Top Banner
34

INTERNATIONALlegal.un.org/avl/studymaterials/rcil-laac/2016/book1_2.pdf2. American Convention on Human Rights, “Pact of San José, Costa Rica”, 1969 3. Additional Protocol to the

Jul 11, 2020

Download

Documents

dariahiddleston
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: INTERNATIONALlegal.un.org/avl/studymaterials/rcil-laac/2016/book1_2.pdf2. American Convention on Human Rights, “Pact of San José, Costa Rica”, 1969 3. Additional Protocol to the
Page 2: INTERNATIONALlegal.un.org/avl/studymaterials/rcil-laac/2016/book1_2.pdf2. American Convention on Human Rights, “Pact of San José, Costa Rica”, 1969 3. Additional Protocol to the
Page 3: INTERNATIONALlegal.un.org/avl/studymaterials/rcil-laac/2016/book1_2.pdf2. American Convention on Human Rights, “Pact of San José, Costa Rica”, 1969 3. Additional Protocol to the

INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW

JUDGE ANTÔNIO AUGUSTO CANÇADO TRINDADE

REQUIRED READINGS (printed format)

Legal instruments and documents

1. The Core International Human Rights Treaties (United Nations publication, Sales No.

E.14.XIV.1)

2. American Convention on Human Rights, “Pact of San José, Costa Rica”, 1969

3. Additional Protocol to the American Convention on Human Rights in the Area of

Economic, Social and Cultural Rights “Protocol of San Salvador”, 1988

4. Protocol to the American Convention on Human Rights to Abolish the Death Penalty,

1990

5. Inter-American Convention on Forced Disappearance of Persons, 1994

Page 4: INTERNATIONALlegal.un.org/avl/studymaterials/rcil-laac/2016/book1_2.pdf2. American Convention on Human Rights, “Pact of San José, Costa Rica”, 1969 3. Additional Protocol to the
Page 5: INTERNATIONALlegal.un.org/avl/studymaterials/rcil-laac/2016/book1_2.pdf2. American Convention on Human Rights, “Pact of San José, Costa Rica”, 1969 3. Additional Protocol to the

American Convention on Human Rights, “Pact of San José,

Costa Rica”, 1969

UNTS, vol. 1144, p. 144

Page 6: INTERNATIONALlegal.un.org/avl/studymaterials/rcil-laac/2016/book1_2.pdf2. American Convention on Human Rights, “Pact of San José, Costa Rica”, 1969 3. Additional Protocol to the
Page 7: INTERNATIONALlegal.un.org/avl/studymaterials/rcil-laac/2016/book1_2.pdf2. American Convention on Human Rights, “Pact of San José, Costa Rica”, 1969 3. Additional Protocol to the
Page 8: INTERNATIONALlegal.un.org/avl/studymaterials/rcil-laac/2016/book1_2.pdf2. American Convention on Human Rights, “Pact of San José, Costa Rica”, 1969 3. Additional Protocol to the
Page 9: INTERNATIONALlegal.un.org/avl/studymaterials/rcil-laac/2016/book1_2.pdf2. American Convention on Human Rights, “Pact of San José, Costa Rica”, 1969 3. Additional Protocol to the
Page 10: INTERNATIONALlegal.un.org/avl/studymaterials/rcil-laac/2016/book1_2.pdf2. American Convention on Human Rights, “Pact of San José, Costa Rica”, 1969 3. Additional Protocol to the
Page 11: INTERNATIONALlegal.un.org/avl/studymaterials/rcil-laac/2016/book1_2.pdf2. American Convention on Human Rights, “Pact of San José, Costa Rica”, 1969 3. Additional Protocol to the
Page 12: INTERNATIONALlegal.un.org/avl/studymaterials/rcil-laac/2016/book1_2.pdf2. American Convention on Human Rights, “Pact of San José, Costa Rica”, 1969 3. Additional Protocol to the
Page 13: INTERNATIONALlegal.un.org/avl/studymaterials/rcil-laac/2016/book1_2.pdf2. American Convention on Human Rights, “Pact of San José, Costa Rica”, 1969 3. Additional Protocol to the
Page 14: INTERNATIONALlegal.un.org/avl/studymaterials/rcil-laac/2016/book1_2.pdf2. American Convention on Human Rights, “Pact of San José, Costa Rica”, 1969 3. Additional Protocol to the
Page 15: INTERNATIONALlegal.un.org/avl/studymaterials/rcil-laac/2016/book1_2.pdf2. American Convention on Human Rights, “Pact of San José, Costa Rica”, 1969 3. Additional Protocol to the
Page 16: INTERNATIONALlegal.un.org/avl/studymaterials/rcil-laac/2016/book1_2.pdf2. American Convention on Human Rights, “Pact of San José, Costa Rica”, 1969 3. Additional Protocol to the
Page 17: INTERNATIONALlegal.un.org/avl/studymaterials/rcil-laac/2016/book1_2.pdf2. American Convention on Human Rights, “Pact of San José, Costa Rica”, 1969 3. Additional Protocol to the
Page 18: INTERNATIONALlegal.un.org/avl/studymaterials/rcil-laac/2016/book1_2.pdf2. American Convention on Human Rights, “Pact of San José, Costa Rica”, 1969 3. Additional Protocol to the
Page 19: INTERNATIONALlegal.un.org/avl/studymaterials/rcil-laac/2016/book1_2.pdf2. American Convention on Human Rights, “Pact of San José, Costa Rica”, 1969 3. Additional Protocol to the
Page 20: INTERNATIONALlegal.un.org/avl/studymaterials/rcil-laac/2016/book1_2.pdf2. American Convention on Human Rights, “Pact of San José, Costa Rica”, 1969 3. Additional Protocol to the
Page 21: INTERNATIONALlegal.un.org/avl/studymaterials/rcil-laac/2016/book1_2.pdf2. American Convention on Human Rights, “Pact of San José, Costa Rica”, 1969 3. Additional Protocol to the
Page 22: INTERNATIONALlegal.un.org/avl/studymaterials/rcil-laac/2016/book1_2.pdf2. American Convention on Human Rights, “Pact of San José, Costa Rica”, 1969 3. Additional Protocol to the
Page 23: INTERNATIONALlegal.un.org/avl/studymaterials/rcil-laac/2016/book1_2.pdf2. American Convention on Human Rights, “Pact of San José, Costa Rica”, 1969 3. Additional Protocol to the

Additional Protocol to the American Convention on Human

Rights in the Area of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights,

“Protocol of San Salvador”, 1988

San Salvador, 17 November 1988

Page 24: INTERNATIONALlegal.un.org/avl/studymaterials/rcil-laac/2016/book1_2.pdf2. American Convention on Human Rights, “Pact of San José, Costa Rica”, 1969 3. Additional Protocol to the

AD

DIT

ION

AL

PRO

TOCO

L TO

TH

E A

ME

RICA

N C

ON

VE

NTI

ON

ON

HU

MA

N R

IGH

TS I

N T

HE

ARE

A

OF

ECO

NO

MIC

, SO

CIA

L A

ND

CU

LTU

RAL

RIG

HTS

“PR

OTO

COL

OF

SAN

SA

LVA

DO

R”

Add

ition

al Pr

otoc

ol to

the

Am

eric

an C

onve

ntio

n on

Hum

an R

ight

s in

the

Are

a of

E

cono

mic

, Soc

ial a

nd C

ultu

ral R

ight

s "Pr

otoc

ol o

f San

Salv

ador

" A

dopt

ed in

San

Salv

ador

on

Nov

embe

r 17

, 19

88 (n

ot y

et in

forc

e)

Prea

mbl

e Th

e St

ates

Par

ties

to th

e A

mer

ican

Conv

en-

tion

on H

uman

Rig

hts

"Pac

t of

San

Jos

é, Co

sta

Rica

," Re

affir

min

g th

eir

inte

ntio

n to

con

solid

ate

in

this

hem

isphe

re,

with

in t

he f

ram

ewor

k of

de

moc

ratic

inst

itutio

ns, a

sys

tem

of p

erso

nal

liber

ty a

nd so

cial j

ustic

e ba

sed

on re

spec

t for

th

e es

sent

ial ri

ghts

of m

an;

Reco

gniz

ing

that

the

esse

ntial

rig

hts

of m

an

are

not

deriv

ed f

rom

one

's be

ing

a na

tiona

l of

a c

erta

in S

tate

, but

are

bas

ed u

pon

attri

b-ut

es o

f the

hum

an p

erso

n, fo

r w

hich

rea

son

they

mer

it in

tern

atio

nal

prot

ectio

n in

the

fo

rm o

f a

conv

entio

n re

info

rcin

g or

com

-pl

emen

ting

the

prot

ectio

n pr

ovid

ed b

y th

e do

mes

tic la

w o

f the

Am

erica

n St

ates

; Co

nsid

erin

g th

e clo

se re

latio

nshi

p th

at e

xist

s be

twee

n ec

onom

ic, so

cial a

nd c

ultu

ral r

ight

s, an

d civ

il an

d po

litica

l rig

hts,

in th

at th

e di

f-fe

rent

cat

egor

ies

of ri

ghts

con

stitu

te a

n in

di-

visib

le w

hole

base

d on

the

reco

gniti

on o

f the

di

gnity

of t

he h

uman

per

son,

for

whi

ch r

ea-

son

both

req

uire

per

man

ent

prot

ectio

n an

d pr

omot

ion

if th

ey a

re t

o be

ful

ly re

alize

d,

and

the

viol

atio

n of

som

e rig

hts i

n fa

vour

of

the

reali

zatio

n of

oth

ers

can

neve

r be

just

i-fie

d;

Reco

gniz

ing

the

bene

fits

that

ste

m fr

om th

e pr

omot

ion

and

deve

lopm

ent o

f co

oper

atio

n am

ong

Stat

es a

nd in

tern

atio

nal r

elatio

ns;

Reca

lling

tha

t, in

acc

orda

nce

with

the

Uni

-ve

rsal

Dec

larat

ion

of H

uman

Rig

hts

and

the

Am

erica

n Co

nven

tion

on H

uman

Rig

hts,

the

idea

l of

fre

e hu

man

bein

gs e

njoy

ing

free

dom

fro

m f

ear

and

wan

t ca

n on

ly be

ac

hiev

ed i

f co

nditi

ons

are

crea

ted

whe

reby

ev

eryo

ne m

ay e

njoy

his

econ

omic,

socia

l and

cu

ltura

l rig

hts a

s wel

l as h

is ci

vil a

nd p

oliti

cal

right

s; Be

arin

g in

min

d th

at, a

lthou

gh f

unda

men

tal

econ

omic,

soc

ial a

nd c

ultu

ral

right

s ha

ve

been

rec

ogni

zed

in e

arlie

r in

tern

atio

nal

in-

stru

men

ts o

f bot

h w

orld

and

regi

onal

scop

e,

it is

esse

ntial

that

thos

e rig

hts b

e re

affir

med

, de

velo

ped,

per

fect

ed a

nd p

rote

cted

in o

rder

to

con

solid

ate

in A

mer

ica,

on t

he b

asis

of

full

resp

ect

for

the

right

s of

the

indi

vidu

al,

the

dem

ocra

tic r

epre

sent

ativ

e fo

rm o

f go

v-er

nmen

t as

well

as

the

right

of i

ts p

eopl

es to

de

velo

pmen

t, se

lf-de

term

inat

ion,

an

d th

e fr

ee d

ispos

al of

the

ir w

ealth

and

nat

ural

re-

sour

ces;

and

Cons

ider

ing

that

the

Am

erica

n Co

nven

tion

on H

uman

Rig

hts

prov

ides

tha

t dr

aft

addi

-tio

nal p

roto

cols

to t

hat

Conv

entio

n m

ay b

e su

bmitt

ed f

or c

onsid

erat

ion

to t

he S

tate

s Pa

rties

, mee

ting

toge

ther

on

the

occa

sion

of

the

Gen

eral

Ass

embl

y of

the

Org

aniz

atio

n of

A

mer

ican

Stat

es,

for

the

purp

ose

of

grad

ually

in

corp

orat

ing

othe

r rig

hts

and

free

dom

s in

to th

e pr

otec

tive

syst

em th

ereo

f, H

ave

agre

ed u

pon

the

follo

win

g A

dditi

onal

Prot

ocol

to

the

Am

eric

an C

onve

ntio

n on

H

uman

Rig

hts "

Prot

ocol

of S

an S

alvad

or:"

Arti

cle 1

Obli

gatio

n to

Ado

pt M

easu

res

The

Stat

es P

artie

s to

thi

s A

dditi

onal

Prot

o-co

l to

the

Am

erica

n Co

nven

tion

on H

uman

Ri

ghts

un

derta

ke

to

adop

t th

e ne

cess

ary

mea

sure

s, bo

th d

omes

ticall

y an

d th

roug

h in

tern

atio

nal

coop

erat

ion,

es

pecia

lly

eco-

nom

ic a

nd t

echn

ical,

to

the

exte

nt a

llow

ed

by t

heir

avail

able

reso

urce

s, an

d ta

king

into

ac

coun

t the

ir de

gree

of d

evel

opm

ent,

for t

he

purp

ose

of a

chiev

ing

prog

ress

ively

and

pur

-su

ant

to t

heir

inte

rnal

legi

slatio

ns,

the

full

obse

rvan

ce o

f th

e rig

hts

reco

gniz

ed in

thi

s Pr

otoc

ol.

Arti

cle 2

Obli

gatio

n to

Ena

ct D

omest

ic Le

gislat

ion

If th

e ex

erci

se o

f th

e rig

hts

set f

orth

in th

is Pr

otoc

ol is

not

alre

ady

guar

ante

ed b

y leg

isla-

tive

or o

ther

pro

visio

ns,

the

Stat

es P

artie

s un

derta

ke to

ado

pt, i

n ac

cord

ance

with

their

co

nstit

utio

nal

proc

esse

s an

d th

e pr

ovisi

ons

of t

his

Prot

ocol

, su

ch l

egisl

ativ

e or

oth

er

mea

sure

s as

may

be

nece

ssar

y fo

r m

akin

g th

ose

right

s a re

ality

.

AD

DIT

ION

AL

PRO

TOCO

L TO

TH

E A

ME

RICA

N C

ON

VE

NTI

ON

ON

HU

MA

N R

IGH

TS I

N T

HE

ARE

A

OF

ECO

NO

MIC

, SO

CIA

L A

ND

CU

LTU

RAL

RIG

HTS

“PR

OTO

COL

OF

SAN

SA

LVA

DO

R”

Arti

cle 3

Obli

gatio

n of

non-

discri

mina

tion

Th

e St

ate

Parti

es to

this

Prot

ocol

und

erta

ke

to g

uara

ntee

the

exe

rcise

of

the

right

s se

t fo

rth h

erein

with

out

disc

rimin

atio

n of

any

ki

nd f

or r

easo

ns r

elat

ed to

rac

e, co

lour

, sex

, lan

guag

e, re

ligio

n, p

oliti

cal

or o

ther

opi

n-io

ns,

natio

nal

or

socia

l or

igin

, ec

onom

ic st

atus

, birt

h or

any

oth

er so

cial c

ondi

tion.

A

rticle

4 In

admi

ssibil

ity of

Rest

rictio

ns

A r

ight

whi

ch is

rec

ogni

zed

or in

effe

ct in

a

Stat

e by

virt

ue o

f its

int

erna

l leg

islat

ion

or

inte

rnat

iona

l co

nven

tions

may

not

be

re-

stric

ted

or c

urta

iled

on t

he p

rete

xt t

hat

this

Prot

ocol

doe

s no

t re

cogn

ize

the

right

or

reco

gniz

es it

to a

less

er d

egre

e. A

rticle

5 S

cope o

f Rest

rictio

ns a

nd L

imita

tions

Th

e St

ate

Parti

es m

ay e

stab

lish

rest

rictio

ns

and

limita

tions

on

the

enjo

ymen

t an

d ex

er-

cise

of

the

right

s es

tabl

ished

he

rein

by

m

eans

of

laws

prom

ulga

ted

for

the

purp

ose

of p

rese

rvin

g th

e ge

nera

l w

elfar

e in

a d

e-m

ocra

tic s

ociet

y on

ly to

the

exte

nt th

at th

ey

are

not

inco

mpa

tible

with

the

pur

pose

and

re

ason

und

erlyi

ng th

ose

right

s. A

rticle

6 R

ight t

o Wor

k 1.

Eve

ryon

e ha

s th

e rig

ht t

o w

ork,

whi

ch

incl

udes

the

opp

ortu

nity

to

secu

re t

he

mea

ns f

or l

ivin

g a

dign

ified

and

dec

ent

exist

ence

by

perf

orm

ing

a fr

eely

ele

cted

or

acc

epte

d law

ful a

ctiv

ity.

2. T

he S

tate

Par

ties

unde

rtake

to

adop

t m

easu

res t

hat w

ill m

ake

the

right

to w

ork

fully

effe

ctiv

e, es

pecia

lly w

ith r

egar

d to

th

e ac

hiev

emen

t of

full

empl

oym

ent,

vo-

catio

nal

guid

ance

, an

d th

e de

velo

pmen

t of

tec

hnica

l and

voc

atio

nal t

rain

ing

pro-

ject

s, in

par

ticul

ar t

hose

dire

cted

to

the

disa

bled

. Th

e St

ates

Par

ties

also

unde

r-ta

ke t

o im

plem

ent

and

stre

ngth

en p

ro-

gram

s th

at h

elp

to e

nsur

e su

itabl

e fa

mily

ca

re, s

o th

at w

omen

may

enj

oy a

real

op-

portu

nity

to e

xerc

ise th

e rig

ht to

wor

k.

Arti

cle 7

Jus

t, E

quita

ble, a

nd S

atisf

actor

y Co

ndi-

tions

of W

ork

The

Stat

es P

artie

s to

this

Prot

ocol

reco

gniz

e th

at th

e rig

ht to

wor

k to

whi

ch th

e fo

rego

ing

artic

le re

fers

pre

supp

oses

that

eve

ryon

e sh

all

enjo

y th

at r

ight

und

er j

ust,

equi

tabl

e, an

d sa

tisfa

ctor

y co

nditi

ons,

whi

ch

the

Stat

es

Parti

es u

nder

take

to g

uara

ntee

in th

eir i

nter

-na

l leg

islat

ion,

par

ticul

arly

with

resp

ect t

o:

a. Re

mun

erat

ion

whi

ch

guar

ante

es,

as

a m

inim

um,

to a

ll w

orke

rs d

igni

fied

and

dece

nt l

ivin

g co

nditi

ons

for

them

and

th

eir fa

mili

es a

nd fa

ir an

d eq

ual w

ages

for

equa

l wor

k, w

ithou

t dist

inct

ion;

b.

The

rig

ht o

f ev

ery

wor

ker

to f

ollo

w h

is vo

catio

n an

d to

dev

ote

him

self

to th

e ac

-tiv

ity th

at b

est f

ulfil

s hi

s ex

pect

atio

ns a

nd

to

chan

ge

empl

oym

ent

in

acco

rdan

ce

with

the

perti

nent

nat

iona

l reg

ulat

ions

; c.

The

right

of e

very

wor

ker t

o pr

omot

ion

or

upw

ard

mob

ility

in h

is em

ploy

men

t, fo

r w

hich

pur

pose

acc

ount

sha

ll be

tak

en o

f hi

s qu

alific

atio

ns,

com

pete

nce,

inte

grity

an

d se

nior

ity;

d. S

tabi

lity

of e

mpl

oym

ent,

subj

ect

to t

he

natu

re o

f ea

ch i

ndus

try a

nd o

ccup

atio

n an

d th

e ca

uses

for

jus

t se

para

tion.

In

case

s of

unj

ustif

ied d

ismiss

al, th

e w

orke

r sh

all h

ave

the

right

to in

dem

nity

or t

o re

-in

stat

emen

t on

the

job

or a

ny o

ther

ben

e-fit

s pro

vide

d by

dom

estic

legi

slatio

n;

e. Sa

fety

and

hyg

iene

at w

ork;

f.

The

proh

ibiti

on o

f ni

ght

wor

k or

un-

healt

hy o

r da

nger

ous

wor

king

con

ditio

ns

and,

in g

ener

al, o

f all

wor

k w

hich

jeop

-ar

dize

s he

alth,

saf

ety,

or m

orals

, for

per

-so

ns u

nder

18

year

s of

age

. A

s re

gard

s m

inor

s un

der t

he a

ge o

f 16,

the

wor

k da

y sh

all b

e su

bord

inat

ed t

o th

e pr

ovisi

ons

rega

rdin

g co

mpu

lsory

edu

catio

n an

d in

no

cas

e sh

all w

ork

cons

titut

e an

impe

di-

men

t to

scho

ol a

ttend

ance

or a

lim

itatio

n on

ben

efiti

ng fr

om e

duca

tion

rece

ived

; g.

A re

ason

able

limita

tion

of w

orki

ng h

ours

, bo

th d

aily

and

wee

kly.

The

days

sha

ll be

sh

orte

r in

the

cas

e of

dan

gero

us o

r un

-he

althy

wor

k or

of n

ight

wor

k;

h. R

est,

leisu

re a

nd p

aid v

acat

ions

as

well

as

rem

uner

atio

n fo

r nat

iona

l hol

iday

s. A

rticle

8 T

rade

Uni

on R

ights

1. T

he S

tate

s Par

ties s

hall

ensu

re:

a. Th

e rig

ht o

f w

orke

rs to

org

aniz

e tra

de

unio

ns a

nd t

o jo

in t

he u

nion

of

thei

r ch

oice

for

the

pur

pose

of

prot

ectin

g an

d pr

omot

ing

their

int

eres

ts.

As

an

Page 25: INTERNATIONALlegal.un.org/avl/studymaterials/rcil-laac/2016/book1_2.pdf2. American Convention on Human Rights, “Pact of San José, Costa Rica”, 1969 3. Additional Protocol to the

AD

DIT

ION

AL

PRO

TOCO

L TO

TH

E A

ME

RICA

N C

ON

VE

NTI

ON

ON

HU

MA

N R

IGH

TS I

N T

HE

ARE

A

OF

ECO

NO

MIC

, SO

CIA

L A

ND

CU

LTU

RAL

RIG

HTS

“PR

OTO

COL

OF

SAN

SA

LVA

DO

R”

ex

tens

ion

of th

at r

ight

, the

Sta

tes

Par-

ties

shall

per

mit

trade

uni

ons

to e

stab

-lis

h na

tiona

l fed

erat

ions

or

conf

eder

a-tio

ns, o

r to

affi

liate

with

thos

e th

at a

l-re

ady

exist

, as

well

as

to fo

rm in

tern

a-tio

nal t

rade

uni

on o

rgan

izat

ions

and

to

affil

iate

with

tha

t of

the

ir ch

oice

. The

St

ates

Par

ties

shall

also

per

mit

trade

un

ions

, fed

erat

ions

and

con

fede

ratio

ns

to fu

nctio

n fr

eely;

b.

The

righ

t to

strik

e. 2.

The

exe

rcise

of t

he r

ight

s se

t for

th a

bove

m

ay b

e su

bjec

t onl

y to

res

trict

ions

est

ab-

lishe

d by

law

, pro

vide

d th

at s

uch

rest

ric-

tions

are

cha

ract

erist

ic of

a d

emoc

ratic

so

ciety

and

nec

essa

ry f

or s

afeg

uard

ing

publ

ic or

der

or

for

prot

ectin

g pu

blic

healt

h or

mor

als o

r th

e rig

hts

and

free

-do

ms

of o

ther

s. M

embe

rs o

f th

e ar

med

fo

rces

and

the

polic

e an

d of

oth

er e

ssen

-tia

l pu

blic

serv

ices

shall

be

subj

ect

to

limita

tions

and

res

trict

ions

est

ablis

hed

by

law.

3. N

o on

e m

ay b

e co

mpe

lled

to b

elong

to a

tra

de u

nion

. A

rticle

9 R

ight t

o Soci

al Se

curit

y 1.

Eve

ryon

e sh

all h

ave

the

right

to

socia

l se

curit

y pr

otec

ting

him

fro

m t

he c

onse

-qu

ence

s of o

ld a

ge a

nd o

f disa

bilit

y w

hich

pr

even

ts

him

, ph

ysica

lly

or

men

tally

, fr

om s

ecur

ing

the

mea

ns f

or a

dig

nifie

d an

d de

cent

exi

sten

ce. I

n th

e ev

ent o

f th

e de

ath

of

a be

nefic

iary,

socia

l se

curit

y be

nefit

s sh

all b

e ap

plied

to

his

depe

nd-

ents

. 2.

In

the

case

of p

erso

ns w

ho a

re e

mpl

oyed

, th

e rig

ht t

o so

cial s

ecur

ity s

hall

cove

r at

lea

st m

edica

l car

e an

d an

allo

wan

ce o

r re-

tirem

ent b

enef

it in

the

case

of w

ork

acci-

dent

s or

occ

upat

iona

l dise

ase

and,

in th

e ca

se o

f w

omen

, paid

mat

erni

ty le

ave

be-

fore

and

afte

r chi

ldbi

rth.

Arti

cle 1

0 Ri

ght t

o Hea

lth

1. E

very

one

shall

hav

e th

e rig

ht t

o he

alth,

un

ders

tood

to m

ean

the

enjo

ymen

t of t

he

high

est

level

of p

hysic

al, m

enta

l and

so-

cial

wel

l-bei

ng.

2. In

ord

er to

ens

ure

the

exer

cise

of t

he ri

ght

to h

ealth

, the

Sta

tes

Parti

es a

gree

to

rec-

ogni

ze h

ealth

as

a pu

blic

good

and

, par

-tic

ular

ly, to

ado

pt th

e fo

llow

ing

mea

sure

s to

ens

ure

that

righ

t: a.

Prim

ary

healt

h ca

re,

that

is,

esse

ntial

he

alth

care

mad

e av

ailab

le to

all

indi

-vi

duals

and

fam

ilies

in th

e co

mm

unity

; b.

Ext

ensio

n of

the

ben

efits

of

healt

h se

rvice

s to

all

indi

vidu

als s

ubjec

t to

th

e St

ate's

juris

dict

ion;

c.

Uni

vers

al im

mun

izat

ion

again

st

the

prin

cipal

infe

ctio

us d

iseas

es;

d. P

reve

ntio

n an

d tre

atm

ent

of e

ndem

ic,

occu

patio

nal a

nd o

ther

dise

ases

; e.

Edu

catio

n of

the

pop

ulat

ion

on t

he

prev

entio

n an

d tre

atm

ent

of h

ealth

pr

oblem

s, an

d f.

Satis

fact

ion

of t

he h

ealth

nee

ds o

f th

e hi

ghes

t ris

k gr

oups

an

d of

th

ose

who

se p

over

ty m

akes

the

m t

he m

ost

vuln

erab

le.

Arti

cle 1

1 Ri

ght t

o a H

ealth

y Env

ironm

ent

1. E

very

one

shall

hav

e th

e rig

ht to

live

in a

he

althy

env

ironm

ent

and

to h

ave

acce

ss

to b

asic

publ

ic se

rvice

s. 2.

The

Sta

tes

Parti

es s

hall

prom

ote

the

pro-

tect

ion,

pre

serv

atio

n, a

nd i

mpr

ovem

ent

of th

e en

viro

nmen

t. A

rticle

12

Righ

t to F

ood

1. E

very

one

has

the

right

to a

dequ

ate

nutri

-tio

n w

hich

gua

rant

ees

the

poss

ibili

ty o

f en

joyin

g th

e hi

ghes

t lev

el of

phy

sical,

em

otio

nal a

nd in

telle

ctua

l dev

elopm

ent.

2. I

n or

der

to p

rom

ote

the

exer

cise

of

this

right

an

d er

adica

te

maln

utrit

ion,

th

e St

ates

Pa

rties

un

derta

ke

to

impr

ove

met

hods

of

prod

uctio

n, s

uppl

y an

d di

s-tri

butio

n of

foo

d, a

nd t

o th

is en

d, a

gree

to

pro

mot

e gr

eate

r int

erna

tiona

l coo

pera

-tio

n in

sup

port

of t

he r

eleva

nt n

atio

nal

polic

ies.

Arti

cle 1

3 Ri

ght t

o Edu

catio

n 1.

Eve

ryon

e ha

s the

righ

t to

educ

atio

n.

2. T

he S

tate

s Pa

rties

to

this

Prot

ocol

agr

ee

that

edu

catio

n sh

ould

be

dire

cted

tow

ards

th

e fu

ll de

velo

pmen

t of

the

hum

an p

er-

sona

lity

and

hum

an d

igni

ty a

nd s

houl

d st

reng

then

re

spec

t fo

r hu

man

rig

hts,

ideo

logi

cal

plur

alism

, fu

ndam

enta

l fr

ee-

AD

DIT

ION

AL

PRO

TOCO

L TO

TH

E A

ME

RICA

N C

ON

VE

NTI

ON

ON

HU

MA

N R

IGH

TS I

N T

HE

ARE

A

OF

ECO

NO

MIC

, SO

CIA

L A

ND

CU

LTU

RAL

RIG

HTS

“PR

OTO

COL

OF

SAN

SA

LVA

DO

R”

do

ms,

just

ice

and

peac

e. Th

ey f

urth

er

agre

e th

at e

duca

tion

ough

t to

enab

le ev

e-ry

one

to p

artic

ipat

e ef

fect

ively

in

a de

-m

ocra

tic

and

plur

alist

ic

soci

ety

and

achi

eve

a de

cent

exi

sten

ce a

nd s

houl

d fo

ster

un

ders

tand

ing,

to

lera

nce

and

frien

dshi

p am

ong

all n

atio

ns a

nd a

ll ra

-cia

l, et

hnic

or r

eligi

ous

grou

ps a

nd p

ro-

mot

e ac

tiviti

es f

or t

he m

ainte

nanc

e of

pe

ace.

3. T

he S

tate

s Pa

rties

to th

is Pr

otoc

ol r

ecog

-ni

ze th

at in

ord

er to

ach

ieve

the

full

exer

-cis

e of

the

right

to e

duca

tion:

a.

Prim

ary

educ

atio

n sh

ould

be

com

pul-

sory

and

acc

essib

le to

all

with

out c

ost;

b. S

econ

dary

edu

catio

n in

its

diff

eren

t fo

rms,

inclu

ding

tec

hnica

l an

d vo

ca-

tiona

l sec

onda

ry e

duca

tion,

sho

uld

be

mad

e ge

nera

lly a

vaila

ble

and

acce

ssib

le

to a

ll by

eve

ry a

ppro

priat

e m

eans

, and

in

par

ticul

ar, b

y th

e pr

ogre

ssiv

e in

tro-

duct

ion

of fr

ee e

duca

tion;

c.

Hig

her

educ

atio

n sh

ould

be

m

ade

equa

lly a

cces

sible

to al

l, on

the

basis

of

indi

vidu

al ca

pacit

y, by

eve

ry a

ppro

pri-

ate

mea

ns,

and

in p

artic

ular

, by

the

pr

ogre

ssiv

e in

trodu

ctio

n of

fre

e ed

u-ca

tion;

d.

Bas

ic ed

ucat

ion

shou

ld b

e en

cour

aged

or

int

ensif

ied a

s fa

r as

pos

sible

for

thos

e pe

rson

s w

ho h

ave

not

rece

ived

or

com

plet

ed t

he w

hole

cyc

le o

f pr

i-m

ary

inst

ruct

ion;

e.

Prog

ram

s of

spe

cial

educ

atio

n sh

ould

be

est

ablis

hed

for t

he h

andi

capp

ed, s

o as

to

prov

ide

spec

ial i

nstru

ctio

n an

d tra

inin

g to

per

sons

with

phy

sical

dis-

abili

ties o

r men

tal d

efic

ienc

ies.

4. I

n co

nfor

mity

with

the

dom

estic

leg

isla-

tion

of t

he S

tate

s Pa

rties

, par

ents

sho

uld

have

the

right

to se

lect

the

type

of e

duca

-tio

n to

be

give

n to

the

ir ch

ildre

n, p

ro-

vide

d th

at i

t co

nfor

ms

to t

he p

rincip

les

set f

orth

abo

ve.

5. N

othi

ng i

n th

is Pr

otoc

ol s

hall

be i

nter

-pr

eted

as

a re

stric

tion

of t

he f

reed

om o

f in

divi

duals

and

ent

ities

to

esta

blish

and

di

rect

edu

catio

nal

inst

itutio

ns i

n ac

cor-

danc

e w

ith th

e do

mes

tic le

gisla

tion

of th

e St

ates

Par

ties.

Arti

cle 1

4Righ

t to t

he B

enefi

ts of

Cultu

re 1.

The

Sta

tes

Parti

es to

this

Prot

ocol

rec

og-

nize

the

right

of e

very

one:

a. To

take

par

t in

the

cultu

ral a

nd a

rtist

ic lif

e of

the

com

mun

ity;

b. T

o en

joy

the

bene

fits

of s

cien

tific

and

te

chno

logi

cal p

rogr

ess;

c. To

ben

efit

from

the

pro

tect

ion

of

mor

al an

d m

ater

ial i

nter

ests

der

ivin

g fr

om a

ny s

cient

ific,

liter

ary

or a

rtist

ic pr

oduc

tion

of w

hich

he

is th

e au

thor

. 2.

The

step

s to

be ta

ken

by th

e St

ates

Par

ties

to th

is Pr

otoc

ol to

ens

ure

the

full

exer

cise

of th

is rig

ht s

hall

inclu

de th

ose

nece

ssar

y fo

r th

e co

nser

vatio

n, d

evelo

pmen

t an

d di

ssem

inat

ion

of sc

ience

, cul

ture

and

art.

3.

The

Sta

tes

Parti

es to

this

Prot

ocol

und

er-

take

to re

spec

t the

free

dom

indi

spen

sabl

e fo

r sc

ient

ific

rese

arch

and

cre

ativ

e ac

tiv-

ity.

4. T

he S

tate

s Pa

rties

to th

is Pr

otoc

ol r

ecog

-ni

ze t

he b

enef

its t

o be

der

ived

fro

m t

he

enco

urag

emen

t an

d de

velo

pmen

t of

in-

tern

atio

nal

coop

erat

ion

and

relat

ions

in

the

field

s of

scie

nce,

arts

and

cul

ture

, and

ac

cord

ingl

y ag

ree

to f

oste

r gr

eate

r in

ter-

natio

nal c

oope

ratio

n in

thes

e fie

lds.

Arti

cle 1

5 Ri

ght t

o th

e For

matio

n an

d th

e Pro

tec-

tion

of Fa

milie

s 1.

The

fam

ily is

the

natu

ral a

nd fu

ndam

enta

l ele

men

t of

soc

iety

and

ough

t to

be

pro-

tect

ed b

y th

e St

ate,

whi

ch s

houl

d se

e to

th

e im

prov

emen

t of

its s

pirit

ual a

nd m

a-te

rial c

ondi

tions

. 2.

Eve

ryon

e ha

s th

e rig

ht t

o fo

rm a

fam

ily,

whi

ch s

hall

be e

xerc

ised

in a

ccor

danc

e w

ith t

he p

rovi

sions

of

the

perti

nent

do-

mes

tic le

gisla

tion.

3.

The

Sta

tes

Parti

es h

ereb

y un

derta

ke t

o ac

cord

ade

quat

e pr

otec

tion

to t

he f

amily

un

it an

d in

par

ticul

ar:

a. To

pro

vide

spe

cial

care

and

ass

istan

ce

to m

othe

rs d

urin

g a

reas

onab

le pe

riod

befo

re a

nd a

fter c

hild

birth

; b.

To

guar

ante

e ad

equa

te n

utrit

ion

for

child

ren

at t

he n

ursin

g st

age

and

dur-

ing

scho

ol a

ttend

ance

yea

rs;

c. To

ado

pt s

pecia

l mea

sure

s fo

r the

pro

-te

ctio

n of

ado

lesce

nts

in o

rder

to

en-

sure

th

e fu

ll de

velo

pmen

t of

th

eir

Page 26: INTERNATIONALlegal.un.org/avl/studymaterials/rcil-laac/2016/book1_2.pdf2. American Convention on Human Rights, “Pact of San José, Costa Rica”, 1969 3. Additional Protocol to the

AD

DIT

ION

AL

PRO

TOCO

L TO

TH

E A

ME

RICA

N C

ON

VE

NTI

ON

ON

HU

MA

N R

IGH

TS I

N T

HE

ARE

A

OF

ECO

NO

MIC

, SO

CIA

L A

ND

CU

LTU

RAL

RIG

HTS

“PR

OTO

COL

OF

SAN

SA

LVA

DO

R”

ph

ysica

l, in

telle

ctua

l and

mor

al ca

paci

-tie

s; d.

To

unde

rtake

spec

ial p

rogr

ams o

f fam

-ily

train

ing

so a

s to

help

cre

ate

a st

able

an

d po

sitiv

e en

viro

nmen

t in

w

hich

ch

ildre

n w

ill r

ecei

ve a

nd d

evel

op t

he

valu

es o

f un

ders

tand

ing,

sol

idar

ity, r

e-sp

ect a

nd re

spon

sibili

ty.

Arti

cle 1

6 Ri

ghts

of Ch

ildren

E

very

chi

ld, w

hate

ver

his

pare

ntag

e, ha

s th

e rig

ht t

o th

e pr

otec

tion

that

his

stat

us a

s a

min

or r

equi

res

from

his

fam

ily, s

ociet

y an

d th

e St

ate.

Eve

ry c

hild

has

the

rig

ht t

o gr

ow

unde

r th

e pr

otec

tion

and

resp

onsib

ility

of

his

pare

nts;

save

in

exce

ptio

nal,

judi

cially

-re

cogn

ized

circ

umst

ance

s, a

child

of

youn

g ag

e ou

ght

not

to b

e se

para

ted

from

his

mot

her.

Eve

ry c

hild

has

the

right

to fr

ee a

nd

com

pulso

ry e

duca

tion,

at

least

in

the

ele-

men

tary

pha

se, a

nd t

o co

ntin

ue h

is tra

inin

g at

hig

her l

evels

of t

he e

duca

tiona

l sys

tem

. A

rticle

17

Prote

ction

of th

e Elde

rly

Eve

ryon

e ha

s th

e rig

ht to

spe

cial

prot

ectio

n in

old

age

. With

this

in v

iew th

e St

ates

Par

-tie

s ag

ree

to ta

ke p

rogr

essiv

ely

the

nece

ssar

y st

eps t

o m

ake

this

right

a re

ality

and

, par

ticu-

larly

, to:

a.

Prov

ide

suita

ble

faci

litie

s, as

wel

l as

food

an

d sp

ecial

ized

med

ical

care

, fo

r eld

erly

indi

vidu

als w

ho la

ck th

em a

nd a

re u

nabl

e to

pro

vide

them

for t

hem

selv

es;

b.

Und

erta

ke

wor

k pr

ogra

ms

spec

ifica

lly

desig

ned

to g

ive

the

elder

ly th

e op

portu

-ni

ty t

o en

gage

in

a pr

oduc

tive

activ

ity

suite

d to

the

ir ab

ilitie

s an

d co

nsist

ent

with

their

voc

atio

ns o

r des

ires;

c. Fo

ster

the

esta

blish

men

t of

soci

al or

gani

-za

tions

aim

ed a

t im

prov

ing

the

quali

ty o

f lif

e fo

r the

eld

erly.

A

rticle

18

Prote

ction

of th

e Han

dicap

ped

Eve

ryon

e af

fect

ed b

y a

dim

inut

ion

of h

is ph

ysica

l or

men

tal

capa

cities

is

entit

led t

o re

ceiv

e sp

ecial

atte

ntio

n de

signe

d to

help

hi

m a

chiev

e th

e gr

eate

st p

ossib

le de

velo

p-m

ent

of h

is pe

rson

ality

. Th

e St

ates

Par

ties

agre

e to

ado

pt s

uch

mea

sure

s as

may

be

nece

ssar

y fo

r thi

s pur

pose

and

, esp

ecial

ly, to

: a.

Und

erta

ke p

rogr

ams

spec

ifica

lly a

imed

at

prov

idin

g th

e ha

ndica

pped

with

the

re-

sour

ces

and

envi

ronm

ent

need

ed f

or a

t-ta

inin

g th

is go

al, i

nclu

ding

wor

k pr

o-gr

ams

cons

isten

t w

ith t

heir

poss

ibili

ties

and

free

ly ac

cept

ed b

y th

em o

r the

ir leg

al re

pres

enta

tives

, as t

he c

ase

may

be;

b. P

rovi

de s

peci

al tra

inin

g to

the

fam

ilies

of

the

hand

icapp

ed i

n or

der

to h

elp t

hem

so

lve

the

prob

lems

of c

oexi

sten

ce a

nd

conv

ert

them

int

o ac

tive

agen

ts i

n th

e ph

ysica

l, m

enta

l and

em

otio

nal d

evelo

p-m

ent o

f the

latte

r; c.

Incl

ude

the

cons

ider

atio

n of

sol

utio

ns t

o sp

ecifi

c re

quire

men

ts a

risin

g fr

om n

eeds

of

this

grou

p as

a p

riorit

y co

mpo

nent

of

their

urb

an d

evelo

pmen

t plan

s; d.

Enc

oura

ge t

he e

stab

lishm

ent

of s

ocial

gr

oups

in w

hich

the

han

dica

pped

can

be

help

ed to

enj

oy a

fulle

r life

. A

rticle

19

Mea

ns of

Pro

tectio

n 1.

Pur

suan

t to

the

pro

visio

ns o

f th

is ar

ticle

and

the

corr

espo

ndin

g ru

les to

be

form

u-lat

ed fo

r thi

s pu

rpos

e by

the

Gen

eral

As-

sem

bly

of t

he O

rgan

izat

ion

of A

mer

ican

St

ates

, the

Sta

tes

Parti

es t

o th

is Pr

otoc

ol

unde

rtake

to

subm

it pe

riodi

c re

ports

on

the

prog

ress

ive

mea

sure

s th

ey h

ave

take

n to

ens

ure

due

resp

ect

for

the

right

s se

t fo

rth in

this

Prot

ocol

. 2.

All

repo

rts s

hall

be s

ubm

itted

to th

e Se

c-re

tary

Gen

eral

of t

he O

AS,

who

sha

ll tra

nsm

it th

em

to

the

Inte

r-Am

erica

n E

cono

mic

and

Socia

l Cou

ncil

and

the

In-

ter-A

mer

ican

Coun

cil fo

r E

duca

tion,

Sci-

ence

and

Cul

ture

so

that

they

may

exa

m-

ine

them

in

acco

rdan

ce w

ith t

he p

rovi

-sio

ns o

f th

is ar

ticle

. The

Sec

reta

ry G

en-

eral

shall

sen

d a

copy

of

such

rep

orts

to

the

Inte

r-Am

erica

n Co

mm

issio

n on

Hu-

man

Rig

hts.

3. T

he S

ecre

tary

Gen

eral

of t

he O

rgan

iza-

tion

of A

mer

ican

Stat

es s

hall

also

trans

-m

it to

the

spec

ializ

ed o

rgan

izat

ions

of t

he

inte

r-A

mer

ican

sy

stem

of

w

hich

th

e St

ates

Par

ties

to th

e pr

esen

t Pro

toco

l are

m

embe

rs, c

opies

or p

ertin

ent p

ortio

ns o

f th

e re

ports

sub

mitt

ed, i

nsof

ar a

s th

ey r

e-lat

e to

mat

ters

with

in t

he p

urvi

ew o

f th

ose

orga

niza

tions

, as

es

tabl

ished

by

th

eir c

onst

ituen

t ins

trum

ents

.

AD

DIT

ION

AL

PRO

TOCO

L TO

TH

E A

ME

RICA

N C

ON

VE

NTI

ON

ON

HU

MA

N R

IGH

TS I

N T

HE

ARE

A

OF

ECO

NO

MIC

, SO

CIA

L A

ND

CU

LTU

RAL

RIG

HTS

“PR

OTO

COL

OF

SAN

SA

LVA

DO

R”

4. T

he s

pecia

lized

org

aniz

atio

ns o

f the

inte

r-A

mer

ican

syst

em m

ay s

ubm

it re

ports

to

the

Inte

r-Am

erica

n E

cono

mic

and

Socia

l Co

uncil

and

the

Int

er-A

mer

ican

Coun

cil

for

Edu

catio

n, S

cienc

e an

d Cu

lture

rela

-tiv

e to

com

plian

ce w

ith th

e pr

ovisi

ons

of

the

pres

ent P

roto

col i

n th

eir f

ields

of

ac-

tivity

. 5.

The

ann

ual r

epor

ts s

ubm

itted

to th

e G

en-

eral

Ass

embl

y by

th

e In

ter-

Am

eric

an

Eco

nom

ic an

d So

cial C

ounc

il an

d th

e In

-te

r-Am

erica

n Co

uncil

for

Edu

catio

n, S

ci-en

ce a

nd C

ultu

re sh

all c

onta

in a

sum

mar

y of

the

inf

orm

atio

n re

ceiv

ed f

rom

the

St

ates

Par

ties

to th

e pr

esen

t Pro

toco

l and

th

e sp

ecial

ized

org

aniz

atio

ns c

once

rnin

g th

e pr

ogre

ssiv

e m

easu

res

adop

ted

in o

r-de

r to

ens

ure

resp

ect

for

the

right

s ac

-kn

owled

ged

in th

e Pr

otoc

ol it

self

and

the

gene

ral

reco

mm

enda

tions

the

y co

nsid

er

to b

e ap

prop

riate

in th

is re

spec

t. 6.

Any

ins

tanc

e in

whi

ch t

he r

ight

s es

tab-

lishe

d in

par

agra

ph a

) of

Arti

cle 8

and

in

Arti

cle

13 a

re v

iolat

ed b

y ac

tion

dire

ctly

at

tribu

tabl

e to

a S

tate

Par

ty to

this

Prot

o-co

l may

giv

e ris

e, th

roug

h pa

rtici

patio

n of

th

e In

ter-A

mer

ican

Com

miss

ion

on H

u-m

an R

ight

s an

d, w

hen

appl

icabl

e, of

the

In

ter-A

mer

ican

Cour

t of

Hum

an R

ight

s, to

app

licat

ion

of th

e sy

stem

of i

ndiv

idua

l pe

titio

ns g

over

ned

by A

rticle

44

thro

ugh

51 a

nd 6

1 th

roug

h 69

of

the

Am

erica

n Co

nven

tion

on H

uman

Rig

hts.

7. W

ithou

t pre

judi

ce to

the

prov

ision

s of t

he

prec

edin

g pa

ragr

aph,

the

Int

er-A

mer

ican

Com

miss

ion

on H

uman

Rig

hts

may

for

-m

ulat

e su

ch

obse

rvat

ions

an

d re

com

-m

enda

tions

as

it de

ems

perti

nent

con

-ce

rnin

g th

e st

atus

of t

he e

cono

mic,

soc

ial

and

cultu

ral r

ight

s es

tabl

ished

in th

e pr

e-se

nt P

roto

col i

n all

or s

ome

of th

e St

ates

Pa

rties

, w

hich

it

may

inc

lude

in

its A

n-nu

al Re

port

to t

he G

ener

al A

ssem

bly

or

in a

spe

cial r

epor

t, w

hich

ever

it c

onsid

ers

mor

e ap

prop

riate

. 8.

The

Cou

ncils

and

the

Int

er-A

mer

ican

Com

miss

ion

on H

uman

Rig

hts,

in d

is-ch

argi

ng t

he f

unct

ions

con

ferr

ed u

pon

them

in

this

artic

le, s

hall

take

int

o ac

-co

unt

the

prog

ress

ive

natu

re o

f th

e ob

-se

rvan

ce o

f th

e rig

hts

subj

ect

to p

rote

c-

tion

by th

is Pr

otoc

ol.

Arti

cle 2

0 Re

serva

tions

Th

e St

ates

Par

ties

may

, at

the

tim

e of

ap-

prov

al, s

igna

ture

, ra

tifica

tion

or a

cces

sion,

m

ake

rese

rvat

ions

to

one

or m

ore

spec

ific

prov

ision

s of

thi

s Pr

otoc

ol,

prov

ided

tha

t su

ch r

eser

vatio

ns a

re n

ot in

com

patib

le w

ith

the

objec

t and

pur

pose

of t

he P

roto

col.

Arti

cle 2

1 Si

gnat

ure,

Ratif

icatio

n or

Acce

ssion

E

ntry

into

Effe

ct 1.

Thi

s Pr

otoc

ol s

hall

rem

ain o

pen

to s

igna

-tu

re a

nd r

atifi

catio

n or

acc

essio

n by

any

St

ate

Party

to

the

Am

erica

n Co

nven

tion

on H

uman

Rig

hts.

2. R

atifi

catio

n of

or

acce

ssio

n to

this

Prot

o-co

l sha

ll be

effe

cted

by

depo

sitin

g an

in-

stru

men

t of r

atifi

catio

n or

acc

essio

n w

ith

the

Gen

eral

Secr

etar

iat o

f th

e O

rgan

iza-

tion

of A

mer

ican

Stat

es.

3. T

he P

roto

col s

hall

ente

r in

to e

ffect

whe

n ele

ven

Stat

es h

ave

depo

sited

their

resp

ec-

tive

inst

rum

ents

of

ratif

icat

ion

or a

cces

-sio

n.

4. T

he S

ecre

tary

Gen

eral

shall

not

ify a

ll th

e m

embe

r st

ates

of

the

Org

aniz

atio

n of

A

mer

ican

Stat

es o

f th

e en

try o

f th

e Pr

o-to

col i

nto

effe

ct.

Arti

cle 2

2 In

clusio

n of

other

Righ

ts an

d E

xpan

sion

of th

ose R

ecogn

ized

1.

Any

Sta

te P

arty

and

the

Int

er-A

mer

ican

Com

miss

ion

on

Hum

an

Righ

ts

may

su

bmit

for t

he c

onsid

erat

ion

of th

e St

ates

Pa

rties

mee

ting

on t

he o

ccas

ion

of t

he

Gen

eral

Ass

embl

y pr

opos

ed a

men

dmen

ts

to in

clude

the

reco

gniti

on o

f ot

her

right

s or

fr

eedo

ms

or

to

exte

nd

or

expa

nd

right

s or f

reed

oms r

ecog

nize

d in

this

Pro-

toco

l. 2.

Suc

h am

endm

ents

sha

ll en

ter

into

effe

ct

for t

he S

tate

s th

at ra

tify

them

on

the

date

of

dep

osit

of t

he i

nstru

men

t of

rat

ifica

-tio

n co

rres

pond

ing

to th

e nu

mbe

r re

pre-

sent

ing

two

third

s of

the

Stat

es P

artie

s to

th

is Pr

otoc

ol. F

or a

ll ot

her

Stat

es P

artie

s th

ey s

hall

ente

r int

o ef

fect

on

the

date

on

whi

ch t

hey

depo

sit t

heir

resp

ectiv

e in

-st

rum

ent o

f rat

ifica

tion.

___

____

____

____

____

Page 27: INTERNATIONALlegal.un.org/avl/studymaterials/rcil-laac/2016/book1_2.pdf2. American Convention on Human Rights, “Pact of San José, Costa Rica”, 1969 3. Additional Protocol to the

Protocol to the American Convention on Human Rights to

Abolish the Death Penalty, 1990

Asuncion, 8 June 1990

Page 28: INTERNATIONALlegal.un.org/avl/studymaterials/rcil-laac/2016/book1_2.pdf2. American Convention on Human Rights, “Pact of San José, Costa Rica”, 1969 3. Additional Protocol to the

PR

OTO

CO

L TO

TH

E A

MER

ICA

N C

ON

VEN

TIO

N O

N H

UM

AN

RIG

HTS

TO

A

BO

LISH

TH

E D

EATH

PEN

ALT

Y

PR

EAM

BLE

THE

STAT

ES P

ARTI

ES T

O T

HIS

PRO

TOCO

L,

CON

SID

ERIN

G:

That

Art

icle

4 o

f th

e Am

eric

an C

onve

ntio

n on

Hum

an R

ight

s re

cogn

izes

the

rig

ht

to li

fe a

nd r

estr

icts

the

app

licat

ion

of t

he d

eath

pen

alty

;

That

eve

ryon

e ha

s th

e in

alie

nabl

e rig

ht t

o re

spec

t fo

r hi

s lif

e, a

rig

ht t

hat

cann

ot

be s

uspe

nded

for

any

rea

son;

That

the

ten

denc

y am

ong

the

Amer

ican

Sta

tes

is t

o be

in f

avor

of

abol

ition

of

the

deat

h pe

nalty

;

That

app

licat

ion

of t

he d

eath

pen

alty

has

irre

voca

ble

cons

eque

nces

, for

eclo

ses

the

corr

ectio

n of

judi

cial

err

or, a

nd p

recl

udes

any

pos

sibi

lity

of c

hang

ing

or

reha

bilit

atin

g th

ose

conv

icte

d;

That

the

abo

litio

n of

the

dea

th p

enal

ty h

elps

to

ensu

re m

ore

effe

ctiv

e pr

otec

tion

of t

he r

ight

to

life;

That

an

inte

rnat

iona

l agr

eem

ent

mus

t be

arr

ived

at

that

will

ent

ail a

pro

gres

sive

de

velo

pmen

t of

the

Am

eric

an C

onve

ntio

n on

Hum

an R

ight

s, a

nd

That

Sta

tes

Part

ies

to t

he A

mer

ican

Con

vent

ion

on H

uman

Rig

hts

have

ex

pres

sed

thei

r in

tent

ion

to a

dopt

an

inte

rnat

iona

l agr

eem

ent

with

a v

iew

to

cons

olid

atin

g th

e pr

actic

e of

not

app

lyin

g th

e de

ath

pena

lty in

the

Am

eric

as,

HA

VE

AG

REE

D T

O S

IGN

TH

E FO

LLO

WIN

G P

RO

TOC

OL

TO T

HE

AM

ERIC

AN

CO

NV

ENTI

ON

ON

HU

MA

N R

IGH

TS T

O A

BO

LISH

TH

E D

EATH

P

ENA

LTY

Art

icle

1

The

Stat

es P

artie

s to

thi

s Pr

otoc

ol s

hall

not

appl

y th

e de

ath

pena

lty in

the

ir te

rrito

ry t

o an

y pe

rson

sub

ject

to

thei

r ju

risdi

ctio

n.

Art

icle

2

1. N

o re

serv

atio

ns m

ay b

e m

ade

to t

his

Prot

ocol

. How

ever

, at

the

time

of

ratif

icat

ion

or a

cces

sion

, the

Sta

tes

Part

ies

to t

his

inst

rum

ent

may

dec

lare

tha

t th

ey r

eser

ve t

he r

ight

to

appl

y th

e de

ath

pena

lty in

war

time

in a

ccor

danc

e w

ith

inte

rnat

iona

l law

, for

ext

rem

ely

serio

us c

rimes

of

a m

ilita

ry n

atur

e.

2. T

he S

tate

Par

ty m

akin

g th

is r

eser

vatio

n sh

all,

upon

rat

ifica

tion

or a

cces

sion

, in

form

the

Sec

reta

ry G

ener

al o

f th

e O

rgan

izat

ion

of A

mer

ican

Sta

tes

of t

he

pert

inen

t pr

ovis

ions

of its

nat

iona

l leg

isla

tion

appl

icab

le in

war

time,

as

refe

rred

to

in t

he p

rece

ding

par

agra

ph.

3. S

aid

Stat

e Pa

rty

shal

l not

ify t

he S

ecre

tary

Gen

eral

of

the

Org

aniz

atio

n of

Am

eric

an S

tate

s of

the

beg

inni

ng o

r en

d of

any

sta

te o

f w

ar in

eff

ect

in it

s te

rrito

ry.

Art

icle

3

1. T

his

Prot

ocol

sha

ll be

ope

n fo

r si

gnat

ure

and

ratif

icat

ion

or a

cces

sion

by

any

Stat

e Pa

rty

to t

he A

mer

ican

Con

vent

ion

on H

uman

Rig

hts.

2. R

atifi

catio

n of

thi

s Pr

otoc

ol o

r ac

cess

ion

ther

eto

shal

l be

mad

e th

roug

h th

e de

posi

t of

an

inst

rum

ent

of r

atifi

catio

n or

acc

essi

on w

ith t

he G

ener

al S

ecre

taria

t of

the

Org

aniz

atio

n of

Am

eric

an S

tate

s.

Art

icle

4

This

Pro

toco

l sha

ll en

ter

into

for

ce a

mon

g th

e St

ates

tha

t ra

tify

or a

cced

e to

it

whe

n th

ey d

epos

it th

eir

resp

ectiv

e in

stru

men

ts o

f ra

tific

atio

n or

acc

essi

on w

ith

the

Gen

eral

Sec

reta

riat

of t

he O

rgan

izat

ion

of A

mer

ican

Sta

tes.

Page 29: INTERNATIONALlegal.un.org/avl/studymaterials/rcil-laac/2016/book1_2.pdf2. American Convention on Human Rights, “Pact of San José, Costa Rica”, 1969 3. Additional Protocol to the

Inter-American Convention on Forced Disappearance of Persons,

1994

Belém do Pará, 9 June 1994

Page 30: INTERNATIONALlegal.un.org/avl/studymaterials/rcil-laac/2016/book1_2.pdf2. American Convention on Human Rights, “Pact of San José, Costa Rica”, 1969 3. Additional Protocol to the

INT

ER

-AM

ER

ICA

NC

ON

VE

NT

ION

ON

FO

RC

ED

DIS

AP

PE

AR

AN

CE

OF

PE

RS

ON

S

(Ado

pted

at B

elém

do

Pará

, Bra

zil,

9 Ju

ne 1

994,

at

the

twen

ty-f

ourt

h re

gula

r se

ssio

n of

the

Gen

eral

Ass

embl

y o

f th

e O

rgan

izat

ion

of A

mer

ican

Sta

tes)

Pre

amb

le

The

Mem

ber

Sta

tes

of t

he O

rgan

izat

ion

of A

mer

ican

Sta

tes

sign

ator

y to

th

e pr

esen

t Con

vent

ion,

DIS

TU

RB

ED

by

the

pers

iste

nce

of th

e fo

rced

dis

appe

aran

ce o

f pe

rson

s;

RE

AF

FIR

MIN

G t

hat

the

true

mea

ning

of

Am

eric

an s

olid

arit

y an

d go

od

neig

hbor

lines

s ca

n be

no

ne

othe

r th

an

that

of

co

nsol

idat

ing

in

this

H

emis

pher

e, i

n th

e fr

amew

ork

of d

emoc

rati

c in

stitu

tion

s, a

sys

tem

of

indi

vidu

al f

reed

om a

nd s

ocia

l ju

stic

e ba

sed

on r

espe

ct f

or e

ssen

tial

hum

an

righ

ts;

CO

NS

IDE

RIN

G t

hat

the

forc

ed d

isap

pear

ance

of

pers

ons

in a

n af

fron

t to

th

e co

nsci

ence

of

the

Hem

isph

ere

and

a gr

ave

and

abom

inab

le o

ffen

se

agai

nst

the

inhe

rent

dig

nity

of

the

hum

an b

eing

, an

d on

e th

at c

ontr

adic

ts

the

prin

cipl

es a

nd p

urpo

ses

ensh

rine

d in

the

Cha

rter

of

the

Org

aniz

atio

n of

A

mer

ican

Sta

tes;

CO

NS

IDE

RIN

G

that

th

e fo

rced

di

sapp

eara

nce

of

pers

ons

of

pers

ons

viol

ates

num

erou

s no

n-de

roga

ble

and

esse

ntia

l hu

man

rig

hts

ensh

rine

d in

th

e A

mer

ican

Con

vent

ion

on H

uman

Rig

hts,

in

the

Am

eric

an D

ecla

rati

on

of t

he R

ight

s an

d D

utie

s of

Man

, an

d in

the

Uni

vers

al D

ecla

rati

on o

f H

uman

Rig

hts;

RE

CA

LL

ING

tha

t th

e in

tern

atio

nal

prot

ecti

on o

f hu

man

rig

hts

is i

n th

e fo

rm

of

a co

nven

tion

re

info

rcin

g or

co

mpl

emen

ting

th

e pr

otec

tion

pr

ovid

ed b

y do

mes

tic

law

and

is

base

d up

on t

he a

ttri

bute

s of

the

hum

an

pers

onal

ity;

RE

AF

FIR

MIN

G t

hat

the

syst

emat

ic p

ract

ice

of t

he f

orce

d di

sapp

eara

nce

of p

erso

ns c

onst

itut

es a

cri

me

agai

nst h

uman

ity;

HO

PIN

G t

hat

this

Con

vent

ion

may

hel

p to

pre

vent

, pu

nish

, an

d el

imin

ate

the

forc

ed

disa

ppea

ranc

e of

pe

rson

s in

th

e H

emis

pher

e an

d m

ake

a de

cisi

ve c

ontr

ibut

ion

to th

e pr

otec

tion

of

hum

an r

ight

s an

d th

e ru

le o

f la

w,

RE

SO

LV

E t

o ad

opt

the

foll

owin

g In

ter-

Am

eric

an C

onve

ntio

n on

For

ced

Dis

appe

aran

ce o

f P

erso

ns:

Art

icle

I

The

Sta

tes

Par

ties

to th

is C

onve

ntio

n un

dert

ake:

a. N

ot t

o pr

acti

ce,

perm

it,

or t

oler

ate

the

forc

ed d

isap

pear

ance

of

pers

ons,

ev

en in

sta

tes

of e

mer

genc

y or

sus

pens

ion

of in

divi

dual

gua

rant

ees;

b. T

o pu

nish

wit

hin

thei

r ju

risd

icti

ons,

tho

se p

erso

ns w

ho c

omm

it o

r at

tem

pt t

o co

mm

it t

he c

rim

e of

for

ced

disa

ppea

ranc

e of

per

sons

and

the

ir

acco

mpl

ices

and

acc

esso

ries

;

c. T

o co

oper

ate

wit

h on

e an

othe

r in

hel

ping

to

prev

ent,

puni

sh,

and

elim

inat

e th

e fo

rced

dis

appe

aran

ce o

f pe

rson

s;

d. T

o ta

ke l

egis

lati

ve,

adm

inis

trat

ive,

jud

icia

l, an

d an

y ot

her

mea

sure

s ne

cess

ary

to c

ompl

y w

ith

the

com

mit

men

ts u

nder

take

n in

this

Con

vent

ion.

Page 31: INTERNATIONALlegal.un.org/avl/studymaterials/rcil-laac/2016/book1_2.pdf2. American Convention on Human Rights, “Pact of San José, Costa Rica”, 1969 3. Additional Protocol to the

Art

icle

II

For

the

purp

oses

of

this

Con

vent

ion,

for

ced

disa

ppea

ranc

e is

con

side

red

to

be t

he a

ct o

f de

priv

ing

a pe

rson

or

pers

ons

of h

is o

r th

eir

free

dom

, in

w

hate

ver

way

, per

petr

ated

by

agen

ts o

f th

e st

ate

or b

y pe

rson

s or

gro

ups

of

pers

ons

acti

ng w

ith

the

auth

oriz

atio

n, s

uppo

rt, o

r ac

quie

scen

ce o

f th

e st

ate,

fo

llow

ed b

y an

abs

ence

of

info

rmat

ion

or a

ref

usal

to

ackn

owle

dge

that

de

priv

atio

n of

fre

edom

or

to g

ive

info

rmat

ion

on t

he w

here

abou

ts o

f th

at

pers

on,

ther

eby

impe

ding

hi

s or

he

r re

cour

se

to

the

appl

icab

le

lega

l re

med

ies

and

proc

edur

al g

uara

ntee

s.

Art

icle

III

The

S

tate

s P

arti

es

unde

rtak

e to

ad

opt,

in

acco

rdan

ce

wit

h th

eir

cons

titu

tion

al p

roce

dure

s, t

he l

egis

lati

ve m

easu

res

that

may

be

need

ed t

o de

fine

the

for

ced

disa

ppea

ranc

e of

per

sons

as

an o

ffen

se a

nd t

o im

pose

an

appr

opri

ate

puni

shm

ent

com

men

sura

te

wit

h it

s ex

trem

e gr

avit

y.

Thi

s of

fens

e sh

all

be d

eem

ed c

onti

nuou

s or

per

man

ent

as l

ong

as t

he f

ate

or

whe

reab

outs

of

the

vict

im h

as n

ot b

een

dete

rmin

ed.

The

Sta

tes

Par

ties

may

est

abli

sh m

itig

atin

g ci

rcum

stan

ces

for

pers

ons

who

ha

ve p

arti

cipa

ted

in a

cts

cons

titu

ting

for

ced

disa

ppea

ranc

e w

hen

they

hel

p to

cau

se t

he v

icti

m t

o re

appe

ar a

live

or

prov

ide

info

rmat

ion

that

she

ds

ligh

t on

the

forc

ed d

isap

pear

ance

of

a pe

rson

.

Art

icle

IV

The

ac

ts

cons

titu

ting

th

e fo

rced

di

sapp

eara

nce

of

pers

ons

shal

l be

co

nsid

ered

off

ense

s in

eve

ry S

tate

Par

ty.

Con

sequ

ently

, ea

ch S

tate

Par

ty

shal

l ta

ke m

easu

res

to e

stab

lish

its

juri

sdic

tion

ove

r su

ch c

ases

in

the

foll

owin

g in

stan

ces:

a. W

hen

the

forc

ed d

isap

pear

ance

of

pers

ons

or a

ny a

ct c

onst

itut

ing

such

of

fens

e w

as c

omm

itte

d w

ithi

n it

s ju

risd

icti

on;

b. W

hen

the

accu

sed

is a

nat

iona

l of

that

sta

te;

c .W

hen

the

vict

im is

a n

atio

nal o

f th

at s

tate

and

that

sta

te s

ees

fit t

o do

so.

Eve

ry S

tate

Par

ty s

hall

, mor

eove

r, ta

ke th

e ne

cess

ary

mea

sure

s to

est

abli

sh

its

juri

sdic

tion

ove

r th

e cr

ime

desc

ribe

d in

thi

s C

onve

ntio

n w

hen

the

alle

ged

crim

inal

is

wit

hin

its

terr

itor

y an

d it

doe

s no

t pr

ocee

d to

ext

radi

te

him

.

Thi

s C

onve

ntio

n do

es n

ot a

utho

rize

any

Sta

te P

arty

to

unde

rtak

e, i

n th

e te

rrit

ory

of

anot

her

Sta

te

Par

ty,

the

exer

cise

of

ju

risd

icti

on

or

the

perf

orm

ance

of

func

tions

tha

t ar

e pl

aced

with

in t

he e

xclu

sive

pur

view

of

the

auth

orit

ies

of th

at o

ther

Par

ty b

y it

s do

mes

tic

law

.

Art

icle

V

The

for

ced

disa

ppea

ranc

e of

per

sons

sha

ll n

ot b

e co

nsid

ered

a p

olit

ical

of

fens

e fo

r pu

rpos

es o

f ex

trad

itio

n.

The

for

ced

disa

ppea

ranc

e of

per

sons

sha

ll b

e de

emed

to

be i

nclu

ded

amon

g th

e ex

trad

itab

le o

ffen

ses

in e

very

ext

radi

tion

tre

aty

ente

red

into

be

twee

n S

tate

s P

arti

es.

The

Sta

tes

Par

ties

und

erta

ke to

incl

ude

the

offe

nse

of f

orce

d di

sapp

eara

nce

as o

ne w

hich

is

extr

adit

able

in

ever

y ex

trad

itio

n tr

eaty

to

be c

oncl

uded

be

twee

n th

em in

the

futu

re.

Eve

ry S

tate

Par

ty t

hat

mak

es e

xtra

diti

on c

ondi

tion

al o

n th

e ex

iste

nce

of a

tr

eaty

and

rec

eive

s a

requ

est

for

extr

adit

ion

from

ano

ther

Sta

te P

arty

wit

h w

hich

it h

as n

o ex

trad

itio

n tr

eaty

may

con

side

r th

is C

onve

ntio

n as

the

Page 32: INTERNATIONALlegal.un.org/avl/studymaterials/rcil-laac/2016/book1_2.pdf2. American Convention on Human Rights, “Pact of San José, Costa Rica”, 1969 3. Additional Protocol to the

nece

ssar

y le

gal

basi

s fo

r ex

trad

itio

n w

ith

resp

ect

to t

he o

ffen

se o

f fo

rced

di

sapp

eara

nce.

Sta

tes

Par

ties

whi

ch d

o no

t m

ake

extr

adit

ion

cond

itio

nal

on t

he e

xist

ence

of

a t

reat

y sh

all

reco

gniz

e su

ch o

ffen

se a

s ex

trad

itab

le,

subj

ect

to t

he

cond

ition

s im

pose

d by

the

law

of

the

requ

este

d st

ate.

Ext

radi

tion

sha

ll b

e su

bjec

t to

the

pro

visi

ons

set

fort

h in

the

con

stit

utio

n an

d ot

her

law

s of

the

requ

est s

tate

.

Art

icle

VI

Whe

n a

Sta

te P

arty

doe

s no

t gr

ant

the

extr

adit

ion,

the

cas

e sh

all

be

subm

itte

d to

its

com

pete

nt a

utho

riti

es a

s if

the

offe

nse

had

been

com

mit

ted

wit

hin

its

juri

sdic

tion

, fo

r th

e pu

rpos

es

of

inve

stig

atio

n an

d w

hen

appr

opri

ate,

for

cri

min

al a

ctio

n, i

n ac

cord

ance

wit

h it

s na

tion

al l

aw.

Any

de

cisi

on a

dopt

ed b

y th

ese

auth

orit

ies

shal

l be

com

mun

icat

ed t

o th

e st

ate

that

has

req

uest

ed th

e ex

trad

itio

n.

Art

icle

VII

Cri

min

al p

rose

cuti

on f

or t

he f

orce

d di

sapp

eara

nce

of p

erso

ns a

nd t

he

pena

lty

judi

cial

ly im

pose

d on

its

perp

etra

tor

shal

l not

be

subj

ect t

o st

atut

es

of li

mit

atio

ns.

How

ever

, if

ther

e sh

ould

be

a no

rm o

f a

fund

amen

tal

char

acte

r pr

even

ting

ap

plic

atio

n of

the

sti

pula

tion

con

tain

ed i

n th

e pr

evio

us p

arag

raph

, th

e pe

riod

of

lim

itat

ion

shal

l be

equ

al t

o th

at w

hich

app

lies

to

the

grav

est

crim

e in

the

dom

estic

law

s of

the

corr

espo

ndin

g S

tate

Par

ty.

Art

icle

VII

I

The

de

fens

e of

du

e ob

edie

nce

to

supe

rior

or

ders

or

in

stru

ctio

ns

that

st

ipul

ate,

au

thor

ize,

or

en

cour

age

forc

ed

disa

ppea

ranc

e sh

all

not

be

adm

itte

d. A

ll p

erso

ns w

ho r

ecei

ve s

uch

orde

rs h

ave

the

righ

t an

d du

ty n

ot

to o

bey

them

.

The

Sta

tes

Par

ties

sha

ll e

nsur

e th

at t

he t

rain

ing

of p

ubli

c la

w-e

nfor

cem

ent

pers

onne

l or

off

icia

ls i

nclu

des

the

nece

ssar

y ed

ucat

ion

on t

he o

ffen

se o

f fo

rced

dis

appe

aran

ce o

f pe

rson

s. A

rtic

le I

X

Per

sons

all

eged

to

be r

espo

nsib

le f

or t

he a

cts

cons

titu

ting

the

off

ense

of

forc

ed d

isap

pear

ance

of

pe

rson

s m

ay

be

trie

d on

ly

in

the

com

pete

nt

juri

sdic

tion

s of

ord

inar

y la

w i

n ea

ch s

tate

, to

the

exc

lusi

on o

f al

l ot

her

spec

ial j

uris

dict

ions

, par

ticu

larl

y m

ilit

ary

juri

sdic

tion

s.

The

act

s co

nsti

tuti

ng f

orce

d di

sapp

eara

nce

shal

l no

t be

dee

med

to

have

be

en c

omm

itte

d in

the

cour

se o

f m

ilit

ary

duti

es.

Pri

vile

ges,

im

mun

itie

s, o

r sp

ecia

l di

spen

sati

ons

shal

l no

t be

adm

itte

d in

su

ch t

rial

s, w

itho

ut p

reju

dice

to

the

prov

isio

ns s

et f

orth

in

the

Vie

nna

Con

vent

ion

on D

iplo

mat

ic R

elat

ions

.

Art

icle

X

In n

o ca

se m

ay e

xcep

tion

al c

ircu

mst

ance

s su

ch a

s a

stat

e of

war

, the

thr

eat

of w

ar,

inte

rnal

pol

itic

al i

nsta

bili

ty,

or a

ny o

ther

pub

lic

emer

genc

y be

in

voke

d to

jus

tify

the

for

ced

disa

ppea

ranc

e of

per

sons

. In

suc

h ca

ses,

the

ri

ght

to e

xped

itio

us a

nd e

ffec

tive

jud

icia

l pr

oced

ures

and

rec

ours

e sh

all

be

reta

ined

as

a m

eans

of

dete

rmin

ing

the

whe

reab

outs

or

stat

e of

hea

lth

of a

Page 33: INTERNATIONALlegal.un.org/avl/studymaterials/rcil-laac/2016/book1_2.pdf2. American Convention on Human Rights, “Pact of San José, Costa Rica”, 1969 3. Additional Protocol to the

pers

on w

ho h

as b

een

depr

ived

of

free

dom

, or

of

iden

tify

ing

the

offi

cial

w

ho o

rder

ed o

r ca

rrie

d ou

t suc

h de

priv

atio

n of

fre

edom

.

In p

ursu

ing

such

pro

cedu

res

or r

ecou

rse,

and

in

keep

ing

wit

h ap

plic

able

do

mes

tic

law

, th

e co

mpe

tent

ju

dici

al

auth

orit

ies

shal

l ha

ve

free

an

d im

med

iate

acc

ess

to a

ll d

eten

tion

cen

ters

and

to

each

of

thei

r un

its,

and

to

all p

lace

s w

here

ther

e is

rea

son

to b

elie

ve t

he d

isap

pear

ed p

erso

n m

ight

be

foun

d in

clud

ing

plac

es th

at a

re s

ubje

ct to

mil

itar

y ju

risd

icti

on.

Art

icle

XI

Eve

ry p

erso

n de

priv

ed o

f li

bert

y sh

all

be h

eld

in a

n of

fici

ally

rec

ogni

zed

plac

e of

det

enti

on a

nd b

e br

ough

t be

fore

a c

ompe

tent

jud

icia

l au

thor

ity

wit

hout

del

ay, i

n ac

cord

ance

wit

h ap

plic

able

dom

esti

c la

w.

The

Sta

tes

Par

ties

sha

ll e

stab

lish

and

mai

ntai

n of

fici

al u

p-to

-dat

e re

gist

ries

of

the

ir d

etai

nees

and

, in

acc

orda

nce

wit

h th

eir

dom

esti

c la

w,

shal

l m

ake

them

ava

ilab

le t

o re

lativ

es,

judg

es,

atto

rney

s, a

ny o

ther

per

son

havi

ng a

le

giti

mat

e in

tere

st, a

nd o

ther

aut

hori

ties.

Art

icle

XII

The

Sta

tes

Par

ties

sha

ll g

ive

each

oth

er m

utua

l ass

ista

nce

in th

e se

arch

for

, id

enti

fica

tion

, lo

cati

on,

and

retu

rn o

f m

inor

s w

ho h

ave

been

rem

oved

to

anot

her

stat

e or

de

tain

ed

ther

ein

as

a co

nseq

uenc

e of

th

e fo

rced

di

sapp

eara

nce

of th

eir

pare

nts

or g

uard

ians

.

Art

icle

XII

I

For

th

e pu

rpos

es

of

this

C

onve

ntio

n,

the

proc

essi

ng

of

peti

tion

s or

co

mm

unic

atio

ns p

rese

nted

to

the

Inte

r-A

mer

ican

Com

mis

sion

on

Hum

an

Rig

hts

alle

ging

the

for

ced

disa

ppea

ranc

e of

per

sons

sha

ll b

e su

bjec

t to

the

pr

oced

ures

est

abli

shed

in

the

Am

eric

an C

onve

ntio

n on

Hum

an R

ight

s an

d

to

the

Sta

tue

and

Reg

ulat

ions

of

th

e In

ter-

Am

eric

an

Com

mis

sion

on

H

uman

Rig

hts

and

to t

he S

tatu

te a

nd R

ules

of

Pro

cedu

re o

f th

e In

ter-

Am

eric

an

Cou

rt

of

Hum

an

Rig

hts,

in

clud

ing

the

prov

isio

ns

on

prec

auti

onar

y m

easu

res.

Art

icle

XIV

Wit

hout

pre

judi

ce t

o th

e pr

ovis

ions

of

the

prec

edin

g ar

ticl

e, w

hen

the

Inte

r-A

mer

ican

C

omm

issi

on

on

Hum

an

Rig

hts

rece

ives

a

peti

tion

or

co

mm

unic

atio

n re

gard

ing

an a

lleg

ed f

orce

d di

sapp

eara

nce,

its

Exe

cuti

ve

Sec

reta

riat

sh

all

urge

ntly

an

d co

nfid

enti

ally

ad

dres

s th

e re

spec

tive

go

vern

men

t, an

d sh

all

requ

est

that

gov

ernm

ent

to p

rovi

de a

s so

on a

s po

ssib

le i

nfor

mat

ion

as t

o th

e w

here

abou

ts o

f th

e al

lege

dly

disa

ppea

red

pers

on to

geth

er w

ith

any

othe

r in

form

atio

n it

con

side

rs p

erti

nent

, and

suc

h re

ques

t sha

ll b

e w

itho

ut p

reju

dice

as

to th

e ad

mis

sibi

lity

of

the

peti

tion

.

Art

icle

XV

Non

e of

the

pro

visi

ons

of t

his

Con

vent

ion

shal

l be

int

erpr

eted

as

lim

itin

g ot

her

bila

tera

l or

mul

tila

tera

l tr

eati

es o

r ot

her

agre

emen

ts s

igne

d by

the

P

arti

es.

Thi

s C

onve

ntio

n sh

all

not

appl

y to

th

e in

tern

atio

nal

arm

ed

conf

lict

s go

vern

ed b

y th

e 19

49 G

enev

a C

onve

ntio

ns a

nd i

ts P

roto

col

conc

erni

ng

prot

ecti

on o

f w

ound

ed,

sick

, an

d sh

ipw

reck

ed m

embe

rs o

f th

e ar

med

fo

rces

; and

pri

sone

rs o

f w

ar a

nd c

ivil

ians

in ti

me

of w

ar.

Art

icle

XV

I

Thi

s C

onve

ntio

n is

op

en

for

sign

atur

e by

th

e m

embe

r st

ates

of

th

e O

rgan

izat

ion

of A

mer

ican

Sta

tes.

Page 34: INTERNATIONALlegal.un.org/avl/studymaterials/rcil-laac/2016/book1_2.pdf2. American Convention on Human Rights, “Pact of San José, Costa Rica”, 1969 3. Additional Protocol to the

Art

icle

XV

II

Thi

s C

onve

ntio

n is

sub

ject

to

rati

fica

tion

. T

he i

nstr

umen

ts o

f ra

tifi

cati

on

shal

l be

dep

osit

ed w

ith

the

Gen

eral

Sec

reta

riat

of

the

Org

aniz

atio

n of

A

mer

ican

Sta

tes.

Art

icle

XV

III

Thi

s C

onve

ntio

n sh

all

be

open

to

ac

cess

ion

by

any

othe

r st

ate.

T

he

inst

rum

ents

of

acce

ssio

n sh

all

be d

epos

ited

wit

h th

e G

ener

al S

ecre

tari

at o

f th

e O

rgan

izat

ion

of A

mer

ican

Sta

tes.

Art

icle

XIX

The

sta

tes

may

exp

ress

res

erva

tion

s w

ith

resp

ect

to t

his

Con

vent

ion

whe

n ad

opti

ng,

sign

ing,

rat

ifyi

ng o

r ac

cedi

ng t

o it

, un

less

suc

h re

serv

atio

ns a

re

inco

mpa

tibl

e w

ith

the

obje

ct a

nd p

urpo

se o

f th

e C

onve

ntio

n an

d as

long

as

they

ref

er to

one

or

mor

e sp

ecif

ic p

rovi

sion

s.

Art

icle

XX

Thi

s C

onve

ntio

n sh

all

ente

r in

to f

orce

for

the

rat

ifyi

ng s

tate

s on

the

th

irti

eth

day

from

th

e da

te

of

depo

sit

of

the

seco

nd

inst

rum

ent

of

rati

fica

tion

.

For

eac

h st

ate

rati

fyin

g or

acc

edin

g to

the

Con

vent

ion

afte

r th

e se

cond

in

stru

men

t of

rat

ific

atio

n ha

s be

en d

epos

ited

, th

e C

onve

ntio

n sh

all

ente

r in

to f

orce

on

the

thir

tiet

h da

y fr

om t

he d

ate

on w

hich

tha

t st

ate

depo

site

d it

s in

stru

men

t of

rati

fica

tion

or

acce

ssio

n.

Art

icle

XX

I

Thi

s C

onve

ntio

n sh

all

rem

ain

in f

orce

ind

efin

itel

y, b

uy m

ay b

e de

noun

ced

by a

ny S

tate

Par

ty. T

he i

nstr

umen

t of

denu

ncia

tion

sha

ll b

e de

posi

ted

wit

h

the

Gen

eral

S

ecre

tari

at

of

the

Org

aniz

atio

n of

A

mer

ican

S

tate

s.

The

C

onve

ntio

n sh

all

ceas

e to

be

in e

ffec

t fo

r th

e de

noun

cing

sta

te a

nd s

hall

re

mai

n in

for

ce f

or t

he o

ther

Sta

tes

Par

ties

one

year

fro

m t

he d

ate

of

depo

sit o

f th

e in

stru

men

t of

denu

ncia

tion

.

Art

icle

XX

II

The

or

igin

al

inst

rum

ent

of

this

C

onve

ntio

n,

the

Spa

nish

, E

ngli

sh,

Por

tugu

ese,

and

Fre

nch

text

s of

whi

ch a

re e

qual

ly a

uthe

ntic

, sh

all

be

depo

site

d w

ith

the

Gen

eral

Sec

reta

riat

of

the

Org

aniz

atio

n of

Am

eric

an

Sta

tes,

whi

ch s

hall

for

war

d ce

rtif

ied

copi

es t

here

of t

o th

e U

nite

d N

atio

ns

Sec

reta

riat

, for

reg

istr

atio

n an

d pu

blic

atio

n, in

acc

orda

nce

wit

h A

rtic

le 1

02

of t

he C

hart

er o

f th

e U

nite

d N

atio

ns.

The

Gen

eral

Sec

reta

riat

of

the

Org

aniz

atio

n of

A

mer

ican

St

ates

sh

all

noti

fy

mem

ber

stat

es

of

the

Org

aniz

atio

n an

d st

ates

acc

edin

g to

the

Con

vent

ion

of t

he s

igna

ture

s an

d de

posi

t of

ins

trum

ents

of

rati

fica

tion

, acc

essi

on o

r de

nunc

iati

on, a

s w

ell

as

of a

ny r

eser

vati

ons

that

may

be

expr

esse

d.