Top Banner

of 62

2 22 12 0204 60838 Couglhin's CR11-2064-2720994 (Supplemental ...)

Apr 14, 2018

Download

Documents

DoTheMacaReno
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
  • 7/29/2019 2 22 12 0204 60838 Couglhin's CR11-2064-2720994 (Supplemental ...)

    1/62

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    F I L E DElectronically

    02-22-2012:05:47:25 AMJoey Orduna Hastings

    +Document Code: Clerk of the Court

    Zach Coughlin, Esq. Transaction # 2778332

    Nevada Bar No: 947!4"" E. 9th #t. $"%eno, N& '9(!")ele: 77(*'*'!!'

    a: 949*--7*74"ZachCoughlin/hotmail.com0ttorne1 2or 033ellant

    N )5E #EC6ND 8DC0 D#)%C) C68%) 6 )5E #)0)E 6 NE&0D0

    N 0ND 6% )5E C68N) 6 ;0#56E

    Z0C5 C68>

    033ellant, >

    >vs. > C0#E N6: C%!!*"-4

    >C) 6 %EN6 > DE?). N6: !

    >%es3ondents. >

    >

    SUPPLEMENT TO APPELLANT'S OPENING BRIEFC6@E# N6;, 033ellant Zach Coughlin, A1 and through his attorne1, Zachar1 Barer

    Coughlin, Esq , and o22ers his #8??E@EN) )6 @6)6N )6 D#@##. )he undersigned as

    instructed A1 the #econd udicial District Court to suAmit a cddvd 2or 2iling as an ehiAit to a 2iling

    in this manner.

    )0BE 6 C0#E# 0ND #)0)8E# C)ED

    STATUTES

    #)0)E@EN) 6 )5E ##8E# ?%E#EN)ED 6% %E&E;

    Did the District Court &iolate Coughlins -th 0mendment

    %ight to Con2ront ;itnesses ;hen it ?rohiAited De2ense

    - 1SUPPLEMENT TO APPELLANT'S OPENING BRIE

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]
  • 7/29/2019 2 22 12 0204 60838 Couglhin's CR11-2064-2720994 (Supplemental ...)

    2/62

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    ' 24 Counsel 2rom Conducting a ull and Com3leteCross*EaminationF

    Did the District Court Commit udicial @isconduct)hroughout the )rial ;hich ?reGudiced CoughlinsDue ?rocessF .

    Did the District Court Error A1 0dmitting nadmissiAle 5earsa1 #tatements

    0gainst CoughlinF

    n the 2irst ! min. trial Gudge 5oard disagreed ith the de2endant on the record as to hether or not

    the case he as aAout to tr1 as a com3le case rather Gudge 5oard had alread1 made u3 his mind that he

    as not on lag Aut that as rather o3en and shut an1 dedicated Gudge our ne house rule on this case Ae2ore it

    even started hich is ind o2 im3ermissiAle under most notions o2 due 3rocess and 2undamental 2airness Gudge

    5oard Aanged his 2ist m1 gavel mind 1ou Aut his 2ist on the Aench causing terriAle 2eedAac on the

    micro3hones recording 3roceedings ehiAited an unAalanced and erratic a33roach to his rulings in this matter

    that are indicative o2 a Aias or other evident im3artialit1 this is 3articularl1 trouAling here so man1 ancillar1

    matters involving the %eno @unici3al Court have arisen recentl1 ith res3ect to the de2endant including

    violations o2 %eno @unici3al Court rules A1 house 2ormer 3rosecutor ou tale in not onl1 set the case 2or

    hich hes his on con2lict checing 3rocedure should have alerted him to the 2act that Coughlin as sailing

    an entit1 ith hich tale shares o2 o22ice and rece3tionist and a Aoom list taAle as associated ith its Ausiness

    that Aeing Nevada court services on aAout court services eAsite Aut also here )a1lor 2ailed to com3l1 ith

    %eno @unici3al Court rule 2ive in 2iling a motion to ithdra stating ith su22icient 3articularit1 in riting

    his rationale 2or ithdraing rather tale manage to Aroer a ithdraal 2rom the case Aehind*the*scenes

    ithout hacing do reveal is emAarrassing de3artures 2rom the rules s3ecial conduct the com3licit1 o2 their

    %eno @unici3al Court alloing this is trouAling 3articularl1 here Gudge 5oard then 3roceeded to den1 the

    accused is si*memAer right counsel to Aang his this on the Aench in an a33arent a mosh to the 1ear hes Aeen

    3la1ing 2ootAall at 1ou and our and here Gudge 5oard in2ormed the de2endant that he ould have him

    - 2SUPPLEMENT TO APPELLANT'S OPENING BRIE

  • 7/29/2019 2 22 12 0204 60838 Couglhin's CR11-2064-2720994 (Supplemental ...)

    3/62

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    arrested and incarcerated should the de2endant continued to attem3t to 3reserve oAGections 2or the record ona33eal a scant ( min. into the trial room o2 the

    udge 5oard, at ":!:(" 3m in the 0), res3onded to the 3ro so accused De2endant arguing that the #ith

    0mendment, as inter3reted A1 0insgliser requires the a33ointment o2 counsel here even the mere 3ossiAilit1

    o2 Gail time is 3resent under a 3lain reading o2 the charge. udge 5oard cited to #cott v. llinois 2or his

    contention that the %@C as not required to 3rovide an indigent lie the 033ellant an1 a33ointed counsel.

    8nder 0rgersinger v. 5amlin, 47 8.#. "( H!97">, counsel must Ae a33ointed in an1 case resulting in a

    sentence o2 actual im3risonment. 5oever, in #cott v. llinois, 44 8.#. -7 H!979>, the Court ruled that

    counsel did not need to Ae a33ointed i2 the de2endant as not sentenced to an1 im3risonment. t as reversiAle

    error 2or udge 5oard and so rule 3articularl1 here he ultimatel1 did sentence a33ellant to three da1s

    incarceration. urther this 3erversion o2 an1 holding in #cott versus llinois on udge 5oards 3art is

    indicative o2 the trouAling lac o2 2idelit1 to the true intent o2 the sith amendment and 2undamental motions

    o2 due 3rocess and 2air 3la1. or udge 5oard to mae mens attem3ts to reconcile his dee3 desire to

    sentence to incarceration 2or the a33ellant in this matter hile also and den1ing the a33ellant his sith

    amendment right to counsel in the trial court A1 reaching out to leverage the statute related to summar1

    contem3t committed in the course 3resents indicates a trouAling lac o2 intellectual hon than est1 on the court

    3art and 2urther elucidates a disturAing inca3aAilit1 o2 the court to gras3 the im3ortance the1 should attach to

    once 2undamental right to Iealousl1 advocate on their on Aehal2 3articularl1 in a criminal matter ere either

    incarceration is a 3ossiAilit1 or as here ere Aoth incarceration and severe damage to a 3ro3ert1 right i.e. a la

    license ill necessaril1 2ollo u3on a conviction given the dictates o2 Nevada #u3reme Court rule !!! in that

    the charge here 3ett1 larcen1 clearl1 comes ithin the 3urvie o2 #u3reme Court rule !!! suAsection - in that

    that an1 o22enses 2or hich an essential element involves an1 t13e o2 the2t are necessaril1 de2ined as a

    quotations serious o22ense in quotations ithin the tet o2 Nevada #u3reme Court ont !!!.

    Construction and 033lication o2 #ith 0mendment %ight to CounselJ#u3reme Court Cases.

    0..%. ed. "d ! H6riginall1 3uAlished in "9>. )he 8.#. #u3reme Court decided that actual im3risonment

    as the line de2ining the constitutional right to a33ointment o2 counsel in #cott v. llinois, 44 8.#. -7, 99 #.

    - 3SUPPLEMENT TO APPELLANT'S OPENING BRIE

  • 7/29/2019 2 22 12 0204 60838 Couglhin's CR11-2064-2720994 (Supplemental ...)

    4/62

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    Ct. !!(', (9 . Ed. "d ' H!979>. )he 3etitioner as convicted o2 sho3li2ting merchandise valued at less thanK!(. )he a33licaAle state statute set the maimum 3enalt1 2or such an o22ense at a K( 2ine or one 1ear in

    Gail, or Aoth. )he 3etitioners conviction as a22irmed A1 the state a33eals court and then A1 the state su3reme

    court, notithstanding his argument that the #ith and !4th 0mendments to the 8.#. Constitution required that

    the #tate 3rovide trial counsel to him at its e3ense. )he 8.#. #u3reme Court a22irmed, determining that the

    ederal Constitution did not require a state trial court to a33oint counsel 2or a criminal de2endant unless actual

    im3risonment as im3osed. )he court e3lained that actual im3risonment as a 3enalt1 di22erent in ind 2rom

    2ines or the mere threat o2 im3risonment, and limiting the a33lication o2 the right to counsel to cases here

    im3risonment as actuall1 im3osed and not Gust threatened as sound. )he court said that the 3recedent o2

    0rgersinger v. 5amlin, 47 8.#. "(, 9" #. Ct. "-, " . Ed. "d ( H!97">, had 3roved reasonaAl1 oraAle

    Aut an1 etension thereo2 ould create con2usion and im3ose un3redictaAle and suAstantial costs on the states.

    0ccordingl1, the court held that no indigent criminal de2endant could Ae sentenced to a term o2 im3risonment

    unless the #tate had a22orded him the right to the assistance o2 a33ointed counsel in his de2ense.

    n Gudge 5oards Gudgment order o2 conviction in this matter this 2ranl1 a33alling hen considering

    the lengths to hich Gudge 5oard goes to manage to den1 an indigent de2endant his sith amendment right to

    counsel hile at the same time entering an order that resulted in the de2endants incarceration this is

    3articularl1 startling and disturAing considering that Gudge 5oard reasoned 2rom the Aench at the trial that

    #cott the llinois alloed him to den1 the indigent de2endant his sith amendment right to counsel in that Gail

    time ould not Ae ordered in this matter Gudge 5oard in no a1 at that time limited that ruling hich he

    rendered 2rom the Aench the term rendered or u3on rendition a33ears in N%# !'9.! and is a33licaAle to the

    deadline u3on hich criminal a33ellants must 2ile a notice o2 a33eal as etensivel1 Arie2ed in the motion to

    dismiss and its accom3an1ing o33osition and su33lement thereto rendered or rendition essentiall1 means hen

    the court or Gudge verAall1 announces something the Aench as such Gudge 5oards oral ruling ith regard to

    the 2act that incarceration ould not occur in this matter is Ainding u3on Gudge 5oard it is la the case

    hoever Gudge 5oard in order incarceration in an1 mincing attem3ts to suggest that the 2act that the

    incarceration as 2or a 2ine o2 summar1 contem3t committed in the course 3resents under N%# "".! suA

    - 4SUPPLEMENT TO APPELLANT'S OPENING BRIE

  • 7/29/2019 2 22 12 0204 60838 Couglhin's CR11-2064-2720994 (Supplemental ...)

    5/62

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    three should sim3l1 Ae unavailing 3articularl1 here a 2undamental constitutional right is involved and hereit Gudge 5oards ruling as rendered 2rom the Aench ( min. into the trial did not limit the a33lication o2 his

    ruling in an1 a1 as such no incarceration the matter hat it stems 2rom is 3ermissiAle in this matter or

    an1thing connected thereto as such this entire Gudgment order o2 conviction is void us as the to are

    inetricaAl1 intertined in 2act sith amendment right to counsel once right to Iealous advocac1 summar1

    contem3t 2inding and a conviction 2or the crime alleged herein are all inetricaAl1 intertined in a1s

    disturAing the Gudge 5oard has event such a clear disregard 2or matters that have such a 3reeminent

    im3ortance in the can1on o2 due 3rocess and notions o2 2undamental 2airness 2urther at the trial hen a2ter (

    min. o2 3roceedings that is to sa1 trial it onl1 Aeen going on Gust a 2e scant minutes and a de2endant u3on the

    2irst time he tried to 3reserve and oAGections 2or the record Gudge 5oard going quote 2rom to - in one

    secondL announced to the de2endant in a Aull1ing menacing voice that he ould have the de2endant clearl1

    custod1 and the trial continued i2 the de2endant ere to continue to tr1 to 3reserve issues 2or a33eal or

    oAGections thereto. )he 2act that Gudge 5oard is a 2ormer 3rosecutor in addition to Gudge

  • 7/29/2019 2 22 12 0204 60838 Couglhin's CR11-2064-2720994 (Supplemental ...)

    6/62

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    and the %eno 3olice a3artment such that an1 2uture negligent hiring trainer su3ervision claims that might issuesimilar to those that arose in Eo22 the cit1 o2 %eno incident to a rong2ul arrest and 4" 8#C section !9'

    lasuit o2 recent note. 0s to the 2ormer 3rosecutor caAal a33earance at the %eno @unici3al Court taes on o2

    late o2 the 2our a33ointed de2ense attorne1s e )aitel, Esq., %oAerto ?uentes, Esq., Meith oomis, Esq. and

    ane @cMenna that the %eno @unici3al Court has 2inall1 admitted to the de2endant are the names o2 the

    a33ointed de2ense counsel three o2 them are 2ormer 3rosecutors ith the ;ashoe Count1 Dist. 0tt1.s o22ice

    there is some indication that )homas &iloria. Esq is also associated ith the %@C as a de2ense attorne1 in

    some manner, hoever that has not Aeen con2irmed. 5oever, Mell1 &iloria, Esq. is a 2ormer ;ashoe Count1

    Dist. 0tt1. it is im3ortant to note that the de2endant immediatel1 a2ter the arrest in this matter hich occurred

    Gust da1s a2ter the de2endant 2iled a com3laint ith the %eno ?olice De3artment alleging 3olice misconduct

    and that time hen the %eno cit1s attorne1s o22ice as aare o2 such a com3laint the de2endant sought a co31

    o2 the 3olice re3ort 2rom the arrest 2or hich the trial in this case involved the %eno #3ars ndian colon1

    re3eatedl1 re2used to 3rovide a co31 o2 this re3ort Aoth in res3onse to ritten and in 3erson request A1 the

    de2endant 2or these materials including the conversation ith a sergeant havent seen ho re3eatedl1 gave

    con2licting contradictor1 statements ith regard to the eistence o2 such materials availaAilit1 thereo2 and

    hether or not the1 had Aeen 3rovided to the %eno cit1 attorne1s o22ice the de2endant called the %eno cit1

    attorne1s o22ice and s3oe ith %eno cit1 attorne1 de3ut1 Christo3her 5aIlitt #tevens in the ee 2olloing

    the #e3temAer 9, "!! arrest @r. 5aIlitt #tevens in2ormed the accused that he %eno cit1 attorne1s o22ice did

    not having materials incident to the arrest and ould nine Aac have an1 such. 8ntil a2ter the arraignment

    hich as set equal month out 2rom the #e3temAer 9 arrest 2or 6ctoAer ! suAsequent 3roductions 2rom the

    %eno cit1 attorne1s o22ice indicate that the %eno cit1 attorne1s o22ice had received 2aes 2rom the %eno

    #3ars ndian colon1 it didnt tae a genius or #herloc 5olmes to 2igure this out as 2a headers Aear itness

    to that these o2 the the documents 3roduced A1 %eno cit1 attorne1 ?am %oAerts Aearing com3lete and again the

    2a headers ith her 3age numAers and 3age counts indicate that not ever1thing is Aeen 3rovided in addition

    indicating that shortl1 a2ter the #e3temAer 9 arrest and 3roAaAl1 incident to the 2uss and sunshine the

    de2endant as Aringing to this matter 3eo3le ere Aus1 data %eno #3ars ndian colon1 ?olice De3artment

    - 6SUPPLEMENT TO APPELLANT'S OPENING BRIE

  • 7/29/2019 2 22 12 0204 60838 Couglhin's CR11-2064-2720994 (Supplemental ...)

    7/62

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    and the %eno cit1 attorne1s us 3articularl1 in light o2 the #e3temAer 7 com3laint 2iled A1 the de2endantalleging 3olice misconduct A1 the Aeen ? hich ha33ened to involve some o2 the ver1 same issues Ae2ore the

    court in this matter s3eci2icall1 retaliator1 3rosecution and retaliator1 arrest incident to citiIens invoing or

    attem3ting to insert their constitutional rights including those guaranteed A1 the 2ourth and i2th 0mendment

    %eno cit1 attorne1 3rosecutor ?am %oAerts is a Aig 2an o2 s3eluning in 2act @s. %oAerts seems to hate

    sunshine or hat other conclusion could one mae u3on a revie o2 this record @s. %oAerts sees to have this

    a33eal dismiss Ae2ore it even gets o22 the ground Aased u3on some 3erverted inter3retation o2 N%# !'9.!

    she lies to this court hen she suggests that a CD as not 3rovided to her o22ice and she is gone to great

    lengths to avoid hearing 3ortion o2 the audio record herein Gudge 5oard announced or 2urther rendered his

    order ith res3ect to the deadline to 2ile a notice o2 a33eal in this matter @s. %oAerts has a33arentl1 gone so

    2ar as to have her e*mail address shut don the one hich is reversel1 Aeen held u3 to 3uAlic on the #tate Bar

    Nevadas eAsite it undersigned attem3ted to 3rovide @s. 5oard a strie that 3rovide @s. %oAerts courtes1

    co31 o2 the audio herein Gudge 5oard announced that the notice the deadline 2ile a notice o2 a33eal ould

    not Aegin running until a2ter three da1s incarceration he ordered incident to the summar1 contem3t 2inding that

    Gudge 5oard made Gustice cant ( min. into the trial des3ite the 2act that he said such a 2inding ould result at

    trial continued Gudge 5oard dis3la1ed even 2urther Gust ho cra2t1 he can Ae hen he reall1 ants to get

    something accom3lished duet rather than continue the trial hich might a22ord the accused some means o2

    oAtaining the ecul3ator1 materials 2or hich unla2ul rent distraint as Aeing a33lied A1 %ichard 5ill

    Esquire incident to the rong2ul eviction 2rom the ecuse 2ormer home la o22ice here in the retaliator1 at

    intent o2 ;almart and its asset 3rotection sta22 hich had 3reviousl1 Aeen e3ressl1 stated A1 ;almart and its

    asset 3rotection sta22 could Ae accessed and 3rovided to the court 2or the 3ur3ose o2 aiding in the de2endants

    de2ense o2 the crime charged in this matter. 5e transcri3t o2 the trial in this matter is almost com3lete the

    undersigned urge is the court to re2rain 2rom doing that hich the %eno #aturda1 attorne1 oAviousl1 one hich

    is to 3revent an1 sunshine shoing on this matter or the trouAling lac o2 checs and Aalances in the %eno

    @unici3al Court and the 3roAlems incident to having a caAal o2 2ormer 3rosecutors let loose in the hen house

    that is the %eno @unici3al Court indeed these 3roAlems include the 2act that the undersigned as denied the

    - 7SUPPLEMENT TO APPELLANT'S OPENING BRIE

  • 7/29/2019 2 22 12 0204 60838 Couglhin's CR11-2064-2720994 (Supplemental ...)

    8/62

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    right A1 Gudge 5oard it got covered ! arraignment to no the names and identities o2 equal or 2ormer3rosecutorsL that either the %eno cit1 attorne1 or %eno @unici3al Court has contracted ith ide

    re3resentation to indigent de2endants in matters 2or the %eno @unici3al Court the undersigned in clearl1 Ae

    heard on the record o2 that arraignment quer1ing Gudge

  • 7/29/2019 2 22 12 0204 60838 Couglhin's CR11-2064-2720994 (Supplemental ...)

    9/62

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    taAle as associated ith their Ausiness on the Nevada court services eAsite tale violated %eno @unici3alCourt rules in seeing ithdra 2rom the matter ithout 2ile a ritten motion in that regard onl1 a2ter )a1lor

    Aeen 3rett1 to etremel1 sensitive and con2idential in2ormation and 2iles incident the de2ense this matter tale

    still is 1et to divulge this are in an1 a1 document this im3ro3riet1 instead tales good 2riend %oAerta 3oint as

    ho also suAsequentl1 had revealed Coughlin that he has a Ausiness relationshi3 ith Nevada court services

    himsel2 m1steriousl1 a33eared in @r. tales status counsel 2or the same de2endant Coughlin in another matter

    %@C !! C% "-4( herein Coughlin as charged ith tres3assing in connection to the same 3ro3ert1

    involved in the eviction 2rom Coughlins 2ormer home o22ice in %eno Gustice court case rev "!! !7'

    hich involve %ichard < 5ill Esquire signed a criminal com3laint 2or tres3ass against Coughlin. ;hile

    Coughlin as arrested 2or tres3ass u3on 5ill suAmitting a sign criminal com3laint to the same %eno ?olice

    De3artment o22icer Chris Carter that admitted to Coughlin that 5ill AriAes him, the %eno ?olice De3artment

    re2used to arrest an1one 2rom Coughlins 2ormer %eno @unici3al Court a33ointed 3uAlic de2ender uis tae

    tolls Ausiness 3artners Nevada court services 2or their tres3ass u3on Coughlins 2ormer home la o22ices gated

    Aac1ard hich as caught on ta3e and can Ae seen on ou)uAe right no. ts also ver1 incestuous and

    con2using that it ould reall1 tae much than the 2ive 3ages mentioned in the scores Arie2ing order to s3ell it

    out su22ice to sa1 @r. ?uentes as recentl1 granted his motion to ithdra 2rom re3resenting Coughlin in the

    tres3ass case Ae2ore %eno @unici3al Court A1 2ormer 3rosecutor no %eno @unici3al Court Gudge

  • 7/29/2019 2 22 12 0204 60838 Couglhin's CR11-2064-2720994 (Supplemental ...)

    10/62

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    LBeginnings audio transcri3t at ":!!:(- ?@Coughlin: are 1ou having them sit together Aecause the1 are on the same teamF@arshall @entIel: m1 courtroom. 3ut 3eo3le here ant them.Coughlin: oa1 Aut h1 are the1 3ut togetherF

    @arshall: all rise de3artment 2or the %eno @unici3al Court sta22 session the 5on. udge 5oard 3residing5oard: Ae seated ever1one

    %oAerts: our 5onor last cases cit1 verse Zachar1 Coughlin !! C% ""!7- @r. Coughlin ould 1ou ste3 2orard 3lease5oard all right this is the time and 3lace set 2or trial in regard to a

    n regard to a head1 larcen1 alleged to Aeen committed on #e3temAer 9 o2 this 1ear com3laint alleges that said de2endanton o and ill ill and ill in no small him as him terriAl1 shaen r aAout #e3temAer 9 " !!th hour ;almart "4"( E. "nd

    #t. cit1 o2 %eno state o2 Nevada did tae carr1ing aa1 ;almart 3ro3ert1 valued at less than K"( ith the intent tode3rive ;almart o2 said 3ro3ert1 said 3ro3ert1 consisted o2 cough dro3s chocolate Aar @r. Coughlin is that 1ourunderstanding o2 the charge

    Coughlin: Aelieve so our 5onor5oard: all right 3art Aoth 3arties read1 to 3roceed at this time%oAert: es, our 5onorCoughlin: no our 5onor m not read1 to 3roceed5oard: h1 not

    @r. Coughlin: ;ell, there is a variet1 o2 reasons, our 5onor

    5oard: 1ou have to s3ea u3 i2 1ou ant me..

    - 10SUPPLEMENT TO APPELLANT'S OPENING BRIE

  • 7/29/2019 2 22 12 0204 60838 Couglhin's CR11-2064-2720994 (Supplemental ...)

    11/62

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    . Coughlin: 1es sir our 5onor, theres a variet1 o2 reasons, sir, ould sa1 chie2 o2 hich is that it unla2ul rent distraint

    is currentl1 Aeing a33lied to m1 2iles that are necessar1 to de2end this case as evicted in Gustice court case %E&"!!*

    !7' recentl1, Aesides having an im3ermissiAle rent escro de3osit a33lied to me in that case

    5oard:hat is that have to do ith this caseF

    Coughlin: recentl1 have Aeen a22ected all m1 2iles

    5oard: right

    Coughlin: all m1 2iles incident the de2ense o2 this case are currentl1 Aeing ithheld under in him 3ermissiAle rent distraint

    in violation o2 N%# 4 * "(7- and !!' a.4-

    5oard hat else 1ou have other than this hat else 1ou have, as a Aasis 2or not Aeing 3re3aredF

    Coughlin: made numerous attem3ts to contact the %eno cit1 attorne1s o22ice @s. %oAerts in attem3ts to discuss this

    matter

    5oard: @s. %oAerts

    Coughlin: and have not Aeen aAle to reach her

    5oard or that sound Aasis 2or Brenda continuance ma1Ae she doesnt s3ea to she is not required to Coughlin 2urther

    theres a good deal o2 discover1 that needs to Ae undertaen in this regard ;almart has Aeen oAstructive, as ell as

    unintelligiAle

    5oard: hat items o2 discover1

    Coughlin: ell d lie to tae some de3ositions as ell have them res3ond to some suA3oena duces ) comes had served

    on them

    5oard hat else

    Coughlin the same could Ae said 2or the %eno #3ars ndian: a this is a com3le case in terms 1ou have the ndian colon1

    renting 3ro3ert1 to ;almart hile em3lo1ing the same 3olice 3atrolling the 3ro3ert1 on hich the1 have a 2inancial stae

    in hether mae an arrest theres 2ourth amendment issues involved in this case as ell is 4" section !9' aAuse o2

    3rocesss and 3olice misconduct in terms o2 attem3ting to oAtain consent an im3ermissiAle search through coercive means

    this is not a sim3le little case civil recover1 aAuses are Aeing alleged on the 3art o2 ;almart attem3ted state actors as ell

    can 3roAaAl1 3ut into ords and math our 5onor 5uc trul1 disru3tive this eviction it is as evicted 2rom m1 home

    o22ice man attorne1 in the state o2 Nevada m1 client 2iles are curling dont even no i2 should call the m1 2iles to m1

    - 11SUPPLEMENT TO APPELLANT'S OPENING BRIE

  • 7/29/2019 2 22 12 0204 60838 Couglhin's CR11-2064-2720994 (Supplemental ...)

    12/62

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    clients 2iles are Aeing ithheld under an im3ermissiAle rent distraint as seuall1 assaulted A1 a Aaili22 in court the other

    da1

    5oard in this court

    Coughlin in Gustice court

    Coughlin all o2 these matters can shi33ing to an undul1 Aurdensome environment in hich A1 that aAilit1 to de2end this

    case has Aeen undul1 3reGudice in the etreme

    5oard than 1ou amended to m1 request to continue guess hether this is a com3le case is in the e1e o2 the

    Aeholder dont t13icall1 2ind that these matters are as com3le as 1ouve indicated the1 are on that as ell that much o2

    the argument that 1ou made here relating to seual assault o2 a Aaili22 and another core 1our inaAilit1 to 3ossess control

    1our client 2iles have no relevance in m1 mind to 3roceeding ith the charges and 3ett1 larcen1 alleged to have occurred

    at ;almart on #e3temAer 9

    Coughlin not Gust m1 client 2iles or materials needed to de2end this case are Aeing ithheld

    5oard interru3t 1ou sir dont interru3t me

    Coughlin 1ester

    5oard additional note that the last hearing NovemAer !4 the cit1 as 3resent ith three itnesses the matter as

    continued initiall1 indicated that e ould note @r. Coughlins 2ailure to a33ear e ordered a Aench arrant and K!

    cash Aail onl1 to discover un2ortunatel1 2or @r. Coughlin as in custod1 so the matter as reset ill ill thin theres

    Aeen su22icient time to 3re3are 2or trial in this matter so e ill 3roceed ith trial all itnesses 3lease stand rich arra1 can

    Ae sorn 3lease

    Coughlin i2 can Gust no m1 oAGections 2or the record ill

    5oard standing oAGections

    Coughlin @s. 5oard has agreed to a continuance suAmitting a ritten agreement to the continues this matter

    5oard @s. %oAerts

    %oAerts he initiall1 had ased 2or a motion to continue sometime ago ent as 2or the !4th and did not oAGect at that

    time am thin 1ou sent me an e*mail a2ter the !4th and said ould not oAGect Aut our 5onor so at that time did not

    oAGect he has 2iled 2iled additional motions ith additional allegations that thin should Ae stricen and not considered

    A1 this court and d lie to ithdra m1 lac o2 o33osition to continuance

    - 12SUPPLEMENT TO APPELLANT'S OPENING BRIE

  • 7/29/2019 2 22 12 0204 60838 Couglhin's CR11-2064-2720994 (Supplemental ...)

    13/62

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    5oard ill in an1 event this court is not going to agree to the sti3ulation i2 there as a sti3ulation to continue ithoutitnesses itnesses here 2or second time the1re read1 to 3roceed this case going 2orard the1 ill Gudge Aut ill sear

    the itnesses

    @arshall < sear to tell the truth and nothing Aut the truth

    itnesses 1ester

    @arshall evolved and sorn

    5oard all right @r. Coughlin do need to go over the here toda1F

    Coughlin 1ester and 5oard the cit1 has a Aurden o2 3roo2 and as such ill allo @s. %oAerts to 3roceed ith its case in

    chie2 initiall1 she can do so A1 calling one more itnesses to the itness stand 1ou have an o33ortunit1 to cross eamine

    each o2 those itnesses once she has com3leted she can honestl1 o22er an1 3h1sical or documentar1 evidence that she

    2eels is relevant oAviousl1 suAGect to an1 oAGections that 1ou might have to relevanc1 initiatives A1 this court ants the

    cit1 has concluded its case 1ou ill have not #aturda1 to 3resent a de2ense case highlight the ord o33ortunit1 Aecause

    thin 1ou understand there is no requirement that 1ou 3resent an1 evidence hatsoever and Aac should 1ou choose not

    to testi21 this court theres no in2erence as to 1our guilt or urine hundred cents Aased on 1our decision not to testi21 on the

    other hand 1ou have an aAsolute right to o22er testimon1 in the 2orm o2 itnesses including 1oursel2 realiIing that each o2

    those itnesses ill Ae suAGect to cross*eamination A1 the cit1 attorne1 in 2act i2 1ou have an1 additional evidence

    3h1sical or documentar1 that 1ou ould lie me to revie in most circumstances ill do so suAGect once again to an1

    oAGections that the cit1 attorne1 and he might have to that evidence once the to o2 1ou have suAmitted 1our res3ective

    cases ill allo Aoth o2 1ou to mae closing arguments once concluded this court ill render a decision as 1our guilt 2or

    1our innocence do understandF

    Coughlin do have a question our 5onor the cou3le 1ou mentioned that ould Ae aAle to 3resent evidence i2 that

    evidence is Aeing ithheld 2rom me at this 3oint and its 3ending a sta1 in motion 2or return o2 3ersonal 3ro3ert1 in Gustice

    court ould Ae 3recluded 2rom action accessing that evidenceF

    5oard ve ruled on that alread1 have not

    Coughlin it sounded lie 1ou said it didnt matter

    5oard dont 2ind that its relevant to go 2orard ith the trial toda1

    Coughlin so i2 have video evidence o2 retaliator1 intent A1 ;almart

    5oard 1ou shouldve Arought it ith 1ou toda1

    - 13SUPPLEMENT TO APPELLANT'S OPENING BRIE

  • 7/29/2019 2 22 12 0204 60838 Couglhin's CR11-2064-2720994 (Supplemental ...)

    14/62

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    Coughlin Aut i2 its Aeing ithheld im3ermissiAl1 under the la

    5oard: e are going 2orard toda1 have addressed the issue 1ou can Aring it u3 on a33eal i2 1ou 2eel that the decision

    o2 the scores in 3ro3er understood

    Coughlin 1ester our 5onor 1es i2 question did ith

    5oard @r. Coughlin lets 1ou and have a agreement toda1 that e ill Ae res3ect2ul o2 one another 1ou can tender an1

    oAGections that 1ou ma1 have do not ant 1ou to Ae re3etitious i2 1ou made an oAGection or a 3resentation and ve ruled

    on it ece3t that and lets move on to understanding do hoever

    Coughlin do hoever to the etent that 1ouve told me that m1 li2e and career are not orth a continuance Aecause it

    might cost ;almart associate another tri3 to the court house dont see e are Aeing res3ect2ul o2 me our 5onor

    ":"7 ?@

    5oard ver1 good Aut 3roceed

    %oAerts our 5onor %1an can invoe eclusionar1 rule ased )homas and )ina is A1

    Coughlin our 5onor C0 Gust interGect and address a cou3le 3reliminar1 motions in limine and eclusionar1 motions

    5oard got

    Coughlin ont as an1 o2 the discover1 that there %eno cit1 attorne1s 3rovided Ae ecluded under them motion in

    lemonade eclusionar1 rule and that e 2ull1 Arie2ed the issues there and i2 Ae2ore an1 such such discover1 is admitted in

    evidence

    5oard hich emotional lemon1

    Coughlin to eclude the the ritten statements o2 @r. ontenot and the

    5oard ill on hat Aasis do lie o2ten that their violative o2 the 2ourth amendment

    cit1

    5oard cit1 a res3onse

    %oAerts thin he is articulate ho the1 invoe the 2ourth 2i2th amendments rather than Gust mae Aald assertion that

    the1ve violative ill

    5oard ell and good and denied a request man1 in N%# !7 4!"( motions are required to Ae made 3rior to trial 1ou

    2ailed to do that in ritten 2orm on noc in or register them at this 3oint in time Aecause there have the oAvious e22ect o2

    continuing this 3receding toda1 and thin thats here 1oure going not request that

    Coughlin and ll Gust nternet inGection

    - 14SUPPLEMENT TO APPELLANT'S OPENING BRIE

  • 7/29/2019 2 22 12 0204 60838 Couglhin's CR11-2064-2720994 (Supplemental ...)

    15/62

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    5oard ant to hear an1thing 2urther is denied

    Coughlin ine1 dinner m1 oAGections to the records are mad do so

    5oard @r. Coughlin and giving 1ou 2air arning i2 1ou continue to 3ersist in this line o2 3er2ormance m going to hold

    1ou in contem3t ":"9 ?@

    Coughlin ont Ae Aullied into and not entering m1 oAGections on the record ne line 5oard this matter ill Ae

    continued Aecause 1oure going to Ae 3laced in custod1 no 1ou can giving 2air arning lets 3roceed

    Coughlin our 5onor ma1 enter m1 oAGections in the record to 3reserve them 2or the record on a33eal

    5oard go ahead

    Coughlin seems as though 1ouve Gust told me that ma1 not Aecause 1ou Gust told me 1ou are going to have to Ae arrested

    i2 do so am a little scared to do that at this 3oint our 5onor and move 2or 1our recusal 2rom this case on that Aasis

    5oard

    Coughlin 3aroles

    5oard denies

    Coughlin oa1 then can enter m1 record and state the Aasis 2or m1 oAGections 2or the motions in limine

    5oard @r. Coughlin lets 3roceed Baer oAGections on the record no go ahead

    Coughlin oa1 citiIen originall1 get angr1 Aelieve have. )hose motions suAmit Aelieve have suAmitted those

    motions in riting

    5oard and the1 have Aeen denied

    Coughlin ell it seemed as though a second ago our 5onor said that the1 had not Aeen suAmitted in riting

    5oard: all right H3ounds 2ist on des maing ver1 loud soundO @icro3hone no 2unctions ith 2eedAac 2or an etended

    3eriod o2 time >

    "::-: ?@:

    Coughlin 2urther there is a coercive attem3t to 3rocure consent to a search Aased u3on not consenting. ?roAaAle cause as

    Auttressed u3on a 2ailure to not consent to search hich as 1ou stated earlier our 5onor asserting i2th 0mendment or

    2ourth man right cannot Ae used to in2er evidence o2 guilt ill or to Auttress a 3roAaAle cause 2inding 2or a search

    3articularl1 2or a search that occurs 3rior to arrest

    5oard: an1thing 2urtherF

    - 15SUPPLEMENT TO APPELLANT'S OPENING BRIE

  • 7/29/2019 2 22 12 0204 60838 Couglhin's CR11-2064-2720994 (Supplemental ...)

    16/62

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    Coughlin do am terriAl1 shaen A1 hat 1ou said to me, #ir, and its a22ected m1 aAilit1 to concentrate right no andde2end m1 case given the to - in one second a33roach that have itnessed 1ou tae ith me toda1 in terms o2

    threatening me ith content u3on the 2irst attem3t Aelieve made to 3reserve and oAGections 2or the record 2urther

    Aelieve m1 motion 2or reconsideration 2or counsel as never ruled on there is a si amendment right to counsel here the

    3ossiAilit1 o2 Gail time is

    5oard: 1our initial motion has Aeen 3reviousl1 denied all denied again in regard to motion 2or counsel all denied again

    2or the record that is 2ounded u3on #cott versus llinois hich is that an inGured event and visual as 1ou claim 1ou are i2

    the1 are not going to Ae sentenced to Gail time there is no requirement o2 the a33ointment o2 counsel...L

    )hats Gust a taste in the transcri3t ill reveal much o2 interest to the District Court and in 2act much 2or hich the District

    Court liel1 has some liaAilities should it see to turn a Alind e1e to the due 3rocess de2iciencies endemic to that hich

    occurs on a dail1 Aasis in the %eno @unici3al Court. urther its disturAing to have that the %eno @unici3al Court has

    clearl1 suAmitted to the District Court a record on a33eal Aut is entirel1 incom3lete and attem3ts to thart the

    undersigneds attem3ts to e3ose some o2 the 3roAlems in due 3rocess de2iciencies 3revalent ithin the %eno @unici3al

    Court at this time in addition to the various 2actual and legal Aases 2or this a33eal the undersigned has this court 2orced the

    %eno @unici3al Court to 3rovide actual one 3age 3er 3age re3roductions o2 the oa means all o2 them at the

    undersigned sheet a33roval 2ile 2rom %eno @unici3al Court 2or o22ice su3ervisor Donna Ballard instead o2 these

    decidedl1 illegiAle 2our 3ages 3er 3age versions additionall1 incor3orated A1 re2erence are all the arguments 2actual and

    legal assertions made ithin the o33osition and an1 other 2ilings in this or the trial court the o33osition the motion to

    dismiss 2iled A1 @s. %oAerts 2urther as this court has made clear to the undersigned in other cases the 2ailure to o33ose a

    motion ill Ae taen under the ?o3e case and district court rule ! as admission o2 the validit1 o2 the arguments made and

    2or hich no o33osition as 3rovided in that regard @s. %oAerts court re2usal to res3ond to an1 o2 the matters set 2orth in

    the undersigneds recent 2ilings in this case should r result in the same t13es o2 admissions that the undersigned has had

    2ound as rising against him in other cases in De3artment !, 2urther is trouAling that ere some de3artments 3re2er to

    decide cases on the merits other de3artments indicate to certain litigants that N%C? -He> does not accord litigants an

    additional three da1s to res3ond to notions etc. here electronic service has occurred des3ite the 3lain reading o2 that rule

    - 16SUPPLEMENT TO APPELLANT'S OPENING BRIE

  • 7/29/2019 2 22 12 0204 60838 Couglhin's CR11-2064-2720994 (Supplemental ...)

    17/62

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    indicating that it does. 0lso, see DeAoer. )he undersigned signed a test under 3enalt1 o2 3erGur1 that u3on in2ormationAelieved to 2actual legal assertions made herein are true to the Aest o2 his noledge although admittedl1 this recitation

    given the eigencies and 5arrington %eno cit1 attorne1 %oAerts as aAout intention to mae sure this case never sees

    the light o2 Gudicial revie.

    0dditionall1 Gudge 5oard admitted he as remiss not in2orming the undersigned o2 his right to a33eal

    res3ect to the conviction the ?etit larcen1 charge hoever Gudge 5oard could Ae said to have attem3ted to

    mislead the undersigned ith res3ect to hether or not he ould have an1 right to a33eal the summar1

    contem3t 2inding as u3on Aeing queried in that regard Gudge 5oard denied that an1 such revie ould Ae

    accorded in curtl1 stated that he as going 2orard ith that des3ite his Lsaddened A1 the etent to hich

    doing so ould 3reGudice the undersigned engaging criminal de2endant attorne1s clients cases.

    Notes 2rom revie o2 %ecord on 033eal

    Clearl1 the %ecord on 033eal 2rom the %eno @unici3al Court is missing much o2 hat Coughlin 2iled

    )he %@C e3ressl1 gave Coughlin 3ermission to 2ile A1 email rather than 2a. )hat 3ermission cannot

    reasonaAl1 Ae said to have Aeen revoed 3rior to DecemAer "th, "!!. 0s such, the 2ull Lone 3age 3er 3ageL

    3roduction o2 the various 2iling Coughlin suAmitted to the %@C Hhith the e3ress ritten 3ermission o2 %@C

    iling 622ice #u3ervisor Donna Ballard> shoudl Ae included in the %ecord on 033eal, not the L2our 3age 3er

    3ageL version that has Aeen scanned n A1 the %@C in a manner to mae it es3eciall1 illegiAle.

    )he undersigned is 2iling no Hattached as EhiAit P> a co31 o2 the %ecord on 033eal, hich the

    %@C has a33arentl1 title L0??E0 ?%6CEEDN

  • 7/29/2019 2 22 12 0204 60838 Couglhin's CR11-2064-2720994 (Supplemental ...)

    18/62

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    himsel2 ith his testimon1 at trial in this matter Hand %eno Cit1 0ttorne1 ?am %oAerts suAorned his 3erGur1 inviolation o2 numerous %ules o2 ?ro2essional Conduct and 3rosecutorial standards>.

    Cra2ords testimon1 is littered ith l1ing and or slo331 errors, Gusti21ing overturning the conviction in thismatter. 0t (:(4 3m on the audio transcri3t 2rom !!!! in %@C !! C% ""!7- H0)> Cameron incidates thatthe 8?C 2or the Lcough dro3sL Coughlin as accused o2 stealing Ldid not a33ear on the recei3tL o2 the itemsCoughlin actuall1 3urchased:Cra2ord: did chec 2or the 8?C, 1es, Gust the numAersCoughlin: 2or hichFCr: or Aoth.Co: or BothF #o, no 1oure sa1ing that the 8?C 2or the cough dro3s did not a33ear on the recei3tFCr: Correct.Co: #o, i2 the 8?C 2or the cough dro3s does a33ear on the recei3t, that ould mae 1our testimon1, inaccurate

    or unreliaAleFCr: guess. dont no.Co: ou guessF

    0lso at -:(3m Cra2ord amdits Hand that hen he shoed u3 to the scened, ;almarts rontino

    alread1 had a Criminal Com3laint 2illed out. )his directl1 contradicts rontinos earlier testimon1 that da1 that

    rontino did not no Coughlins name 3rior to Cra2ord receiving it 2rom Coughlin, and that rontino did

    not have a Criminal Com3laint 2illed out, ith Couglhins name inserted into even 3rior to Cra2ord and

    Braunorth shoing u3 to investigate. rontino clearl1 o22ered 3erGured testimon1 in that regard. )5#

    D%EC) C6N)%0DC)# rontinos ealier1 tetiom1 that he didnotno Coughlins nme 3riorto ra2ord

    - 18SUPPLEMENT TO APPELLANT'S OPENING BRIE

  • 7/29/2019 2 22 12 0204 60838 Couglhin's CR11-2064-2720994 (Supplemental ...)

    19/62

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    getting it 2rom Coulhin. urter, this im3licates rotino 2or 3erGru1eve 2urther i consideration o2 te 2act tatrontino lied ene idicated tat he id ot ave a seeto2c 3a3erih Coughlns nam isat et to Couhli

    immediatelenrontinoescorted Coughlin Aacto ;almarts nterrogation room

    0t -:- 3m 0) Cra2ord indicates that he onl1 conducted the search o2 Coughlins 3ocets a2ter he 3laced

    handcu22s on Coughlin.

    urther, Cra2ord clearl1 3er2orms an im3ermissiAle search o2 Coughlins Aag on the L0? 6&E%&E;*

    99"!!L video Hhereina2ter L0? 6vervieL, see attached as EhiAit P> at 9:"':, ell 3rior to an1 cu22s

    Aeing 3ut on and ell 3rior Cra2ord searchign in Coughlins 3ocets. t is this Aull1ing, menacing a33roach,

    comAined ith Cra2ords o2t ehiAited illingness to Aend the rules as to the Bill o2 %ights Hhen he is even

    aare the1 eist> that is trul1 trouAl1, 3articularl1 here it is the same entit1 that is 3a1ing Cra2ords chec

    that is renting the land to ;al*@art. Cra2ord can Ae seen at various 3oints in the 0? 6vervie video GaA

    ste33ing toards Couglin, over and over, in an overl1 aggressive 2ashion, ith the standing Cra2ord Gutting

    his crotch toards the sitting Coughlins 2ace, over and over, in some sort o2 3recursor to an a33arent Aull rush

    t is ridiculous to atch.

    urther, earlier in this L0? 6vervieL video at 9:"4:"7 3m Coughlin can clearl1 Ae seen res3onding to

    Cra2ords request 2or Coughlins drivers license A1 giving Cra2ord Coughlins drivers license. Cra2ord

    lied aAout this at trial, and even asserted that he as unaAle to issue a citation to Coughlin in light o2

    Coughlins re2usal to 3rovide Coughlins drivers license. 5oever, the 0rrest %e3ort and ?roAaAle Cause

    sheet Cra2ord 2illed out Hsee the %60 3age 9> clearl1 sho that Cra2ord had Coughlins drivers license

    numAer Hhich he got 2rom the drivers license Coughlin gave Cra2ord, as shon in the 0? 6vervie video

    at 9:"4:"4 3m>. urther, as indicated on the 3roAaAle cause sheet, Cra2ord rote don the address 2or

    Coughlin 2rom Coughlins drivers license: !"! %iver %oc #t. %eno, N& '9(!. 0dditionall1, Cra2ord

    - 19SUPPLEMENT TO APPELLANT'S OPENING BRIE

  • 7/29/2019 2 22 12 0204 60838 Couglhin's CR11-2064-2720994 (Supplemental ...)

    20/62

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    graAs Coughlins sho33ing Aag 2rom out o2 Coughlins hands at 9:"4:- 3m, in an im3emissilAe sho o2dominance and aAuse o2 3oer, occuring ell 3rior to an1 LtechnicalL 3oint o2 arrest. Cra2ord tried to

    descriAe this 3rocess as Coughlin Lvoluntaril1L suAmitting to a sort o2 ea3ons 2ris, hoever the video

    reveals something 2ar 2rom a voluntar1 encounter, ith Cra2ord himsel2 committing a crime A1 graAAing the

    Aag out o2 Coughlins hands, then l1ing aAout it in his re3ort and suAsequentl1 at )rial. urther, Cra2ord

    goes Ae1ond a sim3le L3at don to chec 2or ea3onsL hen he 3ulls Coughlins hat o22 o2 Coughlins head at

    9:"(:9 3m.

    Cra2ord received Coughlins drivers license 2rom Coughlin at 9:"4:"7 ?@ in the 0? 6vervie

    video. )he video clearl1 reveals it is Coughlins #tate o2 Nevad drivers license Coughlin hands to Cra2ord,

    hich Cra2ord suAsequentl1 called into the ncline Dis3atch Center Hhich contracts ith the %#C> to run a

    chec 2or 3riors using Coughlins name and drivers license numAer. 83on receiving the drivers license,

    Cra2ord loos at it and 3ins it to a cli3 on his 2ront right shirt 3ocet, shortl1 Ae2ore conducting a 3at don o2

    Coughlin. 0t 9:"4: 3m the 2emale his3anic ;al*@art em3lo1ee re*enters to small ! A1 ! 2oot con2ined

    interrogation room, maing it " %#C 622icers and to ;al*mart 0? 0ssociatessu3ervisors in the room ith

    Coughlin. 0t 9:"4:( 3m, ;almarts rontino can clearl1 Ae seen 3lanting somethign into Coughlins

    sho33ing Aag. Net at 9:"(:!' 3m, another male, caucasian ;almart 0? 0ssociate enters this small, con2ined

    interrogation room, maing it 2ive on one.

    0t the Aeginning o2 hat as 3rovided A1 the %eno Cit1 0ttorne1 as the 0? 6vervie video, at

    9:!7:- 3m, rontino enters the interrogation room ahead o2 Coughlin, hom enters ith the sho33ing cart

    and Aag o2 some K'( orth o2 3urchases he had Gust 3aid 2or. n the loer right hand corner o2 the screen

    clearl1 visiAile is a com3uter monitor and 3rinter ato3 a des. Atop this printer is a CD/DVD is! in a

    "hite s#ee$e% rontino and an another ;almart 0? 0ssociate are in the room ith Coughlin seconds later.

    0) 9:!7:4( rontino reaches into the sho33ing cart and 3ulls hat a33ears to Ae a Aron ra33er o2 some sort

    out. )his ra33er is clearl1 set in the middle o2 a near em3t1 sho33ing cart HCoughlins K'( orth o2 3urchase

    all 2it ithin a singular small hite 3lastic sho33ing Aag hich. )his Aron ra33er does not have an1thing

    - 20SUPPLEMENT TO APPELLANT'S OPENING BRIE

  • 7/29/2019 2 22 12 0204 60838 Couglhin's CR11-2064-2720994 (Supplemental ...)

    21/62

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    ato3 it oAscurring it in an1 a1 here it as in the sho33ing cart 3rior to rontino 3ulling it out. 83onin2ormation and Aelie2, as is standard o3erating 3rocedure 2or ;almarts 0? 3ersonnel in this situations, the

    unnamed ;almart 0? 0ssociate can Ae seen 3ressing record on his record device at the 9:!7:(' mar, though

    ;almart ould suAsequentl1 den1 having an1 such audio records and ould 2urther 2ail to res3ond to

    Coughlins #uA3oena duces tecum.

    0t the 9:!':(( 3m mar a ;almart Customer #ervice @anager HL@attL> in an 6aland %aiders Gerse1 enters

    the room. rontino attem3ts to give this C#@ the items he Aelieves ere stolen to this C#@, along ith a red

    Aag o2 @Q@s. 5oever, rontinos attem3t to include this Aag o2 @Q@s in hat is delivered to the C#@

    Hho, oAstensiAl1 goes o22 ith the items to create a Lrecei3tL o2 the allegedl1 stolen items> is reAu22ed A1 the

    unnamed ;almart 0? 0ssociate also in the room at the time. 0t )rial, rontino testi2ied that this 0ssociate

    as not 3resent during the relevant times, as he as Lon AreaL.

    0t 9:!9:9 rontino is seen o3ening and reachign into the le2t u33er draer o2 his des and 3ulling out

    a cli3Aoard ith 3a3er a22ied to it. rom this time until a 2ull 2our minutes later at 9:":!( hen the %#C

    622icers Braunorth and trainee Cra2ord arrive, rontino can Ae seen threatening and attem3ting to

    alternativel1 intimidate Coughlin and o22er Coughlin LdealsL hereA1 an admission ill Ae treated ith

    lenience in the 2orm o2 Lletting 1ou goL . 8nnamed can Ae seen adGusting his recording device and alie tal

    at 9:"":4 3m. 0t 9:"4:!! 3m rontino 3ulls out a sheet o2 3a3er 2rom a 2ile in his loer le2t des draer. 0t

    9:"4:" a his3anic 2emale ;almart #u3ervisor enters the room, maing the total " ;almart em3lo1ees, and

    to %#C 622icers and Coughlin in a ! 2oot A1 ! 2oot room. ;hile Gutting his crotch 2orard into the sitting

    Coughlins 2ace, Cra2ord graAs the 3lastic Aag ith Coughlins 3urchases out o2 Coughlins la3 and demands

    that Coughlin allo him to do a L3at donL to chec 2or ea3ons. )his ea3ons chec L3at donL Aeginning

    at 9:"(: 3m is overl1 long and involves much mani3ulation and ruAAing o2 Coughlins 3ocets, ell Ae1ond

    that reasonaAl1 necessar1 to assure the sus3ect did not have a ea3on.

    - 21SUPPLEMENT TO APPELLANT'S OPENING BRIE

  • 7/29/2019 2 22 12 0204 60838 Couglhin's CR11-2064-2720994 (Supplemental ...)

    22/62

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    Cra2ord lied aAout hether Coughlin ould 3rovide his drivers license Aecause he is snea1 anddishonest. Cra2ord ne that the la in Nevada does not allo 2or an 622icer lie Cra2ord to arrest one

    accused o2 a misdemeanor not committed in the 3resence o2 the o22icer. n such situations, an 622icer ma1

    issue a citation, Aut not conduct a custodial arrest. ;ithout a custodial arrest, the o22icer is unaAle to 3er2orm a

    search incident to an arrest. 5oever, Cra2ord Aadl1 anted to 3er2orm such a search incident to arrest here,

    and so he lied aAout hether Coughlin 3rovided his drivers license. )hen, at )rial, Cra2ord lied aAout Gust

    ho he as aAle to get Coughlins drivers license numAer, address, date o2 Airth adn teh eact height and

    eight listed on Coughlins drivers license i2 Cra2ord did not receive the drivers license 2orm Coughlin u3on

    request. t is 3articularl1 trouAling that Cra2ord lied there, sa1ing that he received all that in2ormation at the

    ;ashoe Count1 ail. )his is 3atentl1 2alse. Cra2ord shoed u3 to the Gail ith Braunorth, trans2erred

    custod1 o2 Coughlin to the Gail, and le2t shortl1 therea2ter. Coughlin as 3resent the entire time that Cra2ord

    as at the Gail and no such documentation as 3rovided A1 the Gail to Cra2ord, and Cra2ord did not 2ill out

    an1 2urther 3a3eror hile at the Gail. urther, i2 that reall1 as the case, then h1 ouldnt the ail have

    3rovided Cra2ord Coughlins sociial securt1 numAer Hthat is called 2or on the 0rrest and ?roAaAle Cause

    sheet Cra2ord 2illed out>F )he same could Ae ased 2or the other Alans asign 2or in2ormation on that 2orm,

    including the sus3ects: 3lace o2 Airth, home 3hone, Ausiness 3hone, net o2 in, ocu3ation and Ausiness

    address, etc., etc.

    urther, and this is im3ortant 2or Gurisidctional 3ur3oses considering one ith an1 hint o2 triAal or

    Native 0merican Alood ho is accused o2 a crime o2 this nature hile on triAal land is onl1 triaAle in )riAal

    Court, Cra2ord lied hen 2illing out this 0rrest %e3ort and Declaration o2 ?roAaAle Cause Hhereina2ter

    0%D?C> hen he indicates that Coughlins race is L;hiteL and his ethnicit1 is LNon*his3anicL. Coughlin did

    not indicate hat race or ethnicit1 he is to Cra2ord or an1Aod1 else on this date. Cra2ord made the

    e3edient choice and 3ut don his on o3inion aAout Coughlins race and ethnicit1. )he conviction is void

    2or lac o2 Gurisdiction in that regard.

    - 22SUPPLEMENT TO APPELLANT'S OPENING BRIE

  • 7/29/2019 2 22 12 0204 60838 Couglhin's CR11-2064-2720994 (Supplemental ...)

    23/62

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    urther on 3age 9 o2 the 0%D?C, Cra2ord sears: L)he undlersigned, Mameron Cra2ord, a 3olice o22icer,o2 %#C, hereA1 declares under 3enalt1 o2 3erGur1 that the aAove*named de2endant has Aeen arrested on

    3roAaAle cause and is suAGect to detention 2or the aAove*iisted o22enseHs>. Either 3ersonall1 or u3on

    in2ormation and Aelie2 this o22icer leamed the 2olloing 2acts and circumstances hich su33ort the arrest and

    detention: 6n 99!! at aAout "!"! hours, res3onded to "4"( E. "nd #t. %eno, N& '9(" 2or a 3etit larcen1.

    83on m1 arrival met ith asset 3rotection associate )homas rontino ho made a citiIens arrest 2or 3etit

    larcen1. rontino as in 3ossession o2 the stolen items.L

    t is not clear at all ho rontino could have LAeen in 3ossession o2 the stolen itemsL ithout having

    conducted a Lsearch incident toL LcitiIens arrestL Hhich, as Aoth ;al*@arts rontino and Cra2ord testi2ied,

    is against ;al*@arts 3olic1 and did not occur here. )his t13e o2 slo331 and recless a33roach to evidence

    gathering and 3olice or 3ervades Cra2ords a33roach. urther, there as no testimon1 o22ered that

    rontino made a LcitiIens arrestL and this 0%D?C as not included in the co31 o2 the Criminal Com3laint

    served on Coughlin and it as not introduced into evidence at )rial. urther, Coughlins drivers license

    numAer is statutoril1 de2ined as a 3iece o2 3ersonall1 identi2iaAle in2ormation and as such should Ae redacted

    2rom the %ecord on 033eal and an1 other documents in the 3uAlic record.

    )he L2ruitsL o2 the im3ermissiAle search A1 Cra2ord must Ae suAGect to the eclusionar1 rule as

    clearl1, nothing in this 0%D?C could reasonaAl1 Ae said to give Cra2ord 3roAaAle cause to conduct a search

    incident to arrest, 3articularl1 here the alleged conduct u3on hich this misdemeanor charge stems 2rom did

    not occur in the o22icers 3resence. )his is 3articularl1 true given the aAsolute lac o2 an1thing in the 0%D?C

    that could Ae said to state, ith an1 degree o2 s3eci2icit1 or 3articularit1, Gust hat eactl1 is as that 2ormed

    the Aasis 2or the 2inding o2 3roAaAle cause, other than com3letel1 conclusor1 and circular assertsion made onl1

    A1 the 3re3rinted tet o2 the 0%D?C itsel2. #im3l1 3ut, this is roAo*3olice or at its aAsolute orst. )he

    - 23SUPPLEMENT TO APPELLANT'S OPENING BRIE

  • 7/29/2019 2 22 12 0204 60838 Couglhin's CR11-2064-2720994 (Supplemental ...)

    24/62

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    menacing, lunging 3osture Cra2ord too throughout the overl1 long interrogation in a Aac room at ;al*@art, hich, curiousl1, as ta3ed A1 to video cameras, 1et as Lsu33osedl1L not not audio recorded A1

    either ;al*@art, or an1 o2 the three 0? associates or one #tore @anager ho ere in and out o2 the room. 0?

    orer rontino and a his3anic 2emale ;al*@art su3ervisor can Ae seen in the 0? 6vervie video givin each

    other a Lhigh 2iveL at 9:"4:( 3m. 5o3e2ull1 that Lhigh 2iveL ill Ae orth it to ;al*@art 2or the ensuing

    rounds o2 litigation that ill undouAtedl1 stem 2rom this rong2ul arrest, hich ill liel1 include, Aut not Ae

    limited to claims 2or rong2ull arrest, de2amation, cons3irac1, retaliation, 2raud, etc., etc.

    #)0)E@EN) 6 )5E C0#E

    Nat&re o the Case

    Co&rse o Pro(eein)s in the Distri(t Co&rt

    #)0)E@EN) 6 )5E 0C)#

    )

    #8@@0% 6 0%

  • 7/29/2019 2 22 12 0204 60838 Couglhin's CR11-2064-2720994 (Supplemental ...)

    25/62

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    ;e generall1 revie a district courtSs decision to admit or eclude evidence 2or an aAuse o2discretion, 5ernandeI v. #tate, !"4 Nev. -9, -4-, !'' ?.d !!"-, !!! H"'>, Aut to the etent the

    evidentiar1 ruling rests on a legal inter3retation o2 the evidence code, de novo revie oAtains. #ee

    8nited #tates v. e#hore, (4 .d 9(, 94! H7th Cir. "'>.

    0

    )he )rial Court admitted ran hearsa1 violating Coughlins right to con2rontation A1

    an unidenti2ied declarant.

    )

    There "as Ins&i(ient E$ien(e to S&pport Co&)h#in's Con$i(tion or

    Petit Lar(en* an or the S&++ar* Conte+pt inin) as "e##% F&rther (#ear error "as present in +na*

    respe(ts here an the tria# (o&rt (o++itte re$ersi,#e Error ,* A+ittin) Ina+issi,#e -earsa*

    State+ents

    A)ainst Co&)h#in.

    )o satis21 the re&ire+ents o the (onrontation (#a&se , i the State see!s to intro&(e

    hearsa* state+ents a)ainst a (ri+ina# eenant, s&(h e$ien(e +&st ,ear ae&ate ini(ia o

    re#ia,i#it* ,* either a##in) "ithin a ir+#* roote hearsa* e0(eption , or the State +&st

    e+onstrate that the state+ent possesses parti(ari1e )&arantees o tr&st"orthiness% I the

    state+ent oes not a## "ithin a ir+#* roote hearsa* e0(eption , the state+ent is 2pres&+pti$e#*3&nre#ia,#e an ina+issi,#e or (onrontation (#a&se p&rposes .LRamirez v.State, !!4 Nev. ((,456 P."d, 7"4, 784 9Ne$% :446> H(itations o+itte;%The Tria# Co&rt a+itte an i+proper hearsa* state+ent &rin) the testi+on*

    - 25SUPPLEMENT TO APPELLANT'S OPENING BRIE

  • 7/29/2019 2 22 12 0204 60838 Couglhin's CR11-2064-2720994 (Supplemental ...)

    26/62

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    o Frontino% It "as (#ear error or

  • 7/29/2019 2 22 12 0204 60838 Couglhin's CR11-2064-2720994 (Supplemental ...)

    27/62

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    )Tria# Co&rts ha$e "ie is(retion to (ontro# (rosse0a+inationthat atta(!s a "itnesses )enera# (rei,i#it*3

    ho"e$er a tria# (o&rt s is(retion is %%%narro"e or ,ias

    9+oti$e; is the o,=e(t to ,e sho"n an the e0a+iner +&st ,e

    per+itte to e#i(it an* a(ts "hi(h +i)ht (o#or a "itnesses

    testi+on*%Id.

    )he De2ense should have Aeen 3ermitted to as the three itnesses all o2 the questions that ere

    oAGected to and 2or hich the %@C re2used to allo the de2endnat to as.

    )he Coughlin record on a33eal might have received a signi2icantl1 di22erent im3ression o2 the three

    itnesses and and his crediAilit1 i2 De2ense Counsel had Aeen 3ermitted to cross*eamine on the

    iss&e o "hether the "itness #ie in his s"orn state+ent to po#i(e an "hether the RSIC

    Oi(er's #ie3 et(%

    N%# T(.'(H> 3ermits im3eaching a itness on cross*eamination aAout questions

    aAout s3eci2ic acts as long as the im3eachment 3ertains to truth2ulness or untruth2ulness and no

    etrinsic evidence is used.

    C-ALLENGES FOR CAUSE

    PVIII% Di the Tria# Co&rt Co++it hi(h Pre=&i(e Co&)h#in s Ri)ht to D&e Pro(ess.

    0 trial court should act as a re2eree o2 the contest Aeteen the 3arties. t should Ae 2air

    and im3artial as Aeteen the 3arties and their attorne1s and allo them consideraAle 2reedom in

    the 3resentation o2 their res3ective cases in their on a1. 0 trial court has a certain amount o2

    discretion to control the 3roceedings Ae2ore it. )he court is constrained hoever A1 a requirement

    that all criminal de2endants are entitled to a 2air trial. 2 the actions o2 the trial court 3reGudice a

    de2endants right to a 2air trial then oAviousl1 an aAuse o2 discretion is 3resent.Belden v.

    - 27SUPPLEMENT TO APPELLANT'S OPENING BRIE

  • 7/29/2019 2 22 12 0204 60838 Couglhin's CR11-2064-2720994 (Supplemental ...)

    28/62

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    Wyoming, !*(7, ;1o. ".)rial Courts should Ae mind2ul that innocuous conduct in some circumstances ma1constitute Gudicial misconduct. udges should Ae mind2ul o2 the in2luence the1 ield.Parodi vs.B. Washoe Medical Center, !!! Nevada -(, -7. )his court said it Aest inParodi at ('9.

    The a$era)e =&ror is a #a*+en . The a$era)e #a*+en #oo!s "ith the

    +ost proo&n respe(t to the presiin) =&)e an the =&r* is as a re

    a#ert to an* re+ar! that "i## ini(ate a$or or isa$or on the part o

    the tria# =&)e%

    5uman o3inion is o2ten times 2ormed u3on circumstances meager and insigni2icant in

    there outard a33earance. 0nd the ords and utterances o2 a trial udge sitting ith a Gur1 in

    attendance are liaAle, hoever unintentional, to mold the o3inion o2 memAers o2 the Gur1 to the

    etent that one or the other side o2 the controvers1 ma1 Ae 3reGudiced or inGured thereA1. )he

    in2luence o2 the trial Gudge on the Gur1 is necessaril1 and 3ro3erl1 a great eight and his lightest

    ord or intimation is received ith de2erence and ma1 3rove controlling. Starr V. United States,

    !( 8.#. -!4 at -"-. H!'94>.

    )his Court recogniIed inParodi Id. at (9! that trial counsel is 2aced ith a Lho3sons

    choiceL o2 either oAGecting to the misconduct hich o2 course has the attendant riss o2

    antagoniIing the trial Gudge 2urther and eas3erating the Gur1 or A1 not oAGecting Geo3ardiIing their

    right 2or a33ellate revie. )his Court ent on to rule that A1 2ailing to oAGect, at the time o2 the

    Gudicial misconduct, that a33ellate revie ould not Ae 3recluded. Errant conduct is revieaAle

    under the 3lain error doctrine. Oade v. State, !!4 Nev. -!9, 9- ?."d - at '.

    )hroughout Coughlins trial the )rial Court re3eatedl1, hoever inadvertentl1 and

    unintentionall1, e3ressed im3atience and as discourteous to trial counsel. )hese comments had

    an adverse im3act on Coughlins trial counsel hich in turn ma1 have a22ected the acce3tance or e22icac1 o2

    Coughlins de2ense.

    )he errors cited herein ere clearl1 erroneous, cumulative and had a 3reGudicial a22ect on

    - 28SUPPLEMENT TO APPELLANT'S OPENING BRIE

  • 7/29/2019 2 22 12 0204 60838 Couglhin's CR11-2064-2720994 (Supplemental ...)

    29/62

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    Coughlins case.

    Eam3les o2 Gudicial misconduct in tr1ing to usur3 trial counsels role are numerous and

    are seen as earl1 as o3ening statement.)he )rial Courts remars and actions throughout

    the trial ere clearl1 3reGudicial. ;hat has Aeen outlined 2or this court is not ehaustive o2 ever1

    comment made A1 the )rial Court nor as it meant to Ae.

    )he highlights 3resented o2 Gudicial misconduct sho cumulative error that as so

    egregious and 3reGudicial that the de2ense could not get a 2air trial, there2ore Coughlins case

    should Ae reversed.

    F&rther is i+portant to note that the Reno Po#i(e Depart+ent an opposin) (o&nse# no$ation (ase

    Ri(har G -i## =oine or(es a)ain to )et the &nersi)ne arreste a (&stoia# arrest +in *o& or

    =a*"a#!in) on CSO Dep&t* Ma(he+'s 2persona##* ser$e2 Aia$it o ::/:/8@::

    Date T&e3 7 Fe, 8@:8 ::@4 @6@@

    Fro+ LSt&(he##"ashoe(o&nt*%&s

    To 1a(h(o&)h#inhot+ai#%(o+

    - 29SUPPLEMENT TO APPELLANT'S OPENING BRIE

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]
  • 7/29/2019 2 22 12 0204 60838 Couglhin's CR11-2064-2720994 (Supplemental ...)

    30/62

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    CC +!anarasa%"ashoe(o&nt*%&s

    Mr% Co&)h#in

    O&r re(ors ini(ate that the e$i(tion (on&(te on that a* "as persona##* ser$e ,* Dep&t* Ma(hen

    ,* postin) a (op* o the Orer to the resien(e% The resien(e "as &no((&pie at the ti+e%

    Li1 St&(he##3 S&per$isor

    >CSO Ci$i# Se(tion

    Fro+ a(h Co&)h#in +ai#to1a(h(o&)h#inhot+ai#%(o+H

    Sent Mona*3 Fe,r&ar* @?3 8@:8 856 AM

    To St&(he##3 Li1 Janaras3 Mar* n$renop(op#o)i(%(o+ Si#$a3 Ro0anna !a#i(=reno%)o$

    o&rthestate)+ai#%(o+=a+esanre,o#es+sn%(o+

    S&,=e(t >CSO Dep&t* Ma(he+'s 2persona##* ser$e2 Aia$it o ::/:/8@::

    - 30SUPPLEMENT TO APPELLANT'S OPENING BRIE

    mailto:[email protected]:mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]
  • 7/29/2019 2 22 12 0204 60838 Couglhin's CR11-2064-2720994 (Supplemental ...)

    31/62

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    Dear IA S&per$isor St&(he## an DDA Janaras3

    I rea#i1e *o& "i## #i!e#* not rea a## o this% The +ain thin) is I a+ respe(t#* re&estin) that *o&

    (onir+ "ith Dep&t* Ma(he+ that he i3 in a(t3 2persona##* ser$e2 the S&++ar* E$i(tion Orer on

    +e at :8: Ri$er Ro(! St%3 Reno 645@: on No$e+,er :3 8@:: at @ p+3 in (onne(tion "ith peror+in)

    the #o(!o&t% It is +* position that I "as not 2persona##* ser$e2 an I a+ tr*in) to i)&re o&t "hether

    Dep&t* Ma(he+ is #*in) or "hether the phrase 2persona##* ser$e2 +eans so+ethin) other than "hat I

    ,e#ie$e it +eans3 et(%3 et(% I appre(iate *o&r attention to this%

    I a+ "ritin) to in&ire a,o&t an (o+p#ain "ith re)ar to an Aia$it o Ser$i(e i#e ,* or or >CSO

    Dep&t* Ma(he+ "ith respe(t to the ser$i(e o a Orer Grantin) S&++ar* E$i(tion a)ainst +e 9in +*

    #a" oi(e "here nonpa*+ent o rent "as not a##e)e3 no #ess in $io#ation o NRS @%85 an "here a

    K83875 rent es(ro" eposit "as oiste &pon +e in $io#ation o @%859?;3 espe(ia##* "here a sta* o

    e$i(tion "as not )rante e$en "hi#e the RCSO% >hat3 e0a(t#*3 is the

    2&s&a# (&sto+ an pra(ti(e o the >CSO. I hear a #ot a,o&t this 2"ithin 8 ho&rs2 st&% So3 I )o

    h&ntin) or so+e ,#a(! #etter #a" to s&pport "hat those at the R

  • 7/29/2019 2 22 12 0204 60838 Couglhin's CR11-2064-2720994 (Supplemental ...)

    32/62

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    #ar)e 9"hi(h oten in(#&es Ne$aa Le)a# Ser$i(es an >ashoe Le)a# Ser$i(es3 the peop#e *o& )&*s has&(h tro&,#e a(t&a##* ser$in) in the #a"s&its I i#e3 "hi(h +a* ha$e a(t&a##* he#pe i+pro$e #e)a#

    ser$i(es in this (o++&nit*3 i the* "ere not is+isse &e to ins&i(ien(* o ser$i(e o pro(ess3 e$en

    "here the IFP re&ire the >CSO to ser$e the eenants%%%%;% An*"a*3 ,a(! to the 2"ithin 8 ho&rs2

    phraseo#o)* 2

    This "ho#e ,&siness a,o&t The (o&rt +a* there&pon iss&e an orer ire(tin) the sheri or (onsta,#e o

    the (o&nt* to re+o$e the tenant "ithin 8 ho&rs ater re(eipt o the orer%%% is inapp#i(a,#e to this

    sit&ation3 "here an Orer Grantin) S&++ar* E$i(tion "as si)ne ,* O(to,er 87th3 8@::% That

    #an)&a)e is on#* o&n in sit&ations inapp#i(a,#e to the (&rrent one% NRS @%859;9,;98;3 an NRS

    @%8595;9a; are the on#* se(tions o NRS @ "here this "ithin 8 ho&rs #an)&a)e o((&rs3 an those

    sit&ations on#* app#* "here3 in

    @%859;9,;98; % A noti(e ser$e p&rs&ant to s&,se(tion : or 8 +&st %%%9,; A$ise the tenant % 98;

    That i the (o&rt eter+ines that the tenant is )&i#t* o an &n#a" etainer3 the (o&rt +a* iss&e a

    s&++ar* orer or re+o$a# o the tenant or an orer pro$iin) or the nona+ittan(e o the tenant3

    ire(tin) the sheri or (onsta,#e o the (o&nt* to re+o$e the tenant "ithin 8 ho&rs ater re(eipt o the

    orer

    an3

    @%8595;9a; 5% Upon non(o+p#ian(e "ith the noti(e 9a; The #an#or or the #an#ors a)ent +a*

    app#* ,* aia$it o (o+p#aint or e$i(tion to the =&sti(e (o&rt o the to"nship in "hi(h the "e##in)3

    apart+ent3 +o,i#e ho+e or (o++er(ia# pre+ises are #o(ate or to the istri(t (o&rt o the (o&nt* in

    "hi(h the "e##in)3 apart+ent3 +o,i#e ho+e or (o++er(ia# pre+ises are #o(ate3 "hi(he$er has

    =&risi(tion o$er the +atter% The (o&rt +a* there&pon iss&e an orer ire(tin) the sheri or (onsta,#e

    - 32SUPPLEMENT TO APPELLANT'S OPENING BRIE

  • 7/29/2019 2 22 12 0204 60838 Couglhin's CR11-2064-2720994 (Supplemental ...)

    33/62

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    o the (o&nt* to re+o$e the tenant "ithin 8 ho&rs ater re(eipt o the orer% The "a* these s&++ar*e$i(tion pro(eein)s are ,ein) (arrie o&t in Reno CSO's Dep&t* Ma(he+ i

    in this (ase% The a,o$e t"o se(tions (ontainin) the "ithin 8 ho&rs o re(eipt #an)&a)e are

    inapp#i(a,#e3 as those sit&ations o not in$o!e the present (ir(&+stan(es3 "here the Tenant i i#e an

    Aia$it an i (ontest this +atter to a e)ree not oten seen% To re&ire Ne$aa's tenants to )et &p

    an )et o&t "ithin 8 ho&rs o re(eipt o the orer 9"hat oes that e$en +ean. The &se o ter+s #i!e

    renition3 renere3 noti(e o entr*3 prono&n(e3 is a,sent here3 an this re(eipt o the orer

    #an)&a)e is so+ethin) rare#* o&n e#se"here in Ne$aa #a"see atta(he DMV stat&tor* (itations3 an

    in e+p#o*+ent #a" #iti)ations "here one +&st i#e a Co+p#aint "ithin 4@ a*s o re(eipt o a Ri)ht To

    S&e Letter3 a sit&ation "hi(h o##o"s NRCP 59,;3 an NRCP ?9e; in i+p&tin) re(eipt o s&(h a #etter3

    "hen a(t&a# re(eipt is not sho"n3 ,* app#*in) a (onstr&(ti$e noti(e stanar that re#ies &pon the a*s

    or +ai#in) e0tension o ti+e or ite+s ser$e in the +ai#in)3 et(%;% In A,raha+ $% >oos -o#e

    O(eano)raphi( Instit&te3 55 F% :: 9:st Cir% 8@@4;3 the re(or i not re#e(t "hen the p#ainti

    re(ei$e his ri)httos&e #etter% The #etter "as iss&e on No$e+,er 83 8@@?% The (o&rt (a#(ate that

    the 4@a* perio (o++en(e on No$e+,er @3 8@@?3 ,ase on three a*s or +ai#in) ater e0(#&in)

    Sat&ra*s an S&na*s% In orer to ,rin) a (#ai+ &ner either Tit#e VII or the ADA3 a p#ainti +&st

    e0ha&st a+inistrati$e re+eies an s&e "ithin 4@ a*s o re(eipt o a ri)ht to s&e #etter% See 8 U%S%C%

    8@@@e59;9:;% See Ba#"in Co&nt* >e#(o+e Center $% Bro"n3 ?? U%S% :73 :6 n%:3 :@ S%Ct% :783 6@

    L%E%8 :4? 9:46;9)rantin) p#ainti an aitiona# three a*s or +ai#in) p&rs&ant to Re ?;%%%% %%%

    Dear >ashoe Co&nt* Sheri's Oi(e3

    - 33SUPPLEMENT TO APPELLANT'S OPENING BRIE

  • 7/29/2019 2 22 12 0204 60838 Couglhin's CR11-2064-2720994 (Supplemental ...)

    34/62

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    http//en%"i!ipeia%or)/"i!i/Ser$i(eQoQpro(ess

    2S&,stit&te ser$i(e

    >hen an ini$i&a# part* to ,e ser$e is &na$ai#a,#e or persona# ser$i(e3 +an* =&risi(tions a##o" or

    s&,stit&te ser$i(e% S&,stit&te ser$i(e a##o"s the pro(ess ser$er to #ea$e ser$i(e o(&+ents "ith

    another responsi,#e ini$i&a#3 (a##e a person o s&ita,#e a)e an is(retion3 s&(h as a (oha,itin) at

    or a teena)er% Uner the Feera# Res3 s&,stit&te ser$i(e +a* on#* ,e +ae at the a,oe or "e##in)

    o the eenant%H Ca#iornia3 Ne" or!35H I##inois3 an +an* other Unite States =&risi(tions

    re&ire that in aition to s&,stit&te ser$i(e3 the o(&+ents ,e +ai#e to the re(ipient%5H S&,stit&te

    ser$i(e oten re&ires a ser$in) part* sho" that orinar* ser$i(e is i+pra(ti(a,#e3 that &e i#i)en(e has

    ,een +ae to atte+pt to +a!e persona# ser$i(e ,* e#i$er*3 an that s&,stit&te ser$i(e "i## rea(h the

    part* an ee(t noti(e%5H2

    I a+ prett* s&re 2persona##* ser$e2 +eans *o& ser$e the person in person3 not that a person na+e

    Ma(he+ "ent an poste a noti(e on a oor3 persona##* hi+se#% See3 I thin! *o& )&*s are thin!in) o

    the 2person2 in the "or persona##* as app#*in) to the ser$er3 "hen in a## instan(es I ha$e e$er seen it

    &se in the #a"3 the 2person2 part o 2persona##*2 app#ies to the person ,ein) ser$e% -e#p +e o&t here3

    Mar*%

    https//s!*ri$e%#i$e%(o+/reir%asp0.(i@6?68586resi@6?6F8F5F86

    :647pariroot

    - 34SUPPLEMENT TO APPELLANT'S OPENING BRIE

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Service_of_processhttps://skydrive.live.com/redir.aspx?cid=43084638f32f5f28&resid=43084638F32F5F28http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Service_of_processhttps://skydrive.live.com/redir.aspx?cid=43084638f32f5f28&resid=43084638F32F5F28
  • 7/29/2019 2 22 12 0204 60838 Couglhin's CR11-2064-2720994 (Supplemental ...)

    35/62

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    A#so3 oes the >CSO ha$e a position on "hat t*pe o ser$i(e is re&ire o e$i(tion orers prior to the>CSO or "hoe$er oes it3 ,ein) a,#e to (on&(t a #o(!o&t.

    http//"""%#e)%state%n$%&s/(o&rtres/nr(p%ht+#

    NRCP RULE ?@% RELIEF FROM hen3 ho"e$er3 a part* has ,een persona##* ser$e "ith

    s&++ons an (o+p#aint3 either in the State o Ne$aa or in an* other =&risi(tion3 the part* +&st +a!e

    app#i(ation to ,e re#ie$e ro+ a eat3 a =&)+ent3 an orer3 or other pro(eein) ta!en a)ainst the

    part*3 or or per+ission to i#e an ans"er3 in a((oran(e "ith the pro$isions o s&,i$ision 9,; o this

    re%

    O!a*3 so3 rea##*3 *o& )&*s o this or a #i$in)3 ri)ht%%%*o& ser$e peop#e thin)s%%%%an si)n Aia$its &ner

    pena#t* o per=&r* an st&3 an *o& are te##in) +e *o& ,e#ie$e 2persona##* ser$e2 (an in(#&e

    sit&ations "here the person "as not there. O!a*%%%%%o& o !no" that3 #i!e3 a S&++ons an Co+p#aint

    nee to ,e 2persona##* ser$e2 in the sense that3 sa* Ma(he+3 "o nee to see that person an ser$e it

    on the+ 9I on't thin! the* ha$e to ta!e the paper3 the* on't nee to a)ree to a((ept ser$i(e3 ,&t

    Ma(he+ oes nee to see that person3 in person3 persona##* "hen he is s"earin) &ner pena#t* o

    per=&r* that he 2persona##* ser$e2 so+e,o*% Us&a##* 2persona##* ser$e2 is on#* one in the (ase o

    the irst thin) i#e 9&n#ess there is an IFP; in a (ase3 the S&++ons an Co+p#aint% Thereater3 t*pi(a##*3

    peop#e =&st ee(t 2s&,stit&te ser$i(e2 ,e(a&se its (heaper3 #ess o a hass#e3 an 2persona# ser$i(e2 is

    on#* re&ire or ser$in) the p#eain)s that start a (ase3 the S&++ons an Co+p#aint% >o"%%%%O!a*3 so

    - 35SUPPLEMENT TO APPELLANT'S OPENING BRIE

    http://www.leg.state.nv.us/courtrules/nrcp.htmlhttp://www.leg.state.nv.us/courtrules/nrcp.html
  • 7/29/2019 2 22 12 0204 60838 Couglhin's CR11-2064-2720994 (Supplemental ...)

    36/62

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    this is +* "ho#e point3 these state sponsore #o(!o&ts &ner (o#or o state #a" sho not ,e ,ein) oneso ast3 &n#ess *o& )&*s 2persona##* ser$e2 the tenant3 I ee# the #a" is &ite (#ear3 *o& ha$e to ee(t

    2s&,stit&te ser$i(e2 "hi(h3 &ner NRCP ?9a; an NRCP ?9e; an NRCP 59,;98; 9an NRCP3 not

  • 7/29/2019 2 22 12 0204 60838 Couglhin's CR11-2064-2720994 (Supplemental ...)

    37/62

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    the S&++ons an Co+p#aint one in ti+e3 or 2s&i(ient#*23 opposin) (o&nse# in that +atter (o te##*o& that 2a(t&a# noti(e2 is not a s&,stit&te or (o+p#ian(e "ith the ser$i(e re&ire+ents%

    >hi(h is ni(e ,e(a&se o#!s #i!e Ri(har G% -i##3 Es% ha$e #ess o an opport&nit* to )a+e the s*ste+

    an s"oop in "ith #o(!o&t then assert a ,&n(h o hooe* a,o&t NRS ::6A%?@ 2reasona,#e stora)e3

    +o$in)3 an in$entor*in) e0penses2 s&,=e(tin) the tenant's persona# propert* to a #ien% Ri(har G% -i##

    insiste on thro"in) a"a* the #ast thin) +* ,e#o$e )ran+other )a$e +e ,eore she ie 8 *ears a)o in

    the to"n &+p% -e an his (ontra(tor #ie a,o&t so +an* thin)s3 in(#&in) the a(t that the* &se +*

    o"n a+n p#*"oo to ,oar &p the ,a(! por(h o the propert*3 then s&,+itte a ,i## to the (o&rt in an

    e0hi,it or K:3@?@ or 2se(&rin)2 the propert* 9"hi(h oesn't rea##* app#* to NRS ::6A%?@'s

    2reasona,#e stora)e +o$in) an in$entor*in) e0penses2 #i!e it is re&ire to%%%&rther3 the (har)e +e

    K4@@ a +onth or stora)e an sent +e a ,i## or s&(h prior to +* arrest or trespassin) at the :8: Ri$er

    Ro(! #o(ation3%%%"e## i the* (har)e +e K4@@ to ha$e a ho+e #a" oi(e there3 then ho" is it so+eone

    (o ,e trespassin) i the* are ,ein) (har)e the # renta# $a#&e or 2&se an o((&pan(* o the

    pre+ises2. F&rther3 e$en i it "as a stora)e sit&ations3 there are se(tions o NRS ::6A e$ote to

    e$i(tin) so+eone ro+ a stora)e a(i#it*3 not arrestin) the+ or trespass3 an (ertain#* not a (&stoia#

    arrest "here the RPD Oi(er Carter an Sar)ent Lope1 a+it the* ne$er iss&e a "arnin) to +e or

    as!e +e to #ea$e prior to (on&(tin) a (&stoia# arrest 9"hi(h re&ire K6@@ o ,ai#3 )reat3 an a*s

    in =ai#3 no #ess;% This is espe(ia##* poor or+ "here Oi(er Carter a+itte to +e that he ta!es ,ri,es

    ro+ Ri(har -i##% -e*3 i Oi(er Carter i not sa* that to +e3 )o ahea an s&e +e3 +* +an%%%%I'+

    "aitin)%%%%%that's "hat I tho&)ht%

    - 37SUPPLEMENT TO APPELLANT'S OPENING BRIE

  • 7/29/2019 2 22 12 0204 60838 Couglhin's CR11-2064-2720994 (Supplemental ...)

    38/62

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    -e (an sa* he "as =o!in) a## he "ants3 ,&t it ain't no =o!in) ass sit&ation to +e "hen *o& are arrestin)+e an (a&sin) a )oo)#e sear(h rest or +* na+e to sho" an arrest%%%%that's a+a)in) the on#* thin) I

    ha$e o +onetar* $a#&e 9+* proessiona# rep&tation an na+e;% It ain't no stan &p ho&r "hen *o& are

    p&ttin) +e in (&s3 ,ro% An Oi(er Carter an Sar)ent Lope1 re&se to proper#* &er* -i## as to

    "hether he ha sent +e3 prior to the trespassin) arrest3 a ,i## or the 2# renta# $a#&e2 o the propert*3

    a $a#&e that3 at K4@@3 "as the sa+e (har)e or the # 2&se an o((&pan(*2 o the pre+ises% An

    Ri(har G% -I##3 Es% "as too ,&s* (hort#in) an i##in) o&t the Cri+ina# Co+p#aint to ,other settin)

    the+ strai)ht3 espite +* (&es3 I )&ess%

    No"3 a to that +a#easan(e the a(t that

  • 7/29/2019 2 22 12 0204 60838 Couglhin's CR11-2064-2720994 (Supplemental ...)

    39/62

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    I !no"3 I !no"3 its (on&sin) ,e(a&se a(t&a##* those se(tions or(e the #an#or3 his attorne*s an theR

  • 7/29/2019 2 22 12 0204 60838 Couglhin's CR11-2064-2720994 (Supplemental ...)

    40/62

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    the penen(* o the appea#% Upon ta!in) the appea# an i#in) the &nerta!in)3 a## &rther pro(eein)sin the (ase sha## ,e sta*e%

    So3 "h* on earth is the Cit* Attorne*'s Oi(e sti## tr*in) to tr* Co&)h#in on the trespass (har)e or

    "hi(h he en&re a (&stoia# arrest an or "hi(h o# Ri(har -i## is sti## i#in) Motion's to Sho" Ca&se

    on in the appea# o the s&++ar* e$i(tion +atter in CV::@?86. >h*3 oh "h*. Does the Reno Cit*

    Attorne*'s Oi(e ha$e so+e sort o $este interest in !eepin) Co&)h#in o"n3 ,&s*3 ,esotte3

    en(&+,ere3 or other"ise. It3 "h*3 it (on't ,e ,e(a&se Co&)h#in has a rea##* )oo "ron) arrest

    (a&se o a(tion a)ainst the Reno Po#i(e Depart+ent3 (o it. http//"""%*o&t&,e%(o+/"at(h.

    $5PR7OI5,@

    An3 "e##3 *eah the >ashoe Co&nt* Sheri's Oi(e in't &ite )et those S&++ons an Co+p#aints

    ser$e in that one (ase Co&)h#in "as s&in) his or+er e+p#o*er in3 the one "here Co&)h#in "as )rante

    an Orer to Pro(ee In For+a Pa&peris3 "hi(h re&ire the >ashoe Co&nt* Sheri's Oi(e to ser$e

    the S&++ons an Co+p#aints%%%%B&t "hat oes that ha$e to to "ith the ? a*s Co&)h#in spent in =ai# on

    the arrest sho"n in the *o&t&,e $ieo a,o$e. Its not #i!e the >ashoe Co&nt* =ai#e $ieotape a s(ene

    "here the* "ere or(in) Co&)h#in to )et na!e an p&t on a )reen ress% >hat's that. It is. The* i o

    that. Rea##*. No%%%>hat. The* a#so or(e hi+ to si+ate ora# an ana# se0 "ith ep&ties3 in the )&ise

    o so+e rii(o&s 2pro(e&re2 ne(essar* to ins&re Dep&t* saet*. Oh3 "o"% An the* reta#iate

    a)ainst hi+ or ai#in) to ans"er their re#i)io&s preeren(e interro)ation &estions ,* p#a(in) hi+ in an

    i(* (o# (e## or ho&rs at a ti+e3 re&sin) hi+ +ei(a# (are espite his p#ainti$e (ries or he#p3 "hi#e

    "earin) a thin tshirt. >o"% The* in't =a+ a taser nee#e in his spine or e0tene perios o ti+e3

    - 40SUPPLEMENT TO APPELLANT'S OPENING BRIE

    http://www.youtube.com/watchhttp://www.youtube.com/watch
  • 7/29/2019 2 22 12 0204 60838 Couglhin's CR11-2064-2720994 (Supplemental ...)

    41/62

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    tho&)h3 i the*. o&r !iin) >hats ne0t3 *o&r )oin) te## +e Sar)ent Si)ree o the Reno PD orerea (&stoia# arrest on Co&)h#in or 2=a*"a#!in)2 "hi#e Co&)h#in "as pea(e#* i#+in)3 ro+ a p&,#i(

    spot3 Ri(har G% -i##'s ra&ent (ontra(tor Phi# -o"ar estro*in) an ta!in) to the to"n &+p

    ite+s o enor+o&s senti+enta# $a#&e to Co&)h#in that he "as pre$ente ro+ retrie$in) ro+ the

    propert* &rin) the s(ant ti+e he "as a##o"e to 9ater he pai K6@ "orth o a #ien or "hat he !ne"

    not3 ,e(a&se3 espite3 o#' Contra(tor Phi#'s ra&ent K:3@?@ ,i## or 2se(&rin)2 the ,a(! por(h 9"ith

    s(re"s a(in) the o&tsie3 ine0p#i(a,#*3 an a "ino" &nit a/( #et in the "ino" a(in) the sie"a#!

    near the La!e+i## Lo)e3 se(&re ,* nothin) ,&t &(t tape

    It is !in o a (o+,o neon si)n that sa*s 2B&r)#ari1e this P#a(e3 E$er*,o*2;3 Co&)h#in's or+er ho+e

    #a" oi(e "as ,&r)#ari1e on De(e+,er :83 8@:: "hi#e Ri(har G% -i## "as ho#in) its (ontents

    9in(#&am