 123.21 - 184.97 = 0VB2 = 1140.8 / 8 = 142.60 kN
Fy = 0142.60 + V C1 33.72(8) = 0VC1 = 127.16 kN
33.72 kN/m
8 m
123.21 kNm
VC1VB2
184.97 kNm
Span A - B
Span B - C
8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis
59/61
With Wisdom We Explore
Solution of Example 2.5www.uthm.edu.my
24.72 kN/m
8 m
184.97 kNm
VC2
VD1
MD = 0VC2(8) 24.72(8) 2/2 - 123.21 + 184.97 = 0VC2 = 729.28 / 8 = 91.16 kN
Fy = 091.16 + V D1 24.72(8) = 0VD1 = 106.60 kN
ME = 0
VD2(8)
33.72(8)2
/2 - 184.97 = 0VD2 = 1264.01 / 8 = 158.0 kN
Fy = 0158.0 + V E 33.72(8) = 0VE = 111.76 kN
33.72 kN/m
8 m
VEVD2
184.97 kNm
123.21 kNmSpan C - D
Span D - E
8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis
60/61
With Wisdom We Explore
Solution of Example 2.5www.uthm.edu.my
SFD EnvelopeAfter 20%Redistribution
BMD EnvelopeAfter 20%Redistribution
8/13/2019 2. Chapter 2 - Structural Analysis
61/61
www.uthm.edu.my